Prohibition of Target Shooting on Public Lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains, Utah County, Utah, 45196-45199 [2018-19300]
Download as PDF
45196
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 5,
2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: August 31, 2018.
Alexandra Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart UU—Vermont
2. Section 52.2370 is amended in
paragraph (e) table by adding the entry
‘‘Submittals to meet Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS’’ after the entry ‘‘Vermont
Regional Haze Five-Year Progress
Report’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2370
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
VERMONT NON-REGULATORY
Name of nonregulatory
SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
*
Submittals to meet Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS.
*
*
Statewide .....................
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8365
[17X.LLUTW01100.L12200000.AL0000]
Prohibition of Target Shooting on
Public Lands in the Eastern Lake
Mountains, Utah County, Utah
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Interim final supplementary
rule.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
15:59 Sep 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
Explanation
*
*
9/6/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
These submittals are approved with respect to
the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E)(1), E(2),
(F), (G), (H), (J1), (J2), (J3), (K), (L), and (M).
The rule is effective on
September 6, 2018. You may submit
comments to the BLM on or before
November 5, 2018.
DATES:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Utah State Director
hereby establishes an interim final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
10/31/2015
EPA approval date
supplementary rule (rule) prohibiting
target shooting within a 2,004-acre area
on BLM-administered public lands in
the Eastern Lake Mountains area of the
Salt Lake Field Office, Eastern Lake
Mountains, Utah County, Utah. The rule
is necessary to implement and enforce
this long-term prohibition to provide for
public safety and historic properties
(specifically Native American
petroglyphs), as authorized in the
Decision Record for the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting Resource
Management Plan Amendment (RMPA).
The rule does not restrict other public
activities in or access to or through the
Lake Mountains, including legal
hunting.
[FR Doc. 2018–19291 Filed 9–5–18; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
State
submittal date/
effective date
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
Mail: Bureau of Land Management,
Attention: Matt Preston, Salt Lake Field
Office, 2370 South Decker Lake
Boulevard, West Valley City, Utah
84119.
Email: blm_ut_sl_comments@blm.gov.
NEPA Register: https://go.usa.gov/
xXBNF.
The environmental assessment,
Decision Record, and RMPA are
available for public review at the
mailing and NEPA Register website
addresses in this section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Preston, BLM Salt Lake Field Manager,
Bureau of Land Management at 801–
977–4300. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to
contact the above individual. The FRS
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week. You will receive a reply during
normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
is establishing this rule under the
authority of 43 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 8365.1–6, which
allows State Directors to establish
supplementary rules for the protection
of persons, property, and the public
lands and resources. This provision
allows the BLM to issue rules of less
than national effect by publishing the
rule in the Federal Register, but without
codifying it in the CFR. This rule
applies to 2,004 acres of public lands
managed by the BLM Salt Lake Field
Office in the Eastern Lake Mountains
within Utah County, Utah.
This Notice and the map of the
affected area can be obtained by visiting
or contacting the Salt Lake Field Office
(see ADDRESSES). The BLM will post this
Notice and the map to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Register (see ADDRESSES).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
I. Public Comment Procedures
Please submit your written comments
on issues related to this rule to one of
the addresses shown in the ADDRESSES
section above. Comments on the rule
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the rule, and explain the
reason for any recommended change.
Comments requesting changes to the
Decision Record, environmental
assessment, or the RMPA are outside the
scope of this rule.
The BLM is not obligated to consider,
or include in the Administrative Record
for the rule, comments delivered to an
address other than those listed above
(see ADDRESSES), or comments that the
BLM receives after the close of the
comment period (see DATES), unless
they are postmarked or electronically
dated before the deadline.
The BLM will make your comments,
including your name and address,
available for public review at the Salt
Lake Field Office address listed in
ADDRESSES above during regular
business hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays). Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personally identifiable
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personally
identifiable information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask the BLM in your comment
to withhold your personally identifiable
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Sep 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
II. Discussion of Interim Final
Supplementary Rule
The rule is necessary to implement
and enforce the long-term target
shooting closure authorized in the
Decision Record for the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting RMPA. The
long-term closure covers 2,004 acres of
public lands in Utah County, Utah. This
rule replaces and expands the previous
target shooting closure orders
implemented by the BLM in the Eastern
Lake Mountains since 2012 (81 FR
90864, 79 FR 74111, 77 FR 75186). The
expanded closure area identified in this
supplementary rule is necessary in
order to provide additional protection
for public health and safety to those
who may be endangered by target
shooting and for protection of historic
properties (specifically Native American
petroglyphs) damaged by target
shooting, outside the previous closure
area.
The BLM determined that a long-term
target shooting closure was necessary
due to a variety of concerns, including:
Several serious public safety incidents
of errant gunfire endangering lives and
property, the high incidence of target
shooting-caused wildfires annually,
documented and irreparable damage to
historic properties (specifically Native
American petroglyphs), and the large
amounts of litter and hazardous waste
that result from target shooting. In
addition, the area is not considered safe
for target shooting due to the lack of
proper backstops in lower elevations,
nearby homes, and its proximity to State
Highway 68. Public outreach and
education efforts to address these
problems have not been successful.
The BLM has determined that this
rule is necessary to allow immediate
implementation of the long-term
closure, thereby providing for public
safety and protection of important
historic and pre-historic properties.
In accordance with section 553(b)(B)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)), the BLM
finds good cause that publishing a
proposed supplementary rule, accepting
public comment on the proposed
supplementary rule, and then,
publishing a final supplementary rule
are contrary to the public interest. The
urgency and magnitude of the need to
reduce the risks to public safety and
health, and historic properties
(specifically Native American
petroglyphs) associated with target
shooting in the Eastern Lake Mountains
warrants expedited action. Furthermore,
the planning process for the Eastern
Lake Mountains Target Shooting RMPA
offered extensive opportunities for
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45197
public comment, including public
notices, an extended scoping period, an
extended comment period, a protest
period on the proposed land use plan
decision, and a Governor’s consistency
review.
Under section 553(d)(3) of the APA (5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3)), good cause also exists
for making these rules effective
immediately because a variety of
government and public stakeholders
have asked the BLM to take immediate
and affirmative action to curtail the
public safety risks and the damage to
historic properties (specifically Native
American petroglyphs) caused by the
target shooting. The environmental
assessment for the RMPA discussed the
need to establish a supplementary rule,
and thus, the public was on notice
during that process that this
supplementary rule would follow
completion of the RMPA. A summary of
the planning process, including public
participation periods, is described
below in Section III. Procedural Matters,
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA).
The BLM invites public comment on
this interim final supplementary rule
until November 5, 2018. If any
substantive comments are received in
response to this notice, the BLM will
determine whether or not to modify this
rule. The BLM will publish a Notice
establishing the final supplementary
rule only if substantive comments are
received. If no substantive comments
are received, the rule will become a
final supplementary rule without
another published notice.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Planning and Review
The rule prohibits target shooting on
a limited area of public lands in the
Eastern Lake Mountains. The rule is not
a significant regulatory action and is not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 or 13563. The
rule would not have an annual effect of
$100 million or more on the economy;
and it would not adversely affect in a
material way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments, or communities.
The rule would not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; and it would not
materially alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs, or the rights or obligations of
their recipients; nor does it raise novel
legal or policy issues. This rule
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
45198
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
implements and supports enforcement
of the long-term target shooting closure
authorized in the Decision Record for
the Eastern Lake Mountains Target
Shooting RMPA.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Clarity of the Supplementary Rule
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are
simple and easy to understand. The
BLM invites your comments on how to
make this rule easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as
the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that interferes with
its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule
(grouping and order of sections, use of
headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity?
(4) Would the rule be easier to
understand if it was divided into more
(but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this preamble helpful in understanding
the rule? How could this description be
more helpful in making the rule easier
to understand?
Please send any comments you have
on the clarity of the rule to one of the
addresses specified in the ADDRESSES
section.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
The rule implements a land use plan
decision to prohibit target shooting on
2,004 acres to provide for public safety
and protect historic properties
(specifically Native American
petroglyphs) as authorized in the
Decision Record for the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting RMPA
(DOI–BLM–UT–W010–2015–0023–EA).
The BLM analyzed and disclosed the
environmental consequences of the
long-term target shooting closure
identified in an environmental
assessment completed on December 14,
2016. The BLM found that the long-term
target shooting closure, including the
rule, would not have a significant
individual or cumulative effect on the
quality of the human environment
under Section 102(2) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
The Eastern Lake Mountains Target
Shooting RMPA was initiated under a
Notice of Intent published in the
Federal Register on June 12, 2015 (80
FR 33547). A 30-day public scoping
period began on June 12, 2015, with
public open houses on August 4 and 5,
2015, and was subsequently extended
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Sep 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
through August 20, 2015. The BLM
released the Draft RMPA and associated
environmental assessment for a 30-day
public comment period beginning on
April 15, 2016, with an open house on
May 11, 2016; and subsequently
extended the comment period through
May 31, 2016. The BLM released the
Proposed RMPA and associated
environmental assessment for a 30-day
public protest period and 60-day
Governor’s consistency review on
December 14, 2016. The BLM informed
the public of the scoping period and
associated open houses, comment
period and associated open house, and
the protest period through news
releases, NEPA register postings, BLM
website postings, flyers on local bulletin
boards, and public mailings to a project
mailing list of more than 300 addresses.
The environmental assessment,
Decision Record, and RMPA are
available for public review at the
locations identified in the ADDRESSES
section.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as
amended (5 U.S.C. 601–612) to ensure
that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. The RFA requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial,
on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule does not pertain
specifically to commercial or
governmental entities of any size, but to
public recreational use of specific
public lands. This rule establishes a rule
of conduct for recreational use of certain
public lands in the Eastern Lake
Mountains. Therefore, the BLM has
determined, under the RFA, that this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule does not constitute a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined at 5 U.S.C 804(2). This
rule establishes a rule of conduct for
recreational use of certain public lands
in the Eastern Lake Mountains and
would not affect business, commercial,
or industrial use of the public lands.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule would not impose an
unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector,
of more than $100 million per year; nor
would it have a significant or unique
effect on small governments. This rule
would have no effect on governmental
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or tribal entities and would impose no
requirements on any of these entities.
This rule establishes a rule of conduct
for recreational use of certain public
lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains
and does not affect business,
commercial, or industrial use of these
public lands. Therefore, the BLM is not
required to prepare a statement
containing the information required by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
This rule does not represent a
Government action capable of
interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. This rule does
not address property rights in any form
and does not cause the impairment of
anyone’s property rights. This rule
establishes a rule of conduct for
recreational use of certain public lands
in the Eastern Lake Mountains.
Therefore, the BLM has determined that
this rule would not cause a ‘‘taking’’ of
private property or require preparation
of a takings assessment under this
Executive Order.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rule would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This rule applies
to a limited area of land in only one
State, Utah, and would not conflict with
any Utah state statute or regulation.
Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, the BLM has determined
that this rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
Under Executive Order 12988, the
BLM has determined that this rule
would not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, the BLM consulted and
coordinated with Indian tribal
governments on this rule during the
development of the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting RMPA,
which included an implementation-
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
level decision to establish this interim
final supplementary rule through
publication in the Federal Register.
The Salt Lake Field Manager sent
project information and invited the
initiation of formal consultation with
the following Native American Tribes
via certified letter dated June 29, 2015:
Jemez Pueblo, Skull Valley Band of
Goshute Indians of Utah, Confederated
Tribes of the Goshute Reservation,
Paiute Indian Tribe, Ute Indian Tribe,
and Eastern Shoshone. The BLM
contacted these same tribes via phone
between July 1 and 7, 2015, to schedule
telephone conferences with the Salt
Lake Field Manager, if desired. The
Paiute Indian Tribe requested a meeting
and a presentation was made to the
Paiute Tribal Council on July 16, 2015,
at which the tribe expressed their
support for the Eastern Lake Mountains
Target Shooting RMPA. Additionally,
these tribes received formal invitations
to participate in the planning process as
a consulting party and/or cooperating
agency; none of the tribes accepted
either role. These same tribes were
included on the project mailing list and
received notification of the scoping
period and associated open houses, the
public comment period and associated
open house, and the protest period.
Only the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah
submitted a comment letter during the
public comment period expressing
concern over preserving and protecting
Native American petroglyphs. To
discuss this in detail with the tribe, the
BLM attended a Paiute Tribal Council
meeting on November 1, 2016, in which
the tribal leaders expressed their
support for the Proposed RMPA.
The Salt Lake Field Manager and staff
also attended the November 15, 2016
Utah Tribal Leaders Conference in
Wendover, Nevada, at which time tribal
leaders of the Confederated Tribes of the
Goshute Reservation, Paiute, Ute, and
Eastern Shoshone were informed of the
Proposed RMPA and invited to make
comments. Tribal leaders asked
questions and made verbal comments in
support of the Proposed RMPA. A final
letter was mailed to these same tribes on
December 14, 2016, inviting them to
consult on the Proposed RMPA and
associated environmental assessment.
The BLM also contacted these tribes via
telephone. No further comments were
received.
Executive Order 13352, Facilitation of
Cooperative Conservation
Under Executive Order 13352, the
BLM has determined that this rule
would not impede the facilitation of
cooperative conservation. This rule
would take appropriate account of and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Sep 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
consider the interests of persons with
ownership or other legally recognized
interests in land or other natural
resources; properly accommodate local
participation in the Federal decisionmaking process; and provide that the
programs, projects, and activities are
consistent with protecting public health
and safety.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule does not constitute a
‘‘significant energy action,’’ as defined
in Executive Order 13211. The rule
would not have an adverse effect on
energy supplies, production, or
consumption and has no connection
with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
the Office of Management and Budget
must approve under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
IV. Interim Final Supplementary Rule
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, and under the authority of 43
CFR 8365.1–6, the State Director
establishes a rule for 2,004 acres of
public lands managed by the BLM in the
Lake Mountains in Utah County, Utah,
subject to the Pony Express Resource
Management Plan, to read as follows:
Prohibited Act
Target shooting is prohibited within
the area described below, including
2,004 acres, in Utah County, Utah.
Exemptions
The following persons are exempt
from this rule: Any Federal, state, local,
and/or military employees acting within
the scope of their official duties;
members of any organized rescue or fire
fighting force performing an official
duty; and persons who are expressly
authorized or approved by the BLM.
Legal Land Description
The legal description of the affected
public lands is:
Salt Lake Meridian, Utah
T. 7 S, R. 1 E,
Sec. 6, lot 1 and NE1⁄4SE1⁄4;
Sec. 7, lot 1.
T. 7 S, R. 1 W,
Sec. 13, lots 2 thru 4, lots 9 thru 12, and
W1⁄2;
Sec. 22, those portions of lots 5, 11, and
12 lying southwesterly of the top of a
ridgeline, bears northwest and southeast,
on the south side of Pfeiffer Canyon, the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45199
easterly end of the ridgeline being
approximately 460 feet northerly of the
south one quarter section corner of
section 22 along the north-south
centerline of section 22 and the westerly
end of the ridgeline being approximately
1,780 feet northerly of the southwest
corner of section 22 along the section
line between sections 21 and 22;
Sec. 24, lots 1 thru 3, lots 10 thru 13, lots
17 and 18, and NW1⁄4;
Sec. 26, NW1⁄4NE1⁄4, N1⁄2NW1⁄4, and
NW1⁄4SW1⁄4;
Sec. 27, SW1⁄4NE1⁄4;
Sec. 28, N1⁄2 and SE1⁄4.
The areas described contain approximately
2,004 acres.
Definition
Target shooting: The discharge or use
of a firearm or other dangerous weapon
(e.g. bow-and-arrows, projectile
weapons, etc.) for the purposes of
recreational shooting not associated
with lawful hunting practices.
Enforcement
Any person who violates this rule
may be tried before a United States
Magistrate and fined in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 3571, imprisoned no more
than 12 months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a)
and 43 CFR 8360.0–7, or both. In
accordance with 43 CFR 8365.1–7, State
or local officials may also impose
penalties for violations of Utah law.
Edwin L. Roberson,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2018–19300 Filed 9–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2018–0002; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8545]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives
documentation that the community has
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45196-45199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19300]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8365
[17X.LLUTW01100.L12200000.AL0000]
Prohibition of Target Shooting on Public Lands in the Eastern
Lake Mountains, Utah County, Utah
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Interim final supplementary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Utah State Director hereby
establishes an interim final supplementary rule (rule) prohibiting
target shooting within a 2,004-acre area on BLM-administered public
lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains area of the Salt Lake Field Office,
Eastern Lake Mountains, Utah County, Utah. The rule is necessary to
implement and enforce this long-term prohibition to provide for public
safety and historic properties (specifically Native American
petroglyphs), as authorized in the Decision Record for the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting Resource Management Plan Amendment (RMPA).
The rule does not restrict other public activities in or access to or
through the Lake Mountains, including legal hunting.
DATES: The rule is effective on September 6, 2018. You may submit
comments to the BLM on or before November 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Mail: Bureau of Land Management, Attention: Matt Preston, Salt Lake
Field Office, 2370 South Decker Lake Boulevard, West Valley City, Utah
84119.
Email: [email protected].
NEPA Register: https://go.usa.gov/xXBNF.
The environmental assessment, Decision Record, and RMPA are
available for public review at the mailing and NEPA Register website
addresses in this section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Preston, BLM Salt Lake Field
Manager, Bureau of Land Management at 801-977-4300. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual. The
FRS
[[Page 45197]]
is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM is establishing this rule under the
authority of 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 8365.1-6, which
allows State Directors to establish supplementary rules for the
protection of persons, property, and the public lands and resources.
This provision allows the BLM to issue rules of less than national
effect by publishing the rule in the Federal Register, but without
codifying it in the CFR. This rule applies to 2,004 acres of public
lands managed by the BLM Salt Lake Field Office in the Eastern Lake
Mountains within Utah County, Utah.
This Notice and the map of the affected area can be obtained by
visiting or contacting the Salt Lake Field Office (see ADDRESSES). The
BLM will post this Notice and the map to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) Register (see ADDRESSES).
I. Public Comment Procedures
Please submit your written comments on issues related to this rule
to one of the addresses shown in the ADDRESSES section above. Comments
on the rule should be specific, confined to issues pertinent to the
rule, and explain the reason for any recommended change. Comments
requesting changes to the Decision Record, environmental assessment, or
the RMPA are outside the scope of this rule.
The BLM is not obligated to consider, or include in the
Administrative Record for the rule, comments delivered to an address
other than those listed above (see ADDRESSES), or comments that the BLM
receives after the close of the comment period (see DATES), unless they
are postmarked or electronically dated before the deadline.
The BLM will make your comments, including your name and address,
available for public review at the Salt Lake Field Office address
listed in ADDRESSES above during regular business hours (8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays). Before
including your address, phone number, email address, or other
personally identifiable information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personally identifiable
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask the BLM in your comment to withhold your personally identifiable
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
II. Discussion of Interim Final Supplementary Rule
The rule is necessary to implement and enforce the long-term target
shooting closure authorized in the Decision Record for the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting RMPA. The long-term closure covers 2,004
acres of public lands in Utah County, Utah. This rule replaces and
expands the previous target shooting closure orders implemented by the
BLM in the Eastern Lake Mountains since 2012 (81 FR 90864, 79 FR 74111,
77 FR 75186). The expanded closure area identified in this
supplementary rule is necessary in order to provide additional
protection for public health and safety to those who may be endangered
by target shooting and for protection of historic properties
(specifically Native American petroglyphs) damaged by target shooting,
outside the previous closure area.
The BLM determined that a long-term target shooting closure was
necessary due to a variety of concerns, including: Several serious
public safety incidents of errant gunfire endangering lives and
property, the high incidence of target shooting-caused wildfires
annually, documented and irreparable damage to historic properties
(specifically Native American petroglyphs), and the large amounts of
litter and hazardous waste that result from target shooting. In
addition, the area is not considered safe for target shooting due to
the lack of proper backstops in lower elevations, nearby homes, and its
proximity to State Highway 68. Public outreach and education efforts to
address these problems have not been successful.
The BLM has determined that this rule is necessary to allow
immediate implementation of the long-term closure, thereby providing
for public safety and protection of important historic and pre-historic
properties.
In accordance with section 553(b)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)), the BLM finds good cause that
publishing a proposed supplementary rule, accepting public comment on
the proposed supplementary rule, and then, publishing a final
supplementary rule are contrary to the public interest. The urgency and
magnitude of the need to reduce the risks to public safety and health,
and historic properties (specifically Native American petroglyphs)
associated with target shooting in the Eastern Lake Mountains warrants
expedited action. Furthermore, the planning process for the Eastern
Lake Mountains Target Shooting RMPA offered extensive opportunities for
public comment, including public notices, an extended scoping period,
an extended comment period, a protest period on the proposed land use
plan decision, and a Governor's consistency review.
Under section 553(d)(3) of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)), good cause
also exists for making these rules effective immediately because a
variety of government and public stakeholders have asked the BLM to
take immediate and affirmative action to curtail the public safety
risks and the damage to historic properties (specifically Native
American petroglyphs) caused by the target shooting. The environmental
assessment for the RMPA discussed the need to establish a supplementary
rule, and thus, the public was on notice during that process that this
supplementary rule would follow completion of the RMPA. A summary of
the planning process, including public participation periods, is
described below in Section III. Procedural Matters, National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The BLM invites public comment on this interim final supplementary
rule until November 5, 2018. If any substantive comments are received
in response to this notice, the BLM will determine whether or not to
modify this rule. The BLM will publish a Notice establishing the final
supplementary rule only if substantive comments are received. If no
substantive comments are received, the rule will become a final
supplementary rule without another published notice.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Regulatory Planning and Review
The rule prohibits target shooting on a limited area of public
lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains. The rule is not a significant
regulatory action and is not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 or 13563. The rule
would not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy;
and it would not adversely affect in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or state, local, or tribal governments, or communities. The
rule would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; and it would not
materially alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs, or the rights or obligations of their
recipients; nor does it raise novel legal or policy issues. This rule
[[Page 45198]]
implements and supports enforcement of the long-term target shooting
closure authorized in the Decision Record for the Eastern Lake
Mountains Target Shooting RMPA.
Clarity of the Supplementary Rule
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations
that are simple and easy to understand. The BLM invites your comments
on how to make this rule easier to understand, including answers to
questions such as the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its clarity?
(4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it was divided into
more (but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the rule in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this preamble helpful in understanding the rule? How could
this description be more helpful in making the rule easier to
understand?
Please send any comments you have on the clarity of the rule to one
of the addresses specified in the ADDRESSES section.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The rule implements a land use plan decision to prohibit target
shooting on 2,004 acres to provide for public safety and protect
historic properties (specifically Native American petroglyphs) as
authorized in the Decision Record for the Eastern Lake Mountains Target
Shooting RMPA (DOI-BLM-UT-W010-2015-0023-EA). The BLM analyzed and
disclosed the environmental consequences of the long-term target
shooting closure identified in an environmental assessment completed on
December 14, 2016. The BLM found that the long-term target shooting
closure, including the rule, would not have a significant individual or
cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment under Section
102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
The Eastern Lake Mountains Target Shooting RMPA was initiated under
a Notice of Intent published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2015
(80 FR 33547). A 30-day public scoping period began on June 12, 2015,
with public open houses on August 4 and 5, 2015, and was subsequently
extended through August 20, 2015. The BLM released the Draft RMPA and
associated environmental assessment for a 30-day public comment period
beginning on April 15, 2016, with an open house on May 11, 2016; and
subsequently extended the comment period through May 31, 2016. The BLM
released the Proposed RMPA and associated environmental assessment for
a 30-day public protest period and 60-day Governor's consistency review
on December 14, 2016. The BLM informed the public of the scoping period
and associated open houses, comment period and associated open house,
and the protest period through news releases, NEPA register postings,
BLM website postings, flyers on local bulletin boards, and public
mailings to a project mailing list of more than 300 addresses.
The environmental assessment, Decision Record, and RMPA are
available for public review at the locations identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as
amended (5 U.S.C. 601-612) to ensure that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a
significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule does not pertain
specifically to commercial or governmental entities of any size, but to
public recreational use of specific public lands. This rule establishes
a rule of conduct for recreational use of certain public lands in the
Eastern Lake Mountains. Therefore, the BLM has determined, under the
RFA, that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule does not constitute a ``major rule'' as defined at 5
U.S.C 804(2). This rule establishes a rule of conduct for recreational
use of certain public lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains and would not
affect business, commercial, or industrial use of the public lands.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector, of more than $100 million per
year; nor would it have a significant or unique effect on small
governments. This rule would have no effect on governmental or tribal
entities and would impose no requirements on any of these entities.
This rule establishes a rule of conduct for recreational use of certain
public lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains and does not affect
business, commercial, or industrial use of these public lands.
Therefore, the BLM is not required to prepare a statement containing
the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
This rule does not represent a Government action capable of
interfering with constitutionally protected property rights. This rule
does not address property rights in any form and does not cause the
impairment of anyone's property rights. This rule establishes a rule of
conduct for recreational use of certain public lands in the Eastern
Lake Mountains. Therefore, the BLM has determined that this rule would
not cause a ``taking'' of private property or require preparation of a
takings assessment under this Executive Order.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rule would not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This rule applies to a limited area of land in
only one State, Utah, and would not conflict with any Utah state
statute or regulation. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132, the BLM has determined that this rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
Under Executive Order 12988, the BLM has determined that this rule
would not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the BLM consulted and
coordinated with Indian tribal governments on this rule during the
development of the Eastern Lake Mountains Target Shooting RMPA, which
included an implementation-
[[Page 45199]]
level decision to establish this interim final supplementary rule
through publication in the Federal Register.
The Salt Lake Field Manager sent project information and invited
the initiation of formal consultation with the following Native
American Tribes via certified letter dated June 29, 2015: Jemez Pueblo,
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah, Confederated Tribes of
the Goshute Reservation, Paiute Indian Tribe, Ute Indian Tribe, and
Eastern Shoshone. The BLM contacted these same tribes via phone between
July 1 and 7, 2015, to schedule telephone conferences with the Salt
Lake Field Manager, if desired. The Paiute Indian Tribe requested a
meeting and a presentation was made to the Paiute Tribal Council on
July 16, 2015, at which the tribe expressed their support for the
Eastern Lake Mountains Target Shooting RMPA. Additionally, these tribes
received formal invitations to participate in the planning process as a
consulting party and/or cooperating agency; none of the tribes accepted
either role. These same tribes were included on the project mailing
list and received notification of the scoping period and associated
open houses, the public comment period and associated open house, and
the protest period. Only the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah submitted a
comment letter during the public comment period expressing concern over
preserving and protecting Native American petroglyphs. To discuss this
in detail with the tribe, the BLM attended a Paiute Tribal Council
meeting on November 1, 2016, in which the tribal leaders expressed
their support for the Proposed RMPA.
The Salt Lake Field Manager and staff also attended the November
15, 2016 Utah Tribal Leaders Conference in Wendover, Nevada, at which
time tribal leaders of the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute
Reservation, Paiute, Ute, and Eastern Shoshone were informed of the
Proposed RMPA and invited to make comments. Tribal leaders asked
questions and made verbal comments in support of the Proposed RMPA. A
final letter was mailed to these same tribes on December 14, 2016,
inviting them to consult on the Proposed RMPA and associated
environmental assessment. The BLM also contacted these tribes via
telephone. No further comments were received.
Executive Order 13352, Facilitation of Cooperative Conservation
Under Executive Order 13352, the BLM has determined that this rule
would not impede the facilitation of cooperative conservation. This
rule would take appropriate account of and consider the interests of
persons with ownership or other legally recognized interests in land or
other natural resources; properly accommodate local participation in
the Federal decision-making process; and provide that the programs,
projects, and activities are consistent with protecting public health
and safety.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule does not constitute a ``significant energy action,'' as
defined in Executive Order 13211. The rule would not have an adverse
effect on energy supplies, production, or consumption and has no
connection with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
the Office of Management and Budget must approve under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
IV. Interim Final Supplementary Rule
For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of
43 CFR 8365.1-6, the State Director establishes a rule for 2,004 acres
of public lands managed by the BLM in the Lake Mountains in Utah
County, Utah, subject to the Pony Express Resource Management Plan, to
read as follows:
Prohibited Act
Target shooting is prohibited within the area described below,
including 2,004 acres, in Utah County, Utah.
Exemptions
The following persons are exempt from this rule: Any Federal,
state, local, and/or military employees acting within the scope of
their official duties; members of any organized rescue or fire fighting
force performing an official duty; and persons who are expressly
authorized or approved by the BLM.
Legal Land Description
The legal description of the affected public lands is:
Salt Lake Meridian, Utah
T. 7 S, R. 1 E,
Sec. 6, lot 1 and NE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
Sec. 7, lot 1.
T. 7 S, R. 1 W,
Sec. 13, lots 2 thru 4, lots 9 thru 12, and W\1/2\;
Sec. 22, those portions of lots 5, 11, and 12 lying
southwesterly of the top of a ridgeline, bears northwest and
southeast, on the south side of Pfeiffer Canyon, the easterly end of
the ridgeline being approximately 460 feet northerly of the south
one quarter section corner of section 22 along the north-south
centerline of section 22 and the westerly end of the ridgeline being
approximately 1,780 feet northerly of the southwest corner of
section 22 along the section line between sections 21 and 22;
Sec. 24, lots 1 thru 3, lots 10 thru 13, lots 17 and 18, and
NW\1/4\;
Sec. 26, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\NW\1/4\, and NW\1/4\SW\1/4\;
Sec. 27, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\;
Sec. 28, N\1/2\ and SE\1/4\.
The areas described contain approximately 2,004 acres.
Definition
Target shooting: The discharge or use of a firearm or other
dangerous weapon (e.g. bow-and-arrows, projectile weapons, etc.) for
the purposes of recreational shooting not associated with lawful
hunting practices.
Enforcement
Any person who violates this rule may be tried before a United
States Magistrate and fined in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3571,
imprisoned no more than 12 months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43 CFR
8360.0-7, or both. In accordance with 43 CFR 8365.1-7, State or local
officials may also impose penalties for violations of Utah law.
Edwin L. Roberson,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-19300 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P