Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: Infrastructure Monitoring Requirements for the 2008 Pb, 2010 SO2, 47566-47568 [2018-20448]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
47566
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
State
effective
date
EPA
effective
date
Rule No.
Rule title
*
Section 03 .........
*
*
Emission standards for nitrogen oxides.
*
12/20/2016
*
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation]. 9/20/2018.
*
10/22/2018
*
Section 09 .........
*
*
Incorporation by reference ..................
*
2/5/2018
*
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation]. 9/20/2018.
*
10/22/2018
*
*
*
Final rule citation/date
*
*
Comments
*
*
*
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.
*
*
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.
*
Chapter 06. Permitting Requirements
*
Section 04 .........
*
*
Prevention of significant deterioration
*
Section 14 .........
*
*
Incorporation by reference ..................
*
*
*
12/20/2016
10/22/2018
*
2/5/2018
10/22/2018
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.
*
*
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.
*
Chapter 08. Non-attainment Area Regulations
*
Section 03 .........
*
*
Conformity of general federal actions
to state implementation plans.
*
2/5/2018
10/22/2018
*
Section 10 .........
*
*
Incorporation by reference ..................
*
2/5/2018
10/22/2018
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–20447 Filed 9–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0388–0001; FRL–
9983–73—Region 8]
Air Quality State Implementation
Plans; Approvals and Promulgations:
Infrastructure Monitoring
Requirements for the 2008 Pb, 2010
SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards; Utah
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving elements of
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions from the State of Utah to
demonstrate the State meets
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
*
infrastructure monitoring requirements
of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA) for
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for
lead (Pb) on October 15, 2008, nitrogen
dioxide (NO2) on January 22, 2010,
sulfur dioxide (SO2) on June 2, 2010,
and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on
December 14, 2012. The EPA is taking
this action pursuant to section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on October
22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0388–0001.
All documents in the docket are listed
on the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Gregory, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6175,
gregory.kate@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is
discussed in detail in our July 23, 2018
proposal (83 FR 34816). In that
document we proposed to approve the
State’s submittal in reference to
infrastructure requirements for CAA
section 110(a)(2)(B), element B: Ambient
air quality monitoring/data system. In
the proposal, we find that Utah’s SIP
and practices are adequate for the
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ambient air quality monitoring and data
system requirements and therefore
propose to approve the infrastructure
SIP for the 2008 Pb, 2010 SO2, 2010 NO2
and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for this
element.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA received six anonymous
comments on the proposal. After
reviewing the comments, the EPA has
determined that the comments are
outside the scope of our proposed action
or fail to identify any material issue
necessitating a response. All comments
received on this action are available for
review in the docket for this
rulemaking. This rule will be finalized
as proposed without revisions.
III. Final Action
We are approving infrastructure
element B for the 2008 Pb, 2010 SO2,
2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS from
the State’s certifications as shown in
Table 1.
TABLE 1—LIST OF UTAH INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENTS THAT THE EPA IS
APPROVING
Approval
Element
January 19, 2012 submittal—2008
Pb NAAQS ..................................
January 31, 2013 submittal—2010
NO2 NAAQS ...............................
June 2, 2013 submittal—2010 SO2
NAAQS ........................................
December 4, 2015 submittal—2012
PM2.5 NAAQS .............................
(B)
(B)
(B)
(B)
For the basis of our approval, please
refer to the July 23, 2018 proposal (83
FR 34816).
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, described in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47567
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 19,
2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations,
Greenhouse gases, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 14, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart TT—Utah
2. Section 52.2355 is amended by
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2355 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The Utah Department of
Environmental Quality submitted
certification of Utah’s infrastructure SIP
for the 2008 Pb NAAQS on January 19,
2012; 2010 NO2 NAAQS on January 31,
2013; 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 2,
2013; and 2012 PM2.5 on December 4,
2015. Utah’s infrastructure certifications
demonstrate how the State, where
applicable, has plans in place that meet
the requirements of section 110 for the
2008 Pb, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS. The State’s
Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Pb, 2010
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
47568
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
is approved with respect to 110(a)(2)(B).
[FR Doc. 2018–20448 Filed 9–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0061; FRL–9983–
83—Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Washington;
Interstate Transport Requirements for
the 2015 Ozone NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires each State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to contain adequate provisions
prohibiting emissions that will have
certain adverse air quality effects in
other states. On February 7, 2018, the
State of Washington made a submittal to
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to address these requirements for
the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). The EPA is
approving the submittal as meeting the
requirement that each SIP contain
adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will significantly
contribute to nonattainment or interfere
with maintenance of the 2015 ozone
NAAQS in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0061. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and is publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov, or
please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability
information.
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
Jeff
Hunt at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@
epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
I. Background Information
On July 23, 2018, the EPA proposed
to approve Washington as meeting the
requirement that each SIP contain
adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2015
ozone NAAQS in any other state (83 FR
34813). An explanation of the Clean Air
Act requirements, a detailed analysis of
the submittal, and the EPA’s reasons for
proposing approval were provided in
the notice of proposed rulemaking, and
will not be restated here. The public
comment period for the proposal ended
August 22, 2018.
II. Response to Comments
We received several anonymous
comments unrelated to Washington’s
submission. After reviewing the
anonymous comments, we have
determined that the comments are
outside the scope of our proposed action
and fail to identify any material issue
necessitating a response. For more
information, please see our
memorandum included in the docket for
this action.
III. Final Action
The EPA is approving Washington’s
February 7, 2018, submittal certifying
that the SIP is sufficient to meet the
interstate transport requirements of
Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C.
7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because actions such as SIP
approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land and is also
not approved to apply in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47566-47568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20448]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2018-0388-0001; FRL-9983-73--Region 8]
Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and
Promulgations: Infrastructure Monitoring Requirements for the 2008 Pb,
2010 SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards; Utah
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
elements of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions from the State of
Utah to demonstrate the State meets infrastructure monitoring
requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA) for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for lead (Pb) on October 15,
2008, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on January 22, 2010, sulfur
dioxide (SO2) on June 2, 2010, and fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) on December 14, 2012. The EPA is taking this action
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on October 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2018-0388-0001. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed
in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the For
Further Information Contact section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Gregory, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6175,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is discussed in detail in our July
23, 2018 proposal (83 FR 34816). In that document we proposed to
approve the State's submittal in reference to infrastructure
requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(B), element B: Ambient air
quality monitoring/data system. In the proposal, we find that Utah's
SIP and practices are adequate for the
[[Page 47567]]
ambient air quality monitoring and data system requirements and
therefore propose to approve the infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Pb,
2010 SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS for this element.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA received six anonymous comments on the proposal. After
reviewing the comments, the EPA has determined that the comments are
outside the scope of our proposed action or fail to identify any
material issue necessitating a response. All comments received on this
action are available for review in the docket for this rulemaking. This
rule will be finalized as proposed without revisions.
III. Final Action
We are approving infrastructure element B for the 2008 Pb, 2010
SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
from the State's certifications as shown in Table 1.
Table 1--List of Utah Infrastructure Elements That the EPA Is Approving
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approval Element
------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 submittal--2008 Pb NAAQS.................... (B)
January 31, 2013 submittal--2010 NO2 NAAQS................... (B)
June 2, 2013 submittal--2010 SO2 NAAQS....................... (B)
December 4, 2015 submittal--2012 PM2.5 NAAQS................. (B)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the basis of our approval, please refer to the July 23, 2018
proposal (83 FR 34816).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 19, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Greenhouse
gases, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 14, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart TT--Utah
0
2. Section 52.2355 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2355 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.
* * * * *
(d) The Utah Department of Environmental Quality submitted
certification of Utah's infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Pb NAAQS on
January 19, 2012; 2010 NO2 NAAQS on January 31, 2013; 2010
SO2 NAAQS on June 2, 2013; and 2012 PM2.5 on
December 4, 2015. Utah's infrastructure certifications demonstrate how
the State, where applicable, has plans in place that meet the
requirements of section 110 for the 2008 Pb, 2010 NO2, 2010
SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The State's
Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Pb, 2010
[[Page 47568]]
NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS is
approved with respect to 110(a)(2)(B).
[FR Doc. 2018-20448 Filed 9-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
