Adoption and Recirculation of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Wilton Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Casino Project, 46754-46755 [2018-20042]
Download as PDF
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
46754
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Notices
operation and surface exploration
activities for barite. The proposed action
would increase the disturbance to a total
of approximately 2,063 acres of public
and private land, including 896 acres of
previously approved or existing
disturbance and 1,167 acres of new land
disturbance. Of the 2,063 acres of
surface disturbance, approximately 209
acres consists of private land and the
remaining 1,854 acres are public land
administered by the BLM. The proposed
expansion would employ an estimated
433 people.
The proposed action includes the
expansion of the existing plan of
operations boundary, expansion of the
existing open pits, development of new
open pits, expansion of the existing
waste rock disposal facilities,
construction of new waste rock disposal
facilities, expansion or modification of
ancillary facilities, expansion and
development of new roads, re-alignment
of segments of the Boulder Valley Road
and Antelope-Boulder Connector Road,
installation of new power distribution
lines, the continuation of surface
exploration, and reclamation activities.
The proposed expansion is projected to
add eight years to the mine’s life. The
Project is located on the northern end of
the Carlin Trend in Elko County,
approximately 25 miles north of the
community of Dunphy and 28 aerial
miles northwest of the town of Carlin,
Nevada.
The Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS
was published in the Federal Register
on September 9, 2015 (80 FR 54319).
Scoping meetings, news release and
mailings were used to solicit comments
and identify key issues to be analyzed.
Tribal governments with interest in this
project were also contacted to discern
their issues and concerns, and to
conduct government-to-government
consultation. During the scoping period,
the BLM received 12 comment
submittals (e.g., letters, emails,
comment forms), resulting in a total of
131 comments and questions. Key
issues identified by individuals, groups,
and government entities include
potential impacts to sage-grouse and
wildlife, cultural resources and
traditional cultural properties, access,
noise, surface and ground water, air
quality, and support for the project. The
BLM is the lead Federal agency for this
EIS. Cooperating agencies include the
Nevada Department of Wildlife, the
Nevada Department of Conservation and
Natural Resources Sagebrush Ecosystem
Technical Team, the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service, the Elko County
Board of Commissioners, and the United
States Environmental Protection
Agency.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information- may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10.
Jill C. Silvey,
District Manager, Elko District Office.
[FR Doc. 2018–19940 Filed 9–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
Adoption and Recirculation of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Wilton Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and
Casino Project
National Indian Gaming
Commission, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of adoption and
recirculation of the final environmental
impact statement for the Wilton
Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Casino
Project.
AGENCY:
The National Indian Gaming
Commission (NIGC) is adopting the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA),
Department of the Interior, December
2016 Final Environmental Impact
Statement (the ‘‘BIA EIS’’) for the
Wilton Rancheria (Tribe) Fee-to-Trust
and Casino Project in Elk Grove,
California. The NIGC is adopting the
BIA EIS to satisfy the NIGC’s National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
obligations related to the Tribe’s request
for the NIGC Chairman’s approval of a
gaming management agreement between
the Tribe and BGM Co, Inc. (BGM).
DATES: The NIGC will execute a Record
of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30
days following publication by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
of its Notice of Availability of the BIA
EIS (EPA Notice) in the Federal
Register.
SUMMARY:
An electronic copy of the
BIA EIS, among other documents, is
available for download from https://
www.wiltoneis.com. Electronic copies
are also available on CD at the NIGC
Sacramento Region Office located at 801
I Street Suite 489, Sacramento, CA
95814.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Austin Badger, National Indian Gaming
Commission, Office of the General
Counsel; 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop
#1621, Washington, DC 20240. Phone:
202–632–7003. Facsimile: 202–632–
7066. Email: info@nigc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
described in the BIA EIS, the Tribe’s
casino resort project (2017 Approved
Project) includes management of the
gaming facility by a professional
management company on behalf of the
Tribe. The NIGC Chairman’s approval is
necessary for the management
agreement to take effect. The Tribe has
therefore requested that the NIGC
Chairman approve a management
agreement between the Tribe and BGM
which would allow BGM to manage the
Tribe’s gaming facility on the Tribe’s
trust property in Elk Grove, California
(Proposed Action).
The environmental effects of the 2017
Approved Project, including
management by a professional
management company, were fully
analyzed and chosen as the Preferred
Alternative in the BIA EIS and approved
in the BIA’s January 19, 2017 Record of
Decision (BIA ROD) for the acquisition
in trust by the United States of land in
the City of Elk Grove, California, for the
Tribe. The adequacy of the BIA EIS is
the subject of a judicial action which is
not final, Stand Up For California!, et
al., v. United States Department of
Interior, et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv00058 (D.D.C. filed Jan. 11, 2017).
Electronic copies of the BIA EIS and
BIA ROD, among other documents, are
available for download from https://
www.wiltoneis.com.
The BIA ROD included mitigation for
any significant environmental impacts
resulting from the 2017 Approved
Project by recommending that the Tribe
implement mitigation measures set out
in the Mitigation Monitoring and
Enforcement Plan (MMEP), which was
Attachment IV to the BIA ROD. The
NIGC was consulted during the
preparation of the BIA EIS but did not
serve as a cooperating agency in the
development of the BIA EIS.
Subsequent to the release of the BIA
EIS and BIA ROD, the Tribe made
several modifications to the casino
resort project (2018 Modified Project).
The NIGC therefore directed preparation
of a Supplemental Information Report
(SIR) to evaluate the 2018 Modified
Project and the adequacy of the BIA EIS
to address NIGC NEPA compliance
requirements in its consideration of the
Proposed Action. The SIR concluded
that the 2018 Modified Project does not
include any substantial changes to the
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Notices
2017 Approved Project relevant to
environmental concerns and that no
significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on the 2018
Modified Project and its impacts exist.
The SIR further concluded that the BIA
EIS appears adequate to meet the NIGC’s
NEPA compliance requirements and
that a supplemental environmental
impact statement is not required. An
electronic copy of the SIR is available
for download from https://
www.wiltoneis.com.
The Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing
NEPA strongly encourage agencies to
reduce paperwork and duplication, 40
CFR 1500.4. One of the methods
identified by CEQ to accomplish this
goal is through the adoption by one
agency of environmental documents
prepared by other agencies, 40 CFR
1500.4(n), 1500.5(h), and 1506.3. In
instances where the actions covered by
the original environmental impact
statement and the proposed action are
substantially the same, the agency
adopting another agency’s statement is
not required to recirculate it except as
a final statement, 40 CFR 1506.3(b).
The NIGC has conducted an
independent review of the BIA EIS, BIA
ROD, and SIR for the purpose of
determining whether the NIGC could
adopt the BIA EIS pursuant to 40 CFR
1506.3. First, the NIGC’s review
concluded that the actions encompassed
by the 2018 Modified Project are
substantially the same as the actions
documented as the 2017 Approved
Project in the BIA EIS and BIA ROD.
Second, the NIGC assessed whether a
supplemental environmental impact
statement is required. As supported by
the SIR, the NIGC concluded that there
are (1) no significant new circumstances
or information relevant to
environmental concerns or bearing on
the Proposed Action and (2) no
substantial changes to the Proposed
Action relevant to environmental
concerns. Thus, a supplemental
environmental impact statement is not
required. Third, the BIA EIS meets the
standards of the CEQ regulations, 40
CFR parts 1500–1508. Therefore, the
NIGC can adopt the BIA EIS and
recirculate it as a final statement.
In accordance with the Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) requirements
regarding the filing of environmental
impact statements, the NIGC has
provided EPA with electronic copies of
the BIA EIS. EPA will publish a notice
of availability of the BIA EIS in the
Federal Register consistent with its
usual practices. Because of the
multivolume size of the BIA EIS and its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
continued availability on https://
www.wiltoneis.com, the NIGC is not
republishing the document under a new
title. To do so would be costly, defeat
CEQ’s goals of reducing paperwork and
duplication of effort, and be of little or
no additional value to other agencies or
the public. The review period for the
adoption of the BIA EIS shall extend for
30 calendar days following publication
of the EPA Notice.
The final stage in the environmental
review process under NEPA is the
issuance of a ROD describing the
agency’s decision and the basis for it.
Under the timelines included in the
CEQ regulation, 40 CFR 1506.10, a ROD
cannot be issued by an agency earlier
than thirty days after EPA publishes its
Federal Register notice notifying the
public of the availability of the final EIS.
Any ROD issued by the NIGC will be
consistent with 40 CFR 1505.2.
Accordingly, the NIGC is adopting
and recirculating the BIA EIS and has
concluded that no supplemental or
additional environmental review is
required to support the Proposed
Action.
Authority: This notice is published in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 2711 and
Section 1506.3 of the Council of
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR parts 1500–1508) implementing the
procedural requirements of NEPA, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.).
Dated: September 11, 2018.
Christinia Thomas,
Chief of Staff (Acting).
46755
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The properties listed in this notice are
being considered for listing or related
actions in the National Register of
Historic Places. Nominations for their
consideration were received by the
National Park Service before September
1, 2018. Pursuant to Section 60.13 of 36
CFR part 60, written comments are
being accepted concerning the
significance of the nominated properties
under the National Register criteria for
evaluation.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Nominations submitted by State
Historic Preservation Officers:
MAINE
Androscoggin County
Lewiston Commercial Historic District, 1–39
Lisbon, 157–249 Main, 35 Ash & 103 Park
Sts., Lewiston, SG100003009
Kennebec County
Tiffany Chapel, 544 Tiffany Rd., Sidney,
SG100003010
[FR Doc. 2018–20042 Filed 9–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
Penobscot County
United Baptist Church, 53 Main Rd.,
Charleston, SG100003011
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WISCONSIN
National Park Service
Ozaukee County
[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–26421;
PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000]
J.M. ALLMENDINGER (Steambarge)
Shipwreck, (Great Lakes Shipwreck Sites
of Wisconsin MPS), 2.5 mi. SSE of
Concordia U. in L. Michigan, Mequon,
MP100003012
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Park Service is
soliciting comments on the significance
of properties nominated before
September 1, 2018, for listing or related
actions in the National Register of
Historic Places.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
by October 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via
U.S. Postal Service and all other carriers
to the National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St.
NW, MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part
60
Dated: September 4, 2018.
Julie H. Ernstein,
Acting Chief, National Register of Historic
Places/National Historic Landmarks Program
and Deputy Keeper of the National Register
of Historic Places.
[FR Doc. 2018–20006 Filed 9–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46754-46755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20042]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
Adoption and Recirculation of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Wilton Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Casino Project
AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of adoption and recirculation of the final environmental
impact statement for the Wilton Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Casino
Project.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) is adopting the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Department of the Interior, December
2016 Final Environmental Impact Statement (the ``BIA EIS'') for the
Wilton Rancheria (Tribe) Fee-to-Trust and Casino Project in Elk Grove,
California. The NIGC is adopting the BIA EIS to satisfy the NIGC's
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) obligations related to the
Tribe's request for the NIGC Chairman's approval of a gaming management
agreement between the Tribe and BGM Co, Inc. (BGM).
DATES: The NIGC will execute a Record of Decision (ROD) no sooner than
30 days following publication by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) of its Notice of Availability of the BIA EIS (EPA Notice) in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the BIA EIS, among other documents, is
available for download from https://www.wiltoneis.com. Electronic copies
are also available on CD at the NIGC Sacramento Region Office located
at 801 I Street Suite 489, Sacramento, CA 95814.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Austin Badger, National Indian Gaming
Commission, Office of the General Counsel; 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop
#1621, Washington, DC 20240. Phone: 202-632-7003. Facsimile: 202-632-
7066. Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As described in the BIA EIS, the Tribe's
casino resort project (2017 Approved Project) includes management of
the gaming facility by a professional management company on behalf of
the Tribe. The NIGC Chairman's approval is necessary for the management
agreement to take effect. The Tribe has therefore requested that the
NIGC Chairman approve a management agreement between the Tribe and BGM
which would allow BGM to manage the Tribe's gaming facility on the
Tribe's trust property in Elk Grove, California (Proposed Action).
The environmental effects of the 2017 Approved Project, including
management by a professional management company, were fully analyzed
and chosen as the Preferred Alternative in the BIA EIS and approved in
the BIA's January 19, 2017 Record of Decision (BIA ROD) for the
acquisition in trust by the United States of land in the City of Elk
Grove, California, for the Tribe. The adequacy of the BIA EIS is the
subject of a judicial action which is not final, Stand Up For
California!, et al., v. United States Department of Interior, et al.,
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00058 (D.D.C. filed Jan. 11, 2017). Electronic
copies of the BIA EIS and BIA ROD, among other documents, are available
for download from https://www.wiltoneis.com.
The BIA ROD included mitigation for any significant environmental
impacts resulting from the 2017 Approved Project by recommending that
the Tribe implement mitigation measures set out in the Mitigation
Monitoring and Enforcement Plan (MMEP), which was Attachment IV to the
BIA ROD. The NIGC was consulted during the preparation of the BIA EIS
but did not serve as a cooperating agency in the development of the BIA
EIS.
Subsequent to the release of the BIA EIS and BIA ROD, the Tribe
made several modifications to the casino resort project (2018 Modified
Project). The NIGC therefore directed preparation of a Supplemental
Information Report (SIR) to evaluate the 2018 Modified Project and the
adequacy of the BIA EIS to address NIGC NEPA compliance requirements in
its consideration of the Proposed Action. The SIR concluded that the
2018 Modified Project does not include any substantial changes to the
[[Page 46755]]
2017 Approved Project relevant to environmental concerns and that no
significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on the 2018 Modified Project and its impacts
exist. The SIR further concluded that the BIA EIS appears adequate to
meet the NIGC's NEPA compliance requirements and that a supplemental
environmental impact statement is not required. An electronic copy of
the SIR is available for download from https://www.wiltoneis.com.
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing
NEPA strongly encourage agencies to reduce paperwork and duplication,
40 CFR 1500.4. One of the methods identified by CEQ to accomplish this
goal is through the adoption by one agency of environmental documents
prepared by other agencies, 40 CFR 1500.4(n), 1500.5(h), and 1506.3. In
instances where the actions covered by the original environmental
impact statement and the proposed action are substantially the same,
the agency adopting another agency's statement is not required to
recirculate it except as a final statement, 40 CFR 1506.3(b).
The NIGC has conducted an independent review of the BIA EIS, BIA
ROD, and SIR for the purpose of determining whether the NIGC could
adopt the BIA EIS pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.3. First, the NIGC's review
concluded that the actions encompassed by the 2018 Modified Project are
substantially the same as the actions documented as the 2017 Approved
Project in the BIA EIS and BIA ROD. Second, the NIGC assessed whether a
supplemental environmental impact statement is required. As supported
by the SIR, the NIGC concluded that there are (1) no significant new
circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns or
bearing on the Proposed Action and (2) no substantial changes to the
Proposed Action relevant to environmental concerns. Thus, a
supplemental environmental impact statement is not required. Third, the
BIA EIS meets the standards of the CEQ regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500-
1508. Therefore, the NIGC can adopt the BIA EIS and recirculate it as a
final statement.
In accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
requirements regarding the filing of environmental impact statements,
the NIGC has provided EPA with electronic copies of the BIA EIS. EPA
will publish a notice of availability of the BIA EIS in the Federal
Register consistent with its usual practices. Because of the
multivolume size of the BIA EIS and its continued availability on
https://www.wiltoneis.com, the NIGC is not republishing the document
under a new title. To do so would be costly, defeat CEQ's goals of
reducing paperwork and duplication of effort, and be of little or no
additional value to other agencies or the public. The review period for
the adoption of the BIA EIS shall extend for 30 calendar days following
publication of the EPA Notice.
The final stage in the environmental review process under NEPA is
the issuance of a ROD describing the agency's decision and the basis
for it. Under the timelines included in the CEQ regulation, 40 CFR
1506.10, a ROD cannot be issued by an agency earlier than thirty days
after EPA publishes its Federal Register notice notifying the public of
the availability of the final EIS. Any ROD issued by the NIGC will be
consistent with 40 CFR 1505.2.
Accordingly, the NIGC is adopting and recirculating the BIA EIS and
has concluded that no supplemental or additional environmental review
is required to support the Proposed Action.
Authority: This notice is published in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
2711 and Section 1506.3 of the Council of Environmental Quality
Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) implementing the procedural
requirements of NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.).
Dated: September 11, 2018.
Christinia Thomas,
Chief of Staff (Acting).
[FR Doc. 2018-20042 Filed 9-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P