Air Plan Approval; KY; Updates to Attainment Status Designations, 47856-47858 [2018-20530]
Download as PDF
47856
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
under PSD rules in effect on or before
July 30, 1987. South Carolina’s revised
language is consistent with the federal
Permit Rescission Rule, allowing for
permit rescission if the permit meets the
requirement of paragraph (w)(3).
Finally, paragraph (w)(3) is revised to
change the word ‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘may’’ to
clarify that this provision does not
create a mandatory duty for the State.
This change is consistent with the
Permit Rescission Rule at 40 CFR
52.21(w)(3).
The September 5, 2017, SIP revision
also revises other paragraphs in
Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No. 7 for
consistency in formatting, to correct
internal references, and to correct
typographical errors. Section (b) is
modified at paragraph (34),
subparagraph (vi), to correct a
typographical error in the definition of
‘‘Net emissions increase.’’ Next, sections
(w), (aa), and (bb) are revised to be in
bold font for internal consistency.
Finally, Standard No. 7 is revised to
make internal references and formatting
consistent by making changes in section
(aa) at (aa)(1)(i), (aa)(9), (aa)(11)(i), and
(aa)(14)(i). EPA preliminarily finds that
South Carolina’s revised rules are
consistent with federal requirements
and CAA section 110.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the SC DHEC regulatory paragraphs
identified above in Section III within SC
DHEC Regulation 61–62.5, Standard No.
7, entitled ‘‘Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD),’’ state effective on
August 25, 2017. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
changes to the SIP identified in Section
III, above, because they are consistent
with the CAA and its implementing
regulations.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Sep 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed approval
for the State of South Carolina does not
have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because it does not
have substantial direct effects on an
Indian Tribe. The Catawba Indian
Nation Reservation is located within the
boundary of York County, South
Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba
Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code
Ann. 27–16–120, ‘‘all state and local
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
environmental laws and regulations
apply to the [Catawba Indian Nation]
and Reservation and are fully
enforceable by all relevant state and
local agencies and authorities.’’ EPA
notes this action will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 10, 2018.
Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018–20529 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0308; FRL–9984–
07—Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY; Updates to
Attainment Status Designations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Commonwealth of
Kentucky, through the Kentucky
Division for Air Quality (KDAQ),
submitted a revision to the Kentucky
State Implementation Plan (SIP) on
December 13, 2016. The SIP revision
updates, as of October 6, 2016, the
description and attainment status
designations for geographic areas within
the Commonwealth for several National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The updates are being made
to conform Kentucky’s attainment status
tables with the federal attainment status
designations made for these areas. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing to approve Kentucky’s SIP
revision because it is consistent with the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2018–0308 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone
number is (404) 562–9644. Ms. Sanchez
can also be reached via electronic mail
at sanchez.madolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
Sections 108 and 109 of the CAA
require EPA to set NAAQS for criteria
air pollutants: Ozone (O3), particulate
matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO),
lead (Pb), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and
nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and to
undertake periodic review of these
standards. After EPA sets a new NAAQS
or revises an existing standard, the CAA
requires EPA to determine if areas of the
country meet the new standards and to
designate areas as either nonattainment,
unclassifiable/attainment, or
unclassifiable. Such designations inform
the state’s planning and implementation
of requirements to achieve and maintain
the NAAQS for each area within that
state.
Section 107(d) of the CAA governs the
process for these initial area
designations. Under this process, states
and tribes submit recommendations to
EPA as to whether or not an area is
attaining the NAAQS for criteria air
pollutants. EPA then considers these
recommendations as part of its
obligation to promulgate the area
designations and boundaries for the new
or revised NAAQS. EPA codifies its
designations for areas within each state
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Sep 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
in 40 CFR part 81.1 Under section
107(d) of the CAA, a designation for an
area remains in effect until redesignated
by EPA.
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to Kentucky
regulation 401 KAR 51:010, which
updates, as of October 6, 2016, the
description and attainment or
nonattainment status of geographic
areas within the Commonwealth with
regard to a number of NAAQS. The
Commonwealth of Kentucky last
amended Regulation 401 KAR 51:010 in
1997 and, since that time, EPA has
promulgated several revisions to the
designations of areas within the
Commonwealth. As a result, Kentucky
has amended Regulation 401 KAR
51:010 by updating, as of October 6,
2016, the attainment status designations
in Sections 4 through 8 and Section 10
for CO, Pb, NO2, O3, PM2.5, and total
suspended solids (TSP) 2 to conform
with EPA’s designations as reflected in
40 CFR 81.318. Regulation 401 KAR
51:010 has also been amended by
making minor textual modifications to
the NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND
CONFORMITY section and Section 1
(Definitions) and Section 2 (Attainment
Status Designations). The SIP submittal
amending the Kentucky regulation to
incorporate these updates can be found
in the docket at www.regulations.gov
and are summarized below.
II. Analysis of the Kentucky Submittal
On December 15, 2016,3 the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
KDAQ, submitted a revision to the
Kentucky SIP. EPA is proposing to
approve portions of the December 15,
2016, submission which amend and
update, as of October 6, 2016, the
attainment status designations for CO,
Pb, NO2, O3, PM2.5, and TSP. EPA is not
acting on the portion of the submittal
(Section 9) that modifies the attainment
status designations for SO2.
Minor textual modifications were
made to the NECESSITY, FUNCTION,
AND CONFORMITY section by
changing the wording from
‘‘Environmental and Public Protection
Cabinet’’ to ‘‘cabinet’’ and by changing
the word ‘‘prescribe’’ to ‘‘promulgate.’’
Section 1 (Definitions) was modified by
removing the wording ‘‘as used in
Sections 4 through 7 of this
administrative regulation’’ from the
1 EPA’s
attainment status designations for
Kentucky are found at 40 CFR 81.318.
2 EPA is not acting on the portion of the submittal
(Section 9) that modifies the attainment status
designations for SO2.
3 EPA notes that the cover letter was dated
December 13, 2016. The submittal date is the date
of receipt, which was December 15, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47857
definition ‘‘Rest of State’’; by re-ordering
the definition ‘‘Road’’ from subsection
(3) to subsection (2) to be in alphabetical
order and by removing the wording ‘‘as
used in Section 2(3) of this
administrative regulation’’ from the
definition; and by removing the wording
‘‘as used in Section 8 of this
administrative regulation’’ from the
definition ‘‘Statewide.’’ Section 2
(Attainment Status Designations) was
modified in subsection (1) by listing the
pollutants in alphabetical order and by
adding the pollutants ‘‘lead,’’ ‘‘ozone,’’
and ‘‘particulate matter’’ to the list; by
rewording ‘‘Section 5 through 8’’ to
‘‘Sections 4 through 10’’; and by
removing the sentence ‘‘The attainment
status of areas of the Commonwealth of
Kentucky with respect to total
suspended particulate is listed in
Section 4 of this administrative
regulation’’ and in subsection (2) by
adding the acronym ‘‘U.S. EPA’’
following ‘‘U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.’’
The attainment status tables (Sections
4 through 8 and Section 10) in 401 KAR
51.010 were re-ordered to be in
alphabetical order of the pollutant—CO,
Pb, NO2, O3, PM2.5, and TSP. The
following are the specific revisions
made to Sections 4 through 8 and
Section 10:
Section 4.—Attainment Status
Designations for Carbon Monoxide (CO)
The attainment status designation
table for CO was amended to reflect the
attainment status of areas in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky for the
1971 CO NAAQS.
Section 5.—Attainment Status
Designations for Lead (Pb)
The attainment status designation
table for Pb was amended to reflect the
attainment status of areas in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky for the
2008 Pb NAAQS.
Section 6.—Attainment Status
Designations for Nitrogen Oxides (NO2)
The attainment status designation
Table (1) for NO2 was amended to add
the ‘‘1971 Annual Standard’’ title to the
table. Table (2) was added to reflect the
attainment status of areas in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky for the
2010 one-hour NO2 NAAQS.
Section 7.—Attainment Status
Designations for Ozone (O3)
The following language was added to
subsection (1): ‘‘The 1971 One (1) Hour
Standard was revoked effective June 15,
2005, for all areas in the Commonwealth
of Kentucky. The Cincinnati-Hamilton,
Edmonson County, Huntington-
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
47858
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Ashland, Lexington-Fayette, Louisville,
Owensboro, and Paducah areas shall be
considered maintenance for the one (1)
hour national ambient air quality
standards for the purposes of 40 CFR
part 51, subpart X.’’ The corresponding
table for the 1971 O3 standard was
removed.
Table (2) was added to reflect the
attainment status designation of areas in
the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the
1997 eight-hour (8-hour) primary and
secondary O3 NAAQS.
Table (3) was added to reflect the
attainment status designation of areas
for the 2008 8-hour primary and
secondary O3 NAAQS.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 8.—Attainment Status
Designations for PM2.5
Table (1) was added to reflect the
attainment status of areas in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky for the
1997 annual primary and secondary
PM2.5 NAAQS.
Table (2) was added to reflect the
attainment status of areas for the 2012
annual PM2.5 primary NAAQS.
Table (3) was added to reflect the
attainment status of areas for the 1997
twenty-four hour (24-hour) primary and
secondary PM2.5 NAAQS.
Table (4) was added to reflect the
attainment status of areas for the 2006
24-hour primary and secondary PM2.5
NAAQS.
Section 10.—Attainment Status
Designations for Total Suspended
Particulates (TSP)
The attainment status designation
table for TSP was amended to reflect the
attainment status of areas in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky for the
1971 TSP NAAQS.
EPA has reviewed these changes to
the Kentucky regulations for attainment
status designations and is proposing to
find that these changes are consistent
with federal regulations, specifically 40
CFR 81.318.
In addition to the revision of
attainment status designations in
Sections 4 through 8 and Section 10 of
Regulation 401 KAR 51:010, the SIP
submittal includes minor textual
modifications to the NECESSITY,
FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY
section and Section 1 (Definitions) and
Section 2 (Attainment Status
Designations). EPA is proposing to find
that these are administrative changes
that are consistent with the
requirements of the CAA.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Sep 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Kentucky Regulation 401 KAR 51:010,
Attainment status designations,
effective October 6, 2016, which was
revised to be consistent with the federal
attainment status designations for the
areas within the Commonwealth.4 EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Commonwealth of Kentucky December
13, 2016, SIP revisions identified in
section II above, because these changes
are consistent with the CAA and EPA
regulations.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
4 The
incorporation by reference will not include
Section 9 of 401 KAR 51:010, as EPA is not acting
on Section 9 in this action.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 10, 2018.
Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018–20530 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2018–0527; FRL–9984–
12—Region 4]
Kentucky: Proposed Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47856-47858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20530]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0308; FRL-9984-07--Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY; Updates to Attainment Status Designations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division
for Air Quality (KDAQ), submitted a revision to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP) on December 13, 2016. The SIP revision
updates, as of October 6, 2016, the description and attainment status
designations for geographic areas within the Commonwealth for several
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The updates are being
made to conform Kentucky's attainment status tables with the federal
attainment status designations made for these areas. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve Kentucky's SIP revision
because it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2018-0308 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be
[[Page 47857]]
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9644. Ms. Sanchez can
also be reached via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 108 and 109 of the CAA require EPA to set NAAQS for
criteria air pollutants: Ozone (O3), particulate matter
(PM), carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), sulfur dioxide (SO2),
and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and to undertake periodic review
of these standards. After EPA sets a new NAAQS or revises an existing
standard, the CAA requires EPA to determine if areas of the country
meet the new standards and to designate areas as either nonattainment,
unclassifiable/attainment, or unclassifiable. Such designations inform
the state's planning and implementation of requirements to achieve and
maintain the NAAQS for each area within that state.
Section 107(d) of the CAA governs the process for these initial
area designations. Under this process, states and tribes submit
recommendations to EPA as to whether or not an area is attaining the
NAAQS for criteria air pollutants. EPA then considers these
recommendations as part of its obligation to promulgate the area
designations and boundaries for the new or revised NAAQS. EPA codifies
its designations for areas within each state in 40 CFR part 81.\1\
Under section 107(d) of the CAA, a designation for an area remains in
effect until redesignated by EPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA's attainment status designations for Kentucky are found
at 40 CFR 81.318.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this rule, EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Kentucky
regulation 401 KAR 51:010, which updates, as of October 6, 2016, the
description and attainment or nonattainment status of geographic areas
within the Commonwealth with regard to a number of NAAQS. The
Commonwealth of Kentucky last amended Regulation 401 KAR 51:010 in 1997
and, since that time, EPA has promulgated several revisions to the
designations of areas within the Commonwealth. As a result, Kentucky
has amended Regulation 401 KAR 51:010 by updating, as of October 6,
2016, the attainment status designations in Sections 4 through 8 and
Section 10 for CO, Pb, NO2, O3, PM2.5,
and total suspended solids (TSP) \2\ to conform with EPA's designations
as reflected in 40 CFR 81.318. Regulation 401 KAR 51:010 has also been
amended by making minor textual modifications to the NECESSITY,
FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY section and Section 1 (Definitions) and
Section 2 (Attainment Status Designations). The SIP submittal amending
the Kentucky regulation to incorporate these updates can be found in
the docket at www.regulations.gov and are summarized below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ EPA is not acting on the portion of the submittal (Section
9) that modifies the attainment status designations for
SO2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Analysis of the Kentucky Submittal
On December 15, 2016,\3\ the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
KDAQ, submitted a revision to the Kentucky SIP. EPA is proposing to
approve portions of the December 15, 2016, submission which amend and
update, as of October 6, 2016, the attainment status designations for
CO, Pb, NO2, O3, PM2.5, and TSP. EPA
is not acting on the portion of the submittal (Section 9) that modifies
the attainment status designations for SO2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA notes that the cover letter was dated December 13, 2016.
The submittal date is the date of receipt, which was December 15,
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minor textual modifications were made to the NECESSITY, FUNCTION,
AND CONFORMITY section by changing the wording from ``Environmental and
Public Protection Cabinet'' to ``cabinet'' and by changing the word
``prescribe'' to ``promulgate.'' Section 1 (Definitions) was modified
by removing the wording ``as used in Sections 4 through 7 of this
administrative regulation'' from the definition ``Rest of State''; by
re-ordering the definition ``Road'' from subsection (3) to subsection
(2) to be in alphabetical order and by removing the wording ``as used
in Section 2(3) of this administrative regulation'' from the
definition; and by removing the wording ``as used in Section 8 of this
administrative regulation'' from the definition ``Statewide.'' Section
2 (Attainment Status Designations) was modified in subsection (1) by
listing the pollutants in alphabetical order and by adding the
pollutants ``lead,'' ``ozone,'' and ``particulate matter'' to the list;
by rewording ``Section 5 through 8'' to ``Sections 4 through 10''; and
by removing the sentence ``The attainment status of areas of the
Commonwealth of Kentucky with respect to total suspended particulate is
listed in Section 4 of this administrative regulation'' and in
subsection (2) by adding the acronym ``U.S. EPA'' following ``U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.''
The attainment status tables (Sections 4 through 8 and Section 10)
in 401 KAR 51.010 were re-ordered to be in alphabetical order of the
pollutant--CO, Pb, NO2, O3, PM2.5, and
TSP. The following are the specific revisions made to Sections 4
through 8 and Section 10:
Section 4.--Attainment Status Designations for Carbon Monoxide (CO)
The attainment status designation table for CO was amended to
reflect the attainment status of areas in the Commonwealth of Kentucky
for the 1971 CO NAAQS.
Section 5.--Attainment Status Designations for Lead (Pb)
The attainment status designation table for Pb was amended to
reflect the attainment status of areas in the Commonwealth of Kentucky
for the 2008 Pb NAAQS.
Section 6.--Attainment Status Designations for Nitrogen Oxides (NO2)
The attainment status designation Table (1) for NO2 was
amended to add the ``1971 Annual Standard'' title to the table. Table
(2) was added to reflect the attainment status of areas in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky for the 2010 one-hour NO2 NAAQS.
Section 7.--Attainment Status Designations for Ozone (O3)
The following language was added to subsection (1): ``The 1971 One
(1) Hour Standard was revoked effective June 15, 2005, for all areas in
the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Cincinnati-Hamilton, Edmonson County,
Huntington-
[[Page 47858]]
Ashland, Lexington-Fayette, Louisville, Owensboro, and Paducah areas
shall be considered maintenance for the one (1) hour national ambient
air quality standards for the purposes of 40 CFR part 51, subpart X.''
The corresponding table for the 1971 O3 standard was
removed.
Table (2) was added to reflect the attainment status designation of
areas in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the 1997 eight-hour (8-hour)
primary and secondary O3 NAAQS.
Table (3) was added to reflect the attainment status designation of
areas for the 2008 8-hour primary and secondary O3 NAAQS.
Section 8.--Attainment Status Designations for PM2.5
Table (1) was added to reflect the attainment status of areas in
the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the 1997 annual primary and secondary
PM2.5 NAAQS.
Table (2) was added to reflect the attainment status of areas for
the 2012 annual PM2.5 primary NAAQS.
Table (3) was added to reflect the attainment status of areas for
the 1997 twenty-four hour (24-hour) primary and secondary
PM2.5 NAAQS.
Table (4) was added to reflect the attainment status of areas for
the 2006 24-hour primary and secondary PM2.5 NAAQS.
Section 10.--Attainment Status Designations for Total Suspended
Particulates (TSP)
The attainment status designation table for TSP was amended to
reflect the attainment status of areas in the Commonwealth of Kentucky
for the 1971 TSP NAAQS.
EPA has reviewed these changes to the Kentucky regulations for
attainment status designations and is proposing to find that these
changes are consistent with federal regulations, specifically 40 CFR
81.318.
In addition to the revision of attainment status designations in
Sections 4 through 8 and Section 10 of Regulation 401 KAR 51:010, the
SIP submittal includes minor textual modifications to the NECESSITY,
FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY section and Section 1 (Definitions) and
Section 2 (Attainment Status Designations). EPA is proposing to find
that these are administrative changes that are consistent with the
requirements of the CAA.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Kentucky Regulation 401 KAR 51:010, Attainment status
designations, effective October 6, 2016, which was revised to be
consistent with the federal attainment status designations for the
areas within the Commonwealth.\4\ EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The incorporation by reference will not include Section 9 of
401 KAR 51:010, as EPA is not acting on Section 9 in this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the Commonwealth of Kentucky December
13, 2016, SIP revisions identified in section II above, because these
changes are consistent with the CAA and EPA regulations.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 10, 2018.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018-20530 Filed 9-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P