Capital Leases, 47574-47576 [2018-20474]
Download as PDF
47574
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Dated: September 13, 2018.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
List of Subjects
■
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
2. Amend § 52.1342 by adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
4. Section 81.326 is amended by
revising the entry for ‘‘St. Louis-St.
Charles-Farmington, MO-IL’’ in the table
entitled ‘‘Missouri—2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS (Primary and Secondary)’’ to
read as follows:
§ 52.1342
§ 81.326
(e) Redesignation to attainment. On
September 12, 2016, and February 16,
2018, Missouri submitted requests to
redesignate its portion of the St. Louis
MO-IL area to attainment of the 2008
ozone standard. The Missouri portion of
the St. Louis MO-IL area includes
Jefferson, Franklin, St. Charles, and St.
Louis Counties along with the City of St.
Louis. As part of the redesignation
request, the State submitted a plan for
maintaining the 2008 ozone standard
through 2030 in the area as required by
section 175A of the Clean Air Act.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Designations and
classifications, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts 52
and 81 as set forth below:
3. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
Status Designations
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart—AA Missouri
*
*
Control strategy: Ozone.
*
*
*
*
Missouri.
*
*
*
*
MISSOURI—2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
Designation
Classification
Designated area
Date 1
St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL 2:
Franklin County ........................................................................................
Jefferson County ......................................................................................
St. Charles County ...................................................................................
St. Louis County .......................................................................................
St. Louis City ............................................................................................
*
1 This
*
*
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
*
Date 1
Type
Type
Attainment.
Attainment.
Attainment.
Attainment.
Attainment.
*
*
*
date is July 20, 2012, unless otherwise noted.
Indian country located in each area, unless otherwise noted.
2 Excludes
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[FR Doc. 2018–20326 Filed 9–19–18; 8:45 am]
Federal Transit Administration
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
49 CFR Part 639
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2
[Docket No. FTA–2018–0006]
RIN 2132–AB34
Capital Leases
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rulemaking rescinds the
regulation implementing the
requirement for recipients to conduct a
cost-effectiveness analysis before leasing
public transportation equipment or
facilities with Federal transit funds. The
requirement to conduct a costeffectiveness analysis was rescinded by
statute in 2015.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
September 20, 2018.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Montgomery, Office of Chief
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Counsel, (202) 366–1017 or
mark.montgomery@dot.gov. Office
hours are from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document is viewable online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval
help and guidelines are available on the
website. It is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days a year. An electronic copy
of this document is available for
download from the Office of the Federal
Register home page at: https://
www.ofr.gov and the Government
Publishing Office web page at: https://
www.gpo.gov.
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2
Background
49 CFR part 639 limits capital leasing
arrangements for use in public
transportation to those that are more
cost-effective than purchase or
construction. This part implements
section 3003 of the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (Pub. L.
105–178) (TEA–21), which amended
section 5302 of title 49, United States
Code (Section 5302), to allow a recipient
to use capital funds to finance the
leasing of facilities and equipment on
the condition that the leasing
arrangements are more cost-effective
than purchase or construction. This
section also required the Secretary to
promulgate regulations to implement
the cost-effectiveness limitation.
Recently, section 3002 of the Fixing
America’s Surface Transportation Act
(Pub. L. 114–357) (FAST Act) amended
the definition of ‘‘capital project’’ under
section 5302 to remove this requirement
and the mandate to promulgate
regulations to carry out this
requirement. For this reason, FTA is
issuing this final rule to rescind 49 CFR
part 639.
FTA will continue to evaluate its
regulations and guidance to promote
improvements to the capital leasing
process in the least burdensome
manner.
Discussion of the Changes
Under the amended statutory
definition of ‘‘capital project,’’ capital
leases are no longer subject to the
requirement or regulation limiting
leasing arrangements to those that are
more cost-effective than purchase or
construction. Accordingly, this
rulemaking rescinds 49 CFR part 639,
which outlines the procedures for
conducting the cost-effectiveness
analysis. This rule does not affect the
general procurement standards in 2 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
part 200, nor does it alter the award
management requirements in FTA’s
Circular 5010.1E.
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and
comment procedure if it finds, for good
cause, that it is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. Additionally, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
provides that an agency may waive the
30-day delayed effective date upon
finding of good cause.
Section 3003 of TEA–21 amended
section 5302 to allow a recipient to use
capital funds to finance the leasing of
facilities and equipment, ‘‘subject to
regulations that the Secretary prescribes
limiting the leasing arrangements to
those that are more cost-effective than
purchase or construction.’’ By removing
this language, section 3002 of the FAST
Act eliminated the requirement limiting
capital leases to those that are more
cost-effective than purchase or
construction. FTA finds good cause that
notice and comment for this rule is
unnecessary due to the nature of the
revisions (i.e., the rule simply carries
out the statutory language found in the
FAST Act). The statutory language does
not require regulatory interpretation to
carry out its intent, and comments
cannot alter the regulation given that the
statute abrogated its purpose. Further,
the delayed effective date is
unnecessary because the removal of the
cost-effectiveness analysis requirement
was already made effective by the FAST
Act. Accordingly, FTA finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) to
waive notice and opportunity for
comment and the delayed effective date.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), Executive Order
13771 (Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs), and
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FTA has determined that this
rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of
Executive Order 12866, and within the
meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. This action complies with
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and
13771 to improve regulation.
FTA classifies this rule as a
deregulatory action under Executive
Order 13771, because it removes the
mandatory cost-effectiveness analysis.
FTA finds that the cost savings are
minor. On average, there are twelve
leases per year subject to the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47575
requirement, and the analysis takes
approximately a week for transit
agencies to compile and prepare and
approximately eight hours for FTA to
review and approve the certification.
Thus, removing these requirements
would provide a maximum average
annual cost savings of $32,373 and
impose no additional costs on
recipients.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because FTA finds good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice
and opportunity for comment for this
rule, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
601–612) do not apply. FTA evaluated
the effects of this action on small
entities and determined the action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. FTA hereby certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
FTA has determined that this rule
does not impose unfunded mandates, as
defined by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4,
March 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48). This rule
does not include a Federal mandate that
may result in expenditures of $155.1
million or more in any 1 year (when
adjusted for inflation) in 2012 dollars
for either State, local, and tribal
governments in the aggregate, or by the
private sector. Additionally, the
definition of ‘‘Federal mandate’’ in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
excludes financial assistance of the type
in which State, local, or tribal
governments have authority to adjust
their participation in the program in
accordance with changes made in the
program by the Federal Government.
The Federal Transit Act permits this
type of flexibility.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This action has
been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132 dated August 4,
1999, and FTA determined this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
47576
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
or sufficient federalism implications on
the States. FTA also determined this
action will not preempt any State law or
regulation or affect the States’ ability to
discharge traditional State governmental
functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. FTA has
analyzed this rule under the Paperwork
Reduction Act and believes that it does
not impose additional information
collection requirements for the purposes
of the Act above and beyond existing
information collection clearances from
OMB.
National Environmental Policy Act
Federal agencies are required to adopt
implementing procedures for the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) that establish specific criteria
for, and identification of, three classes
of actions: (1) Those that normally
require preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement, (2) those that
normally require preparation of an
Environmental Assessment, and (3)
those that are categorically excluded
from further NEPA review (40 CFR
1507.3(b)). This rule qualifies for
categorical exclusions under 23 CFR
771.118(c)(4) (planning and
administrative activities that do not
involve or lead directly to construction).
FTA has evaluated whether the rule will
involve unusual or extraordinary
circumstances and has determined that
it will not.
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
FTA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. FTA does not believe this rule
effects a taking of private property or
otherwise has taking implications under
Executive Order 12630.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
FTA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. FTA certifies
that this action will not cause an
environmental risk to health or safety
that might disproportionately affect
children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
FTA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13175, dated November
6, 2000, and believes that it will not
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes; will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments; and will not
preempt tribal laws. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FTA has analyzed this action under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. FTA has
determined that this action is not a
significant energy action under that
order and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental
Justice)
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations) and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (77 FR 27534, May 10,
2012) (available online at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/
environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/order_
56102a/index.cf) require DOT agencies
to achieve Environmental Justice (EJ) as
part of their mission by identifying and
addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
human health or environmental effects,
including interrelated social and
economic effects, of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority and
low-income populations. All DOT
agencies must address compliance with
Executive Order 12898 and the DOT
Order in all rulemaking activities. On
August 15, 2012, FTA’s Circular 4703.1
became effective, which contains
guidance for recipients of FTA financial
assistance to incorporate EJ principles
into plans, projects, and activities
(available online at https://
www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_EJ_
Circular_7.14-12_FINAL.pdf).
FTA has evaluated this action under
the Executive Order, the DOT Order,
and the FTA Circular. The rule rescinds
the requirement of conducting costeffectiveness analysis for capital leases,
and FTA has determined that this action
will not cause disproportionately high
and adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations.
Regulation Identifier Number
A Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used
to cross-reference this rule with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 639
Grant programs—transportation, Mass
transportation.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.90:
K. Jane Williams,
Acting Administrator.
Title 49—Transportation
PART 639—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
In consideration of the foregoing, and
under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5302
and Public Law 114–357, amend 49 CFR
chapter VI by removing and reserving
part 639, consisting of §§ 639.1 through
639.33.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–20474 Filed 9–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47574-47576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20474]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 639
[Docket No. FTA-2018-0006]
RIN 2132-AB34
Capital Leases
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking rescinds the regulation implementing the
requirement for recipients to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis
before leasing public transportation equipment or facilities with
Federal transit funds. The requirement to conduct a cost-effectiveness
analysis was rescinded by statute in 2015.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 20, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Montgomery, Office of Chief
[[Page 47575]]
Counsel, (202) 366-1017 or [email protected]. Office hours are
from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document is viewable online through the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the website. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days a
year. An electronic copy of this document is available for download
from the Office of the Federal Register home page at: https://www.ofr.gov and the Government Publishing Office web page at: https://www.gpo.gov.
Background
49 CFR part 639 limits capital leasing arrangements for use in
public transportation to those that are more cost-effective than
purchase or construction. This part implements section 3003 of the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (Pub. L. 105-178) (TEA-
21), which amended section 5302 of title 49, United States Code
(Section 5302), to allow a recipient to use capital funds to finance
the leasing of facilities and equipment on the condition that the
leasing arrangements are more cost-effective than purchase or
construction. This section also required the Secretary to promulgate
regulations to implement the cost-effectiveness limitation. Recently,
section 3002 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (Pub.
L. 114-357) (FAST Act) amended the definition of ``capital project''
under section 5302 to remove this requirement and the mandate to
promulgate regulations to carry out this requirement. For this reason,
FTA is issuing this final rule to rescind 49 CFR part 639.
FTA will continue to evaluate its regulations and guidance to
promote improvements to the capital leasing process in the least
burdensome manner.
Discussion of the Changes
Under the amended statutory definition of ``capital project,''
capital leases are no longer subject to the requirement or regulation
limiting leasing arrangements to those that are more cost-effective
than purchase or construction. Accordingly, this rulemaking rescinds 49
CFR part 639, which outlines the procedures for conducting the cost-
effectiveness analysis. This rule does not affect the general
procurement standards in 2 CFR part 200, nor does it alter the award
management requirements in FTA's Circular 5010.1E.
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an
agency may waive the normal notice and comment procedure if it finds,
for good cause, that it is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. Additionally, 5 U.S.C. 553(d) provides that an
agency may waive the 30-day delayed effective date upon finding of good
cause.
Section 3003 of TEA-21 amended section 5302 to allow a recipient to
use capital funds to finance the leasing of facilities and equipment,
``subject to regulations that the Secretary prescribes limiting the
leasing arrangements to those that are more cost-effective than
purchase or construction.'' By removing this language, section 3002 of
the FAST Act eliminated the requirement limiting capital leases to
those that are more cost-effective than purchase or construction. FTA
finds good cause that notice and comment for this rule is unnecessary
due to the nature of the revisions (i.e., the rule simply carries out
the statutory language found in the FAST Act). The statutory language
does not require regulatory interpretation to carry out its intent, and
comments cannot alter the regulation given that the statute abrogated
its purpose. Further, the delayed effective date is unnecessary because
the removal of the cost-effectiveness analysis requirement was already
made effective by the FAST Act. Accordingly, FTA finds good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) to waive notice and opportunity for
comment and the delayed effective date.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), Executive Order
13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs), and
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FTA has determined that this rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and
within the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and procedures. This
action complies with Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771 to improve
regulation.
FTA classifies this rule as a deregulatory action under Executive
Order 13771, because it removes the mandatory cost-effectiveness
analysis. FTA finds that the cost savings are minor. On average, there
are twelve leases per year subject to the requirement, and the analysis
takes approximately a week for transit agencies to compile and prepare
and approximately eight hours for FTA to review and approve the
certification. Thus, removing these requirements would provide a
maximum average annual cost savings of $32,373 and impose no additional
costs on recipients.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because FTA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
notice and opportunity for comment for this rule, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601-612) do not
apply. FTA evaluated the effects of this action on small entities and
determined the action would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. FTA hereby certifies that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
FTA has determined that this rule does not impose unfunded
mandates, as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-4, March 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48). This rule does not include a
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $155.1 million or
more in any 1 year (when adjusted for inflation) in 2012 dollars for
either State, local, and tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the
private sector. Additionally, the definition of ``Federal mandate'' in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act excludes financial assistance of the
type in which State, local, or tribal governments have authority to
adjust their participation in the program in accordance with changes
made in the program by the Federal Government. The Federal Transit Act
permits this type of flexibility.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that may have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive
Order 13132 dated August 4, 1999, and FTA determined this action will
not have a substantial direct effect
[[Page 47576]]
or sufficient federalism implications on the States. FTA also
determined this action will not preempt any State law or regulation or
affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental
functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct,
sponsor, or require through regulations. FTA has analyzed this rule
under the Paperwork Reduction Act and believes that it does not impose
additional information collection requirements for the purposes of the
Act above and beyond existing information collection clearances from
OMB.
National Environmental Policy Act
Federal agencies are required to adopt implementing procedures for
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that establish specific
criteria for, and identification of, three classes of actions: (1)
Those that normally require preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement, (2) those that normally require preparation of an
Environmental Assessment, and (3) those that are categorically excluded
from further NEPA review (40 CFR 1507.3(b)). This rule qualifies for
categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.118(c)(4) (planning and
administrative activities that do not involve or lead directly to
construction). FTA has evaluated whether the rule will involve unusual
or extraordinary circumstances and has determined that it will not.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FTA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights. FTA does not believe this rule effects a taking of
private property or otherwise has taking implications under Executive
Order 12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
FTA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. FTA
certifies that this action will not cause an environmental risk to
health or safety that might disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
FTA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13175, dated
November 6, 2000, and believes that it will not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments; and will not
preempt tribal laws. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement is
not required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FTA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. FTA has determined that this action is not a
significant energy action under that order and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations) and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (77 FR 27534, May 10, 2012) (available online at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/order_56102a/index.cf) require DOT agencies to achieve Environmental
Justice (EJ) as part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including interrelated social and economic
effects, of their programs, policies, and activities on minority and
low-income populations. All DOT agencies must address compliance with
Executive Order 12898 and the DOT Order in all rulemaking activities.
On August 15, 2012, FTA's Circular 4703.1 became effective, which
contains guidance for recipients of FTA financial assistance to
incorporate EJ principles into plans, projects, and activities
(available online at https://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_EJ_Circular_7.14-12_FINAL.pdf).
FTA has evaluated this action under the Executive Order, the DOT
Order, and the FTA Circular. The rule rescinds the requirement of
conducting cost-effectiveness analysis for capital leases, and FTA has
determined that this action will not cause disproportionately high and
adverse human health and environmental effects on minority or low-
income populations.
Regulation Identifier Number
A Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading
of this document can be used to cross-reference this rule with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 639
Grant programs--transportation, Mass transportation.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.90:
K. Jane Williams,
Acting Administrator.
Title 49--Transportation
PART 639--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
0
In consideration of the foregoing, and under the authority of 49 U.S.C.
5302 and Public Law 114-357, amend 49 CFR chapter VI by removing and
reserving part 639, consisting of Sec. Sec. 639.1 through 639.33.
[FR Doc. 2018-20474 Filed 9-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P