Information Collection; Subcontract Consent and Contractors' Purchasing System Review, 42651-42653 [2018-18280]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 164 / Thursday, August 23, 2018 / Notices the Commission’s website at https:// www.fmc.gov/P1-18. Replies filed in response to the Petition will also be posted on the Commission’s website at this location. Rachel Dickon, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–18244 Filed 8–22–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) is adopting a proposal to extend for three years, without revision, the Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Changes in Foreign Investments (Made Pursuant to Regulation K) (FR 2064; OMB No. 7100– 0109). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer—Nuha Elmaghrabi—Office of the Chief Data Officer, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC, 20551 (202) 452–3829. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact (202) 263–4869, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. OMB Desk Officer—Shagufta Ahmed—Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–6974. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 15, 1984, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) delegated to the Board authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) to approve and assign OMB control numbers to collection of information requests and requirements conducted or sponsored by the Board. Board-approved collections of information are incorporated into the official OMB inventory of currently approved collections of information. Copies of the Paperwork Reduction Act Submission, supporting statements and approved collection of information instrument(s) are placed into OMB’s public docket files. The Board may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection that has been extended, daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Aug 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Final approval under OMB delegated authority of the extension for three years, without revision, of the following information collection: Report title: Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Changes in Foreign Investments (Made Pursuant to Regulation K). Agency form number: FR 2064. OMB control number: 7100–0109. Frequency: On occasion. Respondents: Internationally active U.S banking organizations (member banks, Edge Act and agreement corporations, and bank holding companies). Estimated number of respondents: 20. Estimated average hours per response: 2. Estimated annual burden hours: 160. General description of report: Internationally active U.S. banking organizations are required to maintain adequate internal records to demonstrate compliance with the investment provisions contained in Subpart A of Regulation K (12 CFR part 211). Legal authorization and confidentiality: This collection of information is authorized pursuant to section 5(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)); sections 25 and 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 602 and 625). The recordkeeping requirements are mandatory. Because the Federal Reserve does not collect these records, an issue of confidentiality under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is unlikely to arise. FOIA, however, may be implicated if the Federal Reserve’s examiners retain a copy of the records in their examination or supervision of the institution. Any such records would be exempt from disclosure pursuant to exemption 8 of FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b) (b)(8)). Exemption 4 to FOIA, which protects confidential financial information, may also be applicable. (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)). Current actions: On May 22, 2018, the Board published a notice in the Federal Register (83 FR 23682) requesting public comment for 60 days on the extension, without revision, of the FR 2064. The comment period for this notice expired on July 23, 2018. The Board did not receive any comments. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 20, 2018. Ann Misback, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2018–18254 Filed 8–22–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 42651 FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD Agenda; Board Meeting; August 27, 2018, 10:00 a.m. (Telephonic) Open Session 1. Approval of the Minutes for the July 24, 2018 Board Meeting 2. Monthly Reports (a) Participant Activity (b) Investment Performance (c) Legislative Report 3. Quarterly Reports (d) Metrics 4. 2018–2019 Board Meeting Calendar Review Closed Session Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) and (c)(10). Contact Person for More Information: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942–1640. Dated: August 17, 2018. Dharmesh Vashee, Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. [FR Doc. 2018–18138 Filed 8–22–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6760–01–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [OMB Control No. 9000–0149; Docket No. 2018–0003; Sequence No. 16] Information Collection; Subcontract Consent and Contractors’ Purchasing System Review Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations, the FAR Council invites the public to comment upon a renewal concerning consent to subcontract, advance notification, and Contractors’ purchasing system review. DATES: Submit comments on or before October 22, 2018. ADDRESSES: The FAR Council invites interested persons to submit comments on this collection by either of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: This website provides the ability to type SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 42652 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 164 / Thursday, August 23, 2018 / Notices short comments directly into the comment field or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to https:// www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions on the site. • Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms. Mandell/IC 9000–0149, Subcontract Consent and Contractors’ Purchasing System Review. Instructions: All items submitted must cite Information Collection 9000– 0149, Subcontract Consent and Contractors’ Purchasing System Review. Comments received in response to this docket will be made available for public inspection and posted without change, including any personal information, at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments received generally will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail). This information collection is pending at the FAR Council. The Council will submit it to OMB within 60 days from the date of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, at telephone 202–969–7207, or email zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Overview of Information Collection Description of the Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection: Revision/Renewal of a currently approved collection. 2. Title of the Collection: Subcontract Consent and Contractors’ Purchasing System Review. 3. Agency Form Number, If Any: N/A. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Solicitation of Public Comment Written comments and suggestions from the public should address one or more of the following four points: (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Aug 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. B. Purpose This information collection requirement, OMB Control No. 9000– 0149, currently titled ‘‘Subcontract Consent,’’ is proposed to be retitled ‘‘Subcontract Consent and Contractors’ Purchasing System Review,’’ due to consolidation with currently approved information collection requirement OMB Control No. 9000–0132, Contractors’ Purchasing System Review. This clearance covers the information that a contractor must submit to comply with the requirements in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.244–2, Subcontracts, regarding consent to subcontract, advance notification, and Contractors’ purchasing system review as follows: 1. Consent to subcontract. This is the contracting officer’s written consent for the prime contractor to enter into a particular subcontract. In order for the contracting officer responsible for consent to make an informed decision, the prime contractor must submit adequate information to ensure that the proposed subcontract is appropriate for the risks involved and consistent with current policy and sound business judgment. The review allows the Government to determine whether the contractor’s purchasing policies and practices are efficient and adequately protect the Government’s interests. If the contractor has an approved purchasing system, consent is required for subcontracts specifically identified by the contracting officer in the subcontracts clause of the contract. The contracting officer may require consent to subcontract if the contracting officer has determined that an individual consent action is required to protect the Government adequately because of the subcontract type, complexity, or value, or because the subcontract needs special surveillance. These can be subcontracts for critical systems, subsystems, components, or services. If the contractor does not have an approved purchasing system, consent to subcontract is required for costreimbursement, time-and-materials, labor-hour, or letter contracts, and also for unpriced actions under fixed-price PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. 2. Advance notification. Prime contractors must provide contracting officers notification before the award of any cost-plus-fixed-fee subcontract, or certain fixed-price subcontracts. This requirement for advance notification is driven by statutory requirements in 10 U.S.C. 2306 and 41 U.S.C. 3905. 3. Contractors’ Purchasing System Review. The objective of a contractor purchasing system review (CPSR), is to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness with which a contractor spends Government funds and complies with Government policy when subcontracting. Paragraph (i) of FAR clause 52.244–2 specifies that the Government reserves the right to review the contractor’s purchasing system as set forth in FAR subpart 44.3. FAR 44.302 requires the administrative contracting officer (ACO) to determine the need for a CPSR based on, but not limited to, the past performance of the contractor, and the volume, complexity and dollar value of subcontracts. If a contractor’s sales to the Government (excluding competitively awarded firm-fixed-price and competitively awarded fixed-price with economic price adjustment contracts and sales of commercial items pursuant to Part 12) are expected to exceed $25 million during the next 12 months, the ACO will perform a review to determine if a CPSR is needed. Sales include those represented by prime contracts, subcontracts under Government prime contracts, and modifications. Generally, a CPSR is not performed for a specific contract. The head of the agency responsible for contract administration may raise or lower the $25 million review level if it is considered to be in the Government’s best interest. Once an initial determination has been made to conduct a review, at least every three years the ACO shall determine whether a purchasing system review is necessary. If necessary, the cognizant contract administration office will conduct a purchasing system review. A CPSR provides the administrative contracting officer (ACO) a basis for granting, withholding, or withdrawing approval of a contractor’s purchasing system. An approved purchasing system allows the contractor more autonomy in subcontracting actions. Without an approved purchasing system more Government oversight is necessary, and Government consent to subcontract is required. Generally, a CPSR is not performed for a specific contract. Rather, CPSRs are conducted on contractors based on the factors E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 164 / Thursday, August 23, 2018 / Notices identified above. For example, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Contractor Purchasing System Review Group is a group dedicated to conducting CPSRs for the Department of Defense. As of June 2014 the group’s review workload included more than 700 contractors worldwide. The cognizant ACO is responsible for granting, withholding, or withdrawing approval of a contractor’s purchasing system and for promptly notifying the contractor of same (FAR 44.305–1). Related administrative requirements are as follows: FAR 44.305–2(c) requires that when recommendations are made for improvement of an approved system, the contractor shall be requested to reply within 15 days with a position regarding the recommendations. FAR 44.305–3(b) requires when approval of the contractor’s purchasing system is withheld or withdrawn, the ACO shall within 10 days after completing the inplant review (1) inform the contractor in writing, (2) specify the deficiencies that must be corrected to qualify the system for approval, and (3) request the contractor to furnish within 15 days a plan for accomplishing the necessary actions. If the plan is accepted, the ACO shall make a follow-up review as soon as the contractor notifies the ACO that the deficiencies have been corrected. C. Annual Reporting Burden 1. Consent to Subcontract Respondents: 2,578. Responses per Respondent: 3. Total Annual Responses: 7,734. Hours per Response: 3. Total Burden Hours: 23,202. 2. Advance Notification Respondents: 1,861. Responses per Respondent: 3. Total Annual Responses: 5,583. Hours per Response: 0.25. Total Burden Hours: 1,396. 3. Contractors’ Purchasing System Review Respondents: 1,050. Responses per Respondent: 1. Total Annual Responses: 1,050. Hours per Response: 25. Total Burden Hours: 26,250. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 4. Summary Respondents: 5,489. Total Annual Responses: 14,367. Total Burden Hours: 50,848. Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit and not-for-profit institutions. Obtaining Copies: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection documents from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Aug 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000–0149, Subcontract Consent and Contractors’ Purchasing System Review, in all correspondence. Dated: August 20, 2018. William Clark, Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. [FR Doc. 2018–18280 Filed 8–22–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee (MSHRAC), Metal Mining Automation and Advanced Technologies (MMAAT) Workgroup Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the CDC announces the following meeting for the Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee (MSHRAC), Metal Mining Automation and Advanced Technologies (MMAAT) Workgroup. This meeting is open to the public, limited only by the space available. The public is welcome to submit written comments in advance of the meeting to the contact person below. Written comments received in advance of the meeting will be included in the official record of the meeting. DATES: The meeting will be held on September 10, 2018, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. MDT; and September 11, 2018, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon MDT. ADDRESSES: University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045. On September 10, the meeting will be held in the Krugman Conference Hall, and on September 11 in the Education 2 South Auditorium, both on that campus. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Ruff, MMAAT Workgroup Designated Federal Officer, NIOSH, CDC, 315 E Montgomery Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99207, Telephone (509) 354–8003; Email ter5@cdc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose: This meeting will focus on emerging health and safety issues associated with the implementation of automation and advanced technology in SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 42653 the U.S. metal mining industry. The meeting is designed to identify to what extent automation and smart technologies will be implemented in metal mining and in what timeframe; to identify the related emerging health & safety concern;, and to identify what gaps exist in occupational health & safety research related to automation and smart technologies. Matters to be Considered: The agenda will include updates on the state-of-theart in mining automation and case studies on implementing automation at mine sites. The updates will be followed by panel discussions regarding: (1) Human factors considerations, (2) risk management, (3) automated haulage, (4) sensor technology, and (5) data analytics. Each panel will seek input and discuss the health and safety implications associated with these various topics, and identify gaps for further study. Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate. The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Sherri A. Berger, Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2018–18185 Filed 8–22–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–19–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC–2018–0028; Docket Number NIOSH– 310] Final National Occupational Research Agenda for Wholesale and Retail Trade National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: NIOSH announces the availability of the final National Occupational Research Agenda for Wholesale and Retail Trade. DATES: The final document was published August 17, 2018 on the CDC website. ADDRESSES: The document may be obtained at the following link: https:// SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42651-42653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 9000-0149; Docket No. 2018-0003; Sequence No. 16]


Information Collection; Subcontract Consent and Contractors' 
Purchasing System Review

AGENCY:  Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations, the FAR Council 
invites the public to comment upon a renewal concerning consent to 
subcontract, advance notification, and Contractors' purchasing system 
review.

DATES: Submit comments on or before October 22, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The FAR Council invites interested persons to submit 
comments on this collection by either of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: This website provides the 
ability to type

[[Page 42652]]

short comments directly into the comment field or attach a file for 
lengthier comments. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
instructions on the site.
     Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory 
Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405. 
ATTN: Ms. Mandell/IC 9000-0149, Subcontract Consent and Contractors' 
Purchasing System Review.
    Instructions: All items submitted must cite Information Collection 
9000-0149, Subcontract Consent and Contractors' Purchasing System 
Review. Comments received in response to this docket will be made 
available for public inspection and posted without change, including 
any personal information, at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business 
confidential information provided. To confirm receipt of your 
comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov, approximately two to 
three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for 
posting of comments submitted by mail). This information collection is 
pending at the FAR Council. The Council will submit it to OMB within 60 
days from the date of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Zenaida Delgado, Procurement 
Analyst, at telephone 202-969-7207, or email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Overview of Information Collection

Description of the Information Collection

    1. Type of Information Collection: Revision/Renewal of a currently 
approved collection.
    2. Title of the Collection: Subcontract Consent and Contractors' 
Purchasing System Review.
    3. Agency Form Number, If Any: N/A.

Solicitation of Public Comment

    Written comments and suggestions from the public should address one 
or more of the following four points:
    (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.

B. Purpose

    This information collection requirement, OMB Control No. 9000-0149, 
currently titled ``Subcontract Consent,'' is proposed to be retitled 
``Subcontract Consent and Contractors' Purchasing System Review,'' due 
to consolidation with currently approved information collection 
requirement OMB Control No. 9000-0132, Contractors' Purchasing System 
Review.
    This clearance covers the information that a contractor must submit 
to comply with the requirements in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
52.244-2, Subcontracts, regarding consent to subcontract, advance 
notification, and Contractors' purchasing system review as follows:
    1. Consent to subcontract. This is the contracting officer's 
written consent for the prime contractor to enter into a particular 
subcontract. In order for the contracting officer responsible for 
consent to make an informed decision, the prime contractor must submit 
adequate information to ensure that the proposed subcontract is 
appropriate for the risks involved and consistent with current policy 
and sound business judgment. The review allows the Government to 
determine whether the contractor's purchasing policies and practices 
are efficient and adequately protect the Government's interests.
    If the contractor has an approved purchasing system, consent is 
required for subcontracts specifically identified by the contracting 
officer in the subcontracts clause of the contract. The contracting 
officer may require consent to subcontract if the contracting officer 
has determined that an individual consent action is required to protect 
the Government adequately because of the subcontract type, complexity, 
or value, or because the subcontract needs special surveillance. These 
can be subcontracts for critical systems, subsystems, components, or 
services.
    If the contractor does not have an approved purchasing system, 
consent to subcontract is required for cost-reimbursement, time-and-
materials, labor-hour, or letter contracts, and also for unpriced 
actions under fixed-price contracts that exceed the simplified 
acquisition threshold.
    2. Advance notification. Prime contractors must provide contracting 
officers notification before the award of any cost-plus-fixed-fee 
subcontract, or certain fixed-price subcontracts. This requirement for 
advance notification is driven by statutory requirements in 10 U.S.C. 
2306 and 41 U.S.C. 3905.
    3. Contractors' Purchasing System Review. The objective of a 
contractor purchasing system review (CPSR), is to evaluate the 
efficiency and effectiveness with which a contractor spends Government 
funds and complies with Government policy when subcontracting.
    Paragraph (i) of FAR clause 52.244-2 specifies that the Government 
reserves the right to review the contractor's purchasing system as set 
forth in FAR subpart 44.3. FAR 44.302 requires the administrative 
contracting officer (ACO) to determine the need for a CPSR based on, 
but not limited to, the past performance of the contractor, and the 
volume, complexity and dollar value of subcontracts. If a contractor's 
sales to the Government (excluding competitively awarded firm-fixed-
price and competitively awarded fixed-price with economic price 
adjustment contracts and sales of commercial items pursuant to Part 12) 
are expected to exceed $25 million during the next 12 months, the ACO 
will perform a review to determine if a CPSR is needed. Sales include 
those represented by prime contracts, subcontracts under Government 
prime contracts, and modifications. Generally, a CPSR is not performed 
for a specific contract. The head of the agency responsible for 
contract administration may raise or lower the $25 million review level 
if it is considered to be in the Government's best interest. Once an 
initial determination has been made to conduct a review, at least every 
three years the ACO shall determine whether a purchasing system review 
is necessary. If necessary, the cognizant contract administration 
office will conduct a purchasing system review.
    A CPSR provides the administrative contracting officer (ACO) a 
basis for granting, withholding, or withdrawing approval of a 
contractor's purchasing system. An approved purchasing system allows 
the contractor more autonomy in subcontracting actions. Without an 
approved purchasing system more Government oversight is necessary, and 
Government consent to subcontract is required. Generally, a CPSR is not 
performed for a specific contract. Rather, CPSRs are conducted on 
contractors based on the factors

[[Page 42653]]

identified above. For example, the Defense Contract Management Agency 
(DCMA) Contractor Purchasing System Review Group is a group dedicated 
to conducting CPSRs for the Department of Defense. As of June 2014 the 
group's review workload included more than 700 contractors worldwide.
    The cognizant ACO is responsible for granting, withholding, or 
withdrawing approval of a contractor's purchasing system and for 
promptly notifying the contractor of same (FAR 44.305-1).
    Related administrative requirements are as follows: FAR 44.305-2(c) 
requires that when recommendations are made for improvement of an 
approved system, the contractor shall be requested to reply within 15 
days with a position regarding the recommendations. FAR 44.305-3(b) 
requires when approval of the contractor's purchasing system is 
withheld or withdrawn, the ACO shall within 10 days after completing 
the in-plant review (1) inform the contractor in writing, (2) specify 
the deficiencies that must be corrected to qualify the system for 
approval, and (3) request the contractor to furnish within 15 days a 
plan for accomplishing the necessary actions. If the plan is accepted, 
the ACO shall make a follow-up review as soon as the contractor 
notifies the ACO that the deficiencies have been corrected.

C. Annual Reporting Burden

1. Consent to Subcontract
    Respondents: 2,578.
    Responses per Respondent: 3.
    Total Annual Responses: 7,734.
    Hours per Response: 3.
    Total Burden Hours: 23,202.
2. Advance Notification
    Respondents: 1,861.
    Responses per Respondent: 3.
    Total Annual Responses: 5,583.
    Hours per Response: 0.25.
    Total Burden Hours: 1,396.
3. Contractors' Purchasing System Review
    Respondents: 1,050.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Total Annual Responses: 1,050.
    Hours per Response: 25.
    Total Burden Hours: 26,250.
4. Summary
    Respondents: 5,489.
    Total Annual Responses: 14,367.
    Total Burden Hours: 50,848.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit and not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Obtaining Copies: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information 
collection documents from the General Services Administration, 
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, 
DC 20405, telephone 202-501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-
0149, Subcontract Consent and Contractors' Purchasing System Review, in 
all correspondence.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
William Clark,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-18280 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.