Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 40632-40634 [2018-17597]
Download as PDF
40632
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2018 / Notices
without a hearing aid when the
audiometric device is calibrated to
American National Standard (formerly
ASA Standard) Z24.5—1951.
49 CFR 391.41(b)(11) was adopted in
1970, with a revision in 1971 to allow
drivers to be qualified under this
standard while wearing a hearing aid,
35 FR 6458, 6463 (April 22, 1970) and
36 FR 12857 (July 3, 1971).
III. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this
proceeding. Vicky Johnson, of the
Minnesota Department of Safety wrote
that the Minnesota Department of Safety
has no objections to Gary T. Nagel
obtaining a hearing exemption.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b), FMCSA may grant an
exemption from the hearing standard in
49 CFR 391.41(b)(11) if the exemption is
likely to achieve an equivalent or greater
level of safety than would be achieved
without the exemption. The exemption
allows the applicants to operate CMVs
in interstate commerce.
The Agency’s decision regarding these
exemption applications is based on
current medical information and
literature, and the 2008 Evidence
Report, ‘‘Executive Summary on
Hearing, Vestibular Function and
Commercial Motor Driving Safety.’’ The
evidence report reached two
conclusions regarding the matter of
hearing loss and CMV driver safety: (1)
No studies that examined the
relationship between hearing loss and
crash risk exclusively among CMV
drivers were identified; and (2) evidence
from studies of the private driver’s
license holder population does not
support the contention that individuals
with hearing impairment are at an
increased risk for a crash. In addition,
the Agency reviewed each applicant’s
driving record found in the Commercial
Driver’s License Information System
(CDLIS), for commercial driver’s license
(CDL) holders, and inspections recorded
in the Motor Carrier Management
Information System (MCMIS). For nonCDL holders, the Agency reviewed the
driving records from the State Driver’s
Licensing Agency (SDLA). Each
applicant’s record demonstrated a safe
driving history. Based on an individual
assessment of each applicant that
focused on whether an equal or greater
level of safety is likely to be achieved by
permitting each of these drivers to drive
in interstate commerce as opposed to
restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce, the Agency
believes the drivers granted this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Aug 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
exemption have demonstrated that they
do not pose a risk to public safety.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in
each case exempting these applicants
from the hearing standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(11) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
IV. Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the
exemption are provided to the
applicants in the exemption document
and includes the following: (1) Each
driver must report any crashes or
accidents as defined in 49 CFR 390.5;
(2) each driver must report all citations
and convictions for disqualifying
offenses under 49 CFR part 383 and 49
CFR 391 to FMCSA; and (3) each driver
is prohibited from operating a
motorcoach or bus with passengers in
interstate commerce. The driver must
also have a copy of the exemption when
driving, for presentation to a duly
authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official. In addition, the
exemption does not exempt the
individual from meeting the applicable
CDL testing requirements.
V. Preemption
VI. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 30
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the
hearing standard, 49 CFR 391.41(b)(11),
subject to the requirements cited above:
Alan M. Bridgeford (NV)
Mataio Brown (MS)
Leroy Carter (OH)
Robert M. Cates (NM)
Rocky R. Chin (WA)
Ralph E. Craig (IL)
Cesar DeLeon (TX)
Brody DiPasquale (MD)
Edward J. Duhon (AL)
Lyle Eash (OH)
Richard R. Fisher (PA)
Kinberly I. Foss (CA)
Bradley Ledford (TN)
Dustin McFadden (TX)
Francisco M. Mendoza (CA)
Jack W. Mitchell (TX)
Eugene Mostepan (CA)
Steven Moorehead (OH)
Gary T. Nagel (MN)
Marcel Paul (WA)
Dexter E. Perez (WI)
Connie Ralston (GA)
Noble D. Reed (TX)
Kurt Sanders (VA)
David L. Schibilla (IL)
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Issued on: August 9, 2018
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–17607 Filed 8–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2018–0016]
During the period the exemption is in
effect, no State shall enforce any law or
regulation that conflicts with this
exemption with respect to a person
operating under the exemption.
PO 00000
Pamela Singleton (TX)
Robert W. Slate (NM)
Willine D. Smith (GA)
Michael R. Tayman (ME)
Jason R. Winemiller (IL)
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315,
each exemption will be valid for two
years from the effective date unless
revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if the
following occurs: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained prior to being granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and
31315.
Sfmt 4703
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denials.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to deny applications from 110
individuals who requested an
exemption from the vision standard in
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) to operate a CMV
in interstate commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64–224,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2018 / Notices
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov,
as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.
II. Background
FMCSA received applications from
110 individuals who requested an
exemption from the vision standard in
the FMCSRs.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of these applicants and concluded that
granting these exemptions would not
provide a level of safety that would be
equivalent to or greater than, the level
of safety that would be obtained by
complying with the regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
III. Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C.31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption if it
finds such an exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater then, the level
that would be achieved absent such an
exemption.
The Agency’s decision regarding these
exemption applications is based on the
eligibility criteria, the terms and
conditions for Federal exemptions, and
an individualized assessment of each
applicant’s medical information
provided by the applicant.
IV. Conclusion
The Agency has determined that these
applicants do not satisfy the criteria
eligibility or meet the terms and
conditions of the Federal exemption and
granting these exemptions would not
provide a level of safety that would be
equivalent to or greater than, the level
of safety that would be obtained by
complying with the regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10). Therefore, the 110
applicants in this notice have been
denied exemptions from the physical
qualification standards in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10).
Each applicant has, prior to this
notice, received a letter of final
disposition regarding his/her exemption
request. Those decision letters fully
outlined the basis for the denial and
constitute final action by the Agency.
This notice summarizes the Agency’s
recent denials as required under 49
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Aug 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by periodically
publishing names and reasons for
denial.
The following six applicants did not
have sufficient driving experience over
the past three years under normal
highway operating conditions:
Emma D. Hyde Howe (WA)
Wallace T. Kraus (IN)
Luis M. Perez-Francisco (NJ)
Darrell Potteiger (PA)
Jeffrey J. Winter (KS)
Scott E. Zinn (CA)
The following 35 applicants had no
experience operating a CMV:
Eurico F. Barbosa (MA)
Michael A. Barone (TX)
Celine Burgos (NJ)
Geovanny J. Cano-Cruz (NJ)
Luis Cardona (CA)
Eduardo Carrasco (AZ)
Nelson D. Carvalho (TX)
Sergio Chavez-Nunez (IL)
Jeffrey M. Colson (NY)
Hunter W. Cook (MS)
James F. Duffy (NJ)
Michael S. Engel (CO)
David W. Frieze (MN)
Christopher D. Gilbert (ND)
Jose S. Hernandez (TX)
Jesse J. James (MI)
Tammy L. Loran (ND)
Jonathan B. Lovette (TN)
Russell T. Meyers (OH)
Giedrius Morkunas (IL)
Michael D. Narveson (MN)
Jose L. Olvera-Hernandez (PA)
Mohammed A. Omer (MN)
Timothy L. Porter (AL)
Robert L. Price (CO)
Jerad J. Riddle (IL)
Doral W. Robinson (MD)
Nicholas A. Smyth (NE)
Anes Tabakovic (IA)
Anthony R. VanAcker (IN)
John T. Vanderbeek (UT)
Andry A. Vargas (MA)
McKenley M. Victor (DE)
David W. Wiard (MI)
Tarrence R. Williams (MS)
The following 23 applicants did not
have three years of experience driving a
CMV on public highways with their
vision deficiencies:
Matthew R. Beggs (IL)
Richard W. Bullard (FL)
Paulo G. Clemente (NC)
Hector A. Davila (GA)
Chad M. Diamond (HI)
Paul A. Gulotta (NV)
Burl V. Ingebretsen (MN)
Russell L. Kelly (SC)
Nicholas J. Luksha (TN)
Jerred R. Murray (NY)
Christopher J. Neville (ME)
Eric L. Nydick (KS)
Robert F. Reed (NV)
Wesley C. Riley (IL)
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40633
Dennis E. Sanches (CO)
Alexander P. Scardino (NY)
Jeffrey A. See (FL)
Don J. Smith (VA)
Terry L. Stanger (IL)
Robert B. Sundvor (ND)
Leonard H. Wesselman (IL)
Tommy A. Williamson (OK)
Ananias E. Yoder (IA)
The following 14 applicants did not
have three years of recent experience
driving a CMV on public highways with
their vision deficiencies:
David G. April (NH)
Jason W. Beer (NE)
David L. Dellinger (IN)
John D. Flatten (MN)
Armand P. Fortier (NH)
Jeri P. Hollingsworth (ND)
Suad Jukic (NY)
Jimmy R. Kite (TN)
William J. Mason (AR)
Akbar H. Mokhtarani (ID)
Scott A. Murphy (PA)
Asa R. Sessions (WI)
Stephen C. Stenberg (NY)
Blair D. Tunell (DE)
The following seven applicants did
not have sufficient driving experience
over the past three years under normal
highway operating conditions (gaps in
driving record):
Wayne O. Campbell (FL)
James P. Flaherty (KY)
Aaron L. Knoblock (TX)
Ronald M. Lytle (PA)
Chad O’Brien (MN)
Reginald Smart (TX)
Levi J. Tindall (TX)
The following applicant, Gregory P.
Grimes (OK), had more than two
commercial motor vehicle violations
during three-year period and/or
application process.
The following applicant, Randall L.
Bauman (IN), contributed to accident(s)
in which the applicant was operating a
CMV, which is a disqualifying offense.
The following applicant, Daniel W.
Schraven (IA), did not demonstrate the
level of safety required for interstate
driving (excessive moving/non-moving
violations during three-year period).
The following 16 applicants were
denied for multiple reasons:
Jose G. Batres (PA)
Guillermo Casio Gamero (WA)
Edward J. Delehant (OK)
Kevin DeMarco (PA)
Anthony M. Goodman (TX)
Eduardo L. Gutierrez (CA)
Michael L. Johnson (SC)
Patrick E. Kuempel (IA)
Michael T. McGinty (PA)
Michael E. McGregor (ID)
Steven Ramirez (CA)
Robert L. Schwartz (ND)
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
40634
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2018 / Notices
Emmanuel A. Sepulveda (CA)
Tyrone Sipp (TN)
Calvin R. Stoltzfus (PA)
Latasha M. Williams-Barnes (CT)
The following four applicants have
not had stable vision for the preceding
three-year period:
Miguel M. Levario (NM)
Markell D. Riley (NC)
Michael J. Smith (MN)
Vernon L. Speakman (GA)
The following applicant, Charles E.
Chamberlain (KY), does not meet the
vision standard in his better eye.
The following applicant, Jerry B.
Gibson (KY), drove interstate while
restricted to intrastate driving.
Issued on: August 9, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–17597 Filed 8–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–1998–4334; FMCSA–
1999–5578; FMCSA–2000–8398; FMCSA–
2001–9561; FMCSA–2003–14504; FMCSA–
2003–14504; FMCSA–2003–15268; FMCSA–
2005–20560; FMCSA–2005–21254; FMCSA–
2007–27333; FMCSA–2007–27515; FMCSA–
2007–27897; FMCSA–2007–28695; FMCSA–
2009–0121; FMCSA–2009–0154; FMCSA–
2011–0092; FMCSA–2011–0124; FMCSA–
2011–0140; FMCSA–2011–0141; FMCSA–
2013–0027; FMCSA–2013–0028; FMCSA–
2013–0029; FMCSA–2013–0030; FMCSA–
2014–0007; FMCSA–2014–0300; FMCSA–
2014–0304; FMCSA–2015–0048; FMCSA–
2015–0052; FMCSA–2015–0053; FMCSA–
2015–0055]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to renew exemptions for 86
individuals from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) for interstate
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers. The exemptions enable these
individuals to continue to operate CMVs
in interstate commerce without meeting
the vision requirement in one eye.
DATES: Each group of renewed
exemptions were applicable on the
dates stated in the discussions below
and will expire on the dates stated in
the discussions below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Aug 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
Programs Division, 202–366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64–224,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov,
as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.
II. Background
On June 18, 2018, FMCSA published
a notice announcing its decision to
renew exemptions for 86 individuals
from the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) to operate a CMV in
interstate commerce and requested
comments from the public (83 FR
28307). The public comment period
ended on July 18, 2018, and no
comments were received.
As stated in the previous notice,
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of
these applicants and determined that
renewing these exemptions would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or
greater than the level that would be
achieved by complying with the current
regulation 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The physical qualification standard
for drivers regarding vision found in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10) states that a person is
physically qualified to drive a CMV if
that person has distant visual acuity of
at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses or visual
acuity separately corrected to 20/40
(Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least
20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
without corrective lenses, field of vision
of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian
in each eye, and the ability to recognize
the colors of traffic signals and devices
showing red, green, and amber.
III. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
preceding.
IV. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 86
renewal exemption applications and
comments received, FMCSA confirms
its’ decision to exempt the following
drivers from the vision requirement in
49 CFR 391.41 (b)(10):
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following groups of
drivers received renewed exemptions in
the month of September and are
discussed below:
As of September 6, 2017, and in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following 35 individuals
have satisfied the renewal conditions for
obtaining an exemption from the vision
requirement in the FMCSRs for
interstate CMV drivers (65 FR 78256; 66
FR 16311; 66 FR 30502; 66 FR 41654;
68 FR 13360; 68 FR 44837; 70 FR 17504;
70 FR 25878; 70 FR 30997; 70 FR 41811;
72 FR 12666; 72 FR 21313; 72 FR 25831;
72 FR 27624; 72 FR 28093; 72 FR 32703;
72 FR 40362; 74 FR 19270; 74 FR 23472;
74 FR 26461; 74 FR 26464; 74 FR 34395;
74 FR 34630; 76 FR 25762; 76 FR 25766;
76 FR 32017; 76 FR 34135; 76 FR 37168;
76 FR 37169; 76 FR 37885; 76 FR 44652;
76 FR 50318; 78 FR 24798; 78 FR 26106;
78 FR 27281; 78 FR 32708; 78 FR 34140;
78 FR 34143; 78 FR 37270; 78 FR 41188;
78 FR 41975; 78 FR 46407; 78 FR 51269;
78 FR 52602; 78 FR 56986; 78 FR 56993;
79 FR 4531; 79 FR 38659; 79 FR 53514;
80 FR 2473; 80 FR 14223; 80 FR 18693;
80 FR 26139; 80 FR 26320; 80 FR 29154;
80 FR 31640; 80 FR 33007; 80 FR 33009;
80 FR 33011; 80 FR 35699; 80 FR 36395;
80 FR 37718; 80 FR 40122; 80 FR 44185;
80 FR 44188; 80 FR 48404; 80 FR 48409;
80 FR 50917; 80 FR 62161; 80 FR
62163):
Robert D. Arkwright (MS)
Roger Bell (IL)
Phillip J. Boes (MN)
Dale E. Bunke (ID)
Daniel G. Cohen (VT)
Jeffrey W. Cotner (OR)
Jeffrey S. Daniel (VA)
John J. Davis (SC)
Roy H. Degner (IA)
David S. Devine (ID)
John C. Dimassa (WA)
Mark J. Dufresne (NH)
Donnie H. Eagle (WV)
Dennis C. Edler (PA)
Steven G. Garrett (CA)
Eric M. Grayson (KY)
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40632-40634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17597]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0016]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denials.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to deny applications from 110
individuals who requested an exemption from the vision standard in the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to operate a CMV in
interstate commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the
[[Page 40633]]
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed
at https://www.dot.gov/privacy.
II. Background
FMCSA received applications from 110 individuals who requested an
exemption from the vision standard in the FMCSRs.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and
concluded that granting these exemptions would not provide a level of
safety that would be equivalent to or greater than, the level of safety
that would be obtained by complying with the regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10).
III. Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C.31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption if
it finds such an exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that
is equivalent to, or greater then, the level that would be achieved
absent such an exemption.
The Agency's decision regarding these exemption applications is
based on the eligibility criteria, the terms and conditions for Federal
exemptions, and an individualized assessment of each applicant's
medical information provided by the applicant.
IV. Conclusion
The Agency has determined that these applicants do not satisfy the
criteria eligibility or meet the terms and conditions of the Federal
exemption and granting these exemptions would not provide a level of
safety that would be equivalent to or greater than, the level of safety
that would be obtained by complying with the regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10). Therefore, the 110 applicants in this notice have been
denied exemptions from the physical qualification standards in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10).
Each applicant has, prior to this notice, received a letter of
final disposition regarding his/her exemption request. Those decision
letters fully outlined the basis for the denial and constitute final
action by the Agency. This notice summarizes the Agency's recent
denials as required under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by periodically
publishing names and reasons for denial.
The following six applicants did not have sufficient driving
experience over the past three years under normal highway operating
conditions:
Emma D. Hyde Howe (WA)
Wallace T. Kraus (IN)
Luis M. Perez-Francisco (NJ)
Darrell Potteiger (PA)
Jeffrey J. Winter (KS)
Scott E. Zinn (CA)
The following 35 applicants had no experience operating a CMV:
Eurico F. Barbosa (MA)
Michael A. Barone (TX)
Celine Burgos (NJ)
Geovanny J. Cano-Cruz (NJ)
Luis Cardona (CA)
Eduardo Carrasco (AZ)
Nelson D. Carvalho (TX)
Sergio Chavez-Nunez (IL)
Jeffrey M. Colson (NY)
Hunter W. Cook (MS)
James F. Duffy (NJ)
Michael S. Engel (CO)
David W. Frieze (MN)
Christopher D. Gilbert (ND)
Jose S. Hernandez (TX)
Jesse J. James (MI)
Tammy L. Loran (ND)
Jonathan B. Lovette (TN)
Russell T. Meyers (OH)
Giedrius Morkunas (IL)
Michael D. Narveson (MN)
Jose L. Olvera-Hernandez (PA)
Mohammed A. Omer (MN)
Timothy L. Porter (AL)
Robert L. Price (CO)
Jerad J. Riddle (IL)
Doral W. Robinson (MD)
Nicholas A. Smyth (NE)
Anes Tabakovic (IA)
Anthony R. VanAcker (IN)
John T. Vanderbeek (UT)
Andry A. Vargas (MA)
McKenley M. Victor (DE)
David W. Wiard (MI)
Tarrence R. Williams (MS)
The following 23 applicants did not have three years of experience
driving a CMV on public highways with their vision deficiencies:
Matthew R. Beggs (IL)
Richard W. Bullard (FL)
Paulo G. Clemente (NC)
Hector A. Davila (GA)
Chad M. Diamond (HI)
Paul A. Gulotta (NV)
Burl V. Ingebretsen (MN)
Russell L. Kelly (SC)
Nicholas J. Luksha (TN)
Jerred R. Murray (NY)
Christopher J. Neville (ME)
Eric L. Nydick (KS)
Robert F. Reed (NV)
Wesley C. Riley (IL)
Dennis E. Sanches (CO)
Alexander P. Scardino (NY)
Jeffrey A. See (FL)
Don J. Smith (VA)
Terry L. Stanger (IL)
Robert B. Sundvor (ND)
Leonard H. Wesselman (IL)
Tommy A. Williamson (OK)
Ananias E. Yoder (IA)
The following 14 applicants did not have three years of recent
experience driving a CMV on public highways with their vision
deficiencies:
David G. April (NH)
Jason W. Beer (NE)
David L. Dellinger (IN)
John D. Flatten (MN)
Armand P. Fortier (NH)
Jeri P. Hollingsworth (ND)
Suad Jukic (NY)
Jimmy R. Kite (TN)
William J. Mason (AR)
Akbar H. Mokhtarani (ID)
Scott A. Murphy (PA)
Asa R. Sessions (WI)
Stephen C. Stenberg (NY)
Blair D. Tunell (DE)
The following seven applicants did not have sufficient driving
experience over the past three years under normal highway operating
conditions (gaps in driving record):
Wayne O. Campbell (FL)
James P. Flaherty (KY)
Aaron L. Knoblock (TX)
Ronald M. Lytle (PA)
Chad O'Brien (MN)
Reginald Smart (TX)
Levi J. Tindall (TX)
The following applicant, Gregory P. Grimes (OK), had more than two
commercial motor vehicle violations during three-year period and/or
application process.
The following applicant, Randall L. Bauman (IN), contributed to
accident(s) in which the applicant was operating a CMV, which is a
disqualifying offense.
The following applicant, Daniel W. Schraven (IA), did not
demonstrate the level of safety required for interstate driving
(excessive moving/non-moving violations during three-year period).
The following 16 applicants were denied for multiple reasons:
Jose G. Batres (PA)
Guillermo Casio Gamero (WA)
Edward J. Delehant (OK)
Kevin DeMarco (PA)
Anthony M. Goodman (TX)
Eduardo L. Gutierrez (CA)
Michael L. Johnson (SC)
Patrick E. Kuempel (IA)
Michael T. McGinty (PA)
Michael E. McGregor (ID)
Steven Ramirez (CA)
Robert L. Schwartz (ND)
[[Page 40634]]
Emmanuel A. Sepulveda (CA)
Tyrone Sipp (TN)
Calvin R. Stoltzfus (PA)
Latasha M. Williams-Barnes (CT)
The following four applicants have not had stable vision for the
preceding three-year period:
Miguel M. Levario (NM)
Markell D. Riley (NC)
Michael J. Smith (MN)
Vernon L. Speakman (GA)
The following applicant, Charles E. Chamberlain (KY), does not meet
the vision standard in his better eye.
The following applicant, Jerry B. Gibson (KY), drove interstate
while restricted to intrastate driving.
Issued on: August 9, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17597 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P