Willamette National Forest, McKenzie River Ranger District; Oregon; Flat Country Project, 42105-42106 [2018-17837]
Download as PDF
42105
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN FOR EACH TYPE OF RESPONDENT
Estimated
number of
respondents
Affected public
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Est. total
hours per
response
Estimated total
burden
Reporting
State agencies .....................................................................
Non-profit Institutions ...........................................................
Total Estimated Reporting Burden ......................................
54
3,445
3,499
24
1
1.35
1,296
3,445
4,741
0.25
0.25
0.25
324
861
1,185
861.8
10.78
2 23.91
46,537
1 37,129
83,666
0.10
0.20
0.15
4,714
7,426
12,140
Recordkeeping
State agencies .....................................................................
Non-profit Institutions ...........................................................
Total Estimated Recordkeeping Burden ..............................
54
3,445
3,499
Total Reporting and Recordkeeping
Reporting ..............................................................................
Recordkeeping .....................................................................
3,499
3,499
1.35
23.91
4,741
83,666
0.25
0.15
1,185
12,140
Total ..............................................................................
3,499
25.27
88,407
0.15
13,325
1 Certain
procurement requirements only apply to the 2,679 school food authorities and residential child care institutions participating in the
Special Milk Program.
2 Rounded from 23.91146.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Willamette National Forest, McKenzie
River Ranger District; Oregon; Flat
Country Project
AGENCY:
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
ACTION:
The Flat Country Project is
located on the western slope of the
Cascades, extending from Scott
Mountain to the upper reach of the
McKenzie River, eight miles east of
McKenzie Bridge, Oregon. The project
area is approximately 74,063 acres.
There is a high amount of mid-seral
stands, moving the seral distribution
away from historic levels and limiting
stand structure and species diversity
across the landscape. This project
proposes to thin, reduce the number of
trees, and increase the size and structure
of the remaining forest over time.
Activities proposed include forest
management treatments across
approximately 5,001 acres, including
forest thinning (including riparian
reserve thinning) and regenerating
harvests. Additional proposed activities
would include road work (including
maintenance, reconstruction, temporary
road construction, and
decommissioning), and meadow
enhancements.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Aug 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
September 19, 2018. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected March 2019 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected August 2019.
ADDRESSES: Scoping comments can be
submitted electronically through
https://cara.ecosystemmanagement.org/Public//
CommentInput?Project=53966. You may
also submit written comments via mail
or by hand delivery to Darren Cross,
District Ranger, McKenzie Bridge
Ranger District, 57600 McKenzie Hwy.,
McKenzie Bridge, OR 97413; or via
facsimile to 541–822–7254.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Schlichting (Project Team Leader)
at deandschlichting@fs.fed.us, 541–822–
7214.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
encouraging the creation of early seral
habitat, and alerting the recreating
public of operation schedules and haul
routes to avoid conflict. After the review
of the project and due to the complexity
and size of this project, as well as public
input, the decision was made to elevate
the analysis to an environmental impact
statement.
Background
This project was originally an
environmental assessment and was
scoped from May 22 to June 23, 2018.
Scoping comments were received on a
range of concerns and topics. Primary
concerns included: Providing a
sustainable supply of timber products
for local industry, reasons for and
against road construction, preserving
and impacting northern spotted owl
habitat, no logging of mature forests,
Proposed Action
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2018–17841 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Purpose and Need for Action
The Flat Country Project is proposed
to provide a sustainable supply of
timber products, actively manage stands
to improve stand conditions (density,
diversity, and structure), increase
vegetative habitat complexity and
hardwood composition along streams,
and sustainably manage the network of
road systems in the project area. Within
the project area trees are competing for
sunlight, water and nutrients causing
reduced tree growth and vigor. The
productivity and site conditions of
forests in the project area allow for the
production of forest products while
being sensitive to the ecology of the area
and meeting other important natural
values and services.
The proposed action has multiple
facets:
(1) Commercially harvest about 5,001
acres (3.7% of the Project Area) and
regenerate roughly 962 acres (1.0% of
the Project Area). We propose to use
thinning across the majority of the
project and these treatments would
incorporate some untreated areas (skips)
and create gaps of up to three acres with
variable spacing of remaining trees. We
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
42106
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Notices
would design the regeneration harvest
to increase forest-age diversity across
the project area. The type of
regeneration harvests would vary and
may potentially include: Shelterwood
harvests, two-aged systems, group
selection harvests, variable retention
harvests, and seed tree harvests. The age
of stands proposed for treatment range
from 29 to 150 years.
(2) Thin and treat fuels on
approximately 767 acres of riparian
reserves outside of riparian buffers to
accelerate and/or improve Aquatic
Conservation Strategy Objectives
(ACSOs). Additional riparian reserve
treatments could occur on up to 50 acres
within buffers, including diversity
thinning in plantations, wood
placement in creeks and cutting and
leaving conifers in areas of hardwoods
to encourage hardwood growth. All
treatments will be designed to accelerate
and/or improve ACSOs.
(3) Maintain or reconstruct
approximately 146 miles of road,
including installation of approximately
200 culverts (primarily replacements).
(4) Decommission and hydrologically
stabilize approximately 11 miles of
road.
(5) Construct 16 miles of temporary
roads; temporary roads would be
restored to their previous function and
closed after all project activities are
completed.
(6) Create fuel breaks along forest
roads. Treatments would occur along
approximate 57 miles of road and range
from 33 to 66 feet wide which would
equate to about 2597 acres.
(7) Enhance dry and wet meadow
habitats on approximately 368 acres,
which includes a combination of tree
removal and broadcast burning.
(8) Reduce hazardous fuels on both
existing fuel loadings and logging slash
as a result of harvest to bring stands to
levels within Forest Plan standards and
guidelines. Proposed treatments include
broadcast or under-burning, machine
piling, burning of landings, hand piling
and chipping.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Possible Alternatives
Due to the responses we received
from the initial scoping, there is at least
one other action alternative that may be
considered. One commentor suggested
the Forest Service consider alternatives
that avoid logging mature forests. The
district will develop an alternative that
harvests only in previously managed
stands under 80 years old (Alternative
3).
Responsible Official
McKenzie River District Ranger.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:04 Aug 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Given the purpose and need, the
scope of the decision to be made by the
responsible official will be as follows:
Do the proposed actions comply with all
applicable laws governing Forest
Service actions and with the applicable
standards and guidelines found in the
Willamette Land and Resource
Management Plan (LRMP)? Does the
Environmental Impact Statement have
sufficient site-specific environmental
analysis to make an informed decision?
Do the proposed actions meet the
purpose and need for action? With these
assurances the responsible official must
decide: Whether or not to select the
proposed action or one of any other
potential alternatives that may be
developed, and what, if any, additional
actions should be required.
Scoping Process
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Dated: July 26, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2018–17837 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Comprehensive River Management
Plan for Black Butte Wild and Scenic
River, Including Portions of Cold
Creek, Mendocino National Forest,
Mendocino County, California
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with Section
3(d)(1) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers
Act, the USDA Forest Service
announces the completion and
availability of the comprehensive river
management plan for Black Butte Wild
and Scenic River, including portions of
Cold Creek. On May 11, 2018, Acting
Mendocino Forest Supervisor, Gar
Abbas signed a decision notice to adopt
a comprehensive river management plan
(‘‘CRMP’’) for Black Butte Wild and
Scenic River (including Cold Creek).
The Black Butte Wild and Scenic River
CRMP (including Cold Creek) addresses
resource protection, development of
lands and facilities, user capacities, and
other management practices necessary
or desirable to achieve the purposes of
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This
CRMP was prepared after consultation
with State and local governments and
the interested public. An environmental
assessment (EA) was prepared as part of
the CRMP development. This EA has
been prepared in compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act and
other relevant federal laws and
regulations. The EA discloses the direct,
indirect, and cumulative environmental
effects that would result from adopting
the CRMP.
The Black Butte Wild and Scenic
River CRMP (including Cold Creek) and
the EA are available for review at
https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/
?project=50351 and the following
offices: Upper Lake Ranger District,
10025 Elk Mountain Road, Upper Lake,
CA 95484. Mendocino National Forest
Supervisor’s Office, 825 N Humboldt
Ave., Willows, CA 95988.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information may be obtained by
contacting Hilda Kwan, District
Hydrologist, Mendocino National
SUMMARY:
This notice of intent begins the formal
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. It is important that
reviewers provide their comments at
such times and in such manner that
they are useful to the agency’s
preparation of the environmental impact
statement. Therefore, comments should
be provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
We are interested in your comments
on the following questions: Are there
alternative ways to meet the purpose of
the project other than the proposed
action we offer, which you would like
the Forest Service to consider and
analyze? Is there any information about
the project area, which you believe is
important in the context of the proposed
activities that you would like the Forest
Service to consider? What specifically
are the potential effects of this proposal
that you are particularly concerned
about? For example, rather than simply
stating that you would like a change in
a proposed activity or that you would
not like an activity to take place, it is
most helpful to understand why you
desire this. What are your underlying
concerns with an activity or action;
what are the effects from the activity
that concern you?
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
PO 00000
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42105-42106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17837]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Willamette National Forest, McKenzie River Ranger District;
Oregon; Flat Country Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Flat Country Project is located on the western slope of
the Cascades, extending from Scott Mountain to the upper reach of the
McKenzie River, eight miles east of McKenzie Bridge, Oregon. The
project area is approximately 74,063 acres. There is a high amount of
mid-seral stands, moving the seral distribution away from historic
levels and limiting stand structure and species diversity across the
landscape. This project proposes to thin, reduce the number of trees,
and increase the size and structure of the remaining forest over time.
Activities proposed include forest management treatments across
approximately 5,001 acres, including forest thinning (including
riparian reserve thinning) and regenerating harvests. Additional
proposed activities would include road work (including maintenance,
reconstruction, temporary road construction, and decommissioning), and
meadow enhancements.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by September 19, 2018. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected March 2019 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected August 2019.
ADDRESSES: Scoping comments can be submitted electronically through
https://cara.ecosystem-management.org/Public//CommentInput?Project=53966. You may also submit written comments via
mail or by hand delivery to Darren Cross, District Ranger, McKenzie
Bridge Ranger District, 57600 McKenzie Hwy., McKenzie Bridge, OR 97413;
or via facsimile to 541-822-7254.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Schlichting (Project Team Leader)
at [email protected], 541-822-7214.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This project was originally an environmental assessment and was
scoped from May 22 to June 23, 2018. Scoping comments were received on
a range of concerns and topics. Primary concerns included: Providing a
sustainable supply of timber products for local industry, reasons for
and against road construction, preserving and impacting northern
spotted owl habitat, no logging of mature forests, encouraging the
creation of early seral habitat, and alerting the recreating public of
operation schedules and haul routes to avoid conflict. After the review
of the project and due to the complexity and size of this project, as
well as public input, the decision was made to elevate the analysis to
an environmental impact statement.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Flat Country Project is proposed to provide a sustainable
supply of timber products, actively manage stands to improve stand
conditions (density, diversity, and structure), increase vegetative
habitat complexity and hardwood composition along streams, and
sustainably manage the network of road systems in the project area.
Within the project area trees are competing for sunlight, water and
nutrients causing reduced tree growth and vigor. The productivity and
site conditions of forests in the project area allow for the production
of forest products while being sensitive to the ecology of the area and
meeting other important natural values and services.
Proposed Action
The proposed action has multiple facets:
(1) Commercially harvest about 5,001 acres (3.7% of the Project
Area) and regenerate roughly 962 acres (1.0% of the Project Area). We
propose to use thinning across the majority of the project and these
treatments would incorporate some untreated areas (skips) and create
gaps of up to three acres with variable spacing of remaining trees. We
[[Page 42106]]
would design the regeneration harvest to increase forest-age diversity
across the project area. The type of regeneration harvests would vary
and may potentially include: Shelterwood harvests, two-aged systems,
group selection harvests, variable retention harvests, and seed tree
harvests. The age of stands proposed for treatment range from 29 to 150
years.
(2) Thin and treat fuels on approximately 767 acres of riparian
reserves outside of riparian buffers to accelerate and/or improve
Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives (ACSOs). Additional riparian
reserve treatments could occur on up to 50 acres within buffers,
including diversity thinning in plantations, wood placement in creeks
and cutting and leaving conifers in areas of hardwoods to encourage
hardwood growth. All treatments will be designed to accelerate and/or
improve ACSOs.
(3) Maintain or reconstruct approximately 146 miles of road,
including installation of approximately 200 culverts (primarily
replacements).
(4) Decommission and hydrologically stabilize approximately 11
miles of road.
(5) Construct 16 miles of temporary roads; temporary roads would be
restored to their previous function and closed after all project
activities are completed.
(6) Create fuel breaks along forest roads. Treatments would occur
along approximate 57 miles of road and range from 33 to 66 feet wide
which would equate to about 2597 acres.
(7) Enhance dry and wet meadow habitats on approximately 368 acres,
which includes a combination of tree removal and broadcast burning.
(8) Reduce hazardous fuels on both existing fuel loadings and
logging slash as a result of harvest to bring stands to levels within
Forest Plan standards and guidelines. Proposed treatments include
broadcast or under-burning, machine piling, burning of landings, hand
piling and chipping.
Possible Alternatives
Due to the responses we received from the initial scoping, there is
at least one other action alternative that may be considered. One
commentor suggested the Forest Service consider alternatives that avoid
logging mature forests. The district will develop an alternative that
harvests only in previously managed stands under 80 years old
(Alternative 3).
Responsible Official
McKenzie River District Ranger.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Given the purpose and need, the scope of the decision to be made by
the responsible official will be as follows: Do the proposed actions
comply with all applicable laws governing Forest Service actions and
with the applicable standards and guidelines found in the Willamette
Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP)? Does the Environmental Impact
Statement have sufficient site-specific environmental analysis to make
an informed decision? Do the proposed actions meet the purpose and need
for action? With these assurances the responsible official must decide:
Whether or not to select the proposed action or one of any other
potential alternatives that may be developed, and what, if any,
additional actions should be required.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent begins the formal scoping process, which
guides the development of the environmental impact statement. It is
important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of the
environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided
prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate
the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
We are interested in your comments on the following questions: Are
there alternative ways to meet the purpose of the project other than
the proposed action we offer, which you would like the Forest Service
to consider and analyze? Is there any information about the project
area, which you believe is important in the context of the proposed
activities that you would like the Forest Service to consider? What
specifically are the potential effects of this proposal that you are
particularly concerned about? For example, rather than simply stating
that you would like a change in a proposed activity or that you would
not like an activity to take place, it is most helpful to understand
why you desire this. What are your underlying concerns with an activity
or action; what are the effects from the activity that concern you?
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however, anonymous comments will not provide
the Agency with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Dated: July 26, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2018-17837 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P