Fees for the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement, 42244-42251 [2018-17976]
Download as PDF
42244
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: August 2, 2018.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2018–17930 Filed 8–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 367
[Docket No. FMCSA–2018–0068]
RIN 2126–AC12
Fees for the Unified Carrier
Registration Plan and Agreement
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
FMCSA proposes reductions
in the annual registration fees States
collect from motor carriers, motor
private carriers of property, brokers,
freight forwarders, and leasing
companies for the Unified Carrier
Registration (UCR) Plan and Agreement
for the 2019, 2020, and subsequent
registration years. The proposed fees for
the 2019 registration year would be
reduced below the 2017 registration fee
level that was in effect by approximately
17.59 percent to ensure that fee
revenues do not exceed the statutory
maximum, and to account for the excess
funds held in the depository. The
proposed fees for the 2020 registration
year would be reduced below the 2017
level by approximately 9.5 percent. The
reduction of the current 2019
registration year fees (finalized on
January 5, 2018) would range from
approximately $10 to $9,530 per entity,
depending on the number of vehicles
owned or operated by the affected
entities. The reduction in fees for
subsequent registration years would
range from approximately $4 to $3,565
per entity.
DATES: Comments on this notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) must be
received on or before August 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Docket Number FMCSA–
2018–0068 using any of the following
methods:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Gerald Folsom, Office of Registration
and Safety Information, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001 by telephone at 202–385–
2405. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone 202–
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
NPRM is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Not Required
II. Executive Summary
A. Purpose and Summary of the Major
Provisions
B. Benefits and Costs
III. Abbreviations and Acronyms
IV. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
V. Statutory Requirements for the UCR Fees
A. Legislative History
B. Fee Requirements
VI. Background
VII. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
VIII. International Impacts
IX. Section-by-Section Analysis
X. Regulatory Analyses
A. E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review), E.O. 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review), and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
B. E.O. 13771 (Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small
Entities)
D. Assistance for Small Entities
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
F. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection of
Information)
G. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
H. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
I. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
J. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
K. Privacy
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
L. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
M. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
N. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
O. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (Technical Standards)
P. Environment (NEPA, CAA,
Environmental Justice)
Q. E.O. 13783 (Promoting Energy
Independence and Economic Growth)
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
NPRM (Docket No. FMCSA–2018–
0068), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. FMCSA recommends that
you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that FMCSA can contact you if there
are questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, put the
docket number, FMCSA–2018–0068, in
the keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’
When the new screen appears, click on
the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ button and type
your comment into the text box on the
following screen. Choose whether you
are submitting your comment as an
individual or on behalf of a third party
and then submit.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope.
FMCSA will consider all comments
and material received during the
comment period and may change this
proposed rule based on your comments.
FMCSA may issue a final rule at any
time after the close of the comment
period.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is customarily not
made available to the general public by
the submitter. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is
eligible for protection from public
disclosure. If you have CBI that is
relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI.
Accordingly, please mark each page of
your submission as ‘‘confidential’’ or
‘‘CBI.’’ Submissions designated as CBI
and meeting the definition noted above
will not be placed in the public docket
of this NPRM. Submissions containing
CBI should be sent to Brian Dahlin,
Chief, Regulatory Analysis Division,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington DC 20590. Any
commentary that FMCSA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Insert the
docket number, FMCSA–2018–0068, in
the keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, click the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’
button and choose the document to
review. If you do not have access to the
internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
C. Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c),
DOT solicits comments from the public
to better inform its rulemaking process.
DOT posts these comments, without
edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Not Required
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(g), added by
section 5202 of the Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation or FAST Act,
Public Law 114–94, 129 Stat.1312, 1534
(Dec. 4, 2015), FMCSA is required to
publish an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) or conduct a
negotiated rulemaking ‘‘if a proposed
rule is likely to lead to the promulgation
of a major rule.’’ 49 U.S.C. 31136(g)(1).
As this proposed rule is not likely to
result in the promulgation of a major
rule, the Agency is not required to issue
an ANPRM or to proceed with a
negotiated rulemaking.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
II. Executive Summary
A. Purpose and Summary of the Major
Provisions
The UCR Plan and the 41 States
participating in the UCR Agreement
establish and collect fees from motor
carriers, motor private carriers of
property, brokers, freight forwarders,
and leasing companies. The UCR Plan
and Agreement are administered by a
15-member board of directors; 14
appointed from the participating States
and the industry, plus the Deputy
Administrator of FMCSA. Revenues
collected are allocated to the
participating States and the UCR Plan.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
14504a(f)(1)(E)(ii), fee adjustments must
be requested by the UCR Plan when
annual revenues exceed the maximum
allowed. Also, if there are excess funds
after payments to the States and for
administrative costs, they are retained
in the UCR Plan’s depository and
subsequent fees must be reduced as
required by 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h)(4).
These two distinct provisions are the
reasons for the two-stage adjustment
proposed in this rule. This NPRM
proposes to reduce the annual
registration fees established pursuant to
the UCR Agreement for 2019, 2020, and
subsequent years.
Currently the UCR Plan estimates that
by December 31, 2018, total revenues
will exceed the statutory maximum for
the 2017 registration year by
approximately $9.17 million. Therefore,
in January 2018, the UCR Plan made a
formal recommendation that FMCSA
adjust the fees in a two-stage process.
The proposed fees for the 2019
registration year, with collection
beginning on or about October 1, 2018,
the fees would be reduced below the
2017 registration fee level that was in
effect by approximately 17.59 percent to
ensure that fee revenues do not exceed
the statutory maximum, and to reduce
the excess funds held in the depository.
The proposed fees for the 2020
registration year, with collection
beginning on or about October 1, 2019,
the fees would be reduced below the
2017 level by approximately 9.5 percent
to ensure the fee revenues in that and
future years do not exceed the statutory
maximum. The UCR Plan requested that
the adjusted fees be adopted no later
than August 31, 2018, to enable the
participating States and the UCR Plan to
reflect the new fees when collections for
the 2019 registration year begin on or
about October 1, 2018. The adoption of
the adjusted fees must be accomplished
by rulemaking by FMCSA under
authority delegated from the Secretary
of Transportation (Secretary).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42245
The UCR Plan’s formal
recommendation requested that FMCSA
publish a rule reducing the fees paid per
motor carrier, motor private carrier of
property, broker, freight forwarder, and
leasing company based on an analysis of
current collections and past trends. The
UCR Plan’s recommendation reduces
fees based on collections over the
statutory cap in 2017, and also includes
a reduction in the amount of the
administrative cost allowance from
$5,000,000 to $3,500,000 for the 2019
and 2020 UCR Agreement registration
years. The Board completed an analysis
estimating the amount of administrative
cost allowance needed for the 2019 and
2020 registration period and has
determined that an allowance of
$3,500,000 will be needed each year for
those registration years. The Agency
reviewed the UCR Plan’s formal
recommendation and concluded that the
UCR Plan’s projection of the total
revenues received for registration year
2017 is acceptable.
B. Benefits and Costs
The changes proposed in this NPRM
would reduce the fees paid by motor
carriers, motor private carriers of
property, brokers, freight forwarders,
and leasing companies to the UCR Plan
and the participating States. While each
motor carrier would realize a reduced
burden, fees are considered by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A–4, Regulatory
Analysis, as transfer payments, not
costs. Transfer payments are payments
from one group to another that do not
affect total resources available to
society. Therefore, transfers are not
considered in the monetization of
societal costs and benefits of
rulemakings.
III. Abbreviations and Acronyms
The following is a list of abbreviations
and acronyms used in this document.
ANPRM Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI Confidential Business Information
CE Categorical Exclusion
E.O. Executive Order
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
Secretary Secretary of Transportation
SBREFA Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
SSRS Single State Registration System
UCR Unified Carrier Registration
UCR Agreement Unified Carrier
Registration Agreement
UCR Plan Unified Carrier Registration Plan
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
42246
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
IV. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This rule proposes to adjust the
annual registration fees required by the
UCR Agreement established by 49
U.S.C. 14504a. The requested fee
adjustments are required by 49 U.S.C.
14504a because, for registration year
2017, the total revenues collected are
expected to exceed the total revenue
entitlements of $107.78 million
distributed to the 41 participating States
plus the $5 million established for the
administrative costs associated with the
UCR Plan and Agreement. The
requested adjustments have been
submitted by the UCR Plan in
accordance with 49 U.S.C.
14504a(f)(1)(E)(ii), which requires the
UCR Plan to request an adjustment by
the Secretary when the annual revenues
exceed the maximum allowed. In
addition, 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h)(4) states
that any excess funds held by the UCR
Plan in its depository, after payments to
the States and for administrative costs,
shall be retained ‘‘and the fees charged
. . . shall be reduced by the Secretary
accordingly.’’
The UCR Plan is also requesting
approval of a revised total revenue to be
collected because of a reduction in the
amount for costs of administering the
UCR Agreement. No changes in the
revenue allocations to the participating
States have been recommended by the
UCR Plan. The revised total revenue
must be approved in accordance with 49
U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7).
The Secretary also has broad
rulemaking authority in 49 U.S.C.
13301(a) to carry out 49 U.S.C. 14504a,
which is part of 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV,
part B. Authority to administer these
statutory provisions has been delegated
to the FMCSA Administrator by 49 CFR
1.87(a)(2) and (7).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory Requirements for the UCR
Fees
A. Legislative History
The statute states that the ‘‘Unified
Carrier Registration Plan . . . mean[s]
the organization . . . responsible for
developing, implementing, and
administering the unified carrier
registration agreement.’’ (49 U.S.C.
14504a(a)(9)) (UCR Plan). The UCR
Agreement developed by the UCR Plan
is the ‘‘interstate agreement . . .
governing the collection and
distribution of registration and financial
responsibility information provided and
fees paid by motor carriers, motor
private carriers, brokers, freight
forwarders, and leasing companies
. . .’’ (49 U.S.C. 14504a(a)(8)).
The legislative history of the statute
indicates that the purpose of the UCR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
Plan and Agreement is both to replace
the Single State Registration System
(SSRS) for registration of interstate
motor carrier entities with the States
and to ‘‘ensure that States don’t lose
current revenues derived from SSRS’’
(S. Rep. 109–120, at 2 (2005)). The
statute provides for a 15-member board
of directors for the UCR Plan to be
appointed by the Secretary. The statute
specifies that the board of directors
should consist of one individual from
DOT (either the FMCSA Deputy
Administrator or another Presidential
appointee); four directors from among
the chief administrative officers of the
State agencies responsible for
administering the UCR Agreement (one
from each of the four FMCSA service
areas); five directors from among the
professional staffs of State agencies
responsible for administering the UCR
Agreement (who are nominated by the
National Conference of State
Transportation Specialists); and five
directors from the motor carrier industry
(at least one must be from a national
trade association representing the
general motor carrier of property
industry and one from a motor carrier
that falls within the smallest fleet fee
bracket).
The UCR Plan and the participating
States are authorized by 49 U.S.C.
14504a(f) to establish and collect fees
from motor carriers, motor private
carriers of property, brokers, freight
forwarders, and leasing companies. The
current annual fees charged for
registration year 2018 are set out in 49
CFR 367.40 and for registration years
2019 and thereafter in § 367.50. These
fees were adopted by FMCSA in January
2018 after a rulemaking proceeding. See
Fees for the Unified Carrier Registration
Plan and Agreement, 83 FR 605 (Jan. 5,
2018).
For carriers and freight forwarders,
the fees vary according to the size of the
vehicle fleets, as required by 49 U.S.C.
14504a(f). The fees collected are
allocated to the States and the UCR Plan
in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h).
B. Fee Requirements
The statute specifies that the fees set
by the Agency are to be based on the
recommendation of the UCR Plan (49
U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(B)). In
recommending the level of fees to be
charged in any registration year, and in
setting the fee level, both the UCR Plan
and the Agency shall consider the
following factors:
• Administrative costs associated
with the UCR Plan and Agreement;
• Whether the revenues generated in
the previous year and any surplus or
shortage from that or prior years enable
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the participating States to achieve the
revenue levels set by the UCR Plan; and
• Provisions governing fees in 49
U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)
(49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(A)). The fees
may be adjusted within a reasonable
range on an annual basis if the revenues
derived from the fees are either
insufficient to provide the participating
States with the revenues they are
entitled to receive or exceed those
revenues (49 U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(E)).
Overall, the fees charged under the
UCR Agreement must produce the level
of revenue established by statute.
Section 14504a(g) establishes the
revenue entitlements for States that
choose to participate in the UCR
Agreement. That section provides that a
participating State, which participated
in SSRS in the registration year prior to
the enactment of the Unified Carrier
Registration Act of 2005, is entitled to
receive revenues under the UCR
Agreement equivalent to the revenues it
received in the year before that
enactment. Participating States that also
collected intrastate registration fees
from interstate motor carrier entities
(whether they participated in SSRS or
not) are also entitled to receive revenues
of this type under the UCR Agreement,
in an amount equivalent to the amount
received in the year before the Act’s
enactment. The section also provides
that States that did not participate in
SSRS, but which choose to participate
in the UCR Plan, may receive revenues
not to exceed $500,000 per registration
year.
FMCSA’s interpretation of its
responsibilities under 49 U.S.C. 14504a
in setting fees for the UCR Plan and
Agreement is guided by the primacy the
statute places on the need both to set
and to adjust the fees to ensure they
‘‘provide the revenues to which the
States are entitled’’ (49 U.S.C.14504a(f)
(1)(E)(i)). The statute links the
requirement that the fees be adjusted
‘‘within a reasonable range’’ to the
provision of sufficient revenues to meet
the entitlements of the participating
States (49 U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(E)). See
also 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(A)(ii)).
Section 14504a(h)(4) gives additional
support for this interpretation. This
provision explicitly requires FMCSA to
reduce the fees charged in the
registration year following any year in
which the depository retains any funds
in excess of the amount necessary to
satisfy the revenue entitlements of the
participating States and the UCR Plan’s
administrative costs.
VI. Background
On December 14, 2017, the board of
directors voted unanimously to submit
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
42247
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
a recommendation to the Secretary to
reduce the fees collected by the UCR
Plan for registration years 2019 and
thereafter. The recommendation was
submitted to the Secretary on January
11, 2018.1 The requested fee
adjustments are required by 49 U.S.C.
14504a because, for registration year
2017, the total revenues collected are
expected to exceed the total revenue
entitlements of $107.78 million
distributed to the 41 participating States
plus the $5 million established for ‘‘the
administrative costs associated with the
unified carrier registration plan and
agreement’’ (49 U.S.C.
14504a(d)(7)(A)(i)). The maximum
revenue entitlements for each of the 41
participating States, established in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 14504a(g),
are set out in a table attached to the
January 11, 2018 recommendation.
As indicated in the analysis attached
to the January 11, 2018 recommendation
letter, as of the end of November 2017,
the UCR Plan had already collected
$7.30 million more than the statutory
maximum of $112.78 million for
registration year 2017. The UCR Plan
estimates that by the end of 2018, total
revenues will exceed the statutory
maximum by $9.17 million, or
approximately 8.13 percent. The excess
revenues collected will be held in a
depository maintained by the UCR Plan
as required by 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h)(4).
The UCR Plan’s recommendation
estimated the minimum projection of
revenue collections for December 2017
through December 2018 by summing the
collections within each of the
registration years 2013 through 2015 2
and then comparing across years to find
the minimum total amount. This is the
same methodology used to project
collections and estimate fees in the
previous fee adjustment rulemaking (83
FR 605 (Jan. 5, 2018)).
Under 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7), the
costs incurred by the UCR Plan to
administer the UCR Agreement are
eligible for inclusion in the total
revenue to be collected, in addition to
the revenue allocations for the
participating States. The total revenue
for registration years 2010 to 2018, as
approved in the 2010 final rule (75 FR
21993 (April, 27, 2010)), has been
$112,777,059.81, including $5,000,000
for administrative costs. The UCR Plan’s
latest recommendation includes a
reduction in the amount of the
administrative cost allowance to
$3,500,000 for the 2019 and 2020
registration years. The reduction of
$1,500,000 recommended by the UCR
Plan was based on estimates of future
administrative cost allowances needed
to operate the UCR Plan and Agreement.
No changes in the State revenue
entitlements are recommended, and the
entitlement figures for 2019 and 2020
for the 41 participating States are the
same as those previously approved for
the years 2010 through 2018. Therefore,
for registration years 2019 and 2020, the
UCR Plan recommends total revenue to
be collected of $111,277,060 (rounded
to the nearest dollar). FMCSA proposes
to approve this recommendation for the
total revenue to be collected by the UCR
Plan, as shown in the following table.
STATE UCR REVENUE ENTITLEMENTS AND FINAL 2019 REVENUE TARGET
Total 2019 UCR
revenue entitlements
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
State
Alabama ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ..............................................................................................................................................................................
California ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts .....................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ................................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ............................................................................................................................................................................
Montana ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ..............................................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico .........................................................................................................................................................................
New York .............................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ......................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ........................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .............................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ........................................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina .....................................................................................................................................................................
South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Utah .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................
1 The January 11, 2018 recommendation from the
UCR Plan and all related tables are available in the
docket.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
2 Collections for registration year 2016 are not
available for use for this purpose because
registration and fee collection for that year was not
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$2,939,964.00
1,817,360.00
2,131,710.00
1,801,615.00
3,129,840.00
2,660,060.00
547,696.68
3,516,993.00
2,364,879.00
474,742.00
4,344,290.00
5,365,980.00
4,063,836.00
1,555,672.00
2,282,887.00
7,520,717.00
1,137,132.30
2,342,000.00
4,322,100.00
1,049,063.00
741,974.00
2,273,299.00
3,292,233.00
4,414,538.00
372,007.00
2,010,434.00
4,813,877.74
2,457,796.00
4,945,527.00
2,285,486.00
2,420,120.00
855,623.00
4,759,329.00
2,718,628.06
2,098,408.00
4,852,865.00
finalized at the time of the UCR Plan
Recommendation.
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
42248
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
STATE UCR REVENUE ENTITLEMENTS AND FINAL 2019 REVENUE TARGET—Continued
Total 2019 UCR
revenue entitlements
State
Washington ..........................................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ........................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .............................................................................................................................................................................
2,467,971.00
1,431,727.03
2,196,680.00
Sub-Total ......................................................................................................................................................................
Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware ..............................................................................................................................................................................
106,777,059.81
500,000.00
500,000.00
Total State Revenue Entitlement ..........................................................................................................................
Administrative Expenses .......................................................................................................................................
107,777,060.00
3,500,000.00
Total Revenue Target ....................................................................................................................................
111,277,060.00
VII. Discussion of Proposed
Rulemaking
FMCSA has reviewed the formal
recommendation from the UCR Plan and
proposes to approve it, including the
reduction in the allowance for
administrative costs necessary to
continue administering the UCR
Agreement and the UCR Plan. Overall,
the UCR Plan and the Agency agree on
the reduction of the current fees for
2019 and subsequent registration years,
and that there would be no change in
the State UCR revenue entitlements.
VIII. International Impacts
Motor carriers and other entities
involved in interstate and foreign
transportation in the United States that
do not have a principal office in the
United States, are nonetheless subject to
the fees for the UCR Plan. They are
required to designate a participating
State as a base State and pay the
appropriate fees to that State (49 U.S.C.
14504a(a)(2)(B)(ii) and (f)(4)).
IX. Section-by-Section Analysis
In this NPRM, FMCSA proposes that
the provisions of 49 CFR 367.50 (which
were just adopted in the January 5, 2018
final rule) would be revised to establish
new reduced fees applicable only to
registration year 2019. A new 49 CFR
367.60 would establish the proposed
fees for registration year 2020, which
would remain in effect for subsequent
registration years unless revised in the
future.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
X. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O.
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FMCSA performed an analysis of the
impacts of the proposed rule and
determined it is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
as supplemented by E.O. 13563,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it
under those Orders. It is also not
significant within the meaning of DOT
regulatory policies and procedures
(DOT Order 2100.5 dated May 22, 1980;
44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
The changes proposed by this rule
would reduce the registration fees paid
by motor carriers, motor private carriers
of property, brokers, freight forwarders,
and leasing companies to the UCR Plan
and the participating States. While each
motor carrier would realize a reduced
burden, fees are considered by OMB
Circular A–4, Regulatory Analysis, as
transfer payments, not costs. Transfer
payments are payments from one group
to another that do not affect total
resources available to society. By
definition, transfers are not considered
in the monetization of societal costs and
benefits of rulemakings.
This rule would establish reductions
in the annual registration fees for the
UCR Plan and Agreement. The entities
affected by this rule are the participating
States, motor carriers, motor private
carriers of property, brokers, freight
forwarders, and leasing companies.
Because the State UCR revenue
entitlements would remain unchanged,
the participating States would not be
impacted by this rule. The primary
impact of this rule would be a reduction
in fees paid by individual motor
carriers, motor private carriers of
property, brokers, freight forwarders,
and leasing companies. The reduction of
the current 2019 registration year fees
(finalized on January 5, 2018) would
range from approximately $10 to $9,530
per entity, depending on the number of
vehicles owned or operated by the
affected entities. The reduction in fees
for subsequent registration years would
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
range from approximately $4 to $3,565
per entity.
B. E.O. 13771 Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs
E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs,’’ does not
apply to this action because it is
nonsignificant and has zero costs;
therefore, it is not subject to the ‘‘2 for
1’’ and budgeting requirements.
This rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in section
3(f) of E.O. 12866.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small
Entities)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as
amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104–121, 110
Stat. 857), requires Federal agencies to
consider the effects of the regulatory
action on small business and other
small entities and to minimize any
significant economic impact. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses and not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000 (5 U.S.C.
601(6)). Accordingly, DOT policy
requires an analysis of the impact of all
regulations on small entities, and
mandates that agencies strive to lessen
any adverse effects on these businesses.
Section 605 of the RFA allows an
agency to certify a rule, in lieu of
preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking
is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would directly
affect the participating States, motor
carriers, motor private carriers of
property, brokers, freight forwarders,
and leasing companies. Under the
standards of the RFA, as amended by
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
the SBREFA, the participating States are
not small entities. States are not
considered small entities because they
do not meet the definition of a small
entity in section 601 of the RFA.
Specifically, States are not considered
small governmental jurisdictions under
section 601(5) of the RFA, both because
State government is not included among
the various levels of government listed
in section 601(5), and because, even if
this were the case, no State or the
District of Columbia has a population of
less than 50,000, which is the criterion
by which a governmental jurisdiction is
considered small under section 601(5)
of the RFA.
The Small Business Administration’s
size standard for a small entity (13 CFR
121.201) differs by industry code. The
entities affected by this rule fall into
many different industry codes. In order
to determine if this rule would have an
impact on a significant number of small
entities, FMCSA examined the 2012
Economic Census 3 data for two
different industries; truck transportation
(Subsector 484) and transit and ground
transportation (Subsector 485).
According to the 2012 Economic
Census, approximately 99 percent of
truck transportation firms, and
approximately 97 percent of transit and
ground transportation firms, had annual
revenue less than the Small Business
Administration’s 4 revenue thresholds of
$27.5 million and $15 million,
respectively, to be defined as a small
entity. Therefore, FMCSA has
determined that this rule will impact a
substantial number of small entities.
However, FMCSA has determined
that this rule would not have a
significant impact on the affected
entities. The effect of this rule would be
to reduce the annual registration fee
motor carriers, motor private carriers of
property, brokers, freight forwarders,
and leasing companies are currently
required to pay. The reduction will
range from approximately $10 to $9,530
per entity, in the first year, and from
approximately $4 to $3,565 per entity in
subsequent years, depending on the
number of vehicles owned and/or
operated by the affected entities.
Accordingly, I certify that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
3 U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 US Economic Census,
available at https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/
tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=
ECN_2012_US_48SSSZ4&prodType=table
(accessed Apr. 27, 2017).
4 U.S. Small Business Administration. ‘‘Table of
Small Business Size Standards Matched to North
American Industry Classification System Codes.’’
Published February 26,2016. Available at: https://
www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_
Standards_Table.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
on a substantial number of small
entities.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
In accordance with section 213(a) of
the SBREFA, FMCSA wants to assist
small entities in understanding this
proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on themselves and
participate in the rulemaking initiative.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance; please consult
the FMCSA point of contact, Gerald
Folsom, listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
proposed rule.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce or otherwise determine
compliance with Federal regulations to
the Small Business Administration’s
Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of FMCSA, call 1–888–REG–
FAIR (1–888–734–3247). DOT has a
policy regarding the rights of small
entities to regulatory enforcement
fairness and an explicit policy against
retaliation for exercising these rights.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$156 million (which is the value
equivalent of $100,000,000 in 1995,
adjusted for inflation to 2015 levels) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, the Agency does
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
G. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for federalism
under section 1(a) of E.O. 13132 if it has
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42249
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ FMCSA
determined that this proposal would not
have substantial direct costs on or for
States, nor would it limit the
policymaking discretion of States.
Nothing in this document preempts any
State law or regulation. Therefore, this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Impact Statement.
H. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
E.O. 13045, Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), requires agencies issuing
‘‘economically significant’’ rules, if the
regulation also concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
an agency has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, to
include an evaluation of the regulation’s
environmental health and safety effects
on children. The Agency determined
this proposed rule is not economically
significant. Therefore, no analysis of the
impacts on children is required. In any
event, the Agency does not anticipate
that this regulatory action could in any
respect present an environmental or
safety risk that could disproportionately
affect children.
J. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private
Property)
FMCSA reviewed this proposed rule
in accordance with E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and has determined it will not
effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications.
K. Privacy
The Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2005, (Pub. L. 108–447, 118 Stat. 2809,
3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note) requires the
Agency to conduct a privacy impact
assessment of a regulation that will
affect the privacy of individuals. This
rule does not require the collection of
personally identifiable information.
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a)
applies only to Federal agencies and any
non-Federal agency that receives
records contained in a system of records
from a Federal agency for use in a
matching program.
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
42250
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub.
L. 107–347, 208, 116 Stat. 2899, 2921
(Dec. 17, 2002), requires Federal
agencies to conduct a privacy impact
assessment for new or substantially
changed technology that collects,
maintains, or disseminates information
in an identifiable form. No new or
substantially changed technology would
collect, maintain, or disseminate
information as a result of this rule.
Accordingly, FMCSA has not conducted
a privacy impact assessment.
L. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental
Review)
The regulations implementing E.O.
12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this program.
M. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed
rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Agency has
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under E.O.
13211.
N. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal
Governments)
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
O. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs agencies to use voluntary
consensus standards in their regulatory
activities unless the agency provides
Congress, through OMB, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods;
sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) are
standards that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, FMCSA did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
P. Environment (NEPA, CAA,
Environmental Justice)
FMCSA analyzed this NPRM for the
purpose of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and determined this action
is categorically excluded from further
analysis and documentation in an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under
FMCSA Order 5610.1 (69 FR 9680,
March 1, 2004), Appendix 2, paragraph
6.h. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) in
paragraph 6.h. covers regulations and
actions taken pursuant to regulation
implementing procedures to collect fees
that will be charged for motor carrier
registrations. The proposed
requirements in this rule are covered by
this CE and the NPRM does not have
any effect on the quality of the
environment. The CE determination is
available in the docket.
FMCSA also analyzed this rule under
section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA) (42 U.S.C. 7406(c)), and
implementing regulations promulgated
by the Environmental Protection
Agency. Approval of this action is
exempt from the CAA’s general
conformity requirement because it does
not affect direct or indirect emissions of
criteria pollutants.
Under E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations, each Federal agency must
identify and address, as appropriate,
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
of its programs, policies, and activities
on minority populations and lowincome populations’’ in the United
States, its possessions, and territories.
FMCSA evaluated the environmental
justice effects of this proposed rule in
accordance with the E.O., and has
determined that no environmental
justice issue is associated with this
proposed rule, nor is there any
collective environmental impact that
would result from its promulgation.
Q. E.O. 13783 (Promoting Energy
Independence and Economic Growth)
E.O. 13783 directs executive
departments and agencies to review
existing regulations that potentially
burden the development or use of
domestically produced energy
resources, and to appropriately suspend,
revise, or rescind those that unduly
burden the development of domestic
energy resources. In accordance with
E.O. 13783, DOT prepared and
submitted a report to the Director of
OMB that provides specific
recommendations that, to the extent
permitted by law, could alleviate or
eliminate aspects of agency action that
burden domestic energy production.
This proposed rule has not been
identified by DOT under E.O. 13783 as
potentially alleviating unnecessary
burdens on domestic energy production.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 367
Insurance, Intergovernmental
relations, Motor carriers, Surety bonds.
In consideration of the foregoing,
FMCSA proposes to amend 49 CFR
chapter III, part 367 to read as follows:
PART 367—STANDARDS FOR
REGISTRATION WITH STATES
1. The authority citation for part 367
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 13301, 14504a; and 49
CFR 1.87.
■
2. Revise § 367.50 to read as follows:
§ 367.50 Fees Under the Unified Carrier
Registration Plan and Agreement for
Registration Year 2019.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
FEES UNDER THE UNIFIED CARRIER REGISTRATION PLAN AND AGREEMENT FOR REGISTRATION YEAR 2019
Bracket
Number of commercial motor vehicles owned or operated by exempt
or non-exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder
Fee per entity for
exempt or non-exempt
motor carrier, motor
private carrier, or freight
forwarder
Fee per entity for broker
or leasing company
B1 .......................
B2 .......................
B3 .......................
0–2 ..........................................................................................................
3–5 ..........................................................................................................
6–20 ........................................................................................................
$63
187
372
$63
........................................
........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
42251
FEES UNDER THE UNIFIED CARRIER REGISTRATION PLAN AND AGREEMENT FOR REGISTRATION YEAR 2019—Continued
Bracket
Number of commercial motor vehicles owned or operated by exempt
or non-exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder
Fee per entity for
exempt or non-exempt
motor carrier, motor
private carrier, or freight
forwarder
Fee per entity for broker
or leasing company
B4 .......................
B5 .......................
B6 .......................
21–100 ....................................................................................................
101–1,000 ...............................................................................................
1,001 and above .....................................................................................
1,299
6,190
60,441
........................................
........................................
........................................
§ 367.60 Fees Under the Unified Carrier
Registration Plan and Agreement for
Registration Years Beginning in 2020.
3. Add new § 367.60 to subpart B to
read as follows:
■
FEES UNDER THE UNIFIED CARRIER REGISTRATION PLAN AND AGREEMENT FOR REGISTRATION YEAR 2020 AND EACH
SUBSEQUENT REGISTRATION YEAR THEREAFTER
Number of commercial motor vehicles owned or operated by exempt
or non-exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder
Bracket
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
Fee per entity for
exempt or non-exempt
motor carrier, motor
private carrier, or freight
forwarder
Fee per entity for broker
or leasing company
0–2 ..........................................................................................................
3–5 ..........................................................................................................
6–20 ........................................................................................................
21–100 ....................................................................................................
101–1,000 ...............................................................................................
1,001 and above .....................................................................................
$69
206
409
1,427
6,800
66,406
$69
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.87 on: August 15, 2018.
Raymond P. Martinez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–17976 Filed 8–20–18; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Aug 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42244-42251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17976]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 367
[Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0068]
RIN 2126-AC12
Fees for the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA proposes reductions in the annual registration fees
States collect from motor carriers, motor private carriers of property,
brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing companies for the Unified
Carrier Registration (UCR) Plan and Agreement for the 2019, 2020, and
subsequent registration years. The proposed fees for the 2019
registration year would be reduced below the 2017 registration fee
level that was in effect by approximately 17.59 percent to ensure that
fee revenues do not exceed the statutory maximum, and to account for
the excess funds held in the depository. The proposed fees for the 2020
registration year would be reduced below the 2017 level by
approximately 9.5 percent. The reduction of the current 2019
registration year fees (finalized on January 5, 2018) would range from
approximately $10 to $9,530 per entity, depending on the number of
vehicles owned or operated by the affected entities. The reduction in
fees for subsequent registration years would range from approximately
$4 to $3,565 per entity.
DATES: Comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) must be
received on or before August 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Docket Number FMCSA-
2018-0068 using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gerald Folsom, Office of
Registration and Safety Information, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001 by
telephone at 202-385-2405. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This NPRM is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Not Required
II. Executive Summary
A. Purpose and Summary of the Major Provisions
B. Benefits and Costs
III. Abbreviations and Acronyms
IV. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
V. Statutory Requirements for the UCR Fees
A. Legislative History
B. Fee Requirements
VI. Background
VII. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
VIII. International Impacts
IX. Section-by-Section Analysis
X. Regulatory Analyses
A. E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O. 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
B. E.O. 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small Entities)
D. Assistance for Small Entities
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
F. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection of Information)
G. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
H. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
I. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
J. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
K. Privacy
L. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
M. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
N. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
O. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
P. Environment (NEPA, CAA, Environmental Justice)
Q. E.O. 13783 (Promoting Energy Independence and Economic
Growth)
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
NPRM (Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0068), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that FMCSA can contact you if there are questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
put the docket number, FMCSA-2018-0068, in the keyword box, and click
``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on the ``Comment Now!''
button and type your comment into the text box on the following screen.
Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual or on
behalf of a third party and then submit.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope.
FMCSA will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your
comments. FMCSA may issue a final rule at any time after the close of
the comment period.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is customarily not made available to the general
public by the submitter. Under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552), CBI is eligible for protection from public disclosure. If you
have CBI that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it
[[Page 42245]]
is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI.
Accordingly, please mark each page of your submission as
``confidential'' or ``CBI.'' Submissions designated as CBI and meeting
the definition noted above will not be placed in the public docket of
this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Brian Dahlin,
Chief, Regulatory Analysis Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington DC 20590. Any
commentary that FMCSA receives which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Insert the docket number, FMCSA-2018-0068, in the
keyword box, and click ``Search.'' Next, click the ``Open Docket
Folder'' button and choose the document to review. If you do not have
access to the internet, you may view the docket online by visiting the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
C. Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
D. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Not Required
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(g), added by section 5202 of the Fixing
America's Surface Transportation or FAST Act, Public Law 114-94, 129
Stat.1312, 1534 (Dec. 4, 2015), FMCSA is required to publish an advance
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) or conduct a negotiated
rulemaking ``if a proposed rule is likely to lead to the promulgation
of a major rule.'' 49 U.S.C. 31136(g)(1). As this proposed rule is not
likely to result in the promulgation of a major rule, the Agency is not
required to issue an ANPRM or to proceed with a negotiated rulemaking.
II. Executive Summary
A. Purpose and Summary of the Major Provisions
The UCR Plan and the 41 States participating in the UCR Agreement
establish and collect fees from motor carriers, motor private carriers
of property, brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing companies. The
UCR Plan and Agreement are administered by a 15-member board of
directors; 14 appointed from the participating States and the industry,
plus the Deputy Administrator of FMCSA. Revenues collected are
allocated to the participating States and the UCR Plan. In accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(E)(ii), fee adjustments must be requested
by the UCR Plan when annual revenues exceed the maximum allowed. Also,
if there are excess funds after payments to the States and for
administrative costs, they are retained in the UCR Plan's depository
and subsequent fees must be reduced as required by 49 U.S.C.
14504a(h)(4). These two distinct provisions are the reasons for the
two-stage adjustment proposed in this rule. This NPRM proposes to
reduce the annual registration fees established pursuant to the UCR
Agreement for 2019, 2020, and subsequent years.
Currently the UCR Plan estimates that by December 31, 2018, total
revenues will exceed the statutory maximum for the 2017 registration
year by approximately $9.17 million. Therefore, in January 2018, the
UCR Plan made a formal recommendation that FMCSA adjust the fees in a
two-stage process. The proposed fees for the 2019 registration year,
with collection beginning on or about October 1, 2018, the fees would
be reduced below the 2017 registration fee level that was in effect by
approximately 17.59 percent to ensure that fee revenues do not exceed
the statutory maximum, and to reduce the excess funds held in the
depository. The proposed fees for the 2020 registration year, with
collection beginning on or about October 1, 2019, the fees would be
reduced below the 2017 level by approximately 9.5 percent to ensure the
fee revenues in that and future years do not exceed the statutory
maximum. The UCR Plan requested that the adjusted fees be adopted no
later than August 31, 2018, to enable the participating States and the
UCR Plan to reflect the new fees when collections for the 2019
registration year begin on or about October 1, 2018. The adoption of
the adjusted fees must be accomplished by rulemaking by FMCSA under
authority delegated from the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary).
The UCR Plan's formal recommendation requested that FMCSA publish a
rule reducing the fees paid per motor carrier, motor private carrier of
property, broker, freight forwarder, and leasing company based on an
analysis of current collections and past trends. The UCR Plan's
recommendation reduces fees based on collections over the statutory cap
in 2017, and also includes a reduction in the amount of the
administrative cost allowance from $5,000,000 to $3,500,000 for the
2019 and 2020 UCR Agreement registration years. The Board completed an
analysis estimating the amount of administrative cost allowance needed
for the 2019 and 2020 registration period and has determined that an
allowance of $3,500,000 will be needed each year for those registration
years. The Agency reviewed the UCR Plan's formal recommendation and
concluded that the UCR Plan's projection of the total revenues received
for registration year 2017 is acceptable.
B. Benefits and Costs
The changes proposed in this NPRM would reduce the fees paid by
motor carriers, motor private carriers of property, brokers, freight
forwarders, and leasing companies to the UCR Plan and the participating
States. While each motor carrier would realize a reduced burden, fees
are considered by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-
4, Regulatory Analysis, as transfer payments, not costs. Transfer
payments are payments from one group to another that do not affect
total resources available to society. Therefore, transfers are not
considered in the monetization of societal costs and benefits of
rulemakings.
III. Abbreviations and Acronyms
The following is a list of abbreviations and acronyms used in this
document.
ANPRM Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI Confidential Business Information
CE Categorical Exclusion
E.O. Executive Order
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
Secretary Secretary of Transportation
SBREFA Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
SSRS Single State Registration System
UCR Unified Carrier Registration
UCR Agreement Unified Carrier Registration Agreement
UCR Plan Unified Carrier Registration Plan
[[Page 42246]]
IV. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This rule proposes to adjust the annual registration fees required
by the UCR Agreement established by 49 U.S.C. 14504a. The requested fee
adjustments are required by 49 U.S.C. 14504a because, for registration
year 2017, the total revenues collected are expected to exceed the
total revenue entitlements of $107.78 million distributed to the 41
participating States plus the $5 million established for the
administrative costs associated with the UCR Plan and Agreement. The
requested adjustments have been submitted by the UCR Plan in accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(E)(ii), which requires the UCR Plan to
request an adjustment by the Secretary when the annual revenues exceed
the maximum allowed. In addition, 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h)(4) states that
any excess funds held by the UCR Plan in its depository, after payments
to the States and for administrative costs, shall be retained ``and the
fees charged . . . shall be reduced by the Secretary accordingly.''
The UCR Plan is also requesting approval of a revised total revenue
to be collected because of a reduction in the amount for costs of
administering the UCR Agreement. No changes in the revenue allocations
to the participating States have been recommended by the UCR Plan. The
revised total revenue must be approved in accordance with 49 U.S.C.
14504a(d)(7).
The Secretary also has broad rulemaking authority in 49 U.S.C.
13301(a) to carry out 49 U.S.C. 14504a, which is part of 49 U.S.C.
subtitle IV, part B. Authority to administer these statutory provisions
has been delegated to the FMCSA Administrator by 49 CFR 1.87(a)(2) and
(7).
V. Statutory Requirements for the UCR Fees
A. Legislative History
The statute states that the ``Unified Carrier Registration Plan . .
. mean[s] the organization . . . responsible for developing,
implementing, and administering the unified carrier registration
agreement.'' (49 U.S.C. 14504a(a)(9)) (UCR Plan). The UCR Agreement
developed by the UCR Plan is the ``interstate agreement . . . governing
the collection and distribution of registration and financial
responsibility information provided and fees paid by motor carriers,
motor private carriers, brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing
companies . . .'' (49 U.S.C. 14504a(a)(8)).
The legislative history of the statute indicates that the purpose
of the UCR Plan and Agreement is both to replace the Single State
Registration System (SSRS) for registration of interstate motor carrier
entities with the States and to ``ensure that States don't lose current
revenues derived from SSRS'' (S. Rep. 109-120, at 2 (2005)). The
statute provides for a 15-member board of directors for the UCR Plan to
be appointed by the Secretary. The statute specifies that the board of
directors should consist of one individual from DOT (either the FMCSA
Deputy Administrator or another Presidential appointee); four directors
from among the chief administrative officers of the State agencies
responsible for administering the UCR Agreement (one from each of the
four FMCSA service areas); five directors from among the professional
staffs of State agencies responsible for administering the UCR
Agreement (who are nominated by the National Conference of State
Transportation Specialists); and five directors from the motor carrier
industry (at least one must be from a national trade association
representing the general motor carrier of property industry and one
from a motor carrier that falls within the smallest fleet fee bracket).
The UCR Plan and the participating States are authorized by 49
U.S.C. 14504a(f) to establish and collect fees from motor carriers,
motor private carriers of property, brokers, freight forwarders, and
leasing companies. The current annual fees charged for registration
year 2018 are set out in 49 CFR 367.40 and for registration years 2019
and thereafter in Sec. 367.50. These fees were adopted by FMCSA in
January 2018 after a rulemaking proceeding. See Fees for the Unified
Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement, 83 FR 605 (Jan. 5, 2018).
For carriers and freight forwarders, the fees vary according to the
size of the vehicle fleets, as required by 49 U.S.C. 14504a(f). The
fees collected are allocated to the States and the UCR Plan in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h).
B. Fee Requirements
The statute specifies that the fees set by the Agency are to be
based on the recommendation of the UCR Plan (49 U.S.C.
14504a(f)(1)(B)). In recommending the level of fees to be charged in
any registration year, and in setting the fee level, both the UCR Plan
and the Agency shall consider the following factors:
Administrative costs associated with the UCR Plan and
Agreement;
Whether the revenues generated in the previous year and
any surplus or shortage from that or prior years enable the
participating States to achieve the revenue levels set by the UCR Plan;
and
Provisions governing fees in 49 U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)
(49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(A)). The fees may be adjusted within a
reasonable range on an annual basis if the revenues derived from the
fees are either insufficient to provide the participating States with
the revenues they are entitled to receive or exceed those revenues (49
U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(E)).
Overall, the fees charged under the UCR Agreement must produce the
level of revenue established by statute. Section 14504a(g) establishes
the revenue entitlements for States that choose to participate in the
UCR Agreement. That section provides that a participating State, which
participated in SSRS in the registration year prior to the enactment of
the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, is entitled to receive
revenues under the UCR Agreement equivalent to the revenues it received
in the year before that enactment. Participating States that also
collected intrastate registration fees from interstate motor carrier
entities (whether they participated in SSRS or not) are also entitled
to receive revenues of this type under the UCR Agreement, in an amount
equivalent to the amount received in the year before the Act's
enactment. The section also provides that States that did not
participate in SSRS, but which choose to participate in the UCR Plan,
may receive revenues not to exceed $500,000 per registration year.
FMCSA's interpretation of its responsibilities under 49 U.S.C.
14504a in setting fees for the UCR Plan and Agreement is guided by the
primacy the statute places on the need both to set and to adjust the
fees to ensure they ``provide the revenues to which the States are
entitled'' (49 U.S.C.14504a(f) (1)(E)(i)). The statute links the
requirement that the fees be adjusted ``within a reasonable range'' to
the provision of sufficient revenues to meet the entitlements of the
participating States (49 U.S.C. 14504a(f)(1)(E)). See also 49 U.S.C.
14504a(d)(7)(A)(ii)).
Section 14504a(h)(4) gives additional support for this
interpretation. This provision explicitly requires FMCSA to reduce the
fees charged in the registration year following any year in which the
depository retains any funds in excess of the amount necessary to
satisfy the revenue entitlements of the participating States and the
UCR Plan's administrative costs.
VI. Background
On December 14, 2017, the board of directors voted unanimously to
submit
[[Page 42247]]
a recommendation to the Secretary to reduce the fees collected by the
UCR Plan for registration years 2019 and thereafter. The recommendation
was submitted to the Secretary on January 11, 2018.\1\ The requested
fee adjustments are required by 49 U.S.C. 14504a because, for
registration year 2017, the total revenues collected are expected to
exceed the total revenue entitlements of $107.78 million distributed to
the 41 participating States plus the $5 million established for ``the
administrative costs associated with the unified carrier registration
plan and agreement'' (49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(A)(i)). The maximum
revenue entitlements for each of the 41 participating States,
established in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 14504a(g), are set out in a
table attached to the January 11, 2018 recommendation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The January 11, 2018 recommendation from the UCR Plan and
all related tables are available in the docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As indicated in the analysis attached to the January 11, 2018
recommendation letter, as of the end of November 2017, the UCR Plan had
already collected $7.30 million more than the statutory maximum of
$112.78 million for registration year 2017. The UCR Plan estimates that
by the end of 2018, total revenues will exceed the statutory maximum by
$9.17 million, or approximately 8.13 percent. The excess revenues
collected will be held in a depository maintained by the UCR Plan as
required by 49 U.S.C. 14504a(h)(4).
The UCR Plan's recommendation estimated the minimum projection of
revenue collections for December 2017 through December 2018 by summing
the collections within each of the registration years 2013 through 2015
\2\ and then comparing across years to find the minimum total amount.
This is the same methodology used to project collections and estimate
fees in the previous fee adjustment rulemaking (83 FR 605 (Jan. 5,
2018)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Collections for registration year 2016 are not available for
use for this purpose because registration and fee collection for
that year was not finalized at the time of the UCR Plan
Recommendation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7), the costs incurred by the UCR Plan to
administer the UCR Agreement are eligible for inclusion in the total
revenue to be collected, in addition to the revenue allocations for the
participating States. The total revenue for registration years 2010 to
2018, as approved in the 2010 final rule (75 FR 21993 (April, 27,
2010)), has been $112,777,059.81, including $5,000,000 for
administrative costs. The UCR Plan's latest recommendation includes a
reduction in the amount of the administrative cost allowance to
$3,500,000 for the 2019 and 2020 registration years. The reduction of
$1,500,000 recommended by the UCR Plan was based on estimates of future
administrative cost allowances needed to operate the UCR Plan and
Agreement. No changes in the State revenue entitlements are
recommended, and the entitlement figures for 2019 and 2020 for the 41
participating States are the same as those previously approved for the
years 2010 through 2018. Therefore, for registration years 2019 and
2020, the UCR Plan recommends total revenue to be collected of
$111,277,060 (rounded to the nearest dollar). FMCSA proposes to approve
this recommendation for the total revenue to be collected by the UCR
Plan, as shown in the following table.
State UCR Revenue Entitlements and Final 2019 Revenue Target
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 2019 UCR revenue
State entitlements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................ $2,939,964.00
Arkansas....................................... 1,817,360.00
California..................................... 2,131,710.00
Colorado....................................... 1,801,615.00
Connecticut.................................... 3,129,840.00
Georgia........................................ 2,660,060.00
Idaho.......................................... 547,696.68
Illinois....................................... 3,516,993.00
Indiana........................................ 2,364,879.00
Iowa........................................... 474,742.00
Kansas......................................... 4,344,290.00
Kentucky....................................... 5,365,980.00
Louisiana...................................... 4,063,836.00
Maine.......................................... 1,555,672.00
Massachusetts.................................. 2,282,887.00
Michigan....................................... 7,520,717.00
Minnesota...................................... 1,137,132.30
Missouri....................................... 2,342,000.00
Mississippi.................................... 4,322,100.00
Montana........................................ 1,049,063.00
Nebraska....................................... 741,974.00
New Hampshire.................................. 2,273,299.00
New Mexico..................................... 3,292,233.00
New York....................................... 4,414,538.00
North Carolina................................. 372,007.00
North Dakota................................... 2,010,434.00
Ohio........................................... 4,813,877.74
Oklahoma....................................... 2,457,796.00
Pennsylvania................................... 4,945,527.00
Rhode Island................................... 2,285,486.00
South Carolina................................. 2,420,120.00
South Dakota................................... 855,623.00
Tennessee...................................... 4,759,329.00
Texas.......................................... 2,718,628.06
Utah........................................... 2,098,408.00
Virginia....................................... 4,852,865.00
[[Page 42248]]
Washington..................................... 2,467,971.00
West Virginia.................................. 1,431,727.03
Wisconsin...................................... 2,196,680.00
------------------------
Sub-Total.................................. 106,777,059.81
Alaska......................................... 500,000.00
Delaware....................................... 500,000.00
------------------------
Total State Revenue Entitlement........ 107,777,060.00
Administrative Expenses................ 3,500,000.00
------------------------
Total Revenue Target............... 111,277,060.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
FMCSA has reviewed the formal recommendation from the UCR Plan and
proposes to approve it, including the reduction in the allowance for
administrative costs necessary to continue administering the UCR
Agreement and the UCR Plan. Overall, the UCR Plan and the Agency agree
on the reduction of the current fees for 2019 and subsequent
registration years, and that there would be no change in the State UCR
revenue entitlements.
VIII. International Impacts
Motor carriers and other entities involved in interstate and
foreign transportation in the United States that do not have a
principal office in the United States, are nonetheless subject to the
fees for the UCR Plan. They are required to designate a participating
State as a base State and pay the appropriate fees to that State (49
U.S.C. 14504a(a)(2)(B)(ii) and (f)(4)).
IX. Section-by-Section Analysis
In this NPRM, FMCSA proposes that the provisions of 49 CFR 367.50
(which were just adopted in the January 5, 2018 final rule) would be
revised to establish new reduced fees applicable only to registration
year 2019. A new 49 CFR 367.60 would establish the proposed fees for
registration year 2020, which would remain in effect for subsequent
registration years unless revised in the future.
X. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O.
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
FMCSA performed an analysis of the impacts of the proposed rule and
determined it is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), as supplemented by E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). Accordingly, OMB has
not reviewed it under those Orders. It is also not significant within
the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and procedures (DOT Order 2100.5
dated May 22, 1980; 44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
The changes proposed by this rule would reduce the registration
fees paid by motor carriers, motor private carriers of property,
brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing companies to the UCR Plan and
the participating States. While each motor carrier would realize a
reduced burden, fees are considered by OMB Circular A-4, Regulatory
Analysis, as transfer payments, not costs. Transfer payments are
payments from one group to another that do not affect total resources
available to society. By definition, transfers are not considered in
the monetization of societal costs and benefits of rulemakings.
This rule would establish reductions in the annual registration
fees for the UCR Plan and Agreement. The entities affected by this rule
are the participating States, motor carriers, motor private carriers of
property, brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing companies. Because
the State UCR revenue entitlements would remain unchanged, the
participating States would not be impacted by this rule. The primary
impact of this rule would be a reduction in fees paid by individual
motor carriers, motor private carriers of property, brokers, freight
forwarders, and leasing companies. The reduction of the current 2019
registration year fees (finalized on January 5, 2018) would range from
approximately $10 to $9,530 per entity, depending on the number of
vehicles owned or operated by the affected entities. The reduction in
fees for subsequent registration years would range from approximately
$4 to $3,565 per entity.
B. E.O. 13771 Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
E.O. 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs,'' does not apply to this action because it is nonsignificant and
has zero costs; therefore, it is not subject to the ``2 for 1'' and
budgeting requirements.
This rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined
in section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small Entities)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857), requires Federal
agencies to consider the effects of the regulatory action on small
business and other small entities and to minimize any significant
economic impact. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses
and not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000 (5 U.S.C. 601(6)).
Accordingly, DOT policy requires an analysis of the impact of all
regulations on small entities, and mandates that agencies strive to
lessen any adverse effects on these businesses. Section 605 of the RFA
allows an agency to certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis,
if the rulemaking is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would directly affect the participating States,
motor carriers, motor private carriers of property, brokers, freight
forwarders, and leasing companies. Under the standards of the RFA, as
amended by
[[Page 42249]]
the SBREFA, the participating States are not small entities. States are
not considered small entities because they do not meet the definition
of a small entity in section 601 of the RFA. Specifically, States are
not considered small governmental jurisdictions under section 601(5) of
the RFA, both because State government is not included among the
various levels of government listed in section 601(5), and because,
even if this were the case, no State or the District of Columbia has a
population of less than 50,000, which is the criterion by which a
governmental jurisdiction is considered small under section 601(5) of
the RFA.
The Small Business Administration's size standard for a small
entity (13 CFR 121.201) differs by industry code. The entities affected
by this rule fall into many different industry codes. In order to
determine if this rule would have an impact on a significant number of
small entities, FMCSA examined the 2012 Economic Census \3\ data for
two different industries; truck transportation (Subsector 484) and
transit and ground transportation (Subsector 485). According to the
2012 Economic Census, approximately 99 percent of truck transportation
firms, and approximately 97 percent of transit and ground
transportation firms, had annual revenue less than the Small Business
Administration's \4\ revenue thresholds of $27.5 million and $15
million, respectively, to be defined as a small entity. Therefore,
FMCSA has determined that this rule will impact a substantial number of
small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 US Economic Census, available at
https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2012_US_48SSSZ4&prodType=table (accessed
Apr. 27, 2017).
\4\ U.S. Small Business Administration. ``Table of Small
Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry
Classification System Codes.'' Published February 26,2016. Available
at: https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, FMCSA has determined that this rule would not have a
significant impact on the affected entities. The effect of this rule
would be to reduce the annual registration fee motor carriers, motor
private carriers of property, brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing
companies are currently required to pay. The reduction will range from
approximately $10 to $9,530 per entity, in the first year, and from
approximately $4 to $3,565 per entity in subsequent years, depending on
the number of vehicles owned and/or operated by the affected entities.
Accordingly, I certify that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
In accordance with section 213(a) of the SBREFA, FMCSA wants to
assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they
can better evaluate its effects on themselves and participate in the
rulemaking initiative. If the proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance; please
consult the FMCSA point of contact, Gerald Folsom, listed in the For
Further Information Contact section of this proposed rule.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business Administration's Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of FMCSA, call
1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). DOT has a policy regarding the rights
of small entities to regulatory enforcement fairness and an explicit
policy against retaliation for exercising these rights.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $156 million (which is the
value equivalent of $100,000,000 in 1995, adjusted for inflation to
2015 levels) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would
not result in such an expenditure, the Agency does discuss the effects
of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
G. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for federalism under section 1(a) of E.O.
13132 if it has ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' FMCSA determined that this proposal would not have
substantial direct costs on or for States, nor would it limit the
policymaking discretion of States. Nothing in this document preempts
any State law or regulation. Therefore, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Impact Statement.
H. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), requires agencies
issuing ``economically significant'' rules, if the regulation also
concerns an environmental health or safety risk that an agency has
reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, to include an
evaluation of the regulation's environmental health and safety effects
on children. The Agency determined this proposed rule is not
economically significant. Therefore, no analysis of the impacts on
children is required. In any event, the Agency does not anticipate that
this regulatory action could in any respect present an environmental or
safety risk that could disproportionately affect children.
J. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, and has determined it will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have taking implications.
K. Privacy
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, (Pub. L. 108-447, 118
Stat. 2809, 3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note) requires the Agency to conduct a
privacy impact assessment of a regulation that will affect the privacy
of individuals. This rule does not require the collection of personally
identifiable information.
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) applies only to Federal agencies
and any non-Federal agency that receives records contained in a system
of records from a Federal agency for use in a matching program.
[[Page 42250]]
The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-347, 208, 116 Stat. 2899,
2921 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires Federal agencies to conduct a privacy
impact assessment for new or substantially changed technology that
collects, maintains, or disseminates information in an identifiable
form. No new or substantially changed technology would collect,
maintain, or disseminate information as a result of this rule.
Accordingly, FMCSA has not conducted a privacy impact assessment.
L. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this
program.
M. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Agency has determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a
``significant regulatory action'' likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under E.O. 13211.
N. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under E.O.
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
O. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through OMB,
with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) are standards that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, FMCSA did not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
P. Environment (NEPA, CAA, Environmental Justice)
FMCSA analyzed this NPRM for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
determined this action is categorically excluded from further analysis
and documentation in an environmental assessment or environmental
impact statement under FMCSA Order 5610.1 (69 FR 9680, March 1, 2004),
Appendix 2, paragraph 6.h. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) in paragraph
6.h. covers regulations and actions taken pursuant to regulation
implementing procedures to collect fees that will be charged for motor
carrier registrations. The proposed requirements in this rule are
covered by this CE and the NPRM does not have any effect on the quality
of the environment. The CE determination is available in the docket.
FMCSA also analyzed this rule under section 176(c) of the Clean Air
Act, as amended (CAA) (42 U.S.C. 7406(c)), and implementing regulations
promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency. Approval of this
action is exempt from the CAA's general conformity requirement because
it does not affect direct or indirect emissions of criteria pollutants.
Under E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, each Federal agency
must identify and address, as appropriate, ``disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations'' in the United States, its possessions, and territories.
FMCSA evaluated the environmental justice effects of this proposed rule
in accordance with the E.O., and has determined that no environmental
justice issue is associated with this proposed rule, nor is there any
collective environmental impact that would result from its
promulgation.
Q. E.O. 13783 (Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth)
E.O. 13783 directs executive departments and agencies to review
existing regulations that potentially burden the development or use of
domestically produced energy resources, and to appropriately suspend,
revise, or rescind those that unduly burden the development of domestic
energy resources. In accordance with E.O. 13783, DOT prepared and
submitted a report to the Director of OMB that provides specific
recommendations that, to the extent permitted by law, could alleviate
or eliminate aspects of agency action that burden domestic energy
production. This proposed rule has not been identified by DOT under
E.O. 13783 as potentially alleviating unnecessary burdens on domestic
energy production.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 367
Insurance, Intergovernmental relations, Motor carriers, Surety
bonds.
In consideration of the foregoing, FMCSA proposes to amend 49 CFR
chapter III, part 367 to read as follows:
PART 367--STANDARDS FOR REGISTRATION WITH STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 367 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 13301, 14504a; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
2. Revise Sec. 367.50 to read as follows:
Sec. 367.50 Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and
Agreement for Registration Year 2019.
Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement for Registration Year 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of commercial motor
vehicles owned or operated Fee per entity for
by exempt or non-exempt exempt or non-exempt Fee per entity for
Bracket motor carrier, motor motor carrier, motor broker or leasing
private carrier, or private carrier, or company
freight forwarder freight forwarder
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B1................................ 0-2....................... $63 $63
B2................................ 3-5....................... 187 .......................
B3................................ 6-20...................... 372 .......................
[[Page 42251]]
B4................................ 21-100.................... 1,299 .......................
B5................................ 101-1,000................. 6,190 .......................
B6................................ 1,001 and above........... 60,441 .......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Add new Sec. 367.60 to subpart B to read as follows:
Sec. 367.60 Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and
Agreement for Registration Years Beginning in 2020.
Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement for Registration Year 2020 and Each Subsequent
Registration Year Thereafter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of commercial motor
vehicles owned or operated Fee per entity for
by exempt or non-exempt exempt or non-exempt Fee per entity for
Bracket motor carrier, motor motor carrier, motor broker or leasing
private carrier, or private carrier, or company
freight forwarder freight forwarder
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B1................................ 0-2....................... $69 $69
B2................................ 3-5....................... 206 .......................
B3................................ 6-20...................... 409 .......................
B4................................ 21-100.................... 1,427 .......................
B5................................ 101-1,000................. 6,800 .......................
B6................................ 1,001 and above........... 66,406 .......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: August 15,
2018.
Raymond P. Martinez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-17976 Filed 8-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P