Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Inspection and Maintenance Program, 48383-48384 [2018-20748]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0020; FRL–9984–
23—Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina;
Inspection and Maintenance Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of North Carolina
on November 17, 2017, through the
North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air
Quality (DAQ), for the purpose of
removing 26 counties from North
Carolina’s expanded inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program, which was
previously approved into the SIP for use
as a component of the State’s Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX) Budget and Allowance
Trading Program. The EPA has
determined that North Carolina’s
November 17, 2017, SIP revision is
approvable because it is consistent with
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and with
the EPA’s regulations.
DATES: This rule will be effective
September 25, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2018–0020. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Sep 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division,
Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone
number is (404) 562–9222. Ms. Sheckler
can also be reached via electronic mail
at sheckler.kelly@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 17, 2017, DAQ
submitted a SIP revision seeking to
remove 26 counties from the expanded
I/M program contained in the North
Carolina SIP. This removal
consequently removes reliance on the I/
M reduction credits gained from the 26
counties’ participation in the expanded
I/M program from the State’s NOX
emissions budget—a component of the
State’s response to the NOX SIP Call.
North Carolina indicated that it no
longer needs these reduction credits in
order to meet its obligations under the
NOX SIP Call. In addition, North
Carolina provided a technical
demonstration showing that removing
the 26 counties from the expanded I/M
program will not interfere with North
Carolina’s attainment or maintenance of
any National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) or with any other
applicable requirement of the CAA.
The EPA published a proposed
rulemaking on July 26, 2018 (83 FR
35444), proposing to approve this SIP
revision. The proposed approval was
based on the EPA’s proposed findings
that the removal of the 26 counties from
the State’s expanded I/M program will
not interfere with North Carolina’s
obligations under the NOX SIP Call and
will not interfere with North Carolina’s
attainment or maintenance of any
NAAQS or with any other applicable
requirement of the CAA. The details of
North Carolina’s submittal and the
rationale for the EPA’s action are
explained in the proposed rulemaking.
The comment period for this proposed
rulemaking closed on August 27, 2018.
The EPA received two comments
supporting the proposed action. The
remaining comments received were not
relevant.
II. Final Action
The EPA is taking final action to
approve the November 17, 2017,
revision to the North Carolina SIP.
Specifically, the EPA is approving the
removal of Brunswick, Burke, Caldwell,
Carteret, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland,
Craven, Edgecombe, Granville, Harnett,
Haywood, Henderson, Lenoir, Moore,
Nash, Orange, Pitt, Robeson, Rutherford,
Stanly, Stokes, Surry, Wayne, Wilkes,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48383
and Wilson counties from the SIPapproved expanded I/M program.
Additionally, the EPA is finding that
North Carolina’s removal of the 26
counties from the SIP-approved
expanded I/M program (and the removal
of reliance on the I/M emissions
reductions generated from those
counties as part of the ‘‘credits’’ in
North Carolina’s NOX emissions budget)
will not interfere with the State’s
obligations under the NOX SIP Call to
meet its Statewide NOX emissions
budget. The EPA is also finding that the
removal of the 26 counties from the SIPapproved I/M program will not interfere
with continued attainment or
maintenance of any applicable NAAQS
or with any other applicable
requirement of the CAA, and that North
Carolina has satisfied the requirements
of section 110(l) of the CAA.
The EPA has determined that this
action is effective immediately upon
publication under the authority of 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(1). The purpose of the 30day waiting period prescribed in section
553(d) is to give affected parties a
reasonable time to adjust their behavior
and prepare before the final rule takes
effect. Section 553(d)(1) allows an
effective date less than 30 days after
publication if a substantive rule
‘‘relieves a restriction.’’ This action
qualifies for the exception under section
553(d)(1) because it relieves the 26
counties identified above from the
requirements of North Carolina’s SIPapproved expanded I/M program.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
48384
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 26, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 11, 2018.
Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II—North Carolina
2. In § 52.1770, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry
‘‘North Carolina Removal of 26 Counties
from Inspection and Maintenance
Program and 110(l) Non-Interference
Demonstration’’ at the end of the table
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Provision
State effective
date
EPA approval
date
*
11/17/2017
9/25/2018
*
*
*
North Carolina Removal of 26 Counties from Inspection
and Maintenance Program and 110(l) Non-Interference Demonstration.
[FR Doc. 2018–20748 Filed 9–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Federal Register citation
*
*
[insert Federal Register citation].
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ACTION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
[Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2018–0622;
FRL–9984–35—Region 2]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets for the New Jersey
Portion of the New York-Northern New
Jersey-Long Island, NY–NJ–CT 2008
8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Sep 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Notification of adequacy.
In this document, the
Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’ or ‘‘Agency’’) is notifying the
public that the Agency has found that
the 2017 motor vehicle emissions
budgets (‘‘budgets’’) for volatile organic
compounds (‘‘VOCs’’) and nitrogen
oxides (‘‘NOX’’) submitted by the New
Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection for the 2008 national ambient
air quality standard (‘‘NAAQS’’) for
ozone are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes for the New Jersey
portions of the New York-Northern New
SUMMARY:
40 CFR Part 52
Explanation
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 25, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48383-48384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20748]
[[Page 48383]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0020; FRL-9984-23--Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Inspection and Maintenance
Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of North
Carolina on November 17, 2017, through the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (DAQ), for the purpose
of removing 26 counties from North Carolina's expanded inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program, which was previously approved into the SIP
for use as a component of the State's Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)
Budget and Allowance Trading Program. The EPA has determined that North
Carolina's November 17, 2017, SIP revision is approvable because it is
consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and with the EPA's
regulations.
DATES: This rule will be effective September 25, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0020. All documents in the
docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed
in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562-9222. Ms. Sheckler can also be
reached via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 17, 2017, DAQ submitted a SIP revision seeking to
remove 26 counties from the expanded I/M program contained in the North
Carolina SIP. This removal consequently removes reliance on the I/M
reduction credits gained from the 26 counties' participation in the
expanded I/M program from the State's NOX emissions budget--
a component of the State's response to the NOX SIP Call.
North Carolina indicated that it no longer needs these reduction
credits in order to meet its obligations under the NOX SIP
Call. In addition, North Carolina provided a technical demonstration
showing that removing the 26 counties from the expanded I/M program
will not interfere with North Carolina's attainment or maintenance of
any National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) or with any other
applicable requirement of the CAA.
The EPA published a proposed rulemaking on July 26, 2018 (83 FR
35444), proposing to approve this SIP revision. The proposed approval
was based on the EPA's proposed findings that the removal of the 26
counties from the State's expanded I/M program will not interfere with
North Carolina's obligations under the NOX SIP Call and will
not interfere with North Carolina's attainment or maintenance of any
NAAQS or with any other applicable requirement of the CAA. The details
of North Carolina's submittal and the rationale for the EPA's action
are explained in the proposed rulemaking. The comment period for this
proposed rulemaking closed on August 27, 2018. The EPA received two
comments supporting the proposed action. The remaining comments
received were not relevant.
II. Final Action
The EPA is taking final action to approve the November 17, 2017,
revision to the North Carolina SIP. Specifically, the EPA is approving
the removal of Brunswick, Burke, Caldwell, Carteret, Catawba, Chatham,
Cleveland, Craven, Edgecombe, Granville, Harnett, Haywood, Henderson,
Lenoir, Moore, Nash, Orange, Pitt, Robeson, Rutherford, Stanly, Stokes,
Surry, Wayne, Wilkes, and Wilson counties from the SIP-approved
expanded I/M program. Additionally, the EPA is finding that North
Carolina's removal of the 26 counties from the SIP-approved expanded I/
M program (and the removal of reliance on the I/M emissions reductions
generated from those counties as part of the ``credits'' in North
Carolina's NOX emissions budget) will not interfere with the
State's obligations under the NOX SIP Call to meet its
Statewide NOX emissions budget. The EPA is also finding that
the removal of the 26 counties from the SIP-approved I/M program will
not interfere with continued attainment or maintenance of any
applicable NAAQS or with any other applicable requirement of the CAA,
and that North Carolina has satisfied the requirements of section
110(l) of the CAA.
The EPA has determined that this action is effective immediately
upon publication under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). The purpose
of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section 553(d) is to give
affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare
before the final rule takes effect. Section 553(d)(1) allows an
effective date less than 30 days after publication if a substantive
rule ``relieves a restriction.'' This action qualifies for the
exception under section 553(d)(1) because it relieves the 26 counties
identified above from the requirements of North Carolina's SIP-approved
expanded I/M program.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions
[[Page 48384]]
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 26, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 11, 2018.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II--North Carolina
0
2. In Sec. 52.1770, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding
the entry ``North Carolina Removal of 26 Counties from Inspection and
Maintenance Program and 110(l) Non-Interference Demonstration'' at the
end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved North Carolina Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval Federal Register
Provision effective date date citation Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
North Carolina Removal of 26 11/17/2017 9/25/2018 [insert Federal ............................
Counties from Inspection and Register
Maintenance Program and 110(l) citation].
Non-Interference Demonstration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2018-20748 Filed 9-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P