Proposed Revisions to Standard Review Plan Section 13.6, Physical Security, 45992-45993 [2018-19684]
Download as PDF
45992
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Notices
No. ML18191B091; documents related
to this amendment are listed in the
Safety Evaluation enclosed with the
amendment.
Facility Combined Licenses No. NPF–
91 and NPF–92: Amendment revised the
Facility Combined Licenses.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: May 22, 2018 (83 FR 23728).
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in the
Safety Evaluation dated August 7, 2018.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026, Vogtle
Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units
3 and 4, Burke County, Georgia
Date of amendment request: January
31, 2018, as supplemented by letter
dated May 2, 2018.
Description of amendment: The
amendment revises the VEGP Units 3
and 4 combined license (COL)
Appendix A, Technical Specification
(TS) related to Pressurizer Safety Valve
(PSV) operability. The amendment
changes TS 3.4.6, ‘‘PSV Applicability’’
to require the PSV to be operable when
the TS 3.4.14, ‘‘Low Temperature
Overpressure Protection,’’ is not
required to be operable. A conforming
change is made to the TS 3.4.6 Actions.
Additional TS changes necessary to
support PSV operability are made for
consistency with the TS 3.4.6. The
amendment also approves moving TS
Limiting Condition for Operation Notes
regarding reactor coolant pump starts
from TS 3.4.4, ‘‘Reactor Coolant System
(RCS) Loops, 3.4.8, ‘‘Minimum RCS
Flow,’’ and 3.4.14 to TS 3.4.3, ‘‘RCS
Pressure/Temperature Limits.’’
Date of issuance: July 12, 2018.
Effective date: As of the date of
issuance and shall be implemented
within 30 days of issuance.
Amendment Nos.: 133 (Unit 3) and
132 (Unit 4). A publicly-available
version is in ADAMS under Accession
No. ML18159A437; documents related
to this amendment are listed in the
Safety Evaluation enclosed with the
amendment.
Facility Combined Licenses Nos. NPF–
91 and NPF–92: Amendment revised the
Facility COL.
Date of Initial Notice in Federal
Register: March 13, 2018 (83 FR
10922). The supplement dated May 2,
2018, provided additional information
that clarified the application, did not
expand the scope of the application as
originally noticed, and did not change
the NRC staff’s original proposed no
significant hazards consideration
determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in the
Safety Evaluation dated July 12, 2018.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No.
50–390, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN),
Unit 1, Rhea County, Tennessee
Date of amendment request: July 8,
2018, as supplemented by letters dated
July 24 and July 30, 2018.
Brief description of amendment: The
amendment extended Technical
Specification (TS) Surveillance
Requirements (SRs) 3.3.1.5, 3.3.2.2, and
3.3.6.2 by revising the WBN, Unit 1, TS
SR 3.0.2 and certain SRs in Table SR
3.0.2–1.
Date of issuance: August 16, 2018.
Effective date: As of the date of
issuance and shall be implemented
immediately.
Amendment No.: 121. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML18204A252;
documents related to this amendment
are listed in the Safety Evaluation
enclosed with the amendment.
Facility Operating License No. NPF–
90: The amendment revised the Facility
Operating License and TSs.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: July 16, 2018 (83 FR 32912).
The supplemental letters dated July 24
and July 30, 2018, provided additional
information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally notified,
and did not change the NRC staff’s
proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment and final
determination of no significant hazards
consideration is contained in a Safety
Evaluation dated August 16, 2018.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day
of August 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Kathryn M. Brock,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2018–0197]
Proposed Revisions to Standard
Review Plan Section 13.6, Physical
Security
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Standard review plan-draft
section revision; request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is soliciting public
comment on draft NUREG–0800,
‘‘Standard Review Plan for the Review
of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear
Power Plants: LWR Edition,’’ Section
13.6, ‘‘Physical Security.’’ This section
has been updated to reflect the latest
NRC guidance concerning physical
security.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be filed no later
than November 13, 2018. Comments
received after this date will be
considered, if it is practical to do so, but
the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0197. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer
Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127;
email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office
of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark D. Notich, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–3053, email: Mark.Notich@
nrc.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2018–19419 Filed 9–10–18; 8:45 am]
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
A. Obtaining Information
PO 00000
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–
0197 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Notices
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0197.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2018–
0197 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Further Information
The NRC seeks public comment on
the proposed Standard Review Plan
(SRP)-draft section revision of Section
13.6, ‘‘Physical Security.’’ The changes
made in this revision to this section
reflect the latest NRC guidance
concerning physical security.
Following NRC staff evaluation of
public comments, the NRC intends to
finalize SRP Section 13.6, ‘‘Physical
Security,’’ Revision 4 in ADAMS and
post it on the NRC’s public website at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. The
SRP is guidance for the NRC staff. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
SRP is not a substitute for the NRC
regulations, and compliance with the
SRP is not required.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Issuance of this draft SRP, if finalized,
would not constitute backfitting as
defined in section 50.109 of title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) (the Backfit Rule) or otherwise be
inconsistent with the issue finality
provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The NRC’s
position is based upon the following
considerations:
1. The draft SRP positions do not
constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the
SRP is guidance directed to the NRC
staff with respect to its regulatory
responsibilities.
The SRP provides internal guidance
to the NRC staff on how to review an
application for NRC regulatory approval
in the form of licensing. Changes in
guidance intended for use by only the
staff are not matters that constitute
backfitting as that term is defined in 10
CFR 50.109(a)(1) or involve the issue
finality provisions of 10 CFR part 52.
2. Backfitting and issue finality—with
certain exceptions discussed below—do
not apply to current or future
applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants
are not, with certain exceptions, the
subject of either the Backfit Rule or any
issue finality provisions under 10 CFR
part 52. This is because neither the
Backfit Rule nor the issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52 were
intended to apply to every NRC action
that substantially changes the
expectations of current and future
applicants.
The exceptions to the general
principle are applicable whenever a 10
CFR part 50 operating license applicant
references a construction permit or a 10
CFR part 52 combined license applicant
references a license (e.g., an early site
permit) and/or NRC regulatory approval
(e.g., a design certification rule) for
which specified issue finality provisions
apply.
The NRC staff does not, at this time,
intend to impose the positions
represented in this draft SRP section in
a manner that constitutes backfitting or
is inconsistent with any issue finality
provision of 10 CFR part 52. If, in the
future, the staff seeks to impose a
position in this draft SRP section in a
manner that would constitute
backfitting or be inconsistent with these
issue finality provisions, the NRC staff
must make the showing as set forth in
the Backfit rule or address the
regulatory criteria set forth in the
applicable issue finality provision, as
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45993
applicable, that would allow the staff to
impose the position.
3. The NRC staff has no intention to
impose the SRP positions on existing
nuclear power plant licensees either
now or in the future (absent a voluntary
request for a change from the licensee,
holder of a regulatory approval or a
design certification applicant).
The NRC staff does not intend to
impose or apply the positions described
in the draft SRP to existing (already
issued) licenses (e.g., operating licenses
and combined licenses) and regulatory
approvals. Hence, the issuance of this
SRP guidance—even if considered
guidance subject to the Backfit Rule or
the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR
part 52—would not need to be evaluated
as if it were a backfit or as being
inconsistent with these issue finality
provisions. If, in the future, the NRC
staff seeks to impose a position in the
SRP on holders of already issued
licenses in a manner that would
constitute backfitting or does not
provide issue finality as described in the
applicable issue finality provision, then
the staff must make a showing as set
forth in the Backfit Rule or address the
criteria set forth in the applicable issue
finality provision, as applicable, that
would allow the staff to impose the
position.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of September 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennivine K. Rankin,
Acting Chief, Division of Licensing, Siting,
and Environmental Analysis, Licensing
Branch 3, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2018–19684 Filed 9–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Meeting of the Advisory Committee on
Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee on
Plant License Renewal
The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant
License Renewal will hold a meeting on
September 20, 2018 at U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, 11545
Rockville Pike, Room T–2B1, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance. The agenda for the
subject meeting shall be as follows:
Thursday, September 20, 2018, 1 p.m.
Until 5 p.m.
The Subcommittee will conduct a
briefing on the River Bend Nuclear
Generating Station Unit 1 License
Renewal Application. The
Subcommittee will hear presentations
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45992-45993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2018-0197]
Proposed Revisions to Standard Review Plan Section 13.6, Physical
Security
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Standard review plan-draft section revision; request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting
public comment on draft NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the
Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR
Edition,'' Section 13.6, ``Physical Security.'' This section has been
updated to reflect the latest NRC guidance concerning physical
security.
DATES: Comments must be filed no later than November 13, 2018. Comments
received after this date will be considered, if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0197. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287-
9127; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: May Ma, Office of Administration, Mail
Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark D. Notich, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-3053, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0197 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this
[[Page 45993]]
action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0197.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected].
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2018-0197 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Further Information
The NRC seeks public comment on the proposed Standard Review Plan
(SRP)-draft section revision of Section 13.6, ``Physical Security.''
The changes made in this revision to this section reflect the latest
NRC guidance concerning physical security.
Following NRC staff evaluation of public comments, the NRC intends
to finalize SRP Section 13.6, ``Physical Security,'' Revision 4 in
ADAMS and post it on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. The SRP is guidance
for the NRC staff. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC regulations,
and compliance with the SRP is not required.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Issuance of this draft SRP, if finalized, would not constitute
backfitting as defined in section 50.109 of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) (the Backfit Rule) or otherwise be
inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The
NRC's position is based upon the following considerations:
1. The draft SRP positions do not constitute backfitting, inasmuch
as the SRP is guidance directed to the NRC staff with respect to its
regulatory responsibilities.
The SRP provides internal guidance to the NRC staff on how to
review an application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of
licensing. Changes in guidance intended for use by only the staff are
not matters that constitute backfitting as that term is defined in 10
CFR 50.109(a)(1) or involve the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR
part 52.
2. Backfitting and issue finality--with certain exceptions
discussed below--do not apply to current or future applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain
exceptions, the subject of either the Backfit Rule or any issue
finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52. This is because neither the
Backfit Rule nor the issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52
were intended to apply to every NRC action that substantially changes
the expectations of current and future applicants.
The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever a
10 CFR part 50 operating license applicant references a construction
permit or a 10 CFR part 52 combined license applicant references a
license (e.g., an early site permit) and/or NRC regulatory approval
(e.g., a design certification rule) for which specified issue finality
provisions apply.
The NRC staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the
positions represented in this draft SRP section in a manner that
constitutes backfitting or is inconsistent with any issue finality
provision of 10 CFR part 52. If, in the future, the staff seeks to
impose a position in this draft SRP section in a manner that would
constitute backfitting or be inconsistent with these issue finality
provisions, the NRC staff must make the showing as set forth in the
Backfit rule or address the regulatory criteria set forth in the
applicable issue finality provision, as applicable, that would allow
the staff to impose the position.
3. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on
existing nuclear power plant licensees either now or in the future
(absent a voluntary request for a change from the licensee, holder of a
regulatory approval or a design certification applicant).
The NRC staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions
described in the draft SRP to existing (already issued) licenses (e.g.,
operating licenses and combined licenses) and regulatory approvals.
Hence, the issuance of this SRP guidance--even if considered guidance
subject to the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR
part 52--would not need to be evaluated as if it were a backfit or as
being inconsistent with these issue finality provisions. If, in the
future, the NRC staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP on holders
of already issued licenses in a manner that would constitute
backfitting or does not provide issue finality as described in the
applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must make a showing
as set forth in the Backfit Rule or address the criteria set forth in
the applicable issue finality provision, as applicable, that would
allow the staff to impose the position.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of September 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennivine K. Rankin,
Acting Chief, Division of Licensing, Siting, and Environmental
Analysis, Licensing Branch 3, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2018-19684 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P