Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters, 45364-45366 [2018-19430]
Download as PDF
45364
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(h) Required Actions
For Group 1 airplanes, within 24 months
after the effective date of this AD, modify the
airplane by replacing each affected part with
a restrictor check valve that has a filter
screen, P/N CKLX0517200B or P/N
CKLX0520100B, as applicable, in accordance
with the accomplishment instructions of
Fokker Service Bulletin F100/70 SBF100–32–
163, Revision 1, dated February 21, 2018.
(i) Parts Installation Prohibition
Do not install an affected part on any
airplane, as required by paragraph (i)(1) or
(i)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For Group 1 airplanes: After
modification of the airplane as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) For Group 2 airplanes: From the
effective date of this AD.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
August 23, 2018.
James Cashdollar,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–19297 Filed 9–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(j) Terminating Actions for AD 2010–22–05
Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (h) of this AD terminates all
requirements of AD 2010–22–05.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Fokker Services B.V.’s EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2018–0077, dated
April 6, 2018, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2018–0767.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3226.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357,
2130 EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands;
telephone +31 (0)88–6280–350; fax +31
(0)88–6280–111; email technicalservices@
fokker.com; internet https://
www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0336; Product
Identifier 2017–SW–130–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus
Helicopters) Model EC135P1, EC135P2,
EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1,
EC135T2, EC135T2+, and EC135T3
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require replacing the retaining ring and
inspecting the hoist cable hook
assembly (hook). This proposed AD is
prompted by a report that a hook
detached from the hoist cable. The
actions of this proposed AD are
intended to prevent an unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 6, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0336; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641–
0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–
3775; or at https://www.helicopters.
airbus.com/website/en/ref/TechnicalSupport_73.html. You may review the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Hatfield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5110; email
david.hatfield@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Proposed Rules
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2017–
0199, dated October 11, 2017, to correct
an unsafe condition for Airbus
Helicopters Model EC135P1, EC135P2,
EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1,
EC135T2, EC135T2+, EC135T3,
EC635P2+, EC635P3, EC635T1,
EC635T2+, and EC635T3 helicopters.
EASA advises of a report of a hook
separating from the hoist cable.
According to EASA, an investigation
determined that failure of the internal
retaining ring combined with a
permanent compression set of the
elastomeric energy absorber caused the
separation. EASA states that this
condition, if not corrected, could lead to
the detachment of an external load or
person from the hoist, possibly resulting
in personal injury or injury to persons
on the ground.
The EASA AD consequently requires
repetitive inspections of the hook
assembly and replacement of the
retaining ring. Depending on the
findings of the inspection, the EASA AD
also requires replacement of the
elastomeric energy absorber. According
to the manufacturer of the hook, the
retaining ring can corrode in a salt-laden
environment. Therefore, replacement of
the retaining ring is required with each
inspection. EASA considers its AD an
interim measure and states that further
AD action may follow.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of Germany
and are approved for operation in the
United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Germany, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in its
AD. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Related Service Information Under
1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Goodrich Service
Bulletin No. 44301–10–17, Revision 4,
dated July 26, 2017. The Goodrich
Service Bulletin is attached as an
appendix to Airbus Helicopters Alert
Service Bulletin No. ASB EC135–85A–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
069, Revision 0, dated August 2, 2017.
This service information specifies an
initial and repetitive inspections of the
hook assembly and replacement of the
retaining ring. If the inspections of
elastomeric energy absorber detect a
permanent compression set, this service
information also specifies replacing the
elastomeric energy absorber.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require,
within 90 hours time-in-service (TIS)
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
180 hours TIS, replacing the retaining
ring and inspecting the elastometric
energy absorber for a permanent
compression set, and if necessary,
replacing the elastometric energy
absorber before the next hoist operation.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires corrective
actions in terms of months in service.
This proposed AD would require
compliance within 90 hours TIS and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 180
hours TIS. The EASA AD applies to
Airbus Helicopters Model EC635P2+,
EC635P3, EC635T1, EC635T2+, and
EC635T3 helicopters. This proposed AD
would not because these model
helicopters have no FAA type
certificate.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD to be
an interim action. The design approval
holder is currently developing a
modification that will address the
unsafe condition identified in this
proposed AD. Once this modification is
developed, approved, and available, we
might consider additional rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 278 helicopters of U.S.
Registry and that labor costs average $85
per work-hour. Based on these
estimates, we expect the following costs:
• Inspecting the hoist cable hook
assembly and replacing the retaining
ring would require 0.5 work-hour and
parts would be minimal for a cost of $43
per helicopter and $11,954 for the U.S.
fleet per inspection cycle.
• Replacing an elastomeric energy
absorber would require 0.5 work-hour
and parts would cost $2,152 for a cost
of $2,195 per helicopter.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45365
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
detachment of a hook from a hoist cable
resulting in in-flight failure of the hoist,
which could result in injury to persons being
lifted.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November
6, 2018.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 90 hours time-in-service (TIS) and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 180 hours
TIS:
(1) Inspect the hook and determine
whether the elastometric energy absorber has
taken a permanent compression set by
following the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 2.A and 2.B, of Goodrich Service
Bulletin No. 44301–10–17, Revision 4, dated
July 26, 2017 (SB 44301–10–17). If the
elastometric energy absorber has taken a
permanent compression set, replace the
elastometric energy absorber before the next
hoist operation.
(2) Replace the retaining ring by following
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
2.D through 2.K, of SB 44301–10–17.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
[Amended]
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2018–
0336; Product Identifier 2017–SW–130–
AD.
(f) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be permitted
provided the hoist is not used.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your
proposal to: David Hatfield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email 9-ASWFTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2017–0199, dated October 11, 2017. You
may view the EASA AD on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 2500, Cabin Equipment/Furnishings.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model EC135P1,
EC135P2, EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1,
EC135T2, EC135T2+, and EC135T3
helicopters, certificated in any category, with
an external mounted hoist (hoist) part
number (P/N) and hook assembly (hook)
P/N shown in Table 1 to paragraph (a) of this
AD:
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 23,
2018.
Scott A. Horn,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–19430 Filed 9–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2200
Revisions to Procedural Rules
Governing Practice Before the
Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission
Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document solicits
recommendations for amendments to
the Commission’s rules of procedure.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
October 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
EP07SE18.006
45366
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45364-45366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19430]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0336; Product Identifier 2017-SW-130-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus Helicopters) Model EC135P1,
EC135P2, EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1, EC135T2, EC135T2+, and EC135T3
helicopters. This proposed AD would require replacing the retaining
ring and inspecting the hoist cable hook assembly (hook). This proposed
AD is prompted by a report that a hook detached from the hoist cable.
The actions of this proposed AD are intended to prevent an unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 6,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0336; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this proposed AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at
https://www.helicopters.airbus.com/website/en/ref/Technical-Support_73.html. You may review the referenced service information at
the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Hatfield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110;
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments.
[[Page 45365]]
We will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if
it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may
change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2017-0199, dated October 11,
2017, to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters Model
EC135P1, EC135P2, EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1, EC135T2, EC135T2+,
EC135T3, EC635P2+, EC635P3, EC635T1, EC635T2+, and EC635T3 helicopters.
EASA advises of a report of a hook separating from the hoist cable.
According to EASA, an investigation determined that failure of the
internal retaining ring combined with a permanent compression set of
the elastomeric energy absorber caused the separation. EASA states that
this condition, if not corrected, could lead to the detachment of an
external load or person from the hoist, possibly resulting in personal
injury or injury to persons on the ground.
The EASA AD consequently requires repetitive inspections of the
hook assembly and replacement of the retaining ring. Depending on the
findings of the inspection, the EASA AD also requires replacement of
the elastomeric energy absorber. According to the manufacturer of the
hook, the retaining ring can corrode in a salt-laden environment.
Therefore, replacement of the retaining ring is required with each
inspection. EASA considers its AD an interim measure and states that
further AD action may follow.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
Germany and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known
relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely
to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Goodrich Service Bulletin No. 44301-10-17, Revision 4,
dated July 26, 2017. The Goodrich Service Bulletin is attached as an
appendix to Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB EC135-
85A-069, Revision 0, dated August 2, 2017. This service information
specifies an initial and repetitive inspections of the hook assembly
and replacement of the retaining ring. If the inspections of
elastomeric energy absorber detect a permanent compression set, this
service information also specifies replacing the elastomeric energy
absorber.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require, within 90 hours time-in-service
(TIS) and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 180 hours TIS,
replacing the retaining ring and inspecting the elastometric energy
absorber for a permanent compression set, and if necessary, replacing
the elastometric energy absorber before the next hoist operation.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires corrective actions in terms of months in
service. This proposed AD would require compliance within 90 hours TIS
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 180 hours TIS. The EASA AD
applies to Airbus Helicopters Model EC635P2+, EC635P3, EC635T1,
EC635T2+, and EC635T3 helicopters. This proposed AD would not because
these model helicopters have no FAA type certificate.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD to be an interim action. The design
approval holder is currently developing a modification that will
address the unsafe condition identified in this proposed AD. Once this
modification is developed, approved, and available, we might consider
additional rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 278 helicopters of
U.S. Registry and that labor costs average $85 per work-hour. Based on
these estimates, we expect the following costs:
Inspecting the hoist cable hook assembly and replacing the
retaining ring would require 0.5 work-hour and parts would be minimal
for a cost of $43 per helicopter and $11,954 for the U.S. fleet per
inspection cycle.
Replacing an elastomeric energy absorber would require 0.5
work-hour and parts would cost $2,152 for a cost of $2,195 per
helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 45366]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-
2018-0336; Product Identifier 2017-SW-130-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model
EC135P1, EC135P2, EC135P2+, EC135P3, EC135T1, EC135T2, EC135T2+, and
EC135T3 helicopters, certificated in any category, with an external
mounted hoist (hoist) part number (P/N) and hook assembly (hook) P/N
shown in Table 1 to paragraph (a) of this AD:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP07SE18.006
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as detachment of a hook
from a hoist cable resulting in in-flight failure of the hoist,
which could result in injury to persons being lifted.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November 6, 2018.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 90 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 180 hours TIS:
(1) Inspect the hook and determine whether the elastometric
energy absorber has taken a permanent compression set by following
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 2.A and 2.B, of Goodrich
Service Bulletin No. 44301-10-17, Revision 4, dated July 26, 2017
(SB 44301-10-17). If the elastometric energy absorber has taken a
permanent compression set, replace the elastometric energy absorber
before the next hoist operation.
(2) Replace the retaining ring by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 2.D through 2.K, of SB 44301-10-17.
(f) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be permitted provided the hoist is
not used.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to:
David Hatfield, Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth,
TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email [email protected].
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No. 2017-0199, dated October 11, 2017. You may view
the EASA AD on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the AD
Docket.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 2500, Cabin
Equipment/Furnishings.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 23, 2018.
Scott A. Horn,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19430 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P