Weld Residual Stress Finite Element Analysis Validation, 46524-46525 [2018-19941]
Download as PDF
46524
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Notices
Place: National Science Foundation,
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314.
Type of Meeting: Part—Open.
Contact Person: Cassandra Dudka,
PIRE Program Manager, National
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314;
Telephone 703/292–7250.
Purpose of Meeting: NSF reverse site
visit to conduct a review during year 3
of the five-year award period. To
conduct an in-depth evaluation of
performance, to assess progress towards
goals, and to provide recommendations.
Agenda: See attached.
Reason for Closing: Topics to be
discussed and evaluated during closed
portions of the reverse site review will
include information of a proprietary or
confidential nature, including technical
information; and information on
personnel. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: September 7, 2018.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
Partnerships for International Research
and Education (PIRE) Reverse Site Visit
Agenda PIRE–1545684 (PI: Barbara
Schneider)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
NSF Room C3080
Friday, October 12, 2018
8:00 a.m. Panelists arrive. Coffee/light
refreshments available
8:15 a.m.–8:45 a.m. Panel Orientation
(CLOSED), PIRE Rationale and
Goals, Charge to Panel
8:45 a.m. PIs arrive. Introductions
(OPEN)
9:00 a.m.–11:30 a.m. PIRE Project
Presentation should cover the
following: (OPEN)
Research
Integrating Research & Education
Students (e.g. involvement in project,
recruitment, diversity)
Project Management and
Communication
Evaluation & Assessment
Institutional Support
International Partnerships
11:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Questions and
Answers
12:30 p.m.–2:00 p.m. Working Lunch—
Panel Discussion (CLOSED)
2:00 p.m.–2:30 p.m. Initial Feedback to
Project Team (CLOSED)
2:30 p.m. PIRE PI and presenters are
dismissed
2:30 p.m.–4:30 p.m. Panel meets for
Reverse Site Visit Report
Preparation (CLOSED)
4:30 p.m.–4:45 p.m. Report presented to
and discussion held with NSF staff
(CLOSED)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
5:00 p.m. End of Reverse Site Visit
[FR Doc. 2018–19891 Filed 9–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2018–0168]
Weld Residual Stress Finite Element
Analysis Validation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is requesting public
comment on a draft NUREG entitled,
‘‘Weld Residual Stress Finite Element
Analysis Validation: Part II—
Acceptance and Guidelines.’’ This
report proposes a methodology by
which analysts can increase confidence
in modeling capabilities for regulatory
applications involving weld residual
stress calculation. Specifically, the NRC
staff posed four questions for
consideration by the public (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
DATES: Submit comments by November
13, 2018. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the Commission is able to
ensure consideration only for comments
received before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0168. Address
questions about NRC dockets in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office
of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Benson, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research, telephone: 301–
415–2425, email: michael.benson@
nrc.gov; or Patrick Raynaud, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research, telephone:
301–415–1987, email: patrick.raynaud@
nrc.gov. Both are staff of the U.S.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–
0168 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0168.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The draft NUREG on ‘‘Weld
Residual Stress Validation’’ is available
in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML18242A007.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2018–
0168 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
Between 2008–2015, the Electric
Power Research Institute and the NRC
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
conducted a joint research program on
weld residual stress (WRS) modeling
under a memorandum of understanding.
This research program consisted of
several modeling and measurement
studies on prototypic mockups to
represent the residual stress state in
safety-related nuclear components
susceptible to primary water stress
corrosion cracking, see NUREG–2162
(ADAMS Accession No. ML14087A118).
Since then, the NRC has made use of the
data gained in that research program to
formulate a potential validation scheme
for finite element modeling of WRS. The
NRC’s proposal is documented in a draft
NUREG entitled, ‘‘Weld Residual Stress
Finite Element Analysis Validation: Part
II–Proposed Validation Procedure’’
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18242A007).
The NRC is requesting public comment
on this document. Specifically, the NRC
would like feedback on four specific
technical issues related to the proposed
validation procedure:
1. The NRC recommended the use of
the average hardening approach in the
current version of the draft NUREG
(‘‘average hardening’’ meaning the
arithmetic mean of isotropic and
nonlinear kinematic results). Given the
discussion in Section 5.2, please
comment on the advantages and
disadvantages of using either the
averaging approach or isotropic
hardening. What initial and recurring
costs are foreseen in implementing
either approach in future analyses?
2. The NRC introduced four options
for benchmark in Section 5.4.2. The
NRC chose to develop the validation
scheme with a benchmark based upon
the modeling results, rather than the
measurements. Please comment on the
NRC’s proposal and whether the
justification is adequate.
3. Please comment on the proposed
quality metrics introduced in Section
5.4.7. Are these metrics appropriate for
their intended purpose? Has the NRC
presented an appropriate technical
justification (see Sections 5.4.8 and
5.4.10) for the proposed metrics?
4. Please comment on the feasibility
of the proposed validation scheme.
What initial (e.g., software and guidance
development) and recurring (i.e., costs
for each analysis) costs are foreseen for
implementing the validation scheme?
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of September, 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Raj Iyengar,
Chief, Component Integrity Branch, Division
of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory
Research.
[FR Doc. 2018–19941 Filed 9–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 72–1050; NRC–2016–0231]
46525
at: https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spentfuel-storage/cis/waste-controlspecialist.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Interim Storage Partners LLC’s
Consolidated Interim Spent Fuel
Storage Facility; Correction
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental impact
statement; reopening of scoping
comment period; correction.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice
that was published in the Federal
Register (FR) on September 4, 2018,
reopening the scoping comment period
for the NRC’s Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Interim Storage
Partners LLC (ISP) proposed
consolidated interim storage facility for
spent nuclear fuel, to be located on the
Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS)
site in Andrews County, Texas.
DATES: The correction is effective
September 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2016–0231 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0231. Address
questions about dockets in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual(s)
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. Documents related to WCS’
license application can be found under
Docket Number 72–1050.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• Project web page: Information
related to the ISP CISF project can be
accessed on the NRC’s project web page
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
James Park, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–6954;
email: James.Park@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the FR
on September 4, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018–
18067, on page 44923, in column one,
under the second paragraph, last line in
Section II, ‘‘Discussion,’’ correct the
date from ‘‘October 19, 2018’’ to
‘‘September 4, 2018.’’ The scoping
comment period due date was
inadvertently added.
The NRC has decided to reopen the
EIS public scoping comment period on
the application until October 19, 2018,
to allow more time for members of the
public to submit their comments.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, on
September 7, 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian W. Smith,
Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
Safeguards, and Environmental Review,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2018–19928 Filed 9–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2018–301]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: September
17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46524-46525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19941]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC-2018-0168]
Weld Residual Stress Finite Element Analysis Validation
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting
public comment on a draft NUREG entitled, ``Weld Residual Stress Finite
Element Analysis Validation: Part II--Acceptance and Guidelines.'' This
report proposes a methodology by which analysts can increase confidence
in modeling capabilities for regulatory applications involving weld
residual stress calculation. Specifically, the NRC staff posed four
questions for consideration by the public (see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES: Submit comments by November 13, 2018. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the
Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received
before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0168. Address
questions about NRC dockets in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
Mail comments to: May Ma, Office of Administration, Mail
Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Benson, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research, telephone: 301-415-2425, email:
[email protected]; or Patrick Raynaud, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research, telephone: 301-415-1987, email:
[email protected]. Both are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0168 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0168.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The draft NUREG on ``Weld Residual
Stress Validation'' is available in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML18242A007.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2018-0168 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
Between 2008-2015, the Electric Power Research Institute and the
NRC
[[Page 46525]]
conducted a joint research program on weld residual stress (WRS)
modeling under a memorandum of understanding. This research program
consisted of several modeling and measurement studies on prototypic
mockups to represent the residual stress state in safety-related
nuclear components susceptible to primary water stress corrosion
cracking, see NUREG-2162 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14087A118). Since then,
the NRC has made use of the data gained in that research program to
formulate a potential validation scheme for finite element modeling of
WRS. The NRC's proposal is documented in a draft NUREG entitled, ``Weld
Residual Stress Finite Element Analysis Validation: Part II-Proposed
Validation Procedure'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML18242A007). The NRC is
requesting public comment on this document. Specifically, the NRC would
like feedback on four specific technical issues related to the proposed
validation procedure:
1. The NRC recommended the use of the average hardening approach in
the current version of the draft NUREG (``average hardening'' meaning
the arithmetic mean of isotropic and nonlinear kinematic results).
Given the discussion in Section 5.2, please comment on the advantages
and disadvantages of using either the averaging approach or isotropic
hardening. What initial and recurring costs are foreseen in
implementing either approach in future analyses?
2. The NRC introduced four options for benchmark in Section 5.4.2.
The NRC chose to develop the validation scheme with a benchmark based
upon the modeling results, rather than the measurements. Please comment
on the NRC's proposal and whether the justification is adequate.
3. Please comment on the proposed quality metrics introduced in
Section 5.4.7. Are these metrics appropriate for their intended
purpose? Has the NRC presented an appropriate technical justification
(see Sections 5.4.8 and 5.4.10) for the proposed metrics?
4. Please comment on the feasibility of the proposed validation
scheme. What initial (e.g., software and guidance development) and
recurring (i.e., costs for each analysis) costs are foreseen for
implementing the validation scheme?
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of September, 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Raj Iyengar,
Chief, Component Integrity Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2018-19941 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P