Governing Bodies, 38270-38272 [2018-16765]
Download as PDF
38270
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 151
Monday, August 6, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1607
Governing Bodies
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule revises the
Legal Services Corporation (LSC or
Corporation) regulation regarding
recipient governing bodies. LSC is
proposing two revisions to give
recipient governing bodies flexibility in
how they recruit, appoint, and retain
client eligible members while remaining
faithful to the LSC Act’s requirement to
appoint client-eligible board members
who may also represent associations or
organizations of eligible clients. First,
LSC proposes to revise the definition of
the term eligible client to remove the
requirement that a client-eligible board
member must be financially eligible ‘‘at
the time of appointment to each term of
office’’ (emphasis added). Second, LSC
proposes to eliminate the requirement
that client-eligible members be
appointed by outside groups.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
October 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: lscrulemaking@lsc.gov.
Include ‘‘Comments on Revisions to Part
1607’’ in the subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 337–6519.
• Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services
Corporation, 3333 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part
1607 Rulemaking.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K.
Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part
1607 Rulemaking.
Instructions: Electronic submissions
are preferred via email with attachments
in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not
consider written comments sent to any
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Aug 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
other address or received after the end
of the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K Street NW, Washington, DC
20007; (202) 295–1563 (phone), (202)
337–6519 (fax), or sdavis@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In December 1977, Congress amended
§ 1007(c) of the LSC Act. Public Law
95–222, 11, 91 Stat. 1619. Through the
amendment, Congress directed LSC to
fund only those organizations whose
governing bodies consisted of ‘‘onethird . . . persons who are, when
selected, eligible clients who may also
be representatives of associations or
organizations of eligible clients.’’ Id. at
1622. LSC published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
implement the new requirement in May
1978. In that NPRM, LSC proposed to
define ‘‘eligible client’’ as an
‘‘individual eligible to receive legal
assistance under the LSC Act.’’ 43 FR
21902, May 22, 1978. The proposed
definition was narrower than the LSC
Act’s definition of the term ‘‘[e]ligible
client,’’ which the Act defines as ‘‘any
person financially unable to afford legal
assistance.’’ Sec. 1002(3), Public Law
88–452, title X; 42 U.S.C. 2996a(3). LSC
also proposed to adopt a requirement
that eligible client members ‘‘be selected
from, or designated by, a variety of
appropriate groups including, but not
limited to, client and neighborhood
associations and organizations.’’ Id. This
language reflected LSC’s ‘‘attempt to
insure that programs will be
accountable to the communities that
they serve.’’ On July 28, 1978, LSC
adopted the proposed rule without
change. 43 FR 32772, July 28, 1978.
The provisions governing the
appointment of client-eligible members
to recipient governing bodies remained
unchanged for 16 years. In 1994, LSC
proposed to revise Part 1607 in two
relevant ways. First, LSC proposed to
amend the regulation to reflect its
interpretation of the statutory language
requiring one-third of a recipient
governing body’s members to be
‘‘persons who are, when selected,
eligible clients’’:
[T]he language has been revised to make it
clear that client board members must be
eligible at the time of their appointment to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
each term of office. Thus, a client member
who is financially eligible for services when
first appointed to a recipient’s board may not
be reappointed to a second or subsequent
term if, at the time of reappointment, the
client board member is no longer financially
eligible for LSC-funded services.
59 FR 30885, 30886, June 16, 1994. The
second proposed revision ‘‘would
codify the current LSC interpretation of
the language to require that client board
members be selected by client groups
that have been designated by the
recipient.’’ Id. at 30886–87.
In a final rule published on December
19, 1994, LSC adopted both proposed
changes. LSC revised the proposed
definition of ‘‘eligible client’’ to make
clear that the member had to be
financially eligible ‘‘to receive legal
assistance under the Act and part 1611’’
of LSC’s regulations. 59 FR 65249–50,
Dec. 19, 1994. In so doing, LSC rejected
comments recommending that LSC
expand the definition to include
individuals whose income exceeds
LSC’s financial eligibility limit, but who
are eligible to receive non-LSC-funded
legal assistance from a recipient. LSC
limited the definition to individuals
who were financially eligible for LSCfunded legal assistance because it
‘‘wished to insure that the focus of the
legal services program remains on the
indigent population.’’ Id. at 65250. As it
did in 1978, LSC adopted a narrower
definition of the term ‘‘eligible client’’
than the one provided in § 1002 of the
LSC Act.
With respect to LSC’s proposal to
require that client-eligible members be
appointed by organizations or
associations, LSC received comments
both in support of and opposing the
requirement. In the preamble to the final
rule, LSC explained that favorable
comments ‘‘supported the clarification
and the policy choice that it
represented.’’ Id. at 65251. LSC
provided more detailed explanations of
the comments in opposition. One basis
for opposition was that it would be
difficult or impossible for some
recipients to comply with the
requirement because ‘‘often there are no
organized client groups within the
service area and, even when there are,
it is not necessarily true that client
groups speak for the client community.’’
Id. at 65251. The other was that
‘‘recipients often come into contact with
program clients or other financially
eligible individuals who would make
E:\FR\FM\06AUP1.SGM
06AUP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 151 / Monday, August 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
good client board members but who, for
one reason or another, are not involved
with any client group.’’ Id. LSC adopted
the language from the NPRM without
change.
In 2015, LSC Board Member Julie
Reiskin provided Management with a
memorandum detailing concerns clients
had expressed to her. The primary
concerns expressed in the memorandum
were that some client governing body
members were not truly representative
of the population eligible for LSCfunded legal services and that the rule
was more prescriptive than § 1007(c) of
the LSC Act, which states that clienteligible members (1) must be eligible
when selected; and (2) may be
representatives of associations or
organizations of eligible clients. 42
U.S.C. 2996f(c). Following up on this
memorandum, in 2017, the Office of
Legal Affairs (OLA) participated in
Board Member Reiskin’s and President
Sandman’s client-listening session at
the National Legal Aid and Defender
Association’s annual conference.
Recipients and their clients
communicated that two provisions in
Part 1607 present obstacles to recruiting
and retaining qualified client-eligible
members: the definition of ‘‘eligible
client’’ and the requirement that outside
organizations appoint client-eligible
members.
LSC takes seriously the client
community’s concerns and believes
regulatory action is justified for two
reasons. First, LSC believes that the
current rule interprets § 1007(c) too
restrictively. Second, LSC believes that
recipients should have discretion to
establish board member appointment
procedures that maximize their ability
to recruit qualified client-eligible board
members.
On April 23, 2017, the Committee
approved Management’s proposed
2017–2018 rulemaking, which included
revising part 1607 as a Tier 2
rulemaking item. On April 8, 2018, the
Committee voted to recommend that the
Board authorize rulemaking on part
1607. On April 10, 2018, the Board
authorized LSC to begin rulemaking. On
July 25, 2018, the Committee voted to
recommend that the Board authorize
publication of this NPRM in the Federal
Register for notice and comment. On
July 26, 2018, the Board accepted the
Committee’s recommendation and voted
to approve publication of this NPRM.
§ 1607.2
II. Proposed Changes
§ 1607.4
Body
§ 1607.1 Purpose
LSC proposes to make no changes to
this section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Aug 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 1607.5
Definitions
LSC proposes to remove the
requirement that a board member be
financially eligible ‘‘at the time of
appointment to each term of office to
the recipient’s governing body’’ to allow
client-eligible members who improve
their financial position to serve
consecutive terms on a recipient’s
governing body (emphasis added).
Under this interpretation, the member’s
eligibility status would be evaluated
upon first appointment and at any
subsequent appointment following a gap
in service on the recipient’s governing
body, but not upon reappointment to
consecutive terms of service. This is not
intended to require the recipient to
reappoint the client-eligible member to
another term; it merely permits the
recipient to do so. Thus, for example, if
a client-eligible board member’s income
increases negligibly, but nonetheless
sufficiently to exceed the applicable
financial eligibility income ceiling, the
recipient would have the discretion and
flexibility to reappoint that clienteligible board member to a successive
term. This is consistent with the
statutory language of Section 1007(c) of
the LSC Act that ‘‘at least one-third of
[the recipient’s governing body] consists
of persons who are, when selected,
eligible clients . . .’’ (emphasis added).
§ 1607.3
Composition
LSC proposes to eliminate the
§ 1607.3(c) requirement that clienteligible members be appointed by
groups. Unlike the requirement that the
majority of attorney members of
recipient governing bodies be appointed
by state, county, or local bar
associations, LSC’s governing statutes
do not require client-eligible members
to be appointed by groups. LSC believes
that each recipient governing body
should have the authority and flexibility
to implement an appointment procedure
that takes into account its unique client
population, including associations and
organizations of client-eligible people.
Under LSC’s proposal, recipients may
choose to continue using the procedure
required by existing § 1607.3(c), but will
no longer be required to have outside
organizations appoint client-eligible
members to the recipients’ governing
bodies.
Functions of a Governing
LSC proposes to make no changes to
this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38271
Compensation
LSC proposes to make no changes to
this section.
§ 1607.6
Waiver
LSC proposes to make no changes to
this section.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1607
Grant programs—law, Legal services.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Legal Services
Corporation proposes to amend 45 CFR
part 1607 as follows:
PART 1607—GOVERNING BODIES
1. Revise the authority citation for part
1607 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996g(e).
2. Revise paragraph (c) of § 1607.2 to
read as follows:
■
§ 1607.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Eligible client member means a
board member who is financially
eligible to receive legal assistance under
the Act and part 1611 of this chapter,
without regard to whether the person
actually has received or is receiving
legal assistance at that time. Eligibility
of client members must be determined
by the recipient or, if the recipient so
chooses, by the nominating
organization(s) or group(s) in
accordance with written policies
adopted by the recipient.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise paragraph (c) of § 1607.3 to
read as follows:
§ 1607.3
Composition.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) At least one-third of the members
of a recipient’s governing body must be
eligible client members when initially
appointed by the recipient. The
recipient must solicit recommendations
for eligible client members from a
variety of appropriate groups designated
by the recipient that may include, but
are not limited to, client and
neighborhood associations and
community-based organizations that
advocate for or deliver services or
resources to the client community
served by the recipient. Recipients
should solicit recommendations from
groups in a manner that reflects, to the
extent possible, the variety of interests
E:\FR\FM\06AUP1.SGM
06AUP1
38272
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 151 / Monday, August 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
within the client community, and
eligible client members should be
selected so that they reasonably reflect
the diversity of the eligible client
population served by the recipient,
including race, gender, ethnicity and
other similar factors.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 1, 2018.
Stefanie Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018–16765 Filed 8–3–18; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Aug 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06AUP1.SGM
06AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 151 (Monday, August 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38270-38272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16765]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 151 / Monday, August 6, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 38270]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1607
Governing Bodies
AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule revises the Legal Services Corporation (LSC
or Corporation) regulation regarding recipient governing bodies. LSC is
proposing two revisions to give recipient governing bodies flexibility
in how they recruit, appoint, and retain client eligible members while
remaining faithful to the LSC Act's requirement to appoint client-
eligible board members who may also represent associations or
organizations of eligible clients. First, LSC proposes to revise the
definition of the term eligible client to remove the requirement that a
client-eligible board member must be financially eligible ``at the time
of appointment to each term of office'' (emphasis added). Second, LSC
proposes to eliminate the requirement that client-eligible members be
appointed by outside groups.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by October 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include ``Comments on
Revisions to Part 1607'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 337-6519.
Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20007, ATTN:
Part 1607 Rulemaking.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part 1607 Rulemaking.
Instructions: Electronic submissions are preferred via email with
attachments in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not consider written
comments sent to any other address or received after the end of the
comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW, Washington, DC
20007; (202) 295-1563 (phone), (202) 337-6519 (fax), or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In December 1977, Congress amended Sec. 1007(c) of the LSC Act.
Public Law 95-222, 11, 91 Stat. 1619. Through the amendment, Congress
directed LSC to fund only those organizations whose governing bodies
consisted of ``one-third . . . persons who are, when selected, eligible
clients who may also be representatives of associations or
organizations of eligible clients.'' Id. at 1622. LSC published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to implement the new requirement
in May 1978. In that NPRM, LSC proposed to define ``eligible client''
as an ``individual eligible to receive legal assistance under the LSC
Act.'' 43 FR 21902, May 22, 1978. The proposed definition was narrower
than the LSC Act's definition of the term ``[e]ligible client,'' which
the Act defines as ``any person financially unable to afford legal
assistance.'' Sec. 1002(3), Public Law 88-452, title X; 42 U.S.C.
2996a(3). LSC also proposed to adopt a requirement that eligible client
members ``be selected from, or designated by, a variety of appropriate
groups including, but not limited to, client and neighborhood
associations and organizations.'' Id. This language reflected LSC's
``attempt to insure that programs will be accountable to the
communities that they serve.'' On July 28, 1978, LSC adopted the
proposed rule without change. 43 FR 32772, July 28, 1978.
The provisions governing the appointment of client-eligible members
to recipient governing bodies remained unchanged for 16 years. In 1994,
LSC proposed to revise Part 1607 in two relevant ways. First, LSC
proposed to amend the regulation to reflect its interpretation of the
statutory language requiring one-third of a recipient governing body's
members to be ``persons who are, when selected, eligible clients'':
[T]he language has been revised to make it clear that client
board members must be eligible at the time of their appointment to
each term of office. Thus, a client member who is financially
eligible for services when first appointed to a recipient's board
may not be reappointed to a second or subsequent term if, at the
time of reappointment, the client board member is no longer
financially eligible for LSC-funded services.
59 FR 30885, 30886, June 16, 1994. The second proposed revision ``would
codify the current LSC interpretation of the language to require that
client board members be selected by client groups that have been
designated by the recipient.'' Id. at 30886-87.
In a final rule published on December 19, 1994, LSC adopted both
proposed changes. LSC revised the proposed definition of ``eligible
client'' to make clear that the member had to be financially eligible
``to receive legal assistance under the Act and part 1611'' of LSC's
regulations. 59 FR 65249-50, Dec. 19, 1994. In so doing, LSC rejected
comments recommending that LSC expand the definition to include
individuals whose income exceeds LSC's financial eligibility limit, but
who are eligible to receive non-LSC-funded legal assistance from a
recipient. LSC limited the definition to individuals who were
financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance because it
``wished to insure that the focus of the legal services program remains
on the indigent population.'' Id. at 65250. As it did in 1978, LSC
adopted a narrower definition of the term ``eligible client'' than the
one provided in Sec. 1002 of the LSC Act.
With respect to LSC's proposal to require that client-eligible
members be appointed by organizations or associations, LSC received
comments both in support of and opposing the requirement. In the
preamble to the final rule, LSC explained that favorable comments
``supported the clarification and the policy choice that it
represented.'' Id. at 65251. LSC provided more detailed explanations of
the comments in opposition. One basis for opposition was that it would
be difficult or impossible for some recipients to comply with the
requirement because ``often there are no organized client groups within
the service area and, even when there are, it is not necessarily true
that client groups speak for the client community.'' Id. at 65251. The
other was that ``recipients often come into contact with program
clients or other financially eligible individuals who would make
[[Page 38271]]
good client board members but who, for one reason or another, are not
involved with any client group.'' Id. LSC adopted the language from the
NPRM without change.
In 2015, LSC Board Member Julie Reiskin provided Management with a
memorandum detailing concerns clients had expressed to her. The primary
concerns expressed in the memorandum were that some client governing
body members were not truly representative of the population eligible
for LSC-funded legal services and that the rule was more prescriptive
than Sec. 1007(c) of the LSC Act, which states that client-eligible
members (1) must be eligible when selected; and (2) may be
representatives of associations or organizations of eligible clients.
42 U.S.C. 2996f(c). Following up on this memorandum, in 2017, the
Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) participated in Board Member Reiskin's
and President Sandman's client-listening session at the National Legal
Aid and Defender Association's annual conference. Recipients and their
clients communicated that two provisions in Part 1607 present obstacles
to recruiting and retaining qualified client-eligible members: the
definition of ``eligible client'' and the requirement that outside
organizations appoint client-eligible members.
LSC takes seriously the client community's concerns and believes
regulatory action is justified for two reasons. First, LSC believes
that the current rule interprets Sec. 1007(c) too restrictively.
Second, LSC believes that recipients should have discretion to
establish board member appointment procedures that maximize their
ability to recruit qualified client-eligible board members.
On April 23, 2017, the Committee approved Management's proposed
2017-2018 rulemaking, which included revising part 1607 as a Tier 2
rulemaking item. On April 8, 2018, the Committee voted to recommend
that the Board authorize rulemaking on part 1607. On April 10, 2018,
the Board authorized LSC to begin rulemaking. On July 25, 2018, the
Committee voted to recommend that the Board authorize publication of
this NPRM in the Federal Register for notice and comment. On July 26,
2018, the Board accepted the Committee's recommendation and voted to
approve publication of this NPRM.
II. Proposed Changes
Sec. 1607.1 Purpose
LSC proposes to make no changes to this section.
Sec. 1607.2 Definitions
LSC proposes to remove the requirement that a board member be
financially eligible ``at the time of appointment to each term of
office to the recipient's governing body'' to allow client-eligible
members who improve their financial position to serve consecutive terms
on a recipient's governing body (emphasis added). Under this
interpretation, the member's eligibility status would be evaluated upon
first appointment and at any subsequent appointment following a gap in
service on the recipient's governing body, but not upon reappointment
to consecutive terms of service. This is not intended to require the
recipient to reappoint the client-eligible member to another term; it
merely permits the recipient to do so. Thus, for example, if a client-
eligible board member's income increases negligibly, but nonetheless
sufficiently to exceed the applicable financial eligibility income
ceiling, the recipient would have the discretion and flexibility to
reappoint that client-eligible board member to a successive term. This
is consistent with the statutory language of Section 1007(c) of the LSC
Act that ``at least one-third of [the recipient's governing body]
consists of persons who are, when selected, eligible clients . . .''
(emphasis added).
Sec. 1607.3 Composition
LSC proposes to eliminate the Sec. 1607.3(c) requirement that
client-eligible members be appointed by groups. Unlike the requirement
that the majority of attorney members of recipient governing bodies be
appointed by state, county, or local bar associations, LSC's governing
statutes do not require client-eligible members to be appointed by
groups. LSC believes that each recipient governing body should have the
authority and flexibility to implement an appointment procedure that
takes into account its unique client population, including associations
and organizations of client-eligible people. Under LSC's proposal,
recipients may choose to continue using the procedure required by
existing Sec. 1607.3(c), but will no longer be required to have
outside organizations appoint client-eligible members to the
recipients' governing bodies.
Sec. 1607.4 Functions of a Governing Body
LSC proposes to make no changes to this section.
Sec. 1607.5 Compensation
LSC proposes to make no changes to this section.
Sec. 1607.6 Waiver
LSC proposes to make no changes to this section.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1607
Grant programs--law, Legal services.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Legal Services
Corporation proposes to amend 45 CFR part 1607 as follows:
PART 1607--GOVERNING BODIES
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 1607 to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996g(e).
0
2. Revise paragraph (c) of Sec. 1607.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 1607.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(c) Eligible client member means a board member who is financially
eligible to receive legal assistance under the Act and part 1611 of
this chapter, without regard to whether the person actually has
received or is receiving legal assistance at that time. Eligibility of
client members must be determined by the recipient or, if the recipient
so chooses, by the nominating organization(s) or group(s) in accordance
with written policies adopted by the recipient.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise paragraph (c) of Sec. 1607.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1607.3 Composition.
* * * * *
(c) At least one-third of the members of a recipient's governing
body must be eligible client members when initially appointed by the
recipient. The recipient must solicit recommendations for eligible
client members from a variety of appropriate groups designated by the
recipient that may include, but are not limited to, client and
neighborhood associations and community-based organizations that
advocate for or deliver services or resources to the client community
served by the recipient. Recipients should solicit recommendations from
groups in a manner that reflects, to the extent possible, the variety
of interests
[[Page 38272]]
within the client community, and eligible client members should be
selected so that they reasonably reflect the diversity of the eligible
client population served by the recipient, including race, gender,
ethnicity and other similar factors.
* * * * *
Dated: August 1, 2018.
Stefanie Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-16765 Filed 8-3-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P