Medical Device Submissions: Amending Premarket Regulations That Require Multiple Copies and Specify Paper Copies To Be Allowed in Electronic Format, 46444-46449 [2018-19865]
Download as PDF
46444
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 807, 812, and 814
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–0628]
RIN 0910–AH48
Medical Device Submissions:
Amending Premarket Regulations That
Require Multiple Copies and Specify
Paper Copies To Be Allowed in
Electronic Format
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
proposing to amend requirements for
medical device premarket submissions
to remove paper and multiple copies
and replace them with requirements for
a single submission in electronic format.
If finalized, this action would reduce
the number of copies in electronic
format required, thus improving and
making more efficient the FDA’s
premarket submission program for
medical devices. This action is part of
FDA’s implementation of Executive
Orders (EOs) 13771 and 13777. Under
these EOs, FDA is comprehensively
reviewing existing regulations to
identify opportunities for repeal,
replacement, or modification that will
result in meaningful burden reduction
while allowing the Agency to achieve
our public health mission and fulfill
statutory obligations.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on this proposed rule
by December 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before December 12,
2018. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of December 12, 2018.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2018–N–0628 for ‘‘Medical Device
Submissions: Amending Premarket
Regulations that Require Multiple
Copies and Specify Paper Copies to be
Allowed in Electronic Format.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Garcia, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5424, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 301–796–6559, email:
Diane.Garcia@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Legal Authority
IV. Description of the Proposed Rule
V. Proposed Effective Date
VI. Economic Analysis of Impacts
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
IX. Federalism
X. Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments
XI. References
I. Executive Summary
This proposed rule would amend
regulations on medical device
premarket submissions to remove
requirements for paper and multiple
copies and replace them with
requirements for a single submission in
electronic format to improve the FDA’s
premarket submission program for
medical devices and to create a more
efficient submission program. Because a
medical device premarket submission in
electronic format is easily reproducible,
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
and the requirement for multiple copies,
whether in electronic format or paper
form, is no longer necessary, FDA
believes it is beneficial to the public to
limit any burden and expense to
submitters caused by requiring
additional copies.
II. Background
On February 24, 2017, E.O. 13777,
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda’’ (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
pkg/FR-2017-03-01/pdf/2017-04107.pdf,
82 FR 12285 (March 1, 2017)) was
issued. One of the provisions in the E.O.
requires Agencies to evaluate existing
regulations and make recommendations
to the Agency head regarding their
repeal, replacement, or modification,
consistent with applicable law. As part
of this initiative, FDA is updating
regulations as specified in this proposed
rule.
FDA’s current medical device
regulations that require multiple copies
and paper submissions predate the
authority provided to FDA in the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) to require electronic
submissions (see 21 CFR parts 807, 812,
and 814 and section 745A of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 379k–1)).
The FD&C Act was amended by the
Food and Drug Administration Safety
and Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L.
112–144) (see section 745A(b) of the
FD&C Act and section 1136 of FDASIA).
The amendments in FDASIA provided
that after FDA issued guidance on the
submission of electronic copies
(eCopies), the submission of eCopies
will be required for presubmissions and
submissions and any supplements to
these presubmissions and submissions
for medical devices. (For sections
requiring submission, see sections
510(k), 513(f)(2)(A), 515(c), (d) and (f),
520(g) and (m), or 564 of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360(k), 360c(f)(2)(A), 360e(c),
(d) and (f), 360j(g) and (m), and 360bbb–
3 or section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262).) Congress
granted explicit statutory authorization
to FDA to implement eCopy
requirements by providing through
guidance the standards and criteria for
waivers and exemptions (section
745(b)(1) and (2) of the FD&C Act).
On January 2, 2013, FDA published
the guidance entitled ‘‘eCopy Program
for Medical Device Submissions’’
(eCopy guidance). The issuance of the
eCopy guidance marked the beginning
of the eCopy program. The 2013
guidance was superseded by an updated
guidance of the same title issued on
December 3, 2015. The eCopy guidance
recommends that one paper copy
should be submitted, and that any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
additional copies required under the
regulations be submitted as eCopies.
While the eCopy guidance does not
change the overall number of copies
required for any submission, the
guidance states that eCopies should be
provided in lieu of some of the paper
copies. The guidance also outlines other
requirements for eCopies. The eCopy
guidance provides instructions for the
processing and technical standards for
eCopies based on FDA’s experience
with the program (Ref. 1).
In 2017, the FD&C Act was amended
by the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017
(FDARA) (Pub. L. 115–52) (see section
745A(b) of the FD&C Act and section
207 of FDARA). The amended
provisions in the FD&C Act require
presubmissions and submissions, any
supplements to such presubmissions or
submissions for devices, and any
appeals of action taken with respect to
such presubmissions or submissions,
including devices under the Public
Health Service Act to be submitted
solely in electronic format as specified
by FDA in guidance (section 745A(b)(3)
of the FD&C Act).
III. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this proposed rule
from the same authority under which
FDA initially issued these regulations:
21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 355,
360, 360h–360j, 360c–360j, 371, 372,
373, 374, 375, 379, 379e, 381, 382, 393;
42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 262, 263b–263n,
264, 271. In addition, section 745A of
the FD&C Act and section 207 of
FDARA provide FDA authority with
respect to electronic format for
submissions and any appeals, and
section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 371(a)) grants FDA general
rulemaking authority to issue
regulations for the efficient enforcement
of the FD&C Act.
IV. Description of the Proposed Rule
We are proposing to revise FDA’s
regulations for devices to remove the
requirements for multiple copies of
submissions and to instead require one
electronic version. The affected
submissions include premarket
notification submissions (510(k)
submissions) (21 CFR 807.90), including
confidentiality of information
certification (21 CFR 807.95);
investigational device exemption
applications (21 CFR 812.20); premarket
approval applications (PMA) (21 CFR
814.20), including PMA supplements
(21 CFR 814.39); and humanitarian
device exemption applications (21 CFR
814.104). This proposed rule also affects
submissions for Center for Biologics
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46445
Evaluation and Research (CBER)
regulated devices.
Another amendment that the
proposed rule will make, if finalized, is
to the sections of the regulations that
identify FDA’s mailing addresses for
submissions. Current regulations
include specific mailing addresses for
submissions. If a mailing address needs
to be updated, this necessitates an
amendment to the regulations to update
that address. A simpler and more
efficient means of providing current
mailing addresses is to create a website
that can list current mailing addresses.
Any changes to mailing addresses can
be added to the website without the
need for an amendment to the
regulations. This proposed rule will
amend the regulations to remove the
mailing addresses for submissions and
replace those addresses with a website
address for the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health (CDRH) and CBER.
The submission of an eCopy is
separate and distinct from FDA’s
electronic submission programs
(eSubmitter), which include the
Electronic Submission Gateway (ESG)
and CDRH’s 510(k) eSubmissions Pilot
Program (79 FR 24732, May 1, 2014).
Nevertheless, FDA considers both to be
submissions in electronic format. While
eCopy provides for submissions to be in
electronic format, the eCopy
submissions must still be mailed to
FDA. By contrast, eSubmitter allows for
electronic submissions to be transmitted
over the internet. FDA has been moving
toward transforming all regulatory
submissions from mailed copies to
electronic means via the internet. Since
January 1999, FDA has accepted
voluntary electronic submissions
through eSubmitter. FDA presently
utilizes the ESG for the receipt and
processing of many types of electronic
regulatory submissions (Ref. 2). FDA
considers eCopies, submissions copied
to a CD, DVD, or flash drive and mailed
to FDA, and eSubmissions, to be
submissions in electronic format.
These changes are intended to
improve the efficiency of the review
process by allowing immediate
availability of an electronic version for
review, rather than relying solely on the
paper version. Because a submission in
electronic format is easily reproducible,
the requirement for multiple copies
(whether in electronic format or paper
form) is no longer necessary.
Furthermore, FDA believes it is
beneficial to the public to limit any
burdens and expenses to submitters
caused by requiring additional copies.
FDA is proposing to amend current
medical device regulations that require
multiple copies and paper submissions
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
46446
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(21 CFR parts 807, 812, and 814). FDA
is taking this action because the
requirement for multiple copies
(whether in electronic format or paper
form) listed in the regulation is no
longer necessary, and it is beneficial to
the public to limit any burden and
expense to submitters caused by
requiring additional copies.
V. Proposed Effective Date
FDA is proposing that any final rule
based on this proposal become effective
30 days after the date of publication of
a final rule in the Federal Register.
VI. Economic Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under E.O. 12866, E.O.
13563, E.O. 13771, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). E.O.s 12866 and
13563 direct us to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). E.O. 13771
requires that the costs associated with
significant new regulations ‘‘shall, to the
extent permitted by law, be offset by the
elimination of existing costs associated
with at least two prior regulations.’’ We
believe that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by E.O. 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires us to analyze regulatory options
that would minimize any significant
impact of a rule on small entities.
Because the proposed rule amends the
existing premarket regulations requiring
multiple copies and paper submissions
to electronic format submissions
without imposing any new
requirements, we propose to certify that
the proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandate’s Reform Act
of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires us to
prepare a written statement, which
includes an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits, before proposing
‘‘any rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year.’’ The current threshold after
adjustment for inflation is $150 million,
using the most current (2017) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic
Product. This proposed rule would not
result in an expenditure in any year that
meets or exceeds this amount.
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to amend device regulations requiring
that firms submit a specific number of
copies with a premarket presubmission
or submission to a single submission in
electronic form. The proposed rule also
amends all device regulations
containing references to submission
media (i.e., paper copies) to a
submission in electronic form. The
amendment will produce cost savings
for firms without imposing any
additional regulatory burdens for
submissions. Firms will incur minimal
administrative costs to read and
understand the rule. We expect the
economic impact of this regulation to be
a total net costs savings yielding
positive net benefits.
We have developed a comprehensive
Preliminary Economic Analysis of
Impacts that assesses the impacts of the
proposed rule. The full analysis of
economic impacts is available in the
docket for this proposed rule (Ref. 3)
and at https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
ReportsManualsForms/Reports/
EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.
Summary of Costs and Benefits
The proposed rule, if finalized, would
amend device regulations requiring the
number of copies firms must submit
with a premarket presubmission or
submission. The proposed rule would
also amend all device regulations
containing a reference to the specific
form of a submission to require an
electronic submission. The amendment
would produce cost savings for firms
without imposing any additional
regulatory burdens for submissions or
affecting the Agency’s ability to review
submissions. Firms would incur
minimal administrative costs to read
and understand the rule. We expect the
economic impact of this regulation to be
a total net costs savings yielding
positive net benefits.
Table 1 summarizes the benefits,
costs, and distributional effects of the
proposed rule. We find that the
proposed rule would result in
annualized net benefits in the form of
cost savings of around $2.80 million
with a 3 percent discount rate and $2.71
million with a 7 percent discount rate.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF BENEFITS, COSTS, AND DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED RULE
Units
Category
Primary
estimate
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Benefits:
Annualized ...........
Monetized
$millions/year.
Annualized ...........
Quantified .............
Qualitative ............
Costs:
Annualized ...........
Monetized
$millions/year.
Annualized ...........
Quantified .............
Qualitative ............
Transfers:
Federal
Annualized.
Monetized
$millions/year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Low estimate
High estimate
Year dollars
Discount rate
Period
covered
$3.37
$1.31
$5.47
2016
7%
10 years
$3.37
$1.31
$5.47
2016
3%
10 years
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
7%
3%
........................
........................
........................
........................
$0.67
$0.57
$0.67
$0.57
$0.67
$0.57
2016
2016
7%
3%
10 years
10 years
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
7%
3%
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
7%
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
3%
........................
18:19 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
Notes
Benefits are
cost savings.
Benefits are
cost savings.
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
46447
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF BENEFITS, COSTS, AND DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED RULE—Continued
Units
Category
Primary
estimate
Low estimate
High estimate
Year dollars
Period
covered
Discount rate
From/To ................
From:
Other Annualized
........................
........................
........................
........................
7%
........................
Monetized
$millions/year.
From/To ................
........................
........................
........................
........................
3%
........................
Notes
To:
From:
To:
Table 2 summarizes the E.O. 13771
impacts of the proposed rule. Over an
infinite time horizon, the present value
of the total net costs would range from
$40.01 million to $182.94 million at a 3
percent discount rate and from $15.04
million to $78.67 million at a 7 percent
discount rate. Over an infinite time
horizon, the total annualized net costs
would range from $1.17 million to $5.33
million at a 3 percent discount rate, and
range from $0.98 million to $5.15
million at a 7 percent discount rate.
This proposed rule, if finalized, is
considered an Executive Order 13771
deregulatory action.
TABLE 2—SUMMARY OF THE EXECUTIVE ORDER 13771 IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED RULE OVER AN INFINITE TIME
HORIZON
[2016 $ millions]
Primary
estimate
(3%)
Present Value of Costs ............................
Present Value of Cost Savings ................
Present Value of Net Costs .....................
Annualized Costs .....................................
Annualized Cost Savings .........................
Annualized Net Costs ..............................
Lower bound
(3%)
$5.01
115.79
(110.78)
0.15
3.37
(3.23)
Upper bound
(3%)
$5.01
45.02
(40.01)
0.15
1.31
(1.17)
$5.01
187.95
(182.94)
0.15
5.47
(5.33)
Primary
estimate
(7%)
Lower bound
(7%)
$5.01
51.55
(46.54)
0.33
3.37
(3.04)
$5.01
20.04
(15.04)
0.33
1.31
(0.98)
Upper bound
(7%)
$5.01
83.68
(78.67)
0.33
5.47
(5.15)
Note: Values in parentheses denote net negative costs (i.e. cost-savings).
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.30(h) and 25.34(a) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this
proposed rule contains no collection of
information subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Rather, it proposes to remove
requirements to submit multiple paper
copies of certain medical device
presubmissions and submissions and to
replace them with one copy in an
electronic format.
IX. Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in E.O. 13132. We have
determined that this proposed rule does
not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
conclude that the rule does not contain
policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the E.O. and,
consequently, a federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
X. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in E.O. 13175. We have
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that would have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
The Agency solicits comments from
tribal officials on any potential impact
on Indian Tribes from this proposed
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
XI. References
The following references are on
display at Dockets Management Staff
(see ADDRESSES) and are available for
viewing by interested persons between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday; they are also available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the website addresses, as of the date this
document publishes in the Federal
Register, but websites are subject to
change over time.
1. ‘‘eCopy Program for Medical Device
Submissions; Guidance for Industry and
Food and Drug Administration Staff’’
available at: https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/UCM313794.pdf.
2. Electronic Submission Gateway procedure
for electronic regulatory submission is
available at: https://www.fda.gov/
ForIndustry/ElectronicSubmissions
Gateway/default.htm.
3. Preliminary economic impacts analysis for
this proposed rule available at: https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
ReportsManualsForms/Reports/
EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
46448
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 807
Confidential business information,
Imports, Medical devices, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 812
Health records, Medical devices,
Medical research, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 814
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Medical devices, Medical
research, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under the
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR parts 807,
812, and 814 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 807—ESTABLISHMENT
REGISTRATION AND DEVICE LISTING
FOR MANUFACTURERS AND INITIAL
IMPORTERS OF DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 807
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
360, 360c, 360e, 360i, 360j, 371, 374, 379k–
1, 381, 393; 42 U.S.C. 264, 271.
2. In § 807.90, revise paragraph (a),
remove and reserve paragraph (b), and
revise paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 807.90 Format of a premarket notification
submission.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(a)(1) For devices regulated by the
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, be addressed to the current
address displayed on the website
https://www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmission
address.
(2) For devices regulated by the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, be addressed to the current
address displayed on the website
https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProducts
andTobacco/CBER/ucm385240.htm; or
for devices regulated by the Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, be
addressed to the Central Document
Room, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 5901–B Ammendale
Rd., Beltsville, MD 20705–1266.
Information about devices regulated by
the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research is available at https://
www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/
BloodBloodProducts/
ApprovedProducts/default.htm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
(3) All inquiries regarding a premarket
notification submission should be sent
the address in this section or one of the
current addresses displayed on the Food
and Drug Administration’s website.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Be submitted as a single version in
electronic format.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 807.95 by revising
paragraph (b)(1) introductory text to
read as follows:
§ 807.95
Confidentiality of information.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The person submitting the
premarket notification submission
requests in the submission that the Food
and Drug Administration hold as
confidential commercial information the
intent to market the device and submits
a certification to the Commissioner:
*
*
*
*
*
PART 812—INVESTIGATIONAL
DEVICE EXEMPTIONS
4. The authority citation for part 812
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331, 351, 352, 353,
355, 360, 360c–360f, 360h–360j, 371, 372,
374, 379e, 379k–1, 381, 382, 383; 42 U.S.C.
216, 241, 262, 263b–263n.
5. Amend § 812.19 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 812.19 Addresses for IDE
correspondence.
(a) * * *
(1) For devices regulated by the
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, send it to the current address
displayed on the website https://
www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, send it to the current address
displayed on the website https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/
OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/
CBER/ucm385240.htm.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 812.20 by revising
paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
§ 812.20
Application.
(a) * * *
(3) A sponsor shall submit a signed
‘‘Application for an Investigational
Device Exemption’’ (IDE application),
together with accompanying materials
in electronic format, to one of the
addresses in § 812.19, and if eCopy by
registered mail or by hand. Subsequent
correspondence concerning an
application or a supplemental
application shall be submitted in
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
electronic format and if eCopy by
registered mail or by hand.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 814—PREMARKET APPROVAL
OF MEDICAL DEVICES
7. The authority citation for part 814
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 353, 360,
360bbb–8b, 360c–360j, 371, 372, 373, 374,
375, 379, 379e, 379k–1, 381.
8. Amend § 814.20 by:
a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory
text and paragraph (b)(2);
■ b. Removing the phrase ‘‘of the act’’
and adding in its place ‘‘of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act’’ in
paragraphs (b)(5) introductory text,
(b)(5)(i), and (b)(10);
■ c. Revising paragraph (c);
■ d. Revising paragraph (e) introductory
text; and
■ e. Revising paragraphs (f) and (h)(1)
and (2).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 814.20
Application.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Unless the applicant justifies an
omission in accordance with paragraph
(d) of this section, a PMA shall include
in electronic format:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) A table of contents that specifies
the volume and page number for each
item referred to in the table. A PMA
shall include separate sections on
nonclinical laboratory studies and on
clinical investigations involving human
subjects. A PMA shall be submitted as
a single version. The applicant shall
include information that it believes to
be trade secret or confidential
commercial or financial information in
the PMA and identify the information
that it believes to be trade secret or
confidential commercial or financial
information.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Pertinent information in FDA files
specifically referred to by an applicant
may be incorporated into a PMA by
reference. Information in a master file or
other information submitted to FDA by
a person other than the applicant will
not be considered part of a PMA unless
such reference is authorized in a record
submitted to FDA by the person who
submitted the information or the master
file. If a master file is not referenced
within 5 years after the date that it is
submitted to FDA, FDA will return the
master file to the person who submitted
it.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The applicant shall periodically
update its pending application with
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 178 / Thursday, September 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
new safety and effectiveness
information learned about the device
from ongoing or completed studies that
may reasonably affect an evaluation of
the safety or effectiveness of the device
or that may reasonably affect the
statement of contraindications,
warnings, precautions, and adverse
reactions in the draft labeling. The
update report shall be consistent with
the data reporting provisions of the
protocol. The applicant shall submit any
update report in electronic format and
shall include in the report the number
assigned by FDA to the PMA. These
updates are considered to be
amendments to the PMA. The time
frame for review of a PMA will not be
extended due to the submission of an
update report unless the update is a
major amendment under § 814.37(c)(1).
The applicant shall submit these
reports—
*
*
*
*
*
(f) If a color additive subject to section
721 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act is used in or on the device
and has not previously been listed for
such use, then, in lieu of submitting a
color additive petition under part 71 of
this chapter, at the option of the
applicant, the information required to
be submitted under part 71 may be
submitted as part of the PMA. When
submitted as part of the PMA, the
information shall be submitted in
electronic format. A PMA for a device
that contains a color additive that is
subject to section 721 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act will not
be approved until the color additive is
listed for use in or on the device.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) For devices regulated by the
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, send it to the current address
displayed on the website https://
www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, send it to the current address
displayed on the website https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/
OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/
CBER/ucm385240.htm.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 814.39 by revising
paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
§ 814.39
§ 814.20(b)(3) is required for only a
supplement submitted for new
indications for use of the device,
significant changes in the performance
or design specifications, circuits,
components, ingredients, principles of
operation, or physical layout of the
device, or when otherwise required by
FDA. The applicant shall submit a PMA
supplement in electronic format and
shall include information relevant to the
proposed changes in the device. A PMA
supplement shall include a separate
section that identifies each change for
which approval is being requested and
explains the reason for each such
change. The applicant shall submit
additional information, if requested by
FDA, in electronic format. The time
frames for review of, and FDA action on,
a PMA supplement are the same as
those provided in § 814.40 for a PMA.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Amend § 814.104 by revising
paragraphs (d) introductory text and
(d)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
§ 814.104
Original applications.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Address for submissions and
correspondence. All original HDEs,
amendments and supplements, as well
as any correspondence relating to an
HDE, must be provided in electronic
format. These materials must be sent or
delivered to one of the following:
(1) For devices regulated by the
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, send it to the current address
found on the website https://
www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, send it to the current address
displayed on the website https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/
OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/
CBER/ucm385240.htm.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 7, 2018.
Scott Gottlieb,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
PMA supplements.
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) All procedures and actions that
apply to an application under § 814.20
also apply to PMA supplements except
that the information required in a
supplement is limited to that needed to
support the change. A summary under
18:19 Sep 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0713]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy
Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
reduce the size of the Navy Pier
Southeast Safety Zone within the
Chicago Harbor. This action is necessary
to alleviate congestion near the Chicago
Lock during regularly scheduled
fireworks events. The current safety
zone encompasses part of the lock
restricting vessels during events. This
proposed rulemaking would still
prohibit persons and vessels from
entering the safety zone, but would
allow the lock to remain in full
operation during the fireworks display.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before October 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0713 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LT John Ramos, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety
Unit Chicago, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (630) 986–2155, email D09DG-MSUChicago-Waterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
I. Table of Abbreviations
[FR Doc. 2018–19865 Filed 9–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
46449
The Coast Guard regularly enforces
the Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy
Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL listed in 33
CFR 165.931 for weekly fireworks
events during the boating season. The
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46444-46449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19865]
[[Page 46444]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 807, 812, and 814
[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0628]
RIN 0910-AH48
Medical Device Submissions: Amending Premarket Regulations That
Require Multiple Copies and Specify Paper Copies To Be Allowed in
Electronic Format
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
proposing to amend requirements for medical device premarket
submissions to remove paper and multiple copies and replace them with
requirements for a single submission in electronic format. If
finalized, this action would reduce the number of copies in electronic
format required, thus improving and making more efficient the FDA's
premarket submission program for medical devices. This action is part
of FDA's implementation of Executive Orders (EOs) 13771 and 13777.
Under these EOs, FDA is comprehensively reviewing existing regulations
to identify opportunities for repeal, replacement, or modification that
will result in meaningful burden reduction while allowing the Agency to
achieve our public health mission and fulfill statutory obligations.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on this proposed
rule by December 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before December 12, 2018. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
midnight Eastern Time at the end of December 12, 2018. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-N-0628 for ``Medical Device Submissions: Amending Premarket
Regulations that Require Multiple Copies and Specify Paper Copies to be
Allowed in Electronic Format.'' Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except
for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Garcia, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5424, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6559, email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Legal Authority
IV. Description of the Proposed Rule
V. Proposed Effective Date
VI. Economic Analysis of Impacts
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
IX. Federalism
X. Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments
XI. References
I. Executive Summary
This proposed rule would amend regulations on medical device
premarket submissions to remove requirements for paper and multiple
copies and replace them with requirements for a single submission in
electronic format to improve the FDA's premarket submission program for
medical devices and to create a more efficient submission program.
Because a medical device premarket submission in electronic format is
easily reproducible,
[[Page 46445]]
and the requirement for multiple copies, whether in electronic format
or paper form, is no longer necessary, FDA believes it is beneficial to
the public to limit any burden and expense to submitters caused by
requiring additional copies.
II. Background
On February 24, 2017, E.O. 13777, ``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda'' (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-03-01/pdf/2017-04107.pdf, 82 FR 12285 (March 1, 2017)) was issued. One of the
provisions in the E.O. requires Agencies to evaluate existing
regulations and make recommendations to the Agency head regarding their
repeal, replacement, or modification, consistent with applicable law.
As part of this initiative, FDA is updating regulations as specified in
this proposed rule.
FDA's current medical device regulations that require multiple
copies and paper submissions predate the authority provided to FDA in
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to require
electronic submissions (see 21 CFR parts 807, 812, and 814 and section
745A of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379k-1)).
The FD&C Act was amended by the Food and Drug Administration Safety
and Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112-144) (see section 745A(b) of
the FD&C Act and section 1136 of FDASIA). The amendments in FDASIA
provided that after FDA issued guidance on the submission of electronic
copies (eCopies), the submission of eCopies will be required for
presubmissions and submissions and any supplements to these
presubmissions and submissions for medical devices. (For sections
requiring submission, see sections 510(k), 513(f)(2)(A), 515(c), (d)
and (f), 520(g) and (m), or 564 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k),
360c(f)(2)(A), 360e(c), (d) and (f), 360j(g) and (m), and 360bbb-3 or
section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262).) Congress
granted explicit statutory authorization to FDA to implement eCopy
requirements by providing through guidance the standards and criteria
for waivers and exemptions (section 745(b)(1) and (2) of the FD&C Act).
On January 2, 2013, FDA published the guidance entitled ``eCopy
Program for Medical Device Submissions'' (eCopy guidance). The issuance
of the eCopy guidance marked the beginning of the eCopy program. The
2013 guidance was superseded by an updated guidance of the same title
issued on December 3, 2015. The eCopy guidance recommends that one
paper copy should be submitted, and that any additional copies required
under the regulations be submitted as eCopies. While the eCopy guidance
does not change the overall number of copies required for any
submission, the guidance states that eCopies should be provided in lieu
of some of the paper copies. The guidance also outlines other
requirements for eCopies. The eCopy guidance provides instructions for
the processing and technical standards for eCopies based on FDA's
experience with the program (Ref. 1).
In 2017, the FD&C Act was amended by the FDA Reauthorization Act of
2017 (FDARA) (Pub. L. 115-52) (see section 745A(b) of the FD&C Act and
section 207 of FDARA). The amended provisions in the FD&C Act require
presubmissions and submissions, any supplements to such presubmissions
or submissions for devices, and any appeals of action taken with
respect to such presubmissions or submissions, including devices under
the Public Health Service Act to be submitted solely in electronic
format as specified by FDA in guidance (section 745A(b)(3) of the FD&C
Act).
III. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this proposed rule from the same authority under
which FDA initially issued these regulations: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351,
352, 353, 355, 360, 360h-360j, 360c-360j, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 379,
379e, 381, 382, 393; 42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 262, 263b-263n, 264, 271. In
addition, section 745A of the FD&C Act and section 207 of FDARA provide
FDA authority with respect to electronic format for submissions and any
appeals, and section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)) grants
FDA general rulemaking authority to issue regulations for the efficient
enforcement of the FD&C Act.
IV. Description of the Proposed Rule
We are proposing to revise FDA's regulations for devices to remove
the requirements for multiple copies of submissions and to instead
require one electronic version. The affected submissions include
premarket notification submissions (510(k) submissions) (21 CFR
807.90), including confidentiality of information certification (21 CFR
807.95); investigational device exemption applications (21 CFR 812.20);
premarket approval applications (PMA) (21 CFR 814.20), including PMA
supplements (21 CFR 814.39); and humanitarian device exemption
applications (21 CFR 814.104). This proposed rule also affects
submissions for Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)
regulated devices.
Another amendment that the proposed rule will make, if finalized,
is to the sections of the regulations that identify FDA's mailing
addresses for submissions. Current regulations include specific mailing
addresses for submissions. If a mailing address needs to be updated,
this necessitates an amendment to the regulations to update that
address. A simpler and more efficient means of providing current
mailing addresses is to create a website that can list current mailing
addresses. Any changes to mailing addresses can be added to the website
without the need for an amendment to the regulations. This proposed
rule will amend the regulations to remove the mailing addresses for
submissions and replace those addresses with a website address for the
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and CBER.
The submission of an eCopy is separate and distinct from FDA's
electronic submission programs (eSubmitter), which include the
Electronic Submission Gateway (ESG) and CDRH's 510(k) eSubmissions
Pilot Program (79 FR 24732, May 1, 2014). Nevertheless, FDA considers
both to be submissions in electronic format. While eCopy provides for
submissions to be in electronic format, the eCopy submissions must
still be mailed to FDA. By contrast, eSubmitter allows for electronic
submissions to be transmitted over the internet. FDA has been moving
toward transforming all regulatory submissions from mailed copies to
electronic means via the internet. Since January 1999, FDA has accepted
voluntary electronic submissions through eSubmitter. FDA presently
utilizes the ESG for the receipt and processing of many types of
electronic regulatory submissions (Ref. 2). FDA considers eCopies,
submissions copied to a CD, DVD, or flash drive and mailed to FDA, and
eSubmissions, to be submissions in electronic format.
These changes are intended to improve the efficiency of the review
process by allowing immediate availability of an electronic version for
review, rather than relying solely on the paper version. Because a
submission in electronic format is easily reproducible, the requirement
for multiple copies (whether in electronic format or paper form) is no
longer necessary. Furthermore, FDA believes it is beneficial to the
public to limit any burdens and expenses to submitters caused by
requiring additional copies.
FDA is proposing to amend current medical device regulations that
require multiple copies and paper submissions
[[Page 46446]]
(21 CFR parts 807, 812, and 814). FDA is taking this action because the
requirement for multiple copies (whether in electronic format or paper
form) listed in the regulation is no longer necessary, and it is
beneficial to the public to limit any burden and expense to submitters
caused by requiring additional copies.
V. Proposed Effective Date
FDA is proposing that any final rule based on this proposal become
effective 30 days after the date of publication of a final rule in the
Federal Register.
VI. Economic Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the proposed rule under E.O. 12866,
E.O. 13563, E.O. 13771, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct us to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). E.O. 13771 requires that
the costs associated with significant new regulations ``shall, to the
extent permitted by law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs
associated with at least two prior regulations.'' We believe that this
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by E.O.
12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because the proposed rule amends the existing premarket
regulations requiring multiple copies and paper submissions to
electronic format submissions without imposing any new requirements, we
propose to certify that the proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandate's Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires
us to prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $150 million, using the most current (2017) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. This proposed rule would
not result in an expenditure in any year that meets or exceeds this
amount.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to amend device regulations
requiring that firms submit a specific number of copies with a
premarket presubmission or submission to a single submission in
electronic form. The proposed rule also amends all device regulations
containing references to submission media (i.e., paper copies) to a
submission in electronic form. The amendment will produce cost savings
for firms without imposing any additional regulatory burdens for
submissions. Firms will incur minimal administrative costs to read and
understand the rule. We expect the economic impact of this regulation
to be a total net costs savings yielding positive net benefits.
We have developed a comprehensive Preliminary Economic Analysis of
Impacts that assesses the impacts of the proposed rule. The full
analysis of economic impacts is available in the docket for this
proposed rule (Ref. 3) and at https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.
Summary of Costs and Benefits
The proposed rule, if finalized, would amend device regulations
requiring the number of copies firms must submit with a premarket
presubmission or submission. The proposed rule would also amend all
device regulations containing a reference to the specific form of a
submission to require an electronic submission. The amendment would
produce cost savings for firms without imposing any additional
regulatory burdens for submissions or affecting the Agency's ability to
review submissions. Firms would incur minimal administrative costs to
read and understand the rule. We expect the economic impact of this
regulation to be a total net costs savings yielding positive net
benefits.
Table 1 summarizes the benefits, costs, and distributional effects
of the proposed rule. We find that the proposed rule would result in
annualized net benefits in the form of cost savings of around $2.80
million with a 3 percent discount rate and $2.71 million with a 7
percent discount rate.
Table 1--Summary of Benefits, Costs, and Distributional Effects of Proposed Rule
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units
Category Primary Low estimate High estimate ------------------------------------------------ Notes
estimate Year dollars Discount rate Period covered
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits:
Annualized.................... $3.37 $1.31 $5.47 2016 7% 10 years Benefits are cost
savings.
Monetized $millions/year...... $3.37 $1.31 $5.47 2016 3% 10 years Benefits are cost
savings.
Annualized.................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 7% .............. ....................
Quantified.................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 3% .............. ....................
Qualitative................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ....................
Costs:
Annualized.................... $0.67 $0.67 $0.67 2016 7% 10 years ....................
Monetized $millions/year...... $0.57 $0.57 $0.57 2016 3% 10 years ....................
Annualized.................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 7% .............. ....................
Quantified.................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 3% .............. ....................
Qualitative................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ....................
Transfers:
Federal Annualized............ .............. .............. .............. .............. 7% .............. ....................
Monetized $millions/year...... .............. .............. .............. .............. 3% .............. ....................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46447]]
From/To....................... From:
To:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Annualized.............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 7% .............. ....................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monetized $millions/year...... .............. .............. .............. .............. 3% .............. ....................
From/To....................... From:
To:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 summarizes the E.O. 13771 impacts of the proposed rule.
Over an infinite time horizon, the present value of the total net costs
would range from $40.01 million to $182.94 million at a 3 percent
discount rate and from $15.04 million to $78.67 million at a 7 percent
discount rate. Over an infinite time horizon, the total annualized net
costs would range from $1.17 million to $5.33 million at a 3 percent
discount rate, and range from $0.98 million to $5.15 million at a 7
percent discount rate. This proposed rule, if finalized, is considered
an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory action.
Table 2--Summary of the Executive Order 13771 Impacts of the Proposed Rule Over an Infinite Time Horizon
[2016 $ millions]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Lower bound Upper bound Primary Lower bound Upper bound
estimate (3%) (3%) (3%) estimate (7%) (7%) (7%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Value of Costs.................................. $5.01 $5.01 $5.01 $5.01 $5.01 $5.01
Present Value of Cost Savings........................... 115.79 45.02 187.95 51.55 20.04 83.68
Present Value of Net Costs.............................. (110.78) (40.01) (182.94) (46.54) (15.04) (78.67)
Annualized Costs........................................ 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.33 0.33 0.33
Annualized Cost Savings................................. 3.37 1.31 5.47 3.37 1.31 5.47
Annualized Net Costs.................................... (3.23) (1.17) (5.33) (3.04) (0.98) (5.15)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Values in parentheses denote net negative costs (i.e. cost-savings).
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) and 25.34(a) that this
action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this proposed rule contains no
collection of information subject to review by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Rather, it
proposes to remove requirements to submit multiple paper copies of
certain medical device presubmissions and submissions and to replace
them with one copy in an electronic format.
IX. Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in E.O. 13132. We have determined that this
proposed rule does not contain policies that have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
we conclude that the rule does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in the E.O. and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
X. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in E.O. 13175. We have determined that the rule
does not contain policies that would have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. The
Agency solicits comments from tribal officials on any potential impact
on Indian Tribes from this proposed action.
XI. References
The following references are on display at Dockets Management Staff
(see ADDRESSES) and are available for viewing by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the website addresses, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change over time.
1. ``eCopy Program for Medical Device Submissions; Guidance for
Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff'' available at:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM313794.pdf.
2. Electronic Submission Gateway procedure for electronic regulatory
submission is available at: https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ElectronicSubmissionsGateway/default.htm.
3. Preliminary economic impacts analysis for this proposed rule
available at: https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.
[[Page 46448]]
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 807
Confidential business information, Imports, Medical devices,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 812
Health records, Medical devices, Medical research, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 814
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Medical devices, Medical research, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
the authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR
parts 807, 812, and 814 are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 807--ESTABLISHMENT REGISTRATION AND DEVICE LISTING FOR
MANUFACTURERS AND INITIAL IMPORTERS OF DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 807 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 360, 360c, 360e, 360i,
360j, 371, 374, 379k-1, 381, 393; 42 U.S.C. 264, 271.
0
2. In Sec. 807.90, revise paragraph (a), remove and reserve paragraph
(b), and revise paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 807.90 Format of a premarket notification submission.
* * * * *
(a)(1) For devices regulated by the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, be addressed to the current address displayed on
the website https://www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, be addressed to the current address displayed on the
website https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CBER/ucm385240.htm; or for devices
regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, be addressed
to the Central Document Room, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 5901-B Ammendale Rd., Beltsville, MD
20705-1266. Information about devices regulated by the Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research is available at https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/ApprovedProducts/default.htm.
(3) All inquiries regarding a premarket notification submission
should be sent the address in this section or one of the current
addresses displayed on the Food and Drug Administration's website.
* * * * *
(c) Be submitted as a single version in electronic format.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 807.95 by revising paragraph (b)(1) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 807.95 Confidentiality of information.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The person submitting the premarket notification submission
requests in the submission that the Food and Drug Administration hold
as confidential commercial information the intent to market the device
and submits a certification to the Commissioner:
* * * * *
PART 812--INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTIONS
0
4. The authority citation for part 812 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331, 351, 352, 353, 355, 360, 360c-360f,
360h-360j, 371, 372, 374, 379e, 379k-1, 381, 382, 383; 42 U.S.C.
216, 241, 262, 263b-263n.
0
5. Amend Sec. 812.19 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 812.19 Addresses for IDE correspondence.
(a) * * *
(1) For devices regulated by the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, send it to the current address displayed on the
website https://www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, send it to the current address displayed on the website
https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CBER/ucm385240.htm.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 812.20 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 812.20 Application.
(a) * * *
(3) A sponsor shall submit a signed ``Application for an
Investigational Device Exemption'' (IDE application), together with
accompanying materials in electronic format, to one of the addresses in
Sec. 812.19, and if eCopy by registered mail or by hand. Subsequent
correspondence concerning an application or a supplemental application
shall be submitted in electronic format and if eCopy by registered mail
or by hand.
* * * * *
PART 814--PREMARKET APPROVAL OF MEDICAL DEVICES
0
7. The authority citation for part 814 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 353, 360, 360bbb-8b, 360c-360j,
371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 379, 379e, 379k-1, 381.
0
8. Amend Sec. 814.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text and paragraph (b)(2);
0
b. Removing the phrase ``of the act'' and adding in its place ``of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act'' in paragraphs (b)(5)
introductory text, (b)(5)(i), and (b)(10);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c);
0
d. Revising paragraph (e) introductory text; and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (f) and (h)(1) and (2).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 814.20 Application.
* * * * *
(b) Unless the applicant justifies an omission in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section, a PMA shall include in electronic
format:
* * * * *
(2) A table of contents that specifies the volume and page number
for each item referred to in the table. A PMA shall include separate
sections on nonclinical laboratory studies and on clinical
investigations involving human subjects. A PMA shall be submitted as a
single version. The applicant shall include information that it
believes to be trade secret or confidential commercial or financial
information in the PMA and identify the information that it believes to
be trade secret or confidential commercial or financial information.
* * * * *
(c) Pertinent information in FDA files specifically referred to by
an applicant may be incorporated into a PMA by reference. Information
in a master file or other information submitted to FDA by a person
other than the applicant will not be considered part of a PMA unless
such reference is authorized in a record submitted to FDA by the person
who submitted the information or the master file. If a master file is
not referenced within 5 years after the date that it is submitted to
FDA, FDA will return the master file to the person who submitted it.
* * * * *
(e) The applicant shall periodically update its pending application
with
[[Page 46449]]
new safety and effectiveness information learned about the device from
ongoing or completed studies that may reasonably affect an evaluation
of the safety or effectiveness of the device or that may reasonably
affect the statement of contraindications, warnings, precautions, and
adverse reactions in the draft labeling. The update report shall be
consistent with the data reporting provisions of the protocol. The
applicant shall submit any update report in electronic format and shall
include in the report the number assigned by FDA to the PMA. These
updates are considered to be amendments to the PMA. The time frame for
review of a PMA will not be extended due to the submission of an update
report unless the update is a major amendment under Sec. 814.37(c)(1).
The applicant shall submit these reports--
* * * * *
(f) If a color additive subject to section 721 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act is used in or on the device and has not
previously been listed for such use, then, in lieu of submitting a
color additive petition under part 71 of this chapter, at the option of
the applicant, the information required to be submitted under part 71
may be submitted as part of the PMA. When submitted as part of the PMA,
the information shall be submitted in electronic format. A PMA for a
device that contains a color additive that is subject to section 721 of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act will not be approved until the
color additive is listed for use in or on the device.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) For devices regulated by the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, send it to the current address displayed on the
website https://www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, send it to the current address displayed on the website
https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CBER/ucm385240.htm.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 814.39 by revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.39 PMA supplements.
* * * * *
(c)(1) All procedures and actions that apply to an application
under Sec. 814.20 also apply to PMA supplements except that the
information required in a supplement is limited to that needed to
support the change. A summary under Sec. 814.20(b)(3) is required for
only a supplement submitted for new indications for use of the device,
significant changes in the performance or design specifications,
circuits, components, ingredients, principles of operation, or physical
layout of the device, or when otherwise required by FDA. The applicant
shall submit a PMA supplement in electronic format and shall include
information relevant to the proposed changes in the device. A PMA
supplement shall include a separate section that identifies each change
for which approval is being requested and explains the reason for each
such change. The applicant shall submit additional information, if
requested by FDA, in electronic format. The time frames for review of,
and FDA action on, a PMA supplement are the same as those provided in
Sec. 814.40 for a PMA.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec. 814.104 by revising paragraphs (d) introductory text
and (d)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.104 Original applications.
* * * * *
(d) Address for submissions and correspondence. All original HDEs,
amendments and supplements, as well as any correspondence relating to
an HDE, must be provided in electronic format. These materials must be
sent or delivered to one of the following:
(1) For devices regulated by the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, send it to the current address found on the
website https://www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress.
(2) For devices regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, send it to the current address displayed on the website
https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CBER/ucm385240.htm.
* * * * *
Dated: September 7, 2018.
Scott Gottlieb,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2018-19865 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P