Willamette National Forest, McKenzie River Ranger District; Oregon; Flat Country Project, 42105-42106 [2018-17837]

Download as PDF 42105 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Notices TABLE 1—ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN FOR EACH TYPE OF RESPONDENT Estimated number of respondents Affected public Number of responses per respondent Total annual responses Est. total hours per response Estimated total burden Reporting State agencies ..................................................................... Non-profit Institutions ........................................................... Total Estimated Reporting Burden ...................................... 54 3,445 3,499 24 1 1.35 1,296 3,445 4,741 0.25 0.25 0.25 324 861 1,185 861.8 10.78 2 23.91 46,537 1 37,129 83,666 0.10 0.20 0.15 4,714 7,426 12,140 Recordkeeping State agencies ..................................................................... Non-profit Institutions ........................................................... Total Estimated Recordkeeping Burden .............................. 54 3,445 3,499 Total Reporting and Recordkeeping Reporting .............................................................................. Recordkeeping ..................................................................... 3,499 3,499 1.35 23.91 4,741 83,666 0.25 0.15 1,185 12,140 Total .............................................................................. 3,499 25.27 88,407 0.15 13,325 1 Certain procurement requirements only apply to the 2,679 school food authorities and residential child care institutions participating in the Special Milk Program. 2 Rounded from 23.91146. BILLING CODE 3410–30–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Willamette National Forest, McKenzie River Ranger District; Oregon; Flat Country Project AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. ACTION: The Flat Country Project is located on the western slope of the Cascades, extending from Scott Mountain to the upper reach of the McKenzie River, eight miles east of McKenzie Bridge, Oregon. The project area is approximately 74,063 acres. There is a high amount of mid-seral stands, moving the seral distribution away from historic levels and limiting stand structure and species diversity across the landscape. This project proposes to thin, reduce the number of trees, and increase the size and structure of the remaining forest over time. Activities proposed include forest management treatments across approximately 5,001 acres, including forest thinning (including riparian reserve thinning) and regenerating harvests. Additional proposed activities would include road work (including maintenance, reconstruction, temporary road construction, and decommissioning), and meadow enhancements. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Aug 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by September 19, 2018. The draft environmental impact statement is expected March 2019 and the final environmental impact statement is expected August 2019. ADDRESSES: Scoping comments can be submitted electronically through https://cara.ecosystemmanagement.org/Public// CommentInput?Project=53966. You may also submit written comments via mail or by hand delivery to Darren Cross, District Ranger, McKenzie Bridge Ranger District, 57600 McKenzie Hwy., McKenzie Bridge, OR 97413; or via facsimile to 541–822–7254. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Schlichting (Project Team Leader) at deandschlichting@fs.fed.us, 541–822– 7214. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: encouraging the creation of early seral habitat, and alerting the recreating public of operation schedules and haul routes to avoid conflict. After the review of the project and due to the complexity and size of this project, as well as public input, the decision was made to elevate the analysis to an environmental impact statement. Background This project was originally an environmental assessment and was scoped from May 22 to June 23, 2018. Scoping comments were received on a range of concerns and topics. Primary concerns included: Providing a sustainable supply of timber products for local industry, reasons for and against road construction, preserving and impacting northern spotted owl habitat, no logging of mature forests, Proposed Action DATES: [FR Doc. 2018–17841 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Purpose and Need for Action The Flat Country Project is proposed to provide a sustainable supply of timber products, actively manage stands to improve stand conditions (density, diversity, and structure), increase vegetative habitat complexity and hardwood composition along streams, and sustainably manage the network of road systems in the project area. Within the project area trees are competing for sunlight, water and nutrients causing reduced tree growth and vigor. The productivity and site conditions of forests in the project area allow for the production of forest products while being sensitive to the ecology of the area and meeting other important natural values and services. The proposed action has multiple facets: (1) Commercially harvest about 5,001 acres (3.7% of the Project Area) and regenerate roughly 962 acres (1.0% of the Project Area). We propose to use thinning across the majority of the project and these treatments would incorporate some untreated areas (skips) and create gaps of up to three acres with variable spacing of remaining trees. We E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM 20AUN1 42106 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Notices would design the regeneration harvest to increase forest-age diversity across the project area. The type of regeneration harvests would vary and may potentially include: Shelterwood harvests, two-aged systems, group selection harvests, variable retention harvests, and seed tree harvests. The age of stands proposed for treatment range from 29 to 150 years. (2) Thin and treat fuels on approximately 767 acres of riparian reserves outside of riparian buffers to accelerate and/or improve Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives (ACSOs). Additional riparian reserve treatments could occur on up to 50 acres within buffers, including diversity thinning in plantations, wood placement in creeks and cutting and leaving conifers in areas of hardwoods to encourage hardwood growth. All treatments will be designed to accelerate and/or improve ACSOs. (3) Maintain or reconstruct approximately 146 miles of road, including installation of approximately 200 culverts (primarily replacements). (4) Decommission and hydrologically stabilize approximately 11 miles of road. (5) Construct 16 miles of temporary roads; temporary roads would be restored to their previous function and closed after all project activities are completed. (6) Create fuel breaks along forest roads. Treatments would occur along approximate 57 miles of road and range from 33 to 66 feet wide which would equate to about 2597 acres. (7) Enhance dry and wet meadow habitats on approximately 368 acres, which includes a combination of tree removal and broadcast burning. (8) Reduce hazardous fuels on both existing fuel loadings and logging slash as a result of harvest to bring stands to levels within Forest Plan standards and guidelines. Proposed treatments include broadcast or under-burning, machine piling, burning of landings, hand piling and chipping. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Possible Alternatives Due to the responses we received from the initial scoping, there is at least one other action alternative that may be considered. One commentor suggested the Forest Service consider alternatives that avoid logging mature forests. The district will develop an alternative that harvests only in previously managed stands under 80 years old (Alternative 3). Responsible Official McKenzie River District Ranger. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:04 Aug 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 Nature of Decision To Be Made Given the purpose and need, the scope of the decision to be made by the responsible official will be as follows: Do the proposed actions comply with all applicable laws governing Forest Service actions and with the applicable standards and guidelines found in the Willamette Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP)? Does the Environmental Impact Statement have sufficient site-specific environmental analysis to make an informed decision? Do the proposed actions meet the purpose and need for action? With these assurances the responsible official must decide: Whether or not to select the proposed action or one of any other potential alternatives that may be developed, and what, if any, additional actions should be required. Scoping Process Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Dated: July 26, 2018. Chris French, Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System. [FR Doc. 2018–17837 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3411–15–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Comprehensive River Management Plan for Black Butte Wild and Scenic River, Including Portions of Cold Creek, Mendocino National Forest, Mendocino County, California Forest Service, USDA. Notice of availability. AGENCY: ACTION: In accordance with Section 3(d)(1) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the USDA Forest Service announces the completion and availability of the comprehensive river management plan for Black Butte Wild and Scenic River, including portions of Cold Creek. On May 11, 2018, Acting Mendocino Forest Supervisor, Gar Abbas signed a decision notice to adopt a comprehensive river management plan (‘‘CRMP’’) for Black Butte Wild and Scenic River (including Cold Creek). The Black Butte Wild and Scenic River CRMP (including Cold Creek) addresses resource protection, development of lands and facilities, user capacities, and other management practices necessary or desirable to achieve the purposes of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This CRMP was prepared after consultation with State and local governments and the interested public. An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared as part of the CRMP development. This EA has been prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and other relevant federal laws and regulations. The EA discloses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects that would result from adopting the CRMP. The Black Butte Wild and Scenic River CRMP (including Cold Creek) and the EA are available for review at https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/ ?project=50351 and the following offices: Upper Lake Ranger District, 10025 Elk Mountain Road, Upper Lake, CA 95484. Mendocino National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 825 N Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information may be obtained by contacting Hilda Kwan, District Hydrologist, Mendocino National SUMMARY: This notice of intent begins the formal scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. We are interested in your comments on the following questions: Are there alternative ways to meet the purpose of the project other than the proposed action we offer, which you would like the Forest Service to consider and analyze? Is there any information about the project area, which you believe is important in the context of the proposed activities that you would like the Forest Service to consider? What specifically are the potential effects of this proposal that you are particularly concerned about? For example, rather than simply stating that you would like a change in a proposed activity or that you would not like an activity to take place, it is most helpful to understand why you desire this. What are your underlying concerns with an activity or action; what are the effects from the activity that concern you? Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however, anonymous comments will not provide the Agency with the ability to provide the PO 00000 respondent with subsequent environmental documents. Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM 20AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42105-42106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Willamette National Forest, McKenzie River Ranger District; 
Oregon; Flat Country Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Flat Country Project is located on the western slope of 
the Cascades, extending from Scott Mountain to the upper reach of the 
McKenzie River, eight miles east of McKenzie Bridge, Oregon. The 
project area is approximately 74,063 acres. There is a high amount of 
mid-seral stands, moving the seral distribution away from historic 
levels and limiting stand structure and species diversity across the 
landscape. This project proposes to thin, reduce the number of trees, 
and increase the size and structure of the remaining forest over time. 
Activities proposed include forest management treatments across 
approximately 5,001 acres, including forest thinning (including 
riparian reserve thinning) and regenerating harvests. Additional 
proposed activities would include road work (including maintenance, 
reconstruction, temporary road construction, and decommissioning), and 
meadow enhancements.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by September 19, 2018. The draft environmental impact statement is 
expected March 2019 and the final environmental impact statement is 
expected August 2019.

ADDRESSES: Scoping comments can be submitted electronically through 
https://cara.ecosystem-management.org/Public//CommentInput?Project=53966. You may also submit written comments via 
mail or by hand delivery to Darren Cross, District Ranger, McKenzie 
Bridge Ranger District, 57600 McKenzie Hwy., McKenzie Bridge, OR 97413; 
or via facsimile to 541-822-7254.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Schlichting (Project Team Leader) 
at [email protected], 541-822-7214.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    This project was originally an environmental assessment and was 
scoped from May 22 to June 23, 2018. Scoping comments were received on 
a range of concerns and topics. Primary concerns included: Providing a 
sustainable supply of timber products for local industry, reasons for 
and against road construction, preserving and impacting northern 
spotted owl habitat, no logging of mature forests, encouraging the 
creation of early seral habitat, and alerting the recreating public of 
operation schedules and haul routes to avoid conflict. After the review 
of the project and due to the complexity and size of this project, as 
well as public input, the decision was made to elevate the analysis to 
an environmental impact statement.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The Flat Country Project is proposed to provide a sustainable 
supply of timber products, actively manage stands to improve stand 
conditions (density, diversity, and structure), increase vegetative 
habitat complexity and hardwood composition along streams, and 
sustainably manage the network of road systems in the project area. 
Within the project area trees are competing for sunlight, water and 
nutrients causing reduced tree growth and vigor. The productivity and 
site conditions of forests in the project area allow for the production 
of forest products while being sensitive to the ecology of the area and 
meeting other important natural values and services.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action has multiple facets:
    (1) Commercially harvest about 5,001 acres (3.7% of the Project 
Area) and regenerate roughly 962 acres (1.0% of the Project Area). We 
propose to use thinning across the majority of the project and these 
treatments would incorporate some untreated areas (skips) and create 
gaps of up to three acres with variable spacing of remaining trees. We

[[Page 42106]]

would design the regeneration harvest to increase forest-age diversity 
across the project area. The type of regeneration harvests would vary 
and may potentially include: Shelterwood harvests, two-aged systems, 
group selection harvests, variable retention harvests, and seed tree 
harvests. The age of stands proposed for treatment range from 29 to 150 
years.
    (2) Thin and treat fuels on approximately 767 acres of riparian 
reserves outside of riparian buffers to accelerate and/or improve 
Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives (ACSOs). Additional riparian 
reserve treatments could occur on up to 50 acres within buffers, 
including diversity thinning in plantations, wood placement in creeks 
and cutting and leaving conifers in areas of hardwoods to encourage 
hardwood growth. All treatments will be designed to accelerate and/or 
improve ACSOs.
    (3) Maintain or reconstruct approximately 146 miles of road, 
including installation of approximately 200 culverts (primarily 
replacements).
    (4) Decommission and hydrologically stabilize approximately 11 
miles of road.
    (5) Construct 16 miles of temporary roads; temporary roads would be 
restored to their previous function and closed after all project 
activities are completed.
    (6) Create fuel breaks along forest roads. Treatments would occur 
along approximate 57 miles of road and range from 33 to 66 feet wide 
which would equate to about 2597 acres.
    (7) Enhance dry and wet meadow habitats on approximately 368 acres, 
which includes a combination of tree removal and broadcast burning.
    (8) Reduce hazardous fuels on both existing fuel loadings and 
logging slash as a result of harvest to bring stands to levels within 
Forest Plan standards and guidelines. Proposed treatments include 
broadcast or under-burning, machine piling, burning of landings, hand 
piling and chipping.

Possible Alternatives

    Due to the responses we received from the initial scoping, there is 
at least one other action alternative that may be considered. One 
commentor suggested the Forest Service consider alternatives that avoid 
logging mature forests. The district will develop an alternative that 
harvests only in previously managed stands under 80 years old 
(Alternative 3).

Responsible Official

    McKenzie River District Ranger.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    Given the purpose and need, the scope of the decision to be made by 
the responsible official will be as follows: Do the proposed actions 
comply with all applicable laws governing Forest Service actions and 
with the applicable standards and guidelines found in the Willamette 
Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP)? Does the Environmental Impact 
Statement have sufficient site-specific environmental analysis to make 
an informed decision? Do the proposed actions meet the purpose and need 
for action? With these assurances the responsible official must decide: 
Whether or not to select the proposed action or one of any other 
potential alternatives that may be developed, and what, if any, 
additional actions should be required.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent begins the formal scoping process, which 
guides the development of the environmental impact statement. It is 
important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in 
such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of the 
environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided 
prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate 
the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
    We are interested in your comments on the following questions: Are 
there alternative ways to meet the purpose of the project other than 
the proposed action we offer, which you would like the Forest Service 
to consider and analyze? Is there any information about the project 
area, which you believe is important in the context of the proposed 
activities that you would like the Forest Service to consider? What 
specifically are the potential effects of this proposal that you are 
particularly concerned about? For example, rather than simply stating 
that you would like a change in a proposed activity or that you would 
not like an activity to take place, it is most helpful to understand 
why you desire this. What are your underlying concerns with an activity 
or action; what are the effects from the activity that concern you?
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record 
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be 
accepted and considered, however, anonymous comments will not provide 
the Agency with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent 
environmental documents.

    Dated: July 26, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2018-17837 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.