Performance-Based Payments and Progress Payments (DFARS Case 2017-D019), 42831-42850 [2018-18238]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2017–D011), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 225 and
252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 225 and 252
are proposed to be amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 225 and 252 continues to read as
follows:
2. Amend section 225.7002–2 by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
Exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Acquisitions at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold, except
for athletic footwear purchased by DoD
for use by members of the Army, Navy,
Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their
initial entry into the Armed Forces
(section 817 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017
(Pub. L. 114–328)).
*
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
3. Amend section 225.7002–3, in
paragraph (a) by removing ‘‘commercial
items, that exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold’’ and adding
‘‘commercial items’’ in its place.
■
[Amended]
4. Amend section 225.7004–1 by
removing ‘‘United States or Canada’’
and adding ‘‘United States, Australia,
Canada, or the United Kingdom’’ in its
place.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
225.7004–3
[Amended]
5. Amend section 225.7004–3 by:
a. In paragraph (a) by removing
‘‘United States or Canada’’ and adding
‘‘United States, Australia, Canada, or the
United Kingdom’’ in its place wherever
it appears.
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
225.7006–1
7. Amend section 225.7006–1 by
removing ‘‘United States or Canada’’
and adding ‘‘United States, Australia,
Canada, or the United Kingdom’’ in its
place.
■ 8. Revise section 225.7006–3 to read
as follows:
■
225.7006–3
Waiver.
The waiver criteria at 225.7008(a)
apply to this restriction.
[Amended]
9. Amend section 225.7006–4 by:
■ a. In paragraph (a)(2), removing ‘‘A
waiver has been granted, other than the
waiver for the United Kingdom, which
has been incorporated into the
provision’’ and adding ‘‘A waiver has
been granted’’ in its place; and
■ b. In paragraph (b)(2), removing ‘‘A
waiver has been granted, other than the
waiver for the United Kingdom, which
has been incorporated into the clause’’
and adding ‘‘A waiver has been
granted’’ in its place.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
252.225–7037
[Amended]
10. Amend section 252.225–7037 by:
a. Removing the provision date of
‘‘(JUN 2012)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in
its place; and
■ b. In paragraphs (a) and (b), removing
‘‘outlying areas, Canada,’’ and adding
‘‘outlying areas, Australia, Canada,’’ in
its place in both places.
■
■
252.225–7038
[Amended]
11. Amend section 252.225–7038 by:
■ a. Removing the provision date of
‘‘(JUN 2005)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in
its place; and
■ b. Removing ‘‘outlying areas,
Canada,’’ and adding ‘‘outlying areas,
Australia, Canada,’’ in its place.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–18245 Filed 8–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–ep–P
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 232, 242, and 252
[Docket DARS–2018–0042]
RIN 0750–AJ28
Performance-Based Payments and
Progress Payments (DFARS Case
2017–D019)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of
meeting.
AGENCY:
[Amended]
■
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
225.7004–1
[Amended]
6. Amend section 225.7005–1, in the
introductory text and paragraph (b), by
removing ‘‘United States or Canada’’
and adding ‘‘United States, Australia,
Canada, or the United Kingdom’’ in its
place in both places.
225.7006–4
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
225.7002–3
225.7005–1
■
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
225.7002–2
b. In paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) by
removing ‘‘United States and Canada’’
and adding ‘‘United States, Australia,
Canada, or the United Kingdom’’ in its
place wherever it appears.
■
42831
DoD is proposing to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2017, which addresses the
preference for performance-based
payments, and to streamline the
performance-based payment process.
DoD is also proposing to amend the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to revise progress
payments and performance-based
payments policies for DoD contracts in
order to increase its business
effectiveness and efficiency as well as to
provide an opportunity for both small
and other than small entities to qualify
for increased customary progress
payment rates and maximum
performance-based payment rates based
on whether the offeror/contractor has
met certain performance criteria.
DOD believes the proposed rule will
eliminate the unintended consequences
of not updating its contract financing
policies (which, in turn will save
hundreds of millions of dollars for the
taxpayers), will improve contractor
performance, and will distinguish and
meaningfully recognize high performing
companies and divisions of companies,
as the case may be.
This rule proposes to relieve the
administrative burden on contractors by
deleting the current regulations relating
to performance-based payments at
DFARS subpart 232.10 and the
associated clauses at DFARS 252.232–
7012, Performance-Based Payments—
Whole Contract Basis, and 252.232–
7013, Performance-Based Payments—
Deliverable Item Basis. This rule also
removes the requirement to negotiate
consideration due the Government for
providing the contractor with the
improved cash flow when utilizing
performance-based payments.
In addition to the request for written
comments on this proposed rule, DoD
will hold a public meeting to hear the
views of interested parties.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
42832
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Comment Date: Comments on
the proposed rule should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below
on or before October 23, 2018, to be
considered in the formation of a final
rule.
Public Meeting Date: The public
meeting will be held on September 14,
2018, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. EST.
Registration to attend this meeting must
be received by September 6, 2018.
Further information for the public
meeting may be found under the
heading SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Public Meeting: The public
meeting will be held at the Mark Center
Auditorium, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3603. The Mark
Center Auditorium is located on level
B–1 of the building.
Submission of Comments: Submit
comments identified by DFARS Case
2017–D019, using any of the following
methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2017–D019.’’ Select
‘‘Comment Now’’ and follow the
instructions provided to submit a
comment. Please include ‘‘DFARS Case
2017–D019’’ on any attached
documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2017–D019 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
Williams, OUSD (A&S) DPC/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Amy Williams, DPC/DARS, at 571–372–
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Public Meeting
DoD is hosting a public meeting to
obtain views of experts and interested
parties in Government and the private
sector regarding revising policies and
procedures with regard to customary
progress payment rates and maximum
performance-based payment rates for
DoD contracts.
Registration: Individuals wishing to
attend the public meeting must register
by September 6, 2018, to ensure
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
adequate room accommodations and to
facilitate security screening and entry to
the Mark Center. Individuals desiring to
attend the meeting must register at this
website, https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/performance-based_
payments_and_progress_
payments.html, by providing the
following information:
(1) Company or organization name.
(2) Full name, valid email address,
and telephone number of each person
planning to attend, and whether the
individual is a U.S. citizen. For each
person, the Pentagon Force Protection
Agency will send additional
instructions to the email address
provided at the time of registration in
order for the individual to be approved
for entry to the Mark Center.
(3) Name, title, organizational
affiliation of presenter, if desiring to
make a presentation, limited to a 5minute presentation per company or
organization. This limitation may be
subject to adjustment, depending on the
number of entities requesting to present,
in order to ensure adequate time for
discussion.
Once registered, attendees will be
prompted by the Pentagon Force
Protection Agency on building entry
requirements.
One valid government-issued photo
identification card (i.e., driver’s license
or passport) will be required in order to
enter the building.
Attendees are encouraged to arrive at
least 45 minutes early to accommodate
security procedures. Public parking is
not available at the Mark Center.
Presentations: If you wish to make a
presentation, please submit an
electronic copy of your presentation to
osd.dfars@mail.mil no later than
September 10, 2018. When submitting
presentations, provide presenter’s name,
organization affiliation, telephone
number, and email address on the cover
page. Please submit presentations only
and cite ‘‘Public Meeting, DFARS Case
2017–D019’’ in all correspondence
related to the public meeting. There will
be no transcription at the meeting. The
submitted presentations will be the only
record of the public meeting.
Special accommodations: The public
meeting is physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
reasonable accommodations, sign
language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
Daniel Weinstein at 571–372–6105, at
least 10 working days prior to the
meeting date.
The TTY number for further
information is: 1–800–877–8339. When
the operator answers the call, let them
know the agency is the Department of
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Defense; the point of contact is Daniel
Weinstein at 571–372–6105.
Correspondence and Comments:
Please cite ‘‘Public Meeting, DFARS
Case 2017–D019’’ in all correspondence
related to this public meeting. The
submitted presentations will be the only
record of the public meeting. To have a
presentation considered as a public
comment for the formation of the final
rule, the presentation, or pertinent
excerpts, must be submitted separately
as a written comment as instructed in
the paragraph titled ‘‘Submission of
Comments’’ in ADDRESSES.
II. Background
A. Purpose
The fundamental purpose of the rule
change is to increase the effectiveness
and efficiency of the Department of
Defense in five domains while
recognizing that its cash flow policy was
outdated and costly to the tax payers.
The five domains are:
• On Time or Accelerated Contract
Deliveries;
• Contractor Quality;
• Contractor Business Systems;
• Increasing Contract Opportunities
for Small Business and for the Blind and
Severely Disabled; and
• Receipt of Timely Quality
Proposals.
The present progress payment rate
was established in an economic
environment when interest rates were
significantly higher than the historic
lows that have been experienced over
the past several years. As a result of the
aforementioned, and because DoD
desires to take an enterprise-wide view
of contractor performance and to
recognize and distinguish performance
among the companies with which it
deals, DoD is proposing to modify the
customary progress payment rate for
large businesses. DoD recognizes that
small businesses do not have the
borrowing power that large businesses
have and, therefore, is not proposing a
change to the basic customary progress
payment for small business, which is 90
percent. In modifying the customary
rate for large business, DoD is proposing
to allow large and small business to
achieve progress payment rates greater
than the customary rates.
The goal would be that a significant
majority of the large and small
businesses would eventually meet the
desired level of enterprise-wide
performance.
In the case of large business, for
progress payments, a two-step process:
1. Modify the customary progress
payment rate to 50 percent (effectively
updating the premises of the Defense
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Financial and Investment Review
(DFAIR) study to address today’s
business and market environment).
2. Establish opportunities for
recognizing contractor behaviors that
align themselves with the performance
objectives established in the five
business domains that are important to
the DoD such that large business
contractors could potentially increase
the rate determined in Step 1 and
receive progress payments that can be as
high as 95 percent of contract cost. The
increased customary progress payment
rate will be established for each
company or company division as the
case may be.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Brief History
The most comprehensive review of
Government financing was the DFAIR
study. One key recommendation from
the DFAIR study was that ‘‘interest cost
should remain an unallowable cost and
progress payment rates should be reset
in the future based on changes in
interest rates.’’ Between the DFAIR
study in 1985 and 2001, the customary
progress payment rate for other than
small business was changed five times
and was usually a somewhat delayed
reaction to changes in interest rates in
prior years. In 2001, the customary rate
was increased from 75 percent to 80
percent and has remained unchanged
ever since.
In the rule making process it is
customary to analyze the impact of the
proposed rule versus the status quo and
that traditional analysis is included in
the regulatory cost analysis (see section
V. of this preamble). However, DoD has
been providing financing in excess of
that warranted based on the historically
low interest rates in effect since 2008.
By modifying the customary progress
payment rate to 50 percent, it will result
in savings hundreds of millions of
dollars to the taxpayers by eliminating
an unintended consequence of the past
practice associated with providing
contract financing in excess of what was
necessary. In the future, contractors will
have the opportunity to earn increased
contract financing benefit through
improved performance.
III. Discussion and Analysis
DoD is proposing to amend DFARS
parts 232, 242, and 252 to revise how
contract financing, in the form of
progress payments and performancebased payments, is calculated and
determined for DoD contracts.
A. Current FAR and DFARS
1. Progress payments. Currently, FAR
52.232–16, Progress Payments, sets a
customary progress payment rate of 80
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
percent, except the rate is 85 percent for
a small business, unless it is a letter
contract. There is a statutory cap of 80
percent for letter contracts. DFARS
252.232–7004, DoD Progress Payment
Rates, currently increases the FAR
customary progress payment rate for
small businesses to 90 percent (except
for letter contracts).
2. Performance-based payments. FAR
52.232–28, Invitation to Propose
Performance-Based Payments, sets a
maximum performance-based rate of 90
percent of the contract price if on a
whole contract basis, or 90 percent of
the delivery item price if on a delivery
item basis. DFARS 232.1004 provides
procedures for analysis of proposed
performance-based payments using the
performance-based payments analysis
tool, and also requires that the
contractor provide consideration to the
Government, if the performance-based
payments payment schedule will be
more favorable to the contractor than
customary progress payments. DFARS
232.1005–70 prescribes the use of the
provision at DFARS 252.232–7012,
Performance-Based Payments—Whole
Contract Basis, or the provision at
DFARS 252.232–7013, PerformanceBased Payments—Deliverable Item
Basis.
B. Proposed Changes
1. Progress payments (DFARS
232.501–1(a) and 52.232–7004). DoD
proposes a customary progress payment
rate of 50 percent for other than small
businesses and retains the 90 percent
rate for small businesses, but provides
criteria by which contractors can
achieve a customary progress payment
rate of up to 95 percent. However, if a
contractor or any of its principals has
within the preceding Government fiscal
year been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against the
contractor or any of its principals for
commission of fraud or a criminal
offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a
public (Federal, State, or local) contract
or subcontract; violation of Federal or
State antitrust statutes relating to the
submission of offers; or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records,
making false statements, tax evasion,
violating Federal criminal tax laws, or
receiving stolen property, then the
contractor will not be eligible for any
incentives and the customary progress
payment rate will be 25 percent for that
contractor.
On December 1 of each year, a
contractor, or higher-level owner of a
contractor, may submit a representation
as to which criteria it meets and request
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42833
a higher customary progress payment
rate. Based on the representation
received, the Director of Defense Pricing
and Contracting will determine the
appropriate customary progress
payment rate for the following calendar
year, and that data will be entered into
the Contract Business Analysis
Repository (CBAR) by December 31.
If a contractor fails to submit by the
December 1 deadline, then the rate for
that contractor in CBAR will be 50
percent if the offeror is other than a
small business and 90 percent if the
offeror is a small business, unless the
rate is 25 percent as provided in DFARS
232.501–1(a)(ii). If the offeror
subsequently submits a representation
after the December 1 deadline, any
increase in rates will not be effective in
CBAR until 30 days after submission.
The rate may be adjusted at any time
during the year if it is subsequently
determined that the representation
provided by a contractor was not
accurate.
2. Performance-based payments
(DFARS 232.1004(b)(2) and 252.232–
70YY). For maximum performancebased payments, DoD proposes rates
and procedures comparable to those for
determining the customary progress
payment rate. The same representation
will be used to determine both the
customary progress payment rate and
the maximum performance-based
payment rate.
DoD proposes to amend DFARS
232.1004 to remove the procedures for
analysis of proposed performance-based
payments using the performance-based
payments analysis tool, and also
removes the requirement that the
contractor provide consideration to the
Government, if the performance-based
payments payment schedule will be
more favorable to the contractor than
customary progress payments. The
current solicitation provisions at DFARS
252.232–7012 and 252.232–7013 are no
longer required and will be removed,
thus reducing burden on contractors.
3. Corrective action requests (DFARS
242.302(a)). One of the criteria to
qualify for higher customary progress
payments or maximum performancebased payments is that the offeror/
contractor does not have any open level
III or level IV corrective action requests.
Because the DFARS does not currently
address corrective action requests, a
paragraph has been added at DFARS
242.302(a) to explain the different levels
of corrective action requests.
4. Withholding of payments (DFARS
242.7000 and 252.242–7005). DFARS
242.7000, Contractor business system
deficiencies, and 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, provide
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
42834
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
for withholding of payments (including
progress and performance-based
payments) when there are significant
deficiencies in a required business
system. However, the contracting officer
will not withhold progress or
performance-based payments from a
contract that includes the clause
252.232–7004 or the provision 252.232–
70YY, unless the contractor is receiving
progress payments or performancebased payments under the contract at a
rate specified in CBAR that includes the
10 percent incentive based on having
acceptable business systems without
significant deficiencies.
5. Preference for performance-based
payments. This rule also proposes to
implement section 831 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2017, which modifies 10 U.S.C.
2307(b) to address preference for
performance-based payments.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial
Items, Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule proposes to amend the
clause at DFARS 252.232–7004, DoD
Progress Payment Rates, and adds a new
provision at DFARS 252.232–70YY,
DoD Maximum Performance-Based
Payment Rates. DFARS 252.232–7004 is
used with FAR clause 52.232–16,
Progress Payments, and DFARS
252.232–70YY is used with FAR
provision 52.232–28, Invitation to
Propose Performance-Based Payments.
The FAR provision and clause are not
prescribed for use in contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items or for
acquisitions at or below the SAT. The
DFARS provision and clause, therefore,
will not be applied to commercial items
or to contact actions at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold.
V. Expected Costs and Benefits
This rule proposes to amend the
DFARS to implement changes to the
progress payment and performancebased payment policies for DoD
contracts by amending the section on
customary progress payment rates at
DFARS 232.501–1; adding new
procedures for performance-based
payments at 232.1003; amending the
clause at 252.232–7004, DoD Customary
Progress Payment Rates, and adding a
new provision at 252.232–70YY, DoD
Maximum Performance-Based Payment
Rates. This rule also proposes to delete
the clauses at DFARS 252.232–7012,
Performance-Based Payments—Whole
Contract Basis, and 252.232–7013,
Performance-Based Payments—
Deliverable Item Basis.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
This rule will impact all offerors/
contractors (large or small) seeking DoD
contracts that offer progress payments or
performance-based payments. Although
there are added costs associated with
submission of an annual representation,
the contractors/offerors that can meet
the criteria will qualify for substantial
savings on interest payments, due to
increased Government financing.
The expected benefits are that the
modified approach to the establishment
of a performance-based cash flow
environment will enable DoD to take an
enterprise-wide view of contractor
performance and to recognize and
distinguish performance among the
companies with which it deals. The goal
would be that a significant majority of
the large and small businesses would
eventually meet the desired level of
enterprise-wide performance. As a
result of the improved industrial
performance, DOD’s efficiency and
effectiveness will be improved thereby
increasing the lethality of its fighting
force and positively reforming DOD’s
business practices.
A. Summary of Expected Costs to the
Public. DoD has performed a regulatory
cost analysis on this rule. The following
is a summary of the estimated net public
costs in millions, calculated in 2016
dollars in perpetuity at a 7-percent
discount rate.
Annualized at 7 percent: $5.5 million
Present Value at 7 percent: $78.8
million
B. Summary of Expected Transfers.
The following is a summary of the
expected transfer of interest costs/
savings from the Government to the
public, due to an expected net increase
in progress payment and performancebased payment rates paid by the
Government.
1. Reduced Interest Payments by
Contractors:
Annualized at 7 percent: $60.2 million
Present Value at 7 percent: $859.6
million
2. Increased Interest Payments by
Government:
Annualized at 7 percent: $30.2 million
Present Value at 7 percent: $431.8
million
To access the complete Regulatory
Cost Analysis, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov, search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2017–D019’’, click ‘‘Open
Docket’’, and view ‘‘Supporting
Documents’’.
VI. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is an economically
significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was subject to review under
section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September
30, 1993. This rule is a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is subject to E.O.
13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, because
this rule is a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866. If finalized as
proposed, this rule would be an E.O.
13771 regulatory action. The E.O. 13771
status will be informed by public
comment, so please share any data and/
or analysis that would relate to the
rule’s potential to be considered a
deregulatory action. Details on the
expected costs and benefits can be
found in section V of this preamble.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD expects that this proposed rule
may have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared
and is summarized as follows:
This rule revises progress payments
and performance-based payments
policies for DoD contracts, basing the
payment rate on whether the offeror/
contractor has met certain performance
criteria. This rule also implements
section 831 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY)
2017, which modifies 10 U.S.C. 2301(b)
to address preference for performancebased payments.
The objective of this rule is to
increase the effectiveness and efficiency
of DoD in five domains: on time or
accelerated contract deliveries,
contractor quality, contractor business
systems, increasing contract
opportunities for small businesses and
for the blind and severely disables, and
receipt of timely quality proposals. The
statutory basis is 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 10
U.S.C. 2301(b).
This rule will apply to small entities
that receive either progress payments or
performance-based payments for
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
noncommercial fixed-price contracts.
There were 1,938 unique small entities
receiving progress payments or
performance-based payments in FY
2017.
The rule provides an opportunity to
submit a representation as to whether a
small entity meets certain performance
criteria, in order to obtain higher
progress payments or performancebased payments. DoD estimates that the
professional skill set necessary to
prepare the representation annually will
approximate 25 percent at the
journeyman level, 60 percent at the
senior level, and 15 percent at the
executive/attorney level. DoD estimates
an average of 13 hours per response
from small entities. The rule also
removes a burden of approximately one
hour per entity, associated with
paragraph (b) of DFARS subpart 32.10
and the associated clauses at DFARS
252.232–7012 and 252.232–7013, which
this rule proposes to delete.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
DoD did not identify any significant
alternatives that would meet the
objectives of the rule. However, the rule
provides certain advantages for small
entities as the basic customary progress
payment rate for small entities remains
at 90 percent, with possible increase up
to 95 percent. So, small entities can
continue to get the same rate, even if
they do not submit a representation or
meet the criteria. Small entities are only
asked to represent with regard to three
criteria: timely delivery or performance,
contractor quality, and contractor
business systems.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2017–D019), in
correspondence.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Accordingly, DoD has submitted a
request for approval of a revised
information collection requirement
0704–0359, Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part
232, Contract Financing, and associated
clauses at DFARS 252.232, to the Office
of Management and Budget.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
A. Public Reporting Burden
1. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information proposed by
this DFARS case 2017–D019 is
estimated to average 28.8 hours per
response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
The annual reporting burden
estimated as follows:
Respondents: 3,200.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 3,200.
Preparation hours per response: 28.8
hours.
Total response Burden Hours: 92,027
hours.
2. In addition, this information
collection includes a pre-existing
burden related to DFARS clause
252.232–7007 (800 hours, 1 response
per respondent, 800 responses, 1 hour
per response, for a total of 8,000 hours).
Therefore, the total burden for 0704–
0359, rounded, is as follows:
Respondents: 4,000.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 4,000.
Preparation hours per response: 24
hours.
Total response Burden Hours: 93,000
hours.
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at
the Office of Management and Budget,
Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email Jasmeet_K._Seehra@
omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Attn:
Ms. Amy G. Williams, OUSD (A&S)
DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments can be received from 30 to 60
days after the date of this notice, but
comments to OMB will be most useful
if received by OMB within 30 days after
the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the DFARS,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42835
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
Williams, OUSD (A&S) DPC/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060, or email
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS
Case 2017–D019 in the subject line of
the message.
This rule also affects the information
collection requirements at DFARS
subpart 232.10 (and associated clauses
at DFARS 252.232–7012 and 252.232–
7013, currently approved under OMB
Control Number 0704–0359. This rule
proposes to remove these requirements.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 232,
242, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 232, 242, and
252 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for parts 232,
242, and 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 232—CONTRACT FINANCING
2. Revise section 232.501–1 to read as
follows:
■
232.501–1
rates.
Customary progress payment
(a) Except for undefinitized contract
actions as provided at FAR 32.501–1(d),
in lieu of the customary progress
payment rates specified at FAR 32.501–
1(a), the customary progress payment
rates for DoD solicitations issued on or
after January 1, 2019, and resultant
contracts, including contracts that
contain foreign military sales (FMS)
requirements, are 50 percent for other
than small businesses and 90 percent for
small businesses, unless a different rate
is specified for the contractor in the
Contract Business Analysis Repository
(CBAR) at [details TBD].
(i) Contractors can qualify for an
increased customary progress payment
rate of up to 95 percent, based on the
following criteria:
(A) Other than small businesses:
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
42836
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Additional
percentage
Criteria
10 ..................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
At least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year, when responding to solicitations that required submission of certified cost or pricing data, met the due date in the request for proposal and complied with the Proposal Adequacy Checklist (252.215–7009).
Has met its small business subcontracting goals during the preceding Government fiscal year.
Has provided subcontracting opportunities for AbilityOne [details TBD].
10 ..................
10 ..................
7.5 .................
5 ....................
2.5 .................
(B) Small businesses:
Additional
percentage
Criteria
2 ....................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
2 ....................
1 ....................
(ii) However, if a contractor or any of
its principals has within the preceding
Government fiscal year been convicted
of or had a civil judgment rendered
against the contractor or any of its
principals for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (Federal, State, or
local) contract or subcontract; violation
of Federal or State antitrust statutes
relating to the submission of offers; or
commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, making false
statements, tax evasion, violating
Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving
stolen property, the contractor will not
be eligible for any of the above
incentives and the customary progress
payment rate will be 25 percent for that
contractor.
(iii)(A) On or before December 1 of
each year, except as provided in
paragraph (a)(ii) of this section, a
contractor, or a higher-level owner of a
contractor, may submit to [email
address TBD] a representation as to
which criteria specified in paragraph
(a)(i) of this section the contractor
meets, and request a higher customary
progress payment rate on that basis.
(1) If a representation is made on
behalf of multiple business segments,
the representation must address the
criteria in paragraph (a)(i) of this section
for each business segment for which
higher customary progress payment
rates are requested.
(2) If the size status of a contractor
varies dependent upon the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code of the acquisition,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
the contractor may submit a
representation and request for higher
customary progress payment rates that
addresses the rates for both a small
business and an other than small
business.
(3) A separate representation is not
required to also request a higher
maximum performance-based payment
rate (see 232.1001(b)(2)).
(B) The representation is required to
be executed by a person authorized to
sign for the entity submitting the
representation and must at a minimum
include—
(1) The unique entity identifier and
Commercial and Government Entity
(CAGE) code(s) of the contractor;
(2) Size status of the contractor (small,
other than small, or varies dependent
upon the NAICS code of the
acquisition); and
(3) Identification of the criteria for
which the contractor is requesting
increase in the customary progress
payment rate for the following calendar
year. It is not necessary to submit
supporting data with the representation,
but the contractor is required to provide
such data upon request.
(iv) Based on the representation
received, the Director, Defense Pricing
and Contracting, will determine the
appropriate customary progress
payment rate(s) for the following
calendar year. DoD will enter the
customary progress payment rate(s) into
CBAR by December 31.
(v) If a contractor fails to submit by
the December 1 deadline, then the rate
for that contractor in CBAR will be 50
percent if the contractor is other than a
small business and 90 percent if the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contractor is a small business, unless
the rate is 25 percent as provided in
(a)(ii) of this section. If the contractor
subsequently submits a representation
after the December 1 deadline, any
increase in rates will not be effective in
CBAR until 30 days after submission.
(vi) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any
time during the year if the Director,
Defense Pricing and Contracting,
subsequently determines that the
representation provided by a contractor
was not accurate.
■ 3. Add new section 232.502–4
heading to read as follows:
232.502–4
Contract clauses.
4. Amend section 232.502–4–70 by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
232.502–4–70
Additional clauses.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Use the clause at 252.232–7004,
DoD Customary Progress Payment Rates,
in solicitations and contracts that
include FAR 52.232–16. Do not use
Alternate I of FAR 52.232–16.
■ 5. Amend section 232.503–6 by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
232.503–6 Suspension or reduction of
payments.
(b) Contractor noncompliance.
(i) If the Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting, subsequently determines
that the representation in accordance
with 232.501–1(a) is inaccurate, the
progress payment rate in CBAR will be
adjusted.
(ii) See also 242.7502(c).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend section 232.1001 by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
232.1001
Policy.
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2307(b)(2), performance-based payments
shall not be conditioned upon costs
incurred in contract performance, but
on the achievement of performance
outcomes.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend section 232.1004 by—
■ a. Revising paragraph (b); and
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (S–70).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
232.1004
Procedures.
(b) Establishing performance-based
finance payment amounts.
(2) In lieu of the 90 percent maximum
rate specified in the FAR for
performance-based payments, the
maximum rates for DoD performancebased payments in solicitations issued
42837
on or after January 1, 2019, are 50
percent for other than small businesses
and 90 percent for small businesses,
unless a different rate is specified for
the offeror in the Contract Business
Analysis Repository [details TBD].
(A) Offerors can qualify for an
increased maximum performance-based
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based
on the following criteria:
(1) Other than small businesses:
Additional
percentage
Criteria
10 ..................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
At least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year, when responding to solicitations that required submission of certified cost or pricing data, met the due date in the request for proposal and complied with the Proposal Adequacy Checklist (252.215–7009).
Has met its small business subcontracting goals during the preceding Government fiscal year.
Has provided subcontracting opportunities for the blind and severely disabled [details TBD].
10 ..................
10 ..................
7.5 .................
5 ....................
2.5 .................
(2) Small businesses:
Additional
percentage
Criteria
2 ....................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
2 ....................
1 ....................
(B) However, if an offeror or any of its
principals has within the preceding
Government fiscal year been convicted
of or had a civil judgment rendered
against the offeror or any of its
principals for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (Federal, State, or
local) contract or subcontract; violation
of Federal or State antitrust statutes
relating to the submission of offers; or
commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, making false
statements, tax evasion, violating
Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving
stolen property, the offeror will not be
eligible for any of the above incentives
and the maximum performance-based
payment rate will be 25 percent for that
offeror.
(C)(1) On December 1 of each year,
except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2)(B) of this section, an offeror, or a
higher-level owner of an offeror, may
submit to [email address TBD] a
representation as to which criteria
specified in paragraph (b)(2)(A) of this
section the offeror meets, and request a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
higher customary progress payment rate
on that basis.
(i) If a representation is made on
behalf of multiple business segments,
the representation must address the
criteria in paragraph (b)(2)(A) of this
section for each business segment for
which higher customary progress
payment rates are requested.
(ii) If the size status of an offeror
varies dependent upon the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code of the acquisition,
the offeror may submit a representation
and request for a higher customary
progress payment rate that addresses the
rates for both a small business and an
other than small business.
(iii) A separate representation is not
required to also request a higher
maximum performance-based payment
rate (see 232.501–1(a)).
(2) The representation is required to
be executed by a person authorized to
sign for the entity submitting the
representation and must at a minimum
include—
(i) The unique entity identifier and
Commercial and Government Entity
(CAGE) code(s) of the offeror;
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) Size status of the offeror (small,
other than small, or varies dependent
upon the NAICS code of the
acquisition); and
(iii) Identification of the criteria for
which the offeror is requesting increase
in the customary progress payment rate
for the following calendar year. It is not
necessary to submit supporting data
with the representation, but the offeror
is required to provide such data upon
request.
(D) Based on the representation
received, the Director, Defense Pricing
and Contracting, will determine the
appropriate maximum performancebased payment rate(s) for the following
calendar year. DoD will enter the
maximum performance-based payment
rate(s) into CBAR by December 31.
(E) If an offeror fails to submit by the
December 1 deadline, then the rate for
that offeror in CBAR will be 50 percent
if the offeror is other than a small
business and 90 percent if the offeror is
a small business, unless the rate is 25
percent as provided in (b)(2)(B) of this
section. If the offeror subsequently
submits a representation after the
December 1 deadline, any increase in
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
42838
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
rates will not be effective in CBAR until
30 days after submission.
(F) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any
time during the year if the Director,
Defense Pricing and Contracting,
subsequently determines that the
representation provided by an offeror
was not accurate.
*
*
*
*
*
(S–70) Eligibility for performancebased payments. Nontraditional defense
contractors and other private sector
companies shall be eligible for
performance-based payments, consistent
with best commercial practices. In
accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b), a
contractor’s accounting system shall be
in compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles in order to
receive performance-based payments. 10
U.S.C. 2307 does not grant the Defense
Contract Audit Agency the authority to
audit compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.
■ 8. Revise section 232.1005–70 to read
as follows:
232.1005–70
Solicitation provision.
Use the provision 252.232–70YY, DoD
Maximum Performance-Based Payment
Rates, in solicitations that include FAR
52.232–28, Invitation to Propose
Performance-Based Payments.
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
242.7000 Contractor business system
deficiencies.
9. Amend section 242.302 by adding
paragraph (a) text to read as follows:
■
242.302
Contract administration functions.
(a) Government personnel performing
contract administration duties outlined
in FAR 42.302(a) and this paragraph
issue a corrective action request when
contractual noncompliance is
independently identified. The Defense
Contract Management Agency had
(b) * * *
(1) In accordance with agency
procedures, identify one or more
covered contracts containing the clause
at 252.242–7005, Contractor Business
Systems, from which payments will be
withheld, except that, if a contract
includes the clause 252.232–7004, DoD
Customary Progress Payments, or the
provision 252.232–70YY, DoD
Maximum Performance-Based
Payments, the contracting officer shall
not withhold progress payments or
performance based payments from that
contract unless the contractor is
receiving progress payments or
performance-based payments under the
contract at a rate specified in Contract
Business Analysis Repository that
includes the 10 percent incentive based
on having acceptable business systems
without significant deficiencies (see
232.501–1(a)). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
11. Revise section 252.232–7004 to
read as follows:
■
252.232–7004 DoD Customary Progress
Payment Rates.
As prescribed in 232.502–4–70(b), use
the following clause:
DoD Customary Progress Payment
Rates (Date)
(a) The Progress Payments clause of this
contract is modified to change each mention
of the progress payment rate and liquidation
rate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6), and (b) to 50
percent if the Contractor is other than a small
business and 90 percent if the Contractor is
a small business, unless a different rate is
specified for the Contractor in the Contract
Business Analysis Repository (CBAR) at
[details TBD]. The limitations on
undefinitized contract actions in paragraph
(k) of the Progress Payments clause remain at
a maximum of 80 percent for both the
progress payment rate and the liquidation
rate, notwithstanding any higher rate
specified in CBAR.
(b) If the Contractor has a satisfactory
record of performance, the Contractor can
qualify for an increased customary progress
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based on
the following criteria:
(1) If the Contractor is other than a small
business:
Additional
percentage
Criteria
10 ..................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
At least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year, when responding to solicitations that required submission of certified cost or pricing data, met the due date in the request for proposal and complied with the Proposal Adequacy Checklist (252.215–7009).
Has met its small business subcontracting goals during the preceding Government fiscal year.
Has provided subcontracting opportunities for AbilityOne [details TBD].
10 ..................
10 ..................
7.5 .................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
identified four levels of corrective
action requests.
(i) Level I is issued for
noncompliances that are minor in
nature, are promptly corrected by the
contractor, and present no need for root
cause determination or further
preventive action.
(ii) Level II is issued for
noncompliances that are not promptly
correctable and warrant root cause
analysis and preventive action, or need
action by the contractor to determine if
other product/services are affected.
(iii) Level III is issued to the
contractor’s management responsible for
the company or business segment to call
attention to a serious noncompliance, a
significant deficiency pursuant to
252.242–7005(b), a failure to respond to
a lower level corrective action request,
or to remedy recurring noncompliance.
(iv) Level IV is issued to the
contractor’s segment or corporate
management and when the contractual
noncompliance(s) is of a serious nature
or when a Level III corrective action
request has been ineffective.
(v) For additional information on
corrective action requests, see PGI
242.302(a).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Amend section 242.7000 by
revising the first sentence in paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
5 ....................
2.5 .................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
42839
(2) If the Contractor is a small business:
Additional
percentage
Criteria
2 ....................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
2 ....................
1 ....................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(c) However, if the Contractor or any of its
principals has within the preceding
Government fiscal year been convicted of or
had a civil judgment rendered against the
Contractor or any of its principals for
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in
connection with obtaining, attempting to
obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State,
or local) contract or subcontract; violation of
Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to
the submission of offers; or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making
false statements, tax evasion, violating
Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen
property, the Contractor will not be eligible
for any of the above incentives and the
customary progress payment rate will be 25
percent.
(d)(1) On December 1 of each year, except
as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause,
the Contractor, or a higher-level owner of the
Contractor, may submit to [email address
TBD] a representation as to which criteria
specified in paragraph (b) of this clause the
Contractor meets, and request a higher
customary progress payment rate on that
basis.
(i) If a representation is made on behalf of
multiple business segments, the
representation shall address the criteria in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
paragraph (b) of this clause for each business
segment for which higher customary progress
payment rates are requested. Business
segments that meet the same criteria may be
grouped together.
(ii) If the size status of the Contractor varies
dependent upon the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
of the acquisition, the Contractor may submit
a representation and request for a higher
customary progress payment rate that
addresses the rates for both a small business
and an other than small business.
(iii) A separate representation is not
required to also request a higher maximum
performance-based payment rate (see DFARS
232.1004(b)(2)).
(2) The representation shall be executed by
a person authorized to sign for the entity
submitting the representation and shall at a
minimum include—
(i) The unique entity identifier and
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE)
code(s) of the Contractor;
(ii) The size status of the Contractor (small,
other than small, or varies dependent upon
the NAICS code of the acquisition); and
(iii) Identification of the criteria for which
the Contractor is requesting increase in the
customary progress payment rate for the
following calendar year. It is not necessary to
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submit supporting data with the
representation, but the Contractor is required
to provide such data upon request.
(3) The template in paragraph (h) of this
clause may be used for the submission of the
request and representation.
(e) Based on the representation received,
the Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting, will determine the appropriate
customary progress payment rate(s) for the
following calendar year. DoD will enter the
customary progress payment rate(s) into
CBAR by December 31.
(f) If the Contractor fails to submit by the
December 1 deadline, then the rate for the
Contractor in CBAR will be 50 percent if the
Contractor is other than a small business and
90 percent if the Contractor is a small
business, except as provided in paragraph (c)
of this clause. If the Contractor subsequently
submits a representation after the December
1 deadline, any increase in rates will not be
effective in CBAR until 30 days after
submission.
(g) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any time
during the year if the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting, subsequently
determines that the representation provided
by a contractor was not accurate.
(h) Template.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
42840
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Company Letterhead
I,
[print name and title]
----~~----------------------~---
, request customary progress
payment/maximum performance based payment rate(s)
1.a.
as follows:
Name and address of company:
b.
Unique Entity Identifier
c.
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE)
d.
Size status.
business.
Code(s).
Fill out Table A if other than small
Fill out Table B if a small business.
status varies dependent upon NAICS code,
If size
fill out both tables.
Table A- Other than small business:
Enter "Yes" if
50 percent
meet the
plus
criteria, "No"
additional
if do not
percentage
Criteria
meet.
10 percent
Met the dates in the delivery or
performance schedule in the
contract at least 95 percent of
the time during the preceding
Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Does not have open level III or
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.323
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
10 percent
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
42841
IV corrective action requests.
See DFARS 242.302(a).
10 percent
All applicable contractor
business systems are acceptable,
without significant
deficiencies.
7.5 percent
At least 95 percent of the time
during the preceding Government
fiscal year, when responding to
solicitations that required
submission of certified cost or
pricing data, met the due date
in the request for proposal and
complied with the Proposal
Adequacy Checklist (252.2157009) .
5 percent
Has met its small business
subcontracting goals during the
preceding Government fiscal
year.
2.5 percent
Has provided subcontracting
[details TBD] .
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.324
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
opportunities for AbilityOne
42842
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Total customary progress payment/maximum performance-based
payment rate requested as an other than small business:
Table B - Small business:
Enter "Yes" if
90 percent
meet the
plus
criteria, "No"
additional
if do not
percentage
Criteria
meet.
2 percent
Met the contract delivery dates
for contract end items and
contract data requirements
lists or performance milestone
schedule, as the case may be,
at least 95 percent of the time
during the preceding Government
fiscal year (October 1 through
September 30).
2 percent
Does not have open level III or
IV corrective action requests.
See DFARS 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor
business systems are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.325
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1 percent
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
42843
acceptable, without significant
deficiencies.
Total customary progress payment/maximum performance-based
payment rate requested as a small business:
2.
Repeat above information for any additional companies for
which increased customary progress payment/maximum performancebased payment rates are requested.
Business segments that meet
the same criteria may be grouped together.
The above identified entity (entities) and any of the
principals thereof have not
within the preceding Government
fiscal year been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered
against any entity or any of its principals for commission of
fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State,
or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or
State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers;
or commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws,
or receiving stolen property.
of the above information is accurate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.326
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
I represent, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that all
42844
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
252.232–70YY DoD Maximum
Performance-Based Payment Rates.
(End of clause)
252.232–7012
[Removed and Reserved]
As prescribed in 232.1005–70, use the
following provision:
12. Remove and reserve section
252.232–7012.
■
252.232–7013
DoD Maximum Performance-Based
Payment Rates (Date)
[Removed and Reserved]
13. Remove and reserve section
252.232–7013.
■ 14. Add new section 252.232–70YY to
read as follows:
■
(a) The Invitation to Propose PerformanceBased Payments provision in this solicitation
is modified to change the maximum
performance-based payment rate in
paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of that provision to 50
percent if the Offeror is other than small
business and 90 percent if the Offeror is a
small business, unless a different rate is
specified for the Offeror in the Contract
Business Analysis Repository (CBAR) at
[details TBD].
(b) If the Offeror has a satisfactory record
of performance, the Offeror can qualify for an
increased maximum performance-based
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based on
the following criteria:
(1) If the Offeror is other than small
business:
Additional
percentage
Criteria
10 ..................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
At least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year, when responding to solicitations that required submission of certified cost or pricing data, met the due date in the request for proposal and complied with the Proposal Adequacy Checklist (252.215–7009).
Has met its small business subcontracting goals during the preceding Government fiscal year.
Has provided subcontracting opportunities for AbilityOne [details TBD].
10 ..................
10 ..................
7.5 .................
5 ....................
2.5 .................
Additional
percentage
Criteria
2 ....................
Met the contract delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirements lists or performance milestone schedule,
as the case may be, at least 95 percent of the time during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1 through September 30).
Does not have open level III or IV corrective action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
All applicable contractor business systems are acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
2 ....................
1 ....................
(c) However, if the Offeror or any of its
principals has within the preceding
Government fiscal year been convicted of or
had a civil judgment rendered against the
Offeror or any of its principals for
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in
connection with obtaining, attempting to
obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State,
or local) contract or subcontract; violation of
Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to
the submission of offers; or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making
false statements, tax evasion, violating
Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen
property, the Offeror will not be eligible for
any of the above incentives and the
maximum performance-based payment rate
will be 25 percent.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
(d)(1) On December 1 of each year, except
as provided in paragraph (c) of this
provision, the Offeror, or a higher-level
owner of the Offeror, may submit to [email
address TBD] a representation as to which
criteria specified in paragraph (b) of this
provision it meets, and request a higher
maximum performance-based payment rate
on the basis of the applicable criteria.
(i) If a representation is made on behalf of
multiple business segments, the
representation shall address the criteria in
paragraph (b) of this provision for each
business segment for which higher customary
progress payment rates are requested.
Business segments that meet the same criteria
may be grouped together.
(ii) If the size status of the Offeror varies
dependent upon the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the acquisition, the Offeror may submit a
representation and request for a higher
customary progress payment rate that
addresses the rates for both a small business
and an other than small business.
(iii) A separate representation is not
required to also request a higher customary
progress payment rate (see DFARS 232.501–
1(a)).
(2) The representation shall be executed by
a person authorized to sign for the entity
submitting the representation and shall at a
minimum include—
(i) The unique entity identifier and
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE)
code(s) of the Offeror;
(ii) The size status of the Offeror (small,
other than small, or varies dependent upon
the NAICS code of the acquisition); and
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.327
(2) If the Offeror is a small business:
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(iii) Identification of the criteria for which
the Offeror is requesting increased maximum
performance-based payment rate for the
following calendar year. It is not necessary to
submit supporting data with the
representation, but the Offeror shall provide
such data upon request.
(3) The template in paragraph (h) of this
clause may be used for the submission of this
request and representation.
(e) Based on the representation received,
the Director, Defense Pricing and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
Contracting, will determine the appropriate
maximum performance-based payment
rate(s) for the following calendar year. DoD
will enter the maximum performance-based
payment rate(s) into CBAR by December 31.
(f) If the Offeror fails to submit by the
December 1 deadline, then the rate for the
Offeror in CBAR will be 50 percent if the
Offeror is other than a small business and 90
percent if the Offeror is a small business,
except as provided in paragraph (c) of this
provision. If the Offeror subsequently
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42845
submits a representation after the December
1 deadline, any increase in rates will not be
effective in CBAR until 30 days after
submission.
(g) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any time
during the year if the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting, subsequently
determines that the representation provided
by the Offeror was not accurate.
(h) Template.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
42846
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Company Letterhead
I,
[print name and title]
----~----------------------~----
, request customary progress
payment/maximum performance based payment rate(s)
l.a.
as follows:
Name and address of company:
b.
Unique Entity Identifier:
c.
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE)
d.
Size status.
business.
code(s):
Fill out Table A if other than a small
Fill out Table B if a small business.
status varies dependent upon NAICS code,
If size
fill out both tables.
Table A- Other than small business:
Enter "Yes" if
50 percent
meet the
plus
criteria, "No"
additional
if do not
percentage
Criteria
meet.
10 percent
Met the contract delivery dates
for contract end items and
contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone
schedule, as the case may be, at
least 95 percent of the time
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.328
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
during the preceding Government
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
42847
fiscal year (October 1 through
September 30).
10 percent
Does not have open level III or
IV corrective action requests.
See DFARS 242.302(a).
10 percent
All applicable contractor
business systems are acceptable,
without significant
deficiencies.
7.5 percent
At least 95 percent of the time
during the preceding Government
fiscal year, when responding to
solicitations that required
submission of certified cost or
pricing data, met the due date
in the request for proposal and
complied with the Proposal
Adequacy Checklist (252.2157009) .
5 percent
Has met its small business
subcontracting goals during the
year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.329
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
preceding Government fiscal
42848
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2.5 percent
Has provided subcontracting
opportunities for AbilityOne
[details TBD] .
Total customary progress payment/maximum performance-based
payment rate requested as an other than small business:
---
.
Table B - Small business:
Enter "Yes" if
90 percent
meet the
plus
criteria, "No"
additional
if do not meet.
percentage
2 percent
Criteria
Met the contract delivery dates
for contract end items and
contract data requirements
lists or performance milestone
schedule, as the case may be,
at least 95 percent of the time
during the preceding Government
fiscal year (October 1 through
September 30).
2 percent
Does not have open level III or
See DFARS 242.302(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.330
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV corrective action requests.
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
1 percent
42849
All applicable contractor
business systems are
acceptable, without significant
deficiencies.
Total customary progress payment/maximum performance-based
payment rate requested as a small business:
2.
-------
.
Repeat above information for any additional companies for
which increased customary progress payment/maximum performancebased payment rates are requested.
Business segments that meet
the same criteria may be grouped together.
The above identified entity(entities) and any of the principals
thereof have not within the preceding Government fiscal year
been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against any
entity or any of its principals for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to
obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local)
contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State
antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or
commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making false
or receiving stolen property.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.331
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws,
42850
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 252.242–7005
Systems.
Contractor Business
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The requirements in paragraphs (f)
and (g) of this clause regarding
withholding of amounts due from
progress payments and performancebased payments do not apply unless the
Contractor is receiving progress
payments or performance-based
payments under this contract at a rate
specified in CBAR that includes the 10
percent incentive based on having
acceptable business systems without
significant deficiencies.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–18238 Filed 8–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 236
[Docket DARS–2018–0039]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 0750–AJ75
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Exemption
From Design-Build Selection
Procedures (DFARS Case 2018–D011)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Aug 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
Regulation Supplement to implement a
section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018
that allows for more than five offerors
on solicitations issued using two-phase
design-build selection procedures for
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity
contracts that exceed $4 million.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
October 23, 2018, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2018–D011,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2018–D011’’. Select
‘‘Submit a Comment Now’’ and follow
the instructions provided to submit a
comment. Please include ‘‘DFARS Case
2018–D011’’ on any attached document.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2018–D011 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Heather
Kitchens, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room
3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Heather Kitchens, telephone 571–372–
6104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This rule proposes to revise the
DFARS to implement section 823 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115–91).
Section 823 amends 10 U.S.C. 2305a to
allow for more than the maximum
number of five offerors when a
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
solicitation is issued using two-phase
design-build selection procedures for an
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity
(IDIQ) contract that exceeds $4 million.
Prior to the amendments made by
section 823, 10 U.S.C. 2305a required
the head of the contracting activity to
approve the contracting officer’s
justification that it is in the best interest
of the Government to exceed the
maximum number of five offerors that
may be selected to submit phase-two
proposals, if certain conditions apply.
Section 823 eliminates the requirement
for such a justification when the
solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that
exceeds $4 million.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The two-phase design-build selection
procedures authorized by 10 U.S.C.
2305a are implemented at Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart
36.3. The statutory requirement for a
contracting officer to justify exceeding
the maximum number of five offerors is
implemented at FAR 36.303–1(a)(4).
This rule proposes to implement section
823 by adding a new DFARS section
236.303–1(a)(4), to be used in lieu of the
procedures at FAR 36.303–1(a)(4). The
new DFARS section implements 10
U.S.C. 2305a, as amended by section
823, by providing—
• The new authority to exceed the
five offeror maximum when the
solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that
exceeds $4 million;
• The authority to exceed the five
offeror maximum when the contracting
officer’s decision is approved by the
head of the contracting activity when
the solicitation is for a contract that
exceeds $4 million; and
• A statement that the number of
offerors is at the contracting officer’s
discretion when the solicitation is for a
contract that does not exceed $4
million.
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
EP24AU18.332
(End of provision)
■ 15. Amend section 252.242–7005 by—
■ a. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(FEB
2012)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in its
place;
■ b. In paragraph (d)(2) removing
‘‘withhold payments’’ and adding
‘‘withhold payments, except as
provided in paragraph (e) of this clause’’
in its place;
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f)
as paragraphs (f) and (g); and
■ d. Adding a new paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42831-42850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18238]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 232, 242, and 252
[Docket DARS-2018-0042]
RIN 0750-AJ28
Performance-Based Payments and Progress Payments (DFARS Case
2017-D019)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, which addresses the
preference for performance-based payments, and to streamline the
performance-based payment process. DoD is also proposing to amend the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to revise
progress payments and performance-based payments policies for DoD
contracts in order to increase its business effectiveness and
efficiency as well as to provide an opportunity for both small and
other than small entities to qualify for increased customary progress
payment rates and maximum performance-based payment rates based on
whether the offeror/contractor has met certain performance criteria.
DOD believes the proposed rule will eliminate the unintended
consequences of not updating its contract financing policies (which, in
turn will save hundreds of millions of dollars for the taxpayers), will
improve contractor performance, and will distinguish and meaningfully
recognize high performing companies and divisions of companies, as the
case may be.
This rule proposes to relieve the administrative burden on
contractors by deleting the current regulations relating to
performance-based payments at DFARS subpart 232.10 and the associated
clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012, Performance-Based Payments--Whole
Contract Basis, and 252.232-7013, Performance-Based Payments--
Deliverable Item Basis. This rule also removes the requirement to
negotiate consideration due the Government for providing the contractor
with the improved cash flow when utilizing performance-based payments.
In addition to the request for written comments on this proposed
rule, DoD will hold a public meeting to hear the views of interested
parties.
[[Page 42832]]
DATES: Comment Date: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below on or before October 23, 2018, to
be considered in the formation of a final rule.
Public Meeting Date: The public meeting will be held on September
14, 2018, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. EST. Registration to attend this
meeting must be received by September 6, 2018. Further information for
the public meeting may be found under the heading SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Public Meeting: The public meeting will be held at the Mark
Center Auditorium, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-3603.
The Mark Center Auditorium is located on level B-1 of the building.
Submission of Comments: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case
2017-D019, using any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2017-D019.'' Select ``Comment Now'' and follow
the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS
Case 2017-D019'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2017-D019 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
G. Williams, OUSD (A&S) DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, DPC/DARS, at 571-
372-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Meeting
DoD is hosting a public meeting to obtain views of experts and
interested parties in Government and the private sector regarding
revising policies and procedures with regard to customary progress
payment rates and maximum performance-based payment rates for DoD
contracts.
Registration: Individuals wishing to attend the public meeting must
register by September 6, 2018, to ensure adequate room accommodations
and to facilitate security screening and entry to the Mark Center.
Individuals desiring to attend the meeting must register at this
website, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/performance-based_payments_and_progress_payments.html, by providing the following
information:
(1) Company or organization name.
(2) Full name, valid email address, and telephone number of each
person planning to attend, and whether the individual is a U.S.
citizen. For each person, the Pentagon Force Protection Agency will
send additional instructions to the email address provided at the time
of registration in order for the individual to be approved for entry to
the Mark Center.
(3) Name, title, organizational affiliation of presenter, if
desiring to make a presentation, limited to a 5-minute presentation per
company or organization. This limitation may be subject to adjustment,
depending on the number of entities requesting to present, in order to
ensure adequate time for discussion.
Once registered, attendees will be prompted by the Pentagon Force
Protection Agency on building entry requirements.
One valid government-issued photo identification card (i.e.,
driver's license or passport) will be required in order to enter the
building.
Attendees are encouraged to arrive at least 45 minutes early to
accommodate security procedures. Public parking is not available at the
Mark Center.
Presentations: If you wish to make a presentation, please submit an
electronic copy of your presentation to [email protected] no later
than September 10, 2018. When submitting presentations, provide
presenter's name, organization affiliation, telephone number, and email
address on the cover page. Please submit presentations only and cite
``Public Meeting, DFARS Case 2017-D019'' in all correspondence related
to the public meeting. There will be no transcription at the meeting.
The submitted presentations will be the only record of the public
meeting.
Special accommodations: The public meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for reasonable accommodations,
sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed
to Daniel Weinstein at 571-372-6105, at least 10 working days prior to
the meeting date.
The TTY number for further information is: 1-800-877-8339. When the
operator answers the call, let them know the agency is the Department
of Defense; the point of contact is Daniel Weinstein at 571-372-6105.
Correspondence and Comments: Please cite ``Public Meeting, DFARS
Case 2017-D019'' in all correspondence related to this public meeting.
The submitted presentations will be the only record of the public
meeting. To have a presentation considered as a public comment for the
formation of the final rule, the presentation, or pertinent excerpts,
must be submitted separately as a written comment as instructed in the
paragraph titled ``Submission of Comments'' in ADDRESSES.
II. Background
A. Purpose
The fundamental purpose of the rule change is to increase the
effectiveness and efficiency of the Department of Defense in five
domains while recognizing that its cash flow policy was outdated and
costly to the tax payers. The five domains are:
On Time or Accelerated Contract Deliveries;
Contractor Quality;
Contractor Business Systems;
Increasing Contract Opportunities for Small Business and
for the Blind and Severely Disabled; and
Receipt of Timely Quality Proposals.
The present progress payment rate was established in an economic
environment when interest rates were significantly higher than the
historic lows that have been experienced over the past several years.
As a result of the aforementioned, and because DoD desires to take an
enterprise-wide view of contractor performance and to recognize and
distinguish performance among the companies with which it deals, DoD is
proposing to modify the customary progress payment rate for large
businesses. DoD recognizes that small businesses do not have the
borrowing power that large businesses have and, therefore, is not
proposing a change to the basic customary progress payment for small
business, which is 90 percent. In modifying the customary rate for
large business, DoD is proposing to allow large and small business to
achieve progress payment rates greater than the customary rates.
The goal would be that a significant majority of the large and
small businesses would eventually meet the desired level of enterprise-
wide performance.
In the case of large business, for progress payments, a two-step
process:
1. Modify the customary progress payment rate to 50 percent
(effectively updating the premises of the Defense
[[Page 42833]]
Financial and Investment Review (DFAIR) study to address today's
business and market environment).
2. Establish opportunities for recognizing contractor behaviors
that align themselves with the performance objectives established in
the five business domains that are important to the DoD such that large
business contractors could potentially increase the rate determined in
Step 1 and receive progress payments that can be as high as 95 percent
of contract cost. The increased customary progress payment rate will be
established for each company or company division as the case may be.
B. Brief History
The most comprehensive review of Government financing was the DFAIR
study. One key recommendation from the DFAIR study was that ``interest
cost should remain an unallowable cost and progress payment rates
should be reset in the future based on changes in interest rates.''
Between the DFAIR study in 1985 and 2001, the customary progress
payment rate for other than small business was changed five times and
was usually a somewhat delayed reaction to changes in interest rates in
prior years. In 2001, the customary rate was increased from 75 percent
to 80 percent and has remained unchanged ever since.
In the rule making process it is customary to analyze the impact of
the proposed rule versus the status quo and that traditional analysis
is included in the regulatory cost analysis (see section V. of this
preamble). However, DoD has been providing financing in excess of that
warranted based on the historically low interest rates in effect since
2008. By modifying the customary progress payment rate to 50 percent,
it will result in savings hundreds of millions of dollars to the
taxpayers by eliminating an unintended consequence of the past practice
associated with providing contract financing in excess of what was
necessary. In the future, contractors will have the opportunity to earn
increased contract financing benefit through improved performance.
III. Discussion and Analysis
DoD is proposing to amend DFARS parts 232, 242, and 252 to revise
how contract financing, in the form of progress payments and
performance-based payments, is calculated and determined for DoD
contracts.
A. Current FAR and DFARS
1. Progress payments. Currently, FAR 52.232-16, Progress Payments,
sets a customary progress payment rate of 80 percent, except the rate
is 85 percent for a small business, unless it is a letter contract.
There is a statutory cap of 80 percent for letter contracts. DFARS
252.232-7004, DoD Progress Payment Rates, currently increases the FAR
customary progress payment rate for small businesses to 90 percent
(except for letter contracts).
2. Performance-based payments. FAR 52.232-28, Invitation to Propose
Performance-Based Payments, sets a maximum performance-based rate of 90
percent of the contract price if on a whole contract basis, or 90
percent of the delivery item price if on a delivery item basis. DFARS
232.1004 provides procedures for analysis of proposed performance-based
payments using the performance-based payments analysis tool, and also
requires that the contractor provide consideration to the Government,
if the performance-based payments payment schedule will be more
favorable to the contractor than customary progress payments. DFARS
232.1005-70 prescribes the use of the provision at DFARS 252.232-7012,
Performance-Based Payments--Whole Contract Basis, or the provision at
DFARS 252.232-7013, Performance-Based Payments--Deliverable Item Basis.
B. Proposed Changes
1. Progress payments (DFARS 232.501-1(a) and 52.232-7004). DoD
proposes a customary progress payment rate of 50 percent for other than
small businesses and retains the 90 percent rate for small businesses,
but provides criteria by which contractors can achieve a customary
progress payment rate of up to 95 percent. However, if a contractor or
any of its principals has within the preceding Government fiscal year
been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against the
contractor or any of its principals for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract;
violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the
submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or
receiving stolen property, then the contractor will not be eligible for
any incentives and the customary progress payment rate will be 25
percent for that contractor.
On December 1 of each year, a contractor, or higher-level owner of
a contractor, may submit a representation as to which criteria it meets
and request a higher customary progress payment rate. Based on the
representation received, the Director of Defense Pricing and
Contracting will determine the appropriate customary progress payment
rate for the following calendar year, and that data will be entered
into the Contract Business Analysis Repository (CBAR) by December 31.
If a contractor fails to submit by the December 1 deadline, then
the rate for that contractor in CBAR will be 50 percent if the offeror
is other than a small business and 90 percent if the offeror is a small
business, unless the rate is 25 percent as provided in DFARS 232.501-
1(a)(ii). If the offeror subsequently submits a representation after
the December 1 deadline, any increase in rates will not be effective in
CBAR until 30 days after submission.
The rate may be adjusted at any time during the year if it is
subsequently determined that the representation provided by a
contractor was not accurate.
2. Performance-based payments (DFARS 232.1004(b)(2) and 252.232-
70YY). For maximum performance-based payments, DoD proposes rates and
procedures comparable to those for determining the customary progress
payment rate. The same representation will be used to determine both
the customary progress payment rate and the maximum performance-based
payment rate.
DoD proposes to amend DFARS 232.1004 to remove the procedures for
analysis of proposed performance-based payments using the performance-
based payments analysis tool, and also removes the requirement that the
contractor provide consideration to the Government, if the performance-
based payments payment schedule will be more favorable to the
contractor than customary progress payments. The current solicitation
provisions at DFARS 252.232-7012 and 252.232-7013 are no longer
required and will be removed, thus reducing burden on contractors.
3. Corrective action requests (DFARS 242.302(a)). One of the
criteria to qualify for higher customary progress payments or maximum
performance-based payments is that the offeror/contractor does not have
any open level III or level IV corrective action requests. Because the
DFARS does not currently address corrective action requests, a
paragraph has been added at DFARS 242.302(a) to explain the different
levels of corrective action requests.
4. Withholding of payments (DFARS 242.7000 and 252.242-7005). DFARS
242.7000, Contractor business system deficiencies, and 252.242-7005,
Contractor Business Systems, provide
[[Page 42834]]
for withholding of payments (including progress and performance-based
payments) when there are significant deficiencies in a required
business system. However, the contracting officer will not withhold
progress or performance-based payments from a contract that includes
the clause 252.232-7004 or the provision 252.232-70YY, unless the
contractor is receiving progress payments or performance-based payments
under the contract at a rate specified in CBAR that includes the 10
percent incentive based on having acceptable business systems without
significant deficiencies.
5. Preference for performance-based payments. This rule also
proposes to implement section 831 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2017, which modifies 10 U.S.C. 2307(b) to address
preference for performance-based payments.
IV. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule proposes to amend the clause at DFARS 252.232-7004, DoD
Progress Payment Rates, and adds a new provision at DFARS 252.232-70YY,
DoD Maximum Performance-Based Payment Rates. DFARS 252.232-7004 is used
with FAR clause 52.232-16, Progress Payments, and DFARS 252.232-70YY is
used with FAR provision 52.232-28, Invitation to Propose Performance-
Based Payments. The FAR provision and clause are not prescribed for use
in contracts for the acquisition of commercial items or for
acquisitions at or below the SAT. The DFARS provision and clause,
therefore, will not be applied to commercial items or to contact
actions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.
V. Expected Costs and Benefits
This rule proposes to amend the DFARS to implement changes to the
progress payment and performance-based payment policies for DoD
contracts by amending the section on customary progress payment rates
at DFARS 232.501-1; adding new procedures for performance-based
payments at 232.1003; amending the clause at 252.232-7004, DoD
Customary Progress Payment Rates, and adding a new provision at
252.232-70YY, DoD Maximum Performance-Based Payment Rates. This rule
also proposes to delete the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012, Performance-
Based Payments--Whole Contract Basis, and 252.232-7013, Performance-
Based Payments--Deliverable Item Basis.
This rule will impact all offerors/contractors (large or small)
seeking DoD contracts that offer progress payments or performance-based
payments. Although there are added costs associated with submission of
an annual representation, the contractors/offerors that can meet the
criteria will qualify for substantial savings on interest payments, due
to increased Government financing.
The expected benefits are that the modified approach to the
establishment of a performance-based cash flow environment will enable
DoD to take an enterprise-wide view of contractor performance and to
recognize and distinguish performance among the companies with which it
deals. The goal would be that a significant majority of the large and
small businesses would eventually meet the desired level of enterprise-
wide performance. As a result of the improved industrial performance,
DOD's efficiency and effectiveness will be improved thereby increasing
the lethality of its fighting force and positively reforming DOD's
business practices.
A. Summary of Expected Costs to the Public. DoD has performed a
regulatory cost analysis on this rule. The following is a summary of
the estimated net public costs in millions, calculated in 2016 dollars
in perpetuity at a 7-percent discount rate.
Annualized at 7 percent: $5.5 million
Present Value at 7 percent: $78.8 million
B. Summary of Expected Transfers. The following is a summary of the
expected transfer of interest costs/savings from the Government to the
public, due to an expected net increase in progress payment and
performance-based payment rates paid by the Government.
1. Reduced Interest Payments by Contractors:
Annualized at 7 percent: $60.2 million
Present Value at 7 percent: $859.6 million
2. Increased Interest Payments by Government:
Annualized at 7 percent: $30.2 million
Present Value at 7 percent: $431.8 million
To access the complete Regulatory Cost Analysis, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov, search for ``DFARS Case
2017-D019'', click ``Open Docket'', and view ``Supporting Documents''.
VI. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is an economically significant regulatory action and, therefore,
was subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is subject to E.O. 13771, Reducing Regulation
and Controlling Regulatory Costs, because this rule is a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866. If finalized as proposed, this rule
would be an E.O. 13771 regulatory action. The E.O. 13771 status will be
informed by public comment, so please share any data and/or analysis
that would relate to the rule's potential to be considered a
deregulatory action. Details on the expected costs and benefits can be
found in section V of this preamble.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD expects that this proposed rule may have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. Therefore, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is
summarized as follows:
This rule revises progress payments and performance-based payments
policies for DoD contracts, basing the payment rate on whether the
offeror/contractor has met certain performance criteria. This rule also
implements section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2017, which modifies 10 U.S.C. 2301(b) to address
preference for performance-based payments.
The objective of this rule is to increase the effectiveness and
efficiency of DoD in five domains: on time or accelerated contract
deliveries, contractor quality, contractor business systems, increasing
contract opportunities for small businesses and for the blind and
severely disables, and receipt of timely quality proposals. The
statutory basis is 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 10 U.S.C. 2301(b).
This rule will apply to small entities that receive either progress
payments or performance-based payments for
[[Page 42835]]
noncommercial fixed-price contracts. There were 1,938 unique small
entities receiving progress payments or performance-based payments in
FY 2017.
The rule provides an opportunity to submit a representation as to
whether a small entity meets certain performance criteria, in order to
obtain higher progress payments or performance-based payments. DoD
estimates that the professional skill set necessary to prepare the
representation annually will approximate 25 percent at the journeyman
level, 60 percent at the senior level, and 15 percent at the executive/
attorney level. DoD estimates an average of 13 hours per response from
small entities. The rule also removes a burden of approximately one
hour per entity, associated with paragraph (b) of DFARS subpart 32.10
and the associated clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012 and 252.232-7013,
which this rule proposes to delete.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
DoD did not identify any significant alternatives that would meet
the objectives of the rule. However, the rule provides certain
advantages for small entities as the basic customary progress payment
rate for small entities remains at 90 percent, with possible increase
up to 95 percent. So, small entities can continue to get the same rate,
even if they do not submit a representation or meet the criteria. Small
entities are only asked to represent with regard to three criteria:
timely delivery or performance, contractor quality, and contractor
business systems.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2017-D019), in
correspondence.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Accordingly, DoD has submitted a
request for approval of a revised information collection requirement
0704-0359, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
Part 232, Contract Financing, and associated clauses at DFARS 252.232,
to the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Public Reporting Burden
1. Public reporting burden for the collection of information
proposed by this DFARS case 2017-D019 is estimated to average 28.8
hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden estimated as follows:
Respondents: 3,200.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 3,200.
Preparation hours per response: 28.8 hours.
Total response Burden Hours: 92,027 hours.
2. In addition, this information collection includes a pre-existing
burden related to DFARS clause 252.232-7007 (800 hours, 1 response per
respondent, 800 responses, 1 hour per response, for a total of 8,000
hours). Therefore, the total burden for 0704-0359, rounded, is as
follows:
Respondents: 4,000.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 4,000.
Preparation hours per response: 24 hours.
Total response Burden Hours: 93,000 hours.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, should be
sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk
Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email [email protected], with a copy to the
Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G. Williams, OUSD
(A&S) DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301-3060. Comments can be received from 30 to 60 days after the date
of this notice, but comments to OMB will be most useful if received by
OMB within 30 days after the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly invited on: whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the DFARS, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection
instruments, please write to the Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Ms. Amy G. Williams, OUSD (A&S) DPC/DARS, Room 3B941,
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, or email
[email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2017-D019 in the subject line of
the message.
This rule also affects the information collection requirements at
DFARS subpart 232.10 (and associated clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012 and
252.232-7013, currently approved under OMB Control Number 0704-0359.
This rule proposes to remove these requirements.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 232, 242, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 232, 242, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for parts 232, 242, and 252 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 232--CONTRACT FINANCING
0
2. Revise section 232.501-1 to read as follows:
232.501-1 Customary progress payment rates.
(a) Except for undefinitized contract actions as provided at FAR
32.501-1(d), in lieu of the customary progress payment rates specified
at FAR 32.501-1(a), the customary progress payment rates for DoD
solicitations issued on or after January 1, 2019, and resultant
contracts, including contracts that contain foreign military sales
(FMS) requirements, are 50 percent for other than small businesses and
90 percent for small businesses, unless a different rate is specified
for the contractor in the Contract Business Analysis Repository (CBAR)
at [details TBD].
(i) Contractors can qualify for an increased customary progress
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based on the following criteria:
(A) Other than small businesses:
[[Page 42836]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10..................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
10..................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See 242.302(a).
10..................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
7.5.................... At least 95 percent of the time during the
preceding Government fiscal year, when
responding to solicitations that required
submission of certified cost or pricing data,
met the due date in the request for proposal
and complied with the Proposal Adequacy
Checklist (252.215-7009).
5...................... Has met its small business subcontracting goals
during the preceding Government fiscal year.
2.5.................... Has provided subcontracting opportunities for
AbilityOne [details TBD].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Small businesses:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2...................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
2...................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See 242.302(a).
1...................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) However, if a contractor or any of its principals has within
the preceding Government fiscal year been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against the contractor or any of its principals for
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local)
contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust
statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal
criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property, the contractor will
not be eligible for any of the above incentives and the customary
progress payment rate will be 25 percent for that contractor.
(iii)(A) On or before December 1 of each year, except as provided
in paragraph (a)(ii) of this section, a contractor, or a higher-level
owner of a contractor, may submit to [email address TBD] a
representation as to which criteria specified in paragraph (a)(i) of
this section the contractor meets, and request a higher customary
progress payment rate on that basis.
(1) If a representation is made on behalf of multiple business
segments, the representation must address the criteria in paragraph
(a)(i) of this section for each business segment for which higher
customary progress payment rates are requested.
(2) If the size status of a contractor varies dependent upon the
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of the
acquisition, the contractor may submit a representation and request for
higher customary progress payment rates that addresses the rates for
both a small business and an other than small business.
(3) A separate representation is not required to also request a
higher maximum performance-based payment rate (see 232.1001(b)(2)).
(B) The representation is required to be executed by a person
authorized to sign for the entity submitting the representation and
must at a minimum include--
(1) The unique entity identifier and Commercial and Government
Entity (CAGE) code(s) of the contractor;
(2) Size status of the contractor (small, other than small, or
varies dependent upon the NAICS code of the acquisition); and
(3) Identification of the criteria for which the contractor is
requesting increase in the customary progress payment rate for the
following calendar year. It is not necessary to submit supporting data
with the representation, but the contractor is required to provide such
data upon request.
(iv) Based on the representation received, the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting, will determine the appropriate customary
progress payment rate(s) for the following calendar year. DoD will
enter the customary progress payment rate(s) into CBAR by December 31.
(v) If a contractor fails to submit by the December 1 deadline,
then the rate for that contractor in CBAR will be 50 percent if the
contractor is other than a small business and 90 percent if the
contractor is a small business, unless the rate is 25 percent as
provided in (a)(ii) of this section. If the contractor subsequently
submits a representation after the December 1 deadline, any increase in
rates will not be effective in CBAR until 30 days after submission.
(vi) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any time during the year if the
Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, subsequently determines that
the representation provided by a contractor was not accurate.
0
3. Add new section 232.502-4 heading to read as follows:
232.502-4 Contract clauses.
0
4. Amend section 232.502-4-70 by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
232.502-4-70 Additional clauses.
* * * * *
(b) Use the clause at 252.232-7004, DoD Customary Progress Payment
Rates, in solicitations and contracts that include FAR 52.232-16. Do
not use Alternate I of FAR 52.232-16.
0
5. Amend section 232.503-6 by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
232.503-6 Suspension or reduction of payments.
(b) Contractor noncompliance.
(i) If the Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, subsequently
determines that the representation in accordance with 232.501-1(a) is
inaccurate, the progress payment rate in CBAR will be adjusted.
(ii) See also 242.7502(c).
* * * * *
0
6. Amend section 232.1001 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
[[Page 42837]]
232.1001 Policy.
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b)(2), performance-based
payments shall not be conditioned upon costs incurred in contract
performance, but on the achievement of performance outcomes.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend section 232.1004 by--
0
a. Revising paragraph (b); and
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (S-70).
The revision and addition read as follows:
232.1004 Procedures.
(b) Establishing performance-based finance payment amounts.
(2) In lieu of the 90 percent maximum rate specified in the FAR for
performance-based payments, the maximum rates for DoD performance-based
payments in solicitations issued on or after January 1, 2019, are 50
percent for other than small businesses and 90 percent for small
businesses, unless a different rate is specified for the offeror in the
Contract Business Analysis Repository [details TBD].
(A) Offerors can qualify for an increased maximum performance-based
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based on the following criteria:
(1) Other than small businesses:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10..................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
10..................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See 242.302(a).
10..................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
7.5.................... At least 95 percent of the time during the
preceding Government fiscal year, when
responding to solicitations that required
submission of certified cost or pricing data,
met the due date in the request for proposal
and complied with the Proposal Adequacy
Checklist (252.215-7009).
5...................... Has met its small business subcontracting goals
during the preceding Government fiscal year.
2.5.................... Has provided subcontracting opportunities for
the blind and severely disabled [details TBD].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Small businesses:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2...................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
2...................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See 242.302(a).
1...................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) However, if an offeror or any of its principals has within the
preceding Government fiscal year been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against the offeror or any of its principals for
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local)
contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust
statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal
criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property, the offeror will not
be eligible for any of the above incentives and the maximum
performance-based payment rate will be 25 percent for that offeror.
(C)(1) On December 1 of each year, except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2)(B) of this section, an offeror, or a higher-level owner of an
offeror, may submit to [email address TBD] a representation as to which
criteria specified in paragraph (b)(2)(A) of this section the offeror
meets, and request a higher customary progress payment rate on that
basis.
(i) If a representation is made on behalf of multiple business
segments, the representation must address the criteria in paragraph
(b)(2)(A) of this section for each business segment for which higher
customary progress payment rates are requested.
(ii) If the size status of an offeror varies dependent upon the
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of the
acquisition, the offeror may submit a representation and request for a
higher customary progress payment rate that addresses the rates for
both a small business and an other than small business.
(iii) A separate representation is not required to also request a
higher maximum performance-based payment rate (see 232.501-1(a)).
(2) The representation is required to be executed by a person
authorized to sign for the entity submitting the representation and
must at a minimum include--
(i) The unique entity identifier and Commercial and Government
Entity (CAGE) code(s) of the offeror;
(ii) Size status of the offeror (small, other than small, or varies
dependent upon the NAICS code of the acquisition); and
(iii) Identification of the criteria for which the offeror is
requesting increase in the customary progress payment rate for the
following calendar year. It is not necessary to submit supporting data
with the representation, but the offeror is required to provide such
data upon request.
(D) Based on the representation received, the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting, will determine the appropriate maximum
performance-based payment rate(s) for the following calendar year. DoD
will enter the maximum performance-based payment rate(s) into CBAR by
December 31.
(E) If an offeror fails to submit by the December 1 deadline, then
the rate for that offeror in CBAR will be 50 percent if the offeror is
other than a small business and 90 percent if the offeror is a small
business, unless the rate is 25 percent as provided in (b)(2)(B) of
this section. If the offeror subsequently submits a representation
after the December 1 deadline, any increase in
[[Page 42838]]
rates will not be effective in CBAR until 30 days after submission.
(F) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any time during the year if the
Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, subsequently determines that
the representation provided by an offeror was not accurate.
* * * * *
(S-70) Eligibility for performance-based payments. Nontraditional
defense contractors and other private sector companies shall be
eligible for performance-based payments, consistent with best
commercial practices. In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b), a
contractor's accounting system shall be in compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles in order to receive performance-based
payments. 10 U.S.C. 2307 does not grant the Defense Contract Audit
Agency the authority to audit compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
0
8. Revise section 232.1005-70 to read as follows:
232.1005-70 Solicitation provision.
Use the provision 252.232-70YY, DoD Maximum Performance-Based
Payment Rates, in solicitations that include FAR 52.232-28, Invitation
to Propose Performance-Based Payments.
PART 242--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
0
9. Amend section 242.302 by adding paragraph (a) text to read as
follows:
242.302 Contract administration functions.
(a) Government personnel performing contract administration duties
outlined in FAR 42.302(a) and this paragraph issue a corrective action
request when contractual noncompliance is independently identified. The
Defense Contract Management Agency had identified four levels of
corrective action requests.
(i) Level I is issued for noncompliances that are minor in nature,
are promptly corrected by the contractor, and present no need for root
cause determination or further preventive action.
(ii) Level II is issued for noncompliances that are not promptly
correctable and warrant root cause analysis and preventive action, or
need action by the contractor to determine if other product/services
are affected.
(iii) Level III is issued to the contractor's management
responsible for the company or business segment to call attention to a
serious noncompliance, a significant deficiency pursuant to 252.242-
7005(b), a failure to respond to a lower level corrective action
request, or to remedy recurring noncompliance.
(iv) Level IV is issued to the contractor's segment or corporate
management and when the contractual noncompliance(s) is of a serious
nature or when a Level III corrective action request has been
ineffective.
(v) For additional information on corrective action requests, see
PGI 242.302(a).
* * * * *
0
10. Amend section 242.7000 by revising the first sentence in paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
242.7000 Contractor business system deficiencies.
(b) * * *
(1) In accordance with agency procedures, identify one or more
covered contracts containing the clause at 252.242-7005, Contractor
Business Systems, from which payments will be withheld, except that, if
a contract includes the clause 252.232-7004, DoD Customary Progress
Payments, or the provision 252.232-70YY, DoD Maximum Performance-Based
Payments, the contracting officer shall not withhold progress payments
or performance based payments from that contract unless the contractor
is receiving progress payments or performance-based payments under the
contract at a rate specified in Contract Business Analysis Repository
that includes the 10 percent incentive based on having acceptable
business systems without significant deficiencies (see 232.501-1(a)). *
* *
* * * * *
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
11. Revise section 252.232-7004 to read as follows:
252.232-7004 DoD Customary Progress Payment Rates.
As prescribed in 232.502-4-70(b), use the following clause:
DoD Customary Progress Payment Rates (Date)
(a) The Progress Payments clause of this contract is modified to
change each mention of the progress payment rate and liquidation
rate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6), and (b) to 50 percent if the
Contractor is other than a small business and 90 percent if the
Contractor is a small business, unless a different rate is specified
for the Contractor in the Contract Business Analysis Repository
(CBAR) at [details TBD]. The limitations on undefinitized contract
actions in paragraph (k) of the Progress Payments clause remain at a
maximum of 80 percent for both the progress payment rate and the
liquidation rate, notwithstanding any higher rate specified in CBAR.
(b) If the Contractor has a satisfactory record of performance,
the Contractor can qualify for an increased customary progress
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based on the following criteria:
(1) If the Contractor is other than a small business:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10..................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
10..................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
10..................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
7.5.................... At least 95 percent of the time during the
preceding Government fiscal year, when
responding to solicitations that required
submission of certified cost or pricing data,
met the due date in the request for proposal
and complied with the Proposal Adequacy
Checklist (252.215-7009).
5...................... Has met its small business subcontracting goals
during the preceding Government fiscal year.
2.5.................... Has provided subcontracting opportunities for
AbilityOne [details TBD].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 42839]]
(2) If the Contractor is a small business:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2...................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
2...................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
1...................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) However, if the Contractor or any of its principals has
within the preceding Government fiscal year been convicted of or had
a civil judgment rendered against the Contractor or any of its
principals for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in
connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a
public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation
of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of
offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making false statements,
tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving
stolen property, the Contractor will not be eligible for any of the
above incentives and the customary progress payment rate will be 25
percent.
(d)(1) On December 1 of each year, except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor, or a higher-level
owner of the Contractor, may submit to [email address TBD] a
representation as to which criteria specified in paragraph (b) of
this clause the Contractor meets, and request a higher customary
progress payment rate on that basis.
(i) If a representation is made on behalf of multiple business
segments, the representation shall address the criteria in paragraph
(b) of this clause for each business segment for which higher
customary progress payment rates are requested. Business segments
that meet the same criteria may be grouped together.
(ii) If the size status of the Contractor varies dependent upon
the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of
the acquisition, the Contractor may submit a representation and
request for a higher customary progress payment rate that addresses
the rates for both a small business and an other than small
business.
(iii) A separate representation is not required to also request
a higher maximum performance-based payment rate (see DFARS
232.1004(b)(2)).
(2) The representation shall be executed by a person authorized
to sign for the entity submitting the representation and shall at a
minimum include--
(i) The unique entity identifier and Commercial and Government
Entity (CAGE) code(s) of the Contractor;
(ii) The size status of the Contractor (small, other than small,
or varies dependent upon the NAICS code of the acquisition); and
(iii) Identification of the criteria for which the Contractor is
requesting increase in the customary progress payment rate for the
following calendar year. It is not necessary to submit supporting
data with the representation, but the Contractor is required to
provide such data upon request.
(3) The template in paragraph (h) of this clause may be used for
the submission of the request and representation.
(e) Based on the representation received, the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting, will determine the appropriate customary
progress payment rate(s) for the following calendar year. DoD will
enter the customary progress payment rate(s) into CBAR by December
31.
(f) If the Contractor fails to submit by the December 1
deadline, then the rate for the Contractor in CBAR will be 50
percent if the Contractor is other than a small business and 90
percent if the Contractor is a small business, except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this clause. If the Contractor subsequently submits
a representation after the December 1 deadline, any increase in
rates will not be effective in CBAR until 30 days after submission.
(g) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any time during the year if
the Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, subsequently
determines that the representation provided by a contractor was not
accurate.
(h) Template.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[[Page 42840]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.323
[[Page 42841]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.324
[[Page 42842]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.325
[[Page 42843]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.326
[[Page 42844]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.327
(End of clause)
252.232-7012 [Removed and Reserved]
0
12. Remove and reserve section 252.232-7012.
252.232-7013 [Removed and Reserved]
0
13. Remove and reserve section 252.232-7013.
0
14. Add new section 252.232-70YY to read as follows:
252.232-70YY DoD Maximum Performance-Based Payment Rates.
As prescribed in 232.1005-70, use the following provision:
DoD Maximum Performance-Based Payment Rates (Date)
(a) The Invitation to Propose Performance-Based Payments
provision in this solicitation is modified to change the maximum
performance-based payment rate in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of that
provision to 50 percent if the Offeror is other than small business
and 90 percent if the Offeror is a small business, unless a
different rate is specified for the Offeror in the Contract Business
Analysis Repository (CBAR) at [details TBD].
(b) If the Offeror has a satisfactory record of performance, the
Offeror can qualify for an increased maximum performance-based
payment rate of up to 95 percent, based on the following criteria:
(1) If the Offeror is other than small business:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10..................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
10..................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
10..................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
7.5.................... At least 95 percent of the time during the
preceding Government fiscal year, when
responding to solicitations that required
submission of certified cost or pricing data,
met the due date in the request for proposal
and complied with the Proposal Adequacy
Checklist (252.215-7009).
5...................... Has met its small business subcontracting goals
during the preceding Government fiscal year.
2.5.................... Has provided subcontracting opportunities for
AbilityOne [details TBD].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) If the Offeror is a small business:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional percentage Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2...................... Met the contract delivery dates for contract
end items and contract data requirements lists
or performance milestone schedule, as the case
may be, at least 95 percent of the time during
the preceding Government fiscal year (October
1 through September 30).
2...................... Does not have open level III or IV corrective
action requests. See DFARS 242.302(a).
1...................... All applicable contractor business systems are
acceptable, without significant deficiencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) However, if the Offeror or any of its principals has within
the preceding Government fiscal year been convicted of or had a
civil judgment rendered against the Offeror or any of its principals
for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal,
State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or
State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or
commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification
or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion,
violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property,
the Offeror will not be eligible for any of the above incentives and
the maximum performance-based payment rate will be 25 percent.
(d)(1) On December 1 of each year, except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this provision, the Offeror, or a higher-level
owner of the Offeror, may submit to [email address TBD] a
representation as to which criteria specified in paragraph (b) of
this provision it meets, and request a higher maximum performance-
based payment rate on the basis of the applicable criteria.
(i) If a representation is made on behalf of multiple business
segments, the representation shall address the criteria in paragraph
(b) of this provision for each business segment for which higher
customary progress payment rates are requested. Business segments
that meet the same criteria may be grouped together.
(ii) If the size status of the Offeror varies dependent upon the
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of the
acquisition, the Offeror may submit a representation and request for
a higher customary progress payment rate that addresses the rates
for both a small business and an other than small business.
(iii) A separate representation is not required to also request
a higher customary progress payment rate (see DFARS 232.501-1(a)).
(2) The representation shall be executed by a person authorized
to sign for the entity submitting the representation and shall at a
minimum include--
(i) The unique entity identifier and Commercial and Government
Entity (CAGE) code(s) of the Offeror;
(ii) The size status of the Offeror (small, other than small, or
varies dependent upon the NAICS code of the acquisition); and
[[Page 42845]]
(iii) Identification of the criteria for which the Offeror is
requesting increased maximum performance-based payment rate for the
following calendar year. It is not necessary to submit supporting
data with the representation, but the Offeror shall provide such
data upon request.
(3) The template in paragraph (h) of this clause may be used for
the submission of this request and representation.
(e) Based on the representation received, the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting, will determine the appropriate maximum
performance-based payment rate(s) for the following calendar year.
DoD will enter the maximum performance-based payment rate(s) into
CBAR by December 31.
(f) If the Offeror fails to submit by the December 1 deadline,
then the rate for the Offeror in CBAR will be 50 percent if the
Offeror is other than a small business and 90 percent if the Offeror
is a small business, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this
provision. If the Offeror subsequently submits a representation
after the December 1 deadline, any increase in rates will not be
effective in CBAR until 30 days after submission.
(g) The rate(s) may be adjusted at any time during the year if
the Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, subsequently
determines that the representation provided by the Offeror was not
accurate.
(h) Template.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[[Page 42846]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.328
[[Page 42847]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.329
[[Page 42848]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.330
[[Page 42849]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.331
[[Page 42850]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AU18.332
(End of provision)
0
15. Amend section 252.242-7005 by--
0
a. Removing the clause date of ``(FEB 2012)'' and adding ``(DATE)'' in
its place;
0
b. In paragraph (d)(2) removing ``withhold payments'' and adding
``withhold payments, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this
clause'' in its place;
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (f) and (g); and
0
d. Adding a new paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 252.242-7005 Contractor Business Systems.
* * * * *
(e) The requirements in paragraphs (f) and (g) of this clause
regarding withholding of amounts due from progress payments and
performance-based payments do not apply unless the Contractor is
receiving progress payments or performance-based payments under this
contract at a rate specified in CBAR that includes the 10 percent
incentive based on having acceptable business systems without
significant deficiencies.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-18238 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C