Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program, 42618-42622 [2018-18089]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
• Rural Housing Service

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42618-42622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18089]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Housing Service

7 CFR Part 3555

RIN 0575-AD09


Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program

AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service (RHS or Agency) proposes to make 
several changes to the single-family housing guaranteed loan program 
(SFHGLP) regulations to streamline the loss claim process for lenders 
who have acquired title to property through voluntary liquidation or 
foreclosure; clarify that lenders must comply with applicable laws, 
including those within the purview of the Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau; and better align loss mitigation policies with those in the 
mortgage industry.

DATES: Written or email comments on the proposed rule must be received 
on or before October 22, 2018 to be assured for consideration.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this proposed rule by any one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Submit written comments via the U.S. Postal Service 
to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, 
Washington, DC 20250-0742.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit written comments via Federal 
Express mail, or other courier service requiring a street address to 
the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 
20250.
    All written comments will be available for public inspection during 
regular work hours at the 1400 Independence Ave. SW, address listed 
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Jensen, Finance and Loan Analyst, 
Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Division, STOP 0784, Room 2250, 
USDA Rural Development, South Agriculture Building, 1400 Independence 
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-0784, telephone: (503) 894-2382, email 
is [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order 12866, Classification

    This proposed rule has been determined to be non-significant and, 
therefore was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. Except where specified, all State and local laws 
and regulations that are in direct conflict with this rule will be 
preempted. Federal funds carry Federal requirements. No person is 
required to apply for funding under SFHGLP, but if they do apply and 
are selected for funding, they must comply with the requirements 
applicable to the Federal program funds. This proposed rule is not 
retroactive. It will not affect agreements entered prior to the 
effective date of the rule. Before any judicial action may be brought 
regarding the provisions of this rule, the administrative appeal 
provisions of 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
effect of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal 
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the 
Agency generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal 
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 
million, or more, in any one year. When such a statement is needed for 
a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the Agency to 
identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives 
and adopt the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome 
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
    This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the 
regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and 
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not 
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.

Environmental Impact Statement

    This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, 
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' It is the determination of the 
Agency that this action does not constitute a major Federal action 
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, and, in 
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public 
Law 91-190, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental 
Impact Statement is required.

Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial 
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national 
government and States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this 
rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local 
governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not required.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.) the undersigned has determined and certified by signature of this 
document that this rule change will not have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. This rule does not impose any 
significant new

[[Page 42619]]

requirements on Agency applicants and borrowers, and the regulatory 
changes affect only Agency determination of program benefits for 
guarantees of loans made to individuals.

Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments

    Executive Order 13175 imposes requirements on RHS in the 
development of regulatory policies that have Tribal implications or 
preempt tribal laws. RHS has determined that the proposed rule does not 
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribe(s) or on 
either the relationship or the distribution of powers and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. 
Thus, this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of 
Executive Order 13175. If a tribe determines that this rule has 
implications of which RHS is not aware and would like to engage with 
RHS on this rule, please contact USDA's Native American Coordinator at 
(720) 544-2911 or [email protected].

Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Consultation

    These loans are subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, 
which require intergovernmental consultation with State and local 
officials. RHS conducts intergovernmental consultations for each SFHGLP 
in accordance with 2 CFR part 415, subpart C.

Programs Affected

    The program affected by this regulation is listed in the Catalog of 
Federal Domestic Assistance under Number 10.410, Very Low to Moderate 
Income Housing Loans (Section 502 Rural Housing Loans).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The information collection and record keeping requirements 
contained in this regulation have been approved by OMB in accordance 
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). The 
assigned OMB control number is 0575-0179.

E-Government Act Compliance

    The Agency is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to 
promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to 
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government 
information and services, and for other purposes.

Non-Discrimination Policy

    In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its 
Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or 
administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on 
race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including 
gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital 
status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance 
program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil 
rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA 
(not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing 
deadlines vary by program or incident.
    Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of 
communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, 
audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible 
Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or 
contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. 
Additionally, program information may be made available in languages 
other than English.
    To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA 
Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at https://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or 
write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the 
information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint 
form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA 
by:
    (1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 
20250-9410;
    (2) Fax: (202) 690-7442; or
    (3) Email: [email protected].
    USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Background Information

    Driven by tight credit markets in which lenders are reluctant to 
make mortgage loans without insurance or guarantees from the federal 
government, SFHGLP has grown significantly in recent fiscal years (FY); 
from $33 million in loans in 1991 to $19.2 billion in FY 2017. The 
total portfolio of the SFHGLP consists of over one million loans 
serviced by over 1,000 lenders. The expansion of the program has led 
the Agency to look for ways in which current policies and procedures 
can be revised to streamline the program, align the Agency with 
industry practices, and balance Agency resources with program demand. 
In order to help achieve these objectives, this rule proposes various 
changes to the loss claim process and loss mitigation loan servicing.

I. Loss Claims

    When a borrower stops making loan payments and goes into default, 
lenders are required to contact the borrower at prescribed intervals to 
offer various loss mitigation options to continue with the loan, come 
to an agreement to self-liquidate, or transfer the property to the 
lender through a deed-in-lieu. If these loss mitigation activities are 
unsuccessful, the lender will proceed to foreclosure where the property 
is sold to a third party or acquired into the lender's real estate 
owned (REO) portfolio. After sale of the property at the foreclosure 
sale or from the lender's REO, those proceeds are applied to the 
account. If that amount cannot satisfy the account, the lender submits 
a loss claim to the Agency using a web-based automated system or in a 
paper format. Upon payment of the loss claim payment to the lender, the 
Agency has satisfied its obligation to the lender under the loan 
guarantee.
    When a lender acquires title to a property (i.e., REO), the Agency 
requires an REO property disposition plan from the lender explaining 
how, among other things, the lender will maintain and market the 
property during the permissible marketing period. The lender must 
obtain Agency concurrence for any significant changes to the plan.
    Currently, the Agency provides two opportunities for the lender to 
file a loss claim on REO property: When the property sells during the 
permissible marketing period, or after the permissible marketing period 
(typically 9 or 12 months) if the REO property does not sell.
    If the property has sold during the permissible marketing period, 
the loss claim is paid based on the actual property sales price 
combined with the actual property liquidation, property preservation, 
and disposition costs. If the property remains unsold after the 
permissible marketing period, the loss claim is based upon a 
liquidation value real estate appraisal and preservation and 
disposition costs consistent with the most currently published U.S. 
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Management and Acquisition Factor 
(VA Net Value Factor) found at https://www.benefits.va.gov/HOMELOANS/servicers_valeri.asp. When a lender receives a loss claim payment on 
unsold

[[Page 42620]]

REO, they are responsible to report the future sale of the property and 
pay future recovery if the sales price is greater than the liquidation 
value real estate appraisal amount. The proceeds are distributed so 
that the total loss to the Agency is equivalent to the loss that would 
have been incurred had the recovered amount been included in the 
initial loss calculation.
    The Agency proposes changes to the loss claim payment process when 
a lender acquires title by way of a deed-in-lieu or foreclosure sale. 
Under the proposed framework, lenders who acquire title must order a 
market value appraisal for the REO property within 15 days of acquiring 
title to the property. The loss claim request must be submitted to the 
Agency within 45 days upon receipt of the appraisal. The Agency will 
employ a loss claim model that takes into consideration various 
factors, including the market value appraisal, as well as property 
preservation and disposition costs based on the VA Management and 
Acquisition Factor costs consistent with the most currently published 
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Management and Acquisition 
Factor (VA Net Value Factor) found at https://www.benefits.va.gov/HOMELOANS/servicers_valeri.asp to determine the loss claim amount. 
Because loss claims will be paid after acquisition and prior to 
marketing the REO, this will eliminate the need for REO property 
disposition plans, different loss claim calculations based on whether 
the property has sold or remains in the lender's REO portfolio, and 
claim adjustments based on future recovery. To reflect this more 
streamlined approach to loss claim processing that should deliver loss 
claim payments to lenders in a timelier fashion, the Agency will limit 
the lender to 60 days of additional interest during the loss claim 
period.
    The Agency also proposes to revise 7 CFR 3555.354, which allows 
lenders to submit a loss claim electronically or in paper format. The 
change will require all lenders to utilize a web-based system to submit 
loss claims to reduce paperwork burden to both lenders and the Agency.
    The Agency proposes to revise the definition of the settlement date 
to add the settlement date for deed-in-lieu actions. The Agency will 
define the settlement date of the deed-in-lieu as the date title is 
recorded. The current version of the regulation is silent on this 
issue.
    These proposed changes were recommended by a Lean Six Sigma task 
force that consisted of Agency staff and lenders. Lean Six Sigma is a 
methodology used to improve performance and streamline processes by 
defining, measuring, analyzing, improving, and controlling problems or 
issues. The Lean Six Sigma task force was established to develop 
solutions on improving the loss claim process, while also making the 
SFGHLP cost-effective and efficient. Benefits of the proposed loss 
claim process to the lender include: A faster claim resolution by 
elimination of the 9- and 12 month marketing periods; a simplified 
claim submission due to elimination of requirement to submit invoices, 
system notes, financial history, listing agreement, Closing Disclosure 
and other information applicable to the marketing period; elimination 
of the property disposition plan; and efficient disposition of REO 
properties due to the elimination of agency approval required for 
offers, repair bids or valuations. Benefits to the Agency include: A 
reduction of REO claim processing time to 1.5-4 hours per claim from 3-
6 hours per claim resulting in an annual savings of 26,728 staff hours 
or $927,000 in annual labor costs; elimination of property disposition 
plans resulting in a savings of 14,492 hours or $503,000 in annual 
labor costs; reduction of improper payment risk by eliminating 
consideration of actual expenditure activity within the marketing 
period; simplification and streamlining of compliance reviews by 
eliminating all post-foreclosure activity on REO claims; reduction of 
interest paid by 30 days per REO claim resulting in annual interest 
savings of $3.7 million (based on FY 2014 REO claim payments). The 
proposed change will not impact borrowers.

II. General Lender Requirement

    The Agency is proposing to amend 7 CFR 3555.51(b)(1) to clarify 
that in addition to complying with Agency laws and guidance, lenders 
must comply with other applicable federal, state and local laws, 
including those that fall under the purview of the Consumer Financial 
Protection Bureau, such as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act 
and the Truth in Lending Act.

III. Loss Mitigation

    In November of 2015, the Department of Treasury hosted a summit 
attended by federal agencies, mortgage lenders, consumer groups, 
investors, and mortgage service providers to discuss the future of loss 
mitigation pending the expiration of the Home Affordable Modification 
Program (HAMP) in December 2016. An important take-away from the summit 
was HAMP data showing payment reduction was key to a borrower's loss 
mitigation success. Borrowers facing financial hardship are unable to 
retain their home if the modified payment remains equal or exceeds 
their current promissory note installment.
    The proposed changes regarding loss mitigation procedures, 
described below, would continue the Agency's efforts to improve the 
effectiveness of loss mitigation by emphasizing payment reduction as 
the key component to any relief provided to the borrower while offering 
lenders and borrowers consistent loss mitigation policies that align 
with industry standard.
    The proposed changes will offer borrowers faster and greater 
payment relief early in the loss mitigation process. Historically, 
borrowers who receive less than 10 percent payment reduction have re-
defaulted at a rate greater than 60 percent. When at least a 10 percent 
payment reduction is achieved, the re-default rate is reduced by half. 
These changes would increase homeownership success and decrease 
foreclosures. The Agency expects a corresponding reduction in lender-
owned property resulting in greater community stability, as well as 
decreasing the expenses associated with foreclosure and property 
disposition.

A. Agency Concurrence on Servicing Plans and Voluntary Liquidation

    Currently, lenders must obtain Agency concurrence for a formal 
servicing plan or voluntary liquidation prior to implementation with 
the borrower. The Agency may grant lenders a waiver for concurrence.
    The Agency proposes to amend the regulation to eliminate the 
requirement for Agency concurrence on formal servicing plans and 
voluntary liquidation. The proposed change would streamline the 
servicing plan and voluntary liquidation process for lenders and 
borrowers. Lenders would still report to the Agency any servicing plans 
and voluntary liquidation options that have been adopted, but Agency 
concurrence will not be necessary beforehand. While Agency concurrence 
for these actions will not be necessary, lenders will still be 
accountable for servicing plans and voluntary liquidation actions. The 
Agency will set performance benchmarks, monitor lender performance, and 
implement any necessary corrective action plans. Performance benchmarks 
will include rates for delinquency, foreclosure, and loss claim.
    Lender performance regarding loss mitigation servicing plans and 
voluntary liquidation will be captured by the

[[Page 42621]]

Agency's existing quality control (QC) process that incorporates a set 
of questions and findings for a sample of files submitted by the lender 
during a specific time. Findings are recorded and reported back to the 
lender along with any suggestions for improvement.
    In addition, the Agency already reviews lenders on a regular basis 
for compliance with Agency requirements, and will reflect lenders' 
implementation of loss mitigation servicing plans and voluntary 
liquidation. Lender compliance reviews focus on the lender's adherence 
to Agency requirements and continuing eligibility for the program based 
on the results of individual file reviews. Lenders are provided a 
report of any findings and given an opportunity to correct issues.
    Lenders that are determined to be out of compliance through Agency 
QC or compliance reviews will be counseled, offered training, and given 
the opportunity to improve. Lenders that show little or no progress 
could be subject to enhanced oversight during the loss claim process.
    The Agency believes that eliminating the need for Agency 
concurrence for these actions will reduce the number of approval steps 
within the process and provide assistance to borrowers more quickly and 
balance Agency resources against demands. In addition, the change will 
align Agency policy with other loan guarantee programs that do not 
require a case-by-case review and rely on regular QC, lender compliance 
reviews, and data to determine lender performance and compliance with 
regulations.
    To conform with the above changes, the Agency proposes to eliminate 
references to mandatory Agency concurrence from 3555.302 regarding 
protective advances and 3555.305 regarding voluntary liquidation.

B. Trial Plan (Traditional Servicing Loan Modification)

    Pursuant to 7 CFR 3555.303(b)(3)(v) borrowers may not be required 
to complete a trial plan in order to be eligible for a traditional 
servicing loan modification. The Agency proposes to amend this 
requirement and provide flexibility to lenders to determine whether a 
trial period is warranted for a traditional servicing loan 
modification.

C. Mortgage Recovery Advance

    Lenders may use special servicing options to bring a borrower's 
mortgage payment to an income ratio as close as possible to 31 percent. 
If the borrower cannot reach the targeted payment with an extended term 
loan modification of interest rate and loan term under 3555.304(c), the 
lender may utilize a Mortgage Recovery Advance (MRA) under 3555.304(d).
    The Agency proposes to amend the language to standardize many of 
the requirements of special servicing options to increase the 
opportunity and effectiveness of lender assistance to borrowers facing 
an involuntary inability to pay their mortgage.
    The Agency proposes to allow a ``stand-alone'' MRA when a borrower 
faced a hardship but is now able to continue making payments under the 
promissory note rate and terms but cannot cure the delinquency with 
personal funds. Currently, the regulation does not provide a solution 
for this scenario. The Agency has received feedback from stakeholders 
that a stand-alone MRA in certain circumstances would be an effective 
tool to facilitate borrower's long-term repayment ability. The proposed 
stand-alone MRA would be permitted when the borrower's mortgage payment 
to income ratio is less than 31 percent. For other borrowers, the 
existing requirement to use special servicing options in the order they 
appear in 3555.304 would remain.
    The regulation is currently silent on how the servicer should treat 
the capitalization of the delinquency when using special servicing 
options. In comparison, traditional servicing options direct the lender 
through specific steps to capitalize all or a portion of the arrearage 
(PITI). Capitalization may also include foreclosure fees and costs, tax 
and insurance advances, past due Agency annual fees imposed by the 
lender, but not late charges or lender fees. Allowing the lender to 
capitalize the delinquency and these other amounts creates a clearer 
path to borrower success.
    The Agency proposes to remove the maximum limit of 12 months PITI 
when calculating the MRA maximum amount and the requirement that the 
lender reduce the maximum MRA by the sum of the arrearages advanced to 
cure the default and any foreclosure costs incurred to that point. The 
servicing industry uses a standard ``waterfall'' method where the first 
step is to capitalize the delinquency, defined as PITI, annual fees, 
legal fees, and foreclosure costs. The lender then considers changes to 
the interest rate and term extension. By focusing on the limit of 30 
percent of the unpaid principal balance, the changes would simplify the 
MRA calculation and increase the chances of the borrower becoming and 
remaining current. In addition, removal of the 12-month maximum PITI 
will bring the Agency in line with other federal programs and industry 
standards.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3555

    Home improvement, Loan Programs--Housing and community development, 
Mortgage insurance, Mortgages, Rural areas.

    Therefore, chapter XXXV, title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 3555--GUARANTEED RURAL HOUSING PROGRAM

0
1. The authority citation for part 3555 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301; 42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.

0
2. Amend Sec.  3555.10 in the definition of Settlement date by revising 
the introductory text and adding paragraph (5) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.10  Definitions and abbreviations.

* * * * *
    Settlement date. The settlement date, for the purpose of loss 
calculation, is:
* * * * *
    (5) The date title is acquired upon recordation of a deed-in-lieu 
of foreclosure, with prior approval of the lender.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec.  3555.51 (b)(1) by adding a new sentence after the first 
sentence to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.51  Lender eligibility.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * * Lenders must also comply with all other applicable 
federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements, including those 
under the purview of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, such as 
the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act. 
* * *
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec.  3555.301 by revising paragraph (h) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.301  General servicing techniques.

* * * * *
    (h) Formal servicing plan. The lender must report to the Agency 
utilizing a web-based automated system a formal servicing plan when a 
borrower's account is 90 days or more delinquent and a method other 
than foreclosure is recommend to solve the delinquency.
0
5. Amend Sec.  3555.302 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.302  Protective advances.

* * * * *

[[Page 42622]]

    (b) Advances for costs other than taxes and insurance. Protective 
advances for costs other than taxes and insurance, such as emergency 
repairs, can be made only if the borrower cannot, or will not, obtain 
an additional loan or reimbursement from an insurer or the borrower has 
abandoned the property. The lender must determine that any repairs 
funded by protective advances are cost effective. Repairs funded by 
protective advances must be planned, performed and inspected in 
accordance with Sec.  3555.202 and as further described by the Agency. 
The lender must obtain prior Agency concurrence before issuing 
protective advances under this paragraph only for protective advances 
of a significant amount as specified by the Agency.
0
6. Amend Sec.  3555.303 by revising paragraph (b)(3)(v) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  3555.303  Traditional servicing options.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (v) Lenders may require that borrowers complete a trial payment 
plan prior to making scheduled payments amended by the traditional loan 
servicing loan modification.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec.  3555.304 by removing and reserving paragraph (a)(2), 
revising paragraph (a)(4), revising paragraphs (c)(1)and (2), and 
revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.304  Special servicing options.

    (a) * * *
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (4) If the borrower currently has a mortgage payment to income 
ratio lower than 31 percent, special servicing options can be utilized 
to cure the delinquency without modifying the note. Otherwise, special 
servicing options shall be used in the order established in this 
section to bring the borrower's mortgage payment to income ratio as 
close as possible to, but not less than, 31 percent.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Loan modifications may capitalize all or a portion of the 
arrearage (PITI) and/or reamortization of the balance due. 
Capitalization may also include foreclosure fees and costs, tax and 
insurance advances, past due annual fees imposed by the lender, but not 
late charges or lender fees.
    (2) Loan modifications must be a fixed interest rate and cannot 
exceed the current market interest rate at the time of modification. 
When reducing the interest rate, the maximum rate is subject to 
paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
    (d) * * *
    (2) The maximum amount of a mortgage recovery advance is 30 percent 
of the unpaid principal balance as of the date of default. The Agency 
may change the maximum amount of mortgage recovery advance by 
publication in the Federal Register.
    (3) If the borrower's total monthly mortgage payment is less than 
31 percent of gross monthly income prior to an extended term loan 
modification, the mortgage recovery advance can be used as a stand-
alone option to cure the borrower's delinquency without changing the 
terms of the note.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec.  3555.305 by revising the introductory text to read as 
follows:


Sec.  3555.305  Voluntary liquidation.

    The lender must have exhausted the servicing options outlined in 
Sec. Sec.  3555.302 through 3555.304 to cure the delinquency before 
considering voluntary liquidation. The methods of voluntary liquidation 
of the security property outlined in this section may be used to 
protect the interests of the Government.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec.  3555.306 by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.306  Liquidation.

* * * * *
    (f) Lender acquisition of title. If at liquidation, the title to 
the property is conveyed to the lender, the lender will order a market 
value appraisal within 15 days of acquiring title. The appraisal must 
be completed by an appraiser to be used to pay the loss claim using a 
calculated value as provided by a model. The lender must submit the 
appraisal with a loss claim request in accordance with subpart H.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec.  3555.352 by revising paragraphs (c) and (e) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  3555.352  Loss covered by the guarantee.

* * * * *
    (c) Additional interest. Additional interest on the unsatisfied 
principal accrued from the settlement date to the date the claim is 
paid, but not more than 60 days from the settlement date;
* * * * *
    (e) Liquidation costs. Reasonable and customary liquidation costs, 
such as attorney fees, market value appraisals, and foreclosure costs. 
Annual fees advanced by the lender to the Agency are ineligible for 
reimbursement when calculating the loss claim payment.
0
11. Amend Sec.  3555.353 by revising paragraphs (a) introductory text 
and (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.353  Net recovery value.

* * * * *
    (a) For a property that has been sold. When a loss claim is filed 
on a property that was sold to a third party at the foreclosure sale or 
through an approved pre-foreclosure sale, net recovery value is 
calculated as follows:
* * * * *
    (b) For a property that has been acquired. When a loss claim is 
filed on a property acquired by the lender through a foreclosure sale 
or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, net recovery value is based on an 
estimated sales price calculated using the market value, holding and 
disposition costs calculated using an acquisition and management factor 
published by the VA, and other factors as determined by the Agency. The 
lender must order the appraisal within 15 days of acquiring title to 
the property, and submit the appraisal with any loss claim request in 
accordance with subpart H of this part.
0
12. Amend Sec.  3555.354 by revising the introductory text and 
paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  3555.354  Loss claim procedures.

    All lenders must use a web-based automated system designated by the 
Agency to submit all loss claim requests.
* * * * *
    (b) REO. When the lender acquires title to the property, the lender 
must order a market value appraisal within 15 days of acquiring title. 
The lender must submit a complete loss claim package that includes the 
completed market value appraisal within 45 calendar days of receiving 
the appraisal. Loss claims submitted beyond this period of time, or 
submitted without an appraisal may be rejected or reduced by Rural 
Development. The Agency will apply an acquisition and management resale 
factor to estimate holding and disposition costs, based on the most 
current VA Management and Acquisition Factor found at https://www.benefits.va.gov/HOMELOANS/servicers_valeri.asp.
* * * * *


Sec.  3555.356  [Removed]

0
13. Remove Sec.  3555.356.

    Dated: July 27, 2018.
Joel C. Baxley,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-18089 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P