Agency Information Collection Activities: Information Collection Renewal; Submission for OMB Review; Appraisal Management Companies, 38204-38206 [2018-16639]
Download as PDF
38204
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
data.13 However, NHTSA has not
conducted any formal reviews or
baseline risk adjustments to date.
Should NHTSA now consider adjusting
the baseline risks used in the ratings
calculations to reflect the crash test data
from today’s vehicles? Or, would there
be a better approach to update the
crashworthiness program to better
differentiate performance among the
vehicle fleet (e.g., new tests, dummies,
injury criteria, etc.)?
(21) How frequently should NCAP
change crashworthiness test
requirements and/or update rating
requirements to stay relevant with each
new model year vehicle fleet? What
effect would year-to-year changes have
on (a) the credibility and
understandability of information
provided to consumers and (b) the
manufacturers?
D. Crashworthiness
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
should consider, and what are their
advantages and disadvantages?
(16) Currently, many crash avoidance
technologies are sold as optional
equipment on vehicles, and a variety of
different advanced technology features
may be available on different trim
levels. How can NCAP best
communicate whether crash avoidance
technologies are standard vs. optional
on a vehicle model or trim level to
ensure consumers are given accurate
information on the safety of the vehicle
they are purchasing? How should
equipment availability affect the ratings
of vehicles? What metric should NHTSA
use to determine when it is appropriate
to remove an advanced technology from
NCAP (e.g., replace a technology once it
reaches a high level of fleet penetration
and replace it with a technology with a
low level of penetration)?
E. Meeting Agenda
8–9 a.m. Arrival/Check-in through
security
9–9:10 a.m. Welcome remarks from
NHTSA
9:10–11:10 a.m. Speakers on consumer
information
11:10 a.m.–12:10 p.m. Speakers on
rating system
12:10–1:15 p.m. Lunch (not provided)
1:15–3:15 p.m. Speakers on crash
avoidance
3:15–4:15 p.m. Speakers on
crashworthiness
4:15–4:50 p.m. Speakers on other
topics
4:50–5 p.m. Closing remarks from
NHTSA
Under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.5.
(17) What are the opportunities for
crashworthiness safety improvement?
How should NHTSA approach
consideration of new tests, test
protocols or test devices, new injury
criteria, risk curves, or additional
occupants to be more reflective of realworld crashes? Could meaningful
changes to injury criteria and risk
curves be made to the current crash test
dummies in the existing test
configurations?
(18) Should NHTSA expand
assessments beyond frontal and side
crash testing? If so, how? For example,
should NHTSA consider inclusion of
other strategies, such as credit for
enhanced seat belt reminders, or other
technologies?
(19) How can the crashworthiness
aspects of NCAP complement other
vehicle safety consumer information
programs in the U.S.? For example, are
the crash modes, crash test dummies
and injury criteria used in NCAP
complementary to those used by the
IIHS? Do they strike the right balance for
the frontal and side impact crash
configurations?
(20) Most new vehicles rated by
NCAP are currently receiving 4- or 5star ratings. These star ratings are based
on how a vehicle’s risk of injury
reflected in NCAP tests compares to a
baseline injury risk for all crash types
that was derived from NHTSA crash
data for MY 2007 and 2008 vehicles. In
its July 11, 2008, Federal Register notice
announcing enhancements to NCAP,
NHTSA indicated that it would
periodically review the crash
performance of the vehicle fleet, as
reflected by then-current NCAP test
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Issued in Washington, DC on: July 27,
2018.
Heidi R. King,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–16653 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Information Collection
Renewal; Submission for OMB Review;
Appraisal Management Companies
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
The OCC, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
SUMMARY:
13 78
PO 00000
FR 20603.
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on a continuing information
collection as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). In
accordance with the requirements of the
PRA, the OCC may not conduct or
sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information
collection unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
The OCC is soliciting comment
concerning the renewal of its
information collection titled, ‘‘Appraisal
Management Companies.’’ The OCC also
is giving notice that it has sent the
collection to OMB for review.
DATES: You should submit written
comments by September 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are encouraged
to submit comments by email, if
possible. You may submit comments by
any of the following methods:
• Email: prainfo@occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, Attention:
1557–0324, 400 7th Street SW, suite 3E–
218, Washington, DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street, SW, suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘1557–
0324’’ in your comment. In general, the
OCC will publish them on
www.reginfo.gov without change,
including any business or personal
information that you provide, such as
name and address information, email
addresses, or phone numbers.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
Additionally, please send a copy of
your comments by mail to: OCC Desk
Officer, 1557–0324, U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW, #10235, Washington, DC
20503 or by email to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
information collection 1 following the
close of the 30-Day comment period for
1 On March 23, 2018, the OCC published a 60-Day
notice for this information collection. The
comments can be viewed on www.reginfo.gov.
Please follow the instructions listed in this notice
to view them.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
this notice by any of the following
methods:
• Viewing Comments Electronically:
Go to www.reginfo.gov. Click on the
‘‘Information Collection Review’’ tab.
Underneath the ‘‘Currently under
Review’’ section heading, from the dropdown menu, select ‘‘Department of
Treasury’’ and then click ‘‘submit’’. This
information collection can be located by
searching by OMB control number
‘‘1557–0324’’ or ‘‘Appraisal
Management Companies.’’ Upon finding
the appropriate information collection,
click on the related ‘‘ICR Reference
Number.’’ On the next screen, select
‘‘View Supporting Statement and Other
Documents’’ and then click on the link
to any comment listed at the bottom of
the screen.
• For assistance in navigating
www.reginfo.gov, please contact the
Regulatory Information Service Center
at (202) 482–7340.
• Viewing Comments Personally: You
may personally inspect comments at the
OCC, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington,
DC. For security reasons, the OCC
requires that visitors make an
appointment to inspect comments. You
may do so by calling (202) 649–6700 or,
for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY, (202) 649–5597. Upon
arrival, visitors will be required to
present valid government-issued photo
identification and submit to security
screening in order to inspect comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shaquita Merritt, OCC Clearance
Officer, (202) 649–5490 or, for persons
who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY,
(202) 649–5597, Legislative and
Regulatory Activities Division, Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
Street, SW, suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
OMB for each collection of information
that they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) to include agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. The OCC
requests that OMB extend its approval
of the following collection:
Title: Appraisal Management
Companies.
OMB Control No.: 1557–0324.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Type of Review: Regular review.
Abstract: The OCC, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (FRB), Federal Deposit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA),
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(Bureau), and Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) (Agencies) have rules
implementing the minimum
requirements in section 1473 of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act to be applied
by States in the registration and
supervision of appraisal management
companies (AMCs). The Agencies have
also implemented the requirement in
section 1473 of the Dodd-Frank Act for
States to report to the Appraisal
Subcommittee of the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council
(FFIEC) the information required by the
Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) to
administer the new national registry of
appraisal management companies (AMC
National Registry or Registry).
State Recordkeeping Requirements
States seeking to register AMCs must
have an AMC registration and
supervision program. Section 34.213(a)
requires each participating State to
establish and maintain within its
appraiser certifying and licensing
agency a registration and supervision
program with the legal authority and
mechanisms to: (i) Review and approve
or deny an application for initial
registration; (ii) periodically review and
renew, or deny renewal of, an AMC’s
registration; (iii) examine an AMC’s
books and records and require the
submission of reports, information, and
documents; (iv) verify an AMC’s panel
members’ certifications or licenses; (v)
investigate and assess potential law,
regulation, or order violations; (vi)
discipline, suspend, terminate, or deny
registration renewals of, AMCs that
violate laws, regulations, or orders; and
(vii) report violations of appraisalrelated laws, regulations, or orders, and
disciplinary and enforcement actions to
the ASC.
Section 34.213(b) requires each
participating State to impose
requirements on AMCs not owned and
controlled by an insured depository
institution and regulated by a Federal
financial institutions regulatory agency
to: (i) Register with and be subject to
supervision by a State appraiser
certifying and licensing agency in each
State in which the AMC operates; (ii)
use only State-certified or State-licensed
appraisers for Federally regulated
transactions in conformity with any
Federally regulated transaction
regulations; (iii) establish and comply
with processes and controls reasonably
designed to ensure that the AMC, in
engaging an appraiser, selects an
appraiser who is independent of the
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38205
transaction and who has the requisite
education, expertise, and experience
necessary to competently complete the
appraisal assignment for the particular
market and property type; (iv) direct the
appraiser to perform the assignment in
accordance with Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practices
(USPAP); and (v) establish and comply
with processes and controls reasonably
designed to ensure that the AMC
conducts its appraisal management
services in accordance with section
129E(a)–(i) of the Truth in Lending Act.
State Reporting Burden
Section 34.216 requires that each
State electing to register AMCs for
purposes of permitting AMCs to provide
appraisal management services relating
to covered transactions in the State must
submit to the ASC the information
required to be submitted under subpart
H to part 34 and any additional
information required by the ASC
concerning AMCs.
AMC Reporting Requirements
Section 34.215(c) requires that a
Federally regulated AMC must report to
the State or States in which it operates
the information required to be
submitted by the State pursuant to the
ASC’s policies, including: (i)
Information regarding the determination
of the AMC National Registry fee; and
(ii) the information listed in § 34.214.
Section 34.214 provides that an AMC
may not be registered by a State or
included on the AMC National Registry
if such company is owned, directly or
indirectly, by any person who has had
an appraiser license or certificate
refused, denied, cancelled, surrendered
in lieu of revocation, or revoked in any
State. Each person that owns more than
10 percent of an AMC shall submit to
a background investigation carried out
by the State appraiser certifying and
licensing agency. While § 34.214 does
not authorize States to conduct
background investigations of Federally
regulated AMCs, it would allow a State
to do so if the Federally regulated AMC
chooses to register voluntarily with the
State.
AMC Recordkeeping Requirements
Section 34.212(b) provides that an
appraiser in an AMC’s network or panel
is deemed to remain on the network or
panel until: (i) The AMC sends a written
notice to the appraiser removing the
appraiser with an explanation; or (ii)
receives a written notice from the
appraiser asking to be removed or a
notice of the death or incapacity of the
appraiser. The AMC would retain these
notices in its files.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
38206
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
Estimated Number of Respondents:
200 AMCs; 55 States and Territories.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 421.
The OCC issued a notice for 60 days
of comment on March 23, 2018, 83 FR
12843. One comment was received from
a trade association representing
appraisal management companies
(AMCs).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Topic A: Whether the Collection of
Information is Necessary for the Proper
Performance of the Functions of the
OCC, Including Whether the
Information has Practical Utility
In response to topic A, the commenter
stated that the collection of information
is ‘‘necessary and does have practical
utility’’ but ‘‘only to the extent that the
information collected serves the proper
purpose to promote appraiser
independence while ensuring a healthy
real estate valuation market.’’ While not
stated expressly, the commenter implies
that the ‘‘proper purpose’’ of the
collection is limited to collections
relating appraiser independence.
In response to this comment, the OCC
notes that the purpose of the AMC rule
and the collection is to implement all
required elements of the statute, not
only provisions that extend to appraiser
independence. See 12 U.S.C. 3353(a)
(setting minimum requirements for
registration regulation in participating
states); id. section 3353(d) (setting
registration limitations for AMCs); and
id. section 3353(e) (requiring reporting
of information by AMCs to the ASC).
The OCC and the other agencies that
were party to the AMC rule were
required to adopt regulations to
implement the statutory requirements
and the collection is a necessary
component for implementation of these
requirements.
To the extent that the commenter
disagrees with the scope and
requirements of Title XI and the AMC
rule, the OCC also notes that regulations
may not be rescinded by the OCC
through the PRA renewal process.
Topic B: The Accuracy of the OCC’s
Estimate of the Information Collection
Burden
In response to topic B, the commenter
states that the burden estimates are too
low. The commenter believes that the
number of respondents is approximately
twice what was estimated. The
commenter also states that the actual
number of AMCs will not be known
until 2020 when the AMC National
Registry is fully operational.
The commenter indicates that its
members believe that the estimate of the
annual burden to comply is also too
low. The commenter recommends that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
the estimate be increased to twice the
current estimate. The commenter notes
that each state differs in complexity of
their demands for the collection of
information and not all are on the same
renewal schedule. Some renew annually
and some biennially, which have
varying burdens for preparation and
validation.
The burden estimates for this
collection have historically been
prepared on an industry-wide basis and
then allotted to each agency. The FDIC
prepared the industry-wide estimates
for this renewal. We invite commenters
to review the analysis, which is
included in our supporting statement,
and comment during the 30-day
comment period.
Topic C: Ways to Enhance the Quality,
Utility, and Clarity of the Information to
be Collected
In response to topic C, the commenter
suggested that the ASC should issue
additional guidance to states and AMCs
concerning the AMC minimum
requirements. The goal of such guidance
would be to ‘‘provide consistency in the
implementation of the regulations and
information required.’’ The commenter
also expressed concern that wide
variation of AMC requirements from
state to state may have material
unintended consequences on lending
activity in a particular jurisdiction.
In response to these comments, OCC
notes that the commenter’s suggestions
do not relate to the collection. In
addition, while Title XI and the AMC
rule set minimum standards for the
registration and supervision of AMCs by
states, Title XI and the AMC rule
expressly provide that a state may adopt
requirements in addition to those
contained in the AMC regulation. 12
U.S.C. 3353(b); 12 CFR 34.210(d). The
OCC will, however, refer these
suggestions to the ASC for
consideration.
Topic D: Ways to Minimize the Burden
of the Collection on Respondents,
Including Through the use of
Automated Collection Techniques or
Other Forms of Information Technology
In response to topic D, the commenter
recommends that the ASC ‘‘find
opportunities to develop reporting
efficiencies in the licensing system,
which could include partnering with
the Nationwide Multistate Licensing
System (NMLS) or investing in a new
process. Furthermore, the ASC should
be more aggressive in supporting
modernization of the outdated National
Appraiser Registry (which AMCs must
use to comply with the minimum
requirements).’’
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In response to these comments, OCC
notes that the commenter’s suggestions
do not relate to the collection. The OCC
will, however, refer these suggestions to
the ASC for consideration.
Topic E: Estimates of Capital or Start-up
Costs and Costs of Operation,
Maintenance, and Purchase of Services
to Provide Information
The commenter stated that the
‘‘estimated cost to implement the AMC
minimum requirements and AMC
Registry requirements in 50 states and
the District of Columbia ranges from
$250,000–$500,000 per AMC,’’ not
including ‘‘the additional $100,000–
$200,000 paid by AMCs to the ASC to
be on the National AMC Registry.’’
In response to the comment, the OCC
notes that the commenter has not
segregated the costs relating to the
collection from costs of complying with
the substantive requirements of Title XI
and the AMC rule.
Comments continue to be invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
OCC, including whether the information
has practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the OCC’s
estimate of the information collection
burden;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Dated: July 30, 2018.
Karen Solomon,
Acting Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief
Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018–16639 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
Agency Information Collection
Requirements; Information Collection
Renewal; Submission for OMB Review;
Release of Non-Public Information
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
The OCC, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38204-38206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16639]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Agency Information Collection Activities: Information Collection
Renewal; Submission for OMB Review; Appraisal Management Companies
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The OCC, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to comment on a continuing
information collection as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA). In accordance with the requirements of the PRA, the OCC may
not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
The OCC is soliciting comment concerning the renewal of its
information collection titled, ``Appraisal Management Companies.'' The
OCC also is giving notice that it has sent the collection to OMB for
review.
DATES: You should submit written comments by September 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are encouraged to submit comments by email, if
possible. You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected].
Mail: Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Attention: 1557-0324, 400
7th Street SW, suite 3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street, SW, suite 3E-218,
Washington, DC 20219.
Fax: (571) 465-4326.
Instructions: You must include ``OCC'' as the agency name and
``1557-0324'' in your comment. In general, the OCC will publish them on
www.reginfo.gov without change, including any business or personal
information that you provide, such as name and address information,
email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any information
in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential
or inappropriate for public disclosure.
Additionally, please send a copy of your comments by mail to: OCC
Desk Officer, 1557-0324, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW, #10235, Washington, DC 20503 or by email to
[email protected].
You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to
this information collection \1\ following the close of the 30-Day
comment period for
[[Page 38205]]
this notice by any of the following methods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On March 23, 2018, the OCC published a 60-Day notice for
this information collection. The comments can be viewed on
www.reginfo.gov. Please follow the instructions listed in this
notice to view them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Viewing Comments Electronically: Go to www.reginfo.gov.
Click on the ``Information Collection Review'' tab. Underneath the
``Currently under Review'' section heading, from the drop-down menu,
select ``Department of Treasury'' and then click ``submit''. This
information collection can be located by searching by OMB control
number ``1557-0324'' or ``Appraisal Management Companies.'' Upon
finding the appropriate information collection, click on the related
``ICR Reference Number.'' On the next screen, select ``View Supporting
Statement and Other Documents'' and then click on the link to any
comment listed at the bottom of the screen.
For assistance in navigating www.reginfo.gov, please
contact the Regulatory Information Service Center at (202) 482-7340.
Viewing Comments Personally: You may personally inspect
comments at the OCC, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC. For security
reasons, the OCC requires that visitors make an appointment to inspect
comments. You may do so by calling (202) 649-6700 or, for persons who
are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597. Upon arrival,
visitors will be required to present valid government-issued photo
identification and submit to security screening in order to inspect
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaquita Merritt, OCC Clearance
Officer, (202) 649-5490 or, for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597, Legislative and Regulatory Activities
Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street,
SW, suite 3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the OMB for each collection of
information that they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information''
is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) to include agency
requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to a third party. The OCC requests
that OMB extend its approval of the following collection:
Title: Appraisal Management Companies.
OMB Control No.: 1557-0324.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
Type of Review: Regular review.
Abstract: The OCC, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(FRB), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), National Credit
Union Administration (NCUA), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(Bureau), and Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) (Agencies) have
rules implementing the minimum requirements in section 1473 of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to be applied
by States in the registration and supervision of appraisal management
companies (AMCs). The Agencies have also implemented the requirement in
section 1473 of the Dodd-Frank Act for States to report to the
Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (FFIEC) the information required by the Appraisal
Subcommittee (ASC) to administer the new national registry of appraisal
management companies (AMC National Registry or Registry).
State Recordkeeping Requirements
States seeking to register AMCs must have an AMC registration and
supervision program. Section 34.213(a) requires each participating
State to establish and maintain within its appraiser certifying and
licensing agency a registration and supervision program with the legal
authority and mechanisms to: (i) Review and approve or deny an
application for initial registration; (ii) periodically review and
renew, or deny renewal of, an AMC's registration; (iii) examine an
AMC's books and records and require the submission of reports,
information, and documents; (iv) verify an AMC's panel members'
certifications or licenses; (v) investigate and assess potential law,
regulation, or order violations; (vi) discipline, suspend, terminate,
or deny registration renewals of, AMCs that violate laws, regulations,
or orders; and (vii) report violations of appraisal-related laws,
regulations, or orders, and disciplinary and enforcement actions to the
ASC.
Section 34.213(b) requires each participating State to impose
requirements on AMCs not owned and controlled by an insured depository
institution and regulated by a Federal financial institutions
regulatory agency to: (i) Register with and be subject to supervision
by a State appraiser certifying and licensing agency in each State in
which the AMC operates; (ii) use only State-certified or State-licensed
appraisers for Federally regulated transactions in conformity with any
Federally regulated transaction regulations; (iii) establish and comply
with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC,
in engaging an appraiser, selects an appraiser who is independent of
the transaction and who has the requisite education, expertise, and
experience necessary to competently complete the appraisal assignment
for the particular market and property type; (iv) direct the appraiser
to perform the assignment in accordance with Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practices (USPAP); and (v) establish and comply
with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC
conducts its appraisal management services in accordance with section
129E(a)-(i) of the Truth in Lending Act.
State Reporting Burden
Section 34.216 requires that each State electing to register AMCs
for purposes of permitting AMCs to provide appraisal management
services relating to covered transactions in the State must submit to
the ASC the information required to be submitted under subpart H to
part 34 and any additional information required by the ASC concerning
AMCs.
AMC Reporting Requirements
Section 34.215(c) requires that a Federally regulated AMC must
report to the State or States in which it operates the information
required to be submitted by the State pursuant to the ASC's policies,
including: (i) Information regarding the determination of the AMC
National Registry fee; and (ii) the information listed in Sec. 34.214.
Section 34.214 provides that an AMC may not be registered by a
State or included on the AMC National Registry if such company is
owned, directly or indirectly, by any person who has had an appraiser
license or certificate refused, denied, cancelled, surrendered in lieu
of revocation, or revoked in any State. Each person that owns more than
10 percent of an AMC shall submit to a background investigation carried
out by the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency. While Sec.
34.214 does not authorize States to conduct background investigations
of Federally regulated AMCs, it would allow a State to do so if the
Federally regulated AMC chooses to register voluntarily with the State.
AMC Recordkeeping Requirements
Section 34.212(b) provides that an appraiser in an AMC's network or
panel is deemed to remain on the network or panel until: (i) The AMC
sends a written notice to the appraiser removing the appraiser with an
explanation; or (ii) receives a written notice from the appraiser
asking to be removed or a notice of the death or incapacity of the
appraiser. The AMC would retain these notices in its files.
[[Page 38206]]
Estimated Number of Respondents: 200 AMCs; 55 States and
Territories.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 421.
The OCC issued a notice for 60 days of comment on March 23, 2018,
83 FR 12843. One comment was received from a trade association
representing appraisal management companies (AMCs).
Topic A: Whether the Collection of Information is Necessary for the
Proper Performance of the Functions of the OCC, Including Whether the
Information has Practical Utility
In response to topic A, the commenter stated that the collection of
information is ``necessary and does have practical utility'' but ``only
to the extent that the information collected serves the proper purpose
to promote appraiser independence while ensuring a healthy real estate
valuation market.'' While not stated expressly, the commenter implies
that the ``proper purpose'' of the collection is limited to collections
relating appraiser independence.
In response to this comment, the OCC notes that the purpose of the
AMC rule and the collection is to implement all required elements of
the statute, not only provisions that extend to appraiser independence.
See 12 U.S.C. 3353(a) (setting minimum requirements for registration
regulation in participating states); id. section 3353(d) (setting
registration limitations for AMCs); and id. section 3353(e) (requiring
reporting of information by AMCs to the ASC). The OCC and the other
agencies that were party to the AMC rule were required to adopt
regulations to implement the statutory requirements and the collection
is a necessary component for implementation of these requirements.
To the extent that the commenter disagrees with the scope and
requirements of Title XI and the AMC rule, the OCC also notes that
regulations may not be rescinded by the OCC through the PRA renewal
process.
Topic B: The Accuracy of the OCC's Estimate of the Information
Collection Burden
In response to topic B, the commenter states that the burden
estimates are too low. The commenter believes that the number of
respondents is approximately twice what was estimated. The commenter
also states that the actual number of AMCs will not be known until 2020
when the AMC National Registry is fully operational.
The commenter indicates that its members believe that the estimate
of the annual burden to comply is also too low. The commenter
recommends that the estimate be increased to twice the current
estimate. The commenter notes that each state differs in complexity of
their demands for the collection of information and not all are on the
same renewal schedule. Some renew annually and some biennially, which
have varying burdens for preparation and validation.
The burden estimates for this collection have historically been
prepared on an industry-wide basis and then allotted to each agency.
The FDIC prepared the industry-wide estimates for this renewal. We
invite commenters to review the analysis, which is included in our
supporting statement, and comment during the 30-day comment period.
Topic C: Ways to Enhance the Quality, Utility, and Clarity of the
Information to be Collected
In response to topic C, the commenter suggested that the ASC should
issue additional guidance to states and AMCs concerning the AMC minimum
requirements. The goal of such guidance would be to ``provide
consistency in the implementation of the regulations and information
required.'' The commenter also expressed concern that wide variation of
AMC requirements from state to state may have material unintended
consequences on lending activity in a particular jurisdiction.
In response to these comments, OCC notes that the commenter's
suggestions do not relate to the collection. In addition, while Title
XI and the AMC rule set minimum standards for the registration and
supervision of AMCs by states, Title XI and the AMC rule expressly
provide that a state may adopt requirements in addition to those
contained in the AMC regulation. 12 U.S.C. 3353(b); 12 CFR 34.210(d).
The OCC will, however, refer these suggestions to the ASC for
consideration.
Topic D: Ways to Minimize the Burden of the Collection on Respondents,
Including Through the use of Automated Collection Techniques or Other
Forms of Information Technology
In response to topic D, the commenter recommends that the ASC
``find opportunities to develop reporting efficiencies in the licensing
system, which could include partnering with the Nationwide Multistate
Licensing System (NMLS) or investing in a new process. Furthermore, the
ASC should be more aggressive in supporting modernization of the
outdated National Appraiser Registry (which AMCs must use to comply
with the minimum requirements).''
In response to these comments, OCC notes that the commenter's
suggestions do not relate to the collection. The OCC will, however,
refer these suggestions to the ASC for consideration.
Topic E: Estimates of Capital or Start-up Costs and Costs of Operation,
Maintenance, and Purchase of Services to Provide Information
The commenter stated that the ``estimated cost to implement the AMC
minimum requirements and AMC Registry requirements in 50 states and the
District of Columbia ranges from $250,000-$500,000 per AMC,'' not
including ``the additional $100,000-$200,000 paid by AMCs to the ASC to
be on the National AMC Registry.''
In response to the comment, the OCC notes that the commenter has
not segregated the costs relating to the collection from costs of
complying with the substantive requirements of Title XI and the AMC
rule.
Comments continue to be invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the OCC, including whether the
information has practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the OCC's estimate of the information
collection burden;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Dated: July 30, 2018.
Karen Solomon,
Acting Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-16639 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P