Cerevisane (Cell Walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain LAS117); Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 39373-39375 [2018-17081]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 180
I. General Information
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0315; FRL–9980–51]
A. Does this action apply to me?
Cerevisane (Cell Walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain
LAS117); Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–17080 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117) in or on all food commodities
when used in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural
practices. Lesaffre Yeast Corporation
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117) under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 9, 2018. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before October 9, 2018, and must be
filed in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0315, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=
ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_
02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0315 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before October 9, 2018. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39373
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0315, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of March 6,
2018 (83 FR 9471) (FRL–9973–27), EPA
issued a document pursuant to FFDCA
section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3),
announcing the filing of a pesticide
tolerance petition (PP 6F8535) by
Technology Sciences Group Inc., 712
Fifth Street, Suite A, Davis, CA 95616
(on behalf of Lesaffre Yeast Corporation,
7475 W Main St., Milwaukee, WI
53214). The petition requested that 40
CFR 180 be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the systemic
resistance inducer (SRI) cerevisane (cell
walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain LAS117) in or on all food
commodities. That document referenced
a summary of the petition prepared by
the petitioner, Technology Sciences
Group Inc., (on behalf of Lesaffre Yeast
Corporation), which is available in the
docket via https://www.regulations.gov.
There were no relevant comments
received in response to the notice of
filing.
III. Final Rule
A. EPA’s Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM
09AUR1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
39374
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give
special consideration to exposure of
infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance or tolerance exemption and to
‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .’’ Additionally, FFDCA
section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA
consider ‘‘available information
concerning the cumulative effects of [a
particular pesticide’s] . . . residues and
other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’ FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold (10X)
margin of safety for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to
account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the
database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable
data that a different margin of safety
will be safe for infants and children.
This additional margin of safety is
commonly referred to as the FQPA
Safety Factor (SF). In applying this
provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor.
EPA evaluated the available toxicity
and exposure data on cerevisane (cell
walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain LAS117) and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability,
as well as the relationship of this
information to human risk. EPA also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
Cerevisane is a whole cell wall extract
of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a
common source of yeast, commonly
used in the manufacturing of beers,
wines, and liquor intended for human
consumption because of its ability to
ferment sugars into ethanol.
Cerevisane is a systemic resistance
inducer (SRI) that aids in the upregulation of plant defense genes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
resulting in physiological changes,
including the reinforcement of plant cell
walls and the production of
antimicrobial compounds, e.g.,
hydrogen peroxide (an oxidant active
against a wide variety of
microorganisms) and phytoalexins
(which inhibit mycelium growth and
the fruitification of susceptible fungal
pathogens), that impart resistance
against fungal diseases.
Based on the data submitted in
support of this petition and the
Agency’s assessment of that data, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children from aggregate exposures to a
cerevisane (cells walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117). This conclusion is based on
the lack of toxicity associated with this
pesticide chemical residue; the available
toxicology data indicate that the active
ingredient is of low toxicity and is not
a developmental toxicant or a mutagen;
therefore, no toxicological endpoints
were identified. Accordingly, given the
lack of threshold effects, the FQPA
Safety Factor need not be retained. The
Agency has conducted a qualitative
assessment of exposure and determined
that dietary and drinking water
exposure from the pesticide use is
expected to be negligible since
significant residues are not expected
due to low application rates and rapid
degradation rates following application.
Non-occupational exposures are not
expected since cerevisane (cells walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117) is not intended for residential
use. Given the lack of toxicity, this
minimal exposure aggregated with the
background levels already present in
commonly consumed foods that contain
baker’s yeast, or beer, wine, and liquor
do not pose a risk of concern. A full
explanation of the data upon which EPA
relied, its risk assessment, and other
supporting documents is available in
the docket for this action as described
under ADDRESSES.
Based on its safety determination,
EPA is establishing an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117) in or on all food commodities
when used in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural
practices.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes due to the
lack of concern about safety for
cerevisane (cell walls of Saccharomyces
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cerevisiae strain LAS117) at any
exposure level.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to EPA.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997); nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemption in this action,
do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes. As a result,
this action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
EPA has determined that this action will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM
09AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
EPA’s consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 31, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
39375
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.1357 to subpart D to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.1357 Cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117);
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance.
Residues of the biochemical pesticide
cerevisane (cell walls of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae strain LAS117) are exempt
from the requirement of a tolerance in
or on all food commodities, when used
in accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2018–17081 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM
09AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39373-39375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17081]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0315; FRL-9980-51]
Cerevisane (Cell Walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain
LAS117); Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for cerevisane (cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain LAS117) in or on all food commodities when used in accordance
with label directions and good agricultural practices. Lesaffre Yeast
Corporation submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requesting an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a
maximum permissible level for residues of cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117) under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 9, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 9, 2018,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0315, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0315 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
October 9, 2018. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0315, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of March 6, 2018 (83 FR 9471) (FRL-9973-
27), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 6F8535) by Technology Sciences Group Inc., 712 Fifth
Street, Suite A, Davis, CA 95616 (on behalf of Lesaffre Yeast
Corporation, 7475 W Main St., Milwaukee, WI 53214). The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180 be amended by establishing an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the systemic resistance
inducer (SRI) cerevisane (cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain
LAS117) in or on all food commodities. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner, Technology Sciences
Group Inc., (on behalf of Lesaffre Yeast Corporation), which is
available in the docket via https://www.regulations.gov. There were no
relevant comments received in response to the notice of filing.
III. Final Rule
A. EPA's Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the
[[Page 39374]]
pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures
and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This
includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings
but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the
factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance
exemption and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA consider ``available information
concerning the cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . .
residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of
toxicity.'' FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In
applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X,
or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor.
EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on
cerevisane (cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117) and
considered their validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as
the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
Cerevisane is a whole cell wall extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain LAS117. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a common source of yeast,
commonly used in the manufacturing of beers, wines, and liquor intended
for human consumption because of its ability to ferment sugars into
ethanol.
Cerevisane is a systemic resistance inducer (SRI) that aids in the
up-regulation of plant defense genes resulting in physiological
changes, including the reinforcement of plant cell walls and the
production of antimicrobial compounds, e.g., hydrogen peroxide (an
oxidant active against a wide variety of microorganisms) and
phytoalexins (which inhibit mycelium growth and the fruitification of
susceptible fungal pathogens), that impart resistance against fungal
diseases.
Based on the data submitted in support of this petition and the
Agency's assessment of that data, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population,
including infants and children from aggregate exposures to a cerevisane
(cells walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117). This
conclusion is based on the lack of toxicity associated with this
pesticide chemical residue; the available toxicology data indicate that
the active ingredient is of low toxicity and is not a developmental
toxicant or a mutagen; therefore, no toxicological endpoints were
identified. Accordingly, given the lack of threshold effects, the FQPA
Safety Factor need not be retained. The Agency has conducted a
qualitative assessment of exposure and determined that dietary and
drinking water exposure from the pesticide use is expected to be
negligible since significant residues are not expected due to low
application rates and rapid degradation rates following application.
Non-occupational exposures are not expected since cerevisane (cells
walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117) is not intended for
residential use. Given the lack of toxicity, this minimal exposure
aggregated with the background levels already present in commonly
consumed foods that contain baker's yeast, or beer, wine, and liquor do
not pose a risk of concern. A full explanation of the data upon which
EPA relied, its risk assessment, and other supporting documents is
available in the docket for this action as described under ADDRESSES.
Based on its safety determination, EPA is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of cerevisane (cell
walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117) in or on all food
commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good
agricultural practices.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes due
to the lack of concern about safety for cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117) at any exposure level.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to EPA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997); nor is it considered a regulatory action under
Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
[[Page 39375]]
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 31, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 180.1357 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1357 Cerevisane (cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain LAS117); exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
Residues of the biochemical pesticide cerevisane (cell walls of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117) are exempt from the requirement
of a tolerance in or on all food commodities, when used in accordance
with label directions and good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2018-17081 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P