Denial of Export Privileges, 38123-38125 [2018-16678]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
(j) Whether the project can be
replicated. A maximum of 10 points can
be awarded. Points to be awarded will
be determined as follows:
(1) If the project can be commercially
replicated regionally (e.g., Northeast,
Southwest, etc.), 5 points will be
awarded.
(2) If the project can be commercially
replicated nationally, 10 points will be
awarded.
(k) If the project uses a particular
technology, system, or process that is
not currently operating at commercial
scale as of October 1 of the fiscal year
for which the funding is available;
October 1, 2018, 5 points will be
awarded.
(l) The Administrator can award up to
a maximum of 10 bonus points:
(1) To ensure, to the extent practical,
there is diversity in the types of projects
approved for loan guarantees to ensure
a wide a range as possible technologies,
products, and approaches are assisted in
the program portfolio; and
(2) To applications that promote
partnerships and other activities that
assist in the development of new and
emerging technologies for the
development of renewable chemicals
and other biobased outputs of
biorefineries, so as to, as applicable,
promote resource conservation, public
health, and the environment; diversify
markets for agricultural and forestry
products and agriculture waste material;
and create jobs and enhance the
economic development of the rural
economy. No additional information
regarding partnerships is provided at
this time. If additional information does
become available, the Agency will
publish those details in a Federal
Register notice.
IX. General Program Information
A. Loan Origination. Lenders seeking
a loan guarantee under this Notice must
comply with all of the provisions found
in 7 CFR 4279, subpart C.
B. Loan Processing. The Agency will
process loans guaranteed under this
Notice in accordance with the
provisions specified in 7 CFR 4279.260
through 4279.290.
C. Evaluation of Applications and
Awards. Awards under this Notice will
be made on a competitive basis;
submission of an application neither
reserves funding nor ensures funding.
The Agency will evaluate each
application received in the USDA Rural
Business-Cooperative Service, Energy
Programs, select Phase 1 applications in
accordance with 7 CFR 4279.267 to
invite submittal of Phase 2 applications
and will make awards using the
provisions specified in 7 CFR 4279.278.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
D. Guaranteed Loan Servicing. The
Agency will service loans guaranteed
under this Notice in accordance with
the provisions specified in 7 CFR
4287.301 through 4287.399.
E. System for Award Management
(SAM) and Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
Registration. Unless exempt under 2
CFR 25.110, the applicant must be
registered in the SAM prior to
submitting an application and maintain
an active SAM registration with current
information at all times during which it
has an active Federal award or an
application under consideration by the
Agency. Applicants must provide a
DUNS number for each application
submitted to the Agency.
X. Administration Information
A. Notifications. The Agency will
notify, in writing, lenders whose Phase
1 applications have scored highest and
will invite them to submit Phase 2
applications. If the Agency determines it
is unable to guarantee any particular
loan, the lender will be informed in
writing. Such notification will include
the reason(s) for denial of the guarantee.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements.
1. Review or Appeal Rights. A person
may seek a review of an Agency
decision or appeal to the National
Appeals Division in accordance with 7
CFR 4279.204.
2. Exception Authority. The
provisions specified in 7 CFR 4279.203
and 7 CFR 4287.303 apply to this
Notice.
C. Environmental Review. The Agency
will review all applicant proposals that
may qualify for assistance under this
section in accordance with 7 CFR part
1970, Environmental Policies and
Procedures. The environmental review
for projects that score high enough will
be submitted during the Phase 2
application process and must be
conducted in accordance with 7 CFR
part 1970, Environmental Policies and
Procedures.
XI. Agency Contacts
For general questions about this
Notice, please contact Aaron Morris,
Rural Business–Cooperative Service,
Energy Programs, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Room 6901–S, Washington DC
20250–3225. Telephone: 202–720–1501.
Email: Aaron.Morris@wdc.usda.gov.
Equal Opportunity and NonDiscrimination Requirements
In accordance with Federal civil
rights law and U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) civil rights
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38123
regulations and policies, the USDA, its
Agencies, offices, and employees, and
institutions participating in or
administering USDA programs are
prohibited from discriminating based on
race, color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity (including gender
expression), sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family/
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program. Political
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior
civil rights activity, in any program or
activity conducted or funded by USDA
(not all bases apply to all programs).
Remedies and complaint filing
deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means of communication for
program information (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign
Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible Agency or USDA’s TARTET
Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and
TTY) or contact USDA through the
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Additionally, program information may
be made available in languages other
than English.
To file a program discrimination
complaint, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, AD–
3027, found online at: https://
www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_
cust.html, and at any USDA office or
write a letter addressed to USDA and
provide in the letter all of the
information requested in the form. To
request a copy of a complaint form, call,
(866) 632–9992. Submit your completed
form or letter to USDA by:
(1) Mail: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410;
(2) Fax: (202) 690–7442; or
(3) Email at: program.intake@
usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
Dated: July 30, 2018.
Bette B. Brand,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–16664 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket Number 17–BIS–0005]
Denial of Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Narender Sharma Middle
Bazzar, Rampur Bushahr Distt. Shimla (H.P.)
172 001 India, Hydel Engineering Products
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
38124
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
Middle Bazzar, Rampur Bushahr Distt.
Shimla (H.P) 172 001 India, Respondents;
Order Activating Suspended Portion of Civil
Penalty and Activating Suspended Denial of
Export Privileges Against Narender Sharma
and Hydel Engineering Products
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
On August 31, 2017, I signed an order
(the ‘‘August 31, 2017 Order’’)
approving the terms of the settlement
agreement entered into in August 2017
(the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’) between
the Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’),
and Narender Sharma (‘‘Sharma’’) and
his company Hydel Engineering
Products (‘‘Hydel’’ or ‘‘Hydel
Engineering’’) (collectively, ‘‘Hydel/
Sharma’’ or ‘‘Respondents’’). The
Settlement Agreement and the August
31, 2017 Order relate to an enforcement
action brought by BIS against Hydel and
Sharma for conspiring to export items
from the United States to Iran, including
to an Iranian Government entity,
without the required U.S. Government
authorization, in violation of the Export
Administration Regulations (the
‘‘Regulations’’), which issued under the
authority of the Export Administration
Act of 1979, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1
The Settlement Agreement and
August 31, 2017 Order imposed on
Hydel and Sharma a civil penalty of
$100,000, for which they are jointly and
severally liable. Hydel and Sharma were
required to pay $30,000 of this amount
to the U.S. Department of Commerce by
no later than December 15, 2017.
Payment of the remaining $70,000 was
suspended for a probationary period of
five years from the date of the August
31, 2017 Order, after which it would be
waived, provided that during this fiveyear probationary period, Hydel and
Sharma made full and timely payment
of $30,000 as set forth above, otherwise
complied with the terms of the
Settlement Agreement and the August
31, 2017 Order, and committed no other
violation of the Act, the Regulations, or
any order, license, or authorization
issued thereunder.
The Settlement Agreement and the
August 31, 2017 Order also imposed a
five-year denial of Hydel and Sharma’s
export privileges under the Regulations.
This denial order was suspended
pursuant to Section 766.18(c) of the
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2018). The Regulations issued under the Act,
50 U.S.C. app. 4601–4623 (Supp. III 2015). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as
extended most recently by the Notice of August 15,
2017 (82 FR 39,005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued
the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq. (2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Regulations, subject to the same
probationary conditions described
above, including Hydel and Sharma’s
full and timely payment of $30,000 by
December 15, 2017. If Hydel and
Sharma failed to make such full and
timely payment, the suspension could
be modified or revoked by BIS and a
denial order including a denial period
of up to five years activated against
Hydel and Sharma. Upon activation of
the denial order, any license issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Hydel or Sharma had an interest
at such time would be revoked.
BIS has brought to my attention that
Hydel and Sharma have not paid the
$30,000 that was due by December 15,
2017, and thus that Hydel and Sharma
have violated one of the probationary
conditions relating to the $70,000
suspended portion of the civil penalty
and the suspension of the denial of their
export privileges.
In accordance with Sections 766.17(c)
and 766.18(c) of the Regulations, I
notified Hydel and Sharma, by letter
dated February 12, 2018, of the
proposed activation of these suspended
sanctions, and provided them with an
opportunity to respond, including an
opportunity to explain their failure to
make the December 15, 2017 payment of
$30,000, and to show why I should not
activate the $70,000 suspended penalty
amount, issue an active five-year denial
order against them, or take both actions.
Neither Hydel nor Sharma has
responded to the February 12, 2018
letter. The $30,000 civil penalty
payment that was due by December 15,
2017, also remains unpaid.
Based on the totality of circumstances
here, I have determined within my
discretion that it is appropriate to
activate the $70,000 suspended portion
of the civil penalty and to activate a
denial order including a five-year denial
period.
It is therefore ordered:
First, the suspension of the $70,000
suspended portion of the civil penalty
set forth in the August 31, 2017 Order
is hereby revoked, and that this nowactivated $70,000 civil penalty amount
shall be paid to the U.S. Department of
Commerce within 15 days of the date of
this Order. Hydel and Sharma are
jointly and severally liable for payment
of this amount, and continue to be
jointly and severally liable for the
$30,000 civil penalty amount they were
required to pay by December 15, 2017,
along with any related interest, penalty,
or administrative charge that has
accrued or may accrue as a result of
their failure to pay $30,000 by the
December 15, 2017 due date.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Second, pursuant to the Debt
Collection Act of 1982, as amended (31
U.S.C. 3701–3720E (2000)), the $70,000
civil penalty amount activated by this
Order accrues interest as more fully
described in the attached Notice, and if
payment is not made by the due date
specified herein, Hydel and Sharma will
be assessed, in addition to the full
amount of the civil penalty and interest,
a penalty charge and an administrative
charge, as more fully described in the
attached Notice.
Third, for a period of five years from
the date of this Order, Hydel
Engineering Products, with a last known
address of Middle Bazzar, Rampur
Bushahr Distt. Shimla (H.P.) 172 001,
India, and Narender Sharma, with a last
known address of Middle Bazzar,
Rampur Bushahr Distt. Shimla (H.P.)
172 001, India, and when acting for or
on their behalf, their successors, assigns,
representatives, agents, or employees
(each a ‘‘Denied Person’’ and
collectively the ‘‘Denied Persons’’), may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, license exception, or export
control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or engaging
in any other activity subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Fourth, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of a Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
a Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby a Denied Person
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from a Denied Person of any
item subject to the Regulations that has
been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the
United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Fifth, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any person, firm,
corporation, or business organization
related to a Denied Person by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order.
Sixth, any license issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which Hydel
or Sharma has an interest of the date of
this Order is hereby revoked.
Seventh, this Order shall be served on
Hydel and Sharma, and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately.
Issued on July 30, 2018.
Richard R. Majauskas,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018–16678 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
RIN 0648–XG131
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to the Bravo
Wharf Recapitalization Project
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Notice; issuance of incidental
harassment authorization.
ACTION:
In accordance with the
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA) to the
U.S. Navy (Navy) for the take, by Level
B harassment only, of bottlenose
dolphins (Tursiops truncatus),
incidental to the Bravo Wharf
Recapitalization Project at Bravo Wharf,
Naval Station Mayport, Florida.
DATES: The IHA is valid from May 14,
2018 through May 13, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaclyn Daly, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8438.
SUMMARY:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated
to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by
U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and either
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
limited to harassment, a notice of a
proposed authorization is provided to
the public for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
The MMPA states that the term ‘‘take’’
means to harass, hunt, capture, kill or
attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill
any marine mammal.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38125
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B
harassment).
National Environmental Policy Act
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as implemented by
the regulations published by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), the Navy
prepared an Environmental Assessment
(EA) to consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative effects to the human
environment resulting from the Bravo
Wharf recapitalization project. NMFS
made the Navy’s EA available to the
public for review and comment, in
relation to its suitability for adoption by
NMFS in order to assess the impacts to
the human environment of issuance of
an IHA to the Navy. Also in compliance
with NEPA and the CEQ regulations, as
well as NOAA Administrative Order
216–6, NMFS has reviewed the Navy’s
EA, determined it to be sufficient, and
adopted that EA and signed a Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) in
July, 2016. The 2016 NEPA documents
are available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/node/23111.
Since the IHA covers a subset of the
same work covered in a former IHA,
NMFS is relying on this same EA and
FONSI document.
History of Request
On July 21, 2015, we received a
request from the Navy for authorization
of the taking, by Level B harassment
only, of marine mammals incidental to
pile driving (predominantly vibratory
pile driving, with a small amount of
impact pile driving as a contingency
plan in case of difficult piles) in
association with the Bravo Wharf
Recapitalization Project at Naval Station
Mayport, Florida. A final version of the
application, which we deemed adequate
and complete, was submitted on
November 17, 2015. We published a
notice of a proposed IHA and request for
comments on December 7, 2015 (80 FR
75978), and subsequently published
final notice of our issuance of the IHA
on August 9, 2016 (81 FR 52637). Inwater work associated with the project
was expected to be completed within
the one-year timeframe of the IHA
(effective dates originally December 1,
2016 through November 30, 2017). The
specified activities were, and are,
expected to result in the take of
individuals from four stocks of
bottlenose dolphins.
On January 23, 2017, the Navy
informed NMFS that no work had been
performed relevant to the specified
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38123-38125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16678]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket Number 17-BIS-0005]
Denial of Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Narender Sharma Middle Bazzar, Rampur Bushahr
Distt. Shimla (H.P.) 172 001 India, Hydel Engineering Products
[[Page 38124]]
Middle Bazzar, Rampur Bushahr Distt. Shimla (H.P) 172 001 India,
Respondents; Order Activating Suspended Portion of Civil Penalty and
Activating Suspended Denial of Export Privileges Against Narender
Sharma and Hydel Engineering Products
On August 31, 2017, I signed an order (the ``August 31, 2017
Order'') approving the terms of the settlement agreement entered into
in August 2017 (the ``Settlement Agreement'') between the Bureau of
Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (``BIS''), and
Narender Sharma (``Sharma'') and his company Hydel Engineering Products
(``Hydel'' or ``Hydel Engineering'') (collectively, ``Hydel/Sharma'' or
``Respondents''). The Settlement Agreement and the August 31, 2017
Order relate to an enforcement action brought by BIS against Hydel and
Sharma for conspiring to export items from the United States to Iran,
including to an Iranian Government entity, without the required U.S.
Government authorization, in violation of the Export Administration
Regulations (the ``Regulations''), which issued under the authority of
the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2018). The Regulations
issued under the Act, 50 U.S.C. app. 4601-4623 (Supp. III 2015).
Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President,
through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp.
783 (2002)), as extended most recently by the Notice of August 15,
2017 (82 FR 39,005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued the Regulations
in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50
U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Settlement Agreement and August 31, 2017 Order imposed on Hydel
and Sharma a civil penalty of $100,000, for which they are jointly and
severally liable. Hydel and Sharma were required to pay $30,000 of this
amount to the U.S. Department of Commerce by no later than December 15,
2017. Payment of the remaining $70,000 was suspended for a probationary
period of five years from the date of the August 31, 2017 Order, after
which it would be waived, provided that during this five-year
probationary period, Hydel and Sharma made full and timely payment of
$30,000 as set forth above, otherwise complied with the terms of the
Settlement Agreement and the August 31, 2017 Order, and committed no
other violation of the Act, the Regulations, or any order, license, or
authorization issued thereunder.
The Settlement Agreement and the August 31, 2017 Order also imposed
a five-year denial of Hydel and Sharma's export privileges under the
Regulations. This denial order was suspended pursuant to Section
766.18(c) of the Regulations, subject to the same probationary
conditions described above, including Hydel and Sharma's full and
timely payment of $30,000 by December 15, 2017. If Hydel and Sharma
failed to make such full and timely payment, the suspension could be
modified or revoked by BIS and a denial order including a denial period
of up to five years activated against Hydel and Sharma. Upon activation
of the denial order, any license issued pursuant to the Act or
Regulations in which Hydel or Sharma had an interest at such time would
be revoked.
BIS has brought to my attention that Hydel and Sharma have not paid
the $30,000 that was due by December 15, 2017, and thus that Hydel and
Sharma have violated one of the probationary conditions relating to the
$70,000 suspended portion of the civil penalty and the suspension of
the denial of their export privileges.
In accordance with Sections 766.17(c) and 766.18(c) of the
Regulations, I notified Hydel and Sharma, by letter dated February 12,
2018, of the proposed activation of these suspended sanctions, and
provided them with an opportunity to respond, including an opportunity
to explain their failure to make the December 15, 2017 payment of
$30,000, and to show why I should not activate the $70,000 suspended
penalty amount, issue an active five-year denial order against them, or
take both actions.
Neither Hydel nor Sharma has responded to the February 12, 2018
letter. The $30,000 civil penalty payment that was due by December 15,
2017, also remains unpaid.
Based on the totality of circumstances here, I have determined
within my discretion that it is appropriate to activate the $70,000
suspended portion of the civil penalty and to activate a denial order
including a five-year denial period.
It is therefore ordered:
First, the suspension of the $70,000 suspended portion of the civil
penalty set forth in the August 31, 2017 Order is hereby revoked, and
that this now-activated $70,000 civil penalty amount shall be paid to
the U.S. Department of Commerce within 15 days of the date of this
Order. Hydel and Sharma are jointly and severally liable for payment of
this amount, and continue to be jointly and severally liable for the
$30,000 civil penalty amount they were required to pay by December 15,
2017, along with any related interest, penalty, or administrative
charge that has accrued or may accrue as a result of their failure to
pay $30,000 by the December 15, 2017 due date.
Second, pursuant to the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended (31
U.S.C. 3701-3720E (2000)), the $70,000 civil penalty amount activated
by this Order accrues interest as more fully described in the attached
Notice, and if payment is not made by the due date specified herein,
Hydel and Sharma will be assessed, in addition to the full amount of
the civil penalty and interest, a penalty charge and an administrative
charge, as more fully described in the attached Notice.
Third, for a period of five years from the date of this Order,
Hydel Engineering Products, with a last known address of Middle Bazzar,
Rampur Bushahr Distt. Shimla (H.P.) 172 001, India, and Narender
Sharma, with a last known address of Middle Bazzar, Rampur Bushahr
Distt. Shimla (H.P.) 172 001, India, and when acting for or on their
behalf, their successors, assigns, representatives, agents, or
employees (each a ``Denied Person'' and collectively the ``Denied
Persons''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or
in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not
limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license
exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any
other activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Fourth, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control
of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person
[[Page 38125]]
acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Fifth, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to a Denied Person by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order.
Sixth, any license issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Hydel or Sharma has an interest of the date of this Order is
hereby revoked.
Seventh, this Order shall be served on Hydel and Sharma, and shall
be published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately.
Issued on July 30, 2018.
Richard R. Majauskas,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018-16678 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P