Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2019 Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Year, 45866-45874 [2018-19594]
Download as PDF
45866
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
We plan to hold a public meeting to
receive oral comments on this notice of
inquiry and will announce the date,
time, and location in a separate
document published in the Federal
Register. If you signed up for docket
email alerts mentioned in the paragraph
above, you will receive an email notice
when the public meeting notice is
published and placed in the docket.
Dated: September 4, 2018.
N.C. Witt,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Savannah.
[FR Doc. 2018–19661 Filed 9–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 180517486–8772–01]
RIN 0648–XG263
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
2019 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Year
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
establish quotas, opening dates, and
retention limits for the 2019 fishing year
for the Atlantic commercial shark
fisheries. Quotas would be adjusted as
required or allowable based on any
over- and/or underharvests experienced
during the 2018 fishing year. In
addition, NMFS proposes opening dates
and commercial retention limits based
on adaptive management measures to
provide, to the extent practicable,
fishing opportunities for commercial
shark fishermen in all regions and areas.
The proposed measures could affect
fishing opportunities for commercial
shark fishermen in the northwestern
Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of
Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by October 11, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2018–0097, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0097, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Brad McHale, NMFS/SF1, 1315 EastWest Highway, National Marine
Fisheries Service, SSMC3, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Copies of this proposed rule and
supporting documents are available
from the HMS Management Division
website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.
gov/topic/atlantic-highly-migratoryspecies or by contacting Lauren
Latchford or Chante´ Davis by phone at
(301) 427–8503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karyl Brewster-Geisz, Lauren Latchford,
or Chante´ Davis at (301) 427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark
fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) and its amendments are
implemented by regulations at 50 CFR
part 635. For the Atlantic commercial
shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments
established commercial shark retention
limits, commercial quotas for species
and management groups, and
accounting measures for under- and
overharvests for the shark fisheries. The
FMP also includes adaptive
management measures, such as flexible
opening dates for the fishing year and
inseason adjustments to shark trip
limits, which provide management
flexibility in furtherance of equitable
fishing opportunities, to the extent
practicable, for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2019 Proposed Quotas
This proposed rule would adjust the
quota levels for the different shark
stocks and management groups for the
2019 Atlantic commercial shark fishing
year based on over- and underharvests
that occurred during the 2018 fishing
year, consistent with existing
regulations at 50 CFR 635.27(b). Overand underharvests are accounted for in
the same region, sub-region, and/or
fishery in which they occurred the
following year, except that large
overharvests may be spread over a
number of subsequent fishing years up
to a maximum of five years. Shark
stocks that are overfished, have
overfishing occurring, or have an
unknown status, as well as management
groups that contain one or more stocks
that are overfished, have overfishing
occurring, or have an unknown stock
status, will not have underharvest
carried over in the following year.
Stocks or management groups that are
not overfished and have no overfishing
occurring may have any underharvest
carried over in the following year, up to
50 percent of the base quota.
Based on harvests to date, and after
considering catch rates and landings
from previous years, NMFS proposes to
adjust the 2019 quotas for some
management groups as shown in Table
1. In the final rule, NMFS will adjust the
quotas as needed based on dealer
reports received by mid-October 2018.
Thus, all of the 2019 proposed quotas
for the respective stocks and
management groups will be subject to
further adjustment after NMFS
considers the dealer reports through
mid-October. All dealer reports that are
received after the October date will be
used to adjust 2020 quotas, as
appropriate.
While the sub-quota for the western
Gulf of Mexico aggregated large coastal
shark (LCS) was exceeded this year,
based on current landings in the eastern
Gulf of Mexico for that management
group and based on catch rates from
previous years from the eastern Gulf of
Mexico, NMFS does not believe the
overall regional Gulf of Mexico
aggregated LCS quota will be exceeded.
Thus, NMFS proposes the base line
quotas for the eastern and western Gulf
of Mexico sub-regions. If catch rates in
the eastern Gulf of Mexico increase, it
is possible that in the final rule NMFS
would need to reduce the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-regional aggregated LCS
quota to account for that sub-region’s
overharvest.
Because the Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group and
smoothhound shark management groups
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions have been determined not to be
overfished, and to have no overfishing
occurring, available underharvest (up to
50 percent of the base quota) from the
2018 fishing year for these management
groups may be applied to the respective
2019 quotas. NMFS proposes to account
for any underharvest of Gulf of Mexico
blacktip sharks by dividing
underharvest between the eastern and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional
quotas based on the sub-regional quota
split percentage implemented in
Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
(HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP).
For the sandbar shark, aggregated
large coastal shark (LCS), hammerhead
shark, non-blacknose small coastal
shark (SCS), blacknose shark, blue
shark, porbeagle shark, and pelagic
shark (other than porbeagle or blue
sharks) management groups, the 2018
underharvests cannot be carried over to
the 2019 fishing year because those
stocks or management groups have been
determined to be overfished, overfished
with overfishing occurring, or have an
45867
unknown status. Furthermore, with the
exception of the sub-regional western
Gulf of Mexico overharvest of the
aggregated LCS quota described above,
there were no overharvests to account
for in these management groups. Thus,
NMFS proposes that quotas for these
management groups be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment.
The proposed 2019 quotas by species
and management group are summarized
in Table 1; the description of the
calculations for each stock and
management group can be found below.
TABLE 1—2019 PROPOSED QUOTAS AND OPENING DATES FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUPS
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of July 13,
2018; final quotas are subject to change based on landings as of October 2018. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb.]
Region or
sub-region
Management group
Western Gulf of
Mexico.
Blacktip Sharks .................................
Aggregated Large Coastal Sharks ...
Hammerhead Sharks ........................
Eastern Gulf of
Mexico.
Blacktip Sharks .................................
Aggregated Large Coastal Sharks ...
Hammerhead Sharks ........................
Gulf of Mexico .....
Non-Blacknose
Small
Coastal
Sharks.
Smoothhound Sharks .......................
Atlantic .................
Aggregated Large Coastal Sharks ...
Hammerhead Sharks ........................
Non-Blacknose
Small
Coastal
Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks (South of 34° N
lat. only).
Smoothhound Sharks .......................
No regional
quotas.
Non-Sandbar LCS Research ............
Sandbar Shark Research .................
Blue Sharks .......................................
Porbeagle Sharks .............................
Pelagic
Sharks
Other
Porbeagle or Blue sharks.
Than
2018 Annual quota
Preliminary 2018
landings
Adjustments 2
2019 base
Annual quota
2019 proposed
annual quota
(A)
(B) 1
(C)
(D)
(D + C)
347.2 mt dw .........
765,392 lb dw .......
72 mt dw ..............
158,724 lb dw .......
11.9 mt dw ...........
26,301 lb dw .........
37.7 mt dw ...........
83,158 lb dw .........
85.5 mt dw ...........
188,593 lb dw .......
13.4 mt dw ...........
29,421 lb dw .........
112.6 mt dw .........
248,215 lb dw .......
504.6 mt dw .........
1,112,441 lb dw ....
168.9 mt dw .........
372,552 lb dw .......
27.1 mt dw ...........
59,736 lb dw .........
264.1 mt dw .........
582,333 lb dw .......
17.2 mt dw ...........
(37,921 lb dw) ......
1802.6 mt dw .......
3,971,587 lb dw ....
50.0 mt dw ...........
110,230 lb dw .......
90.7 mt dw ...........
199,943 lb dw .......
273.0 mt dw .........
601,856 lb dw .......
1.7 mt dw .............
3,748 lb dw ...........
488.0 mt dw .........
1,075,856 lb dw ....
330.2 mt dw .........
727,992 lb dw .......
92.2 mt dw ...........
203,400 lb dw .......
11.0 mt dw ...........
24,292 lb dw .........
16.3 mt dw ...........
35,856 lb dw .........
37.5 mt dw ...........
82,751 lb dw .........
6.2 mt dw .............
13,696 lb dw .........
27.5 mt dw ...........
60,731 lb dw .........
0 mt dw ................
0 lb dw ..................
45.9 mt dw ...........
101,245 lb dw .......
4.9 mt dw .............
10,777 lb dw .........
55.1 mt dw ...........
121,385 lb dw .......
3.4 mt dw .............
7,501 lb dw ...........
261.4 mt dw .........
576,181 lb dw .......
11.2 mt dw ...........
24,799 lb dw .........
31.0 mt dw ...........
68,443 lb dw .........
<13.6 mt dw .........
(<30,000 lb dw) ....
0 mt dw ................
0 lb dw ..................
38.1 mt dw ...........
83,896 lb dw .........
dw 3
34.6 mt
.........
76,401 lb dw .........
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
3.8 mt dw 3 ...........
8,301 lb dw ...........
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
168.2 mt dw .........
370,814 lb dw .......
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
600.85 mt dw .......
1,324,634 lb dw ....
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
231.0 mt dw .........
510,261 lb dw .......
72.0 mt dw ...........
158,724 lb dw .......
11.9 mt dw ...........
26,301 lb dw .........
25.1 mt dw ...........
55,439 lb dw .........
85.5 mt dw ...........
188,593 lb dw .......
13.4 mt dw ...........
29,421 lb dw .........
112.6 mt dw .........
248,215 lb dw .......
336.4 mt dw .........
741,627 lb dw .......
168.9 mt dw .........
372,552 lb dw .......
27.1 mt dw ...........
59,736 lb dw .........
264.1 mt dw .........
582,333 lb dw .......
17.2 mt dw ...........
37,921 lb dw .........
1201.7 mt dw .......
2,649,268 lb dw ....
50.0 mt dw ...........
110,230 lb dw .......
90.7 mt dw ...........
199,943 lb dw .......
273.0 mt dw .........
601,856 lb dw .......
1.7 mt dw .............
3,748 lb dw ...........
488.0 mt dw .........
1,075,856 lb dw ....
265.6 mt dw.
586,662.2 lb dw.
72.0 mt dw.
158,724 lb dw.
11.9 mt dw.
26,301 lb dw.
28.9 mt dw.
63,740 lb dw
85.5 mt dw.
188,593 lb dw.
13.4 mt dw.
29,421 lb dw.
112.6. mt dw.
248,215 lb dw.
504.6 mt dw.
1,112,441 lb dw.
168.9 mt dw.
372,552 lb dw.
27.1 mt dw.
59,736 lb dw.
264.1 mt dw.
582,333 lb dw
17.2 mt dw
3,7921 lb dw.
1802.55 mt dw.
3,973,902 lb dw.
50.0 mt dw.
110,230 lb dw.
90.7 mt dw.
199,943 lb dw.
273.0 mt dw.
601,856 lb dw.
1.7 mt dw.
3,748 lb dw.
488.0 mt dw.
1,075,856 lb dw.
1 Landings
are from January 1, 2018, through July 13, 2018, and are subject to change.
adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the underharvest
adjustments cannot exceed 50 percent of the base quota.
3 This proposed rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota due to an overall underharvest of 38.4 mt dw (84,702 lb dw) in 2018. The overall quota would be split based on percentages that are allocated to each sub-region, as explained in the text.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2 Underharvest
1. Proposed 2019 Quotas for the Gulf of
Mexico Region Shark Management
Groups
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for blacktip sharks in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region is 265.6 mt dw
(586,662 lb dw) and the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region is 28.9 mt dw (63,740
lb dw; Table 1). As of July 13, 2018,
preliminary reported landings for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
blacktip sharks in the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were at 95 percent
(330.2 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels
(347.2 mt dw), while the blacktip sharks
in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were at 43 percent (16.3 mt dw) of their
2018 quota levels (37.7 mt dw).
Reported landings have not exceeded
the 2018 quota to date, and the western
Gulf of Mexico sub-region fishery was
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
closed on March 13, 2018 (83 FR
10802). Gulf of Mexico blacktip sharks
have not been declared to be overfished,
to have overfishing occurring, or to have
an unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
blacktip sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore could be
applied to the 2019 quotas up to 50
percent of the base quota. Additionally,
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
45868
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
any underharvest would be divided
between the two sub-regions, based on
the percentages that are allocated to
each sub-region, which are set forth in
§ 635.27(b)(1)(ii)(C). To date, the overall
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group is underharvested by
38.4 mt dw (84,702 lb dw). Accordingly,
the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark quota would be increased by 34.6
mt dw or 90.2 percent of the
underharvest, while the eastern Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark sub-regional
quota would be increased by 3.8 mt dw,
or 9.8 percent of the underharvest
(Table 1). Thus, the proposed western
sub-regional Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark commercial quota is 265.6 mt dw
(586,662 lb dw), and the proposed
eastern sub-regional Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark commercial quota is 28.9
mt dw (63,740 lb dw).
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for aggregated LCS in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region is 72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb dw), and the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region is 85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb dw; Table 1). As of July 13,
2018, preliminary reported landings for
aggregated LCS in the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were at 128 percent
(92.2 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels
(72.0 mt dw), while the aggregated LCS
in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were at 44 percent (37.5 mt dw) of their
2018 quota levels (85.5 mt dw).
Reported landings have not exceeded
the overall Gulf of Mexico regional 2018
quota to date, and the western
aggregated LCS sub-region fishery was
closed on March 13, 2018 (83 FR
10802). Given the unknown status of
some of the shark species within the
Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS
management group, underharvests
cannot be carried over pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that
the 2019 quotas for aggregated LCS in
the western Gulf of Mexico and eastern
Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be equal to
their annual base quotas without
adjustment, because the overall regional
quota has not been overharvested and
because underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial
quotas for hammerhead sharks in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region and
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region are
11.9 mt dw (26,301 lb dw) and 13.4 mt
dw (29,421 lb dw), respectively (Table
1). As of July 13, 2018, preliminary
reported landings for hammerhead
sharks in the western Gulf of Mexico
sub-region were at 92 percent (11.0 mt
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
dw) of their 2018 quota levels (11.9 mt
dw), while landings of hammerhead
sharks in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
sub-region were at 47 percent (6.2 mt
dw) of their 2018 quota levels (13.4 mt
dw). Reported landings from both Gulf
of Mexico and Atlantic regions have not
exceeded the 2018 overall hammerhead
quota to date, and the western
hammerhead shark Gulf of Mexico subregion fishery was closed on March 13,
2018 (83 FR 10802). Given the
overfished status of the scalloped
hammerhead shark, the hammerhead
shark quota cannot be adjusted for any
underharvests. Therefore, based on both
preliminary estimates and catch rates
from previous years, the fact that the
2018 overall hammerhead shark quota
has not been overharvested to date, and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2)(ii), NMFS proposes that
the 2019 quotas for hammerhead sharks
in the western Gulf of Mexico and
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be
equal to their annual base quotas
without adjustment.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region is 112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw). As of July 13, 2018, preliminary
reported landings of non-blacknose SCS
were at 24 percent (27.5 mt dw) of their
2018 quota level (112.6 mt dw) in the
Gulf of Mexico region. Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2018
quota to date. Given the unknown status
of bonnethead sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico non-blacknose SCS management
group, underharvests cannot be carried
forward pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(ii).
Therefore, based on both preliminary
estimates and catch rates from previous
years, and consistent with the current
regulations at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2019 quota for nonblacknose SCS in the Gulf of Mexico
region be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment, because there have
not been any overharvests and because
underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441
lb dw). As of July 13, 2018, there are no
preliminary reported landings of
smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region. Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound sharks have not been
declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an
unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore could be
applied to the 2019 quotas up to 50
percent of the base quota. Accordingly,
NMFS proposes to increase the 2019
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Gulf of Mexico smoothhound shark
quota to adjust for anticipated
underharvests in 2018 as allowed. The
proposed 2019 adjusted base annual
quota for Gulf of Mexico smoothhound
sharks is 504.6 mt dw (336.4 mt dw
annual base quota + 168.2 mt dw 2018
underharvest = 504.6 mt dw 2019
adjusted annual quota).
2. Proposed 2019 Quotas for the
Atlantic Region Shark Management
Groups
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for aggregated LCS in the Atlantic region
is 168.9 mt dw (372,552 lb dw). As of
July 13, 2018, the aggregated LCS
fishery in the Atlantic region is still
open and preliminary landings indicate
that only 27 percent of the quota, or 45.9
mt dw, has been harvested. Given the
unknown status of some of the shark
species within the Atlantic aggregated
LCS management group, underharvests
cannot be carried over pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and
consistent with current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2018 quota for aggregated LCS in the
Atlantic region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests
and underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic
region is 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw).
Currently, the hammerhead shark
fishery in the Atlantic region is still
open and preliminary landings as of
July 13, 2018, indicate that only 18
percent of the Atlantic regional quota, or
4.9 mt dw, has been harvested. Reported
landings from both Gulf of Mexico and
Atlantic regions have not exceeded the
2018 overall hammerhead quota to date.
Given the overfished status of
hammerhead sharks, underharvests
cannot be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that
the 2019 quota for hammerhead sharks
in the Atlantic region be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment,
because the overall hammerhead shark
quota has not been overharvested, and
because underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for non-blacknose SCS in the Atlantic
region is 264.1 mt dw (582,333 lb dw).
As of July 13, 2018, preliminary
reported landings of non-blacknose SCS
were at 21 percent (55.1 mt dw) of their
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2018 quota level in the Atlantic region.
Reported landings have not exceeded
the 2018 quota to date. Given the
unknown status of bonnethead sharks
within the Atlantic non-blacknose SCS
management group, underharvests
cannot be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates of catch rates
from previous years, and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2019 quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Atlantic region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests,
and because underharvests cannot be
carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for blacknose sharks in the Atlantic
region is 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw).
This quota is available in the Atlantic
region only for those vessels operating
south of 34° N. latitude. North of 34° N.
latitude, retention, landing, or sale of
blacknose sharks is prohibited. As of
July 13, 2018, preliminary reported
landings of blacknose sharks were at 20
percent (3.4 mt dw) of their 2018 quota
levels in the Atlantic region. Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2018
quota to date. Pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2),
because blacknose sharks have been
declared to be overfished with
overfishing occurring in the Atlantic
region, NMFS could not carry forward
the remaining underharvest. Therefore,
NMFS proposes that the 2019 Atlantic
blacknose shark quota be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic
region is 1,802.6 mt dw (3,973,902 lb
dw). As of July 13, 2018, preliminary
reported landings of smoothhound
sharks were at 14 percent (261.4 mt dw)
of their 2018 quota levels in the Atlantic
region. Atlantic smoothhound sharks
have not been declared to be overfished,
to have overfishing occurring, or to have
an unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Atlantic
region therefore could be applied to the
2019 quotas up to 50 percent of the base
quota. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to
increase the 2019 Atlantic smoothhound
shark quota to adjust for anticipated
underharvests in 2018 as allowed. The
proposed 2019 adjusted base annual
quota for Atlantic smoothhound sharks
is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,201.7 mt dw annual
base quota + 600.9 mt dw 2018
underharvest = 1,802.6 mt dw 2019
adjusted annual quota).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
3. Proposed 2019 Quotas for Shark
Management Groups With No Regional
Quotas
The 2019 proposed commercial
quotas within the shark research fishery
are 50 mt dw (110,230 lb dw) for
research LCS and 90 mt dw (199,943 lb
dw) for sandbar sharks. Within the
shark research fishery, as of July 13,
2018, preliminary reported landings of
research LCS were at 22 percent (11.2
mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels, and
sandbar shark reported landings were at
34 percent (31.0 mt dw) of their 2018
quota levels. Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2018 quotas to date. Under
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), because sandbar
sharks and scalloped hammerhead
sharks within the research LCS
management group have been
determined to be either overfished or
overfished with overfishing occurring,
underharvests for these management
groups cannot be carried forward to the
2019 quotas. Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates, and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2019 quota in the shark research fishery
be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment because there have
not been any overharvests, and because
underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial
quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle sharks,
and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle
or blue sharks) are 273.0 mt dw (601,856
lb dw), 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw), and
488.0 mt dw (1,075,856 lb dw),
respectively. As of July 13, 2018,
preliminary reported landings of blue
sharks were at less than 5 percent (less
than 13.6 mt dw) of their 2018 quota
level (273.0 mt dw), there are no
preliminary reported landings of
porbeagle sharks, and landings of
pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle and
blue sharks) were at 8 percent (38.1 mt
dw) of their 2018 quota level (488.0 mt
dw). Given that these pelagic species are
overfished, have overfishing occurring,
or have an unknown status,
underharvests cannot be carried forward
pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore,
based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that
the 2019 quotas for blue sharks,
porbeagle sharks, and pelagic sharks
(other than porbeagle and blue sharks)
be equal to their annual base quotas
without adjustment, because there have
not been any overharvests and because
underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45869
4. Proposed Opening Dates and
Retention Limits for the 2019 Atlantic
Commercial Shark Fishing Year
For each fishery, NMFS considered
the seven ‘‘Opening Commercial Fishing
Season Criteria’’ listed at § 635.27(b)(3).
The Criteria includes factors such as the
available annual quotas for the current
fishing season, estimated season length
and average weekly catch rates from
previous years, length of the season and
fishery participation in past years,
impacts to accomplishing objectives of
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments, temporal
variation in behavior or biology of target
species (e.g., seasonal distribution or
abundance), impact of catch rates in one
region on another, and effects of delayed
openings.
NMFS applied the Opening
Commercial Fishing Season Criteria by
examining the over- and underharvests
of the different management groups in
the 2018 fishing year to determine the
likely effects of the proposed
commercial quotas for 2019 on shark
stocks and fishermen across regional
and sub-regional fishing areas. NMFS
also examined the potential season
length and previous catch rates to
ensure, to the extent practicable, that
equitable fishing opportunities be
provided to fishermen in all areas.
Lastly, NMFS examined the seasonal
variation of the different species/
management groups and the effects on
fishing opportunities.
NMFS also considered the six
‘‘Inseason trip limit adjustment criteria’’
listed at § 635.24(a)(8) for directed shark
limited access permit holders intending
to land LCS other than sandbar sharks.
Those criteria are: the amount of
remaining shark quota in the relevant
area or region, to date, based on dealer
reports; the catch rates of the relevant
shark species/complexes, to date, based
on dealer reports; estimated date of
fishery closure based on when the
landings are projected to reach 80percent of the available overall,
regional, and/or sub-regional quota, if
the fishery’s landings are not projected
to reach 100 percent of the applicable
quota before the end of the season, or
when the season of a quota-linked
management group is closed; effects of
the adjustment on accomplishing the
objectives of the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments;
variations in seasonal distribution,
abundance, or migratory patterns of the
relevant shark species based on
scientific and fishery-based knowledge;
and/or effects of catch rates in one part
of a region precluding vessels in another
part of that region from having a
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
45870
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
reasonable opportunity to harvest a
portion of the relevant quota.
After considering all these criteria,
NMFS is proposing to open the 2019
Atlantic commercial shark fishing
season for all shark management groups
in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean,
including the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean Sea, on or about January 1,
2019, after the publication of the final
rule for this action (Table 2). NMFS is
also proposing to start the 2019
commercial shark fishing season with
the commercial retention limit of 36
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in both the eastern and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-regions, and
a commercial retention limit of 25 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip in the Atlantic region (Table 2).
NMFS will consider public comments
received during the current year and
catch rates from this year. Any retention
limits that are proposed could change as
a result of public comments as well as
catch rates and landings information
based on updated data available when
drafting the final rule.
TABLE 2—QUOTA LINKAGES, SEASON OPENING DATES, AND COMMERCIAL RETENTION LIMIT BY REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP
Management group
Quota linkages
Season opening
dates
Commercial retention limits for directed
shark limited access permit holders
(inseason adjustments are possible)
Blacktip Sharks .....................................
Aggregated Large Coastal Sharks
Hammerhead Sharks
Blacktip Sharks .....................................
Aggregated Large Coastal Sharks
Hammerhead Sharks
Not Linked ..........
Linked .................
January 1, 2019 ..
36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
Not Linked ..........
Linked .................
January 1, 2019 ..
Non-Blacknose Small Coastal Sharks ..
Smoothhound Sharks ............................
Aggregated Large Coastal Sharks ........
Hammerhead Sharks
Not Linked ..........
Not Linked ..........
Linked .................
January 1, 2019 ..
January 1, 2019 ..
January 1, 2019 ..
Non-Blacknose Small Coastal Sharks ..
Linked (South of
34° N lat. only).
.............................
January 1, 2019 ..
36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
NMFS anticipates an inseason increase to 50 large coastal sharks
other than sandbar sharks per vessel
per trip around April 1, 2019.
N/A.
N/A.
25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
If quota is landed quickly (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of quota is
caught at the beginning of the year),
NMFS anticipates an inseason reduction (e.g., to 3 or fewer LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip), then an inseason increase to 36
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip around July 15, 2019.
N/A.
Not Linked ..........
Linked .................
January 1, 2019 ..
January 1, 2019 ..
8 Blacknose sharks per vessel per trip
(applies to directed and incidental
permit holders).
N/A.
N/A.
Not Linked ..........
January 1, 2019 ..
N/A.
Region or subregion
Western Gulf of
Mexico.
Eastern Gulf of
Mexico.
Gulf of Mexico ........
Atlantic ...................
Blacknose Sharks (South of 34° N lat.
only).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
No regional quotas
Smoothhound Sharks ............................
Non-Sandbar LCS Research
Sandbar Shark Research ......................
Blue Sharks ...........................................
Porbeagle Sharks
Pelagic Sharks Other Than Porbeagle
or Blue.
In the Gulf of Mexico region, NMFS
proposes opening the fishing season on
or about January 1, 2019, for the
aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and
hammerhead shark management groups
with the commercial retention limits of
36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip for directed shark permit
holders in the eastern and western subregion. This opening date and retention
limit combination would provide, to the
extent practicable, equitable
opportunities across the fisheries
management sub-regions. This opening
date takes into account all the season
opening criteria listed in § 635.27(b)(3),
and particularly the criteria that NMFS
consider the length of the season for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
.............................
different species and/or management
group in the previous years
(§ 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)) and whether
fishermen were able to participate in the
fishery in those years (§ 635.27(b)(3)(v)).
The proposed commercial retention
limits take into account the criteria
listed in § 635.24(a)(8), and particularly
the criterion that NMFS consider the
catch rates of the relevant shark species/
complexes based on dealer reports to
date (§ 635.24(a)(8)(ii)). NMFS may also
adjust the retention limit in the Gulf of
Mexico region throughout the season to
ensure fishermen in all parts of the
region have an opportunity to harvest
aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and
hammerhead sharks (see the criteria
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
listed at § 635.27(b)(3)(v) and
§ 635.24(a)(8)(ii), (v), and (vi)). In 2018,
the aggregated LCS, hammerhead, and
blacktip shark management groups in
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were closed on March 13, 2018 (82 FR
20447). As such, in 2019, NMFS is
proposing a reduction in the
commercial trip limit for these
management groups in order to ensure
the management group is open until at
least April 2019, which is when the
State of Louisiana closes state waters to
shark fishing and when that State has
previously asked that NMFS close
Federal shark fisheries to match state
regulations (see the criteria listed at
§ 635.27(b)(3)(vii) and
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 635.24(a)(8)(iii)). In the eastern Gulf of
Mexico, NMFS is proposing a lower trip
limit to ensure fishermen in both Gulf
of Mexico sub-regions have an
opportunity to harvest aggregated LCS,
blacktip sharks, and hammerhead
sharks and to reduce any confusion or
inequities caused by establishing
different catch limits for each subregion. When the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region closes, which is
expected to occur around April 1, 2019,
NMFS may increase the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region retention limit,
potentially up to 50 or 55 sharks per
trip. Modifying the retention limit on an
inseason basis in this manner is similar
to what NMFS has done successfully in
recent years in the Atlantic region.
NMFS expects such changes in
retention limit to allow fishermen in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico the opportunity
to fully land the available quotas.
In the Atlantic region, NMFS
proposes opening the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups on or about January 1, 2019. This
opening date is the same date that these
management groups opened in 2018. As
described below, this opening date also
takes into account all the criteria listed
in § 635.27(b)(3), and particularly the
criterion that NMFS consider the effects
of catch rates in one part of a region
precluding vessels in another part of
that region from having a reasonable
opportunity to harvest a portion of the
different species and/or management
quotas (§ 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The 2018 data
indicates that an opening date of
January 1, coupled with inseason
adjustments to the retention limit,
provided a reasonable opportunity for
fishermen in every part of each region
to harvest a portion of the available
quotas (§ 635.27(b)(3)(i)) while
accounting for variations in seasonal
distribution of the different species in
the management groups
(§ 635.27(b)(3)(iv)). In 2018, when the
aggregated LCS quota was harvested too
quickly, NMFS reduced the retention
limit to three sharks per trip (May 10,
2018; 83 FR 17765) to allow fishermen
in the North Atlantic an opportunity to
fish later in the year when sharks are
available in the North Atlantic area (see
the criteria at § 635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v),
and (vi)). NMFS then increased the
retention limit to 36 sharks per trip on
July 18, 2018 (83 FR 33870), to increase
fishing opportunities for all fishermen
across the Atlantic region. Because the
quotas we propose for 2019 are the same
as the quotas in 2018, NMFS expects
that the season lengths and therefore the
participation of various fishermen
throughout the region, would be similar
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
in 2019 (§ 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)).
Based on the recent performance of the
fishery, the January 1 opening date
appears to meet the objectives of the
2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments (§ 635.27(b)(3)(vi)).
Therefore, changing the opening date in
the fishery seems unnecessary.
In addition, for the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups in the Atlantic region, NMFS
proposes opening the fishing year with
the commercial retention limit for
directed shark limited access permit
holders of 25 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip. This retention
limit should allow fishermen to harvest
some of the 2019 quota at the beginning
of the year when sharks are more
prevalent in the South Atlantic area (see
the criteria at § 635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v),
and (vi)). As was done in 2018, if it
appears that the quota is being
harvested too quickly (i.e., about 20
percent) to allow directed fishermen
throughout the entire region an
opportunity to fish and ensure enough
quota remains until later in the year,
NMFS would reduce the commercial
retention limits to incidental levels (3
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip) or another level
calculated to reduce the harvest of LCS
taking into account § 635.27(b)(3) and
the inseason trip limit adjustment
criteria listed in § 635.24(a)(8). If the
quota continues to be harvested quickly,
NMFS could reduce the retention limit
to 0 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip to ensure enough quota
remains until later in the year. If either
situation occurs, NMFS would publish
in the Federal Register notification of
any inseason adjustments of the
retention limit to an appropriate limit of
sharks per trip. In 2018, NMFS reduced
the retention limit to 3 LCS other than
sandbar sharks on May 10, 2018 (83 FR
21744) when the aggregated LCS
landings reached approximately 20
percent of the aggregated LCS quota,
and did not need to reduce it further.
Also, as was done in 2018, NMFS will
consider increasing the commercial
retention limits per trip at a later date
if necessary to provide fishermen in the
northern portion of the Atlantic region
an opportunity to retain aggregated LCS
and hammerhead sharks after
considering the appropriate inseason
adjustment criteria. Similarly, at some
point later in the year (e.g., July 15),
potentially equivalent to how the 2018
fishing season operated, NMFS may
consider increasing the retention limit
to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip or another amount, as
deemed appropriate, after considering
the inseason trip limit adjustment
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45871
criteria. If the quota is being harvested
too quickly or too slowly, NMFS could
adjust the retention limit appropriately
to ensure the fishery remains open most
of the rest of the year. Since the fishery
is still open with a majority of the quota
available, NMFS will monitor the rest of
the fishing year and could make changes
to the proposed 2019 opening date if
necessary to ensure equitable fishing
opportunities.
All of the shark management groups
would remain open until December 31,
2019, or until NMFS determines that the
landings for any shark management
group have reached, or are projected to
reach, 80-percent of the available
overall, regional, and/or sub-regional
quota, if the fishery’s landings are not
projected to reach 100 percent of the
applicable quota before the end of the
season, or when the quota-linked
management group is closed. If NMFS
determines that a non-linked shark
species or management group must be
closed, then, consistent with
§ 635.28(b)(2) for non-linked quotas
(e.g., eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip,
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip, Gulf of
Mexico non-blacknose SCS, pelagic
sharks, or the Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound sharks), NMFS will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of closure for that shark species, shark
management group, region, and/or subregion that will be effective no fewer
than four days from the date of filing (83
FR 31677). For the blacktip shark
management group, regulations at
§ 635.28(b)(5)(i) through (v) authorize
NMFS to close the management group
before landings reach, or are expected to
reach, 80-percent of the available
overall, regional, and/or sub-regional
quota, after considering the following
criteria and other relevant factors:
Season length based on available subregional quota and average sub-regional
catch rates; variability in regional and/
or sub-regional seasonal distribution,
abundance, and migratory patterns;
effects on accomplishing the objectives
of the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments; amount of
remaining shark quotas in the relevant
sub-region; and regional and/or subregional catch rates of the relevant shark
species or management groups. From
the effective date and time of the closure
until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register, that additional quota is
available and the season is reopened,
the fisheries for the shark species or
management group are closed, even
across fishing years.
If NMFS determines that a linked
shark species or management group
must be closed, then, consistent with
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
45872
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 635.28(b)(3) for linked quotas and the
Final Rule to Revise Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Shark Fishery
Closure Regulations (83 FR 31677),
NMFS will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of closure for all of the
species and/or management groups in a
linked group that will be effective no
fewer than four days from date of filing.
From the effective date and time of the
closure until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register, that additional quota is
available and the season is reopened,
the fisheries for all linked species and/
or management groups are closed, even
across fishing years. The linked quotas
of the species and/or management
groups are Atlantic hammerhead sharks
and Atlantic aggregated LCS; eastern
Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks and
eastern Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS;
western Gulf of Mexico hammerhead
sharks and western Gulf of Mexico
aggregated LCS; and Atlantic blacknose
and Atlantic non-blacknose SCS south
of 34° N. latitude.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may
be submitted via www.regulations.gov or
by mail. NMFS solicits comments on
this proposed rule by October 11, 2018
(see DATES and ADDRESSES).
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that the proposed rule is
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
NMFS determined that the final rules
to implement Amendment 2 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (June
24, 2008, 73 FR 35778; corrected on July
15, 2008, 73 FR 40658), Amendment 5a
to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013),
Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR 50073;
August 18, 2015), and Amendment 9 to
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP (80 FR 73128; November 24, 2015)
are consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the approved coastal management
program of coastal states on the Atlantic
including the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean Sea as required under the
Coastal Zone Management Act. Pursuant
to 15 CFR 930.41(a), NMFS provided the
Coastal Zone Management Program of
each coastal state a 60-day period to
review the consistency determination
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
and to advise the Agency of their
concurrence. NMFS received
concurrence with the consistency
determinations from several states and
inferred consistency from those states
that did not respond within the 60-day
time period. This proposed action to
establish opening dates and adjust
quotas for the 2019 fishing year for the
Atlantic commercial shark fisheries
does not change the framework
previously consulted upon; therefore,
no additional consultation is required.
An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. The IRFA
analysis follows.
Section 603(b)(1) of the RFA requires
agencies to explain the purpose of the
rule. This rule, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments, is being proposed to
establish the 2019 commercial shark
fishing quotas, retention limits, and
fishing seasons. Without this rule, the
commercial shark fisheries would close
on December 31, 2018, and would not
open until another action was taken.
This proposed rule would be
implemented according to the
regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments. Thus, NMFS expects few,
if any, economic impacts to fishermen
other than those already analyzed in the
2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments, based on the quota
adjustments.
Section 603(b)(2) of the RFA requires
agencies to explain the rule’s objectives.
The objectives of this rule are to: Adjust
the baseline quotas for all shark
management groups based on any overand/or underharvests from the previous
fishing year(s); establish the opening
dates of the various management
groups; and establish the retention
limits for the blacktip shark, aggregated
large coastal shark, and hammerhead
shark management groups in order to
provide, to the extent practicable,
equitable opportunities across the
fishing management regions and/or subregions while also considering the
ecological needs of the different shark
species.
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires
agencies to provide an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the
rule would apply. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States, including
fish harvesters. Provision is made under
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SBA’s regulations for an agency to
develop its own industry-specific size
standards after consultation with
Advocacy and an opportunity for public
comment (see 13 CFR 121.903(c)).
Under this provision, NMFS may
establish size standards that differ from
those established by the SBA Office of
Size Standards, but only for use by
NMFS and only for the purpose of
conducting an analysis of economic
effects in fulfillment of the agency’s
obligations under the RFA. To utilize
this provision, NMFS must publish such
size standards in the Federal Register,
which NMFS did on December 29, 2015
(80 FR 81194). In this final rule effective
on July 1, 2016, NMFS established a
small business size standard of $11
million in annual gross receipts for all
businesses in the commercial fishing
industry (NAICS 11411) for RFA
compliance purposes. NMFS considers
all HMS permit holders to be small
entities because they had average
annual receipts of less than $11 million
for commercial fishing.
As of October 2017, the proposed rule
would apply to the approximately 221
directed commercial shark permit
holders, 269 incidental commercial
shark permit holders, 154 smoothhound
shark permit holders, and 113
commercial shark dealers. Not all
permit holders are active in the fishery
in any given year. Active directed
commercial shark permit holders are
defined as those with valid permits that
landed one shark based on HMS
electronic dealer reports. Of the 490
directed and incidental commercial
shark permit holders, only 28 permit
holders landed sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region and only 78 landed
sharks in the Atlantic region. Of the 154
smoothhound shark permit holders,
only 26 permit holders landed
smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic
region and none landed smoothhound
sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region.
NMFS has determined that the proposed
rule would not likely affect any small
governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule does not contain
any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements (5 U.S.C.
603(b)(4)). Similarly, this proposed rule
would not conflict, duplicate, or overlap
with other relevant Federal rules (5
U.S.C. 603(b)(5)). Fishermen, dealers,
and managers in these fisheries must
comply with a number of international
agreements as domestically
implemented, domestic laws, and FMPs.
These include, but are not limited to,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Atlantic
Tunas Convention Act, the High Seas
Fishing Compliance Act, the Marine
Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Species Act, the National
Environmental Policy Act, the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Section 603(c) of the RFA requires
each IRFA to contain a description of
any significant alternatives to the
proposed rule which would accomplish
the stated objectives of applicable
statutes and minimize any significant
economic impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. Additionally, the RFA
(5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)–(4)) lists four general
categories of significant alternatives that
would assist an agency in the
development of significant alternatives.
These categories of alternatives are: (1)
Establishment of differing compliance
or reporting requirements or timetables
that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2)
clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design
standards; and, (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule for small entities. In
order to meet the objectives of this
proposed rule, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS cannot
exempt small entities or change the
reporting requirements only for small
entities because all the entities affected
are considered small entities; therefore,
there are no alternatives discussed that
fall under the first, second, and fourth
categories described above. NMFS does
not know of any performance or design
standards that would satisfy the
aforementioned objectives of this
rulemaking while, concurrently,
complying with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act; therefore, there are no alternatives
considered under the third category.
This rulemaking does not establish
management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements
previously adopted and analyzed
measures with adjustments, as specified
in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments and the
Environmental Assessment (EA) that
accompanied the 2011 shark quota
specifications rule (75 FR 76302;
December 8, 2010). Thus, NMFS
proposes to adjust quotas established
and analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments
by subtracting the underharvest or
adding the overharvest as allowable.
Thus, NMFS has limited flexibility to
modify the quotas in this rule, the
impacts of which were analyzed in
previous regulatory flexibility analyses.
Based on the 2017 ex-vessel price
(Table 3), fully harvesting the
unadjusted 2019 Atlantic shark
commercial baseline quotas could result
in total fleet revenues of $7,184,943. For
the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group, NMFS is proposing
to increase the baseline sub-regional
quotas due to the underharvests in 2018.
45873
The increase for the western Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark management
group could result in a $79,243 gain in
total revenues for fishermen in that subregion, while the increase for the eastern
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group could result in a
$9,781 gain in total revenues for
fishermen in that sub-region. For the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
smoothhound shark management
groups, NMFS is proposing to increase
the baseline quotas due to the
underharvest in 2018. This would cause
a potential gain in revenue of $581,718
for the fleet in the Gulf of Mexico region
and a potential gain in revenue of
$1,323,867 for the fleet in the Atlantic
region.
All of these changes in gross revenues
are similar to the changes in gross
revenues analyzed in the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments. The final regulatory
flexibility analyses for those
amendments concluded that the
economic impacts on these small
entities are expected to be minimal. In
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments and the EA for
the 2011 shark quota specifications rule,
NMFS stated it would be conducting
annual rulemakings and considering the
potential economic impacts of adjusting
the quotas for under- and overharvests
at that time.
TABLE 3—AVERAGE EX-VESSEL PRICES PER LB DW FOR EACH SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2017
Species
Western Gulf of Mexico ...............................
Blacktip Shark ................................................................................
Aggregated LCS ............................................................................
Hammerhead Shark .......................................................................
Blacktip Shark ................................................................................
Aggregated LCS ............................................................................
Hammerhead Shark .......................................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS ......................................................................
Smoothhound Shark ......................................................................
Aggregated LCS ............................................................................
Hammerhead Shark .......................................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS ......................................................................
Blacknose Shark ............................................................................
Smoothhound Shark ......................................................................
Shark Research Fishery (Aggregated LCS) ..................................
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar only) .......................................
Blue shark ......................................................................................
Porbeagle shark* ...........................................................................
Other Pelagic sharks .....................................................................
Eastern Gulf of Mexico ...............................
Gulf of Mexico .............................................
Atlantic .........................................................
No Region ...................................................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Average
ex-vessel
meat price
Region
$0.51
0.51
0.67
0.62
0.43
0.55
0.38
1.50
0.95
0.41
0.96
1.05
0.70
0.80
0.50
1.40
1.54
1.52
Average
ex-vessel
fin price
$11.03
12.51
11.67
8.22
13.00
12.80
8.68
1.91
11.47
13.91
7.33
7.33
1.63
12.40
12.40
11.44
2.82
2.82
* Used other pelagic shark ex-vessel prices for porbeagle sharks ex-vessel prices since there currently are no landings of porbeagle sharks.
For this rule, NMFS also reviewed the
criteria at § 635.27(b)(3) to determine
when opening each fishery would
provide equitable opportunities for
fishermen, to the extent practicable,
while also considering the ecological
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s)
could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and
number of fishing participants during
the year. For the 2019 fishing year,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NMFS is proposing to open all of the
shark management groups on the
effective date of the final rule for this
action (expected to be on or about
January 1). The direct and indirect
economic impacts would be neutral on
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
45874
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
a short- and long-term basis because
NMFS is not proposing to change the
opening dates of these fisheries from the
status quo.
Authority 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
Dated: September 5, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–19594 Filed 9–10–18; 8:45 am]
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Sep 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45866-45874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19594]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 180517486-8772-01]
RIN 0648-XG263
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2019 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Year
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish quotas, opening dates, and
retention limits for the 2019 fishing year for the Atlantic commercial
shark fisheries. Quotas would be adjusted as required or allowable
based on any over- and/or underharvests experienced during the 2018
fishing year. In addition, NMFS proposes opening dates and commercial
retention limits based on adaptive management measures to provide, to
the extent practicable, fishing opportunities for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas. The proposed measures could affect
fishing opportunities for commercial shark fishermen in the
northwestern Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean
Sea.
DATES: Written comments must be received by October 11, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2018-0097, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0097, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Brad McHale, NMFS/SF1,
1315 East-West Highway, National Marine Fisheries Service, SSMC3,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Copies of this proposed rule and supporting documents are available
from the HMS Management Division website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantic-highly-migratory-species or by
contacting Lauren Latchford or Chant[eacute] Davis by phone at (301)
427-8503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karyl Brewster-Geisz, Lauren
Latchford, or Chant[eacute] Davis at (301) 427-8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and its
amendments are implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For the
Atlantic commercial shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments established commercial shark retention limits,
commercial quotas for species and management groups, and accounting
measures for under- and overharvests for the shark fisheries. The FMP
also includes adaptive management measures, such as flexible opening
dates for the fishing year and inseason adjustments to shark trip
limits, which provide management flexibility in furtherance of
equitable fishing opportunities, to the extent practicable, for
commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas.
2019 Proposed Quotas
This proposed rule would adjust the quota levels for the different
shark stocks and management groups for the 2019 Atlantic commercial
shark fishing year based on over- and underharvests that occurred
during the 2018 fishing year, consistent with existing regulations at
50 CFR 635.27(b). Over- and underharvests are accounted for in the same
region, sub-region, and/or fishery in which they occurred the following
year, except that large overharvests may be spread over a number of
subsequent fishing years up to a maximum of five years. Shark stocks
that are overfished, have overfishing occurring, or have an unknown
status, as well as management groups that contain one or more stocks
that are overfished, have overfishing occurring, or have an unknown
stock status, will not have underharvest carried over in the following
year. Stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no
overfishing occurring may have any underharvest carried over in the
following year, up to 50 percent of the base quota.
Based on harvests to date, and after considering catch rates and
landings from previous years, NMFS proposes to adjust the 2019 quotas
for some management groups as shown in Table 1. In the final rule, NMFS
will adjust the quotas as needed based on dealer reports received by
mid-October 2018. Thus, all of the 2019 proposed quotas for the
respective stocks and management groups will be subject to further
adjustment after NMFS considers the dealer reports through mid-October.
All dealer reports that are received after the October date will be
used to adjust 2020 quotas, as appropriate.
While the sub-quota for the western Gulf of Mexico aggregated large
coastal shark (LCS) was exceeded this year, based on current landings
in the eastern Gulf of Mexico for that management group and based on
catch rates from previous years from the eastern Gulf of Mexico, NMFS
does not believe the overall regional Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS
quota will be exceeded. Thus, NMFS proposes the base line quotas for
the eastern and western Gulf of Mexico sub-regions. If catch rates in
the eastern Gulf of Mexico increase, it is possible that in the final
rule NMFS would need to reduce the western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional
aggregated LCS quota to account for that sub-region's overharvest.
Because the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group and
smoothhound shark management groups
[[Page 45867]]
in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic regions have been determined not to
be overfished, and to have no overfishing occurring, available
underharvest (up to 50 percent of the base quota) from the 2018 fishing
year for these management groups may be applied to the respective 2019
quotas. NMFS proposes to account for any underharvest of Gulf of Mexico
blacktip sharks by dividing underharvest between the eastern and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional quotas based on the sub-regional
quota split percentage implemented in Amendment 6 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management
Plan (FMP).
For the sandbar shark, aggregated large coastal shark (LCS),
hammerhead shark, non-blacknose small coastal shark (SCS), blacknose
shark, blue shark, porbeagle shark, and pelagic shark (other than
porbeagle or blue sharks) management groups, the 2018 underharvests
cannot be carried over to the 2019 fishing year because those stocks or
management groups have been determined to be overfished, overfished
with overfishing occurring, or have an unknown status. Furthermore,
with the exception of the sub-regional western Gulf of Mexico
overharvest of the aggregated LCS quota described above, there were no
overharvests to account for in these management groups. Thus, NMFS
proposes that quotas for these management groups be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment.
The proposed 2019 quotas by species and management group are
summarized in Table 1; the description of the calculations for each
stock and management group can be found below.
Table 1--2019 Proposed Quotas and Opening Dates for the Atlantic Shark Management Groups
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of July 13, 2018; final quotas are subject to change based on
landings as of October 2018. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 proposed annual
Region or sub-region Management group 2018 Annual quota Preliminary 2018 landings Adjustments \2\ 2019 base Annual quota quota
(A)...................... (B) \1\.................. (C)...................... (D)...................... (D + C)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Gulf of Mexico............ Blacktip Sharks...... 347.2 mt dw.............. 330.2 mt dw.............. 34.6 mt dw \3\........... 231.0 mt dw.............. 265.6 mt dw.
765,392 lb dw............ 727,992 lb dw............ 76,401 lb dw............. 510,261 lb dw............ 586,662.2 lb dw.
Aggregated Large 72 mt dw................. 92.2 mt dw............... ......................... 72.0 mt dw............... 72.0 mt dw.
Coastal Sharks. 158,724 lb dw............ 203,400 lb dw............ ......................... 158,724 lb dw............ 158,724 lb dw.
Hammerhead Sharks.... 11.9 mt dw............... 11.0 mt dw............... ......................... 11.9 mt dw............... 11.9 mt dw.
26,301 lb dw............. 24,292 lb dw............. ......................... 26,301 lb dw............. 26,301 lb dw.
Eastern Gulf of Mexico............ Blacktip Sharks...... 37.7 mt dw............... 16.3 mt dw............... 3.8 mt dw \3\............ 25.1 mt dw............... 28.9 mt dw.
83,158 lb dw............. 35,856 lb dw............. 8,301 lb dw.............. 55,439 lb dw............. 63,740 lb dw
Aggregated Large 85.5 mt dw............... 37.5 mt dw............... ......................... 85.5 mt dw............... 85.5 mt dw.
Coastal Sharks. 188,593 lb dw............ 82,751 lb dw............. ......................... 188,593 lb dw............ 188,593 lb dw.
Hammerhead Sharks.... 13.4 mt dw............... 6.2 mt dw................ ......................... 13.4 mt dw............... 13.4 mt dw.
29,421 lb dw............. 13,696 lb dw............. ......................... 29,421 lb dw............. 29,421 lb dw.
Gulf of Mexico.................... Non-Blacknose Small 112.6 mt dw.............. 27.5 mt dw............... ......................... 112.6 mt dw.............. 112.6. mt dw.
Coastal Sharks. 248,215 lb dw............ 60,731 lb dw............. ......................... 248,215 lb dw............ 248,215 lb dw.
Smoothhound Sharks... 504.6 mt dw.............. 0 mt dw.................. 168.2 mt dw.............. 336.4 mt dw.............. 504.6 mt dw.
1,112,441 lb dw.......... 0 lb dw.................. 370,814 lb dw............ 741,627 lb dw............ 1,112,441 lb dw.
Atlantic.......................... Aggregated Large 168.9 mt dw.............. 45.9 mt dw............... ......................... 168.9 mt dw.............. 168.9 mt dw.
Coastal Sharks. 372,552 lb dw............ 101,245 lb dw............ ......................... 372,552 lb dw............ 372,552 lb dw.
Hammerhead Sharks.... 27.1 mt dw............... 4.9 mt dw................ ......................... 27.1 mt dw............... 27.1 mt dw.
59,736 lb dw............. 10,777 lb dw............. ......................... 59,736 lb dw............. 59,736 lb dw.
Non-Blacknose Small 264.1 mt dw.............. 55.1 mt dw............... ......................... 264.1 mt dw.............. 264.1 mt dw.
Coastal Sharks. 582,333 lb dw............ 121,385 lb dw............ ......................... 582,333 lb dw............ 582,333 lb dw
Blacknose Sharks 17.2 mt dw............... 3.4 mt dw................ ......................... 17.2 mt dw............... 17.2 mt dw
(South of 34[deg] N (37,921 lb dw)........... 7,501 lb dw.............. ......................... 37,921 lb dw............. 3,7921 lb dw.
lat. only).
Smoothhound Sharks... 1802.6 mt dw............. 261.4 mt dw.............. 600.85 mt dw............. 1201.7 mt dw............. 1802.55 mt dw.
3,971,587 lb dw.......... 576,181 lb dw............ 1,324,634 lb dw.......... 2,649,268 lb dw.......... 3,973,902 lb dw.
No regional quotas................ Non-Sandbar LCS 50.0 mt dw............... 11.2 mt dw............... ......................... 50.0 mt dw............... 50.0 mt dw.
Research. 110,230 lb dw............ 24,799 lb dw............. ......................... 110,230 lb dw............ 110,230 lb dw.
Sandbar Shark 90.7 mt dw............... 31.0 mt dw............... ......................... 90.7 mt dw............... 90.7 mt dw.
Research. 199,943 lb dw............ 68,443 lb dw............. ......................... 199,943 lb dw............ 199,943 lb dw.
Blue Sharks.......... 273.0 mt dw.............. <13.6 mt dw.............. ......................... 273.0 mt dw.............. 273.0 mt dw.
601,856 lb dw............ (<30,000 lb dw).......... ......................... 601,856 lb dw............ 601,856 lb dw.
Porbeagle Sharks..... 1.7 mt dw................ 0 mt dw.................. ......................... 1.7 mt dw................ 1.7 mt dw.
3,748 lb dw.............. 0 lb dw.................. ......................... 3,748 lb dw.............. 3,748 lb dw.
Pelagic Sharks Other 488.0 mt dw.............. 38.1 mt dw............... ......................... 488.0 mt dw.............. 488.0 mt dw.
Than Porbeagle or 1,075,856 lb dw.......... 83,896 lb dw............. ......................... 1,075,856 lb dw.......... 1,075,856 lb dw.
Blue sharks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Landings are from January 1, 2018, through July 13, 2018, and are subject to change.
\2\ Underharvest adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the underharvest adjustments cannot exceed 50
percent of the base quota.
\3\ This proposed rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota due to an overall underharvest of 38.4 mt dw (84,702 lb dw) in 2018. The overall quota would be split
based on percentages that are allocated to each sub-region, as explained in the text.
1. Proposed 2019 Quotas for the Gulf of Mexico Region Shark Management
Groups
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for blacktip sharks in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 265.6 mt dw (586,662 lb dw) and
the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 28.9 mt dw (63,740 lb dw;
Table 1). As of July 13, 2018, preliminary reported landings for
blacktip sharks in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 95
percent (330.2 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels (347.2 mt dw), while
the blacktip sharks in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 43
percent (16.3 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels (37.7 mt dw). Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2018 quota to date, and the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region fishery was closed on March 13, 2018 (83 FR
10802). Gulf of Mexico blacktip sharks have not been declared to be
overfished, to have overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown
status. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for blacktip
sharks within the Gulf of Mexico region therefore could be applied to
the 2019 quotas up to 50 percent of the base quota. Additionally,
[[Page 45868]]
any underharvest would be divided between the two sub-regions, based on
the percentages that are allocated to each sub-region, which are set
forth in Sec. 635.27(b)(1)(ii)(C). To date, the overall Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark management group is underharvested by 38.4 mt dw (84,702
lb dw). Accordingly, the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota
would be increased by 34.6 mt dw or 90.2 percent of the underharvest,
while the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark sub-regional quota
would be increased by 3.8 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest
(Table 1). Thus, the proposed western sub-regional Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark commercial quota is 265.6 mt dw (586,662 lb dw), and the
proposed eastern sub-regional Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark commercial
quota is 28.9 mt dw (63,740 lb dw).
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for aggregated LCS in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 72.0 mt dw (158,724 lb dw), and
the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 85.5 mt dw (188,593 lb dw;
Table 1). As of July 13, 2018, preliminary reported landings for
aggregated LCS in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 128
percent (92.2 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels (72.0 mt dw), while the
aggregated LCS in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 44
percent (37.5 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels (85.5 mt dw). Reported
landings have not exceeded the overall Gulf of Mexico regional 2018
quota to date, and the western aggregated LCS sub-region fishery was
closed on March 13, 2018 (83 FR 10802). Given the unknown status of
some of the shark species within the Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS
management group, underharvests cannot be carried over pursuant to
Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on both preliminary estimates
and catch rates from previous years, and consistent with the current
regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2019 quotas
for aggregated LCS in the western Gulf of Mexico and eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-regions be equal to their annual base quotas without
adjustment, because the overall regional quota has not been
overharvested and because underharvests cannot be carried over due to
stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quotas for hammerhead sharks in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region and eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region
are 11.9 mt dw (26,301 lb dw) and 13.4 mt dw (29,421 lb dw),
respectively (Table 1). As of July 13, 2018, preliminary reported
landings for hammerhead sharks in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were at 92 percent (11.0 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels (11.9 mt
dw), while landings of hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
sub-region were at 47 percent (6.2 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels
(13.4 mt dw). Reported landings from both Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions have not exceeded the 2018 overall hammerhead quota to date,
and the western hammerhead shark Gulf of Mexico sub-region fishery was
closed on March 13, 2018 (83 FR 10802). Given the overfished status of
the scalloped hammerhead shark, the hammerhead shark quota cannot be
adjusted for any underharvests. Therefore, based on both preliminary
estimates and catch rates from previous years, the fact that the 2018
overall hammerhead shark quota has not been overharvested to date, and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), NMFS
proposes that the 2019 quotas for hammerhead sharks in the western Gulf
of Mexico and eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be equal to their
annual base quotas without adjustment.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Gulf of Mexico region is 112.6 mt dw (248,215 lb dw). As of July 13,
2018, preliminary reported landings of non-blacknose SCS were at 24
percent (27.5 mt dw) of their 2018 quota level (112.6 mt dw) in the
Gulf of Mexico region. Reported landings have not exceeded the 2018
quota to date. Given the unknown status of bonnethead sharks within the
Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS management group, underharvests cannot
be carried forward pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based
on both preliminary estimates and catch rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2019 quota for non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment,
because there have not been any overharvests and because underharvests
cannot be carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for smoothhound sharks in the
Gulf of Mexico region is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441 lb dw). As of July 13,
2018, there are no preliminary reported landings of smoothhound sharks
in the Gulf of Mexico region. Gulf of Mexico smoothhound sharks have
not been declared to be overfished, to have overfishing occurring, or
to have an unknown status. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii),
underharvests for smoothhound sharks within the Gulf of Mexico region
therefore could be applied to the 2019 quotas up to 50 percent of the
base quota. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to increase the 2019 Gulf of
Mexico smoothhound shark quota to adjust for anticipated underharvests
in 2018 as allowed. The proposed 2019 adjusted base annual quota for
Gulf of Mexico smoothhound sharks is 504.6 mt dw (336.4 mt dw annual
base quota + 168.2 mt dw 2018 underharvest = 504.6 mt dw 2019 adjusted
annual quota).
2. Proposed 2019 Quotas for the Atlantic Region Shark Management Groups
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for aggregated LCS in the
Atlantic region is 168.9 mt dw (372,552 lb dw). As of July 13, 2018,
the aggregated LCS fishery in the Atlantic region is still open and
preliminary landings indicate that only 27 percent of the quota, or
45.9 mt dw, has been harvested. Given the unknown status of some of the
shark species within the Atlantic aggregated LCS management group,
underharvests cannot be carried over pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on both preliminary estimates and
catch rates from previous years, and consistent with current
regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2018 quota
for aggregated LCS in the Atlantic region be equal to the annual base
quota without adjustment, because there have not been any overharvests
and underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for hammerhead sharks in the
Atlantic region is 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw). Currently, the hammerhead
shark fishery in the Atlantic region is still open and preliminary
landings as of July 13, 2018, indicate that only 18 percent of the
Atlantic regional quota, or 4.9 mt dw, has been harvested. Reported
landings from both Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic regions have not
exceeded the 2018 overall hammerhead quota to date. Given the
overfished status of hammerhead sharks, underharvests cannot be carried
forward pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on both
preliminary estimates and catch rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2019 quota for hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic
region be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment, because
the overall hammerhead shark quota has not been overharvested, and
because underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Atlantic region is 264.1 mt dw (582,333 lb dw). As of July 13, 2018,
preliminary reported landings of non-blacknose SCS were at 21 percent
(55.1 mt dw) of their
[[Page 45869]]
2018 quota level in the Atlantic region. Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2018 quota to date. Given the unknown status of bonnethead
sharks within the Atlantic non-blacknose SCS management group,
underharvests cannot be carried forward pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on preliminary estimates of catch
rates from previous years, and consistent with the current regulations
at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2019 quota for non-
blacknose SCS in the Atlantic region be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment, because there have not been any overharvests, and
because underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for blacknose sharks in the
Atlantic region is 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw). This quota is available
in the Atlantic region only for those vessels operating south of
34[deg] N. latitude. North of 34[deg] N. latitude, retention, landing,
or sale of blacknose sharks is prohibited. As of July 13, 2018,
preliminary reported landings of blacknose sharks were at 20 percent
(3.4 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels in the Atlantic region. Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2018 quota to date. Pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2), because blacknose sharks have been declared to be
overfished with overfishing occurring in the Atlantic region, NMFS
could not carry forward the remaining underharvest. Therefore, NMFS
proposes that the 2019 Atlantic blacknose shark quota be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for smoothhound sharks in the
Atlantic region is 1,802.6 mt dw (3,973,902 lb dw). As of July 13,
2018, preliminary reported landings of smoothhound sharks were at 14
percent (261.4 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels in the Atlantic
region. Atlantic smoothhound sharks have not been declared to be
overfished, to have overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown
status. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Atlantic region therefore could be
applied to the 2019 quotas up to 50 percent of the base quota.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to increase the 2019 Atlantic smoothhound
shark quota to adjust for anticipated underharvests in 2018 as allowed.
The proposed 2019 adjusted base annual quota for Atlantic smoothhound
sharks is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,201.7 mt dw annual base quota + 600.9 mt dw
2018 underharvest = 1,802.6 mt dw 2019 adjusted annual quota).
3. Proposed 2019 Quotas for Shark Management Groups With No Regional
Quotas
The 2019 proposed commercial quotas within the shark research
fishery are 50 mt dw (110,230 lb dw) for research LCS and 90 mt dw
(199,943 lb dw) for sandbar sharks. Within the shark research fishery,
as of July 13, 2018, preliminary reported landings of research LCS were
at 22 percent (11.2 mt dw) of their 2018 quota levels, and sandbar
shark reported landings were at 34 percent (31.0 mt dw) of their 2018
quota levels. Reported landings have not exceeded the 2018 quotas to
date. Under Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), because sandbar sharks and
scalloped hammerhead sharks within the research LCS management group
have been determined to be either overfished or overfished with
overfishing occurring, underharvests for these management groups cannot
be carried forward to the 2019 quotas. Therefore, based on preliminary
estimates, and consistent with the current regulations at Sec.
635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2019 quota in the shark research
fishery be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment because
there have not been any overharvests, and because underharvests cannot
be carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle
sharks, and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle or blue sharks) are
273.0 mt dw (601,856 lb dw), 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw), and 488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb dw), respectively. As of July 13, 2018, preliminary
reported landings of blue sharks were at less than 5 percent (less than
13.6 mt dw) of their 2018 quota level (273.0 mt dw), there are no
preliminary reported landings of porbeagle sharks, and landings of
pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle and blue sharks) were at 8 percent
(38.1 mt dw) of their 2018 quota level (488.0 mt dw). Given that these
pelagic species are overfished, have overfishing occurring, or have an
unknown status, underharvests cannot be carried forward pursuant to
Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2019 quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle sharks, and
pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle and blue sharks) be equal to their
annual base quotas without adjustment, because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests cannot be carried over due to
stock status.
4. Proposed Opening Dates and Retention Limits for the 2019 Atlantic
Commercial Shark Fishing Year
For each fishery, NMFS considered the seven ``Opening Commercial
Fishing Season Criteria'' listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3). The Criteria
includes factors such as the available annual quotas for the current
fishing season, estimated season length and average weekly catch rates
from previous years, length of the season and fishery participation in
past years, impacts to accomplishing objectives of the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments, temporal variation in
behavior or biology of target species (e.g., seasonal distribution or
abundance), impact of catch rates in one region on another, and effects
of delayed openings.
NMFS applied the Opening Commercial Fishing Season Criteria by
examining the over- and underharvests of the different management
groups in the 2018 fishing year to determine the likely effects of the
proposed commercial quotas for 2019 on shark stocks and fishermen
across regional and sub-regional fishing areas. NMFS also examined the
potential season length and previous catch rates to ensure, to the
extent practicable, that equitable fishing opportunities be provided to
fishermen in all areas. Lastly, NMFS examined the seasonal variation of
the different species/management groups and the effects on fishing
opportunities.
NMFS also considered the six ``Inseason trip limit adjustment
criteria'' listed at Sec. 635.24(a)(8) for directed shark limited
access permit holders intending to land LCS other than sandbar sharks.
Those criteria are: the amount of remaining shark quota in the relevant
area or region, to date, based on dealer reports; the catch rates of
the relevant shark species/complexes, to date, based on dealer reports;
estimated date of fishery closure based on when the landings are
projected to reach 80-percent of the available overall, regional, and/
or sub-regional quota, if the fishery's landings are not projected to
reach 100 percent of the applicable quota before the end of the season,
or when the season of a quota-linked management group is closed;
effects of the adjustment on accomplishing the objectives of the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments; variations in
seasonal distribution, abundance, or migratory patterns of the relevant
shark species based on scientific and fishery-based knowledge; and/or
effects of catch rates in one part of a region precluding vessels in
another part of that region from having a
[[Page 45870]]
reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the relevant quota.
After considering all these criteria, NMFS is proposing to open the
2019 Atlantic commercial shark fishing season for all shark management
groups in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
and the Caribbean Sea, on or about January 1, 2019, after the
publication of the final rule for this action (Table 2). NMFS is also
proposing to start the 2019 commercial shark fishing season with the
commercial retention limit of 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in both the eastern and western Gulf of Mexico sub-
regions, and a commercial retention limit of 25 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip in the Atlantic region (Table 2). NMFS will
consider public comments received during the current year and catch
rates from this year. Any retention limits that are proposed could
change as a result of public comments as well as catch rates and
landings information based on updated data available when drafting the
final rule.
Table 2--Quota Linkages, Season Opening Dates, and Commercial Retention Limit by Regional or Sub-Regional Shark
Management Group
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial
retention
limits for
directed shark
Region or sub- region Management group Quota linkages Season opening dates limited access
permit holders
(inseason
adjustments are
possible)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Gulf of Mexico....... Blacktip Sharks. Not Linked............ January 1, 2019....... 36 LCS other
Aggregated Large Linked................ than sandbar
Coastal Sharks. sharks per
Hammerhead vessel per
Sharks. trip.
Eastern Gulf of Mexico....... Blacktip Sharks. Not Linked............ January 1, 2019....... 36 LCS other
Aggregated Large Linked................ than sandbar
Coastal Sharks. sharks per
Hammerhead vessel per
Sharks. trip.
NMFS
anticipates an
inseason
increase to 50
large coastal
sharks other
than sandbar
sharks per
vessel per
trip around
April 1, 2019.
Gulf of Mexico............... Non-Blacknose Not Linked............ January 1, 2019....... N/A.
Small Coastal Not Linked............ January 1, 2019....... N/A.
Sharks.
Smoothhound
Sharks.
Atlantic..................... Aggregated Large Linked................ January 1, 2019....... 25 LCS other
Coastal Sharks. than sandbar
Hammerhead sharks per
Sharks. vessel per
trip.
If quota is
landed quickly
(e.g., if
approximately
20 percent of
quota is
caught at the
beginning of
the year),
NMFS
anticipates an
inseason
reduction
(e.g., to 3 or
fewer LCS
other than
sandbar sharks
per vessel per
trip), then an
inseason
increase to 36
LCS other than
sandbar sharks
per vessel per
trip around
July 15, 2019.
Non-Blacknose Linked (South of January 1, 2019....... N/A.
Small Coastal 34[deg] N lat. only).
Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks ...................... ...................... 8 Blacknose
(South of sharks per
34[deg] N lat. vessel per
only). trip (applies
to directed
and incidental
permit
holders).
Smoothhound Not Linked............ January 1, 2019....... N/A.
Sharks.
No regional quotas........... Non-Sandbar LCS Linked................ January 1, 2019....... N/A.
Research
Sandbar Shark
Research.
Blue Sharks..... Not Linked............ January 1, 2019....... N/A.
Porbeagle Sharks
Pelagic Sharks
Other Than
Porbeagle or
Blue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Gulf of Mexico region, NMFS proposes opening the fishing
season on or about January 1, 2019, for the aggregated LCS, blacktip
sharks, and hammerhead shark management groups with the commercial
retention limits of 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip for directed shark permit holders in the eastern and western sub-
region. This opening date and retention limit combination would
provide, to the extent practicable, equitable opportunities across the
fisheries management sub-regions. This opening date takes into account
all the season opening criteria listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), and
particularly the criteria that NMFS consider the length of the season
for the different species and/or management group in the previous years
(Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)) and whether fishermen were able to
participate in the fishery in those years (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The
proposed commercial retention limits take into account the criteria
listed in Sec. 635.24(a)(8), and particularly the criterion that NMFS
consider the catch rates of the relevant shark species/complexes based
on dealer reports to date (Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(ii)). NMFS may also
adjust the retention limit in the Gulf of Mexico region throughout the
season to ensure fishermen in all parts of the region have an
opportunity to harvest aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and hammerhead
sharks (see the criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v) and Sec.
635.24(a)(8)(ii), (v), and (vi)). In 2018, the aggregated LCS,
hammerhead, and blacktip shark management groups in the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were closed on March 13, 2018 (82 FR 20447). As such,
in 2019, NMFS is proposing a reduction in the commercial trip limit for
these management groups in order to ensure the management group is open
until at least April 2019, which is when the State of Louisiana closes
state waters to shark fishing and when that State has previously asked
that NMFS close Federal shark fisheries to match state regulations (see
the criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vii) and
[[Page 45871]]
Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(iii)). In the eastern Gulf of Mexico, NMFS is
proposing a lower trip limit to ensure fishermen in both Gulf of Mexico
sub-regions have an opportunity to harvest aggregated LCS, blacktip
sharks, and hammerhead sharks and to reduce any confusion or inequities
caused by establishing different catch limits for each sub-region. When
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region closes, which is expected to
occur around April 1, 2019, NMFS may increase the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region retention limit, potentially up to 50 or 55 sharks
per trip. Modifying the retention limit on an inseason basis in this
manner is similar to what NMFS has done successfully in recent years in
the Atlantic region. NMFS expects such changes in retention limit to
allow fishermen in the eastern Gulf of Mexico the opportunity to fully
land the available quotas.
In the Atlantic region, NMFS proposes opening the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management groups on or about January 1, 2019.
This opening date is the same date that these management groups opened
in 2018. As described below, this opening date also takes into account
all the criteria listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), and particularly the
criterion that NMFS consider the effects of catch rates in one part of
a region precluding vessels in another part of that region from having
a reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the different species
and/or management quotas (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The 2018 data
indicates that an opening date of January 1, coupled with inseason
adjustments to the retention limit, provided a reasonable opportunity
for fishermen in every part of each region to harvest a portion of the
available quotas (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(i)) while accounting for
variations in seasonal distribution of the different species in the
management groups (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(iv)). In 2018, when the
aggregated LCS quota was harvested too quickly, NMFS reduced the
retention limit to three sharks per trip (May 10, 2018; 83 FR 17765) to
allow fishermen in the North Atlantic an opportunity to fish later in
the year when sharks are available in the North Atlantic area (see the
criteria at Sec. 635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v), and (vi)). NMFS then
increased the retention limit to 36 sharks per trip on July 18, 2018
(83 FR 33870), to increase fishing opportunities for all fishermen
across the Atlantic region. Because the quotas we propose for 2019 are
the same as the quotas in 2018, NMFS expects that the season lengths
and therefore the participation of various fishermen throughout the
region, would be similar in 2019 (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)).
Based on the recent performance of the fishery, the January 1 opening
date appears to meet the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic
HMS FMP and its amendments (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vi)). Therefore,
changing the opening date in the fishery seems unnecessary.
In addition, for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management
groups in the Atlantic region, NMFS proposes opening the fishing year
with the commercial retention limit for directed shark limited access
permit holders of 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip.
This retention limit should allow fishermen to harvest some of the 2019
quota at the beginning of the year when sharks are more prevalent in
the South Atlantic area (see the criteria at Sec. 635.24(a)(3)(i),
(ii), (v), and (vi)). As was done in 2018, if it appears that the quota
is being harvested too quickly (i.e., about 20 percent) to allow
directed fishermen throughout the entire region an opportunity to fish
and ensure enough quota remains until later in the year, NMFS would
reduce the commercial retention limits to incidental levels (3 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip) or another level
calculated to reduce the harvest of LCS taking into account Sec.
635.27(b)(3) and the inseason trip limit adjustment criteria listed in
Sec. 635.24(a)(8). If the quota continues to be harvested quickly,
NMFS could reduce the retention limit to 0 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip to ensure enough quota remains until later
in the year. If either situation occurs, NMFS would publish in the
Federal Register notification of any inseason adjustments of the
retention limit to an appropriate limit of sharks per trip. In 2018,
NMFS reduced the retention limit to 3 LCS other than sandbar sharks on
May 10, 2018 (83 FR 21744) when the aggregated LCS landings reached
approximately 20 percent of the aggregated LCS quota, and did not need
to reduce it further.
Also, as was done in 2018, NMFS will consider increasing the
commercial retention limits per trip at a later date if necessary to
provide fishermen in the northern portion of the Atlantic region an
opportunity to retain aggregated LCS and hammerhead sharks after
considering the appropriate inseason adjustment criteria. Similarly, at
some point later in the year (e.g., July 15), potentially equivalent to
how the 2018 fishing season operated, NMFS may consider increasing the
retention limit to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip
or another amount, as deemed appropriate, after considering the
inseason trip limit adjustment criteria. If the quota is being
harvested too quickly or too slowly, NMFS could adjust the retention
limit appropriately to ensure the fishery remains open most of the rest
of the year. Since the fishery is still open with a majority of the
quota available, NMFS will monitor the rest of the fishing year and
could make changes to the proposed 2019 opening date if necessary to
ensure equitable fishing opportunities.
All of the shark management groups would remain open until December
31, 2019, or until NMFS determines that the landings for any shark
management group have reached, or are projected to reach, 80-percent of
the available overall, regional, and/or sub-regional quota, if the
fishery's landings are not projected to reach 100 percent of the
applicable quota before the end of the season, or when the quota-linked
management group is closed. If NMFS determines that a non-linked shark
species or management group must be closed, then, consistent with Sec.
635.28(b)(2) for non-linked quotas (e.g., eastern Gulf of Mexico
blacktip, western Gulf of Mexico blacktip, Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose
SCS, pelagic sharks, or the Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico smoothhound
sharks), NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notice of closure
for that shark species, shark management group, region, and/or sub-
region that will be effective no fewer than four days from the date of
filing (83 FR 31677). For the blacktip shark management group,
regulations at Sec. 635.28(b)(5)(i) through (v) authorize NMFS to
close the management group before landings reach, or are expected to
reach, 80-percent of the available overall, regional, and/or sub-
regional quota, after considering the following criteria and other
relevant factors: Season length based on available sub-regional quota
and average sub-regional catch rates; variability in regional and/or
sub-regional seasonal distribution, abundance, and migratory patterns;
effects on accomplishing the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments; amount of remaining shark quotas
in the relevant sub-region; and regional and/or sub-regional catch
rates of the relevant shark species or management groups. From the
effective date and time of the closure until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal Register, that additional quota
is available and the season is reopened, the fisheries for the shark
species or management group are closed, even across fishing years.
If NMFS determines that a linked shark species or management group
must be closed, then, consistent with
[[Page 45872]]
Sec. 635.28(b)(3) for linked quotas and the Final Rule to Revise
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Shark Fishery Closure Regulations (83
FR 31677), NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notice of
closure for all of the species and/or management groups in a linked
group that will be effective no fewer than four days from date of
filing. From the effective date and time of the closure until NMFS
announces, via the publication of a notice in the Federal Register,
that additional quota is available and the season is reopened, the
fisheries for all linked species and/or management groups are closed,
even across fishing years. The linked quotas of the species and/or
management groups are Atlantic hammerhead sharks and Atlantic
aggregated LCS; eastern Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks and eastern
Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS; western Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks
and western Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS; and Atlantic blacknose and
Atlantic non-blacknose SCS south of 34[deg] N. latitude.
Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted via
www.regulations.gov or by mail. NMFS solicits comments on this proposed
rule by October 11, 2018 (see DATES and ADDRESSES).
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that the proposed
rule is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject
to further consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
NMFS determined that the final rules to implement Amendment 2 to
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (June 24, 2008, 73 FR 35778;
corrected on July 15, 2008, 73 FR 40658), Amendment 5a to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013), Amendment 6
to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR 50073; August 18,
2015), and Amendment 9 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR
73128; November 24, 2015) are consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies of the approved coastal
management program of coastal states on the Atlantic including the Gulf
of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea as required under the Coastal Zone
Management Act. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.41(a), NMFS provided the Coastal
Zone Management Program of each coastal state a 60-day period to review
the consistency determination and to advise the Agency of their
concurrence. NMFS received concurrence with the consistency
determinations from several states and inferred consistency from those
states that did not respond within the 60-day time period. This
proposed action to establish opening dates and adjust quotas for the
2019 fishing year for the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries does not
change the framework previously consulted upon; therefore, no
additional consultation is required.
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. The IRFA analysis follows.
Section 603(b)(1) of the RFA requires agencies to explain the
purpose of the rule. This rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments, is
being proposed to establish the 2019 commercial shark fishing quotas,
retention limits, and fishing seasons. Without this rule, the
commercial shark fisheries would close on December 31, 2018, and would
not open until another action was taken. This proposed rule would be
implemented according to the regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments. Thus, NMFS expects
few, if any, economic impacts to fishermen other than those already
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments,
based on the quota adjustments.
Section 603(b)(2) of the RFA requires agencies to explain the
rule's objectives. The objectives of this rule are to: Adjust the
baseline quotas for all shark management groups based on any over- and/
or underharvests from the previous fishing year(s); establish the
opening dates of the various management groups; and establish the
retention limits for the blacktip shark, aggregated large coastal
shark, and hammerhead shark management groups in order to provide, to
the extent practicable, equitable opportunities across the fishing
management regions and/or sub-regions while also considering the
ecological needs of the different shark species.
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires agencies to provide an
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule would apply.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria
for all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish
harvesters. Provision is made under SBA's regulations for an agency to
develop its own industry-specific size standards after consultation
with Advocacy and an opportunity for public comment (see 13 CFR
121.903(c)). Under this provision, NMFS may establish size standards
that differ from those established by the SBA Office of Size Standards,
but only for use by NMFS and only for the purpose of conducting an
analysis of economic effects in fulfillment of the agency's obligations
under the RFA. To utilize this provision, NMFS must publish such size
standards in the Federal Register, which NMFS did on December 29, 2015
(80 FR 81194). In this final rule effective on July 1, 2016, NMFS
established a small business size standard of $11 million in annual
gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing industry
(NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance purposes. NMFS considers all HMS
permit holders to be small entities because they had average annual
receipts of less than $11 million for commercial fishing.
As of October 2017, the proposed rule would apply to the
approximately 221 directed commercial shark permit holders, 269
incidental commercial shark permit holders, 154 smoothhound shark
permit holders, and 113 commercial shark dealers. Not all permit
holders are active in the fishery in any given year. Active directed
commercial shark permit holders are defined as those with valid permits
that landed one shark based on HMS electronic dealer reports. Of the
490 directed and incidental commercial shark permit holders, only 28
permit holders landed sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region and only 78
landed sharks in the Atlantic region. Of the 154 smoothhound shark
permit holders, only 26 permit holders landed smoothhound sharks in the
Atlantic region and none landed smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region. NMFS has determined that the proposed rule would not
likely affect any small governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule does not contain any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements (5 U.S.C. 603(b)(4)).
Similarly, this proposed rule would not conflict, duplicate, or overlap
with other relevant Federal rules (5 U.S.C. 603(b)(5)). Fishermen,
dealers, and managers in these fisheries must comply with a number of
international agreements as domestically implemented, domestic laws,
and FMPs. These include, but are not limited to, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered
[[Page 45873]]
Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and the Coastal Zone Management Act.
Section 603(c) of the RFA requires each IRFA to contain a
description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule which
would accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and
minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. Additionally, the RFA (5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(4)) lists four
general categories of significant alternatives that would assist an
agency in the development of significant alternatives. These categories
of alternatives are: (1) Establishment of differing compliance or
reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the
resources available to small entities; (2) clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting
requirements under the rule for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design standards; and, (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule for small entities. In order to meet the
objectives of this proposed rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, NMFS cannot exempt small entities or change the reporting
requirements only for small entities because all the entities affected
are considered small entities; therefore, there are no alternatives
discussed that fall under the first, second, and fourth categories
described above. NMFS does not know of any performance or design
standards that would satisfy the aforementioned objectives of this
rulemaking while, concurrently, complying with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act; therefore, there are no alternatives considered under the third
category.
This rulemaking does not establish management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements previously adopted and analyzed
measures with adjustments, as specified in the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments and the Environmental Assessment
(EA) that accompanied the 2011 shark quota specifications rule (75 FR
76302; December 8, 2010). Thus, NMFS proposes to adjust quotas
established and analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and
its amendments by subtracting the underharvest or adding the
overharvest as allowable. Thus, NMFS has limited flexibility to modify
the quotas in this rule, the impacts of which were analyzed in previous
regulatory flexibility analyses.
Based on the 2017 ex-vessel price (Table 3), fully harvesting the
unadjusted 2019 Atlantic shark commercial baseline quotas could result
in total fleet revenues of $7,184,943. For the Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group, NMFS is proposing to increase the baseline sub-
regional quotas due to the underharvests in 2018. The increase for the
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group could result in
a $79,243 gain in total revenues for fishermen in that sub-region,
while the increase for the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group could result in a $9,781 gain in total revenues for
fishermen in that sub-region. For the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
smoothhound shark management groups, NMFS is proposing to increase the
baseline quotas due to the underharvest in 2018. This would cause a
potential gain in revenue of $581,718 for the fleet in the Gulf of
Mexico region and a potential gain in revenue of $1,323,867 for the
fleet in the Atlantic region.
All of these changes in gross revenues are similar to the changes
in gross revenues analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments. The final regulatory flexibility analyses for those
amendments concluded that the economic impacts on these small entities
are expected to be minimal. In the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments and the EA for the 2011 shark quota specifications
rule, NMFS stated it would be conducting annual rulemakings and
considering the potential economic impacts of adjusting the quotas for
under- and overharvests at that time.
Table 3--Average Ex-Vessel Prices per lb dw for Each Shark Management Group, 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average ex- Average ex-
Region Species vessel meat vessel fin
price price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Gulf of Mexico........................ Blacktip Shark.................. $0.51 $11.03
Aggregated LCS.................. 0.51 12.51
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.67 11.67
Eastern Gulf of Mexico........................ Blacktip Shark.................. 0.62 8.22
Aggregated LCS.................. 0.43 13.00
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.55 12.80
Gulf of Mexico................................ Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.38 8.68
Smoothhound Shark............... 1.50 1.91
Atlantic...................................... Aggregated LCS.................. 0.95 11.47
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.41 13.91
Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.96 7.33
Blacknose Shark................. 1.05 7.33
Smoothhound Shark............... 0.70 1.63
No Region..................................... Shark Research Fishery 0.80 12.40
(Aggregated LCS).
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar 0.50 12.40
only).
Blue shark...................... 1.40 11.44
Porbeagle shark*................ 1.54 2.82
Other Pelagic sharks............ 1.52 2.82
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Used other pelagic shark ex-vessel prices for porbeagle sharks ex-vessel prices since there currently are no
landings of porbeagle sharks.
For this rule, NMFS also reviewed the criteria at Sec.
635.27(b)(3) to determine when opening each fishery would provide
equitable opportunities for fishermen, to the extent practicable, while
also considering the ecological needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s) could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and number of fishing participants
during the year. For the 2019 fishing year, NMFS is proposing to open
all of the shark management groups on the effective date of the final
rule for this action (expected to be on or about January 1). The direct
and indirect economic impacts would be neutral on
[[Page 45874]]
a short- and long-term basis because NMFS is not proposing to change
the opening dates of these fisheries from the status quo.
Authority 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 5, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19594 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P