Public Listening Session; Stakeholder Input on Peak Flows Management, 44623-44625 [2018-19016]
Download as PDF
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before October 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID Number EPA–
HQ–OECA–2017–0640 to (1) EPA online
using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to
docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Stevenson, Office of
Compliance, Monitoring, Assistance,
and Media Programs Division,
Pesticides, Waste & Toxics Branch
(2225A), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564–4203; fax number:
(202) 564–0085; email:
stevenson.michelle@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents, which explain
in detail the information that the EPA
will be collecting, are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket
can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744.
For additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Abstract: Producers of pesticides and
pesticide devices must maintain certain
records with respect to their operations
and make such records available for
inspection and copying as specified in
Section 8 of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
and in regulations at 40 CFR part 169.
This information collection is
mandatory under FIFRA Section 8. It is
used by the Agency to determine
compliance with FIFRA.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities:
Producers of pesticides and pesticide
devices for sale or distribution in or
exported to the United States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR 169).
Estimated number of respondents:
28,566 (total).
Frequency of response: Annually.
Total estimated burden: 57,132 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $7,545,424 (per
year), which includes no annualized
capital or operation & maintenance
costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is an
increase of 28,238 hours in the total
estimated burden currently identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. This increase is due to an
adjustment in the estimates of the
number of respondents.
Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–18954 Filed 8–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2018–0420; FRL–9983–12–
OW]
Public Listening Session; Stakeholder
Input on Peak Flows Management
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is interested in the views
of the public on possible approaches to
updating the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
regulations related to the management
of peak wet weather flows at Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
treatment plants serving separate
sanitary sewer collection systems.
Consequently, EPA is inviting interested
members of the public to three planned
listening sessions on: October 16, 2018
at EPA Headquarters in Washington,
DC, October 24, 2018 at EPA Region 7
in Lenexa, Kansas, and October 30, 2018
to be held online. EPA welcomes oral or
written information at the listening
sessions as well as any other
information the public may wish to
provide EPA through the docket (Docket
ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2018–0420).
DATES: The in-person listening sessions
will be held at EPA Headquarters in
Washington, DC on October 16, 2018
from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT; and in
EPA Region 7 in Lenexa, Kansas on
October 24, 2018 from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00
p.m. CDT. In addition to the in-person
listening sessions, EPA will hold an
online listening session on October 30,
2018 from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EDT.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44623
For those who intend to submit
written statements to the docket, EPA is
asking that this information be provided
before October 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The in-person listening
sessions will be held at the following
locations:
• For the EPA Headquarters in
Washington, DC listening session: US
EPA Headquarters, William Jefferson
Clinton East Building, Room 1153, 1201
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20004;
• For the EPA Region 7 listening
session: 11201 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS
66219.
The online listening session will be
accessible though https://www.epa.gov/
npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatmentplants.
To register for any of the listening
sessions go to: https://www.epa.gov/
npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatmentplants.
To submit written information to EPA:
Submit any written statements or input,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2018–0420, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Piziali, Water Permits Division,
Office of Water, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: 202–564–1709; or
email: peakflowsrule@epa.gov. Also see
the following website for additional
information regarding the rulemaking:
https://www.epa.gov/npdes/municipalwastewater.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
44624
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices
I. General Information
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
A. Public Listening Session
i. Public Listening Sessions: EPA will
hold two public listening sessions to
gather feedback from interested
members of the public on the issues and
concerns that the Agency should be
aware of during this rulemaking. The
public listening sessions will begin with
EPA providing a brief background on
peak flows management issues and
EPA’s goals for this rulemaking. This
will then be followed by an opportunity
for the public to provide input on these
issues. EPA is asking that oral
statements be limited to three minutes
or less and is welcoming written
statements at the sessions. Each
listening session will begin at 9:00 a.m.
local time and continue until all those
wishing to speak have had a chance to
provide comments, or until 2:00 p.m.,
whichever comes first. A transcript of
oral remarks made during the listening
sessions will be at https://www.epa.gov/
npdes/municipal-wastewater and
included in the rulemaking docket.
ii. Online Listening Session: In
addition to the in-person listening
sessions, EPA will also hold a ‘‘virtual’’
listening session via a webcast on
October 30, 2018, from 11:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. EDT. The same format will be
followed as that for the in-person
listening session. After a presentation
from EPA, members of the public may
call in and give brief (three-minute or
less) statements. Audience members
will be able to listen to the webcast and
all public statements through their
computer speakers. A transcript of oral
remarks made during the listening
sessions will be at https://www.epa.gov/
npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatmentplants and included in the rulemaking
docket.
B. Additional Information and Public
Meeting Registration
Prior to each listening session, EPA
will post any relevant materials to the
following website: https://www.epa.gov/
npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatmentplants. Information posted to the
website will include any handouts that
may be provided at the meeting as well
as a web link that participants may use
to register for the public meeting in
advance. Advanced registration is not
required, but is requested so that EPA
can ensure there is sufficient space and
time allotted for those who wish to
participate. The listening session will
continue until all speakers in
attendance have had a chance to
provide comments, or the listed end
time, whichever comes first. If you
choose not to pre-register to speak, it is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
recommended that you arrive at the start
of the listening session to register in
person in order to ensure the
opportunity to participate.
II. Background
EPA is providing the following
background information to assist the
public in preparing for the listening
sessions. Under the Clean Water Act
(CWA), municipal sewage treatment
plants or Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTWs) treatment plants are
required to comply with prescribed
restrictions on their discharges to a
water of the United States. Specifically,
each POTW must obtain an NPDES
permit that will require, at a minimum,
that the treatment plant’s discharge
meet effluent limitations for secondary
treatment. See CWA § 1311(b)(1)(B) and
§ 1342(a), 40 CFR 133 and 40 CFR
122.44(a)(1). The permit will also
require meeting any more stringent
effluent limitations that are necessary to
meet applicable water quality standards.
See CWA § 1311(b)(1)(C), § 1342(a), and
40 CFR 122.44(d). The permit will also
require the POTW operator to comply
with other terms and conditions based
on the NPDES regulations at 40 CFR
122. These include, for example,
requirements regarding monitoring and
reporting of discharges and proper
operation and maintenance of POTW
facilities and systems of treatment.
Many sewage treatment processes
may be used to comply with these
effluent requirements. Most
municipalities use a series of unit
processes to treat wastewater prior to
discharge including the following:
• Preliminary treatment or screening
to remove large solids,
• primary clarification (or
preliminary sedimentation) to remove
floating and settleable solids,
• biological treatment (also referred to
as secondary treatment) to remove
biodegradable organic pollutants and
suspended solids, and
• disinfection to deactivate
pathogens.
Some facilities also provide more
advanced treatment, which is designed
to reduce constituents, such as nitrogen
and phosphorus, that are not removed
in any significant quantity by traditional
biological treatment processes.
Sanitary sewer collection systems are
designed to remove wastewater from
homes and other buildings and convey
it to a wastewater treatment plant. The
collection system is a critical element in
the successful performance of the
POTW’s wastewater treatment
operation. Collection systems are
designed in one of two ways. Combined
sewer systems are designed to collect
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
both stormwater and sanitary
wastewater for delivery to the treatment
plant. By contrast, separate sanitary
sewers are designed to carry only
sanitary wastewater (separate sanitary
sewers typically are built with some
allowance, however, for higher flows
that occur during storm events in order
to handle minor and non-excessive
amounts of stormwater or groundwater
that enter the system through
infiltration and inflow or ‘‘I/I’’). EPA
notes that, at this time, it contemplates
the scope of the rulemaking would be
limited to peak flows at POTWs with
separate sanitary sewer systems.
Significant increases in flows at a
treatment facility can create operational
challenges and potentially adversely
affect the treatment efficiencies.
Biological treatment components at
treatment plants are particularly
vulnerable to high-volume peak flows.
Where peak influent flows during
periods of wet weather exceed the
treatment capacity of existing biological
or advanced treatment units, POTWs
must consider ways in which to prevent
damage to their treatment plant, while
maintaining effective operation of the
system to meet applicable NPDES
permit limitations. Under these
conditions, POTW operators use several
different strategies which may include a
combination of alternative treatment
approaches, storage, and sewer
maintenance and rehabilitation work to
minimize the amount of stormwater that
enters the collection system
through I/I.
Among the peak flow management
approaches that have been used or
considered are those involving the
diversion of a portion of the peak flows
around biological or advanced treatment
units. The diverted flow is then
recombined with flows from the
biological treatment units. Other
alternatives include the installation of
various treatment processes at the
POTW that supplement the plant’s
ability to process and treat peak flows.
Refer to EPA’s Draft Summary of
Blending Practices and the Discharge of
Pollutants for Different Blending
Scenarios (EPA, June 2014) at https://
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/
2015-10/documents/sso_lit_review_
draft.pdf. These approaches have been
the subject of previous EPA
policymaking efforts that have not been
adopted. See 68 FR 63042 (November 7,
2003), and 70 FR 76013 (December 22,
2005). EPA has also looked at the
potential public health implications of
these different approaches. See
Summary of June 19–20, 2014, Experts
Forum on Public Health Impacts of
Blending (EPA, May 2015) at https://
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/
2015-10/documents/experts_forum_
summary.pdf.
POTWs with separate sanitary sewer
systems can also lessen the impact of
peak flows by implementing a variety of
strategies to minimize the introduction
of stormwater into the collection
system. While virtually every separate
sanitary sewer system has some
groundwater infiltration and
stormwater-derived I/I, it may be
considered excessive when it is the
cause of overflows or causes disruptions
in the treatment system. POTWs with
excessive I/I have a number of different
methods for identifying the largest
sources of I/I in their sewer system.
These include system mapping, flow
monitoring, conducting smoke or dye
tests, sensor technology, and using
optical devices to view sections of the
system. Developing plans for correcting
and rehabilitating the highest priority
sources of I/I into the collection system
may involve such strategies as repairing
manholes, replacing and repairing
private building lateral pipes, ensuring
building downspouts are not connected
to the sewer system, sealing sewer
joints, inserting sewer liners, or even
replacing sections of the sewer line.
Other strategies may focus on
maximizing existing collection system
capacity through real-time controls to
optimize flows within the system, or
building additional storage within the
collection system or treatment plant.
EPA acknowledges the significant
expertise that exists among states, tribes,
POTWs and municipal officials,
engineering firms, public health
agencies, and the public related to these
issues. These listening sessions are
designed to take advantage of this
information from a variety of
perspectives to help provide a complete
picture of the considerations that should
go into any rulemaking to address
permitting requirements for the
management of peak flows at POTWs
with separate sanitary sewer systems.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
III. Areas of Feedback Requested for
Public Listening Sessions
Interested members of the public who
plan to provide oral or written
testimony at the listening sessions, or to
submit written material to EPA
separately as detailed in the instructions
provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice, are welcome to provide their
input on any issue related to the topic
of peak flow management at POTW
treatment plants with separate sanitary
sewer systems. But EPA particularly
welcomes feedback from the public on
the following specific questions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
• What strategies have you found to
be successful in reducing peak flow
volumes at the POTW treatment plant?
• What permitting or other regulatory
approaches are you aware of that in
your opinion provide a good basis for
any rulemaking in this area?
• What treatment technologies have
POTWs with separate sanitary sewer
systems used successfully to manage
peak excess flows during wet weather?
How effective are these technologies at
meeting effluent limitations? What are
examples of technologies addressing
other pollutants not typically subject to
discharge requirements in NPDES
permits (e.g., pathogens)? Related to
these questions, do you have supporting
treatment efficacy data that you would
be willing to share with EPA for this
rulemaking?
• What are your specific suggestions
regarding conditions that could be
included in NPDES permits to allow
diversions of some peak flows around
biological treatment units to protect the
treatment plant? Considerations could
include:
—What information might the NPDES
permitting authority need in order to
determine whether such diversions
are necessary to protect the treatment
plant?
—Should the number of times such
diversions are permitted to occur be
limited or reported?
—Are there any requirements that
should be considered for ensuring
that the treatment plant is operated
and maintained in an effective
manner to minimize the number of
peak flow diversions that occur?
—What requirements would be
appropriate for ensuring that
maintenance of the collection system
to minimize the introduction of
stormwater into the sanitary system
through inflow and infiltration is
occurring?
—What monitoring and reporting
requirements would be important to
demonstrate that applicable effluent
limits are still being met?
—How may the permit ensure that
public and ecological health is
protected?
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251
et seq.
Dated: August 24, 2018.
Martha Shimkin,
Acting Director, Office of Wastewater
Management.
[FR Doc. 2018–19016 Filed 8–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44625
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–9041–1]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Office of Federal Activities,
EPA.
General Information (202) 564–7156 or
https://www2.epa.gov/nepa/
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 08/20/2018 Through 08/24/2018
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
AGENCY:
Notice
Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act
requires that EPA make public its
comments on EISs issued by other
Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters
on EISs are available at: https://
cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/
action/eis/search.
EIS No. 20180192, Draft, BLM, AZ, Ten
West Link 500kV Transmission Line
Project Draft Environmental Impact
Statement and Draft Resource
Management Plan Amendments,
Comment Period Ends: 11/29/2018,
Contact: Joseph Incardine 801–560–
7135.
EIS No. 20180193, Final, DOI, AK,
Liberty Development and Production
Plan Beaufort Sea, Alaska Final
Environmental Impact Statement,
Review Period Ends: 10/01/2018,
Contact: Lauren Boldrick 907–334–
5200.
EIS No. 20180194, Draft, FERC, OR,
Swan Lake North Pumped Storage
Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/15/
2018, Contact: Dianne Rodman 202–
502–6077.
EIS No. 20180195, Draft, BLM, WY,
Leavitt Reservoir Expansion Project,
Comment Period Ends: 10/15/2018,
Contact: Holly Elliott 307–347–5100.
EIS No. 20180196, Final, BLM, AK,
Alpine Satellite Development Plan for
the Proposed Greater Mooses Tooth 2
Development Project, Review Period
Ends: 10/01/2018, Contact: Stephanie
Rice 907–271–3202.
EIS No. 20180197, Draft, BLM, WY, Lost
Creek Uranium In-Situ Recovery
Project Modifications, Comment
Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact:
Annette Treat 307–328–4314.
EIS No. 20180199, Draft, USFWS, IA,
Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for Proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan and Incidental
Take Permit, Comment Period Ends:
10/15/2018, Contact: Kraig McPeek
309–757–5800.
EIS No. 20180199, Final Supplement,
TVA, KY, Shawnee Fossil Plant Coal
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44623-44625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19016]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2018-0420; FRL-9983-12-OW]
Public Listening Session; Stakeholder Input on Peak Flows
Management
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is interested in the
views of the public on possible approaches to updating the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations related to
the management of peak wet weather flows at Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTWs) treatment plants serving separate sanitary sewer
collection systems. Consequently, EPA is inviting interested members of
the public to three planned listening sessions on: October 16, 2018 at
EPA Headquarters in Washington, DC, October 24, 2018 at EPA Region 7 in
Lenexa, Kansas, and October 30, 2018 to be held online. EPA welcomes
oral or written information at the listening sessions as well as any
other information the public may wish to provide EPA through the docket
(Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2018-0420).
DATES: The in-person listening sessions will be held at EPA
Headquarters in Washington, DC on October 16, 2018 from 9:00 a.m. to
2:00 p.m. EDT; and in EPA Region 7 in Lenexa, Kansas on October 24,
2018 from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. CDT. In addition to the in-person
listening sessions, EPA will hold an online listening session on
October 30, 2018 from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EDT.
For those who intend to submit written statements to the docket,
EPA is asking that this information be provided before October 31,
2018.
ADDRESSES: The in-person listening sessions will be held at the
following locations:
For the EPA Headquarters in Washington, DC listening
session: US EPA Headquarters, William Jefferson Clinton East Building,
Room 1153, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004;
For the EPA Region 7 listening session: 11201 Renner
Blvd., Lenexa, KS 66219.
The online listening session will be accessible though https://www.epa.gov/npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatment-plants.
To register for any of the listening sessions go to: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatment-plants.
To submit written information to EPA: Submit any written statements
or input, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2018-0420, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Piziali, Water Permits Division,
Office of Water, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-564-1709; or
email: [email protected]. Also see the following website for
additional information regarding the rulemaking: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/municipal-wastewater.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 44624]]
I. General Information
A. Public Listening Session
i. Public Listening Sessions: EPA will hold two public listening
sessions to gather feedback from interested members of the public on
the issues and concerns that the Agency should be aware of during this
rulemaking. The public listening sessions will begin with EPA providing
a brief background on peak flows management issues and EPA's goals for
this rulemaking. This will then be followed by an opportunity for the
public to provide input on these issues. EPA is asking that oral
statements be limited to three minutes or less and is welcoming written
statements at the sessions. Each listening session will begin at 9:00
a.m. local time and continue until all those wishing to speak have had
a chance to provide comments, or until 2:00 p.m., whichever comes
first. A transcript of oral remarks made during the listening sessions
will be at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/municipal-wastewater and included
in the rulemaking docket.
ii. Online Listening Session: In addition to the in-person
listening sessions, EPA will also hold a ``virtual'' listening session
via a webcast on October 30, 2018, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EDT.
The same format will be followed as that for the in-person listening
session. After a presentation from EPA, members of the public may call
in and give brief (three-minute or less) statements. Audience members
will be able to listen to the webcast and all public statements through
their computer speakers. A transcript of oral remarks made during the
listening sessions will be at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatment-plants and included in the rulemaking docket.
B. Additional Information and Public Meeting Registration
Prior to each listening session, EPA will post any relevant
materials to the following website: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/peak-flows-sewage-treatment-plants. Information posted to the website will
include any handouts that may be provided at the meeting as well as a
web link that participants may use to register for the public meeting
in advance. Advanced registration is not required, but is requested so
that EPA can ensure there is sufficient space and time allotted for
those who wish to participate. The listening session will continue
until all speakers in attendance have had a chance to provide comments,
or the listed end time, whichever comes first. If you choose not to
pre-register to speak, it is recommended that you arrive at the start
of the listening session to register in person in order to ensure the
opportunity to participate.
II. Background
EPA is providing the following background information to assist the
public in preparing for the listening sessions. Under the Clean Water
Act (CWA), municipal sewage treatment plants or Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTWs) treatment plants are required to comply with
prescribed restrictions on their discharges to a water of the United
States. Specifically, each POTW must obtain an NPDES permit that will
require, at a minimum, that the treatment plant's discharge meet
effluent limitations for secondary treatment. See CWA Sec.
1311(b)(1)(B) and Sec. 1342(a), 40 CFR 133 and 40 CFR 122.44(a)(1).
The permit will also require meeting any more stringent effluent
limitations that are necessary to meet applicable water quality
standards. See CWA Sec. 1311(b)(1)(C), Sec. 1342(a), and 40 CFR
122.44(d). The permit will also require the POTW operator to comply
with other terms and conditions based on the NPDES regulations at 40
CFR 122. These include, for example, requirements regarding monitoring
and reporting of discharges and proper operation and maintenance of
POTW facilities and systems of treatment.
Many sewage treatment processes may be used to comply with these
effluent requirements. Most municipalities use a series of unit
processes to treat wastewater prior to discharge including the
following:
Preliminary treatment or screening to remove large solids,
primary clarification (or preliminary sedimentation) to
remove floating and settleable solids,
biological treatment (also referred to as secondary
treatment) to remove biodegradable organic pollutants and suspended
solids, and
disinfection to deactivate pathogens.
Some facilities also provide more advanced treatment, which is
designed to reduce constituents, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, that
are not removed in any significant quantity by traditional biological
treatment processes.
Sanitary sewer collection systems are designed to remove wastewater
from homes and other buildings and convey it to a wastewater treatment
plant. The collection system is a critical element in the successful
performance of the POTW's wastewater treatment operation. Collection
systems are designed in one of two ways. Combined sewer systems are
designed to collect both stormwater and sanitary wastewater for
delivery to the treatment plant. By contrast, separate sanitary sewers
are designed to carry only sanitary wastewater (separate sanitary
sewers typically are built with some allowance, however, for higher
flows that occur during storm events in order to handle minor and non-
excessive amounts of stormwater or groundwater that enter the system
through infiltration and inflow or ``I/I''). EPA notes that, at this
time, it contemplates the scope of the rulemaking would be limited to
peak flows at POTWs with separate sanitary sewer systems.
Significant increases in flows at a treatment facility can create
operational challenges and potentially adversely affect the treatment
efficiencies. Biological treatment components at treatment plants are
particularly vulnerable to high-volume peak flows. Where peak influent
flows during periods of wet weather exceed the treatment capacity of
existing biological or advanced treatment units, POTWs must consider
ways in which to prevent damage to their treatment plant, while
maintaining effective operation of the system to meet applicable NPDES
permit limitations. Under these conditions, POTW operators use several
different strategies which may include a combination of alternative
treatment approaches, storage, and sewer maintenance and rehabilitation
work to minimize the amount of stormwater that enters the collection
system through I/I.
Among the peak flow management approaches that have been used or
considered are those involving the diversion of a portion of the peak
flows around biological or advanced treatment units. The diverted flow
is then recombined with flows from the biological treatment units.
Other alternatives include the installation of various treatment
processes at the POTW that supplement the plant's ability to process
and treat peak flows. Refer to EPA's Draft Summary of Blending
Practices and the Discharge of Pollutants for Different Blending
Scenarios (EPA, June 2014) at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/sso_lit_review_draft.pdf. These approaches have
been the subject of previous EPA policymaking efforts that have not
been adopted. See 68 FR 63042 (November 7, 2003), and 70 FR 76013
(December 22, 2005). EPA has also looked at the potential public health
implications of these different approaches. See Summary of June 19-20,
2014, Experts Forum on Public Health Impacts of Blending (EPA, May
2015) at https://
[[Page 44625]]
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/
experts_forum_summary.pdf.
POTWs with separate sanitary sewer systems can also lessen the
impact of peak flows by implementing a variety of strategies to
minimize the introduction of stormwater into the collection system.
While virtually every separate sanitary sewer system has some
groundwater infiltration and stormwater-derived I/I, it may be
considered excessive when it is the cause of overflows or causes
disruptions in the treatment system. POTWs with excessive I/I have a
number of different methods for identifying the largest sources of I/I
in their sewer system. These include system mapping, flow monitoring,
conducting smoke or dye tests, sensor technology, and using optical
devices to view sections of the system. Developing plans for correcting
and rehabilitating the highest priority sources of I/I into the
collection system may involve such strategies as repairing manholes,
replacing and repairing private building lateral pipes, ensuring
building downspouts are not connected to the sewer system, sealing
sewer joints, inserting sewer liners, or even replacing sections of the
sewer line. Other strategies may focus on maximizing existing
collection system capacity through real-time controls to optimize flows
within the system, or building additional storage within the collection
system or treatment plant.
EPA acknowledges the significant expertise that exists among
states, tribes, POTWs and municipal officials, engineering firms,
public health agencies, and the public related to these issues. These
listening sessions are designed to take advantage of this information
from a variety of perspectives to help provide a complete picture of
the considerations that should go into any rulemaking to address
permitting requirements for the management of peak flows at POTWs with
separate sanitary sewer systems.
III. Areas of Feedback Requested for Public Listening Sessions
Interested members of the public who plan to provide oral or
written testimony at the listening sessions, or to submit written
material to EPA separately as detailed in the instructions provided in
the ADDRESSES section of this notice, are welcome to provide their
input on any issue related to the topic of peak flow management at POTW
treatment plants with separate sanitary sewer systems. But EPA
particularly welcomes feedback from the public on the following
specific questions.
What strategies have you found to be successful in
reducing peak flow volumes at the POTW treatment plant?
What permitting or other regulatory approaches are you
aware of that in your opinion provide a good basis for any rulemaking
in this area?
What treatment technologies have POTWs with separate
sanitary sewer systems used successfully to manage peak excess flows
during wet weather? How effective are these technologies at meeting
effluent limitations? What are examples of technologies addressing
other pollutants not typically subject to discharge requirements in
NPDES permits (e.g., pathogens)? Related to these questions, do you
have supporting treatment efficacy data that you would be willing to
share with EPA for this rulemaking?
What are your specific suggestions regarding conditions
that could be included in NPDES permits to allow diversions of some
peak flows around biological treatment units to protect the treatment
plant? Considerations could include:
--What information might the NPDES permitting authority need in order
to determine whether such diversions are necessary to protect the
treatment plant?
--Should the number of times such diversions are permitted to occur be
limited or reported?
--Are there any requirements that should be considered for ensuring
that the treatment plant is operated and maintained in an effective
manner to minimize the number of peak flow diversions that occur?
--What requirements would be appropriate for ensuring that maintenance
of the collection system to minimize the introduction of stormwater
into the sanitary system through inflow and infiltration is occurring?
--What monitoring and reporting requirements would be important to
demonstrate that applicable effluent limits are still being met?
--How may the permit ensure that public and ecological health is
protected?
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Dated: August 24, 2018.
Martha Shimkin,
Acting Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-19016 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P