Notice of Intent To Request Revision and Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection, 42863-42864 [2018-18316]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Notices
comments during opportunities for
public comment during the planning
process are eligible to file an objection.
Regulations at 36 CFR 219.62 define
substantive formal comments as:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Written comments submitted to, or oral
comments recorded by, the responsible
official or his designee during an opportunity
for public participation provided during the
planning process, and attributed to the
individual or entity providing them.
Comments are considered substantive when
they are within the scope of the proposal, are
specific to the proposal, have a direct
relationship to the proposal, and include
supporting reasons for the responsible
official to consider.
How To File an Objection
The Forest Service will accept mailed,
emailed, faxed, and hand-delivered
objections concerning the Revised Land
Management Plan and associated FEIS
for 60 calendar days following the date
of the publication of the legal notice of
this objection period in the newspaper
of record, El Nuevo Dia. It is the
responsibility of the objector to ensure
that the Reviewing Officer receives the
objection in a timely manner. The
regulations prohibit extending the
length of the objection filing period.
Objections must be submitted to the
Reviewing Officer, who will be the
Regional Forester for the Southern
Region, at the address shown in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Objections or objection content specific
to the identification of species of
conservation concern will be forwarded
to Glenn Casamassa, Associate Deputy
Chief, delegated Reviewing Officer for
the Chief of the Forest Service.
An objection must include the
following (36 CFR 219.54(c)):
(1) The objector’s name and address
along with a telephone number or email
address, if available. In cases where no
identifiable name is attached to an
objection, the Forest Service will
attempt to verify the identity of the
objector to confirm objection eligibility;
(2) Signature or other verification of
authorship upon request (a scanned
signature for electronic mail may be
filed with the objection);
(3) Identification of the lead objector,
when multiple names are listed on an
objection. The Forest Service will
communicate to all parties to an
objection through the lead objector.
Verification of the identity of the lead
objector must also be provided if
requested;
(4) The name of the plan revision
being objected to, and the name and title
of the Responsible Official;
(5) A statement of the issues and/or
parts of the plan revision to which the
objection applies;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
(6) A concise statement explaining the
objection and suggesting how the
proposed plan decision may be
improved. If the objector believes that
the plan revision is inconsistent with
law, regulation, or policy, an
explanation should be included;
(7) A statement that demonstrates the
link between the objector’s prior
substantive formal comments and the
content of the objection, unless the
objection concerns an issue that arose
after the opportunities for formal
comment; and
(8) All documents referenced in the
objection (a bibliography is not
sufficient), except that the following
need not be provided:
a. All or any part of a Federal law or
regulation,
b. Forest Service Directive System
documents and land management plans
or other published Forest Service
documents,
c. Documents referenced by the Forest
Service in the planning documentation
related to the proposal subject to
objection, and
d. Formal comments previously
provided to the Forest Service by the
objector during the plan revision
comment period.
Responsible Official
The responsible official for the
revision of the Land Management Plan
for El Yunque National Forest is Sharon
Wallace, Forest Supervisor, El Yunque
National Forest, HC 01 Box 13490, Rio
Grande, PR 00745.
Dated: July 9, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2018–18353 Filed 8–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Notice of Intent To Request Revision
and Extension of a Currently Approved
Information Collection
National Agricultural Statistics
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intent of the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) to request revision and
extension of a currently approved
information collection to comply with a
mandate in the 2014 Farm Bill. (. . . the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42863
Secretary of Agriculture should
recognize the threat feral swine pose to
the domestic swine population and the
entire agriculture industry . . .).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by October 23, 2018 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number 0535–0256,
by any of the following methods:
• Email: ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
Include docket number above in the
subject line of the message.
• Efax: (855) 838–6382.
• Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD–
ROM submissions to: David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Room 5336
South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–
2024.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand
deliver to: David Hancock, NASS
Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 5336 South Building,
1400 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20250–2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin L. Barnes, Associate
Administrator, National Agricultural
Statistics Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, (202) 720–2707. Copies of
this information collection and related
instructions can be obtained without
charge from David Hancock, NASS—
OMB Clearance Officer, at (202) 690–
2388 or at ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Feral Swine Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0535–0256.
Type of Request: Intent to Seek
Approval to Revise and Extend an
Information Collection for three Years.
Abstract: On Feb 3, 1999, Executive
Order 13112 was signed, establishing
the National Invasive Species Council.
This Executive Order requires that a
Council of Departments dealing with
invasive species be created. This Order
was enhanced by Executive Order 13751
which was signed on Dec. 5, 2016.
Currently there are 16 Departments and
Agencies on the Council. https://
www.doi.gov/invasivespecies/aboutnisc.
On April 2, 2014 the USDA kicked off
a national effort to reduce the
devastating damage caused by feral
swine. In 2015, the benchmark survey
was conducted in 11 States (Alabama,
Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas) to
measure the amount of damage feral
hogs caused to specific crops in these
states. The target population within
these states consisted of farm operations
who have historically produced one or
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
42864
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Notices
more of the following crops: corn,
soybeans, wheat, rice, peanuts, or
sorghum (Texas only). The results of
this benchmark survey shows that in the
11 surveyed States, there was damage to
an estimated $190 million in crops for
the six target crops. The published
findings from this benchmark survey
can be found at https://
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0261219416301557.
In 2017, this survey was conducted in
the following 13 States: Alabama,
Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Tennessee, and Texas, to measure the
damage to livestock that is associated
with the presence of feral swine. These
States were chosen because they had
high feral swine densities and a
significant presence of cattle, hogs,
sheep and/or goats. The findings from
this survey are scheduled to be
submitted for publication around the
end of September 2018.
In 2019, the survey will be conducted
in 12 States: Alabama, Arkansas,
California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
The operators in 11 of the States will be
selected from operations that recently
produced hay/haylage, tree nuts,
melons, sugar cane, sweet potatoes, or
cotton. In California, operators will be
selected from operations that produced
hay/haylage, tree nuts, grapes, sod,
carrots, lettuce, or strawberries.
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife
Services’ (WS) National Wildlife
Research Center (NWRC) is the only
Federal research organization devoted
exclusively to resolving conflicts
between people and wildlife through
the development of effective, selective,
and socially responsible methods, tools,
and techniques. As increased
urbanization leads to a loss of
traditional wildlife habitat, the potential
for conflicts between people and
wildlife increases. Such conflicts can
take many forms, including property
and natural resource damage, human
health and safety concerns, and disease
transmission among wildlife, livestock,
and humans.
Free-ranging populations of feral
swine exist in at least 35 states, and the
nationwide population is estimated at
approximately 5 million animals. Feral
swine damage pastures, agricultural
crops, lawns, landscaping, and natural
areas due to feeding, rooting, wallowing,
grazing, and trampling activities. Feral
swine are reservoirs of many diseases
and act as a host to parasites that can
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
negatively impact agricultural animals,
especially swine.
Authority: These data will be
collected under the authority of 7 U.S.C.
2204(a). The eradication of feral swine
is authorized by the Animal Health
Protection Act (Title 7 U.S.C. 8301 et
seq.) and the 2014 Farmbill. The $20
million program aims to help states deal
with a rapidly expanding population of
invasive feral swine.
Individually identifiable data
collected under this authority are
governed by Section 1770 of the Food
Security Act of 1985, as amended, 7
U.S.C. 2276, which requires USDA to
afford strict confidentiality to nonaggregated data provided by
respondents. This Notice is submitted in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office
of Management and Budget regulations
at 5 CFR part 1320.
NASS also complies with OMB
Implementation Guidance,
‘‘Implementation Guidance for Title V
of the E-Government Act, Confidential
Information Protection and Statistical
Efficiency Act of 2002 (CIPSEA),’’
Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 115, June
15, 2007, p. 33362.
Estimate of Burden: Reporting burden
for this collection of information is
estimated to average 45 minutes per
response. This was determined by our
Survey Methodologists, who compared
the length and difficulty of the
questions with similar surveys. They
also took into account the projected
number of farmers who will skip some
sections of the questionnaire due to the
presence or absence of damage due to
feral swine. Burden is based on an
estimated minimum response rate of
80%. On similar types of surveys and
through the use of a mail questionnaire
and telephone follow-up to nonrespondents NASS has been able to
contact and collect some data from
approximately 80% of the target sample.
After removing the out of business
operations and those with no items of
interest we hope to have at least a 65 to
70% usable response rate.
NASS will be utilizing several pieces
of publicity and informational materials
to encourage respondents to participate
in this important survey. NASS will
conduct the survey initially by mail
with phone follow-up for non-response.
Respondents: Farm Operators.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 15,000.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 11,600 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical,
technological or other forms of
information technology collection
methods.
All responses to this notice will
become a matter of public record and be
summarized in the request for OMB
approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, August 8, 2018.
Kevin L. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–18316 Filed 8–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2018–0005]
Notice of Proposed Changes to the
National Handbook of Conservation
Practices for the Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed changes to the National
Handbook of Conservation Practices
(NHCP) for public review and comment.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of the
intention of NRCS to issue a series of
revised conservation practice standards
in the NHCP. These standards include
Combustion System Improvement (Code
372), Dust Control on Unpaved Roads
and Surfaces (Code 373), Integrated Pest
Management (Code 595), Nutrient
Management (Code 590), Pesticide
Mitigation (Code 594), Subsurface Drain
(Code 606), Waste Facility Closure
(Code 360), and Wildlife Habitat
Planting (Code 420).
NRCS State Conservationists who
choose to adopt these practices in their
States will incorporate them into
Section IV of their respective electronic
Field Office Technical Guide. These
practices may be used in conservation
systems that treat highly erodible land
(HEL) or on land determined to be a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42863-42864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18316]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Notice of Intent To Request Revision and Extension of a Currently
Approved Information Collection
AGENCY: National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intent of the National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) to request revision and extension of a currently
approved information collection to comply with a mandate in the 2014
Farm Bill. (. . . the Secretary of Agriculture should recognize the
threat feral swine pose to the domestic swine population and the entire
agriculture industry . . .).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by October 23, 2018 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number 0535-
0256, by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Include docket number
above in the subject line of the message.
Efax: (855) 838-6382.
Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions to:
David Hancock, NASS Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Room 5336 South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20250-2024.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand deliver to: David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 5336 South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin L. Barnes, Associate
Administrator, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, (202) 720-2707. Copies of this information
collection and related instructions can be obtained without charge from
David Hancock, NASS--OMB Clearance Officer, at (202) 690-2388 or at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Feral Swine Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0535-0256.
Type of Request: Intent to Seek Approval to Revise and Extend an
Information Collection for three Years.
Abstract: On Feb 3, 1999, Executive Order 13112 was signed,
establishing the National Invasive Species Council. This Executive
Order requires that a Council of Departments dealing with invasive
species be created. This Order was enhanced by Executive Order 13751
which was signed on Dec. 5, 2016. Currently there are 16 Departments
and Agencies on the Council. https://www.doi.gov/invasivespecies/about-nisc.
On April 2, 2014 the USDA kicked off a national effort to reduce
the devastating damage caused by feral swine. In 2015, the benchmark
survey was conducted in 11 States (Alabama, Arkansas, California,
Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina,
South Carolina, and Texas) to measure the amount of damage feral hogs
caused to specific crops in these states. The target population within
these states consisted of farm operations who have historically
produced one or
[[Page 42864]]
more of the following crops: corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, peanuts, or
sorghum (Texas only). The results of this benchmark survey shows that
in the 11 surveyed States, there was damage to an estimated $190
million in crops for the six target crops. The published findings from
this benchmark survey can be found at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219416301557.
In 2017, this survey was conducted in the following 13 States:
Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Tennessee, and Texas, to measure the damage to livestock that is
associated with the presence of feral swine. These States were chosen
because they had high feral swine densities and a significant presence
of cattle, hogs, sheep and/or goats. The findings from this survey are
scheduled to be submitted for publication around the end of September
2018.
In 2019, the survey will be conducted in 12 States: Alabama,
Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. The
operators in 11 of the States will be selected from operations that
recently produced hay/haylage, tree nuts, melons, sugar cane, sweet
potatoes, or cotton. In California, operators will be selected from
operations that produced hay/haylage, tree nuts, grapes, sod, carrots,
lettuce, or strawberries.
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife
Services' (WS) National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) is the only
Federal research organization devoted exclusively to resolving
conflicts between people and wildlife through the development of
effective, selective, and socially responsible methods, tools, and
techniques. As increased urbanization leads to a loss of traditional
wildlife habitat, the potential for conflicts between people and
wildlife increases. Such conflicts can take many forms, including
property and natural resource damage, human health and safety concerns,
and disease transmission among wildlife, livestock, and humans.
Free-ranging populations of feral swine exist in at least 35
states, and the nationwide population is estimated at approximately 5
million animals. Feral swine damage pastures, agricultural crops,
lawns, landscaping, and natural areas due to feeding, rooting,
wallowing, grazing, and trampling activities. Feral swine are
reservoirs of many diseases and act as a host to parasites that can
negatively impact agricultural animals, especially swine.
Authority: These data will be collected under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 2204(a). The eradication of feral swine is authorized by the
Animal Health Protection Act (Title 7 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.) and the 2014
Farmbill. The $20 million program aims to help states deal with a
rapidly expanding population of invasive feral swine.
Individually identifiable data collected under this authority are
governed by Section 1770 of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended,
7 U.S.C. 2276, which requires USDA to afford strict confidentiality to
non-aggregated data provided by respondents. This Notice is submitted
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Public Law 104-
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office of Management and Budget
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320.
NASS also complies with OMB Implementation Guidance,
``Implementation Guidance for Title V of the E-Government Act,
Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of
2002 (CIPSEA),'' Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 115, June 15, 2007, p.
33362.
Estimate of Burden: Reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 45 minutes per response. This was
determined by our Survey Methodologists, who compared the length and
difficulty of the questions with similar surveys. They also took into
account the projected number of farmers who will skip some sections of
the questionnaire due to the presence or absence of damage due to feral
swine. Burden is based on an estimated minimum response rate of 80%. On
similar types of surveys and through the use of a mail questionnaire
and telephone follow-up to non-respondents NASS has been able to
contact and collect some data from approximately 80% of the target
sample. After removing the out of business operations and those with no
items of interest we hope to have at least a 65 to 70% usable response
rate.
NASS will be utilizing several pieces of publicity and
informational materials to encourage respondents to participate in this
important survey. NASS will conduct the survey initially by mail with
phone follow-up for non-response.
Respondents: Farm Operators.
Estimated Annual Number of Respondents: 15,000.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 11,600 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, technological or other forms of
information technology collection methods.
All responses to this notice will become a matter of public record
and be summarized in the request for OMB approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, August 8, 2018.
Kevin L. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-18316 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-20-P