Louisiana: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision, 45061-45068 [2018-19195]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 165.T09–0832 Safety Zone; Head of the
Buffalo Regatta; Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of the Buffalo
River, Buffalo, NY, beginning at position
42°52′19.4″ N, 78°52′25.3″ W to
42°51′36.7″ N, 78°50′56.0″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This rule is
effective from 8:00 a.m. until 6:30 p.m.
on October 20, 2018.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: August 28, 2018.
Joseph S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2018–19192 Filed 9–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R06–RCRA–2018–0395; FRL–9982–
64—Region 6]
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Louisiana: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The State of Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality
(LDEQ) has applied to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
for final authorization of the changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). The EPA has reviewed
Louisiana’s application, and has
determined that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is proposing to
authorize the State’s changes. The EPA
is seeking public comment prior to
taking final action.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received by October 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov.
• Fax: (214) 665–6762 (prior to
faxing, please notify Alima Patterson at
(214) 665–8533).
• Mail: Alima Patterson, Regional
Authorization/Codification Coordinator,
RCRA Permit Section (6MM–RP),
Multimedia Division, EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Alima Patterson,
Regional Authorization/Codification
Coordinator, RCRA Permit Section
(6MM–RP), Multimedia Division, EPA
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Instructions: EPA must receive your
comments by October 5, 2018. Direct
your comments to Docket ID Number
EPA–R06–RCRA–2018–0395. The EPA’s
policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email. The
Federal regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45061
contact information in the body of your
comment and with CD you submit. If
the EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA
may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. (For additional information
about the EPA’s public docket, visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at https://
www.regulations.gov).
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy.
You can view and copy Louisiana’s
application and associated publicly
available materials from 8:30 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday at the
following locations: Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality,
602 N Fifth Street, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana 70884–2178, phone number
(225) 219–3559 and EPA, Region 6, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733, phone number (214) 665–
8533. The public is advised to call in
advance to verify business hours.
Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least two
weeks in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization/Codification Coordinator,
Permit Section (6MM–RP), Multimedia
Division, (214) 665–8533, EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733, and Email address
patterson.alima@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
the changes. Changes to State programs
may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
45062
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
modified or when certain other changes
occur.
Most commonly, States must change
their programs because of changes to the
EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260
through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. What decisions have the EPA made
in this rule?
On March 13, 2018, the State of
Louisiana submitted a final complete
program revision application seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program that
correspond to certain Federal rules
promulgated on January 13, 2015, April
8, 2015 and April 17, 2015, RCRA
Cluster XXIV (Checklists 233A, 233B,
233C, 233D2, 233E, 234 and 235), as
well as state-initiated changes. The EPA
has reviewed Louisiana’s application to
revise its authorized program and has
made a tentative decision that it meets
all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA.
Therefore, we propose to grant LDEQ
final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application, except for federal
provisions that were vacated from the
January 13, 2015 final rule (Revisions to
the Definition of Solid Waste (DSW)) by
the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit (Am.
Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 862 F.3d 50
(D.C. Cir. 2017) and Am. Petroleum Inst.
v. EPA, No. 09–1038 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 6,
2018).
LDEQ will continue to have
responsibility for permitting treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities within its
borders, and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its
revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates
under the authority of HSWA take effect
in authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
the EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in
Louisiana, including issuing permits,
until the State is granted authorization
to do so.
C. What is the effect of this proposed
authorization decision?
If Louisiana is authorized for these
changes, a facility in Louisiana subject
to RCRA will now have to comply with
the authorized State requirements
instead of the equivalent Federal
requirements in order to comply with
RCRA. Additionally, such facilities will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
have to comply with any applicable
federal requirements such as, for
example, HSWA regulations issued by
the EPA for which the State has not
received authorization. LDEQ continues
to have enforcement responsibilities
under its State hazardous waste program
for violations of such program, but the
EPA retains its authority under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority
to:
• Conduct inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports;
• enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits, and
• take enforcement actions after
notice to and consultation with the
State.
The action to approve these
provisions would not impose additional
requirements on the regulated
community because the regulations for
which LDEQ is requesting authorization
are already effective under state law,
and are not changed by the act of
authorization.
D. What happens if the EPA receives
comments on this action?
If the EPA receives comments on this
proposed action, we will address those
comments in our final action. You may
not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on
this proposed authorization, you must
do so at this time.
E. What has Louisiana previously been
authorized?
The State of Louisiana initially
received final authorization on February
7, 1985 (50 FR 3348), to implement its
base Hazardous Waste Management
Program. We granted authorization for
changes to their program on November
28, 1989 (54 FR 48889), effective
January 29, 1990; August 26, 1991 (56
FR 41958), as corrected October 15,
1991 (56 FR 51762), effective October
25, 1991; November 7, 1994 (59 FR
55368), effective January 23, 1995 (Note:
On January 23, 1995 (60 FR 4380), the
EPA responded to public adverse
comments and affirmed the effective
date for the November 7, 1994 final
rule). Then on April 11, 1995 (60 FR
18360), the EPA also made
administrative corrections for the
January 23, 1995 Federal Register
document; December 23, 1994 (59 FR
66200), effective March 8, 1995; October
17, 1995 (60 FR 53704), effective
January 2, 1996; March 28, 1996 (61 FR
13777), effective June 11, 1996;
December 29, 1997 (62 FR 67572),
effective March 16, 1998; October 23,
1998 (63 FR 56830), effective December
22, 1998; August 25, 1999 (64 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46302), effective October 25, 1999;
September 2, 1999 (64 FR 48099),
effective November 1, 1999; February
28, 2000 (65 FR 10411), effective April
28, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR 23),
effective March 5, 2001; December 9,
2003 (68 FR 68526), effective February
9, 2004; June 10, 2005 (70 FR 33852),
effective August 9, 2005; November 13,
2006 (71 FR 66116), effective January
12, 2007; August 16, 2007 (72 FR
45905), effective October 15, 2007; May
20, 2009 (74 FR 23645), effective July
20, 2009; June 24, 2011(76 FR 122),
effective August 23, 2011; June 28, 2012
(77 FR 38530), effective August 27,
2012, September 14, 2015 (80 FR
55032), effective November 14, 2015
and July 13, 2017 (82 FR 32253)
effective September 11, 2017. On March
13, 2018, LDEQ submitted a final
program revision application seeking
authorization of its program revision in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21.
Since 1979, through the
Environmental Affairs Act, Act 449
enabled the Office of Environmental
Affairs within the Louisiana Department
of Natural Resources, as well as, the
Environmental Control Commission to
conduct an effective program designed
to regulate those who generate,
transport, treat, store, dispose or recycle
hazardous waste. During the 1983
Regular Session of the Louisiana
Legislature, Act 97 was adopted, which
amended and reenacted La. R. S.
30:1051 et seq. as the Environmental
Quality Act, renaming the
Environmental Affairs Act (Act 1938 of
1979). This Act created Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality
(LDEQ), including provisions for new
offices within this new Department of
Environmental Quality. Act 97 also
transferred the duties and
responsibilities previously delegated to
the Department of Natural Resources,
Office of Environmental Affairs to the
new Department. The LDEQ has lead
agency jurisdictional authority for
administering the RCRA Subtitle C
program in Louisiana. Also, the LDEQ is
designated to facilitate communication
between the EPA and the State. During
the 1999 Regular Session of Louisiana
Legislature, Act 303 revised the La. R.
S. 30:2011 et seq., allowing LDEQ to
reengineer the Department to perform
more efficiently and to meet its strategic
goals.
It is the intention of the State, through
this application, to demonstrate its
equivalence and consistency with the
federal statutory tests, which are
outlined in the United States EPA
regulatory requirements under 40 CFR
271 for final authorization. The
submittal of this application is in
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
F. What changes is EPA proposing to
authorize with today’s action?
application includes revisions to the
federal hazardous waste program, as
well as state-initiated changes to the
state’s previously authorized program.
The EPA proposes to authorize,
subject to receipt of written comments
that oppose this action that the State of
Louisiana’s hazardous waste program
revisions are equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the
federal program, and therefore satisfy all
of the requirements necessary to qualify
for final authorization.
On March 13, 2018, the State of
Louisiana submitted a final complete
program revision application seeking
authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21.
Louisiana’s program revision
1. Program Revision Changes for Federal
Rules
The LDEQ program revisions consist
of regulations which specifically govern
federal hazardous waste revisions
promulgated on January 13, 2015, April
keeping with the spirit and intent of
RCRA, which provides equivalent States
the opportunity to apply for final
delegation to operate all aspects of their
hazardous waste management programs
in lieu of the federal government. The
Louisiana Environmental Quality Act
authorizes the State’s program, Subtitle
II of Title 30 of the Louisiana Revised
Statutes.
45063
8, 2015 and April 17, 2015 (RCRA
Cluster XXIV; Checklists 233A, 233B,
233C, 233D2, 233E, 234 and 235).
LDEQ’s adoption of the January 13, 2015
final rule (80 FR 1694; Revisions to the
Definition of Solid Waste (DSW)),
includes provisions that have been
vacated by the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 862
F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2017) and Am.
Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, No. 09–1038
(D.C. Cir. Mar. 6, 2018). The impact of
the vacaturs on the Louisiana hazardous
waste program is discussed in Section G
of this document. We propose to grant
Louisiana final authorization for the
requirements which are listed in Table
1.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1—PROGRAM REVISION CHANGES FOR FEDERAL RULES
Description of Federal
requirement
(include checklist No.,
if relevant)
Federal Register
date and page
(and/or RCRA
statutory authority)
1. Revisions to the Definition
of Solid Waste. (Checklist
233A).
80 FR 1694–1814 January
13, 2015.
2. Revisions to the Definition
of Solid Waste. (Checklist
233B).
80 FR 1694–1814 January
13, 2015.
3. Revisions to the Definition
of Solid Waste. (Checklist
233C).
4. Revisions to the Definition
of Solid Waste. (Checklist
233D2).
80 FR 1694–1814 January
13, 2015.
5. Revisions to the Definition
of Solid Waste. (Checklist
233E).
80 FR 1694–1814 80 FR
January 13, 2015.
6. Response to Vacaturs of
the Comparable Fuels
Rule and Gasification
Rule. (Checklist 234).
7. Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities. (Checklist
235).
80 FR 18777–18780 April
8, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
80 FR 1694–1814 January
13, 2015.
80 FR 21302–21501 April
17, 2015.
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Analogous state authority
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
LAC Sections 33:V.105.O.2.c, 33:V.105.O.2.c.i–v, 33:V.105.K, 33:V.105.K.2.c–e,
33:V.105.Q, 33:V.105.Q.1, 33:V.105.Q.1.a–i and 33:V.105.Q.2, as amended June
20, 2017.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
LAC Sections 33:V.109 contained, 33:V109. Hazardous secondary material,
33:V.R.1–2, 33:V.105.R.2.a–e, 33:V.105.R.3, 33:V.105.R.3.a–b, 33:V.105.R.4,
33:V.109.solid waste 2.c, 33:V.109.solid waste.2.d and .33:V.109.sham recycling,
as amended June 20, 2017.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
LAC Section 33:V.109.V.accumulated speculatively, as amended June 20, 2017.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
LAC Sections 33:V.109.facility, 33:V.109 Hazardous secondary material generator, 33:V.109 Intermediate facility, 33:V.109 Land-based unit, 33:V.109 Transfer
facility, 33:V.105.O.1, 33: V.105.O.1.b, 33: V.105.O.1.d, 33: V.105.O.1.e,
33:V.105.O.1.b, 33:V.105.O.1.d, LAC 33:V.105.O.1.e, 33:V.105.K.2, 33:
V.105.K.2.a, 33:V.105.K.3, 33:V.105.K.3.a , 33:V.105.K.3.b, 33:105.K.3.b.i–iv,
33:V.105.K.3.c, 33:V.105.K.3.c.i–v, 33:V.109.solid waste, 33:V.109.solid waste
Table 1, 33:V.105.D.1.x, 33:V.105.D.1.x.i–ix, 33:V.105.D.1.y.vi.(f)—incorporate by
reference 40 CFR part 261, subpart H (Financial Requirements for Management
of Excluded Hazardous Secondary Materials), 33:V.105.D.1.y.vi.(e)—incorporate
by reference 40 CFR part 261, subpart M (Emergency Preparedness and Response for Management of Excluded Hazardous Secondary Materials) and 33:
V.322.A, as amended June 20, 2017.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
LAC Sections 33:V.109. remanufacturing, 33:V.109.solid waste, and
33:V.105.D.1.z incorporate by reference 40 CFR 261.4(a)(27) and part 261, subparts I, J, AA, BB and CC, as amended June 20, 2017.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
Sections LAC 33:V.109.Gasification (Repealed), 33:V.105.D.1.l.i, 33: V.105.D.1.q
(Reserved), as amended June 20, 2017.
Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality,
ERC Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Subpart 1.
LAC Sections 33:V.105.D.2.d.(i)–(ii), and 33:V.105.D.2.d.(ii)(a)–(h), as amended
June 20, 2017.
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
45064
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2. State-Initiated Changes
In addition to adopting the federal
program revisions discussed in Section
F.1, LDEQ has made amendments to its
regulations that are not directly related
to any of the federal rules addressed in
Item F.1. These changes are categorized
as follows: (a) Changes to clarify
previously authorized provisions; (b) redesignations and changes made to
conform to the renumbering of state
provisions, including corrections to
internal references and other
typographical errors; (c) new provisions
added for equivalency to federal
provisions; and (d) removal of
provisions in order to clarify the state’s
regulations, or correct errors or
duplications.
LDEQ submitted these state-initiated
amendments under the requirements of
40 CFR 271.21(a) and included
provisions from the Louisiana
Administrative Code, Title 33, Part V,
Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Material, Louisiana Hazardous Waste
Regulations (LHWR), as amended
effective through January 20, 2018. The
state’s regulations, as amended by these
provisions, provide authority which
remains equivalent to, and no less
stringent than the federal laws and
regulations. The EPA has reviewed the
state-initiated changes and have
determined they satisfy the
requirements of 40 CFR 271.21(a).
We are proposing to grant LDEQ final
authorization to carry out the state’s
hazardous waste program, as amended
by the state-initiated changes, in lieu of
the federal program. In the Tables
below, LDEQ provisions annotated with
an asterisk are different from the Federal
program; details are discussed in
Section G. Unless otherwise indicated,
the State provisions listed in the Tables
in this section are analogous to the
indicated RCRA regulations found at 40
CFR as of July 1, 2015. (Note: Some of
the state provisions have no direct
federal analog but are related to
particular paragraphs, sections, or parts
of the federal hazardous waste
regulations.)
(a) Changes To Clarify Previously
Authorized Provisions
The following state provisions contain
state-initiated changes that clarify
previously authorized provisions to
ensure equivalency to the federal
regulations or make the state’s
regulations more internally consistent.
TABLE 2a—CHANGES TO CLARIFY PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROVISIONS TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY AND EQUIVALENCY
State requirement
Analogous Federal requirement
309.L.8 ......................................................................................................
705.B introductory paragraph * .................................................................
1103 introductory paragraph ....................................................................
1107.B.1.b ................................................................................................
1515.A.4 ...................................................................................................
1516.B.5 ...................................................................................................
1516.B.2.d ................................................................................................
3301.G ......................................................................................................
3511.C.2.c and .d .....................................................................................
4037.A introductory paragraph .................................................................
4053.A introductory paragraph .................................................................
4053.B introductory paragraph .................................................................
4071.A introductory paragraph .................................................................
4085.A introductory paragraph .................................................................
4105.A.1 a ................................................................................................
4407.A.12 .................................................................................................
4501.D introductory paragraph .................................................................
(b) Redesignations, Revisions to Internal
References and Correction of
Typographical Errors
The following state provisions contain
state-initiated changes made to conform
270.30(L)(7).
124.15(b) introductory paragraph.
262.11 introductory paragraph.
262, Appendix, Items 6 and 7.
264.16(a) related.
264.71(a)(3).
264.71(b)(4).
264.90(f).
264.112(c)(2)(iii) and (iv).
279.46(a) introductory paragraph.
279.56(a) introductory paragraph.
279.56(b) introductory paragraph.
279.65(a) introductory paragraph.
279.74(a) introductory paragraph.
261.6(a)(3)(i).
265.145(a)(12).
265.310(d) introductory paragraph.
to the renumbering of state provisions,
including corrections to internal
references and the redesignation of
existing provisions to correct
provisions’ numbering in keeping with
the numbering scheme of Louisiana’s
regulations. Except for the changes at
108.F.4, 108.F.6, 108.G4 and 108.G.6,
the changes were made without
affecting the stringency of the state’s
currently authorized program.
TABLE 2b—REDESIGNATIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO INTERNAL REFERENCES AND OTHER ERRORS
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
State requirement
Analogous Federal requirement
108.F.4 * and F.6 * ....................................................................................
108.G.4 * and G.6 * ...................................................................................
517.T.4.c.i .................................................................................................
1103.D [was 1103.C] ................................................................................
1903.C and .D [were 1903.B.5.c and .d] .................................................
1109.E.1.a.i ...............................................................................................
1109.E.7.a ................................................................................................
1109.E.12 .................................................................................................
1529.E introductory paragraph .................................................................
1751.C.4.b ................................................................................................
1901.E ......................................................................................................
2203.A ‘‘Inorganic metal bearing waste’’ .................................................
2207.C introductory paragraph .................................................................
2209.C ......................................................................................................
2211.C ......................................................................................................
2216.D ......................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
261.5(f) related.
261.5(g) related.
270.14(c)(4)(i).
262.11(d).
264.191(c) and (d).
262.34(a)(1)(i).
262.34(d)(2).
262.34(i).
264.77 introductory paragraph.
264.1082(c)(4)(ii).
262.34(a)(1)(ii) related.
268.2(j).
268.3(c).
268.30(c).
268.31(a)(1), 268.31(c).
268.34.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
45065
TABLE 2b—REDESIGNATIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO INTERNAL REFERENCES AND OTHER ERRORS—Continued
State requirement
Analogous Federal requirement
2221.E.3 ...................................................................................................
2221.F.5 ....................................................................................................
2299, Table 2, Footnote 11 ......................................................................
2299, Table 11 .........................................................................................
3001.B.2.e ................................................................................................
3203 introductory paragraph ....................................................................
4301.C [was 4301.B] ................................................................................
4301.D–D.13.d [was 4301.C–C.13.d] .......................................................
4301.D.13.e and (f) [was 4301.C.13.f and (f)] .........................................
4301.E–.G [were 4301.D–.F] ....................................................................
4301.H [was 4301.G] ................................................................................
4301.I [was 4301.H] .................................................................................
4301.J [was 4301.I] ..................................................................................
4399.A.9 [was 4399.A.8] ..........................................................................
4513.B.2 ...................................................................................................
(c) New State Provisions Added for
Equivalency to Federal Provisions
268.38.
268.39(e)–(g).
268 related, No direct federal analog.
268, Appendix VII, Table 1.
266.100(b)(2)(v).
264.601 introductory paragraph.
265.1(b).
265.1(c)–265.1(c)(14)(iv).
265.1(c)(14) related; No direct Federal analog.
270.70(a) and (c).
265.1(d).
270.70(b).
265.1(f).
265.141(h).
265.340(b)(3).
federal regulations. These state
provisions had either not been
previously adopted by the state,
incorrectly adopted, or had been
LDEQ has adopted the following
provisions in order to be equivalent to
inadvertently removed from the state’s
regulations.
TABLE 2c—STATE PROVISIONS ADDED FOR EQUIVALENCY
State requirement
Analogous Federal requirement
1103.C ......................................................................................................
1109.E.1.a.iv.(b) .......................................................................................
1516.B.6 ...................................................................................................
1907.G.2.d ................................................................................................
2245.L .......................................................................................................
4301.B ......................................................................................................
4399.A.8 ...................................................................................................
4501.D.3 ...................................................................................................
(d) Removal of Provisions To Clarify
State Regulations or Correct Errors
LDEQ has removed the following
provisions in order to clarify the state’s
regulations because they were not part
262.11(b).
262.34(a)(1)(iv)(B).
264.71(e).
264.193(g)(2)(iv).
268.7(a)(10).
270.70(a).
265.141(f) ‘‘current plugging and abandonment cost estimate’’.
265.340(b)(2).
of the authorized program, or correct
errors or duplications, making the state
regulations more internally consistent
and more consistent with federal. The
removed provisions can be found in
Louisiana Administrative Code, Title
33, Part V, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials, Louisiana
Hazardous Waste Regulations (LHWR),
as amended effective through April
2016.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 2d—STATE PROVISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN REMOVED
State requirement
Analogous Federal requirement
537.B.2.f ...................................................................................................
537.B.2.l ....................................................................................................
1516.B.5.a and b ......................................................................................
2201.G.3 ...................................................................................................
2203.A ‘‘Treatment’’ ..................................................................................
2221.A & .B ..............................................................................................
2227.B ......................................................................................................
2231.A and .B ...........................................................................................
2231.C and .D ..........................................................................................
2231.E and .F ...........................................................................................
2239 ..........................................................................................................
2241 ..........................................................................................................
2299, Table 4 ...........................................................................................
2299, Table 12 .........................................................................................
3511.C.5 ...................................................................................................
4301.C ......................................................................................................
270.66 related; No federal analog [not part of authorized program].
270.66 related; No federal analog [not part of authorized program].
264.71(e) [unnecessary or incomplete duplicate].
268.1 related [not part of authorized program].
268.2 related, no analog in Part 268 [not part of authorized program].
268.13 related [not part of authorized program].
268.42(b) [non-delegable; not part of authorized program].
268.44(a) and (b) [non-delegable; not part of authorized program].
268.44(d) and (e) [non-delegable; not part of authorized program].
268.44(f)–(g) [non-delegable; not part of authorized program].
268.5 [non-delegable; not part of authorized program].
268.6 [non-delegable; not part of authorized program].
268 related, No direct federal analog [not part of authorized program].
268, Appendix XI [unnecessary or incomplete duplicate].
264.112(c)(2)(iv) [unnecessary or incomplete duplicate].
265.1(b) & (c) related; 270.70(a) related [unnecessary or incomplete
duplicate].
265.1(f) [unnecessary or incomplete duplicate].
265.141(f) ‘‘current plugging and abandonment cost estimate’’ [unnecessary or incomplete duplicate].
265.141(f) ‘‘current plugging and abandonment cost estimate’’ [unnecessary or incomplete duplicate].
4301.C.14 .................................................................................................
4399.A.6.i ‘‘current plugging and abandonment cost estimate’’ ..............
4399.A.7 ‘‘current plugging and abandonment costs’’ .............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
45066
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2d—STATE PROVISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN REMOVED—Continued
State requirement
Analogous Federal requirement
4999, Appendix F .....................................................................................
265.73 related, No direct federal analog [not part of authorized program].
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Where are the revised state rules
different from the Federal rules?
1. Evaluation and Analysis on When
State Regulations Are More Stringent or
Broader in Scope Than the Federal
Regulations
Under 40 CFR 271.1(i), EPA allows
states to (1) adopt and enforce
requirements which are more stringent
or more extensive than those required
by the federal RCRA program, and (2)
operate a program with a greater scope
of coverage than that required by the
federal program. To determine whether
particular state provisions are more
stringent or broader in scope, EPA uses
the December 23, 2014 guidance
document: ‘‘Determining Whether State
Hazardous Waste Requirements are
More Stringent or Broader in Scope than
the Federal RCRA Program.’’ In the
guidance document, EPA uses a twopart test to determine if state regulations
are MS or BIS. The two-part test
requires that the following questions be
answered sequentially:
a. Does imposition of the particular
state requirement increase the size of
the regulated community or universe of
wastes beyond what is covered by the
federal program through either directly
enforceable requirements or certain
conditions for exclusion?
b. Does the particular requirement
under review have a counterpart in the
federal regulatory program?
If the answer to the first part of the
test is yes, then the state requirement is
generally considered broader in scope. If
the answer is no, then EPA uses the
second part of the test to determine
whether the state requirement is more
stringent or broader in scope. If the state
requirement has a counterpart in the
federal program, the state requirement is
classified as more stringent. However, if
the state requirement does not have a
counterpart, it is classified as broader in
scope.
State provisions that are broader in
scope are not part of the federally
authorized program and thus, are not
federally enforceable.
2. Louisiana Requirements That Are
Broader in Scope Than the Federal
Program
LDEQ has adopted the Revisions to
the Definition of Solid Waste (DSW)
Rule published on January 13, 2015 (80
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
FR 1694). However, the Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit, Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 862
F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2017) and Am.
Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 883F.3d 918
(D.C. Cir. 2018) vacated certain aspects
of the 2015 federal DSW rule and
replaced them with provisions from the
2008 DSW rule, see 73 FR 64668
(October 30, 2008). The Court (1)
vacated the federal 2015 verified
recycler exclusion for hazardous waste
that is recycled off-site (except for
certain provisions) (40 CFR 261.4(a)(24))
and the associated provisions at 40 CFR
260.30(f) and 260.31(d); (2) reinstated
the transfer-based exclusion at
261.4(a)(24) and (25) from the 2008 rule
to replace the now vacated 2015 verified
recycler exclusion; (3) vacated Factor 4
of the 2015 definition of legitimate
recycling in its entirety (40 CFR
260.43(a)(4)); and (4) reinstated the 2008
version of Factor 4 at 40 CFR
260.43(c)(2) to replace the now-vacated
2015 version of Factor 4.
In order to determine whether the
State of Louisiana regulations are more
stringent or broader in scope than the
federal RCRA program, the EPA used
the two-part test described in Section
G.1. With respect to the first test,
Louisiana regulates the same size of the
regulated community and the same
universe of hazardous secondary
materials as the federal RCRA program.
With respect to the second test, EPA has
determined that the following State of
Louisiana provisions from the 2015
federal DSW rule are broader in scope:
Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC),
Title 33, Part V, sections 105.O.1.f
[260.30(f)], 105.O.2.d [260.31(d)],
105.D.1.y [261.4(a)(24)] with respect to
the verified recycler exclusion and
105.R.5 [260.43(a)(4)] with respect to
Factor 4 definition of legitimate
recycling.
Due to the vacatur of certain 2015
federal DSW provisions and the
reinstatement of 2008 federal DSW
provisions, EPA’s regulations do not
include the provisions that were vacated
by the Court.a Louisiana has adopted
these vacated provisions, including the
vacated 2015 DSW Factor 4 in the
definition of legitimate recycling of
hazardous secondary material and the
verified recycler exclusion.b As a result
of the federal vacatur, the Louisiana
provisions at LAC:33.V.105.O.1.f,
105.O.2.d, 105.D.1.y and 105.R.5 have
no direct analogs in the federal
regulations. December 23, 2014
guidance supports this conclusion. On
page 6, EPA gives this example ‘‘. . .
Further, if a state adopts a federal solid
or hazardous waste exclusion, but adds
additional conditions that must be met
for the state exclusion to apply, those
additional conditions would be
considered outside the scope of the
federal program and would not be part
of the federally authorized program,
although the entity would still be
subject to federal enforcement regarding
the part of the state regulations which
track the federal conditions.’’ Following
the vacatur of portions of the federal
rules, Louisiana’s program effectively
contains additional conditions that must
be met for the exclusion to apply. This
makes the State’s additional provisions
broader in scope and not part of the
federally authorized program, see 40
CFR part 271.1(i)(2).
The LDEQ provisions that are broader
in scope than the federal regulations are
not part of the program being proposed
to be authorized by today’s action. EPA
cannot enforce requirements that are
broader in scope, although compliance
with such provisions is required by
Louisiana law. For the purposes of
RCRA section 3009, the Agency has
determined that the broader in scope
provisions are more protective/stricter,
thus being within the State’s authority
to maintain them as part of the State’s
RCRA program. We make this
determination due to the fact that the
broader in scope provisions in
Louisiana’s verified recycler exclusion
require additional conditions to be met
in order to qualify for the exclusion
when compared to the reinstated
transfer based exclusion found in 83 FR
24664 (May 30, 2018).
a EPA issued a final rule referred to as the
Transfer Base Exclusion reflecting the Court’s
ruling, see 83 FR 24664 (May 30, 2018).
b The Federal Register citation for the ‘‘2015 DSW
rule’’ is 80 FR 1694, January 13, 2015, and for the
‘‘2008 DSW rule’’ is 73 FR 64668, October 30, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Louisiana Requirements That Are
More Stringent Than the Federal
Program
Louisiana’s regulations contain
certain provisions that are more
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
stringent than is required by the RCRA
program. At LAC 33:V.108.F.4 and
108.F.6, LDEQ requires that in order to
be excluded from full regulation,
conditionally-exempt small quantity
generators who generate acute
hazardous waste in quantities less than
or equal to the specified quantity
limitations must comply with the listed
notification, EPA ID number, and
container labeling requirements. LDEQ
also has the same requirements at LAC
33:V.108.G.4 and 108.G.6 for
conditionally-exempt small quantity
generators who do not exceed the
quantity limitation of 100 kg of
hazardous waste. The federal
regulations do not include such
notification, EPA ID, and labeling
requirements at 40 CFR 261.5(f) and (g).
These provisions clearly meet the test
for regulations that are more stringent
than the federal requirements. This
finding is consistent with United States
v. Southern Union, 630 F.3d 17 (1st Cir.
2010) and the December 23, 2014
guidance on page 5 where it states ’’ For
example, a state that does not recognize
the CESQG or small quantity generators
(SQG) categories, or that imposes
additional requirements on CESQGs or
SQGs, is not increasing the size of the
regulated community, since these
generators are managing wastes that are
regulated as hazardous at the federal
level. CESQGs and SQGs are subject to
regulation under the federal program in
40 CFR 261.5 and 40 CFR part 262,
respectively. While the requirements
imposed on these entities are not as
extensive as those for large quantity
generators (LQGs), CESQGs and SQGs
are regulated entities under the federal
program.’’ Also see page 7 of the 2014
guidance, where EPA further states that
these additional requirements are
considered more stringent because they
cover the same universe of waste
handlers as the EPA rules.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Revisions to State Procedural
Provisions
LDEQ has revised the introductory
paragraph of LAC 33:V.705.B to allow a
final permit decision, or a decision to
deny a permit for the active life of a
hazardous waste management facility, to
become effective upon issuance rather
than 30 days after the service of notice
of the decision (as found in 40 CFR
124.15(b) introductory paragraph).
Under 40 CFR 271.14, states are not
required to adopt 40 CFR 124.15;
therefore, changes to this state
procedural provision do not impact
LDEQ’s authorized program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
H. Who handles permits after the final
authorization takes effect?
The State of Louisiana will issue
permits for all the provisions for which
it is authorized and will administer the
permits it issues. The EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous
waste permits or portions of permits
which we issued prior to the effective
date of this authorization. EPA will not
issue new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in
Table 1 in this document after the
effective date of this authorization.
The EPA will continue to implement
and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which LDEQ is not yet
authorized.
I. How does today’s action affect Indian
Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Louisiana?
LDEQ is not authorized to carry out
its Hazardous Waste Program in Indian
Country within the State. This authority
remains with EPA. Therefore, this
action has no effect in Indian Country.
J. What is codification and is the EPA
codifying Louisiana’s hazardous waste
program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the CFR.
We do this by referencing the
authorized State rules in 40 CFR part
272. We reserve the amendment of 40
CFR part 272 subpart T for this
authorization of Louisiana’s program
changes until a later date. In this
authorization application, the EPA is
not codifying the rules documented in
this Federal Register notice.
K. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action (RCRA
State Authorization) from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Therefore, this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action proposes to
authorize State requirements pursuant
to RCRA 3006, and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. Because this
proposed rule is not subject to Executive
Order 12866, this proposed rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13771 (82 FR
9339, February 3, 2017), entitled
Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs. Accordingly, this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action proposes to
authorize pre-existing requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45067
under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). For the same reason,
this proposed action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely proposes to authorize State
requirements as part of the State RCRA
hazardous waste program without
altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
This proposed action also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This proposed
rule is not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants
a State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, the EPA has taken
the necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. The
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the proposed rule in accordance with
the ‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
45068
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Takings’’ issued under the Executive
Order. This proposed rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this rule authorizes pre-existing
State rules which are at least equivalent
to, and no less stringent than existing
federal requirements, and impose no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human
health or environmental effects, the
proposed rule is not subject to Executive
Order 12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: August 28, 2018.
David Gray,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2018–19195 Filed 9–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R10–RCRA–2018–0298; FRL–9983–
15—Region 10]
Idaho: Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Idaho has applied to the EPA
for authorization of certain changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), as amended. The EPA has
reviewed Idaho’s application and has
determined that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is proposing to
authorize the State’s changes. The EPA
seeks public comment prior to taking
final action.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received on or before
October 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
RCRA–2018–0298 by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: mccullough.barbara@
epa.gov.
• Mail: Barbara McCullough, U.S.
EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 155, Mail Stop OAW–150, Seattle,
Washington 98101.
• Hand Delivery: Barbara
McCullough, U.S. EPA, Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Mail Stop
OAW–150, Seattle, Washington 98101.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the normal business hours of
operation; special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–RCRA–2018–
0298. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to the EPA
without going through
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the internet. If you submit
an electronic comment through
www.regulations.gov, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about the EPA’s public docket visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at
www.epa.gov/dockets.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 10 Library, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, First Floor Lobby, Seattle,
Washington 98101. The EPA Region 10
Library is open from 9:00 a.m. to noon,
and 1:00 to 4:00 p.m. PST Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The EPA Region 10 Library
telephone number is (206) 553–1289.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara McCullough, U.S. EPA, Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Mail
Stop OAW–150, Seattle, Washington
98101, email: mccullough.barbara@
epa.gov or phone number (206) 553–
2416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Proposed Authorization Revision
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States that have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
their changes. Changes to State
programs may be necessary when
Federal or State statutory or regulatory
authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur. Most commonly,
States must change their programs
because of changes to the EPA’s
regulations codified in Title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts
124, 260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have we made in this
proposed rule?
The EPA has determined that Idaho’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets the statutory and
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45061-45068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19195]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R06-RCRA-2018-0395; FRL-9982-64--Region 6]
Louisiana: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
(LDEQ) has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for
final authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA has reviewed
Louisiana's application, and has determined that these changes satisfy
all requirements needed to qualify for final authorization and is
proposing to authorize the State's changes. The EPA is seeking public
comment prior to taking final action.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received by October 5,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected].
Fax: (214) 665-6762 (prior to faxing, please notify Alima
Patterson at (214) 665-8533).
Mail: Alima Patterson, Regional Authorization/Codification
Coordinator, RCRA Permit Section (6MM-RP), Multimedia Division, EPA
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Alima
Patterson, Regional Authorization/Codification Coordinator, RCRA Permit
Section (6MM-RP), Multimedia Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: EPA must receive your comments by October 5, 2018.
Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-R06-RCRA-2018-0395. The
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov, or
email. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment,
the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with CD you submit. If the
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. (For
additional information about the EPA's public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://www.regulations.gov).
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy.
You can view and copy Louisiana's application and associated
publicly available materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through
Friday at the following locations: Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality, 602 N Fifth Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
70884-2178, phone number (225) 219-3559 and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-
8533. The public is advised to call in advance to verify business
hours. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents should
make an appointment with the office at least two weeks in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization/Codification Coordinator, Permit Section (6MM-RP),
Multimedia Division, (214) 665-8533, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, and Email address
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from the EPA under
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes,
States must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or
State statutory or regulatory authority is
[[Page 45062]]
modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes
to the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
124, 260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have the EPA made in this rule?
On March 13, 2018, the State of Louisiana submitted a final
complete program revision application seeking authorization of changes
to its hazardous waste program that correspond to certain Federal rules
promulgated on January 13, 2015, April 8, 2015 and April 17, 2015, RCRA
Cluster XXIV (Checklists 233A, 233B, 233C, 233D2, 233E, 234 and 235),
as well as state-initiated changes. The EPA has reviewed Louisiana's
application to revise its authorized program and has made a tentative
decision that it meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we propose to grant LDEQ final
authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the changes
described in the authorization application, except for federal
provisions that were vacated from the January 13, 2015 final rule
(Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste (DSW)) by the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Am. Petroleum
Inst. v. EPA, 862 F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2017) and Am. Petroleum Inst. v.
EPA, No. 09-1038 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 6, 2018).
LDEQ will continue to have responsibility for permitting treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities within its borders, and for carrying
out the aspects of the RCRA program described in its revised program
application, subject to the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal regulations that the EPA promulgates
under the authority of HSWA take effect in authorized States before
they are authorized for the requirements. Thus, the EPA will implement
those requirements and prohibitions in Louisiana, including issuing
permits, until the State is granted authorization to do so.
C. What is the effect of this proposed authorization decision?
If Louisiana is authorized for these changes, a facility in
Louisiana subject to RCRA will now have to comply with the authorized
State requirements instead of the equivalent Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Additionally, such facilities will have to
comply with any applicable federal requirements such as, for example,
HSWA regulations issued by the EPA for which the State has not received
authorization. LDEQ continues to have enforcement responsibilities
under its State hazardous waste program for violations of such program,
but the EPA retains its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013,
and 7003, which include, among others, authority to:
Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses, or reports;
enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits,
and
take enforcement actions after notice to and consultation
with the State.
The action to approve these provisions would not impose additional
requirements on the regulated community because the regulations for
which LDEQ is requesting authorization are already effective under
state law, and are not changed by the act of authorization.
D. What happens if the EPA receives comments on this action?
If the EPA receives comments on this proposed action, we will
address those comments in our final action. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this proposed
authorization, you must do so at this time.
E. What has Louisiana previously been authorized?
The State of Louisiana initially received final authorization on
February 7, 1985 (50 FR 3348), to implement its base Hazardous Waste
Management Program. We granted authorization for changes to their
program on November 28, 1989 (54 FR 48889), effective January 29, 1990;
August 26, 1991 (56 FR 41958), as corrected October 15, 1991 (56 FR
51762), effective October 25, 1991; November 7, 1994 (59 FR 55368),
effective January 23, 1995 (Note: On January 23, 1995 (60 FR 4380), the
EPA responded to public adverse comments and affirmed the effective
date for the November 7, 1994 final rule). Then on April 11, 1995 (60
FR 18360), the EPA also made administrative corrections for the January
23, 1995 Federal Register document; December 23, 1994 (59 FR 66200),
effective March 8, 1995; October 17, 1995 (60 FR 53704), effective
January 2, 1996; March 28, 1996 (61 FR 13777), effective June 11, 1996;
December 29, 1997 (62 FR 67572), effective March 16, 1998; October 23,
1998 (63 FR 56830), effective December 22, 1998; August 25, 1999 (64 FR
46302), effective October 25, 1999; September 2, 1999 (64 FR 48099),
effective November 1, 1999; February 28, 2000 (65 FR 10411), effective
April 28, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR 23), effective March 5, 2001;
December 9, 2003 (68 FR 68526), effective February 9, 2004; June 10,
2005 (70 FR 33852), effective August 9, 2005; November 13, 2006 (71 FR
66116), effective January 12, 2007; August 16, 2007 (72 FR 45905),
effective October 15, 2007; May 20, 2009 (74 FR 23645), effective July
20, 2009; June 24, 2011(76 FR 122), effective August 23, 2011; June 28,
2012 (77 FR 38530), effective August 27, 2012, September 14, 2015 (80
FR 55032), effective November 14, 2015 and July 13, 2017 (82 FR 32253)
effective September 11, 2017. On March 13, 2018, LDEQ submitted a final
program revision application seeking authorization of its program
revision in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21.
Since 1979, through the Environmental Affairs Act, Act 449 enabled
the Office of Environmental Affairs within the Louisiana Department of
Natural Resources, as well as, the Environmental Control Commission to
conduct an effective program designed to regulate those who generate,
transport, treat, store, dispose or recycle hazardous waste. During the
1983 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature, Act 97 was adopted,
which amended and reenacted La. R. S. 30:1051 et seq. as the
Environmental Quality Act, renaming the Environmental Affairs Act (Act
1938 of 1979). This Act created Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ), including provisions for new offices within this new
Department of Environmental Quality. Act 97 also transferred the duties
and responsibilities previously delegated to the Department of Natural
Resources, Office of Environmental Affairs to the new Department. The
LDEQ has lead agency jurisdictional authority for administering the
RCRA Subtitle C program in Louisiana. Also, the LDEQ is designated to
facilitate communication between the EPA and the State. During the 1999
Regular Session of Louisiana Legislature, Act 303 revised the La. R. S.
30:2011 et seq., allowing LDEQ to reengineer the Department to perform
more efficiently and to meet its strategic goals.
It is the intention of the State, through this application, to
demonstrate its equivalence and consistency with the federal statutory
tests, which are outlined in the United States EPA regulatory
requirements under 40 CFR 271 for final authorization. The submittal of
this application is in
[[Page 45063]]
keeping with the spirit and intent of RCRA, which provides equivalent
States the opportunity to apply for final delegation to operate all
aspects of their hazardous waste management programs in lieu of the
federal government. The Louisiana Environmental Quality Act authorizes
the State's program, Subtitle II of Title 30 of the Louisiana Revised
Statutes.
F. What changes is EPA proposing to authorize with today's action?
On March 13, 2018, the State of Louisiana submitted a final
complete program revision application seeking authorization of their
changes in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. Louisiana's program revision
application includes revisions to the federal hazardous waste program,
as well as state-initiated changes to the state's previously authorized
program.
The EPA proposes to authorize, subject to receipt of written
comments that oppose this action that the State of Louisiana's
hazardous waste program revisions are equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the federal program, and therefore satisfy
all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization.
1. Program Revision Changes for Federal Rules
The LDEQ program revisions consist of regulations which
specifically govern federal hazardous waste revisions promulgated on
January 13, 2015, April 8, 2015 and April 17, 2015 (RCRA Cluster XXIV;
Checklists 233A, 233B, 233C, 233D2, 233E, 234 and 235). LDEQ's adoption
of the January 13, 2015 final rule (80 FR 1694; Revisions to the
Definition of Solid Waste (DSW)), includes provisions that have been
vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit (Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 862 F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir.
2017) and Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, No. 09-1038 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 6,
2018). The impact of the vacaturs on the Louisiana hazardous waste
program is discussed in Section G of this document. We propose to grant
Louisiana final authorization for the requirements which are listed in
Table 1.
Table 1--Program Revision Changes for Federal Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register date and
Description of Federal requirement page (and/or RCRA statutory Analogous state authority
(include checklist No., if relevant) authority)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Revisions to the Definition of Solid 80 FR 1694-1814 January 13, Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
Waste. (Checklist 233A). 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. LAC
Sections 33:V.105.O.2.c,
33:V.105.O.2.c.i-v, 33:V.105.K,
33:V.105.K.2.c-e, 33:V.105.Q,
33:V.105.Q.1, 33:V.105.Q.1.a-i and
33:V.105.Q.2, as amended June 20, 2017.
2. Revisions to the Definition of Solid 80 FR 1694-1814 January 13, Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
Waste. (Checklist 233B). 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. LAC
Sections 33:V.109 contained, 33:V109.
Hazardous secondary material, 33:V.R.1-
2, 33:V.105.R.2.a-e, 33:V.105.R.3,
33:V.105.R.3.a-b, 33:V.105.R.4,
33:V.109.solid waste 2.c, 33:V.109.solid
waste.2.d and .33:V.109.sham recycling,
as amended June 20, 2017.
3. Revisions to the Definition of Solid 80 FR 1694-1814 January 13, Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
Waste. (Checklist 233C). 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. LAC
Section 33:V.109.V.accumulated
speculatively, as amended June 20, 2017.
4. Revisions to the Definition of Solid 80 FR 1694-1814 January 13, Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
Waste. (Checklist 233D2). 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. LAC
Sections 33:V.109.facility, 33:V.109
Hazardous secondary material generator,
33:V.109 Intermediate facility, 33:V.109
Land-based unit, 33:V.109 Transfer
facility, 33:V.105.O.1, 33: V.105.O.1.b,
33: V.105.O.1.d, 33: V.105.O.1.e,
33:V.105.O.1.b, 33:V.105.O.1.d, LAC
33:V.105.O.1.e, 33:V.105.K.2, 33:
V.105.K.2.a, 33:V.105.K.3,
33:V.105.K.3.a , 33:V.105.K.3.b,
33:105.K.3.b.i-iv, 33:V.105.K.3.c,
33:V.105.K.3.c.i-v, 33:V.109.solid
waste, 33:V.109.solid waste Table 1,
33:V.105.D.1.x, 33:V.105.D.1.x.i-ix,
33:V.105.D.1.y.vi.(f)--incorporate by
reference 40 CFR part 261, subpart H
(Financial Requirements for Management
of Excluded Hazardous Secondary
Materials), 33:V.105.D.1.y.vi.(e)--
incorporate by reference 40 CFR part
261, subpart M (Emergency Preparedness
and Response for Management of Excluded
Hazardous Secondary Materials) and 33:
V.322.A, as amended June 20, 2017.
5. Revisions to the Definition of Solid 80 FR 1694-1814 80 FR Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
Waste. (Checklist 233E). January 13, 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. LAC
Sections 33:V.109. remanufacturing,
33:V.109.solid waste, and 33:V.105.D.1.z
incorporate by reference 40 CFR
261.4(a)(27) and part 261, subparts I,
J, AA, BB and CC, as amended June 20,
2017.
6. Response to Vacaturs of the 80 FR 18777-18780 April 8, Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
Comparable Fuels Rule and Gasification 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
Rule. (Checklist 234). Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. Sections
LAC 33:V.109.Gasification (Repealed),
33:V.105.D.1.l.i, 33: V.105.D.1.q
(Reserved), as amended June 20, 2017.
7. Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals 80 FR 21302-21501 April 17, Environmental Regulatory Code, Louisiana
from Electric Utilities. (Checklist 2015. Department of Environmental Quality, ERC
235). Title 33, Part V. Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials Subpart 1. LAC
Sections 33:V.105.D.2.d.(i)-(ii), and
33:V.105.D.2.d.(ii)(a)-(h), as amended
June 20, 2017.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45064]]
2. State-Initiated Changes
In addition to adopting the federal program revisions discussed in
Section F.1, LDEQ has made amendments to its regulations that are not
directly related to any of the federal rules addressed in Item F.1.
These changes are categorized as follows: (a) Changes to clarify
previously authorized provisions; (b) re-designations and changes made
to conform to the renumbering of state provisions, including
corrections to internal references and other typographical errors; (c)
new provisions added for equivalency to federal provisions; and (d)
removal of provisions in order to clarify the state's regulations, or
correct errors or duplications.
LDEQ submitted these state-initiated amendments under the
requirements of 40 CFR 271.21(a) and included provisions from the
Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 33, Part V, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Material, Louisiana Hazardous Waste Regulations (LHWR), as
amended effective through January 20, 2018. The state's regulations, as
amended by these provisions, provide authority which remains equivalent
to, and no less stringent than the federal laws and regulations. The
EPA has reviewed the state-initiated changes and have determined they
satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR 271.21(a).
We are proposing to grant LDEQ final authorization to carry out the
state's hazardous waste program, as amended by the state-initiated
changes, in lieu of the federal program. In the Tables below, LDEQ
provisions annotated with an asterisk are different from the Federal
program; details are discussed in Section G. Unless otherwise
indicated, the State provisions listed in the Tables in this section
are analogous to the indicated RCRA regulations found at 40 CFR as of
July 1, 2015. (Note: Some of the state provisions have no direct
federal analog but are related to particular paragraphs, sections, or
parts of the federal hazardous waste regulations.)
(a) Changes To Clarify Previously Authorized Provisions
The following state provisions contain state-initiated changes that
clarify previously authorized provisions to ensure equivalency to the
federal regulations or make the state's regulations more internally
consistent.
Table 2a--Changes To Clarify Previously Authorized Provisions To Ensure
Consistency and Equivalency
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State requirement Analogous Federal requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
309.L.8................................ 270.30(L)(7).
705.B introductory paragraph *......... 124.15(b) introductory
paragraph.
1103 introductory paragraph............ 262.11 introductory paragraph.
1107.B.1.b............................. 262, Appendix, Items 6 and 7.
1515.A.4............................... 264.16(a) related.
1516.B.5............................... 264.71(a)(3).
1516.B.2.d............................. 264.71(b)(4).
3301.G................................. 264.90(f).
3511.C.2.c and .d...................... 264.112(c)(2)(iii) and (iv).
4037.A introductory paragraph.......... 279.46(a) introductory
paragraph.
4053.A introductory paragraph.......... 279.56(a) introductory
paragraph.
4053.B introductory paragraph.......... 279.56(b) introductory
paragraph.
4071.A introductory paragraph.......... 279.65(a) introductory
paragraph.
4085.A introductory paragraph.......... 279.74(a) introductory
paragraph.
4105.A.1 a............................. 261.6(a)(3)(i).
4407.A.12.............................. 265.145(a)(12).
4501.D introductory paragraph.......... 265.310(d) introductory
paragraph.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Redesignations, Revisions to Internal References and Correction of
Typographical Errors
The following state provisions contain state-initiated changes made
to conform to the renumbering of state provisions, including
corrections to internal references and the redesignation of existing
provisions to correct provisions' numbering in keeping with the
numbering scheme of Louisiana's regulations. Except for the changes at
108.F.4, 108.F.6, 108.G4 and 108.G.6, the changes were made without
affecting the stringency of the state's currently authorized program.
Table 2b--Redesignations and Corrections to Internal References and
Other Errors
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State requirement Analogous Federal requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
108.F.4 * and F.6 *.................... 261.5(f) related.
108.G.4 * and G.6 *.................... 261.5(g) related.
517.T.4.c.i............................ 270.14(c)(4)(i).
1103.D [was 1103.C].................... 262.11(d).
1903.C and .D [were 1903.B.5.c and .d]. 264.191(c) and (d).
1109.E.1.a.i........................... 262.34(a)(1)(i).
1109.E.7.a............................. 262.34(d)(2).
1109.E.12.............................. 262.34(i).
1529.E introductory paragraph.......... 264.77 introductory paragraph.
1751.C.4.b............................. 264.1082(c)(4)(ii).
1901.E................................. 262.34(a)(1)(ii) related.
2203.A ``Inorganic metal bearing 268.2(j).
waste''.
2207.C introductory paragraph.......... 268.3(c).
2209.C................................. 268.30(c).
2211.C................................. 268.31(a)(1), 268.31(c).
2216.D................................. 268.34.
[[Page 45065]]
2221.E.3............................... 268.38.
2221.F.5............................... 268.39(e)-(g).
2299, Table 2, Footnote 11............. 268 related, No direct federal
analog.
2299, Table 11......................... 268, Appendix VII, Table 1.
3001.B.2.e............................. 266.100(b)(2)(v).
3203 introductory paragraph............ 264.601 introductory paragraph.
4301.C [was 4301.B].................... 265.1(b).
4301.D-D.13.d [was 4301.C-C.13.d]...... 265.1(c)-265.1(c)(14)(iv).
4301.D.13.e and (f) [was 4301.C.13.f 265.1(c)(14) related; No direct
and (f)]. Federal analog.
4301.E-.G [were 4301.D-.F]............. 270.70(a) and (c).
4301.H [was 4301.G].................... 265.1(d).
4301.I [was 4301.H].................... 270.70(b).
4301.J [was 4301.I].................... 265.1(f).
4399.A.9 [was 4399.A.8]................ 265.141(h).
4513.B.2............................... 265.340(b)(3).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) New State Provisions Added for Equivalency to Federal Provisions
LDEQ has adopted the following provisions in order to be equivalent
to federal regulations. These state provisions had either not been
previously adopted by the state, incorrectly adopted, or had been
inadvertently removed from the state's regulations.
Table 2c--State Provisions Added for Equivalency
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State requirement Analogous Federal requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1103.C................................. 262.11(b).
1109.E.1.a.iv.(b)...................... 262.34(a)(1)(iv)(B).
1516.B.6............................... 264.71(e).
1907.G.2.d............................. 264.193(g)(2)(iv).
2245.L................................. 268.7(a)(10).
4301.B................................. 270.70(a).
4399.A.8............................... 265.141(f) ``current plugging
and abandonment cost
estimate''.
4501.D.3............................... 265.340(b)(2).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Removal of Provisions To Clarify State Regulations or Correct
Errors
LDEQ has removed the following provisions in order to clarify the
state's regulations because they were not part of the authorized
program, or correct errors or duplications, making the state
regulations more internally consistent and more consistent with
federal. The removed provisions can be found in Louisiana
Administrative Code, Title 33, Part V, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, Louisiana Hazardous Waste Regulations (LHWR), as amended
effective through April 2016.
Table 2d--State Provisions That Have Been Removed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State requirement Analogous Federal requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
537.B.2.f.............................. 270.66 related; No federal
analog [not part of authorized
program].
537.B.2.l.............................. 270.66 related; No federal
analog [not part of authorized
program].
1516.B.5.a and b....................... 264.71(e) [unnecessary or
incomplete duplicate].
2201.G.3............................... 268.1 related [not part of
authorized program].
2203.A ``Treatment''................... 268.2 related, no analog in
Part 268 [not part of
authorized program].
2221.A & .B............................ 268.13 related [not part of
authorized program].
2227.B................................. 268.42(b) [non-delegable; not
part of authorized program].
2231.A and .B.......................... 268.44(a) and (b) [non-
delegable; not part of
authorized program].
2231.C and .D.......................... 268.44(d) and (e) [non-
delegable; not part of
authorized program].
2231.E and .F.......................... 268.44(f)-(g) [non-delegable;
not part of authorized
program].
2239................................... 268.5 [non-delegable; not part
of authorized program].
2241................................... 268.6 [non-delegable; not part
of authorized program].
2299, Table 4.......................... 268 related, No direct federal
analog [not part of authorized
program].
2299, Table 12......................... 268, Appendix XI [unnecessary
or incomplete duplicate].
3511.C.5............................... 264.112(c)(2)(iv) [unnecessary
or incomplete duplicate].
4301.C................................. 265.1(b) & (c) related;
270.70(a) related [unnecessary
or incomplete duplicate].
4301.C.14.............................. 265.1(f) [unnecessary or
incomplete duplicate].
4399.A.6.i ``current plugging and 265.141(f) ``current plugging
abandonment cost estimate''. and abandonment cost
estimate'' [unnecessary or
incomplete duplicate].
4399.A.7 ``current plugging and 265.141(f) ``current plugging
abandonment costs''. and abandonment cost
estimate'' [unnecessary or
incomplete duplicate].
[[Page 45066]]
4999, Appendix F....................... 265.73 related, No direct
federal analog [not part of
authorized program].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Where are the revised state rules different from the Federal rules?
1. Evaluation and Analysis on When State Regulations Are More Stringent
or Broader in Scope Than the Federal Regulations
Under 40 CFR 271.1(i), EPA allows states to (1) adopt and enforce
requirements which are more stringent or more extensive than those
required by the federal RCRA program, and (2) operate a program with a
greater scope of coverage than that required by the federal program. To
determine whether particular state provisions are more stringent or
broader in scope, EPA uses the December 23, 2014 guidance document:
``Determining Whether State Hazardous Waste Requirements are More
Stringent or Broader in Scope than the Federal RCRA Program.'' In the
guidance document, EPA uses a two-part test to determine if state
regulations are MS or BIS. The two-part test requires that the
following questions be answered sequentially:
a. Does imposition of the particular state requirement increase the
size of the regulated community or universe of wastes beyond what is
covered by the federal program through either directly enforceable
requirements or certain conditions for exclusion?
b. Does the particular requirement under review have a counterpart
in the federal regulatory program?
If the answer to the first part of the test is yes, then the state
requirement is generally considered broader in scope. If the answer is
no, then EPA uses the second part of the test to determine whether the
state requirement is more stringent or broader in scope. If the state
requirement has a counterpart in the federal program, the state
requirement is classified as more stringent. However, if the state
requirement does not have a counterpart, it is classified as broader in
scope.
State provisions that are broader in scope are not part of the
federally authorized program and thus, are not federally enforceable.
2. Louisiana Requirements That Are Broader in Scope Than the Federal
Program
LDEQ has adopted the Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste
(DSW) Rule published on January 13, 2015 (80 FR 1694). However, the
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Am. Petroleum
Inst. v. EPA, 862 F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2017) and Am. Petroleum Inst. v.
EPA, 883F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2018) vacated certain aspects of the 2015
federal DSW rule and replaced them with provisions from the 2008 DSW
rule, see 73 FR 64668 (October 30, 2008). The Court (1) vacated the
federal 2015 verified recycler exclusion for hazardous waste that is
recycled off-site (except for certain provisions) (40 CFR 261.4(a)(24))
and the associated provisions at 40 CFR 260.30(f) and 260.31(d); (2)
reinstated the transfer-based exclusion at 261.4(a)(24) and (25) from
the 2008 rule to replace the now vacated 2015 verified recycler
exclusion; (3) vacated Factor 4 of the 2015 definition of legitimate
recycling in its entirety (40 CFR 260.43(a)(4)); and (4) reinstated the
2008 version of Factor 4 at 40 CFR 260.43(c)(2) to replace the now-
vacated 2015 version of Factor 4.
In order to determine whether the State of Louisiana regulations
are more stringent or broader in scope than the federal RCRA program,
the EPA used the two-part test described in Section G.1. With respect
to the first test, Louisiana regulates the same size of the regulated
community and the same universe of hazardous secondary materials as the
federal RCRA program. With respect to the second test, EPA has
determined that the following State of Louisiana provisions from the
2015 federal DSW rule are broader in scope: Louisiana Administrative
Code (LAC), Title 33, Part V, sections 105.O.1.f [260.30(f)], 105.O.2.d
[260.31(d)], 105.D.1.y [261.4(a)(24)] with respect to the verified
recycler exclusion and 105.R.5 [260.43(a)(4)] with respect to Factor 4
definition of legitimate recycling.
Due to the vacatur of certain 2015 federal DSW provisions and the
reinstatement of 2008 federal DSW provisions, EPA's regulations do not
include the provisions that were vacated by the Court.\a\ Louisiana has
adopted these vacated provisions, including the vacated 2015 DSW Factor
4 in the definition of legitimate recycling of hazardous secondary
material and the verified recycler exclusion.\b\ As a result of the
federal vacatur, the Louisiana provisions at LAC:33.V.105.O.1.f,
105.O.2.d, 105.D.1.y and 105.R.5 have no direct analogs in the federal
regulations. December 23, 2014 guidance supports this conclusion. On
page 6, EPA gives this example ``. . . Further, if a state adopts a
federal solid or hazardous waste exclusion, but adds additional
conditions that must be met for the state exclusion to apply, those
additional conditions would be considered outside the scope of the
federal program and would not be part of the federally authorized
program, although the entity would still be subject to federal
enforcement regarding the part of the state regulations which track the
federal conditions.'' Following the vacatur of portions of the federal
rules, Louisiana's program effectively contains additional conditions
that must be met for the exclusion to apply. This makes the State's
additional provisions broader in scope and not part of the federally
authorized program, see 40 CFR part 271.1(i)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ EPA issued a final rule referred to as the Transfer Base
Exclusion reflecting the Court's ruling, see 83 FR 24664 (May 30,
2018).
\b\ The Federal Register citation for the ``2015 DSW rule'' is
80 FR 1694, January 13, 2015, and for the ``2008 DSW rule'' is 73 FR
64668, October 30, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The LDEQ provisions that are broader in scope than the federal
regulations are not part of the program being proposed to be authorized
by today's action. EPA cannot enforce requirements that are broader in
scope, although compliance with such provisions is required by
Louisiana law. For the purposes of RCRA section 3009, the Agency has
determined that the broader in scope provisions are more protective/
stricter, thus being within the State's authority to maintain them as
part of the State's RCRA program. We make this determination due to the
fact that the broader in scope provisions in Louisiana's verified
recycler exclusion require additional conditions to be met in order to
qualify for the exclusion when compared to the reinstated transfer
based exclusion found in 83 FR 24664 (May 30, 2018).
3. Louisiana Requirements That Are More Stringent Than the Federal
Program
Louisiana's regulations contain certain provisions that are more
[[Page 45067]]
stringent than is required by the RCRA program. At LAC 33:V.108.F.4 and
108.F.6, LDEQ requires that in order to be excluded from full
regulation, conditionally-exempt small quantity generators who generate
acute hazardous waste in quantities less than or equal to the specified
quantity limitations must comply with the listed notification, EPA ID
number, and container labeling requirements. LDEQ also has the same
requirements at LAC 33:V.108.G.4 and 108.G.6 for conditionally-exempt
small quantity generators who do not exceed the quantity limitation of
100 kg of hazardous waste. The federal regulations do not include such
notification, EPA ID, and labeling requirements at 40 CFR 261.5(f) and
(g). These provisions clearly meet the test for regulations that are
more stringent than the federal requirements. This finding is
consistent with United States v. Southern Union, 630 F.3d 17 (1st Cir.
2010) and the December 23, 2014 guidance on page 5 where it states ''
For example, a state that does not recognize the CESQG or small
quantity generators (SQG) categories, or that imposes additional
requirements on CESQGs or SQGs, is not increasing the size of the
regulated community, since these generators are managing wastes that
are regulated as hazardous at the federal level. CESQGs and SQGs are
subject to regulation under the federal program in 40 CFR 261.5 and 40
CFR part 262, respectively. While the requirements imposed on these
entities are not as extensive as those for large quantity generators
(LQGs), CESQGs and SQGs are regulated entities under the federal
program.'' Also see page 7 of the 2014 guidance, where EPA further
states that these additional requirements are considered more stringent
because they cover the same universe of waste handlers as the EPA
rules.
4. Revisions to State Procedural Provisions
LDEQ has revised the introductory paragraph of LAC 33:V.705.B to
allow a final permit decision, or a decision to deny a permit for the
active life of a hazardous waste management facility, to become
effective upon issuance rather than 30 days after the service of notice
of the decision (as found in 40 CFR 124.15(b) introductory paragraph).
Under 40 CFR 271.14, states are not required to adopt 40 CFR 124.15;
therefore, changes to this state procedural provision do not impact
LDEQ's authorized program.
H. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect?
The State of Louisiana will issue permits for all the provisions
for which it is authorized and will administer the permits it issues.
The EPA will continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which we issued prior to the effective date of this
authorization. EPA will not issue new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in Table 1 in this document after the
effective date of this authorization.
The EPA will continue to implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which LDEQ is not yet authorized.
I. How does today's action affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Louisiana?
LDEQ is not authorized to carry out its Hazardous Waste Program in
Indian Country within the State. This authority remains with EPA.
Therefore, this action has no effect in Indian Country.
J. What is codification and is the EPA codifying Louisiana's hazardous
waste program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the CFR. We do this by referencing the authorized State
rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment of 40 CFR part 272
subpart T for this authorization of Louisiana's program changes until a
later date. In this authorization application, the EPA is not codifying
the rules documented in this Federal Register notice.
K. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
(RCRA State Authorization) from the requirements of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011). Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action proposes to authorize State requirements pursuant to RCRA 3006,
and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. Because this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order
12866, this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017), entitled Reducing Regulations and
Controlling Regulatory Costs. Accordingly, this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this action proposes to authorize pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same
reason, this proposed action also does not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely proposes to authorize State requirements as part of
the State RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established by RCRA.
This proposed action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant and it does not make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This proposed rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 May 22, 2001),
because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this proposed rule, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has
complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of the proposed rule in accordance
with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the
Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
[[Page 45068]]
Takings'' issued under the Executive Order. This proposed rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this rule authorizes pre-
existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less
stringent than existing federal requirements, and impose no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects,
the proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: August 28, 2018.
David Gray,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2018-19195 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P