Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor, Baltimore, MD, 40164-40167 [2018-17469]
Download as PDF
40164
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. You
may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@
faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local Flight Standards District Office/
Certificate Holding District Office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Kevin M. Clark, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–238–
7088; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
kevin.m.clark@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box
31, Derby, England, DE24 8BJ; phone: 011–
44–1332–242424; fax: 011–44–1332–249936,
or email: https://www.rolls-royce.com/
contact/civil_team.jsp. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7759.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
August 9, 2018.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–17405 Filed 8–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
anchorages. This proposed rule would
ensure that Coast Guard regulations are
consistent with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Baltimore District Port of
Baltimore Anchorages and Channels
civil works project that widened the
channel, and provide a higher degree of
safety to persons, property and the
environment by accurately depicting the
anchorage locations. The proposed
changes to the regulated uses of the
anchorages would support current and
future port activity related to the safety
of post-Panamax commercial cargo
vessels, and would remove vessel
security provisions that currently exist
in these Baltimore Harbor regulations.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before November 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0181 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald L.
Houck, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard; telephone (410) 576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0181]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore
Harbor, Baltimore, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
amend its Baltimore Harbor anchorage
grounds regulation. The proposed
changes would reduce the size of three
general anchorages, establish one new
general anchorage, rename two existing
general anchorages, and change the
duration a vessel may remain within an
anchorage for two existing general
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
Anchorage regulation duties and
powers were transferred to the Coast
Guard in 1967 (32 FR 17726, Dec. 12,
1967). On December 12, 1968, the Fifth
Coast Guard District published a final
rule in the Federal Register (33 FR
18438) establishing an anchorage area in
Baltimore Harbor, Maryland. The
anchorage grounds at Baltimore,
Maryland are described in 33 CFR
110.158. These anchorage grounds are
involved in a federal navigation project
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Baltimore District.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 101a(22) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–
53, 113 Stat 269 (1999)) authorized
widening of the Dundalk and Seagirt
Marine Terminal channels. Widening of
the Seagirt Marine Terminal channel
occurred in 2015. This dredging
widened the limits of existing
navigation channels which are used to
access key Maryland Port
Administration marine terminals
located immediately adjacent to the
Baltimore Harbor, Maryland anchorage
grounds, and put the existing anchorage
grounds in the way of the newly
expanded navigation channels. To
addresses these changes, Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region,
Baltimore, Maryland, worked in
coordination with the Port of Baltimore
Harbor Safety and Coordination
Committee to develop proposed
revisions to the affected anchorage
boundaries and associated regulations.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
reduce navigational safety risk and
support port efficiency in Baltimore
Harbor. This proposed rule would
designate a new general anchorage
ground developed from an existing
anchorage ground that is located outside
of the established navigation channel in
order to align with the existing U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore
District Port of Baltimore Anchorages
and Channels civil works project. The
Baltimore Harbor anchorage grounds are
typically used by deep draft commercial
cargo vessels. In order to maximize the
availability and use of these important
anchorages, this proposed rule would
also change the duration for which
vessels may remain in these anchorages.
This proposed rule would reduce the
duration a vessel may remain within
Anchorage No. 3 Lower (proposed to be
changed to Anchorage No. 3A) and
Anchorage No. 4, from 72 hours to 24
hours. Lastly, due to similar provisions
within the Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) (Pub. L.
107–295) and federal regulations (33
CFR part 104, and 46 CFR chapter 1,
subchapters N and O), the vessel
security requirements in § 110.158(d)
are now redundant and would be
removed as part of this proposed rule.
The legal basis for this rule is: 33
U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33
CFR 1.05–1; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the
Coast Guard to define anchorage
grounds.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to amend
the Baltimore Harbor, Maryland
anchorage grounds as described in 33
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
CFR 110.158. The general anchorages
currently listed in the regulation that
would be affected by this proposed rule
are Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage No. 3
Upper, Anchorage No. 3 Lower,
Anchorage No. 4, Anchorage No. 5 and
Anchorage No. 6.
This proposed rule would reduce the
sizes of Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage
No. 3 Lower, and Anchorage No. 4.
These reductions would remove the
portions of the anchorage grounds that
are in the navigable channel. The area
of Anchorage No. 2 would be reduced
by approximately 16,330 square yards
along its northern limit and
approximately 326,770 square yards
along its eastern limit. The area of
Anchorage No. 3 Lower would be
reduced at its eastern limit by 12,560
square yards. The area of Anchorage No.
4 would be reduced at its western limit
by 6,000 square yards.
This proposed rule would rename
Anchorage No. 3 Lower to Anchorage
No. 3A, and rename Anchorage No. 3
Upper to Anchorage No. 3B. This
proposed rule would revise Anchorage
No. 2 and would create an area called
Anchorage No. 3C out of existing
anchorage ground from Anchorage No.
2. An area within Anchorage No. 2 that
is approximately 500 yards in length
and 165 yards in width, and adjacent to
Anchorage No. 3 Upper, would become
Anchorage No. 3C. This reconfiguration
does not provide new space available
for anchorage, would not restrict traffic,
and is located outside of the established
navigation channel. A graphic depicting
these changes is included in the docket.
This proposed rule would reduce the
duration a vessel may remain within
Anchorage No. 3 Lower (proposed to be
changed to Anchorage No. 3A) and
Anchorage No. 4, from 72 hours to 24
hours. These changes are based on
recommendations documented by the
Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety and
Coordination Committee on September
8, 2010, and the Association of
Maryland Pilots. The Port of Baltimore
Harbor Safety and Coordination
Committee’s recommendation is
available in the docket. The Coast Guard
agrees that the Committee’s
recommendation addresses the problem
of ensuring maximum availability and
use of these anchorages. This proposed
rule would establish that a vessel may
remain within Anchorage No. 3C for no
more than 72 hours without permission
from the Captain of the Port, to remain
consistent with the regulations for
Anchorage No. 2.
This rulemaking rule would renumber
several paragraphs listed in 33 CFR
110.158, from (a)(3) Anchorage No. 3,
Upper, general anchorage, through (a)(8)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage.
All anchorage ground descriptions
would be updated to state they are in
the waters of the Patapsco River, except
for Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship
anchorage, which would be updated to
state it is in the waters of Curtis Bay.
Designation of the new Anchorage No.
3C would create a new paragraph, (a)(9)
for Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship
anchorage. This rulemaking would
modify paragraph (c)(3) of the general
regulations to remove the reference to a
vessel becoming ‘‘a menace’’ because we
do not define that term and we don’t
believe it is needed given other factors
already included in that paragraph. We
also propose to change the defined term
‘‘dangerous cargo’’ to ‘‘certain
dangerous cargo’’ without changing the
definition, continuing to incorporate the
definition of certain dangerous cargo
from 33 CFR 160.202, and aligning
terminology used in this proposed rule
with that used throughout the rest of 33
CFR 110.158. This rulemaking would
remove paragraphs (c)(4) regarding
revocable permits for habitual use of an
anchorage, and paragraph (d) in their
entirety for reasons stated earlier.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
E.O.s.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
The Coast Guard has determined this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it would not
interfere with existing maritime activity
in Baltimore Harbor. Moreover, the
proposed changes would reduce
navigational safety risk in Baltimore
Harbor by: (1) Aligning existing general
anchorage boundaries with recent
dredging projects that widened the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40165
limits of adjacent navigational channels,
(2) reducing the duration a vessel may
remain within an anchorage to increase
availability and usage, and (3) renaming
and reconfiguring general anchorages
that support a proper naming and
numbering convention within the
existing anchorage regulation. The
reconfiguration of the additional general
anchorage does not provide additional
anchorage area and would not restrict
traffic, as it is developed from an
existing anchorage and is located
outside of the established navigation
channel. As discussed in section III
above, this proposed rule would replace
the ‘‘dangerous cargo’’ definition with
one for ‘‘certain dangerous cargo’’ and
remove vessel security provisions that
are redundant to other federal
regulations.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in paragraph
IV.A above, this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40166
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
involves the modification of existing
anchorages within the Baltimore Harbor,
Maryland anchorage grounds. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L59(a) and (b) of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001,
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 110.158 to read as follows:
§ 110.158
Baltimore Harbor, MD.
(a) Anchorage Grounds—(1) No. 1,
general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
39°15′13.51″
39°15′11.01″
39°14′52.98″
39°14′47.90″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
76°34′07.76″
76°34′11.69″
76°33′52.67″
76°33′40.73″
W
W
W
W
These coordinates are based on
North American Datum 83 (NAD
83).
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 12 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(2) Anchorage No. 2, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′50.06″
39°14′57.53″
39°15′08.56″
39°15′15.77″
39°15′18.87″
39°15′17.71″
39°14′50.35″
39°14′45.28″
39°14′46.27″
39°14′43.76″
39°14′57.51″
39°14′55.60″
39°14′59.42″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
76°33′29.86″
76°33′37.74″
76°33′37.66″
76°33′28.81″
76°33′12.82″
76°33′09.09″
76°32′40.43″
76°32′48.68″
76°32′49.69″
76°32′53.63″
76°33′08.14″
76°33′11.14″
76°33′15.17″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(3) Anchorage No. 3A, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′15.66″
39°14′32.48″
39°14′46.27″
39°14′32.50″
39°14′22.37″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
76°32′53.59″
76°33′11.31″
76°32′49.69″
76°32′35.18″
76°32′43.07″
W
W
W
W
W
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(4) Anchorage No. 3B, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′32.48″
39°14′46.23″
39°14′57.51″
39°14′43.76″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
76°33′11.31″
76°33′25.83″
76°33′08.14″
76°32′53.63″
W
W
W
W
Latitude
39°13′21.20″ N
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(8) Anchorage No. 6, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(5) Anchorage No. 3C, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
39°14′46.23″
39°14′50.06″
39°14′59.42″
39°14′55.60″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
76°33′25.83″
76°33′29.86″
76°33′15.17″
76°33′11.14″
W
W
W
W
39°13′42.98″
39°13′20.65″
39°13′34.00″
39°14′01.95″
39°13′51.01″
Latitude
39°13′52.92″
39°14′04.38″
39°14′09.35″
39°14′17.96″
39°14′05.32″
39°14′00.05″
76°32′29.60″
76°32′41.69″
76°32′39.89″
76°32′26.44″
76°32′13.09″
76°32′17.77″
W
W
W
W
W
W
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(7) Anchorage No. 5, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
39°14′07.89″ N
39°13′34.82″ N
39°13′22.25″ N
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Longitude
76°32′58.23″ W
76°32′23.66″ W
76°32′28.90″ W
17:23 Aug 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
N
N
N
N
N
76°32′19.11″
76°31′55.58″
76°31′33.50″
76°32′02.65″
76°32′18.71″
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(9) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship
anchorage. (i) All waters of Curtis Bay,
bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(6) Anchorage No. 4, general
anchorage. (i) All waters of the Patapsco
River, bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
76°33′11.94″ W
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
Latitude
Longitude
39°13′00.40″
39°13′13.40″
39°13′13.96″
39°13′14.83″
39°13′00.40″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
76°34′10.40″
76°34′10.81″
76°34′05.02″
76°33′29.80″
76°33′29.90″
W
W
W
W
W
These coordinates are based on
NAD 83.
(ii) The primary use of this anchorage
is to lay up dead ships. Such use has
priority over other uses. Permission
from the Captain of the Port must be
obtained prior to the use of this
anchorage for more than 72 hours.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Certain dangerous cargo means
certain dangerous cargo as defined in
§ 160.202 of this chapter.
COTP means Captain of the Port
Sector Maryland—National Capital
Region.
(c) General regulations. (1) Except as
otherwise provided, this section applies
to vessels over 20 meters long and all
vessels carrying or handling certain
dangerous cargo while anchored in an
anchorage ground described in this
section.
(2) Except in cases where unforeseen
circumstances create conditions of
imminent peril, or with the permission
of the Captain of the Port, no vessel
shall be anchored in Baltimore Harbor
or the Patapsco River outside of the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40167
anchorage areas established in this
section for more than 24 hours. No
vessel shall anchor within a tunnel,
cable or pipeline area shown on a
government chart. No vessel shall be
moored, anchored, or tied up to any
pier, wharf, or other vessel in such
manner as to extend into established
channel limits. No vessel shall be
positioned so as to obstruct or endanger
the passage of any other vessel.
(3) Except in an emergency, a vessel
that is likely to sink or otherwise
become an obstruction to navigation or
the anchoring of other vessels may not
occupy an anchorage, unless the vessel
obtains permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(4) Upon notification by the Captain
of the Port to shift its position, a vessel
at anchor must get underway and shall
move to its new designated position
within two hours after notification.
(5) The Captain of the Port may
prescribe specific conditions for vessels
anchoring within the anchorages
described in this section, including, but
not limited to, the number and location
of anchors, scope of chain, readiness of
engineering plant and equipment, usage
of tugs, and requirements for
maintaining communication guards on
selected radio frequencies.
(6) No vessel at anchor or at a mooring
within an anchorage may transfer oil to
or from another vessel unless the vessel
has given the Captain of the Port the
four hours advance notice required by
§ 156.118 of this chapter.
(7) No vessel shall anchor in a ‘‘dead
ship’’ status (propulsion or control
unavailable for normal operations)
without prior approval of the Captain of
the Port.
Dated: August 1, 2018.
Meredith L. Austin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018–17469 Filed 8–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 600 and 668
[Docket ID ED–2018–OPE–0042]
RIN 1840–AD31
Program Integrity: Gainful Employment
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Secretary proposes to
rescind the gainful employment (GE)
regulations, which added to the Student
Assistance General Provisions
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40164-40167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17469]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0181]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor, Baltimore, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend its Baltimore Harbor
anchorage grounds regulation. The proposed changes would reduce the
size of three general anchorages, establish one new general anchorage,
rename two existing general anchorages, and change the duration a
vessel may remain within an anchorage for two existing general
anchorages. This proposed rule would ensure that Coast Guard
regulations are consistent with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Baltimore District Port of Baltimore Anchorages and Channels civil
works project that widened the channel, and provide a higher degree of
safety to persons, property and the environment by accurately depicting
the anchorage locations. The proposed changes to the regulated uses of
the anchorages would support current and future port activity related
to the safety of post-Panamax commercial cargo vessels, and would
remove vessel security provisions that currently exist in these
Baltimore Harbor regulations. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before November 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0181 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, U.S. Coast
Guard, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone (410) 576-2674, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
Anchorage regulation duties and powers were transferred to the
Coast Guard in 1967 (32 FR 17726, Dec. 12, 1967). On December 12, 1968,
the Fifth Coast Guard District published a final rule in the Federal
Register (33 FR 18438) establishing an anchorage area in Baltimore
Harbor, Maryland. The anchorage grounds at Baltimore, Maryland are
described in 33 CFR 110.158. These anchorage grounds are involved in a
federal navigation project under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Section 101a(22) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106-53, 113 Stat 269 (1999))
authorized widening of the Dundalk and Seagirt Marine Terminal
channels. Widening of the Seagirt Marine Terminal channel occurred in
2015. This dredging widened the limits of existing navigation channels
which are used to access key Maryland Port Administration marine
terminals located immediately adjacent to the Baltimore Harbor,
Maryland anchorage grounds, and put the existing anchorage grounds in
the way of the newly expanded navigation channels. To addresses these
changes, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region, Baltimore, Maryland,
worked in coordination with the Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety and
Coordination Committee to develop proposed revisions to the affected
anchorage boundaries and associated regulations.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to reduce navigational safety
risk and support port efficiency in Baltimore Harbor. This proposed
rule would designate a new general anchorage ground developed from an
existing anchorage ground that is located outside of the established
navigation channel in order to align with the existing U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Baltimore District Port of Baltimore Anchorages and
Channels civil works project. The Baltimore Harbor anchorage grounds
are typically used by deep draft commercial cargo vessels. In order to
maximize the availability and use of these important anchorages, this
proposed rule would also change the duration for which vessels may
remain in these anchorages. This proposed rule would reduce the
duration a vessel may remain within Anchorage No. 3 Lower (proposed to
be changed to Anchorage No. 3A) and Anchorage No. 4, from 72 hours to
24 hours. Lastly, due to similar provisions within the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) (Pub. L. 107-295) and
federal regulations (33 CFR part 104, and 46 CFR chapter 1, subchapters
N and O), the vessel security requirements in Sec. 110.158(d) are now
redundant and would be removed as part of this proposed rule.
The legal basis for this rule is: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236,
2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to define
anchorage grounds.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to amend the Baltimore Harbor, Maryland
anchorage grounds as described in 33
[[Page 40165]]
CFR 110.158. The general anchorages currently listed in the regulation
that would be affected by this proposed rule are Anchorage No. 2,
Anchorage No. 3 Upper, Anchorage No. 3 Lower, Anchorage No. 4,
Anchorage No. 5 and Anchorage No. 6.
This proposed rule would reduce the sizes of Anchorage No. 2,
Anchorage No. 3 Lower, and Anchorage No. 4. These reductions would
remove the portions of the anchorage grounds that are in the navigable
channel. The area of Anchorage No. 2 would be reduced by approximately
16,330 square yards along its northern limit and approximately 326,770
square yards along its eastern limit. The area of Anchorage No. 3 Lower
would be reduced at its eastern limit by 12,560 square yards. The area
of Anchorage No. 4 would be reduced at its western limit by 6,000
square yards.
This proposed rule would rename Anchorage No. 3 Lower to Anchorage
No. 3A, and rename Anchorage No. 3 Upper to Anchorage No. 3B. This
proposed rule would revise Anchorage No. 2 and would create an area
called Anchorage No. 3C out of existing anchorage ground from Anchorage
No. 2. An area within Anchorage No. 2 that is approximately 500 yards
in length and 165 yards in width, and adjacent to Anchorage No. 3
Upper, would become Anchorage No. 3C. This reconfiguration does not
provide new space available for anchorage, would not restrict traffic,
and is located outside of the established navigation channel. A graphic
depicting these changes is included in the docket.
This proposed rule would reduce the duration a vessel may remain
within Anchorage No. 3 Lower (proposed to be changed to Anchorage No.
3A) and Anchorage No. 4, from 72 hours to 24 hours. These changes are
based on recommendations documented by the Port of Baltimore Harbor
Safety and Coordination Committee on September 8, 2010, and the
Association of Maryland Pilots. The Port of Baltimore Harbor Safety and
Coordination Committee's recommendation is available in the docket. The
Coast Guard agrees that the Committee's recommendation addresses the
problem of ensuring maximum availability and use of these anchorages.
This proposed rule would establish that a vessel may remain within
Anchorage No. 3C for no more than 72 hours without permission from the
Captain of the Port, to remain consistent with the regulations for
Anchorage No. 2.
This rulemaking rule would renumber several paragraphs listed in 33
CFR 110.158, from (a)(3) Anchorage No. 3, Upper, general anchorage,
through (a)(8) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. All anchorage
ground descriptions would be updated to state they are in the waters of
the Patapsco River, except for Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage,
which would be updated to state it is in the waters of Curtis Bay.
Designation of the new Anchorage No. 3C would create a new paragraph,
(a)(9) for Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. This rulemaking would
modify paragraph (c)(3) of the general regulations to remove the
reference to a vessel becoming ``a menace'' because we do not define
that term and we don't believe it is needed given other factors already
included in that paragraph. We also propose to change the defined term
``dangerous cargo'' to ``certain dangerous cargo'' without changing the
definition, continuing to incorporate the definition of certain
dangerous cargo from 33 CFR 160.202, and aligning terminology used in
this proposed rule with that used throughout the rest of 33 CFR
110.158. This rulemaking would remove paragraphs (c)(4) regarding
revocable permits for habitual use of an anchorage, and paragraph (d)
in their entirety for reasons stated earlier.
The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
The Coast Guard has determined this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because it would not interfere with
existing maritime activity in Baltimore Harbor. Moreover, the proposed
changes would reduce navigational safety risk in Baltimore Harbor by:
(1) Aligning existing general anchorage boundaries with recent dredging
projects that widened the limits of adjacent navigational channels, (2)
reducing the duration a vessel may remain within an anchorage to
increase availability and usage, and (3) renaming and reconfiguring
general anchorages that support a proper naming and numbering
convention within the existing anchorage regulation. The
reconfiguration of the additional general anchorage does not provide
additional anchorage area and would not restrict traffic, as it is
developed from an existing anchorage and is located outside of the
established navigation channel. As discussed in section III above, this
proposed rule would replace the ``dangerous cargo'' definition with one
for ``certain dangerous cargo'' and remove vessel security provisions
that are redundant to other federal regulations.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in paragraph IV.A above, this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 40166]]
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
modification of existing anchorages within the Baltimore Harbor,
Maryland anchorage grounds. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L59(a) and (b) of Appendix
A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001, Rev. 01. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated in the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-
1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 110.158 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.158 Baltimore Harbor, MD.
(a) Anchorage Grounds--(1) No. 1, general anchorage. (i) All waters
of the Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following
points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]15'13.51'' N 76[deg]34'07.76'' W
39[deg]15'11.01'' N 76[deg]34'11.69'' W
39[deg]14'52.98'' N 76[deg]33'52.67'' W
39[deg]14'47.90'' N 76[deg]33'40.73'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on North American Datum 83 (NAD 83).
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 12
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(2) Anchorage No. 2, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]14'50.06'' N 76[deg]33'29.86'' W
39[deg]14'57.53'' N 76[deg]33'37.74'' W
39[deg]15'08.56'' N 76[deg]33'37.66'' W
39[deg]15'15.77'' N 76[deg]33'28.81'' W
39[deg]15'18.87'' N 76[deg]33'12.82'' W
39[deg]15'17.71'' N 76[deg]33'09.09'' W
39[deg]14'50.35'' N 76[deg]32'40.43'' W
39[deg]14'45.28'' N 76[deg]32'48.68'' W
39[deg]14'46.27'' N 76[deg]32'49.69'' W
39[deg]14'43.76'' N 76[deg]32'53.63'' W
39[deg]14'57.51'' N 76[deg]33'08.14'' W
39[deg]14'55.60'' N 76[deg]33'11.14'' W
39[deg]14'59.42'' N 76[deg]33'15.17'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(3) Anchorage No. 3A, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]14'15.66'' N 76[deg]32'53.59'' W
39[deg]14'32.48'' N 76[deg]33'11.31'' W
39[deg]14'46.27'' N 76[deg]32'49.69'' W
39[deg]14'32.50'' N 76[deg]32'35.18'' W
39[deg]14'22.37'' N 76[deg]32'43.07'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
[[Page 40167]]
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(4) Anchorage No. 3B, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]14'32.48'' N 76[deg]33'11.31'' W
39[deg]14'46.23'' N 76[deg]33'25.83'' W
39[deg]14'57.51'' N 76[deg]33'08.14'' W
39[deg]14'43.76'' N 76[deg]32'53.63'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(5) Anchorage No. 3C, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]14'46.23'' N 76[deg]33'25.83'' W
39[deg]14'50.06'' N 76[deg]33'29.86'' W
39[deg]14'59.42'' N 76[deg]33'15.17'' W
39[deg]14'55.60'' N 76[deg]33'11.14'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(6) Anchorage No. 4, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]13'52.92'' N 76[deg]32'29.60'' W
39[deg]14'04.38'' N 76[deg]32'41.69'' W
39[deg]14'09.35'' N 76[deg]32'39.89'' W
39[deg]14'17.96'' N 76[deg]32'26.44'' W
39[deg]14'05.32'' N 76[deg]32'13.09'' W
39[deg]14'00.05'' N 76[deg]32'17.77'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(7) Anchorage No. 5, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]14'07.89'' N 76[deg]32'58.23'' W
39[deg]13'34.82'' N 76[deg]32'23.66'' W
39[deg]13'22.25'' N 76[deg]32'28.90'' W
39[deg]13'21.20'' N 76[deg]33'11.94'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(8) Anchorage No. 6, general anchorage. (i) All waters of the
Patapsco River, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]13'42.98'' N 76[deg]32'19.11'' W
39[deg]13'20.65'' N 76[deg]31'55.58'' W
39[deg]13'34.00'' N 76[deg]31'33.50'' W
39[deg]14'01.95'' N 76[deg]32'02.65'' W
39[deg]13'51.01'' N 76[deg]32'18.71'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(9) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage. (i) All waters of Curtis
Bay, bounded by a line connecting the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39[deg]13'00.40'' N 76[deg]34'10.40'' W
39[deg]13'13.40'' N 76[deg]34'10.81'' W
39[deg]13'13.96'' N 76[deg]34'05.02'' W
39[deg]13'14.83'' N 76[deg]33'29.80'' W
39[deg]13'00.40'' N 76[deg]33'29.90'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These coordinates are based on NAD 83.
(ii) The primary use of this anchorage is to lay up dead ships.
Such use has priority over other uses. Permission from the Captain of
the Port must be obtained prior to the use of this anchorage for more
than 72 hours.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Certain dangerous cargo means certain dangerous cargo as defined in
Sec. 160.202 of this chapter.
COTP means Captain of the Port Sector Maryland--National Capital
Region.
(c) General regulations. (1) Except as otherwise provided, this
section applies to vessels over 20 meters long and all vessels carrying
or handling certain dangerous cargo while anchored in an anchorage
ground described in this section.
(2) Except in cases where unforeseen circumstances create
conditions of imminent peril, or with the permission of the Captain of
the Port, no vessel shall be anchored in Baltimore Harbor or the
Patapsco River outside of the anchorage areas established in this
section for more than 24 hours. No vessel shall anchor within a tunnel,
cable or pipeline area shown on a government chart. No vessel shall be
moored, anchored, or tied up to any pier, wharf, or other vessel in
such manner as to extend into established channel limits. No vessel
shall be positioned so as to obstruct or endanger the passage of any
other vessel.
(3) Except in an emergency, a vessel that is likely to sink or
otherwise become an obstruction to navigation or the anchoring of other
vessels may not occupy an anchorage, unless the vessel obtains
permission from the Captain of the Port.
(4) Upon notification by the Captain of the Port to shift its
position, a vessel at anchor must get underway and shall move to its
new designated position within two hours after notification.
(5) The Captain of the Port may prescribe specific conditions for
vessels anchoring within the anchorages described in this section,
including, but not limited to, the number and location of anchors,
scope of chain, readiness of engineering plant and equipment, usage of
tugs, and requirements for maintaining communication guards on selected
radio frequencies.
(6) No vessel at anchor or at a mooring within an anchorage may
transfer oil to or from another vessel unless the vessel has given the
Captain of the Port the four hours advance notice required by Sec.
156.118 of this chapter.
(7) No vessel shall anchor in a ``dead ship'' status (propulsion or
control unavailable for normal operations) without prior approval of
the Captain of the Port.
Dated: August 1, 2018.
Meredith L. Austin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-17469 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P