Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User Fee, 39507-39508 [2018-17053]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
transportation serving the metropolitan
planning area,’’ and ‘‘peer reviews and
exchanges of . . . performance-based
planning.’’ FTA removed ‘‘arts and
artistic design’’ from the list of eligible
grant activities to comply with 49 U.S.C.
5323, as amended by the FAST Act. In
Section 4, FTA reordered subsections
identifying the components of a UPWP.
In Section 9, FTA added programs
created by MAP–21 and the FAST Act,
and removed references to programs
repealed by MAP–21 and the FAST Act.
C. Chapter III—State Planning and
Research Program
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
D. Chapter IV—Consolidated Planning
Grants
Chapter IV provides information on
the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG)
Program, a program administered by
FTA and FHWA. The CPG Program
allows FTA and FHWA funding that
supports metropolitan and statewide
transportation planning to be combined
into a single consolidated grant, which
fosters a cooperative effort between the
Federal agencies and the participating
States to streamline the delivery of their
planning programs by providing the
flexibility to transfer the planning funds
to either FTA or FHWA for processing.
In Section 1, FTA clarified that FTA
funds used for metropolitan planning in
a CPG are allowed to have the same
match ratio as the FHWA Metropolitan
Planning funds.
E. Chapter V—Application Instructions
Chapter V details the application
process of MPOs and States that apply
for and receive funds from MPP and
SPRP grants. FTA made no substantive
changes to this chapter.
18:11 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Issued in Washington, DC.
K. Jane Williams,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–17032 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
authorizes user fees on operators of
these facilities, and directs PHMSA to
prescribe procedures to collect those
fees upon appropriation. Section 2 of
the PIPES Act of 2016 authorizes $8
million per year to be appropriated from
those fees for each of FY 2017–2019 for
the newly established Underground
Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety
Account in the Pipeline Safety Fund.
After Congress appropriates funds to
this account for fiscal year (FY) 2018
and beyond, PHMSA will collect user
fees from the operators of the facilities.
On December 8, 2017,
PHMSA published a notice and request
for comments in the Federal Register
titled: ‘‘Underground Natural Gas
Storage Facility User Fee’’ seeking
comments from underground natural
gas storage facility (UNGS) operators on
a proposal to use UNGS annual report
data in the user fee rate structure.
PHMSA received two comments in the
docket. We are publishing this notice to
address the comments received and to
announce that PHMSA has used UNGS
annual report data about the number of
wells in the user fee rate structure for
the Pipeline Safety Fund’s Underground
Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety
Account.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Crystal Stewart by telephone at 202–
366–1524, by fax at 202–366–4566, by
email at Crystal.Stewart@dot.gov, or by
mail at U.S. Department of
Transportation, PHMSA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., PHP–2, Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of Comments
The December 8, 2017 notice advised
all UNGS facility operators of a
proposed PHMSA pipeline user fee
assessment and rate structure (82 FR
58045). During the one-month response
period, PHMSA received comments
from two commenters on the proposed
UNGS user fee billing methodology:
WBI Energy Transmission Inc., and
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
The comments can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket Number
PHMSA–2017–0129. WBI Energy
Transmission Inc., submitted comments
supporting the rate structure proposed
by PHMSA in the December 8, 2017
notice. The remaining comment is
summarized below with PHMSA’s
response:
Comment: National Fuel Gas Supply
Corporation stated that well count alone
is not an appropriate measure for
determining a user fee since larger wells
will require more regulatory oversight
than smaller wells.
Response: Each well penetrating an
underground natural gas storage
reservoir represents a risk. Currently,
PHMSA intends to apply a consistent
level of regulatory oversight to all wells,
regardless of size. As PHMSA
implements its underground storage
inspection program, we may gain
insights leading to a user fee
methodology more reflective of
regulatory oversight effort.
Background
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA)
(Pub. L. 99–272, sec. 7005), codified in
part at section 60301 of title 49, United
States Code, authorizes the assessment
and collection of user fees to fund the
pipeline safety activities conducted
under chapter 601 of title 49. On June
22, 2016, President Obama signed into
law the ‘‘Protecting our Infrastructure of
Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of
2016’’ (Pub. L. 114–183) (PIPES Act of
2016). Section 12 of the PIPES Act of
2016 mandates that PHMSA issue
regulations for UNGS facilities,
Underground Natural Gas Storage
Facility User Fee Plan
During the FY 2018 user fee process,
PHMSA has used calendar year (CY)
2016 annual report data for gas
transmission pipelines, hazardous
liquid pipelines, and liquefied natural
gas facilities. Using CY 2016 data
ensures adequate time to verify annual
report data quality and still be able to
send user fee assessments promptly
after appropriation. PHMSA does not
have CY 2016 annual report data for
underground natural gas storage
facilities. Congress appropriated UNGS
funds for FY 2018, and PHMSA has
[Docket No. PHMSA–2017–0129]
Chapter III provides an overview of
the SPRP in terms of its statutory
authority and program goals, and
explains the program’s relationship to
and coordination with other FTAfunded programs. The chapter also
defines the role of the individual States
and FTA, and provides information on
eligible grant activities, SPRP assistance
formula and notification, and State
planning activities. In Section 2, FTA
removed ‘‘training and educational
activities’’ and ‘‘human resource
program activities’’ from the list of
eligible grant activities for the SPRP
because the statutory basis for their
eligibility was removed by MAP–21. In
Section 5, FTA added programs created
by MAP–21 and the FAST Act, and
removed references to programs
repealed by MAP–21 and the FAST Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
F. Appendices
FTA made minor, clarifying edits to
the appendices.
39507
Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural
Gas Storage Facility User Fee
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of agency action.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
39508
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
used the CY 2017 UNGS annual report
data to develop the UNGS user fee rate
structure for FY 2018. If Congress
appropriates UNGS funds for FY 2019,
PHMSA plans to use the CY 2017 UNGS
annual report data to develop the UNGS
user fee rate structure for FY 2019.
Specifically, PHMSA will use the
number of injection/withdraw wells
(section C7) and monitoring/observation
wells (section C8) in the rate structure.
For the FY 2020 user fee rate structure,
PHMSA would use the CY 2018 UNGS
annual report data.
For FY 2018, Congress has
appropriated $8 million to the
Underground Natural Gas Storage
Facility Safety Account in the Pipeline
Safety Fund. PHMSA has used the
following steps to develop the user fee
rate structure. PHMSA summed the
number of wells from sections C7 and
C8 of the annual report for each
operator. Once PHMSA determined the
number of wells for all UNGS operators,
each operator was parsed into one of 10
tiers, based on an ordinal ranking of its
well counts compared to other UNGS
operators. The operators with the lowest
well-count values were placed in tier 1,
with the highest operator well-count
values in tier 10. The minimum and
maximum well counts for each tier were
then selected so that an equal number
of operators were placed in each tier.
This tiered fee structure is designed to
place a larger share of the user fee on
operators with higher well counts.
Using CY 2017 UNGS annual report
data as of May 9, 2018, the following
table shows the tier boundaries and user
fee for each operator in the tier. When
the tier boundary spans two tiers,
PHMSA randomly selected operators for
the lower tier. For example, four wells
is the boundary between Tiers 1 and 2.
Seven operators have four wells, but
only two operators were randomly
selected and placed in Tier 1. The
remaining five operators with four wells
were placed in Tier 2.
Tier
Amount
(% of total)
Tier boundaries
1 .........................
2 .........................
3 .........................
4 .........................
5 .........................
6 .........................
7 .........................
8 .........................
9 .........................
10 .......................
$160,000 (2%) ..............................................
$320,000 (4%) ..............................................
$400,000 (5%) ..............................................
$480,000 (6%) ..............................................
$640,000 (8%) ..............................................
$800,000 (10%) ............................................
$960,000 (12%) ............................................
$1,040,000 (13%) .........................................
$1,200,000 (15%) .........................................
$2,000,000 (25%) .........................................
4 wells or less ..............................................
4 to 7 wells ...................................................
7 to 12 wells .................................................
13 to 19 wells ...............................................
19 to 27 wells ...............................................
28 to 45 wells ...............................................
46 to 68 wells ...............................................
69 to 100 wells .............................................
101 to 377 wells ...........................................
378 wells or more .........................................
In summary, PHMSA has used UNGS
annual report data about the number of
wells in the FY 2018 user fee rate
structure for the Pipeline Safety Fund’s
Underground Natural Gas Storage
Facility Safety Account. In future years,
the final tier boundaries and user fee per
operator may differ slightly from those
listed above based on the annual report
data at the time the rate structure is
established.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 3,
2018, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2018–17053 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. PHMSA–2018–0078]
Pipeline Safety: Information Collection
Activities, Revision to OPID
Assignment Request and National
Registry Notification
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before October
9, 2018.
DATES:
Comments may be
submitted in the following ways:
E-Gov Website: https://
www.regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
West Building, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on the
ground level of DOT, West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
AGENCY:
PHMSA is preparing to
request Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval for the revision
of the Operator Assignment Request
(PHMSA F 1000.1) and National
Registry Notification (PHMSA F 1000.2)
currently approved under OMB control
number 2137–0627. PHMSA proposes
revising certain parts of the forms and
instructions. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
PHMSA invites comments on the
proposed revisions.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
operators
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
User fee per
operator
$12,308
24,615
30,769
36,923
49,231
61,538
73,846
86,667
100,000
166,667
Instructions: Identify the docket
number, PHMSA–2018–0078, at the
beginning of your comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. You
should know that anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). Therefore,
you may want to review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19476) or visit https://
www.regulations.gov before submitting
any such comments.
Docket: For access to the docket or to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or to
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
DOT, West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
If you wish to receive confirmation of
receipt of your written comments,
please include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard with the following
statement: Comments on: PHMSA–
2018–0078.’’ The docket clerk will date
stamp the postcard prior to returning it
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39507-39508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17053]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2017-0129]
Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User
Fee
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of agency action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On December 8, 2017, PHMSA published a notice and request for
comments in the Federal Register titled: ``Underground Natural Gas
Storage Facility User Fee'' seeking comments from underground natural
gas storage facility (UNGS) operators on a proposal to use UNGS annual
report data in the user fee rate structure. PHMSA received two comments
in the docket. We are publishing this notice to address the comments
received and to announce that PHMSA has used UNGS annual report data
about the number of wells in the user fee rate structure for the
Pipeline Safety Fund's Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety
Account.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Stewart by telephone at 202-
366-1524, by fax at 202-366-4566, by email at [email protected],
or by mail at U.S. Department of Transportation, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., PHP-2, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA)
(Pub. L. 99-272, sec. 7005), codified in part at section 60301 of title
49, United States Code, authorizes the assessment and collection of
user fees to fund the pipeline safety activities conducted under
chapter 601 of title 49. On June 22, 2016, President Obama signed into
law the ``Protecting our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing
Safety Act of 2016'' (Pub. L. 114-183) (PIPES Act of 2016). Section 12
of the PIPES Act of 2016 mandates that PHMSA issue regulations for UNGS
facilities, authorizes user fees on operators of these facilities, and
directs PHMSA to prescribe procedures to collect those fees upon
appropriation. Section 2 of the PIPES Act of 2016 authorizes $8 million
per year to be appropriated from those fees for each of FY 2017-2019
for the newly established Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility
Safety Account in the Pipeline Safety Fund. After Congress appropriates
funds to this account for fiscal year (FY) 2018 and beyond, PHMSA will
collect user fees from the operators of the facilities.
Summary of Comments
The December 8, 2017 notice advised all UNGS facility operators of
a proposed PHMSA pipeline user fee assessment and rate structure (82 FR
58045). During the one-month response period, PHMSA received comments
from two commenters on the proposed UNGS user fee billing methodology:
WBI Energy Transmission Inc., and National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
The comments can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket
Number PHMSA-2017-0129. WBI Energy Transmission Inc., submitted
comments supporting the rate structure proposed by PHMSA in the
December 8, 2017 notice. The remaining comment is summarized below with
PHMSA's response:
Comment: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation stated that well
count alone is not an appropriate measure for determining a user fee
since larger wells will require more regulatory oversight than smaller
wells.
Response: Each well penetrating an underground natural gas storage
reservoir represents a risk. Currently, PHMSA intends to apply a
consistent level of regulatory oversight to all wells, regardless of
size. As PHMSA implements its underground storage inspection program,
we may gain insights leading to a user fee methodology more reflective
of regulatory oversight effort.
Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User Fee Plan
During the FY 2018 user fee process, PHMSA has used calendar year
(CY) 2016 annual report data for gas transmission pipelines, hazardous
liquid pipelines, and liquefied natural gas facilities. Using CY 2016
data ensures adequate time to verify annual report data quality and
still be able to send user fee assessments promptly after
appropriation. PHMSA does not have CY 2016 annual report data for
underground natural gas storage facilities. Congress appropriated UNGS
funds for FY 2018, and PHMSA has
[[Page 39508]]
used the CY 2017 UNGS annual report data to develop the UNGS user fee
rate structure for FY 2018. If Congress appropriates UNGS funds for FY
2019, PHMSA plans to use the CY 2017 UNGS annual report data to develop
the UNGS user fee rate structure for FY 2019. Specifically, PHMSA will
use the number of injection/withdraw wells (section C7) and monitoring/
observation wells (section C8) in the rate structure. For the FY 2020
user fee rate structure, PHMSA would use the CY 2018 UNGS annual report
data.
For FY 2018, Congress has appropriated $8 million to the
Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account in the Pipeline
Safety Fund. PHMSA has used the following steps to develop the user fee
rate structure. PHMSA summed the number of wells from sections C7 and
C8 of the annual report for each operator. Once PHMSA determined the
number of wells for all UNGS operators, each operator was parsed into
one of 10 tiers, based on an ordinal ranking of its well counts
compared to other UNGS operators. The operators with the lowest well-
count values were placed in tier 1, with the highest operator well-
count values in tier 10. The minimum and maximum well counts for each
tier were then selected so that an equal number of operators were
placed in each tier. This tiered fee structure is designed to place a
larger share of the user fee on operators with higher well counts.
Using CY 2017 UNGS annual report data as of May 9, 2018, the
following table shows the tier boundaries and user fee for each
operator in the tier. When the tier boundary spans two tiers, PHMSA
randomly selected operators for the lower tier. For example, four wells
is the boundary between Tiers 1 and 2. Seven operators have four wells,
but only two operators were randomly selected and placed in Tier 1. The
remaining five operators with four wells were placed in Tier 2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of User fee per
Tier Amount (% of total) Tier boundaries operators operator
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. $160,000 (2%)........ 4 wells or less...... 13 $12,308
2................................. $320,000 (4%)........ 4 to 7 wells......... 13 24,615
3................................. $400,000 (5%)........ 7 to 12 wells........ 13 30,769
4................................. $480,000 (6%)........ 13 to 19 wells....... 13 36,923
5................................. $640,000 (8%)........ 19 to 27 wells....... 13 49,231
6................................. $800,000 (10%)....... 28 to 45 wells....... 13 61,538
7................................. $960,000 (12%)....... 46 to 68 wells....... 13 73,846
8................................. $1,040,000 (13%)..... 69 to 100 wells...... 12 86,667
9................................. $1,200,000 (15%)..... 101 to 377 wells..... 12 100,000
10................................ $2,000,000 (25%)..... 378 wells or more.... 12 166,667
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In summary, PHMSA has used UNGS annual report data about the number
of wells in the FY 2018 user fee rate structure for the Pipeline Safety
Fund's Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account. In
future years, the final tier boundaries and user fee per operator may
differ slightly from those listed above based on the annual report data
at the time the rate structure is established.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 3, 2018, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2018-17053 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P