Release of Risk and Exposure Assessment Plan for the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur and Particulate Matter, 42497-42498 [2018-17041]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 2018 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0128; FRL–9981–88–
OAR]
Release of Risk and Exposure
Assessment Plan for the Secondary
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
for Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of
Sulfur and Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is conducting a periodic
review of the air quality criteria and the
secondary National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for oxides of
nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and
particulate matter (PM). On or about
August 6, 2018, the EPA will make
available for public review the
document titled Review of the
Secondary National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for Oxides of
Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur and
Particulate Matter: Risk and Exposure
Assessment Planning Document (REA
Planning Document). This plan presents
considerations and the proposed
approach for conducting quantitative
analyses of oxides of nitrogen, oxides of
sulfur, and PM exposures and welfare
risks in this NAAQS review. This
planning document is intended to
facilitate consultation with the Clean
Air Scientific Advisory Committee
(CASAC) and public comment on plans
for such quantitative analyses.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before October 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2014–0128, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
42497
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. The REA
Planning Document will be available
primarily via the internet at: https://
www.epa.gov/naaqs/nitrogen-dioxideno2-and-sulfur-dioxide-so2-secondarystandards-planning-documents-current.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ginger Tennant, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (Mail Code
C504–06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
919–541–4072; fax number: 919–541–
0237; or email address: tennant.ginger@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternative and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumption and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
I. General Information
Two sections of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) govern the establishment and
revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42
U.S.C. 7408) directs the Administrator
to identify and list certain air pollutants
and then to issue air quality criteria for
those pollutants. The Administrator is
to list those air pollutants that in his
‘‘judgment, cause or contribute to air
pollution which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare;’’ ‘‘the presence of which in the
ambient air results from numerous or
diverse mobile or stationary sources;’’
and ‘‘for which . . . [the Administrator]
plans to issue air quality criteria. . . . ’’
Air quality criteria are intended to
‘‘accurately reflect the latest scientific
knowledge useful in indicating the kind
and extent of all identifiable effects on
public health or welfare which may be
expected from the presence of [a]
pollutant in the ambient air . . . ’’ 42
U.S.C. 7408(b). Under section 109 (42
U.S.C. 7409), the EPA establishes
primary (health-based) and secondary
(welfare-based) NAAQS for pollutants
for which air quality criteria are issued.
Section 109(d) requires periodic review
and, if appropriate, revision of existing
air quality criteria. The revised air
quality criteria reflect advances in
scientific knowledge on the effects of
the pollutant on public health or
welfare. The EPA is also required to
periodically review and, if appropriate,
revise the NAAQS based on the revised
criteria. Section 109(d)(2) requires that
an independent scientific review
committee ‘‘shall complete a review of
the criteria . . . and the national
primary and secondary ambient air
quality standards . . . and shall
recommend to the Administrator any
new . . . standards and revisions of
existing criteria and standards as may be
appropriate. . . .’’ Since the early
A. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information on any digital storage media
that you mail to EPA, mark the outside
of the digital storage media as CBI and
then identify electronically within the
digital storage media the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket. If you
submit any digital storage media that
does not contain CBI, mark the outside
of the digital storage media clearly that
it does not contain CBI. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 2. Send or deliver information
identified as CBI only to the following
address: OAQPS Document Control
Officer (C404–02), OAQPS, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2014–0128.
2. Tips for Preparing your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the notice by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions. The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
CFR part or section number.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Information About the Document
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
42498
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
1980’s, this independent review
function has been performed by CASAC.
Presently, the EPA is reviewing the
secondary NAAQS for oxides of
nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and PM.1 PM
was added to this review after the draft
Integrated Review Plan (80 FR 69220,
November 9, 2015) was released to the
public and reviewed by CASAC in
recognition of linkages between these
pollutants (oxides of nitrogen, oxides of
sulfur, and PM) with respect to
deposition and atmospheric chemistry,
as well as from an environmental effects
perspective. Additional welfare effects
associated with PM, such as visibility,
climate and materials effects, and the
health effects of PM (including
particulate transformation products of
oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur)
are considered as part of the review of
the NAAQS for PM (81 FR 87933,
December 6, 2016). The health effects of
oxides of nitrogen were considered in a
separate assessment that was completed
recently as part of the review of the
primary (health-based) NAAQS for
oxides of nitrogen (83 FR 17226, April
18, 2018). Similarly, the health effects of
oxides of sulfur are currently being
considered in a separate assessment as
part of the review of the primary
NAAQS for oxides of sulfur (83 FR
26752, June 8, 2018).
The EPA’s overall plan for this review
is presented in the Integrated Review
Plan for the Secondary NAAQS for
Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur
and Particulate Matter.2 The REA
Planning Document considers the
degree to which important uncertainties
identified in quantitative analyses from
previous reviews have been addressed
by newly available scientific evidence,
tools, or information, including those in
the second external review draft of the
Integrated Science Assessment for
Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur
and Particulate Matter-Ecological
Criteria (83 FR 29786, June 26, 2018).
Based on these considerations, the
document reaches preliminary
conclusions on the extent to which
updated quantitative analyses of
exposures or public welfare risks are
warranted in the current review. For
updated analyses that are supported,
this planning document presents
anticipated approaches to conducting
such analyses. This document will be
available on or about August 6, 2018, on
1 The EPA’s call for information for the NO /SO
X
X
secondary review was issued on August 29, 2013
(78 FR 53452), and the call for information on the
PM review (both secondary and primary) was
issued on December 3, 2014 (79 FR 71764).
2 Available at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/
nitrogen-dioxide-no2-and-sulfur-dioxide-so2secondary-standards-planning-documents-current.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
the EPA’s Technology Transfer Network
website at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/
nitrogen-dioxide-no2-and-sulfurdioxide-so2-secondary-standardsplanning-documents-current.
The REA Planning Document will be
discussed at a public meeting for review
by CASAC and the public. A separate
Federal Register notice provides details
about this meeting and the process for
participation (83 FR 31755, July 9,
2018). The EPA will also consider
public comments on the REA Planning
Document that are submitted to the
docket, as described above.
Dated: August 2, 2018.
Panagiotis Tsirigotis,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2018–17041 Filed 8–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9982–69–OW]
Clean Water Act; Contractor Access to
Confidential Business Information
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of intended transfer of
confidential business information to
contractor and its subcontractors and
consultants.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) intends to transfer
confidential business information (CBI),
collected from numerous industries, to
ICF International (ICF) and its
subcontractors and consultants, under
an EPA contract newly awarded to ICF.
Transfer of this information is necessary
for ICF to assist the Office of Water in
the preparation of economic analyses
and environmental assessment activities
conducted in support of Clean Water
Act regulations and programs, such as
effluent guidelines and associated
planning and review activities, and
water quality standards. Much of the
information being transferred was or
will be collected under the authority of
section 308 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) to support effluent guidelines
development in particular. Interested
persons may submit comments on this
intended transfer of information to the
address noted below.
DATES: Comments on the transfer of data
are due August 27, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to
M. Ahmar Siddiqui, Document Control
Officer, Engineering and Analysis
Division (4303T), U.S. EPA, 1200
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M.
Ahmar Siddiqui, Document Control
Officer, at (202) 566–1044, or via email
at siddiqui.ahmar@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has
transferred CBI to its contractors and
subcontractors as part of the effluent
guidelines program under 40 CFR
2.302(h). EPA determined that this
transfer was necessary to enable the
contractors, subcontractors, and
consultants to perform their work in
supporting EPA in planning,
developing, and reviewing effluent
guidelines and standards for certain
industries.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 2.302(h)(2), EPA
is giving notice that it has entered into
a new contract with ICF, contract
number 68HE0C18D0001, located in
Fairfax, Virginia. The purpose of this
contract is to secure economic and
environmental assessment support for
EPA in its development, review,
implementation, and defense of waterrelated initiatives for a variety of
industries or states. To obtain assistance
in responding to this contract, ICF has
entered into contracts with the
following subcontractors and
consultants: The Cadmus Group, LLC
(located in Waltham, Massachusetts),
CognistX (located in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania), Great Lakes
Environmental Center, Inc. (located in
Traverse City, Michigan), Horizon
Systems Corporation (located in White
Stone, Virginia), Innovate! Inc. (located
in Alexandria, Virginia), LimnoTech
Inc. (located in Ann Arbor, Michigan),
Resources for the Future (located in
Washington, DC), RTI International
(located in Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina), Wayne Gray (located in
Worcester, Massachusetts), Robert
Johnston (located in Millville,
Massachusetts), Klaus Moeltner (located
in Blacksburg, Virginia), Kerry Smith
(located in Cave Creek, Arizona), and
Raghavan Srinivasan (located in College
Station, Texas).
All EPA contractor, subcontractor,
and consultant personnel are bound by
the requirements and sanctions
contained in their contracts with EPA
and in EPA’s CBI regulations found at
40 CFR part 2, subpart B. ICF will
adhere to an EPA-approved security
plan which describes procedures to
protect CBI. ICF will apply the
procedures in this plan to CBI
previously gathered by EPA and to CBI
that may be gathered in the future. The
security plan specifies that contractor
personnel are required to sign nondisclosure agreements and are briefed
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42497-42498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17041]
[[Page 42497]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0128; FRL-9981-88-OAR]
Release of Risk and Exposure Assessment Plan for the Secondary
National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of
Sulfur and Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conducting a
periodic review of the air quality criteria and the secondary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for oxides of nitrogen, oxides of
sulfur, and particulate matter (PM). On or about August 6, 2018, the
EPA will make available for public review the document titled Review of
the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of
Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur and Particulate Matter: Risk and Exposure
Assessment Planning Document (REA Planning Document). This plan
presents considerations and the proposed approach for conducting
quantitative analyses of oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and PM
exposures and welfare risks in this NAAQS review. This planning
document is intended to facilitate consultation with the Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) and public comment on plans for
such quantitative analyses.
DATES: Comments should be received on or before October 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2014-0128, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. The REA Planning Document will be available primarily via the
internet at: https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/nitrogen-dioxide-no2-and-sulfur-dioxide-so2-secondary-standards-planning-documents-current.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ginger Tennant, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (Mail Code C504-06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
919-541-4072; fax number: 919-541-0237; or email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on any
digital storage media that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
digital storage media as CBI and then identify electronically within
the digital storage media the specific information that is claimed as
CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. If you submit any digital storage media that does not
contain CBI, mark the outside of the digital storage media clearly that
it does not contain CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed
except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 2. Send or deliver information identified as CBI
only to the following address: OAQPS Document Control Officer (C404-
02), OAQPS, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-
0128.
2. Tips for Preparing your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the notice by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
Follow directions. The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a CFR part or
section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternative and
substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumption and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Information About the Document
Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment
and revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42 U.S.C. 7408) directs the
Administrator to identify and list certain air pollutants and then to
issue air quality criteria for those pollutants. The Administrator is
to list those air pollutants that in his ``judgment, cause or
contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare;'' ``the presence of which in the
ambient air results from numerous or diverse mobile or stationary
sources;'' and ``for which . . . [the Administrator] plans to issue air
quality criteria. . . . '' Air quality criteria are intended to
``accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge useful in
indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on public
health or welfare which may be expected from the presence of [a]
pollutant in the ambient air . . . '' 42 U.S.C. 7408(b). Under section
109 (42 U.S.C. 7409), the EPA establishes primary (health-based) and
secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for pollutants for which air quality
criteria are issued. Section 109(d) requires periodic review and, if
appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria. The revised air
quality criteria reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the
effects of the pollutant on public health or welfare. The EPA is also
required to periodically review and, if appropriate, revise the NAAQS
based on the revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2) requires that an
independent scientific review committee ``shall complete a review of
the criteria . . . and the national primary and secondary ambient air
quality standards . . . and shall recommend to the Administrator any
new . . . standards and revisions of existing criteria and standards as
may be appropriate. . . .'' Since the early
[[Page 42498]]
1980's, this independent review function has been performed by CASAC.
Presently, the EPA is reviewing the secondary NAAQS for oxides of
nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and PM.\1\ PM was added to this review
after the draft Integrated Review Plan (80 FR 69220, November 9, 2015)
was released to the public and reviewed by CASAC in recognition of
linkages between these pollutants (oxides of nitrogen, oxides of
sulfur, and PM) with respect to deposition and atmospheric chemistry,
as well as from an environmental effects perspective. Additional
welfare effects associated with PM, such as visibility, climate and
materials effects, and the health effects of PM (including particulate
transformation products of oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur) are
considered as part of the review of the NAAQS for PM (81 FR 87933,
December 6, 2016). The health effects of oxides of nitrogen were
considered in a separate assessment that was completed recently as part
of the review of the primary (health-based) NAAQS for oxides of
nitrogen (83 FR 17226, April 18, 2018). Similarly, the health effects
of oxides of sulfur are currently being considered in a separate
assessment as part of the review of the primary NAAQS for oxides of
sulfur (83 FR 26752, June 8, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EPA's call for information for the NOX/
SOX secondary review was issued on August 29, 2013 (78 FR
53452), and the call for information on the PM review (both
secondary and primary) was issued on December 3, 2014 (79 FR 71764).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA's overall plan for this review is presented in the
Integrated Review Plan for the Secondary NAAQS for Oxides of Nitrogen,
Oxides of Sulfur and Particulate Matter.\2\ The REA Planning Document
considers the degree to which important uncertainties identified in
quantitative analyses from previous reviews have been addressed by
newly available scientific evidence, tools, or information, including
those in the second external review draft of the Integrated Science
Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur and Particulate
Matter-Ecological Criteria (83 FR 29786, June 26, 2018). Based on these
considerations, the document reaches preliminary conclusions on the
extent to which updated quantitative analyses of exposures or public
welfare risks are warranted in the current review. For updated analyses
that are supported, this planning document presents anticipated
approaches to conducting such analyses. This document will be available
on or about August 6, 2018, on the EPA's Technology Transfer Network
website at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/nitrogen-dioxide-no2-and-sulfur-dioxide-so2-secondary-standards-planning-documents-current.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Available at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/nitrogen-dioxide-no2-and-sulfur-dioxide-so2-secondary-standards-planning-documents-current.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The REA Planning Document will be discussed at a public meeting for
review by CASAC and the public. A separate Federal Register notice
provides details about this meeting and the process for participation
(83 FR 31755, July 9, 2018). The EPA will also consider public comments
on the REA Planning Document that are submitted to the docket, as
described above.
Dated: August 2, 2018.
Panagiotis Tsirigotis,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2018-17041 Filed 8-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P