Air Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5, 48240-48242 [2018-20616]
Download as PDF
48240
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED SOUTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS—Continued
Provision
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2012
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
Regional Haze Plan Revision ..
§ 52.2127
State effective
date
12/18/2015
9/24/2018, [Insert citation of
publication].
9/5/2017
9/24/2018, [Insert citation of
publication].
[Removed and Reserved]
Explanation
Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only.
Subpart RR—Tennessee
3. Section 52.2127 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 52.2132
EPA approval date
5. Section 52.2220 is amended by
adding entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
1-hour NO2 NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
■
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Section 52.2132 is removed and
reserved.
■
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS’’ and ‘‘Regional
Haze Plan Revision’’ at the end of the
table in paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 52.2220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Name of non-regulatory SIP provision
*
*
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2
NAAQS.
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS.
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS.
Regional Haze Plan Revision .................
§ 52.2219
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment area
State effective
date
*
Tennessee .............
*
3/13/2014
Tennessee .............
3/13/2014
Tennessee .............
12/16/2015
Tennessee .............
11/22/2017
[Removed and Reserved]
[Removed and Reserved]
7. Sections 52.2234 is removed and
reserved.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–20621 Filed 9–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0509; FRL–9984–
29—Region 10]
This final rule is effective
October 24, 2018.
DATES:
Air Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate
Transport Requirements for the 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires each State Implementation Plan
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Sep 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0509. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
ADDRESSES:
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
*
9/24/2018, [Insert
citation of publication].
9/24/2018, [Insert
citation of publication].
9/24/2018, [Insert
citation of publication].
9/24/2018, [Insert
citation of publication].
(SIP) to contain adequate provisions
prohibiting emissions that will have
certain adverse air quality effects in
other states. On December 23, 2015, the
State of Idaho made a submission to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to address these requirements. The EPA
is approving the submission as meeting
the requirement that each SIP contain
adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2012
annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) in any other state.
6. Section 52.2219 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 52.2234
EPA approval date
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
*
Addressing prong 4 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only.
Addressing prong 4 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only.
Addressing prong 4 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only.
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and is publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov, or
please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability
information.
Jeff
Hunt at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@
epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
I. Background Information
On July 18, 2018, the EPA proposed
to approve Idaho as meeting the
requirement that each SIP contain
adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state (83 FR
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
33892). An explanation of the Clean Air
Act requirements, a detailed analysis of
the submittal, and the EPA’s reasons for
proposing approval were provided in
the notice of proposed rulemaking, and
will not be restated here. The public
comment period for the proposal ended
August 17, 2018.
II. Response to Comments
We received two comments on the
rulemaking. After reviewing the
comments, we have determined that the
comments are outside the scope of our
proposed action and fail to identify any
material issue necessitating a response.
For more information, please see our
memorandum included in the docket for
this action.
III. Final Action
The EPA is approving Idaho’s
December 23, 2015, submission
certifying that the SIP is sufficient to
meet the interstate transport
requirements of Clean Air Act section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), specifically prongs one
and two, as set forth in the proposed
rulemaking for this action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C.
7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because actions such as SIP
approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Sep 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land and is also
not approved to apply in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48241
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 23,
2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 5, 2018.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670, paragraph (e) is
amended by adding an entry at the end
of the table for ‘‘Interstate Transport
Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.670
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
*
*
48242
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
Interstate Transport Requirements
for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
*
State-wide ........
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0211; FRL–9984–
22—Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Regional
Haze Plan and Prong 4 (Visibility) for
the 2012 PM2.5, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2,
and 2008 Ozone NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking several final
actions regarding the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP). Three SIP
actions relate to how the state addresses
transport as related to visibility
impairment in Class 1 areas and the
2012 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5),
2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2010
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), and 2008 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS): The EPA is approving the
portion of the state’s September 5, 2014
Five-year Progress Report for the State
of Missouri Regional Haze Plan and a
subsequently submitted letter dated July
31, 2017, which clarified that the state
was changing from reliance on the Clean
Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) to reliance on
the Cross State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR) for certain regional haze
requirements; the EPA is converting its
limited approval/limited disapproval of
the state’s Regional Haze Plan to a full
approval; and the EPA is approving the
states’ submissions addressing the Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act) provisions that
prohibit emissions activity in one state
from interfering with measures to
protect visibility in another state (prong
4) of the state’s infrastructure SIP
submittals for the 2008 Ozone, the 2010
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2), and the 2012 Fine
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) NAAQS.
Finally, based on EPA’s approval of the
portion of the state’s September 5, 2014,
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
17:46 Sep 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
12/23/2015
EPA approval date
This final rule is effective on
October 24, 2018.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0211. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracey Casburn, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7016, or by email at
casburn.tracey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. Background Information
II. Have the requirements for approval of the
SIP submittals been met?
a. 2008 Ozone NAAQS
b. 2010 NO2 NAAQS
c. 2010 SO2 NAAQS
d. 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
e. Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report
III. The EPA’s Response to Comments
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Comments
*
*
9/24/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
Five-year Progress Report that clarified
that the state was changing from
reliance on CAIR to reliance on CSAPR
for certain regional haze requirements
and conversion of its limited approval/
limited disapproval of the state’s
Regional Haze Plan to a full approval,
the EPA is withdrawing the June 7,
2012, Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)
for regional haze.
[FR Doc. 2018–20616 Filed 9–21–18; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
State
submittal
date
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
This
action
addresses
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
CAA
I. Background Information
On May 3, 2018, the EPA proposed to
approve the state’s change from a
reliance on CAIR to a reliance on
CSAPR to meet certain Regional Haze
planning obligations; to convert the
EPA’s limited approval/limited
disapproval of the state’s Regional Haze
Plan to a full approval; to approve the
prong 4 elements of the state’s 2008
Ozone, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS infrastructure SIP
submittals; and to remove EPA’s
existing regional haze FIP from 40 CFR
52.1339(c) and (d). See 83 FR 19479.
The EPA received six sets of comments
prior to the close of the comment
period; all six sets of comments were
not directly related to the action. The
EPA’s rationale for approving those SIP
submissions, was provided in the
proposal action and will not be restated
here. See 83 FR 19479.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of the SIP submittals been met?
a. 2008 Ozone NAAQS
The state’s submission met the public
notice requirements for the Ozone
infrastructure SIP submission in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The
state held a public comment period
from April 30, 2013, to June 6, 2013.
The EPA provided comments on May
23, 2013, and was the only commenter.
A public hearing was held on May 30,
2013. The submission satisfied the
completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V, for all elements except
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—significant
contribution to nonattainment (prong 1),
interfering with maintenance of the
NAAQs (prong 2). The EPA published a
document in the Federal Register,
‘‘Findings of Failure to Submit a Section
110 State Implementation Plan for
Interstate Transport for the 2008
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Ozone’’.1 The state was
included in this finding because it had
not made a complete ‘‘good neighbor’’
SIP submittal to meet the prong 1 and
2 elements.
1 See
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
80 FR 39961 (August 12, 2015).
24SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 185 (Monday, September 24, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48240-48242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20616]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2018-0509; FRL-9984-29--Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate Transport Requirements for
the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires each State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to contain adequate provisions prohibiting emissions that
will have certain adverse air quality effects in other states. On
December 23, 2015, the State of Idaho made a submission to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to address these requirements.
The EPA is approving the submission as meeting the requirement that
each SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions that will
contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance
of the 2012 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 24, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2018-0509. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and is publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt at (206) 553-0256, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
I. Background Information
On July 18, 2018, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho as meeting the
requirement that each SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will contribute significantly to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in any
other state (83 FR
[[Page 48241]]
33892). An explanation of the Clean Air Act requirements, a detailed
analysis of the submittal, and the EPA's reasons for proposing approval
were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking, and will not be
restated here. The public comment period for the proposal ended August
17, 2018.
II. Response to Comments
We received two comments on the rulemaking. After reviewing the
comments, we have determined that the comments are outside the scope of
our proposed action and fail to identify any material issue
necessitating a response. For more information, please see our
memorandum included in the docket for this action.
III. Final Action
The EPA is approving Idaho's December 23, 2015, submission
certifying that the SIP is sufficient to meet the interstate transport
requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), specifically
prongs one and two, as set forth in the proposed rulemaking for this
action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because actions such as SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land and
is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those
areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 23, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 5, 2018.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, paragraph (e) is amended by adding an entry at the
end of the table for ``Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 48242]]
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of SIP provision Applicable geographic or submittal EPA approval date Comments
nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Interstate Transport State-wide.............. 12/23/2015 9/24/2018, [Insert This action
Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 Federal Register addresses CAA
NAAQS. citation]. 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I
).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2018-20616 Filed 9-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P