Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes, 46670-46676 [2018-19759]
Download as PDF
46670
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0790; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–078–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc., Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–14–
05, which applies to certain
Bombardier, Inc., Model CL–600–1A11
(600), CL–600–2A12 (601), and CL–600–
2B16 (601–3A, 601–3R, and 604
Variants) airplanes. AD 2010–14–05
requires inspection for the part numbers
of the system and brake accumulators,
and repetitive replacement of affected
accumulators. Since we issued AD
2010–14–05, we have determined that
new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations, as well as additional
actions, are necessary to address the
unsafe condition. In addition to the
requirements of AD 2010–14–05, this
proposed AD would require relocating
the accumulators and revising the
maintenance or inspection program to
incorporate new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations. This
proposed AD would also add optional
terminating action for certain airplanes.
We are proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 29, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Que´bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody
Customer Response Center North
America toll-free telephone 1–866–538–
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
1247 or direct-dial telephone 1–514–
855–2999; fax 514–855–7401; email
ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0790; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neil
Doh, Aerospace Engineer, Aviation
Safety Section AIR–7B1, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone 781–
238–7757.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2018–0790; Product Identifier 2018–
NM–078–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We issued AD 2010–14–05,
Amendment 39–16350 (75 FR 37994,
July 1, 2010) (‘‘AD 2010–14–05’’), for
certain Bombardier Model CL–600–
1A11 (600), CL–600–2A12 (601), CL–
600–2B16 (601–3A, 601–3R, and 604
Variants (including CL–605 Marketing
Variant)) airplanes. AD 2010–14–05
requires an inspection to determine the
part numbers of the system
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accumulators numbers 1, 2, and 3 and
brake accumulators numbers 2 and 3,
and repetitive replacement of the
accumulator. AD 2010–14–05 resulted
from reports of the on-ground failure of
the hydraulic accumulator screw cap or
end cap, resulting in loss of the
associated hydraulic system and highenergy impact damage to adjacent
systems and structure. We issued AD
2010–14–05 to address failure of one of
the brake accumulator screw caps/end
caps, resulting in impact damage
causing loss of both hydraulic systems
No. 2 and No. 3, with consequent loss
of both braking and nose wheel steering
and the potential for a runway
excursion.
Actions Since AD 2010–14–05 Was
Issued
Since we issued AD 2010–14–05, we
have determined that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations and
additional actions are necessary to
address the unsafe condition.
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian AD
CF–2009–39R1, issued October 13, 2017
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc.,
Model CL–600–1A11 (600), CL–600–
2A12 (601), and CL–600–2B16 (601–3A,
601–3R, and 604 Variants) airplanes.
The MCAI states:
Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic
accumulator screw cap or end cap failure
have been experienced on CL–600–2B19
(CRJ) aircraft, resulting in loss of the
associated hydraulic system and high-energy
impact damage to adjacent systems and
structure. The lowest number of flight cycles
accumulated at the time of failure, to date,
has been 6991 flight cycles.
Although there have been no failures to
date on any CL–600–1A11, CL–600–2A12 or
CL–600–2B16 aircraft, the same accumulators
as those installed on the CL–600–2B19, Part
Numbers (P/N) 08–60163–002 and 08–
60164–002 are installed on some of the
aircraft listed in the Applicability section of
this directive.
Notes:
1. Earlier accumulators, P/Ns 2770571–
102, 2770571–103, 2770571–104 and
2770571–105, were installed in production
on the following aircraft: CL–600–1A11 [all
Serial Numbers (S/Ns)], CL–600–2A12 (all S/
Ns) and CL–600–2B16 (S/Ns 5001 through
5194 and 5301 through 5524 only). These
accumulators do not require inspection or
replacement. However, if any of the
accumulators with the above P/Ns have been
replaced in-service by P/Ns 08–60163–002
and 08–60164–002, these latter accumulators
require replacement.
2. Prior to issuance of [Canadian] AD CF–
2009–39, the only accumulators ever
installed in production on CL–600–2B16
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
aircraft, S/Ns 5525 through 5665 and 5701
through 5908, are P/Ns 08–60163–002 and
08–60164–002; these accumulators require
replacement.
3. After issuance of [Canadian] AD CF–
2009–39 [which corresponded to FAA AD
2010–14–05, Amendment 39–16350 (75 FR
37994, July 1, 2010)], accumulators with P/
Ns specified in Note 2, above, began to
feature various S/N suffixes. Only
accumulators with S/N suffix ‘‘TNAE’’ do not
require replacement, but they are subject to
other mandatory actions detailed in this AD.
4. Stainless steel accumulators P/Ns
601R75139–3 (11094–4) and 601R75139–1
(11093–4) were installed in production on
CL–600–2B16 aircraft, S/Ns 5909 and
subsequent. These accumulators do not
require replacement, but they are subjected to
other mandatory actions detailed in this AD.
A detailed analysis of the systems and
structure in the potential line of trajectory of
a failed screw cap/end cap for each
accumulator, P/Ns 08–60163–002 and 08–
60164–002, has been conducted. On the
Challengers, it has been identified that the
worst case scenario would be a failure of
system No. 1, 2 or 3 accumulator screw caps/
end caps (depending on the model), resulting
in a potential uncontrolled fire in a nondesignated fire zone.
The original version of this [Canadian] AD
gave instructions to perform identification
and records checks, where applicable, and
replace accumulators, P/Ns 08–60163–002
and 08–60164–002 within the time
compliance specified.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is potential
impact damage that could cause loss of
both hydraulic systems No. 2 and No. 3,
and the consequent loss of both braking
and nose wheel steering, the potential
for a runway excursion, and damage to
the airplane. Required actions include
relocating certain accumulators. You
may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0790.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The following Bombardier service
information describes procedures for
replacing hydraulic system
accumulators with new, overhauled, or
refurbished accumulators. These
documents are distinct since they apply
to different airplane models.
• Service Bulletin 600–742, Revision 4,
dated June 11, 2015
• Service Bulletin 601–597, Revision 4,
dated June 11, 2015
• Service Bulletin 604–29–008,
Revision 4, dated June 11, 2015
• Service Bulletin 605–29–001,
Revision 4, dated June 10, 2015
The following Bombardier service
information describes procedures for
relocating hydraulic system
accumulators. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different
airplane models in different
configurations.
• Service Bulletin 600–0764, dated
October 8, 2015
• Service Bulletin 600–0767, dated
August 25, 2016
• Service Bulletin 601–0633, dated
October 8, 2015
• Service Bulletin 601–0637, dated
August 25, 2016
• Service Bulletin 604–29–013,
Revision 2, dated April 18, 2016
• Service Bulletin 605–29–006,
Revision 2, dated April 19, 2016
The following Bombardier Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks describe
certain systems life limits of the safe life
items. These documents are distinct
since they apply to different airplane
models in different configurations.
• Bombardier Challenger 600 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks, PSP 605,
Revision 39, dated January 8, 2018
• Bombardier Challenger 601 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks, PSP
601–5, Revision 46, dated January 8,
2018
• Bombardier Challenger 601 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks, PSP
601A–5, Revision 42, dated January 8,
2018
• Bombardier Challenger 604 CL–604
Time Limits/Maintenance Checks,
Revision 30, dated December 4, 2017
• Bombardier Challenger CL–605 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks, Revision
18, dated December 4, 2017
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
46671
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type designs.
This proposed AD would require
revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections). Compliance
with these actions is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired
in the areas addressed by this proposed
AD, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the actions described in the
revisions. In this situation, to comply
with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator
must request approval for an alternative
method of compliance according to
paragraph (n)(1) of this proposed AD.
The request should include a
description of changes to the required
inspections that will ensure the
continued operational safety of the
airplane.
Difference Between Proposed AD and
MCAI
Although the MCAI placed no
restrictions on special flight permits,
this proposed AD would limit ferry
flights by requiring an engineering
recommendation from Bombardier as
well as approval from the Flight
Standards District Office. This
difference has been coordinated with
TCCA.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 130 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Retained actions: 20 work-hours ×
$85 per hour = $,1,700.
New actions: Up to 170 work-hours ×
$85 per hour = Up to $14,450.
$7,717 ................................................
$9,417 ................................................
$1,224,210.
Up to $41,635 ....................................
Up to $56,085 ....................................
Up to $7,291,050.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Cost on U.S. operators
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
46672
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
For the new maintenance/inspection
program revision, we have determined
that this action takes an average of 90
work-hours per operator, although we
recognize that this number may vary
from operator to operator. In the past,
we have estimated that this action takes
1 work-hour per airplane. Since
operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their
affected fleet, we have determined that
a per-operator estimate is more accurate
than a per-airplane estimate. Therefore,
we estimate the total cost per operator
to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per
work-hour).
According to the manufacturer, some
or all of the costs of this proposed AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all known
costs in our cost estimate.
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska, and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes to the Director of the
System Oversight Division.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010–14–05, Amendment 39–16350 (75
FR 37994, July 1, 2010), and adding the
following new AD:
■
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2018–
0790; Product Identifier 2018–NM–078–
AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 29,
2018.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2010–14–05,
Amendment 39–16350 (75 FR 37994, July 1,
2010) (‘‘AD 2010–14–05’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Bombardier, Inc.,
airplanes, certificated in any category,
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(5)
of this AD.
(1) Model CL–600–1A11 (600) airplanes,
serial numbers 1004 through 1085 inclusive.
(2) Model CL–600–2A12 (601) airplanes,
serial numbers 3001 through 3066 inclusive.
(3) Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes (601–3A
Variant), serial numbers 5001 through 5134
inclusive.
(4) Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes (601–3R
Variant), serial numbers 5135 through 5194
inclusive.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(5) Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes (604
Variant), serial numbers 5301 through 5665
inclusive and 5701 and subsequent.
Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD: Certain
Model CL–600–2B16 (604 Variant) airplanes
might be referred to by the marketing
designation CL–605.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 29, Hydraulic power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of onground hydraulic accumulator screw cap or
end cap failure that resulted in the loss of the
associated hydraulic system and high-energy
impact damage to adjacent systems and
structure. We are issuing this AD to address
failure of one of the brake accumulator screw
caps/end caps, which could result in impact
damage causing loss of both hydraulic
systems No. 2 and No. 3, and the consequent
loss of both braking and nose wheel steering,
the potential for a runway excursion, and
damage to the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Part Number Inspection and
Accumulator Replacement, With Revised
Formatting, Service Information, and
Affected Part Numbers
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2010–14–05, with
revised formatting, service information, and
affected part numbers. Do the following
actions as applicable.
(1) Within 50 flight hours after August 5,
2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–14–05),
inspect to determine the part numbers of the
system accumulators numbers 1, 2, and 3,
and brake accumulators numbers 2 and 3 that
are installed on the airplane. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of this inspection if the part number of
each accumulator can be conclusively
determined from that review. If all of the
installed accumulators have part number
(P/N) 2770571–102, 2770571–103, 2770571–
104, 2770571–105, 601R75139–3 (11094–4),
or 601R75139–1 (11093–4), no further action
is required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(1)
of this AD: At the applicable time in
paragraph (g)(2)(i), (g)(2)(ii), or (g)(2)(iii) of
this AD, replace the accumulator with a new,
overhauled, or refurbished accumulator with
the same part number, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin listed in figure 1
to paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD.
(i) For each accumulator having P/Ns 08–
60163–002 (601R75138–1), and 08–60164–
002 (601R75138–3), as applicable, that has
accumulated more than 3,650 total flight
cycles as of August 5, 2010 (the effective date
of AD 2010–14–05): Replace the accumulator
within 100 flight cycles after August 5, 2010.
(ii) For each accumulator having P/N 08–
60163–002 (601R75138–1), and 08–60164–
002 (601R75138–3), as applicable, that has
accumulated 3,650 total flight cycles or fewer
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
as of August 5, 2010: Replace the
accumulator before the accumulation of
3,750 total flight cycles on the accumulator.
(iii) For each accumulator having P/N 08–
60163–002 (601R75138–1), and 08–60164–
002 (601R75138–3), as applicable, for which
it is not possible to determine the number of
flight cycles accumulated: Replace the
accumulator within 100 flight cycles after
August 5, 2010.
(3) Thereafter, before the accumulation of
3,750 total flight cycles on any accumulator
having P/Ns 08–60163–002 (601R75138–1),
and 08–60164–002 (601R75138–3), as
applicable, replace the accumulator with a
new, overhauled, or refurbished accumulator
having the same part number, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin listed in figure 1
to paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD.
accumulators as required by this paragraph
does not terminate any repetitive
replacement required by paragraph (g)(2) or
(g)(3) of this AD.
(1) For Model CL–600–1A11 (600)
airplanes, S/Ns 1004 through 1085 inclusive:
Relocate accumulators as specified in
paragraphs (i)(1)(i) and (i)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Relocate hydraulic system Nos. 1 and 2
accumulators, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601–0764, dated October 8,
2015.
(ii) Relocate hydraulic system No. 3
accumulator, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 600–0767, dated August 25,
2016.
(2) For Model CL–600–2A12 (601)
airplanes, S/Ns 3001 through 3066 inclusive,
and Model CL–600–2B16 (601–3A and 601–
3R Variants) airplanes, S/Ns 5001 through
5194 inclusive: Relocate accumulators as
specified in paragraphs (i)(2)(i) and (i)(2)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Relocate hydraulic system Nos. 1 and 2
accumulators, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601–0633, dated October 8,
2015.
(ii) Relocate hydraulic system No. 3
accumulator, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601–0637, dated August 25,
2016.
(3) For Model CL–600–2B16 (604 Variant)
airplanes, S/Ns 5301 through 5665 inclusive:
Relocate hydraulic system No. 3
accumulator, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 604–29–013, Revision 2,
dated April 18, 2016.
(4) For Model CL–600–2B16 (605)
airplanes, S/Ns 5701 and subsequent (i.e.,
Model CL–600–2B16 (604 Variant), referred
to by the marketing designation CL–605):
Relocate hydraulic system No. 3
accumulator, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 605–29–006, Revision 2,
dated April 19, 2016.
(i) New Requirement of This AD: Relocation
of Accumulators
Within 60 months or 2,400 flight cycles,
whichever occurs first after the effective date
of this AD, relocate the hydraulic system
accumulators as specified in paragraphs (i)(1)
through (i)(4) of this AD, as applicable.
Relocation of the hydraulic system
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(j) New Requirement of This AD: Revision of
Maintenance/Inspection Program
Within 50 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the tasks specified in figure 2 to
paragraph (j) of this AD.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
EP14SE18.000
(h) New Provision of This AD: Terminating
Action for Certain Accumulators
For each accumulator with one of the
following part number and serial number
(S/N) suffixes, the repetitive replacement
specified in paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of
this AD is not required.
(1) P/N 08–60163–002 with S/N suffix TNAE
(2) P/N 08–601–002 with S/N suffix TNAE
(3) P/N 601R75139–3 (11094–4)
(4) P/N 601R75139–1 (11093–4)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
46673
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(k) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (j) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (n)(1) of
this AD.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) Replacement of an accumulator with a
new accumulator having the same part
number is also acceptable for compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with the requirements of paragraphs (g)(2)
and (g)(3) of this AD, if done before August
5, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–14–
05), in accordance with the applicable
service bulletin listed in figure 3 to paragraph
(l)(1) of this AD. This service information is
not incorporated by reference in this AD.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
EP14SE18.001
46674
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
and (g)(3) of this AD, if done before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
the applicable service bulletin listed in figure
4 to paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. This service
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information is not incorporated by reference
in this AD.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
EP14SE18.002
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(2) Replacement of an accumulator with a
new accumulator having the same part
number is also acceptable for compliance
with the requirements of paragraphs (g)(2)
46675
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(3) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraph (i)(3) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD, in accordance
with Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–29–
013, dated April 30, 2015; or Bombardier
Service Bulletin 604–29–013, Revision 1,
dated October 19, 2015. This service
information is not incorporated by reference
in this AD.
(4) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraph (i)(4) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD, in accordance
with Bombardier Service Bulletin 605–29–
006, dated April 30, 2015; or Bombardier
Service Bulletin 605–29–006, Revision 1,
dated October 19, 2015. This service
information is not incorporated by reference
in this AD.
(m) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to
a location where the airplane can be
modified, provided the following conditions
are met:
(1) An engineering recommendation must
be obtained via the Bombardier process
Service Request for Product Support Action
(SRPSA) at SRPSA@aerobombardier.com.
(2) Approval of the special flight permit
must be obtained from the Flight Standards
District Office.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Sep 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(ii) AMOC 15–76R1 and AMOC 15–53,
approved previously for AD 2010–14–05, are
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or Bombardier’s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by
the DAO, the approval must include the
DAO-authorized signature.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Neil Doh, Aerospace Engineer,
Aviation Safety Section AIR–7B1, Boston
ACO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone 781–238–
7757.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que´bec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; Widebody Customer Response
Center North America toll-free telephone 1–
866–538–1247 or direct-dial telephone 1–
514–855–2999; fax 514–855–7401; email
ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
August 24, 2018.
James Cashdollar,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–19759 Filed 9–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
AD CF–2009–39R1, dated October 13, 2017,
for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0790.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
EP14SE18.003
46676
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46670-46676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19759]
[[Page 46670]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0790; Product Identifier 2018-NM-078-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010-14-
05, which applies to certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-1A11 (600),
CL-600-2A12 (601), and CL-600-2B16 (601-3A, 601-3R, and 604 Variants)
airplanes. AD 2010-14-05 requires inspection for the part numbers of
the system and brake accumulators, and repetitive replacement of
affected accumulators. Since we issued AD 2010-14-05, we have
determined that new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
well as additional actions, are necessary to address the unsafe
condition. In addition to the requirements of AD 2010-14-05, this
proposed AD would require relocating the accumulators and revising the
maintenance or inspection program to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations. This proposed AD would also add
optional terminating action for certain airplanes. We are proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 29,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North America toll-
free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial telephone 1-514-855-2999;
fax 514-855-7401; email [email protected]; internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0790; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neil Doh, Aerospace Engineer, Aviation
Safety Section AIR-7B1, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone 781-238-7757.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0790;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-078-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We issued AD 2010-14-05, Amendment 39-16350 (75 FR 37994, July 1,
2010) (``AD 2010-14-05''), for certain Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11
(600), CL-600-2A12 (601), CL-600-2B16 (601-3A, 601-3R, and 604 Variants
(including CL-605 Marketing Variant)) airplanes. AD 2010-14-05 requires
an inspection to determine the part numbers of the system accumulators
numbers 1, 2, and 3 and brake accumulators numbers 2 and 3, and
repetitive replacement of the accumulator. AD 2010-14-05 resulted from
reports of the on-ground failure of the hydraulic accumulator screw cap
or end cap, resulting in loss of the associated hydraulic system and
high-energy impact damage to adjacent systems and structure. We issued
AD 2010-14-05 to address failure of one of the brake accumulator screw
caps/end caps, resulting in impact damage causing loss of both
hydraulic systems No. 2 and No. 3, with consequent loss of both braking
and nose wheel steering and the potential for a runway excursion.
Actions Since AD 2010-14-05 Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2010-14-05, we have determined that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations and additional actions are
necessary to address the unsafe condition.
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2009-39R1, issued
October 13, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-1A11 (600), CL-
600-2A12 (601), and CL-600-2B16 (601-3A, 601-3R, and 604 Variants)
airplanes. The MCAI states:
Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic accumulator screw cap or end
cap failure have been experienced on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft,
resulting in loss of the associated hydraulic system and high-energy
impact damage to adjacent systems and structure. The lowest number
of flight cycles accumulated at the time of failure, to date, has
been 6991 flight cycles.
Although there have been no failures to date on any CL-600-1A11,
CL-600-2A12 or CL-600-2B16 aircraft, the same accumulators as those
installed on the CL-600-2B19, Part Numbers (P/N) 08-60163-002 and
08-60164-002 are installed on some of the aircraft listed in the
Applicability section of this directive.
Notes:
1. Earlier accumulators, P/Ns 2770571-102, 2770571-103, 2770571-
104 and 2770571-105, were installed in production on the following
aircraft: CL-600-1A11 [all Serial Numbers (S/Ns)], CL-600-2A12 (all
S/Ns) and CL-600-2B16 (S/Ns 5001 through 5194 and 5301 through 5524
only). These accumulators do not require inspection or replacement.
However, if any of the accumulators with the above P/Ns have been
replaced in-service by P/Ns 08-60163-002 and 08-60164-002, these
latter accumulators require replacement.
2. Prior to issuance of [Canadian] AD CF-2009-39, the only
accumulators ever installed in production on CL-600-2B16
[[Page 46671]]
aircraft, S/Ns 5525 through 5665 and 5701 through 5908, are P/Ns 08-
60163-002 and 08-60164-002; these accumulators require replacement.
3. After issuance of [Canadian] AD CF-2009-39 [which
corresponded to FAA AD 2010-14-05, Amendment 39-16350 (75 FR 37994,
July 1, 2010)], accumulators with P/Ns specified in Note 2, above,
began to feature various S/N suffixes. Only accumulators with S/N
suffix ``TNAE'' do not require replacement, but they are subject to
other mandatory actions detailed in this AD.
4. Stainless steel accumulators P/Ns 601R75139-3 (11094-4) and
601R75139-1 (11093-4) were installed in production on CL-600-2B16
aircraft, S/Ns 5909 and subsequent. These accumulators do not
require replacement, but they are subjected to other mandatory
actions detailed in this AD.
A detailed analysis of the systems and structure in the
potential line of trajectory of a failed screw cap/end cap for each
accumulator, P/Ns 08-60163-002 and 08-60164-002, has been conducted.
On the Challengers, it has been identified that the worst case
scenario would be a failure of system No. 1, 2 or 3 accumulator
screw caps/end caps (depending on the model), resulting in a
potential uncontrolled fire in a non-designated fire zone.
The original version of this [Canadian] AD gave instructions to
perform identification and records checks, where applicable, and
replace accumulators, P/Ns 08-60163-002 and 08-60164-002 within the
time compliance specified.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is potential impact damage that could cause
loss of both hydraulic systems No. 2 and No. 3, and the consequent loss
of both braking and nose wheel steering, the potential for a runway
excursion, and damage to the airplane. Required actions include
relocating certain accumulators. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0790.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The following Bombardier service information describes procedures
for replacing hydraulic system accumulators with new, overhauled, or
refurbished accumulators. These documents are distinct since they apply
to different airplane models.
Service Bulletin 600-742, Revision 4, dated June 11, 2015
Service Bulletin 601-597, Revision 4, dated June 11, 2015
Service Bulletin 604-29-008, Revision 4, dated June 11, 2015
Service Bulletin 605-29-001, Revision 4, dated June 10, 2015
The following Bombardier service information describes procedures
for relocating hydraulic system accumulators. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models in different
configurations.
Service Bulletin 600-0764, dated October 8, 2015
Service Bulletin 600-0767, dated August 25, 2016
Service Bulletin 601-0633, dated October 8, 2015
Service Bulletin 601-0637, dated August 25, 2016
Service Bulletin 604-29-013, Revision 2, dated April 18, 2016
Service Bulletin 605-29-006, Revision 2, dated April 19, 2016
The following Bombardier Time Limits/Maintenance Checks describe
certain systems life limits of the safe life items. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models in different
configurations.
Bombardier Challenger 600 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks, PSP
605, Revision 39, dated January 8, 2018
Bombardier Challenger 601 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks, PSP
601-5, Revision 46, dated January 8, 2018
Bombardier Challenger 601 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks, PSP
601A-5, Revision 42, dated January 8, 2018
Bombardier Challenger 604 CL-604 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks, Revision 30, dated December 4, 2017
Bombardier Challenger CL-605 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks,
Revision 18, dated December 4, 2017
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type designs.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(n)(1) of this proposed AD. The request should include a description of
changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued
operational safety of the airplane.
Difference Between Proposed AD and MCAI
Although the MCAI placed no restrictions on special flight permits,
this proposed AD would limit ferry flights by requiring an engineering
recommendation from Bombardier as well as approval from the Flight
Standards District Office. This difference has been coordinated with
TCCA.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 130 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained actions: 20 work-hours x $7,717.............. $9,417............. $1,224,210.
$85 per hour = $,1,700.
New actions: Up to 170 work-hours Up to $41,635....... Up to $56,085...... Up to $7,291,050.
x $85 per hour = Up to $14,450.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46672]]
For the new maintenance/inspection program revision, we have
determined that this action takes an average of 90 work-hours per
operator, although we recognize that this number may vary from operator
to operator. In the past, we have estimated that this action takes 1
work-hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their affected fleet, we have determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate. Therefore, we estimate the total cost per operator to be
$7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we have included all known costs in
our cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010-14-05, Amendment 39-16350 (75 FR 37994, July 1, 2010), and adding
the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2018-0790; Product Identifier 2018-
NM-078-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 29, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2010-14-05, Amendment 39-16350 (75 FR 37994,
July 1, 2010) (``AD 2010-14-05'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Bombardier, Inc., airplanes, certificated
in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(5) of
this AD.
(1) Model CL-600-1A11 (600) airplanes, serial numbers 1004
through 1085 inclusive.
(2) Model CL-600-2A12 (601) airplanes, serial numbers 3001
through 3066 inclusive.
(3) Model CL-600-2B16 airplanes (601-3A Variant), serial numbers
5001 through 5134 inclusive.
(4) Model CL-600-2B16 airplanes (601-3R Variant), serial numbers
5135 through 5194 inclusive.
(5) Model CL-600-2B16 airplanes (604 Variant), serial numbers
5301 through 5665 inclusive and 5701 and subsequent.
Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD: Certain Model CL-600-2B16
(604 Variant) airplanes might be referred to by the marketing
designation CL-605.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29, Hydraulic
power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of on-ground hydraulic
accumulator screw cap or end cap failure that resulted in the loss
of the associated hydraulic system and high-energy impact damage to
adjacent systems and structure. We are issuing this AD to address
failure of one of the brake accumulator screw caps/end caps, which
could result in impact damage causing loss of both hydraulic systems
No. 2 and No. 3, and the consequent loss of both braking and nose
wheel steering, the potential for a runway excursion, and damage to
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Part Number Inspection and Accumulator Replacement, With
Revised Formatting, Service Information, and Affected Part Numbers
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2010-14-05, with revised formatting, service information, and
affected part numbers. Do the following actions as applicable.
(1) Within 50 flight hours after August 5, 2010 (the effective
date of AD 2010-14-05), inspect to determine the part numbers of the
system accumulators numbers 1, 2, and 3, and brake accumulators
numbers 2 and 3 that are installed on the airplane. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the part number of each accumulator can be
conclusively determined from that review. If all of the installed
accumulators have part number (P/N) 2770571-102, 2770571-103,
2770571-104, 2770571-105, 601R75139-3 (11094-4), or 601R75139-1
(11093-4), no further action is required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD: At the
applicable time in paragraph (g)(2)(i), (g)(2)(ii), or (g)(2)(iii)
of this AD, replace the accumulator with a new, overhauled, or
refurbished accumulator with the same part number, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service
bulletin listed in figure 1 to paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this
AD.
(i) For each accumulator having P/Ns 08-60163-002 (601R75138-1),
and 08-60164-002 (601R75138-3), as applicable, that has accumulated
more than 3,650 total flight cycles as of August 5, 2010 (the
effective date of AD 2010-14-05): Replace the accumulator within 100
flight cycles after August 5, 2010.
(ii) For each accumulator having P/N 08-60163-002 (601R75138-1),
and 08-60164-002 (601R75138-3), as applicable, that has accumulated
3,650 total flight cycles or fewer
[[Page 46673]]
as of August 5, 2010: Replace the accumulator before the
accumulation of 3,750 total flight cycles on the accumulator.
(iii) For each accumulator having P/N 08-60163-002 (601R75138-
1), and 08-60164-002 (601R75138-3), as applicable, for which it is
not possible to determine the number of flight cycles accumulated:
Replace the accumulator within 100 flight cycles after August 5,
2010.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14SE18.000
(3) Thereafter, before the accumulation of 3,750 total flight
cycles on any accumulator having P/Ns 08-60163-002 (601R75138-1),
and 08-60164-002 (601R75138-3), as applicable, replace the
accumulator with a new, overhauled, or refurbished accumulator
having the same part number, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin listed in figure 1
to paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD.
(h) New Provision of This AD: Terminating Action for Certain
Accumulators
For each accumulator with one of the following part number and
serial number (S/N) suffixes, the repetitive replacement specified
in paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD is not required.
(1) P/N 08-60163-002 with S/N suffix TNAE
(2) P/N 08-601-002 with S/N suffix TNAE
(3) P/N 601R75139-3 (11094-4)
(4) P/N 601R75139-1 (11093-4)
(i) New Requirement of This AD: Relocation of Accumulators
Within 60 months or 2,400 flight cycles, whichever occurs first
after the effective date of this AD, relocate the hydraulic system
accumulators as specified in paragraphs (i)(1) through (i)(4) of
this AD, as applicable. Relocation of the hydraulic system
accumulators as required by this paragraph does not terminate any
repetitive replacement required by paragraph (g)(2) or (g)(3) of
this AD.
(1) For Model CL-600-1A11 (600) airplanes, S/Ns 1004 through
1085 inclusive: Relocate accumulators as specified in paragraphs
(i)(1)(i) and (i)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Relocate hydraulic system Nos. 1 and 2 accumulators, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601-0764, dated October 8, 2015.
(ii) Relocate hydraulic system No. 3 accumulator, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
600-0767, dated August 25, 2016.
(2) For Model CL-600-2A12 (601) airplanes, S/Ns 3001 through
3066 inclusive, and Model CL-600-2B16 (601-3A and 601-3R Variants)
airplanes, S/Ns 5001 through 5194 inclusive: Relocate accumulators
as specified in paragraphs (i)(2)(i) and (i)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Relocate hydraulic system Nos. 1 and 2 accumulators, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601-0633, dated October 8, 2015.
(ii) Relocate hydraulic system No. 3 accumulator, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
601-0637, dated August 25, 2016.
(3) For Model CL-600-2B16 (604 Variant) airplanes, S/Ns 5301
through 5665 inclusive: Relocate hydraulic system No. 3 accumulator,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 604-29-013, Revision 2, dated April 18, 2016.
(4) For Model CL-600-2B16 (605) airplanes, S/Ns 5701 and
subsequent (i.e., Model CL-600-2B16 (604 Variant), referred to by
the marketing designation CL-605): Relocate hydraulic system No. 3
accumulator, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 605-29-006, Revision 2, dated April 19,
2016.
(j) New Requirement of This AD: Revision of Maintenance/Inspection
Program
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
revise the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the tasks specified in figure 2 to paragraph (j) of this
AD.
[[Page 46674]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14SE18.001
(k) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (j) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (n)(1) of
this AD.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) Replacement of an accumulator with a new accumulator having
the same part number is also acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD, if done
before August 5, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010-14-05), in
accordance with the applicable service bulletin listed in figure 3
to paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. This service information is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
[[Page 46675]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14SE18.002
(2) Replacement of an accumulator with a new accumulator having
the same part number is also acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD, if done
before the effective date of this AD in accordance with the
applicable service bulletin listed in figure 4 to paragraph (l)(2)
of this AD. This service information is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
[[Page 46676]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14SE18.003
(3) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (i)(3) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD, in accordance with Bombardier Service
Bulletin 604-29-013, dated April 30, 2015; or Bombardier Service
Bulletin 604-29-013, Revision 1, dated October 19, 2015. This
service information is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(4) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (i)(4) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD, in accordance with Bombardier Service
Bulletin 605-29-006, dated April 30, 2015; or Bombardier Service
Bulletin 605-29-006, Revision 1, dated October 19, 2015. This
service information is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(m) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections
21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the airplane
can be modified, provided the following conditions are met:
(1) An engineering recommendation must be obtained via the
Bombardier process Service Request for Product Support Action
(SRPSA) at [email protected].
(2) Approval of the special flight permit must be obtained from
the Flight Standards District Office.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(ii) AMOC 15-76R1 and AMOC 15-53, approved previously for AD
2010-14-05, are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions
of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier's TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by
the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2009-39R1, dated October 13, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0790.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Neil Doh,
Aerospace Engineer, Aviation Safety Section AIR-7B1, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone
781-238-7757.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial
telephone 1-514-855-2999; fax 514-855-7401; email
[email protected]; internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on August 24, 2018.
James Cashdollar,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19759 Filed 9-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P