Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food, 46104-46107 [2018-19855]
Download as PDF
46104
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Joinus Freight Systems (H.K.) Limited, a.k.a., the
following two aliases:
–JFS Global Logistics; and.
–Joinus Freight Systems Global Logistics Limited.
Unit 07–07, 25F, Tower B, Regent Centre, 63 Wo
Yi Hop Road, Kwai Chung, N.T. Hong Kong and
Units 801–803 and 805, Park Sun Building, No.
97–107 Wo Yi Hop Road, Kwai Chung, Hong
Kong.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Proezd
12/1,
*
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
Presumption of
denial.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Effective September 12, 2018,
FDA withdraws amendatory instruction
13 on page 56144 of the final rule
published at 80 FR 55908 at 56144 on
September 17, 2015. Submit either
electronic or written comments by
October 12, 2018.
Food and Drug Administration
ADDRESSES:
DATES:
[FR Doc. C2–2018–18766 Filed 9–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
21 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0920]
Current Good Manufacturing Practice,
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based
Preventive Controls for Human Food
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule; partial withdrawal.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is removing instruction 13 from the
Current Good Manufacturing Practice,
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based
Preventive Controls for Human Food
(Preventive Controls for Human Food)
regulation. Instruction 13 directs the
Federal Register to remove and reserve
as of September 17, 2018, the Current
Good Manufacturing Practice in
Manufacturing, Packing, or Holding
Human Food (Human Food CGMP)
regulation. Removal of instruction 13 is
necessary because the compliance dates
for certain facilities subject to the
modernized current good manufacturing
practice requirements in the Preventive
Controls for Human Food regulation
have been extended. Retaining the
Human Food CGMP regulation will
maintain the status quo while these
facilities prepare for compliance with
the new CGMP requirements and will
avoid an unintended gap in public
health protection.
SUMMARY:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Presumption of
denial.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Sep 11, 2018
81 FR 14958, 3/21/16. 83 FR [Insert
FR Page Number] 9/4/2018.
3. On page 44826, in the table, under
the country heading for Russia, the PJSC
Mikron entry should read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
PJSC Mikron, 1st Zapadniy
Zelenograd, Russia, 124460.
*
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
Jkt 244001
You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before October 12,
2018. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of October 12, 2018.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
81 FR 61601, 9/7/16. 83 FR [Insert
FR Page Number] 9/4/2018.
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2011–N–0920 for ‘‘Current Good
Manufacturing Practice, Hazard
Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive
Controls for Human Food.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jenny Scott, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–300), Food and
Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–2166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Discussion
II. Legal Authority
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
I. Background and Discussion
In the Federal Register of September
17, 2015, FDA published the final rule,
‘‘Current Good Manufacturing Practice,
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based
46105
Preventive Controls for Human Food’’
(80 FR 55908; the ‘‘rule establishing part
117’’). Among other things, in the final
rule establishing part 117 (21 CFR part
117), we modernized and placed in part
117, subpart B the longstanding current
good manufacturing practice
requirements (CGMPs) codified in part
110 (21 CFR part 110). We staggered the
compliance dates for part 117 based on
business size. We also instructed the
Federal Register to remove and reserve
part 110 effective September 17, 2018,
the latest of the staggered compliance
dates, which we treated as a conforming
amendment (see instruction number 13
at 80 FR 55908 at 56144).
Subsequently, in a final rule
published in the Federal Register of
August 24, 2016 (81 FR 57784; the
‘‘compliance date final rule’’), among
other things, we extended by up to 16
months the part 117 compliance dates
for certain facilities, to address concerns
about the practicality of compliance,
consider changes to the regulatory text,
and better align compliance dates across
various rules. The compliance date final
rule extended the part 117 compliance
dates for the following establishments,
as set out in table 1:
TABLE 1—FACILITIES THAT RECEIVED EXTENDED PART 117 COMPLIANCE DATES
Compliance date announced in
final rule establishing part 117
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Facility solely engaged in packing and/or holding activities on produce
RACs, that is:
• a very small business ...................................................................
• a small business ...........................................................................
• not a small or very small business ...............................................
Facility that would qualify as a secondary activities farm except for
ownership of the facility, that is:
• a very small business ...................................................................
• a small business ...........................................................................
• not a small or very small business ...............................................
Facilities that would qualify as a farm if it did not color RACs, that is:
a very small business ......................................................................
a small business ..............................................................................
not a small or very small business ..................................................
A small business is a business
(including any subsidiaries and
affiliates) employing fewer than 500
full-time equivalent employees. A very
small business is a business (including
any subsidiaries and affiliates) averaging
less than $1 million, adjusted for
inflation, per year, during the 3-year
period preceding the applicable
calendar year in sales of human food
plus the market value of human food
manufactured, processed, packed or
held without sale (e.g., held for a fee).
(See § 117.3.)
After issuing the compliance date
final rule, FDA announced that as a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Sep 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
September 17, 2018 ......................
September 18, 2017 ......................
September 19, 2016 ......................
January 27, 2020.
January 28, 2019.
January 26, 2018.
September 17, 2018 ......................
September 18, 2017 ......................
September 19, 2016 ......................
January 27, 2020.
January 28, 2019.
January 26, 2018.
September 17, 2018 ......................
September 18, 2017 ......................
September 19, 2016 ......................
January 27, 2020.
January 28, 2019.
January 26, 2018.
matter of enforcement policy it did not
intend to enforce certain part 117
requirements for certain facilities,
including some of the facilities in table
1 whose compliance dates had been
extended by the compliance date final
rule. See the January 2018 guidance
entitled ‘‘Policy Regarding Certain
Entities Subject to the Current Good
Manufacturing Practice and Preventive
Controls, Produce Safety, and/or
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs’’
(https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/
guidanceregulation/guidancedocuments
regulatoryinformation/ucm590661.pdf).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Compliance date with extension as
announced in compliance date
final rule
Sfmt 4700
The present rulemaking does not change
the policies contained in this guidance.
As mentioned above, in the final rule
establishing part 117 we instructed the
Federal Register to remove and reserve
part 110, effective September 17, 2018,
which at the time was the latest of the
staggered compliance dates. The goal
was to have firms subject to the Human
Food CGMP regulation until the
Preventive Controls for Human Food
regulation took its place, leaving no gap
in public health protection. However, in
the compliance date final rule we
extended the compliance dates for part
117 by up to 16 months but failed to
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
46106
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
revise the previous instruction to
remove part 110. Without the current
action, the small and very small
facilities described in table 1 will not be
subject to any CGMPs until,
respectively, January 28, 2019, and
January 27, 2020. However, FDA’s
intent always has been that part 110
would remain unchanged and in effect
until all establishments have reached
the date when they must be in
compliance with part 117. Therefore, we
are amending the rule establishing part
117 to remove the instruction to the
Federal Register to remove and reserve
part 110. We intend to remove part 110
in a separate action after all
establishments have reached their
compliance dates for the part 117
CGMPs.
When FDA conducts rulemaking, it
normally does so using notice-andcomment procedures established under
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
and FDA regulations. These procedures
allow the public an opportunity to
participate in Agency rulemaking by
submitting written comments on
proposed rules. FDA considers these
comments as it finalizes rules. (5 U.S.C.
553(b) and (c); § 10.40 (21 CFR 10.40.))
The APA, however, does not require an
agency to use notice-and-comment
procedures in all rulemaking. For
example, the APA provides that
Agencies shall not use notice-andcomment procedures, and shall proceed
with a final rule, when the Agency for
good cause finds that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to public
interest, and incorporates the finding
and a brief statement of reasons therefor
in the rules issued. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).)
Likewise, FDA’s regulations provide
that the requirements of notice and
public procedure do not apply when the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs
determines for good cause that they are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, in which case, the
notice issuing the regulation will state
the reasons for the determination, and
provide an opportunity for comment to
determine whether the regulation
should subsequently be modified or
revoked. (§ 10.40(e)(1).) Pursuant to this
regulation, FDA requests comments on
the timing for the removal of part 110.
In this instance, for several reasons,
FDA finds good cause for issuing this
final rule without notice and comment.
Notice and comment are unnecessary
because this final rule is a minor and
technical repair of an obvious oversight
in the compliance date final rule,
maintains the CGMP regulatory status
quo for industry, affirms FDA’s plan for
transitioning from part 110 to part 117
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
as outlined in the rule establishing part
117, and is not expected to generate
public concern. FDA is addressing the
gap in CGMP regulatory coverage from
September 17, 2018, to January 27,
2020, by issuing a narrowly tailored
amendment to remove instruction 13
from the rule to establish part 117. The
result of this amendment will be that
the part 110 CGMPs will continue in
effect for establishments that have not
reached their part 117 compliance date.
This action will serve to correct an
obvious oversight made in the
compliance date final rule. FDA does
not anticipate public concern with this
action. The Agency previously sought
public comment on its proposal to
remove part 110 in coordination with
the compliance dates for part 117 and
received no comments that disagreed.
The present continuation and planned
eventual removal of part 110 is a repeat
of what was previously proposed
without public objection. Furthermore,
it is clear from the rule establishing part
117 that we intended for facilities to
remain subject to part 110 until their
part 117 compliance date (80 FR 55908
at 56127). Thus, we do not believe there
was ever any reasonable expectation on
the part of the establishments listed in
table 1 that they would not be
continuously subject to CGMPs. For
these various reasons, we have
determined that notice and comment is
unnecessary.
FDA finds further good cause for
issuing this final rule without notice
and comment because notice and
comment are contrary to the public
interest and impracticable. There could
be negative public health implications if
there were a temporal gap in CGMP
coverage; for example, there have been
outbreaks associated with the types of
facilities still subject to part 110 (e.g.,
listeria in cantaloupe). Many of the
establishments listed in table 1 are not
required to comply with the
replacement CGMPs in part 117 until
January 2019 or January 2020,
depending on business size. This means
that these establishments would have no
applicable CGMP requirements for 4 to
16 months. CGMP requirements have
existed for all human food
manufacturers since at least 1970 (see
34 FR 6977) and serve as a significant
basis for FDA’s determination of what
constitutes an insanitary food
production environment that may result
in food that is injurious to public health
under section 402(a)(4) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
342(a)(4)), among other authorities. It
would be contrary to the public interest
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to allow the temporal gap in CGMP
coverage.
To summarize, a gap in CGMP
coverage would leave FDA without a
primary tool to execute its function of
ensuring that food manufacturing
establishments follow basic food safety
practices, potentially endangering the
public health, in order to provide the
public an opportunity to comment on a
non-controversial technical matter. For
these reasons, we are issuing this
amendment to the final rule establishing
part 117 without prior notice and
comment. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)).
In addition, we find good cause for
this amendment to the rule establishing
part 117 to become effective on the date
of publication. The APA allows an
effective date less than 30 days after
publication as provided by the Agency
for good cause found and published
within the rule (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). As
provided at 80 FR 55908, September 17,
2015, the amendment removing part 110
was to take effect on September 17,
2018. In order to continue part 110 for
an interim period, this final rule needs
to be effective on or before September
16, 2018, and therefore it is not possible
for this rule to take effect 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. As
previously described, in order to
prevent a gap in CGMP coverage for
certain establishments, an immediate
effective date is necessary to remove,
before September 17, 2018, the
instruction to remove and reserve part
110. Further, because the facilities’
responsibility to comply with CGMP
requirements remains unchanged, this
rule places no burden on affected
parties for which they would need a
reasonable time to prepare. Therefore,
the Commissioner finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and
§ 10.40(c)(4)(ii) for this amendment to
become effective on the date of
publication.
II. Legal Authority
We are issuing this final rule
removing instruction number 13 of the
rule to establish part 117 under the
same authority for which the rule
containing instruction number 13 was
originally issued. That analysis may be
found in section II, ‘‘Legal Authority,’’
of the rule to establish part 117 (80 FR
55908 at 55917 to 55920).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
FDA has determined that the removal
of instruction 13 will not change the
status quo and, therefore, is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
within the meaning of section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection
of information. Therefore, clearance by
the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 is not required.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 110
Food packaging, Foods.
Therefore, in FR Rule Doc. No. 2015–
21920, published September 17, 2015, at
80 FR 55908–56168, amendatory
instruction 13 in the third column on
page 56144 is withdrawn.
■
Dated: September 7, 2018.
Scott Gottlieb,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2018–19855 Filed 9–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63
[EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0091; FRL–9982–
62—Region 6]
New Source Performance Standards
and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation
of Authority to New Mexico
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; delegation of
authority.
AGENCY:
The New Mexico
Environment Department (NMED) has
submitted updated regulations for
receiving delegation and approval of a
program for the implementation and
enforcement of certain New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS) and
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for
all sources (both Title V and non-Title
V sources). These updated regulations
apply to certain NSPS promulgated by
the EPA and amended between
September 24, 2013 and January 15,
2017; certain NESHAP promulgated by
the EPA and amended between January
1, 2011 and January 15, 2017; and other
NESHAP promulgated by the EPA and
amended between August 30, 2013 and
January 15, 2017, as adopted by the
NMED. The delegation of authority
under this action does not apply to
sources located in Bernalillo County,
New Mexico, or to sources located in
areas defined as Indian Country. The
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
EPA is providing notice that it is
updating the delegation of certain NSPS
to NMED, and taking final action to
approve the delegation of certain
NESHAP to NMED.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0091. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rick Barrett (6MM–AP), (214) 665–7227;
email: barrett.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comment
III. What does this action do?
IV. What is the authority for delegation?
V. What criteria must New Mexico’s
programs meet to be approved?
VI. How did NMED meet the NSPS and
NESHAP program approval criteria?
VII. What is being delegated?
VIII. What is not being delegated?
IX. How will statutory and regulatory
interpretations be made?
X. What authority does the EPA have?
XI. What information must NMED provide to
the EPA?
XII. What is the EPA’s oversight role?
XIII. Should sources submit notices to the
EPA or NMED?
XIV. How will unchanged authorities be
delegated to NMED in the future?
XV. Final Action
XVI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On April 13, 2018, EPA published a
direct final rule and accompanying
proposal approving the updated
delegation of authority for
implementation and enforcement of
NSPS and NESHAPs for all sources
(both part 70 and non-part 70 sources)
to the NMED. The direct final rule and
proposal were published without prior
proposal because EPA anticipated no
relevant adverse comments. See 83 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46107
15964 and 83 FR 16027, respectively.
EPA stated in the direct final rule that
if we receive relevant adverse comments
by May 14, 2018, we would publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register, and all public comments
received would be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule.
EPA received an adverse comment on
May 14, 2018, and accordingly
withdrew the direct final rule on June
5, 2018, pursuant to sections 111 and
112 of the CAA. See 83 FR 25936. The
comment and our response to that
comment follows below.
II. Response to Comment
Comment: EPA received an
anonymous adverse comment in
response to the proposed rulemaking.
The comment includes several personal
observations and statements critical of
New Mexico’s ability to maintain and
oversee its air quality programs. The
commenter recommends that the
proposed update to New Mexico’s
NESHAP delegation not be approved
until EPA investigates the commenter’s
allegations and New Mexico has
addressed the alleged deficiencies. See
Docket for the entire comment.
EPA’s Response: We thank the
commenter for the comment. Section
112(l) of the Act and EPA’s
implementing regulations at 40 CFR part
63, subpart E primarily govern EPA’s
actions on State requests for delegation
of authority to implement and enforce
the NESHAP program. CAA section
112(l)(5)(B) states that EPA shall
disapprove a NESHAP program
submitted by a State if we find that
adequate resources are not available to
implement the program. See also 40
CFR 63.91(d)(3)(iii). Several concerns
expressed by the commenter relate to
the adequacy of resources (including the
lack of technically experienced and
qualified staff) maintained by the NMED
Air Quality Bureau. NMED provided
EPA with a response to those comments
that included a description of current
resources and experience within the Air
Quality Bureau. See Docket for NMED’s
response. In addition, consistent with
40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), New Mexico’s
delegation update request included a
reference to its previous demonstration
and a reaffirmation that the up-front
approval criteria for delegation are still
being met. Based on this information as
well as discussions with the
Compliance and Enforcement Division
and the Criminal Investigation Division
within EPA Region 6, we have not
identified sufficient information to
support the necessary finding for
disapproval of the requested NESHAP
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 12, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46104-46107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19855]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0920]
Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-
Based Preventive Controls for Human Food
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; partial withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
removing instruction 13 from the Current Good Manufacturing Practice,
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food
(Preventive Controls for Human Food) regulation. Instruction 13 directs
the Federal Register to remove and reserve as of September 17, 2018,
the Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing, or
Holding Human Food (Human Food CGMP) regulation. Removal of instruction
13 is necessary because the compliance dates for certain facilities
subject to the modernized current good manufacturing practice
requirements in the Preventive Controls for Human Food regulation have
been extended. Retaining the Human Food CGMP regulation will maintain
the status quo while these facilities prepare for compliance with the
new CGMP requirements and will avoid an unintended gap in public health
protection.
DATES: Effective September 12, 2018, FDA withdraws amendatory
instruction 13 on page 56144 of the final rule published at 80 FR 55908
at 56144 on September 17, 2015. Submit either electronic or written
comments by October 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before October 12, 2018. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
midnight Eastern Time at the end of October 12, 2018. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2011-N-0920 for ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard
Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food.'' Received
comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your
[[Page 46105]]
comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be
confidential with a heading or cover note that states ``THIS DOCUMENT
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will review this copy,
including the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of
comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential
information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing
and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the
Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact
information to be made publicly available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and
you must identify this information as ``confidential.'' Any information
marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance
with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Scott, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-300), Food and Drug Administration, 5001
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Discussion
II. Legal Authority
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
I. Background and Discussion
In the Federal Register of September 17, 2015, FDA published the
final rule, ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and
Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food'' (80 FR 55908; the
``rule establishing part 117''). Among other things, in the final rule
establishing part 117 (21 CFR part 117), we modernized and placed in
part 117, subpart B the longstanding current good manufacturing
practice requirements (CGMPs) codified in part 110 (21 CFR part 110).
We staggered the compliance dates for part 117 based on business size.
We also instructed the Federal Register to remove and reserve part 110
effective September 17, 2018, the latest of the staggered compliance
dates, which we treated as a conforming amendment (see instruction
number 13 at 80 FR 55908 at 56144).
Subsequently, in a final rule published in the Federal Register of
August 24, 2016 (81 FR 57784; the ``compliance date final rule''),
among other things, we extended by up to 16 months the part 117
compliance dates for certain facilities, to address concerns about the
practicality of compliance, consider changes to the regulatory text,
and better align compliance dates across various rules. The compliance
date final rule extended the part 117 compliance dates for the
following establishments, as set out in table 1:
Table 1--Facilities That Received Extended Part 117 Compliance Dates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance date
Compliance date with extension as
announced in final announced in
rule establishing compliance date
part 117 final rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility solely engaged in
packing and/or holding
activities on produce RACs,
that is:
a very small September 17, 2018 January 27, 2020.
business.
a small business... September 18, 2017 January 28, 2019.
not a small or very September 19, 2016 January 26, 2018.
small business.
Facility that would qualify as a
secondary activities farm
except for ownership of the
facility, that is:
a very small September 17, 2018 January 27, 2020.
business.
a small business... September 18, 2017 January 28, 2019.
not a small or very September 19, 2016 January 26, 2018.
small business.
Facilities that would qualify as
a farm if it did not color
RACs, that is:
a very small business....... September 17, 2018 January 27, 2020.
a small business............ September 18, 2017 January 28, 2019.
not a small or very small September 19, 2016 January 26, 2018.
business.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A small business is a business (including any subsidiaries and
affiliates) employing fewer than 500 full-time equivalent employees. A
very small business is a business (including any subsidiaries and
affiliates) averaging less than $1 million, adjusted for inflation, per
year, during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year
in sales of human food plus the market value of human food
manufactured, processed, packed or held without sale (e.g., held for a
fee). (See Sec. 117.3.)
After issuing the compliance date final rule, FDA announced that as
a matter of enforcement policy it did not intend to enforce certain
part 117 requirements for certain facilities, including some of the
facilities in table 1 whose compliance dates had been extended by the
compliance date final rule. See the January 2018 guidance entitled
``Policy Regarding Certain Entities Subject to the Current Good
Manufacturing Practice and Preventive Controls, Produce Safety, and/or
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs'' (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/ucm590661.pdf). The present
rulemaking does not change the policies contained in this guidance.
As mentioned above, in the final rule establishing part 117 we
instructed the Federal Register to remove and reserve part 110,
effective September 17, 2018, which at the time was the latest of the
staggered compliance dates. The goal was to have firms subject to the
Human Food CGMP regulation until the Preventive Controls for Human Food
regulation took its place, leaving no gap in public health protection.
However, in the compliance date final rule we extended the compliance
dates for part 117 by up to 16 months but failed to
[[Page 46106]]
revise the previous instruction to remove part 110. Without the current
action, the small and very small facilities described in table 1 will
not be subject to any CGMPs until, respectively, January 28, 2019, and
January 27, 2020. However, FDA's intent always has been that part 110
would remain unchanged and in effect until all establishments have
reached the date when they must be in compliance with part 117.
Therefore, we are amending the rule establishing part 117 to remove the
instruction to the Federal Register to remove and reserve part 110. We
intend to remove part 110 in a separate action after all establishments
have reached their compliance dates for the part 117 CGMPs.
When FDA conducts rulemaking, it normally does so using notice-and-
comment procedures established under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) and FDA regulations. These procedures allow the public an
opportunity to participate in Agency rulemaking by submitting written
comments on proposed rules. FDA considers these comments as it
finalizes rules. (5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (c); Sec. 10.40 (21 CFR 10.40.))
The APA, however, does not require an agency to use notice-and-comment
procedures in all rulemaking. For example, the APA provides that
Agencies shall not use notice-and-comment procedures, and shall proceed
with a final rule, when the Agency for good cause finds that notice and
public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
public interest, and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of
reasons therefor in the rules issued. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).) Likewise,
FDA's regulations provide that the requirements of notice and public
procedure do not apply when the Commissioner of Food and Drugs
determines for good cause that they are impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest, in which case, the notice issuing the
regulation will state the reasons for the determination, and provide an
opportunity for comment to determine whether the regulation should
subsequently be modified or revoked. (Sec. 10.40(e)(1).) Pursuant to
this regulation, FDA requests comments on the timing for the removal of
part 110.
In this instance, for several reasons, FDA finds good cause for
issuing this final rule without notice and comment.
Notice and comment are unnecessary because this final rule is a
minor and technical repair of an obvious oversight in the compliance
date final rule, maintains the CGMP regulatory status quo for industry,
affirms FDA's plan for transitioning from part 110 to part 117 as
outlined in the rule establishing part 117, and is not expected to
generate public concern. FDA is addressing the gap in CGMP regulatory
coverage from September 17, 2018, to January 27, 2020, by issuing a
narrowly tailored amendment to remove instruction 13 from the rule to
establish part 117. The result of this amendment will be that the part
110 CGMPs will continue in effect for establishments that have not
reached their part 117 compliance date. This action will serve to
correct an obvious oversight made in the compliance date final rule.
FDA does not anticipate public concern with this action. The Agency
previously sought public comment on its proposal to remove part 110 in
coordination with the compliance dates for part 117 and received no
comments that disagreed. The present continuation and planned eventual
removal of part 110 is a repeat of what was previously proposed without
public objection. Furthermore, it is clear from the rule establishing
part 117 that we intended for facilities to remain subject to part 110
until their part 117 compliance date (80 FR 55908 at 56127). Thus, we
do not believe there was ever any reasonable expectation on the part of
the establishments listed in table 1 that they would not be
continuously subject to CGMPs. For these various reasons, we have
determined that notice and comment is unnecessary.
FDA finds further good cause for issuing this final rule without
notice and comment because notice and comment are contrary to the
public interest and impracticable. There could be negative public
health implications if there were a temporal gap in CGMP coverage; for
example, there have been outbreaks associated with the types of
facilities still subject to part 110 (e.g., listeria in cantaloupe).
Many of the establishments listed in table 1 are not required to comply
with the replacement CGMPs in part 117 until January 2019 or January
2020, depending on business size. This means that these establishments
would have no applicable CGMP requirements for 4 to 16 months. CGMP
requirements have existed for all human food manufacturers since at
least 1970 (see 34 FR 6977) and serve as a significant basis for FDA's
determination of what constitutes an insanitary food production
environment that may result in food that is injurious to public health
under section 402(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 342(a)(4)), among other authorities. It would be contrary to the
public interest to allow the temporal gap in CGMP coverage.
To summarize, a gap in CGMP coverage would leave FDA without a
primary tool to execute its function of ensuring that food
manufacturing establishments follow basic food safety practices,
potentially endangering the public health, in order to provide the
public an opportunity to comment on a non-controversial technical
matter. For these reasons, we are issuing this amendment to the final
rule establishing part 117 without prior notice and comment. (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)).
In addition, we find good cause for this amendment to the rule
establishing part 117 to become effective on the date of publication.
The APA allows an effective date less than 30 days after publication as
provided by the Agency for good cause found and published within the
rule (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). As provided at 80 FR 55908, September 17,
2015, the amendment removing part 110 was to take effect on September
17, 2018. In order to continue part 110 for an interim period, this
final rule needs to be effective on or before September 16, 2018, and
therefore it is not possible for this rule to take effect 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. As previously described, in order
to prevent a gap in CGMP coverage for certain establishments, an
immediate effective date is necessary to remove, before September 17,
2018, the instruction to remove and reserve part 110. Further, because
the facilities' responsibility to comply with CGMP requirements remains
unchanged, this rule places no burden on affected parties for which
they would need a reasonable time to prepare. Therefore, the
Commissioner finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and Sec.
10.40(c)(4)(ii) for this amendment to become effective on the date of
publication.
II. Legal Authority
We are issuing this final rule removing instruction number 13 of
the rule to establish part 117 under the same authority for which the
rule containing instruction number 13 was originally issued. That
analysis may be found in section II, ``Legal Authority,'' of the rule
to establish part 117 (80 FR 55908 at 55917 to 55920).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
FDA has determined that the removal of instruction 13 will not
change the status quo and, therefore, is not a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
[[Page 46107]]
Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 110
Food packaging, Foods.
0
Therefore, in FR Rule Doc. No. 2015-21920, published September 17,
2015, at 80 FR 55908-56168, amendatory instruction 13 in the third
column on page 56144 is withdrawn.
Dated: September 7, 2018.
Scott Gottlieb,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2018-19855 Filed 9-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P