National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Science Policy (OSP) Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Research: Proposed Changes to the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines), 41082-41093 [2018-17760]
Download as PDF
41082
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
humans or animal models that could be
addressed with new technologies.
• Considerations for data sharing
infrastructure and policies.
• Areas and topics for research on the
ethical implications of BRAIN Initiativesupported emerging neurotechnologies
and advancements and their
applications.
• Approaches for disseminating new
tools and technologies as well as
training the broader neuroscience
research community.
• Any other topic relevant to the
strategic plan of the BRAIN Initiative.
Responses to this RFI are voluntary.
Any personal identifiers will be
removed when responses are compiled.
Individual feedback will not be
provided to any responder. Proprietary,
classified, confidential, or sensitive
information should not be included in
your response. This Request for
Information (RFI) is for planning
purposes only and is not a solicitation
for applications or an obligation on the
part of the United States (U.S.)
Government to provide support for any
ideas identified in response to it. Please
note that the U.S. Government will not
pay for the preparation of any comment
submitted or for its use of that comment.
Dated: August 10, 2018.
Lawrence A. Tabak,
Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2018–17759 Filed 8–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Office of Science Policy (OSP)
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Research: Proposed Changes to the
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecules (NIH Guidelines)
AGENCY:
National Institutes of Health,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The National Institutes of
Health (NIH) seeks public comment on
its proposal to amend the NIH
Guidelines for Research Involving
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecules (NIH Guidelines) to
streamline oversight for human gene
transfer clinical research protocols and
reduce duplicative reporting
requirements already captured within
the existing regulatory framework.
Specifically, NIH proposes amendments
to: Delete the NIH protocol registration
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
submission and reporting requirements
under Appendix M of the NIH
Guidelines, and modify the roles and
responsibilities of entities that involve
human gene transfer or the Recombinant
DNA Advisory Committee (RAC).
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments must be submitted in writing
by October 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically by visiting:
https://osp.od.nih.gov/comment-formnih-guidelines/. Comments may also be
sent via fax to 301–496–9839, or by mail
to the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge
Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, Maryland
20892–7985. All written comments
received in response to this notice will
be available for public inspection at NIH
Office of Science Policy (OSP), 6705
Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda,
MD 20892–7985, weekdays between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. and may
be posted without change, including
any personal information, to the NIH
OSP website.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions, or require
additional background information
about these proposed changes, please
contact the NIH by email at
SciencePolicy@od.nih.gov, or telephone
at 301–496–9838. You may also contact
Jessica Tucker, Ph.D., Director of the
Division of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and
Emerging Biotechnology Policy, Office
of Science Policy, NIH, at 301–451–4431
or Jessica.Tucker@nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIH is
proposing a series of actions to the NIH
Guidelines for Research Involving
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecules (NIH Guidelines) to
streamline oversight of human gene
transfer research (HGT), and to focus the
NIH Guidelines more specifically on
biosafety issues associated with research
involving recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecules. The field of
HGT has recently experienced a series
of advances that have resulted in the
translation of research into clinical
practice, including U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approvals for
licensed products. Additionally,
oversight mechanisms for ensuring HGT
proceeds safely have sufficiently
evolved to keep pace with new
discoveries in this field.
At this time, there is duplication in
submitting protocols, annual reports,
amendments, and serious adverse
events for HGT clinical protocols to
both NIH and FDA that does not exist
for other areas of clinical research.
Historically, this duplication was
conceived as harmonized reporting,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
enabling FDA to provide regulatory
oversight while NIH provided a forum
for open dialogue and transparency.
However, since these complementary
functions were first envisioned, we have
now seen several converging systems
emerge that provide some of these
functions. For instance,
ClinicalTrials.gov has been instituted,
which provides a transparent and
searchable database for clinical trials. In
addition, the protection of human
research subjects was improved through
changes that updated provisions of the
Common Rule. In 2018, FDA released a
suite of draft guidance documents
pertaining to gene therapy that includes
new guidance on manufacturing issues,
long-term follow-up, and pathways for
clinical development in certain areas,
including hemophilia, ophthalmologic
indications, and rare diseases.
While the science and oversight
system have evolved, HGT protocols
continue to receive special oversight
that is not afforded to other areas of
clinical research. This observation was
also noted in a 2014 Institute of
Medicine of the National Academies
report, Oversight and Review of Clinical
Gene Transfer Protocols: Assessing the
Role of the Recombinant DNA Advisory
Committee, in which it was
recommended that NIH begin to limit
RAC review to only exceptional HGT
protocols that meet certain criteria and
that would significantly benefit from
RAC review. As very few protocols have
been assessed by NIH to merit review
under this new system, NIH asserts it is
an opportune time to make changes to
the NIH Guidelines to make oversight of
HGT commensurate with oversight
afforded to other areas of clinical
research given the robust infrastructure
in place to oversee this type of research.
Briefly to summarize, NIH proposes
amending the NIH Guidelines to:
1. Eliminate RAC review and
reporting requirements to NIH for HGT
protocols.
2. Modify roles and responsibilities of
investigators, institutions, IBCs, the
RAC, and NIH to be consistent with
these goals including:
a. Modifying roles of IBCs in
reviewing HGT to be consistent with
review of other covered research, and
b. Eliminating references to the RAC,
including its roles in HGT and biosafety.
NIH suggests that the series of
changes proposed in this Notice is a
rational next step in the process of
considering appropriate oversight of
HGT. Consistent with these proposed
changes to the NIH Guidelines, Section
I–A, the Purpose of the NIH Guidelines,
is proposed to be amended to clarify
that the focus of the policy is biosafety
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
oversight of research involving
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules. NIH notes that some of the
duties of Institutional Biosafety
Committees (IBCs) as currently written
in the NIH Guidelines (e.g., review of
informed consent documents) are
duplicative with the oversight provided
by FDA or Institutional Review Boards
(IRBs). NIH proposes that IBCs retain
responsibility to review and approve
HGT protocols; however, NIH proposes
that these responsibilities be modified
to be similar to those responsibilities
IBCs currently have for review and
approval of other research subject to the
NIH Guidelines.
With the proposed elimination of the
requirements for safety reporting under
Appendix M, IBC oversight should be
completed immediately after the last
participant is administered the final
dose of product. Additionally, the role
of IBC review is proposed to be
amended to be consistent with FDA’s
current guidance regarding individual
patient expanded access to
investigational drugs. In this way, the
role of the IBCs will be focused on
providing local biosafety oversight of
basic and clinical research involving
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids.
In particular, NIH seeks comment on
whether the expectations of IBCs, in
light of these proposed changes, have
been articulated clearly in the proposed
revisions to the NIH Guidelines.
Notably, the roles and responsibilities
of the RAC are proposed to be removed
from the NIH Guidelines. NIH
recognizes the value of the RAC in
discussions of science, safety, and
ethics. In an effort to use the RAC as a
public forum to advise on issues
associated with emerging
biotechnologies, the RAC’s charter will
be modified to change the committee’s
focus from research solely involving
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids
to emerging biotechnologies research. In
light of this modification to the
committee, NIH proposes eliminating
references to the RAC in the NIH
Guidelines, though NIH may continue to
seek advice from the RAC on biosafety
issues that fall under the purview of the
NIH Guidelines. Similarly, NIH may
choose to seek advice from internal
working groups or Federal Advisory
Committees on a variety of issues, when
warranted.
The proposed changes outlined above
will require amendment of multiple
portions of the NIH Guidelines. Sections
and appendices proposed to be deleted
from the current NIH Guidelines may be
accessed at https://osp.od.nih.gov/
biotechnology/nih-guidelines/.
Following deletions, sections and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
appendices will be relabeled to proceed
consecutively throughout the NIH
Guidelines.
Proposed Amendments to the NIH
Guidelines
Section I–A currently states:
Section I–A. Purpose
The purpose of the NIH Guidelines is
to specify the practices for constructing
and handling: (i) Recombinant nucleic
acid molecules, (ii) synthetic nucleic
acid molecules, including those that are
chemically or otherwise modified but
can base pair with naturally occurring
nucleic acid molecules, and (iii) cells,
organisms, and viruses containing such
molecules.
Section I–A is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section I–A. Purpose
The purpose of the NIH Guidelines is
to specify the biosafety practices and
containment principles for constructing
and handling: (i) Recombinant nucleic
acid molecules, (ii) synthetic nucleic
acid molecules, including those that are
chemically or otherwise modified but
can base pair with naturally occurring
nucleic acid molecules, and (iii) cells,
organisms, and viruses containing such
molecules.
Section I–A–1 currently states:
Section I–A–1. Any nucleic acid
molecule experiment, which according
to the NIH Guidelines requires approval
by NIH, must be submitted to NIH or to
another federal agency that has
jurisdiction for review and approval.
Once approvals, or other applicable
clearances, have been obtained from a
federal agency other than NIH (whether
the experiment is referred to that agency
by NIH or sent directly there by the
submitter), the experiment may proceed
without the necessity for NIH review or
approval. (See exception in Section I–
A–1-a regarding requirement for human
gene transfer protocol registration.)
Section I–A–1 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section I–A–1. Any nucleic acid
molecule experiment, which according
to the NIH Guidelines requires approval
by NIH, must be submitted to NIH or to
another federal agency that has
jurisdiction for review and approval.
Once approvals, or other applicable
clearances, have been obtained from a
federal agency other than NIH (whether
the experiment is referred to that agency
by NIH or sent directly there by the
submitter), the experiment may proceed
without the necessity for NIH review or
approval.
Section I–A–1–a currently states:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41083
Section I–A–1–a. For experiments
involving the deliberate transfer of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules, into human research
participants (human gene transfer), no
research participant shall be enrolled
(see definition of enrollment in Section
I–E–7) until the NIH protocol
registration process has been completed
(see Appendix M–I–B, Selection of
Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion); Institutional
Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval
(from the clinical trial site) has been
obtained; Institutional Review Board
(IRB) approval has been obtained; and
all applicable regulatory
authorization(s) have been obtained.
For a clinical trial site that is added
after the completion of the NIH protocol
registration process, no research
participant shall be enrolled (see
definition of enrollment in Section I–E–
7) at the clinical trial site until IBC
approval and IRB approval from that
site have been obtained. Within 30 days
of enrollment (see definition of
enrollment in Section I–E–7) at a
clinical trial site, the following
documentation shall be submitted to
NIH OSP: (1) Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval (from the clinical
trial site); (2) Institutional Review Board
approval; (3) Institutional Review
Board-approved informed consent
document(s); and (4) NIH grant
number(s) if applicable.
Section I–A–1–a is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section I–A–1–a. For experiments
involving the deliberate transfer of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules, into human research
participants (human gene transfer), no
human gene transfer experiment shall
be initiated (see definition of initiation
in Section I–E–7) until Institutional
Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval
(from the clinical trial site) has been
obtained; and all other applicable
institutional and regulatory
authorization(s) and approvals have
been obtained.
Section I–E. General Definitions is
proposed to be amended to delete the
current definitions I–E–4, I–E–7 through
I–E–12 and to include a new definition
for ‘‘initiation.’’
Section I–E–4 is proposed to be
amended to define initiation as the
following: ‘‘Initiation’’ of research is the
introduction of recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecules into
organisms, cells, or viruses.
Section III currently states:
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
41084
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
Section III. Experiments Covered by the
NIH Guidelines
This section describes six categories
of experiments involving recombinant
or synthetic nucleic acid molecules: (i)
Those that require Institutional
Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval,
RAC review, and NIH Director approval
before initiation (see Section III–A), (ii)
those that require NIH OSP and
Institutional Biosafety Committee
approval before initiation (see Section
III–B), (iii) those that require
Institutional Biosafety Committee and
Institutional Review Board approvals
and RAC review before research
participant enrollment (see Section III–
C), (iv) those that require Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation (see Section III–D), (v) those
that require Institutional Biosafety
Committee notification simultaneous
with initiation (see Section III–E), and
(vi) those that are exempt from the NIH
Guidelines (see Section III–F).
Note: If an experiment falls into Sections
III–A, III–B, or III–C and one of the other
sections, the rules pertaining to Sections III–
A, III–B, or III–C shall be followed. If an
experiment falls into Section III–F and into
either Sections III–D or III–E as well, the
experiment is considered exempt from the
NIH Guidelines.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Any change in containment level,
which is different from those specified
in the NIH Guidelines, may not be
initiated without the express approval
of NIH OSP (see Section IV–C–1–b–(2)
and its subsections, Minor Actions).
Section III is proposed to be amended
as follows:
Section III. Experiments Covered by the
NIH Guidelines
This section describes six categories
of experiments involving recombinant
or synthetic nucleic acid molecules: (i)
Those that require Institutional
Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval and
NIH Director approval before initiation
(see Section III–A), (ii) those that require
NIH OSP and Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval before initiation
(see Section III–B), (iii) those that
require Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval before initiation of
human gene transfer (see Section III–C),
(iv) those that require Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation (see Section III–D), (v) those
that require Institutional Biosafety
Committee notification simultaneous
with initiation (see Section III–E), and
(vi) those that are exempt from the NIH
Guidelines (see Section III–F).
Note: If an experiment falls into Sections
III–A, III–B, or III–C and one of the other
sections, the rules pertaining to Sections III–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
A, III–B, or III–C shall be followed. If an
experiment falls into Section III–F and into
either Sections III–D or III–E as well, the
experiment is considered exempt from the
NIH Guidelines.
Any change in containment level,
which is different from those specified
in the NIH Guidelines, may not be
initiated without the express approval
of NIH OSP (see Section IV–C–1–b–(2)
and its subsections, Minor Actions).
Section III–A currently states:
Section III–A. Experiments That
Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee Approval, RAC Review, and
NIH Director Approval Before
Initiation (See Section IV–C–1–b–(1),
Major Actions).
Experiments considered as Major
Actions under the NIH Guidelines
cannot be initiated without submission
of relevant information on the proposed
experiment to the Office of Science
Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by email to: NIHGuidelines@
od.nih.gov, the publication of the
proposal in the Federal Register for 15
days of comment, review by RAC, and
specific approval by NIH. The
containment conditions or stipulation
requirements for such experiments will
be recommended by RAC and set by
NIH at the time of approval. Such
experiments require Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation. Specific experiments already
approved are included in Appendix D,
Major Actions Taken under the NIH
Guidelines, which may be obtained from
the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, preferably by
submitting a request for this information
to: NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov;
additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Section III–A–1–a. The deliberate
transfer of a drug resistance trait to
microorganisms that are not known to
acquire the trait naturally (see Section
V–B, Footnotes and References of
Sections I–IV), if such acquisition could
compromise the ability to control
disease agents in humans, veterinary
medicine, or agriculture, will be
reviewed by the RAC.
Consideration should be given as to
whether the drug resistance trait to be
used in the experiment would render
that microorganism resistant to the
primary drug available to and/or
indicated for certain populations, for
example children or pregnant women.
At the request of an Institutional
Biosafety Committee, NIH OSP will
make a determination regarding whether
a specific experiment involving the
deliberate transfer of a drug resistance
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
trait falls under Section III–A–1-a and
therefore requires RAC review and NIH
Director approval. An Institutional
Biosafety Committee may also consult
with NIH OSP regarding experiments
that do not meet the requirements of
Section III–A–1–a but nonetheless raise
important public health issues. NIH
OSP will consult, as needed, with one
or more experts, which may include the
RAC.
Section III–A is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section III–A. Experiments That
Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee Approval and NIH Director
Approval Before Initiation (See Section
IV–C–1–b–(1), Major Actions).
Section III–A–1. Major Actions Under
the NIH Guidelines
Experiments considered as Major
Actions as defined in Section III–A–1-a
under the NIH Guidelines cannot be
initiated without submission of relevant
information on the proposed experiment
to the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, preferably by email
to: NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov, the
publication of the proposal in the
Federal Register for 15 days of
comment, and specific approval by NIH.
The containment conditions or
stipulation requirements for such
experiments will be set by NIH at the
time of approval. Such experiments
require Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval before initiation.
Specific experiments already approved
are included in Appendix D, Major
Actions Taken under the NIH
Guidelines, which may be obtained from
the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, preferably by
submitting a request for this information
to: NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov;
additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Section III–A–1-a. The deliberate
transfer of a drug resistance trait to
microorganisms that are not known to
acquire the trait naturally (see Section
V–B, Footnotes and References of
Sections I–IV), if such acquisition could
compromise the ability to control
disease agents in humans, veterinary
medicine, or agriculture, will require
NIH Director approval.
Consideration should be given as to
whether the drug resistance trait to be
used in the experiment would render
that microorganism resistant to the
primary drug available to and/or
indicated for certain populations, for
example children or pregnant women.
At the request of an Institutional
Biosafety Committee, NIH OSP will
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
make a determination regarding whether
a specific experiment involving the
deliberate transfer of a drug resistance
trait falls under Section III–A–1-a and
therefore requires NIH Director
approval. An Institutional Biosafety
Committee may also consult with NIH
OSP regarding experiments that do not
meet the requirements of Section III–A–
1-a but nonetheless raise important
public health issues.
Section III–C currently states:
Section III–C. Experiments that
Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee and Institutional Review
Board Approvals and RAC Review (if
applicable) Before Research Participant
Enrollment
Section III–C–1. Experiments
Involving the Deliberate Transfer of
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecules, or DNA or RNA Derived
from Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic
Acid Molecules, into One or More
Human Research Participants
Human gene transfer is the deliberate
transfer into human research
participants of either:
1. Recombinant nucleic acid
molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
recombinant nucleic acid molecules, or
2. Synthetic nucleic acid molecules,
or DNA or RNA derived from synthetic
nucleic acid molecules that meet any
one of the following criteria:
a. Contain more than 100 nucleotides;
or
b. Possess biological properties that
enable integration into the genome (e.g.,
cis elements involved in integration); or
c. Have the potential to replicate in a
cell; or
d. Can be translated or transcribed.
No research participant shall be
enrolled (see definition of enrollment in
Section I–E–7) until the NIH protocol
registration process has been completed
(see Appendix M–I–B, Selection of
Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion).
In its evaluation of human gene
transfer protocols, NIH will make a
determination, following a request from
one or more oversight bodies involved
in the review at an initial site(s),
whether a proposed human gene
transfer experiment meets the
requirements for selecting protocols for
public RAC review and discussion (See
Appendix M–I–B). The process of
public RAC review and discussion is
intended to foster the safe and ethical
conduct of human gene transfer
experiments. Public review and
discussion of a human gene transfer
experiment (and access to relevant
information) also serves to inform the
public about the technical aspects of the
proposal, the meaning and significance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
of the research, and any significant
safety, social, and ethical implications
of the research.
Public RAC review and discussion of
a human gene transfer experiment will
be initiated in two exceptional
circumstances: (1) Following a request
for public RAC review from one or more
oversight bodies involved in the review
at an initial site(s), the NIH concurs that
(a) the individual protocol would
significantly benefit from RAC review
and (b) that the submission meets one
or more of the following NIH RAC
review criteria: (i) The protocol uses a
new vector, genetic material, or delivery
methodology that represents a first-inhuman experience, thus presenting an
unknown risk; (ii) the protocol relies on
preclinical safety data that were
obtained using a new preclinical model
system of unknown and unconfirmed
value; or (iii) the proposed vector, gene
construct, or method of delivery is
associated with possible toxicities that
are not widely known and that may
render it difficult for oversight and
federal regulatory bodies to evaluate the
protocol rigorously. However, if one or
more oversight bodies involved in the
review at an initial site(s) requests
public RAC review, but NIH does not
concur that (a) the individual protocol
would significantly benefit from RAC
review and (b) that the submission
meets one or more of the RAC review
criteria (listed in i, ii, or iii), then the
NIH OSP will inform, within 10
working days, the requesting and other
oversight bodies involved in the review
at an initial site(s) that public RAC
review is not warranted. (2) The NIH
Director, in consultation (if needed)
with appropriate regulatory authorities,
determines that the submission: (a)
Meets one or more of the NIH RAC
review criteria (listed in i, ii, or iii) and
that public RAC review and discussion
would provide a clear and obvious
benefit to the scientific community or
the public; or (b) raises significant
scientific, societal, or ethical concerns.
For a clinical trial site that is added
after the completion of the NIH protocol
registration process, no research
participant shall be enrolled (see
definition of enrollment in Section I–E–
7) at the clinical trial site until IBC
approval and IRB approval from that
site have been obtained. Within 30 days
of enrollment (see definition of
enrollment in Section I–E–7) at a
clinical trial site, the following
documentation shall be submitted to
NIH OSP: (1) Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval (from the clinical
trial site); (2) Institutional Review Board
approval; (3) Institutional Review
Board-approved informed consent
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41085
document(s); and (4) NIH grant
number(s) if applicable.
In order to maintain public access to
information regarding human gene
transfer (including protocols that are not
publicly reviewed by the RAC), the NIH
OSP will maintain the documentation
described in Appendices M–I through
M–II. The information provided in
response to Appendix M should not
contain any confidential commercial or
financial information or trade secrets,
enabling all aspects of RAC review to be
open to the public.
Note: For specific directives concerning the
use of retroviral vectors for gene delivery,
consult Appendix B–V–1, Murine Retroviral
Vectors.
Section III–C is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section III–C. Experiments Involving
Human Gene Transfer That Require
Institutional Biosafety Committee
Approval Prior to Initiation
Section III–C–1. Experiments Involving
the Deliberate Transfer of Recombinant
or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules, or
DNA or RNA Derived From
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecules, into One or More Human
Research Participants
Human gene transfer is the deliberate
transfer into human research
participants of either:
1. Recombinant nucleic acid
molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
recombinant nucleic acid molecules, or
2. Synthetic nucleic acid molecules,
or DNA or RNA derived from synthetic
nucleic acid molecules that meet any
one of the following criteria:
a. Contain more than 100 nucleotides;
or
b. Possess biological properties that
enable integration into the genome (e.g.,
cis elements involved in integration); or
c. Have the potential to replicate in a
cell; or
d. Can be translated or transcribed.
Research cannot be initiated until
Institutional Biosafety Committee and
all other applicable institutional and
regulatory authorization(s) and
approvals have been obtained.
An individual patient expanded
access IND is not research subject to the
NIH Guidelines and thus does not need
to be submitted to an IBC, if the
following conditions are met: (i) A PI is
submitting an individual patient
expanded access IND using Form FDA
3926; (ii) the PI selects the appropriate
box on that form to request a waiver
under 21 CFR 56.105 of the
requirements in 21 CFR 56.108(c); and
(iii) the FDA concludes that such a
waiver is appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
41086
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
Section III–D–7–b currently states:
Section III–D–7–b. Highly Pathogenic
Avian Influenza H5N1 strains within
the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5
lineage (HPAI H5N1). Experiments
involving influenza viruses containing a
majority of genes and/or segments from
a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced
containment, (see Appendix G–II–C–5,
Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced for Research
Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza
Viruses). Experiments involving
influenza viruses containing a minority
of genes and/or segments from a HPAI
H5N1 influenza virus shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced unless a
risk assessment performed by the IBC
determines that they can be conducted
safely at biosafety level 2 and after they
have been excluded pursuant to 9 CFR
121.3(e). NIH OSP is available to IBCs
to provide consultation with the RAC
and influenza virus experts when risk
assessments are being made to
determine the appropriate
biocontainment for experiments with
influenza viruses containing a minority
of gene/segments from HPAI H5N1.
Such experiments may be performed at
BL3 enhanced containment or
containment may be lowered to
biosafety level 2, the level of
containment for most research with
other influenza viruses. (USDA/APHIS
regulations and decisions on lowering
containment also apply). In deciding to
lower containment, the IBC should
consider whether, in at least two animal
models (e.g., ferret, mouse, Syrian
golden hamster, cotton rat, non-human
primates), there is evidence that the
resulting influenza virus shows reduced
replication and virulence compared to
the parental RG3 virus at relevant doses.
This should be determined by
measuring biological indices
appropriate for the specific animal
model (e.g., severe weight loss, elevated
temperature, mortality or neurological
symptoms).
Section III–D–7–b is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section III–D–7–b. Highly Pathogenic
Avian Influenza H5N1 strains within
the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5
lineage (HPAI H5N1). Experiments
involving influenza viruses containing a
majority of genes and/or segments from
a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced
containment, (see Appendix G–II–C–5,
Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced for Research
Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza
Viruses). Experiments involving
influenza viruses containing a minority
of genes and/or segments from a HPAI
H5N1 influenza virus shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced unless a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
risk assessment performed by the IBC
determines that they can be conducted
safely at biosafety level 2 and after they
have been excluded pursuant to 9 CFR
121.3(e). NIH OSP is available to IBCs
to provide consultation with influenza
virus experts when risk assessments are
being made to determine the
appropriate biocontainment for
experiments with influenza viruses
containing a minority of gene/segments
from HPAI H5N1. Such experiments
may be performed at BL3 enhanced
containment or containment may be
lowered to biosafety level 2, the level of
containment for most research with
other influenza viruses. (USDA/APHIS
regulations and decisions on lowering
containment also apply). In deciding to
lower containment, the IBC should
consider whether, in at least two animal
models (e.g., ferret, mouse, Syrian
golden hamster, cotton rat, non-human
primates), there is evidence that the
resulting influenza virus shows reduced
replication and virulence compared to
the parental RG3 virus at relevant doses.
This should be determined by
measuring biological indices
appropriate for the specific animal
model (e.g., severe weight loss, elevated
temperature, mortality or neurological
symptoms).
Section III–D–7–d currently states:
Section III–D–7–d. Antiviral
Susceptibility and Containment. The
availability of antiviral drugs as
preventive and therapeutic measures is
an important safeguard for experiments
with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1, and
human H2N2 (1957–1968). If an
influenza virus containing genes from
one of these viruses is resistant to both
classes of current antiviral agents,
adamantanes and neuraminidase
inhibitors, higher containment may be
required based on the risk assessment
considering transmissibility to humans,
virulence, pandemic potential,
alternative antiviral agents if available,
etc.
Experiments with 1918 H1N1, human
H2N2 (1957–1968) or HPAI H5N1 that
are designed to create resistance to
neuraminidase inhibitors or other
effective antiviral agents (including
investigational antiviral agents being
developed for influenza) would be
subject to Section III–A–1 (Major
Actions) and require RAC review and
NIH Director approval. As per Section I–
A–1 of the NIH Guidelines, if the agent
is a Select Agent, the NIH will defer to
the appropriate federal agency (HHS or
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Select Agent Divisions) on such
experiments.
Section III–D–7–d is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section III–D–7–d. Antiviral
Susceptibility and Containment. The
availability of antiviral drugs as
preventive and therapeutic measures is
an important safeguard for experiments
with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1, and
human H2N2 (1957–1968). If an
influenza virus containing genes from
one of these viruses is resistant to both
classes of current antiviral agents,
adamantanes and neuraminidase
inhibitors, higher containment may be
required based on the risk assessment
considering transmissibility to humans,
virulence, pandemic potential,
alternative antiviral agents if available,
etc.
Experiments with 1918 H1N1, human
H2N2 (1957–1968) or HPAI H5N1 that
are designed to create resistance to
neuraminidase inhibitors or other
effective antiviral agents (including
investigational antiviral agents being
developed for influenza) would be
subject to Section III–A–1 (Major
Actions) and NIH Director approval. As
per Section I–A–1 of the NIH
Guidelines, if the agent is a Select
Agent, NIH will defer to the appropriate
Federal agency (HHS or USDA Select
Agent Divisions) on such experiments.
Section III–F–6 currently states:
Section III–F–6. Those that consist
entirely of DNA segments from different
species that exchange DNA by known
physiological processes, though one or
more of the segments may be a synthetic
equivalent. A list of such exchangers
will be prepared and periodically
revised by the NIH Director with advice
of the RAC after appropriate notice and
opportunity for public comment (see
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(c), Major
Actions). See Appendices A–I through
A–VI, Exemptions under Section III–F–
6—Sublists of Natural Exchangers, for a
list of natural exchangers that are
exempt from the NIH Guidelines.
Section III–F–6 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section III–F–6. Those that consist
entirely of DNA segments from different
species that exchange DNA by known
physiological processes, though one or
more of the segments may be a synthetic
equivalent. A list of such exchangers
will be prepared and periodically
revised by the NIH Director after
appropriate notice and opportunity for
public comment (see Section IV–C–1–b–
(1)–(c), Major Actions). See Appendices
A–I through A–VI, Exemptions under
Section III–F–6—Sublists of Natural
Exchangers, for a list of natural
exchangers that are exempt from the
NIH Guidelines.
Section III–F–8 currently states:
Section III–F–8. Those that do not
present a significant risk to health or the
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
environment (see Section IV–C–1–b–
(1)–(c), Major Actions), as determined
by the NIH Director, with the advice of
the RAC, and following appropriate
notice and opportunity for public
comment. See Appendix C, Exemptions
under Section III–F–8 for other classes of
experiments which are exempt from the
NIH Guidelines.
Section III–F–8 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section III–F–8. Those that do not
present a significant risk to health or the
environment (see Section IV–C–1–b–
(1)–(c), Major Actions), as determined
by the NIH Director, and following
appropriate notice and opportunity for
public comment. See Appendix C,
Exemptions under Section III–F–8 for
other classes of experiments which are
exempt from the NIH Guidelines.
Section IV–B–1–f currently states:
Section IV–B–1–f. Ensure that when
the institution participates in or
sponsors recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule research
involving human subjects: (i) The
Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using
ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary), (ii) all aspects of Appendix
M have been appropriately addressed by
the Principal Investigator; and (iii) no
research participant shall be enrolled
(see definition of enrollment in Section
I–E–7) in a human gene transfer
experiment until the NIH protocol
registration process has been completed
(see Appendix M–I–B, Selection of
Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion), Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval has been
obtained, Institutional Review Board
approval has been obtained, and all
applicable regulatory authorizations
have been obtained. Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval must be
obtained from the clinical trial site.
Section IV–B–1–f is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section IV–B–1–f. Ensure that when
the institution participates in or
sponsors recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule research
involving human subjects: (i) The
Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using
ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary), and (ii) no human gene
transfer experiment shall be initiated
until Institutional Biosafety Committee
approval has been obtained, and all
other applicable institutional and
regulatory authorization(s) and
approvals have been obtained.
Institutional Biosafety Committee
approval must be obtained from the
clinical trial site.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
None of the other sub-sections under
Section IV–B–1. General Information are
proposed to be amended.
Section IV–B–2–a–(1) currently states:
Section IV–B–2–a–(1). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee must
be comprised of no fewer than five
members so selected that they
collectively have experience and
expertise in recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule technology and
the capability to assess the safety of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research and to identify any
potential risk to public health or the
environment. At least two members
shall not be affiliated with the
institution (apart from their membership
on the Institutional Biosafety
Committee) and who represent the
interest of the surrounding community
with respect to health and protection of
the environment (e.g., officials of state
or local public health or environmental
protection agencies, members of other
local governmental bodies, or persons
active in medical, occupational health,
or environmental concerns in the
community). The Institutional Biosafety
Committee shall include at least one
individual with expertise in plant, plant
pathogen, or plant pest containment
principles when experiments utilizing
Appendix P, Physical and Biological
Containment for Recombinant or
Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecule
Research Involving Plants, require prior
approval by the Institutional Biosafety
Committee. The Institutional Biosafety
Committee shall include at least one
scientist with expertise in animal
containment principles when
experiments utilizing Appendix Q,
Physical and Biological Containment for
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecule Research Involving Animals,
require Institutional Biosafety
Committee prior approval. When the
institution conducts recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule
research at BL3, BL4, or Large Scale
(greater than 10 liters), a Biological
Safety Officer is mandatory and shall be
a member of the Institutional Biosafety
Committee (see Section IV–B–3,
Biological Safety Officer). When the
institution participates in or sponsors
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research involving human
research participants, the institution
must ensure that: (i) The Institutional
Biosafety Committee has adequate
expertise and training (using ad hoc
consultants as deemed necessary); (ii)
all aspects of Appendix M have been
appropriately addressed by the
Principal Investigator; (iii) no research
participant shall be enrolled (see
definition of enrollment in Section I–E–
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41087
7) in a human gene transfer experiment
until the NIH protocol registration
process has been completed (see
Appendix M–I–B, Selection of
Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion); and (iv) final
IBC approval is granted only after the
NIH protocol registration process has
been completed (see Appendix M–I–B,
Selection of Individual Protocols for
Public RAC Review and Discussion).
Institutional Biosafety Committee
approval must be obtained from the
clinical trial site.
Section IV–B–2–a–(1) is proposed to
be amended as follows:
Section IV–B–2–a–(1). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee must
be comprised of no fewer than five
members so selected that they
collectively have experience and
expertise in recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule technology and
the capability to assess the safety of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research and to identify any
potential risk to public health or the
environment. At least two members
shall not be affiliated with the
institution (apart from their membership
on the Institutional Biosafety
Committee) and who represent the
interest of the surrounding community
with respect to health and protection of
the environment (e.g., officials of state
or local public health or environmental
protection agencies, members of other
local governmental bodies, or persons
active in medical, occupational health,
or environmental concerns in the
community). The Institutional Biosafety
Committee shall include at least one
individual with expertise in plant, plant
pathogen, or plant pest containment
principles when experiments utilizing
Appendix P, Physical and Biological
Containment for Recombinant or
Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecule
Research Involving Plants, require prior
approval by the Institutional Biosafety
Committee. The Institutional Biosafety
Committee shall include at least one
scientist with expertise in animal
containment principles when
experiments utilizing Appendix Q,
Physical and Biological Containment for
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecule Research Involving Animals,
require Institutional Biosafety
Committee prior approval. When the
institution conducts recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule
research at BL3, BL4, or Large Scale
(greater than 10 liters), a Biological
Safety Officer is mandatory and shall be
a member of the Institutional Biosafety
Committee (see Section IV–B–3,
Biological Safety Officer). When the
institution participates in or sponsors
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
41088
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research involving human
research participants, the institution
must ensure that the Institutional
Biosafety Committee has adequate
expertise and training (using ad hoc
consultants as deemed necessary).
Institutional Biosafety Committee
approval must be obtained from the
clinical trial site.
Section IV–B–2–b–(1) currently states:
Section IV–B–2–b–(1). Reviewing
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research conducted at or
sponsored by the institution for
compliance with the NIH Guidelines as
specified in Section III, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines, and
approving those research projects that
are found to conform with the NIH
Guidelines. This review shall include:
(i) Independent assessment of the
containment levels required by the NIH
Guidelines for the proposed research;
(ii) assessment of the facilities,
procedures, practices, and training and
expertise of personnel involved in
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research; (iii) ensuring that all
aspects of Appendix M have been
appropriately addressed by the
Principal Investigator; (iv) ensuring that
no research participant is enrolled (see
definition of enrollment in Section I–E–
7) in a human gene transfer experiment
until the NIH protocol registration
process has been completed (see
Appendix M–I–B, Selection of
Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion), Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval (from the
clinical trial site) has been obtained,
Institutional Review Board approval has
been obtained, and all applicable
regulatory authorizations have been
obtained; (v) for human gene transfer
protocols selected for public RAC
review and discussion, consideration of
the issues raised and recommendations
made as a result of this review and
consideration of the Principal
Investigator’s response to the
recommendations; (vi) ensuring that
final IBC approval is granted only after
the NIH protocol registration process
has been completed (see Appendix M–
I–B, Selection of Individual Protocols for
Public RAC Review and Discussion);
and (vii) ensuring compliance with all
surveillance, data reporting, and adverse
event reporting requirements set forth in
the NIH Guidelines.
Section IV–B–2–b–(1) is proposed to
be amended as follows:
Section IV–B–2–b–(1). Reviewing
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research conducted at or
sponsored by the institution for
compliance with the NIH Guidelines as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
specified in Section III, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines, and
approving those research projects that
are found to conform with the NIH
Guidelines. This review shall include:
(i) Independent assessment of the
containment levels required by the NIH
Guidelines for the proposed research;
(ii) assessment of the facilities,
procedures, practices, and training and
expertise of personnel involved in
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research; (iii) for recombinant
or synthetic nucleic acid molecule
research involving human research
participants, assessment focused on
biosafety issues (e.g., administration,
shedding).
Section IV–B–2–b–(8) currently states:
Section IV–B–2–b–(8). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee may
not authorize initiation of experiments
which are not explicitly covered by the
NIH Guidelines until NIH (with the
advice of the RAC when required)
establishes the containment
requirement.
Section IV–B–2–b–(8) is proposed to
be amended as follows:
Section IV–B–2–b–(8). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee may
not authorize initiation of experiments
which are not explicitly covered by the
NIH Guidelines until NIH establishes
the containment requirement.
None of the other sub-sections under
Section IV–B–2. Institutional Biosafety
Committee (IBC) are proposed to be
amended.
Section IV–B–6 currently states:
Section IV–B–6. Human Gene Therapy
Expertise
When the institution participates in or
sponsors recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule research
involving human subjects, the
institution must ensure that: (i) The
Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using
ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary) and (ii) all aspects of
Appendix M, Points to Consider in the
Design and Submission of Protocols for
the Transfer of Recombinant or
Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules into
One or More Human Subjects (Points to
Consider), have been appropriately
addressed by the Principal Investigator
prior to its approval.
Section IV–B–6 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section IV–B–6. Human Gene Transfer
Expertise
When the institution participates in or
sponsors recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule research
involving human subjects, the
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
institution must ensure that the
Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using
ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary).
Section IV–B–7 currently states:
Section IV–B–7. Principal Investigator
(PI)
On behalf of the institution, the
Principal Investigator is responsible for
full compliance with the NIH
Guidelines in the conduct of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research. A Principal
Investigator engaged in human gene
transfer research may delegate to
another party, such as a corporate
sponsor, the reporting functions set
forth in Appendix M, with written
notification to the NIH OSP of the
delegation and of the name(s), address,
telephone, and fax numbers of the
contact. The Principal Investigator is
responsible for ensuring that the
reporting requirements are fulfilled and
will be held accountable for any
reporting lapses.
Section IV–B–7 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section IV–B–7. Principal Investigator
(PI)
On behalf of the institution, the
Principal Investigator is responsible for
full compliance with the NIH
Guidelines in the conduct of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research.
Section IV–B–7–b–(6) is proposed to
be deleted in its entirety
Section IV–B–7–e–(5) is proposed to
be deleted in its entirety
None of the other sub-sections under
Section IV–B–7. Principal Investigator
are proposed to be amended.
Section IV–C currently states:
Section IV–C. Responsibilities of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Section IV–C–1. NIH Director
The NIH Director is responsible for: (i)
Establishing the NIH Guidelines, (ii)
overseeing their implementation, and
(iii) their final interpretation. The NIH
Director has responsibilities under the
NIH Guidelines that involve OSP and
RAC. OSP’s responsibilities under the
NIH Guidelines are administrative.
Advice from RAC is primarily scientific,
technical, and ethical. In certain
circumstances, there is specific
opportunity for public comment with
published response prior to final action.
Section IV–C–1-a. General
Responsibilities
The NIH Director is responsible for:
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
Section IV–C–1–a–(1). Promulgating
requirements as necessary to implement
the NIH Guidelines;
Section IV–C–1–a–(2). Establishing
and maintaining RAC to carry out the
responsibilities set forth in Section IV–
C–2, Recombinant DNA Advisory
Committee (RAC membership is
specified in its charter and in Section
IV–C–2);
Section IV–C–1–a–(3). Establishing
and maintaining NIH OSP to carry out
the responsibilities defined in Section
IV–C–3, Office of Science Policy;
Section IV–C–1–a–(4). Conducting
and supporting training programs in
laboratory safety for Institutional
Biosafety Committee members,
Biological Safety Officers and other
institutional experts (if applicable),
Principal Investigators, and laboratory
staff.
Section IV–C–1–a–(5). Establishing
and convening Gene Therapy Policy
Conferences as described in Appendix
L, Gene Therapy Policy Conferences.
Section IV–C–1–b. Specific
Responsibilities
In carrying out the responsibilities set
forth in this section, the NIH Director,
or a designee shall weigh each proposed
action through appropriate analysis and
consultation to determine whether it
complies with the NIH Guidelines and
presents no significant risk to health or
the environment.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Section IV–C–1–b–(1). Major Actions
To execute Major Actions, the NIH
Director shall seek the advice of RAC
and provide an opportunity for public
and federal agency comment.
Specifically, the Notice of Meeting and
Proposed Actions shall be published in
the Federal Register at least 15 days
before the RAC meeting. The NIH
Director’s decision/recommendation (at
his/her discretion) may be published in
the Federal Register for 15 days of
comment before final action is taken.
The NIH Director’s final decision/
recommendation, along with responses
to public comments, shall be published
in the Federal Register. The RAC and
Institutional Biosafety Committee Chairs
shall be notified of the following
decisions:
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(a). Changing
containment levels for types of
experiments that are specified in the
NIH Guidelines when a Major Action is
involved;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(b). Assigning
containment levels for types of
experiments that are not explicitly
considered in the NIH Guidelines when
a Major Action is involved;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(c).
Promulgating and amending a list of
classes of recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecules to be exempt
from the NIH Guidelines because they
consist entirely of DNA segments from
species that exchange DNA by known
physiological processes or otherwise do
not present a significant risk to health
or the environment;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(d). Permitting
experiments specified by Section III–A,
Experiments that Require Institutional
Biosafety Committee Approval, RAC
Review, and NIH Director Approval
Before Initiation;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(e). Certifying
new host-vector systems with the
exception of minor modifications of
already certified systems (the standards
and procedures for certification are
described in Appendix I–II, Certification
of Host-Vector Systems). Minor
modifications constitute (e.g., those of
minimal or no consequence to the
properties relevant to containment); and
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(f). Adopting
other changes in the NIH Guidelines.
Section IV–C–1–b–(2). Minor Actions
NIH OSP shall carry out certain
functions as delegated to it by the NIH
Director (see Section IV–C–3, Office of
Science Policy). Minor Actions (as
determined by NIH OSP in consultation
with the RAC Chair and one or more
RAC members, as necessary) will be
transmitted to RAC and Institutional
Biosafety Committee Chairs:
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(a). Changing
containment levels for experiments that
are specified in Section III, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines (except
when a Major Action is involved);
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(b). Assigning
containment levels for experiments not
explicitly considered in the NIH
Guidelines;
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(c). Revising
the Classification of Etiologic Agents for
the purpose of these NIH Guidelines
(see Section V–A, Footnotes and
References of Sections I–IV).
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(d).
Interpreting the NIH Guidelines for
experiments to which the NIH
Guidelines do not specifically assign
containment levels;
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(e). Setting
containment under Sections III–D–1–d,
Experiments Using Risk Group 2, Risk
Group 3, Risk Group 4, or Restricted
Agents as Host-Vector Systems, and III–
D–2–b, Experiments in which DNA from
Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group
4, or Restricted Agents is Cloned into
Nonpathogenic Prokaryotic or Lower
Eukaryotic Host-Vector Systems;
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41089
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(f). Approving
minor modifications of already certified
host-vector systems (the standards and
procedures for such modifications are
described in Appendix I–II, Certification
of Host-Vector Systems);
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(g).
Decertifying already certified hostvector systems;
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(h). Adding
new entries to the list of molecules toxic
for vertebrates (see Appendix F,
Containment Conditions for Cloning of
Genes Coding for the Biosynthesis of
Molecules Toxic for Vertebrates); and
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(i).
Determining appropriate containment
conditions for experiments according to
case precedents developed under
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(c).
Section IV–C is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section IV–C. Responsibilities of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Section IV–C–1. NIH Director
The NIH Director is responsible for: (i)
Establishing the NIH Guidelines, (ii)
overseeing their implementation, and
(iii) their final interpretation. The NIH
Director has responsibilities under the
NIH Guidelines that involve OSP. OSP’s
responsibilities under the NIH
Guidelines are administrative. In certain
circumstances, there is specific
opportunity for public comment with
published response prior to final action.
Section IV–C–1–a. General
Responsibilities
The NIH Director is responsible for:
Section IV–C–1–a–(1). Promulgating
requirements as necessary to implement
the NIH Guidelines;
Section IV–C–1–a–(2). Establishing
and maintaining NIH OSP to carry out
the responsibilities defined in Section
IV–C–3, Office of Science Policy;
Section IV–C–1–a–(3). Conducting
and supporting training programs in
laboratory safety for Institutional
Biosafety Committee members,
Biological Safety Officers and other
institutional experts (if applicable),
Principal Investigators, and laboratory
staff.
Section IV–C–1–b. Specific
Responsibilities
In carrying out the responsibilities set
forth in this section, the NIH Director or
a designee shall weigh each proposed
action through appropriate analysis and
consultation to determine whether it
complies with the NIH Guidelines and
presents no significant risk to health or
the environment.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
41090
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Section IV–C–1–b–(1). Major Actions
To execute Major Actions, the NIH
Director shall provide an opportunity
for public and Federal agency comment.
The NIH Director’s decision/
recommendation (at his/her discretion)
may be published in the Federal
Register for 15 days of comment before
final action is taken. The NIH Director’s
final decision/recommendation, along
with responses to public comments,
shall be published in the Federal
Register. Institutional Biosafety
Committee Chairs shall be notified of
the following decisions:
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(a). Changing
containment levels for types of
experiments that are specified in the
NIH Guidelines when a Major Action is
involved;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(b). Assigning
containment levels for types of
experiments that are not explicitly
considered in the NIH Guidelines when
a Major Action is involved;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(c).
Promulgating and amending a list of
classes of recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecules to be exempt
from the NIH Guidelines because they
consist entirely of DNA segments from
species that exchange DNA by known
physiological processes or otherwise do
not present a significant risk to health
or the environment;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(d). Permitting
experiments specified by Section III–A,
Experiments that Require Institutional
Biosafety Committee Approval, and NIH
Director Approval Before Initiation;
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(e). Certifying
new host-vector systems with the
exception of minor modifications (e.g.,
those of minimal or no consequence to
the properties relevant to containment)
of already certified systems (the
standards and procedures for
certification are described in Appendix
I–II, Certification of Host-Vector
Systems; and
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(f). Adopting
other changes in the NIH Guidelines.
Section IV–C–1–b–(2). Minor Actions
NIH OSP shall carry out certain
functions as delegated to it by the NIH
Director (see Section IV–C–3, Office of
Science Policy). Minor Actions will be
transmitted to Institutional Biosafety
Committee Chairs:
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(a). Changing
containment levels for experiments that
are specified in Section III, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines (except
when a Major Action is involved);
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(b). Assigning
containment levels for experiments not
explicitly considered in the NIH
Guidelines;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(c). Revising
the Classification of Etiologic Agents for
the purpose of these NIH Guidelines
(see Section V–A, Footnotes and
References of Sections I–IV).
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(d).
Interpreting the NIH Guidelines for
experiments to which the NIH
Guidelines do not specifically assign
containment levels;
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(e). Setting
containment under Sections III–D–1–d,
Experiments Using Risk Group 2, Risk
Group 3, Risk Group 4, or Restricted
Agents as Host-Vector Systems, and III–
D–2–b, Experiments in which DNA from
Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group
4, or Restricted Agents is Cloned into
Nonpathogenic Prokaryotic or Lower
Eukaryotic Host-Vector Systems;
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(f). Approving
minor modifications of already certified
host-vector systems (the standards and
procedures for such modifications are
described in Appendix I–II, Certification
of Host-Vector Systems);
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(g).
Decertifying already certified hostvector systems;
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(h). Adding
new entries to the list of molecules toxic
for vertebrates (see Appendix F,
Containment Conditions for Cloning of
Genes Coding for the Biosynthesis of
Molecules Toxic for Vertebrates); and
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(i).
Determining appropriate containment
conditions for experiments according to
case precedents developed under
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(c).
Section IV–C–2. Recombinant DNA
Advisory Committee (RAC) is proposed
to be deleted in its entirety.
Section IV–C–3. Office of Science
Policy (OSP) is proposed to be amended
as follows:
Sections IV–C–3–a through IV–C–3–f
are proposed to be deleted in their
entirety. Section IV–C–3–h is proposed
to be deleted in its entirety. Section IV–
C–3–g will be renumbered to Section
IV–C–3–a. Section IV–C–i will be
renumbered to Section IV–C–3–b;
Section IV–C–3–i–(1), Section IV–C–3–
i–(2) and Section IV–C–3–i–(3) are
proposed to be deleted in their entirety.
Section IV–C–3–j will be renumbered to
Section IV–C–3–c.
Section IV–C–3 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Section IV–C–3. Office of Science Policy
(OSP)
OSP shall serve as a focal point for
information on recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule activities and
provide advice to all within and outside
NIH including institutions, Biological
Safety Officers, Principal Investigators,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal agencies, state and local
governments, and institutions in the
private sector. OSP shall carry out such
other functions as may be delegated to
it by the NIH Director. OSP’s
responsibilities include (but are not
limited to) the following:
Section IV–C–3–a. Reviewing and
approving experiments involving the
cloning of genes encoding for toxin
molecules that are lethal for vertebrates
at an LD50 of less than or equal to 100
nanograms per kilogram body weight in
organisms other than Escherichia coli
K–12 (see Section III–B–1, Experiments
Involving the Cloning of Toxin
Molecules with LD50 of Less than 100
Nanograms Per Kilogram Body Weight,
Appendix F, Containment Conditions
for Cloning of Genes Coding for the
Biosynthesis of Molecules Toxic for
Vertebrates);
Section IV–C–3–b. Publishing in the
Federal Register, as needed.
Section IV–C–3–c. Reviewing and
approving the membership of an
institution’s Institutional Biosafety
Committee, and where it finds the
Institutional Biosafety Committee meets
the requirements set forth in Section IV–
B–2, Institutional Biosafety Committee
(IBC), giving its approval to the
Institutional Biosafety Committee
membership.
Section IV–D–5 currently states:
Section IV–D–5. Protection of
Proprietary Data—Voluntary
Compliance
Section IV–D–5–a. General
In general, the Freedom of
Information Act requires federal
agencies to make their records available
to the public upon request. However,
this requirement does not apply to,
among other things, ‘‘trade secrets and
commercial or financial information
that is obtained from a person and that
is privileged or confidential.’’ Under 18
U.S.C. 1905, it is a criminal offense for
an officer or employee of the U.S. or any
federal department or agency to publish,
divulge, disclose, or make known ‘‘in
any manner or to any extent not
authorized by law any information
coming to him in the course of his
employment or official duties or by
reason of any examination or
investigation made by, or return, report
or record made to or filed with, such
department or agency or officer or
employee thereof, which information
concerns or relates to the trade secrets,
(or) processes . . . of any person, firm,
partnership, corporation, or
association.’’ This provision applies to
all employees of the federal government,
including special Government
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
employees. Members of RAC are
‘‘special Government employees.’’
Section IV–D–5 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Section IV–D–5–a. General
In general, the Freedom of
Information Act requires federal
agencies to make their records available
to the public upon request. However,
this requirement does not apply to,
among other things, ‘‘trade secrets and
commercial or financial information
that is obtained from a person and that
is privileged or confidential.’’ Under 18
U.S.C. 1905, it is a criminal offense for
an officer or employee of the United
States or any federal department or
agency to publish, divulge, disclose, or
make known ‘‘in any manner or to any
extent not authorized by law any
information coming to him in the course
of his employment or official duties or
by reason of any examination or
investigation made by, or return, report
or record made to or filed with, such
department or agency or officer or
employee thereof, which information
concerns or relates to the trade secrets,
(or) processes . . . of any person, firm,
partnership, corporation, or
association.’’ This provision applies to
all employees of the federal government,
including special Government
employees.
None of the other sub-sections under
Section IV are proposed to be amended.
Section V currently states:
Section V. Footnotes and References of
Sections I through IV
Section V–A. The NIH Director, with
advice of the RAC, may revise the
classification for the purposes of the
NIH Guidelines (see Section IV–C–1–b–
(2)–(e), Minor Actions). The revised list
of organisms in each Risk Group is
reprinted in Appendix B, Classification
of Human Etiologic Agents on the Basis
of Hazard.
Section V–B. Section III, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines,
describes a number of places where
judgments are to be made. In all these
cases, the Principal Investigator shall
make the judgment on these matters as
part of his/her responsibility to ‘‘make
the initial determination of the required
levels of physical and biological
containment in accordance with the
NIH Guidelines’’ (see Section IV–B–7–
c–(1)). For cases falling under Sections
III–A through III–E, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines, this
judgment is to be reviewed and
approved by the Institutional Biosafety
Committee as part of its responsibility to
make an ‘‘independent assessment of
the containment levels required by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
NIH Guidelines for the proposed
research’’ (see Section IV–B–2–b–(1),
Institutional Biosafety Committee). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee may
refer specific cases to NIH OSP as part
of NIH OSP’s functions to ‘‘provide
advice to all within and outside NIH’’
(see Section IV–C–3). NIH OSP may
request advice from the RAC as part of
the RAC’s responsibility for
‘‘interpreting the NIH Guidelines for
experiments to which the NIH
Guidelines do not specifically assign
containment levels’’ (see Section IV–C–
1–b–(2)–(f), Minor Actions).
Section V is proposed to be amended
as follows:
Section V–A. The NIH Director may
revise the classification for the purposes
of the NIH Guidelines (see Section IV–
C–1–b–(2)–(e), Minor Actions). The
revised list of organisms in each Risk
Group is reprinted in Appendix B,
Classification of Human Etiologic
Agents on the Basis of Hazard.
Section V–B. Section III, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines,
describes a number of places where
judgments are to be made. In all these
cases, the Principal Investigator shall
make the judgment on these matters as
part of his/her responsibility to ‘‘make
the initial determination of the required
levels of physical and biological
containment in accordance with the
NIH Guidelines’’ (see Section IV–B–7–
c–(1)). For cases falling under Sections
III–A through III–E, Experiments
Covered by the NIH Guidelines, this
judgment is to be reviewed and
approved by the Institutional Biosafety
Committee as part of its responsibility to
make an ‘‘independent assessment of
the containment levels required by the
NIH Guidelines for the proposed
research’’ (see Section IV–B–2–b–(1),
Institutional Biosafety Committee). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee may
refer specific cases to NIH OSP as part
of NIH OSP’s functions to ‘‘provide
advice to all within and outside NIH’’
(see Section IV–C–3).
Appendix A currently states:
Appendix A. Exemptions Under Section
III–F–6—Sublists of Natural Exchangers
Certain specified recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecules that consist entirely
of DNA segments from different species that
exchange DNA by known physiological
processes, though one or more of the
segments may be a synthetic equivalent are
exempt from these NIH Guidelines (see
Section III–F–6, Exempt Experiments).
Institutional Biosafety Committee registration
is not required for these exempt experiments.
A list of such exchangers will be prepared
and periodically revised by the NIH Director
with advice from the RAC after appropriate
notice and opportunity for public comment
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41091
(see Section IV–C–1-b-(1)-(c), NIH Director—
Specific Responsibilities). For a list of natural
exchangers that are exempt from the NIH
Guidelines, see Appendices A–I through A–
VI, Exemptions under Section III–F–6
Sublists of Natural Exchangers. Section III–
F–6, Exempt Experiments, describes
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules that are: (1) Composed entirely of
DNA segments from one or more of the
organisms within a sublist, and (2) to be
propagated in any of the organisms within a
sublist (see Classification of Bergey’s Manual
of Determinative Bacteriology; 8th edition,
R.E. Buchanan and N.E. Gibbons, editors,
Williams and Wilkins Company; Baltimore,
Maryland 1984). Although these experiments
are exempt, it is recommended that they be
performed at the appropriate biosafety level
for the host or recombinant/synthetic
organism (see Biosafety in Microbiological
and Biomedical Laboratories, 5th edition,
2007, U.S. DHHS, Public Health Service,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Atlanta, Georgia, and NIH Office of Biosafety,
Bethesda, Maryland).
Appendix A is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Appendix A. Exemptions Under Section
III–F–6—Sublists of Natural Exchangers
Certain specified recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecules that consist entirely
of DNA segments from different species that
exchange DNA by known physiological
processes, though one or more of the
segments may be a synthetic equivalent are
exempt from these NIH Guidelines (see
Section III–F–6, Exempt Experiments).
Institutional Biosafety Committee registration
is not required for these exempt experiments.
A list of such exchangers will be prepared
and periodically revised by the NIH Director
after appropriate notice and opportunity for
public comment (see Section IV–C–1-b-(1)(c), NIH Director—Specific Responsibilities.
For a list of natural exchangers that are
exempt from the NIH Guidelines, see
Appendices A–I through A–VI, Exemptions
under Section III–F–6 Sublists of Natural
Exchangers. Section III–F–6, Exempt
Experiments, describes recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecules that are: (1)
Composed entirely of DNA segments from
one or more of the organisms within a
sublist, and (2) to be propagated in any of the
organisms within a sublist (see Bergey’s
Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; 2nd
edition, Springer-Verlag; New York, NY).
Although these experiments are exempt, it is
recommended that they be performed at the
appropriate biosafety level for the host or
recombinant/synthetic organism (see
Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical
Laboratories, 5th edition, 2007, U.S. DHHS,
Public Health Service, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and
NIH Office of Biosafety, Bethesda, Maryland).
Appendix C–IX–A currently states:
Appendix C–IX–A
The NIH Director, with advice of the RAC,
may revise the classification for the purposes
of these NIH Guidelines (see Section IV–C–
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
41092
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
1–b–(2)–(b), Minor Actions). The revised list
of organisms in each Risk Group is located
in Appendix B.
Appendix C–IX–A is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Appendix C–IX–A
The NIH Director may revise the
classification for the purposes of these NIH
Guidelines (see Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(b),
Minor Actions). The revised list of organisms
in each Risk Group is located in Appendix
B.
None of the other sub-sections under
Appendix C–IX. Footnotes and
References of Appendix C are proposed
to be amended.
Appendix D currently states in part:
Appendix D. Major Actions Taken
Under the NIH Guidelines
As noted in the subsections of Section IV–
C–1–b–(1), the Director, NIH, may take
certain actions with regard to the NIH
Guidelines after the issues have been
considered by the RAC. Some of the actions
taken to date include the following:
Appendix D is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Appendix D. Major Actions Taken
Under the NIH Guidelines
As noted in the subsections of Section IV–
C–1–b–(1), the Director, NIH, may take
certain actions with regard to the NIH
Guidelines. (Entries up to and including D–
118 were approved using a process that
involved the RAC.) Some of the actions taken
to date include the following:
Appendix I–II currently states:
Appendix I–II. Certification of HostVector Systems
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix I–II–A. Responsibility
Host-Vector 1 systems (other than
Escherichia coli K–12) and Host-Vector 2
systems may not be designated as such until
they have been certified by the NIH Director.
Requests for certification of host-vector
systems may be submitted to the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by email to: NIHGuidelines@
od.nih.gov; additional contact information is
also available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov). Proposed host-vector
systems will be reviewed by the RAC (see
Section IV–C–1–b–(1)–(f), Major Actions).
Initial review will based on the construction,
properties, and testing of the proposed hostvector system by a subcommittee composed
of one or more RAC members and/or ad hoc
experts. The RAC will evaluate the
subcommittee’s report and any other
available information at the next scheduled
RAC meeting. The NIH Director is
responsible for certification of host-vector
systems, following advice of the RAC. Minor
modifications to existing host-vector systems
(i.e., those that are of minimal or no
consequence to the properties relevant to
containment) may be certified by the NIH
Director without prior RAC review (see
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(f), Minor Actions).
Once a host-vector system has been certified
by the NIH Director, a notice of certification
will be sent by NIH OSP to the applicant and
to the Institutional Biosafety Committee
Chairs. A list of all currently certified hostvector systems is available from the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by submitting a request for this
information to: NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov;
additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov). The NIH Director may
rescind the certification of a host-vector
system (see Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(g), Minor
Actions). If certification is rescinded, NIH
will instruct investigators to transfer cloned
DNA into a different system or use the clones
at a higher level of physical containment
level, unless NIH determines that the already
constructed clones incorporate adequate
biological containment. Certification of a
host-vector system does not extend to
modifications of either the host or vector
component of that system. Such modified
systems shall be independently certified by
the NIH Director. If modifications are minor,
it may only be necessary for the investigator
to submit data showing that the
modifications have either improved or not
impaired the major phenotypic traits on
which the containment of the system
depends. Substantial modifications to a
certified host-vector system requires
submission of complete testing data.
Appendix I–II–B. Data To Be Submitted
for Certification
Appendix I–II–B–1. Host-Vector 1
Systems Other than Escherichia coli
K–12
The following types of data shall be
submitted, modified as appropriate for the
particular system under consideration: (i) A
description of the organism and vector; the
strain’s natural habitat and growth
requirements; its physiological properties,
particularly those related to its reproduction,
survival, and the mechanisms by which it
exchanges genetic information; the range of
organisms with which this organism
normally exchanges genetic information and
the type of information is exchanged; and
any relevant information about its
pathogenicity or toxicity; (ii) a description of
the history of the particular strains and
vectors to be used, including data on any
mutations which render this organism less
able to survive or transmit genetic
information; and (iii) a general description of
the range of experiments contemplated with
emphasis on the need for developing such an
Host-Vector 1 system.
Appendix I–II–B–2. Host-Vector 2
Systems
Investigators planning to request HostVector 2 systems certification may obtain
instructions from NIH OSP concerning data
to be submitted (see Appendices I–III–N and
O, Footnotes and References of Appendix I).
In general, the following types of data are
required: (i) Description of construction steps
with indication of source, properties, and
manner of introduction of genetic traits; (ii)
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
quantitative data on the stability of genetic
traits that contribute to the containment of
the system; (iii) data on the survival of the
host-vector system under non-permissive
laboratory conditions designed to represent
the relevant natural environment; (iv) data on
transmissibility of the vector and/or a cloned
DNA fragment under both permissive and
non-permissive conditions; (v) data on all
other properties of the system which affect
containment and utility, including
information on yields of phage or plasmid
molecules, ease of DNA isolation, and ease of
transfection or transformation; and (vi) in
some cases, the investigator may be asked to
submit data on survival and vector
transmissibility from experiments in which
the host-vector is fed to laboratory animals or
one or more human subjects. Such in vivo
data may be required to confirm the validity
of predicting in vivo survival on the basis of
in vitro experiments. Data shall be submitted
12 weeks prior to the RAC meeting at which
such data will be considered by the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by email to: NIHGuidelines@
od.nih.gov; additional contact information is
also available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov). Investigators are
encouraged to publish their data on the
construction, properties, and testing of
proposed Host Vector 2 systems prior to
consideration of the system by the RAC and
its subcommittee. Specific instructions
concerning the submission of data for
proposed Escherichia coli K–12 Host-Vector
2 system (EK2) involving either plasmids or
bacteriophage in Escherichia coli K–12, are
available from the Office of Science Policy,
National Institutes of Health, preferably by
submitting a request for this information to:
NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov;additional
contact information is also available here and
on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Appendix I–II is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Appendix I–II. Certification of HostVector Systems
Appendix I–II–A. Responsibility
Host-Vector 1 systems (other than
Escherichia coli K–12) and Host-Vector 2
systems may not be designated as such until
they have been certified by the NIH Director.
Requests for certification of host-vector
systems may be submitted to the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by email to: NIHGuidelines@
od.nih.gov; additional contact information is
also available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov). Proposed host-vector
systems will be reviewed based on the
construction, properties, and testing of the
proposed host-vector system by ad hoc
experts. The NIH Director is responsible for
certification of host-vector systems. Once a
host-vector system has been certified by the
NIH Director, a notice of certification will be
sent by NIH OSP to the applicant and to the
Institutional Biosafety Committee Chairs. A
list of all currently certified host-vector
systems is available from the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by submitting a request for this
information to: NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov;
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Notices
additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov). The NIH Director may
rescind the certification of a host-vector
system (see Section IV–C–1–b–(2)–(g), Minor
Actions). If certification is rescinded, NIH
will instruct investigators to transfer cloned
DNA into a different system or use the clones
at a higher level of physical containment
level, unless NIH determines that the already
constructed clones incorporate adequate
biological containment. Certification of a
host-vector system does not extend to
modifications of either the host or vector
component of that system. Such modified
systems shall be independently certified by
the NIH Director. If modifications are minor,
it may only be necessary for the investigator
to submit data showing that the
modifications have either improved or not
impaired the major phenotypic traits on
which the containment of the system
depends. Substantial modifications to a
certified host-vector system requires
submission of complete testing data.
Appendix I–II–B. Data To Be Submitted
for Certification
Appendix I–II–B–1. Host-Vector 1
Systems Other than Escherichia coli
K–12
containment and utility, including
information on yields of phage or plasmid
molecules, ease of DNA isolation, and ease of
transfection or transformation; and (vi) in
some cases, the investigator may be asked to
submit data on survival and vector
transmissibility from experiments in which
the host-vector is fed to laboratory animals or
one or more human subjects. Such in vivo
data may be required to confirm the validity
of predicting in vivo survival on the basis of
in vitro experiments. Data shall be submitted
to the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, preferably by email to:
NIHGuidelines@od.nih.gov; additional
contact information is also available here and
on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Investigators are encouraged to publish their
data on the construction, properties, and
testing of proposed Host Vector 2 systems
prior to consideration of the system by NIH.
Specific instructions concerning the
submission of data for proposed Escherichia
coli K–12 Host-Vector 2 system (EK2)
involving either plasmids or bacteriophage in
Escherichia coli K–12, are available from the
Office of Science Policy, National Institutes
of Health, preferably by submitting a request
for this information to: NIHGuidelines@
od.nih.gov; additional contact information is
also available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Appendix L, GENE THERAPY
POLICY CONFERENCES (GTPCS), is
proposed to be deleted in its entirety.
Appendix M, Points to Consider in
the Design and Submission of Protocols
for the Transfer of Recombinant or
Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules into
One or More Human Research
Participants (Points to Consider), is
proposed to be deleted in its entirety.
Appendix I–II–B–2. Host-Vector 2
Systems
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
The following types of data shall be
submitted, modified as appropriate for the
particular system under consideration: (i) A
description of the organism and vector; the
strain’s natural habitat and growth
requirements; its physiological properties,
particularly those related to its reproduction,
survival, and the mechanisms by which it
exchanges genetic information; the range of
organisms with which this organism
normally exchanges genetic information and
the type of information is exchanged; and
any relevant information about its
pathogenicity or toxicity; (ii) a description of
the history of the particular strains and
vectors to be used, including data on any
mutations which render this organism less
able to survive or transmit genetic
information; and (iii) a general description of
the range of experiments contemplated with
emphasis on the need for developing such an
Host-Vector 1 system.
National Institutes of Health
Investigators planning to request HostVector 2 systems certification may obtain
instructions from NIH OSP concerning data
to be submitted (see Appendices I–III–N and
O, Footnotes and References of Appendix I).
In general, the following types of data are
required: (i) Description of construction steps
with indication of source, properties, and
manner of introduction of genetic traits; (ii)
quantitative data on the stability of genetic
traits that contribute to the containment of
the system; (iii) data on the survival of the
host-vector system under non-permissive
laboratory conditions designed to represent
the relevant natural environment; (iv) data on
transmissibility of the vector and/or a cloned
DNA fragment under both permissive and
non-permissive conditions; (v) data on all
other properties of the system which affect
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of
Closed Meetings
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: August 7, 2018.
Lawrence A. Tabak,
Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
41093
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR–17–
144: Limited Competition: National Primate
Research Centers (P51).
Date: September 11–14, 2018.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Hotel Vintage Portland, 422 SW
Broadway, Portland, OR 97205.
Contact Person: Brian H. Scott, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, National Institutes
of Health, Center for Scientific Review, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–
827–7490, brianscott@mail.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and
Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review
Group; Pathophysiological Basis of Mental
Disorders and Addictions Study Section.
Date: September 13–14, 2018.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld,
6677 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32821.
Contact Person: Boris P. Sokolov, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5217A,
MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–408–
9115, bsokolov@csr.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: August 13, 2018.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–17785 Filed 8–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
[FR Doc. 2018–17760 Filed 8–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, notice is hereby given of the
following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Institutes of Health
Draft Report on Carcinogens
Monograph on Night Shift Work and
Light at Night; Availability of
Document; Request for Comments;
Notice of Peer-Review Meeting
AGENCY:
National Institutes of Health,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The National Toxicology
Program (NTP) announces a meeting to
peer review the Draft Report on
Carcinogens Monograph on Night Shift
Work and Light at Night. NTP has
conducted a literature-based assessment
to determine whether night shift work
(e.g., working at least three hours
between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m.) and light
at night are cancer hazards and should
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 160 (Friday, August 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41082-41093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17760]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Science Policy
(OSP) Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Research: Proposed Changes
to the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic
Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines)
AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) seeks public comment
on its proposal to amend the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines) to
streamline oversight for human gene transfer clinical research
protocols and reduce duplicative reporting requirements already
captured within the existing regulatory framework. Specifically, NIH
proposes amendments to: Delete the NIH protocol registration submission
and reporting requirements under Appendix M of the NIH Guidelines, and
modify the roles and responsibilities of entities that involve human
gene transfer or the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC).
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments must be submitted in writing
by October 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically by visiting:
https://osp.od.nih.gov/comment-form-nih-guidelines/. Comments may also
be sent via fax to 301-496-9839, or by mail to the Office of Science
Policy, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 750,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7985. All written comments received in
response to this notice will be available for public inspection at NIH
Office of Science Policy (OSP), 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 750,
Bethesda, MD 20892-7985, weekdays between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5
p.m. and may be posted without change, including any personal
information, to the NIH OSP website.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions, or require
additional background information about these proposed changes, please
contact the NIH by email at [email protected], or telephone at
301-496-9838. You may also contact Jessica Tucker, Ph.D., Director of
the Division of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Emerging Biotechnology
Policy, Office of Science Policy, NIH, at 301-451-4431 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIH is proposing a series of actions to the
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic
Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines) to streamline oversight of human gene
transfer research (HGT), and to focus the NIH Guidelines more
specifically on biosafety issues associated with research involving
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules. The field of HGT has
recently experienced a series of advances that have resulted in the
translation of research into clinical practice, including U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for licensed products.
Additionally, oversight mechanisms for ensuring HGT proceeds safely
have sufficiently evolved to keep pace with new discoveries in this
field.
At this time, there is duplication in submitting protocols, annual
reports, amendments, and serious adverse events for HGT clinical
protocols to both NIH and FDA that does not exist for other areas of
clinical research. Historically, this duplication was conceived as
harmonized reporting, enabling FDA to provide regulatory oversight
while NIH provided a forum for open dialogue and transparency. However,
since these complementary functions were first envisioned, we have now
seen several converging systems emerge that provide some of these
functions. For instance, ClinicalTrials.gov has been instituted, which
provides a transparent and searchable database for clinical trials. In
addition, the protection of human research subjects was improved
through changes that updated provisions of the Common Rule. In 2018,
FDA released a suite of draft guidance documents pertaining to gene
therapy that includes new guidance on manufacturing issues, long-term
follow-up, and pathways for clinical development in certain areas,
including hemophilia, ophthalmologic indications, and rare diseases.
While the science and oversight system have evolved, HGT protocols
continue to receive special oversight that is not afforded to other
areas of clinical research. This observation was also noted in a 2014
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies report, Oversight and
Review of Clinical Gene Transfer Protocols: Assessing the Role of the
Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, in which it was recommended that
NIH begin to limit RAC review to only exceptional HGT protocols that
meet certain criteria and that would significantly benefit from RAC
review. As very few protocols have been assessed by NIH to merit review
under this new system, NIH asserts it is an opportune time to make
changes to the NIH Guidelines to make oversight of HGT commensurate
with oversight afforded to other areas of clinical research given the
robust infrastructure in place to oversee this type of research.
Briefly to summarize, NIH proposes amending the NIH Guidelines to:
1. Eliminate RAC review and reporting requirements to NIH for HGT
protocols.
2. Modify roles and responsibilities of investigators,
institutions, IBCs, the RAC, and NIH to be consistent with these goals
including:
a. Modifying roles of IBCs in reviewing HGT to be consistent with
review of other covered research, and
b. Eliminating references to the RAC, including its roles in HGT
and biosafety.
NIH suggests that the series of changes proposed in this Notice is
a rational next step in the process of considering appropriate
oversight of HGT. Consistent with these proposed changes to the NIH
Guidelines, Section I-A, the Purpose of the NIH Guidelines, is proposed
to be amended to clarify that the focus of the policy is biosafety
[[Page 41083]]
oversight of research involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules. NIH notes that some of the duties of Institutional Biosafety
Committees (IBCs) as currently written in the NIH Guidelines (e.g.,
review of informed consent documents) are duplicative with the
oversight provided by FDA or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). NIH
proposes that IBCs retain responsibility to review and approve HGT
protocols; however, NIH proposes that these responsibilities be
modified to be similar to those responsibilities IBCs currently have
for review and approval of other research subject to the NIH
Guidelines.
With the proposed elimination of the requirements for safety
reporting under Appendix M, IBC oversight should be completed
immediately after the last participant is administered the final dose
of product. Additionally, the role of IBC review is proposed to be
amended to be consistent with FDA's current guidance regarding
individual patient expanded access to investigational drugs. In this
way, the role of the IBCs will be focused on providing local biosafety
oversight of basic and clinical research involving recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acids. In particular, NIH seeks comment on whether
the expectations of IBCs, in light of these proposed changes, have been
articulated clearly in the proposed revisions to the NIH Guidelines.
Notably, the roles and responsibilities of the RAC are proposed to
be removed from the NIH Guidelines. NIH recognizes the value of the RAC
in discussions of science, safety, and ethics. In an effort to use the
RAC as a public forum to advise on issues associated with emerging
biotechnologies, the RAC's charter will be modified to change the
committee's focus from research solely involving recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acids to emerging biotechnologies research. In light
of this modification to the committee, NIH proposes eliminating
references to the RAC in the NIH Guidelines, though NIH may continue to
seek advice from the RAC on biosafety issues that fall under the
purview of the NIH Guidelines. Similarly, NIH may choose to seek advice
from internal working groups or Federal Advisory Committees on a
variety of issues, when warranted.
The proposed changes outlined above will require amendment of
multiple portions of the NIH Guidelines. Sections and appendices
proposed to be deleted from the current NIH Guidelines may be accessed
at https://osp.od.nih.gov/biotechnology/nih-guidelines/. Following
deletions, sections and appendices will be relabeled to proceed
consecutively throughout the NIH Guidelines.
Proposed Amendments to the NIH Guidelines
Section I-A currently states:
Section I-A. Purpose
The purpose of the NIH Guidelines is to specify the practices for
constructing and handling: (i) Recombinant nucleic acid molecules, (ii)
synthetic nucleic acid molecules, including those that are chemically
or otherwise modified but can base pair with naturally occurring
nucleic acid molecules, and (iii) cells, organisms, and viruses
containing such molecules.
Section I-A is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section I-A. Purpose
The purpose of the NIH Guidelines is to specify the biosafety
practices and containment principles for constructing and handling: (i)
Recombinant nucleic acid molecules, (ii) synthetic nucleic acid
molecules, including those that are chemically or otherwise modified
but can base pair with naturally occurring nucleic acid molecules, and
(iii) cells, organisms, and viruses containing such molecules.
Section I-A-1 currently states:
Section I-A-1. Any nucleic acid molecule experiment, which
according to the NIH Guidelines requires approval by NIH, must be
submitted to NIH or to another federal agency that has jurisdiction for
review and approval. Once approvals, or other applicable clearances,
have been obtained from a federal agency other than NIH (whether the
experiment is referred to that agency by NIH or sent directly there by
the submitter), the experiment may proceed without the necessity for
NIH review or approval. (See exception in Section I-A-1-a regarding
requirement for human gene transfer protocol registration.)
Section I-A-1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section I-A-1. Any nucleic acid molecule experiment, which
according to the NIH Guidelines requires approval by NIH, must be
submitted to NIH or to another federal agency that has jurisdiction for
review and approval. Once approvals, or other applicable clearances,
have been obtained from a federal agency other than NIH (whether the
experiment is referred to that agency by NIH or sent directly there by
the submitter), the experiment may proceed without the necessity for
NIH review or approval.
Section I-A-1-a currently states:
Section I-A-1-a. For experiments involving the deliberate transfer
of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules, or DNA or RNA
derived from recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules, into
human research participants (human gene transfer), no research
participant shall be enrolled (see definition of enrollment in Section
I-E-7) until the NIH protocol registration process has been completed
(see Appendix M-I-B, Selection of Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion); Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
approval (from the clinical trial site) has been obtained;
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval has been obtained; and all
applicable regulatory authorization(s) have been obtained.
For a clinical trial site that is added after the completion of the
NIH protocol registration process, no research participant shall be
enrolled (see definition of enrollment in Section I-E-7) at the
clinical trial site until IBC approval and IRB approval from that site
have been obtained. Within 30 days of enrollment (see definition of
enrollment in Section I-E-7) at a clinical trial site, the following
documentation shall be submitted to NIH OSP: (1) Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval (from the clinical trial site); (2)
Institutional Review Board approval; (3) Institutional Review Board-
approved informed consent document(s); and (4) NIH grant number(s) if
applicable.
Section I-A-1-a is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section I-A-1-a. For experiments involving the deliberate transfer
of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules, or DNA or RNA
derived from recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules, into
human research participants (human gene transfer), no human gene
transfer experiment shall be initiated (see definition of initiation in
Section I-E-7) until Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval
(from the clinical trial site) has been obtained; and all other
applicable institutional and regulatory authorization(s) and approvals
have been obtained.
Section I-E. General Definitions is proposed to be amended to
delete the current definitions I-E-4, I-E-7 through I-E-12 and to
include a new definition for ``initiation.''
Section I-E-4 is proposed to be amended to define initiation as the
following: ``Initiation'' of research is the introduction of
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules into organisms, cells,
or viruses.
Section III currently states:
[[Page 41084]]
Section III. Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines
This section describes six categories of experiments involving
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules: (i) Those that require
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval, RAC review, and NIH
Director approval before initiation (see Section III-A), (ii) those
that require NIH OSP and Institutional Biosafety Committee approval
before initiation (see Section III-B), (iii) those that require
Institutional Biosafety Committee and Institutional Review Board
approvals and RAC review before research participant enrollment (see
Section III-C), (iv) those that require Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval before initiation (see Section III-D), (v) those
that require Institutional Biosafety Committee notification
simultaneous with initiation (see Section III-E), and (vi) those that
are exempt from the NIH Guidelines (see Section III-F).
Note: If an experiment falls into Sections III-A, III-B, or
III-C and one of the other sections, the rules pertaining to
Sections III-A, III-B, or III-C shall be followed. If an experiment
falls into Section III-F and into either Sections III-D or III-E as
well, the experiment is considered exempt from the NIH Guidelines.
Any change in containment level, which is different from those
specified in the NIH Guidelines, may not be initiated without the
express approval of NIH OSP (see Section IV-C-1-b-(2) and its
subsections, Minor Actions).
Section III is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III. Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines
This section describes six categories of experiments involving
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules: (i) Those that require
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval and NIH Director
approval before initiation (see Section III-A), (ii) those that require
NIH OSP and Institutional Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation (see Section III-B), (iii) those that require Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval before initiation of human gene transfer
(see Section III-C), (iv) those that require Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval before initiation (see Section III-D), (v) those
that require Institutional Biosafety Committee notification
simultaneous with initiation (see Section III-E), and (vi) those that
are exempt from the NIH Guidelines (see Section III-F).
Note: If an experiment falls into Sections III-A, III-B, or
III-C and one of the other sections, the rules pertaining to
Sections III-A, III-B, or III-C shall be followed. If an experiment
falls into Section III-F and into either Sections III-D or III-E as
well, the experiment is considered exempt from the NIH Guidelines.
Any change in containment level, which is different from those
specified in the NIH Guidelines, may not be initiated without the
express approval of NIH OSP (see Section IV-C-1-b-(2) and its
subsections, Minor Actions).
Section III-A currently states:
Section III-A. Experiments That Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee Approval, RAC Review, and NIH Director Approval Before
Initiation (See Section IV-C-1-b-(1), Major Actions).
Experiments considered as Major Actions under the NIH Guidelines
cannot be initiated without submission of relevant information on the
proposed experiment to the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, preferably by email to: [email protected],
the publication of the proposal in the Federal Register for 15 days of
comment, review by RAC, and specific approval by NIH. The containment
conditions or stipulation requirements for such experiments will be
recommended by RAC and set by NIH at the time of approval. Such
experiments require Institutional Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation. Specific experiments already approved are included in
Appendix D, Major Actions Taken under the NIH Guidelines, which may be
obtained from the Office of Science Policy, National Institutes of
Health, preferably by submitting a request for this information to:
[email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Section III-A-1-a. The deliberate transfer of a drug resistance
trait to microorganisms that are not known to acquire the trait
naturally (see Section V-B, Footnotes and References of Sections I-IV),
if such acquisition could compromise the ability to control disease
agents in humans, veterinary medicine, or agriculture, will be reviewed
by the RAC.
Consideration should be given as to whether the drug resistance
trait to be used in the experiment would render that microorganism
resistant to the primary drug available to and/or indicated for certain
populations, for example children or pregnant women.
At the request of an Institutional Biosafety Committee, NIH OSP
will make a determination regarding whether a specific experiment
involving the deliberate transfer of a drug resistance trait falls
under Section III-A-1-a and therefore requires RAC review and NIH
Director approval. An Institutional Biosafety Committee may also
consult with NIH OSP regarding experiments that do not meet the
requirements of Section III-A-1-a but nonetheless raise important
public health issues. NIH OSP will consult, as needed, with one or more
experts, which may include the RAC.
Section III-A is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III-A. Experiments That Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee Approval and NIH Director Approval Before Initiation (See
Section IV-C-1-b-(1), Major Actions).
Section III-A-1. Major Actions Under the NIH Guidelines
Experiments considered as Major Actions as defined in Section III-
A-1-a under the NIH Guidelines cannot be initiated without submission
of relevant information on the proposed experiment to the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health, preferably by email to:
[email protected], the publication of the proposal in the
Federal Register for 15 days of comment, and specific approval by NIH.
The containment conditions or stipulation requirements for such
experiments will be set by NIH at the time of approval. Such
experiments require Institutional Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation. Specific experiments already approved are included in
Appendix D, Major Actions Taken under the NIH Guidelines, which may be
obtained from the Office of Science Policy, National Institutes of
Health, preferably by submitting a request for this information to:
[email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Section III-A-1-a. The deliberate transfer of a drug resistance
trait to microorganisms that are not known to acquire the trait
naturally (see Section V-B, Footnotes and References of Sections I-IV),
if such acquisition could compromise the ability to control disease
agents in humans, veterinary medicine, or agriculture, will require NIH
Director approval.
Consideration should be given as to whether the drug resistance
trait to be used in the experiment would render that microorganism
resistant to the primary drug available to and/or indicated for certain
populations, for example children or pregnant women.
At the request of an Institutional Biosafety Committee, NIH OSP
will
[[Page 41085]]
make a determination regarding whether a specific experiment involving
the deliberate transfer of a drug resistance trait falls under Section
III-A-1-a and therefore requires NIH Director approval. An
Institutional Biosafety Committee may also consult with NIH OSP
regarding experiments that do not meet the requirements of Section III-
A-1-a but nonetheless raise important public health issues.
Section III-C currently states:
Section III-C. Experiments that Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee and Institutional Review Board Approvals and RAC Review (if
applicable) Before Research Participant Enrollment
Section III-C-1. Experiments Involving the Deliberate Transfer of
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules, or DNA or RNA Derived
from Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules, into One or More
Human Research Participants
Human gene transfer is the deliberate transfer into human research
participants of either:
1. Recombinant nucleic acid molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
recombinant nucleic acid molecules, or
2. Synthetic nucleic acid molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
synthetic nucleic acid molecules that meet any one of the following
criteria:
a. Contain more than 100 nucleotides; or
b. Possess biological properties that enable integration into the
genome (e.g., cis elements involved in integration); or
c. Have the potential to replicate in a cell; or
d. Can be translated or transcribed.
No research participant shall be enrolled (see definition of
enrollment in Section I-E-7) until the NIH protocol registration
process has been completed (see Appendix M-I-B, Selection of Individual
Protocols for Public RAC Review and Discussion).
In its evaluation of human gene transfer protocols, NIH will make a
determination, following a request from one or more oversight bodies
involved in the review at an initial site(s), whether a proposed human
gene transfer experiment meets the requirements for selecting protocols
for public RAC review and discussion (See Appendix M-I-B). The process
of public RAC review and discussion is intended to foster the safe and
ethical conduct of human gene transfer experiments. Public review and
discussion of a human gene transfer experiment (and access to relevant
information) also serves to inform the public about the technical
aspects of the proposal, the meaning and significance of the research,
and any significant safety, social, and ethical implications of the
research.
Public RAC review and discussion of a human gene transfer
experiment will be initiated in two exceptional circumstances: (1)
Following a request for public RAC review from one or more oversight
bodies involved in the review at an initial site(s), the NIH concurs
that (a) the individual protocol would significantly benefit from RAC
review and (b) that the submission meets one or more of the following
NIH RAC review criteria: (i) The protocol uses a new vector, genetic
material, or delivery methodology that represents a first-in-human
experience, thus presenting an unknown risk; (ii) the protocol relies
on preclinical safety data that were obtained using a new preclinical
model system of unknown and unconfirmed value; or (iii) the proposed
vector, gene construct, or method of delivery is associated with
possible toxicities that are not widely known and that may render it
difficult for oversight and federal regulatory bodies to evaluate the
protocol rigorously. However, if one or more oversight bodies involved
in the review at an initial site(s) requests public RAC review, but NIH
does not concur that (a) the individual protocol would significantly
benefit from RAC review and (b) that the submission meets one or more
of the RAC review criteria (listed in i, ii, or iii), then the NIH OSP
will inform, within 10 working days, the requesting and other oversight
bodies involved in the review at an initial site(s) that public RAC
review is not warranted. (2) The NIH Director, in consultation (if
needed) with appropriate regulatory authorities, determines that the
submission: (a) Meets one or more of the NIH RAC review criteria
(listed in i, ii, or iii) and that public RAC review and discussion
would provide a clear and obvious benefit to the scientific community
or the public; or (b) raises significant scientific, societal, or
ethical concerns.
For a clinical trial site that is added after the completion of the
NIH protocol registration process, no research participant shall be
enrolled (see definition of enrollment in Section I-E-7) at the
clinical trial site until IBC approval and IRB approval from that site
have been obtained. Within 30 days of enrollment (see definition of
enrollment in Section I-E-7) at a clinical trial site, the following
documentation shall be submitted to NIH OSP: (1) Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval (from the clinical trial site); (2)
Institutional Review Board approval; (3) Institutional Review Board-
approved informed consent document(s); and (4) NIH grant number(s) if
applicable.
In order to maintain public access to information regarding human
gene transfer (including protocols that are not publicly reviewed by
the RAC), the NIH OSP will maintain the documentation described in
Appendices M-I through M-II. The information provided in response to
Appendix M should not contain any confidential commercial or financial
information or trade secrets, enabling all aspects of RAC review to be
open to the public.
Note: For specific directives concerning the use of retroviral
vectors for gene delivery, consult Appendix B-V-1, Murine Retroviral
Vectors.
Section III-C is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III-C. Experiments Involving Human Gene Transfer That Require
Institutional Biosafety Committee Approval Prior to Initiation
Section III-C-1. Experiments Involving the Deliberate Transfer of
Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules, or DNA or RNA Derived
From Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules, into One or More
Human Research Participants
Human gene transfer is the deliberate transfer into human research
participants of either:
1. Recombinant nucleic acid molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
recombinant nucleic acid molecules, or
2. Synthetic nucleic acid molecules, or DNA or RNA derived from
synthetic nucleic acid molecules that meet any one of the following
criteria:
a. Contain more than 100 nucleotides; or
b. Possess biological properties that enable integration into the
genome (e.g., cis elements involved in integration); or
c. Have the potential to replicate in a cell; or
d. Can be translated or transcribed.
Research cannot be initiated until Institutional Biosafety
Committee and all other applicable institutional and regulatory
authorization(s) and approvals have been obtained.
An individual patient expanded access IND is not research subject
to the NIH Guidelines and thus does not need to be submitted to an IBC,
if the following conditions are met: (i) A PI is submitting an
individual patient expanded access IND using Form FDA 3926; (ii) the PI
selects the appropriate box on that form to request a waiver under 21
CFR 56.105 of the requirements in 21 CFR 56.108(c); and (iii) the FDA
concludes that such a waiver is appropriate.
[[Page 41086]]
Section III-D-7-b currently states:
Section III-D-7-b. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 strains
within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1). Experiments
involving influenza viruses containing a majority of genes and/or
segments from a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be conducted at BL3
enhanced containment, (see Appendix G-II-C-5, Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses).
Experiments involving influenza viruses containing a minority of genes
and/or segments from a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be conducted at
BL3 enhanced unless a risk assessment performed by the IBC determines
that they can be conducted safely at biosafety level 2 and after they
have been excluded pursuant to 9 CFR 121.3(e). NIH OSP is available to
IBCs to provide consultation with the RAC and influenza virus experts
when risk assessments are being made to determine the appropriate
biocontainment for experiments with influenza viruses containing a
minority of gene/segments from HPAI H5N1. Such experiments may be
performed at BL3 enhanced containment or containment may be lowered to
biosafety level 2, the level of containment for most research with
other influenza viruses. (USDA/APHIS regulations and decisions on
lowering containment also apply). In deciding to lower containment, the
IBC should consider whether, in at least two animal models (e.g.,
ferret, mouse, Syrian golden hamster, cotton rat, non-human primates),
there is evidence that the resulting influenza virus shows reduced
replication and virulence compared to the parental RG3 virus at
relevant doses. This should be determined by measuring biological
indices appropriate for the specific animal model (e.g., severe weight
loss, elevated temperature, mortality or neurological symptoms).
Section III-D-7-b is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III-D-7-b. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 strains
within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1). Experiments
involving influenza viruses containing a majority of genes and/or
segments from a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be conducted at BL3
enhanced containment, (see Appendix G-II-C-5, Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses).
Experiments involving influenza viruses containing a minority of genes
and/or segments from a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be conducted at
BL3 enhanced unless a risk assessment performed by the IBC determines
that they can be conducted safely at biosafety level 2 and after they
have been excluded pursuant to 9 CFR 121.3(e). NIH OSP is available to
IBCs to provide consultation with influenza virus experts when risk
assessments are being made to determine the appropriate biocontainment
for experiments with influenza viruses containing a minority of gene/
segments from HPAI H5N1. Such experiments may be performed at BL3
enhanced containment or containment may be lowered to biosafety level
2, the level of containment for most research with other influenza
viruses. (USDA/APHIS regulations and decisions on lowering containment
also apply). In deciding to lower containment, the IBC should consider
whether, in at least two animal models (e.g., ferret, mouse, Syrian
golden hamster, cotton rat, non-human primates), there is evidence that
the resulting influenza virus shows reduced replication and virulence
compared to the parental RG3 virus at relevant doses. This should be
determined by measuring biological indices appropriate for the specific
animal model (e.g., severe weight loss, elevated temperature, mortality
or neurological symptoms).
Section III-D-7-d currently states:
Section III-D-7-d. Antiviral Susceptibility and Containment. The
availability of antiviral drugs as preventive and therapeutic measures
is an important safeguard for experiments with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1,
and human H2N2 (1957-1968). If an influenza virus containing genes from
one of these viruses is resistant to both classes of current antiviral
agents, adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors, higher containment
may be required based on the risk assessment considering
transmissibility to humans, virulence, pandemic potential, alternative
antiviral agents if available, etc.
Experiments with 1918 H1N1, human H2N2 (1957-1968) or HPAI H5N1
that are designed to create resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors or
other effective antiviral agents (including investigational antiviral
agents being developed for influenza) would be subject to Section III-
A-1 (Major Actions) and require RAC review and NIH Director approval.
As per Section I-A-1 of the NIH Guidelines, if the agent is a Select
Agent, the NIH will defer to the appropriate federal agency (HHS or
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Select Agent Divisions) on such
experiments.
Section III-D-7-d is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III-D-7-d. Antiviral Susceptibility and Containment. The
availability of antiviral drugs as preventive and therapeutic measures
is an important safeguard for experiments with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1,
and human H2N2 (1957-1968). If an influenza virus containing genes from
one of these viruses is resistant to both classes of current antiviral
agents, adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors, higher containment
may be required based on the risk assessment considering
transmissibility to humans, virulence, pandemic potential, alternative
antiviral agents if available, etc.
Experiments with 1918 H1N1, human H2N2 (1957-1968) or HPAI H5N1
that are designed to create resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors or
other effective antiviral agents (including investigational antiviral
agents being developed for influenza) would be subject to Section III-
A-1 (Major Actions) and NIH Director approval. As per Section I-A-1 of
the NIH Guidelines, if the agent is a Select Agent, NIH will defer to
the appropriate Federal agency (HHS or USDA Select Agent Divisions) on
such experiments.
Section III-F-6 currently states:
Section III-F-6. Those that consist entirely of DNA segments from
different species that exchange DNA by known physiological processes,
though one or more of the segments may be a synthetic equivalent. A
list of such exchangers will be prepared and periodically revised by
the NIH Director with advice of the RAC after appropriate notice and
opportunity for public comment (see Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c), Major
Actions). See Appendices A-I through A-VI, Exemptions under Section
III-F-6--Sublists of Natural Exchangers, for a list of natural
exchangers that are exempt from the NIH Guidelines.
Section III-F-6 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III-F-6. Those that consist entirely of DNA segments from
different species that exchange DNA by known physiological processes,
though one or more of the segments may be a synthetic equivalent. A
list of such exchangers will be prepared and periodically revised by
the NIH Director after appropriate notice and opportunity for public
comment (see Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c), Major Actions). See Appendices
A-I through A-VI, Exemptions under Section III-F-6--Sublists of Natural
Exchangers, for a list of natural exchangers that are exempt from the
NIH Guidelines.
Section III-F-8 currently states:
Section III-F-8. Those that do not present a significant risk to
health or the
[[Page 41087]]
environment (see Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c), Major Actions), as
determined by the NIH Director, with the advice of the RAC, and
following appropriate notice and opportunity for public comment. See
Appendix C, Exemptions under Section III-F-8 for other classes of
experiments which are exempt from the NIH Guidelines.
Section III-F-8 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section III-F-8. Those that do not present a significant risk to
health or the environment (see Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c), Major
Actions), as determined by the NIH Director, and following appropriate
notice and opportunity for public comment. See Appendix C, Exemptions
under Section III-F-8 for other classes of experiments which are exempt
from the NIH Guidelines.
Section IV-B-1-f currently states:
Section IV-B-1-f. Ensure that when the institution participates in
or sponsors recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research
involving human subjects: (i) The Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary), (ii) all aspects of Appendix M have been appropriately
addressed by the Principal Investigator; and (iii) no research
participant shall be enrolled (see definition of enrollment in Section
I-E-7) in a human gene transfer experiment until the NIH protocol
registration process has been completed (see Appendix M-I-B, Selection
of Individual Protocols for Public RAC Review and Discussion),
Institutional Biosafety Committee approval has been obtained,
Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained, and all
applicable regulatory authorizations have been obtained. Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval must be obtained from the clinical trial
site.
Section IV-B-1-f is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-B-1-f. Ensure that when the institution participates in
or sponsors recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research
involving human subjects: (i) The Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary), and (ii) no human gene transfer experiment shall be
initiated until Institutional Biosafety Committee approval has been
obtained, and all other applicable institutional and regulatory
authorization(s) and approvals have been obtained. Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval must be obtained from the clinical trial
site.
None of the other sub-sections under Section IV-B-1. General
Information are proposed to be amended.
Section IV-B-2-a-(1) currently states:
Section IV-B-2-a-(1). The Institutional Biosafety Committee must be
comprised of no fewer than five members so selected that they
collectively have experience and expertise in recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule technology and the capability to assess the
safety of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research and
to identify any potential risk to public health or the environment. At
least two members shall not be affiliated with the institution (apart
from their membership on the Institutional Biosafety Committee) and who
represent the interest of the surrounding community with respect to
health and protection of the environment (e.g., officials of state or
local public health or environmental protection agencies, members of
other local governmental bodies, or persons active in medical,
occupational health, or environmental concerns in the community). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee shall include at least one individual
with expertise in plant, plant pathogen, or plant pest containment
principles when experiments utilizing Appendix P, Physical and
Biological Containment for Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecule Research Involving Plants, require prior approval by the
Institutional Biosafety Committee. The Institutional Biosafety
Committee shall include at least one scientist with expertise in animal
containment principles when experiments utilizing Appendix Q, Physical
and Biological Containment for Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecule Research Involving Animals, require Institutional Biosafety
Committee prior approval. When the institution conducts recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule research at BL3, BL4, or Large Scale
(greater than 10 liters), a Biological Safety Officer is mandatory and
shall be a member of the Institutional Biosafety Committee (see Section
IV-B-3, Biological Safety Officer). When the institution participates
in or sponsors recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research
involving human research participants, the institution must ensure
that: (i) The Institutional Biosafety Committee has adequate expertise
and training (using ad hoc consultants as deemed necessary); (ii) all
aspects of Appendix M have been appropriately addressed by the
Principal Investigator; (iii) no research participant shall be enrolled
(see definition of enrollment in Section I-E-7) in a human gene
transfer experiment until the NIH protocol registration process has
been completed (see Appendix M-I-B, Selection of Individual Protocols
for Public RAC Review and Discussion); and (iv) final IBC approval is
granted only after the NIH protocol registration process has been
completed (see Appendix M-I-B, Selection of Individual Protocols for
Public RAC Review and Discussion). Institutional Biosafety Committee
approval must be obtained from the clinical trial site.
Section IV-B-2-a-(1) is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-B-2-a-(1). The Institutional Biosafety Committee must be
comprised of no fewer than five members so selected that they
collectively have experience and expertise in recombinant or synthetic
nucleic acid molecule technology and the capability to assess the
safety of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research and
to identify any potential risk to public health or the environment. At
least two members shall not be affiliated with the institution (apart
from their membership on the Institutional Biosafety Committee) and who
represent the interest of the surrounding community with respect to
health and protection of the environment (e.g., officials of state or
local public health or environmental protection agencies, members of
other local governmental bodies, or persons active in medical,
occupational health, or environmental concerns in the community). The
Institutional Biosafety Committee shall include at least one individual
with expertise in plant, plant pathogen, or plant pest containment
principles when experiments utilizing Appendix P, Physical and
Biological Containment for Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecule Research Involving Plants, require prior approval by the
Institutional Biosafety Committee. The Institutional Biosafety
Committee shall include at least one scientist with expertise in animal
containment principles when experiments utilizing Appendix Q, Physical
and Biological Containment for Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecule Research Involving Animals, require Institutional Biosafety
Committee prior approval. When the institution conducts recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule research at BL3, BL4, or Large Scale
(greater than 10 liters), a Biological Safety Officer is mandatory and
shall be a member of the Institutional Biosafety Committee (see Section
IV-B-3, Biological Safety Officer). When the institution participates
in or sponsors
[[Page 41088]]
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research involving human
research participants, the institution must ensure that the
Institutional Biosafety Committee has adequate expertise and training
(using ad hoc consultants as deemed necessary). Institutional Biosafety
Committee approval must be obtained from the clinical trial site.
Section IV-B-2-b-(1) currently states:
Section IV-B-2-b-(1). Reviewing recombinant or synthetic nucleic
acid molecule research conducted at or sponsored by the institution for
compliance with the NIH Guidelines as specified in Section III,
Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines, and approving those research
projects that are found to conform with the NIH Guidelines. This review
shall include: (i) Independent assessment of the containment levels
required by the NIH Guidelines for the proposed research; (ii)
assessment of the facilities, procedures, practices, and training and
expertise of personnel involved in recombinant or synthetic nucleic
acid molecule research; (iii) ensuring that all aspects of Appendix M
have been appropriately addressed by the Principal Investigator; (iv)
ensuring that no research participant is enrolled (see definition of
enrollment in Section I-E-7) in a human gene transfer experiment until
the NIH protocol registration process has been completed (see Appendix
M-I-B, Selection of Individual Protocols for Public RAC Review and
Discussion), Institutional Biosafety Committee approval (from the
clinical trial site) has been obtained, Institutional Review Board
approval has been obtained, and all applicable regulatory
authorizations have been obtained; (v) for human gene transfer
protocols selected for public RAC review and discussion, consideration
of the issues raised and recommendations made as a result of this
review and consideration of the Principal Investigator's response to
the recommendations; (vi) ensuring that final IBC approval is granted
only after the NIH protocol registration process has been completed
(see Appendix M-I-B, Selection of Individual Protocols for Public RAC
Review and Discussion); and (vii) ensuring compliance with all
surveillance, data reporting, and adverse event reporting requirements
set forth in the NIH Guidelines.
Section IV-B-2-b-(1) is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-B-2-b-(1). Reviewing recombinant or synthetic nucleic
acid molecule research conducted at or sponsored by the institution for
compliance with the NIH Guidelines as specified in Section III,
Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines, and approving those research
projects that are found to conform with the NIH Guidelines. This review
shall include: (i) Independent assessment of the containment levels
required by the NIH Guidelines for the proposed research; (ii)
assessment of the facilities, procedures, practices, and training and
expertise of personnel involved in recombinant or synthetic nucleic
acid molecule research; (iii) for recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecule research involving human research participants, assessment
focused on biosafety issues (e.g., administration, shedding).
Section IV-B-2-b-(8) currently states:
Section IV-B-2-b-(8). The Institutional Biosafety Committee may not
authorize initiation of experiments which are not explicitly covered by
the NIH Guidelines until NIH (with the advice of the RAC when required)
establishes the containment requirement.
Section IV-B-2-b-(8) is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-B-2-b-(8). The Institutional Biosafety Committee may not
authorize initiation of experiments which are not explicitly covered by
the NIH Guidelines until NIH establishes the containment requirement.
None of the other sub-sections under Section IV-B-2. Institutional
Biosafety Committee (IBC) are proposed to be amended.
Section IV-B-6 currently states:
Section IV-B-6. Human Gene Therapy Expertise
When the institution participates in or sponsors recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule research involving human subjects, the
institution must ensure that: (i) The Institutional Biosafety Committee
has adequate expertise and training (using ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary) and (ii) all aspects of Appendix M, Points to Consider in
the Design and Submission of Protocols for the Transfer of Recombinant
or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules into One or More Human Subjects
(Points to Consider), have been appropriately addressed by the
Principal Investigator prior to its approval.
Section IV-B-6 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-B-6. Human Gene Transfer Expertise
When the institution participates in or sponsors recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule research involving human subjects, the
institution must ensure that the Institutional Biosafety Committee has
adequate expertise and training (using ad hoc consultants as deemed
necessary).
Section IV-B-7 currently states:
Section IV-B-7. Principal Investigator (PI)
On behalf of the institution, the Principal Investigator is
responsible for full compliance with the NIH Guidelines in the conduct
of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research. A Principal
Investigator engaged in human gene transfer research may delegate to
another party, such as a corporate sponsor, the reporting functions set
forth in Appendix M, with written notification to the NIH OSP of the
delegation and of the name(s), address, telephone, and fax numbers of
the contact. The Principal Investigator is responsible for ensuring
that the reporting requirements are fulfilled and will be held
accountable for any reporting lapses.
Section IV-B-7 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-B-7. Principal Investigator (PI)
On behalf of the institution, the Principal Investigator is
responsible for full compliance with the NIH Guidelines in the conduct
of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule research.
Section IV-B-7-b-(6) is proposed to be deleted in its entirety
Section IV-B-7-e-(5) is proposed to be deleted in its entirety
None of the other sub-sections under Section IV-B-7. Principal
Investigator are proposed to be amended.
Section IV-C currently states:
Section IV-C. Responsibilities of the National Institutes of Health
(NIH)
Section IV-C-1. NIH Director
The NIH Director is responsible for: (i) Establishing the NIH
Guidelines, (ii) overseeing their implementation, and (iii) their final
interpretation. The NIH Director has responsibilities under the NIH
Guidelines that involve OSP and RAC. OSP's responsibilities under the
NIH Guidelines are administrative. Advice from RAC is primarily
scientific, technical, and ethical. In certain circumstances, there is
specific opportunity for public comment with published response prior
to final action.
Section IV-C-1-a. General Responsibilities
The NIH Director is responsible for:
[[Page 41089]]
Section IV-C-1-a-(1). Promulgating requirements as necessary to
implement the NIH Guidelines;
Section IV-C-1-a-(2). Establishing and maintaining RAC to carry out
the responsibilities set forth in Section IV-C-2, Recombinant DNA
Advisory Committee (RAC membership is specified in its charter and in
Section IV-C-2);
Section IV-C-1-a-(3). Establishing and maintaining NIH OSP to carry
out the responsibilities defined in Section IV-C-3, Office of Science
Policy;
Section IV-C-1-a-(4). Conducting and supporting training programs
in laboratory safety for Institutional Biosafety Committee members,
Biological Safety Officers and other institutional experts (if
applicable), Principal Investigators, and laboratory staff.
Section IV-C-1-a-(5). Establishing and convening Gene Therapy
Policy Conferences as described in Appendix L, Gene Therapy Policy
Conferences.
Section IV-C-1-b. Specific Responsibilities
In carrying out the responsibilities set forth in this section, the
NIH Director, or a designee shall weigh each proposed action through
appropriate analysis and consultation to determine whether it complies
with the NIH Guidelines and presents no significant risk to health or
the environment.
Section IV-C-1-b-(1). Major Actions
To execute Major Actions, the NIH Director shall seek the advice of
RAC and provide an opportunity for public and federal agency comment.
Specifically, the Notice of Meeting and Proposed Actions shall be
published in the Federal Register at least 15 days before the RAC
meeting. The NIH Director's decision/recommendation (at his/her
discretion) may be published in the Federal Register for 15 days of
comment before final action is taken. The NIH Director's final
decision/recommendation, along with responses to public comments, shall
be published in the Federal Register. The RAC and Institutional
Biosafety Committee Chairs shall be notified of the following
decisions:
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(a). Changing containment levels for types of
experiments that are specified in the NIH Guidelines when a Major
Action is involved;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(b). Assigning containment levels for types of
experiments that are not explicitly considered in the NIH Guidelines
when a Major Action is involved;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c). Promulgating and amending a list of
classes of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules to be exempt
from the NIH Guidelines because they consist entirely of DNA segments
from species that exchange DNA by known physiological processes or
otherwise do not present a significant risk to health or the
environment;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(d). Permitting experiments specified by
Section III-A, Experiments that Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee Approval, RAC Review, and NIH Director Approval Before
Initiation;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(e). Certifying new host-vector systems with
the exception of minor modifications of already certified systems (the
standards and procedures for certification are described in Appendix I-
II, Certification of Host-Vector Systems). Minor modifications
constitute (e.g., those of minimal or no consequence to the properties
relevant to containment); and
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(f). Adopting other changes in the NIH
Guidelines.
Section IV-C-1-b-(2). Minor Actions
NIH OSP shall carry out certain functions as delegated to it by the
NIH Director (see Section IV-C-3, Office of Science Policy). Minor
Actions (as determined by NIH OSP in consultation with the RAC Chair
and one or more RAC members, as necessary) will be transmitted to RAC
and Institutional Biosafety Committee Chairs:
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(a). Changing containment levels for
experiments that are specified in Section III, Experiments Covered by
the NIH Guidelines (except when a Major Action is involved);
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(b). Assigning containment levels for
experiments not explicitly considered in the NIH Guidelines;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(c). Revising the Classification of Etiologic
Agents for the purpose of these NIH Guidelines (see Section V-A,
Footnotes and References of Sections I-IV).
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(d). Interpreting the NIH Guidelines for
experiments to which the NIH Guidelines do not specifically assign
containment levels;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(e). Setting containment under Sections III-D-
1-d, Experiments Using Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group 4, or
Restricted Agents as Host-Vector Systems, and III-D-2-b, Experiments in
which DNA from Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group 4, or Restricted
Agents is Cloned into Nonpathogenic Prokaryotic or Lower Eukaryotic
Host-Vector Systems;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(f). Approving minor modifications of already
certified host-vector systems (the standards and procedures for such
modifications are described in Appendix I-II, Certification of Host-
Vector Systems);
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(g). Decertifying already certified host-
vector systems;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(h). Adding new entries to the list of
molecules toxic for vertebrates (see Appendix F, Containment Conditions
for Cloning of Genes Coding for the Biosynthesis of Molecules Toxic for
Vertebrates); and
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(i). Determining appropriate containment
conditions for experiments according to case precedents developed under
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(c).
Section IV-C is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-C. Responsibilities of the National Institutes of Health
(NIH)
Section IV-C-1. NIH Director
The NIH Director is responsible for: (i) Establishing the NIH
Guidelines, (ii) overseeing their implementation, and (iii) their final
interpretation. The NIH Director has responsibilities under the NIH
Guidelines that involve OSP. OSP's responsibilities under the NIH
Guidelines are administrative. In certain circumstances, there is
specific opportunity for public comment with published response prior
to final action.
Section IV-C-1-a. General Responsibilities
The NIH Director is responsible for:
Section IV-C-1-a-(1). Promulgating requirements as necessary to
implement the NIH Guidelines;
Section IV-C-1-a-(2). Establishing and maintaining NIH OSP to carry
out the responsibilities defined in Section IV-C-3, Office of Science
Policy;
Section IV-C-1-a-(3). Conducting and supporting training programs
in laboratory safety for Institutional Biosafety Committee members,
Biological Safety Officers and other institutional experts (if
applicable), Principal Investigators, and laboratory staff.
Section IV-C-1-b. Specific Responsibilities
In carrying out the responsibilities set forth in this section, the
NIH Director or a designee shall weigh each proposed action through
appropriate analysis and consultation to determine whether it complies
with the NIH Guidelines and presents no significant risk to health or
the environment.
[[Page 41090]]
Section IV-C-1-b-(1). Major Actions
To execute Major Actions, the NIH Director shall provide an
opportunity for public and Federal agency comment. The NIH Director's
decision/recommendation (at his/her discretion) may be published in the
Federal Register for 15 days of comment before final action is taken.
The NIH Director's final decision/recommendation, along with responses
to public comments, shall be published in the Federal Register.
Institutional Biosafety Committee Chairs shall be notified of the
following decisions:
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(a). Changing containment levels for types of
experiments that are specified in the NIH Guidelines when a Major
Action is involved;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(b). Assigning containment levels for types of
experiments that are not explicitly considered in the NIH Guidelines
when a Major Action is involved;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c). Promulgating and amending a list of
classes of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules to be exempt
from the NIH Guidelines because they consist entirely of DNA segments
from species that exchange DNA by known physiological processes or
otherwise do not present a significant risk to health or the
environment;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(d). Permitting experiments specified by
Section III-A, Experiments that Require Institutional Biosafety
Committee Approval, and NIH Director Approval Before Initiation;
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(e). Certifying new host-vector systems with
the exception of minor modifications (e.g., those of minimal or no
consequence to the properties relevant to containment) of already
certified systems (the standards and procedures for certification are
described in Appendix I-II, Certification of Host-Vector Systems; and
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(f). Adopting other changes in the NIH
Guidelines.
Section IV-C-1-b-(2). Minor Actions
NIH OSP shall carry out certain functions as delegated to it by the
NIH Director (see Section IV-C-3, Office of Science Policy). Minor
Actions will be transmitted to Institutional Biosafety Committee
Chairs:
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(a). Changing containment levels for
experiments that are specified in Section III, Experiments Covered by
the NIH Guidelines (except when a Major Action is involved);
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(b). Assigning containment levels for
experiments not explicitly considered in the NIH Guidelines;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(c). Revising the Classification of Etiologic
Agents for the purpose of these NIH Guidelines (see Section V-A,
Footnotes and References of Sections I-IV).
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(d). Interpreting the NIH Guidelines for
experiments to which the NIH Guidelines do not specifically assign
containment levels;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(e). Setting containment under Sections III-D-
1-d, Experiments Using Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group 4, or
Restricted Agents as Host-Vector Systems, and III-D-2-b, Experiments in
which DNA from Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group 4, or Restricted
Agents is Cloned into Nonpathogenic Prokaryotic or Lower Eukaryotic
Host-Vector Systems;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(f). Approving minor modifications of already
certified host-vector systems (the standards and procedures for such
modifications are described in Appendix I-II, Certification of Host-
Vector Systems);
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(g). Decertifying already certified host-
vector systems;
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(h). Adding new entries to the list of
molecules toxic for vertebrates (see Appendix F, Containment Conditions
for Cloning of Genes Coding for the Biosynthesis of Molecules Toxic for
Vertebrates); and
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(i). Determining appropriate containment
conditions for experiments according to case precedents developed under
Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(c).
Section IV-C-2. Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) is
proposed to be deleted in its entirety.
Section IV-C-3. Office of Science Policy (OSP) is proposed to be
amended as follows:
Sections IV-C-3-a through IV-C-3-f are proposed to be deleted in
their entirety. Section IV-C-3-h is proposed to be deleted in its
entirety. Section IV-C-3-g will be renumbered to Section IV-C-3-a.
Section IV-C-i will be renumbered to Section IV-C-3-b; Section IV-C-3-
i-(1), Section IV-C-3-i-(2) and Section IV-C-3-i-(3) are proposed to be
deleted in their entirety. Section IV-C-3-j will be renumbered to
Section IV-C-3-c.
Section IV-C-3 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-C-3. Office of Science Policy (OSP)
OSP shall serve as a focal point for information on recombinant or
synthetic nucleic acid molecule activities and provide advice to all
within and outside NIH including institutions, Biological Safety
Officers, Principal Investigators, Federal agencies, state and local
governments, and institutions in the private sector. OSP shall carry
out such other functions as may be delegated to it by the NIH Director.
OSP's responsibilities include (but are not limited to) the following:
Section IV-C-3-a. Reviewing and approving experiments involving the
cloning of genes encoding for toxin molecules that are lethal for
vertebrates at an LD50 of less than or equal to 100
nanograms per kilogram body weight in organisms other than Escherichia
coli K-12 (see Section III-B-1, Experiments Involving the Cloning of
Toxin Molecules with LD50 of Less than 100 Nanograms Per Kilogram Body
Weight, Appendix F, Containment Conditions for Cloning of Genes Coding
for the Biosynthesis of Molecules Toxic for Vertebrates);
Section IV-C-3-b. Publishing in the Federal Register, as needed.
Section IV-C-3-c. Reviewing and approving the membership of an
institution's Institutional Biosafety Committee, and where it finds the
Institutional Biosafety Committee meets the requirements set forth in
Section IV-B-2, Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), giving its
approval to the Institutional Biosafety Committee membership.
Section IV-D-5 currently states:
Section IV-D-5. Protection of Proprietary Data--Voluntary Compliance
Section IV-D-5-a. General
In general, the Freedom of Information Act requires federal
agencies to make their records available to the public upon request.
However, this requirement does not apply to, among other things,
``trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is
obtained from a person and that is privileged or confidential.'' Under
18 U.S.C. 1905, it is a criminal offense for an officer or employee of
the U.S. or any federal department or agency to publish, divulge,
disclose, or make known ``in any manner or to any extent not authorized
by law any information coming to him in the course of his employment or
official duties or by reason of any examination or investigation made
by, or return, report or record made to or filed with, such department
or agency or officer or employee thereof, which information concerns or
relates to the trade secrets, (or) processes . . . of any person, firm,
partnership, corporation, or association.'' This provision applies to
all employees of the federal government, including special Government
[[Page 41091]]
employees. Members of RAC are ``special Government employees.''
Section IV-D-5 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section IV-D-5-a. General
In general, the Freedom of Information Act requires federal
agencies to make their records available to the public upon request.
However, this requirement does not apply to, among other things,
``trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is
obtained from a person and that is privileged or confidential.'' Under
18 U.S.C. 1905, it is a criminal offense for an officer or employee of
the United States or any federal department or agency to publish,
divulge, disclose, or make known ``in any manner or to any extent not
authorized by law any information coming to him in the course of his
employment or official duties or by reason of any examination or
investigation made by, or return, report or record made to or filed
with, such department or agency or officer or employee thereof, which
information concerns or relates to the trade secrets, (or) processes .
. . of any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or association.''
This provision applies to all employees of the federal government,
including special Government employees.
None of the other sub-sections under Section IV are proposed to be
amended.
Section V currently states:
Section V. Footnotes and References of Sections I through IV
Section V-A. The NIH Director, with advice of the RAC, may revise
the classification for the purposes of the NIH Guidelines (see Section
IV-C-1-b-(2)-(e), Minor Actions). The revised list of organisms in each
Risk Group is reprinted in Appendix B, Classification of Human
Etiologic Agents on the Basis of Hazard.
Section V-B. Section III, Experiments Covered by the NIH
Guidelines, describes a number of places where judgments are to be
made. In all these cases, the Principal Investigator shall make the
judgment on these matters as part of his/her responsibility to ``make
the initial determination of the required levels of physical and
biological containment in accordance with the NIH Guidelines'' (see
Section IV-B-7-c-(1)). For cases falling under Sections III-A through
III-E, Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines, this judgment is to
be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee as
part of its responsibility to make an ``independent assessment of the
containment levels required by the NIH Guidelines for the proposed
research'' (see Section IV-B-2-b-(1), Institutional Biosafety
Committee). The Institutional Biosafety Committee may refer specific
cases to NIH OSP as part of NIH OSP's functions to ``provide advice to
all within and outside NIH'' (see Section IV-C-3). NIH OSP may request
advice from the RAC as part of the RAC's responsibility for
``interpreting the NIH Guidelines for experiments to which the NIH
Guidelines do not specifically assign containment levels'' (see Section
IV-C-1-b-(2)-(f), Minor Actions).
Section V is proposed to be amended as follows:
Section V-A. The NIH Director may revise the classification for the
purposes of the NIH Guidelines (see Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(e), Minor
Actions). The revised list of organisms in each Risk Group is reprinted
in Appendix B, Classification of Human Etiologic Agents on the Basis of
Hazard.
Section V-B. Section III, Experiments Covered by the NIH
Guidelines, describes a number of places where judgments are to be
made. In all these cases, the Principal Investigator shall make the
judgment on these matters as part of his/her responsibility to ``make
the initial determination of the required levels of physical and
biological containment in accordance with the NIH Guidelines'' (see
Section IV-B-7-c-(1)). For cases falling under Sections III-A through
III-E, Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines, this judgment is to
be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee as
part of its responsibility to make an ``independent assessment of the
containment levels required by the NIH Guidelines for the proposed
research'' (see Section IV-B-2-b-(1), Institutional Biosafety
Committee). The Institutional Biosafety Committee may refer specific
cases to NIH OSP as part of NIH OSP's functions to ``provide advice to
all within and outside NIH'' (see Section IV-C-3).
Appendix A currently states:
Appendix A. Exemptions Under Section III-F-6--Sublists of Natural
Exchangers
Certain specified recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules that consist entirely of DNA segments from different
species that exchange DNA by known physiological processes, though
one or more of the segments may be a synthetic equivalent are exempt
from these NIH Guidelines (see Section III-F-6, Exempt Experiments).
Institutional Biosafety Committee registration is not required for
these exempt experiments. A list of such exchangers will be prepared
and periodically revised by the NIH Director with advice from the
RAC after appropriate notice and opportunity for public comment (see
Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-(c), NIH Director--Specific Responsibilities).
For a list of natural exchangers that are exempt from the NIH
Guidelines, see Appendices A-I through A-VI, Exemptions under
Section III-F-6 Sublists of Natural Exchangers. Section III-F-6,
Exempt Experiments, describes recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules that are: (1) Composed entirely of DNA segments from one
or more of the organisms within a sublist, and (2) to be propagated
in any of the organisms within a sublist (see Classification of
Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology; 8th edition, R.E.
Buchanan and N.E. Gibbons, editors, Williams and Wilkins Company;
Baltimore, Maryland 1984). Although these experiments are exempt, it
is recommended that they be performed at the appropriate biosafety
level for the host or recombinant/synthetic organism (see Biosafety
in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 5th edition, 2007,
U.S. DHHS, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and NIH Office of Biosafety, Bethesda,
Maryland).
Appendix A is proposed to be amended as follows:
Appendix A. Exemptions Under Section III-F-6--Sublists of Natural
Exchangers
Certain specified recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid
molecules that consist entirely of DNA segments from different
species that exchange DNA by known physiological processes, though
one or more of the segments may be a synthetic equivalent are exempt
from these NIH Guidelines (see Section III-F-6, Exempt Experiments).
Institutional Biosafety Committee registration is not required for
these exempt experiments. A list of such exchangers will be prepared
and periodically revised by the NIH Director after appropriate
notice and opportunity for public comment (see Section IV-C-1-b-(1)-
(c), NIH Director--Specific Responsibilities. For a list of natural
exchangers that are exempt from the NIH Guidelines, see Appendices
A-I through A-VI, Exemptions under Section III-F-6 Sublists of
Natural Exchangers. Section III-F-6, Exempt Experiments, describes
recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules that are: (1)
Composed entirely of DNA segments from one or more of the organisms
within a sublist, and (2) to be propagated in any of the organisms
within a sublist (see Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology;
2nd edition, Springer-Verlag; New York, NY). Although these
experiments are exempt, it is recommended that they be performed at
the appropriate biosafety level for the host or recombinant/
synthetic organism (see Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical
Laboratories, 5th edition, 2007, U.S. DHHS, Public Health Service,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and
NIH Office of Biosafety, Bethesda, Maryland).
Appendix C-IX-A currently states:
Appendix C-IX-A
The NIH Director, with advice of the RAC, may revise the
classification for the purposes of these NIH Guidelines (see Section
IV-C-
[[Page 41092]]
1-b-(2)-(b), Minor Actions). The revised list of organisms in each
Risk Group is located in Appendix B.
Appendix C-IX-A is proposed to be amended as follows:
Appendix C-IX-A
The NIH Director may revise the classification for the purposes
of these NIH Guidelines (see Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(b), Minor
Actions). The revised list of organisms in each Risk Group is
located in Appendix B.
None of the other sub-sections under Appendix C-IX. Footnotes and
References of Appendix C are proposed to be amended.
Appendix D currently states in part:
Appendix D. Major Actions Taken Under the NIH Guidelines
As noted in the subsections of Section IV-C-1-b-(1), the
Director, NIH, may take certain actions with regard to the NIH
Guidelines after the issues have been considered by the RAC. Some of
the actions taken to date include the following:
Appendix D is proposed to be amended as follows:
Appendix D. Major Actions Taken Under the NIH Guidelines
As noted in the subsections of Section IV-C-1-b-(1), the
Director, NIH, may take certain actions with regard to the NIH
Guidelines. (Entries up to and including D-118 were approved using a
process that involved the RAC.) Some of the actions taken to date
include the following:
Appendix I-II currently states:
Appendix I-II. Certification of Host-Vector Systems
Appendix I-II-A. Responsibility
Host-Vector 1 systems (other than Escherichia coli K-12) and
Host-Vector 2 systems may not be designated as such until they have
been certified by the NIH Director. Requests for certification of
host-vector systems may be submitted to the Office of Science
Policy, National Institutes of Health, preferably by email to:
[email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov). Proposed
host-vector systems will be reviewed by the RAC (see Section IV-C-1-
b-(1)-(f), Major Actions). Initial review will based on the
construction, properties, and testing of the proposed host-vector
system by a subcommittee composed of one or more RAC members and/or
ad hoc experts. The RAC will evaluate the subcommittee's report and
any other available information at the next scheduled RAC meeting.
The NIH Director is responsible for certification of host-vector
systems, following advice of the RAC. Minor modifications to
existing host-vector systems (i.e., those that are of minimal or no
consequence to the properties relevant to containment) may be
certified by the NIH Director without prior RAC review (see Section
IV-C-1-b-(2)-(f), Minor Actions). Once a host-vector system has been
certified by the NIH Director, a notice of certification will be
sent by NIH OSP to the applicant and to the Institutional Biosafety
Committee Chairs. A list of all currently certified host-vector
systems is available from the Office of Science Policy, National
Institutes of Health, preferably by submitting a request for this
information to: [email protected]; additional contact
information is also available here and on the OSP website
(www.osp.od.nih.gov). The NIH Director may rescind the certification
of a host-vector system (see Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(g), Minor
Actions). If certification is rescinded, NIH will instruct
investigators to transfer cloned DNA into a different system or use
the clones at a higher level of physical containment level, unless
NIH determines that the already constructed clones incorporate
adequate biological containment. Certification of a host-vector
system does not extend to modifications of either the host or vector
component of that system. Such modified systems shall be
independently certified by the NIH Director. If modifications are
minor, it may only be necessary for the investigator to submit data
showing that the modifications have either improved or not impaired
the major phenotypic traits on which the containment of the system
depends. Substantial modifications to a certified host-vector system
requires submission of complete testing data.
Appendix I-II-B. Data To Be Submitted for Certification
Appendix I-II-B-1. Host-Vector 1 Systems Other than Escherichia coli K-
12
The following types of data shall be submitted, modified as
appropriate for the particular system under consideration: (i) A
description of the organism and vector; the strain's natural habitat
and growth requirements; its physiological properties, particularly
those related to its reproduction, survival, and the mechanisms by
which it exchanges genetic information; the range of organisms with
which this organism normally exchanges genetic information and the
type of information is exchanged; and any relevant information about
its pathogenicity or toxicity; (ii) a description of the history of
the particular strains and vectors to be used, including data on any
mutations which render this organism less able to survive or
transmit genetic information; and (iii) a general description of the
range of experiments contemplated with emphasis on the need for
developing such an Host-Vector 1 system.
Appendix I-II-B-2. Host-Vector 2 Systems
Investigators planning to request Host-Vector 2 systems
certification may obtain instructions from NIH OSP concerning data
to be submitted (see Appendices I-III-N and O, Footnotes and
References of Appendix I). In general, the following types of data
are required: (i) Description of construction steps with indication
of source, properties, and manner of introduction of genetic traits;
(ii) quantitative data on the stability of genetic traits that
contribute to the containment of the system; (iii) data on the
survival of the host-vector system under non-permissive laboratory
conditions designed to represent the relevant natural environment;
(iv) data on transmissibility of the vector and/or a cloned DNA
fragment under both permissive and non-permissive conditions; (v)
data on all other properties of the system which affect containment
and utility, including information on yields of phage or plasmid
molecules, ease of DNA isolation, and ease of transfection or
transformation; and (vi) in some cases, the investigator may be
asked to submit data on survival and vector transmissibility from
experiments in which the host-vector is fed to laboratory animals or
one or more human subjects. Such in vivo data may be required to
confirm the validity of predicting in vivo survival on the basis of
in vitro experiments. Data shall be submitted 12 weeks prior to the
RAC meeting at which such data will be considered by the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health, preferably by email
to: [email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Investigators are encouraged to publish their data on the
construction, properties, and testing of proposed Host Vector 2
systems prior to consideration of the system by the RAC and its
subcommittee. Specific instructions concerning the submission of
data for proposed Escherichia coli K-12 Host-Vector 2 system (EK2)
involving either plasmids or bacteriophage in Escherichia coli K-12,
are available from the Office of Science Policy, National Institutes
of Health, preferably by submitting a request for this information
to: [email protected];additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Appendix I-II is proposed to be amended as follows:
Appendix I-II. Certification of Host-Vector Systems
Appendix I-II-A. Responsibility
Host-Vector 1 systems (other than Escherichia coli K-12) and
Host-Vector 2 systems may not be designated as such until they have
been certified by the NIH Director. Requests for certification of
host-vector systems may be submitted to the Office of Science
Policy, National Institutes of Health, preferably by email to:
[email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov). Proposed
host-vector systems will be reviewed based on the construction,
properties, and testing of the proposed host-vector system by ad hoc
experts. The NIH Director is responsible for certification of host-
vector systems. Once a host-vector system has been certified by the
NIH Director, a notice of certification will be sent by NIH OSP to
the applicant and to the Institutional Biosafety Committee Chairs. A
list of all currently certified host-vector systems is available
from the Office of Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by submitting a request for this information to:
[email protected];
[[Page 41093]]
additional contact information is also available here and on the OSP
website (www.osp.od.nih.gov). The NIH Director may rescind the
certification of a host-vector system (see Section IV-C-1-b-(2)-(g),
Minor Actions). If certification is rescinded, NIH will instruct
investigators to transfer cloned DNA into a different system or use
the clones at a higher level of physical containment level, unless
NIH determines that the already constructed clones incorporate
adequate biological containment. Certification of a host-vector
system does not extend to modifications of either the host or vector
component of that system. Such modified systems shall be
independently certified by the NIH Director. If modifications are
minor, it may only be necessary for the investigator to submit data
showing that the modifications have either improved or not impaired
the major phenotypic traits on which the containment of the system
depends. Substantial modifications to a certified host-vector system
requires submission of complete testing data.
Appendix I-II-B. Data To Be Submitted for Certification
Appendix I-II-B-1. Host-Vector 1 Systems Other than Escherichia coli K-
12
The following types of data shall be submitted, modified as
appropriate for the particular system under consideration: (i) A
description of the organism and vector; the strain's natural habitat
and growth requirements; its physiological properties, particularly
those related to its reproduction, survival, and the mechanisms by
which it exchanges genetic information; the range of organisms with
which this organism normally exchanges genetic information and the
type of information is exchanged; and any relevant information about
its pathogenicity or toxicity; (ii) a description of the history of
the particular strains and vectors to be used, including data on any
mutations which render this organism less able to survive or
transmit genetic information; and (iii) a general description of the
range of experiments contemplated with emphasis on the need for
developing such an Host-Vector 1 system.
Appendix I-II-B-2. Host-Vector 2 Systems
Investigators planning to request Host-Vector 2 systems
certification may obtain instructions from NIH OSP concerning data
to be submitted (see Appendices I-III-N and O, Footnotes and
References of Appendix I). In general, the following types of data
are required: (i) Description of construction steps with indication
of source, properties, and manner of introduction of genetic traits;
(ii) quantitative data on the stability of genetic traits that
contribute to the containment of the system; (iii) data on the
survival of the host-vector system under non-permissive laboratory
conditions designed to represent the relevant natural environment;
(iv) data on transmissibility of the vector and/or a cloned DNA
fragment under both permissive and non-permissive conditions; (v)
data on all other properties of the system which affect containment
and utility, including information on yields of phage or plasmid
molecules, ease of DNA isolation, and ease of transfection or
transformation; and (vi) in some cases, the investigator may be
asked to submit data on survival and vector transmissibility from
experiments in which the host-vector is fed to laboratory animals or
one or more human subjects. Such in vivo data may be required to
confirm the validity of predicting in vivo survival on the basis of
in vitro experiments. Data shall be submitted to the Office of
Science Policy, National Institutes of Health, preferably by email
to: [email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Investigators are encouraged to publish their data on the
construction, properties, and testing of proposed Host Vector 2
systems prior to consideration of the system by NIH. Specific
instructions concerning the submission of data for proposed
Escherichia coli K-12 Host-Vector 2 system (EK2) involving either
plasmids or bacteriophage in Escherichia coli K-12, are available
from the Office of Science Policy, National Institutes of Health,
preferably by submitting a request for this information to:
[email protected]; additional contact information is also
available here and on the OSP website (www.osp.od.nih.gov).
Appendix L, GENE THERAPY POLICY CONFERENCES (GTPCS), is proposed to
be deleted in its entirety.
Appendix M, Points to Consider in the Design and Submission of
Protocols for the Transfer of Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid
Molecules into One or More Human Research Participants (Points to
Consider), is proposed to be deleted in its entirety.
Dated: August 7, 2018.
Lawrence A. Tabak,
Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2018-17760 Filed 8-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P