World Trade Center Health Program; Petition 019-Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Finding of Insufficient Evidence, 41039-41041 [2018-17711]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, and
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 13, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2018–17805 Filed 8–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2017–0414; FRL–9981–82]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 27
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). The chemical substances are
subject to Orders issued by EPA
pursuant to section 5(e) of TSCA. This
action would require persons who
intend to manufacture (defined by
statute to include import) or process any
of these 27 chemical substances for an
activity that is designated as a
significant new use by these rules to
notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity. The required
notification initiates EPA’s evaluation of
the intended use within the applicable
review period. Persons may not
commence manufacture or processing
for the significant new use until EPA
has conducted a review of the notice,
made an appropriate determination on
the notification, and has taken such
actions as are required with that
determination. In addition to this notice
of proposed rulemaking, EPA is issuing
the action as a direct final rule
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before September 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2017–0414, by
one of the following methods:
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact:
Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–9232;
email address: moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
In
addition to this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, EPA is issuing the action
as a direct final rule elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. For further
information about the proposed
significant new use rules, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, with the same title, that is
located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this issue of the Federal
Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 3, 2018.
Mark A. Hartman,
Acting Director, Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2018–17349 Filed 8–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41039
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 88
[NIOSH Docket 094]
World Trade Center Health Program;
Petition 019—Irritable Bowel
Syndrome; Finding of Insufficient
Evidence
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, HHS.
AGENCY:
Denial of petition for addition of
a health condition.
ACTION:
On May 17, 2018, the
Administrator of the World Trade
Center (WTC) Health Program received
a petition (Petition 019) to add irritable
bowel syndrome (IBS) to the List of
WTC-Related Health Conditions (List).
Upon reviewing the scientific and
medical literature, including
information provided by the petitioner,
the Administrator has determined that
the available evidence does not have the
potential to provide a basis for a
decision on whether to add IBS to the
List. The Administrator also finds that
insufficient evidence exists to request a
recommendation of the WTC Health
Program Scientific/Technical Advisory
Committee (STAC), to publish a
proposed rule, or to publish a
determination not to publish a proposed
rule.
SUMMARY:
The Administrator of the WTC
Health Program is denying this petition
for the addition of a health condition as
of August 17, 2018.
DATES:
Visit the WTC Health
Program website at https://
www.cdc.gov/wtc/received.html to
review Petition 019.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090
Tusculum Avenue, MS: C–48,
Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855)
818–1629 (this is a toll-free number);
email NIOSHregs@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
A. WTC Health Program Statutory Authority
B. Procedures for Evaluating a Petition
C. Petition 019
D. Review of Scientific and Medical
Information and Administrator
Determination
E. Administrator’s Final Decision on Whether
To Propose the Addition of IBS to the
List
F. Approval To Submit Document to the
Office of the Federal Register
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
41040
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
A. WTC Health Program Statutory
Authority
Title I of the James Zadroga 9/11
Health and Compensation Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111–347, as amended by Pub.
L. 114–113), added Title XXXIII to the
Public Health Service (PHS) Act,1
establishing the WTC Health Program
within the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS). The WTC
Health Program provides medical
monitoring and treatment benefits to
eligible firefighters and related
personnel, law enforcement officers,
and rescue, recovery, and cleanup
workers who responded to the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in
New York City, at the Pentagon, and in
Shanksville, Pennsylvania (responders),
and to eligible persons who were
present in the dust or dust cloud on
September 11, 2001, or who worked,
resided, or attended school, childcare,
or adult daycare in the New York City
disaster area (survivors).
All references to the Administrator of
the WTC Health Program
(Administrator) in this document mean
the Director of the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) or his designee.
Pursuant to section 3312(a)(6)(B) of
the PHS Act, interested parties may
petition the Administrator to add a
health condition to the List in 42 CFR
88.15. Within 90 days after receipt of a
valid petition to add a condition to the
List, the Administrator must take one of
the following four actions described in
section 3312(a)(6)(B) of the PHS Act and
§ 88.16(a)(2) of the Program regulations:
(1) Request a recommendation of the
STAC; (2) publish a proposed rule in the
Federal Register to add such health
condition; (3) publish in the Federal
Register the Administrator’s
determination not to publish such a
proposed rule and the basis for such
determination; or (4) publish in the
Federal Register a determination that
insufficient evidence exists to take
action under (1) through (3) above.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
B. Procedures for Evaluating a Petition
In addition to the regulatory
provisions, the WTC Health Program
has developed policies to guide the
review of submissions and petitions,2 as
well as the analysis of evidence
supporting the potential addition of a
non-cancer health condition to the List.3
A valid petition must include
sufficient medical basis for the
association between the September 11,
2001, terrorist attacks and the health
condition to be added; in accordance
with WTC Health Program policy,
reference to a peer-reviewed, published,
epidemiologic study about the health
condition among 9/11-exposed
populations or to clinical case reports of
health conditions in WTC responders or
survivors may demonstrate the required
medical basis.4 Studies linking 9/11
agents to the petitioned health condition
may also provide sufficient medical
basis for a valid petition.
After the Program has determined that
a petition is valid, the Administrator
must direct the Program to conduct a
review of the scientific literature to
determine if the available scientific
information has the potential to provide
a basis for a decision on whether to add
the health condition to the List.5 The
literature review includes a search for
peer-reviewed, published,
epidemiologic studies (including direct
observational studies in the case of
health conditions such as injuries) about
the health condition among 9/11exposed populations. The Program
evaluates the scientific quality of each
peer-reviewed, published,
epidemiologic study of the health
condition identified in the literature
search; the Program then compiles the
scientific results of each study to assess
whether a causal relationship between
9/11 exposures and the health condition
is supported, and evaluates whether the
results of the studies are representative
of the 9/11-exposed population of
responders and survivors. A health
condition may be added to the List if
peer-reviewed, published,
epidemiologic studies provide support
that the health condition is substantially
likely 6 to be causally associated with 9/
11 exposures. If the evaluation of
evidence provided in peer-reviewed,
published, epidemiologic studies of the
health condition in 9/11 populations
demonstrates a high, but not substantial,
likelihood of a causal association
between the 9/11 exposures and the
1 Title XXXIII of the PHS Act is codified at 42
U.S.C. 300mm to 300mm–61. Those portions of the
James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act
of 2010 found in Titles II and III of Public Law 111–
347 do not pertain to the WTC Health Program and
are codified elsewhere.
2 See WTC Health Program [2014], Policy and
Procedures for Handling Submissions and Petitions
to Add a Health Condition to the List of WTCRelated Health Conditions, May 14, 2014, https://
www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHPPPPetitionHandling
Procedures14May2014.pdf.
3 See WTC Health Program [2017], Policy and
Procedures for Adding Non-Cancer Conditions to
the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions,
February 14, 2017, https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/
WTCHP_PP_Adding_NonCancers_14_February_
2017.pdf.
4 See supra note 2.
5 See supra note 3.
6 The ‘‘substantially likely’’ standard is met when
the scientific evidence, taken as a whole,
demonstrates a strong relationship between the 9/
11 exposures and the health condition.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
health condition, then the
Administrator may consider additional
highly relevant scientific evidence
regarding exposures to 9/11 agents 7
from sources using non-9/11-exposed
populations. If that additional
assessment establishes that the health
condition is substantially likely to be
causally associated with 9/11 exposures
among 9/11-exposed populations, the
health condition may be added to the
List.
C. Petition 019
On May 17, 2018, the Administrator
received a petition (Petition 019) from a
WTC survivor who was caught in the
dust cloud near Ground Zero, requesting
the addition of ‘‘irritable bowel
syndrome (IBS)’’ to the List.8 The
petition included one scientific article,
by Marynowski et al. [2015],9 reviewing
the findings of peer-reviewed, published
epidemiologic studies concerning the
association of IBS with environmental
pollution (including particulate matter,
a 9/11 agent). Although the Marynowski
article on its own did not provide a
sufficient medical basis for the
submission to be considered a valid
petition, the article referenced a peerreviewed, published study by Kaplan et
al. [2012] 10 regarding IBS symptoms in
non-9/11-exposed populations. Kaplan
et al. conducted an epidemiologic study
to evaluate the association between
daily concentrations of air pollutants,
including particulate matter, with
emergency department visits for nonspecific abdominal pain, a symptom
necessary for a diagnosis of IBS. The
inclusion of a reference to this study
provides sufficient medical basis for the
submission to be considered a valid
petition.
D. Review of Scientific and Medical
Information and Administrator
Determination
In response to Petition 019, and
pursuant to the Program policy on the
7 9/11 agents are chemical, physical, biological, or
other hazards reported in a published, peerreviewed exposure assessment study of responders,
recovery workers, or survivors who were present in
the New York City disaster area, or at the Pentagon
site, or the Shanksville, Pennsylvania site, as those
locations are defined in 42 CFR 88.1, as well as
those hazards not identified in a published, peerreviewed exposure assessment study, but which are
reasonably assumed to have been present at any of
the three sites.
8 See Petition 019, WTC Health Program: Petitions
Received, https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/received.html.
9 Marynowski M, Likonska A, Zatorski H, Fichna
´
J [2015], Role of Environmental Pollution in Irritable
Bowel Syndrome, World J Gastroentero
21(40):11371–11378.
10 Kaplan GG, Szyszkowicz M, Fichna J, Rowe
BH, Porada E, Vincent R, Madsen K, Ghosh S, Storr
M [2012], Non-Specific Abdominal Pain and Air
Pollution: A Novel Association, PLOS ONE 7(10).
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
addition of non-cancer health
conditions to the List,11 the Program
conducted a review of the scientific
literature on IBS.12 The Program was
unable to identify any references to the
petitioned health condition, IBS, in 9/
11-exposed populations for further
scientific evaluation based on the
literature search. Since Kaplan et al.
[2012] is not an epidemiologic study of
IBS in 9/11-exposed populations, it does
not meet the threshold for evaluation
established in Program policy; therefore,
the article was not further reviewed.
E. Administrator’s Final Decision on
Whether To Propose the Addition of
IBS to the List
The Administrator has determined
that insufficient evidence is available to
11 Supra
note 3.
searched include: CINAHL, Embase,
NIOSHTIC–2, ProQuest Health & Safety, PsycINFO,
PubMed, Scopus, and Toxicology Abstracts/
TOXLINE.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
12 Databases
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Aug 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
take further action at this time,
including proposing the addition of IBS
to the List (pursuant to PHS Act, sec.
3312(a)(6)(B)(ii) and 42 CFR
88.16(a)(2)(ii)) or publishing a
determination not to publish a proposed
rule in the Federal Register (pursuant to
PHS Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(iii) and 42
CFR 88.16(a)(2)(iii)). The Administrator
has also determined that requesting a
recommendation from the STAC
(pursuant to PHS Act, sec.
3312(a)(6)(B)(i) and 42 CFR
88.16(a)(2)(i)) is unwarranted.
For the reasons discussed above, the
Petition 019 request to add IBS to the
List of WTC-Related Health Conditions
is denied.
F. Approval To Submit Document to the
Office of the Federal Register
The Secretary, HHS, or his designee,
the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) and
Administrator, Agency for Toxic
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
41041
Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), authorized the undersigned,
the Administrator of the WTC Health
Program, to sign and submit the
document to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication as an official
document of the WTC Health Program.
Robert Redfield M.D., Director, CDC,
and Administrator, ATSDR, approved
this document for publication on
August 10, 2018.
Dated: August 10, 2018.
Frank J. Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Delegated
the duties of the Administrator, World Trade
Center Health Program and Director, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2018–17711 Filed 8–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 160 (Friday, August 17, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41039-41041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17711]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 88
[NIOSH Docket 094]
World Trade Center Health Program; Petition 019--Irritable Bowel
Syndrome; Finding of Insufficient Evidence
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Denial of petition for addition of a health condition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On May 17, 2018, the Administrator of the World Trade Center
(WTC) Health Program received a petition (Petition 019) to add
irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) to the List of WTC-Related Health
Conditions (List). Upon reviewing the scientific and medical
literature, including information provided by the petitioner, the
Administrator has determined that the available evidence does not have
the potential to provide a basis for a decision on whether to add IBS
to the List. The Administrator also finds that insufficient evidence
exists to request a recommendation of the WTC Health Program
Scientific/Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), to publish a proposed
rule, or to publish a determination not to publish a proposed rule.
DATES: The Administrator of the WTC Health Program is denying this
petition for the addition of a health condition as of August 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Visit the WTC Health Program website at https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/received.html to review Petition 019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090
Tusculum Avenue, MS: C-48, Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855) 818-
1629 (this is a toll-free number); email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
A. WTC Health Program Statutory Authority
B. Procedures for Evaluating a Petition
C. Petition 019
D. Review of Scientific and Medical Information and Administrator
Determination
E. Administrator's Final Decision on Whether To Propose the Addition
of IBS to the List
F. Approval To Submit Document to the Office of the Federal Register
[[Page 41040]]
A. WTC Health Program Statutory Authority
Title I of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of
2010 (Pub. L. 111-347, as amended by Pub. L. 114-113), added Title
XXXIII to the Public Health Service (PHS) Act,\1\ establishing the WTC
Health Program within the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS). The WTC Health Program provides medical monitoring and treatment
benefits to eligible firefighters and related personnel, law
enforcement officers, and rescue, recovery, and cleanup workers who
responded to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York
City, at the Pentagon, and in Shanksville, Pennsylvania (responders),
and to eligible persons who were present in the dust or dust cloud on
September 11, 2001, or who worked, resided, or attended school,
childcare, or adult daycare in the New York City disaster area
(survivors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Title XXXIII of the PHS Act is codified at 42 U.S.C. 300mm
to 300mm-61. Those portions of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and
Compensation Act of 2010 found in Titles II and III of Public Law
111-347 do not pertain to the WTC Health Program and are codified
elsewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All references to the Administrator of the WTC Health Program
(Administrator) in this document mean the Director of the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) or his designee.
Pursuant to section 3312(a)(6)(B) of the PHS Act, interested
parties may petition the Administrator to add a health condition to the
List in 42 CFR 88.15. Within 90 days after receipt of a valid petition
to add a condition to the List, the Administrator must take one of the
following four actions described in section 3312(a)(6)(B) of the PHS
Act and Sec. 88.16(a)(2) of the Program regulations: (1) Request a
recommendation of the STAC; (2) publish a proposed rule in the Federal
Register to add such health condition; (3) publish in the Federal
Register the Administrator's determination not to publish such a
proposed rule and the basis for such determination; or (4) publish in
the Federal Register a determination that insufficient evidence exists
to take action under (1) through (3) above.
B. Procedures for Evaluating a Petition
In addition to the regulatory provisions, the WTC Health Program
has developed policies to guide the review of submissions and
petitions,\2\ as well as the analysis of evidence supporting the
potential addition of a non-cancer health condition to the List.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See WTC Health Program [2014], Policy and Procedures for
Handling Submissions and Petitions to Add a Health Condition to the
List of WTC-Related Health Conditions, May 14, 2014, https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHPPPPetitionHandlingProcedures14May2014.pdf.
\3\ See WTC Health Program [2017], Policy and Procedures for
Adding Non-Cancer Conditions to the List of WTC-Related Health
Conditions, February 14, 2017, https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHP_PP_Adding_NonCancers_14_February_2017.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A valid petition must include sufficient medical basis for the
association between the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the
health condition to be added; in accordance with WTC Health Program
policy, reference to a peer-reviewed, published, epidemiologic study
about the health condition among 9/11-exposed populations or to
clinical case reports of health conditions in WTC responders or
survivors may demonstrate the required medical basis.\4\ Studies
linking 9/11 agents to the petitioned health condition may also provide
sufficient medical basis for a valid petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See supra note 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the Program has determined that a petition is valid, the
Administrator must direct the Program to conduct a review of the
scientific literature to determine if the available scientific
information has the potential to provide a basis for a decision on
whether to add the health condition to the List.\5\ The literature
review includes a search for peer-reviewed, published, epidemiologic
studies (including direct observational studies in the case of health
conditions such as injuries) about the health condition among 9/11-
exposed populations. The Program evaluates the scientific quality of
each peer-reviewed, published, epidemiologic study of the health
condition identified in the literature search; the Program then
compiles the scientific results of each study to assess whether a
causal relationship between 9/11 exposures and the health condition is
supported, and evaluates whether the results of the studies are
representative of the 9/11-exposed population of responders and
survivors. A health condition may be added to the List if peer-
reviewed, published, epidemiologic studies provide support that the
health condition is substantially likely \6\ to be causally associated
with 9/11 exposures. If the evaluation of evidence provided in peer-
reviewed, published, epidemiologic studies of the health condition in
9/11 populations demonstrates a high, but not substantial, likelihood
of a causal association between the 9/11 exposures and the health
condition, then the Administrator may consider additional highly
relevant scientific evidence regarding exposures to 9/11 agents \7\
from sources using non-9/11-exposed populations. If that additional
assessment establishes that the health condition is substantially
likely to be causally associated with 9/11 exposures among 9/11-exposed
populations, the health condition may be added to the List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See supra note 3.
\6\ The ``substantially likely'' standard is met when the
scientific evidence, taken as a whole, demonstrates a strong
relationship between the 9/11 exposures and the health condition.
\7\ 9/11 agents are chemical, physical, biological, or other
hazards reported in a published, peer-reviewed exposure assessment
study of responders, recovery workers, or survivors who were present
in the New York City disaster area, or at the Pentagon site, or the
Shanksville, Pennsylvania site, as those locations are defined in 42
CFR 88.1, as well as those hazards not identified in a published,
peer-reviewed exposure assessment study, but which are reasonably
assumed to have been present at any of the three sites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Petition 019
On May 17, 2018, the Administrator received a petition (Petition
019) from a WTC survivor who was caught in the dust cloud near Ground
Zero, requesting the addition of ``irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)'' to
the List.\8\ The petition included one scientific article, by
Marynowski et al. [2015],\9\ reviewing the findings of peer-reviewed,
published epidemiologic studies concerning the association of IBS with
environmental pollution (including particulate matter, a 9/11 agent).
Although the Marynowski article on its own did not provide a sufficient
medical basis for the submission to be considered a valid petition, the
article referenced a peer-reviewed, published study by Kaplan et al.
[2012] \10\ regarding IBS symptoms in non-9/11-exposed populations.
Kaplan et al. conducted an epidemiologic study to evaluate the
association between daily concentrations of air pollutants, including
particulate matter, with emergency department visits for non-specific
abdominal pain, a symptom necessary for a diagnosis of IBS. The
inclusion of a reference to this study provides sufficient medical
basis for the submission to be considered a valid petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Petition 019, WTC Health Program: Petitions Received,
https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/received.html.
\9\ Marynowski M, Liko[nacute]ska A, Zatorski H, Fichna J
[2015], Role of Environmental Pollution in Irritable Bowel Syndrome,
World J Gastroentero 21(40):11371-11378.
\10\ Kaplan GG, Szyszkowicz M, Fichna J, Rowe BH, Porada E,
Vincent R, Madsen K, Ghosh S, Storr M [2012], Non-Specific Abdominal
Pain and Air Pollution: A Novel Association, PLOS ONE 7(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Review of Scientific and Medical Information and Administrator
Determination
In response to Petition 019, and pursuant to the Program policy on
the
[[Page 41041]]
addition of non-cancer health conditions to the List,\11\ the Program
conducted a review of the scientific literature on IBS.\12\ The Program
was unable to identify any references to the petitioned health
condition, IBS, in 9/11-exposed populations for further scientific
evaluation based on the literature search. Since Kaplan et al. [2012]
is not an epidemiologic study of IBS in 9/11-exposed populations, it
does not meet the threshold for evaluation established in Program
policy; therefore, the article was not further reviewed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Supra note 3.
\12\ Databases searched include: CINAHL, Embase, NIOSHTIC-2,
ProQuest Health & Safety, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Toxicology
Abstracts/TOXLINE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Administrator's Final Decision on Whether To Propose the Addition of
IBS to the List
The Administrator has determined that insufficient evidence is
available to take further action at this time, including proposing the
addition of IBS to the List (pursuant to PHS Act, sec.
3312(a)(6)(B)(ii) and 42 CFR 88.16(a)(2)(ii)) or publishing a
determination not to publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register
(pursuant to PHS Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(iii) and 42 CFR
88.16(a)(2)(iii)). The Administrator has also determined that
requesting a recommendation from the STAC (pursuant to PHS Act, sec.
3312(a)(6)(B)(i) and 42 CFR 88.16(a)(2)(i)) is unwarranted.
For the reasons discussed above, the Petition 019 request to add
IBS to the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions is denied.
F. Approval To Submit Document to the Office of the Federal Register
The Secretary, HHS, or his designee, the Director, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Administrator, Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), authorized the
undersigned, the Administrator of the WTC Health Program, to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication as an official document of the WTC Health Program. Robert
Redfield M.D., Director, CDC, and Administrator, ATSDR, approved this
document for publication on August 10, 2018.
Dated: August 10, 2018.
Frank J. Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Delegated the duties of the Administrator, World Trade Center Health
Program and Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of
Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2018-17711 Filed 8-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P