Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Updates to Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Regulation, 38102-38103 [2018-16623]
Download as PDF
38102
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0398; FRL–9981–
32—Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire;
Updates to Enhanced Motor Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance Program
Regulation
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of New
Hampshire. This revision includes an
amended regulation for the enhanced
motor vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program in New
Hampshire. New Hampshire continues
to implement a test and repair network
for an on-board diagnostic (OBD2)
testing program. The submitted New
Hampshire regulation updates and
clarifies the implementation of the New
Hampshire I/M program. The intended
effect of this action is to approve the
updated I/M program regulation into the
New Hampshire SIP. This action is
being taken under the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before September 4,
2018.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2016–0398 at
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
garcia.ariel@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. Publicly available docket
materials are available at
www.regulations.gov or at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Region 1 Regional Office, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA Region 1 Regional Office, 5 Post
Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code:
OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912,
telephone number: (617) 918–1660,
email: garcia.ariel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of New Hampshire’s Regulatory
Changes
III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean Air Act
Requirements for I/M programs
IV. Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On June 7, 2016, the State of New
Hampshire submitted a formal revision
to its State Implementation Plan (SIP).
The submitted SIP revision included
amendments to the New Hampshire
Code of Administrative Rules Chapter
Saf-C 3200 entitled, ‘‘Official Motor
Vehicle Inspection Requirements,’’
which update the enhanced motor
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/
M) program in New Hampshire.
New Hampshire previously submitted
an I/M program SIP revision on
November 17, 2011, which EPA
approved into the New Hampshire SIP
on January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292). New
Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 SIP
revision included all the regulatory and
technical documentation required in an
I/M SIP submittal to address the
requirements of EPA’s I/M regulations.
The emissions modeling, I/M SIP
narrative, and other technical
documentation, included in New
Hampshire’s November 17, 2011
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submittal continue to be applicable as
the technical demonstration that New
Hampshire’s implemented I/M program
meets the requirements of EPA’s I/M
regulations. The regulatory amendments
made by New Hampshire to regulation
Saf-C 3200, submitted in the June 2016
SIP revision, do not reflect any changes
to the technical implementation
characteristics of the New Hampshire I/
M program and thus result in no
changes to the EPA-approved emissions
modeling analysis.
II. Summary of New Hampshire’s
Regulatory Changes
New Hampshire’s amended Saf-C
3200 regulation, submitted as a SIP
revision on June 7, 2016, updates a
number of regulatory provisions by
adding language to clarify the I/M
program requirements in New
Hampshire. A summary of the most
substantial changes made to New
Hampshire’s SIP-approved regulation
follows. New Hampshire (1) added
clarifying definitions to Saf-C 3202; (2)
amended Saf-C 3203.03 to change the
month by which government fleet
vehicles need to be inspected, i.e. to
September of each year; (3) amended
Saf-C 3204.02 and adopted Saf-C
3205.11 to clarify both the required
information to be submitted in an
application to become an official
inspection station, as well as the criteria
for denying an application; and (4)
amended Saf-C 3218 through Saf-C 3220
to clarify and update the criteria for
performance or condition of vehicle
components that will result in the
rejection of a vehicle.
III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean
Air Act Requirements for I/M Programs
In this document, EPA is only
proposing to update New Hampshire’s I/
M regulation by revising subsections or
provisions of the regulation as it
currently exists in the New Hampshire
SIP.1 As stated earlier in this document,
the remaining technical aspects (i.e., I/
M SIP narrative, the emissions
modeling, and other technical
documentation) included in New
Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 SIP
revision, and approved by EPA on
January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292), continue
to be applicable as the technical
1 EPA’s January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval
of New Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 I/M SIP
submittal describes how New Hampshire’s I/M
program satisfies the OBD2 and other I/M
regulatory requirements established by the Clean
Air Act and EPA’s I/M regulations. In addition,
EPA’s January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval
contains a detailed discussion of EPA’s rationale for
approving New Hampshire’s November 17, 2011 I/
M SIP revision and will not be restated in this
document.
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
demonstration that New Hampshire’s
implemented I/M program meets the
requirements of EPA’s I/M regulations.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve New
Hampshire’s June 7, 2016 SIP revision
request. This SIP revision request
contains New Hampshire’s revised
motor vehicle I/M program regulation.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve amendments to the following
New Hampshire Department of Safety
Regulation Saf-C 3200 subsections or
provisions as they currently exist in the
New Hampshire SIP: Amendments to
Saf–C 3202, Saf–C 3203, Saf–C 3204,
Saf–C 3205, Saf–C 3206.04, Saf–C
3207.01, Saf–C 3209, Saf–C 3210, Saf–
C 3218, Saf–C 3220, Saf–C 3222, and
Saf–C 3248. In addition, EPA is
proposing to approve Saf–C 3219 which
had not previously been submitted for
inclusion in the New Hampshire SIP.
EPA is proposing to approve New
Hampshire’s June 7, 2016 SIP revision,
containing New Hampshire’s updated I/
M program regulation, because it is
consistent with the CAA’s I/M
requirements and EPA’s I/M regulations,
and will strengthen the SIP. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this notice or on
other relevant matters. These comments
will be considered before taking final
action. Interested parties may
participate in the Federal rulemaking
procedure by submitting written
comments to this proposed rule by
following the instructions listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this Federal
Register.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the aforementioned New Hampshire
Department of Safety Regulation Saf-C
3200 subsections identified in section
IV of this proposal, except as set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 1 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
New Hampshire’s I/M program
regulation contains enforcement
provisions that detail state enforcement
procedures, including administrative,
civil, and criminal penalties, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
administrative and judicial procedures.
Such enforcement-related provisions are
required elements of an I/M SIP under
40 CFR 61.364, and EPA is proposing to
approve the provisions as meeting those
requirements. However, EPA is not
proposing to incorporate those
provisions by reference into the EPAapproved federal regulations at 40 CFR
part 52. In any federal action to enforce
violations of the substantive
requirements of the New Hampshire I/
M program, the relevant provisions of
Section 113 or 304 of the CAA, rather
than state enforcement provisions
would govern. Similarly, the applicable
procedures in any federal action would
be the applicable federal court rules or
EPA’s rules for administrative
proceedings at 40 CFR part 22, rather
than state administrative procedures.
Since the state enforcement provisions
would not be applicable in a federal
action, incorporating these state-only
enforcement provisions into the federal
regulations would have no effect. To
avoid confusion to the public and
regulated parties, EPA is not proposing
to incorporate these provisions by
reference into the EPA-approved federal
regulations in the New Hampshire plan
identification in 40 CFR part 52.
Specifically, EPA is not proposing to
incorporate New Hampshire’s
regulations Saf-C 3222.04(d) and Saf-C
3248 into the federal regulations at 40
CFR 52.1520(c).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• This action is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant
under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38103
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: July 31, 2018.
Alexandra Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2018–16623 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38102-38103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16623]
[[Page 38102]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0398; FRL-9981-32--Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Updates to Enhanced Motor
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Regulation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of New Hampshire. This revision includes an amended regulation
for the enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program
in New Hampshire. New Hampshire continues to implement a test and
repair network for an on-board diagnostic (OBD2) testing program. The
submitted New Hampshire regulation updates and clarifies the
implementation of the New Hampshire I/M program. The intended effect of
this action is to approve the updated I/M program regulation into the
New Hampshire SIP. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 4,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2016-0398 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly available
docket materials are available at www.regulations.gov or at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional Office, Office
of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office
Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional
Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code: OEP05-2), Boston,
MA 02109-3912, telephone number: (617) 918-1660, email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of New Hampshire's Regulatory Changes
III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean Air Act Requirements for I/M
programs
IV. Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On June 7, 2016, the State of New Hampshire submitted a formal
revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submitted SIP
revision included amendments to the New Hampshire Code of
Administrative Rules Chapter Saf-C 3200 entitled, ``Official Motor
Vehicle Inspection Requirements,'' which update the enhanced motor
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in New Hampshire.
New Hampshire previously submitted an I/M program SIP revision on
November 17, 2011, which EPA approved into the New Hampshire SIP on
January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292). New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 SIP
revision included all the regulatory and technical documentation
required in an I/M SIP submittal to address the requirements of EPA's
I/M regulations. The emissions modeling, I/M SIP narrative, and other
technical documentation, included in New Hampshire's November 17, 2011
submittal continue to be applicable as the technical demonstration that
New Hampshire's implemented I/M program meets the requirements of EPA's
I/M regulations. The regulatory amendments made by New Hampshire to
regulation Saf-C 3200, submitted in the June 2016 SIP revision, do not
reflect any changes to the technical implementation characteristics of
the New Hampshire I/M program and thus result in no changes to the EPA-
approved emissions modeling analysis.
II. Summary of New Hampshire's Regulatory Changes
New Hampshire's amended Saf-C 3200 regulation, submitted as a SIP
revision on June 7, 2016, updates a number of regulatory provisions by
adding language to clarify the I/M program requirements in New
Hampshire. A summary of the most substantial changes made to New
Hampshire's SIP-approved regulation follows. New Hampshire (1) added
clarifying definitions to Saf-C 3202; (2) amended Saf-C 3203.03 to
change the month by which government fleet vehicles need to be
inspected, i.e. to September of each year; (3) amended Saf-C 3204.02
and adopted Saf-C 3205.11 to clarify both the required information to
be submitted in an application to become an official inspection
station, as well as the criteria for denying an application; and (4)
amended Saf-C 3218 through Saf-C 3220 to clarify and update the
criteria for performance or condition of vehicle components that will
result in the rejection of a vehicle.
III. New Hampshire Satisfying Clean Air Act Requirements for I/M
Programs
In this document, EPA is only proposing to update New Hampshire's
I/M regulation by revising subsections or provisions of the regulation
as it currently exists in the New Hampshire SIP.\1\ As stated earlier
in this document, the remaining technical aspects (i.e., I/M SIP
narrative, the emissions modeling, and other technical documentation)
included in New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 SIP revision, and
approved by EPA on January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292), continue to be
applicable as the technical
[[Page 38103]]
demonstration that New Hampshire's implemented I/M program meets the
requirements of EPA's I/M regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA's January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292) approval of New
Hampshire's November 17, 2011 I/M SIP submittal describes how New
Hampshire's I/M program satisfies the OBD2 and other I/M regulatory
requirements established by the Clean Air Act and EPA's I/M
regulations. In addition, EPA's January 25, 2013 (78 FR 5292)
approval contains a detailed discussion of EPA's rationale for
approving New Hampshire's November 17, 2011 I/M SIP revision and
will not be restated in this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire's June 7, 2016 SIP
revision request. This SIP revision request contains New Hampshire's
revised motor vehicle I/M program regulation. Specifically, EPA is
proposing to approve amendments to the following New Hampshire
Department of Safety Regulation Saf-C 3200 subsections or provisions as
they currently exist in the New Hampshire SIP: Amendments to Saf-C
3202, Saf-C 3203, Saf-C 3204, Saf-C 3205, Saf-C 3206.04, Saf-C 3207.01,
Saf-C 3209, Saf-C 3210, Saf-C 3218, Saf-C 3220, Saf-C 3222, and Saf-C
3248. In addition, EPA is proposing to approve Saf-C 3219 which had not
previously been submitted for inclusion in the New Hampshire SIP.
EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire's June 7, 2016 SIP
revision, containing New Hampshire's updated I/M program regulation,
because it is consistent with the CAA's I/M requirements and EPA's I/M
regulations, and will strengthen the SIP. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in this notice or on other relevant
matters. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure
by submitting written comments to this proposed rule by following the
instructions listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the aforementioned New Hampshire Department of Safety
Regulation Saf-C 3200 subsections identified in section IV of this
proposal, except as set forth below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 1 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
New Hampshire's I/M program regulation contains enforcement
provisions that detail state enforcement procedures, including
administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, and administrative and
judicial procedures. Such enforcement-related provisions are required
elements of an I/M SIP under 40 CFR 61.364, and EPA is proposing to
approve the provisions as meeting those requirements. However, EPA is
not proposing to incorporate those provisions by reference into the
EPA-approved federal regulations at 40 CFR part 52. In any federal
action to enforce violations of the substantive requirements of the New
Hampshire I/M program, the relevant provisions of Section 113 or 304 of
the CAA, rather than state enforcement provisions would govern.
Similarly, the applicable procedures in any federal action would be the
applicable federal court rules or EPA's rules for administrative
proceedings at 40 CFR part 22, rather than state administrative
procedures. Since the state enforcement provisions would not be
applicable in a federal action, incorporating these state-only
enforcement provisions into the federal regulations would have no
effect. To avoid confusion to the public and regulated parties, EPA is
not proposing to incorporate these provisions by reference into the
EPA-approved federal regulations in the New Hampshire plan
identification in 40 CFR part 52. Specifically, EPA is not proposing to
incorporate New Hampshire's regulations Saf-C 3222.04(d) and Saf-C 3248
into the federal regulations at 40 CFR 52.1520(c).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 31, 2018.
Alexandra Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2018-16623 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P