Alabama Regulatory Program, 43972-43974 [2018-18716]
Download as PDF
43972
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ASW TX E2 Georgetown, TX [New]
Georgetown Municipal Airport, TX
(Lat. 30°40′44″ N, long. 97°40′46″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 3,300 feet MSL
within a 4.1-mile radius of Georgetown
Municipal Airport. This Class E airspace is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective dates and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Austin, TX [Amended]
San Marcos Regional Airport, TX
(Lat. 29°53′34″ N, long. 97°51′47″ W)
Lockhart Municipal Airport, TX
(Lat. 29°51′01″ N, long. 97°40′21″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.8-mile
radius of San Marcos Regional Airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 268° bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.8-mile
radius to 13.1 miles west of the airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 313° bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.8-mile
radius to 12.0 miles northwest of the airport,
and within 2 miles each side of the 088°
bearing from the airport extending from the
6.8-mile radius to 10.5 miles east of the
airport, and within 2 miles each side of the
133° bearing from the airport extending from
the 6.8-mile radius to 9.7 miles southeast of
the airport, and within 2 miles each side of
the 178° bearing from the airport extending
from the 6.8-mile radius to 10.5 miles south
of the airport, and within a 6.4-mile radius
of Lockhart Municipal Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 22,
2018.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018–18645 Filed 8–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 901
[SATS No. AL–082–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2017–0011; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
189S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX064A000 18XS501520]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Alabama Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment
to the Alabama regulatory program
(Alabama program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Alabama
proposed revisions to its program
regarding permit fees. Alabama revised
its program at its own initiative to raise
revenues sufficient to fund the Alabama
Surface Mining Commission’s (ASMC)
share of costs to administer the Alabama
coal regulatory program, including the
reviewing, administering, inspecting,
and enforcing of surface coal mining
permits in Alabama.
DATES: The effective date is September
28, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Joseph, Acting Director,
Birmingham Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite
215, Homewood, Alabama 35209.
Telephone: (205) 290–7282. Email:
bjoseph@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Alabama Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE’s Decisions
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Alabama Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, State laws
and regulations that govern surface coal
mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of the
Act and consistent with the Federal
regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1)
and (7). On the basis of these criteria,
the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Alabama
program effective May 20, 1982. You
can find background information on the
Alabama program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the Alabama program in the
May 20, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
22030). You can also find later actions
concerning the Alabama program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 901.10,
901.15, and 901.16.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By email dated August 14, 2017
(Administrative Record No. AL–0672),
Alabama sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.) at its own initiative.
We announced the receipt of the
proposed amendment in the January 22,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2018, Federal Register (83 FR 2953). In
the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an
opportunity for a public hearing or
meeting on the adequacy of the
amendment. We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one
requested one. The public comment
period ended on February 21, 2018. We
received four public comments
(Administrative Record No. AL–0672–
03) that are addressed in the Public
Comments section of IV, Summary and
Disposition of Comments, below.
III. OSMRE’s Findings
We are approving the amendment as
described below. The following are
findings we made concerning Alabama’s
amendment under SMCRA and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15
and 732.17. Any revisions that we do
not specifically discuss below
concerning non-substantive wording or
editorial changes can be found in the
full text of the program amendment
available at www.regulations.gov.
Alabama Administrative Code 880–X–
8B–.07
Alabama proposed to revise its
regulations at Alabama Administrative
Code 880–X–8B–.07, increasing coal
mining permit fees to adequately fund
the ASMC for the purposes of
reviewing, administering, inspecting,
and enforcing surface coal mining
permits in Alabama.
By this amendment, Alabama is:
(1) Increasing the initial acreage fee
from $35.00 per acre to $75.00, to be
paid on each acre in a permit covered
by a performance bond prior to the
initiation of operations on the permit (or
on an increment if increments are used),
and to be paid on all bonded acreage
covered by a permit renewal;
(2) Increasing the basic fee for a coal
exploration permit application from
$2,000.00 to $2,500.00;
(3) Increasing the basic fee for a
permit renewal application from
$1,000.00 to $2,500.00;
(4) Increasing the basic fee for a
permit transfer application from $200.00
to $500.00;
(5) Adding an annual acreage fee for
expired permits of $15.00, per acre, to
be paid by December 31st of each year
on each acre covered by a performance
bond as of October 1st of the year; and
(6) Adding the inspection of permits
to the ASMC’s uses for the deposited
permit fees.
Alabama fully funds its share of costs
to regulate the coal mining industry
with fees paid by the coal industry. The
proposed fee revisions are intended to
provide adequate funding to pay the
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
State’s cost of operating its regulatory
program. The ASMC does not expect the
increase in permit fees to exceed the
actual or anticipated cost of reviewing,
administering, inspecting, and enforcing
surface coal mining permits in Alabama.
We find that Alabama’s fee changes
are consistent with the discretionary
authority provided by the Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 777.17. Therefore,
we are approving Alabama’s revision.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment. As noted in section II, we
received four comments (Administrative
Record No. AL–0672–03). The four
commenters provided comments that
were outside the scope of the proposed
amendment and not germane to the
topic of surface coal mining in general.
We are not addressing these comments
in this final rule for these reasons. The
full texts of these comments are
available at www.regulations.gov.
Federal Agency Comments
On August 21, 2017, pursuant to 30
CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and Section 503(b)
of SMCRA, we requested comments on
the amendment from various Federal
agencies with an actual or potential
interest in the Alabama program
(Administrative Record No. AL–0672–
02). We did not receive any comments.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Concurrence and Comments
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we
are required to get a written concurrence
from EPA for those provisions of the
program amendment that relate to air or
water quality standards issued under
the authority of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the
revisions that Alabama proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air
or water quality standards. Therefore,
we did not ask EPA to concur on the
amendment. However, on August 21,
2017, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we
requested comments from the EPA on
the amendment (Administrative Record
No. AL–0672–02). The EPA did not
respond to our request.
State Historical Preservation Officer
(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are
required to request comments from the
SHPO and ACHP on amendments that
may have an effect on historic
properties. On August 21, 2017, we
requested comments on the amendment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
(Administrative Record No. AL–0672–
02). We did not receive any comments.
V. OSMRE’s Decision
Based on the above findings, we are
approving the Alabama amendment that
was submitted on August 14, 2017
(Administrative Record No. AL–0672).
To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30
CFR part 901 that codify decisions
concerning the Alabama program. In
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act, this rule will take effect
30 days after the date of publication.
Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that
the State’s program demonstrate the
State has the capability of carrying out
the provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes. SMCRA requires consistency
of State and Federal standards.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rulemaking does not have
takings implications. This
determination is based on the analysis
performed for the counterpart Federal
regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
Pursuant to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Guidance dated October
12, 1993, the approval of state program
amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
reviewed this rule as required by
Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988.
The Department has determined that
this Federal Register document meets
the criteria of Section 3 of Executive
Order 12988, which is intended to
ensure that the agency review its
legislation and regulations to minimize
litigation; and that the agency’s
legislation and regulations provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard, and
promote simplification and burden
reduction. Because Section 3 focuses on
the quality of Federal legislation and
regulations, the Department limited its
review under this Executive Order to
the quality of this Federal Register
document and to changes to the Federal
regulations. The review under this
Executive Order did not extend to the
language of the State regulatory program
or to the program amendment that the
State of Alabama drafted.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule is not a ‘‘[p]olicy that [has]
Federalism implications’’ as defined by
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43973
Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132
because it does not have ‘‘substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ Instead, this rule
approves an amendment to the Alabama
program submitted and drafted by that
State. OSMRE reviewed the submission
with fundamental federalism principles
in mind as set forth in Section 2 and 3
of the Executive Order and with the
principles of cooperative federalism as
set forth in SMCRA. See, e.g., 30 U.S.C.
1201(f). As such, pursuant to Section
503(a)(1) and (7)(30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1)
and (7)), OSMRE reviewed the program
amendment to ensure that it is ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA and ‘‘consistent with’’ the
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rulemaking on Federallyrecognized Tribes and have determined
that the rulemaking does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Tribes. The basis for
this determination is that our decision
is on a State regulatory program and
does not involve Federal regulations
involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
Executive Order 13211 of May 18,
2001, requires agencies to prepare a
Statement of Energy Effects for a
rulemaking that is (1) considered
significant under Executive Order
12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rulemaking is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rulemaking does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
43974
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rulemaking,
is based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an economic
analysis was prepared and certification
made that such regulations would not
have a significant economic effect upon
a substantial number of small entities.
In making the determination as to
whether this rulemaking would have a
significant economic impact, the
Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
This rulemaking is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This rulemaking: (a) Does
not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices
for consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and (c)
Does not have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal, which is
the subject of this rulemaking, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rulemaking will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
Original amendment submission date
Date of final publication
*
*
August 14, 2017 .....................................
*
*
August 29, 2018 .....................................
[FR Doc. 2018–18716 Filed 8–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 901
[SATS No. AL–081–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2017–0006; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
189S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX064A000 18XS501520]
Alabama Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment
to the Alabama regulatory program
(Alabama program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Alabama
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
The effective date is September
28, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Joseph, Acting Director,
Birmingham Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite
215, Homewood, Alabama 35209.
Telephone: (205) 290–7282. Email:
bjoseph@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Alabama Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 16, 2018.
Alfred L. Clayborne,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 901 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 901—ALABAMA
1. The authority citation for part 901
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 901.15 is amended in the
table by adding an entry for ‘‘Alabama
Administrative Code 880–X–8B–.07’’ in
chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
publication’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 901.15 Approval of Alabama regulatory
program amendments.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Alabama Administrative Code 880–X–8B–.07.
DATES:
Frm 00014
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 901
Citation/description
proposed revisions to its program to
allow the Alabama Surface Mining
Commission (ASMC) to revise its
current permit fee collection procedures
from the term of the mine permit to
enable the collection of permit fees over
the entire life of the mine. The revision
also defines the life of the mine to be
from the issuance of the permit through
the full release of the performance bond.
PO 00000
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rulemaking, is
based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an analysis was
prepared and a determination made that
the Federal regulation did not impose
an unfunded mandate.
*
I. Background on the Alabama Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, State laws
and regulations that govern surface coal
mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of the
Act and consistent with the Federal
regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1)
and (7). On the basis of these criteria,
the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Alabama
program effective May 20, 1982. You
can find background information on the
Alabama program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the Alabama program in the
May 20, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
22030). You can also find later actions
concerning the Alabama program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 901.10,
901.15, and 901.16.
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43972-43974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18716]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 901
[SATS No. AL-082-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2017-0011; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 189S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 18XS501520]
Alabama Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Alabama regulatory program
(Alabama program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Alabama proposed revisions to its program
regarding permit fees. Alabama revised its program at its own
initiative to raise revenues sufficient to fund the Alabama Surface
Mining Commission's (ASMC) share of costs to administer the Alabama
coal regulatory program, including the reviewing, administering,
inspecting, and enforcing of surface coal mining permits in Alabama.
DATES: The effective date is September 28, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Joseph, Acting Director,
Birmingham Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite 215, Homewood, Alabama 35209.
Telephone: (205) 290-7282. Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Alabama Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decisions
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Alabama Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, State laws and regulations
that govern surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of the Act and consistent with the
Federal regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of
these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Alabama program effective May 20, 1982. You can find background
information on the Alabama program, including the Secretary's findings,
the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval of the
Alabama program in the May 20, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 22030).
You can also find later actions concerning the Alabama program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 901.10, 901.15, and 901.16.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By email dated August 14, 2017 (Administrative Record No. AL-0672),
Alabama sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.) at its own initiative.
We announced the receipt of the proposed amendment in the January
22, 2018, Federal Register (83 FR 2953). In the same document, we
opened the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a
public hearing or meeting on the adequacy of the amendment. We did not
hold a public hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The
public comment period ended on February 21, 2018. We received four
public comments (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-03) that are
addressed in the Public Comments section of IV, Summary and Disposition
of Comments, below.
III. OSMRE's Findings
We are approving the amendment as described below. The following
are findings we made concerning Alabama's amendment under SMCRA and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. Any revisions that we
do not specifically discuss below concerning non-substantive wording or
editorial changes can be found in the full text of the program
amendment available at www.regulations.gov.
Alabama Administrative Code 880-X-8B-.07
Alabama proposed to revise its regulations at Alabama
Administrative Code 880-X-8B-.07, increasing coal mining permit fees to
adequately fund the ASMC for the purposes of reviewing, administering,
inspecting, and enforcing surface coal mining permits in Alabama.
By this amendment, Alabama is:
(1) Increasing the initial acreage fee from $35.00 per acre to
$75.00, to be paid on each acre in a permit covered by a performance
bond prior to the initiation of operations on the permit (or on an
increment if increments are used), and to be paid on all bonded acreage
covered by a permit renewal;
(2) Increasing the basic fee for a coal exploration permit
application from $2,000.00 to $2,500.00;
(3) Increasing the basic fee for a permit renewal application from
$1,000.00 to $2,500.00;
(4) Increasing the basic fee for a permit transfer application from
$200.00 to $500.00;
(5) Adding an annual acreage fee for expired permits of $15.00, per
acre, to be paid by December 31st of each year on each acre covered by
a performance bond as of October 1st of the year; and
(6) Adding the inspection of permits to the ASMC's uses for the
deposited permit fees.
Alabama fully funds its share of costs to regulate the coal mining
industry with fees paid by the coal industry. The proposed fee
revisions are intended to provide adequate funding to pay the
[[Page 43973]]
State's cost of operating its regulatory program. The ASMC does not
expect the increase in permit fees to exceed the actual or anticipated
cost of reviewing, administering, inspecting, and enforcing surface
coal mining permits in Alabama.
We find that Alabama's fee changes are consistent with the
discretionary authority provided by the Federal regulation at 30 CFR
777.17. Therefore, we are approving Alabama's revision.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment. As noted in section
II, we received four comments (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-03).
The four commenters provided comments that were outside the scope of
the proposed amendment and not germane to the topic of surface coal
mining in general. We are not addressing these comments in this final
rule for these reasons. The full texts of these comments are available
at www.regulations.gov.
Federal Agency Comments
On August 21, 2017, pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and Section
503(b) of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendment from various
Federal agencies with an actual or potential interest in the Alabama
program (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-02). We did not receive any
comments.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that Alabama proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards.
Therefore, we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on
August 21, 2017, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments
from the EPA on the amendment (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-02).
The EPA did not respond to our request.
State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic
properties. On August 21, 2017, we requested comments on the amendment
(Administrative Record No. AL-0672-02). We did not receive any
comments.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we are approving the Alabama amendment
that was submitted on August 14, 2017 (Administrative Record No. AL-
0672).
To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR part 901 that codify decisions concerning the Alabama
program. In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, this rule
will take effect 30 days after the date of publication. Section 503(a)
of SMCRA requires that the State's program demonstrate the State has
the capability of carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting
its purposes. SMCRA requires consistency of State and Federal
standards.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rulemaking does not have takings implications. This
determination is based on the analysis performed for the counterpart
Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
Pursuant to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance dated
October 12, 1993, the approval of state program amendments is exempted
from OMB review under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has reviewed this rule as required
by Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988. The Department has determined
that this Federal Register document meets the criteria of Section 3 of
Executive Order 12988, which is intended to ensure that the agency
review its legislation and regulations to minimize litigation; and that
the agency's legislation and regulations provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard, and promote
simplification and burden reduction. Because Section 3 focuses on the
quality of Federal legislation and regulations, the Department limited
its review under this Executive Order to the quality of this Federal
Register document and to changes to the Federal regulations. The review
under this Executive Order did not extend to the language of the State
regulatory program or to the program amendment that the State of
Alabama drafted.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule is not a ``[p]olicy that [has] Federalism implications''
as defined by Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132 because it does not
have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
Instead, this rule approves an amendment to the Alabama program
submitted and drafted by that State. OSMRE reviewed the submission with
fundamental federalism principles in mind as set forth in Section 2 and
3 of the Executive Order and with the principles of cooperative
federalism as set forth in SMCRA. See, e.g., 30 U.S.C. 1201(f). As
such, pursuant to Section 503(a)(1) and (7)(30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and
(7)), OSMRE reviewed the program amendment to ensure that it is ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA and ``consistent with'' the
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rulemaking on Federally-recognized Tribes and
have determined that the rulemaking does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
government and Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Tribes. The basis
for this determination is that our decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve Federal regulations involving Indian
lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
Executive Order 13211 of May 18, 2001, requires agencies to prepare
a Statement of Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered
significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Because this rulemaking is exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rulemaking does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute
[[Page 43974]]
major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not contain information collection
requirements that require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rulemaking will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rulemaking
would have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon
the data and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rulemaking is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rulemaking:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b)
Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and
a determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rulemaking will not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or
more in any given year. This determination is based upon the fact that
the State submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared
and a determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 901
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 16, 2018.
Alfred L. Clayborne,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 901 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 901--ALABAMA
0
1. The authority citation for part 901 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 901.15 is amended in the table by adding an entry for
``Alabama Administrative Code 880-X-8B-.07'' in chronological order by
``Date of final publication'' to read as follows:
Sec. 901.15 Approval of Alabama regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final Citation/
date publication description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
August 14, 2017................. August 29, 2018... Alabama
Administrative
Code 880-X-8B-
.07.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2018-18716 Filed 8-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P