Modernized Drawback, 37886-37990 [2018-16279]
Download as PDF
37886
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 113, 181, 190, and 191
[USCBP–2018–0029]
RIN 1515–AE23
Modernized Drawback
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document proposes to
amend U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to
implement changes to the drawback
regulations as directed by the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act
of 2015 (TFTEA). These proposed
regulations establish a new process for
drawback pursuant to TFTEA which
liberalizes the merchandise substitution
standard, simplifies recordkeeping
requirements, extends and standardizes
timelines for filing drawback claims,
and requires the electronic filing of
drawback claims. TFTEA allows a
transition period wherein drawback
claimants will have the choice between
filing claims under the existing process
detailed in the current regulations or
filing claims under the proposed new
process. This document explains how
filings during the transition period will
work, discusses the interim policy
guidance procedures for filing claims
prior to these regulations becoming
final, and proposes to make TFTEArelated changes, dealing with bonds,
regarding joint and several liability for
the importer of the goods and the
drawback claimant, and technical
corrections and conforming changes to
CBP regulations. This document also
proposes to clarify the prohibition on
the filing of a substitution drawback
claim for internal revenue excise tax
paid on imported merchandise in
situations where no excise tax was paid
upon the substituted merchandise; or
the substituted merchandise is the
subject of a different claim for refund or
drawback of tax under any provision of
the Internal Revenue Code. CBP is
proposing these amendments regarding
excise taxes to protect the revenue by
clarifying the relationship between
drawback claims and Federal excise tax
liability. Further, CBP proposes to add
a basic importation and entry bond
condition to foster compliance.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Comments must be received on
or before September 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number USCBP–
2018–0029, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, 90 K Street NE,
10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket title for this rulemaking, and
must reference docket number USCBP–
2018–0029 . All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
the document.
Docket: For access to the docket or to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected during
business days between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Office of
Trade, Regulations and Rulings, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, 90 K
Street NE, 10th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325–
0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Mitchell, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Office of Trade,
Trade Policy and Programs, 202–863–
6532, randy.mitchell@cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. CBP also invites
comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this proposed
rulemaking. Comments that will provide
the most assistance to CBP will
reference a specific portion of the
proposed rulemaking, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or
authority to support such recommended
change. See ADDRESSES above for
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
information on how to submit
comments.
Background
Table of Contents
I. Authority
II. Modernized Drawback
A. TFTEA-Drawback Modernization
Overview 1
1. Transition Period (February 24, 2018–
February 23, 2019)
(a) Claims may be filed under the existing
drawback process or the TFTEADrawback process during the transition
period.
(b) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims
cannot designate imported merchandise
if the associated entry summary was
already included on a drawback claim
filed prior to February 24, 2018.
2. Filing Requirements and Deadline
(a) All TFTEA-Drawback claims are
required to be submitted electronically
in ACE.
(b) The import entry summary line item
must be identified for all imported
merchandise for TFTEA-Drawback
claims.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback claims have a
uniform five-year filing deadline from
the date of importation of the designated
imported merchandise.
3. HTSUS-Based Substitution Standards
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims
for most manufacturing and unused
merchandise have new standards based
on HTSUS classification.
(b) The new standards do not apply to
certain claims if substitution is based
upon alternative rules (source material
for sought chemical elements, wine, and
finished petroleum derivatives) or if
pursuant to NAFTA drawback.
4. ‘‘Lesser of’’ Rule for Substitution Claims
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims
are generally subject to a ‘‘lesser of’’ rule
regarding the amount of duties, taxes,
and fees to be refunded where the
amount to be refunded will be equal to
99 percent of the lesser of (1) the amount
of duties, taxes, and fees paid with
respect to the imported merchandise; or
(2) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
that would apply to the substituted
merchandise if the substituted
merchandise were imported.
(b) The TFTEA-Drawback ‘‘lesser of’’ rule
does not apply to certain claims if
substitution is based upon alternative
rules (wine and finished petroleum
derivatives) or if pursuant to NAFTA
drawback.
5. Expanded Scope and Calculation
Methods for Refunds
(a) The scope of refunds for direct
identification and substitution
manufacturing drawback claims will be
expanded from duties to also include
taxes and fees.
1 For purposes of this document, ‘‘TFTEADrawback’’ is the term generally used to refer to
drawback under section 1313, as amended by the
Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of
2015.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(b) TFTEA-Drawback direct identification
claim refunds will be calculated based
on the invoice value of the designated
imported merchandise, which is
unchanged from the current
requirements.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claim
refunds will be calculated based on the
per unit average value reported on the
line from the entry summary that
covered the designated imported
merchandise.
(d) The imported merchandise reported on
a single entry summary line item may
not be the basis of a direct identification
and a substitution claim under TFTEADrawback.
6. Recordkeeping and Proof of Export
(a) Congress, through TFTEA, changed the
starting date for the three-year time
period for maintaining supporting
records for drawback claims from the
date of payment to the date of
liquidation.
(b) Claimants for manufacturing drawback
must provide a certification that they are
in possession of the relevant bill of
materials or formula for the
manufactured goods, in lieu of actual
submission thereof, for each claim filed.
(c) Congress, through TFTEA, permits the
future use of an electronic export system
as automated proof of export for
drawback claims, but no system will be
reliable for this purpose on February 24,
2018; and, proof of export must be
documented in records that are
summarized for the drawback claim.
7. Transfers of Merchandise and Liability
(a) Specific formats for certificates of
delivery and specific formats for
certificates of manufacture and delivery
are no longer required when drawback
products or other drawback-eligible
goods are transferred between parties,
although records of manufacture and
transfer must be provided and
maintained to support the drawback
claim.
(b) The first drawback claim to be filed that
designates any portion of imported
merchandise from a given entry
summary line item will determine the
type of drawback eligibility for all other
imported merchandise covered by that
entry summary line item.
(c) Importers are now jointly and severally
liable with drawback claimants for
refunds associated with their imported
merchandise, when designated on a
drawback claim.
B. Filing a TFTEA-Drawback Claim
C. Required TFTEA-Drawback
Certifications for Existing Manufacturing
Rulings and Privileges
D. Federal Excise Tax and Substitution
Drawback Claims
III. Explanation of Proposed Amendments
A. Proposed New Part 190
B. Other Conforming Amendments
C. Amendments Regarding Federal Excise
Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review) and
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
B. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
V. Proposed Effective/Applicability Dates
VI. Signing Authority
List of Subjects
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
I. Authority
Drawback, as provided for in section
313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1313), is the refund
or remission, in whole or in part, of
duties, taxes, and fees imposed and paid
under Federal law upon importation or
entry and due on the imported
merchandise. Drawback is a privilege,
not a right, subject to compliance with
prescribed rules and regulations
administered by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP). See 19 U.S.C.
1313(l). Currently, the implementing
regulations regarding drawback are
contained in part 191 of the CBP
Regulations (title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) (19 CFR part
191)) and part 181 of the CBP
Regulations (19 CFR part 181, subpart E,
which pertains to drawback claims
under the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA)). Additionally, the
Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of 1986, as
amended (IRC), codified as title 26 of
the United States Code (26 U.S.C.), is
the main body of domestic statutory tax
law of the United States and includes,
inter alia, laws covering Federal excise
taxes. Federal excise taxes are imposed
on the manufacture and distribution of
certain consumer goods, such as
distilled spirits, wines, beer, tobacco
products, imported taxable fuel and
petroleum products. These Federal
excise taxes, and certain limitations
regarding drawback claims, are
discussed below in the section titled
Federal Excise Tax and Substitution
Drawback Claims.
In essence, a drawback claim is a
request for a refund or remission of
certain duties, taxes, and fees imposed
upon importation which is filed with
CBP after the merchandise or articles
have been exported or destroyed. There
are three main categories of drawback:
Manufacturing drawback, rejected
merchandise drawback, and unused
merchandise drawback. Each main
category of drawback is discussed, in
turn, below.
Manufacturing drawback may be
claimed on exported articles that have
been manufactured or produced in the
United States with imported duty-paid
merchandise (direct identification
manufacturing drawback), as well as on
exported articles that have been
manufactured or produced in the United
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37887
States using domestic merchandise
substituted for imported duty-paid
merchandise meeting the statutory
criteria (substitution manufacturing
drawback). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and
(b).
Rejected merchandise drawback may
be available upon the exportation or
destruction of imported duty-paid
merchandise entered or withdrawn for
consumption meeting the statutory
criteria (i.e., not conforming to sample
or specifications, shipped without
consent, determined to be defective at
the time of import, or ultimately sold at
retail and returned). See 19 U.S.C.
1313(c).
Unused merchandise drawback may
be claimed on imported merchandise
that was exported or destroyed without
having been used within the United
States (direct identification unused
merchandise drawback) as well as on
goods that were exported or destroyed
without being used that were
substituted for imported merchandise
meeting the appropriate criteria
(substitution unused merchandise
drawback). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) and
(2).
Originally, as provided for in section
3 of the second Act of Congress, the
Tariff Act of July 4, 1789, drawback of
99% of duties paid on imported
merchandise (except distilled spirits)
was permitted if the merchandise was
exported within a year. However,
drawback expanded over time to, among
other things, provide for refunds of
taxes and fees in some situations, allow
for merchandise to be destroyed as an
alternative to exportation, allow for the
substitution of goods on which
drawback could be claimed, and
provide more than just a single year
within which goods must be exported or
destroyed.
Historically, drawback claims were
submitted entirely on paper. While
filing a claim entirely on paper is
currently still an option, most drawback
claims consist of two portions: The
electronic transmission of the entry
summary data for the designated
imported merchandise via the CBPauthorized electronic data interchange
(EDI); and the physical delivery of the
CBP Form 7551 (Drawback Entry) and
all required documents supporting the
claim. For TFTEA-Drawback claims,
filers will electronically transmit the
drawback entry summary data and the
entry summary data for the designated
imported merchandise to CBP and will
upload all documents required to
support the claim. CBP has programmed
the Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE) for receiving
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37888
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
electronic drawback claims.2 An
electronically submitted drawback
claim will not be complete until the
claim has been successfully transmitted
with all required documents uploaded.
Information for filing a drawback entry
is contained in the relevant CBP and
Trade Automated Interface
Requirements (CATAIR) document,
which is available at: https://
www.cbp.gov/trade/ace/catair.
Upon receipt of a claim, CBP
conducts an initial review, which
allows CBP the opportunity to work
with claimants to ensure that the claim
is complete and timely. Once a
complete claim is timely filed,
drawback specialists review the
supporting documentation to ensure
that the claim is properly documented
and the amount of the drawback is
correctly calculated. In many instances,
it is necessary for CBP to contact
claimants to obtain additional
supporting documentation, such as
when there are questions regarding the
identity of the merchandise in transfer
scenarios or to confirm the actual date
and fact of exportation. If additional
information is required, CBP will send
a request for information (CBP Form 28)
to the claimant through the ACE portal
or through the end of the transition
period by physically transmitting the
request, depending upon the method
used to file the claim was filed.
Claimants generally respond via the
method by which they were contacted.
The increased use of electronic filing
and correspondence will expedite claim
processing and payment.
Requests for information do not toll
the deadlines for timely filing. In any
event, claimants are bound by the
deadlines for claims with respect to
filing, amending, and perfecting.
II. Modernized Drawback
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
A. TFTEA-Drawback Overview
On February 24, 2016, the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act
of 2015 (TFTEA) (Pub. L. 114–125, 130
Stat. 122, February 24, 2016) was signed
into law. Section 906 of TFTEA,
Drawback and Refunds, made
significant changes to the drawback
laws which generally liberalize the
standards for substituting merchandise,
ease documentation requirements,
2 On February 9, 2018, in anticipation of delays
regarding the proposal and finalization of the
TFTEA-Drawback regulations, CBP posted interim
policy guidance for filing TFTEA-Drawback claims
in ACE during the transition period, available at:
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programsadministration/entry-summary/ace-process-andpolicy. This interim policy guidance is discussed in
detail below in section B, Filing a TFTEA-Drawback
Claim.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
extend and standardize timelines for
filing drawback claims, and require
electronic filing. However, while the
changes are significant, on balance,
section 906 of TFTEA left most of 19
U.S.C. 1313 unchanged. In other words,
except for the significant changes
brought about by Section 906 of TFTEA
which are discussed below, most of the
underlying processes involved in
drawback remain unchanged. CBP also
notes that additional steps to further
automate or simplify the drawback
claims process (which may or may not
require regulatory changes) are
anticipated to be announced subsequent
to the implementation of the changes
proposed in this document.
1. Transition Period (February 24, 2018–
February 23, 2019)
(a) Claims may be filed under the
existing drawback process or the
TFTEA-Drawback process during the
transition period.
Section 906(q)(3) of TFTEA provides
for a transition period, beginning
February 24, 2018, and ending February
23, 2019, during which claimants may
file claims under the current drawback
process and regulations detailed in part
191 (and under section 313 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 as in effect on the day
before TFTEA was signed into law) or
under the amended statute and the
implementing regulations (proposed
part 190). February 23, 2019, is the last
day of the transition period. During the
transition period, claimants may choose
which process to file on a claim-byclaim basis, meaning that claimants may
file some claims under the old drawback
process and some claims under the
TFTEA-Drawback process throughout
the entirety of the transition period. For
purposes of this document, ‘‘TFTEADrawback’’ is the term generally used to
refer to drawback under section 1313, as
amended by TFTEA, and the
implementing regulations contained in
proposed Part 190.
While TFTEA-Drawback claims have
been accepted in ACE since February
24, 2018, it is not until February 24,
2019, that all claims must be filed in
compliance with the amended statute.
Section II.B, Filing a TFTEA-Drawback
Claim, below, contains information on
how to file claims, including during the
transition period under the interim
policy guidance procedures announced
February 8, 2018, in anticipation of the
delay in finalizing these proposed
regulations. Accordingly, the changes
proposed in this document have no
immediate effect on the drawback
processes and requirements contained
in part 191 of the CBP regulations. The
transition period allows claimants the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
opportunity to choose which drawback
regime to operate under while providing
additional time, if needed, to complete
any programming requirements for
transmitting claims in ACE.
(b) TFTEA-Drawback substitution
claims cannot designate imported
merchandise if the associated entry
summary was included on a drawback
claim filed under part 191(and vice
versa).
Claimants are precluded from filing
TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims
for imported merchandise associated
with an entry summary if any other
merchandise covered on that entry
summary has been designated as the
basis of a claim under part 191,
including during the transition period.
Nevertheless, claimants may continue to
make claims (including substitution
claims) under part 191 for these entries
through the end of the transition period
on February 23, 2019. Similarly,
claimants are precluded from filing any
drawback claims under part 191 for
imported merchandise associated with
an entry summary if any other
merchandise covered on that entry
summary has been designated as the
basis of a TFTEA-Drawback substitution
claim, including during the transition
period. These limitations exist because
drawback refund amounts are claimed
at the entry summary header level (i.e.,
the aggregate of all lines for which
drawback was claimed on an entry) for
claims under part 191 and CBP is
unable to trace whether merchandise
from a specific line on an entry
summary was designated as the basis for
a drawback claim under part 191.
2. New Filing Requirements and
Deadline
(a) All TFTEA-Drawback claims are
required to be submitted electronically
in ACE.
While all TFTEA-Drawback claims
must be filed electronically, it is not
until February 24, 2019 (the first day
after the end of the transition period),
that all drawback claims must be filed
electronically. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(r)(3)(B). Consequently, claims filed
under part 191 do not have to be filed
electronically. Drawback claims must be
filed electronically through a
combination of transmitting certain
information to the system and
uploading supporting documentation.
By moving to a fully electronic
environment as of February 24, 2019,
CBP will be able to better validate all
drawback claims based upon certain
criteria specific to the type of drawback
claim, including (but not limited to) the
timeliness of the claim, the amount of
refund claimed, and the suitability of
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
the merchandise involved. As a result,
drawback claimants should benefit from
expedited processing, review, and
payment of claims.
(b) The import entry summary line
item must be identified for all imported
merchandise for TFTEA-Drawback
claims.
Many of the benefits for drawback
claim processing noted above are made
possible by systematic enhancements in
ACE concerning line item reporting.
Line item reporting, which is required
for all TFTEA-Drawback claims,
requires claimants to provide certain
relevant information for the designated
imported merchandise on a drawback
claim associated with the line item on
an entry summary, including the tariff
classification, quantity, and value, as
well as the duties, taxes, and fees
assessed thereon. Line item reporting
will enable more system validations at
the line level and will help ensure that
CBP does not overpay refunds.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback claims have a
uniform five-year filing deadline from
the date of importation of the
designated imported merchandise.
All TFTEA-Drawback claims must be
filed not later than 5 years after the date
the merchandise on which drawback is
claimed was imported. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(r)(1). Previously, section 1313
provided three-year filing deadlines
beginning from different starting points
for various types of claims (e.g., three
years from the receipt of imported
merchandise or three years after the date
of importation or withdrawal). This fiveyear deadline does not apply to claims
filed under the existing drawback laws
provided for in part 191 during the
transition period.
3. HTSUS-Based Substitution Standards
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution
claims for most manufacturing and
unused merchandise have new
standards based on HTSUS
classification.
Section 906(b) provides a new
standard for determining which
merchandise may be substituted for
imported merchandise as the basis for a
substitution claim. This standard
generally requires that both the
imported merchandise and the exported
merchandise be classified or classifiable
within the same the 8-digit number in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) classification.
This standard replaces the ‘‘same kind
and quality’’ and ‘‘commercially
interchangeable’’ standards that were
applied, respectively, to substitution
manufacturing drawback claims (19
U.S.C. 1313(b)) and substitution unused
merchandise drawback claims (19
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)). Prior to TFTEA,
determining whether goods were of the
same kind and quality or were
commercially interchangeable was a
commodity-specific question that
imposed burdens on claimants (to prove
that the merchandise met the applicable
standard) and on CBP (to research and
rule on the eligibility of the goods to be
substituted). The new standards will
reduce much of the above-cited burdens
by generally eliminating uncertainty as
to the whether the standard for
substitution has been met.
Substitution under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b),
for manufacturing drawback claims, is
subject to a new standard that requires
the substituted merchandise used in
manufacturing to be classifiable under
the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number as the designated imported
merchandise. Similarly, substitution
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), for unused
merchandise drawback claims, is
subject to a new standard that requires
the substituted merchandise to be
classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number as the
imported merchandise, except that there
are restrictions with respect to HTSUS
basket provisions (i.e., subheadings with
descriptions that begin with the term
‘‘other’’). Specifically, and only for
unused merchandise drawback claims,
merchandise cannot be substituted if the
8-digit HTSUS subheading number
begins with the term ‘‘other’’, unless the
imported merchandise and the
substituted merchandise are both
classifiable under the same 10-digit
HTSUS statistical reporting number and
the description for that 10-digit HTSUS
statistical reporting number does not
begin with the term ‘‘other’’. See 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(5). In lieu of the HTSUS
classification for unused merchandise
drawback claims, substitution may also
be based on the first 8 digits of the 10digit Department of Commerce Schedule
B number (the code for exporting goods
from the United States). See 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(6).
Under the new substitution standards,
the correct HTSUS classification is a
critical aspect of the exercise of
reasonable care. Accordingly, importers
and drawback claimants should take
note that prospective rulings on
classification may be requested
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.1(a)(1).
(b) The new standards do not apply to
certain claims if substitution is based
upon alternative rules (source material
for sought chemical elements, wine, and
finished petroleum derivatives) or if
pursuant to NAFTA drawback.
Certain types of merchandise are
exempt from the new substitution
standards discussed above. Substitution
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37889
manufacturing claims for sought
chemical elements have a special rule
for source material regardless of the 8digit HTSUS subheading number. See
19 U.S.C. 1313(b)(4) (which defines a
sought chemical element as either an
element from the Periodic Table of
Elements or a chemical compound
consisting of such elements). Unused
merchandise claims involving wine
have a distinct standard involving price
variations and color. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2). Both manufacturing and
unused merchandise drawback claims
for finished petroleum products, if filed
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p), are already
subject to more specific HTSUS-based
substitution standards. Substitution
manufacturing claims for NAFTA
drawback remain subject to the ‘‘same
kind and quality’’ standard in part 181,
consistent with 19 U.S.C. 3333(a)(3).
4. ‘‘Lesser of’’ Rule for Substitution
Claims
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution
claims are generally subject to a ‘‘lesser
of’’ rule regarding the amount of duties,
taxes, and fees to be refunded where the
amount to be refunded will be equal to
99 percent of the lesser of (1) the
amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid
with respect to the imported
merchandise; or (2) the amount of
duties, taxes, and fees that would apply
to the substituted merchandise if the
substituted merchandise were imported.
Section 906(g) of TFTEA provides for
a ‘‘lesser of’’ rule, as a safeguard, to
ensure that the revenue is protected in
light of the liberalization and
simplification of the standards for
substitution drawback claims. The
‘‘lesser of’’ rule provides that the refund
will be equal to 99 percent of the lesser
of the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
paid with respect to the imported
merchandise and/or that would have
been paid on the substituted
merchandise had it been imported. In
all claims subject to the ‘‘lesser of’’ rule,
it is incumbent on the claimant to
properly calculate the proper amount of
the claimed refund.
For manufacturing drawback claims,
the substituted merchandise is that
which was used in manufacturing, in
lieu of the designated imported
merchandise, and the ‘‘lesser of’’
comparison is based upon the amount of
duties, taxes, and fees that would apply
to the substituted merchandise if it were
imported (with this amount reduced by
the value of the materials recovered
during destruction, if applicable). See
19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(C). For unused
merchandise drawback claims, the
substituted merchandise is the exported
or destroyed merchandise and the
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37890
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
‘‘lesser of’’ comparison is based upon
the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
that would apply to the exported or
destroyed merchandise if it were
imported (with this amount reduced by
the value of the materials recovered
during destruction, if applicable). See
19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(B). TFTEADrawback claimants must provide the
comparative value (i.e., the ‘‘lesser of’’
comparison for either manufacturing
drawback claims or for unused
merchandise drawback claims), as part
of a substitution claim.
(b) The TFTEA-Drawback ‘‘lesser of’’
rule does not apply to certain claims if
substitution is based upon alternative
rules (wine and finished petroleum
derivatives) or if pursuant to NAFTA
drawback.
The ‘‘lesser of’’ rule does not apply to
claims for wine based on 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2) or to claims for finished
petroleum products under 19 U.S.C.
1313(p). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(D).
Claims under these provisions are
subject to other specific limitations. It is
important to note that sought chemical
elements are not exempt from the
‘‘lesser of’’ rule, even though there is a
special rule for the substitution of
source material. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(b)(4). NAFTA drawback allows for
substitution manufacturing claims
(under certain conditions) and these
claims are not subject to the ‘‘lesser of’’
rule discussed herein, but they remain
subject to the discrete NAFTA drawback
‘‘lesser of duty’’ rule regarding the
amount of duty owed as compared
between the relevant countries. See 19
U.S.C. 3333 and 19 CFR 181.44.
5. Expanded Scope and Calculation
Methods for Refunds
(a) The scope of refunds for direct
identification and substitution
manufacturing drawback claims will be
expanded from duties to also include
taxes and fees.
Section 906(g) of TFTEA provides for
the refund of taxes and fees, along with
duties, for manufacturing drawback
claims. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(C). This
is an expansion of the scope of refunds
available for manufacturing drawback
claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b)).
Previously, the statutory provisions for
direct identification and substitution
manufacturing drawback specified only
the refund of duties. This expansion is
specifically provided for claims with
respect to manufactured articles in
paragraph (l)(2)(C) of 19 U.S.C. 1313.
However, this expansion is not
applicable to all drawback claim
provisions. Refunds of duties, taxes, and
fees were already allowed for in claims
involving unused merchandise prior to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
the new language provided for by
TFTEA. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(B). In
contrast, there was neither any preexisting authority for refunds of taxes
and fees for claims involving rejected
merchandise nor did TFTEA otherwise
expand the scope of refunds beyond
duties by generally referencing 19
U.S.C. 1313(l). The provisions that
provide for refunds of duties, taxes, and
fees are limited to unused merchandise
and manufacturing drawback claims in
19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(B) and (C),
respectively.
There is also a noteworthy difference
regarding the statutory provisions for
substitution manufacturing drawback
claims whereby the merchandise must
be imported duty-paid. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(b)(1). No such requirement exists
for direct identification manufacturing
claims. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(a). The result
of this difference is that imported
merchandise that is duty-free may be
designated as the basis for a direct
identification manufacturing drawback
claim, but not for a substitution
manufacturing drawback claim.
(b) TFTEA-Drawback direct
identification claim refunds will be
calculated based on the invoice value of
the designated imported merchandise,
which is unchanged from the current
requirements.
CBP currently requires all drawback
claimants, regardless of the type of
claim, to calculate drawback refunds
based on the invoice value of the
designated imported merchandise.
TFTEA-Drawback direct identification
claims will continue to be calculated
based on the invoice value of the
designated imported merchandise. This
includes all drawback claims that are
based upon direct identification (e.g.,
manufacturing, rejected merchandise,
and unused merchandise drawback
claims). It should also be noted that all
NAFTA drawback claims will continue
to be calculated based on the invoice
value of the designated imported
merchandise. See 19 U.S.C. 3333 and 19
CFR 181.44.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback substitution
claim refunds will be calculated based
on the per unit average value reported
on the line from the entry summary that
covered the designated imported
merchandise.
Section 906(g) of TFTEA authorized
CBP to calculate refunds based upon the
per unit average of the duties, taxes, and
fees reported on the entry summary line
item that covered the designated
imported merchandise if this method
would result in simplification of the
drawback claims process for CBP
without posing a risk to the revenue of
the United States. Per unit averaging
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
requires that the drawback claimant
calculate the per unit average value of
the designated imported merchandise
(i.e., the entered value for the applicable
entry summary line item apportioned
equally over each unit covered by the
line item) and request a refund 99% of
the amount of duties, taxes and fees
applicable thereto. The legislative
history for Section 906(g) clarifies that
CBP is authorized to utilize per unit
averaging solely to allow for the
simplification of drawback claims and
CBP is not to allow for the
‘‘manipulation of claims in order to
maximize refunds to the detriment of
the revenue of the United States.’’ See
H.R. Rep. no. 114–376, at 221 (2015).
Accordingly, CBP is proposing in these
regulations to allow the use of per unit
averaging in the context of substitution
manufacturing drawback claims (19
U.S.C. 1313(b)) and substitution unused
merchandise drawback claims (19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), but not for direct
identification manufacturing drawback
claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(a)), rejected
merchandise drawback claims (19
U.S.C. 1313(c)), or direct identification
unused merchandise drawback claims
(19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)).
This determination was made only
after much internal consideration as
well as outreach to various trade
stakeholders. A significant justification
for the use of per unit averaging
exclusively for substitution claims is
that TFTEA imposed a ‘‘lesser of’’ rule
for drawback claims involving
substitution that safeguards against risks
to the revenue. Simply put, by
importing high and low value goods
together on a single line, the claimant
could manipulate the drawback claim
through per-unit averaging by
strategically exporting or destroying the
low value goods, where the per-unit
average of duties, taxes, and fees to be
refunded was greater than that
associated with the low value goods.
The lesser of rule prevents this type of
manipulation. No ‘‘lesser of’’ rule was
authorized under TFTEA for direct
identification claims.
The application of per unit averaging
method of calculating drawback refunds
requires the equal apportionment of the
amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible
for drawback for all units covered by a
single line item on an entry summary to
each unit of merchandise (and is
required for certain substitution
drawback claims). In this method, the
ratio of the total value of imported units
as reported on a line item divided by the
total quantity of imported units reported
on a line item is to be multiplied by the
quantity of units designated as the basis
for the drawback claim to determine the
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
average per unit value. The refund per
unit of the designated imported
merchandise is to be 99% of the duties,
taxes, and fees applicable to the average
per unit value and this amount is
calculated to two decimal places (and
subject to the ‘‘lesser of’’ rule).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Example 1. Substitution Unused
Merchandise TFTEA-Drawback Claim
A substitution unused merchandise
drawback claim is filed for 500 exported
articles with a value of $110 per unit.
The 500 units of designated imported
merchandise were reported on an entry
summary line item that covered 1000
units with an entered value of $100,000
and a duty rate of 2.5%. Therefore,
regarding the amount of duties to be
refunded pursuant to the ‘‘lesser of’’
methodology, the calculation of
drawback will be based on the per unit
value of $100 for the designated
imported merchandise rather than the
value of $110 for the exported
merchandise.
The designated imported merchandise
has a per unit value of $100. This
applicable duty rate (2.5%) is applied to
the average per unit value ($100) to
determine the amount of duties
apportioned to each unit at $2.50.
The amount available for a drawback
refund is 99% of the duties paid per
unit ($2.50), which is $2.48. This
amount of refundable duties per unit
($2.48) is multiplied by the quantity of
designated imported merchandise (500
units) to calculate the total amount
available for the drawback refund,
which is $1,240. Similar calculations
must be completed for applicable taxes
and fees as well.
Example 2. Substitution Manufacturing
TFTEA-Drawback Claim
A substitution manufacturing
drawback claim is filed for 200 exported
finished articles with a value of $400
per unit.3 The designated imported
merchandise was reported on an entry
summary line item that covered 800
units with an entered value of $160,000
(averaging $200 per unit) and a duty rate
of 3.1%. To manufacture the finished
articles, the manufacturer actually used
600 units of substituted domestically
sourced merchandise that is classifiable
under the same 10-digit tariff provision.
The domestically sourced merchandise
has a substituted value of $180 per unit.
Therefore, regarding the amount of
3 It is noteworthy that the value of the exported
(or destroyed) finished article is not germane to the
application of the ‘‘lesser of’’ rule for substitution
manufacturing drawback claims. The comparison in
value is between the value of the designated
imported merchandise and the substituted
merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
duties to be refunded pursuant to the
‘‘lesser of’’ methodology, the calculation
of drawback will be based on the per
unit value of $180 for the substituted
merchandise rather than the value of
$200 for the designated imported
merchandise.
The substituted merchandise has a
per unit value of $180. This applicable
duty rate (3.1%) is applied to the
average per unit value ($180) to
determine the amount of duties
apportioned to each unit at $5.58.
The amount available for a drawback
refund is 99% of the duties paid per
unit ($5.58), which is $5.52. This
amount of refundable duties per unit
($5.52) is multiplied by the quantity of
designated imported merchandise (600
units) to calculate the total amount
available for the drawback refund,
which is $3,312. Similar calculations
must be completed for applicable taxes
and fees as well.
Per unit averaging facilitates
verification of the amounts of drawback
refunds claimed. CBP does not receive
invoice data that is usefully searchable
electronically. By moving to the per unit
averaging calculation methodology for
substitution claims that is based on
entry summary line data, CBP will gain
the ability to automate validations of
refund calculations made by the
claimant. This should lead to faster and
more efficient processing of claims,
which will benefit both drawback
claimants and CBP. These efficiencies
are gained through the use of entry
summary line item data, which is
required for all TFTEA-Drawback
claims, and will enable the per unit
averaging calculation to take place as an
automated verification rather than a
manual process.
(d) The imported merchandise
reported on a single entry summary line
item may not be the basis of a direct
identification and a substitution claim
under TFTEA-Drawback.
A consequence of using per unit
averaging for substitution claims under
TFTEA-Drawback is that a single entry
summary line item cannot be used for
both direct identification and
substitution drawback claims.
Consequently, CBP proposes to limit
each line on an entry summary to
designation as the basis for either direct
identification or substitution claims, but
never both. Therefore, all associated
imported merchandise on that line may
only be designated as the basis for either
direct identification or substitution
claims under TFTEA-Drawback. If both
types of claims were allowed on a single
line on an entry summary, CBP would
be unable to issue full refunds for all
drawback claims that could lawfully be
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37891
made against a specific entry summary
line item in some situations. For
example, in some situations where
substitution claims using the per unit
average of the line item were to be
claimed prior to a direct identification
claim, the total amount of drawback
remaining on the line may not be
sufficient to pay the proper amount of
drawback tied to the high value goods.
CBP has also chosen this proposed
policy in expectation of the efficiencies
to be gained by both claimants and CBP
regarding calculating and verifying
refunds. Accordingly, importers and
drawback claimants need to be aware of
the limitation on line item designations
prior to importing merchandise or
receiving transferred merchandise,
because the first-filed claim on a line
will dictate the type of claim available
for any remaining merchandise of the
same line.
6. Recordkeeping and Proof of Export
(a) Congress, through TFTEA,
changed the starting date for the threeyear time period for maintaining
supporting records for drawback claims
from the date of payment to the date of
liquidation.
For all TFTEA-Drawback claims,
section 906(o) replaced the previous
requirement to maintain supporting
records for three years from the date of
payment of the claim with the new
requirement to maintain records for
three years from the date of liquidation
of the claim. See 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3).
This extension of the recordkeeping
time period provides CBP with more
time to request documents needed to
verify or audit claims. This new
timeframe requires claimants with
accelerated payment privileges to
maintain supporting records longer than
before TFTEA (because claims are paid
prior to liquidation for claimants that
obtain the privilege of accelerated
payment).
(b) Claimants for manufacturing
drawback must provide a certification
that they are in possession of the
relevant bill of materials or formula for
the manufactured goods, in lieu of
actual submission thereof, for each
claim filed.
Currently, claimants for
manufacturing drawback are required to
provide a bill of materials or formula to
CBP upon request, for any claim filed.
CBP has and will continue to request
these records for review in the context
of verifications, audits, and other
administrative actions. The purpose of
this requirement is to ensure that the
claims are consistent with the
applicable bill(s) of materials or
formula(s) that accompanied the
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37892
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
claimant’s application to operate under
the applicable general or specific
manufacturing drawback ruling. TFTEA
expressly added a requirement for
substitution manufacturing drawback
claims that the person making the claim
must submit the bill of materials or
formula identifying the drawbackeligible merchandise and manufactured
article(s) by the 8-digit HTSUS
subheading numbers and the quantities
of merchandise with each claim. See 19
U.S.C. 1313(b)(3)(A). For administrative
efficiency and consistency with how
drawback claims are reviewed and
verified, rather than requiring the actual
submission of these records with each
claim, CBP will require a certification in
ACE as to possession of these records.
This certification requirement applies to
both direct identification and
substitution manufacturing claims.
(c) Congress, through TFTEA, permits
the future use of an electronic export
system as automated proof of export for
drawback claims, but no system will be
reliable for this purpose on February 24,
2018; and, proof of export must be
documented in records that are
summarized for the drawback claim.
Claimants whose exported goods are
the basis for a claim of drawback must
provide proof that establishes fully the
date and fact of exportation and the
identity of the exporter. These
requirements are provided for in
proposed § 190.72. Under TFTEADrawback, proof of exportation is
required in the form of export summary
data that is provided as part of a
complete drawback claim filed with
CBP. However, the underlying
supporting records must fully prove the
exportation through records kept in the
normal course of business. TFTEA also
provides for proof of export to be
established via an electronic export
system of the United States, as
determined by the Commissioner of
CBP. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(i). Currently,
the Automated Export System (AES) is
not able to fully establish the required
elements. Accordingly, until such time
as the Commissioner of CBP announces
the availability of a capable electronic
system through a general notice in the
Customs Bulletin, records kept in the
normal course of business shall be used
to establish fully the date and fact of
exportation and the identity of the
exporter, and such records must be
maintained by claimants whose
exported goods are the basis for a claim
of drawback.
7. Transfers of Merchandise and
Liability
(a) Specific formats for certificates of
delivery and specific formats for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
certificates of manufacture and delivery
are no longer required when drawback
products or other drawback-eligible
goods are transferred between parties,
although records of manufacture and
transfer must be provided and
maintained to support the drawback
claim.
Section 906 removed the longstanding
requirements for the submission of
Certificates of Delivery (CDs) and
Certificates of Manufacture and Delivery
(CMDs) by stating that no additional
certificates of transfer or manufacture
shall be required 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), and
by stating that no additional certificates
of transfer are required in 19 U.S.C.
1313(c), (j), and (p). Section 906(l),
Drawback Certificates, removed the
recordkeeping requirements relating to
these certificates for drawback claims by
striking 19 U.S.C. 1313(t). Instead of
CDs and CMDs, parties involved in
transfers of drawback products or other
drawback-eligible goods must maintain
records, which may include records
kept in the normal course of business,
to evidence the transfers.
(b) The first drawback claim to be
filed that designates any portion of
imported merchandise from a given
entry summary line item will determine
the type of drawback eligibility for all
other imported merchandise covered by
that entry summary line item.
As previously explained in part 5(d),
above, there is a limitation that
imported merchandise on a single entry
summary line item cannot be designated
as the basis for both direct identification
and substitution drawback claims under
TFTEA, due to the different methods of
calculating refund amounts. Because the
transferor can transfer the merchandise
covered by a specific line item to
different transferees, the transferees
might unwittingly attempt to file
different types of claims, which is not
permitted. In an effort to best inform
transferees of the possible limitation, if
a transferor has already filed a certain
type of drawback claim designating a
portion of merchandise from an entry
summary line item, or otherwise has
knowledge of an already-filed claim that
does likewise, then the transferor must
designate whether the merchandise is
eligible for substitution or direct
identification claims and notify the
transferee of that designation at the time
of transfer. This should help transferees
to avoid attempting to make drawback
claims for the transferred merchandise
under the mutually exclusive bases of
direct identification and substitution. If,
at the time of transfer, the transferor is
not aware of a particular type of
drawback claim already filed relating to
the entry summary line item, then the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
designation shall so indicate to the
transferee. Notification of the
designation from the transferor to the
transferee must be documented in
records, which may include records
kept in the normal course of business.
Notwithstanding the designation made,
however, the type of the first drawback
claim to be filed relating to that entry
summary line item will dictate the type
of any subsequent claims relating to that
same entry summary line item.
Because this notification requirement
is not effective until February 24, 2018,
parties who anticipate making
substitution-based claims under TFTEADrawback designating imported
merchandise that was entered and
transferred prior to this date, should
consult with the transferor about
whether the transferred merchandise
potentially is eligible for substitutionbased claims under TFTEA-Drawback.
Such eligibility only exists if the
transferred merchandise was not
previously used as the basis for any
non-TFTEA drawback claim, because all
types of non-TFTEA drawback claims
must be calculated based on invoice
values, which conflicts with the use of
per unit averaging when determining
refunds for imported merchandise on a
single entry summary line item.
It is important to note, again, that this
notification of designation requirement
is proposed in an effort to better inform
claimants of possible limitations on the
type of drawback claim that can be filed
in situations involving transferred
merchandise. The designation, however,
is not a guarantee of the type of claim
that can be filed. Drawback claimants
must remain aware that the first
drawback claim to be filed on a given
entry summary line item will control
the type of claim that subsequently can
be filed in the case of transferred
merchandise.
(c) Importers are now jointly and
severally liable with drawback
claimants for refunds associated with
their imported merchandise, when
designated on a drawback claim.
Section 906(f) established joint and
several liability for the drawback
claimant and the importer of the
imported merchandise that is
designated as the basis of the claim. See
19 U.S.C. 1313(k). Accordingly,
importers should be aware of this
liability when transferring imported
merchandise to other parties for
purposes of drawback. Therefore, it is
proposed to amend § 113.62 to reflect
this liability in the import entry bond
conditions.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
B. Filing a TFTEA-Drawback Claim
TFTEA-Drawback claims must be
filed electronically. A complete TFTEADrawback claim will consist of the
successful transmission of the data
required for the TFTEA-Drawback entry
and the upload of all required
documents supporting the claim. When
submitting the claim, the filer must
provide, among other things, the
drawback entry number, filing port
code, claimant ID number, drawback
provision, total drawback claim amount
requested, the import entry summary(s)
and line item number(s) for the
designated imported merchandise, other
required line item data including the
HTSUS subheading number at the 10digit level, information on exportation
or destruction, and, if applicable, the
NAFTA coding sheet. Proposed section
190.51 provides detailed information
about specific data elements,
certifications, and supporting
documents that may be required
depending on the particular type of
drawback claim.
After transmission, the filer will
receive an automated message
indicating either that the electronic
transmission has been accepted or
rejected. In the case of a rejection, the
automated message will inform the filer
regarding the reason(s) for the rejection.
Uploads of required forms, and any
other supporting documentation should
be submitted through ACE, Document
Image System, after the successful
electronic transmission. Further, related
to filing claims electronically, as noted
below in the section explaining the
proposed regulations, a definition for
‘‘drawback office’’ has been added to
§ 190.2 clarifying that CBP has the
authority to share or transfer work
between drawback offices at its
discretion.
For the interim period between
February 24, 2018 and the date on
which the new TFTEA-Drawback
regulations will become effective, CBP
developed interim procedures for
accepting electronically filed TFTEADrawback claims. Specifically, to enable
ACE to recognize and accept such
claims, notwithstanding the absence of
the necessary regulatory requirements
for a complete TFTEA-Drawback claim,
ACE was programed with provisional
placeholder requirements, modeled on
the draft regulatory package then under
development. Corresponding
provisional Customs and Trade
Automated Interface Requirements
(CATAIR) Guidelines were provided to
enable claimants to program their
systems to interface with these
provisional placeholder requirements in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
ACE. And on February 9, 2018, CBP
posted on its website a document
entitled Drawback: Interim Guidance for
Filing TFTEA Drawback Claims (Interim
Guidance), to further inform and
provide guidance to the trading
community regarding the temporary
procedures for electronically filing
TFTEA-Drawback claims during the
interim period until the implementing
regulations are finalized and
operational. This Interim Guidance was
subsequently twice updated, to provide
additional clarity.
The Interim Guidance explained that
the provisional requirements for
electronically-filed TFTEA-Drawback
claims that are reflected in the
provisional CATAIR and described in
the Interim Guidance document are
placeholders only, and will not be used
to process the claims beyond their
initial acceptance in ACE. The actual
final requirements for such claims will
be established once the rulemaking
process is complete and the new
regulations are implemented and
effective. To the extent that the final
requirements established through
rulemaking ultimately differ from the
provisional placeholders used to accept
TFTEA-Drawback claims in ACE prior
to the effective date of the final rule, the
Interim Guidance explained that
claimants will be permitted to perfect
their claims in accordance with the new
requirements before the claims are
processed for payment.
The interim procedures outlined and
explained in the Interim Guidance will
remain in place until this rulemaking is
complete and the final rule to
implement the regulatory changes
pending for TFTEA-Drawback claims is
implemented and effective.
The programming specifics for
electronic transmission are explained in
more detail in the TFTEA-Drawback
CATAIR Guidelines, which can be
accessed at: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/
ace/catair. Specific questions related to
filing TFTEA-Drawback claims may be
directed to a client representative or the
ACE Account Service Desk at 1–866–
530–4172 or ACE.Support@cbp.dhs.gov.
Filers should be aware that a delay of
more than 24 hours in uploading all
required accompanying documentation
after the transmission of the claim data
will mean that the filing date will be
tied to the uploading of documents
rather than the date of transmitting the
claim data. In some instances, this later
official date of filing could affect the
timeliness of a claim.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37893
C. Required TFTEA-Drawback
Certifications for Existing
Manufacturing Rulings and Privileges
While the processes regarding general
and specific manufacturing rulings
detailed in appendices A and B of the
proposed part 190 will be largely
unchanged from those described in the
appendices of part 191, TFTEA does
have some impact on existing rulings.
The existing rulings were issued based
on the requirements of 19 CFR part 191,
which do not comport with the TFTEADrawback requirements (e.g., the new
substitution standard and timeframes).
Accordingly, in order to continue
operating under an existing
manufacturing ruling, a manufacturer or
producer must file a supplemental
application for a limited modification to
that ruling. To ensure compliance with
the TFTEA-Drawback requirements, the
limited application must include
revised parallel columns and a bill of
materials or formula, which must be
annotated with the applicable HTSUS
subheading numbers. In addition, a
certification must be provided to
confirm that all TFTEA-Drawback
claims made under the subject
manufacturing ruling will be in
conformity with all of the applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements.
Any supplemental application to
modify a ruling issued under 19 CFR
part 191 (so that it remains viable for
TFTEA-Drawback claims) must be
submitted to CBP no later than February
23, 2019, which is the close of the
transition period for drawback
claimants. Any ruling issued under 19
CFR part 191 that is not modified by
this deadline will not apply to TFTEADrawback claims; and, manufacturers
and producers would need to apply for
a new ruling under 19 CFR part 190.
Similar to manufacturing rulings,
drawback privileges granted under 19
CFR part 191 will not comport with
TFTEA-Drawback. The privileges are
the waiver of prior notice of intent to
export or destroy and accelerated
payment. With each claim that is filed
under 19 CFR part 190, a certification of
conformity with TFTEA-Drawback is
required for claimants to continue to
operate under one or both privileges if
granted pursuant to 19 CFR part 191.
Unlike for manufacturing rulings, these
certifications will be made
electronically with each TFTEADrawback claim. These certifications are
limited to the drawback provisions
under which they were originally
granted in accordance with 19 CFR part
191, except that privileges granted
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) and 19 CFR
191 may be applied to TFTEA-Drawback
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37894
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
claims made under 1313(j)(1) or
1313(j)(2).
The certification processes described
above are designed to ease the
administrative burden on CBP while
minimizing the disruption to those
operating under existing manufacturing
rulings and/or privileges. However,
claimants are responsible for performing
the requisite due diligence prior to filing
any TFTEA-Drawback claims; and, the
consequences of false or inaccurate
claims include, but are not limited to,
the denial of drawback refunds and the
associated privileges, noted above.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
D. Federal Excise Tax and Substitution
Drawback Claims
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of
1986, as amended, codified as title 26 of
the United States Code (26 U.S.C.), is
the main body of domestic statutory tax
law of the United States and includes
laws covering Federal excise taxes.
Federal excise taxes are imposed on the
manufacture and distribution of certain
consumer goods, including upon the
importation of distilled spirits, wines,
beer, tobacco products, and certain
imported taxable fuel and petroleum
products. While there are also excise
taxes on other products, it is these taxes,
because of the structure of the tax and
the manner in which they are collected,
that are eligible for drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313.
1. Distilled Spirits, Wines, and Beer:
Imposition of Federal Excise Tax and
Exemptions
Chapter 51 of the IRC sets forth excise
tax collection and related provisions
applicable to distilled spirits, wines,
and beer. In general, this chapter
provides that a Federal excise tax is
imposed on all wines, distilled spirits,
and beer produced in or imported into
the United States. 26 U.S.C. 5001, 5041,
5051.
Statutory exceptions to the required
payment of Federal excise tax exist. For
example, when wine, distilled spirits, or
beer are exported after payment or
determination of tax, the IRC provides
for ‘‘drawback’’ in an amount equal to
the tax paid. 26 U.S.C. 5055, 5062.
Under these provisions, the excise taxes
are refunded upon exportation.
Similarly, drawback is also available
when wine, distilled spirits, or beer are
exported from bonded premises
regulated by the Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), where no
tax has been paid, although tax liability
attached at the time of production or
import. While tax must ordinarily be
paid upon removal of wine, distilled
spirits, or beer from TTB-bonded
premises, the removal may occur
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
‘‘without payment of tax’’ for the
purpose of export. 26 U.S.C. 5214(a),
5362(c), 5053(a). Although removed
from a TTB-bonded facility, the product
is still subject to bond and still carries
a tax liability until the product is
exported. 26 U.S.C. 5053, 5175, 5362.
Similarly, Title 19 also provides for
‘‘drawback equal in amount to the tax
found to have been paid or determined
on . . . bottled spirits and wines
manufactured or produced in the United
States’’ upon exportation. 19 U.S.C.
1313(d). Under these drawback
provisions, a refund is made upon
exportation if tax has already been paid,
or if an unpaid tax liability exists, it is
extinguished upon exportation. The net
economic effect is identical.
2. Tobacco: Imposition of Federal Excise
Tax and Exemptions
Under Chapter 52 of the IRC, a
Federal excise tax is imposed on all
tobacco products and cigarette papers
and tubes manufactured in or imported
into the United States. 26 U.S.C. 5701.
The tax on domestically-produced
tobacco products and cigarette papers
and tubes is imposed at the time of
manufacture but generally is not paid or
determined until the products are
removed from TTB-bonded premises. 26
U.S.C. 5702, 5703. Upon exportation of
tobacco products and cigarette papers
and tubes upon which the tax has been
paid, the IRC permits drawback of the
tax paid. 26 U.S.C. 5706. In addition,
tobacco products and cigarette papers
and tubes may be removed from TTBbonded premises, without the payment
of Federal excise tax, for export. 26
U.S.C. 5704. Under these provisions, the
excise tax liability is extinguished upon
exportation. The net economic effect is
identical.
3. Other Excise Taxes
Chapter 32 of the IRC imposes various
excise taxes, including taxes on
gasoline, diesel fuel, and kerosene
(taxable fuel). For example, 26 U.S.C.
4081 imposes tax on the removal of
taxable fuel from any refinery or
terminal and on entry into the United
States for consumption, use, or
warehousing. The IRC permits the
refund of this tax when taxable fuel is
exported. 26 U.S.C. 6416, 6427. When
the taxable fuel is imported into an IRSregistered facility, it is taxed upon
removal from the facility and is not
eligible for drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313. Some taxable fuel, however, is not
imported into an IRS-registered facility,
in which case the tax is due upon
importation and may be eligible for
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
4. Federal Excise Taxes Have Been
Improperly Refunded
Under customs law, a form of
drawback known as ‘‘substitution
drawback’’ also occurs when products
are imported into the United States and
sufficiently similar products are
exported or destroyed. 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2). Treasury Department audits
and analyses have revealed that for a
number of years, CBP has received and
approved claims for substitution
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) for
imported bottled and bulk wine, even in
circumstances in which no excise tax
was paid on the substituted exported
merchandise. CBP has not identified a
record of the first time it granted a
section 1313(j)(2) drawback claim for
wine based on exported merchandise on
which tax had not been paid—a claim
for ‘‘double drawback,’’ drawback of the
excise tax on both the imported product
and the exported product.
An example of a claim for ‘‘double
drawback’’ of wine proceeds as follows:
A domestic winery imports 100 liters of
wine, pays Federal excise tax on the wine,
and sells the imported wine in the United
States. The domestic winery then exports 100
liters of its domestically-produced wine from
TTB-bonded premises without payment of
Federal excise tax. The domestic winery files
a § 1313(j)(2) drawback claim with CBP on
the basis that the 100 liters of domesticallyproduced wine are commercially
interchangeable with the to the 100 liters of
imported wine. The domestic winery
receives a refund of 99 percent of the Federal
excise taxes that it paid on the 100 liters of
imported wine.
In this example, imported products
are introduced into the U.S. market, in
net effect, free of 99 percent of Federal
excise tax. As a result, in this example,
the U.S. Treasury ultimately receives
only one percent of the Federal excise
tax on the imported products that are
consumed in the United States. By
contrast, domestically-produced wine
consumed in the United States is fully
taxed. This practice results in revenue
loss from having untaxed goods
circulating in commerce. It also has the
effect of giving imported wine a clear
tax advantage in the domestic market
over domestically produced wine.
Because the revenue loss (or tax break)
comes in the form of a reduction of tax
on imported product, it puts
domestically produced products at a
disadvantage as compared to imports in
the U.S. market.
This result is inconsistent with the
broader statutory excise tax regime,
which (on net) generally imposes excise
taxes on all subject goods consumed in
the United States, whether produced
domestically or imported for domestic
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
consumption. In the above example, by
contrast, the importer/exporter winery
has (on net) paid no Federal excise tax
on the exported wine and virtually no
Federal excise tax on the imported
wine. In net effect, the winery has
introduced imported wine 99% free of
excise tax to compete with domestically
produced wine that is fully taxed.
CBP currently permits this practice
only with respect to wine. But as
explained, the IRC imposes excise tax
and provides exemptions from such tax
for other goods, including distilled
spirits, beer, tobacco products, and
certain taxable fuel. Some producers
have already requested that CBP extend
its current treatment of wine to distilled
spirits, and it is possible that firms
dealing in these other goods may seek
similar treatment.
5. Statutory Prohibition on Double
Drawback
The allowance of substitution
drawback claims in circumstances
where internal revenue taxes have not
been paid on the substituted product
results in imported product being
introduced into commerce with no net
payment of excise tax—a ‘‘double
drawback’’ that is at odds with the
broader statutory schemes of both
customs drawback and excise taxation.
As noted above, the IRC generally
imposes excise taxes upon all covered
domestic products and products
imported for domestic consumption.
The Customs Modernization and
Informed Compliance Act (Mod Act),
Public Law 103–182, 632, 107 Stat. 2057
(1993) (enacted as Title VI of the North
American Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act), added a clause to
19 U.S.C. 1313(v) providing in relevant
part that ‘‘[m]erchandise that is
exported or destroyed to satisfy any
claim for drawback shall not be the
basis of any other claim for drawback.’’
This provision is best read to preclude,
among other things, exported or
destroyed merchandise from being used
as the basis for both a substitution
drawback claim and a drawback of
internal revenue taxes upon exportation
or destruction. In other words, exported
merchandise on which excise taxes have
been paid can form the basis of a
substitution drawback claim, but
exported products on which no excise
tax has been paid cannot be used to
erase existing tax liability on imported
products.
While Congress did not specifically
define the term ‘‘drawback’’ in
§ 1313(v), its meaning is clear in context
and within the broader statutory scheme
governing drawback and excise taxes. In
context, drawback encompasses the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
refund or remission of an excise tax that
was paid, determined, or otherwise
imposed by Federal law. The term is
often used to refer to the refund of taxes
that have been paid previously. See,
e.g., 19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (c)(1), (j)(1), (j)(2)
(providing for taxes to be ‘‘refunded as
drawback’’). But it is not limited to
refunds, as other provisions use the
term more broadly to refer to an unpaid
tax liability that is extinguished. See,
e.g., § 1313(d) (‘‘there shall be allowed
. . . a drawback equal in amount to the
tax found to have been paid or
determined’’) (emphasis added);
sections 1313(n)(2), (n)(4), (o)(3) (using
the phrase ‘‘refunded, waived, or
reduced’’ to refer to the extinguishing of
tax liability under subsections (a), (b),
(f), (h), (p), and (q), each of which uses
the phrase ‘‘drawback’’). Nor is section
1313(v)’s use of the term ‘‘drawback’’
limited to drawback of taxes imposed
upon importation. Section 1313(v) refers
to ‘‘any’’ claim for drawback. That broad
and inclusive language contrasts with
the language Congress used when it
referred to only specific types of
drawback. See, e.g., sections 1313(j),
(k)(1), and (1)(2)(A), (B), and (C)
(referring to drawback ‘‘under this
section’’); section 1313(n)(2) (referring
to ‘‘NAFTA drawback’’); section
1313(n)(4) (referring to ‘‘Chile FTA
drawback’’). The fact that Congress
expressly limited ‘‘drawback’’ in certain
subsections of section 1313 but did not
do so when it referred to ‘‘any’’
drawback in subsection (v) indicates
that ‘‘drawback’’ is not so limited for
purposes of this subsection.
Accordingly, when wine, distilled
spirits, beer, tobacco products, or other
products subject to excise tax are
exported from TTB-bonded premises
‘‘without payment of tax,’’ pursuant to
26 U.S.C. 5214, 5362, 5053, or 5704, the
extinguishment of tax liability upon
export is best understood as a form of
drawback within the broad prohibition
of 19 U.S.C. 1313(v).
This interpretation is further
supported by the broader statutory
scheme, which operates (in net effect) to
subject all wine, distilled spirits, and
beer consumed in the United States,
whether produced domestically or
imported, to an excise tax. The evident
purpose of section 1313(v) is to advance
that objective by preventing excessive
revenue loss through multiple claims for
drawback based on a single export. And
to the same end, the statutes that govern
withdrawal of wine, distilled spirits,
beer, or tobacco products from TTBbonded premises authorize regulations
that may be necessary to protect
revenue. See 26 U.S.C. 5175, 5214(a)(4),
5362(c), 5053(a), and 5704(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37895
A contrary interpretation would
undermine the statutory scheme of
excise taxes that applies to imports and
cause undue revenue loss. As just one
example, a contrary reading of the
statutory scheme would appear to
permit an importer of distilled spirits to
manufacture inexpensive liquor and
destroy it, without having paid the
excise tax imposed on domesticallyproduced liquor under 26 U.S.C. 5001.
The importer in this scenario could then
use the destruction of that domesticallyproduced liquor to seek a drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) of the excise
tax on liquor they import. Because the
excise tax per gallon may far exceed the
marginal cost of production of some
types of liquor,4 these manufacturers
would receive a significant economic
benefit, despite having never paid
excise taxes on the domesticallyproduced liquor. They would also have
avoided excise tax payment not once
but twice—on both the domestically
produced liquor and the imported
liquor—without, on net, increasing
domestic production for consumption or
export. The statutory framework that
imposes excise tax on the domestic
consumption of alcohol would have
been almost wholly subverted.
A contrary interpretation would also
seem to permit the following
hypothetical transaction:
A distilled spirits importer imports 200
gallons of liquor into a TTB-bonded facility.
It pays excise tax on 100 gallons and sells
those in the United States. It then exports the
remaining 100 gallons without payment of
Federal excise tax. The importer files a
§ 1313(j)(2) drawback claim with CBP on the
basis that the 100 gallons of imported liquor
sold in the United States is commercially
interchangeable with the 100 gallons of
imported liquor exported without payment of
excise tax. The importer receives a refund of
99 percent of the Federal excise taxes that it
paid on the 100 imported gallons sold in the
United States.
In this hypothetical, too, imported
products would be introduced into the
U.S. market, in net effect, free of 99
percent of Federal excise tax. As a
result, the U.S. Treasury would receive
only one percent of the Federal excise
tax on the imported products that are
consumed in the United States. Such
essentially tax-free treatment of
domestically-consumed imported
4 In 2006, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
estimated that that the cost of production of neutral
grain spirits at about $0.53 per proof gallon. See
‘‘Economic Feasibility of Ethanol Production from
Sugar in the United States,’’ available at https://
www.usda.gov/oce/reports/energy/EthanolSugar
FeasibilityReport3.pdf. The excise tax on distilled
spirits is $13.50 per proof gallon (see 26 U.S.C.
5001(a)(1)), or more than 25 times the cost of
production.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37896
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
alcohol does not comport with the
statutory drawback scheme in the IRC or
Title 19.
Because drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313 does not require CBP to verify
whether substitute exported
merchandise is tax paid, CBP does not
have records that would identify
instances of double drawback at issue
here. Treasury Department audits and
analyses have revealed that CBP began
refunding excise taxes on wine under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) in approximately 2004
when the San Francisco office permitted
drawback for such a claim. Some of
these drawback claims may have
included a double refund. It is possible
that this change took place due to a
misunderstanding of a 2004 amendment
to the drawback statute designed to
provide for drawback of the Harbor
Maintenance Tax. See Miscellaneous
Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
2003, Public Law 108–429, 118 Stat.
2433, 2579 at section 1557(a)(1) (2004).
CBP has never issued a ruling or
regulation authorizing the current
treatment with respect to wine.
Nevertheless, because CBP has
approved substitution unused drawback
claims based on wine exports for which
no excise tax has been paid, its
treatment of this issue must be changed
through a notice and comment process.
See 19 U.S.C. 1625(c).
Because of the concern that the
statutory scheme was being subverted
and because of concerns with revenue
losses both realized and potential, on
October 15, 2009, CBP proposed
amending title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to preclude the filing of
substitution drawback claims for
internal revenue excise tax paid on
imported merchandise in situations
where no excise tax was paid upon the
substituted merchandise or where the
substituted merchandise had been the
subject of a different claim for refund or
drawback of excise tax under any
provision of the IRC. See Drawback of
Internal Revenue Excise Tax, 74 FR
52928. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) within the
Department of the Treasury published a
related proposed rulemaking in the
same October 15, 2009, edition of the
Federal Register (Drawback of Internal
Revenue Taxes, 74 FR 52937). Both
notices solicited public comments on
the proposed amendments.
Subsequently, the notices of proposed
rulemaking were withdrawn as
announced in the Federal Register (75
FR 9359) on March 2, 2010.
A number of importers of distilled
spirits have since sought the same
treatment for their products that wine
currently receives. Consistent with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
analysis in this document, CBP has
denied these requests, but has not
corrected the treatment of wine through
a notice and comment process, as
required by 19 U.S.C. 1625(c).
6. Impact of Failing To Curtail Double
Drawback
For the reasons explained above, CBP
believes that the phrase ‘‘any other
claim for drawback’’ in section 1313(v),
read in context of the broader statutory
scheme, encompasses the refund or
remission of an excise tax that was paid,
determined, or otherwise imposed by
Federal law. To the extent section
1313(v) can be considered ambiguous,
however, CBP has determined that there
are compelling economic and fiscal
reasons to resolve any ambiguity to
preclude substitution drawback claims
for excise tax paid on imported
merchandise where no excise tax was
paid on the substituted merchandise.
As explained below, firms dealing in
distilled spirits, beer, tobacco products,
and certain taxable fuels have a strong
economic incentive to seek the same
double drawback treatment currently
afforded to wine. If CBP fails to adopt
a uniform interpretation and application
of section 1313(v), firms dealing in other
products subject to Federal excise tax
could also pursue substitution drawback
claims similar to those that have been
made for wine under section 1313(j)(2).
The statutory provisions governing
excise tax on other goods—beer,
distilled spirits, tobacco products, and
certain fuels—are substantially similar
(and in many material respects,
identical) to those governing excise tax
on wine. Maintaining the current
treatment of drawback claims for wine
risks a growth in future revenue loss
attributable to double drawback.
While proponents of the double
drawback practice argue that it
promotes exports, the observed
economic effects of the practice do not
support the view that it is an effective
or efficient export promotion measure.
Double drawback also places domestic
products made for domestic
consumption, which are subject to
excise tax across the board, at a relative
disadvantage to products imported for
domestic consumption, for which 99
percent of the excise tax may be
refunded based on a double drawback
claim. The interpretation of section
1313(v) reflected in this proposed rule
would avoid such market-distorting
disparities.
A more detailed analysis follows in
two parts. First, the available trade data
suggest that double drawback promotes
imports. In contrast, the trade data
provide little evidence that total wine
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
exports increased in response to double
drawback. Second, a revenue analysis
elucidates the incentives that double
drawback creates for firms that deal in
goods other than wine and provides
initial projections of U.S. Government
revenue loss that could result if these
firms were provided the same double
drawback treatment currently available
only for substituted wine.
7. Analysis of Trade Statistics
Imported wine that benefits from
double drawback enters the U.S. market
with a substantial tax advantage over
domestically produced wine. While this
tax advantage exists for all imported
wine benefiting from double drawback,
it is largest for imported bulk wine.
Because the customs value of imported
bulk wine is lower than the value for
bottled wine, excise tax levied by
volume comprises a greater percentage
of its average price, meaning that
producers have a stronger economic
incentive to claim double drawback on
bulk wine.5
U.S. import statistics are consistent
with these incentives. Import volumes
of wine have grown rapidly during the
period double drawback has been
available. In 2004, total U.S. imports of
wine, either bottled or bulk, were 576
million liters by volume.6 See Table B.
By 2016, that figure had grown to 880
million liters, an increase of over 50
percent. Id. Much of this increase in
imports has been driven by bulk wine,
which has made rapid gains in U.S.
market share. In 2004, imported bulk
wine accounted for 0.9 percent of
domestic wine consumption. By 2016,
imported bulk wine accounted for 6.2
percent of domestic wine consumption.
See Table A. By volume, imports of bulk
wine grew by 875 percent over that
period. See Table B. Of course, other
factors affecting wine trade unrelated to
drawback may also have affected this
growth.
In contrast to the rapid growth of
imports, the U.S. trade statistics provide
little evidence that total wine exports by
volume increased from 2004 to 2016.
The total volume of wine exports only
grew by 5.5 percent over that period.
5 For most imported wine, the tax is $0.282 per
liter. 26 U.S.C. 5041(b). On a percentage of unit
value basis, the tax is larger for bulk wine than for
bottled wine, because the average value of bulk
wine is less. The average value of imports of bulk
wine hovered around $1.10 per liter in the years
2001 to 2016—much less than the average value per
liter of imported bottled wines, which was about
five times as great during the same period. See
Table E.
6 CBP believes the practice of double drawback
began in or around 2004. For that reason, this
analysis addresses trade statistics beginning in
2004.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
See Table B. Disaggregating exports into
those eligible for drawback and those
ineligible for drawback casts further
doubt on the effect of drawback on total
exports. Exports from the United States
to NAFTA countries, Canada and
Mexico, are not eligible for substitution
drawback. Therefore, they are not
subsidized through the double
drawback mechanism. Yet the volume
of U.S. wine exports to these countries
experienced a compound annual growth
rate (CAGR) of 3.3 percent, while export
volumes to countries for which
substitution drawback was available
experienced a 0.01 percent CAGR over
the same period. See Table D.
Although the value of U.S. bottled
wine exports has risen from 2004 to
2016 (from $600 million to $1.05
billion), the average unit value of the
exports also increased during that
period (from $2.30 to $6.10). See Table
B and Table E. At the same time,
volumes of bottled wine exports fell by
a third. See Table B. U.S. wine export
values grew substantially faster (5.2
percent CAGR) than did export volumes
(0.4 percent CAGR) from 2004 to 2016.
See Table B and Table C. This suggests
that the increase in bottled wine exports
by value was driven by price increases
in the average unit value of the exports,
not by an increase in export volumes.
Because the excise tax on wine is levied
by volume and not by value, this
suggests that the increase in the value of
exports is not directly connected to the
availability of double drawback and is
due to other factors.
While U.S. trade statistics do not
indicate a significant increase in total
wine exports, they do indicate a change
in the composition of exports while
double drawback has been available.
From 2004 to 2016, the share of
exported wine in bulk containers rose
from 20.8 percent to 50.6 percent by
volume, consistent with the shift in
composition of imports discussed
above. See Table B. This growth in the
share of bulk exports is only evident for
exports to non-NAFTA countries, which
rose from 16.2 percent to 55.2 percent.
See Table D. Exports to NAFTA
countries, which are not eligible for
double drawback, show no shift toward
bulk exports over that period. See id. In
addition, while U.S. exports of bulk
wine have grown during the period from
2004 to 2016, growth in the volume of
bulk wine imports has been much
greater. Overall, during the same period,
there has been an increase in the U.S.
trade deficit for wine—including for
bulk wine. See Table C.
In short, while it is not possible to say
that double drawback is the primary
driver of the wine trade trends, available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
trade data are consistent with the view
that double drawback may have
promoted wine imports but that it has
not been an effective export promotion
measure.
8. Revenue Loss Analysis
Maintaining the current double
drawback treatment of wine and
extending that treatment to other
products subject to excise tax—distilled
spirits, beer, tobacco products, and
certain taxable fuels—would cause
significant revenue loss to the U.S.
Government.
(a) Data
Because drawback claims have not
previously captured the tax-paid status
on substituted exports, the exact amount
of revenue lost to double drawback
involving imported wine is not certain.
Nevertheless, analysis of CBP import
data and individual drawback claims at
the firm level permit a reasonable
estimate of the historical revenue loss
from double drawback treatment of
wine imports.7 Because CBP has not
kept drawback summary statistics based
on tariff category and type of tax, this
estimate with respect to wine is based
on an analysis of individual drawback
claims made by firms involved in wine
trade and comparing the ratios of
drawback claimed for duties with those
claimed for taxes to differentiate
between shipments of bulk and bottled
wine. These firm-level data are
statutorily-protected from public
disclosure. See 26 U.S.C. 6103
(confidentiality of tax return
information); 18 U.S.C. 1905 (Trade
Secrets Act). With respect to other
products, Treasury’s estimates are based
on current excise tax revenue for each
product.8 The estimated rate at which
firms are projected to take advantage of
double drawback (‘‘takeup rate’’) is
informed by the economic incentives
and data described below—chiefly,
excise tax as a share of product value,
and the potential growth in exports
resulting from the expansion of double
drawback treatment.
(b) Theory, Assumptions, and Estimate
Excise taxes on most products
addressed in this rule are applied based
on volume, not as a percentage of value.
For example, the standard excise tax on
wine is $1.07 per wine gallon.9 The
7 See U.S. International Trade Commission
Interactive DataWeb, available at https://
dataweb.usitc.gov/ (trade data by product
classification, volume, value, and country of origin,
retrieved from the U.S. Census Bureau).
8 See IRS Statistics of Income Tax Stats—Excise
Tax Statistics, available at https://www.irs.gov/
statistics/soi-tax-stats-excise-tax-statistics/.
9 26 U.S.C. 5041(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37897
greater the ratio of excise tax to product
value, the greater the incentive to avoid
payment of the tax through means such
as double drawback. The historical
experience with respect to wine bears
this out: Excise tax as a share of customs
value has been about 5 percent for
bottled wine and 25 percent for bulk
wine in recent years. See Table E. Based
on differences in the tariff rates for
bottled and bulk wine that are reflected
in the amounts of individual drawback
transactions, Treasury estimates the
takeup rate for double drawback of wine
to be 13 percent for bottled imports and
24 percent for bulk imports. The
difference in these rates indicates that
tax as a share of value is an important
determinant of takeup rate. For some
products, such as beer, tax as a share of
customs value is similar to that of wine.
For other products subject to excise tax,
tax as a share of value is much higher
than it is for wine—sometimes
exceeding 100 percent. Indeed, for some
distilled spirits, excise tax can be many
multiples the cost of production.10
Excise tax as a share of tobacco
products’ value is also much higher
than it is as a share of the value of
wine.11 This dynamic creates a strong
incentive for firms that deal in these
other products to seek double drawback
of excise taxes paid on imports by
inexpensively manufacturing domestic
products for either export or
destruction. Because of the strength of
this incentive, firms dealing in these
products likely would take advantage of
double drawback at higher rates than
the wine industry has historically if it
were available to them.
A second factor of particular concern
is the market-distorting incentive for rerouting shipments that an expansion of
double drawback would create. Double
drawback creates an incentive for firms
that both import and export to route a
shipment destined for another country
through the United States to claim
excise tax relief on imports into the
United States. Under this approach,
first, a firm imports 200 units of, for
example, distilled spirits. It removes
100 units from customs custody for
domestic sale and pays excise tax for
their import. It then imports the second
100 units into TTB bond, without
10 For example, the average customs value of
exported grain alcohol is $2.78 per proof gallon
(USITC DataWeb, supra note 7) while the tax is
$13.50 per proof gallon (26 U.S.C. 5001(a)(1)). The
customs value includes profits and other expenses
in addition to the cost of production. In 2006, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated the cost
of production of neutral grain spirits at about $0.53
per proof gallon. See ‘‘Economic Feasibility of
Ethanol Production from Sugar in the United
States,’’ supra note 1.
11 See Table E; infra note 19.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37898
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
having paid excise tax on their import
and then exports the product from bond,
and also uses that exportation to seek
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) of
the import tax paid on the first 100
units. The first 100 units of distilled
spirits would then have been consumed
domestically at 1 percent of the normal
tax rate, without increasing domestic
production or net exports. Depending
on the cost of shipping, firms would
have an incentive to route shipments
destined for other countries through the
United States—without increasing
domestic production or exports—to
claim double drawback on their U.S.
imports. In the analysis, we assume
trade re-routing of all distilled spirits
from Canada and Mexico bound for nonNAFTA countries is feasible. We also
assume that trade re-routing of gin,
vodka, and grain alcohol worldwide is
feasible, though the analysis does not
rely on substantial rerouting of these
products.
The following estimates also assume a
7 percent reduction in revenue loss by
comparison to the historical data
concerning wine due to the Craft
Beverage Modernization Act (CBMA),
Public Law 115–97, § 13801–13808
(2017). The CBMA provides lower
overall effective tax rates for smaller
producers than for larger producers.
This assessment of the effects of the
CBMA is based on the assumption that
most double drawback claims would be
taken by large multinational firms
paying the full rate on marginal imports
above the limit identified in the CBMA.
The transaction costs involved in
drawback support the view that
drawback most benefits larger firms that
are involved in both exporting and
importing.
The following estimates further
assume that double drawback of wine,
distilled spirits, and beer would grow
with real GDP. That is, Treasury
assumes that consumption of excisetaxed beverages, and drawback on those
taxes, would grow with the overall
economy. Treasury uses the
Administration’s forecast of taxable fuel
and tobacco excise tax revenue to
estimate change over time. Both of these
forecasts decrease slightly over time,
consistent with recent trends in excise
revenue.12
In total, the incentives for firms that
deal in distilled spirits, beer, tobacco
products, and certain fuels—in addition
to the continued double drawback
treatment of wine—could cause a
12 Excise Tax Statistics, supra note 8. From 2010
to 2016, excise tax revenue for imported beer, wine,
and distilled spirits grew much more quickly than
revenue for tobacco products or taxable fuels. See
id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
revenue loss of $674 million to $3.3
billion on an average annual basis over
the next ten years, if double drawback
treatment were extended to
commodities other than wine and not
eliminated.13
(c) Wine
In fiscal year 2015, CBP paid $54.9
million in excise tax refunds and had
initial tax collections from wine imports
of $335 million, according to CBP
data.14 As noted above, the tax as a
share of customs value is 5 percent for
bottled wine and 25 percent for bulk
wine. The estimated takeup rate—that
is, the rate of double drawback claims—
is 13 percent for bottled imports and 25
percent for bulk imports, demonstrating
that tax as a share of value is an
important determinant of the takeup
rate. Assuming that double drawback
continues to grow with real GDP, the
current treatment of wine is estimated to
cause between $51 million and $69
million in revenue loss to the U.S.
Government annually over the next ten
years.15
(d) Distilled Spirits
With respect to distilled spirits, fiscal
year 2016 excise tax revenue from
imports was $1.5 billion, according to
TTB collections data. A large portion of
imports are, however, imported into
TTB bond and then are treated as
domestic collections. U.S. Census
Bureau data suggest actual import excise
tax revenue is closer to $2.6 billion.16
The tax as a share of customs value for
distilled spirits—currently $13.50 per
proof gallon 17—is 5 to 8 times higher
13 These estimates are in nominal U.S. dollars,
whereas the figures in the Executive Orders 13563
and 12866 analysis are in undiscounted and
discounted 2016 U.S. dollars. Because of this
difference, only a rough estimate of the total
transfers from the rule and this alternate analysis
can be determined. This estimate can be determined
by adding the revenue losses of extending double
drawback to the rule’s undiscounted net transfers
from the U.S. Government to trade members.
14 See id. Refunds or drawback paid in any given
year may be paid for imports made in previous
years. The $54.9 million figure is a summation of
individual drawback claims from CBP data that are
statutorily-protected from public disclosure. TTB
publishes the $335 million figure. See TTB
Statistical Release, ‘‘Tax Collections Cumulative
Summary, FY 2015,’’ available at https://
www.ttb.gov/statistics/final15.pdf.
15 These estimates are slightly different from the
wine double drawback estimates shown in Table 49
of the Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 analysis.
This is because these estimates are in nominal U.S.
dollars, whereas the figures in Table 49 are in
undiscounted 2016 U.S. dollars.
16 Accessed through the USITC DataWeb, supra
note 7.
17 26 U.S.C. 5001(a)(1). The CBMA reduces the
excise tax on a portion of imported goods. The
estimates reported in this analysis assume the
CBMA is extended indefinitely, reducing the
revenue loss by roughly 7 percent.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
than it is for wine, creating a
significantly greater incentive to export
to take advantage of double drawback.
Further, as noted above, the tax is much
higher than the cost of production for
inexpensive distilled spirits.18 For this
reason, Treasury expects strong
behavioral responses to generate
substitution drawback claims if distilled
spirits become eligible for double
drawback, including purposeful
destruction of inexpensive distilled
spirits and routing of goods destined for
other countries through the United
States when feasible. We estimate that
up to 45 percent of imported spirits
would be commercially viable
predicates for double drawback
claims.19 Varying the projected takeup
rate between 25 percent and 75 percent
for these claims, annual U.S.
Government revenue loss from allowing
double drawback on distilled spirits is
estimated to range from $312 million to
$937 million annually over ten years.
(e) Beer
With respect to beer, fiscal year 2016
excise tax revenue from imports was
$542 million, according to TTB
collections data. The tax of $18 per
barrel is 12.3 percent of the value of
imports and 15.5 percent of the value of
exports,20 suggesting firms have a
stronger incentive to claim double
drawback on beer than bottled wine.
However, qualifying, non-NAFTA
exports of beer amount to only 4 percent
of imports, suggesting limited scope for
18 See
supra note 10.
the years 2014–2016, vodka, gin, and grain
alcohol imports represented 34% of total spirits
imports. Because the cost of production for these
spirits is so low relative to the tax, we expect a
strong behavioral response, including increased
exports, trade re-routing, and destruction, such that
all imports could qualify for duty drawback. In
contrast, brandy, liqueurs, and cordials are
relatively high value spirits, making destruction
and increased exports less feasible. For these
products, we assume that opportunities to claim
double drawback are limited by current exports,
which amount to 2 percent of current spirits
imports. Finally, we assume that all spirits exports
from Canada and Mexico to non-NAFTA countries
could be re-routed through the United States to take
advantage of double drawback. Using United
Nations International Trade Statistics data for
2014–2016, we estimate that, at current trade levels,
this re-routing would generate double drawback
claims for up to 8 percent of US spirits imports.
Adding these shares of imports together, without
rounding, sums to 45 percent of US imports.
20 In 2016, the average customs value of imported
beer was $145.98 per barrel while the average free
alongside ship (FAS) value of exports was $116.06
per barrel. See USITC DataWeb, supra note 7. The
U.S. Census Bureau defines ‘‘customs value’’ and
‘‘FAS export value’’ in their Guide to Foreign Trade
Statistics, § 8, available at https://www.census.gov/
foreign-trade/guide/sec2.html#customs_value.
Treasury uses customs value and FAS value,
because data on cost of production are not
available.
19 For
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
takeup of double drawback. Varying the
projected takeup rate between 10
percent and 30 percent on existing
imports and exports, and varying the
increase in qualifying exports between
10 percent and 30 percent, annual U.S.
Government revenue loss from
extending double drawback to beer is
estimated to range from $9 million to
$28 million annually over ten years.
(f) Tobacco Products
With respect to tobacco products,
fiscal year 2016 excise tax revenue on
imports was $829 million according to
TTB collections data. The tax incentives
to claim double drawback are especially
strong for tobacco products. For
instance, in 2016, the Federal excise tax
on a carton of cigarettes was 199 percent
of the average customs value of a carton
of imported cigarettes and 408 percent
of the average export value of a carton
of cigarettes exported from the United
States based on U.S. Census Bureau
trade data.21 The tax rate by value is
about 40 times larger for cigarettes than
that for bottled wine, suggesting the
incentive to claim drawback on
cigarettes is considerably larger than the
incentive to claim drawback on wine.
Extending the double drawback
treatment to tobacco products would
create significant incentives to shift
production of tobacco products
overseas. It would also create a great
incentive for importers to contract with
domestic producers to match imports
and exports for drawback; the incentive
would be to import products for
domestic sale and export domestically
produced cigarettes. Because
domestically produced tobacco products
account for 95 percent of domestic
tobacco consumption, Treasury assumes
that tobacco firms would gradually
respond by contracting with importers
and setting up foreign production
facilities. Accounting for this slow
ramp-up in drawback claims, Treasury
estimates that between 3 percent and 18
percent of excise revenue on tobacco
products would be lost due to an
extension of double drawback to
tobacco products over the next 10 years,
or between $332 million and $2.2
billion annually.22 In the long run,
Treasury estimates that U.S.
Government revenue losses would be
substantially higher, with increasing
shifts of domestic production overseas.
(g) Taxable Fuels
Finally, with respect to taxable fuels,
current annual excise tax revenue on
imports is roughly $2 billion according
to U.S. Census Bureau data on imports
of gasoline and diesel fuel.23 Due to the
lack of detailed data on fuel imports,
differentiating between those
37899
importations eligible for drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313 and those that are
not, it is quite difficult to estimate the
takeup rate on substitution drawback for
taxable fuels. Even a small takeup rate,
however, could have a significant
economic impact. Assuming, for
example, that 1 percent to 5 percent of
imported fuel receives double drawback
of excise taxes, the U.S. Government
revenue loss would range between $20
million and $98 million annually over
ten years.
9. Conclusion
This proposed rule would protect the
integrity of excise tax revenue
collections by ensuring that 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2) substitution drawback is not
employed to evade the statutory
prohibition on using a single
exportation as the basis for two
drawback claims. It would preclude the
filing of substitution drawback claims
for excise tax paid on imported
merchandise in situations where no
excise tax was paid upon the substituted
merchandise or limit the amount of
drawback allowable to the amount of
taxes paid (and not returned by refund,
credit, or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise, and thus eliminate double
drawback. CBP invites comments from
interested members of the public on this
proposal.
TABLE A—IMPORT SHARES BY VOLUME OF TOTAL U.S. TABLE WINE CONSUMPTION 1
Imported wine container size 2
Year
Imported sum
26.0
26.8
26.5
27.2
25.4
24.5
25.7
24.6
22.8
23.5
21.9
22.9
21.9
0.9
1.8
3.6
3.8
4.6
8.7
6.5
7.7
12.7
8.9
7.3
6.6
6.2
26.9
28.6
30.1
30.9
30.0
33.2
32.2
32.3
35.5
32.4
29.2
29.5
28.1
¥1.4
¥15.7
2004 .............................................................................................................................................
2005 .............................................................................................................................................
2006 .............................................................................................................................................
2007 .............................................................................................................................................
2008 .............................................................................................................................................
2009 .............................................................................................................................................
2010 .............................................................................................................................................
2011 .............................................................................................................................................
2012 .............................................................................................................................................
2013 .............................................................................................................................................
2014 .............................................................................................................................................
2015 .............................................................................................................................................
2016 .............................................................................................................................................
2004–2016:
CAGR 4 (Pct) ........................................................................................................................
Total growth (Pct) .................................................................................................................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Over four liters
(bulk) 3
17.1
567.2
0.4
4.5
Two liters or
less (bottles)
Sources:
U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,’’ accessed February 2, 2018.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, ‘‘Tax Collections,’’ accessed March 2, 2018.
1. Total U.S. wine consumption is estimated using gross excise tax collections and tax rates for wine.
2. The ITC website explains that: ‘‘General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such
merchandise enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade
Zones.’’
3. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
21 In 2016, the average customs value of 1,000
imported cigarettes was $25.335 while the average
FAS value of 1,000 exported cigarettes was $12.345.
See USITC DataWeb, supra note 6. The Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
excise tax on 1,000 cigarettes is $50.33. 26 U.S.C.
5701(b)(1).
22 The range of possible outcomes is large,
primarily due to uncertainty in the timing of firm
responses rather than the magnitude of response.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Specifically, Treasury does not know how quickly
tobacco companies might set up new or use existing
overseas production operations to serve the U.S.
market.
23 Retrieved from USITC DataWeb, supra note 7.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37900
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
4. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit imports codes 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215015,
2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046, 2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and 2204296000.
TABLE B—VOLUME OF U.S. TOTAL WINE EXPORTS AND GENERAL IMPORTS BY CONTAINER SIZE (ALL COUNTRIES)
[Millions of liters of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
General imports 2
Total exports 1
Container
Size
Two liters
or less
(bottles)
Over two
liters
(bulk)
Year
2004 .................................
2005 .................................
2006 .................................
2007 .................................
2008 .................................
2009 .................................
2010 .................................
2011 .................................
2012 .................................
2013 .................................
2014 .................................
2015 .................................
2016 .................................
2004–2016:
CAGR 4 (Pct) .............
Total growth (Pct) .....
Exported
sum
Pct share
in large
containers
Container
Size
Two liters
or less
(bottles)
Over
four liters
(bulk) 3
Imported
sum
Pct share
in large
containers
259
177
189
207
209
177
171
185
196
207
195
205
171
68
100
138
169
201
171
196
190
167
172
176
180
175
327
278
327
376
410
349
368
375
364
379
371
385
345
20.8
36.2
42.3
45.0
49.0
49.2
53.4
50.8
46.1
45.4
47.5
46.7
50.6
556
602
615
661
623
612
658
673
659
671
655
685
685
20
40
84
92
112
218
168
211
365
255
219
197
195
576
642
699
753
735
830
826
884
1024
926
874
882
880
3.5
6.2
12.0
12.2
15.2
26.3
20.3
23.9
35.6
27.5
25.1
22.3
22.2
¥3.4
¥34.1
8.2
156.6
0.4
5.5
7.7
143.2
1.8
23.2
20.9
875.0
3.6
52.8
16.7
538.2
Source: U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,’’ accessed February 2, 2018.
1. The ITC describes total exports as ‘‘Domestic exports plus foreign exports’’ on their website.
2. The ITC website explains that ‘‘General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such
merchandise enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade
Zones.’’
3. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
4. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020. HTS imports codes used include 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046,
2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and 2204296000.
TABLE C—VALUE OF U.S. TOTAL WINE EXPORTS AND GENERAL IMPORTS BY CONTAINER SIZE (ALL COUNTRIES)
[Millions of U.S. dollars of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
General imports,
general customs value 2
Total exports, free
alongside ship (FAS) 1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Container
Size
Two liters
or less
(bottles)
Year
Over two
liters
(bulk)
2004 .................................
2005 .................................
2006 .................................
2007 .................................
2008 .................................
2009 .................................
2010 .................................
2011 .................................
2012 .................................
2013 .................................
2014 .................................
2015 .................................
2016 .................................
2004–2016:
CAGR 4 (Pct) .............
Total growth (Pct) .....
Exported
sum
Pct share
in large
containers
Container
Size
Imported
sum
Two liters
or less
(bottles)
Over four
liters
(bulk) 3
Pct share
in large
containers
600
452
616
635
645
549
702
869
905
1,037
921
1,035
1,050
82
91
121
151
182
202
212
213
199
235
240
227
205
682
543
737
786
827
751
914
1,082
1,104
1,272
1,161
1,262
1,255
12.0
16.8
16.4
19.2
22.0
26.9
23.2
19.7
18.0
18.5
20.7
18.0
16.3
2,658
2,891
3,153
3,494
3,511
3,029
3,143
3,420
3,458
3,652
3,708
3,709
3,779
19
35
67
77
114
157
149
225
400
281
242
202
217
2,677
2,926
3,220
3,571
3,625
3,186
3,292
3,645
3,858
3,933
3,950
3,911
3,996
0.7
1.2
2.1
2.2
3.1
4.9
4.5
6.2
10.4
7.1
6.1
5.2
5.4
4.8
75.0
7.9
150.0
5.2
84.0
2.6
35.9
3.0
42.2
22.5
1,042.1
3.4
49.3
18.5
665.1
Source: U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,’’ accessed February 15, 2018.
The ITC describes total exports as ‘‘Domestic exports plus foreign exports’’ on their website. The U.S. Census Bureau provides definitions of
FAS export value and customs value in their Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics, § 8, available at https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/guide/
sec2.html#customs_value.
1. The ITC website explains that ‘‘General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such
merchandise enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade
Zones.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37901
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
3. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020. HTS imports codes used include 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046,
2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and 2204296000.
TABLE D—VOLUME OF U.S. TOTAL WINE EXPORTS 1 BY DESTINATION
[Millions of liters of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
Exports to
NAFTA
countries
Year
2004 .................................................................................................................
2005 .................................................................................................................
2006 .................................................................................................................
2007 .................................................................................................................
2008 .................................................................................................................
2009 .................................................................................................................
2010 .................................................................................................................
2011 .................................................................................................................
2012 .................................................................................................................
2013 .................................................................................................................
2014 .................................................................................................................
2015 .................................................................................................................
2016 .................................................................................................................
2004–2016:
CAGR 3 (Pct) .............................................................................................
Total growth (Pct) .....................................................................................
Pct share in
large
containers 2
Exports to
non-NAFTA
countries
Pct share in
large
containers
37
35
40
50
55
48
42
46
53
50
57
61
55
56.7
50.7
38.0
37.2
39.8
29.4
33.3
33.4
30.9
18.0
22.6
27.0
25.6
290
243
287
325
354
301
325
329
311
330
314
324
291
16.2
34.1
42.9
46.2
50.5
52.3
56.0
53.2
48.6
49.6
52.0
50.4
55.2
3.3
47.6
¥6.4
¥54.8
0.0
0.2
10.8
240.6
Source: Treasury calculations based on import data from U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,’’
accessed March 2, 2018.
1. The ITC website describes total exports as ‘‘Domestic exports plus foreign exports.’’
2. Large containers is defined here as containers over 2 liters in size.
3. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020.
TABLE E—AVERAGE VALUE OF U.S. TOTAL WINE EXPORTS AND GENERAL IMPORTS AND EFFECTIVE TAX RATES BY
CONTAINER SIZE (ALL COUNTRIES)
[U.S. dollars per liter of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
Average value per liter of total exports 1
Two liters or less
(bottles)
Year
Value per
liter 4
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
2004 .................................
2005 .................................
2006 .................................
2007 .................................
2008 .................................
2009 .................................
2010 .................................
2011 .................................
2012 .................................
2013 .................................
2014 .................................
2015 .................................
2016 .................................
2004–2016:
CAGR 5 (Pct) .............
Total growth (Pct) .....
Average value per liter of general imports 2
Over two liters
(bulk)
Tax/value
(pct)
Value per
liter
Two liters or less
(bottles)
Tax/value
(pct)
Value per
liter
Over four liters
(bulk) 3
Tax/value
(pct)
Value per
liter
Tax/value
(pct)
2.3
2.5
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.1
4.1
4.7
4.6
5.0
4.7
5.0
6.1
12.2
11.1
8.7
9.2
9.1
9.1
6.9
6.0
6.1
5.6
6.0
5.6
4.6
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
23.5
31.2
32.2
31.6
31.2
24.0
26.2
25.3
23.8
20.7
20.7
22.4
24.1
4.8
4.8
5.1
5.3
5.6
4.9
4.8
5.1
5.2
5.4
5.7
5.4
5.5
5.9
5.9
5.5
5.3
5.0
5.7
5.9
5.6
5.4
5.2
5.0
5.2
5.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
29.8
32.3
35.4
33.8
27.8
39.2
31.9
26.5
25.8
25.7
25.6
27.6
25.4
8.5
165.7
¥7.8
¥62.4
¥0.2
¥2.6
0.2
2.6
1.2
15.4
¥1.2
¥13.3
1.3
17.1
¥1.3
¥14.6
Source: U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,’’ accessed February 2–15, 2018.
1. The ITC describes total exports as ‘‘Domestic exports plus foreign exports’’ on their website.
2. The ITC website explains that ‘‘General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such
merchandise enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade
Zones.’’
3. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
4. The tax as a share of value is approximated by dividing the most common tax rate (28.266 cents per liter) by the average customs value
per liter.
5. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020. HTS imports codes used include 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046,
2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and 2204296000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37902
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
III. Explanation of Proposed
Regulations
The following proposed regulatory
amendments are generally based on 19
U.S.C. 1313, including the new
requirements, timeframes, and related
operational decisions necessitated by
TFTEA. When proposed regulatory
language is based, at least in part, on
authority other than 19 U.S.C. 1313,
these instances are noted below.
A. Proposed New Part 190
CBP based the regulatory structure of
the proposed new part 190 on the
current part 191 in order to ease the
transition for drawback practitioners by
attempting to ensure, wherever possible,
that the numerical regulations in each
part correspond with each other. In
some regulations, while the name of a
section has changed, the content of the
proposed section generally aligns with
the content of the corresponding section
in part 191. For example, § 191.10,
Certificate of delivery, deals with
transfers of merchandise and
requirements related to certificates of
delivery as evidence of the transfers.
However, proposed § 190.10, Transfer of
merchandise, also deals with transfers
of merchandise but it is not called
‘‘certificate of delivery’’ because TFTEA
eliminated certificates of delivery (as
well as certificates of manufacture and
delivery). In other instances, it was
necessary to reserve a section (e.g.,
§ 190.76, Landing certificate) if the
corresponding section in part 191 was
no longer required or to add a new
section (e.g., § 190.63, Liability for
drawback claims) if there was no
corresponding section in part 191.
However, for the most part, the
regulations in proposed part 190
directly correspond with those in part
191. Accordingly, when describing the
proposed regulations, comparisons to
the corresponding section in part 191
are included to facilitate the transition
to TFTEA-Drawback. Generally, these
comparisons will note the major
differences between the proposed
regulation and the corresponding
regulation in part 191 (such as in
regulations dealing with substitution
which is now generally based on the
HTSUS), or, in many cases, will indicate
that there are no differences (other than
the references being to sections in part
191) or that the differences are minor.
These minor differences will usually
include grammatical or stylistic edits
(for example, changing ‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘will’’
or ‘‘must’’) or nomenclature changes (for
example, changing ‘‘Customs’’ to ‘‘CBP’’
such as in ‘‘CBP custody’’ or ‘‘CBP
supervision’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
New part 190 is drafted with a scope
section and a section regarding claims
filed under NAFTA followed by 19
subparts: General Provisions;
Manufacturing Drawback; Unused
Merchandise Drawback; Rejected
Merchandise; Completion of Drawback
Claims; Verification of Claims;
Exportation and Destruction;
Liquidation and Protest of Drawback
Entries; Waiver of Prior Notice of Intent
to Export; Accelerated Payment of
Drawback; Internal Revenue Tax on
Flavoring Extracts and Medicinal or
Toilet Preparations (Including
Perfumery) Manufactured From
Domestic Tax-Paid Alcohol; Supplies
for Certain Vessels and Aircraft; Meats
Cured With Imported Salt; Materials for
Construction and Equipment of Vessels
and Aircraft Built for Foreign
Ownership and Account; Foreign-Built
Jet Aircraft Engines Processed in the
United States; Merchandise Exported
From Continuous CBP Custody;
Distilled Spirits, Wines, or Beer Which
Are Unmerchantable or Do Not Conform
to Sample or Specifications;
Substitution of Finished Petroleum
Derivatives; Merchandise Transferred to
a Foreign Trade Zone From CBP
Custody; Drawback Compliance
Program.
Section 190.0 briefly describes the
scope of the new proposed part 190
dealing with drawback as amended by
TFTEA.
Section 190.0a states that claims
involving NAFTA are provided for in
part 181. This section contains only
grammatical changes from the
corresponding section in part 190.
Subpart A—General Provisions
Section 190.1 briefly describes the
authority of the Commissioner of CBP to
prescribe, and of the Secretary of the
Treasury to approve, rules and
regulations regarding drawback. It is
proposed to amend the corresponding
section in part 191 as well as to identify
Treasury Department Order Number
100–16 and DHS Delegation Order
7010.3 as sources of authority. See 19
CFR part 0.
Section 190.2 lists definitions used
throughout the proposed part 190. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 in that the
definitions for certificate of delivery,
certificate of manufacture and delivery,
and commercially interchangeable
merchandise have been removed and
the definitions for the following terms
were added: Bill of materials; document;
drawback office; formula; intermediate
party; per unit averaging; schedule B;
sought chemical element; and wine.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Section 190.3 provides information
regarding the duties, taxes, and fees
subject or not subject to drawback. This
proposed regulation differs from the
corresponding regulation in part 191 in
that it generally provides for refunds of
duties, taxes, and fees based on the
changes to 19 U.S.C. 1313(l) stemming
from TFTEA. This proposed regulation
differs from the current corresponding
regulation in part 191 by allowing
drawback on the merchandise
processing fee (MPF) generally, whereas
19 CFR 191.3(a)(4) limits drawback on
MPF to situations only involving claims
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) and 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv). Consistent with
the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
429), which amended 19 U.S.C. 1313 to
allow, inter alia, harbor maintenance
taxes (HMT) refunds, this proposed
regulation also allows drawback on
HMT for claims under the provisions
which provide for drawback of tax.24
Similarly, but subject to the
limitations under 19 U.S.C. 1313 prior
to being amended by TFTEA, this
document proposes to update 19 CFR
191.3 by creating a new paragraph (a)(5)
to allow drawback on HMT, but limited
to situations involving only claims
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) and 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv). In addition, 19
CFR 191.3(b)(1) is revised to otherwise
prohibit HMT refunds except under the
provisions specified in proposed new
paragraph (a)(5). Relatedly, section
191.3 is retitled as ‘‘duties, taxes, and
fees subject or not subject to drawback’’
for clarifying purposes.
Section 190.4 provides information
regarding drawback and merchandise in
which the U.S. Government has an
interest. This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.5 states that drawback is
available on goods shipped to
Guantanamo Bay and that drawback
under 1313(j)(1) is permitted on
merchandise shipped to certain insular
possessions and trust territories. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in the current part 191 because
the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
429), amended 19 U.S.C. 1313 by adding
paragraph (y) to allow drawback under
19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) on entries shipped
from the customs territory of the United
States to the U.S. Virgin Islands,
American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway
Islands, Kingman Reef, Guam, Canton
Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston
Island, and Palmyra Island.
24 Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations may
also refer to the harbor maintenance tax as the
harbor maintenance fee (HMF).
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Accordingly, while this 2004 change
was not previously made in part 191,
this document proposes to clarify this
modification in proposed § 190.5 and in
existing § 191.5. Further, consistent
with proposed § 190.5, it is proposed to
amend § 191.5 to clarify that drawback
is not allowable on merchandise
shipped to Puerto Rico from elsewhere
in the customs territory of the United
States because Puerto Rico is part of the
customs territory of the United States
(see 19 CFR 101.1).
Section 190.6 specifies who has the
authority to sign or electronically certify
drawback documents. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 in that it provides for
electronic signatures, removes
references to Certificates of Delivery and
Certificates of Manufacture and
Delivery, and includes additional
references to bill of materials and
formulas.
Section 190.7 provides information on
general manufacturing drawback
rulings, states that the process to modify
these rulings is the same as provided for
in § 190.8, and also clarifies the
longstanding CBP procedures for the
modification of these rulings. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 in that it makes
TFTEA-conforming changes, such as
adding the requirement to provide the 8digit HTSUS number, and it contains
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.8 provides information on
specific manufacturing drawback
rulings and establishes a process to
modify these rulings to comply with
TFTEA-Drawback requirements by
providing the ability to annotate the
ruling with the 8-digit HTSUS numbers
for rulings issued prior to February 24,
2018, if accompanied by the relevant
certification. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 in
that it makes TFTEA-conforming
changes, such as adding the requirement
to provide the 8-digit HTSUS number,
and it contains grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.9 provides information
regarding agency relationships detailing
how the owner of the identified
merchandise, the designated imported
merchandise, and/or the substituted
merchandise used to produce an
exported article may employ another
person to do part, or all, of the
manufacture or production under 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b). This section is
similar to the corresponding section in
part 191; however, it updates the
language by removing references to
Certificates of Delivery and includes the
requirement to provide the 10-digit
HTSUS number.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Section 190.10 provides information
regarding documenting and maintaining
records regarding transfers of
merchandise. This section contains
significant differences specific to
TFTEA-Drawback, from the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.11 provides information
on the valuation of the designated
imported merchandise for drawback
claims, as well as for the application of
the ‘‘lesser of’’ rules for substitution
claims (i.e., for exported or destroyed
merchandise and articles, as well as
substituted merchandise used in
manufacturing). The corresponding
regulation in part 191 deals with
tradeoff, which was provided for in 19
U.S.C. 1313(k) prior to the TFTEA
amendments. TFTEA deleted the
provision that authorized tradeoff in 19
U.S.C. 1313(k) and replaced it with an
unrelated new provision establishing
joint and several liability for drawback
claims.
Section 190.12 provides information
regarding situations when a claimant
files under an incorrect provision and
this section states that the claim may be
deemed filed pursuant to any other
provision if it is determined that
drawback is allowable under that
provision but not under the provision as
originally filed. With the exception of
cross-references, this section is
generally unchanged from the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.13 states that drawback is
available under 19 U.S.C. 1313(q) on
imported packaging material when used
to package or repackage merchandise or
articles exported or destroyed pursuant
to certain other provisions. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical changes.
Section 190.14 provides for
identification of merchandise or articles
through accounting methods in
situations not involving substitution,
which remain the same as in part 191
and are based on a standard of
fungibility. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191
regarding the five-year time period and
generally due to minor clarifying edits
as well as grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.15 provides general
information regarding recordkeeping
requirements. With the exception of the
recordkeeping time period, this section
is unchanged from the corresponding
section in part 191.
Subpart B Contains Requirements
Specific to Manufacturing Drawback
Claims
Section 190.21 provides the general
rule regarding direct identification
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37903
manufacturing drawback claims. This
section differs from the corresponding
regulation in part 191 in that it
incorporates changes such as the
amount of drawback provided for and
the limitation of drawback of duties
regarding flour or by-products of
imported wheat.
Section 190.22 provides the general
rule regarding substitution
manufacturing drawback claims. This
section differs from the corresponding
regulation in part 191 in that it
incorporates changes to 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) brought about in Section 906 of
TFTEA such as the 8-digit HTSUS
substitution standard and provides for
the ‘‘lesser of’’ rule as it applies to
TFTEA-Drawback and also contains
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
This section also includes language
regarding the preclusion of claiming
Federal excise taxes discussed in detail
in the section titled Federal Excise Tax
and Substitution Drawback Claims.
Section 190.23 details the methods
and requirements for claiming drawback
specific to manufacturing claims. This
section differs significantly from the
corresponding section in part 191 in
that it is titled differently, it provides for
a different methodology for claiming
drawback (relative value) and it is
slightly reordered.
Section 190.24 directs parties
involved in drawback-related
transactions to § 190.10, the general
section dealing with transfers of
merchandise. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 by
referencing the appropriate section in
the proposed part dealing with transfers
of merchandise.
Section 190.25 directs parties
involved in the destruction of
merchandise for drawback-related
transactions to § 190.71, which contains
the procedures for destroying
merchandise under CBP supervision.
This section is nearly identical to the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.26 provides information
regarding recordkeeping requirements
generally and specifically requires
documents enabling CBP to trace the
articles manufactured or produced from
importation, through any transfers, to
exportation or destruction. This section
is substantially similar to the
corresponding section in part 191 but it
differs due to certain grammatical and
nomenclature changes and it contains
TFTEA-based modifications such as
requiring the 8-digit HTSUS number
rather than referencing same kind and
quality.
Section 190.27 provides general
information on the time limitations
regarding manufacturing drawback. This
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37904
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
section is substantially similar to the
corresponding section in part 191 but it
differs in that it contains certain
grammatical and nomenclature changes
and TFTEA-based modifications such as
changing the time period to 5 years after
importation, from the 3-year time period
after date of receipt by the manufacturer
or producer at the factory in § 191.27.
Section 190.28 details the parties
entitled to file a claim in situations
involving manufacturing drawback.
This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due
only to a few grammatical changes.
Section 190.29 requires a claimant
filing a manufacturing drawback claim
to make certifications regarding the
availability of the applicable bill of
materials or formula including the
HTSUS subheading number(s) and the
quantities of merchandise. This
regulation is new and does not have a
corresponding regulation in part 191;
however, the type of documentation
covered by this certification has
generally been required by CBP as part
of a manufacturing drawback claim.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart C Provides Specific
Requirements Dealing With Unused
Merchandise Drawback
Section 190.31 provides the general
rule regarding direct identification
unused merchandise drawback claims.
This section differs from the
corresponding regulation in part 191 in
that it incorporates TFTEA-based
changes to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) such as
the 5-year period for filing a claim and
it contains grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.32 provides the general
rule regarding substitution unused
merchandise drawback claims. This
section differs from the corresponding
regulation in part 191 in that it
incorporates TFTEA-based changes to
19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) such as the 5-year
period for filing a claim and HTSUSbased substitution determinations,
provides for the ‘‘lesser of’’ rule
regarding allowable refunds, and
contains grammatical and nomenclature
changes. This section also explains the
special substitution rule for wine, which
is not provided for in the corresponding
section of part 191, and includes
language regarding the preclusion of
claiming Federal excise taxes discussed
in detail in the section titled Federal
Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback
Claims. As discussed further below in
the section titled Amendments
Regarding Federal Excise Tax and
Substitution Drawback Claims, this
preclusion is also proposed as an
amendment to § 191.32.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Section 190.33 details the parties
entitled to claim in situations regarding
unused merchandise drawback. This
section differs from the corresponding
regulation in part 191 in that it
incorporates TFTEA-based changes such
as referencing records kept in the
normal course of business; it does not
reference terms such as commercially
interchangeable and certificate of
delivery, which were eliminated for
TFTEA-Drawback; and it contains
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.34 directs parties
involved in drawback-related
transactions to § 190.10, the general
section dealing with transfers of
merchandise. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 in
that it merely directs to the general
section dealing with transfers of
merchandise rather than detailing
specifics.
Section 190.35 contains specific
instructions regarding the required
notice of intent to export, destroy, or
return merchandise, and the process
regarding CBP’s determination to
examine merchandise. The process
described in this section replicates the
process as laid out in the corresponding
section in part 191, with only
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.36 contains information
regarding obtaining a one-time waiver of
the requirement to provide notice of
intent to export. The process described
in this section replicates the process as
laid out in the corresponding section in
part 191.
Section 190.37 directs parties
involved in the destruction of
merchandise for drawback claims to
§ 190.71, which contains the procedures
for destroying merchandise under CBP
supervision. The process described in
this section replicates the process as
laid out in the corresponding section in
part 191 and contains only one
nomenclature change.
Section 190.38 provides information
regarding recordkeeping requirements
generally and specifically requires
documents enabling CBP to trace the
merchandise from importation, through
any transfers, to exportation or
destruction. This section is substantially
similar to the process as laid out in the
corresponding section in part 191 and
contains grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Subpart D Provides Specific
Requirements Regarding Rejected
Merchandise Drawback Under 19 U.S.C.
1313(c)
Section 190.41 provides for drawback
claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)
regarding rejected merchandise
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
involving goods that do not conform to
sample or specifications, were shipped
without consent of the consignee, or
determined to be defective at the time
of importation. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 in
that it contains nomenclature changes
and includes additional language
regarding goods sold at retail and
returned, removes certain language
regarding satisfactory evidence and
includes language regarding the amount
of drawback allowable.
Section 190.42 sets forth the general
procedures for filing, documenting, and
certifying claims under rejected
merchandise drawback. This regulation
differs from the corresponding
regulation in part 191 in that it includes
the expanded time frame of 5 years from
the date of importation for filing claims
and directs claimants to § 190.71 for
procedures regarding the destruction of
merchandise under CBP supervision.
This regulation also differs from the
current corresponding regulation in part
191 (at § 191.42(a)), which requires that
the merchandise be in CBP custody
prior to exportation or destruction. This
was rendered obsolete by the
Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
429), which removed the requirement
that the merchandise be in CBP custody
prior to exportation or destruction.
Accordingly, it is proposed to update
§ 191.42(a) as well.
Section 190.43 informs claimants of
the possibility of filing a direct
identification unused merchandise
claim under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) in lieu
of a rejected merchandise claim, to the
extent that the merchandise qualifies.
This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191;
however, the section title, unused
merchandise drawback claim, differs
from the corresponding section title in
part 191, which is unused merchandise
claim.
Section 190.44 is reserved. The
corresponding regulation in part 191
directs claimants to § 191.71 for the
procedures for destroying merchandise
under CBP supervision. This section is
unnecessary as a stand-alone regulation
because the citation to § 190.71, dealing
with destruction under CBP
supervision, is included in § 190.42, as
discussed above.
Section 190.45 is a new regulation
regarding the special rule for
substitution for returned retail
merchandise, a subset of rejected
merchandise provided for in 19 U.S.C.
1313(c). This section includes
requirements that have been in effect
since 2004, when the Miscellaneous
Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2004 (Pub. L. 108–429), amended 19
U.S.C. 1313(c) regarding drawback on
returned items sold at the retail level.
Specifically, this regulation provides for
a special rule going beyond mere
HTSUS interchangeability for
substitution involving returned retail
merchandise by requiring the specific
product identifier to be the same for
both the returned retail merchandise
and the substituted exported or
destroyed merchandise (e.g., SKU or
part number). Therefore, it is proposed
to add a new § 191.45 as well.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart E Deals With the Completion of
Drawback Claims
Section 190.51 provides information
regarding what constitutes a complete
drawback claim and delineates those
supporting documents that must be
uploaded to complete a claim. This
proposed section explains the
requirement that the successful
electronic transmission of drawback
claims in the CBP-authorized EDI
system includes upload of supporting
documentation. This section, at
190.51(a)(4), includes the prohibition
against designating imported
merchandise from a line item on an
entry summary as part of a TFTEADrawback substitution claim under part
190 if any other merchandise covered
on that entry summary has been
designated as the basis of a claim under
part 191 (and the corresponding
regulation in part 191 is similarly
amended at 191.51(a)(3)). This section
also provides information regarding the
official date of filing, calculation of
refunds relative to drawback-eligible
duties, taxes, and fees, as well as
information regarding the reporting of
the HTSUS classifications and
Department of Commerce Schedule B
commodity numbers applicable to
imported, substituted, exported, and
destroyed merchandise and articles.
This section also differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
corrections of clerical errors in (b)(2)(i)
regarding the mathematical calculations
included in the example.
Section 190.52 concerns rejecting,
perfecting, or amending drawback
claims, including the applicable
timeframes and limitations. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 in that it includes the
TFTEA-based 5-year deadline and
includes certain grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.53 details CBP’s authority
to require claimants to restructure
claims if necessary to foster
administrative efficiency. This section
differs from the corresponding section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
in part 191 due only to nomenclature
changes.
Subpart F Deals With the Verification of
Drawback Claims
Section 190.61 provides information
regarding the verification of drawback
claims, including how verification is
done and its impact on liquidation. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 slightly due to
simplification of the language related to
the electronic environment for TFTEADrawback claims and grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.62 provides information
regarding criminal and civil penalties
related to drawback claims. This section
replicates the corresponding section in
part 191.
Section 190.63 is a new regulation
detailing the joint and several liability
of the importer of the merchandise
designated as the basis of a drawback
claim and the party claiming drawback.
Subpart G Deals With the Exportation
and Destruction of Articles Involved in
Drawback Claims
Section 190.71 provides procedures
and requirements regarding obtaining
drawback on articles destroyed under
CBP supervision. This section differs
from the corresponding section in part
191 due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.72 provides requirements
regarding proof of export in drawback
claims. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 in
that it lists the required summary data
for establishing exportation and
references certain supporting
documents to prove export.
Section 190.73 states that records kept
through an electronic export system of
the United States Government may be
considered as actual proof of
exportation only if CBP has officially
approved the use of that electronic
export system as proof of compliance.
The corresponding regulation in part
191 provided information regarding
export summary procedures.
Section 190.74 provides information
regarding exportation by mail and how
to claim drawback. This section differs
from the corresponding section in part
191 due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.75 provides information
regarding exportation by the U.S.
Government and how to claim
drawback. This section differs slightly
from the corresponding section in part
191 due to grammatical changes and it
does not contain the reference to section
191.73, which in part 191 provided
detailed information on export summary
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37905
procedures (the relevant data elements
from the export summary are now
incorporated into the drawback entry
summary, as provided for in 19 CFR
190.51(a)).
Section 190.76 is reserved as
corresponding section 191.76 provides
information regarding landing
certificates, which are now obsolete.
Subpart H Deals With the Liquidation
and Protest of Drawback Entries
Section 190.81 provides information
regarding the liquidation of drawback
claims. The Miscellaneous Trade and
Technical Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub.
L. 108–429), amended 19 U.S.C. 1504 to
expressly impose limitations on the
liquidation of drawback entries.
Pursuant to this 2004 amendment,
unless a claim for drawback is extended
or suspended, an entry or claim for
drawback not liquidated within 1 year
from the date of entry or claim will be
deemed liquidated at the drawback
amount asserted at the time of entry or
claim. Accordingly, this document in
§ 190.81 and in § 191.81 proposes to
clarify this 2004 modification regarding
drawback claims and deemed
liquidations.
Section 190.82 specifies who is
entitled to claim drawback. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due only to grammatical
changes.
Section 190.83 specifies who is
entitled to receive drawback payments.
This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.84 provides information
regarding protest procedures involving
drawback claims. This section differs
from the corresponding section in part
191 due only to a grammatical change.
Subpart I Deals With Applications for
Privileges Involving Drawback
Section 190.91 provides procedures
regarding applying for and obtaining the
privilege of waiver of prior notice of
intent to export. This section differs
from the corresponding section in part
191 in that it references the need to
meet the standard for substitution rather
than using the term commercially
interchangeable, it discusses
grandfathering in existing privilege
holders relative to TFTEA-based
changes, and it contains grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.92 provides procedures
regarding applying for and obtaining the
privilege of accelerated payment in
which payment of drawback claims may
be obtained prior to liquidation. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37906
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 190.93 provides for the
combined privileges of waiver of prior
notice and accelerated payment and
states that applications may be for one
privilege, both privileges separately, or
both privileges in a combined
application. This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Subpart J Deals With Internal Revenue
Taxes on Flavoring Extracts and
Medicinal or Toilet Preparations.
In addition to the proposed
regulations described immediately
below in subpart J (§§ 190.101—
190.106), the Department of the
Treasury and CBP are also considering
transferring the administration of
drawback refunds provided for in
subpart J from CBP to the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).
This part of the law solely involves
drawback for the export of domestic
products, and such a transfer would
place with the agency with
responsibility for taxation of domestic
products. It would also enable exporters
of flavoring extracts and medicinal or
toilet preparations to claim the full
amount of drawback available at a single
agency. CBP and TTB would greatly
appreciate comments on this proposal.
Section 190.101 states that 19 U.S.C.
1313(d) provides for drawback for the
refund of internal revenue tax upon the
exportation of flavoring extracts and
medicinal or toilet preparations
(including perfumery) manufactured or
produced in the United States in part
from the domestic tax-paid alcohol. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due only to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.102 provides that
provisions relating to direct
identification drawback (contained in
subpart B of this part) will apply to
claims for drawback filed upon the
exportation of flavoring extracts and
medicinal or toilet preparations
(including perfumery) manufactured or
produced in the United States in part
from the domestic tax-paid alcohol. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes and in
paragraph (e), which states that the time
period for completing claims is three
years from the date of export.
Section 190.103 details additional
requirements in situations where a
declaration of the manufacturer showing
whether a claim has been or will be
filed by the manufacturer with the
regional Director, National Review
Center, TTB, is necessary. TTB was
previously referred to as the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. This
regulation has been updated throughout
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
for accuracy, including updating the
statutory citations to 26 U.S.C. 5111–
5114, dealing with the Internal Revenue
Code. This section also differs from the
current corresponding section in part
191 due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes. For the same
reasons detailed here, it is proposed to
update § 191.103 as well.
Section 190.104 provides information
regarding required certificates involving
drawback and TTB. This regulation has
been updated for accuracy because,
among other things, the relevant TTB
Form (5100.4), was updated in
November of 2015. This section also
differs from the current corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes. It is
proposed to update that section,
§ 191.104, as well.
Section 190.105 provides that the
drawback office must ascertain the final
amount of drawback due by reference to
the specific manufacturing ruling under
which drawback was claimed. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191, which requires that
the final amount be made in reference
to the certificate of manufacture and
delivery, which is no longer required in
TFTEA-Drawback.
Section 190.106 provides for the
limitation of drawback available in
situations in which the declaration
required by § 190.103 of this subpart
shows that a claim has been or will be
filed and it states that drawback may not
be granted absent receipt from TTB of a
copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of
Tax-Paid Alcohol). This section also
differs from the current corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes regarding
TTB. It is proposed to update that
section, § 191.106, as well.
Subpart K Deals With Supplies for
Certain Vessels and Aircraft
Section 190.111 states that 19 U.S.C.
1309 provides for drawback on articles
laden as supplies on certain vessels or
aircraft of the United States or as
supplies including equipment upon, or
used in the maintenance or repair of,
certain foreign vessels or aircraft. This
section replicates the corresponding
section in part 191.
Section 190.112 provides procedures
regarding obtaining drawback in
situations involving supplies for certain
vessels and aircraft and states that the
provisions of this subpart will override
other conflicting provisions of this part.
This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
TFTEA-based changes, such as the 5year time period for filing claims, and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
due to grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Subpart L Deals With Meats Cured With
Imported Salt
Section 190.121 states that 19 U.S.C.
1313(f) provides for drawback
allowance on meats cured with
imported salt. This section replicates
the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.122 provides procedures
regarding obtaining drawback in
situations involving meats cured with
imported salt. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 in
that the organizational structure was
changed because paragraph (b),
regarding modifying a paper form, was
removed, and grammatical changes have
been made.
Section 190.123 provides that
drawback will be refunded in aggregate
amounts of not less than $100 and will
not be subject to the retention of 1
percent of duties paid for claims
involving meats cured with imported
salt. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical changes.
Subpart M Deals With Materials for
Construction and Equipment for Vessels
and Aircraft for Foreign Ownership and
Account
Section 190.131 states that 19 U.S.C.
1313(g) provides for drawback on
materials for construction and
equipment for vessels and aircraft for
foreign ownership and account. This
section replicates the corresponding
section in part 191.
Section 190.132 states that other
provisions of this part relating to direct
identification manufacturing drawback
will apply to claims for drawback filed
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(g) and this subpart
insofar as applicable to and not
inconsistent with the provisions of this
subpart. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.133 provides an
explanation of terms specific to this
subpart dealing with drawback on
materials for construction and
equipment for vessels and aircraft for
foreign ownership and account. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
Subpart N Deals With Foreign-Built Jet
Aircraft Engines Processed in the United
States
Section 190.141 states that 19 U.S.C.
1313(h) provides for drawback on the
exportation of jet aircraft engines
manufactured or produced abroad that
have been overhauled, repaired, rebuilt,
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
or reconditioned in the United States
with the use of imported merchandise,
including parts. This section replicates
the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.142 states that other
provisions of this part relating to direct
identification manufacturing drawback
will apply to claims for drawback filed
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(h) and this
subpart insofar as applicable to and not
inconsistent with the provisions of this
subpart. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
a grammatical change.
Section 190.143 provides specifics
relating to the filing of entry and the
contents of the entry regarding claims
filed under this subpart. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 by removing the reference to
CBP Form 7551 (as this data will be
submitted through ACE) and due to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.144 states that drawback
under this subpart will be refunded in
aggregate amounts of not less than $100
and will not be subject to the deduction
of 1 percent of duties paid. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical changes.
Subpart O Deals With Merchandise
Exported From Continuous CBP
Custody
Section 190.151 states that 19 U.S.C.
1557(a) provides for drawback on
merchandise upon which duties have
been paid and which has remained
continuously in bonded warehouse or
otherwise in CBP custody for a specified
period of time, when exported to certain
locations. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.152 provides specified
exceptions for when drawback will be
allowed on merchandise released from
CBP custody. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191
due to grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.153 provides information
regarding when merchandise is
considered in continuous CBP custody
in certain scenarios. This section differs
from the corresponding section in part
191 due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.154 provides information
regarding filing a direct export entry or
entry for merchandise transported to
another port for exportation. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 by not requiring the
filing of CBP Form 7551 (as the data will
be transmitted through ACE) and due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.155 states that the
regulations in 19 CFR part 18 will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
followed to the extent possible when
merchandise is withdrawn from a
warehouse for exportation. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical changes.
Section 190.156 provides information
regarding the filing of a bill of lading
and applicable timeframes. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.157 is reserved as the
corresponding section in part 191
directed readers to section 191.76
regarding landing certificates, which are
now obsolete.
Section 190.158 provides for
procedures of liquidation for a complete
drawback claim in accordance with
§ 190.81. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.159 states that drawback
due under this subpart will not be
subject to the deduction of 1 percent of
duties paid. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191
due to grammatical changes.
Subpart P Deals With Distilled Spirits,
Wines, or Beer Which are
Unmerchantable or do not Conform to
Sample or Specifications
Section 190.161 provides for the
refund, remission, abatement or credit
regarding imported distilled spirits,
wines, or beer found after entry to be
unmerchantable or not to conform to
sample or specifications and which are
returned to CBP custody. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.162 states that export
procedures as provided for at § 190.42
apply, except that the claimant must be
the importer. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191
due to grammatical changes.
Section 190.163 provides for the
required documentation in claims
setting forth in detail the facts which
cause the merchandise to be
unmerchantable and any additional
evidence that the drawback office
requires to establish that the
merchandise is unmerchantable. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.164 states that there is no
time limit for the return to CBP custody
for merchandise covered under this
subpart. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due
only to nomenclature changes.
Section 190.165 states that
exportations by mail are not permitted
for merchandise covered in this subpart.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37907
This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due
only to grammatical changes.
Section 190.166 provides information
regarding the destruction of
merchandise under this subpart. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due only to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.167 states that no
deduction of 1 percent of the internal
revenue taxes paid or determined will
be made in allowing entries under 26
U.S.C. 5062(c), as amended. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due only to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.168 is reserved because
the 90-day time limit for exportation or
destruction from the date of notification
of acceptance of the drawback entry it
is contrary to the statutory requirement
that a claim be filed after exportation or
destruction. Accordingly, this section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191.
Subpart Q Deals With the Substitution
of Finished Petroleum Derivatives
Section 190.171 states that 19 U.S.C.
1313(p) provides for drawback on the
basis of qualified articles including
petroleum derivatives imported or
manufactured or produced in the United
States (and qualified under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b)). TFTEA permits MPF
refunds for all claims under 19 U.S.C.
1313(p), therefore there is no limitation
on MPF refunds as there was in
paragraph (c) in part 191. Additionally,
there is a new paragraph (c) that
explains the calculation of drawback for
claims on petroleum derivatives. This
paragraph requires per unit averaging
for refunds, but clarifies that the refunds
are not subject to the ‘‘lesser of’’ rule.
Finally, this paragraph includes the
preclusion of claiming Federal excise
taxes discussed in detail in the section
titled Federal Excise Tax and
Substitution Drawback Claims.
Section 190.172 provides relevant
definitions for purposes of this subpart.
This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.173 provides specific
requirements for drawback when the
basis is 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) with no
manufacture. This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.174 provides specific
requirements for drawback when the
basis is 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) with a
manufacture under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or
(b). This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.175 provides specific
requirements regarding the identity of
drawback claimants and maintenance of
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37908
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
records under this subpart. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to TFTEA-based changes
removing requirements related to
certificates of delivery and certificates of
manufacture and delivery.
Section 190.176 states that the general
procedures for filing claims are
applicable to claims filed under 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) unless otherwise
specified in this section. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to the timeframe for
recordkeeping being changed to 3 years
from the date of liquidation (rather than
from the date of payment) and due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Subpart R Deals With Merchandise
Transferred to a Foreign Trade Zone
From Customs Territory
Section 190.181 states that drawback
is provided under 19 U.S.C. 81c for
merchandise transferred to a foreign
trade zone for the sole purpose of
exportation, storage, or destruction,
with certain exceptions. This section
replicates the corresponding section in
part 191.
Section 190.182 states that
merchandise in a foreign trade zone for
purposes specified in § 190.181 will be
given status as zone-restricted
merchandise on proper application as
provided for in 19 CFR 146.44. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due only to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.183 provides filing
procedures for certain articles
manufactured or produced in the United
States, including transfers to a foreign
trade zone. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes,
and due to changes related to the
electronic filing provisions of section
906 of TFTEA.
Section 190.184 states that the
procedure described in subpart O of this
part will be followed, as applicable, for
drawback on merchandise transferred to
a foreign trade zone from continuous
CBP custody and provides information
on the drawback entry, required
certifications, modifications, and
endorsement. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191
due to grammatical and nomenclature
changes, and due to changes related to
the electronic filing environment of
TFTEA-Drawback.
Section 190.185 states that the
procedure described in subparts C and
D of this part will be followed, as
applicable, for drawback on
merchandise under this subpart and
provides information on the drawback
entry, required certifications,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
modifications, and endorsement. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes, and to the
electronic filing environment provisions
of section 906 of TFTEA.
Section 190.186 provides information
regarding which person may be
considered the transferor and states that
drawback may be claimed by, and paid
to, the transferor. This section differs
from the corresponding section in part
191 due only to grammatical changes.
Subpart S Deals With the Drawback
Compliance Program
Section 190.191 provides general
information regarding the CBP
drawback compliance program. This
section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due only to
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.192 provides information
regarding obtaining certification for the
compliance program. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due only to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.193 provides the
application procedure for the
compliance program. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due only to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.194 describes the actions
taken on the application to participate
in the compliance program. This section
differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due only to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.195 relates to combined
applications for certification in the
drawback compliance program and
privileges regarding the waiver of prior
notice and/or accelerated payment of
drawback. This section replicates the
corresponding section in Part 191.
Appendices A and B Deal With
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Appendix A to Part 190 sets forth the
general manufacturing drawback
rulings, accompanied by instructions for
how to submit a letter of notification to
operate thereunder. This appendix
differs from Appendix A to part 191 due
to grammatical and nomenclature
changes as well as changes to conform
to TFTEA-Drawback requirements.
Appendix B to Part 190 provides the
sample formats for applications for
specific manufacturing drawback
rulings. This appendix differs from
Appendix B to part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes
as well as changes to conform to
TFTEA-Drawback requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
B. Other Conforming Amendments
NAFTA drawback, which is
separately provided for in subpart E of
part 181 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR
part 181), provides for special
provisions in situations where goods
were imported into the United States
and then subsequently exported to
either Canada or Mexico. While TFTEA
left NAFTA drawback unchanged,
minor conforming edits to part 181 are
necessary to correct certain errors or to
allow for interaction with both the
proposed part 190 and existing part 191
during the transition period. For
example, 19 CFR 181.50(a) includes an
inaccurate reference to subpart G of part
191, stating that it is for liquidation
procedures. However, it is subpart H of
part 191 that deals with liquidation (and
protest) procedures while subpart G of
part 191 deals with exportation and
destruction. Accordingly, it is proposed
to amend § 181.50(a) to update the
reference so it accurately cites to
subpart H of part 191 and to include an
accompanying reference to subpart H of
part 190. Further, § 181.50(c) includes a
specific reference to § 191.92 addressing
accelerated payment. Accordingly, it is
proposed to amend this regulation to
also include a reference to the
corresponding section of the proposed
new part 190, i.e., § 190.92. CBP is
amending sections 181.45, 181.46,
181.47, 181.49, and 181.50 to conform
with proposed part 190 and existing
part 191.
As stated above, the existing
regulations in part 191 are mostly
unchanged with this rulemaking.
However, it is proposed to amend the
scope section of part 191, § 191.0, to
make reference to the drawback
provisions in proposed part 190 and to
note that claims cannot be filed under
part 191 on or after February 24, 2019.
Additionally, as noted above in the
section detailing the differences
between the sections in part 190 and the
corresponding sections in part 191,
some sections in part 191 are outdated
for reasons other than TFTEA, such as
those affected by the Miscellaneous
Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
2004. Therefore, as noted above in the
section detailing the proposed changes
to part 190, where changes were
required due to non-TFTEA reasons, it
is proposed to amend §§ 191.0, 191.1,
191.3, 191.5, 191.42, 191.51, 191.81,
191.103, 191.104, and 191.106 and new
§ 191.45 to address returned retail
merchandise.
Finally, it is important to note that it
is CBP’s intention to remove part 191 at
a future date, but not until after the
completion of the transition period. The
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
part 191 regulations will continue to be
applicable for claims filed under that
part before February 24, 2019, but will
become increasingly less relevant over
time; CBP will assess at what point in
time removal will be most appropriate
to lessen burdens or confusion. This
removal will be announced in the
Federal Register.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
C. Amendments Regarding Federal
Excise Tax and Substitution Claims
For the reasons outlined above in the
section titled Federal Excise Tax and
Substitution Drawback Claims, this
document proposes to amend: § 191.22
by adding a new last sentence to
paragraph (a); § 191.32 by adding a new
paragraph (b)(4); and, § 191.171 by
adding a new paragraph (d). These
amendments preclude drawback of
internal revenue tax imposed under the
IRC in connection with a substitution
drawback claim if no excise tax was
paid on the substituted exported
merchandise or if that merchandise was
subject to a claim for refund or
drawback of tax under any provision of
the IRC. In addition, this document
proposes to amend § 113.62, which sets
forth basic importation and entry bond
conditions, to add a new condition
under which the principal agrees not to
file, or transfer the right to file, a
substitution drawback claim that would
be inconsistent with the terms of new
§ 191.32(b)(4). The consequences of
default specified in newly re-designated
paragraph (n) of § 113.62 would apply
in the case of a breach of this bond
condition.25
These changes are intended to
preclude the filing of substitution
drawback claims under 19 U.S.C.
1313(b), 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), and 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) in circumstances in
which internal revenue taxes have not
been paid on the substituted domestic
product, or where that merchandise is
subject to a different claim for refund or
drawback of IRC taxes. The proposed
amendments still allow for the return of
99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees
paid on the imported merchandise upon
export, or when IRC taxes have been
paid on substituted domestic product
and the substituted merchandise is not
the subject of a separate claim for refund
or drawback of such taxes.
25 The amendment referenced here to § 113.62 of
this chapter is in addition to the previously
discussed proposed amendment to § 113.62,
proposing to add a new paragraph (a)(4) regarding
the joint and several liability provisions of the
importer’s bond.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
IV. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
A. Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review) and
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review)
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule is
an ‘‘economically significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this
proposed rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’). CBP and Treasury have
prepared an economic analysis of the
potential impacts of this rule for public
awareness. The analysis can be found in
the public docket for this rulemaking at
www.regulations.gov.
B. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs)
Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs, and provides
that ‘‘for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be
identified for elimination, and that the
cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a
budgeting process.’’ 26 These
requirements only apply to rules
designated as ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. OMB’s implementation
guidance explains that ‘‘Federal
spending regulatory actions that cause
only income transfers between
taxpayers and program beneficiaries
. . . . are considered ‘transfer rules’ and
are not covered by E.O. [Executive
Order] 13771 . . . However . . . such
regulatory actions may impose
requirements apart from transfers . . .
In those cases, the actions would need
to be offset to the extent they impose
more than de minimis costs.’’ 27
This rule is a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, and is hence subject to the
26 See
82 FR 9339 (February 3, 2017).
OMB’s memorandum titled, ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (April 5, 2017).
37909
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
Most of the regulatory amendments
proposed in this rule are the result of
the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114–125),
which amended 19 U.S.C. 1313, the
statute guiding CBP drawback
regulations, and required CBP to
promulgate regulations implementing
these changes by February 24, 2018.
This rule includes both a regulatory
action and a deregulatory action that
implement TFTEA’s requirements.
Because these actions are related to
drawback, CBP chose to include both
actions in this rule instead of
promulgating two separate rules. On
net, this rule imposes a regulatory
burden (and is thus a regulatory action)
because its regulatory impacts exceed its
deregulatory impacts. This rule’s
regulatory impacts (i.e., costs) would
measure $8.3 million on an annualized
basis, while its deregulatory impacts
(i.e., cost savings) would measure $1.3
million on an annualized basis (in 2016
U.S. dollars, using a 7 percent discount
rate). Together, these impacts would
introduce an annualized net regulatory
cost of $7.0 million.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of
this proposed rule on small entities per
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et.
seq.)(RFA), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). A small
entity may be a small business (defined
as any independently owned and
operated business not dominant in its
field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small notfor-profit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
Under the RFA and SBREFA, if an
agency can certify (typically through a
screening analysis) that a rule will not
have a ‘‘significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,’’
a detailed assessment of the rule’s
impact on small entities is not required.
Otherwise, an agency must complete an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) exploring the impact of the
proposed rulemaking on small entities.
Screening Analysis
The proposed Modernized Drawback
rule would fundamentally change the
drawback process and consequently
affect all trade members eligible for
drawback (i.e., drawback claimants).28
27 See
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28 For more detailed information on the impacts
of this rule, see CBP and Treasury’s economic
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
Continued
02AUP2
37910
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
These trade members can include
importers, exporters, manufacturers,
producers, and intermediate parties
representing a diverse array of
industries. CBP does not assess the
rule’s impact on customs brokers who
file claims for trade members eligible for
drawback in this RFA analysis because
they would presumably charge their
clients a fee for any costs introduced
with the rule (and thus not be affected
themselves).
Because the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) guidelines on
small entities under the RFA do not
explicitly define small entity standards
for the importers, exporters,
manufacturers, producers, and
intermediate parties potentially affected
by the rule, CBP used data on the
industries in which these parties
operate to determine the number of
small entities potentially affected by
this rule. CBP began by compiling a list
of all 9,017 unique drawback claimants
who filed claims between 2007 and
2016 and matching the claimant
identification number (‘‘claimant ID’’) to
the operator/owner name and address
listed in internal CBP databases. Next,
CBP assigned a random number to each
of the claimants in that list and sorted
the data in ascending order by the
random number assigned. Using public
and proprietary databases, CBP then
pulled information like the entity type
(subsidiary or parent company), primary
line of business, employee size, and
revenue on the claimants in ascending
order until the agency had market data
for 100 unique entities.29 30
Table 1 shows the industries,
according to their North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) code, in the sample of entities
affected by this rule and the SBA’s small
entity size standards for these
industries. For the most part, the SBA’s
size standards are the average annual
receipts or the average employment of a
firm.31 As shown, CBP finds that 69
percent (69) of the drawback claimants
sampled are considered ‘‘small’’
according to the SBA’s size standards,
including one non-profit organization.
CBP did not identify any small
governmental jurisdictions affected by
the proposed rule in this sample.
According to these findings, CBP
assumes that the proposed rule would
affect a substantial number of small
entities. CBP recognizes that this
screening analysis may have excluded
some less established, potentially small
entities due to market data availability.
To the extent that those excluded are
small, the portion of small entities
affected by the rule would be higher
than estimated.
Of the small drawback claimants
sampled and included in Table 1, the
average number of employees at these
entities ranged from 1 to 1,000 and their
annual revenue measured from less than
$0.5 million to $391.0 million (see Table
2 and Table 3). Table 2 compares the
low range average number of employees
at the small entities sampled and the
overall average for the corresponding
NAICS industry. Table 3 shows the
average annual revenue of the small
entities sampled by NAICS industry
using the low range of annual revenue
data available as well as the average
annual revenue for all U.S. entities in
each industry.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE
NAICS code
311211
311421
312140
313210
315220
............
............
............
............
............
315240 ............
321911 ............
325180 ............
325194 ............
325199 ............
325998 ............
326199 ............
331410 ............
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
331491 ............
332999 ............
Flour Milling ......................................
Fruit and Vegetable Canning ...........
Distilleries .........................................
Broadwoven Fabric Mills ..................
Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing.
Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut
and Sew Apparel Manufacturing.
Wood Window and Door Manufacturing.
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing.
Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and
Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing.
All Other Basic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing.
All Other Miscellaneous Chemical
Product and Preparation Manufacturing.
All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing.
Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum)
Smelting and Refining.
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper
and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing,
and Extruding.
All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing.
analysis in the public docket for this rulemaking at
www.regulations.gov.
29 Only 13 of the entities researched (12 percent)
did not have market data available.
30 Out of a total population of 9,017 unique
drawback claimants who filed claims between 2007
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Number of
entities in
sample
NAICS description
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Percent of
entities in
sample
Frm 00026
Percent
of small
entities
in sample
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1,000 Employees
1,000 Employees
1,000 Employees
1,000 Employees
750 Employees ...
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
750 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
1,000 Employees
1
1
2
2
1,000 Employees
2
2
1
1
1,250 Employees
1
1
1
1
1,250 Employees
0
0
1
1
500 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
750 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
1,000 Employees
1
1
1
1
750 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
750 Employees ...
1
1
and 2016, CBP used a sample of 100 claimants with
market data to inform this screening analysis. This
sample size resulted in a statistically significant
sample using a 95 percent confidence level with a
10 percent margin of error.
PO 00000
Number of
small
entities
in sample
SBA size
standard
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
31 The SBA’s calculation methods for average
annual receipts and average employment of a firm
can be found in 13 CFR 121.104 and 13 CFR
121.106, respectively.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37911
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—SUMMARY STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE—Continued
Number of
entities in
sample
NAICS code
NAICS description
334118 ............
Computer Terminal and Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing.
Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing.
Instruments and Related Products
Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling Industrial
Process Variables.
Household Cooking Appliance Manufacturing.
Boat Building ....................................
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing.
Blind and Shade Manufacturing .......
Surgical and Medical Instrument
Manufacturing.
Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing.
Musical Instrument Manufacturing ...
All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing.
Furniture Merchant Wholesalers ......
Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers.
Metal Service Centers and Other
Metal Merchant Wholesalers.
Household
Appliances,
Electric
Housewares, and Consumer Electronics Merchant Wholesalers.
Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers.
Sporting and Recreational Goods
and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers.
Toy and Hobby Goods and Supplies
Merchant Wholesalers.
Jewelry, Watch, Precious Stone, and
Precious Metal Merchant Wholesalers.
Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods
Merchant Wholesalers.
Piece Goods, Notions, and Other
Dry Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
Women’s, Children’s, and Infants’
Clothing and Accessories Merchant Wholesalers.
Footwear Merchant Wholesalers ......
Other Grocery and Related Products
Merchant Wholesalers.
Plastics Materials and Basic Forms
and Shapes Merchant Wholesalers.
Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Merchant Wholesalers (except
Bulk Stations and Terminals).
Farm Supplies Merchant Wholesalers.
Other Miscellaneous Nondurable
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
Used Car Dealers .............................
Women’s Clothing Stores .................
Children’s and Infants’ Clothing
Stores.
Other Clothing Stores .......................
Sporting Goods Stores .....................
Sewing, Needlework, and Piece
Goods Stores.
Discount Department Stores ............
334310 ............
334513 ............
335221 ............
336612 ............
336991 ............
337920 ............
339112 ............
339920 ............
339992 ............
339999 ............
423210 ............
423220 ............
423510 ............
423620 ............
423690 ............
423910 ............
423920 ............
423940 ............
423990 ............
424310 ............
424330 ............
424340 ............
424490 ............
424610 ............
424720 ............
424910 ............
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
424990 ............
441120 ............
448120 ............
448130 ............
448190 ............
451110 ............
451130 ............
452112 ............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Percent of
entities in
sample
Number of
small
entities
in sample
SBA size
standard
Percent
of small
entities
in sample
1
1
1,000 Employees
0
0
1
1
750 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
750 Employees ...
0
0
1
1
1,500 Employees
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,000 Employees
1,000 Employees
1
0
1
0
1
2
1
2
1,000 Employees
1,000 Employees
0
1
0
1
1
1
750 Employees ...
0
0
1
1
1
1
1,000 Employees
500 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
100 Employees ...
100 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
2
2
200 Employees ...
2
2
1
1
200 Employees ...
1
1
1
1
250 Employees ...
0
0
3
3
100 Employees ...
3
3
1
1
150 Employees ...
1
1
3
3
100 Employees ...
3
3
1
1
100 Employees ...
1
1
2
2
100 Employees ...
2
2
1
1
100 Employees ...
0
0
3
1
3
1
200 Employees ...
250 Employees ...
2
1
2
1
2
2
150 Employees ...
2
2
1
1
200 Employees ...
1
1
3
3
200 Employees ...
3
3
1
1
100 Employees ...
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
$25.0 Million ........
$27.5 Million ........
$32.5 Million ........
1
2
0
1
2
0
2
1
1
2
1
1
$20.5 Million ........
$15.0 Million ........
$27.5 Million ........
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
$29.5 Million ........
1
1
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37912
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—SUMMARY STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE—Continued
Number of
entities in
sample
NAICS code
NAICS description
453998 ............
.........................
All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores).
Mail-Order Houses ...........................
Deep Sea Passenger Transportation
General Warehousing and Storage ..
Other Financial Vehicles ..................
Testing Laboratories .........................
Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services.
All Other Professional, Scientific,
and Technical Services.
All Other Business Support Services
Security Systems Services (except
Locksmiths).
All Other Support Services ...............
Child and Youth Services * ...............
Independent Artists, Writers, and
Performers.
Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and
Maintenance.
Other Personal and Household
Goods Repair and Maintenance.
Foreign Entity ...................................
Total .........
...........................................................
454113
483112
493110
525990
541380
541690
............
............
............
............
............
............
541990 ............
561499 ............
561621 ............
561990 ............
624110 ............
711510 ............
811310 ............
811490 ............
Percent of
entities in
sample
Number of
small
entities
in sample
SBA size
standard
Percent
of small
entities
in sample
1
1
$7.5 Million ..........
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$38.5
1,500
$27.5
$32.5
$15.0
$15.0
Million ........
Employees
Million ........
Million ........
Million ........
Million ........
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
$15.0 Million ........
1
1
2
1
2
1
$15.0 Million ........
$20.5 Million ........
2
0
2
0
5
1
1
5
1
1
$11.0 Million ........
$11.0 Million ........
$7.5 Million ..........
5
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
$7.5 Million ..........
1
1
1
1
$7.5 Million ..........
1
1
13
13
N/A ......................
N/A
N/A
100
100
.............................
69
69
* This sample corresponds to a non-profit organization.
Source of drawback claimants sample: Internal CBP database; gathered through email correspondence with CBP’s Office of Trade on March
2, 2017.
Source of descriptive entity information: Hoover’s. Online company reports. Available at https://www.hoovers.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and
April 24, 2017; Manta. Online company reports. Available at https://www.manta.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017.
Source of SBA size standard information: U.S. Small Business Administration, ‘‘Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North
American Industry Classification System Codes.’’ February 26, 2016. Available at https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_
Table.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2017.
TABLE 2—EMPLOYMENT STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE AND INDUSTRY
AVERAGES
NAICS code
NAICS description
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
311211
311421
312140
315220
315240
321911
325180
325194
325998
326199
331410
331491
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
332999
334310
335221
336612
339112
339992
339999
423210
423220
423510
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Flour Milling ....................................................................................................
Fruit and Vegetable Canning ..........................................................................
Distilleries ........................................................................................................
Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing .................................
Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing ..............
Wood Window and Door Manufacturing ........................................................
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing .............................................
Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing ..
All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing
All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing .......................................................
Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) Smelting and Refining ........................
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing, and
Extruding.
All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing ................
Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing ...................................................
Household Cooking Appliance Manufacturing ...............................................
Boat Building ...................................................................................................
Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing ............................................
Musical Instrument Manufacturing ..................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing ..........................................................
Furniture Merchant Wholesalers ....................................................................
Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers .......................................................
Metal Service Centers and Other Metal Merchant Wholesalers ....................
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Average
number of
employees at
small entities
in sample-low
range value
Number
of small
entities in
sample
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
Average
number of
employees at
all U.S.
entities in industry
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
20
540
15
40
6
250
502
1,000
3
2
700
65
66
74
30
31
15
46
100
92
34
60
66
69
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
65
350
67
35
52
625
20
5
17
3
20
19
110
34
94
20
10
12
14
20
02AUP2
37913
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—EMPLOYMENT STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE AND INDUSTRY
AVERAGES—Continued
NAICS code
NAICS description
423620 ............
Household Appliances, Electric Housewares, and Consumer Electronics
Merchant Wholesalers.
Sporting and Recreational Goods and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers .......
Toy and Hobby Goods and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers ........................
Jewelry, Watch, Precious Stone, and Precious Metal Merchant Wholesalers.
Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers ........................
Piece Goods, Notions, and Other Dry Goods Merchant Wholesalers ...........
Footwear Merchant Wholesalers ....................................................................
Other Grocery and Related Products Merchant Wholesalers ........................
Plastics Materials and Basic Forms and Shapes Merchant Wholesalers .....
Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers (except Bulk
Stations and Terminals).
Farm Supplies Merchant Wholesalers ...........................................................
Other Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods Merchant Wholesalers ..................
Used Car Dealers ...........................................................................................
Women’s Clothing Stores ...............................................................................
Other Clothing Stores .....................................................................................
Sporting Goods Stores ...................................................................................
Sewing, Needlework, and Piece Goods Stores .............................................
Discount Department Stores ..........................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores) ................
General Warehousing and Storage ................................................................
Other Financial Vehicles .................................................................................
All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services ............................
All Other Business Support Services .............................................................
All Other Support Services .............................................................................
Child and Youth Services * .............................................................................
Independent Artists, Writers, and Performers ................................................
Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive
and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance.
Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance .................
423910 ............
423920 ............
423940 ............
423990
424310
424340
424490
424610
424720
............
............
............
............
............
............
424910
424990
441120
448120
448190
451110
451130
452112
453998
493110
525990
541990
561499
561990
624110
711510
811310
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
811490 ............
Average
number of
employees at
small entities
in sample-low
range value
Number
of small
entities in
sample
Average
number of
employees at
all U.S.
entities in industry
1
80
21
3
1
3
18
12
7
11
15
7
1
2
2
1
2
1
20
2
17
11
14
7
10
9
17
28
13
15
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
26
1
1
12
23
1
7
20
5
20
2
2
29
3
20
2
28
21
7
6
31
14
14
11
15,091
6
118
6
6
17
13
21
2
10
1
18
3
* This sample corresponds to a non-profit organization.
Source of drawback claimants sample: Internal CBP database; gathered through email correspondence with CBP’s Office of Trade on March
2, 2017.
Source of small entity employment information: Hoover’s. Online company reports. Available at https://www.hoovers.com/. Accessed April 20,
2017 and April 24, 2017; Manta. Online company reports. Available at https://www.manta.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017.
Source of industry employment information: U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment Industry, ‘‘Number of
Firms, Number of Establishments, Employment, Annual Payroll, and Estimated Receipts by Enterprise Employment Size for the United States,
All Industries: 2012.’’ June 22, 2015. Available at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/econ/susb/2012-susb-annual.html. Accessed May 30,
2018.
TABLE 3—REVENUE STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE AND INDUSTRY
AVERAGES
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
NAICS code
311211
311421
312140
315220
315240
321911
325180
325194
325998
326199
331410
331491
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Number of
small
entities in
sample
NAICS description
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
Flour Milling ....................................................................................................
Fruit and Vegetable Canning ..........................................................................
Distilleries ........................................................................................................
Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing .................................
Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing ..............
Wood Window and Door Manufacturing ........................................................
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing .............................................
Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing ..
All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing
All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing .......................................................
Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) Smelting and Refining ........................
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing, and
Extruding.
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Average annual
revenue of
small
entities in
sample-low
range value
(in millions)
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
02AUP2
$5.0
178.1
Unknown
6.4
1.1
48.0
90.7
391.0
5.0
0.3
228.9
17.2
Average annual
revenue of all
U.S.
entities in industry
(in millions)
$93.7
41.7
39.6
3.8
2.8
9.2
94.2
161.8
22.2
14.7
93.2
30.9
37914
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3—REVENUE STATISTICS OF SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM SAMPLE AND INDUSTRY
AVERAGES—Continued
NAICS code
332999
334310
335221
336612
339112
339992
339999
423210
423220
423510
423620
Number of
small
entities in
sample
NAICS description
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
423910 ............
423920 ............
423940 ............
423990
424310
424340
424490
424610
424720
............
............
............
............
............
............
424910
424990
441120
448120
448190
451110
451130
452112
453998
493110
525990
541990
561499
561990
624110
711510
811310
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
811490 ............
Average annual
revenue of
small
entities in
sample-low
range value
(in millions)
All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing ................
Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing ...................................................
Household Cooking Appliance Manufacturing ...............................................
Boat Building ...................................................................................................
Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing ............................................
Musical Instrument Manufacturing ..................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing ..........................................................
Furniture Merchant Wholesalers ....................................................................
Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers .......................................................
Metal Service Centers and Other Metal Merchant Wholesalers ....................
Household Appliances, Electric Housewares, and Consumer Electronics
Merchant Wholesalers.
Sporting and Recreational Goods and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers .......
Toy and Hobby Goods and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers ........................
Jewelry, Watch, Precious Stone, and Precious Metal Merchant Wholesalers.
Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers ........................
Piece Goods, Notions, and Other Dry Goods Merchant Wholesalers ...........
Footwear Merchant Wholesalers ....................................................................
Other Grocery and Related Products Merchant Wholesalers ........................
Plastics Materials and Basic Forms and Shapes Merchant Wholesalers .....
Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers (except Bulk
Stations and Terminals).
Farm Supplies Merchant Wholesalers ...........................................................
Other Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods Merchant Wholesalers ..................
Used Car Dealers ...........................................................................................
Women’s Clothing Stores ...............................................................................
Other Clothing Stores .....................................................................................
Sporting Goods Stores ...................................................................................
Sewing, Needlework, and Piece Goods Stores .............................................
Discount Department Stores ..........................................................................
All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores) ................
General Warehousing and Storage ................................................................
Other Financial Vehicles .................................................................................
All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services ............................
All Other Business Support Services .............................................................
All Other Support Services .............................................................................
Child and Youth Services * .............................................................................
Independent Artists, Writers, and Performers ................................................
Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive
and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance.
Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance .................
Average annual
revenue of all
U.S.
entities in industry
(in millions)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
13.5
29.0
9.4
5.1
17.0
115.1
4.3
1.6
4.2
0.8
23.0
4.2
6.1
47.2
8.4
35.3
3.2
2.4
7.4
8.1
27.8
40.2
3
1
3
3.2
2.9
1.2
7.3
11.0
8.3
1
2
2
1
2
1
50.0
1.4
8.0
14.6
7.5
11.4
5.1
5.0
20.3
28.4
17.2
289.0
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
49.2
0.1
0.1
1.9
7.3
0.6
0.6
2.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.2
2.0
0.2
5.3
0.3
7.4
29.2
4.1
3.0
3.5
1.8
2.5
1.1
2,899.3
1.2
6.0
2.8
1.0
2.8
1.9
1.5
0.7
1.7
1
2.0
0.3
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* This sample corresponds to a non-profit organization.
Source of drawback claimants sample: Internal CBP database; gathered through email correspondence with CBP’s Office of Trade on March
2, 2017.
Source of small entity revenue information: Hoover’s. Online company reports. Available at https://www.hoovers.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017
and April 24, 2017; Manta. Online company reports. Available at https://www.manta.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017.
Source of industry revenue information: U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment Industry, ‘‘Number of Firms,
Number of Establishments, Employment, Annual Payroll, and Estimated Receipts by Enterprise Employment Size for the United States, All Industries: 2012.’’ June 22, 2015. Available at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/econ/susb/2012-susb-annual.html. Accessed May 30, 2018.
Based on the share of drawback
claimants sampled, CBP assumes that 69
percent of drawback claimants affected
by this rule over the 2018 to 2027 period
of analysis, or 6,844 claimants, would
be small entities. These drawback
claimants would incur costs related to
ACE system modifications, electronic
claim submission requirements,
additional full desk reviews, and
expanded recordkeeping requirements;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
however, these costs would differ
depending on their filing preferences
and claim review.
Each unique drawback claimant
would need to either modify its existing
drawback system, acquire add-on
drawback software, or hire a customs
broker to comply with this rule’s new
drawback regulations outlined in 19
CFR part 190. CBP estimates that
approximately 200 small entity
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
drawback claimants (69 percent of the
estimated 290 total claimants) would
modify their ACE filing systems in 2018
to comply with all of the new drawback
regulations outlined in 19 CFR part
190.32 These claimants could incur an
32 CBP based the estimate of drawback claimants
required to modify their ACE drawback systems
consistent with this rule’s changes on the projected
number of unique drawback claimants with this
rule in 2018 (9,919) minus the 4,129 trade members
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37915
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
estimated one-time cost of $90,000 that
would translate to $9,000 per year of the
analysis.33 However, because of the high
cost of ACE system modifications, these
small claimants are more likely to
choose a lower-cost option like
purchasing add-on drawback software
or hiring a customs broker to meet this
rule’s requirements while lessening its
impact on their revenue. CBP projects
that an additional 3,795 small drawback
claimants (69 percent of the estimated
5,500 total claimants) would acquire
add-on drawback software consistent
with all of this rule’s requirements for
a one-time cost of $1,500, or $150 over
the 10-year period of analysis. CBP
presumes that rather than acquire and
learn the software necessary to file a
drawback claim electronically and meet
the other submission requirements of
this rule, an estimated 2,849 small
paper-based drawback claimants (69
percent of the estimated 4,129 total
claimants) would hire a customs broker
to file their claim as a result of the rule.
These claimants would likely file an
average of three drawback claims per
year, at an annual cost of $921
according to the $307 customs broker
filing fee.34
All drawback claimants must also
retain drawback records for an extended
period of time with this rule. CBP finds
that all 6,844 small drawback claimants
would sustain $59.99 in expenses
between 2021 and 2027, or
approximately $4 each year over the 10year period of analysis, to electronically
store drawback claim documentation.35
In addition to these requirements, some
drawback claimants may be subject to
this rule’s additional full desk reviews.
CBP estimates that this rule would affect
an estimated 355 small drawback
claimants (69 percent of the estimated
515 total claimants) over the 10-year
period of analysis, introducing an
average cost of $18 per year to these
claimants. CBP assumes that these 355
claimants would each complete one full
desk review over the 10-year period, at
a cost of $181 per review (or $18 over
10 years). Besides these monetized
costs, this rule would introduce nonmonetized, non-quantified costs to trade
members, including the possibility of
decreased use of the United States as a
home base for a distribution facility
when coupled with other
considerations, less third-party
drawback, and less time to file
drawback claims as compared to the
current process.
Table 4 outlines the rule’s different
costs to small entities, while Table 5
shows this rule’s potential range of costs
to small entities. As shown, small
entities could incur undiscounted
annual costs from this rule as low as
$154 if a small claimant only incurs an
added recordkeeping cost and add-on
drawback software cost and up to
$9,022 if a small claimant experiences
the rule’s high ACE drawback system
modification cost, full desk review cost
(once over the 10-year analysis), and
added recordkeeping cost. About 97
percent of small drawback claimants
would likely sustain a cost of $943 (Cost
C + Cost D + Cost E in Table 5) or less
per year from this rule, while the
remaining 3 percent could incur higher
annual cost measuring up to $9,022.
TABLE 4—COST OF RULE TO SMALL ENTITIES
[Undiscounted 2016 U.S. dollars]
Number
of small
entities
affected
Cost category
A
B
C
D
E
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
ACE Drawback System Modification ............................................................................
Add-On Drawback Software .........................................................................................
Customs Broker Claim Filing ........................................................................................
Added Recordkeeping ...................................................................................................
Full Desk Review ..........................................................................................................
Share of small
entities
affected
200
3,795
2,849
6,844
355
Annual cost
per claimant
(undiscounted)
3
55
42
100
5
9,000
150
921
4
18
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
TABLE 5—RANGE OF ANNUAL COSTS OF RULE TO SMALL ENTITIES
[Undiscounted 2016 U.S. dollars]
Cost per claimant by category
ACE drawback
system modification
[A]
Add-on
drawback
software
[B]
Customs
broker claim
filing
[C]
Low ...........................................................
Medium ....................................................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Cost range
........................
........................
$150
........................
........................
921
estimated to file by paper under the current 19 CFR
part 191 regulations in 2018 (and thus exempt from
an ACE drawback system modification cost),
multiplied by the 5 percent share of claimants
anticipated to modify their ACE drawback systems
consistent with this rule’s changes: (9,919 unique
drawback claimants in 2018—4,129 paper-based
filers in 2018) x 5 percent anticipated to modify
their ACE drawback systems = 290 (rounded) trade
members.
33 Such regulatory changes would include
providing line-item drawback claim data at the 10digit HTSUS subheading level; consistent units of
measurement for claimed imports, exports, and
destructions; exported, destroyed, or substituted
merchandise values for substitution claims filed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2);
accounting methodologies used for direct
identification drawback claims (if applicable);
unique identifiers linking imports to exports or
destructions on each drawback claim; per-unit
averages for substitution claims; and ‘‘lesser of’’
rule calculations for substitution claims.
34 From 2018 to 2027, CBP projects under its
primary estimation method that 4,129 unique trade
members would file 101,642 drawback claims
electronically instead of by paper as a result of this
rule, averaging about 3 claims per unique trade
member each year over the 10-year period: 101,642
drawback claims filed electronically instead of by
paper over 10-year period/4,129 unique trade
members = 25 (rounded) claims per unique trade
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Added
recordkeeping
[D]
$4
4
Full desk
review
[E]
........................
18
Total
$154
943
member over the 10-year period; 25 claims over 10year period/10 years = 3 (rounded) claims per
unique trade member each year.
35 $59.99 electronic recordkeeping cost per year ×
7-year period of recordkeeping = $419 (rounded)
total electronic recordkeeping cost over 7-year
period; $419 storage cost over 7-year period of
recordkeeping/10-year period of analysis = $42
(rounded) electronic recordkeeping cost per year of
the 10-year period of analysis; $42 (rounded)
storage cost per year × 10 percent of unique
claimants incurring electronic recordkeeping cost
per year = $4 (rounded) electronic recordkeeping
cost per unique trade member each year.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37916
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5—RANGE OF ANNUAL COSTS OF RULE TO SMALL ENTITIES—Continued
[Undiscounted 2016 U.S. dollars]
Cost per claimant by category
ACE drawback
system modification
[A]
Cost range
High ..........................................................
9,000
Add-on
drawback
software
[B]
Customs
broker claim
filing
[C]
........................
........................
Added
recordkeeping
[D]
4
Full desk
review
[E]
Total
18
9,022
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
CBP compares the rule’s low ($154),
medium ($943), and high ($9,022) range
of monetized costs per year to the
annual revenue of the small drawback
claimants sampled. At the low range,
this rule’s $154 monetized cost would
represent less than 1 percent of annual
revenue for 100 percent (68) of the small
entities sampled with revenue data
available,36 as shown in Table 6. At the
medium range, this rule’s $943
monetized cost would represent less
than 1 percent of annual revenue for 97
percent (66) of the small entities
sampled with revenue data available.
This rule’s $943 monetized cost would
represent between 1 percent and 3
percent of annual revenue for the
remaining 3 percent (2) of the small
entities, as Table 7 illustrates. Finally, at
the high range, this rule’s $9,022
monetized cost would represent less
than 1 percent of the annual revenue for
66 percent (45) of the small entities
sampled with revenue data available
(see Table 8). The share of this rule’s
$9,022 monetized cost on annual
revenue would measure between: 1
percent and 3 percent for about 16
percent (11) of the remaining small
entities, 3 percent and 5 percent for 4
percent (3) of the small entities
sampled, 5 percent and 10 percent for
10 percent (7) percent of small entities
sampled, and 10 percent or more for 3
percent (2) of the small entities sampled
(see Table 8). Note that because of the
high cost of ACE system modifications
included in the high range cost estimate,
only a nominal number of small
claimants would likely incur this rule’s
high annual cost of $9,022. Instead,
most claimants would probably choose
lower-cost options like purchasing addon drawback software or hiring a
customs broker to meet this rule’s
requirements that would have minimal
impacts on their annual revenue, as
assumed under the low- and mediumcost scenarios shown in Table 6 and
Table 7.
Under all three ranges, the share of
this rule’s costs on the annual revenue
of small entities is less than 1 percent
for the vast majority of entities sampled.
Small entities would experience an
impact of 3 percent or more only under
the high cost range of $9,022. Assuming
that the share of this rule’s total
annualized cost to small entities is equal
to the estimated share of drawback
claimants affected by this rule over the
2018 to 2027 period of analysis (69
percent), the total annualized cost of
this rule to all small entities would
equal $5.0 million under the primary
estimation method.
TABLE 6—COST IMPACTS AS A SHARE OF REVENUE FOR SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM
SAMPLE—ASSUMING ANNUAL COST OF $154 PER UNIQUE DRAWBACK CLAIMANT
Number of
small entities
affected
Cost as a share of revenue range
Percent of
small entities
affected
0% ≤ Impact < 1% ...................................................................................................................................................
1% ≤ Impact < 3% ...................................................................................................................................................
3% ≤ Impact < 5% ...................................................................................................................................................
5% ≤ Impact < 10% .................................................................................................................................................
10% or More ............................................................................................................................................................
68
0
0
0
0
100%
0
0
0
0
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
68
100
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
TABLE 7—COST IMPACTS AS A SHARE OF REVENUE FOR SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM
SAMPLE- ASSUMING ANNUALIZED COST OF $943 PER UNIQUE DRAWBACK CLAIMANT
Number of
small entities
affected
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Cost as a share of revenue range
0% ≤ Impact < 1% ...................................................................................................................................................
1% ≤ Impact < 3% ...................................................................................................................................................
3% ≤ Impact < 5% ...................................................................................................................................................
5% ≤ Impact < 10% .................................................................................................................................................
10% or More ............................................................................................................................................................
36 One of the small entities sampled did not have
revenue data available, so CBP excluded this entity
from the revenue impact calculation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
66
2
0
0
0
Percent of
small entities
affected
97%
3
0
0
0
37917
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 7—COST IMPACTS AS A SHARE OF REVENUE FOR SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM
SAMPLE- ASSUMING ANNUALIZED COST OF $943 PER UNIQUE DRAWBACK CLAIMANT—Continued
Number of
small entities
affected
Cost as a share of revenue range
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
Percent of
small entities
affected
68
100
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
TABLE 8—COST IMPACTS AS A SHARE OF REVENUE FOR SMALL ENTITIES AFFECTED BY RULE FROM THE RANDOM
SAMPLE- ASSUMING ANNUALIZED COST OF $9,022 PER UNIQUE DRAWBACK CLAIMANT
Number of
small entities
affected
Cost as a share of revenue range
Percent of
small entities
affected
0% ≤ Impact < 1% ...................................................................................................................................................
1% ≤ Impact < 3% ...................................................................................................................................................
3% ≤ Impact < 5% ...................................................................................................................................................
5% ≤ Impact < 10% .................................................................................................................................................
10% or More ............................................................................................................................................................
45
11
3
7
2
66
16
4
10
3
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
68
100
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
This rule would also result in benefits
as well as net monetary transfers to
drawback claimants. This rule would
provide time and resource savings from
forgone paper-based drawback claims,
form submissions, and ruling and
predetermination requests that offset
some of the rule’s costs to small entities.
CBP estimates that 2,849 small paperbased drawback claimants (69 percent of
the estimated 4,129 total claimants)
would enjoy $8 in cost savings for each
paper claim avoided. These claimants
would likely file an average of three
drawback claims per year, at an annual
cost saving of $24.37 CBP finds that all
6,844 small drawback claimants would
save $17 in printing and mailing costs
related to forgone CBP Form 7552
submissions beginning in 2019. Before
2019, the estimated 2,849 small paperbased claimants would not gain this
benefit because they would still submit
paper CBP Form 7552s. Based on the
total number of CBP Form 7552s
avoided over the period of analysis and
the total number of unique drawback
claimants, CBP estimates that each
claimant would forgo about four CBP
Form 7552 submissions each year of the
37 From 2018 to 2027, CBP projects under its
primary estimation method that 4,129 unique trade
members would file 101,642 drawback claims
electronically instead of by paper as a result of this
rule, averaging about 3 claims per unique trade
member each year over the 10-year period: 101,642
drawback claims filed electronically instead of by
paper over 10-year period/4,129 unique trade
members = 25 (rounded) claims per unique trade
member over the 10-year period; 25 claims over 10year period/10 years = 3 (rounded) claims per
unique trade member each year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
analysis, saving a total of $68 per year.38
Lastly, only a small number of claimants
would sustain benefits from forgone
ruling and predetermination requests.
CBP estimates that 645 requests would
be avoided during the period of analysis
due to the rule and assumes that each
forgone request corresponds to a unique
drawback claimant. By applying the
previously discussed assumption that
69 percent of drawback claimants
affected by this rule over the 2018 to
2027 period of analysis are small
entities, CBP finds that 445 small
drawback claimants would each save
$189 in costs related to ruling and
predeterminations requests. This would
translate to about $19 per year over the
10-year period of analysis.
This rule’s share of net monetary
transfers to small entities is unknown.
This rule would introduce $35.3 million
to $42.4 million in annualized net
transfers from the U.S. Government to
drawback claimants (using a 7 percent
discount rate). These transfers would
average between $3,600 and $4,300 per
claimant based on the projected 9,919
unique drawback claimants affected by
this rule. Some small entities may
receive more or less than this average,
and potentially even negative net
38 From 2018 to 2027, CBP projects under its
primary estimation method that 9,919 unique trade
members would forgo 392,000 CBP Form 7552
submissions as a result of this rule, averaging about
4 forms per unique trade member each year over the
10-year period: 392,000 CBP Form 7552
submissions forgone over 10-year period/9,919
unique trade members = 40 (rounded) forms per
unique trade member over the 10-year period; 40
claims over 10-year period/10 years = 4 (rounded)
forms per unique trade member each year.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
transfers if they make net payments to
the U.S. Government.
According to the results from this
screening analysis, CBP believes that a
substantial number of trade members
who could be considered ‘‘small’’ may
be affected by this proposed rule.39 CBP
cannot determine whether the economic
impact on these entities may be
considered significant under the RFA.
For these reasons, CBP cannot currently
certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
CBP has prepared the following IRFA
assessing the rule’s potential effect on
small entities. CBP welcomes public
comments on the data and findings
included in this RFA analysis.
Comments that will provide the most
assistance to CBP will reference a
specific portion of the RFA analysis,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that supports a
recommended change.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This IRFA includes the following:
1. A description of the reasons why
the action by the agency is being
considered;
2. A succinct statement of the
objectives of, and legal basis for, the
proposed rule;
39 SBA publishes small business size standards
for a variety of, though not all, economic activities
and industries. SBA does not explicitly define size
standards for the importers, exporters,
manufacturers, producers, and intermediate parties
potentially affected by this rule. See 13 CFR
121.101–13 CFR 121.201 for information on SBA’s
size standards.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37918
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
3. A description—and, where feasible,
an estimate of the number—of small
entities to which the proposed rule
would apply;
4. A description of the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the
proposed rule, including an estimate of
the classes of small entities that would
be subject to the requirement and the
types of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record;
5. An identification, to the extent
practicable, of all relevant federal rules
that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with the proposed rule; and
6. A description of any significant
alternatives to the proposed rule which
accomplish the stated objectives of
applicable statutes and which minimize
any significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.
1. A description of the reasons why
the action by the agency is being
considered.
Section 906 of the Trade Facilitation
and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015
(P.L. 114–125) (TFTEA), signed into law
on February 24, 2016, seeks to simplify
and modernize the current drawback
procedures through amendments to 19
U.S.C. 1313, the statute guiding CBP
drawback regulations. Section 906(q) of
TFTEA requires CBP to promulgate
regulations implementing these changes
and allows for a one-year transition
period (February 24, 2018–February 23,
2019) in which trade members can
follow either the old drawback statute
and corresponding regulations as
written prior to TFTEA or the amended
statute.
To fulfill TFTEA’s requirements, CBP,
through this rulemaking, proposes to
add an entirely new part of drawback
regulations in proposed 19 CFR part 190
that would replace the current drawback
regulations contained in 19 CFR part
191. Proposed 19 CFR part 190 would
directly reflect the following major
amendments made by TFTEA, as well as
another amendment required to protect
U.S. Government revenue: (1) Require
the electronic filing of drawback claims;
(2) liberalize the standard for
substituting merchandise for drawback;
(3) generally require per-unit averaging
calculation for substitution drawback;
(4) generally require substitution
drawback claims to be calculated on a
‘‘lesser of’’ basis; (5) expand the scope
of drawback refunds; (6) establish joint
and several liability for drawback
claims; (7) modify the rulings process;
(8) standardize the timeframe for
eligibility to claim drawback; (9) modify
recordkeeping requirements; and (10)
eliminate ‘‘double drawback’’ of excise
taxes. The proposed rule would also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
make minor amendments to the
drawback regulations in accordance
with TFTEA.
2. A succinct statement of the
objectives of, and legal basis for, the
proposed rule.
TFTEA requires CBP to prescribe
drawback regulations in accordance
with the new statute and allows for a
one-year transition period in which
trade members can follow either the old
drawback statute and corresponding
regulations as written prior to TFTEA or
the amended statute until February 23,
2019. CBP proposes to implement new
drawback regulations consistent with
TFTEA in 2018. These new regulations
aim to modernize the current drawback
process.
3. A description—and, where feasible,
an estimate of the number—of small
entities to which the proposed rule
would apply.
As discussed in the screening analysis
above, the proposed Modernized
Drawback rule would fundamentally
change the drawback process and
consequently affect all trade members
eligible for drawback (i.e., drawback
claimants). These trade members can
include importers, exporters,
manufacturers, producers, and
intermediate parties representing a
diverse array of industries. CBP
estimates that 69 percent of drawback
claimants affected by this rule over the
2018 to 2027 period of analysis, or 6,844
claimants, would be small entities.
4. A description of the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the
proposed rule, including an estimate of
the classes of small entities that would
be subject to the requirement and the
types of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record.
This rule proposes several new
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements for all
drawback claimants, including those
considered small. Among these changes,
CBP proposes to require drawback
claimants filing under the new
drawback regulations outlined in 19
CFR part 190 to:
• Submit new data elements with
their claims, including Form 7551:
Drawback Entry summary data at the
line, rather than header, level; claimed
merchandise data at the 10-digit HTSUS
subheading level; line designations; and
consistent units of measurement for
claimed import, export, or destruction
data beginning in 2018.
• File their complete drawback
claims electronically using ACE and
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
DIS, thus not allowing for manual,
paper-based claims.40
• Submit additional data, including
exported, destroyed, or substituted
merchandise values for substitution
claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) and
19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2); accounting
methodologies used for direct
identification drawback claims (if
applicable); unique identifiers linking
imports to exports or destructions; perunit averages for substitution claims;
and ‘‘lesser of’’ rule calculations for
substitution claims.
Along with these reporting
requirements, CBP would change the
recordkeeping standards for all
drawback claimants filing under the
new regulations in 19 CFR part 190.
Consistent with TFTEA, this rule would
change the drawback recordkeeping
timeframe for all drawback claimants
from three years from CBP’s date of
payment of the drawback claim to three
years from the liquidation of the claim.
CBP estimates that drawback claimants
would generally have to retain records
for one extra year with this rule’s new
recordkeeping requirement than under
the current three-year recordkeeping
period, though some trade members
may need to retain records for up to four
more years under this rule.41
This rule would also require parties
that split entry summary line items
when transferring merchandise
(transferors) to provide notification to
the recipients (transferees) as to whether
that merchandise is eligible for
substitution or direct identification
drawback. Notification of this
designation from the transferor to the
transferee must be documented in
records, which may include records
kept in the normal course of business.
Furthermore, this rule would require
all drawback claimants filing
manufacturing drawback claims under
the new regulations in 19 CFR part 190
(which would account for about 20
percent of all claims filed with this rule)
to maintain applicable BOMs and/or
formula records 42 identifying the
imported and/or substituted
merchandise and the exported or
destroyed article(s) in their normal
course of business. When filing a
manufacturing drawback claim, trade
members must also certify that they
have these BOMs and/or formula
40 Some drawback documentation constituting a
complete drawback claim, such as privilege and
ruling applications, would remain paper-based.
41 Based on input from CBP and trade community
representative. Sources: Email correspondence with
CBP’s Office of Field Operations on April 5, 2017
and email correspondence with trade community
representative on February 22, 2017.
42 See 19 CFR 190.2.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
records by checking a box on their
electronic drawback claim, and provide
the documentation to CBP upon request.
5. An identification, to the extent
practicable, of all relevant federal rules
that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with the proposed rule.
CBP does not believe that any federal
rule duplicates, overlaps, or conflicts
with the proposed rule.
6. A description of any significant
alternatives to the proposed rule which
accomplish the stated objectives of
applicable statutes and which minimize
any significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.
CBP considered two other alternatives
in addition to the proposed rule.
a. Alternative 1
The first regulatory alternative CBP
considered would implement all of the
proposed rule’s changes in 2018 rather
than in 2019, offering no transition
period. With this alternative, paperbased filers must begin filing their
drawback claims electronically in 2018,
but they would receive the benefits of
drawback modernization in 2018 and
beyond. With this alternative, paperbased filers, including those considered
small, would begin to incur electronic
filing costs in 2018 rather than 2019 like
under the rule. This alternative would
also lead to relatively more full desk
reviews for claimants, including those
considering small, than under the rule.
Drawback claimants, including those
considered small, would sustain an
annualized cost of $8.0 million from
this alternative under the primary
estimation method, which is slightly
higher than the proposed rule’s $7.6
million annualized cost to trade
members (using a 7 percent discount
rate). On a per-claimant basis,
Alternative 1 would cost $810 annually
over the period of analysis compared to
the rule’s nearly $770 cost per unique
claimant.43 Alternative 1 would also
result in an annualized net transfer
measuring between $42.8 million and
$49.9 million from the U.S. Government
to drawback claimants, which would
average from $4,300 to $5,000 per
unique claimant based on the 9,919
unique drawback claimants projected
under this alternative (using a 7 percent
discount rate). Like the proposed rule,
Alternative 1 would introduce benefits
to drawback claimants. These benefits to
claimants, including those considered
small, would be greater than the rule’s
cost savings due to the relatively higher
number of CBP Form 7552s (and
43 $8,000,000/9,919 unique drawback claimants =
$810 (rounded); $7,600,000/9,919 unique drawback
claimants = $770 (rounded).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
corresponding time, printing, and
mailing costs) avoided. CBP did not
choose Alternative 1 because TFTEA
statutorily allows a one-year transition
period (February 24, 2018–February 23,
2019) in which drawback claimants can
follow either the old drawback statute
and corresponding regulations in 19
CFR part 191 as written prior to TFTEA
or the amended statute.44
b. Alternative 2
The second regulatory alternative CBP
considered would implement all of the
proposed rule’s changes, except it
would not change the current regulatory
standard for substituting merchandise
for drawback (i.e., no implementation of
Major Amendment 2). Under this
alternative, CBP estimates that the
number of substitution drawback claim
submissions and the number of
drawback claimants would be lower
than under the proposed rule over the
period of analysis because this
alternative would offer relatively fewer
new opportunities to claim drawback. In
fact, drawback claims would measure
about 548,000 from 2018 to 2027 under
Alternative 2’s primary estimation
method and the number of unique
drawback claimants would equal
approximately 9,017. Because of its
narrower scope, Alternative 2 would
introduce slightly lower costs to
drawback claimants, including those
considered small, than the proposed
rule’s cost. In particular, claimants
would incur relatively fewer full desk
reviews and associated costs with this
alternative. Drawback claimants,
including those considered small,
would incur an annualized cost of $7.6
million from this alternative under the
primary estimation method, compared
to the proposed rule’s annualized cost of
$7.6 million (using a 7 percent discount
rate). On a per-claimant basis,
Alternative 2 would cost nearly $840
annually over the period of analysis,
while the proposed rule would
introduce an average cost of almost $770
cost per unique claimant.45 Alternative
2 would also result in annualized net
transfers between $56.3 million and
$63.4 million from drawback claimants
to the U.S. Government, which would
average $6,200 to $7,000 per unique
claimant based on the 9,017 unique
drawback claimants projected under
this alternative (using a 7 percent
discount rate). Like the proposed rule,
Alternative 2 would introduce benefits
44 See Section 906 of the Trade Facilitation and
Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114–125).
45 $7,600,000/9,017 unique drawback claimants =
$840 (rounded); $7,600,000/9,919 unique drawback
claimants = $770 (rounded).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37919
to drawback claimants. These benefits
would be slightly lower than the rule’s
benefits because drawback claimants
would continue to submit ruling and
predeterminations requests for
substitution drawback claims with this
alternative. CBP did not choose this
Alternative 2 because TFTEA statutorily
requires CBP to liberalize the standard
for substituting merchandise for
drawback by generally basing it on
goods classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS (or Schedule B) subheading.46
Conclusion
In conclusion, because the proposed
Modernized Drawback rule would
presumably affect all drawback
claimants, it would likely impact a
substantial number of small entities in
each industry submitting such claims.
CBP cannot certify whether the rule’s
(negative) impact on these small entities
would be significant. CBP welcomes
public comments on the data and
findings included in this RFA analysis.
Comments that will provide the most
assistance to CBP will reference a
specific portion of the RFA analysis,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that supports a
recommended change. If CBP does not
receive comments contradicting the
RFA analysis findings, CBP may certify
that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities at
the final rule stage.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507),
an agency may not conduct, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
valid control number assigned by OMB.
The collections of information for this
notice of proposed rulemaking are
included in an existing collection for
CBP Forms 7551, 7552, and 7553 (OMB
control number 1651–0075).
This rule proposes, among other
things, to eliminate the submission
requirement for CBP Form 7552 for
drawback claimants who file
electronically under the new, proposed
drawback regulations in 19 CFR part
190. Drawback claimants filing by paper
under the current drawback regulations
in 19 CFR part 191 would still be
required to submit the paper CBP Form
7552 until this rule’s requirements
become mandatory in 2019. Based on
this change, CBP estimates a decrease in
46 See Section 906 of the Trade Facilitation and
Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114–125).
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37920
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
CBP Form 7552 responses and burden
hours. Additionally, CBP Form 7551 has
a decrease in burden hours based on
changes in the agency estimate. CBP
will submit to OMB for review the
following adjustments to the previously
approved Information Collection under
OMB control number 1651–0075 to
account for the changes proposed in this
rule. Furthermore, CBP expects to
submit a request to eliminate CBP Form
7552 to OMB in 2019 prior to this rule’s
mandatory requirement date.
CBP Form 7551, Drawback Entry
(reduction in burden hours due to
change in agency estimate)
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,516
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 22.2
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 55,772
Estimated Time per Response: 35
minutes
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 32,532
CBP Form 7552, Delivery Certificate for
Drawback (reduction in burden
hours due to regulation)
Estimated Number of Respondents:
400
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 20
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 8,000
Estimated Time per Response: 33
minutes
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 4,400
CBP Form 7553, Notice of Intent to
Export, Destroy or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback (no change)
Estimated Number of Respondents:
150
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 20
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 3,000
Estimated Time per Response: 33
minutes
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,650
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
V. Proposed Effective/Applicability
Dates
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
This proposed regulation is being
issued in accordance with 19 CFR
0.1(a)(1) pertaining to the authority of
the Secretary of the Treasury (or that of
his or her delegate) to approve
regulations pertaining to certain
customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 113
Bonds, Copyrights, Counterfeit goods,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Restricted merchandise,
Seizures and forfeitures.
19 CFR Part 181
Administrative practice and
procedure, Canada, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Mexico, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
19 CFR Part 190
Alcohol and alcoholic beverages,
Claims, Customs duties and inspection,
Exports, Foreign trade zones,
Guantanamo Bay Naval Station, Cuba,
Packaging and containers, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
19 CFR Part 191
Alcohol and alcoholic beverages,
Claims, Customs duties and inspection,
Exports, Foreign trade zones,
Guantanamo Bay Naval Station, Cuba,
Packaging and containers, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
For the reasons given above, it is
proposed to amend 19 CFR chapter I as
set forth below:
1. The general authority citations for
part 113 continue and the specific
authority for § 113.62 is added in
numerical order to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624.
*
*
*
*
Section 113.62 is also issued under 19
U.S.C. 1313(k).
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00036
*
Fmt 4701
§ 113.62 Basic importation and entry bond
conditions.
*
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) If a person who is not the principal
makes a drawback claim with respect to
merchandise imported by the principal
(see part 190 of this chapter), the
principal and surety (jointly and
severally) agree to pay, as demanded by
CBP, any erroneous drawback payment
in an amount not to exceed the lesser of:
(i) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that the person claimed with
respect to the imported merchandise; or
(ii) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that the importer authorized the
other person to claim with respect to the
imported merchandise.
(iii) The amount of the erroneous
drawback payment.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Agreement to comply with CBP
regulations applicable to substitution
drawback claims. In the case of
imported merchandise that is subject to
internal revenue tax imposed under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), the principal agrees not
to file, or to transfer to a successor the
right to file, a substitution drawback
claim involving such tax if the
substituted merchandise has been, or
will be, the subject of a removal from
bonded premises without payment of
tax, or the subject of a claim for refund
or drawback of tax, under any provision
of the IRC.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 181—NORTH AMERICAN FREE
TRADE AGREEMENT
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
*
2. In § 113.62, redesignate paragraphs
(m) and (n) as paragraphs (o) and (p) and
add paragraphs (a)(4) and (m) to read as
follows:
■
*
VI. Signing Authority
PART 113—CUSTOMS BONDS
To allow stakeholders immediate
benefit from these proposed regulations
(see 5 U.S.C. 553(d) and 808), they are
proposed to be effective upon
publication of a rule adopting them as
final, except that the regulations
proposed in §§ 190.22(a)(1)(C),
190.32(b)(3), 191.22(a), 191.32(b)(4), and
191.171(d) regarding the drawback of
excise taxes are proposed to become
VerDate Sep<11>2014
applicable for drawback claims filed on
or after 60 days from the date of
publication of the final rule.
CBP and Treasury invite interested
members of the public to comment on
these proposed effective and
applicability dates.
3. The general authority citations for
part 181 continue to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1624, 3314;
*
*
*
*
*
§ § 181.45, 181.46, 181.47, 181.49, and 181.50
[Amended]
4. In the table below, for each section
indicated in the left column, remove the
words indicated in the middle column,
and add, in their place, the words
indicated in the right column.
■
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
37921
Section
Remove
Add
181.45(b)(2)(i)(B) .................
181.45(c) ..............................
§ 191.14 of this chapter, as provided therein .................
Such a good must be returned to Customs custody for
exportation under Customs supervision within three
years after the release from Customs custody.
181.46(b) ..............................
(see § 191.141(b)(3) (ii) and (iii) of this chapter) ............
181.47(a) ..............................
181.49 ..................................
part 191 of this chapter; ..................................................
(see § 191.15 (see also §§ 191.26(f), 191.38,
191.175(c)) of this chapter).
181.50(a) ..............................
subpart G of part 190 of this chapter .............................
181.50(c) ..............................
§ 191.92 of this chapter ...................................................
§§ 190.14 or 191.14 of this chapter, as appropriate.
Such a good must be exported or destroyed within the
statutory 5-year time period and in compliance with
the requirements set forth in subpart D of part 190 of
this chapter or within the 3-year time period and in
compliance with the requirements set forth in subpart
D of part 191 of this chapter, as applicable.
(see §§ 190.35 or 191.35 of this chapter, as appropriate).
part 190 or 191 of this chapter, as appropriate
(see § 190.15 (see also §§ 190.26(f), 190.38,
190.175(c)) or § 191.15 (see also §§ 191.26(f),
191.38, 191.175(c)) of this chapter, as appropriate)
subpart H of part 190 or subpart H of part 191 of this
chapter, as appropriate
§§ 190.92 or 191.92 of this chapter, as appropriate.
■
5. Add part 190 to read as follows:
PART 190—MODERNIZED DRAWBACK
Sec.
190.0 Scope.
190.0a Claims filed under NAFTA.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart A—General Provisions
190.1 Authority of the Commissioner of
CBP.
190.2 Definitions.
190.3 Duties, taxes, and fees subject or not
subject to drawback.
190.4 Merchandise in which a U.S.
Government interest exists.
190.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular
possessions, trust territories.
190.6 Authority to sign drawback
documents.
190.7 General manufacturing drawback
ruling.
190.8 Specific manufacturing drawback
ruling.
190.9 Agency.
190.10 Transfer of merchandise.
190.11 Valuation of merchandise.
190.12 Claim filed under incorrect
provision.
190.13 Packaging materials.
190.14 Identification of merchandise or
articles by accounting method.
190.15 Recordkeeping.
Subpart B—Manufacturing Drawback
190.21 Direct identification drawback.
190.22 Substitution drawback.
190.23 Methods and requirements for
claiming drawback.
190.24 Transfer of merchandise.
190.25 Destruction under CBP supervision.
190.26 Recordkeeping for manufacturing
drawback.
190.27 Time limitations.
190.28 Person entitled to claim
manufacturing drawback.
Subpart C—Unused Merchandise Drawback
190.31 Direct identification drawback.
190.32 Substitution unused merchandise
drawback.
190.33 Person entitled to claim unused
merchandise drawback.
190.34 Transfer of merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
190.35 Notice of intent to export;
examination of merchandise.
190.36 Failure to file Notice of Intent to
Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise
for Purposes of Drawback.
190.37 Destruction under CBP supervision.
190.38 Recordkeeping for unused
merchandise drawback.
Subpart D—Rejected Merchandise
190.41 Rejected merchandise drawback.
190.42 Procedures and supporting
documentation.
190.43 Unused merchandise claim.
190.44 [Reserved]
190.45 Returned retail merchandise.
Subpart E—Completion of Drawback Claims
Subpart J—Internal Revenue Tax on
Flavoring Extracts and Medicinal or Toilet
Preparations Including Perfumery)
Manufactured From Domestic Tax-Paid
Alcohol
190.101 Drawback allowance.
190.102 Procedure.
190.103 Additional requirements.
190.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau certificates.
190.105 Liquidation.
190.106 Amount of drawback.
Subpart K—Supplies for Certain Vessels
and Aircraft
190.111
190.112
Drawback allowance.
Procedure.
190.51 Completion of drawback claims.
190.52 Rejecting, perfecting or amending
claims.
190.53 Restructuring of claims.
Subpart L—Meats Cured With Imported Salt
Subpart F—Verification of Claims
Subpart M—Materials for Construction and
Equipment of Vessels and Aircraft Built for
Foreign Ownership and Account
190.61
190.62
190.63
Verification of drawback claims.
Penalties.
Liability for drawback claims.
Subpart G—Exportation and Destruction
190.71 Drawback on articles destroyed
under CBP supervision.
190.72 Exportation procedures.
190.73 Electronic proof of exportation.
190.74 Exportation by mail.
190.75 Exportation by the Government.
190.76 [Reserved]
190.121
190.122
190.123
190.131
190.132
190.133
Drawback allowance.
Procedure.
Refund of duties.
Drawback allowance.
Procedure.
Explanation of terms.
Subpart N—Foreign-Built Jet Aircraft
Engines Processed in the United States
190.141
190.142
190.143
190.144
Drawback allowance.
Procedure.
Drawback entry.
Refund of duties.
Subpart H—Liquidation and Protest of
Drawback Entries
Subpart O—Merchandise Exported From
Continuous CBP Custody
190.81
190.82
190.83
190.84
190.151 Drawback allowance.
190.152 Merchandise released from CBP
custody.
190.153 Continuous CBP custody.
190.154 Filing the entry.
190.155 Merchandise withdrawn from
warehouse for exportation.
190.156 Bill of lading.
190.157 [Reserved]
190.158 Procedures.
190.159 Amount of drawback.
Liquidation.
Person entitled to claim drawback.
Person entitled to receive payment.
Protests.
Subpart I—Waiver of Prior Notice of Intent
To Export; Accelerated Payment of
Drawback
190.91 Waiver of prior notice of intent to
export.
190.92 Accelerated payment.
190.93 Combined applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37922
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Subpart P—Distilled Spirits, Wines, or Beer
Which Are Unmerchantable or Do Not
Conform to Sample or Specifications
190.161 Refund of taxes.
190.162 Procedure.
190.163 Documentation.
190.164 Return to CBP custody.
190.165 No exportation by mail.
190.166 Destruction of merchandise.
190.167 Liquidation.
190.168 [Reserved]
Subpart Q—Substitution of Finished
Petroleum Derivatives
190.171 General; drawback allowance.
190.172 Definitions.
190.173 Imported duty-paid derivatives (no
manufacture).
190.174 Derivatives manufactured under 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b).
190.175 Drawback claimant; maintenance
of records.
190.176 Procedures for claims filed under
19 U.S.C. 1313(p).
Subpart R—Merchandise Transferred to a
Foreign Trade Zone From Customs
Territory
190.181 Drawback allowance.
190.182 Zone-restricted merchandise.
190.183 Articles manufactured or produced
in the United States.
190.184 Merchandise transferred from
continuous CBP custody.
190.185 Unused merchandise drawback
and merchandise not conforming to
sample or specification, shipped without
consent of the consignee, found to be
defective as of the time of importation,
or returned after retail sale.
190.186 Person entitled to claim drawback.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart S—Drawback Compliance Program
190.191 Purpose.
190.192 Certification for compliance
program.
190.193 Application procedure for
compliance program.
190.194 Action on application to
participate in compliance program.
190.195 Combined application for
certification in drawback compliance
program and waiver of prior notice and/
or approval of accelerated payment of
drawback.
Appendix A to Part 190—General
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Appendix B to Part 190—Sample Formats
For Applications For Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202
(General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624;
§§ 190.2, 190.10, 190.15, 190.23, 190.38,
190.51 issued under 19 U.S.C. 1508; § 190.84
also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1514; §§ 190.111,
190.112 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1309;
§§ 190.151(a)(1), 190.153, 190.157, 190.159
also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1557;
§§ 190.182–190.186 also issued under 19
U.S.C. 81c; §§ 190.191–190.195 also issued
under 19 U.S.C. 1593a.
§ 190.0
Scope.
This part sets forth general provisions
applicable to all drawback claims and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
specialized provisions applicable to
specific types of drawback claims filed
under 19 U.S.C. 1313, as amended. For
drawback claims and specialized
provisions applicable to specific types
of drawback claims filed pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1313, as it was in effect on or
before February 24, 2016, please see part
191 of this title. Additional drawback
provisions relating to the North
American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) are contained in subpart E of
part 181 of this chapter.
§ 190.0a
Claims filed under NAFTA.
Claims for drawback filed under the
provisions of part 181 of this chapter
must be filed separately from claims
filed under the provisions of this part.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 190.1
CBP.
Authority of the Commissioner of
Pursuant to DHS Delegation number
7010.3, the Commissioner of CBP has
the authority to prescribe, and pursuant
to Treasury Order No. 100–16 (set forth
in the appendix to part 0 of this
chapter), the Secretary of the Treasury
has the sole authority to approve, rules
and regulations regarding drawback.
§ 190.2
Definitions.
For the purposes of this part:
Abstract. Abstract means the
summary of the actual production
records of the manufacturer.
Act. Act, unless indicated otherwise,
means the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended.
Bill of materials. Bill of materials
refers to a record that identifies each
component incorporated into a
manufactured or produced article. This
may include a record kept in the normal
course of business.
Designated merchandise. Designated
merchandise means either eligible
imported duty-paid merchandise or
drawback products selected by the
drawback claimant as the basis for a
drawback claim under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
or (j)(2), as applicable, or qualified
articles selected by the claimant as the
basis for drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(p).
Destruction. Destruction means the
destruction of articles or merchandise to
the extent that they have no commercial
value. For purposes of 19 U.S.C.
1313(a), (b), (c), and (j), destruction also
includes a process by which materials
are recovered from imported
merchandise or from an article
manufactured from imported
merchandise, as provided for in 19
U.S.C. 1313(x).
Direct identification drawback. Direct
identification drawback includes
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
drawback authorized pursuant to
section 313(j)(1) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)), on imported
merchandise exported, or destroyed
under CBP supervision, without having
been used in the United States (see also
sections 313(c), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (q)).
Direct identification is involved in
manufacturing drawback pursuant to
section 313(a) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(a)), on imported
merchandise used to manufacture or
produce an article which is either
exported or destroyed. Merchandise or
articles may be identified for purposes
of direct identification drawback by use
of the accounting methods provided for
in § 190.14.
Document. In this part, document has
its normal meaning and includes
information input to and contained
within an electronic data field, and
electronic versions of hard-copy
documents.
Drawback. Drawback, as authorized
under 19 U.S.C. 1313, means the refund
or remission, in whole or in part, of the
duties, taxes, and/or fees paid on
merchandise which were imposed
under Federal law. It includes drawback
paid upon the entry or importation of
the imported merchandise and the
refund or remission of internal revenue
taxes paid on domestic alcohol as
prescribed in 19 U.S.C. 1313(d) (see also
§ 190.3).
Drawback claim. Drawback claim
means the drawback entry and related
documents required by regulation
which together constitute the request for
drawback payment. All drawback
claims must be filed electronically
through a CBP-authorized EDI system.
Drawback entry. Drawback entry
means the document containing a
description of, and other required
information concerning, the exported or
destroyed article upon which a
drawback claim is based and the
designated imported merchandise for
which drawback of the duties, taxes,
and fees paid upon importation is
claimed. Drawback entries must be filed
electronically.
Drawback office. Drawback office
means any of the locations where
drawback claims and related
applications or requests may be
submitted. CBP may, in its discretion,
transfer or share work between the
different drawback offices even though
that the submission may have been to a
particular office.
Drawback product. A drawback
product means a finished or partially
finished product manufactured in the
United States under the procedures in
this part for manufacturing drawback. A
drawback product may be exported, or
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
destroyed under CBP supervision with a
claim for drawback, or it may be used
in the further manufacture of other
drawback products by manufacturers or
producers operating under the
procedures in this part for
manufacturing drawback, in which case
drawback may be claimed upon
exportation or destruction of the
ultimate product. Products
manufactured or produced from
substituted merchandise (imported or
domestic) also become ‘‘drawback
products’’ when applicable substitution
requirements of the Act are met. For
purposes of section 313(b) of the Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(b)), drawback
products may be designated as the basis
for drawback or deemed to be
substituted merchandise (see 19 U.S.C.
1313(b)). For a drawback product to be
designated as the basis for a drawback
claim, any transfer of the product must
be properly documented (see § 190.24).
Exportation. Exportation means the
severance of goods from the mass of
goods belonging to this country, with
the intention of uniting them with the
mass of goods belonging to some foreign
country. An exportation may be deemed
to have occurred when goods subject to
drawback are admitted into a foreign
trade zone in zone-restricted status, or
are laden upon qualifying aircraft or
vessels as aircraft or vessel supplies in
accordance with section 309(b) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309(b)) (see
§§ 10.59 through 10.65 of this chapter).
Exporter. Exporter means that person
who, as the principal party in interest in
the export transaction, has the power
and responsibility for determining and
controlling the sending of the items out
of the United States. In the case of
‘‘deemed exportations’’ (see definition
of exportation in this section), exporter
means that person who, as the principal
party in interest in the transaction
deemed to be an exportation, has the
power and responsibility for
determining and controlling the
transaction. In the case of aircraft or
vessel supplies under 19 U.S.C. 1309(b),
exporter means the party who has the
power and responsibility for lading
supplies on the qualifying aircraft or
vessel.
Filing. Filing means the electronic
delivery to CBP of any document or
documentation, as provided for in this
part.
Formula. Formula refers to records
that identify the quantity of each
element, material, chemical, mixture, or
other substance incorporated into a
manufactured article. This includes
records kept in the normal course of
business.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Fungible merchandise or articles.
Fungible merchandise or articles means
merchandise or articles which for
commercial purposes are identical and
interchangeable in all situations.
General manufacturing drawback
ruling. A general manufacturing
drawback ruling means a description of
a manufacturing or production
operation for drawback and the
regulatory requirements and
interpretations applicable to that
operation (see § 190.7).
Intermediate party. Intermediate party
means any party in the chain of
commerce leading to the exporter from
the importer and who has acquired,
purchased, or possessed the imported
merchandise (or any intermediate or
finished article, in the case of
manufacturing drawback) as allowed
under the applicable regulations for the
type of drawback claimed, which
authorize the transfer of the imported or
other drawback eligible merchandise by
that intermediate party to another party.
Manufacture or production.
Manufacture or production means a
process, including, but not limited to,
an assembly, by which merchandise is
either made into a new and different
article having a distinctive name,
character or use; or is made fit for a
particular use even though it is not
made into a new and different article.
Multiple products. Multiple products
mean two or more products produced
concurrently by a manufacture or
production operation or operations.
Per unit averaging. Per unit averaging
means the equal apportionment of the
amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible
for drawback for all units covered by a
single line item on an entry summary to
each unit of merchandise (and is
required for certain substitution
drawback claims) (see § 190.51(b)). The
value of the imported merchandise for
which a claim is approved may not
exceed the total value of the exported
merchandise which forms the basis for
the claim (‘‘lesser of’’ rule) (see
§ 190.22(a)(1)(ii) and 190.32(b)).
Possession. Possession, for purposes
of substitution unused merchandise
drawback (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), means
physical or operational control of the
merchandise, including ownership
while in bailment, in leased facilities, in
transit to, or in any other manner under
the operational control of, the party
claiming drawback.
Records. Records include, but are not
limited to, written or electronic business
records, statements, declarations,
documents and electronically generated
or machine readable data which pertain
to a drawback claim or to the
information contained in the records
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37923
required by Chapter 4 of Title 19,
United States Code, in connection with
the filing of a drawback claim and
which may include records normally
kept in the ordinary course of business
(see 19 U.S.C. 1508).
Relative value. Relative value means,
except for purposes of § 190.51(b), the
value of a product divided by the total
value of all products which are
necessarily manufactured or produced
concurrently in the same operation.
Relative value is based on the market
value, or other value approved by CBP,
of each such product determined as of
the time it is first separated in the
manufacturing or production process.
Market value is generally measured by
the selling price, not including any
packaging, transportation, or other
identifiable costs, which accrue after the
product itself is processed. Drawback
must be apportioned to each such
product based on its relative value at the
time of separation.
Schedule. A schedule means a
document filed by a drawback claimant,
under section 313(a) or (b), as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)), showing the
quantity of imported or substituted
merchandise used in or appearing in
each article exported or destroyed that
justifies a claim for drawback.
Schedule B. Schedule B means the
Department of Commerce Schedule B,
Statistical Classification of Domestic
and Foreign Commodities Exported
from the United States.
Sought chemical element. A sought
chemical element, under section 313(b),
means an element listed in the Periodic
Table of Elements that is imported into
the United States or a chemical
compound (a distinct substance formed
by a chemical union of two or more
elements in definite proportion by
weight) consisting of those elements,
either separately in elemental form or
contained in source material.
Specific manufacturing drawback
ruling. A specific manufacturing
drawback ruling means a letter of
approval (or its electronic equivalent)
issued by CBP Headquarters in response
to an application filed by a
manufacturer or producer for a ruling on
a specific manufacturing or production
operation for drawback, as described in
the format in Appendix B of this part.
Synopses of approved specific
manufacturing drawback rulings are
published in the Customs Bulletin with
each synopsis being published under an
identifying CBP Decision. Specific
manufacturing drawback rulings are
subject to the provisions in part 177 of
this chapter.
Substituted merchandise or articles.
Substituted merchandise or articles
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37924
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
means merchandise or articles that may
be substituted as follows:
(1) For manufacturing drawback
pursuant to section 1313(b), substituted
merchandise must be classifiable under
the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number as the imported designated
merchandise;
(2) For direct identification drawback
pursuant to section 1313(c)(2),
substituted merchandise must be
classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number and have
the same specific product identifier
(such as part number, SKU, or product
code) as the imported designated
merchandise;
(3) For direct identification drawback
pursuant to section 1313(j)(2),
substituted merchandise must be
classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number as the
imported designated merchandise
except for wine which may also qualify
pursuant to § 190.32(d), but when the 8digit HTSUS subheading number under
which the imported merchandise is
classified begins with the term ‘‘other,’’
then the other merchandise may be
substituted for imported merchandise
for drawback purposes if the other
merchandise and such imported
merchandise are classifiable under the
same 10-digit HTSUS statistical
reporting number and the article
description for that 10-digit HTSUS
statistical reporting number does not
begin with the term ‘‘other’’; and
(4) For substitution drawback of
finished petroleum derivatives pursuant
to section 1313(p), a substituted article
must be of the same kind and quality as
the qualified article for which it is
substituted, that is, the articles must be
commercially interchangeable or
described in the same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number (see § 190.172(b)).
Verification. Verification means the
examination of any and all records,
maintained by the claimant, or any
party involved in the drawback process,
which are required by the appropriate
CBP officer to render a meaningful
recommendation concerning the
drawback claimant’s conformity to the
law and regulations and the
determination of supportability,
correctness, and validity of the specific
claim or groups of claims being verified.
Wine. Wine, for purposes of
substitution unused merchandise
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) and
pursuant to the alternative standard for
substitution (see 19 CFR 190.32(d)),
refers to table wine. Consistent with
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB) regulations, table wine is
a ‘‘Class 1 grape wine’’ that satisfies the
requirements of 27 CFR 4.21(a)(1) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
having an alcoholic content not in
excess of 14 percent by volume
pursuant to 27 CFR 4.21(a)(2)).
§ 190.3 Duties, taxes, and fees subject or
not subject to drawback.
(a) Drawback is allowable pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1313 of on duties, taxes, and
fees paid on imported merchandise
which were imposed under Federal law
upon entry or importation, including:
(1) Ordinary customs duties,
including:
(i) Duties paid on an entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption for which liquidation has
become final;
(ii) Estimated duties paid on an entry,
or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, for which liquidation has
not become final, subject to the
conditions and requirements of
§ 190.81(b); and
(iii) Tenders of duties after liquidation
of the entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption for which
the duties are paid, subject to the
conditions and requirements of
§ 190.81(c), including:
(A) Voluntary tenders (for purposes of
this section, a ‘‘voluntary tender’’ is a
payment of duties on imported
merchandise in excess of duties
included in the liquidation of the entry,
or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, provided that the
liquidation has become final and that
the other conditions of this section and
§ 190.81 are met);
(B) Tenders of duties in connection
with notices of prior disclosure under
19 U.S.C. 1592(c)(4); and
(C) Duties restored under 19 U.S.C.
1592(d).
(2) Marking duties assessed under
section 304(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(c));
(3) Internal revenue taxes which
attach upon importation (see § 101.1 of
this chapter);
(4) Merchandise processing fees (see
§ 24.23 of this chapter); and
(5) Harbor maintenance taxes (see
§ 24.24 of this chapter).
(b) Drawback is not allowable on
antidumping and countervailing duties
which were imposed on any
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption (see
19 U.S.C. 1677h).
(c) Drawback is not allowed when the
identified merchandise, the designated
imported merchandise, or the
substituted merchandise (when
applicable), consists of an agricultural
product which is duty-paid at the overquota rate of duty established under a
tariff-rate quota, except that:
(1) Agricultural products as described
in this paragraph are eligible for
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1);
and
(2) Tobacco otherwise meeting the
description of agricultural products in
this paragraph is eligible for drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) or 19 U.S.C.
1313(a).
§ 190.4 Merchandise in which a U.S.
Government interest exists.
(a) Restricted meaning of Government.
A U.S. Government instrumentality
operating with nonappropriated funds is
considered a Government entity within
the meaning of this section.
(b) Allowance of drawback. If the
merchandise is sold to the U.S.
Government, drawback will be available
only to the:
(1) Department, branch, agency, or
instrumentality of the U.S. Government
which purchased it; or
(2) Supplier, or any of the parties
specified in § 190.82, provided the
claim is supported by documentation
signed by a proper officer of the
department, branch, agency, or
instrumentality concerned certifying
that the right to drawback was reserved
by the supplier or other parties with the
knowledge and consent of the
department, branch, agency, or
instrumentality.
(c) Bond. No bond will be required
when a U.S. Government entity claims
drawback.
§ 190.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular
possessions, trust territories.
Guantanamo Bay Naval Station is
considered foreign territory for
drawback purposes and, accordingly,
drawback may be permitted on articles
shipped there from the customs territory
of the United States. Drawback is not
allowed, except on claims made under
19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), on articles shipped
from the customs territory of the United
States to the U.S. Virgin Islands,
American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway
Islands, Kingman Reef, Guam, Canton
Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston
Island, or Palmyra Island. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(y). Puerto Rico, which is part of
the customs territory of the United
States, is not considered foreign
territory for drawback purposes and,
accordingly, drawback may not be
permitted on articles shipped there from
elsewhere in the customs territory of the
United States. For refunds of duties,
taxes, or fees paid on merchandise
imported into Puerto Rico and exported
outside of the customs territory of the
United States, claims must be filed
separately from other claims filed under
the provisions of this part.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 190.6 Authority to sign or electronically
certify drawback documents.
(a) Documents listed in paragraph (b)
of this section must be signed or
electronically certified only by one of
the following:
(1) The president, a vice president,
secretary, treasurer, or any other
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation;
(2) A full partner of a partnership;
(3) The owner of a sole
proprietorship;
(4) Any employee of the business
entity with a power of attorney;
(5) An individual acting on his or her
own behalf; or
(6) A licensed customs broker with a
power of attorney to sign the applicable
drawback document.
(b) The following documents require
execution in accordance with paragraph
(a) of this section:
(1) Drawback entries;
(2) Notices of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback;
(3) Certifications of exporters on bills
of lading or evidence of exportation (see
§§ 190.28 and 190.82); and
(4) Abstracts, schedules and extracts
from monthly abstracts, and bills of
materials and formulas, if not included
as part of a drawback claim.
(c) The following documents (see also
part 177 of this chapter) may be
executed by one of the persons
described in paragraph (a) of this
section or by any other individual
legally authorized to bind the person (or
entity) for whom the document is
executed:
(1) A letter of notification of intent to
operate under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under § 190.7;
(2) An application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling under
§ 190.8;
(3) An application for waiver of prior
notice under § 190.91;
(4) An application for approval of
accelerated payment of drawback under
§ 190.92; and
(5) An application for certification in
the Drawback Compliance Program
under § 190.193.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.7
ruling.
General manufacturing drawback
(a) Purpose; eligibility. General
manufacturing drawback rulings are
designed to simplify drawback for
certain common manufacturing
operations but do not preclude or limit
the use of applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings (see
§ 190.8). A manufacturer or producer
engaged in an operation that falls within
a published general manufacturing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
drawback ruling may submit a letter of
notification of intent to operate under
that general ruling. Where a separatelyincorporated subsidiary of a parent
corporation is engaged in manufacture
or production for drawback, the
subsidiary is the proper party to submit
the letter of notification, and cannot
operate under a letter of notification
submitted by the parent corporation.
(b) Procedures—(1) Publication.
General manufacturing drawback
rulings are contained in Appendix A to
this part. As deemed necessary by CBP,
new general manufacturing drawback
rulings will be issued as CBP Decisions
and added to the appendix thereafter.
(2) Submission. Letters of notification
of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling must be
submitted to any drawback office where
drawback entries will be filed,
concurrent with or prior to filing a
claim, provided that the general
manufacturing drawback ruling will be
followed without variation. If there is
any variation from the general
manufacturing drawback ruling, the
manufacturer or producer must apply
for a specific manufacturing drawback
ruling under § 190.8.
(3) Information required. Each
manufacturer or producer submitting a
letter of notification of intent to operate
under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under this section must
provide the following specific detailed
information:
(i) Name and address of manufacturer
or producer (if the manufacturer or
producer is a separately-incorporated
subsidiary of a corporation, the
subsidiary corporation must submit a
letter of notification in its own name);
(ii) In the case of a business entity, the
names of the persons listed in
§ 190.6(a)(1) through (6) who will sign
drawback documents;
(iii) Locations of the factories which
will operate under the letter of
notification;
(iv) Identity (by T.D. or CBP Decision
number and title) of the general
manufacturing drawback ruling under
which the manufacturer or producer
will operate;
(v) Description of the merchandise
and articles, unless specifically
described in the general manufacturing
drawback ruling, and the applicable 8digit HTSUS subheading number(s);
(vi) Description of the manufacturing
or production process, unless
specifically described in the general
manufacturing drawback ruling;
(vii) Basis of claim used for
calculating drawback; and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37925
(viii) IRS (Internal Revenue Service)
number (with suffix) of the
manufacturer or producer.
(c) Review and action by CBP. The
drawback office to which the letter of
notification of intent to operate under a
general manufacturing drawback ruling
was submitted will review the letter of
notification of intent.
(1) Acknowledgment. The drawback
office will promptly issue a letter
acknowledging receipt of the letter of
intent and authorizing the person to
operate under the identified general
manufacturing drawback ruling, subject
to the requirements and conditions of
that general manufacturing drawback
ruling and the law and regulations, to
the person who submitted the letter of
notification if:
(i) The letter of notification is
complete (i.e., contains the information
required in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section);
(ii) The general manufacturing
drawback ruling identified by the
manufacturer or producer is applicable
to the manufacturing or production
process;
(iii) The general manufacturing
drawback ruling identified by the
manufacturer or producer will be
followed without variation; and
(iv) The described manufacturing or
production process is a manufacture or
production as defined in § 190.2 of this
subpart.
(2) Computer-generated number. With
the letter of acknowledgment the
drawback office will include the unique
computer-generated number assigned to
the acknowledgment of the letter of
notification of intent to operate. This
number must be stated when the person
files manufacturing drawback claims
with CBP under the general
manufacturing drawback ruling.
(3) Non-conforming letters of
notification of intent. If the letter of
notification of intent to operate does not
meet the requirements of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section in any respect, the
drawback office will promptly and in
writing specifically advise the person of
this fact and why this is so. A letter of
notification of intent to operate which is
not acknowledged may be resubmitted
to the drawback office to which it was
initially submitted with modifications
and/or explanations addressing the
reasons CBP may have given for nonacknowledgment, or the matter may be
referred (by letter from the manufacturer
or producer) to CBP Headquarters
(Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade).
(d) Procedure to modify a general
manufacturing drawback ruling.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37926
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Modifications are allowed under the
same procedure terms as provided for in
§ 190.8(g) for specific manufacturing
drawback rulings.
(e) Duration. Acknowledged letters of
notification under this section will
remain in effect under the same terms
as provided for in § 190.8(h) for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.8
ruling.
Specific manufacturing drawback
(a) Applicant. Unless operating under
a general manufacturing drawback
ruling (see § 190.7), each manufacturer
or producer of articles intended to be
claimed for drawback must apply for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
Where a separately-incorporated
subsidiary of a parent corporation is
engaged in manufacture or production
for drawback, the subsidiary is the
proper party to apply for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, and
cannot operate under any specific
manufacturing drawback ruling
approved in favor of the parent
corporation.
(b) Sample application. Sample
formats for applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings are
contained in Appendix B to this part.
(c) Content of application. The
application of each manufacturer or
producer must include the following
information as applicable:
(1) Name and address of the
applicant;
(2) Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
number (with suffix) of the applicant;
(3) Description of the type of business
in which engaged;
(4) Description of the manufacturing
or production process, which shows
how the designated and substituted
merchandise is used to make the article
that is to be exported or destroyed;
(5) In the case of a business entity, the
names of persons listed in § 190.6(a)(1)
through (6) who will sign drawback
documents;
(6) Description of the imported
merchandise including specifications
and applicable 8-digit HTSUS
subheading(s);
(7) Description of the exported article
and applicable 8-digit HTSUS
subheadings;
(8) How manufacturing drawback is
calculated;
(9) Summary of the records kept to
support claims for drawback; and
(10) Identity and address of the
recordkeeper if other than the claimant.
(d) Submission of Application. An
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling must be submitted to
CBP Headquarters (Attention: Entry
Process and Duty Refunds Branch,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
Trade). Applications may be physically
delivered (in triplicate) or submitted via
email. Claimants must indicate if
drawback claims are to be filed under
the ruling at more than one drawback
office.
(e) Review and action by CBP. CBP
Headquarters will review each
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling.
(1) Approval. If the application is
consistent with the drawback law and
regulations, CBP Headquarters will
issue a letter of approval to the
applicant and will forward 1 copy of the
application for the specific
manufacturing drawback ruling to the
appropriate drawback office(s) with a
copy of the letter of approval. Each
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
will be assigned a unique manufacturing
number which will be included in the
letter of approval to the applicant from
CBP Headquarters, which must be used
when filing manufacturing drawback
claims.
(2) Disapproval. If the application is
not consistent with the drawback law
and regulations, CBP Headquarters will
promptly and in writing inform the
applicant that the application cannot be
approved and will specifically advise
the applicant why this is so. A
disapproved application may be
resubmitted with modifications and/or
explanations addressing the reasons
given for disapproval, a disapproval
may be appealed to CBP Headquarters
(Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade).
(f) Schedules and supplemental
schedules. When an application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
states that drawback is to be based upon
a schedule, as defined in 190.2, filed by
the manufacturer or producer, the
schedule will be reviewed by CBP
Headquarters. The application may
include a request for authorization for
the filing of supplemental schedules
with the drawback office where claims
are filed.
(g) Procedure to modify a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling—(1)
Supplemental application. Except as
provided for limited modifications in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section, a
manufacturer or producer desiring to
modify an existing specific
manufacturing drawback ruling may
submit a supplemental application for
such modification to CBP Headquarters
(Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade). Such a
supplemental application may, at the
discretion of the manufacturer or
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
producer, be in the form of the original
application, or it may identify the
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
to be modified (by T.D. or CBP Decision
number, if applicable, and unique
computer-generated number) and
include only those paragraphs of the
application that are to be modified, with
a statement that all other paragraphs are
unchanged and are incorporated by
reference in the supplemental
application.
(2) Limited modifications. (i) A
supplemental application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling must be
submitted to the drawback office where
the original claims was filed if the
modifications are limited to:
(A) The location of a factory, or the
addition of one or more factories where
the methods followed and records
maintained are the same as those at
another factory operating under the
existing specific manufacturing
drawback ruling of the manufacturer or
producer;
(B) The succession of a sole
proprietorship, partnership or
corporation to the operations of a
manufacturer or producer;
(C) A change in name of the
manufacturer or producer;
(D) A change in the persons who will
sign drawback documents in the case of
a business entity;
(E) A change in the basis of claim
used for calculating drawback;
(F) A change in the decision to use or
not to use an agent under § 190.9 of this
chapter, or a change in the identity of
an agent under that section;
(G) A change in the drawback office
where claims will be filed under the
ruling (see paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of this
section);
(H) An authorization to continue
operating under a ruling approved
under 19 CFR part 191 (see paragraph
(g)(2)(iv) of this section); or
(I) Any combination of the foregoing
changes.
(ii) A limited modification, as
provided for in this paragraph (g)(2),
must contain only the modifications to
be made, in addition to identifying the
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
and being signed by an authorized
person. To effect a limited modification,
the manufacturer or producer must file
with the drawback office(s) where
claims were originally filed a letter
stating the modifications to be made.
The drawback office will promptly
acknowledge acceptance of the limited
modifications.
(iii) To transfer a claim to another
drawback office, the manufacturer or
producer must file with the second
drawback office where claims will be
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
filed, a written application to file claims
at that office, with a copy of the
application and approval letter under
which claims are currently filed. The
manufacturer or producer must provide
a copy of the written application to file
claims at the new drawback office to the
drawback office where claims are
currently filed.
(iv) To file a claim under this part
based on a ruling approved under 19
CFR part 191, the manufacturer or
producer must file a supplemental
application for a limited modification
no later than February 23, 2019, which
provides the following:
(A) Revised parallel columns with the
required annotations for the applicable
8-digit HTSUS subheading number(s);
(B) Revised bill of materials or
formula with the required annotations
for the applicable 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number(s); and
(C) A certification of continued
compliance, which states: ‘‘The
undersigned acknowledges the current
statutory requirements under 19 U.S.C.
1313 and the regulatory requirements in
19 CFR part 190, and hereby certifies its
continuing eligibility for operating
under the manufacturing drawback
ruling in compliance therewith.’’
(h) Duration. Subject to 19 U.S.C.
1625 and part 177 of this chapter, a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
under this section will remain in effect
indefinitely unless:
(1) No drawback claim is filed under
the ruling for a period of 5 years and
notice of termination is published in the
Customs Bulletin; or
(2) The manufacturer or producer to
whom approval of the ruling was issued
files a request to terminate the ruling, in
writing, with CBP Headquarters
(Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.9
Agency.
(a) General. An owner of the
identified merchandise, the designated
imported merchandise and/or the
substituted merchandise that is used to
produce the exported articles may
employ another person to do part, or all,
of the manufacture or production under
19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b) and as defined
in § 190.2 of this subpart. For purposes
of this section, such owner is the
principal and such other person is the
agent. Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), the
principal will be treated as the
manufacturer or producer of
merchandise used in manufacture or
production by the agent. The principal
must be able to establish by its
manufacturing records, the
manufacturing records of its agent(s), or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
the manufacturing records of both (or
all) parties, compliance with all
requirements of this part (see, in
particular, § 190.26).
(b) Requirements—(1) Contract. The
manufacturer must establish that it is
the principal in a contract between it
and its agent who actually does the
work on either the designated or
substituted merchandise, or both, for the
principal. The contract must include:
(i) Terms of compensation to show
that the relationship is an agency rather
than a sale;
(ii) How transfers of merchandise and
articles will be recorded by the
principal and its agent;
(iii) The work to be performed on the
merchandise by the agent for the
principal;
(iv) The degree of control that is to be
exercised by the principal over the
agent’s performance of work;
(v) The party who is to bear the risk
of loss on the merchandise while it is in
the agent’s custody; and
(vi) The period that the contract is in
effect.
(2) Ownership of the merchandise by
the principal. The records of the
principal and/or the agent must
establish that the principal had legal
and equitable title to the merchandise
before receipt by the agent. The right of
the agent to assert a lien on the
merchandise for work performed does
not derogate the principal’s ownership
interest under this section.
(3) Sales prohibited. The relationship
between the principal and agent must
not be that of a seller and buyer. If the
parties’ records show that, with respect
to the merchandise that is the subject of
the principal-agent contract, the
merchandise is sold to the agent by the
principal, or the articles manufactured
by the agent are sold to the principal by
the agent, those records are inadequate
to establish existence of a principalagency relationship under this section.
(c) Specific manufacturing drawback
rulings; general manufacturing
drawback rulings—(1) Owner. An owner
who intends to operate under the
principal-agent procedures of this
section must state that intent in any
letter of notification of intent to operate
under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling filed under § 190.7 or
in any application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling filed
under § 190.8.
(2) Agent. Each agent operating under
this section must have filed a letter of
notification of intent to operate under a
general manufacturing drawback ruling
(see § 190.7), for an agent, covering the
articles manufactured or produced, or
have obtained a specific manufacturing
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37927
drawback ruling (see § 190.8), as
appropriate.
(d) Certificate—(1) Contents of
certificate. The principal for whom
processing is conducted under this
section must file, with any drawback
claim, a certificate, subject to the
recordkeeping requirements of §§ 190.15
and 190.26, certifying that upon request
by CBP it can establish the following:
(i) Quantity of merchandise
transferred from the principal to the
agent;
(ii) Date of transfer of the merchandise
from the principal to the agent;
(iii) Date of manufacturing or
production operations performed by the
agent;
(iv) Total quantity, description, and
10-digit HTSUS classification of
merchandise appearing in or used in
manufacturing or production operations
performed by the agent;
(v) Total quantity, description, and
10-digit HTSUS classification of articles
produced in manufacturing or
production operations performed by the
agent;
(vi) Quantity and 10-digit HTSUS
classification of articles transferred from
the agent to the principal; and
(vii) Date of transfer of the articles
from the agent to the principal.
(2) Blanket certificate. The certificate
required under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section may be a blanket certificate for
a stated period.
§ 190.10
Transfer of merchandise.
(a) Ability to transfer merchandise. (1)
A party may transfer drawback eligible
merchandise or articles to another party,
provided that the transferring party:
(i) Imports and pays duties, taxes,
and/or fees on such imported
merchandise;
(ii) Receives such imported
merchandise;
(iii) In the case of 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2),
receives such imported merchandise,
substituted merchandise, or any
combination of such imported and
substituted merchandise; or
(iv) Receives an article manufactured
or produced under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
and/or (b).
(2) The transferring party must
maintain records that:
(i) Document the transfer of that
merchandise or article;
(ii) Identify such merchandise or
article as being that to which a potential
right to drawback exists; and
(iii) Assign such right to the transferee
(see § 190.82).
(b) Required records. The records that
support the transfer must include the
following information:
(1) The party to whom the
merchandise or articles are delivered;
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37928
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(2) Date of physical delivery;
(3) Import entry number and entry
line item number;
(4) Quantity delivered and, for
substitution claims, total quantity
attributable to the relevant import entry
line item number;
(5) Total duties, taxes, and fees paid
on, or attributable to, the delivered
merchandise, and, for substitution
claims, total duties, taxes, and fees paid
on, or attributable to, the relevant
import entry line item number;
(6) Date of importation;
(7) Port where import entry filed;
(8) Person from whom received;
(9) Description of the merchandise
delivered;
(10) The 10-digit HTSUS
classification for the designated
imported merchandise (such HTSUS
number must be from the entry
summary line item and other entry
documentation for the merchandise);
and
(11) If the merchandise transferred is
substituted for the designated imported
merchandise under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2),
the 10-digit HTSUS classification of the
substituted merchandise (as if it had
been imported).
(c) Transferor notification for line
item designation. (1) Pursuant to
§ 190.51(a)(3) and for transfers that do
not cover the entire quantity of the
merchandise reported on a specific line
item from an entry summary, the
transferring party (transferor) must
provide notice to the transferee(s) of the
following:
(i) Whether the transferor has claimed
or will claim drawback relating to any
merchandise reported on the entry
summary line item (specifying either
direct identification or substitution as
the basis for the claim);
(ii) Whether the transferor has
previously transferred any merchandise
reported on the entry summary line item
and whether the transferor has
knowledge regarding a drawback claim
being filed relating that transferred
merchandise (specifying either direct
identification or substitution); and
(iii) Whether the transferor has not
previously transferred any merchandise
reported on the entry summary line
item.
(2) Notification of this designation
from the transferor to the transferee(s)
must be documented in records.
(3) Notwithstanding the designation
made, the basis for the first-filed claim
relating to merchandise reported on that
entry summary line item (either direct
identification or substitution) will be
the exclusive basis for any subsequent
claims for any other merchandise
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
reported on that same entry summary
line item.
(d) Retention period. The records
listed in paragraph (b) of this section
must be retained by the issuing party for
3 years from the date of liquidation of
the related claim or longer period if
required by law (see 19 U.S.C.
1508(c)(3)).
(e) Submission to CBP. If the records
required under paragraph (b) of this
section or additional records requested
by CBP are not provided by the
claimant, the part of the drawback claim
dependent on those records will be
denied.
(f) Warehouse transfer and
withdrawals. The person in whose name
merchandise is withdrawn from a
bonded warehouse will be considered
the importer for drawback purposes. No
records are required to document prior
transfers of merchandise while in a
bonded warehouse.
§ 190.11
Valuation of merchandise.
The values declared to CBP as part of
a complete drawback claim pursuant to
§ 190.51 must be established as
provided below. If the drawback eligible
merchandise or articles are destroyed,
then the value of the imported
merchandise and any substituted
merchandise must be reduced by the
value of materials recovered during
destruction in accordance with 19
U.S.C. 1313(x).
(a) Designated imported merchandise.
The value of the imported merchandise
is determined as follows:
(1) Direct identification claims. The
value of the imported merchandise is
the customs value of the imported
merchandise upon entry into the United
States (see subpart E of part 152 of this
chapter); or, if the merchandise is
identified pursuant to an approved
accounting method, then the value of
the imported merchandise is the
customs value that is properly
attributable to the imported
merchandise as identified by the
appropriate recordkeeping (see § 190.14,
varies by accounting method).
(2) Substitution claims. The value of
the designated imported merchandise is
the per unit average value, which is the
entered value for the applicable entry
summary line item apportioned equally
over each unit covered by the line item.
(b) Exported merchandise or articles.
The value of the exported merchandise
or articles eligible for drawback is the
selling price as declared for the
Electronic Export Information (EEI),
including any adjustments and
exclusions required by 15 CFR 30.6(a)).
If there is no selling price for the EEI,
then the value is the other value as
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
declared for the EEI including any
adjustments and exclusions required by
15 CFR 30.6(a) (e.g., the market price, if
the goods are shipped on consignment).
(For special types of transactions where
certain unusual conditions are involved,
the value for the EEI is determined
pursuant to 15 CFR part 30 subpart C.)
If no EEI is required (see, 15 CFR part
30 subpart D for a complete list of
exemptions), then the claimant must
provide the value that would have been
set forth on the EEI when the
exportation took place, but for the
exemption from the requirement for an
EEI.
(c) Destroyed merchandise or articles.
The value of the destroyed merchandise
or articles eligible for drawback is the
value at the time of destruction,
determined as if the merchandise had
been exported in its condition at the
time of its destruction and an EEI had
been required.
(d) Substituted merchandise for
manufacturing drawback claims. The
value of the substituted merchandise for
manufacturing drawback claims
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) is the cost
of acquisition or production for the
manufacturer or producer who used the
substituted merchandise in
manufacturing or production.
§ 190.12 Claim filed under incorrect
provision.
A drawback claim filed pursuant to
any provision of section 313 of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313) may be
deemed filed pursuant to any other
provision thereof should the drawback
office determine that drawback is not
allowable under the provision as
originally filed, but that it is allowable
under such other provision. To be
allowable under such other provision,
the claim must meet each of the
requirements of such provision. The
claimant may raise alternative
provisions prior to liquidation and by
protest (see part 174 of this chapter).
§ 190.13
Packaging materials.
(a) Imported packaging material.
Drawback of duties is provided in
section 313(q)(1) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(q)(1)), on imported
packaging material used to package or
repackage merchandise or articles
exported or destroyed pursuant to
section 313(a), (b), (c), or (j) of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (b), (c),
or (j)). The amount of drawback payable
on the packaging material is determined
pursuant to the particular drawback
provision to which the packaged goods
themselves are subject. The packaging
material must be separately identified
on the claim, and all other information
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
and documents required for the
particular drawback provision under
which the claim is made must be
provided for the packaging material.
(b) Packaging material manufactured
in United States from imported
materials. Drawback of duties is
provided in section 313(q)(2) of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(q)(2)), on
packaging material that is manufactured
or produced in the United States from
imported materials and used to package
or repackage articles that are exported or
destroyed under section 313(a) or (b) of
the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
or (b)). The amount of drawback payable
on the packaging material is determined
pursuant to the particular
manufacturing drawback provision to
which the packaged articles themselves
are subject, either 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or
(b), as applicable. The packaging
material and the imported merchandise
used in the manufacture or production
of the packaging material must be
separately identified on the claim, and
all other information and documents
required for the particular drawback
provision under which the claim is
made must be provided for the
packaging material as well as the
imported merchandise used in its
manufacture or production, for purposes
of determining the applicable drawback
payable.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.14 Identification of merchandise or
articles by accounting method.
(a) General. This section provides for
the identification of merchandise or
articles for drawback purposes by the
use of accounting methods. This section
applies to identification of merchandise
or articles in inventory or storage, as
well as identification of merchandise
used in manufacture or production, as
defined in § 190.2. This section is not
applicable to situations in which the
drawback law authorizes substitution
(substitution is allowed in specified
situations under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b),
1313(j)(2), 1313(k), and 1313(p); this
section does apply to situations in these
subsections in which substitution is not
allowed, as well as to the subsections of
the drawback law under which no
substitution is allowed). When
substitution is authorized, merchandise
or articles may be substituted without
reference to this section, under the
criteria and conditions specifically
authorized in the statutory and
regulatory provisions providing for the
substitution.
(b) Conditions and criteria for
identification by accounting method.
Manufacturers, producers, claimants, or
other appropriate persons may identify
for drawback purposes lots of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
merchandise or articles under this
section, subject to each of the following
conditions and criteria:
(1) The lots of merchandise or articles
to be so identified must be fungible as
defined in § 190.2;
(2) The person using the identification
method must be able to establish that
inventory records (for example, material
control records), prepared and used in
the ordinary course of business, account
for the lots of merchandise or articles to
be identified as being received into and
withdrawn from the same inventory.
Even if merchandise or articles are
received or withdrawn at different
geographical locations, if such inventory
records treat receipts or withdrawals as
being from the same inventory, those
inventory records may be used to
identify the merchandise or articles
under this section, subject to the
conditions of this section. If any such
inventory records (that is, inventory
records prepared and used in the
ordinary course of business) treat
receipts and withdrawals as being from
different inventories, those inventory
records must be used and receipts into
or withdrawals from the different
inventories may not be accounted for
together. If units of merchandise or
articles can be specifically identified
(for example, by serial number), the
merchandise or articles must be
specifically identified and may not be
identified by accounting method, unless
it is established that inventory records,
prepared and used in the ordinary
course of business, treat the
merchandise or articles to be identified
as being received into and withdrawn
from the same inventory (subject to the
above conditions);
(3) Unless otherwise provided in this
section or specifically approved by CBP
(by a binding ruling under part 177 of
this chapter), all receipts (or inputs) into
and all withdrawals from the inventory
must be recorded in the accounting
record;
(4) The records which support any
identification method under this section
are subject to verification by CBP (see
§ 190.61). If CBP requests such
verification, the person using the
identification method must be able to
demonstrate how, under Generally
Accepted Accounting Procedures
(GAAP), the records which support the
identification method used account for
all merchandise or articles in, and all
receipts into and withdrawals from, the
inventory, and the drawback per unit for
each receipt and withdrawal; and
(5) Any accounting method which is
used by a person for drawback purposes
under this section must be used
exclusively, without using other
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37929
methods for a period of at least one year,
unless approval is given by CBP for a
shorter period.
(c) Approved accounting methods.
The following accounting methods are
approved for use in the identification of
merchandise or articles for drawback
purposes under this section. If a claim
is eligible for the use of any accounting
method, the claimant must indicate on
the drawback entry whether an
accounting method was used, and if so,
which accounting method was used, to
identify the merchandise as part of the
complete claim (see § 190.51).
(1) First-in, first-out (FIFO)—(i)
General. The FIFO method is the
method by which fungible merchandise
or articles are identified by
recordkeeping on the basis of the first
merchandise or articles received into
the inventory. Under this method,
withdrawals are from the oldest (first-in)
merchandise or articles in the inventory
at the time of withdrawal.
(ii) Example. If the beginning
inventory is zero, 100 units with $1
drawback attributable per unit are
received in inventory on the 2nd of the
month, 50 units with no drawback
attributable per unit are received into
inventory on the 5th of the month, 75
units are withdrawn for domestic (nonexport) shipment on the 10th of the
month, 75 units with $2 drawback
attributable per unit are received in
inventory on the 15th of the month, 100
units are withdrawn for export on the
20th of the month, and no other receipts
or withdrawals occurred in the month,
the drawback attributable to the 100
units withdrawn for export on the 20th
is a total of $75 (25 units from the
receipt on the 2nd with $1 drawback
attributable per unit, 50 units from the
receipt on the 5th with no drawback
attributable per unit, and 25 units from
the receipt on the 15th with $2
drawback attributable per unit). The
basis of the foregoing and the effects on
the inventory of the receipts and
withdrawals, and balance in the
inventory thereafter are as follows: On
the 2nd of the month the receipt of 100
units ($1 drawback/unit) results in a
balance of that amount; the receipt of 50
units ($0 drawback/unit) on the 5th
results in a balance of 150 units (100
with $1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0
drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
10th of 75 units ($1 drawback/unit)
results in a balance of 75 units (25 with
$1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0
drawback/unit); the receipt of 75 units
($2 drawback/unit) on the 15th results
in a balance of 150 units (25 with $1
drawback/unit, 50 with $0 drawback/
unit, and 75 with $2 drawback/unit); the
withdrawal on the 20th of 100 units (25
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37930
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
with $1 drawback/unit, 50 with $0
drawback/unit, and 25 with $2
drawback unit) results in a balance of 50
units (all 50 with $2 drawback/unit).
(2) Last-in, first out (LIFO)—(i)
General. The LIFO method is the
method by which fungible merchandise
or articles are identified by
recordkeeping on the basis of the last
merchandise or articles received into
the inventory. Under this method,
withdrawals are from the newest (lastin) merchandise or articles in the
inventory at the time of withdrawal.
(ii) Example. In the example in
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, the
drawback attributable to the 100 units
withdrawn for export on the 20th is a
total of $175 (75 units from the receipt
on the 15th with $2 drawback
attributable per unit and 25 units from
the receipt on the 2nd with $1 drawback
attributable per unit). The basis of the
foregoing and the effects on the
inventory of the receipts and
withdrawals, and balance in the
inventory thereafter are as follows: On
the 2nd of the month the receipt of 100
units ($1 drawback/unit) results in a
balance of that amount; the receipt of 50
units ($0 drawback/unit) on the 5th
results in a balance of 150 units (100
with $1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0
drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
10th of 75 units (50 with $0 drawback/
unit and 25 with $1 drawback/unit)
results in a balance of 75 units (all with
$1 drawback/unit); the receipt of 75
units ($2 drawback/unit) on the 15th
results in a balance of 150 units (75 with
$1 drawback/unit and 75 with $2
drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
20th of 100 units (75 with $2 drawback/
unit and 25 with $1 drawback/unit)
results in a balance of 50 units (all 50
with $1 drawback/unit).
(3) Low-to-high—(i) General. The lowto-high method is the method by which
fungible merchandise or articles are
identified by recordkeeping on the basis
of the lowest drawback amount per unit
of the merchandise or articles in
inventory. Merchandise or articles with
no drawback attributable to them (for
example, domestic merchandise or
duty-free merchandise) must be
accounted for and are treated as having
the lowest drawback attributable to
them. Under this method, withdrawals
are from the merchandise or articles
with the least amount of drawback
attributable to them, then those with the
next higher amount, and so forth. If the
same amount of drawback is attributable
to more than one lot of merchandise or
articles, withdrawals are from the oldest
(first-in) merchandise or articles among
those lots with the same amount of
drawback attributable. Drawback
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
requirements are applicable to
withdrawn merchandise or articles as
identified (for example, if the
merchandise or articles identified were
attributable to an import more than 5
years before the claimed export, no
drawback could be granted).
(ii) Ordinary Low–to-High—(A)
Method. Under the ordinary low-to-high
method, all receipts into and all
withdrawals from the inventory are
recorded in the accounting record and
accounted for so that each withdrawal,
whether for export or domestic
shipment, is identified by recordkeeping
on the basis of the lowest drawback
amount per unit of the merchandise or
articles available in the inventory.
(B) Example. (1) In this example, the
beginning inventory is zero, and
receipts into and withdrawals from the
inventory are as follows:
Date
Receipt
($ per unit)
Jan. 2 .....
Jan. 5 .....
Jan. 15 ...
Jan. 20 ...
Jan. 25 ...
Jan. 28 ...
Jan. 31 ...
Feb. 5 .....
Feb. 10 ...
Feb. 15 ...
Feb. 20 ...
Feb. 23 ...
Feb. 25 ...
Feb. 28 ...
Mar. 5 .....
Mar. 10 ...
Mar. 15 ...
Mar. 21 ...
Mar. 20 ...
Mar. 25 ...
Mar. 31 ...
100 (zero).
50 ($1.00).
.........................
50 ($1.01).
50 ($1.02).
.........................
50 ($1.03).
.........................
50 ($.95).
.........................
50 (zero).
.........................
50 ($1.05).
.........................
50 ($1.06).
50 ($.85).
.........................
.........................
50 ($1.08).
50 ($.90).
.........................
Withdrawals
50 (export).
50 (domestic).
100 (export).
50 (export).
50 (domestic).
100 (export).
50 (export).
50 (domestic).
100 (export).
(2) The drawback attributable to the
January 15 withdrawal for export is zero
(the available receipt with the lowest
drawback amount per unit is the
January 2 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the January 28
withdrawal for domestic shipment (no
drawback) is zero (the remainder of the
January 2 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the February 5
withdrawal for export is $100.50 (the
January 5 and January 20 receipts), the
drawback attributable to the February 15
withdrawal for export is $47.50 (the
February 10 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the February 23
withdrawal for domestic shipment (no
drawback) is zero (the February 20
receipt), the drawback attributable to the
February 28 withdrawal for export is
$102.50 (the January 25 and January 31
receipts), the drawback attributable to
the March 15 withdrawal for export is
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
$42.50 (the March 10 receipt), the
drawback attributable to the March 21
withdrawal for domestic shipment (no
drawback) is $52.50 (the February 25
receipt), and the drawback attributable
to the March 31 withdrawal for export
is $98.00 (the March 25 and March 5
receipts). Remaining in inventory is the
March 20 receipt of 50 units ($1.08
drawback/unit). Total drawback
attributable to withdrawals for export in
this example would be $391.00.
(iii) Low-to-high method with
established average inventory turn-over
period—(A) Method. Under the low-tohigh method with established average
inventory turn-over period, all receipts
into and all withdrawals for export are
recorded in the accounting record and
accounted for so that each withdrawal is
identified by recordkeeping on the basis
of the lowest drawback amount per
available unit of the merchandise or
articles received into the inventory in
the established average inventory turnover period preceding the withdrawal.
(B) Accounting for withdrawals (for
domestic shipments and for export).
Under the low to-high method with
established average inventory turn-over
period, domestic withdrawals
(withdrawals for domestic shipment) are
not accounted for and do not affect the
available units of merchandise or
articles. All withdrawals for export must
be accounted for whether or not
drawback is available or claimed on the
withdrawals. Once a withdrawal for
export is made and accounted for under
this method, the merchandise or articles
withdrawn are no longer available for
identification.
(C) Establishment of inventory turnover period. For purposes of the low tohigh method with established average
inventory turn-over period, the average
inventory turn-over period is based on
the rate of withdrawal from inventory
and represents the time in which all of
the merchandise or articles in the
inventory at a given time must have
been withdrawn based on that rate. To
establish an average of this time, at least
1 year, or 3 turn-over periods (if
inventory turns over fewer than 3 times
per year), must be averaged. The
inventory turn-over period must be that
for the merchandise or articles to be
identified, except that if the person
using the method has more than one
kind of merchandise or articles with
different inventory turn-over periods,
the longest average turn-over period
established under this section may be
used (instead of using a different
inventory turn-over period for each kind
of merchandise or article).
(D) Example. In the example in
paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this section
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(but, as required for this method,
without accounting for domestic
withdrawals, and with an established
average inventory turn-over period of 30
days), the drawback attributable to the
January 15 withdrawal for export is zero
(the available receipt in the preceding
30 days with the lowest amount of
drawback is the January 2 receipt, of
which 50 units will remain after the
withdrawal), the drawback attributable
to the February 5 withdrawal for export
is $101.50 (the January 20 and January
25 receipts), the drawback attributable
to the February 15 withdrawal for
export is $47.50 (the February 10
receipt), the drawback attributable to the
February 28 withdrawal for export is
$51.50 (the February 20 and January 31
receipts), the drawback attributable to
the March 15 withdrawal for export is
$42.50 (the March 10 receipt), and the
drawback attributable to the March 31
withdrawal for export is $98.00 (the
March 25 and March 5 receipts). No
drawback may be claimed on the basis
of the January 5 receipt or the February
25 receipt because in the case of each,
there were insufficient withdrawals for
export within the established average
inventory turn-over period; the 50 units
remaining from the January 2 receipt
after the January 15 withdrawal are not
identified for a withdrawal for export
because there is no other withdrawal for
export (other than the January 15
withdrawal) within the established
average inventory turn-over period; the
March 20 receipt (50 units at $1.08) is
not yet attributed to withdrawals for
export. Total drawback attributable to
withdrawals for export in this example
would be $341.00.
(iv) Low-to-high blanket method—(A)
Method. Under the low-to-high blanket
method, all receipts into and all
withdrawals for export are recorded in
the accounting record and accounted
for. Each withdrawal is identified on the
basis of the lowest drawback amount
per available unit of the merchandise or
articles received into inventory in the
applicable statutory period for export
preceding the withdrawal (e.g., 180 days
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) and 5 years for
other types of drawback claims pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1313(r)). Drawback
requirements are applicable to
withdrawn merchandise or articles as
identified (for example, no drawback
could be granted generally if the
merchandise or articles identified were
attributable to an import made more
than 5 years before the claimed export;
and, for claims pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1313(p), no drawback could be granted
if the merchandise or articles identified
were attributable to an import that was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
entered more than 180 days after the
date of the claimed export or if the
claimed export was more than 180 days
after the close of the manufacturing
period attributable to an import).
(B) Accounting for withdrawals (for
domestic shipments and for export).
Under the low-to-high blanket method,
domestic withdrawals (withdrawals for
domestic shipment) are not accounted
for and do not affect the available units
of merchandise or articles. All
withdrawals for export must be
accounted for whether or not drawback
is available or claimed on the
withdrawals. Once a withdrawal for
export is made and accounted for under
this method, the merchandise or articles
withdrawn are no longer available for
identification.
(C) Example. In the example in
paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this section
(but, as required for this method,
without accounting for domestic
withdrawals), the drawback attributable
to the January 15 withdrawal for export
is zero (the available receipt in the
inventory with the lowest amount of
drawback is the January 2 receipt, of
which 50 units will remain after the
withdrawal), the drawback attributable
to the February 5 withdrawal for export
is $50.00 (the remainder of the January
2 receipt and the January 5 receipt), the
drawback attributable to the February 15
withdrawal for export is $47.50 (the
February 10 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the February 28
withdrawal for export is $50.50 (the
February 20 and January 20 receipts),
the drawback attributable to the March
15 withdrawal for export is $42.50 (the
March 10 receipt), and the drawback
attributable to the March 31 withdrawal
for export is $96.00 (the March 25 and
January 25 receipts). Receipts not
attributed to withdrawals for export are
the January 31 (50 units at $1.03),
February 25 (50 units at $1.05), March
5 (50 units at $1.06), and March 20 (50
units at $1.08) receipts. Total drawback
attributable to withdrawals for export in
this example would be $286.50.
(4) Average—(i) General. The average
method is the method by which fungible
merchandise or articles are identified on
the basis of the calculation by
recordkeeping of the amount of
drawback that may be attributed to each
unit of merchandise or articles in the
inventory. In this method, the ratio of:
(A) The total units of a particular
receipt of the fungible merchandise in
the inventory at the time of a
withdrawal to;
(B) The total units of all receipts of
the fungible merchandise (including
each receipt into inventory) at the time
of the withdrawal;
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37931
(C) Is applied to the withdrawal, so
that the withdrawal consists of a
proportionate quantity of units from
each particular receipt and each receipt
is correspondingly decreased.
Withdrawals and corresponding
decreases to receipts are rounded to the
nearest whole number.
(ii) Example. In the example in
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, the
drawback attributable to the 100 units
withdrawn for export on the 20th is a
total of $133 (50 units from the receipt
on the 15th with $2 drawback
attributable per unit, 33 units from the
receipt on the 2nd with $1 drawback
attributable per unit, and 17 units from
the receipt on the 5th with $0 drawback
attributable per unit). The basis of the
foregoing and the effects on the
inventory of the receipts and
withdrawals, and balance in the
inventory thereafter are as follows: On
the 2nd of the month the receipt of 100
units ($1 drawback/unit) results in a
balance of that amount; the receipt of 50
units ($0 drawback/unit) on the 5th
results in a balance of 150 units (100
with $1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0
drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
10th of 75 units (50 with $1 drawback/
unit (applying the ratio of 100 units
from the receipt on the 2nd to the total
of 150 units at the time of withdrawal)
and 25 with $0 drawback/unit (applying
the ratio of 50 units from the receipt on
the 5th to the total of 150 units at the
time of withdrawal)) results in a balance
of 75 units (with 50 with $1 drawback/
unit and 25 with $0 drawback/unit, on
the basis of the same ratios); the receipt
of 75 units ($2 drawback/unit) on the
15th results in a balance of 150 units (50
with $1 drawback/unit, 25 with $0
drawback/unit, and 75 with $2
drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
20th of 100 units (50 with $2 drawback/
unit (applying the ratio of the 75 units
from the receipt on the 15th to the total
of 150 units at the time of withdrawal),
33 with $1 drawback/unit (applying the
ratio of the 50 units remaining from the
receipt on the 2nd to the total of 150
units at the time of withdrawal, and 17
with $0 drawback/unit (applying the
ratio of the 25 units remaining from the
receipt on the 5th to the total of 150
units at the time of withdrawal)) results
in a balance of 50 units (25 with $2
drawback/unit, 17 with $1 drawback/
unit, and 8 with $0 drawback/unit, on
the basis of the same ratios).
(5) Inventory turn-over for limited
purposes. A properly established
average inventory turn-over period, as
provided for in paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(C) of
this section, may be used to determine:
(i) The fact and date(s) of use in
manufacture or production of the
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37932
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
imported designated merchandise and
other (substituted) merchandise (see 19
U.S.C. 1313(b)); or
(ii) The fact and date(s) of
manufacture or production of the
exported or destroyed articles (see 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b)).
(d) Approval of other accounting
methods. (1) Persons proposing to use
an accounting method for identification
of merchandise or articles for drawback
purposes which has not been previously
approved for such use (see paragraph (c)
of this section), or which includes
modifications from the methods listed
in paragraph (c) of this section, may
seek approval by CBP of the proposed
accounting method under the provisions
for obtaining an administrative ruling
(see part 177 of this chapter). The
conditions applied and the criteria used
by CBP in approving such an alternative
accounting method, or a modification of
one of the approved accounting
methods, will be the criteria in
paragraph (b) of this section, as well as
those in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
(2) In order for a proposed accounting
method to be approved by CBP for
purposes of this section, it must meet
the following criteria:
(i) For purposes of calculations of
drawback, the proposed accounting
method must be either revenue neutral
or favorable to the Government; and
(ii) The proposed accounting method
should be:
(A) Generally consistent with
commercial accounting procedures, as
applicable for purposes of drawback;
(B) Consistent with inventory or
material control records used in the
ordinary course of business by the
person proposing the method; and
(C) Easily administered by CBP.
§ 190.15
Recordkeeping.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all
records which pertain to the filing of a
drawback claim or to the information
contained in the records required by 19
U.S.C. 1313 in connection with the
filing of a drawback claim must be
retained for 3 years after liquidation of
such claims or longer period if required
by law (under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the same
records may be subject to a different
period for different purposes).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart B—Manufacturing Drawback
§ 190.21 Direct identification
manufacturing drawback.
Section 313(a) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(a)), provides for
drawback upon the exportation, or
destruction under CBP supervision, of
articles manufactured or produced in
the United States with the use of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
imported merchandise, provided that
those articles have not been used in the
United States prior to such exportation
or destruction. The amount of drawback
allowable shall not exceed 99 percent of
the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
paid with respect to the imported
merchandise. However, duties may not
be refunded upon the exportation or
destruction of flour or by-products
produced from imported wheat. Where
two or more products result, drawback
must be distributed among the products
in accordance with their relative values,
as defined in § 190.2, at the time of
separation. Merchandise may be
identified for drawback purposes under
19 U.S.C. 1313(a) in the manner
provided for and prescribed in § 190.14.
§ 190.22 Substitution manufacturing
drawback.
(a)(1) General—(i) Substitution
standard. If imported, duty-paid
merchandise or merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number as the imported
merchandise is used in the manufacture
or production of articles within a period
not to exceed 5 years from the date of
importation of such imported
merchandise, then upon the
exportation, or destruction under CBP
supervision, of any such articles,
without their having been used in the
United States prior to such exportation
or destruction, drawback is provided for
in section 313(b) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(b)). Drawback is
allowable even though none of the
imported, duty-paid merchandise may
actually have been used in the
manufacture or production of the
exported or destroyed articles.
(ii) Allowable refund—(A)
Exportation. In the case of an article that
is exported, the amount of drawback
allowable will not exceed 99 percent of
the lesser of:
(1) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees paid with respect to the imported
merchandise; or
(2) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that would apply to the substituted
merchandise if the substituted
merchandise were imported.
(B) Destruction. In the case of an
article that is destroyed, the amount of
drawback allowable will not exceed 99
percent of the lesser of:
(1) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees paid with respect to the imported
merchandise (reduced by the value of
materials recovered during destruction
as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x)); or
(2) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that would apply to the substituted
merchandise if the substituted
merchandise were imported (reduced by
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the value of materials recovered during
destruction as provided in 19 U.S.C.
1313(x)).
(C) Federal excise tax. For purposes of
drawback of internal revenue tax
imposed under Chapters 32, 38, 51, and
52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export or destruction of substituted
merchandise will be limited to the
amount of taxes paid (and not returned
by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substituted merchandise.
(2) Special rule for sought chemical
elements—(i) Substitution standard. A
sought chemical element, as defined in
§ 190.2, may be considered imported
merchandise, or merchandise
classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number as such
imported merchandise, used in the
manufacture or production of an article
as described in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section, and it may be substituted for
source material containing that sought
chemical element, without regard to
whether the sought chemical element
and the source material are classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number, and apportioned
quantitatively, as appropriate (see
§ 190.26(b)(4)).
(ii) Allowable refund. The amount of
drawback allowable will be determined
in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(ii)
of this section. The value of the
substituted source material must be
determined based on the quantity of the
sought chemical element present in the
source material, as calculated per
§ 190.26(b)(4).
(b) Use by same manufacturer or
producer at different factory. Duty-paid
merchandise or drawback products used
at one factory of a manufacturer or
producer within 5 years after the date
on which the material was imported
may be designated as the basis for
drawback on articles manufactured or
produced in accordance with these
regulations at other factories of the same
manufacturer or producer.
(c) Designation. A manufacturer or
producer may designate any eligible
imported merchandise or drawback
product which it has used in
manufacture or production.
(d) Designation by successor—(1)
General rule. Upon compliance with the
requirements in this section and under
19 U.S.C. 1313(s), a drawback successor
as defined in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section may designate merchandise or
drawback product used by a predecessor
before the date of succession as the basis
for drawback on articles manufactured
or produced by the successor after the
date of succession.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(2) Drawback successor. A ‘‘drawback
successor’’ is a manufacturer or
producer to whom another entity
(predecessor) has transferred, by written
agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution:
(i) All or substantially all of the rights,
privileges, immunities, powers, duties,
and liabilities of the predecessor; or
(ii) The assets and other business
interests of a division, plant, or other
business unit of such predecessor,
provided that the value of the
transferred assets and interests (realty,
personalty, and intangibles, exclusive of
the drawback rights) exceeds the value
of such drawback rights, whether vested
or contingent.
(3) Certifications and required
evidence—(i) Records of predecessor.
The predecessor or successor must
certify that the successor is in
possession of the predecessor’s records
which are necessary to establish the
right to drawback under the law and
regulations with respect to the
merchandise or drawback product.
(ii) Merchandise not otherwise
designated. The predecessor or
successor must certify in an attachment
to the claim, that the predecessor has
not designated and will not designate,
nor enable any other person to
designate, such merchandise or product
as the basis for drawback.
(iii) Value of transferred property. In
instances in which assets and other
business interests of a division, plant, or
other business unit of a predecessor are
transferred, the predecessor or successor
must specify, and maintain supporting
records to establish, the value of the
drawback rights and the value of all
other transferred property.
(iv) Review by CBP. The written
agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution, provided for in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, and the records
and evidence provided for in paragraph
(d)(3)(i) through (iii) of this section,
must be retained by the appropriate
party(s) for 3 years from the date of
liquidation of the related claim and are
subject to review by CBP upon request.
(e) Multiple products—(1) General.
Where two or more products are
produced concurrently in a substitution
manufacturing operation, drawback will
be distributed to each product in
accordance with its relative value (see
§ 190.2) at the time of separation.
(2) Claims covering a manufacturing
period. Where the claim covers a
manufacturing period rather than a
manufacturing lot, the entire period
covered by the claim is the time of
separation of the products and the value
per unit of product is the market value
for the period (as provided for in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
definition of relative value in § 190.2).
Manufacturing periods in excess of one
month may not be used without specific
approval of CBP.
(3) Recordkeeping. Records must be
maintained showing the relative value
of each product at the time of
separation.
§ 190.23 Methods and requirements for
claiming drawback.
Claims must be based on one or more
of the methods specified in paragraph
(a) of this section and comply with all
other requirements specified in this
section.
(a) Method of claiming drawback.—(1)
Used in. Drawback may be paid based
on the amount of the imported or
substituted merchandise used in the
manufacture of the exported article,
where there is no waste or the waste is
valueless or unrecoverable. This method
must be used when multiple products
also necessarily and concurrently result
from the manufacturing process, and
there is no valuable waste (see
paragraph (a)(2) of this section).
(2) Used in less valuable waste.
Drawback is allowable under this
method based on the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used
to manufacture the exported or
destroyed article, reduced by an amount
equal to the quantity of this
merchandise that the value of the waste
would replace. This method must be
used when multiple products also
necessarily and concurrently result from
the manufacturing process, and there is
valuable waste.
(3) Relative value. Drawback is also
allowable under this method when two
or more products result from
manufacturing or production. The
relative value method must be used
when multiple products also necessarily
and concurrently result from the
manufacturing process, and drawback
must be distributed among the products
in accordance with their relative values
(as defined in § 190.2) at the time of
separation.
(4) Appearing in. Drawback is
allowable under this method based only
on the amount of imported or
substituted merchandise that appears in
(is contained in) the exported articles.
The appearing in method may not be
used if there are multiple products also
necessarily and concurrently resulting
from the manufacturing process.
(b) Abstract or schedule. A drawback
claimant may use either the abstract or
schedule method to show the quantity
of material used or appearing in the
exported or destroyed article. An
abstract is the summary of records
which shows the total quantity used in
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37933
or appearing in all articles produced
during the period covered by the
abstract. A schedule shows the quantity
of material actually used in producing,
or appearing in, each unit of product.
Manufacturers or producers submitting
letters of notification of intent to operate
under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling (see § 190.7) and
applicants for approval of specific
manufacturing drawback rulings (see
§ 190.8) must state whether the abstract
or schedule method is used; if no such
statement is made, drawback claims
must be based upon the abstract
method.
(c) Claim for waste.—(1) Valuable
waste. When the waste has a value and
the drawback claim is not limited to the
quantity of imported or substituted
merchandise or drawback products
appearing in the exported or destroyed
articles claimed for drawback, the
manufacturer or producer must keep
records to show the market value of the
merchandise or drawback products used
to manufacture or produce the exported
or destroyed articles, as well as the
market value of the resulting waste,
under the used in less valuable waste
method (as provided for in the
definition of relative value in § 190.2).
(2) If claim for waste is waived. If
claim for waste is waived, only the
‘‘appearing in’’ basis may be used (see
paragraph (a)(4) of this section). Waste
records need not be kept unless required
to establish the quantity of imported
duty-paid merchandise or drawback
products appearing in the exported or
destroyed articles claimed for drawback.
§ 190.24
Transfer of merchandise.
Evidence of any transfers of
merchandise (see § 190.10) must be
evidenced by records, as defined in
§ 190.2.
§ 190.25 Destruction under CBP
supervision.
A claimant may destroy merchandise
and obtain drawback by complying with
the procedures set forth in § 190.71
relating to destruction.
§ 190.26
Recordkeeping.
(a) Direct identification. (1) Records
required. Each manufacturer or
producer under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) must
keep records to allow the verifying CBP
official to trace all articles manufactured
or produced for exportation or
destruction with drawback, from
importation, through manufacture or
production, to exportation or
destruction. To this end, these records
must specifically establish:
(i) The date or inclusive dates of
manufacture or production;
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37934
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The quantity, identity, and 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number(s) of the
imported duty-paid merchandise or
drawback products used in or appearing
in (see § 190.23) the articles
manufactured or produced;
(iii) The quantity, if any, of the nondrawback merchandise used, when
these records are necessary to determine
the quantity of imported duty-paid
merchandise or drawback product used
in the manufacture or production of the
exported or destroyed articles or
appearing in them;
(iv) The quantity and description of
the articles manufactured or produced;
(v) The quantity of waste incurred, if
applicable; and
(vi) That the articles on which
drawback is claimed were exported or
destroyed within 5 years after the
importation of the duty-paid
merchandise, without having been used
in the United States prior to such
exportation or destruction. (If the
articles were commingled after
manufacture or production, their
identity may be maintained in the
manner prescribed in § 190.14.)
(2) Accounting. The merchandise and
articles to be exported or destroyed will
be accounted for in a manner which will
enable the manufacturer, producer, or
claimant:
(i) To determine, and the CBP official
to verify, the applicable import entry
and any transfers of the merchandise
associated with the claim; and
(ii) To identify with respect to that
import entry, and any transfers of the
merchandise, the imported merchandise
or drawback products used in
manufacture or production.
(b) Substitution. The records of the
manufacturer or producer of articles
manufactured or produced in
accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) must
establish the facts in paragraph (a)(1)(i),
(iv) through (vi) of this section, and:
(1) The quantity, identity, and
specifications of the merchandise
designated (imported duty-paid, or
drawback product);
(2) The quantity, identity, and
specifications of the substituted
merchandise before its use to
manufacture or produce (or appearing
in) the exported or destroyed articles;
(3) That, within 5 years after the date
of importation of the imported dutypaid merchandise, the manufacturer or
producer used the designated
merchandise in manufacturing or
production and that during the same 5year period it manufactured or
produced the exported or destroyed
articles; and
(4) If the designated merchandise is a
sought chemical element, as defined in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 190.2, that was contained in imported
material and a substitution drawback
claim is made based on that chemical
element:
(i) The duty paid on the imported
material must be apportioned among its
constituent components. The claim on
the chemical element that is the
designated merchandise must be limited
to the duty apportioned to that element
on a unit-for-unit attribution using the
unit of measure set forth in the HTSUS
that is applicable to the imported
material. If the material is a compound
with other constituents, including
impurities, and the purity of the
compound in the imported material is
shown by satisfactory analysis, that
purity, converted to a decimal
equivalent of the percentage, is
multiplied against the entered amount
of the material to establish the amount
of pure compound. The amount of the
element in the pure compound is to be
determined by use of the atomic weights
of the constituent elements and
converting to the decimal equivalent of
their respective percentages and
multiplying that decimal equivalent
against the above-determined amount of
pure compound.
(ii) The amount claimed as drawback
based on the sought chemical element
must be deducted from the duty paid on
the imported material that may be
claimed on any other drawback claim.
Example to paragraph (b)(4):
Synthetic rutile that is shown by
appropriate analysis in the entry papers
to be 91.7% pure titanium dioxide is
imported and dutiable at a 5% ad
valorem duty rate. The amount of
imported synthetic rutile is 30,000
pounds with an entered value of
$12,000. The total duty paid is $600.
Titanium in the synthetic rutile is
designated as the basis for a drawback
claim under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b). The
amount of titanium dioxide in the
synthetic rutile is determined by
converting the purity percentage
(91.7%) to its decimal equivalent (.917)
and multiplying the entered amount of
synthetic rutile (30,000 pounds) by that
decimal equivalent (.917 × 30,000 =
27,510 pounds of titanium dioxide
contained in the 30,000 pounds of
imported synthetic rutile). The titanium,
based on atomic weight, represents
59.93% of the constituents in titanium
dioxide. Multiplying that percentage,
converted to its decimal equivalent, by
the amount of titanium dioxide
determines the titanium content of the
imported synthetic rutile (.5993 ×
27,510 pounds of titanium dioxide =
16,486.7 pounds of titanium contained
in the imported synthetic rutile).
Therefore, up to 16,486.7 pounds of
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
titanium is available to be designated as
the basis for drawback. As the per unit
duty paid on the synthetic rutile is
calculated by dividing the duty paid
($600) by the amount of imported
synthetic rutile (30,000 pounds), the per
unit duty is two cents of duty per pound
of the imported synthetic rutile ($600 ÷
30,000 = $0.02). The duty on the
titanium is calculated by multiplying
the amount of titanium contained in the
imported synthetic rutile by two cents
of duty per pound (16,486.7 × $0.02 =
$329.73 duty apportioned to the
titanium). The product is then
multiplied by 99% to determine the
maximum amount of drawback
available ($329.73 × .99 = $326.44). If an
exported titanium alloy ingot weighs
17,000 pounds, in which 16,000 pounds
of titanium was used to make the ingot,
drawback is determined by multiplying
the duty per pound ($0.02) by the
weight of the titanium contained in the
ingot (16,000 pounds) to calculate the
duty available for drawback ($0.02 ×
16,000 = $320.00). Because only 99% of
the duty can be claimed, drawback is
determined by multiplying this
available duty amount by 99% (.99 ×
$320.00 = $316.80). As the oxygen
content of the titanium dioxide is 45%
of the synthetic rutile, if oxygen is the
designated merchandise on another
drawback claim, 45% of the duty
claimed on the synthetic rutile would be
available for drawback based on the
substitution of oxygen.
(c) Valuable waste records. When
waste has a value and the manufacturer,
producer, or claimant, has not limited
the claims based on the quantity of
imported or substituted merchandise
appearing in the articles exported or
destroyed, the manufacturer or producer
must keep records to show the market
value of the merchandise used to
manufacture or produce the exported or
destroyed article, as well as the quantity
and market value of the waste incurred
(as provided for in the definition of
relative value in § 190.2). In such
records, the quantity of merchandise
identified or designated for drawback,
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or 1313(b),
respectively, must be based on the
quantity of merchandise actually used
to manufacture or produce the exported
or destroyed articles. The waste
replacement reduction will be
determined by reducing from the
quantity of merchandise actually used
by the amount of merchandise which
the value of the waste would replace.
(d) Purchase of manufactured or
produced articles for exportation.
Where the claimant purchases articles
from the manufacturer or producer and
exports them, the claimant must
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
maintain records to document the
manufacture or production and transfer
of those articles (see § 190.51(a)(1)).
(e) Multiple claimants—(1) General.
Multiple claimants may file for
drawback with respect to the same
export (for example, if an automobile is
exported, where different parts of the
automobile have been produced by
different manufacturers under drawback
conditions and the exporter waives the
right to claim drawback and assigns
such right to the manufacturers under
§ 190.82).
(2) Procedures—(i) Submission of
letter. Each drawback claimant must file
a separate letter, as part of the claim,
describing the component article on the
export bill of lading to which each claim
will relate. Each letter must show the
name of the claimant and bear a
statement that the claim will be limited
to its respective component article. The
exporter must endorse the letters, as
required, to show the respective
interests of the claimants.
(ii) Blanket waivers and assignments
of drawback rights. Exporters may waive
and assign their drawback rights for all,
or any portion, of their exportations
with respect to a particular commodity
for a given period to a drawback
claimant.
(f) Retention of records. Pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all records
required to be kept by the manufacturer,
producer, or claimant with respect to
drawback claims, and records kept by
others to complement the records of the
manufacturer, producer, or claimant
with respect to drawback claims must
be retained for 3 years after the date of
liquidation of the related claims (under
19 U.S.C. 1508, the same records may be
subject to a different retention period for
different purposes).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.27 Time limitations for
manufacturing drawback.
(a) Direct identification. Drawback
will be allowed on imported
merchandise used to manufacture or
produce articles that are exported or
destroyed under CBP supervision
within 5 years after importation of the
merchandise identified to support the
claim.
(b) Substitution. Drawback will be
allowed on the imported merchandise if
the following conditions are met:
(1) The designated merchandise is
used in manufacture or production
within 5 years after importation;
(2) Within the 5-year period described
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the
exported or destroyed articles, or
drawback products, were manufactured
or produced; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
(3) The completed articles must be
exported or destroyed under CBP
supervision within 5 years of the date of
importation of the designated
merchandise, or within 5 years of the
earliest date of importation associated
with a drawback product.
(c) Drawback claims filed before
specific or general manufacturing
drawback ruling approved or
acknowledged. Drawback claims may be
filed before the letter of notification of
intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling
covering the claims is acknowledged
(§ 190.7), or before the specific
manufacturing drawback ruling
covering the claims is approved
(§ 190.8), but no drawback will be paid
until such acknowledgement or
approval, as appropriate.
§ 190.28 Person entitled to claim
manufacturing drawback.
The exporter (or destroyer) will be
entitled to claim drawback, unless the
exporter (or destroyer), by means of a
certification, assigns the right to claim
drawback to the manufacturer,
producer, importer, or intermediate
party. Such certification must also
affirm that the exporter (or destroyer)
has not and will not itself claim
drawback or assign the right to claim
drawback on the particular exportation
or destruction to any other party. The
certification provided for under this
section may be a blanket certification for
a stated period. Drawback is paid to the
claimant, who may be the manufacturer,
producer, intermediate party, importer,
or exporter (or destroyer).
§ 190.29 Certification of bill of materials or
formula.
At the time of filing a claim under 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), the claimant must
certify the following:
(a) The claimant is in possession of
the applicable bill of materials or
formula for the exported or destroyed
article(s), which will be promptly
provided upon request;
(b) The bill of materials or formula
identifies the imported and/or
substituted merchandise and the
exported or destroyed article(s) by their
8-digit HTSUS subheading numbers;
and
(c) The bill of materials or formula
identifies the manufactured quantities
of the imported and/or substituted
merchandise and the exported or
destroyed article(s).
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37935
Subpart C—Unused Merchandise
Drawback
§ 190.31 Direct identification unused
merchandise drawback.
(a) General. Section 313(j)(1) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)),
provides for drawback upon the
exportation or destruction under CBP
supervision of imported merchandise
upon which was paid any duty, tax, or
fee imposed under Federal law upon
entry or importation, if the merchandise
has not been used within the United
States before such exportation or
destruction. The total amount of
drawback allowable will not exceed 99
percent of the amount of duties, taxes,
and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise.
(b) Time of exportation or destruction.
Drawback will be allowable on imported
merchandise if, before the close of the
5-year period beginning on the date of
importation and before the drawback
claim is filed, the merchandise is
exported from the United States or
destroyed under CBP supervision.
(c) Operations performed on imported
merchandise. The performing of any
operation or combination of operations,
not amounting to manufacture or
production under the provisions of the
manufacturing drawback law as
provided for in 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(3)(A),
on imported merchandise is not a use of
that merchandise for purposes of this
section.
§ 190.32 Substitution unused merchandise
drawback.
(a) General. Section 313(j)(2) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)),
provides for drawback of duties, taxes,
and fees paid on imported merchandise
based on the export or destruction
under CBP supervision of substituted
merchandise (as defined in § 190.2,
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), before
the close of the 5-year period beginning
on the date of importation of the
imported merchandise and before the
drawback claim is filed, and before such
exportation or destruction the
substituted merchandise is not used in
the United States (see paragraph (e) of
this section) and is in the possession of
the party claiming drawback.
(b) Allowable refund. (1) Exportation.
In the case of an article that is exported,
subject to paragraph (3) below, the total
amount of drawback allowable will not
exceed 99 percent of the lesser of:
(i) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees paid with respect to the imported
merchandise; or
(ii) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that would apply to the exported
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37936
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
article if the exported article were
imported.
(2) Destruction. In the case of an
article that is destroyed, subject to
paragraph (3) below, the total amount of
drawback allowable will not exceed 99
percent of the lesser of:
(i) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees paid with respect to the imported
merchandise (reduced by the value of
materials recovered during destruction
as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x)); or
(ii) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that would apply to the destroyed
article if the destroyed article had been
imported (reduced by the value of
materials recovered during destruction
as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x)).
(3) Federal excise tax. For purposes of
drawback of internal revenue tax
imposed under Chapters 32, 38, 51, and
52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export or destruction of substituted
merchandise will be limited to the
amount of taxes paid (and not returned
by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substituted merchandise.
(c) Determination of HTSUS
classification for substituted
merchandise. Requests for binding
rulings on the classification of imported,
substituted, or exported merchandise
may be submitted to CBP pursuant to
the procedures set forth in part 177.
(d) Claims for wine. (1) Alternative
substitution standard. In addition to 8digit HTSUS substitution standard in
§ 190.2, drawback of duties, taxes, and
fees, paid on imported wine as defined
in § 190.2 may be allowable under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) with respect to wine if
the imported wine and the exported
wine are of the same color and the price
variation between the imported wine
and the exported wine does not exceed
50 percent.
(2) Allowable refund. For any
drawback claim for wine (as defined in
§ 190.2) based on subsection (j)(2), the
total amount of drawback allowable will
be equal to 99 percent of the duties,
taxes, and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise, without regard
to the limitations in paragraph (b).
(3) Required certification. When the
basis for substitution for wine drawback
claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) is the
alternative substitution standard rule set
forth in (d)(1), claims under this subpart
may be paid and liquidated if:
(i) The claimant specifies on the
drawback entry that the basis for
substitution is the alternative
substitution standard for wine; and
(ii) The claimant provides a
certification, as part of the complete
claim (see 190.51(a)), stating that:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
(A) The imported wine and the
exported wine are a Class 1 grape wine
(as defined in 27 CFR 4.21(a)(1)) of the
´
same color (i.e., red, white, or rose);
(B) The imported wine and the
exported wine are table wines (as
defined in 27 CFR 4.21(a)(2)) and the
alcoholic content does not exceed 14
percent by volume; and
(C) The price variation between the
imported wine and the exported wine
does not exceed 50 percent.
(e) Operations performed on
substituted merchandise. The
performing of any operation or
combination of operations, not
amounting to manufacture or
production as provided for in 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(3)(B), on the substituted
merchandise is not a use of that
merchandise for purposes of this
section.
(f) Designation by successor; 19 U.S.C.
1313(s). (1) General rule. Upon
compliance with the requirements of
this section and under 19 U.S.C.
1313(s), a drawback successor as
defined in paragraph (f)(2) of this
section may designate either of the
following as the basis for drawback on
merchandise possessed by the successor
after the date of succession:
(i) Imported merchandise which the
predecessor, before the date of
succession, imported; or
(ii) Imported and/or substituted
merchandise that was transferred to the
predecessor from the person who
imported and paid duty on the imported
merchandise.
(2) Drawback successor. A ‘‘drawback
successor’’ is an entity to which another
entity (predecessor) has transferred, by
written agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution:
(i) All or substantially all of the rights,
privileges, immunities, powers, duties,
and liabilities of the predecessor; or
(ii) The assets and other business
interests of a division, plant, or other
business unit of such predecessor,
provided that the value of the
transferred assets and interests (realty,
personalty, and intangibles, exclusive of
the drawback rights) exceeds the value
of such drawback rights, whether vested
or contingent.
(3) Certifications and required
evidence—(i) Records of predecessor.
The predecessor or successor must
certify in an attachment to the drawback
claim that the successor is in possession
of the predecessor’s records which are
necessary to establish the right to
drawback under the law and regulations
with respect to the imported and/or
substituted merchandise.
(ii) Merchandise not otherwise
designated. The predecessor or
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
successor must certify in an attachment
to the drawback claim, that the
predecessor has not and will not
designate, nor enable any other person
to designate, the imported and/or
substituted merchandise as the basis for
drawback.
(iii) Value of transferred property. In
instances in which assets and other
business interests of a division, plant, or
other business unit of a predecessor are
transferred, the predecessor or successor
must specify, and maintain supporting
records to establish, the value of the
drawback rights and the value of all
other transferred property.
(iv) Review by CBP. The written
agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution, provided for in paragraph
(f)(2) of this section, and the records and
evidence provided for in paragraph
(f)(3)(i) through (iii) of this section, must
be retained by the appropriate party(s)
for 3 years from the date of liquidation
of the related claim and are subject to
review by CBP upon request.
§ 190.33 Person entitled to claim unused
merchandise drawback.
(a) Direct identification. (1) Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), as amended, the
exporter or destroyer will be entitled to
claim drawback.
(2) The exporter or destroyer may
waive the right to claim drawback and
assign such right to the importer or any
intermediate party. A drawback
claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)
other than the exporter or destroyer
must secure and retain a certification
signed by the exporter or destroyer
waiving the right to claim drawback,
and did not and will not authorize any
other party to claim the exportation or
destruction for drawback (see § 190.82
of this part). The certification provided
for under this section may be a blanket
certification for a stated period. The
claimant must file such certification at
the time of, or prior to, the filing of the
claim(s) covered by the certification.
(b) Substitution. (1) Under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2), as amended, the following
parties may claim drawback:
(i) In situations where the exporter or
destroyer of the substituted
merchandise is also the importer of the
imported merchandise, that party will
be entitled to claim drawback.
(ii) In situations where the person
who imported and paid the duty on the
imported merchandise transfers the
imported merchandise, substituted
merchandise, or any combination of
imported and substituted merchandise
to the person who exports or destroys
that merchandise, the exporter or
destroyer will be entitled to claim
drawback. (Any such transferred
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
merchandise, regardless of its origin,
will be treated as imported merchandise
for purposes of drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), and any retained
merchandise will be treated as domestic
merchandise.)
(iii) In situations where the
transferred merchandise described in
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section is the
subject of further transfer(s), such
transfer(s) must be documented by
records, including records kept in the
normal course of business, and the
exporter or destroyer will be entitled to
claim drawback (multiple substitutions
are not permitted).
(2) The exporter or destroyer may
waive the right to claim drawback and
assign such right to the importer or to
any intermediate party, provided that
the claimant had possession of the
substituted merchandise prior to its
exportation or destruction. A drawback
claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)
other than the exporter or destroyer
must secure and retain a certification
signed by the exporter or destroyer that
such party waived the right to claim
drawback, and did not and will not
authorize any other party to claim the
exportation or destruction for drawback
(see § 190.82). The certification
provided for under this section may be
a blanket certification for a stated
period. The claimant must file such
certification at the time of, or prior to,
the filing of the claim(s) covered by the
certification.
§ 190.34
Transfer of merchandise.
Any transfer of merchandise (see
§ 190.10) must be recorded in records,
which may include records kept in the
normal course of business, as defined in
§ 190.2.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.35 Notice of intent to export;
examination of merchandise.
(a) Notice. A notice of intent to export
merchandise which may be the subject
of an unused merchandise drawback
claim (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)) must be
provided to CBP to give CBP the
opportunity to examine the
merchandise. The claimant, or the
exporter, must file at the port of
intended examination a Notice of Intent
to Export, Destroy, or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback
on CBP Form 7553 at least 2 working
days prior to the date of intended
exportation unless CBP approves
another filing period or the claimant has
been granted a waiver of prior notice
(see § 190.91).
(b) Required information. The notice
must certify that the merchandise has
not been used in the United States
before exportation. In addition, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
notice must provide the bill of lading
number, if known, the name and
telephone number, mailing address,
and, if available, fax number and email
address of a contact person, and the
location of the merchandise.
(c) Decision to examine or to waive
examination. Within 2 working days
after receipt of the Notice of Intent to
Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise
for Purposes of Drawback (see paragraph
(a) of this section), CBP will notify the
party designated on the Notice in
writing of CBP’s decision to either
examine the merchandise to be
exported, or to waive examination. If
CBP timely notifies the designated
party, in writing, of its decision to
examine the merchandise (see
paragraph (d) of this section), but the
merchandise is exported without having
been presented to CBP for examination,
any drawback claim, or part thereof,
based on the Notice will be denied. If
CBP notifies the designated party, in
writing, of its decision to waive
examination of the merchandise, or, if
timely notification of a decision by CBP
to examine or to waive examination has
not been received, the merchandise may
be exported without delay.
(d) Time and place of examination. If
CBP gives timely notice of its decision
to examine the export merchandise, the
merchandise to be examined must be
promptly presented to CBP. CBP must
examine the merchandise within 5
working days after presentation of the
merchandise. The merchandise may be
exported without examination if CBP
fails to timely examine the merchandise
after presentation to CBP. If the
examination is completed at a port other
than the port of actual exportation, the
merchandise must be transported inbond to the port of exportation.
(e) Extent of examination. The
appropriate CBP office may permit
release of merchandise without
examination, or may examine, to the
extent determined to be necessary, the
items exported or destroyed.
§ 190.36 Failure to file Notice of Intent to
Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback.
(a) General; application. Merchandise
which has been exported without
complying with the requirements of
§ 190.35(a) or § 190.91 may be eligible
for unused merchandise drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) subject to the
following conditions:
(1) Application. The claimant must
file a written application with the
drawback office where the drawback
claims will be filed. Such application
must include the following:
(i) Required information.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37937
(A) Name, address, and Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) number (with
suffix) of applicant;
(B) Name, address, and IRS number(s)
(with suffix(es)) of exporter(s), if
applicant is not the exporter;
(C) Export period covered by this
application;
(D) Commodity/product lines of
imported and exported merchandise
covered in this application (and the
applicable HTSUS numbers);
(E) The origin of the above
merchandise;
(F) Estimated number of export
transactions covered in this application;
(G) Estimated number of drawback
claims and estimated time of filing those
claims to be covered in this application;
(H) The port(s) of exportation;
(I) Estimated dollar value of potential
drawback claims to be covered in this
application;
(J) The relationship between the
parties involved in the import and
export transactions; and
(K) Provision(s) of drawback covered
under the application;
(ii) Written declarations regarding:
(A) The reason(s) that CBP was not
notified of the intent to export; and
(B) Whether the applicant, to the best
of its knowledge, will have future
exportations on which unused
merchandise drawback might be
claimed; and
(iii) A certification that the following
documentary evidence will be made
available for CBP to review upon
request:
(A) For the purpose of establishing
that the imported merchandise was not
used in the United States (for purposes
of drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1))
or that the exported merchandise was
not used in the United States and
satisfied the requirements for
substitution with the imported
merchandise (for purposes of drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), and, as
applicable:
(1) Records;
(2) Any laboratory records prepared in
the ordinary course of business; and/or
(3) Inventory records prepared in the
ordinary course of business tracing all
relevant movements and storage of the
imported merchandise, substituted
merchandise, and/or exported
merchandise; and
(B) Evidence establishing compliance
with all other applicable drawback
requirements.
(2) One-Time Use. The procedure
provided for in this section may be used
by a claimant only once, unless good
cause is shown (for example,
successorship).
(3) Claims filed pending disposition of
application. Drawback claims may be
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37938
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
filed under this section pending
disposition of the application. However,
those drawback claims will not be
processed or paid until the application
is approved by CBP.
(b) CBP action. In order for CBP to
evaluate the application under this
section, CBP may request, and the
applicant must provide, any of the
information listed in paragraph
(a)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of this
section. In making its decision to
approve or deny the application under
this section, CBP will consider factors
such as, but not limited to, the
following:
(1) Information provided by the
claimant in the written application;
(2) Any of the information listed in
paragraphs (a)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of
this section and requested by CBP under
paragraph (b); and
(3) The applicant’s prior record with
CBP.
(c) Time for CBP action. CBP will
notify the applicant in writing within 90
days after receipt of the application of
its decision to approve or deny the
application, or of CBP’s inability to
approve, deny or act on the application
and the reason therefor.
(d) Appeal of denial of application. If
CBP denies the application, the
applicant may file a written appeal with
the drawback office which issued the
denial, provided that the applicant files
this appeal within 30 days of the date
of denial. If CBP denies this initial
appeal, the applicant may file a further
written appeal with CBP Headquarters,
Office of Trade, Trade Policy and
Programs, provided that the applicant
files this further appeal within 30 days
of the denial date of the initial appeal.
CBP may extend the 30-day period for
appeal to the drawback office or to CBP
Headquarters, for good cause, if the
applicant applies in writing for such
extension within the appropriate 30-day
period above.
(e) Future intent to export unused
merchandise. If an applicant states it
will have future exportations on which
unused merchandise drawback may be
claimed (see paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B) of
this section), the applicant will be
informed of the procedures for waiver of
prior notice (see § 190.91). If the
applicant seeks waiver of prior notice
under § 190.91, any documentation
submitted to CBP to comply with this
section will be included in the request
under § 190.91. An applicant that states
that it will have future exportations on
which unused merchandise drawback
may be claimed (see paragraph
(a)(1)(ii)(B) of this section) and which
does not obtain waiver of prior notice
must notify CBP of its intent to export
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
prior to each such exportation, in
accordance with § 190.35.
§ 190.37 Destruction under CBP
supervision.
A claimant may destroy merchandise
and obtain unused merchandise
drawback by complying with the
procedures set forth in § 190.71 relating
to destruction.
§ 190.38
Recordkeeping.
(a) Maintained by claimant; by others.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all
records which are necessary to be
maintained by the claimant under this
part with respect to drawback claims,
and records kept by others to
complement the records of the claimant,
which are essential to establish
compliance with the legal requirements
of 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) or (j)(2), as
applicable, and this part with respect to
drawback claims, must be retained for 3
years after liquidation of such claims
(under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the same records
may be subject to a different retention
period for different purposes).
(b) Accounting for the merchandise.
Merchandise subject to drawback under
19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) and (j)(2) must be
accounted for in a manner which will
enable the claimant:
(1) To determine, and CBP to verify,
the applicable import entry or transfer(s)
of drawback-eligible merchandise;
(2) To determine, and CBP to verify,
the applicable exportation or
destruction; and
(3) To identify, with respect to the
import entry or any transfer(s) of
drawback-eligible merchandise, the
imported merchandise designated as the
basis for the drawback claim.
Subpart D—Rejected Merchandise
§ 190.41
Rejected merchandise drawback.
Section 313(c) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(c)), provides for
drawback upon the exportation or
destruction under CBP supervision of
imported merchandise which has been
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption, duty-paid, and which:
Does not conform to sample or
specifications; has been shipped
without the consent of the consignee; or
has been determined to be defective as
of the time of importation; or ultimately
sold at retail by the importer or the
person who received the merchandise
from the importer, and for any reason
returned to and accepted by the
importer or the person who received the
merchandise from the importer. The
total amount of drawback allowable will
be 99 percent of the amount of duties
paid with respect to the imported, dutypaid merchandise. See subpart P for
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
drawback of internal revenue taxes for
unmerchantable or nonconforming
distilled spirits, wines, or beer.
§ 190.42 Procedures and supporting
documentation.
(a) Time limit for exportation or
destruction. Drawback will be denied on
merchandise that is exported or
destroyed after the statutory 5-year time
period.
(b) Required documentation. The
claimant must submit documentation to
CBP as part of the complete drawback
claim (see § 190.51) to establish that the
merchandise did not conform to sample
or specification, was shipped without
the consent of the consignee, or was
defective as of the time of importation
(see § 190.45 for additional
requirements for claims made on
rejected retail merchandise under 19
U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)). If the claimant
was not the importer, the claimant must
also:
(1) Submit a statement signed by the
importer and every other person, other
than the ultimate purchaser, that owned
the goods, that no other claim for
drawback was made on the goods by
any other person; and
(2) Certify that records are available to
support the statement required in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(c) Notice. A notice of intent to export
or destroy merchandise which may be
the subject of a rejected merchandise
drawback claim (19 U.S.C. 1313(c))
must be provided to CBP to give CBP
the opportunity to examine the
merchandise. The claimant, or the
exporter (for destruction under CBP
supervision, see § 190.71), must file at
the port of intended redelivery to CBP
custody a Notice of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form
7553 at least 5 working days prior to the
date of intended return to CBP custody.
Waiver of prior notice for exportations
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) (see § 190.91) is
inapplicable to exportations under 19
U.S.C. 1313(c).
(d) Required information. The notice
must provide the bill of lading number,
if known, the name and telephone
number, mailing address, and, if
available, fax number and email address
of a contact person, and the location of
the merchandise.
(e) Decision to waive examination.
Within 2 working days after receipt of
the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy,
or Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback (see paragraph (c) of this
section), CBP will notify, in writing, the
party designated on the Notice of CBP’s
decision to either examine the
merchandise to be exported or
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
destroyed, or to waive examination. If
CBP timely notifies the designated
party, in writing, of its decision to
examine the merchandise (see
paragraph (f) of this section), but the
merchandise is exported or destroyed
without having been presented to CBP
for such examination, any drawback
claim, or part thereof, based on the
Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback, must be denied. If CBP
notifies the designated party, in writing,
of its decision to waive examination of
the merchandise, or, if timely
notification of a decision by CBP to
examine or to waive examination is
absent, the merchandise may be
exported or destroyed without delay
and will be deemed to have been
returned to CBP custody.
(f) Time and place of examination. If
CBP gives timely notice of its decision
to examine the merchandise to be
exported or destroyed, the merchandise
to be examined must be promptly
presented to CBP. CBP must examine
the merchandise within 5 working days
after presentation of the merchandise.
The merchandise may be exported or
destroyed without examination if CBP
fails to timely examine the merchandise
after presentation to CBP, and in such
case the merchandise will be deemed to
have been returned to CBP custody. If
the examination is completed at a port
other than the port of actual exportation
or destruction, the merchandise must be
transported in-bond to the port of
exportation or destruction.
(g) Extent of examination. The
appropriate CBP office may permit
release of merchandise without
examination, or may examine, to the
extent determined to be necessary, the
items exported or destroyed.
(h) Drawback claim. When filing the
drawback claim, the drawback claimant
must correctly calculate the amount of
drawback due (see § 190.51(b)). The
procedures for restructuring a claim (see
§ 190.53) apply to rejected merchandise
drawback if the claimant has an ongoing
export program which qualifies for this
type of drawback.
(i) Exportation. Claimants must
provide documentary evidence of
exportation (see subpart G of this part).
The claimant may establish exportation
by mail as set out in § 190.74o.
§ 190.43
claim.
Unused merchandise drawback
Rejected merchandise may be the
subject of an unused merchandise
drawback claim under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1), in accordance with subpart C
of this part, to the extent that the
merchandise qualifies therefor.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 190.44
[Reserved]
§ 190.45
Returned retail merchandise.
(a) Special rule for substitution.
Section 313(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)), provides for drawback
upon the exportation or destruction
under CBP supervision of imported
merchandise which has been entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, duty-paid and ultimately
sold at retail by the importer, or the
person who received the merchandise
from the importer, and for any reason
returned to and accepted by the
importer, or the person who received
the merchandise from the importer.
(b) Eligibility requirements. (1)
Drawback is allowable pursuant to
compliance with all requirements set
forth in this subpart; and
(2) The claimant must also show by
evidence satisfactory to CBP that
drawback may be claimed by—
(i) Designating an entry of
merchandise that was imported within
1 year before the date of exportation or
destruction of the merchandise
described in paragraph (a) under CBP
supervision.
(ii) Certifying that the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number and specific
product identifier (such as part number,
SKU, or product code) apply to both the
merchandise designated for drawback
(in the import documentation) and the
returned merchandise.
(c) Allowable refund. The total
amount of drawback allowable will not
exceed 99 percent of the amount of
duties paid with respect to the imported
merchandise.
(d) Denial of claims. No drawback
will be refunded if CBP is not satisfied
that the claimant has provided, upon
request, the documentation necessary to
support the certification required in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii).
Subpart E—Completion of Drawback
Claims
§ 190.51
Completion of drawback claims.
(a) General—(1) Complete claim.
Unless otherwise specified, a complete
drawback claim under this part will
consist of the successful electronic
transmission to CBP of the drawback
entry (as described in subparagraph (2)),
applicable Notice(s) of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form
7553, applicable import entry data, and
evidence of exportation or destruction
as provided for under subpart G of this
part.
(2) Drawback entry. The drawback
entry is to be filed through a CBP-
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37939
authorized electronic system and must
include the following:
(i) Claimant identification number,
name, and address;
(ii) Broker identification number,
name, and address (if applicable);
(iii) Surety code, bond type, and
amount of bond;
(iv) Port code for the drawback office
that will review the claim;
(v) Drawback entry number and
provision(s) under which drawback is
claimed;
(vi) Statement of eligibility for
applicable privileges (as provided for in
subpart I of this part);
(vii) Amount of refund claimed for
each of relevant duties, taxes, and fees
(calculated to two decimal places);
(viii) For each designated import
entry line item, the entry number and
the line item number designating the
merchandise, a description of the
merchandise, a unique import tracing
identification number(s) (ITIN) (used to
associate the imported merchandise and
any substituted merchandise with any
intermediate products (if applicable)
and the drawback-eligible exported or
destroyed merchandise or finished
article(s)), as well as the following
information for the merchandise
designated as the basis for the drawback
claim: The 10-digit HTSUS
classification and associated duty
rate(s), amount of duties paid,
applicable entered value (see 19 CFR
190.11(a)), quantity and unit of measure
(using the unit(s) of measure required
under the HTSUS, if applicable), as well
as the types, rates, and amounts of any
other duties, taxes, or fees for which a
refund is requested;
(ix) For manufacturing claims under
19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), the basis of the
claim (as provided for in § 190.23), the
ruling number, the factory location, the
date(s) of use of the imported and/or
substituted merchandise in
manufacturing/processing, the 10-digit
HTSUS classification for the imported
merchandise and/or which would have
been applicable to the substituted
merchandise had it been imported, the
quantity and unit of measure (using the
unit(s) of measure required under the
HTSUS, if applicable) of the imported
and/or substituted merchandise in
manufacturing/processing, unique
manufacture tracing identification
number(s) (MTIN) (used to associate the
manufactured merchandise, including
any intermediate products, with the
drawback-eligible exported or destroyed
finished article(s)), and a certification
from the claimant that provides as
follows: ‘‘The article(s) described above
were manufactured or produced and
disposed of as stated herein in
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37940
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
accordance with the drawback ruling on
file with CBP and in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations.’’;
(x) Indicate whether the designated
imported merchandise, other
substituted merchandise, or finished
article (for manufacturing claims) was
transferred to the drawback claimant
prior to the exportation or destruction of
the eligible merchandise, and for
unused merchandise drawback claims
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j), provide a
certification from the client that
provides as follows: ‘‘The undersigned
hereby certifies that the merchandise
herein described is unused in the
United States and further certifies that
this merchandise was not subjected to
any process of manufacture or other
operation except the allowable
operations as provided for by
regulation.’’;
(xi) Indicate whether the eligible
merchandise was exported or destroyed
and provide the applicable 10-digit
HTSUS or Department of Commerce
Schedule B classification, quantity, and
unit of measure (the unit of measure
specified must be the same as that
which was required under the HTSUS
for the designated imported
merchandise) and, for claims under 19
U.S.C. 1313(c), specify the basis as one
of the following:
(A) Merchandise does not conform to
sample or specifications;
(B) Merchandise was defective at time
of importation;
(C) Merchandise was shipped without
consent of the consignee; or
(D) Merchandise sold at retail and
returned to the importer or the person
who received the merchandise from the
importer;
(xii) For eligible merchandise that was
exported, the unique export identifier
(the number used to associate the export
transaction with the appropriate
documentary evidence of exportation),
bill of lading number, export
destination, name of exporter, the
applicable comparative value pursuant
to 19 CFR 190.11(b) (see
§ 190.22(a)(1)(ii), § 190.22(a)(2)(ii), or
§ 190.32(b)) for substitution claims, and
a certification from the claimant that
provides as follows: ‘‘I declare, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that all
of the statements in this document are
correct and that the exported article is
not to be relanded in the United States
or any of its possessions without paying
duty.’’;
(xiii) For eligible merchandise that
was destroyed, the name of the
destroyer and, if substituted, the
applicable comparative value pursuant
to 19 CFR 190.11(c) (see
§ 190.22(a)(1)(ii), § 190.22(a)(2)(ii), or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 190.32(b)), and a certification from the
claimant, if applicable, that provides as
follows: ‘‘The undersigned hereby
certifies that, for the destroyed
merchandise herein described, the value
of recovered materials (including the
value of any tax benefit or royalty
payment) that accrues to the drawback
claimant has been deducted from the
value of the imported (or substituted)
merchandise designated by the
claimant, in accordance with 19 U.S.C.
1313(x).’’;
(xiv) For substitution unused
merchandise drawback claims under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), a certification from the
claimant that provides as follows: ‘‘The
undersigned hereby certifies that the
substituted merchandise is unused in
the United States and that the
substituted merchandise was in our
possession prior to exportation or
destruction.’’;
(xv) For NAFTA drawback claims
provided for in subpart E of part 181,
the foreign entry number and date of
entry, the HTSUS classification for the
foreign entry, the amount of duties paid
for the foreign entry and the applicable
exchange rate, and, if applicable, a
certification from the claimant that
provides as follows: ‘‘Same condition to
NAFTA countries—The undersigned
certifies that the merchandise herein
described is in the same condition as
when it was imported under the above
import entry(s) and further certifies that
this merchandise was not subjected to
any process of manufacture or other
operation except the allowable
operations as provided for by
regulation.’’; and
(xvi) All certifications required in this
part and as otherwise deemed necessary
by CBP to establish compliance with the
applicable laws and regulations, as well
as the following declaration: ‘‘The
undersigned acknowledges statutory
requirements that all records supporting
the information on this document are to
be retained by the issuing party for a
period of 3 years from the date of
liquidation of the drawback claim. All
required documentation that must be
uploaded in accordance with 19 CFR
190.51 will be provided to CBP within
24 hours of the filing of the drawback
claim. The undersigned acknowledges
that a false certification of the foregoing
renders the drawback claim incomplete
and subject to denial. The undersigned
is fully aware of the sanctions provided
in 18 U.S.C. 1001, and 18 U.S.C. 550,
and 19 U.S.C. 1593a.’’
(3) Election of line item designation
for imported merchandise. Merchandise
on a specific line on an entry summary
may be designated for either direct
identification or substitution claims but
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
a single line on an entry summary may
not be split for purposes of claiming
drawback under both direct
identification and substitution claims.
The first complete drawback claim
accepted by CBP which designates
merchandise on a line on an entry
summary establishes this designation
for any remaining merchandise on that
same line. For claims involving
transferred merchandise, please see
§ 190.10(c) regarding required
notifications concerning whether the
merchandise should be eligible for
direct identification or substitution
claims.
(4) Limitation on line item eligibility
for imported merchandise. Claimants
are prohibited from filing substitution
drawback claims under part 190 for
imported merchandise associated with a
line item on an entry summary if any
other merchandise covered on that entry
summary has been designated as the
basis of a claim under part 191.
(b) Drawback due—(1) Claimant
required to calculate drawback.
Drawback claimants are required to
correctly calculate the amount of
drawback due. The amount of drawback
requested on the drawback entry is
generally to be 99 percent of the duties,
taxes, and fees eligible for drawback.
(For example, if $1,000 in import duties
are eligible for drawback less 1 percent
($10), the amount claimed on the
drawback entry should be for $990.)
Claims exceeding 99 percent (or 100%
when 100% of the duty is available for
drawback) will not be paid until the
calculations have been corrected by the
claimant. Claims for less than 99
percent (or 100% when 100% of the
duty is available for drawback) will be
paid as filed, unless the claimant
amends the claim in accordance with
§ 190.52(c). The amount of duties, taxes,
and fees eligible for drawback is
determined by whether a claim is based
upon direct identification or
substitution, as provided for below:
(i) Direct identification. The amounts
eligible for drawback for a unit of
merchandise consists of those duties,
taxes, and fees that were paid for that
unit of the designated imported
merchandise. This may be the amount
of duties, taxes, and fees actually
tendered on that unit or those
attributable to that unit, if identified
pursuant to an approved accounting
method (see 19 CFR 190.14).
(ii) Substitution. The amount of
duties, taxes, and fees eligible for
drawback pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
or 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) is determined by
per unit averaging, as defined in 19 CFR
190.2. The amount that may be refunded
is also subject to the limitations set forth
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
in 19 CFR 190.22(a)(1)(ii)
(manufacturing claims) and 19 CFR
190.32(b) (unused merchandise claims),
as applicable.
(2) Merchandise processing fee
apportionment calculation. Where a
drawback claimant requests a refund of
a merchandise processing fee paid
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9)(A), the
claimant is required to correctly
apportion the fee to that imported
merchandise for which drawback is
claimed when calculating the amount of
drawback requested on the drawback
entry. This is determined as follows:
(i) Relative value ratio for each line
item. The value of each line item of
entered merchandise subject to a
merchandise processing fee is
calculated (to four decimal places) by
dividing the value of the line item
subject to the fee by the total value of
entered merchandise subject to the fee.
The result is the relative value ratio.
(ii) Merchandise processing fee
apportioned to each line item. To
apportion the merchandise processing
fee to each line item, the relative value
ratio for each line item is multiplied by
the merchandise processing fee paid.
(iii) Amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per
line item. The amount of merchandise
processing fee apportioned to each line
item is multiplied by 99 percent to
calculate that portion of the fee
attributable to each line item that is
eligible for drawback.
(iv) Amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per
unit of merchandise. To calculate the
amount of a merchandise processing fee
eligible for drawback per unit of
merchandise, the line item amount that
is eligible for drawback is divided by
the number of units covered by that line
item (to two decimal places).
(v) Limitation on amount of
merchandise processing fee eligible for
drawback for substitution claims. The
amount of a merchandise processing fee
eligible for drawback per unit of
merchandise for drawback claims based
upon substitution is subject to the
limitations set forth in §§ 190.22(a)(1)(ii)
(manufacturing claims) and 190.32(b)
(unused merchandise claims), as
applicable.
(vi)(A) Example 1:
(1) Line item 1—5,000 articles valued at
$10 each total $50,000
(2) Line item 2—6,000 articles valued at
$15 each total $90,000
(3) Line item 3—10,000 articles valued
at $20 each total $200,000
(4) Total units = 21,000
(5) Total value = $340,000
(6) Merchandise processing fee = $485
(for purposes of this example, the fee
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
cap of $485 is assumed; see 19 CFR
24.23 for the current amount
consistent with 19 U.S.C.
58c(a)(9)(B)(i))
(i) Line item relative value ratios. The
relative value ratio for line item 1 is
calculated by dividing the value of that
line item by the total value ($50,000 ÷
340,000 = .1471). The relative value
ratio for line item 2 is .2647. The
relative value ratio for line item 3 is
.5882.
(ii) Merchandise processing fee
apportioned to each line item. The
amount of fee attributable to each line
item is calculated by multiplying $485
by the applicable relative value ratio.
The amount of the $485 fee attributable
to line item 1 is $71.3435 (.1471 × $485
= $71.3435). The amount of the fee
attributable to line item 2 is $128.3795
(.2647 × $485 = $128.3795). The amount
of the fee attributable to line item 3 is
$285.2770 (.5882 × $485 = $285.2770).
(iii) Amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per
line item. The amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback for
line item 1 is $70.6301 (.99 × $71.3435).
The amount of fee eligible for drawback
for line item 2 is $127.0957 (.99 ×
$128.3795). The amount of fee eligible
for drawback for line item 3 is
$282.4242 (.99 × $285.2770).
(iv) Amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per
unit of merchandise. The amount of
merchandise processing fee eligible for
drawback per unit of merchandise is
calculated by dividing the amount of fee
eligible for drawback for the line item
by the number of units in the line item.
For line item 1, the amount of
merchandise processing fee eligible for
drawback per unit is $.0141 ($70.6301 ÷
5,000 = $.0141). If 1,000 widgets form
the basis of a claim for drawback under
19 U.S.C. 1313(j), the total amount of
drawback attributable to the
merchandise processing fee is $14.10
(1,000 × .0141 = $14.10). For line item
2, the amount of fee eligible for
drawback per unit is $.0212 ($127.0957
÷ 6,000 = $.0212). For line item 3, the
amount of fee eligible for drawback per
unit is $.0282 ($282.4242 ÷ 10,000 =
$.0282).
(B) Example 2. This example
illustrates the treatment of dutiable
merchandise that is exempt from the
merchandise processing fee and dutyfree merchandise that is subject to the
merchandise processing fee.
(1)(i) Line item 1—700 meters of
printed cloth valued at $10 per meter
(total value $7,000) that is exempt from
the merchandise processing fee under
19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(8)(B)(iii)
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37941
(ii) Line item 2—15,000 articles
valued at $100 each (total value
$1,500,000)
(iii) Line item 3—10,000 duty-free
articles valued at $50 each (total value
$500,000)
(iv) The relative value ratios are
calculated using line items 2 and 3 only,
as there is no merchandise processing
fee imposed by reason of importation on
line item 1.
(2)(i) Line item 2—1,500,000 ÷
2,000,000 = .75 (line items 2 and 3 form
the total value of the merchandise
subject to the merchandise processing
fee).
(ii) Line item 3—500,000 ÷ 2,000,000
= .25.
(iii) If the total merchandise
processing fee paid was $485, the
amount of the fee attributable to line
item 2 is $363.75 (.75 × $485 = $363.75).
The amount of the fee attributable to
line item 3 is $121.25 (.25 × $485 =
$121.25).
(iv) The amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback for
line item 2 is $360.1125 (.99 × $363.75).
The amount of fee eligible for line item
3 is $120.0375 (.99 × $121.25).
(v) The amount of drawback on the
merchandise processing fee attributable
to each unit of line item 2 is $.0240
($360.1125 ÷ 15,000 = $.0240). The
amount of drawback on the
merchandise processing fee attributable
to each unit of line item 3 is $.0120
($120.0375 ÷ 10,000 = $.0120).
(vi) If 1,000 units of line item 2 were
exported, the drawback attributable to
the merchandise processing fee is
$24.00 ($.0240 × 1,000 = $24.00).
(3) Calculations for all other duties,
taxes, and fees.
(i) General. Where a drawback
claimant requests a refund of any other
duties, taxes, and fees allowable in
accordance with § 190.3, the claimant is
required to accurately calculate
(including apportionment using per unit
averaging or inventory management
methods, as appropriate) the duties,
taxes, and fees attributable to the
designated imported merchandise for
which drawback is being claimed when
calculating the amount of drawback
requested on the drawback entry
(generally 99% of the duties, taxes, and
fees paid on the imported merchandise).
(ii) Examples. As illustrated in the
examples in this paragraph, in the case
of customs duties, the type of
calculation required to determine the
amount of duties available for refund
(generally 99% of the duties paid on the
imported merchandise) will vary
depending on whether the duty
involved is ad valorem, specific, or
compound.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37942
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(1) Example 1: Ad valorem duty rate.
Apportionment of the duties paid (and
available for refund) will be based on
the application of the duty rates to the
per unit values of the imported
merchandise. The per unit values are
based on the invoice values unless the
method of refund calculation is per unit
averaging, which would require equal
apportionment of the duties paid over
the quantity of imported merchandise
covered by the line item upon which the
imported merchandise was reported on
the import entry summary. As a result,
the amount of duties available for
refund will vary depending on the
method used to calculate refunds.
(2) Example 2: Specific duty rate. No
apportionment of the duties paid is
required to determine the amount
available for refund. A fixed duty rate is
applicable to each unit of the imported
merchandise based on quantity. This
fixed rate will not vary based on the per
unit values of the imported merchandise
and, as a result, there is no impact on
the amount of duties available for
refunds (regardless of whether the
refunds are calculated based on invoice
values or per unit averaging).
(3) Example 3: Compound duty rate.
A compound duty rate is a combination
of an ad valorem duty rate and a specific
duty rate, with both rates applied to the
same imported merchandise. As a
result, a combination of the calculations
discussed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section will apply when calculating
the amount of duties paid that are
available for refund.
(b) Limitation. The amount of duties,
taxes, and fees eligible for drawback per
unit of merchandise for drawback
claims based upon substituted
merchandise is subject to the limitations
set forth in 19 CFR 190.22(a)(1)(ii)
(manufacturing claims) and 19 CFR
190.32(b) (unused merchandise claims),
as applicable.
(c) HTSUS classification or Schedule
B commodity number(s)—(1) General.
Drawback claimants are required to
provide, on all drawback claims they
submit, the 10-digit HTSUS
classification or the Schedule B
commodity number(s), for the following:
(i) Designated imported merchandise.
For imported merchandise designated
on drawback claims, the HTSUS
classification applicable at the time of
entry (e.g., as required to be reported on
the applicable entry summary(s) and
other entry documentation).
(ii) Substituted merchandise on
manufacturing claims. For merchandise
substituted on manufacturing drawback
claims, the HTSUS classification
numbers provided must be the same as
either—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
(A) if the substituted merchandise
was imported, the HTSUS classification
applicable at the time of entry (e.g., as
required to be reported on the
applicable entry summary(s) and other
entry documentation); or,
(B) if the substituted merchandise was
not imported, the HTSUS classification
that would have been reported to CBP
for the applicable entry summary(s) and
other entry documentation, for the
domestically produced substituted
merchandise, at the time of entry of the
designated imported merchandise.
(iii) Exported merchandise or articles.
For exported merchandise or articles,
the HTSUS classification or Schedule B
commodity number(s) must be from the
Electronic Export Information (EEI),
when required. If no EEI is required
(see, 15 CFR part 30 subpart D for a
complete list of exemptions), then the
claimant must provide the Schedule B
commodity number(s) or HTSUS
number(s) that the exporter would have
set forth on the EEI when the
exportation took place, but for the
exemption from the requirement for an
EEI.
(iv) Destroyed merchandise or
articles. For destroyed merchandise or
articles, the HTSUS classification or
Schedule B commodity number(s) must
be reported, subject to the following:
(A) if the HTSUS classification is
reported, then it must be the HTSUS
classification that would have been
applicable to the destroyed merchandise
or articles if they had been entered for
consumption at the time of destruction;
or
(B) if the Schedule B commodity
number is reported, then it must be the
Schedule B commodity number that
would have been reported for the
destroyed merchandise or articles if the
EEI had been required for an exportation
at the time of destruction.
(2) Changes to classification. If the 10digit HTSUS classification or the
Schedule B commodity number(s)
reported to CBP for the drawback claim
are determined to be incorrect or
otherwise in controversy after the filing
of the drawback entry, then the claimant
must notify the drawback office where
the drawback claim was filed of the
correct HTSUS classification or
Schedule B commodity number or the
nature of the controversy before the
liquidation of the drawback entry.
(d) Method of filing. All drawback
claims must be submitted through a
CBP-authorized system.
(e) Time of filing—(1) General. A
complete drawback claim is timely filed
if it is successfully transmitted not later
than 5 years after the date on which the
merchandise designated as the basis for
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the drawback claim was imported and
in compliance with all other applicable
deadlines under this part.
(i) Official date of filing. The official
date of filing is the date upon which
CBP receives a complete claim, as
provided in paragraph (a) of this
section, via transmission through a CBPauthorized system, including the
uploading of all required supporting
documentation.
(ii) Abandonment. Claims not
completed within the 5-year period after
the date on which the merchandise
designated as the basis for the drawback
claim was imported will be considered
abandoned. Except as provided in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section, no
extension will be granted unless it is
established that CBP was responsible for
the untimely filing; and
(iii) Special timeframes. For
substitution claims, the exportation or
destruction of merchandise shall not
have preceded the date of importation of
the designated imported merchandise,
and/or the exportation or destruction of
merchandise shall not otherwise be
outside of the timeframes specified in
19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(2)(C) and 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2), if applicable.
(2) Major disaster. The 5-year period
for filing a complete drawback claim
provided for in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section may be extended for a period
not to exceed 18 months if:
(i) The claimant establishes to the
satisfaction of CBP that the claimant
was unable to file the drawback claim
because of an event declared by the
President to be a major disaster, within
the meaning given to that term in 42
U.S.C. 5122(2), on or after January 1,
1994; and
(ii) The claimant files a request for
such extension with CBP no later than
1 year from the last day of the 5-year
period referred to in paragraph (e)(1) of
this section.
(3) Record retention. If an extension is
granted with respect to a request filed
under paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section,
the periods of time for retaining records
under 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3) will be
extended for an additional 18 months.
§ 190.52
claims.
Rejecting, perfecting or amending
(a) Rejecting the claim. Upon review
of a drawback claim, if the claim is
determined to be incomplete (see
§ 190.51(a)(1)) or untimely (see
§ 190.51(e)), the claim will be rejected
and CBP will notify the filer. The filer
will then have the opportunity to
complete the claim subject to the
requirement for filing a complete claim
within 5 years of the date of importation
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
of the merchandise designated as the
basis for the drawback claim.
(b) Perfecting the claim; additional
evidence required. If CBP determines
that the claim is complete according to
the requirements of § 190.51(a)(1), but
that additional evidence or information
is required, CBP will notify the filer.
The claimant must furnish, or have the
appropriate party furnish, the evidence
or information requested within 30 days
of the date of notification by CBP. CBP
may extend this 30-day period if the
claimant files a written request for such
extension within the 30-day period and
provides good cause. The evidence or
information required under this
paragraph may be filed more than 5
years after the date of importation of the
merchandise designated as the basis for
the drawback claim. Such additional
evidence or information may include,
but is not limited to:
(1) Records or other documentary
evidence of exportation, as provided for
in § 190.72, which shows that the
articles were shipped by the person
filing the drawback entry, or a letter of
endorsement from exporter which must
be attached to such bill of lading,
showing that the party filing the entry
is authorized to claim drawback and
receive payment (the claimant must
have on file and make available to CBP
upon request, the endorsement from the
exporter assigning the right to claim
drawback);
(2) A copy of the import entry and
invoice annotated for the merchandise
identified or designated;
(3) A copy of the export invoice
annotated to indicate the items on
which drawback is being claimed; and
(4) Records documenting the transfer
of the merchandise including records
kept in the normal course of business
upon which the claim is based (see
§ 190.10).
(c) Amending the claim; supplemental
filing. Amendments to claims for which
the drawback entries have not been
liquidated must be made within 5 years
of the date of importation of the
merchandise designated as the basis for
the drawback claim. Liquidated
drawback entries may not be amended;
however, they may be protested as
provided for in § 190.84 and part 174 of
this chapter.
§ 190.53
Restructuring of claims.
(a) General. CBP may require
claimants to restructure their drawback
claims in such a manner as to foster
administrative efficiency. In making this
determination, CBP will consider the
following factors:
(1) The number of transactions of the
claimant (imports and exports);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
(2) The value of the claims;
(3) The frequency of claims;
(4) The product or products being
claimed; and
(5) For 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b)
claims, the provisions, as applicable, of
the general manufacturing drawback
ruling or the specific manufacturing
drawback ruling.
(b) Exemption from restructuring;
criteria. In order to be exempt from a
restructuring, a claimant must
demonstrate an inability or
impracticability in restructuring its
claims as required by CBP and must
provide a mutually acceptable
alternative. Criteria used in such
determination will include a
demonstration by the claimant of one or
more of the following:
(1) Complexities caused by multiple
commodities or the applicable general
manufacturing drawback ruling or the
specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
(2) Variable and conflicting
manufacturing and inventory periods
(for example, financial, accounting and
manufacturing records maintained are
significantly different);
(3) Complexities caused by multiple
manufacturing locations;
(4) Complexities caused by difficulty
in adjusting accounting and inventory
records (for example, records
maintained—financial or accounting—
are significantly different); and/or
(5) Complexities caused by
significantly different methods of
operation.
Subpart F—Verification of Claims
§ 190.61
Verification of drawback claims.
(a) Authority. All claims are subject to
verification by CBP.
(b) Method. CBP personnel will verify
compliance with the law and this part,
the accuracy of the related general
manufacturing drawback ruling or
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
(as applicable), and the selected
drawback claims. Verification may
include an examination of all records
relating to the transaction(s).
(c) Liquidation. When a claim has
been selected for verification,
liquidation will be postponed only on
the drawback entry for the claim
selected for verification. Postponement
will continue in effect until the
verification has been completed and a
report is issued, subject to the limitation
in 19 CFR 159.12(f). In the event that a
substantial error is revealed during the
verification, CBP may postpone
liquidation of all related product line
claims, or, in CBP’s discretion, all
claims made by that claimant.
(d) Errors in specific or general
manufacturing drawback rulings—(1)
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37943
Specific manufacturing drawback
ruling; action by CBP. If verification of
a drawback claim filed under a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling (see
§ 190.8) reveals errors or deficiencies in
the drawback ruling or application
therefor, the verifying CBP official will
promptly inform CBP Headquarters
(Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade).
(2) General manufacturing drawback
ruling. If verification of a drawback
claim filed under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling (see
§ 190.7) reveals errors or deficiencies in
a general manufacturing drawback
ruling, the letter of notification of intent
to operate under the general
manufacturing drawback ruling, or the
acknowledgment of the letter of
notification of intent, the verifying CBP
official will promptly inform CBP
Headquarters (Attention: Entry Process
and Duty Refunds Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of Trade).
(3) Action by CBP Headquarters. CBP
Headquarters will review the stated
errors or deficiencies and take
appropriate action (see 19 U.S.C. 1625;
19 CFR part 177).
§ 190.62
Penalties.
(a) Criminal penalty. Any person who
knowingly and willfully files any false
or fraudulent entry or claim for the
payment of drawback upon the
exportation or destruction of
merchandise or knowingly or willfully
makes or files any false document for
the purpose of securing the payment to
himself or others of any drawback on
the exportation or destruction of
merchandise greater than that legally
due, will be subject to the criminal
provisions of 18 U.S.C. 550, 1001, or
any other appropriate criminal
sanctions.
(b) Civil penalty. Any person who
seeks, induces or affects the payment of
drawback, by fraud or negligence, or
attempts to do so, is subject to civil
penalties, as provided under 19 U.S.C.
1593a. A fraudulent violation is subject
to a maximum administrative penalty of
3 times the total actual or potential loss
of revenue. Repetitive negligent
violations are subject to a maximum
penalty equal to the actual or potential
loss of revenue.
§ 190.63
Liability for drawback claims.
(a) Liability of claimants. Any person
making a claim for drawback will be
liable for the full amount of the
drawback claimed.
(b) Liability of importers. An importer
will be liable for any drawback claim
made by another person with respect to
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37944
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
merchandise imported by the importer
in an amount equal to the lesser of:
(1) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that the person claimed with
respect to the imported merchandise; or
(2) The amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that the importer authorized the
other person to claim with respect to the
imported merchandise.
(c) Joint and several liability. Persons
described in paragraphs (a) and (b) will
be jointly and severally liable for the
amount described in paragraph (b).
Subpart G—Exportation and
Destruction
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.71 Drawback on articles destroyed
under CBP supervision.
(a) Procedure. At least 7 working days
before the intended date of destruction
of merchandise or articles upon which
drawback is intended to be claimed, a
Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback on CBP Form 7553 must be
filed by the claimant with the CBP port
where the destruction is to take place,
giving notification of the date and
specific location where the destruction
is to occur. Within 4 working days after
receipt of the CBP Form 7553, CBP will
advise the filer in writing of its
determination to witness or not to
witness the destruction. If the filer of
the notice is not so notified within 4
working days, the merchandise may be
destroyed without delay and will be
deemed to have been destroyed under
CBP supervision. Unless CBP
determines to witness the destruction,
the destruction of the articles following
timely notification on CBP Form 7553
will be deemed to have occurred under
CBP supervision. If CBP attends the
destruction, CBP will certify on CBP
Form 7553.
(b) Evidence of destruction. When
CBP does not attend the destruction, the
claimant must submit evidence that
destruction took place in accordance
with the Notice of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form
7553. The evidence must be issued by
a disinterested third party (for example,
a landfill operator). The type of
evidence depends on the method and
place of destruction, but must establish
that the merchandise was, in fact,
destroyed within the meaning of
‘‘destruction’’ in § 190.2.
(c) Completion of drawback entry.
After destruction, the claimant must
provide CBP Form 7553, certified by the
CBP official witnessing the destruction
in accordance with paragraph (a) of this
section, to CBP as part of the completed
drawback claim based on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
destruction (see § 190.51(a)). If CBP has
not attended the destruction, the
claimant must provide the evidence that
destruction took place in accordance
with the approved CBP Form 7553, as
provided for in paragraph (b) of this
section, as part of the completed
drawback claim based on the
destruction (see § 190.51(a)).
§ 190.72
Proof of Exportation.
(a) Required export data. Proof of
exportation of articles for drawback
purposes must establish fully the date
and fact of exportation and the identity
of the exporter by providing the
following summary data as part of a
complete claim (see § 190.51) (in
addition to providing prior notice of
intent to export if applicable (see
§§ 190.35, 190.36, 190.42, and 190.91)):
(1) Date of export;
(2) Name of exporter;
(3) Description of the goods;
(4) Quantity and unit of measure;
(5) Schedule B number or HTSUS
number; and
(6) Country of ultimate destination.
(b) Supporting documentary evidence.
Exportation may be established by
providing the following:
(1) Records or other documentary
evidence of exportation (originals or
copies) issued by the exporting carrier,
such as a bill of lading, air waybill,
freight waybill, Canadian Customs
manifest, and/or cargo manifest;
(2) Records from a CBP-approved
electronic export system of the United
States Government (§ 190.73);
(3) Official postal records (originals or
copies) which evidence exportation by
mail (§ 190.74);
(4) Notice of lading for supplies on
certain vessels or aircraft (§ 190.112); or
(5) Notice of transfer for articles
manufactured or produced in the United
States which are transferred to a foreign
trade zone (§ 190.183).
§ 190.73
Electronic proof of exportation.
Records kept through an electronic
export system of the United States
Government may be considered as
actual proof of exportation only if CBP
has officially approved the use of that
electronic export system as proof of
compliance for drawback claims.
Official approval will be published as a
general notice in the Customs Bulletin.
§ 190.74
Exportation by mail.
If the merchandise on which
drawback is to be claimed is exported
by mail or parcel post, the official postal
records (original or copies) which
describe the mail shipment will be
sufficient to prove exportation. The
postal record must be identified on the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
drawback entry, and must be retained
by the claimant and submitted as part of
the drawback claim (see § 190.51(a)).
§ 190.75
Exportation by the Government.
(a) Claim by U.S. Government. When
a department, branch, agency, or
instrumentality of the U.S. Government
exports products with the intention of
claiming drawback, it may establish the
exportation in the manner provided in
§ 190.72 of this subpart (see § 190.4).
(b) Claim by supplier. When a
supplier of merchandise to the
Government or any of the parties
specified in § 190.82 claims drawback,
exportation must be established under
§ 190.72 of this subpart.
§ 190.76
[Reserved]
Subpart H—Liquidation and Protest of
Drawback Entries
§ 190.81
Liquidation.
(a) Time of liquidation. Drawback
entries may be liquidated after:
(1) Liquidation of the designated
import entry or entries becomes final
pursuant to paragraph (e); or
(2) Deposit of estimated duties on the
imported merchandise and before
liquidation of the designated import
entry or entries.
(b) Claims based on estimated duties.
(1) Drawback may be paid upon
liquidation of a claim based on
estimated duties if one or more of the
designated import entries have not been
liquidated, or the liquidation has not
become final (because of a protest being
filed) (see also § 173.4(c) of this
chapter), only if the drawback claimant
and any other party responsible for the
payment of liquidated import duties
each files a written request for payment
of each drawback claim, waiving any
right to payment or refund under other
provisions of law, to the extent that the
estimated duties on the unliquidated
import entry are included in the
drawback claim for which drawback on
estimated duties is requested under this
paragraph. The drawback claimant
must, to the best of its knowledge,
identify each import entry that has been
protested and that is included in the
drawback claim. A drawback entry,
once finally liquidated on the basis of
estimated duties pursuant to paragraph
(e)(2), will not be adjusted by reason of
a subsequent final liquidation of the
import entry.
(2) However, if final liquidation of the
import entry discloses that the total
amount of import duty is different from
the total estimated duties deposited,
except in those cases when drawback is
100% of the duty, the party responsible
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
for the payment of liquidated duties, as
applicable, will:
(i) Be liable for 1 percent of all
increased duties found to be due on that
portion of merchandise recorded on the
drawback entry; or
(ii) Be entitled to a refund of 1 percent
of all excess duties found to have been
paid as estimated duties on that portion
of the merchandise recorded on the
drawback entry.
(c) Claims based on voluntary tenders
or other payments of duties—(1)
General. Subject to the requirements in
paragraph (2) of this section, drawback
may be paid upon liquidation of a claim
based on voluntary tenders of the
unpaid amount of lawful ordinary
customs duties or any other payment of
lawful ordinary customs duties for an
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption (see § 190.3(a)(1)(iii)),
provided that:
(i) The tender or payment is
specifically identified as duty on a
specifically identified entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption;
(ii) Liquidation of the specifically
identified entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption became
final prior to such tender or payment;
and
(iii) Liquidation of the drawback entry
in which that specifically identified
import entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption is
designated has not become final.
(2) Written request and waiver.
Drawback may be paid on claims based
on voluntary tenders or other payments
of duties under this subsection only if
the drawback claimant and any other
party responsible for the payment of the
voluntary tenders or other payments of
duties each files a written request for
payment of each drawback claim based
on such voluntary tenders or other
payments of duties, waiving any claim
to payment or refund under other
provisions of law, to the extent that the
voluntary tenders or other payment of
duties under this paragraph are
included in the drawback claim for
which drawback on the voluntary
tenders or other payment of duties is
requested under this paragraph.
(d) Claims based on liquidated duties.
Drawback will be based on the final
liquidated duties paid that have been
made final by operation of law (except
in the case of the written request for
payment of drawback on the basis of
estimated duties, voluntary tender of
duties, and other payments of duty, and
waiver, provided for in paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section).
(e) Liquidation procedure. (1) General.
When the drawback claim has been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
completed by the filing of the entry and
other required documents, and
exportation (or destruction) of the
merchandise or articles has been
established, CBP will determine
drawback due on the basis of the
complete drawback claim, the
applicable general manufacturing
drawback ruling or specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, and
any other relevant evidence or
information. Notice of liquidation will
be given electronically as provided in
§§ 159.9 and 159.10(c)(3).
(2) Liquidation by operation of law. (i)
Liquidated import entries. A drawback
claim that satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (d) that is not liquidated
within one year from the date of the
drawback claim (see § 190.51(e)(1)(i))
will be deemed liquidated for the
purpose of the drawback claim at the
drawback amount asserted by the
claimant or claim, unless the time for
liquidation is extended in accordance
with § 159.12 or if liquidation is
suspended as required by statute or
court order.
(ii) Unliquidated import entries. A
drawback claim that satisfies the
requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c) of
this section will be deemed liquidated
upon the deposit of estimated duties on
the unliquidated imported merchandise
(see § 190.81(b)).
(f) Relative value; multiple products—
(1) Distribution. Where two or more
products result from the manufacture or
production of merchandise, drawback
will be distributed to the several
products in accordance with their
relative values at the time of separation.
(2) Values. The values to be used in
computing the distribution of drawback
where two or more products result from
the manufacture or production of
merchandise under drawback
conditions must be the market value (as
provided for in the definition of relative
value in § 190.2), unless other values are
approved by CBP.
(g) Payment. CBP will authorize the
amount of the refund due as drawback
to the claimant.
§ 190.82 Person entitled to claim
drawback.
Unless otherwise provided in this part
(see §§ 190.42(b), 190.162, 190.175(a),
190.186), the exporter (or destroyer) will
be entitled to claim drawback, unless
the exporter (or destroyer), by means of
a certification, waives the right to claim
drawback and assigns such right to the
manufacturer, producer, importer, or
intermediate party (in the case of
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) and
(2), see § 190.33(a) and (b)). Such
certification must also affirm that the
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37945
exporter (or destroyer) has not and will
not assign the right to claim drawback
on the particular exportation or
destruction to any other party. The
certification provided for in this section
may be a blanket certification for a
stated period.
§ 190.83 Person entitled to receive
payment.
Drawback is paid to the claimant (see
§ 190.82).
§ 190.84
Protests.
Procedures to protest the denial, in
whole or in part, of a drawback entry
must be in accordance with part 174 of
this chapter (19 CFR part 174).
Subpart I—Waiver of Prior Notice of
Intent to Export; Accelerated Payment
of Drawback
§ 190.91
export.
Waiver of prior notice of intent to
(a) General—(1) Scope. The
requirement in § 190.35 for prior notice
of intent to export merchandise which
may be the subject of an unused
merchandise drawback claim under
§ 313(j) of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1313(j)), may be waived under
the provisions of this section.
(2) Effective date for claimants with
existing approval. For claimants
approved for waiver of prior notice
before February 24, 2019, and under 19
CFR 191, such approval of waiver of
prior notice will remain in effect, but
only if the claimant provides the
following certification as part of each
complete claim filed on or after that
date, pursuant to 19 CFR
190.51(a)(2)(xvi): ‘‘The undersigned
acknowledges the current statutory
requirements under 19 U.S.C. 1313 and
the regulatory requirements in 19 CFR
part 190, and hereby certifies continuing
eligibility for the waiver of prior notice
(granted prior to February 24, 2019) in
compliance therewith.’’ This
certification may only be made for
waiver of prior notice for the specific
type of drawback claim for which the
application was previously approved
under 19 CFR 191, except that
applications approved under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1) will also be applicable to
claims for the same type of merchandise
if made under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2).
(3) Limited successorship for waiver
of prior notice. When a claimant
(predecessor) is approved for waiver of
prior notice under this section and all
of the rights, privileges, immunities,
powers, duties and liabilities of the
claimant are transferred by written
agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution to a successor, such approval
of waiver of prior notice will remain in
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37946
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
effect for a period of 1 year after such
transfer. The approval of waiver of prior
notice will terminate at the end of such
1-year period unless the successor
applies for waiver of prior notice under
this section. If such successor applies
for waiver of prior notice under this
section within such 1-year period, the
successor may continue to operate
under the predecessor’s waiver of prior
notice until CBP approves or denies the
successor’s application for waiver of
prior notice under this section, subject
to the provisions in this section (see, in
particular, paragraphs (d) and (e) of this
section).
(b) Application—(1) Who may apply.
A claimant for unused merchandise
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) may
apply for a waiver of prior notice of
intent to export merchandise under this
section.
(2) Contents of application. An
applicant for a waiver of prior notice
under this section must file a written
application (which may be physically
delivered or delivered via email) with
the drawback office where the claims
will be filed. Such application must
include the following:
(i) Required information:
(A) Name, address, and Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) number (with
suffix) of applicant;
(B) Name, address, and Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) number (with
suffix) of current exporter(s) (if more
than 3 exporters, such information is
required only for the 3 most frequently
used exporters), if applicant is not the
exporter;
(C) Export period covered by this
application;
(D) Commodity/product lines of
imported and exported merchandise
covered by this application;
(E) Origin of merchandise covered by
this application;
(F) Estimated number of export
transactions during the next calendar
year covered by this application;
(G) Port(s) of exportation to be used
during the next calendar year covered
by this application;
(H) Estimated dollar value of potential
drawback during the next calendar year
covered by this application;
(I) The relationship between the
parties involved in the import and
export transactions; and
(J) Provision(s) of drawback covered
by the application.
(ii) A written declaration whether or
not the applicant has previously been
denied a waiver request, or had an
approval of a waiver revoked, by any
other drawback office, and whether the
applicant has previously requested a 1time waiver of prior notice under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 190.36, and whether such request was
approved or denied; and
(iii) A certification that the following
documentary evidence will be made
available for CBP review upon request:
(A) For the purpose of establishing
that the imported merchandise was not
used in the United States (for purposes
of drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1))
or that the exported merchandise was
not used in the United States and
satisfies the requirements for
substitution with the imported
merchandise (for purposes of drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), and, as
applicable:
(1) Records;
(2) Laboratory records prepared in the
ordinary course of business; and/or
(3) Inventory records prepared in the
ordinary course of business tracing all
relevant movements and storage of the
imported merchandise, substituted
merchandise, and/or exported
merchandise; and
(B) Any other evidence establishing
compliance with other applicable
drawback requirements, upon CBP’s
request under paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of
this section.
(3) Samples of records to accompany
application. To expedite the processing
of applications under this section, the
application should contain at least one
sample of each of the records to be used
to establish compliance with the
applicable requirements (that is, sample
of import document (for example, CBP
Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent),
sample of export document (for
example, bill of lading), and samples of
business, laboratory, and inventory
records certified, under paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of this
section, to be available to CBP upon
request).
(c) Action on application—(1) CBP
review. The drawback office will review
and verify the information submitted on
and with the application. CBP will
notify the applicant in writing within 90
days of receipt of the application of its
decision to approve or deny the
application, or of CBP’s inability to
approve, deny, or act on the application
and the reason therefor. In order for CBP
to evaluate the application, CBP may
request any of the information listed in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of
this section. Based on the information
submitted on and with the application
and any information so requested, and
based on the applicant’s record of
transactions with CBP, the drawback
office will approve or deny the
application. The criteria to be
considered in reviewing the applicant’s
record with CBP include, but are not
limited to:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(i) The presence or absence of
unresolved CBP charges (duties, taxes,
or other debts owed CBP);
(ii) The accuracy of the claimant’s
past drawback claims;
(iii) Whether waiver of prior notice
was previously revoked or suspended;
and
(iv) The presence or absence of any
failure to present merchandise to CBP
for examination after CBP had timely
notified the party filing a Notice of
Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback
on CBP Form 7553 of CBP’s intent to
examine the merchandise (see § 190.35).
(2) Approval. The approval of an
application for waiver of prior notice of
intent to export, under this section, will
operate prospectively, applying only to
those export shipments occurring after
the date of the waiver. It will be subject
to a stay, as provided in paragraph (d)
of this section.
(3) Denial. If an application for waiver
of prior notice of intent to export, under
this section, is denied, the applicant
will be given written notice, specifying
the grounds therefor, together with what
corrective action may be taken, and
informing the applicant that the denial
may be appealed in the manner
prescribed in paragraph (g) of this
section. The applicant may not reapply
for a waiver until the reason for the
denial is resolved.
(d) Stay. An approval of waiver of
prior notice may be stayed, for a
specified reasonable period, should CBP
desire for any reason to examine the
merchandise being exported with
drawback prior to its exportation for
purposes of verification. CBP will
provide written notice, by registered or
certified mail, of such a stay to the
person for whom waiver of prior notice
was approved. CBP will specify the
reason(s) for the stay in such written
notice. The stay will take effect 2
working days after the date the person
signs the return post office receipt for
the registered or certified mail. The stay
will remain in effect for the period
specified in the written notice, or until
such earlier date as CBP notifies the
person for whom waiver of prior notice
was approved in writing that the reason
for the stay has been satisfied. After the
stay is lifted, operation under the waiver
of prior notice procedure may resume
for exports on or after the date the stay
is lifted.
(e) Proposed revocation. CBP may
propose to revoke the approval of an
application for waiver of prior notice of
intent to export, under this section, for
good cause (such as, noncompliance
with the drawback law and/or
regulations). CBP will give written
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
notice of the proposed revocation of a
waiver of prior notice of intent to
export. The notice will specify the
reasons for CBP’s proposed action and
provide information regarding the
procedures for challenging CBP’s
proposed revocation action as
prescribed in paragraph (g) of this
section. The written notice of proposed
revocation may be included with a
notice of stay of approval of waiver of
prior notice as provided under
paragraph (d) of this section. The
revocation of the approval of waiver of
prior notice will take effect 30 days after
the date of the proposed revocation if
not timely challenged under paragraph
(g) of this section. If timely challenged,
the revocation will take effect after
completion of the challenge procedures
in paragraph (g) of this section unless
the challenge is successful.
(f) Action by drawback office
controlling. Action by the drawback
office to approve, deny, stay, or revoke
waiver of prior notice of intent to
export, unless reversed by CBP
Headquarters, will govern the
applicant’s eligibility for this procedure
in all CBP drawback offices. If the
application for waiver of prior notice of
intent to export is approved, the
claimant must refer to such approval in
the first drawback claim filed after such
approval in the drawback office
approving waiver of prior notice and
must submit a copy of the approval
letter with the first drawback claim filed
in any drawback office other than the
approving office, when the export upon
which the claim is based was without
prior notice, under this section.
(g) Appeal of denial or challenge to
proposed revocation. An appeal of a
denial of an application under this
section, or challenge to the proposed
revocation of an approved application
under this section, may be made by
letter to the drawback office issuing the
denial or proposed revocation and must
be filed within 30 days of the date of
denial or proposed revocation. A denial
of an appeal or challenge made to the
drawback office may itself be appealed
to CBP Headquarters, Office of Trade,
Trade Policy and Programs, and must be
filed within 30 days of the denial date
of the initial appeal or challenge. The
30-day period for appeal or challenge to
the drawback office or to CBP
Headquarters may be extended for good
cause, upon written request by the
applicant or holder for such extension
filed with the appropriate office within
the 30-day period.
§ 190.92
Accelerated payment.
(a) General—(1) Scope. Accelerated
payment of drawback is available under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
this section on drawback claims under
this part, unless specifically excepted
from such accelerated payment.
Accelerated payment of drawback
consists of the payment of estimated
drawback before liquidation of the
drawback entry. Accelerated payment of
drawback is only available when CBP’s
review of the request for accelerated
payment of drawback does not find
omissions from, or inconsistencies with
the requirements of the drawback law
and part 190 (see, especially, subpart E
of this part). Accelerated payment of a
drawback claim does not constitute
liquidation of the drawback entry.
(2) Effective date for claimants with
existing approval. For claimants
approved for accelerated payment of
drawback before February 24, 2019, and
under 19 CFR part 191, such approval
of accelerated payment will remain in
effect, but only if the claimant provides
the following certification as part of
each complete claim filed after that
date, pursuant to 19 CFR
190.51(a)(2)(xvi): ‘‘The undersigned
acknowledges the current statutory
requirements under 19 U.S.C. 1313 and
the regulatory requirements in 19 CFR
part 190, and hereby certifies continuing
eligibility for accelerated payment
(granted prior to February 24, 2019) in
compliance therewith.’’ This
certification may only be made for
accelerated payment for the specific
type of drawback claim for which the
application was previously approved
under 19 CFR 191, except that
applications approved under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1) will also be applicable to
claims for the same type of merchandise
if made under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2).
(3) Limited successorship for approval
of accelerated payment. When a
claimant (predecessor) is approved for
accelerated payment of drawback under
this section and all of the rights,
privileges, immunities, powers, duties
and liabilities of the claimant are
transferred by written agreement,
merger, or corporate resolution to a
successor, such approval of accelerated
payment will remain in effect for a
period of 1 year after such transfer. The
approval of accelerated payment of
drawback will terminate at the end of
such 1-year period unless the successor
applies for accelerated payment of
drawback under this section. If such
successor applies for accelerated
payment of drawback under this section
within such 1-year period, the successor
may continue to operate under the
predecessor’s approval of accelerated
payment until CBP approves or denies
the successor’s application for
accelerated payment under this section,
subject to the provisions in this section
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37947
(see, in particular, paragraph (f) of this
section).
(b) Application for approval; contents.
A person who wishes to apply for
accelerated payment of drawback must
file a written application (which may be
physically delivered or delivered via
email) with the drawback office where
claims will be filed.
(1) Required information. The
application must contain:
(i) Company name and address;
(ii) Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
number (with suffix);
(iii) Identity (by name and title) of the
person in claimant’s organization who
will be responsible for the drawback
program;
(iv) Description of the bond coverage
the applicant intends to use to cover
accelerated payments of drawback (see
paragraph (d) of this section), including:
(A) Identity of the surety to be used;
(B) Dollar amount of bond coverage
for the first year under the accelerated
payment procedure; and
(C) Procedures to ensure that bond
coverage remains adequate (that is,
procedures to alert the applicant when
and if its accelerated payment potential
liability exceeds its bond coverage);
(v) Description of merchandise and/or
articles covered by the application;
(vi) Provision(s) of drawback covered
by the application; and
(vii) Estimated dollar value of
potential drawback during the next 12month period covered by the
application.
(2) Previous applications. In the
application, the applicant must state
whether or not the applicant has
previously been denied an application
for accelerated payment of drawback, or
had an approval of such an application
revoked by any drawback office.
(3) Certification of compliance. In or
with the application, the applicant must
also submit a certification, signed by the
applicant, that all applicable statutory
and regulatory requirements for
drawback will be met.
(4) Description of claimant’s
drawback program. With the
application, the applicant must submit
a description (with sample documents)
of how the applicant will ensure
compliance with its certification that
the statutory and regulatory drawback
requirements will be met. This
description may be in the form of a
booklet. The detail contained in this
description should vary depending on
the size and complexity of the
applicant’s accelerated drawback
program (for example, if the dollar
amount is great and there are several
kinds of drawback involved, with
differing inventory, manufacturing, and
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37948
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
shipping methods, greater detail in the
description will be required). The
description must include at least:
(i) The name of the official in the
claimant’s organization who is
responsible for oversight of the
claimant’s drawback program;
(ii) The procedures and controls
demonstrating compliance with the
statutory and regulatory drawback
requirements;
(iii) The parameters of claimant’s
drawback recordkeeping program,
including the retention period and
method (for example, paper, electronic,
etc.);
(iv) A list of the records that will be
maintained, including at least sample
import documents, sample export
documents, sample inventory and
transportation documents (if
applicable), sample laboratory or other
documents establishing the qualification
of merchandise or articles for
substitution under the drawback law (if
applicable), and sample manufacturing
documents (if applicable);
(v) The procedures that will be used
to notify CBP of changes to the
claimant’s drawback program, variances
from the procedures described in this
application, and violations of the
statutory and regulatory drawback
requirements; and
(vi) The procedures for an annual
review by the claimant to ensure that its
drawback program complies with the
statutory and regulatory drawback
requirements and that CBP is notified of
any modifications from the procedures
described in this application.
(c) Sample application. The drawback
office, upon request, will provide
applicants for accelerated payment with
a sample letter format to assist them in
preparing their submissions.
(d) Bond required. If approved for
accelerated payment, the claimant must
furnish a properly executed bond in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated
amount of drawback to be claimed
during the term of the bond. If
outstanding accelerated drawback
claims exceed the amount of the bond,
the drawback office will require
additional bond coverage as necessary
before additional accelerated payments
are made.
(e) Action on application—(1) CBP
review. The drawback office will review
and verify the information submitted in
and with the application. In order for
CBP to evaluate the application, CBP
may request additional information
(including additional sample
documents) and/or explanations of any
of the information provided for in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section. Based
on the information submitted on and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
with the application and any
information so requested, and based on
the applicant’s record of transactions
with CBP, the drawback office will
approve or deny the application. The
criteria to be considered in reviewing
the applicant’s record with CBP include,
but are not limited to (as applicable):
(i) The presence or absence of
unresolved CBP charges (duties, taxes,
fees, or other debts owed CBP);
(ii) The accuracy of the claimant’s
past drawback claims; and
(iii) Whether accelerated payment of
drawback or waiver of prior notice of
intent to export was previously revoked
or suspended.
(2) Notification to applicant. CBP will
notify the applicant in writing within 90
days of receipt of the application of its
decision to approve or deny the
application, or of CBP’s inability to
approve, deny, or act on the application
and the reason therefor.
(3) Approval. The approval of an
application for accelerated payment,
under this section, will be effective as
of the date of CBP’s written notification
of approval under paragraph (e)(2) of
this section. Accelerated payment of
drawback will be available under this
section to unliquidated drawback claims
filed before and after such date. For
claims filed before such date,
accelerated payment of drawback will
be paid only if the claimant furnishes a
properly executed single transaction
bond covering the claim, in an amount
sufficient to cover the amount of
accelerated drawback to be paid on the
claim.
(4) Denial. If an application for
accelerated payment of drawback under
this section is denied, the applicant will
be given written notice, specifying the
grounds therefor, together with what
corrective action may be taken, and
informing the applicant that the denial
may be appealed in the manner
prescribed in paragraph (i) of this
section. The applicant may not reapply
for accelerated payment of drawback
until the reason for the denial is
resolved.
(f) Revocation. CBP may propose to
revoke the approval of an application
for accelerated payment of drawback
under this section, for good cause (such
as, noncompliance with the drawback
law and/or regulations). In case of such
proposed revocation, CBP will give
written notice, by registered or certified
mail, of the proposed revocation of the
approval of accelerated payment. The
notice will specify the reasons for CBP’s
proposed action and the procedures for
challenging CBP’s proposed revocation
action as prescribed in paragraph (h) of
this section. The revocation will take
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
effect 30 days after the date of the
proposed revocation if not timely
challenged under paragraph (h) of this
section. If timely challenged, the
revocation will take effect after
completion of the challenge procedures
in paragraph (h) of this section unless
the challenge is successful.
(g) Action by drawback office
controlling. Action by the drawback
office to approve, deny, or revoke
accelerated payment of drawback will
govern the applicant’s eligibility for this
procedure in all CBP drawback offices.
If the application for accelerated
payment of drawback is approved, the
claimant must refer to such approval in
the first drawback claim filed after such
approval in the drawback office
approving accelerated payment of
drawback and must submit a copy of the
approval letter with the first drawback
claim filed in a drawback office other
than the approving office.
(h) Appeal of denial or challenge to
proposed revocation. An appeal of a
denial of an application under this
section, or challenge to the proposed
revocation of an approved application
under this section, may be made in
writing to the drawback office issuing
the denial or proposed revocation and
must be filed within 30 days of the date
of denial or proposed revocation. A
denial of an appeal or challenge made
to the drawback office may itself be
appealed to CBP Headquarters, Office of
Trade, Trade Policy and Programs, and
must be filed within 30 days. The 30day period for appeal or challenge to the
drawback office or to CBP Headquarters
may be extended for good cause, upon
written request by the applicant or
holder for such extension filed with the
appropriate office within the 30-day
period.
(i) Payment. The drawback office
approving a drawback claim in which
accelerated payment of drawback was
requested will certify the drawback
claim for payment. After liquidation, the
drawback office will certify the claim
for payment of any amount due or
demand a refund of any excess amount
paid. Any excess amount of duty the
subject of accelerated payment that is
not repaid to CBP within 30 days after
the date of liquidation of the related
drawback entry will be considered
delinquent (see §§ 24.3a and 113.65(b)
of this chapter).
§ 190.93
Combined applications.
An applicant for the procedures
provided for in §§ 190.91 and 190.92 of
this subpart may apply for only one
procedure, both procedures separately,
or both procedures in one application
package (see also § 190.195 regarding
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(a) Drawback. Section 313(d) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)),
provides for drawback of internal
revenue tax upon the exportation of
flavoring extracts and medicinal or
toilet preparations (including
perfumery) manufactured or produced
in the United States in part from
domestic tax-paid alcohol.
(b) Shipment to Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, Guam, and American
Samoa. Drawback of internal revenue
tax on articles manufactured or
produced under this subpart and
shipped to Puerto Rico, the Virgin
Islands, Guam, or American Samoa will
be allowed in accordance with section
7653(c) of the Internal Revenue Code
(26 U.S.C. 7653(c)). However, there is no
authority of law for the allowance of
drawback of internal revenue tax on
flavoring extracts or medicinal or toilet
preparations (including perfumery)
manufactured or produced in the United
States and shipped to Wake Island,
Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Canton
Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston
Island, or Palmyra Island.
(c) Additional information required
on the manufacturer’s application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
The manufacturer’s application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling,
under § 190.8, must state the quantity of
domestic tax-paid alcohol contained in
each product on which drawback is
claimed.
(d) Variance in alcohol content—(1)
Variance of more than 5 percent. If the
percentage of alcohol contained in an
exported medicinal preparation,
flavoring extract or toilet preparation
varies by more than 5 percent from the
percentage of alcohol in the total
volume of the product as stated in a
previously approved application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling,
the manufacturer must apply for a new
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
pursuant to § 190.8. If the variation
differs from a previously filed schedule,
the manufacturer must file a new
schedule incorporating the change.
(2) Variance of 5 percent or less.
Variances of 5 percent or less of the
volume of the product must be reported
to the drawback office where the
drawback entries are liquidated. In such
cases, the drawback office may allow
drawback without specific authorization
from CBP Headquarters.
(e) Time period for completing claims.
Drawback claims under this subpart
must be completed within 3 years after
the date of exportation of the articles
upon which drawback is claimed.
(f) Filing of drawback entries on dutypaid imported merchandise and taxpaid alcohol. When the drawback claim
covers duty-paid imported merchandise
in addition to tax-paid alcohol, the
claimant must file one set of entries for
drawback of customs duty and another
set for drawback of internal revenue tax.
(g) Description of the alcohol. The
description of the alcohol that is the
subject of the drawback entry may be
obtained from the description on the
package containing the tax-paid alcohol.
§ 190.102
§ 190.103
combined applications for certification
in the drawback compliance program
and waiver of prior notice and/or
approval of accelerated payment of
drawback). In the latter instance, the
intent to apply for both procedures must
be clearly stated. In all instances, all of
the requirements for the procedure(s)
applied for must be met (for example, in
a combined application for both
procedures, all of the information
required for each procedure, all required
sample documents for each procedure,
and all required certifications must be
included in and with the application).
Subpart J—Internal Revenue Tax on
Flavoring Extracts and Medicinal or
Toilet Preparations (Including
Perfumery) Manufactured From
Domestic Tax-Paid Alcohol
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.101
Drawback allowance.
Procedure.
(a) General. Other provisions of this
part relating to direct identification
drawback (see subpart B of this part)
will apply to claims for drawback filed
under this subpart insofar as applicable
to and not inconsistent with the
provisions of this subpart.
(b) Manufacturing record. The
manufacturer of flavoring extracts or
medicinal or toilet preparations on
which drawback is claimed will record
the products manufactured, the quantity
of waste, if any, and a full description
of the alcohol. These records must be
available at all times for inspection by
CBP officers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Additional requirements.
(a) Manufacturer claims domestic
drawback. In the case of medicinal
preparations and flavoring extracts, the
claimant must file with the drawback
entry, a declaration of the manufacturer
stating whether a claim has been or will
be filed by the manufacturer with the
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB) for domestic drawback on
alcohol under §§ 5111, 5112, 5113, and
5114, Internal Revenue Code, as
amended (26 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5113,
and 5114).
(b) Manufacturer does not claim
domestic drawback—(1) Submission of
statement. If no claim has been or will
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37949
be filed with TTB for domestic
drawback on medicinal preparations or
flavoring extracts, the manufacturer
must submit a statement, in duplicate,
setting forth that fact to the Director,
National Revenue Center, TTB.
(2) Contents of the statement. The
statement must show the:
(i) Quantity and description of the
exported products;
(ii) Identity of the alcohol used by
serial number of package or tank car;
(iii) Name and registry number of the
distilled spirits plant from which the
alcohol was withdrawn;
(iv) Date of withdrawal;
(v) Serial number of the applicable
record of tax determination (see 27 CFR
17.163(a) and 27 CFR 19.626(c)(7); and
(vi) Drawback office where the claim
will be filed.
(3) Verification of receipt of the
statement. The Director, National
Revenue Center, TTB, will verify receipt
of this statement, and transmit a
verification of receipt of the statement
with a copy of that document to the
drawback office designated.
§ 190.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) certificates.
(a) Request. The drawback claimant or
manufacturer must request the Director,
National Revenue Center, TTB, to
provide the CBP office where the
drawback claim will be processed with
a tax-paid certificate on TTB Form
5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol).
(b) Contents. The request must state
the:
(1) Quantity of alcohol in proof
gallons;
(2) Serial number of each package;
(3) Amount of tax paid on the alcohol;
(4) Name, registry number, and
location of the distilled spirits plant;
(5) Date of withdrawal;
(6) Name of the manufacturer using
the alcohol in producing the exported
articles;
(7) Address of the manufacturer and
its manufacturing plant; and
(8) Customs drawback office where
the drawback claim will be processed.
(c) Extract of TTB certificate. If a
certification of any portion of the
alcohol described in the TTB Form
5100.4 is required for liquidation of
drawback entries processed in another
drawback office, the drawback office, on
written application of the person who
requested its issuance, will transmit a
copy of the extract from the certificate
for use at that drawback office. The
drawback office will note that the copy
of the extract was prepared and
transmitted.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37950
§ 190.105
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Liquidation.
The drawback office will ascertain the
final amount of drawback due by
reference to the specific manufacturing
drawback ruling under which the
drawback claimed is allowable.
§ 190.106
Amount of drawback.
(a) Claim filed with TTB. If the
declaration required by § 190.103(a) of
this subpart shows that a claim has been
or will be filed with TTB for domestic
drawback, drawback under § 313(d) of
the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)),
will be limited to the difference between
the amount of tax paid and the amount
of domestic drawback claimed.
(b) Claim not filed with TTB. If the
declaration and statement required by
§ 190.103(a) and (b) show that no claim
has been or will be filed by the
manufacturer with TTB for domestic
drawback, the drawback will be the full
amount of the tax on the alcohol used.
Drawback under this provision may not
be granted absent receipt from TTB of a
copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of
Tax-Paid Alcohol) indicating that taxes
have been paid on the exported product
for which drawback is claimed.
(c) No deduction of 1 percent. No
deduction of 1 percent may be made in
drawback claims under § 313(d) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)).
(d) Payment. The drawback due will
be paid in accordance with § 190.81(f).
Subpart K—Supplies for Certain
Vessels and Aircraft
§ 190.111
Drawback allowance.
Section 309 of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1309), provides for drawback
on articles laden as supplies on certain
vessels or aircraft of the United States or
as supplies including equipment upon,
or used in the maintenance or repair of,
certain foreign vessels or aircraft.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.112
Procedure.
(a) General. The provisions of this
subpart will override conflicting
provisions of this part, such as the
export procedures in § 190.72.
(b) Notice of lading. The drawback
claimant must file with the drawback
office a notice of lading.
(c) Time of filing notice of lading. In
the case of drawback in connection with
19 U.S.C. 1309(b), the notice of lading
must be filed within 5 years after the
date of importation of the imported
merchandise.
(d) Contents of notice. The notice of
lading must show:
(1) The name of the vessel or identity
of the aircraft on which articles were or
are to be laden;
(2) The number and kind of packages
and their marks and numbers;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
(3) A description of the articles and
their weight (net), gauge, measure, or
number; and
(4) The name of the exporter.
(e) Declaration of Master or other
officer—(1) Requirement. The master or
an authorized representative of the
vessel or aircraft having knowledge of
the facts must provide the following
declaration on the notice of lading ‘‘I
declare that the information given above
is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief; that I have
knowledge of the facts set forth herein;
that the articles described in this notice
of lading were received in the quantities
stated, from the person, and on the date,
indicated above; that said articles were
laden on the vessel (or aircraft) named
above for use on said vessel (or aircraft)
as supplies (or equipment), except as
noted below; and that at the time of
lading of the articles, the said vessel (or
aircraft) was engaged in the business or
trade checked below: (It is not necessary
for a foreign vessel to show its class of
trade.).’’
(2) Filing. The drawback claimant
must file with the drawback office both
the drawback entry and the notice of
lading or separate document containing
the declaration of the master or other
officer or representative.
(f) Information concerning class or
trade. Information about the class of
business or trade of a vessel or aircraft
is required to be furnished in support of
the drawback entry if the vessel or
aircraft is American.
(g) Articles laden or installed on
aircraft as equipment or used in the
maintenance or repair of aircraft. The
drawback office where the drawback
claim is filed will require a declaration
or other evidence showing to its
satisfaction that articles have been laden
or installed on aircraft as equipment or
used in the maintenance or repair of
aircraft.
(h) Fuel laden on vessels or aircraft as
supplies—(1) Composite notice of
lading. In the case of fuel laden on
vessels or aircraft as supplies, the
drawback claimant may file with the
drawback office a composite notice of
lading for each calendar month. The
composite notice of lading must
describe all of the drawback claimant’s
deliveries of fuel supplies during the
one calendar month at a single port or
airport to all vessels or airplanes of one
vessel owner or operator or airline. This
includes fuel laden for flights or voyages
between the contiguous United States
and Hawaii, Alaska, or any U.S.
possessions (see § 10.59 of this chapter).
(2) Contents of composite notice.
Composite notice must show for each
voyage or flight:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(i) The identity of the vessel or
aircraft;
(ii) A description of the fuel supplies
laden;
(iii) The quantity laden; and
(iv) The date of lading.
(3) Declaration of owner or operator.
An authorized vessel or airline
representative having knowledge of the
facts must complete the ‘‘Declaration of
Master or other officer’’(see paragraph
(e) of this section).
(i) Desire to land articles covered by
notice of lading. The master of the
vessel or commander of the aircraft
desiring to land in the United States
articles covered by a notice of lading
must apply for a permit to land those
articles under CBP supervision. All
articles landed, except those transferred
under the original notice of lading to
another vessel or aircraft entitled to
drawback, will be considered imported
merchandise for the purpose of § 309(c)
of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1309(c)).
Subpart L—Meats Cured With Imported
Salt
§ 190.121
Drawback allowance.
Section 313(f) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(f)), provides for the
allowance of drawback upon the
exportation of meats cured with
imported salt.
§ 190.122
Procedure.
Other provisions of this part relating
to direct identification manufacturing
drawback will apply to claims for
drawback under this subpart insofar as
applicable to and not inconsistent with
the provisions of this subpart.
§ 190.123
Refund of duties.
Drawback allowed under this subpart
will be refunded in aggregate amounts
of not less than $100 and will not be
subject to the retention of 1 percent of
duties paid.
Subpart M—Materials for Construction
and Equipment of Vessels and Aircraft
Built for Foreign Account and
Ownership
§ 190.131
Drawback allowance.
Section 313(g) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), provides for
drawback on imported materials used in
the construction and equipment of
vessels and aircraft built for foreign
account and ownership, or for the
government of any foreign country,
notwithstanding that these vessels or
aircraft may not be exported within the
strict meaning of the term.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 190.132
Procedure.
Other provisions of this part relating
to direct identification manufacturing
drawback will apply to claims for
drawback filed under this subpart
insofar as applicable to and not
inconsistent with the provisions of this
subpart.
§ 190.133
Explanation of terms.
(a) Materials. Section 313(g) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)),
applies only to materials used in the
original construction and equipment of
vessels and aircraft, or to materials used
in a ‘‘major conversion,’’ as defined in
this section, of a vessel or aircraft.
Section 313(g) does not apply to
materials used for alteration or repair, or
to materials not required for safe
operation of the vessel or aircraft.
(b) Foreign account and ownership.
Foreign account and ownership, as used
in § 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1313(g)), means only vessels or
aircraft built or equipped for the
account of an owner or owners residing
in a foreign country and having a bona
fide intention that the vessel or aircraft,
when completed, will be owned and
operated under the flag of a foreign
country.
(c) Major conversion. For purposes of
this subpart, a ‘‘major conversion’’
means a conversion that substantially
changes the dimensions or carrying
capacity of the vessel or aircraft,
changes the type of the vessel or aircraft,
substantially prolongs the life of the
vessel or aircraft, or otherwise so
changes the vessel or aircraft that it is
essentially a new vessel or aircraft, as
determined by CBP (see 46 U.S.C.
2101(14a)).
Subpart N—Foreign-Built Jet Aircraft
Engines Processed in the United
States
§ 190.141
Drawback allowance.
Section 313(h) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313(h)), provides for
drawback on the exportation of jet
aircraft engines manufactured or
produced abroad that have been
overhauled, repaired, rebuilt, or
reconditioned in the United States with
the use of imported merchandise,
including parts.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.142
Procedure.
Other provisions of this part will
apply to claims for drawback filed
under this subpart insofar as applicable
to and not inconsistent with the
provisions of this subpart.
§ 190.143
Drawback entry.
(a) Filing of entry. Drawback entries
covering these foreign-built jet aircraft
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
engines must show that the entry covers
jet aircraft engines processed under
§ 313(h) of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1313(h)).
(b) Contents of entry. The drawback
entry must indicate the country in
which each engine was manufactured
and describe the processing performed
thereon in the United States.
§ 190.144
Refund of duties.
Drawback allowed under this subpart
will be refunded in aggregate amounts
of not less than $100, and will not be
subject to the deduction of 1 percent of
duties paid.
Subpart O—Merchandise Exported
From Continuous CBP Custody
§ 190.151
Drawback allowance.
(a) Eligibility of entered or withdrawn
merchandise—(1) Under 19 U.S.C.
1557(a). Section 557(a) of the Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1557(a)), provides
for drawback on the exportation to a
foreign country, or the shipment to the
Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake
Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef,
Johnston Island, or Guam, of
merchandise upon which duties have
been paid which has remained
continuously in bonded warehouse or
otherwise in CBP custody for a period
not to exceed 5 years from the date of
importation.
(2) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313. Imported
merchandise that has not been regularly
entered or withdrawn for consumption,
will not satisfy any requirement for use,
importation, exportation or destruction,
and will not be available for drawback,
under § 313 of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1313) (see 19 U.S.C. 1313(u)).
(b) Guantanamo Bay. Guantanamo
Bay Naval Station will be considered
foreign territory for drawback purposes
under this subpart and merchandise
shipped there is eligible for drawback.
Imported merchandise which has
remained continuously in bonded
warehouse or otherwise in CBP custody
since importation is not entitled to
drawback of duty when shipped to
Puerto Rico, Canton Island, Enderbury
Island, or Palmyra Island.
§ 190.152
custody.
Merchandise released from CBP
No remission, refund, abatement, or
drawback of duty will be allowed under
this subpart because of the exportation
or destruction of any merchandise after
its release from Government custody,
except in the following cases:
(a) When articles are exported or
destroyed on which drawback is
expressly provided for by law;
(b) When prohibited articles have
been regularly entered in good faith and
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37951
are subsequently exported or destroyed
pursuant to statute and regulations
prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury; or
(c) When articles entered under bond
are destroyed within the bonded period,
as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1557(c), or
destroyed within the bonded period by
death, accidental fire, or other casualty,
and satisfactory evidence of destruction
is furnished to CBP (see § 190.71), in
which case any accrued duties will be
remitted or refunded and any condition
in the bond that the articles must be
exported will be deemed satisfied (see
19 U.S.C. 1558).
§ 190.153
Continuous CBP custody.
(a) Merchandise released under an
importer’s bond and returned.
Merchandise released to an importer
under a bond prescribed by § 142.4 of
this chapter and later returned to the
public stores upon requisition of the
appropriate CBP office will not be
deemed to be in the continuous custody
of CBP officers.
(b) Merchandise released under
Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Merchandise
released as provided for in Chapter 98,
Subchapter XIII, HTSUS (19 U.S.C.
1202), will not be deemed to be in the
continuous custody of CBP officers.
(c) Merchandise released from
warehouse. For the purpose of this
subpart, in the case of merchandise
entered for warehouse, CBP custody
will be deemed to cease when estimated
duty has been deposited and the
appropriate CBP office has authorized
the withdrawal of the merchandise.
(d) Merchandise not warehoused,
examined elsewhere than in public
stores—(1) General rule. Except as
stated in paragraph (d)(2) of this section,
merchandise examined elsewhere than
at the public stores, in accordance with
the provisions of § 151.7 of this chapter,
will be considered released from CBP
custody upon completion of final
examination for appraisement.
(2) Merchandise upon the wharf.
Merchandise which remains on the
wharf by permission of the appropriate
CBP office will be considered to be in
CBP custody, but this custody will be
deemed to cease when the CBP officer
in charge accepts the permit and has no
other duties to perform relating to the
merchandise, such as measuring,
weighing, or gauging.
§ 190.154
Filing the entry.
(a) Direct export. At least 6 working
hours before lading the merchandise on
which drawback is claimed under this
subpart, the importer or the agent
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37952
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
designated by him or her in writing
must file a direct export drawback entry.
(b) Merchandise transported to
another port for exportation. The
importer of merchandise to be
transported to another port for
exportation must file an entry naming
the transporting conveyance, route, and
port of exit. The drawback office will
certify one copy and forward it to the
CBP office at the port of exit. A bonded
carrier must transport the merchandise
in accordance with the applicable
regulations. Manifests must be prepared
and filed in the manner prescribed in
§ 144.37 of this chapter.
(e) Extracts of bills of lading.
Drawback offices may issue extracts of
bills of lading filed with drawback
claims.
§ 190.157
[Reserved]
§ 190.158
Procedures.
The regulations in part 18 of this
chapter concerning the supervision of
lading and certification of exportation of
merchandise withdrawn from
warehouse for exportation without
payment of duty will be followed to the
extent applicable.
When the drawback claim has been
completed and the bill of lading filed,
together with the landing certificate, if
required, the reports of inspection and
lading made, and the clearance of the
exporting conveyance established by the
record of clearance in the case of direct
exportation or by certificate in the case
of transportation and exportation, the
drawback office will verify the
importation by referring to the import
records to ascertain the amount of duty
paid on the merchandise exported. To
the extent appropriate and not
inconsistent with the provisions of this
subpart, drawback entries will be
liquidated in accordance with the
provisions of § 190.81.
§ 190.156
§ 190.159
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.155 Merchandise withdrawn from
warehouse for exportation.
Bill of lading.
(a) Filing. In order to complete the
claim for drawback under this subpart,
a bill of lading covering the
merchandise described in the drawback
entry must be filed within 2 years after
the merchandise is exported.
(b) Contents. The bill of lading must
either show that the merchandise was
shipped by the person making the claim
or bear an endorsement of the person in
whose name the merchandise was
shipped showing that the person
making the claim is authorized to do so.
(c) Limitation of the bill of lading. The
terms of the bill of lading may limit and
define its use by stating that it is for
customs purposes only and not
negotiable.
(d) Inability to produce bill of lading.
When a required bill of lading cannot be
produced, the person making the
drawback entry may request the
drawback office, within the time
required for the filing of the bill of
lading, to accept a statement setting
forth the cause of failure to produce the
bill of lading and such evidence of
exportation and of that person’s right to
make the drawback entry as may be
available. The request will be granted if
the drawback office is satisfied by the
evidence submitted that the failure to
produce the bill of lading is justified,
that the merchandise has been exported,
and that the person making the
drawback entry has the right to do so.
If the drawback office is not so satisfied,
such office will transmit the request and
its accompanying evidence to the Office
of Trade, CBP Headquarters, for final
determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Amount of drawback.
Drawback due under this subpart will
not be subject to the deduction of 1
percent.
Subpart P—Distilled Spirits, Wines, or
Beer Which Are Unmerchantable or Do
Not Conform to Sample or
Specifications
§ 190.161
Refund of taxes.
Section 5062(c), Internal Revenue
Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5062(c)),
provides for the refund, remission,
abatement or credit to the importer of
internal revenue taxes paid or
determined incident to importation,
upon the exportation, or destruction
under CBP supervision, of imported
distilled spirits, wines, or beer found
after entry to be unmerchantable or not
to conform to sample or specifications
and which are returned to CBP custody.
§ 190.162
Procedure.
The export procedure will be the
same as that provided in § 190.42 for
rejected merchandise, except that the
claimant must be the importer and must
comply with all other provisions in this
subpart.
§ 190.163
Documentation.
(a) Entry. A drawback entry must be
filed to claim drawback under this
subpart.
(b) Documentation. The drawback
entry for unmerchantable merchandise
must be accompanied by a certificate of
the importer setting forth in detail the
facts which cause the merchandise to be
unmerchantable and any additional
evidence that the drawback office
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
requires to establish that the
merchandise is unmerchantable.
§ 190.164
Return to CBP custody.
There is no time limit for the return
to CBP custody of distilled spirits, wine,
or beer subject to refund of taxes under
the provisions of this subpart. The
claimant must return the merchandise
to CBP custody prior to exportation or
destruction and claims are subject to the
filing deadline set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(r)(1).
§ 190.165
No exportation by mail.
Merchandise covered by this subpart
must not be exported by mail.
§ 190.166
Destruction of merchandise.
(a) Action by the importer. A
drawback claimant who proposes to
destroy rather than export the distilled
spirits, wine, or beer must state that fact
on the drawback entry.
(b) Action by CBP. Distilled spirits,
wine, or beer returned to CBP custody
at the place approved by the drawback
office where the drawback entry was
filed must be destroyed under the
supervision of the CBP officer who will
certify the destruction on CBP Form
7553.
§ 190.167
Liquidation.
No deduction of 1 percent of the
internal revenue taxes paid or
determined will be made in allowing
entries under § 5062(c), Internal
Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C.
5062(c)).
§ 190.168
[Reserved]
Subpart Q—Substitution of Finished
Petroleum Derivatives
§ 190.171
General; drawback allowance.
(a) General. Section 313(p) of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(p)),
provides for drawback for duties, taxes,
and fees paid on qualified articles (see
definition below) which consist of
either petroleum derivatives that are
imported, duty-paid, and qualified for
drawback under the unused
merchandise drawback law (19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1)), or petroleum derivatives that
are manufactured or produced in the
United States, and qualified for
drawback under the manufacturing
drawback law (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)).
(b) Allowance of drawback. Drawback
may be granted under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p):
(1) In cases where there is no
manufacture, upon exportation of the
imported article, an article of the same
kind and quality, or any combination
thereof; or
(2) In cases where there is a
manufacture or production, upon
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
exportation of the manufactured or
produced article, an article of the same
kind and quality, or any combination
thereof.
(c) Calculation of drawback. For
drawback of finished petroleum
derivatives pursuant to § 1313(p), the
claimant is required to calculate the
total amount of drawback due, for
purposes of 190.51(b), which will not
exceed 99 percent of the allowable
duties, taxes, and fees, subject to the
following:
(1) Per unit averaging calculation. The
amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible
for drawback is determined by per unit
averaging, as defined in 19 CFR 190.2,
for any drawback claim based on 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) pursuant to the standards
set forth in 19 CFR 190.172(b) and
without respect to the limitations set
forth in subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 19
U.S.C. 1313(l).
(2) Limitations. The amount of duties,
taxes, and fees eligible for drawback is
not subject to the limitations set out in
19 U.S.C. 1313(p)(4) for unused
merchandise claims (no manufacture)
and manufacturing claims (see
190.173(e) and 190.174(f)).
(3) Federal excise tax. For purposes of
drawback of internal revenue tax
imposed under Chapters 32 and 38 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export of substituted merchandise
will be limited to the amount of taxes
paid (and not returned by refund, credit,
or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.172
Definitions.
The following are definitions for
purposes of this subpart only:
(a) Qualified article. Qualified article
means an article described in headings
2707, 2708, 2710 through 2715, 2901,
2902, 2909.19.14, or 3901 through 3914
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS). In the case
of an article described in headings 3901
through 3914, the definition covers the
article in its primary forms as provided
in Note 6 to chapter 39 of the HTSUS.
(b) Same kind and quality article.
Same kind and quality article means an
article which is referred to under the
same 8-digit classification of the HTSUS
as the article to which it is compared.
(c) Exported article. Exported article
means an article which has been
exported and is a qualified article, an
article of the same kind and quality as
the qualified article, or any combination
thereof.
§ 190.173 Imported duty-paid derivatives
(no manufacture).
When the basis for drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) is imported duty-paid
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
petroleum derivatives (that is, not
articles manufactured under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b)), the requirements for
drawback are as follows:
(a) Imported duty-paid merchandise.
The imported duty-paid merchandise
designated for drawback must be a
‘‘qualified article’’ as defined in
§ 190.172(a) of this subpart;
(b) Exported article. The exported
article on which drawback is claimed
must be an ‘‘exported article’’ as defined
in § 190.172(c) of this subpart;
(c) Exporter. The exporter of the
exported article must have either:
(1) Imported the qualified article in at
least the quantity of the exported article;
or
(2) Purchased or exchanged (directly
or indirectly) from an importer an
imported qualified article in at least the
quantity of the exported article;
(d) Time of export. The exported
article must be exported within 180
days after the date of entry of the
designated imported duty-paid
merchandise; and
(e) Amount of drawback. The amount
of drawback payable may not exceed the
amount of drawback which would be
attributable to the imported qualified
article under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) which
serves as the basis for drawback.
§ 190.174 Derivatives manufactured under
19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b).
When the exported article which is
the basis for a drawback claim under 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) is petroleum derivatives
which were manufactured or produced
in the United States and qualify for
drawback under the manufacturing
drawback law (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)),
the requirements for drawback are as
follows:
(a) Merchandise. The merchandise
which is the basis for drawback under
19 U.S.C. 1313(p) must:
(1) Have been manufactured or
produced as described in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b) from crude petroleum or
a petroleum derivative; and
(2) Be a ‘‘qualified article’’ as defined
in § 190.172(a) of this subpart;
(b) Exported article. The exported
article on which drawback is claimed
must be an ‘‘exported article’’ as defined
in § 190.172(c) of this subpart;
(c) Exporter. The exporter of the
exported article must have either:
(1) Manufactured or produced the
qualified article in at least the quantity
of the exported article; or
(2) Purchased or exchanged (directly
or indirectly) from a manufacturer or
producer described in 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
or (b) the qualified article in at least the
quantity of the exported article;
(d) Manufacture in specific facility.
The qualified article must have been
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37953
manufactured or produced in a specific
petroleum refinery or production
facility which must be identified;
(e) Time of export. The exported
article must be exported either:
(1) During the period provided for in
the manufacturer’s or producer’s
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
(see § 190.8) in which the qualified
article is manufactured or produced; or
(2) Within 180 days after the close of
the period in which the qualified article
is manufactured or produced; and
(f) Amount of drawback. The amount
of drawback payable may not exceed the
amount of drawback which would be
attributable to the article manufactured
or produced under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or
(b) which serves as the basis for
drawback.
§ 190.175 Drawback claimant;
maintenance of records.
(a) Drawback claimant. A drawback
claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) must
be the exporter of the exported article,
or the refiner, producer, or importer of
either the qualified article or the
exported article. Any of these persons
may designate another person to file the
drawback claim.
(b) Transfer of merchandise—(1)
General. A drawback claimant under 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) must maintain records
(which may be records kept in the
normal cause of business) to support the
receipt of transferred merchandise and
the party transferring the merchandise
must maintain records to demonstrate
the transfer.
(2) Article substituted for the qualified
article. (i) Subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)
of this section, the manufacturer,
producer, or importer of a qualified
article may transfer to the exporter an
article of the same kind and quality as
the qualified article in a quantity not
greater than the quantity of the qualified
article.
(ii) Subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of
this section, any intermediate party in
the chain of commerce leading to the
exporter from the manufacturer,
producer, or importer of a qualified
article may also transfer to the exporter
or to another intermediate party an
article of the same kind and quality as
the article purchased or exchanged from
the prior transferor (whether the
manufacturer, producer, importer, or
another intermediate transferor) in a
quantity not greater than the quantity of
the article purchased or exchanged.
(iii) Under either paragraph (b)(2)(i) or
(b)(2)(ii) of this section, the article
transferred, regardless of its origin
(imported, manufactured, substituted, or
any combination thereof), will be the
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37954
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
qualified article eligible for drawback
for purposes of section 1313(p).
(c) Maintenance of records. The
manufacturer, producer, importer,
transferor, exporter and drawback
claimant of the qualified article and the
exported article must all maintain their
appropriate records required by this
part.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.176 Procedures for claims filed
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p).
(a) Applicability. The general
procedures for filing drawback claims
will be applicable to claims filed under
19 U.S.C. 1313(p) unless otherwise
specifically provided for in this section.
(b) Administrative efficiency,
frequency of claims, and restructuring of
claims. The procedures regarding
administrative efficiency, frequency of
claims, and restructuring of claims (as
applicable, see § 190.53) will apply to
claims filed under this subpart.
(c) Imported duty-paid derivatives (no
manufacture). When the basis for
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) is
imported duty-paid petroleum (not
articles manufactured under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b)), claims under this
subpart may be paid and liquidated if:
(1) The claim is filed on the drawback
entry; and
(2) The claimant provides a
certification stating the basis (such as
company records, or customer’s written
certification), for the information
contained therein and certifying that:
(i) The exported merchandise was
exported within 180 days of entry of the
designated, imported merchandise;
(ii) The qualified article and the
exported article are commercially
interchangeable or both articles are
subject to the same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number;
(iii) To the best of the claimant’s
knowledge, the designated imported
merchandise, the qualified article and
the exported article have not and will
not serve as the basis of any other
drawback claim;
(iv) Evidence in support of the
certification will be retained by the
person providing the certification for 3
years after liquidation of the claim; and
(v) Such evidence will be available for
verification by CBP.
(d) Derivatives manufactured under
19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b). When the basis
for a claim for drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) is articles manufactured
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), claims
under this section may be paid and
liquidated if:
(1) The claim is filed on the drawback
entry;
(2) All documents required to be filed
with a manufacturing claim under 19
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b) are filed with the
claim;
(3) The claim identifies the specific
refinery or production facility at which
the derivatives were manufactured or
produced;
(4) The claim states the period of
manufacture for the derivatives; and
(5) The claimant provides a
certification stating the basis (such as
company records or a customer’s
written certification), for the
information contained therein and
certifying that:
(i) The exported merchandise was
exported during the manufacturing
period for the qualified article or within
180 days after the close of that period;
(ii) The qualified article and the
exported article are commercially
interchangeable or both articles are
classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number;
(iii) To the best of the claimant’s
knowledge, the designated imported
merchandise, the qualified article and
the exported article have not and will
not serve as the basis of any other
drawback claim;
(iv) Evidence in support of the
certification will be retained by the
person providing the certification for 3
years after liquidation of the claim; and
(v) Such evidence will be available for
verification by CBP.
Subpart R—Merchandise Transferred
to a Foreign Trade Zone from Customs
Territory
§ 190.181
Drawback allowance.
The fourth proviso of § 3 of the
Foreign Trade Zones Act of June 18,
1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c),
provides that merchandise transferred to
a foreign trade zone for the sole purpose
of exportation, storage or destruction
(except destruction of distilled spirits,
wines, and fermented malt liquors), will
be considered to be exported for the
purpose of drawback, provided there is
compliance with the regulations of this
subpart.
§ 190.182
Zone-restricted merchandise.
Merchandise in a foreign trade zone
for the purposes specified in § 190.181
will be given status as zone-restricted
merchandise on proper application (see
§ 146.44 of this chapter).
§ 190.183 Articles manufactured or
produced in the United States.
(a) Procedure for filing documents.
Except as otherwise provided, the
drawback procedures prescribed in this
part must be followed when claiming
drawback under this subpart on articles
manufactured or produced in the United
States with the use of imported or
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
substituted merchandise, and on
flavoring extracts or medicinal or toilet
preparations (including perfumery)
manufactured or produced with the use
of domestic tax-paid alcohol.
(b) Notice of transfer—(1) Evidence of
export. The notice of zone transfer on
CBP Form 214 (Application for ForeignTrade Zone Admission and/or Status
Designation) or its electronic equivalent
will be in place of the documents under
subpart G of this part to establish the
exportation.
(2) Filing procedures. The notice of
transfer (CBP Form 214) will be filed not
later than 3 years after the transfer of the
articles to the zone. A notice filed after
the transfer will state the foreign trade
zone lot number.
(3) Contents of notice. Each notice of
transfer must show the:
(i) Number and location of the foreign
trade zone;
(ii) Number and kind of packages and
their marks and numbers;
(iii) Description of the articles,
including weight (gross and net), gauge,
measure, or number; and
(iv) Name of the transferor.
(c) Action of foreign trade zone
operator. After articles have been
received in the zone, the zone operator
must certify on a copy of the notice of
transfer (CBP Form 214) the receipt of
the articles (see § 190.184(d)(2)) and
forward the notice to the transferor or
the person designated by the transferor.
The transferor must verify that the
notice has been certified before filing it
with the drawback claim.
(d) Drawback entries. Drawback
entries must indicate that the
merchandise was transferred to a foreign
trade zone. The ‘‘Declaration of
Exportation’’ must be modified as
follows:
Declaration of Transfer to a Foreign
Trade Zone
I, llllllll (member of firm,
officer representing corporation, agent,
or attorney), of llll, declare that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, the
particulars of transfer stated in this
entry, the notices of transfer, and
receipts are correct, and that the
merchandise was transferred to a foreign
trade zone for the sole purpose of
exportation, destruction, or storage, not
to be removed from the foreign trade
zone for domestic consumption.
Dated: lllllllllllllll
llllllllllllllllll
l
Transferor or agent
§ 190.184 Merchandise transferred from
continuous CBP custody.
(a) Procedure for filing claims. The
procedure described in subpart O of this
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
part will be followed as applicable, for
drawback on merchandise transferred to
a foreign trade zone from continuous
CBP custody.
(b) Drawback entry. Before the
transfer of merchandise from
continuous CBP custody to a foreign
trade zone, the importer or a person
designated in writing by the importer
for that purpose must file with the
drawback office a direct export
drawback entry. CBP will notify the
zone operator at the zone.
(c) Certification by zone operator.
After the merchandise has been received
in the zone, the zone operator must
certify the receipt of the merchandise
(see paragraph (d)(2) of this section) and
notify the transferor or the person
designated by the transferor. After
executing the declaration provided for
in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the
transferor must resubmit the drawback
entry to the drawback office in place of
the bill of lading required by § 190.156.
(d) Modification of drawback entry—
(1) Indication of transfer. The drawback
entry must include a certification to
indicate that the merchandise is to be
transferred to a foreign trade zone.
(2) Endorsement. The transferor or
person designated by the transferor and
the foreign trade zone operator must
certify transfer to the foreign trade zone,
with respect to the drawback entry, as
follows:
damage excepted, as it was at the time
of importation; that no allowance nor
reduction of duties has been made for
damage or other cause except as
specified in this entry; and that no part
of the duties paid has been refunded by
drawback or otherwise.
Dated: lllllllllllllll
Transferor
§ 190.185 Unused merchandise drawback
and merchandise not conforming to sample
or specification, shipped without consent of
the consignee, found to be defective as of
the time of importation, or returned after
retail sale.
(a) Procedure for filing claims. The
procedures described in subpart C of
this part relating to unused merchandise
drawback, and in subpart D of this part
relating to rejected merchandise, must
be followed with respect to drawback
under this subpart for unused
merchandise drawback and
merchandise that does not conform to
sample or specification, is shipped
without consent of the consignee, or is
found to be defective as of the time of
importation.
(b) Drawback entry. Before transfer of
the merchandise to a foreign trade zone,
the importer or a person designated in
writing by the importer for that purpose
must file the drawback entry. CBP will
notify the zone operator at the zone.
(c) Certification by zone operator.
After the merchandise has been received
Certification by Foreign Trade Zone
in the zone, the zone operator at the
Operator
zone must certify, with respect to the
drawback entry, the receipt of the
The merchandise described in the
merchandise and notify the transferor or
entry was received from llllll
the person designated by the transferor.
on llll; 20ll; in Foreign Trade
After executing the declaration provided
Zone No. ll, (City and State)
Exceptions lllllllllllll for in paragraph (d)(3) of this section,
the transferor must resubmit the
(Name and title)
drawback entry in place of the bill of
By lllllllllllllllll lading required by § 190.156.
(Name of operator)
(d) Modification of drawback entry—
(1) Indication of transfer. The drawback
(3) Transferor’s declaration. The
entry must indicate that the
transferor must declare, with respect to
merchandise is to be transferred to a
the drawback entry, as follows:
foreign trade zone.
Transferor’s Declaration
(2) Endorsement. The transferor or
person designated by the transferor and
I, llllllll of the firm of
the foreign trade zone operator must
llll, declare that the merchandise
described in this entry was duly entered certify transfer to the foreign trade zone,
with respect to the drawback entry, as
at the customhouse on arrival at this
follows:
port; that the duties thereon have been
paid as specified in this entry; and that
Certification by Foreign Trade Zone
it was transferred to Foreign Trade Zone Operator
No. ll, located at llll, (City and
The merchandise described in this
State) for the sole purpose of
entry was received from llllllon
exportation, destruction, or storage, not
llll, 20 ll, in Foreign Trade
to be removed from the foreign trade
Zone No. ll, llll(City and State).
zone for domestic consumption. I
Exceptions: lllllllllllll
further declare that to the best of my
l
knowledge and belief, this merchandise llllllllllllllllll
is in the same quantity, quality, value,
(Name of operator)
By lllllllllllllllll
and package, unavoidable wastage and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37955
(Name and title)
(3) Transferor’s declaration. The
transferor must certify, with respect to
the drawback entry, as follows:
Transferor’s Declaration
I, llllllll of the firm of
lllll, declare that the
merchandise described in the within
entry was duly entered at the
customhouse on arrival at this port; that
the duties thereon have been paid as
specified in this entry; and that it was
transferred to Foreign Trade Zone No.
ll, located at llll (City and State)
for the sole purpose of exportation,
destruction, or storage, not to be
removed from the foreign trade zone for
domestic consumption. I further declare
that to the best of my knowledge and
belief, said merchandise is the same in
quantity, quality, value, and package as
specified in this entry; that no
allowance nor reduction in duties has
been made; and that no part of the
duties paid has been refunded by
drawback or otherwise.
Dated: lllllllllllllll
Transferor
§ 190.186 Person entitled to claim
drawback.
The person named in the foreign trade
zone operator’s certification on the
notice of transfer or the drawback entry,
as applicable, will be considered to be
the transferor. Drawback may be
claimed by, and paid to, the transferor.
Subpart S—Drawback Compliance
Program
§ 190.191
Purpose.
This subpart sets forth the
requirements for the drawback
compliance program in which claimants
and other parties in interest, including
customs brokers, may participate after
being certified by CBP. Participation in
the program is voluntary. Under the
program, CBP is required to inform
potential drawback claimants and
related parties clearly about their rights
and obligations under the drawback law
and regulations. Reduced penalties and/
or warning letters may be issued once a
party has been certified for the program,
and is in general compliance with the
appropriate procedures and
requirements thereof.
§ 190.192
program.
Certification for compliance
(a) General. A party may be certified
as a participant in the drawback
compliance program after meeting the
core requirements established under the
program, or after negotiating an
alternative drawback compliance
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37956
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
program suited to the needs of both the
party and CBP. Certification
requirements will take into account the
size and nature of the party’s drawback
program, the type of drawback claims
filed, and the volume of claims filed.
Whether the party is a drawback
claimant, a broker, or one that provides
data and documentation on which a
drawback claim is based, will also be
considered.
(b) Core requirements of program. In
order to be certified as a participant in
the drawback compliance program or
negotiated alternative drawback
compliance program, the party must
demonstrate that it:
(1) Understands the legal
requirements for filing claims, including
the nature of the records that are
required to be maintained and produced
and the time periods involved;
(2) Has in place procedures that
explain the CBP requirements to those
employees involved in the preparation
of claims, and the maintenance and
production of required records;
(3) Has in place procedures regarding
the preparation of claims and
maintenance of required records, and
the production of such records to CBP;
(4) Has designated a dependable
individual or individuals who will be
responsible for compliance under the
program, and maintenance and
production of required records;
(5) Has in place a record maintenance
program approved by CBP regarding
original records, or if approved by CBP,
alternative records or recordkeeping
formats for other than the original
records; and
(6) Has procedures for notifying CBP
of variances in, or violations of, the
drawback compliance program or other
alternative negotiated drawback
compliance program, and for taking
corrective action when notified by CBP
of violations and problems regarding
such program.
(c) Broker certification. A customs
broker may be certified as a participant
in the drawback compliance program
only on behalf of a given claimant (see
§ 190.194(b)). To do so, a customs
broker who assists a claimant in filing
for drawback must be able to
demonstrate, for and on behalf of such
claimant, conformity with the core
requirements of the drawback
compliance program as set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section. The broker
must ensure that the claimant has the
necessary documentation and records to
support the drawback compliance
program established on its behalf, and
that claims to be filed under the
program are reviewed by the broker for
accuracy and completeness.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 190.193 Application procedure for
compliance program.
(a) Who may apply. Claimants and
other parties in interest may apply for
participation in the drawback
compliance program. This includes any
person, corporation or business entity
that provides supporting information or
documentation to one who files
drawback claims, as well as customs
brokers who assist claimants in filing for
drawback. Program participants may
further consist of importers,
manufacturers or producers, agentmanufacturers, complementary
recordkeepers, subcontractors,
intermediate parties, and exporters.
(b) Place of filing. An application in
letter format containing the information
as prescribed in paragraphs (c) and (d)
of this section may be submitted to any
drawback office.
(c) Letter of application; contents. A
party requesting certification to become
a participant in the drawback
compliance program must file with the
drawback office a written application,
signed by an authorized individual (see
§ 190.6(c) of this part). The detail
required in the application must take
into account the size and nature of the
applicant’s drawback program, the type
of drawback claims filed, and the dollar
value and volume of claims filed.
However, the application must contain
at least the following information:
(1) Name of applicant, address, IRS
number (with suffix), and the type of
business in which engaged, as well as
the name(s) of the individual(s)
designated by the applicant to be
responsible for compliance under the
program;
(2) A description of the nature of the
applicant’s drawback program,
including the type of drawback in
which involved (such as,
manufacturing, or unused or rejected
merchandise), and the applicant’s
particular role(s) in the drawback claims
process (such as claimant and/or
importer, manufacturer or producer,
agent-manufacturer, complementary
recordkeeper, subcontractor,
intermediate party (possessor or
purchaser), or exporter (destroyer)); and
(3) Size of applicant’s drawback
program. For example, if the applicant
is a claimant, the number of claims filed
over the previous 12-month period
should be included, along with the
number estimated to be filed over the
next 12-month period, and the
estimated amount of drawback to be
claimed annually. Other parties should
describe the extent to which they are
involved in drawback activity, based
upon their particular role(s) in the
drawback process; for example,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
manufacturers should explain how
much manufacturing they are engaged
in for drawback, such as the quantity of
drawback product produced on an
annual basis, as established by the
certificates of manufacture and delivery
they have executed.
(d) Application package. Along with
the letter of application as prescribed in
paragraph (c) of this section, the
application package must include a
description of how the applicant will
ensure compliance with statutory and
regulatory drawback requirements. This
description may be in the form of a
booklet or set forth otherwise. The
description must include at least the
following:
(1) The name and title of the official
in the applicant’s organization who is
responsible for oversight of the
applicant’s drawback program, and the
name and title, with mailing address
and, if available, fax number and email
address, of the person(s) in the
applicant’s organization responsible for
the actual maintenance of the
applicant’s drawback program;
(2) If the applicant is a manufacturer
and the drawback involved is
manufacturing drawback, a copy of the
letter of notification of intent to operate
under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling or the application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling
(see §§ 190.7 and 190.8), as appropriate;
(3) A description of the applicant’s
drawback record-keeping program,
including the retention period and
method (for example, paper, and
electronic.);
(4) A list of the records that will be
maintained, including at least sample
import documents, sample export
documents, sample inventory and
transportation documents (if
applicable), sample laboratory or other
documents establishing the qualification
of merchandise or articles for
substitution under the drawback law (if
applicable), and sample manufacturing
documents (if applicable);
(5) A description of the applicant’s
specific procedures for:
(i) How drawback claims are prepared
(if the applicant is a claimant); and
(ii) How the applicant will fulfill any
requirements under the drawback law
and regulations applicable to its role in
the drawback program;
(6) A description of the applicant’s
procedures for notifying CBP of
variances in, or violations of, its
drawback compliance program or
negotiated alternative drawback
compliance program, and procedures for
taking corrective action when notified
by CBP of violations or other problems
in such program; and
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(7) A description of the applicant’s
procedures for annual review to ensure
that its drawback compliance program
meets the statutory and regulatory
drawback requirements and that CBP is
notified of any modifications from the
procedures described in this
application.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 190.194 Action on application to
participate in compliance program.
(a) Review by drawback office—(1)
General. It is the responsibility of the
drawback office to coordinate its
decision making on the package with
CBP Headquarters and other CBP offices
as appropriate. CBP processing of the
package will consist of the review of the
information contained therein as well as
any additional information requested
(see paragraph (a)(2) of this section).
(2) Criteria for CBP review. The
drawback office will review and verify
the information submitted in and with
the application. In order for CBP to
evaluate the application, CBP may
request additional information
(including additional sample
documents) and/or explanations of any
of the information provided for in
§ 190.193(c) and (d) of this subpart.
Based on the information submitted on
and with the application and any
information so requested, and based on
the applicant’s record of transactions
with CBP, the drawback office will
approve or deny the application. The
criteria to be considered in reviewing
the applicant’s record with CBP will
include (as applicable):
(i) The presence or absence of
unresolved customs charges (duties,
taxes, fees, or other debts owed CBP);
(ii) The accuracy of the claimant’s
past drawback claims; and
(iii) Whether accelerated payment of
drawback or waiver of prior notice of
intent to export was previously revoked
or suspended.
(b) Approval. Certification as a
participant in the drawback compliance
program will be given to applicants
whose applications are approved under
the criteria in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section. The drawback office will give
written notification to an applicant of its
certification as a participant in the
drawback compliance program. A
customs broker obtaining certification
for a drawback claimant will be sent
written notification on behalf of such
claimant, with a copy of the notification
also being sent to the claimant.
(c) Benefits of participation in
program. When a party that has been
certified as a participant in the
drawback compliance program and is
generally in compliance with the
appropriate procedures and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
requirements of the program commits a
violation of 19 U.S.C. 1593a(a) (see
§ 190.62(b)), CBP will, in the absence of
fraud or repeated violations, and in lieu
of a monetary penalty as otherwise
provided under § 1593a, issue a written
notice of the violation to the party.
Repeated violations by a participant,
including a customs broker, may result
in the issuance of penalties and the
removal of certification under the
program until corrective action,
satisfactory to CBP, is taken.
(d) Denial. If certification as a
participant in the drawback compliance
program is denied, the applicant will be
given written notice by the drawback
office, specifying the grounds for such
denial, together with any action that
may be taken to correct the perceived
deficiencies, and informing the
applicant that such denial may be
appealed to the drawback office that
issued the notice of denial and then
appealed to CBP Headquarters.
(e) Certification removal—(1) Grounds
for removal. The certification for
participation in the drawback
compliance program by a party may be
removed when any of the following
conditions are discovered:
(i) The certification privilege was
obtained through fraud or mistake of
fact;
(ii) The program participant is no
longer in compliance with the customs
laws and CBP regulations, including the
requirements set forth in § 190.192;
(iii) The program participant has
repeatedly filed false drawback claims
or false or misleading documentation or
other information relating to such
claims; or
(iv) The program participant is
convicted of any felony or has
committed acts which would constitute
a misdemeanor or felony involving
theft, smuggling, or any theft-connected
crime.
(2) Removal procedure. If CBP
determines that the certification of a
program participant should be removed,
the drawback office will send the
program participant a written notice of
the removal. Such notice will inform the
program participant of the grounds for
the removal and will advise the program
participant of its right to file an appeal
of the removal in accordance with
paragraph (f) of this section.
(3) Effect of removal. The removal of
certification will be effective
immediately in cases of willfulness on
the part of the program participant or
when required by public health,
interest, or safety. In all other cases, the
removal of certification will be effective
when the program participant has
received notice under paragraph (e)(2)
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37957
of this section and either no appeal has
been filed within the time limit
prescribed in paragraph (f)(2) of this
section or all appeal procedures have
been concluded by a decision that
upholds the removal action. Removal of
certification may subject the affected
person to penalties.
(f) Appeal of certification denial or
removal—(1) Appeal of certification
denial. A party may challenge a denial
of an application for certification as a
participant in the drawback compliance
program by filing a written appeal,
within 30 days of issuance of the notice
of denial, with the drawback office. A
denial of an appeal may itself be
appealed to CBP Headquarters, Trade
Policy and Programs, Office of Trade,
within 30 days after issuance of the
drawback office’s appeal decision. This
office will review the appeal and will
respond with a written decision within
30 days after receipt of the appeal
unless circumstances require a delay in
issuance of the decision. If the decision
cannot be issued within the 30-day
period, the officewill advise the
appellant of the reasons for the delay
and of any further actions which will be
carried out to complete the appeal
review and of the anticipated date for
issuance of the appeal decision.
(2) Appeal of certification removal. A
party who has received a CBP notice of
removal of certification for participation
in the drawback compliance program
may challenge the removal by filing a
written appeal, within 30 days after
issuance of the notice of removal, with
the drawback office. A denial of an
appeal may itself be appealed to CBP
Headquarters, Trade Policy and
Programs, Office of Trade, within 30
days after issuance of the drawback
office’s appeal decision. This office will
consider the allegations upon which the
removal was based and the responses
made to those allegations by the
appellant and will render a written
decision on the appeal within 30 days
after receipt of the appeal.
§ 190.195 Combined application for
certification in drawback compliance
program and waiver of prior notice and/or
approval of accelerated payment of
drawback.
An applicant for certification in the
drawback compliance program may
also, in the same application, apply for
waiver of prior notice of intent to export
and accelerated payment of drawback,
under subpart I of this part.
Alternatively, an applicant may
separately apply for certification in the
drawback compliance program and
either or both waiver of prior notice and
accelerated payment of drawback. In the
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37958
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
former instance, the intent to apply for
certification and waiver of prior notice
and/or approval of accelerated payment
of drawback must be clearly stated. In
all instances, all of the requirements for
certification and the procedure applied
for must be met (for example, in a
combined application for certification in
the drawback compliance program and
both procedures, all of the information
required for certification and each
procedure, all required sample
documents for certification and each
procedure, and all required
certifications must be included with the
application).
Appendix A to Part 190—General
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Table of Contents
I. General Instructions
II. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) (T.D. 81–234;
T.D. 83–123)
III. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or 1313(b) for
Agents (T.D. 81–181)
IV. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Burlap or
Other Textile Material (T.D. 83–53)
V. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Component
Parts (T.D. 81–300)
VI. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Flaxseed
(T.D. 83–80)
VII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Fur Skins or
Fur Skin Articles (T.D. 83–77)
VIII. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Orange Juice (T.D. 85–110)
IX. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Petroleum or
Petroleum Derivatives (T.D. 84–49)
X. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Piece Goods
(T.D. 83–73)
XI. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Raw Sugar
(T.D. 83–59)
XII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Steel (T.D.
81–74)
XIII. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Sugar
(T.D. 81–92)
XIV. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for
Woven Piece Goods (T.D. 83–84)
I. General Instructions
A. There follow various general
manufacturing drawback rulings which have
been designed to simplify drawback
procedures. Any person that can comply
with the conditions of any one of these
rulings may notify a CBP drawback office in
writing of its intention to operate under the
ruling (see § 190.7). Such a letter of
notification must include the following
information:
1. Name and address of manufacturer or
producer;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
2. IRS (Internal Revenue Service) number
(with suffix) of manufacturer or producer;
3. Location[s] of factory[ies] which will
operate under the general ruling;
4. If a business entity, names of persons
who will sign drawback documents (see
§ 190.6);
5. Identity (by T.D. number and title, as
stated in this Appendix) of general
manufacturing drawback ruling under which
the manufacturer or producer intends to
operate;
6. Description of the merchandise and
articles, unless specifically described in the
general manufacturing drawback ruling, and
8-digit HTSUS subheading number, and the
quantity of the merchandise;
7. Only for General Manufacturing
Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Petroleum or Petroleum Derivatives, the
name of each article to be exported or, if the
identity of the product is not clearly evident
by its name, what the product is, and the
abstract period to be used for each refinery
(monthly or other specified period (not to
exceed 1 year)), subject to the conditions in
the General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Petroleum or
Petroleum Derivatives, I. Procedures and
Records Maintained, 4(a) or (b);
8. Basis of claim used for calculating
drawback; and
9. Description of the manufacturing or
production process, unless specifically
described in the general manufacturing
drawback ruling.
For the General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling under § 1313(a), the General
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) for Component Parts, and the
General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or 1313(b) for
Agents, if the drawback office has doubts as
to whether there is a manufacture or
production, as defined in § 190.2, the
manufacturer or producer will be asked to
provide details of the operation purported to
be a manufacture or production.
10. For the General Manufacturing
Drawback Ruling where substituted
merchandise will be used, the bill of
materials and/or formulas annotated with the
8-digit HTSUS classifications.
B. These general manufacturing drawback
rulings supersede general ‘‘contracts’’
previously published under the following
Treasury Decisions (T.D.s): 81–74, 81–92, 81–
181, 81–234, 81–300, 83–53, 83–59, 83–73,
83–77, 83–80, 83–84, 83–123, 84–49, and 85–
110. Anyone currently operating under any
of the above-listed Treasury Decisions will
automatically be covered by the superseding
general ruling, including all privileges of the
previous ‘‘contract’’.
II. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) (T.D. 81–234; T.D.
83–123)
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback
Products 1 Used
Imported merchandise or drawback
products are used in the manufacture of the
1 Drawback
products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
exported articles upon which drawback
claims will be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will
be claimed will be manufactured in the
United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback
products will be used to manufacture or
produce articles in accordance with § 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
1. Relative Values
Drawback law mandates the assignment of
relative values when two or more products
necessarily are produced concurrently in the
same operation. If multiple products are
produced records, which may include
records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained of the market
value of each product at the time it is first
separated in the manufacturing process.
2. Appearing-in Method
The appearing-in basis may not be used if
multiple products are produced.
F. Loss or Gain
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained showing the extent of any loss or
gain in net weight or measurement of the
imported merchandise, caused by
atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions,
or other factors.
G. [Reserved]
H. Stock in Process
Stock in process does not result; or if it
does result, details will be given in claims as
filed, and it will not be included in the
computation of the merchandise used to
manufacture the finished articles on which
drawback is claimed.
I. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of merchandise
appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value, the
quantity, and the disposition of any waste
that results from manufacturing the exported
articles. If no waste results, records will be
maintained to establish that fact.
J. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
use of the imported merchandise, and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 2
used in producing the exported articles. (To
obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported
within 5 years after importation of the
imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements must be
available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof
of compliance).
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
K. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures And Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
B. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback
products or other substituted merchandise
will be used to manufacture or produce
articles in accordance with § 190.2.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
L. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the full
quantity of merchandise used in producing
the exported articles only if there is no waste
or valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. A drawback claim
may be based on the quantity of eligible
merchandise that appears in the exported
articles, regardless of whether there is waste,
and no records of waste need be maintained.
If there is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible material used to produce
the exported articles less the amount of that
merchandise which the value of the waste
would replace.
M. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer must:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of the sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
III. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or 1313(b)
for Agents (T.D. 81–181)
Manufacturers or producers operating
under this general manufacturing drawback
ruling must comply with T.D.s 55027(2) and
55207(1), and 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), if
applicable, as well as 19 CFR part 190 (see
particularly, § 190.9).
A. Name and Address of Principal
C. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. Quantity, kind, quality, and 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number of merchandise
transferred from the principal to the agent;
2. Date of transfer of the merchandise from
the principal to the agent;
3. Date of manufacturing or production
operations performed by the agent;
4. Total quantity and description of
merchandise (including 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number) appearing in or used in
manufacturing or production operations
performed by the agent;
5. Total quantity and description of articles
(including 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number) produced in manufacturing or
production operations performed by the
agent;
6. Quantity, kind, quality, and 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number of articles
transferred from the agent to the principal;
and
7. Date of transfer of the articles from the
agent to the principal.
D. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when manufacturing or
producing articles for account of the
principal under the principal’s general
manufacturing drawback ruling or specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, as
appropriate;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates the claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37959
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to help ensure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
IV. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Burlap
or Other Textile Material (T.D. 83–53)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) upon the exportation of bags or meat
wrappers manufactured with the use of
imported burlap or other textile material,
subject to the following special requirements:
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback
Products 1 Used
Imported merchandise or drawback
products (burlap or other textile material) are
used in the manufacture of the exported
articles upon which drawback claims will be
based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will
be claimed will be manufactured in the
United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another, or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback
products will be used to manufacture or
produce articles in accordance with § 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Loss or Gain
Not applicable.
G. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of merchandise
appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value, the
quantity, and the disposition of any waste
that results from manufacturing the exported
articles. If no waste results, records will be
maintained to establish that fact.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
use of the imported merchandise; and
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37960
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 2
used in producing the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures and Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
compliance with those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid. Each lot of
imported material received by a
manufacturer or producer must be given a lot
number and kept separate from other lots
until used. The records of the manufacturer
or producer must show, as to each
manufacturing lot or period of manufacture,
the 8-digit HTSUS classification, the quantity
of material used from each imported lot and
the number of each kind and size of bags or
meat wrappers obtained.
All bags or meat wrappers manufactured or
produced for the account of the same
exporter during a specified period may be
designated as one manufacturing lot. All
exported bags or meat wrappers must be
identified by the exporter.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of merchandise used in producing the
exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. Drawback may be
claimed on the quantity of eligible
merchandise that appears in the exported
articles, regardless of whether there is waste,
and no records of waste need be maintained.
If there is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible material used to produce
the exported articles, less the amount of that
merchandise which the value of the waste
would replace.
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer must:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to help ensure proper
compliance with 19, United States Code,
§ 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
V. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Component
Parts (T.D. 81–300)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification
(Parallel Columns)
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as that designated which will
be used in the production of the exported products
Component parts identified by individual part numbers and 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number.
Component parts classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number and identified with the same individual part numbers
as those in the column immediately to the left hereof.
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
The exported articles will have been
manufactured in the United States using
components described in the parallel
columns above.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
The designated components will have been
manufactured in accordance with the same
specifications and from the same materials,
and identified by the same 8-digit HTSUS
classification, and part number as the
substituted components. Further, the
designated and substituted components are
used interchangeably in the manufacture of
the exported articles upon which drawback
will be claimed. Specifications or drawings
will be maintained and made available for
CBP officers. Fluctuations in market value
resulting from factors other than quality will
not affect the drawback.
F. Waste
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of the sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles.’’
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The components described in the parallel
columns will be used to manufacture or
produce articles in accordance with § 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of components
appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value (or
the lack of value), the quantity, and the
disposition of any waste that results from
manufacturing the exported articles. If no
waste results, records will be maintained to
establish that fact.
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
G. [Reserved]
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the designated
merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the designated merchandise 2 used to
produce the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years after the date of
importation of the designated merchandise,
the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the
same 5-year period, the manufacturer or
producer produced 3 the exported articles. To
obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported
within 5 years after the importation of the
imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be
available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof
of compliance.
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles produced.’’
3 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures And Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of eligible components used in producing the
exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. Drawback may be
claimed on the quantity of eligible
components that appear in the exported
articles, regardless of whether there is waste,
and no records of waste need be maintained.
If there is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible components used to
produce the exported articles less the amount
of those components which the value of the
waste would replace.
K. General Requirements
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
VI. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Flaxseed
(T.D. 83–80)
Drawback may be allowed under the
provision of 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) upon the
exportation of linseed oil, linseed oil cake,
and linseed oil meal, manufactured or
produced with the use of imported flaxseed,
subject to the following special requirements:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback
Products 1 Used
Imported merchandise or drawback
products (flaxseed) are used in the
manufacture of the exported articles upon
which drawback claims will be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will
be claimed will be manufactured in the
United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
37961
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
use of the imported merchandise; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 2
used in producing the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures and Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer will show the inclusive dates of
manufacture; the quantity, identity, value,
and 8-digit HTSUS classification of the
imported flaxseed or screenings, scalpings,
chaff, or scourings used; the quantity by
actual weight and value, if any, of the
material removed from the foregoing by
screening prior to crushing; the quantity and
kind of domestic merchandise added, if any;
the quantity by actual weight or gauge and
value of the oil, cake, and meal obtained; and
the quantity and value, if any, of the waste
incurred. The quantity of imported flaxseed,
screenings, scalpings, chaff, or scourings
used or of material removed will not be
estimated nor computed on the basis of the
quantity of finished products obtained, but
will be determined by actually weighing the
said flaxseed, screenings, scalpings, chaff,
scourings, or other material; or, at the option
of the crusher, the quantities of imported
materials used may be determined from CBP
weights, as shown by the import entry
covering such imported materials, and the
Government weight certificate of analysis
issued at the time of entry. The entire period
covered by an abstract will be deemed the
time of separation of the oil and cake covered
thereby.
If the records of the manufacturer or
producer do not show the quantity of oil cake
used in the manufacture or production of the
exported oil meal and the quantity of oil
meal obtained, the net weight of the oil meal
exported will be regarded as the weight of the
oil cake used in the manufacture thereof.
If various tanks are used for the storage of
imported flaxseed, the mill records must
establish the tank or tanks in which each lot
or cargo is stored. If raw or processed oil
manufactured or produced during different
periods of manufacture is intermixed in
storage, a record must be maintained
showing the quantity, identity, kind, and 8digit HTSUS classification of oil so
intermixed. Identity of merchandise or
articles in either instance must be in
accordance with § 190.14.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations.
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of the sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles.’’
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback
products will be used to manufacture or
produce articles in accordance with § 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Drawback law mandates the assignment of
relative values when two or more products
necessarily are produced concurrently in the
same operation. If multiple products are
produced records will be maintained of the
market value of each product at the time it
is first separated in the manufacturing
process (when a claim covers a
manufacturing period, the entire period
covered by the claim is the time of separation
of the products and the value per unit of
product is the market value for the period
(see §§ 190.2, 190.22(e)). The ‘‘appearing in’’
basis may not be used if multiple products
are produced.
F. Loss or Gain
Records will be maintained showing the
extent of any loss or gain in net weight or
measurement of the imported merchandise,
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors.
G. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of merchandise
appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value, the
quantity, and the disposition of any waste
that results from manufacturing the exported
articles. If no waste results, records will be
maintained to establish that fact.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37962
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will
be claimed will be manufactured in the
United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with 19, United States Code,
§ 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback
products will be used to manufacture or
produce articles in accordance with § 190.2.
Drawback will not be allowed under this
general manufacturing drawback ruling when
the process performed results only in the
restoration of the merchandise to its
condition at the time of importation.
VII. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Fur
Skins or Fur Skin Articles (T.D. 83–77)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) upon the exportation of dressed,
redressed, dyed, redyed, bleached, blended,
or striped fur skins or fur skin articles
manufactured or produced by any one or a
combination of the foregoing processes with
the use of fur skins or fur skin articles, such
as plates, mats, sacs, strips, and crosses,
imported in a raw, dressed, or dyed
condition, subject to the following special
requirements:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of merchandise used in producing the
exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. Drawback may be
claimed on the quantity of eligible
merchandise that appears in the exported
articles, regardless of whether there is waste,
and no records of waste need be maintained.
If there is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible material used to produce
the exported articles, less the amount of that
merchandise which the value of the waste
would replace.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
use of the imported merchandise; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 2
used in producing the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback
Products 1 Used
Imported merchandise or drawback
products (fur skins or fur skin articles) are
used in the manufacture of the exported
articles upon which drawback claims will be
based.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Loss or Gain
Records will be maintained showing the
extent of any loss or gain in net weight or
measurement of the imported merchandise,
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors.
G. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of merchandise
appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value, the
quantity, and the disposition of any waste
that results from manufacturing the exported
articles. If no waste results, records will be
maintained to establish that fact.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of the sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
U.S.C. 1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures and Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
The records of the manufacturer or
producer must show, as to each lot of fur
skins and/or fur skin articles used in the
manufacture or production of articles for
exportation with benefit of drawback, the lot
number and date or inclusive dates of
manufacture or production, the quantity,
identity, description, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the imported merchandise
used, the condition in which imported, the
process or processes applied thereto, the
quantity, description, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the finished articles
obtained, and the quantity of imported pieces
rejected, if any, or spoiled in manufacture or
production.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of merchandise used in producing the
exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. Drawback may be
claimed on the quantity of eligible
merchandise that appears in the exported
articles, regardless of whether there is waste,
and no records of waste need be maintained.
If there is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible material used to produce
the exported articles, less the amount of that
merchandise which the value of the waste
would replace. (If rejects and/or spoilage are
incurred, the quantity of imported
merchandise used will be determined by
deducting from the quantity of fur skins or
fur skin articles put into manufacture or
production the quantity of such rejects and/
or spoilage.)
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with 19, United States Code,
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
37963
VIII. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Orange
Juice (T.D. 85–110)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification
(Parallel Columns)
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as that designated which will
be used in the production of the exported products
Concentrated orange juice for manufacturing (of not less than 55° Brix)
as defined in the standard of identity of the Food and Drug Administration (21 CFR 146.53) which meets the Grade A standard of the
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (7 CFR 52.1557, Table IV).
Concentrated orange juice for manufacturing as described in the lefthand parallel column.
The imported merchandise designated on
drawback claims must be classifiable under
the same 8-digit HTSUS classification as the
merchandise used in producing the exported
articles on which drawback is claimed.
Fluctuations in the market value resulting
from factors other than quality will not affect
the drawback.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
1. Orange juice from concentrate
(reconstituted juice).
2. Frozen concentrated orange juice.
3. Bulk concentrated orange juice.
ii. The concentrate is blended with
essential oils and flavoring components and
water.
3. Bulk concentrated orange juice.
Concentrated orange juice for manufacturing
is blended with essential oils and flavoring
components which would enable another
processor such as a dairy to prepare finished
frozen concentrated orange juice or orange
juice from concentrate by merely adding
water to the (intermediate) bulk concentrated
orange juice.
E. Multiple Products, Waste, Loss or Gain
Not applicable.
components were blended with the
concentrated orange juice for manufacturing.
If those records do not establish satisfaction
of those legal requirements drawback cannot
be paid.
I. Basis of Claim for Drawback
The basis of claim for drawback will be the
quantity of concentrated orange juice for
manufacturing used in the production of the
exported articles. It is understood that when
fresh orange juice is used as ‘‘cutback’’, it
will not be included in the ‘‘pound solids’’
when computing the drawback due.
C. General Statement
F. [Reserved]
J. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
G. Procedures and Records Maintained
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
1. Orange juice from concentrate
(reconstituted juice). Concentrated orange
juice for manufacturing is reduced to a
desired 11.8° Brix by a blending process to
produce orange juice from concentrate. The
following optional blending processes may
be used:
i. The concentrate is blended with fresh
orange juice (single strength juice); or
ii. The concentrate is blended with
essential oils, flavoring components, and
water; or
iii. The concentrate is blended with water
and is heat treated to reduce the enzymatic
activity and the number of viable
microorganisms.
2. Frozen concentrated orange juice.
Concentrated orange juice for manufacturing
is reduced to a desired degree Brix of not less
than 41.8° Brix by the following optional
blending processes:
i. The concentrate is blended with fresh
orange juice (single strength juice); or
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The 8-digit HTSUS classification,
identity, and specifications of the designated
merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the designated merchandise 2 used to
produce the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years after the date of
importation of the designated merchandise,
the manufacturer or producer used the
designated merchandise to produce articles.
During the same 5-year period, the
manufacturer or producer produced 3 the
exported articles.
To obtain drawback it must be established
that the completed articles were exported
within 5 years after the importation of the
imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements must be
available for audit by CBP during business
hours. No drawback is payable without proof
of compliance.
H. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures And Records
Maintained’’, and will show what
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles produced.’’
3 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
IX. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Petroleum or Petroleum Derivatives (T.D.
84–49)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification
(Parallel Columns)
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37964
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products.
B. Exported Articles Produced From
Fractionation
1. Motor Gasoline
2. Aviation Gasoline
3. Special Naphthas
4. Jet Fuel
5. Kerosene & Range Oils
6. Distillate Oils
7. Residual Oils
8. Lubricating Oils
9. Paraffin Wax
10. Petroleum Coke
11. Asphalt
12. Road Oil
13. Still Gas
14. Liquified Petroleum Gas
15. Petrochemical Synthetic Rubber
16. Petrochemical Plastics & Resins
17. All Other Petrochemical Products
C. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
See the General Instructions, I.A.7., for this
general drawback ruling. Each article to be
exported must be named. When the identity
of the product is not clearly evident by its
name, there must be a statement as to what
the product is, e.g., a herbicide.
D. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
E. Process of Manufacture or Production
Heated crude oil is charged to an
atmospheric distillation tower where it is
subjected to fractionation. The charge to the
distillation tower consists of a single crude
oil, or of commingled crudes which are fed
to the tower simultaneously or after blending
in a tank. During fractionation, components
of different boiling ranges are separated.
2. Producibility
The manufacturer or producer can vary the
proportionate quantity of each product. The
manufacturer or producer understands that
drawback is payable on exported products
only to the extent that these products could
have been produced from the designated
merchandise. The records of the
manufacturer or producer must show that all
of the products exported for which drawback
will be claimed under this general
manufacturing drawback ruling could have
been produced concurrently on a practical
operating basis from the designated
merchandise.
The manufacturer or producer agrees to
establish the amount to be designated by
reference to the Industry Standards of
Potential Production published in T.D. 66–
16.2
There are no valuable wastes as a result of
the processing.
G. Loss or Gain
Because the manufacturer or producer
keeps records on a volume basis rather than
a weight basis, it is anticipated that the
material balance will show a volume gain.
For the same reason, it is possible that
occasionally the material balance will show
a volume loss. Fluctuations in type of crude
used, together with the type of finished
product desired make an estimate of an
average volume gain meaningless. However,
records will be kept to show the amount of
loss or gain with respect to the production of
export products.
H. Exchange
The use of any domestic merchandise
acquired in exchange for imported
merchandise that meets the same kind and
quality specifications contained in the
parallel columns of this general ruling shall
be treated as use of the imported
merchandise.
Fractionation results in 17 products. In
order to insure proper distribution of
drawback to each of these products, the
manufacturer or producer agrees to record
the relative values at the time of separation.
The entire period covered by an abstract is
to be treated as the time of separation. The
value per unit of each product will be the
average market value for the abstract period.
I. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the merchandise
designated;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the designated merchandise used to
produce the exported articles.
3. That, within 5 years after importation,
the manufacturer or producer used the
designated merchandise to produce articles.
During the same 5-year period, the
manufacturer or producer produced the
exported articles.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
2 A manufacturer who proposes to use standards
other than those in T.D. 66–16 must state the
proposed standards and provide sufficient
information to CBP in order for those proposed
standards to be verified in accordance with
T.D. 84–49.
F. Multiple Products
1. Relative Values
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as that designated which
will be used in the production of the exported products.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
4(a). The manufacturer or producer agrees
to use a 28–31 day period (monthly) abstract
period for each refinery covered by this
general manufacturing drawback ruling, or
(b). The manufacturer or producer agrees to
use an abstract period (not to exceed 1 year)
for each refinery covered by this general
manufacturing drawback ruling. The
manufacturer or producer certifies that if it
were to file abstracts covering each
manufacturing period of not less than 28
days and not more than 31 days (monthly)
within the longer period, in no such monthly
abstract would the quantity of designated
merchandise exceed the material introduced
into the manufacturing process during that
monthly period. (Select (a) or (b), and state
which is selected in the application, and, if
(b) is selected, specify the length of the
particular abstract period chosen (not to
exceed 1 year (see General Instruction
I.A.7.)).)
5. On each abstract of production the
manufacturer or producer agrees to show the
value per barrel to five decimal places.
6. The manufacturer or producer agrees to
file claims in the format set forth in exhibits
A through F which are attached to this
general manufacturing drawback ruling. The
manufacturer or producer realizes that to
obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported
within 5 years after importation of the
imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be
available for audit by CBP during business
hours. It is understood that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
Records will be kept in accordance with T.D.
84–49, as amended by T.D. 95–61.
J. Residual Rights
It is understood that the refiner can reserve
as the basis for future payment the right to
drawback only on the number of barrels of
raw material computed by subtracting from
Line E the larger of Lines A or B, of a given
Exhibit E. It is further understood that this
right to future payment can be claimed only
against products concurrently producible
with the products listed in Column 21, in the
quantities shown in Column 22 of such
Exhibit E. Such residual right can be
transferred to another refinery of the same
refiner only when Line B of Exhibit E is
larger than Line A. Unless the number of
residual barrels is specifically computed and
rights thereto are expressly reserved on
Exhibit E, such residual rights will be
deemed waived. The procedure the
manufacturer or producer must follow in
preparing drawback entries claiming this
residual right is illustrated in the attached
sample Exhibit E–1. It is understood that
claims involving residual rights must be filed
only at the port where the Exhibit E reserving
such right was filed.
K. Inventory Procedures
The manufacturer or producer realizes that
inventory control is of major importance. In
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
L. Basis of Claim for Drawback
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
The amount of raw material on which
drawback may be based will be computed by
multiplying the quantity of each product
exported by the drawback factor for that
product. The amount of raw material which
may be designated as the basis for drawback
on the exported products produced at a given
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
refinery and covered by a drawback entry
must not exceed the quantity of such raw
material used at the refinery during the
abstract period or periods from which the
exported products were produced. The
quantity of raw material to be designated as
the basis for drawback on exported products
must be at least as great as the quantity of
raw material which would be required to
produce the exported products in the
quantities exported.
M. Agreements
The manufacturer or producer specifically
agrees that it will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its refinery and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
predicated in whole or in part upon this
application;
4. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
EP02AU18.000
accordance with the normal accounting
procedures of the manufacturer or producer,
each refinery prepares a monthly stock and
yield report, which accounts for inventories,
production and disposals from time of
receipt to time of disposition. This provides
an audit trail of all products.
The above-noted records will provide the
required audit trail from the initial source
documents to the drawback claims of the
manufacturer or producer and will support
adherence with the requirements discussed
under the heading PROCEDURES AND
RECORDS MAINTAINED.
37965
37966
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
EXHIBIT C—INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET: ABC OIL CO., INC.; BEAUMONT, TEXAS REFINERY, PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1,
2019 TO JANUARY 31, 2019
[All quantities exclude non-petroleum additives]
Aviation gasoline
Bbls.
Drawback
factor
(13) Drawback Deliveries ..........................................
11,218
108,269
..............
11,218
176
..............
(14) Domestic Shipments ..........................................
(15) Closing Inventory ...............................................
Line
Line
Line
Line
Line
Line
Line
Bbls.
Drawback
factor
1.00126
1.01300
........................
1.00126
1.01300
........................
21,221
308,002
..............
21,221
104,397
..............
97,863
1.01300
10,230
1.01300
Lubricating oils
Petrochemicals, all other
Bbls.
Drawback
factor
Bbls.
Drawback
factor
.45962
.43642
........................
.45962
.43642
........................
9,242
292,492
..............
8,774
4.52178
4.64041
........................
4.52178
891
7,996
..............
195
1.00244
1.07895
........................
1.00244
..............
........................
180,957
.43642
.43642
4.52178
4.64041
4.64041
1.00244
1.07895
1.07895
22,648
468
278,286
14,206
696
319
6,867
810
1.07895
(10)—Opening inventory from previous period’s closing inventory.
(11)—From production period under consideration.
(11–A)—Product received from other sources.
(12)—From earliest on hand (inventory or production). Totals from drawback entry or entries recapitulated (see column 18).
(13)—Deliveries for export or for designation against further manufacture—earliest on hand after exports are deducted.
(14)—From earliest on hand after lines (12) and (13) are deducted.
(15)—Balance on hand.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
EP02AU18.001
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
(10) Opening Inventory .............................................
(11) Production ..........................................................
(11–A) Receipts ........................................................
(12) Exports ...............................................................
Residual oils
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
37967
EXHIBITD
RECAPITULATION OF DRAWBACK ENTRY
ABC OIL CO., INC -BEAUMONT, TEXAS REFINERY
PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2019 TO JANUARY 31, 2019
Duty paid on raw material selected for designation - $.1050 per bbl. (class III crude)
Amount of drawback claimed - gross - 106,594 x .1 050 = $11,192
Less 1%
- 112
Amount of drawback claimed- net
$11,080
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
EP02AU18.002
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Col. (16) Lists only products exported.
Col. (17) Quantities in condition as shown on the notices of exportation and notices of lading.
Col. (18) Quantities in condition as shown on the abstract (i.e., less additives if any). These
quantities will appear in line 12.
Col. (19) The drawback factor(s) shown on line 12.
Col (20) Raw material (crude or derivatives) allowable, determined by multiplying column 18
by 19.
Col (20a) Raw material (crude or derivatives) allowable, for drawback deliveries determined by
multiplying column 18 by column 19.
37968
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
EXHIBITE
PRODUCIBILITY TEST FOR PRODUCTS EXPORTED
(INCLUDING DRAWBACK DELIVERIES)
ABC OIL CO., INC -BEAUMONT, TEXAS REFINERY
PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2019 TO JANUARY 31, 2019
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
EP02AU18.003
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Type and Class of Raw Material Designated - Crude, Class III
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
37969
EXHIBIT E-1
PRODUCIBILITY TEST FOR PRODUCTS ON WHICH RESIDUAL RIGHT TO
DRAWBACK IS NOW CLAIMED AND PRODUCTS COVERED BY ABSTRACTS ON
WHICH RAW MATERIALS COVERED WERE PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED
ABC OIL CO., INC - TULSA, OKLAHOMA REFINERY
PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2019 TO JANUARY 31, 2019
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
EP02AU18.004
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Type and Class of Raw Material Designated - Cmde. Class III
37970
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
EXHIBIT E (COMBINATION)—PRODUCIBILITY TEST FOR PRODUCTS EXPORTED (INCLUDING DRAWBACK DELIVERIES) ABC
OIL CO., INC.; BEAUMONT, TEXAS REFINERY, PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2019 TO JANUARY 31, 2019
[Type and Class of Raw Material Designated—Crude, Class III]
Product
Quantity in
barrels
Industry
standard
(%)
Quantity of
raw material of
type and class
designated
needed to
produce
product per
barrel
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
Aviation Gasoline 1 ...............................................
1 11,218
Lubricating Oils 1 ..................................................
Petrochemicals, Other 1 .......................................
Petrochemicals, Other 2 .......................................
Petrochemicals, Other 2 .......................................
1 8,774
2 319
40
40
83
83
50
29
29
29
Total ..............................................................
146,996
........................
1 176
Residual Oils 1 ......................................................
1 21,221
1 104,397
1 195
2 696
Drawback factor
Crude allowed
for drawback
(19)
(20)
28,045
440
25,567
125,780
17,548
672
2,400
1,100
1.00126
1.01300
.45962
.43642
4.52178
1.00244
1.00244
1.07895
11,232
178
9,754
45,561
39,674
195
698
344
........................
........................................
107,636
1 Exports.
2 Drawback deliveries.
A—Crude allowed (column 20: 107,636 bbls. (106,594 for export, plus 1,042 for drawback deliveries)).
B—Total quantity exported (including drawback deliveries) (column 22): 146,996.
C—Largest quantity of raw material needed to produce an individual exported product (see column 24): 151,347.
D—The excess of raw material over the largest of lines A, B, or C, required to produce concurrently on a practical operating basis, using the
most efficient processing equipment existing within the domestic industry, the exported articles (including drawback deliveries) in the quantities
exported (or delivered): None.
E—Minimum quantity of raw material required to be designated (which is A, B, or C, whichever is largest, plus D, if applicable): 151,347 bbs.
I hereby certify that all the above drawback deliveries and products exported by the Beaumont refinery of ABC Oil Co., Inc. during the period
from January 1, 1995 to January 31, 1995, could have been produced concurrently on a practical operating basis from 151,347 barrels of imported Class III crude against which drawback is claimed.
EXHIBIT F—DESIGNATIONS FOR DRAWBACK CLAIM, ABC OIL CO., INC.; BEAUMONT, TEXAS REFINERY
Entry No.
26192 .............
23990 .............
22517 .............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Date of
importation
04/13/17
08/04/18
10/05/18
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Quantity of
materials in
barrels
Kind of
materials
Class III Crude ..................
......do ................................
......do ................................
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
75,125
37,240
38,982
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Date
received
04/13/17
08/04/18
10/05/18
Date
consumed
May 2017 .............................
Oct. 2018 ..............................
Nov. 2018 .............................
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Rate of
duty
$.1050
.1050
.1050
EP02AU18.005
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
[Period From January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2019]
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
37971
X. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Piece Goods
(T.D. 83–73)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification
(Parallel Columns)
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as that designated which will
be used in the production of the exported products
Piece goods.
Piece goods.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
The piece goods used in manufacture will
be classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS
classification as the piece goods designated
as the basis of claim for drawback, and are
used interchangeably without change in
manufacturing processes or resultant
products (including, if applicable, multiple
products), or wastes. Some tolerances
between imported-designated piece goods
and the used-exported piece goods will be
permitted to accommodate variations which
are normally found in piece goods. These
tolerances are no greater than the tolerances
generally allowed in the industry for piece
goods classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS classification as follows:
1. A 4% weight tolerance so that the piece
goods used in manufacture will be not more
than 4% lighter or heavier than the imported
piece goods which will be designated;
2. A tolerance of 4% in the aggregate
thread count per square inch so that the piece
goods used in manufacture will have an
aggregate thread count within 4%, more or
less of the aggregate thread count of the
imported piece goods which will be
designated. In each case, the average yarn
number of the domestic piece goods will be
the same or greater than the average yarn
number of the imported piece goods
designated, and in each case, the substitution
and tolerance will be employed only within
the same family of fabrics, i.e., print cloth for
print cloth, gingham for gingham, greige for
greige, dyed for dyed, bleached for bleached,
etc. The piece goods used in manufacture of
the exported articles will be designated as
containing the identical percentage of
identical fibers as the piece goods designated
as the basis for allowance of drawback; for
example, piece goods containing 65% cotton
and 35% dacron will be designated against
the use of piece goods shown to contain 65%
cotton and 35% dacron. The actual fiber
composition may vary slightly from that
described on the invoice or other acceptance
of the fabric as having the composition
described on documents in accordance with
trade practices. Differences in value resulting
from factors other than quality, as for
example, price fluctuations, will not
preclude an allowance of drawback.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
Finished piece goods.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b). They may be designated
as the basis for drawback and also may be deemed
to be domestic merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
C. General Statement
H. [Reserved]
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s.
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
I. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the designated
merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the designated merchandise 2 used to
produce the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years after the date of
importation of the designated merchandise,
the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the
same 5-year period, the manufacturer or
producer produced 3 the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after the importation
of the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
Piece goods are subject to any one of the
following finishing productions:
1. Bleaching,
2. Mercerizing,
3. Dyeing,
4. Printing,
5. A combination of the above, or
6. Any additional finishing processes.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
Rag waste may be incurred. No drawback
is payable on any waste which results from
the manufacturing operation. Unless the
claim for drawback is based on the quantity
of merchandise appearing in the exported
articles, the records of the manufacturer or
producer must show the quantity of rag
waste, if any, and its value. In instances
where rag waste occurs and it is impractical
to account for the actual quantity of rag waste
incurred, it may be assumed that such rag
waste constituted 2% of the piece goods put
into the finishing processes. If necessary to
establish the quantity of merchandise
(eligible piece goods) appearing in the
exported articles, such waste records must
also be kept.
G. Shrinkage, Gain, and Spoilage
Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of merchandise appearing in the
exported articles, the records of the
manufacturer or producer must show the
yardage lost by shrinkage or gained by
stretching during manufacture or production,
and the quantity of remnants resulting and of
spoilage incurred, if any. If necessary to
establish the quantity of merchandise
(eligible piece goods) appearing in the
exported articles, such records for shrinkage,
gain and spoilage will also be kept.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
J. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures And Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
K. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of eligible piece goods used in producing the
exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. Drawback may be
claimed on the quantity of eligible piece
goods that appears in the exported articles,
regardless of whether there is waste, and no
records of waste need be maintained. If there
is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste from each lot of piece goods, drawback
may be claimed on the quantity of eligible
piece goods used to produce the exported
articles less the amount of piece goods which
the value of the waste would replace.
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles produced.’’
3 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37972
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
L. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XI. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Raw
Sugar (T.D. 83–59)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) upon the exportation of hard or soft
refined sugars and sirups manufactured from
raw sugar, subject to the following special
requirements:
A. The drawback allowance must not
exceed an amount calculated pursuant to
regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury, of the duties, taxes, and fees paid
on a quantity of raw sugar designated by the
refiner which contains a quantity of sucrose
not in excess of the quantity required to
manufacture the exported sugar or sirup,
ascertained as provided in this general rule.
B. The refined sugars and sirups must have
been manufactured with the use of duty-paid,
duty-free, or domestic sugar, or combinations
thereof, within 5 years after the date of
importation, and must have been exported
within 5 years from the date of importation
of the designated sugar.
C. All granulated sugar testing by the
polariscope 99.5 [degrees] and over will be
deemed hard refined sugar. All refined sugar
testing by the polariscope less than 99.5
[degrees] will be deemed soft refined sugar.
All ‘‘blackstrap,’’ ‘‘unfiltered sirup,’’ and
‘‘final molasses’’ will be deemed sirup.
D. The imported duty-paid sugar selected
by the refiner as the basis for the drawback
claim (designated sugar) must be classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as that used in the manufacture of the
exported refined sugar or sirup and must
have been used within 5 years after the date
of importation. Duty-paid sugar which has
been used at a plant of a refiner within 5
years after the date on which it was imported
by such refiner may be designated as the
basis for the allowance of drawback on
refined sugars or sirups manufactured at
another plant of the same refiner.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
E. For the purpose of distributing the
drawback, relative values must be established
between hard refined (granulated) sugar, soft
refined (various grades) sugar, and sirups at
the time of separation. The entire period
covered by an abstract will be deemed the
time of separation of the sugars and sirups
covered by such abstract.
F. The sucrose allowance per pound on
hard refined (granulated) sugar established
by an abstract, as provided for in this general
ruling, will be applied to hard refined sugar
commercially known as loaf, cut loaf, cube,
pressed, crushed, or powdered sugar
manufactured from the granulated sugar
covered by the abstract.
G. The sucrose allowance per gallon on
sirup established by an abstract, as provided
for in this general ruling, will be applied to
sirup further advanced in value by filtration
or otherwise, unless such sirup is the subject
of a special manufacturing drawback ruling.
H. As to each lot of imported or domestic
sugar used in the manufacture of refined
sugar or sirup on which drawback is to be
claimed, the raw stock records must show the
refiner’s raw lot number, the number and
character of the packages, the settlement
weight in pounds, the settlement
polarization, and the 8-digit HTSUS
classification. Such records covering
imported sugar must show, in addition to the
foregoing, the import entry number, date of
importation, name of importing carrier,
country of origin, the Government weight,
and the Government polarization.
I. The melt records must show the date of
melting, the number of pounds of each lot of
raw sugar melted, and the full analysis at
melting.
J. There must be kept a daily record of final
products boiled showing the date of the melt,
the date of boiling, the magma filling serial
number, the number of the vacuum pan or
crystallizer filling, the date worked off, and
the sirup filling serial number.
K. The sirup manufacture records must
show the date of boiling, the period of the
melt, the sirup filling serial number, the
number of barrels in the filling, the magma
filling serial number, the quantity of sirup, its
disposition in tanks or barrels and the
refinery serial manufacture number.
L. The refined sugar stock records must
show the refinery serial manufacture number,
the period of the melt, the date of
manufacture, the grade of sugar produced, its
polarization, the number and kind of
packages, and the net weight. When soft
sugars are manufactured, the commercial
grade number and quantity of each must be
shown.
M. Each lot of hard or soft refined sugar
and each lot of sirup manufactured,
regardless of the character of the containers
or vessels in which it is packed or stored,
must be marked immediately with the date
of manufacture and the refinery manufacture
number applied to it in the refinery records
provided for and shown in the abstract, as
provided for in this general ruling, from such
records. If all the sugar or sirup contained in
any lot manufactured is not intended for
exportation, only such of the packages as are
intended for exportation need be marked as
prescribed above, provided there is filed with
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the drawback office immediately after such
marking a statement showing the date of
manufacture, the refinery manufacture
number, the number of packages marked, and
the quantity of sugar or sirup contained
therein. No drawback will be allowed in such
case on any sugar or sirup in excess of the
quantity shown on the statement as having
been marked. If any packages of sugar or
sirup so marked are repacked into other
containers, the new containers must be
marked with the marks which appeared on
the original containers and a revised
statement covering such repacking and
remarking must be filed with the drawback
office. If sirups from more than one lot are
stored in the same tank, the refinery records
must show the refinery manufacture number
and the quantity of sirup from each lot
contained in such tank.
N. An abstract from the foregoing records
covering manufacturing periods of not less
than 1 month nor more than 3 months, unless
a different period will have been authorized,
must be filed when drawback is to be
claimed on any part of the refined sugar or
sirup manufactured during such period. Such
abstract must be filed by each refiner with
the drawback office where drawback claims
are filed on the basis of this general ruling.
Such abstract must consist of: (1) A raw stock
record (accounting for Refiner’s raw lot No.,
Import entry No., Packages No. and kind,
Pounds, Polarization, By whom imported or
withdrawn, Date of importation, Date of
receipt by refiner, Date of melt, Importing
carrier, Country of origin); (2) A melt record
[number of pounds in each lot melted]
(accounting for Lot No. Pounds, and
Polarization degrees and pounds sucrose); (3)
Sirup stock records (accounting for Date of
boiling, Refinery serial manufacture No.,
Quantity of sirup in gallons, and Pounds
sucrose contained therein); (4) Refined sugar
stock record (accounting for Refinery serial
production No., Date of manufacture, Hard or
soft refined, Polarization and No., Net weight
in pounds); (5) Recapitulation (consisting of
(in pounds): (a) Sucrose in process at
beginning of period, (b) sucrose melted
during period, (c) sucrose in process at end
of period, (d) sucrose used in manufacture,
and (e) sucrose contained in manufacture, in
which item (a) plus item (b), minus item (c),
should equal item (d)); and (6) A statement
as follows:
I, lllll, the lll refiner at the
lll refinery of lll, located at lll,
do solemnly and truly declare that each of
the statements contained in the foregoing
abstract is true to the best of my knowledge
and belief and can be verified by the refinery
records, which have been kept in accordance
with Treasury Decision 83–59 and Appendix
A of 19 CFR part 190 and which are at all
times open to the inspection of CBP.
Date llllllllllllllllll
Signature llllllllllllllll
O. The refiner must file with each abstract
a statement, showing the average market
values of the products specified in the
abstract and including a statement as follows:
I, lllll, (Official capacity) of the
lll (Refinery), do solemnly and truly
declare that the values shown above are true
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
to the best of my knowledge and belief, and
can be verified by our records.
Date llllllllllllllllll
Signature llllllllllllllll
P. At the end of each calendar month the
refiner must furnish to the drawback office a
statement showing the actual sales of sirup
and the average market values of refined
sugars for the calendar month.
Q. The sucrose allowance to be applied to
the various products based on the abstract
and statement provided for in this general
ruling will be in accordance with the
example set forth in Treasury Decision 83–
59.
R. [Reserved.]
S. Drawback entries under this general
ruling must state the polarization in degrees
and the sucrose in pounds for the designated
imported sugar. Drawback claims under this
general ruling must include a statement as
follows:
I, lllll, the lll of lll, located
at lll declare that the sugar (or sirup)
described in this entry, was manufactured by
said company at its refinery at lll and is
part of the sugar (or sirup) covered by
abstract No. ll, filed at the port of ll;
that, subject to 19 U.S.C. 1508 and 1313(t),
the refinery and other records of the
company verifying the statements contained
in said abstract are now and at all times
hereafter will be open to inspection by CBP.
I further declare that the above-designated
imported sugar (upon which the duties have
been paid) was received by said company on
l and was used in the manufacture of sugar
and sirup during the period covered by
abstract No. ll, CBP No. ll, on file with
the port director at lll.
I further declare that the sugar or sirup
specified therein was exported as stated in
the entry.
Date llllllllllllllllll
Signature llllllllllllllll
T. General Statement. The refiner
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The refiner may manufacture or
produce articles for the account of another or
another manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce for the refiner’s
account under contract within the principal
and agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
U. Waste. No drawback is payable on any
waste which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless drawback claims are based
on the ‘‘appearing in’’ method, records will
be maintained to establish the value (or the
lack of value), the quantity, and the
disposition of any waste that results from
manufacturing the exported articles. If no
waste results, records to establish that fact
will be maintained.
V. Loss or Gain. The refiner will maintain
records showing the extent of any loss or gain
in net weight or measurement of the sugar
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors.
W. [Reserved]
X. Procedures and Records Maintained.
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the designated
merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the designated merchandise 1 used to
produce the exported articles; and
3. That, within 5 years of the date of
importation of the designated merchandise,
the refiner used the designated merchandise
to produce articles. During the same 5-year
period, the refiner produced 2 the exported
articles.
37973
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after the importation
of the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
Y. General requirements. The refiner will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XII. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Steel
(T.D. 81–74)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification
(Parallel Columns)
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as that designated which will
be used in the production of the exported products.
Steel of one general class, e.g., an ingot, falling within on SAE, AISI, or
ASTM 2 specification and, if the specification contains one or more
grades, falling within one grade of the specification.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products
Steel of the same general class, specification, and grade as the steel
in the column immediately to the left hereof.
1. The duty-paid, duty-free, or domestic
steel used instead of the imported, duty-paid
steel (or drawback products) will be
interchangeable for manufacturing purposes
with the duty-paid steel. To be
interchangeable a steel must be able to be
used in place of the substituted steel without
any additional processing step in the
manufacture of the article on which
drawback is to be claimed.
2. Because the duty-paid steel (or drawback
products) that is to be designated as the basis
for drawback is dutiable according to its
value, the amount of duty can vary with its
size (gauge, width, or length) or composition
(e.g., chrome content). If such variances
occur, designation will be by ‘‘price extra’’,
and in no case will drawback be claimed in
a greater amount than that which would have
accrued to that steel used in manufacture of
or appearing in the exported articles. Price
extra is not available for coated or plated
steel, covered in paragraph 4, infra, insofar as
the coating or plating is concerned.
3. Any fluctuation in market value caused
by a factor other than quality does not affect
drawback.
4. If the steel is coated or plated with a
base metal, in addition to meeting the
requirements for uncoated or unplated steel
set forth in the parallel columns, the basemetal coating or plating on the duty-paid,
duty-free, or domestic steel used in place of
the duty-paid steel (or drawback products)
will have the same composition and
thickness as the coating or plating on the
duty-paid steel. If the coated or plated dutypaid steel is within an SAE, AISI, ASTM
specification, then any duty-paid, duty-free,
or domestic coated or plated steel must be
covered by the same specification and grade
(if two or more grades are in the
specification).
1 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles produced.’’
2 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
2 Standards set by the Society of Automotive
Engineers (SAE), the American Iron and Steel
Institute (AISI), or the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37974
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
The exported articles will have been
manufactured in the United States using
steels described in the parallel columns
above.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account.
The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The steel described in the parallel columns
will be used to manufacture or produce
articles in accordance with § 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of steel appearing in
the exported articles, records will be
maintained to establish the value (or the lack
of value), the quantity, and the disposition of
any waste that results from manufacturing
the exported articles. If no waste results,
records to establish that fact will be
maintained.
G. Loss or Gain
The manufacturer or producer will
maintain records showing the extent of any
loss or gain in net weight or measurement of
the steel caused by atmospheric conditions,
chemical reactions, or other factors.
H. [Reserved]
I. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the designated
merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise of the
designated merchandise 3 used to produce
the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years of the date of
importation of the designated merchandise,
the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the
same 5-year period, the manufacturer or
producer produced 4 the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after the importation
of the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
J. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures And Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
K. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of steel used in producing the exported
articles only if there is no waste or valueless
or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing
operation. Drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible steel that appears in the
exported articles, regardless of whether there
is waste, and no records of waste need be
maintained. If there is valuable waste
recovered from the manufacturing operation
and records are kept which show the
quantity and value of the waste from each lot
of steel, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible steel used to produce the
exported articles less the amount of that steel
which the value of the waste would replace.
L. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification to operate
under this general ruling current by reporting
promptly to the drawback office which
liquidates its claims any changes in the
information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XIII. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for Sugar
(T.D. 81–92)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification
(Parallel Columns)
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as that designated which will
be used in the production of the exported products
1. Granulated or liquid sugar for manufacturing, containing sugar solids
of not less than 99.5 sugar degrees.
2. Granulated or liquid sugar for manufacturing, containing sugar solids
of not less than 99.5 sugar degrees.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products
1. Granulated or liquid sugar for manufacturing, containing sugar solids
of less than 99.5 sugar degrees.
2. Granulated or liquid sugar for manufacturing, containing sugar solids
of less than 99.5 sugar degrees.
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
The sugars listed above test within threetenths of a degree on the polariscope. Sugars
in each column are completely
interchangeable with the sugars directly
opposite and designation will be made on
this basis only. The designated sugar on
which claims for drawback will be based will
be classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS
classification. Differences in value resulting
from factors other than quality, such as
market fluctuation, will not affect the
allowance of drawback.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
account of another or another manufacturer
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The sugars are subjected to one or more of
the following operations to form the desired
product(s):
1. Mixing with other substances,
2. Cooking with other substances,
3. Boiling with other substances,
3 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles produced.’’
4 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Edible substances (including
confectionery) and/or beverages and/or
ingredients therefor.
C. General Statement
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
4. Baking with other substances,
5. Additional similar processes.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing
operation. Unless the claim for drawback is
based on the quantity of sugar appearing in
the exported articles, records will be
maintained to establish the value (or the lack
of value), the quantity, and the disposition of
any waste that results from manufacturing
the exported articles. If no waste results,
records to establish that fact will be
maintained.
G. Loss or Gain
The manufacturer or producer will
maintain records showing the extent of any
loss or gain in net weight or measurement of
the sugar caused by atmospheric conditions,
chemical reactions, or other factors.
H. [Reserved]
I. Procedures And Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the designated
merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the designated merchandise 2 used to
produce the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years of the date of
importation of the designated merchandise,
the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the
same 5-year period, the manufacturer or
producer produced 3 the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after the importation
of the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
J. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer, will show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures And Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
K. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of sugar used in producing the exported
articles only if there is no waste or valueless
or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing
operation. Drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible sugar that appears in the
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles produced.’’
3 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
exported articles regardless of whether there
is waste, and no records of waste need be
maintained. If there is valuable waste
recovered from the manufacturing operation
and records are kept which show the
quantity and value of the waste, drawback
may be claimed on the quantity of eligible
material used to produce the exported
articles less the amount of that sugar which
the value of the waste would replace.
L. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XIV. General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for Woven
Piece Goods (T.D. 83–84)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) upon the exportation of bleached,
mercerized, printed, dyed, or redyed piece
goods manufactured or produced by any one
or a combination of the foregoing processes
with the use of imported woven piece goods,
subject to the following special requirements:
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback
Products 1 Used
Imported merchandise or drawback
products (woven piece goods) are used in the
manufacture of the exported articles upon
which drawback claims will be based.
37975
account of another or another manufacturer
or producer may manufacture or produce for
the account of the manufacturer or producer
under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see § 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback
products will be used to manufacture or
produce articles in accordance with § 190.2.
The piece goods used in manufacture or
production under this general manufacturing
drawback ruling may also be subjected to one
or more finishing processes. Drawback will
not be allowed under this general
manufacturing drawback ruling when the
process performed results only in the
restoration of the merchandise to its
condition at the time of importation.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
Rag waste may be incurred. No drawback
is payable on any waste which results from
the manufacturing operation. Unless the
claim for drawback is based on the quantity
of merchandise appearing in the exported
articles, the records of the manufacturer or
producer must show the quantity of rag
waste, if any, its value, and its disposition.
If no waste results, records will be
maintained to establish that fact. In instances
where rag waste occurs and it is impractical
to account for the actual quantity of rag waste
incurred, it may be assumed that such rag
waste constituted 2% of the woven piece
goods put into process. If necessary to
establish the quantity of merchandise
(eligible piece goods) appearing in the
exported articles, such waste records will
also be kept.
G. Shrinkage, Gain, and Spoilage
Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of merchandise appearing in the
exported articles, the records of the
manufacturer or producer must show the
yardage lost by shrinkage or gained by
stretching during manufacture, and the
quantity of remnants resulting and of
spoilage incurred, if any. If necessary to
establish the quantity of merchandise
(eligible piece goods) appearing in the
exported articles, such records for shrinkage,
gain, and spoilage will also be kept.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer
manufactures or produces for its own
account. The manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce articles for the
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept
in the normal course of business, will be
maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
use of the imported merchandise; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 2
used in producing the exported articles.
To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were
exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records
establishing compliance with these
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations.
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of the sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles.’’
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will
Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will
be claimed will be manufactured in the
United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37976
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer
or producer must show how the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations will be met, as discussed under
the heading ‘‘Procedures and Records
Maintained’’. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements,
drawback cannot be paid.
The records of the manufacturer or
producer must show, as to each lot of piece
goods manufactured or produced for
exportation with benefit of drawback, the lot
number and the date or inclusive dates of
manufacture or production, the quantity,
identity, value, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the imported (or drawback
product) piece goods used, the condition in
which imported or received (whether in the
gray, bleached, dyed, or mercerized), the
working allowance specified in the contract
under which they are received, the process
or processes applied thereto, and the quantity
and description of the piece goods obtained.
The records must also show the yardage lost
by shrinkage or gained by stretching during
manufacture or production, and the quantity
of remnants resulting and of spoilage
incurred.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity
of merchandise used in producing the
exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the
manufacturing operation. Drawback may be
claimed on the quantity of eligible
merchandise that appears in the exported
articles, regardless of whether there is waste,
and no records of waste need be maintained.
If there is valuable waste recovered from the
manufacturing operation and records are kept
which show the quantity and value of the
waste, drawback may be claimed on the
quantity of eligible material used to produce
the exported articles, less the amount of that
merchandise which the value of the waste
would replace. (If remnants and/or spoilage
occur during manufacture or production, the
quantity of imported merchandise used will
be determined by deducting from the
quantity of piece goods received and put into
manufacture or production the quantity of
such remnants and/or spoilage. The
remaining quantity will be reduced by the
quantity thereof which the value of the rag
waste, if any, would replace.)
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this
general ruling when claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to
operate under this general ruling current by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the information required by the General
Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10)
or the corporate name or corporate
organization by succession or
reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file
for ready reference by employees and require
all officials and employees concerned to
familiarize themselves with the provisions of
this general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with 19, United States Code,
§ 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
Appendix B to Part 190—Sample
Formats for Applications for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Table of Contents
I. General
II. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under
19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b)
(Combination)
III. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under
19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
IV. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under
19 U.S.C. 1313(d)
V. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under
19 U.S.C. 1313(g)
I. General
Applications for specific manufacturing
drawback rulings using these sample formats
must be submitted to and reviewed and
approved by CBP Headquarters. See 19 CFR
190.8. A specific manufacturing drawback
ruling consists of the letter of approval that
CBP issues to the applicant. In these
application formats, remarks in parentheses
and footnotes are for explanatory purposes
only and should not be copied. Other
material should be quoted directly in the
applications.
II. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) (Combination)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry
Process and Duty Refunds, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, 90 K Street NE—
10th Floor (Mail Stop 1177), Washington, DC
20229–1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant’s
Name), a (State, e.g., Delaware) corporation
(or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling that our manufacturing
operations qualify for drawback under title
19, United States Code, §§ 1313 (a) & (b), and
part 190 of the CBP Regulations. We request
that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of
this application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER
(WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations
provides that each manufacturer or producer
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of articles intended for exportation with the
benefit of drawback must apply for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, unless
operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under § 190.7 of the CBP
Regulations. CBP will not approve an
application which shows an unincorporated
division or company as the applicant (see
§ 190.8(a)).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY
(Give the address of the factory(s) where
the process of manufacture or production
will take place. If the factory is a different
legal entity from the applicant, so state and
indicate if operating under an Agent’s general
manufacturing drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK
DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the
corporation who will sign drawback
documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP
Regulations permits only the president, vice
president, secretary, treasurer, or any
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation to sign for a corporation. In
addition, a person within a business entity
with a customs power of attorney for the
company may sign. A customs power of
attorney may also be given to a licensed
customs broker. This heading should be
changed to Names of Partners or Proprietor
in the case of a partnership or sole
proprietorship, respectively (see footnote at
end of this sample format for persons who
may sign applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings).)
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS
WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims
can be filed are located at: New York, NY;
Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco,
CA.)
(An original application and two copies
must be filed. If the applicant intends to file
drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application
must be furnished for each additional office
indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The following questions must be
answered:)
1. Who will be the importer of the
designated merchandise?
(If the applicant will not always be the
importer of the designated merchandise, does
the applicant understand its obligations to
maintain records to support the transfer
under § 190.10, and its liability under
§ 190.63?)
2. Will an agent be used to process the
designated or the substituted merchandise
into articles?
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant
must state it will comply with T.D.s 55027(2)
and 55207(1) and § 190.9, as applicable, and
that its agent will submit a letter of
notification of intent to operate under the
general manufacturing drawback ruling for
agents (see § 190.7 and Appendix A) or an
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling (see § 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
3. Will the applicant be the exporter?
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(If the applicant will not be the exporter in
every case but will be the claimant, the
manufacturer must state that it will reserve
the right to claim drawback with the
knowledge and written consent of the
exporter (19 CFR 190.82).)
Imported merchandise or drawback products 1 to be designated as the
basis for drawback on the exported products
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1.
2.
3.
PROCEDURES UNDER SECTION 1313(b)
(PARALLEL COLUMNS—‘‘SAME 8-DIGIT
CLASSIFICATION’’)
Duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise of the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number as that designated which will be used in
the production of the exported products
1.
2.
3.
(Following the items listed in the parallel
columns, a statement will be made, by the
applicant, that affirms the same 8-digit
HTSUS classification of the merchandise.
This statement should be included in the
application exactly as it is stated below:)
The imported merchandise which we will
designate in our claims will be classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as the merchandise used in producing the
exported articles on which we claim
drawback.
Fluctuations in the market value resulting
from factors other than quality will not affect
the drawback.
(In order to successfully claim drawback it
is necessary to prove that the duty-paid,
duty-free or domestic merchandise which is
to be substituted for the imported
merchandise is ‘‘classifiable under the same
8-digit HTSUS classification’’. In order to
enable CBP to rule on ‘‘the same 8-digit
HTSUS classification’’, the application must
include a detailed description of the
designated imported merchandise and of the
substituted duty-paid, duty-free or domestic
merchandise to be used to produce the
exported articles, as well as provide the Bill
of Materials and/or formulas annotated with
the HTSUS classifications.)
(It is essential that all the characteristics
which determine the quality of the
merchandise are provided in the application
in order to substantiate that the merchandise
meets the ‘‘the same 8-digit HTSUS
classification’’ statutory requirement. These
characteristics should clearly distinguish
merchandise of different qualities. For
example, USDA standards; FDA standards;
industry standards, e.g., ASTM;
concentration; specific gravity; purity; luster;
melting point, boiling point; odor; color;
grade; type; hardness; brittleness; etc. Note
that these are only a few examples of
characteristics and that each kind of
merchandise has its own set of specifications
that characterizes its quality. If specifications
are given with a minimum value, be sure to
include a maximum value. The converse is
also true. Often characteristics are given to
CBP on attached specification sheets. These
specifications should not include Material
Safety Data sheets or other descriptions of the
merchandise that do not contribute to the
‘‘same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number’’
determination. When the merchandise is a
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
37977
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
chemical, state the chemical’s generic name
as well as its trade name plus any generally
recognized identifying number, e.g., CAS
number; Color Index Number, etc.) (In order
to expedite the specific manufacturing
drawback ruling process, it will be helpful if
you provide copies of technical standards/
specifications (particularly industry
standards such as ASTM standards) referred
to in your application.)
(The descriptions of the ‘‘the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number’’ merchandise
should be formatted in the parallel columns.
The left-hand column will consist of the
name and specifications of the designated
imported merchandise under the heading set
forth above. The right-hand column will
consist of the name, specifications, and 8digit HTSUS subheading number for the
duty-paid, duty-free or domestic
merchandise under the heading set forth
above. Amendments to rulings will be
required if any changes to the HTSUS
classifications occur.)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH
DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported. When
the identity of the product is not clearly
evident by its name state what the product
is, e.g., a herbicide. There must be a match
between each article described under the
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR
PRODUCTION section below and each article
listed here.)
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR
PRODUCTION
(Drawback under § 1313(b) is not allowable
except where a manufacture or production
exists. Manufacture or production is defined,
for drawback purposes, in § 190.2. In order to
obtain drawback under § 1313(b), it is
essential for the applicant to show use in
manufacture or production by giving a
thorough description of the manufacturing
process. This description should include the
name and exact condition of the merchandise
listed in the Parallel Columns, a complete
explanation of the processes to which it is
subjected in this country, the effect of such
processes, the name and exact description of
the finished article, and the use for which the
finished article is intended. When applicable,
give equations of the chemical reactions. The
attachment of a flow chart in addition to the
description showing the manufacturing
process is an excellent means of illustrating
whether or not a manufacture or production
has occurred. Flow charts can clearly
illustrate if and at what point during the
manufacturing process by-products and
wastes are generated.)
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(This section should contain a description
of the process by which each item of
merchandise listed in the parallel columns
above is used to make or produce every
article that is to be exported.)
MULTIPLE PRODUCTS
1. Relative Values
(Some processes result in the separation of
the merchandise used in the same operation
into two or more products. List all of the
products. State that you will record the
market value of each product at the time it
is first separated in the manufacturing
process. If this section is not applicable to
you, then state so.)
(Drawback law mandates the assignment of
relative values when two or more products
necessarily are produced concurrently in the
same operation. For instance, the refining of
flaxseed necessarily produces linseed oil and
linseed husks (animal feed), and drawback
must be distributed to each product in
accordance with its relative value. However,
the voluntary election of a steel fabricator, for
instance, to use part of a lot of imported steel
to produce automobile doors and part of the
lot to produce automobile fenders does not
call for relative value distribution.)
(The relative value of a product is its value
divided by the total value of all products,
whether or not exported. For example, 100
gallons of drawback merchandise are used to
produce 100 gallons of products, including
60 gallons of product A, 20 gallons of
product B, and 20 gallons of product C. At
the time of separation, the unit values of
products A, B, and C are $5, $10, and $50
respectively. The relative value of product A
is $300 divided by $1500 or 1⁄5. The relative
value of B is 2⁄15 and of product C is 2⁄3,
calculated in the same manner. This means
that 1⁄5 of the drawback product payments
will be distributed to product A, 2⁄15 to
product B, and 2⁄3 to product C.)
(Drawback is allowable on exports of any
of multiple products, but is not allowable on
exports of valuable waste. In making this
distinction between a product and valuable
waste, the applicant should address the
following significant elements: (1) The nature
of the material of which the residue is
composed; (2) the value of the residue as
compared to the value of the principal
manufactured product and the raw material;
(3) the use to which it is put; (4) its status
under the tariff laws, if imported; (5) whether
it is a commodity recognized in commerce;
(6) whether it must be subjected to some
process to make it saleable.)
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37978
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2. Producibility
(Some processes result in the separation of
fixed proportions of each product, while
other processes afford the opportunity to
increase or decrease the proportion of each
product. An example of the latter is
petroleum refining, where the refiner has the
option to increase or decrease the production
of one or more products relative to the others.
State under this heading whether you can or
cannot vary the proportionate quantity of
each product.) (The MULTIPLE PRODUCTS
section consists of two sub-sections: Relative
Values and Producibility. If multiple
products do not result from your operation
state ‘‘not applicable’’ for the entire section.
If multiple products do result from your
operation Relative Values will always apply.
However, Producibility may or may not
apply. If Producibility does not apply to your
multiple product operation state ‘‘Not
Applicable’’ for this sub-section.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials
which, for drawback purposes, are treated as
wastes. Describe any residue materials which
you believe should be so treated. If no waste
results, include a positive statement to that
effect under this heading.)
(If waste occurs, state: (1) Whether or not
it is recovered, (2) whether or not it is
valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This
information is required whether claims are
made on a ‘‘used in’’ or ‘‘appearing in’’ basis
and regardless of the amount of waste
incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting
of materials which are lost in the process.
Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These
irrecoverable and valueless wastes do not
reduce the drawback claim provided the
claim is based on the quantity of imported
material used in manufacturing. If the claim
is based upon the quantity of imported
merchandise appearing in the exported
article, irrecoverable and valueless waste will
cause a reduction in the amount of
drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered
wastes which have a value either for sale or
for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this
standard applies to the entire industry and is
not a selection on your part. An option by
you not to choose to sell or use the waste in
some different operation does not make it
valueless if another manufacturer can use the
waste. State what you do with the waste. If
you have to pay someone to get rid of it, or
if you have buyers for the waste, you must
state so in your application regardless of
what ‘‘Basis’’ you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you
choose to claim on the basis of the quantity
of imported or substituted merchandise used
in producing the exported articles (less
valuable waste), state that you will keep
records to establish the quantity and value of
the waste recovered. See ‘‘Basis of Claim for
Drawback’’ section below.)
STOCK IN PROCESS
(Some processes result in another type of
residual material, namely, stock in process,
which affects the allowance of drawback.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Stock in process may exist when residual
material resulting from a manufacturing or
processing operation is reintroduced into a
subsequent manufacturing or processing
operation; e.g., trim pieces from a cast article.
The effect of stock in process on a drawback
claim is that the amount of drawback for the
period in which the stock in process was
withdrawn from the manufacturing or
processing operation (or the manufactured
article, if manufacturing or processing
periods are not used) is reduced by the
quantity of merchandise or drawback
products used to produce the stock in
process if the ‘‘used in’’ or ‘‘used in less
valuable waste’’ methods are used (if the
‘‘appearing in’’ method is used, there will be
no effect on the amount of drawback), and
the quantity of merchandise or drawback
products used to produce the stock in
process is added to the merchandise or
drawback products used in the subsequent
manufacturing or production period (or the
subsequently produced article)).
(If stock in process occurs and claims are
to be based on stock in process, the
application must include a statement to that
effect. The application must also include a
statement that merchandise is considered to
be used in manufacture at the time it was
originally processed so that the stock in
process will not be included twice in the
computation of the merchandise used to
manufacture the finished articles on which
drawback is claimed.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from
WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in
an intangible loss or gain of the net weight
or measurement of the merchandise used.
This loss or gain is caused by atmospheric
conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors. State the approximate usual
percentage or quantity of such loss or gain.
Note that percentage values will be
considered to be measured ‘‘by weight’’
unless otherwise specified. Loss or gain does
not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to
your manufacturing process, state ‘‘Not
Applicable.’’)
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number of the
merchandise we designate;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number as the designated merchandise 2 we
used to produce the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years after the date of
importation, we used the designated
merchandise to produce articles. During the
same 5-year period, we produced 3 the
exported articles.
We realize that to obtain drawback the
claimant must establish that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles we produce.’’
3 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the importation of the imported merchandise.
Our records establishing our compliance
with these requirements will be available for
audit by CBP during business hours. We
understand that drawback is not payable
without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state
how those records will meet the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations as discussed under the heading
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED. To insure compliance the
following areas, as applicable, should be
included in your discussion:)
RECEIPT AND STORAGE OF DESIGNATED
MERCHANDISE
RECORDS OF USE OF DESIGNATED
MERCHANDISE
BILLS OF MATERIALS
MANUFACTURING RECORDS
WASTE RECORDS
RECORDS OF USE OF DUTY-PAID, DUTYFREE OR DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE OF
THE REQUIRED SAME 8-DIGIT HTSUS
SUBHEADING NUMBER WITHIN 5 YEARS
AFTER THE DATE OF IMPORTATION
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
SHIPPING RECORDS
(Proof of time frames may be specific or
inclusive, e.g., within 120 days, but specific
proof is preferable. Separate storage and
identification of each article or lot of
merchandise usually will permit specific
proof of exact dates. Proof of inclusive dates
of use, production or export may be
acceptable, but in such cases it is best to
describe very specifically the data you intend
to use to establish each legal requirement,
thereby avoiding misunderstandings at the
time of audit.) (If you do not describe the
inventory records that you will use, a
statement that the legal requirements will be
met by your inventory procedures is
acceptable. However, it should be noted that
without a detailed description of the
inventory procedures set forth in the
application a judgment as to the adequacy of
such a statement cannot be made until a
drawback claim is verified. Approval of this
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling merely constitutes approval
of the ruling application as submitted; it does
not constitute approval of the applicant’s
record keeping procedures if, for example,
those procedures are merely described as
meeting the legal requirements, without
specifically stating how the requirements
will be met. Drawback is not payable without
proof of compliance.)
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be
used to claim drawback: (1) Used in; (2)
appearing in; and (3) used in less valuable
waste.)
(The ‘‘used in’’ basis may be employed
only if there is either no waste or valueless
or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
reduce the amount of drawback when claims
are based on the ‘‘used in’’ basis. Drawback
is payable in the amount of 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity
of imported material designated as the basis
for the allowance of drawback on the
exported articles. The designated quantity
may not exceed the quantity of material
actually used in the manufacture of the
exported articles.)
(For example, if 100 pounds of material,
valued at $1.00 per pound, were used in
manufacture resulting in 10 pounds of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10
pounds of irrecoverable or valueless waste
would not reduce the drawback. In this case
drawback would be payable on 99% of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 100
pounds of designated material used to
produce the exported articles.)
(The ‘‘appearing in’’ basis may be used
regardless of whether there is waste. If the
‘‘appearing in’’ basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and
its value. However, the manufacturer must
establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported
product and provide this information. Waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are made on the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis.
Drawback is payable on 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity
of material designated, which may not
exceed the quantity of eligible material that
appears in the exported articles. ‘‘Appearing
in’’ may not be used if multiple products are
involved.)
(Based on the previous example, drawback
would be payable on the 90 pounds of
merchandise which actually went into the
exported product (appearing in) rather than
the 100 pounds used in as set forth
previously.)
(The ‘‘used in less valuable waste’’ basis
may be employed when the manufacturer
recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of
the quantity and value of waste from each lot
of merchandise. The value of the waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are based on the ‘‘used in less
valuable waste’’ basis. When valuable waste
is incurred, the drawback allowance on the
exported article is based on the duties, taxes,
and fees paid on the quantity of merchandise
used in the manufacture, reduced by the
quantity of such merchandise which the
value of the waste would replace. Thus in
this case, drawback is claimed on the
quantity of eligible material actually used to
produce the exported product, less the
amount of such material which the value of
the waste would replace. Note section
190.26(c) of the CBP Regulations.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10
pounds of waste had a value of $.50 per
pound, then the 10 pounds of waste, having
a total value of $5.00, would be equivalent
in value to 5 pounds of the designated
material. Thus the value of the waste would
replace 5 pounds of the merchandise used,
and drawback is payable on 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 95 pounds
of imported material designated as the basis
for the allowance of drawback on the
exported article rather than on the 100
pounds ‘‘used in’’ or the 90 pounds
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
‘‘appearing in’’ as set forth in the above
examples.)
(Two methods exist for the manufacturer to
show the quantity of material used or
appearing in the exported article: (1)
Schedule or (2) Abstract.)
(A ‘‘schedule’’ shows the quantity of
material used in producing each unit of
product. The schedule method is usually
employed when a standard line of
merchandise is being produced according to
fixed formulas. Some schedules will show
the quantity of merchandise used to
manufacture or produce each article and
others will show the quantity appearing in
each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of
merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and
measurements. A schedule determines the
amount that will be needed to produce a unit
of product before the material is actually
used in production.)
(An ‘‘abstract’’ is the summary of the
records which shows the total quantity used
in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at
a period of time, for instance 3 months, in
which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material
was actually used after a production period
has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the
‘‘schedule’’ choice must base its claims on
the ‘‘abstract’’ method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In
by Schedule follows:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of
(specify material) used in manufacturing
(exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below. (Section 190.8(f) of the CBP
Regulations requires submission of the
schedule with the application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling. An
applicant who desires to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office whenever
there is a change in the quantity or material
used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office covering
changes in the quantities of material used to
produce the exported articles, or different
styles or capacities of containers of such
exported merchandise. (Neither the
‘‘appearing in’’ basis nor the ‘‘schedule’’
method for claiming drawback may be used
where the relative value procedure is
required.)
PROCEDURES UNDER SECTION 1313(a)
IMPORTED MERCHANDISE OR
DRAWBACK PRODUCTS USED UNDER
1313(a)
(List the imported merchandise or
drawback products.)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH
DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported. When
the identity of the product is not clearly
evident by its name state what the product
is, e.g., a herbicide. There must be a match
between each article described under the
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE AND
PRODUCTION section below and each article
listed here.)
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37979
(If the merchandise used under § 1313(a) is
not also used under § 1313(b), the sections
entitled PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR
PRODUCTION, BY-PRODUCTS, LOSS OR
GAIN, and STOCK IN PROCESS should be
included here to cover merchandise used
under § 1313(a). However, if the merchandise
used under § 1313(a) is also used under
§ 1313(b) these sections need not be repeated
unless they differ in some way from the
§ 1313(b) descriptions.)
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
use of the imported merchandise, and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 4
we used in producing the exported articles.
We realize that to obtain drawback the
claimant must establish that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after
importation of the imported merchandise.
We understand that drawback is not payable
without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(This section must be completed separately
from that set forth under the § 1313(b)
portion of your application. The legal
requirements under § 1313(a) differ from
those under § 1313(b).)
(Describe your inventory procedures and
state how you will identify the imported
merchandise from date of importation until
it is incorporated in the articles to be
exported. Also describe how you will
identify the finished articles from the time of
manufacture until shipment.)
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(See section with this title for procedures
under § 1313(b). Either repeat the same basis
of claim or use a different basis of claim, as
described above, specifically for drawback
claimed under § 1313(a).)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it
will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the
terms of this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
application;
4. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the number or locations of its offices or
factories, the corporate name, the persons
who will sign drawback documents, the basis
of claim used for calculating drawback, the
decision to use or not to use an agent under
§ 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, or the corporate organization by
succession or reincorporation;
4 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of the sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles we produce.’’
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37980
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
5. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to CBP Headquarters all
other changes affecting information
contained in this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the
letter of approval by CBP Headquarters on
file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned
to familiarize themselves with the provisions
of this application and that letter of approval;
and
7. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL
I declare that I have read this application
for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
that I know the averments and agreements
contained herein are true and correct; and
that my signature on this ll day of
llll 20l, makes this application
binding on
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership,
or Sole Proprietorship)
By 5 llllllllllllllllll
(Signature and Title)
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Print Name)
III. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(b)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry
Process and Duty Refunds Branch,
Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90
K Street NE—10th Floor (Mail Stop 1177),
Washington, DC 20229–1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant’s
Name), a (State, e.g., Delaware) corporation
(or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling that our manufacturing
operations qualify for drawback under title
19, United States Code, section 1313(b), and
part 190 of the CBP Regulations. We request
that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of
this application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER
(WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations
provides that each manufacturer or producer
of articles intended for exportation with the
benefit of drawback will apply for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, unless
operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under § 190.7 of the CBP
Regulations. CBP will not approve an
application which shows an unincorporated
division or company as the applicant (see
§ 190.8(a)).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY
(Give the address of the factory(s) where
the process of manufacture or production
will take place. If the factory is a different
legal entity from the applicant, so state and
indicate if operating under an Agent’s general
manufacturing drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK
DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the
corporation who will sign drawback
documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP
Regulations permits only the president, vice
president, secretary, treasurer, or any
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation to sign for a corporation. In
addition, a person within a business entity
with a customs power of attorney for the
company may sign. A customs power of
attorney may also be given to a licensed
customs broker. This heading should be
changed to NAMES OF PARTNERS or
PROPRIETOR in the case of a partnership or
sole proprietorship, respectively (see footnote
at end of this sample format for persons who
may sign applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings).)
Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products 1 to be Designated as the
Basis for Drawback on the Exported Products
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1.
2.
3.
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS
WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims
can be filed are located at: New York, NY;
Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco,
CA.)
(An original application and two copies
must be filed. If the applicant intends to file
drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application
must be furnished for each additional office
indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The following questions must be
answered:)
1. Who will be the importer of the
designated merchandise?
(If the applicant will not always be the
importer of the designated merchandise, does
the applicant understand its obligations to
maintain records to support the transfer
under § 190.10, and its liability under
§ 190.63?)
2. Will an agent be used to process the
designated or the substituted merchandise
into articles?
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant
must state it will comply with T.D.s 55027(2)
and 55207(1), and § 190.9, as applicable, and
that its agent will submit a letter of
notification of intent to operate under the
general manufacturing drawback ruling for
agents (see § 190.7 and Appendix A), or an
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling (see § 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
3. Will the applicant be the exporter?
(If the applicant will not be the exporter in
every case but will be the claimant, the
manufacturer must state that it will reserve
the right to claim drawback with the
knowledge and written consent of the
exporter (19 CFR 190.82).)
PARALLEL COLUMNS—‘‘SAME 8-DIGIT
HTSUS CLASSIFICATION’’)
Duty-Paid, Duty-Free or Domestic Merchandise of the
Same 8-Digit HTSUS Subheading Number as that Designated Which
Will be Used in the Production of the Exported Products
1.
2.
3.
(Following the items listed in the parallel
columns, a statement will be made, by the
applicant, that affirms the ‘‘same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number’’ of the
merchandise. This statement should be
included in the application exactly as it is
stated below:)
The imported merchandise which we will
designate on our claims will be classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number as to the merchandise used in
producing the exported articles on which we
claim drawback, such that the merchandise
used would, if imported, be subject to the
same rate of duty as the imported designated
merchandise.
Fluctuations in the market value resulting
from factors other than quality will not affect
the drawback.
(In order to successfully claim drawback it
is necessary to prove that the duty-paid,
duty-free or domestic merchandise which is
to be substituted for the imported
merchandise is ‘‘classifiable under the same
8-digit HTSUS subheading number’’. In order
to enable CBP to rule on ‘‘same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number’’, the application
must include a detailed description of the
designated imported merchandise and of the
5 Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for
specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed
by any individual legally authorized to bind the
person (or entity) for whom the application is
signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full
partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the
president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a
business entity with a customs power of attorney
filed with the CBP port for the drawback office
which will liquidate your drawback claims may
sign such an application, as may a licensed customs
broker with a customs power of attorney. You
should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
1 Drawback products are those produced in the
United States in accordance with the drawback law
and regulations. Such products have ‘‘dual status’’
under section 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to
be domestic merchandise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
substituted duty-paid, duty-free or domestic
merchandise to be used to produce the
exported articles, as well as provide the Bill
of Materials and/or formulas annotated with
the HTSUS classification.)
(It is essential that all the characteristics
which determine the quality of the
merchandise are provided in the application
in order to substantiate that the merchandise
meets the ‘‘same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number’’ statutory requirement. These
characteristics should clearly distinguish
merchandise of different qualities. For
example, USDA standards; FDA standards;
industry standards, e.g., ASTM;
concentration; specific gravity; purity; luster;
melting point, boiling point; odor; color;
grade; type; hardness; brittleness; etc. Note
that these are only a few examples of
characteristics and that each kind of
merchandise has its own set of specifications
that characterizes its quality. If specifications
are given with a minimum value, be sure to
include a maximum value. The converse is
also true. Often characteristics are given to
CBP on attached specification sheets. These
specifications should not include Material
Safety Data sheets or other descriptions of the
merchandise that do not contribute to the
‘‘same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number’’
determination. When the merchandise is a
chemical, state the chemical’s generic name
as well as its trade name plus any generally
recognized identifying number, e.g., CAS
number; Color Index Number, etc.)
(In order to expedite the specific
manufacturing drawback ruling review
process, it will be helpful if you provide
copies of technical standards/specifications
(particularly industry standards such as
ASTM standards) referred to in your
application.)
(The descriptions of the ‘‘same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number’’ merchandise
should be formatted in the parallel columns.
The left-hand column will consist of the
name and specifications of the designated
imported merchandise under the heading set
forth above. The right-hand column will
consist of the name, specifications, and 8digit HTSUS subheading number for the
duty-paid, duty-free or domestic
merchandise under the heading set forth
above. Amendments to rulings will be
required if any changes to the HTSUS
classifications occur.)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH
DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported. When
the identity of the product is not clearly
evident by its name state what the product
is, e.g., a herbicide. There must be a match
between each article described under the
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE AND
PRODUCTION section below and each article
listed here.)
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR
PRODUCTION
(Drawback under § 1313(b) is not allowable
except where a manufacture or production
exists. Manufacture or production is defined,
for drawback purposes, in § 190.2. In order to
obtain drawback under § 1313(b), it is
essential for the applicant to show use in
manufacture or production by giving a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
thorough description of the manufacturing
process. This description should include the
name and exact condition of the merchandise
listed in the Parallel Columns, a complete
explanation of the processes to which it is
subjected in this country, the effect of such
processes, the name and exact description of
the finished article, and the use for which the
finished article is intended. When applicable,
give equations of the chemical reactions. The
attachment of a flow chart in addition to the
description showing the manufacturing
process is an excellent means of illustrating
whether or not a manufacture or production
has occurred. Flow charts can clearly
illustrate if and at what point during the
manufacturing process by-products and
wastes are generated.)
(This section should contain a description
of the process by which each item of
merchandise listed in the parallel columns
above is used to make or produce every
article that is to be exported.)
MULTIPLE PRODUCTS
1. Relative Values
(Some processes result in the separation of
the merchandise used in the same operation
into two or more products. List all of the
products. State that you will record the
market value of each product or by-product
at the time it is first separated in the
manufacturing process. If this section is not
applicable to you, then state so.)
(Drawback law mandates the assignment of
relative values when two or more products
necessarily are produced concurrently in the
same operation. For instance, the refining of
flaxseed necessarily produces linseed oil and
linseed husks (animal feed), and drawback
must be distributed to each product in
accordance with its relative value. However,
the voluntary election of a steel fabricator, for
instance, to use part of a lot of imported steel
to produce automobile doors and part of the
lot to produce automobile fenders does not
call for relative value distribution.)
(The relative value of a product is its value
divided by the total value of all products,
whether or not exported. For example, 100
gallons of drawback merchandise are used to
produce 100 gallons of products, including
60 gallons of product A, 20 gallons of
product B, and 20 gallons of product C. At
the time of separation, the unit values of
products A, B, and C are $ 5, $ 10, and $ 50
respectively. The relative value of product A
is $ 300 divided by $ 1500 or 1⁄5. The relative
value of B is 2⁄15 and of product C is 2⁄3,
calculated in the same manner. This means
that 1⁄5 of the drawback product payments
will be distributed to product A, 2⁄15 to
product B, and 2⁄3 to product C.)
(Drawback is allowable on exports of any
of multiple products, but is not allowable on
exports of valuable waste. In making this
distinction between a product and valuable
waste, the applicant should address the
following significant elements: (1) the nature
of the material of which the residue is
composed; (2) the value of the residue as
compared to the value of the principal
manufactured product and the raw material;
(3) the use to which it is put; (4) its status
under the tariff laws, if imported; (5) whether
it is a commodity recognized in commerce;
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37981
(6) whether it must be subjected to some
process to make it saleable.)
2. Producibility
(Some processes result in the separation of
fixed proportions of each product, while
other processes afford the opportunity to
increase or decrease the proportion of each
product. An example of the latter is
petroleum refining, where the refiner has the
option to increase or decrease the production
of one or more products relative to the others.
State under this heading whether you can or
cannot vary the proportionate quantity of
each product.)
(The MULTIPLE PRODUCTS section
consists of two sub-sections: Relative Values
and Producibility. If multiple products do
not result from your operation state ‘‘Not
Applicable’’ for the entire section. If multiple
products do result from your operation
Relative Values will always apply. However,
Producibility may or may not apply. If
Producibility does not apply to your multiple
product operation state ‘‘Not Applicable’’ for
this sub-section.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials
which, for drawback purposes, are treated as
waste. Describe any residue materials which
you believe should be so treated. If no waste
results, include a positive statement to that
effect under this heading.)
(If waste occurs, state: (1) whether or not
it is recovered, (2) whether or not it is
valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This
information is required whether claims are
made on a ‘‘used in’’ or ‘‘appearing in’’ basis
and regardless of the amount of waste
incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting
of materials which are lost in the process.
Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These
irrecoverable and valueless wastes do not
reduce the drawback claim provided the
claim is based on the quantity of imported
material used in manufacturing. If the claim
is based upon the quantity of imported
merchandise appearing in the exported
article, irrecoverable and valueless waste will
cause a reduction in the amount of
drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered
wastes which have a value either for sale or
for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this
standard applies to the entire industry and is
not a selection on your part. An option by
you not to choose to sell or use the waste in
some different operation does not make it
valueless if another manufacturer can use the
waste. State what you do with the waste. If
you have to pay someone to get rid of it, or
if you have buyers for the waste, you must
state so in your application regardless of
what ‘‘Basis’’ you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you
choose to claim on the basis of the quantity
of imported or substituted merchandise used
in producing the exported articles less
valuable waste, state that you will keep
records to establish the quantity and value of
the waste recovered. See ‘‘Basis of Claim for
Drawback’’ section below.)
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37982
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
STOCK IN PROCESS
(Some processes result in another type of
residual material, namely, stock in process,
which affects the allowance of drawback.
Stock in process may exist when residual
material resulting from a manufacturing or
processing operation is reintroduced into a
subsequent manufacturing or processing
operation; e.g., trim pieces from a cast article.
The effect of stock in process on a drawback
claim is that the amount of drawback for the
period in which the stock in process was
withdrawn from the manufacturing or
processing operation (or the manufactured
article, if manufacturing or processing
periods are not used) is reduced by the
quantity of merchandise or drawback
products used to produce the stock in
process if the ‘‘used in’’ or ‘‘used in less
valuable waste’’ methods are used (if the
‘‘appearing in’’ method is used, there will be
no effect on the amount of drawback), and
the quantity of merchandise or drawback
products used to produce the stock in
process is added to the merchandise or
drawback products used in the subsequent
manufacturing or production period (or the
subsequently produced article)).
(If stock in process occurs and claims are
to be based on stock in process, the
application must include a statement to that
effect. The application must also include a
statement that merchandise is considered to
be used in manufacture at the time it was
originally processed so that the stock in
process will not be included twice in the
computation of the merchandise used to
manufacture the finished articles on which
drawback is claimed.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from
WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in
an intangible loss or gain of the net weight
or measurement of the merchandise used.
This loss or gain is caused by atmospheric
conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors. State the approximate usual
percentage or quantity of such loss or gain.
Note that percentage values will be
considered to be measured ‘‘by weight’’
unless otherwise specified. Loss or gain does
not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to
your manufacturing process, state ‘‘Not
Applicable.’’)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number of the
merchandise we designate;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number as the designated merchandise 2 we
used to produce the exported articles;
3. That, within 5 years after the date of
importation, we used the designated
merchandise to produce articles. During the
2 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles we produce.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
same 5-year period, we produced 3 the
exported articles;
We realize that to obtain drawback the
claimant must establish that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after
the importation of the imported merchandise.
Our records establishing our compliance
with these requirements will be available for
audit by CBP during business hours. We
understand that drawback is not payable
without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state
how those records will meet the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations as discussed under the heading
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED. To help ensure compliance
the following areas, as applicable, should be
included in your discussion:)
RECEIPT AND STORAGE OF DESIGNATED
MERCHANDISE
RECORDS OF USE OF DESIGNATED
MERCHANDISE
BILLS OF MATERIALS
MANUFACTURING RECORDS
WASTE RECORDS
RECORDS OF USE OF DUTY-PAID, DUTYFREE OR DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE OF
THE REQUIRED SAME 8-DIGIT HTSUS
SUBHEADING WITHIN 5 YEARS AFTER
IMPORTATION OF THE DESIGNATED
MERCHANDISE
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
SHIPPING RECORDS
(Proof of time frames may be specific or
inclusive, e.g., within 120 days, but specific
proof is preferable. Separate storage and
identification of each article or lot of
merchandise usually will permit specific
proof of exact dates. Proof of inclusive dates
of use, production or export may be
acceptable, but in such cases it is better to
describe very specifically the data you intend
to use to establish each legal requirement,
thereby avoiding misunderstandings at the
time of audit.)
(If you do not describe the inventory
records that you will use, a statement that the
legal requirements will be met by your
inventory procedures is acceptable. However,
it should be noted that without a detailed
description of the inventory procedures set
forth in the application, a judgment as to the
adequacy of such a statement cannot be made
until a drawback claim is verified. Approval
of this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling merely
constitutes approval of the ruling application
as submitted; it does not constitute approval
of the applicant’s record keeping procedures
if, for example, those procedures are merely
described as meeting the legal requirements,
without specifically stating how the
requirements will be met. Drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.)
3 The date of production is the date an article is
completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be
used to claim drawback: (1) used in; (2)
appearing in; and (3) used in less valuable
waste.)
(The ‘‘used in’’ basis may be employed
only if there is either no waste or valueless
or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not
reduce the amount of drawback when claims
are based on the ‘‘used in’’ basis. Drawback
is payable in the amount of 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity
of imported material designated as the basis
for the allowance of drawback on the
exported articles. The designated quantity
may not exceed the quantity of material
actually used in the manufacture of the
exported articles.)
(For example, if 100 pounds of material,
valued at $1.00 per pound, were used in
manufacture resulting in 10 pounds of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10
pounds of irrecoverable or valueless waste
would not reduce the drawback. In this case
drawback would be payable on 99% of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 100
pounds of designated material used to
produce the exported articles.)
(The ‘‘appearing in’’ basis may be used
regardless of whether there is waste. If the
‘‘appearing in’’ basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and
its value. However, the manufacturer must
establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported
product and provide this information. Waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are made on the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis.
Drawback is payable on 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity
of material designated, which may not
exceed the quantity of eligible material that
appears in the exported articles. ‘‘Appearing
in’’ may not be used if multiple products are
involved.)
(Based on the previous example, drawback
would be payable on the 90 pounds of
merchandise which actually went into the
exported product (appearing in) rather than
the 100 pounds used in as set forth
previously.)
(The ‘‘used in less valuable waste’’ basis
may be employed when the manufacturer
recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of
the quantity and value of waste from each lot
of merchandise. The value of the waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are based on the ‘‘used in less
valuable waste’’ basis. When valuable waste
is incurred, the drawback allowance on the
exported article is based on the duties, taxes,
and fees paid on the quantity of merchandise
used in the manufacture, reduced by the
quantity of such merchandise which the
value of the waste would replace. Thus in
this case, drawback is claimed on the
quantity of eligible material actually used to
produce the exported product, less the
amount of such material which the value of
the waste would replace. Note section
190.26(c) of the CBP Regulations.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10
pounds of waste had a value of $.50 per
pound, then the 10 pounds of waste, having
a total value of $ 5.00, would be equivalent
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
in value to 5 pounds of the designated
material. Thus the value of the waste would
replace 5 pounds of the merchandise used,
and drawback is payable on 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 95 pounds
of imported material designated as the basis
for the allowance of drawback on the
exported article rather than on the 100
pounds ‘‘used in’’ or the 90 pounds
‘‘appearing in’’ as set forth in the above
examples.)
(Two methods exist for the manufacturer to
show the quantity of material used or
appearing in the exported article: (1)
Schedule or (2) Abstract.)
(A ‘‘schedule’’ shows the quantity of
material used in producing each unit of
product. The schedule method is usually
employed when a standard line of
merchandise is being produced according to
fixed formulas. Some schedules will show
the quantity of merchandise used to
manufacture or produce each article and
others will show the quantity appearing in
each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of
merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and
measurements. A schedule determines the
amount that will be needed to produce a unit
of product before the material is actually
used in production.)
(An ‘‘abstract’’ is the summary of the
records which shows the total quantity used
in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at
a period of time, for instance 3 months, in
which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material
was actually used after a production period
has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the
‘‘schedule’’ choice must base its claims on
the ‘‘abstract’’ method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In
by Schedule would read:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of
(specify material) used in manufacturing
(exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below.
(Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations
requires submission of the schedule with the
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to
file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office whenever there is a change
in the quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office covering
changes in the quantities of material used to
produce the exported articles, or different
styles or capacities of containers of such
exported merchandise.
(Neither the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis nor the
‘‘schedule’’ method for claiming drawback
may be used where the relative value
procedure is required.)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it
will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the
terms of this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
application;
4. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the number or locations of its offices or
factories, the corporate name, the persons
who will sign drawback documents, the basis
of claim used for calculating drawback, the
decision to use or not to use an agent under
§ 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, or the corporate organization by
succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to CBP Headquarters, all
other changes affecting information
contained in this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the
letter of approval by CBP Headquarters on
file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned
to familiarize themselves with the provisions
of this application and that letter of approval;
and
7. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
Declaration of Official
I declare that I have read this application
for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
that I know the averments and agreements
contained herein are true and correct; and
that my signature on this ll day of ll
20l, makes this application binding on
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership,
or Sole Proprietorship)
By 4 llllllllllllllllll
(Signature and Title)
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Print Name)
IV. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(d)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry
Process and Duty Refunds Branch,
Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90
K Street NE—10th Floor (Mail Stop 1177),
Washington, DC 20229–1177.
4 Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for
specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed
by any individual legally authorized to bind the
person (or entity) for whom the application is
signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full
partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the
president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a
business entity with a customs power of attorney
filed with the CBP port for the drawback office
which will liquidate your drawback claims may
sign such an application, as may a licensed customs
broker with a customs power of attorney. You
should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37983
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant’s
Name), a (State, e.g., Delaware) corporation
(or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling that our manufacturing
operations qualify for drawback under title
19, United States Code, section 1313(d), and
part 190 of the CBP Regulations. We request
that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of
this application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER
(WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations
provides that each manufacturer or producer
of articles intended for exportation with the
benefit of drawback must apply for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, unless
operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under § 190.7 of the CBP
Regulations. CBP will not approve an
application which shows an unincorporated
division or company as the applicant (see
§ 190.8(a)).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY
(Give the address of the factory(s) where
the process of manufacture or production
will take place. If the factory is a different
legal entity from the applicant, so state and
indicate if operating under an Agent’s general
manufacturing drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK
DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the
corporation who will sign drawback
documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP
Regulations permits only the president, vice
president, secretary, treasurer, or any
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation to sign for a corporation. In
addition, a person within a business entity
with a customs power of attorney for the
company may sign. A customs power of
attorney may also be given to a licensed
customs broker. This heading should be
changed to NAMES OF PARTNERS or
PROPRIETOR in the case of a partnership or
sole proprietorship, respectively (see footnote
at end of this sample format for persons who
may sign applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings).
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS
WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims
can be filed are located at: New York, NY;
Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco,
CA.)
(An original application and two copies
must be filed. If the applicant intends to file
drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application
must be furnished for each additional office
indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The exact material placed under this
heading in individual cases will vary, but it
should include such information as the type
of business in which the manufacturer is
engaged, whether the manufacturer is
manufacturing for its own account or is
performing the operation on a toll basis
(including commission or conversion basis)
for the account of others, whether the
manufacturer is a direct exporter of its
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37984
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
products or sells or delivers them to others
for export, and whether drawback will be
claimed by the manufacturer or by others.)
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant
must state it will comply with T.D.s 55027(2)
and 55207(1), and § 190.9, as applicable, and
that its agent will submit a letter of
notification of intent to operate under the
general manufacturing drawback ruling for
agents (see § 190.7 and Appendix A), or an
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling (see § 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
(Regarding drawback operations conducted
under § 1313(d), the data may describe the
flavoring extracts, medicinal, or toilet
preparations (including perfumery)
manufactured with the use of domestic taxpaid alcohol; and where such alcohol is
obtained or purchased.)
TAX-PAID MATERIAL USED UNDER
SECTION 1313(d)
(Describe or list the tax-paid material)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH
DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
(Name each article to be exported)
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR
PRODUCTION
(Drawback under § 1313(d) is not allowable
except where a manufacture or production
exists. ‘‘Manufacture or production’’ is
defined, for drawback purposes, in § 190.2. In
order to obtain drawback under § 1313(d), it
is essential for the applicant to show use in
manufacture or production by giving a
thorough description of the manufacturing
process. Describe how the tax-paid material
is processed into the export article.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials
which, for drawback purposes, are treated as
wastes. Describe any residue materials which
you believe should be so treated. If no waste
results, include a positive statement to that
effect under this heading.) (If waste occurs,
state: (1) whether or not it is recovered, (2)
whether or not it is valueless, and (3) what
you do with it. This information is required
whether claims are made on a ‘‘used in’’ or
‘‘appearing in’’ basis and regardless of the
amount of waste incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting
of materials which are lost in the process.
Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These
irrecoverable and valueless wastes do not
reduce the drawback claim provided the
claim is based on the quantity of domestic
tax-paid alcohol used in manufacturing. If
the claim is based upon the quantity of
domestic tax-paid alcohol appearing in the
exported article, irrecoverable and valueless
waste will cause a reduction in the amount
of drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered
wastes which have a value either for sale or
for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this
standard applies to the entire industry and is
not a selection on your part. An option by
you not to choose to sell or use the waste in
some different operation, does not make it
valueless if another manufacturer can use the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
waste. State what you do with the waste. If
you have to pay someone to get rid of it, or
if you have buyers for the waste, you must
state so in your application regardless of
what ‘‘Basis’’ you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you
choose to claim on the basis of the quantity
of domestic tax-paid alcohol used in
producing the exported articles (less valuable
waste), state that you will keep records to
establish the quantity and value of the waste
recovered. See ‘‘Basis of Claim for Drawback’’
section below.)
STOCK IN PROCESS
(Some processes result in another type of
residual material, namely, stock in process,
which affects the allowance of drawback.
Stock in process may exist when residual
material resulting from a manufacturing or
processing operation is reintroduced into a
subsequent manufacturing or processing
operation; e.g., trim pieces from a cast article.
The effect of stock in process on a drawback
claim is that the amount of drawback for the
period in which the stock in process was
withdrawn from the manufacturing or
processing operation (or the manufactured
article, if manufacturing or processing
periods are not used) is reduced by the
quantity of merchandise or drawback
products used to produce the stock in
process if the ‘‘used in’’ or ‘‘used in less
valuable waste’’ methods are used (if the
‘‘appearing in’’ method is used, there will be
no effect on the amount of drawback), and
the quantity of merchandise or drawback
products used to produce the stock in
process is added to the merchandise or
drawback products used in the subsequent
manufacturing or production period (or the
subsequently produced article)).
(If stock in process occurs and claims are
to be based on stock in process, the
application must include a statement to that
effect. The application must also include a
statement that the domestic tax-paid alcohol
is considered to be used in manufacture at
the time it was originally processed so that
the stock in process will not be included
twice in the computation of the domestic taxpaid alcohol used to manufacture the
finished articles on which drawback is
claimed.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from
WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in
an intangible loss or gain of the net weight
or measurement of the merchandise used.
This loss or gain is caused by atmospheric
conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors. State the approximate usual
percentage or quantity of such loss or gain.
Note that percentage values will be
considered to be measured ‘‘by weight’’
unless otherwise specified. Loss or gain does
not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to
your manufacturing process, state ‘‘Not
Applicable.’’)
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed were produced with the
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
use of a particular lot (or lots) of domestic
tax-paid alcohol, and
2. The quantity of domestic tax-paid
alcohol1 we used in producing the exported
articles.
We realize that to obtain drawback the
claimant must establish that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after
the tax has been paid on the domestic
alcohol. Our records establishing our
compliance with these requirements will be
available for audit by CBP during business
hours. We understand that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state
how those records will meet the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(d) and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations as discussed under the heading
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED. To help ensure compliance
the following areas should be included in
your discussion:)
RECEIPT AND RAW STOCK STORAGE
RECORDS
MANUFACTURING RECORDS
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be
used to claim drawback: (1) used in; (2)
appearing in; and (3) used in less valuable
waste.)
(The ‘‘used in’’ basis may be employed
only if there is either no waste or valueless
or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not
reduce the amount of drawback when claims
are based on the ‘‘used in’’ basis. Drawback
is payable in the amount of 100% of the tax
paid on the quantity of domestic alcohol
used in the manufacture of flavoring extracts
and medicinal or toilet preparation
(including perfumery).)
(For example, if 100 gallons of alcohol,
valued at $ 1.00 per gallon, were used in
manufacture resulting in 10 gallons of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10
gallons of irrecoverable or valueless waste
would not reduce the drawback. In this case
drawback would be payable on 100% of the
tax paid on the 100 gallons of domestic
alcohol used to produce the exported
articles.)
The ‘‘appearing in’’ basis may be used
regardless of whether there is waste. If the
‘‘appearing in’’ basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and
its value. However, the manufacturer must
establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported
product and provide this information. Waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are made on the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis.
Drawback is payable on 100% of the tax paid
on the quantity of domestic alcohol which
appears in the exported articles.
(Based on the previous example, drawback
would be payable on the 90 gallons of
1 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles we produce.’’
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
domestic alcohol which actually went into
the exported product (appearing in) rather
than the 100 gallons used in as set forth
previously.)
(The ‘‘used in less valuable waste’’ basis
may be employed when the manufacturer
recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of
the quantity and value of waste from each lot
of domestic tax-paid alcohol. The value of
the waste reduces the amount of drawback
when claims are based on the ‘‘used in less
valuable waste’’ basis. When valuable waste
is incurred, the drawback allowance on the
exported article is based on the quantity of
tax-paid alcohol used to manufacture the
exported articles, reduced by the quantity of
such alcohol which the value of the waste
would replace.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10
gallons of waste had a value of $.50 per
gallon, then the 10 gallons of waste, having
a total value of $ 5.00, would be equivalent
in value to 5 gallons of the tax-paid alcohol.
Thus the value of the waste would replace 5
gallons of the alcohol used, and drawback is
payable on 100% of the tax paid on 95
gallons of alcohol rather than on the 100
gallons ‘‘used in’’ or the 90 gallons
‘‘appearing in’’ as set forth in the above
examples.) (Two methods exist for the
manufacturer to show the quantity of
material used or appearing in the exported
article: (1) Schedule or (2) Abstract.)
(A ‘‘schedule’’ shows the quantity of
material used in producing each unit of
product. The schedule method is usually
employed when a standard line of
merchandise is being produced according to
fixed formulas. Some schedules will show
the quantity of merchandise used to
manufacture or produce each article and
others will show the quantity appearing in
each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of
merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and
measurements. A schedule determines the
amount that will be needed to produce a unit
of product before the material is actually
used in production.)
(An ‘‘abstract’’ is the summary of the
records which shows the total quantity used
in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at
a period of time, for instance 3 months, in
which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material
was actually used after a production period
has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the
‘‘schedule’’ choice must base its claims on
the ‘‘abstract’’ method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In
by schedule follows:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of
(specify material) used in manufacturing
(exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below.
(Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations
requires submission of the schedule with the
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to
file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office whenever there is a change
in the quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office covering
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
changes in the quantities of material used to
produce the exported articles, or different
styles or capacities of containers of such
exported merchandise.
(Neither the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis nor the
‘‘schedule’’ method for claiming drawback
may be used where the relative value
procedure is required.)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it
will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the
terms of this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
application;
4. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the number or locations of its offices or
factories, the corporate name, the persons
who will sign drawback documents, the basis
of claim used for calculating drawback, the
decision to use or not to use an agent under
§ 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, the drawback office where claims
will be filed under the ruling, or the
corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to CBP Headquarters, all
other changes affecting information
contained in this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the
letter of approval by CBP Headquarters on
file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned
to familiarize themselves with the provisions
of this application and that letter of approval;
and
7. Issue instructions to insure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL
I declare that I have read this application
for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
that I know the averments and agreements
contained herein are true and correct; and
that my signature on this l day of llll
20 l, makes this application binding on
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership,
or Sole Proprietorship)
By 2 llllllllllllllllll
2 Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for
specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed
by any individual legally authorized to bind the
person (or entity) for whom the application is
signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full
partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the
president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a
business entity with a customs power of attorney
filed with the CBP port for the drawback office
which will liquidate your drawback claims may
sign such an application, as may a licensed customs
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37985
(Signature and Title)
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Print Name)
V. Format for Application for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(g).
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry
Process and Duty Refunds Branch,
Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90
K Street NE—10th Floor (Mail Stop 1177),
Washington, DC 20229–1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant’s
Name), a (State, e.g., Delaware) corporation
(or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling that our manufacturing
operations qualify for drawback under title
19, United States Code, section 1313(g), and
part 190 of the CBP Regulations. We request
that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of
this application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER
(WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations
provides that each manufacturer or producer
of articles intended for exportation with the
benefit of drawback must apply for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, unless
operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under § 190.7 of the CBP
Regulations. CBP will not approve an
application which shows an unincorporated
division or company as the applicant (see
§ 190.8(a).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY OR SHIPYARD
(Give the address of the factory(s) or
shipyard(s) at which the construction and
equipment will take place. If the factory or
shipyard is a different legal entity from the
applicant, so state and indicate if operating
under an Agent’s general manufacturing
drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK
DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the
corporation who will sign drawback
documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP
Regulations permits only the president, vice
president, secretary, treasurer, or any
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation to sign for a corporation. In
addition, a person within a business entity
with a customs power of attorney for the
company may sign. A customs power of
attorney may also be given to a licensed
customs broker. This heading should be
changed to NAMES OF PARTNERS or
PROPRIETOR in the case of a partnership or
sole proprietorship, respectively (see footnote
at end of this sample format for persons who
may sign applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings).)
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS
WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims
can be filed are located at: New York, NY;
broker with a customs power of attorney. You
should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
37986
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco,
CA.)
(An original application and two copies
must be filed. If the applicant intends to file
drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application
must be furnished for each additional office
indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The following questions must be
answered:
1. Who will be the importer of the
merchandise? (If the applicant will not
always be the importer, does the applicant
understand its obligations to maintain
records to support the transfer under 19 CFR
190.10, and its liability under 19 CFR
190.63?)
2. Who is the manufacturer?
(Is the applicant constructing and
equipping for his own account or merely
performing the operation on a toll basis for
others?)
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant
must state it will comply with T.D.s 55027(2)
and 55207(1), and § 190.9, as applicable, and
that its agent will submit a letter of
notification of intent to operate under the
general manufacturing drawback ruling for
agents (see § 190.7 and Appendix A), or an
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling (see § 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
3. Will the applicant be the drawback
claimant?
(State how the vessel will qualify for
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(g). Who is
the foreign person or government for whom
the vessel is being made or equipped?)
(There must be included under this
heading the following statement:
We are particularly aware of the terms of
§ 190.76(a)(1) of and subpart M of part 190
of the CBP Regulations, and will comply with
these sections where appropriate.)
IMPORTED MERCHANDISE OR
DRAWBACK PRODUCTS USED
(Describe the imported merchandise or
drawback products.)
ARTICLES CONSTRUCTED AND EQUIPPED
FOR EXPORT
(Name the vessel or vessels to be made
with imported merchandise or drawback
products.)
PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION AND
EQUIPMENT
(What is required here is a clear, concise
description of the process of construction
and equipment involved. The description
should also trace the flow of materials
through the manufacturing process for the
purpose of establishing physical
identification of the imported merchandise or
drawback products and of the articles
resulting from the processing.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials
which, for drawback purposes, are treated as
wastes. Describe any residue materials which
you believe should be so treated. If no waste
results, include a positive statement to that
effect under this heading.)
(If waste occurs, state: (1) whether or not
it is recovered, (2) whether or not it is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This
information is required whether claims are
made on a ‘‘used in’’ or ‘‘appearing in’’ basis
and regardless of the amount of waste
incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting
of materials which are lost in the process.
Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These
irrecoverable and valueless wastes do not
reduce the drawback claim provided the
claim is based on the quantity of imported
material used in manufacturing. If the claim
is based upon the quantity of imported
merchandise appearing in the exported
article, irrecoverable and valueless waste will
cause a reduction in the amount of
drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered
wastes which have a value either for sale or
for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this
standard applies to the entire industry and is
not a selection on your part. An option by
you not to choose to sell or use the waste in
some different operation does not make it
valueless if another manufacturer can use the
waste. State what you do with the waste. If
you have to pay someone to get rid of it, or
if you have buyers for the waste, you must
state so in your application regardless of
what ‘‘Basis’’ you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you
choose to claim on the basis of the quantity
of imported or substituted merchandise used
in producing the exported articles (less
valuable waste), state that you will keep
records to establish the quantity and value of
the waste recovered. See ‘‘Basis of Claim for
Drawback’’ section below.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from
WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in
an intangible loss or gain of the net weight
or measurement of the merchandise used.
This loss or gain is caused by atmospheric
conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors. State the approximate usual
percentage or quantity of such loss or gain.
Note that percentage values will be
considered to be measured ‘‘by weight’’
unless otherwise specified. Loss or gain does
not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to
your manufacturing process, state ‘‘Not
Applicable.’’)
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. That the exported article on which
drawback is claimed was constructed and
equipped with the use of a particular lot (or
lots) of imported material; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise 1
we used in producing the exported article.
We realize that to obtain drawback the
claimant must establish that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after
the importation of the imported merchandise.
Our records establishing our compliance
with these requirements will be available for
1 If claims are to be made on an ‘‘appearing in’’
basis, the remainder of this sentence should read
‘‘appearing in the exported articles we produce.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
audit by CBP during business hours. We
understand that drawback is not payable
without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state
how those records will meet the drawback
recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313 and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations as discussed under the heading
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED. To help ensure compliance
the following should be included in your
discussion:)
RECEIPT AND RAW STOCK STORAGE
RECORDS
CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT
RECORDS
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
SHIPPING RECORDS
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be
used to claim drawback: (1) Used in; (2)
appearing in; and (3) used in less valuable
waste.)
(The ‘‘used in’’ basis may be employed
only if there is either no waste or valueless
or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not
reduce the amount of drawback when claims
are based on the ‘‘used in’’ basis. Drawback
is payable in the amount of 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity
of imported material used to construct and
equip the exported article.)
(For example, if 100 pounds of material,
valued at $ 1.00 per pound, were used in
manufacture resulting in 10 pounds of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10
pounds of irrecoverable or valueless waste
would not reduce the drawback. In this case
drawback would be payable on 99% of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 100
pounds of imported material used in
constructing and equipping the exported
articles.)
(The ‘‘appearing in’’ basis may be used
regardless of whether there is waste. If the
‘‘appearing in’’ basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and
its value. However, the manufacturer must
establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported
product and provide this information. Waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are made on the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis.
Drawback is payable on 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity
of imported material which appears in the
exported articles. ‘‘Appearing in’’ may not be
used if multiple products are involved.)
(Based on the previous example, drawback
would be payable on the 90 pounds of
imported material which actually went into
the exported product (appearing in) rather
than the 100 pounds used in as set forth
previously.)
(The ‘‘used in less valuable waste’’ basis
may be employed when the manufacturer
recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of
the quantity and value of waste from each lot
of merchandise. The value of the waste
reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are based on the ‘‘used in less
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
valuable waste’’ basis. When valuable waste
is incurred, the drawback allowance on the
exported article is based on the duties, taxes,
and fees paid on the quantity of imported
material used to construct and equip the
exported product, reduced by the quantity of
such material which the value of the waste
would replace. Thus in this case, drawback
is claimed on the quantity of eligible material
actually used to produce the exported
product, less the amount of such material
which the value of the waste would replace.
Note section 190.26(c) of the CBP
Regulations.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10
pounds of waste had a value of $.50 per
pound, then the 10 pounds of waste, having
a total value of $5.00, would be equivalent
in value to 5 pounds of the imported
material. Thus the value of the waste would
replace 5 pounds of the merchandise used,
and drawback is payable on 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 95 pounds
of imported material rather than on the 100
pounds ‘‘used in’’ or the 90 pounds
‘‘appearing in’’ as set forth in the above
examples.)
(Two methods exist for the manufacturer to
show the quantity of material used or
appearing in the exported article: (1)
Schedule or (2) Abstract.)
(A ‘‘schedule’’ shows the quantity of
material used in producing each unit of
product. The schedule method is usually
employed when a standard line of
merchandise is being produced according to
fixed formulas. Some schedules will show
the quantity of merchandise used to
manufacture or produce each article and
others will show the quantity appearing in
each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of
merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and
measurements. A schedule determines the
amount that will be needed to produce a unit
of product before the material is actually
used in production.)
(An ‘‘abstract’’ is the summary of the
records which shows the total quantity used
in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at
a period of time, for instance 3 months, in
which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material
was actually used after a production period
has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the
‘‘schedule’’ choice must base its claims on
the ‘‘abstract’’ method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In
by Schedule would read:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of
(specify material) used in manufacturing
(exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below.
(Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations
requires submission of the schedule with the
application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to
file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office whenever there is a change
in the quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office covering
changes in the quantities of material used to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
produce the exported articles, or different
styles or capacities of containers of such
exported merchandise.
(Neither the ‘‘appearing in’’ basis nor the
‘‘schedule’’ method for claiming drawback
may be used where the relative value
procedure is required.)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it
will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the
terms of this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for
examination at all reasonable hours by
authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and
supporting data for at least 3 years from the
date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this
application;
4. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to the drawback office
which liquidates its claims any changes in
the number or locations of its offices or
factories, the corporate name, the persons
who will sign drawback documents, the basis
of claim used for calculating drawback, the
decision to use or not to use an agent under
§ 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, the drawback office where claims
will be filed under the ruling, or the
corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep this application current by
reporting promptly to CBP Headquarters, all
other changes affecting information
contained in this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the
letter of approval by CBP Headquarters on
file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned
to familiarize themselves with the provisions
of this application and that letter of approval;
and
7. Issue instructions to help ensure proper
compliance with title 19, United States Code,
section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL
I declare that I have read this application
for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
that I know the averments and agreements
contained herein are true and correct; and
that my signature on this ll day of
llll 20 l, makes this application
binding on
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership,
or Sole Proprietorship)
By 2 llllllllllllllllll
2 Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for
specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed
by any individual legally authorized to bind the
person (or entity) for whom the application is
signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full
partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the
president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or
employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a
business entity with a customs power of attorney
filed with the CBP port for the drawback office
which will liquidate your drawback claims may
sign such an application, as may a licensed customs
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37987
(Signature and Title)
lllllllllllllllllllll
PART 191—DRAWBACK
6. The general authority citations for
part 191 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624;
*
■
*
*
*
*
7. Revise § 191.0 to read as follows:
§ 191.0
Scope.
This part sets forth general provisions
applicable to drawback claims and
specialized provisions applicable to
specific types of drawback claims filed
under 19 U.S.C. 1313, prior to the
February 24, 2016, amendments to the
U.S. drawback law. Drawback claims
may not be filed under this part after
February 23, 2019. For drawback claims
filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313, as amended,
see part 190. Additional drawback
provisions relating to the North
American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) are contained in subpart E of
part 181 of this chapter.
■ 8. Revise § 191.1 to read as follows:
§ 191.1
CBP.
Authority of the Commissioner of
Pursuant to DHS Delegation number
7010.3, the Commissioner of CBP has
the authority to prescribe, and pursuant
to Treasury Department Order No. 100–
16 (set forth in the appendix to part 0
of this chapter), the Secretary of the
Treasury has the sole authority to
approve, rules and regulations regarding
drawback.
■ 9. In § 191.3:
■ a. Revise the section heading;
■ b. Amend paragraph (a)(3) by
removing the word ‘‘and’’ at the end of
the paragraph;
■ c. Amend paragraph (a)(4) by
removing the ‘‘(iv).’’ and adding in its
place the words ‘‘(iv); and’’;
■ d. Add paragraph (a)(5).
■ e. Revise paragraph (b).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 191.3 Duties, taxes, and fees subject or
not subject to drawback.
(a) * * *
(5) Harbor maintenance taxes (see
§ 24.24 of this chapter) for unused
merchandise drawback pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1313(j), and drawback for
substitution of finished petroleum
derivatives pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv).
(b) Duties and fees not subject to
drawback include:
broker with a customs power of attorney. You
should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37988
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(1) Harbor maintenance taxes (see
§ 24.24 of this chapter) except where
unused merchandise drawback pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) or drawback for
substitution of finished petroleum
derivatives pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv) is claimed;
(2) Merchandise processing fees (see
§ 24.23 of this chapter), except where
unused merchandise drawback pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) or drawback for
substitution of finished petroleum
derivatives pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv) is claimed; and
(3) Antidumping and countervailing
duties on merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after August 23,
1988.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Section 191.5 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 191.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular
possessions, trust territories.
Guantanamo Bay Naval Station is
considered foreign territory for
drawback purposes and, accordingly,
drawback may be permitted on articles
shipped there. Drawback is not allowed,
except on claims made under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1), on articles shipped to the
U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa,
Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman
Reef, Guam, Canton Island, Enderbury
Island, Johnston Island, or Palmyra
Island. Puerto Rico is not considered
foreign territory for drawback purposes
and, accordingly, drawback may not be
permitted on articles shipped there from
elsewhere in the customs territory of the
United States.
■ 11. In § 191.22, paragraph (a) is
amended by adding a new sentence to
the end of the paragraph to read as
follows:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 191.22
Substitution drawback.
(a) * * * For purposes of drawback of
internal revenue tax imposed under
Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export or destruction of substituted
merchandise will be limited to the
amount of taxes paid (and not returned
by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substituted merchandise.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. In § 191.32:
■ a. Remove the word ‘‘and’’ at the end
of paragraph (b)(2);
■ b. Remove ‘‘.’’ and adding, in its place,
‘‘; and’’; at the end of paragraph (b)(3)
and;
■ c. Add paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 191.32
Substitution drawback.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) For purposes of drawback of
internal revenue tax imposed under
Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export or destruction of substituted
merchandise will be limited to the
amount of taxes paid (and not returned
by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substituted merchandise.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Section 191.42 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 191.42 Procedures and supporting
documentation.
(a) Time limit for exportation or
destruction. Drawback will be denied on
merchandise that is exported or
destroyed after the statutory 3-year time
period.
(b) Required documentation. The
claimant must submit documentation to
CBP as part of the complete drawback
claim (see § 191.51) to establish that the
merchandise did not conform to sample
or specification, was shipped without
the consent of the consignee, or was
defective as of the time of importation
(see § 191.45 for additional
requirements for claims made with
respect to rejected retail merchandise
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)). If the
claimant was not the importer, the
claimant must also:
(1) Submit a statement signed by the
importer and every other person, other
than the ultimate purchaser, that owned
the goods that no other claim for
drawback was made on the goods by
any other person; and
(2) Certify that records are available to
support the statement required in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(c) Notice. A notice of intent to export
or destroy merchandise which may be
the subject of a rejected merchandise
drawback claim (19 U.S.C. 1313(c))
must be provided to CBP to give CBP
the opportunity to examine the
merchandise. The claimant, or the
exporter (for destruction under CBP
supervision, see § 191.71), must file at
the port of intended redelivery to CBP
custody a Notice of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form
7553 at least 5 working days prior to the
date of intended return to CBP custody.
Waiver of prior notice for exportations
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) (see § 191.91) is
inapplicable to exportations under 19
U.S.C. 1313(c).
(d) Required information. The notice
must provide the bill of lading number,
if known, the name and telephone
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
number, mailing address, and, if
available, fax number and email address
of a contact person, and the location of
the merchandise.
(e) Decision to waive examination.
Within 2 working days after receipt of
the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy,
or Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback (see paragraph (c) of this
section), CBP will notify, in writing, the
party designated on the Notice of CBP’s
decision to either examine the
merchandise to be exported or
destroyed, or to waive examination. If
CBP timely notifies the designated
party, in writing, of its decision to
examine the merchandise (see
paragraph (f) of this section), but the
merchandise is exported or destroyed
without having been presented to CBP
for such examination, any drawback
claim, or part thereof, based on the
Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback, must be denied. If CBP
notifies the designated party, in writing,
of its decision to waive examination of
the merchandise, or, if timely
notification of a decision by CBP to
examine or to waive examination is
absent, the merchandise may be
exported or destroyed without delay
and will be deemed to have been
returned to CBP custody.
(f) Time and place of examination. If
CBP gives timely notice of its decision
to examine the merchandise to be
exported or destroyed, the merchandise
to be examined must be promptly
presented to CBP. CBP must examine
the merchandise within 5 working days
after presentation of the merchandise.
The merchandise may be exported or
destroyed without examination if CBP
fails to timely examine the merchandise
after presentation to CBP, and in such
case the merchandise will be deemed to
have been returned to CBP custody. If
the examination is completed at a port
other than the port of actual exportation
or destruction, the merchandise must be
transported in-bond to the port of
exportation or destruction.
(g) Extent of examination. The
appropriate CBP office may permit
release of merchandise without
examination, or may examine, to the
extent determined to be necessary, the
items exported or destroyed.
(h) Drawback claim. When filing the
drawback claim, the drawback claimant
must correctly calculate the amount of
drawback due (see § 191.51(b)). The
procedures for restructuring a claim (see
§ 191.53) apply to rejected merchandise
drawback if the claimant has an ongoing
export program which qualifies for this
type of drawback.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(i) Exportation. Claimants must
provide documentary evidence of
exportation (see subpart G of this part).
The claimant may establish exportation
by mail as set out in § 191.74 of this
part.
■ 14. Section 191.45 is added to read as
follows:
§ 191.45
Returned retail merchandise.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
(a) Special rule for substitution.
Section 313(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)), provides for drawback
upon the exportation or destruction
under CBP supervision of imported
merchandise which has been entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, duty-paid and ultimately
sold at retail by the importer, or the
person who received the merchandise
from the importer, and for any reason
returned to and accepted by the
importer, or the person who received
the merchandise from the importer.
(b) Eligibility requirements. (1)
Drawback is allowable, subject to
compliance with all requirements set
forth in this subpart; and
(2) The claimant must also show by
evidence satisfactory to CBP that
drawback may be claimed by—
(i) Designating an entry of
merchandise that was imported within
1 year before the date of exportation or
destruction of the merchandise
described in paragraph (a) of this
section under CBP supervision.
(ii) Certifying that the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number and specific
product identifier (such as part number,
SKU, or product code) apply to both the
merchandise designated for drawback
(in the import documentation) and the
returned merchandise.
(c) Allowable refund. The amount of
drawback allowable will be equal to 99
percent of the amount of duties, taxes,
and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise.
(d) Denial of claims. No drawback
will be refunded if CBP is not satisfied
that the claimant has provided, upon
request, the documentation necessary to
support the certification required in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
■ 15. Amend § 191.51 by adding a new
paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
§ 191.51
Completion of drawback claims.
(a) * * *
(3) Limitation on eligibility for
imported merchandise. Claimants are
prohibited from filing any drawback
claims under part 191 for imported
merchandise associated with an entry
summary if any other merchandise
covered on that entry summary has been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
designated as the basis of a drawback
substitution claim under part 190.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Section 191.81 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 191.81
Liquidation.
(a) Time of liquidation. Drawback
entries may be liquidated after:
(1) Liquidation of the designated
import entry or entries becomes final
pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section;
or
(2) Deposit of estimated duties on the
imported merchandise and before
liquidation of the designated import
entry or entries.
(b) Claims based on estimated duties.
(1) Drawback may be paid upon
liquidation of a claim based on
estimated duties if one or more of the
designated import entries have not been
liquidated, or the liquidation has not
become final (because of a protest being
filed) (see also § 173.4(c) of this
chapter), only if the drawback claimant
and any other party responsible for the
payment of liquidated import duties
each files a written request for payment
of each drawback claim, waiving any
right to payment or refund under other
provisions of law, to the extent that the
estimated duties on the unliquidated
import entry are included in the
drawback claim for which drawback on
estimated duties is requested under this
paragraph. The drawback claimant
must, to the best of its knowledge,
identify each import entry that has been
protested and that is included in the
drawback claim. A drawback entry,
once finally liquidated on the basis of
estimated duties pursuant to paragraph
(e)(2), will not be adjusted by reason of
a subsequent final liquidation of the
import entry.
(2) However, if final liquidation of the
import entry discloses that the total
amount of import duty is different from
the total estimated duties deposited,
except in those cases when drawback is
100% of the duty, the party responsible
for the payment of liquidated duties, as
applicable, will:
(i) Be liable for 1 percent of all
increased duties found to be due on that
portion of merchandise recorded on the
drawback entry; or
(ii) Be entitled to a refund of 1 percent
of all excess duties found to have been
paid as estimated duties on that portion
of the merchandise recorded on the
drawback entry.
(c) Claims based on voluntary tenders
or other payments of duties—(1)
General. Subject to the requirements in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
drawback may be paid upon liquidation
of a claim based on voluntary tenders of
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37989
the unpaid amount of lawful ordinary
customs duties or any other payment of
lawful ordinary customs duties for an
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption (see § 191.3(a)(1)(iii)),
provided that:
(i) The tender or payment is
specifically identified as duty on a
specifically identified entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption;
(ii) Liquidation of the specifically
identified entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption became
final prior to such tender or payment;
and
(iii) Liquidation of the drawback entry
in which that specifically identified
import entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption is
designated has not become final.
(2) Written request and waiver.
Drawback may be paid on claims based
on voluntary tenders or other payments
of duties under this subsection only if
the drawback claimant and any other
party responsible for the payment of the
voluntary tenders or other payments of
duties each files a written request for
payment of each drawback claim based
on such voluntary tenders or other
payments of duties, waiving any claim
to payment or refund under other
provisions of law, to the extent that the
voluntary tenders or other payment of
duties under this paragraph are
included in the drawback claim for
which drawback on the voluntary
tenders or other payment of duties is
requested under this paragraph.
(d) Claims based on liquidated duties.
Drawback will be based on the final
liquidated duties paid that have been
made final by operation of law (except
in the case of the written request for
payment of drawback on the basis of
estimated duties, voluntary tender of
duties, and other payments of duty, and
waiver, provided for in paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section).
(e) Liquidation procedure. (1) General.
When the drawback claim has been
completed by the filing of the entry and
other required documents, and
exportation (or destruction) of the
merchandise or articles has been
established, CBP will determine
drawback due on the basis of the
complete drawback claim, the
applicable general manufacturing
drawback ruling or specific
manufacturing drawback ruling, and
any other relevant evidence or
information. Notice of liquidation will
be given electronically as provided in
§§ 159.9 and 159.10(c)(3).
(2) Liquidation by operation of law. (i)
Liquidated import entries. A drawback
claim that satisfies the requirements of
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
37990
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (d) that is not liquidated
within one year from the date of the
drawback claim (see § 190.51(e)(1)(i))
will be deemed liquidated for the
purposes of the drawback claim at the
drawback amount asserted by the
claimant or claim, unless the time for
liquidation is extended in accordance
with § 159.12 or if liquidation is
suspended as required by statute or
court order.
(ii) Unliquidated import entries. A
drawback claim that satisfies the
requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c) of
this section will be deemed liquidated
upon the deposit of estimated duties on
the unliquidated imported merchandise
(see § 191.81(b)).
(iii) Applicability. The provisions of
paragraphs (e)(2)(i) of this section will
apply to drawback entries made on or
after December 3, 2004. An entry or
claim for drawback filed before
December 3, 2004, the liquidation of
which was not final as of December 3,
2004, will be deemed liquidated on the
date that is 1 year after December 3,
2004, at the drawback amount asserted
by the claimant at the time of the entry
or claim.
(f) Relative value; multiple products—
(1) Distribution. Where two or more
products result from the manufacture or
production of merchandise, drawback
will be distributed to the several
products in accordance with their
relative values at the time of separation.
(2) Values. The values to be used in
computing the distribution of drawback
where two or more products result from
the manufacture or production of
merchandise under drawback
conditions must be the market value (as
provided for in the definition of relative
value in § 191.2(u)), unless other values
are approved by CBP.
(g) Payment. CBP will authorize
payment of the amount of the refund
due as drawback to the claimant.
■ 17. Section 191.103 is revised to read
as follows:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 191.103
Additional requirements.
(a) Manufacturer claims domestic
drawback. In the case of medicinal
preparations and flavoring extracts, the
claimant must file with the drawback
entry, a declaration of the manufacturer
showing whether a claim has been or
will be filed by the manufacturer with
the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB) for domestic drawback on
alcohol under §§ 5111, 5112, 5113, and
5114, Internal Revenue Code, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
amended (26 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5113,
and 5114).
(b) Manufacturer does not claim
domestic drawback—(1) Submission of
statement. If no claim has been or will
be filed with TTB for domestic
drawback on medicinal preparations or
flavoring extracts, the manufacturer
must submit a statement setting forth
that fact to the Director, National
Revenue Center, TTB.
(2) Contents of the statement. The
statement must show the:
(i) Quantity and description of the
exported products;
(ii) Identity of the alcohol used by
serial number of package or tank car;
(iii) Name and registry number of the
distilled spirits plant from which the
alcohol was withdrawn;
(iv) Date of withdrawal;
(v) Serial number of the applicable
record of tax determination (see 27 CFR
17.163(a) and 27 CFR 19.626(c)(7); and
(vi) CBP office where the claim will
be filed.
(3) Verification of the statement. The
Director, National Revenue Center, TTB,
will verify receipt of this statement,
forward the original of the document to
the drawback office designated, and
retain the copy.
■ 18. Section 191.104 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 191.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) certificates.
(a) Request. The drawback claimant or
manufacturer must request the Director,
National Revenue Center, TTB, provide
the CBP office where the drawback
claim will be processed with a tax-paid
certificate on TTB Form 5100.4
(Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol).
(b) Contents. The request must state
the:
(1) Quantity of alcohol in proof
gallons;
(2) Serial number of each package;
(3) Amount of tax paid on the alcohol;
(4) Name, registry number, and
location of the distilled spirits plant;
(5) Date of withdrawal;
(6) Name of the manufacturer using
the alcohol in producing the exported
articles;
(7) Address of the manufacturer and
its manufacturing plant; and
(8) CBP drawback office where the
drawback claim will be processed.
(c) Extract of TTB certificate. If a
certification of any portion of the
alcohol described in the TTB Form
5100.4 is required for liquidation of
drawback entries processed in another
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
drawback office, the drawback office, on
written application of the person who
requested its issuance, will transmit a
copy of the extract from the certificate
for use at that drawback office. The
drawback office will note that the copy
of the extract was prepared and
transmitted.
■ 19. Section 191.103 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 191.106
Amount of drawback.
(a) Claim filed with TTB. If the
declaration required by § 191.103 of this
subpart shows that a claim has been or
will be filed with TTB for domestic
drawback, drawback under § 313(d) of
the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)),
will be limited to the difference between
the amount of tax paid and the amount
of domestic drawback claimed.
(b) Claim not filed with TTB. If the
declaration and verified statement
required by § 191.103 show that no
claim has been or will be filed by the
manufacturer with TTB for domestic
drawback, the drawback will be the full
amount of the tax on the alcohol used.
Drawback under this provision may not
be granted absent receipt from TTB of a
copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of
Tax-Paid Alcohol) indicating that taxes
have been paid on the exported product
for which drawback is claimed.
(c) No deduction of 1 percent. No
deduction of 1 percent will be made in
drawback claims under § 313(d) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)).
(d) Payment. The drawback due will
be paid in accordance with § 191.81(f).
■ 20. In § 191.171, add paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 191.171
General; drawback allowance.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Federal excise tax. For purposes of
drawback of internal revenue tax
imposed under Chapters 32 and 38 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export of substituted merchandise
will be limited to the amount of taxes
paid (and not returned by refund, credit,
or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
Approved:
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2018–16279 Filed 7–27–18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
E:\FR\FM\02AUP2.SGM
02AUP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37886-37990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16279]
[[Page 37885]]
Vol. 83
Thursday,
No. 149
August 2, 2018
Part II
Department of Homeland Security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Department of the Treasury
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
19 CFR Parts 113, 181, 190, et al.
Modernized Drawback; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 37886]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 113, 181, 190, and 191
[USCBP-2018-0029]
RIN 1515-AE23
Modernized Drawback
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to amend U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to implement changes to the drawback
regulations as directed by the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement
Act of 2015 (TFTEA). These proposed regulations establish a new process
for drawback pursuant to TFTEA which liberalizes the merchandise
substitution standard, simplifies recordkeeping requirements, extends
and standardizes timelines for filing drawback claims, and requires the
electronic filing of drawback claims. TFTEA allows a transition period
wherein drawback claimants will have the choice between filing claims
under the existing process detailed in the current regulations or
filing claims under the proposed new process. This document explains
how filings during the transition period will work, discusses the
interim policy guidance procedures for filing claims prior to these
regulations becoming final, and proposes to make TFTEA-related changes,
dealing with bonds, regarding joint and several liability for the
importer of the goods and the drawback claimant, and technical
corrections and conforming changes to CBP regulations. This document
also proposes to clarify the prohibition on the filing of a
substitution drawback claim for internal revenue excise tax paid on
imported merchandise in situations where no excise tax was paid upon
the substituted merchandise; or the substituted merchandise is the
subject of a different claim for refund or drawback of tax under any
provision of the Internal Revenue Code. CBP is proposing these
amendments regarding excise taxes to protect the revenue by clarifying
the relationship between drawback claims and Federal excise tax
liability. Further, CBP proposes to add a basic importation and entry
bond condition to foster compliance.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number USCBP-
2018-0029, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 90 K
Street NE, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket title for this rulemaking, and must reference docket number
USCBP-2018-0029 . All comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the
document.
Docket: For access to the docket or to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments
may also be inspected during business days between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Office of Trade, Regulations and Rulings,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 90 K Street NE, 10th Floor,
Washington, DC. Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be
made in advance by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325-0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Mitchell, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Office of Trade, Trade Policy and Programs, 202-863-
6532, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. CBP also invites comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that might result from this
proposed rulemaking. Comments that will provide the most assistance to
CBP will reference a specific portion of the proposed rulemaking,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority to support such recommended change. See
ADDRESSES above for information on how to submit comments.
Background
Table of Contents
I. Authority
II. Modernized Drawback
A. TFTEA-Drawback Modernization Overview \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this document, ``TFTEA-Drawback'' is the
term generally used to refer to drawback under section 1313, as
amended by the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Transition Period (February 24, 2018-February 23, 2019)
(a) Claims may be filed under the existing drawback process or
the TFTEA-Drawback process during the transition period.
(b) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims cannot designate imported
merchandise if the associated entry summary was already included on
a drawback claim filed prior to February 24, 2018.
2. Filing Requirements and Deadline
(a) All TFTEA-Drawback claims are required to be submitted
electronically in ACE.
(b) The import entry summary line item must be identified for
all imported merchandise for TFTEA-Drawback claims.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback claims have a uniform five-year filing
deadline from the date of importation of the designated imported
merchandise.
3. HTSUS-Based Substitution Standards
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims for most manufacturing
and unused merchandise have new standards based on HTSUS
classification.
(b) The new standards do not apply to certain claims if
substitution is based upon alternative rules (source material for
sought chemical elements, wine, and finished petroleum derivatives)
or if pursuant to NAFTA drawback.
4. ``Lesser of'' Rule for Substitution Claims
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims are generally subject to
a ``lesser of'' rule regarding the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
to be refunded where the amount to be refunded will be equal to 99
percent of the lesser of (1) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
paid with respect to the imported merchandise; or (2) the amount of
duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the substituted
merchandise if the substituted merchandise were imported.
(b) The TFTEA-Drawback ``lesser of'' rule does not apply to
certain claims if substitution is based upon alternative rules (wine
and finished petroleum derivatives) or if pursuant to NAFTA
drawback.
5. Expanded Scope and Calculation Methods for Refunds
(a) The scope of refunds for direct identification and
substitution manufacturing drawback claims will be expanded from
duties to also include taxes and fees.
[[Page 37887]]
(b) TFTEA-Drawback direct identification claim refunds will be
calculated based on the invoice value of the designated imported
merchandise, which is unchanged from the current requirements.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claim refunds will be calculated
based on the per unit average value reported on the line from the
entry summary that covered the designated imported merchandise.
(d) The imported merchandise reported on a single entry summary
line item may not be the basis of a direct identification and a
substitution claim under TFTEA-Drawback.
6. Recordkeeping and Proof of Export
(a) Congress, through TFTEA, changed the starting date for the
three-year time period for maintaining supporting records for
drawback claims from the date of payment to the date of liquidation.
(b) Claimants for manufacturing drawback must provide a
certification that they are in possession of the relevant bill of
materials or formula for the manufactured goods, in lieu of actual
submission thereof, for each claim filed.
(c) Congress, through TFTEA, permits the future use of an
electronic export system as automated proof of export for drawback
claims, but no system will be reliable for this purpose on February
24, 2018; and, proof of export must be documented in records that
are summarized for the drawback claim.
7. Transfers of Merchandise and Liability
(a) Specific formats for certificates of delivery and specific
formats for certificates of manufacture and delivery are no longer
required when drawback products or other drawback-eligible goods are
transferred between parties, although records of manufacture and
transfer must be provided and maintained to support the drawback
claim.
(b) The first drawback claim to be filed that designates any
portion of imported merchandise from a given entry summary line item
will determine the type of drawback eligibility for all other
imported merchandise covered by that entry summary line item.
(c) Importers are now jointly and severally liable with drawback
claimants for refunds associated with their imported merchandise,
when designated on a drawback claim.
B. Filing a TFTEA-Drawback Claim
C. Required TFTEA-Drawback Certifications for Existing
Manufacturing Rulings and Privileges
D. Federal Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims
III. Explanation of Proposed Amendments
A. Proposed New Part 190
B. Other Conforming Amendments
C. Amendments Regarding Federal Excise Tax and Substitution
Drawback Claims
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) and Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
B. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
V. Proposed Effective/Applicability Dates
VI. Signing Authority
List of Subjects
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
I. Authority
Drawback, as provided for in section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313), is the refund or remission, in whole or in
part, of duties, taxes, and fees imposed and paid under Federal law
upon importation or entry and due on the imported merchandise. Drawback
is a privilege, not a right, subject to compliance with prescribed
rules and regulations administered by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l). Currently, the implementing
regulations regarding drawback are contained in part 191 of the CBP
Regulations (title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (19 CFR
part 191)) and part 181 of the CBP Regulations (19 CFR part 181,
subpart E, which pertains to drawback claims under the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)). Additionally, the Internal Revenue Code
(IRC) of 1986, as amended (IRC), codified as title 26 of the United
States Code (26 U.S.C.), is the main body of domestic statutory tax law
of the United States and includes, inter alia, laws covering Federal
excise taxes. Federal excise taxes are imposed on the manufacture and
distribution of certain consumer goods, such as distilled spirits,
wines, beer, tobacco products, imported taxable fuel and petroleum
products. These Federal excise taxes, and certain limitations regarding
drawback claims, are discussed below in the section titled Federal
Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims.
In essence, a drawback claim is a request for a refund or remission
of certain duties, taxes, and fees imposed upon importation which is
filed with CBP after the merchandise or articles have been exported or
destroyed. There are three main categories of drawback: Manufacturing
drawback, rejected merchandise drawback, and unused merchandise
drawback. Each main category of drawback is discussed, in turn, below.
Manufacturing drawback may be claimed on exported articles that
have been manufactured or produced in the United States with imported
duty-paid merchandise (direct identification manufacturing drawback),
as well as on exported articles that have been manufactured or produced
in the United States using domestic merchandise substituted for
imported duty-paid merchandise meeting the statutory criteria
(substitution manufacturing drawback). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b).
Rejected merchandise drawback may be available upon the exportation
or destruction of imported duty-paid merchandise entered or withdrawn
for consumption meeting the statutory criteria (i.e., not conforming to
sample or specifications, shipped without consent, determined to be
defective at the time of import, or ultimately sold at retail and
returned). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(c).
Unused merchandise drawback may be claimed on imported merchandise
that was exported or destroyed without having been used within the
United States (direct identification unused merchandise drawback) as
well as on goods that were exported or destroyed without being used
that were substituted for imported merchandise meeting the appropriate
criteria (substitution unused merchandise drawback). See 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1) and (2).
Originally, as provided for in section 3 of the second Act of
Congress, the Tariff Act of July 4, 1789, drawback of 99% of duties
paid on imported merchandise (except distilled spirits) was permitted
if the merchandise was exported within a year. However, drawback
expanded over time to, among other things, provide for refunds of taxes
and fees in some situations, allow for merchandise to be destroyed as
an alternative to exportation, allow for the substitution of goods on
which drawback could be claimed, and provide more than just a single
year within which goods must be exported or destroyed.
Historically, drawback claims were submitted entirely on paper.
While filing a claim entirely on paper is currently still an option,
most drawback claims consist of two portions: The electronic
transmission of the entry summary data for the designated imported
merchandise via the CBP-authorized electronic data interchange (EDI);
and the physical delivery of the CBP Form 7551 (Drawback Entry) and all
required documents supporting the claim. For TFTEA-Drawback claims,
filers will electronically transmit the drawback entry summary data and
the entry summary data for the designated imported merchandise to CBP
and will upload all documents required to support the claim. CBP has
programmed the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) for receiving
[[Page 37888]]
electronic drawback claims.\2\ An electronically submitted drawback
claim will not be complete until the claim has been successfully
transmitted with all required documents uploaded. Information for
filing a drawback entry is contained in the relevant CBP and Trade
Automated Interface Requirements (CATAIR) document, which is available
at: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/ace/catair.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On February 9, 2018, in anticipation of delays regarding the
proposal and finalization of the TFTEA-Drawback regulations, CBP
posted interim policy guidance for filing TFTEA-Drawback claims in
ACE during the transition period, available at: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/entry-summary/ace-process-and-policy.
This interim policy guidance is discussed in detail below in section
B, Filing a TFTEA-Drawback Claim.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon receipt of a claim, CBP conducts an initial review, which
allows CBP the opportunity to work with claimants to ensure that the
claim is complete and timely. Once a complete claim is timely filed,
drawback specialists review the supporting documentation to ensure that
the claim is properly documented and the amount of the drawback is
correctly calculated. In many instances, it is necessary for CBP to
contact claimants to obtain additional supporting documentation, such
as when there are questions regarding the identity of the merchandise
in transfer scenarios or to confirm the actual date and fact of
exportation. If additional information is required, CBP will send a
request for information (CBP Form 28) to the claimant through the ACE
portal or through the end of the transition period by physically
transmitting the request, depending upon the method used to file the
claim was filed. Claimants generally respond via the method by which
they were contacted. The increased use of electronic filing and
correspondence will expedite claim processing and payment.
Requests for information do not toll the deadlines for timely
filing. In any event, claimants are bound by the deadlines for claims
with respect to filing, amending, and perfecting.
II. Modernized Drawback
A. TFTEA-Drawback Overview
On February 24, 2016, the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement
Act of 2015 (TFTEA) (Pub. L. 114-125, 130 Stat. 122, February 24, 2016)
was signed into law. Section 906 of TFTEA, Drawback and Refunds, made
significant changes to the drawback laws which generally liberalize the
standards for substituting merchandise, ease documentation
requirements, extend and standardize timelines for filing drawback
claims, and require electronic filing. However, while the changes are
significant, on balance, section 906 of TFTEA left most of 19 U.S.C.
1313 unchanged. In other words, except for the significant changes
brought about by Section 906 of TFTEA which are discussed below, most
of the underlying processes involved in drawback remain unchanged. CBP
also notes that additional steps to further automate or simplify the
drawback claims process (which may or may not require regulatory
changes) are anticipated to be announced subsequent to the
implementation of the changes proposed in this document.
1. Transition Period (February 24, 2018-February 23, 2019)
(a) Claims may be filed under the existing drawback process or the
TFTEA-Drawback process during the transition period.
Section 906(q)(3) of TFTEA provides for a transition period,
beginning February 24, 2018, and ending February 23, 2019, during which
claimants may file claims under the current drawback process and
regulations detailed in part 191 (and under section 313 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 as in effect on the day before TFTEA was signed into law)
or under the amended statute and the implementing regulations (proposed
part 190). February 23, 2019, is the last day of the transition period.
During the transition period, claimants may choose which process to
file on a claim-by-claim basis, meaning that claimants may file some
claims under the old drawback process and some claims under the TFTEA-
Drawback process throughout the entirety of the transition period. For
purposes of this document, ``TFTEA-Drawback'' is the term generally
used to refer to drawback under section 1313, as amended by TFTEA, and
the implementing regulations contained in proposed Part 190.
While TFTEA-Drawback claims have been accepted in ACE since
February 24, 2018, it is not until February 24, 2019, that all claims
must be filed in compliance with the amended statute. Section II.B,
Filing a TFTEA-Drawback Claim, below, contains information on how to
file claims, including during the transition period under the interim
policy guidance procedures announced February 8, 2018, in anticipation
of the delay in finalizing these proposed regulations. Accordingly, the
changes proposed in this document have no immediate effect on the
drawback processes and requirements contained in part 191 of the CBP
regulations. The transition period allows claimants the opportunity to
choose which drawback regime to operate under while providing
additional time, if needed, to complete any programming requirements
for transmitting claims in ACE.
(b) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims cannot designate imported
merchandise if the associated entry summary was included on a drawback
claim filed under part 191(and vice versa).
Claimants are precluded from filing TFTEA-Drawback substitution
claims for imported merchandise associated with an entry summary if any
other merchandise covered on that entry summary has been designated as
the basis of a claim under part 191, including during the transition
period. Nevertheless, claimants may continue to make claims (including
substitution claims) under part 191 for these entries through the end
of the transition period on February 23, 2019. Similarly, claimants are
precluded from filing any drawback claims under part 191 for imported
merchandise associated with an entry summary if any other merchandise
covered on that entry summary has been designated as the basis of a
TFTEA-Drawback substitution claim, including during the transition
period. These limitations exist because drawback refund amounts are
claimed at the entry summary header level (i.e., the aggregate of all
lines for which drawback was claimed on an entry) for claims under part
191 and CBP is unable to trace whether merchandise from a specific line
on an entry summary was designated as the basis for a drawback claim
under part 191.
2. New Filing Requirements and Deadline
(a) All TFTEA-Drawback claims are required to be submitted
electronically in ACE.
While all TFTEA-Drawback claims must be filed electronically, it is
not until February 24, 2019 (the first day after the end of the
transition period), that all drawback claims must be filed
electronically. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(r)(3)(B). Consequently, claims filed
under part 191 do not have to be filed electronically. Drawback claims
must be filed electronically through a combination of transmitting
certain information to the system and uploading supporting
documentation.
By moving to a fully electronic environment as of February 24,
2019, CBP will be able to better validate all drawback claims based
upon certain criteria specific to the type of drawback claim, including
(but not limited to) the timeliness of the claim, the amount of refund
claimed, and the suitability of
[[Page 37889]]
the merchandise involved. As a result, drawback claimants should
benefit from expedited processing, review, and payment of claims.
(b) The import entry summary line item must be identified for all
imported merchandise for TFTEA-Drawback claims.
Many of the benefits for drawback claim processing noted above are
made possible by systematic enhancements in ACE concerning line item
reporting. Line item reporting, which is required for all TFTEA-
Drawback claims, requires claimants to provide certain relevant
information for the designated imported merchandise on a drawback claim
associated with the line item on an entry summary, including the tariff
classification, quantity, and value, as well as the duties, taxes, and
fees assessed thereon. Line item reporting will enable more system
validations at the line level and will help ensure that CBP does not
overpay refunds.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback claims have a uniform five-year filing deadline
from the date of importation of the designated imported merchandise.
All TFTEA-Drawback claims must be filed not later than 5 years
after the date the merchandise on which drawback is claimed was
imported. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(r)(1). Previously, section 1313 provided
three-year filing deadlines beginning from different starting points
for various types of claims (e.g., three years from the receipt of
imported merchandise or three years after the date of importation or
withdrawal). This five-year deadline does not apply to claims filed
under the existing drawback laws provided for in part 191 during the
transition period.
3. HTSUS-Based Substitution Standards
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims for most manufacturing and
unused merchandise have new standards based on HTSUS classification.
Section 906(b) provides a new standard for determining which
merchandise may be substituted for imported merchandise as the basis
for a substitution claim. This standard generally requires that both
the imported merchandise and the exported merchandise be classified or
classifiable within the same the 8-digit number in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) classification. This
standard replaces the ``same kind and quality'' and ``commercially
interchangeable'' standards that were applied, respectively, to
substitution manufacturing drawback claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(b)) and
substitution unused merchandise drawback claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)).
Prior to TFTEA, determining whether goods were of the same kind and
quality or were commercially interchangeable was a commodity-specific
question that imposed burdens on claimants (to prove that the
merchandise met the applicable standard) and on CBP (to research and
rule on the eligibility of the goods to be substituted). The new
standards will reduce much of the above-cited burdens by generally
eliminating uncertainty as to the whether the standard for substitution
has been met.
Substitution under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), for manufacturing drawback
claims, is subject to a new standard that requires the substituted
merchandise used in manufacturing to be classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS subheading number as the designated imported merchandise.
Similarly, substitution under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), for unused
merchandise drawback claims, is subject to a new standard that requires
the substituted merchandise to be classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number as the imported merchandise, except that there
are restrictions with respect to HTSUS basket provisions (i.e.,
subheadings with descriptions that begin with the term ``other'').
Specifically, and only for unused merchandise drawback claims,
merchandise cannot be substituted if the 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number begins with the term ``other'', unless the imported merchandise
and the substituted merchandise are both classifiable under the same
10-digit HTSUS statistical reporting number and the description for
that 10-digit HTSUS statistical reporting number does not begin with
the term ``other''. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(5). In lieu of the HTSUS
classification for unused merchandise drawback claims, substitution may
also be based on the first 8 digits of the 10-digit Department of
Commerce Schedule B number (the code for exporting goods from the
United States). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(6).
Under the new substitution standards, the correct HTSUS
classification is a critical aspect of the exercise of reasonable care.
Accordingly, importers and drawback claimants should take note that
prospective rulings on classification may be requested pursuant to 19
CFR 177.1(a)(1).
(b) The new standards do not apply to certain claims if
substitution is based upon alternative rules (source material for
sought chemical elements, wine, and finished petroleum derivatives) or
if pursuant to NAFTA drawback.
Certain types of merchandise are exempt from the new substitution
standards discussed above. Substitution manufacturing claims for sought
chemical elements have a special rule for source material regardless of
the 8-digit HTSUS subheading number. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)(4) (which
defines a sought chemical element as either an element from the
Periodic Table of Elements or a chemical compound consisting of such
elements). Unused merchandise claims involving wine have a distinct
standard involving price variations and color. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2). Both manufacturing and unused merchandise drawback claims
for finished petroleum products, if filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p), are
already subject to more specific HTSUS-based substitution standards.
Substitution manufacturing claims for NAFTA drawback remain subject to
the ``same kind and quality'' standard in part 181, consistent with 19
U.S.C. 3333(a)(3).
4. ``Lesser of'' Rule for Substitution Claims
(a) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claims are generally subject to a
``lesser of'' rule regarding the amount of duties, taxes, and fees to
be refunded where the amount to be refunded will be equal to 99 percent
of the lesser of (1) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with
respect to the imported merchandise; or (2) the amount of duties,
taxes, and fees that would apply to the substituted merchandise if the
substituted merchandise were imported.
Section 906(g) of TFTEA provides for a ``lesser of'' rule, as a
safeguard, to ensure that the revenue is protected in light of the
liberalization and simplification of the standards for substitution
drawback claims. The ``lesser of'' rule provides that the refund will
be equal to 99 percent of the lesser of the amount of duties, taxes,
and fees paid with respect to the imported merchandise and/or that
would have been paid on the substituted merchandise had it been
imported. In all claims subject to the ``lesser of'' rule, it is
incumbent on the claimant to properly calculate the proper amount of
the claimed refund.
For manufacturing drawback claims, the substituted merchandise is
that which was used in manufacturing, in lieu of the designated
imported merchandise, and the ``lesser of'' comparison is based upon
the amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the
substituted merchandise if it were imported (with this amount reduced
by the value of the materials recovered during destruction, if
applicable). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(C). For unused merchandise
drawback claims, the substituted merchandise is the exported or
destroyed merchandise and the
[[Page 37890]]
``lesser of'' comparison is based upon the amount of duties, taxes, and
fees that would apply to the exported or destroyed merchandise if it
were imported (with this amount reduced by the value of the materials
recovered during destruction, if applicable). See 19 U.S.C.
1313(l)(2)(B). TFTEA-Drawback claimants must provide the comparative
value (i.e., the ``lesser of'' comparison for either manufacturing
drawback claims or for unused merchandise drawback claims), as part of
a substitution claim.
(b) The TFTEA-Drawback ``lesser of'' rule does not apply to certain
claims if substitution is based upon alternative rules (wine and
finished petroleum derivatives) or if pursuant to NAFTA drawback.
The ``lesser of'' rule does not apply to claims for wine based on
19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) or to claims for finished petroleum products under
19 U.S.C. 1313(p). See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(D). Claims under these
provisions are subject to other specific limitations. It is important
to note that sought chemical elements are not exempt from the ``lesser
of'' rule, even though there is a special rule for the substitution of
source material. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)(4). NAFTA drawback allows for
substitution manufacturing claims (under certain conditions) and these
claims are not subject to the ``lesser of'' rule discussed herein, but
they remain subject to the discrete NAFTA drawback ``lesser of duty''
rule regarding the amount of duty owed as compared between the relevant
countries. See 19 U.S.C. 3333 and 19 CFR 181.44.
5. Expanded Scope and Calculation Methods for Refunds
(a) The scope of refunds for direct identification and substitution
manufacturing drawback claims will be expanded from duties to also
include taxes and fees.
Section 906(g) of TFTEA provides for the refund of taxes and fees,
along with duties, for manufacturing drawback claims. See 19 U.S.C.
1313(l)(2)(C). This is an expansion of the scope of refunds available
for manufacturing drawback claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b)).
Previously, the statutory provisions for direct identification and
substitution manufacturing drawback specified only the refund of
duties. This expansion is specifically provided for claims with respect
to manufactured articles in paragraph (l)(2)(C) of 19 U.S.C. 1313.
However, this expansion is not applicable to all drawback claim
provisions. Refunds of duties, taxes, and fees were already allowed for
in claims involving unused merchandise prior to the new language
provided for by TFTEA. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(B). In contrast, there
was neither any pre-existing authority for refunds of taxes and fees
for claims involving rejected merchandise nor did TFTEA otherwise
expand the scope of refunds beyond duties by generally referencing 19
U.S.C. 1313(l). The provisions that provide for refunds of duties,
taxes, and fees are limited to unused merchandise and manufacturing
drawback claims in 19 U.S.C. 1313(l)(2)(B) and (C), respectively.
There is also a noteworthy difference regarding the statutory
provisions for substitution manufacturing drawback claims whereby the
merchandise must be imported duty-paid. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)(1). No
such requirement exists for direct identification manufacturing claims.
See 19 U.S.C. 1313(a). The result of this difference is that imported
merchandise that is duty-free may be designated as the basis for a
direct identification manufacturing drawback claim, but not for a
substitution manufacturing drawback claim.
(b) TFTEA-Drawback direct identification claim refunds will be
calculated based on the invoice value of the designated imported
merchandise, which is unchanged from the current requirements.
CBP currently requires all drawback claimants, regardless of the
type of claim, to calculate drawback refunds based on the invoice value
of the designated imported merchandise. TFTEA-Drawback direct
identification claims will continue to be calculated based on the
invoice value of the designated imported merchandise. This includes all
drawback claims that are based upon direct identification (e.g.,
manufacturing, rejected merchandise, and unused merchandise drawback
claims). It should also be noted that all NAFTA drawback claims will
continue to be calculated based on the invoice value of the designated
imported merchandise. See 19 U.S.C. 3333 and 19 CFR 181.44.
(c) TFTEA-Drawback substitution claim refunds will be calculated
based on the per unit average value reported on the line from the entry
summary that covered the designated imported merchandise.
Section 906(g) of TFTEA authorized CBP to calculate refunds based
upon the per unit average of the duties, taxes, and fees reported on
the entry summary line item that covered the designated imported
merchandise if this method would result in simplification of the
drawback claims process for CBP without posing a risk to the revenue of
the United States. Per unit averaging requires that the drawback
claimant calculate the per unit average value of the designated
imported merchandise (i.e., the entered value for the applicable entry
summary line item apportioned equally over each unit covered by the
line item) and request a refund 99% of the amount of duties, taxes and
fees applicable thereto. The legislative history for Section 906(g)
clarifies that CBP is authorized to utilize per unit averaging solely
to allow for the simplification of drawback claims and CBP is not to
allow for the ``manipulation of claims in order to maximize refunds to
the detriment of the revenue of the United States.'' See H.R. Rep. no.
114-376, at 221 (2015). Accordingly, CBP is proposing in these
regulations to allow the use of per unit averaging in the context of
substitution manufacturing drawback claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(b)) and
substitution unused merchandise drawback claims (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)),
but not for direct identification manufacturing drawback claims (19
U.S.C. 1313(a)), rejected merchandise drawback claims (19 U.S.C.
1313(c)), or direct identification unused merchandise drawback claims
(19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)).
This determination was made only after much internal consideration
as well as outreach to various trade stakeholders. A significant
justification for the use of per unit averaging exclusively for
substitution claims is that TFTEA imposed a ``lesser of'' rule for
drawback claims involving substitution that safeguards against risks to
the revenue. Simply put, by importing high and low value goods together
on a single line, the claimant could manipulate the drawback claim
through per-unit averaging by strategically exporting or destroying the
low value goods, where the per-unit average of duties, taxes, and fees
to be refunded was greater than that associated with the low value
goods. The lesser of rule prevents this type of manipulation. No
``lesser of'' rule was authorized under TFTEA for direct identification
claims.
The application of per unit averaging method of calculating
drawback refunds requires the equal apportionment of the amount of
duties, taxes, and fees eligible for drawback for all units covered by
a single line item on an entry summary to each unit of merchandise (and
is required for certain substitution drawback claims). In this method,
the ratio of the total value of imported units as reported on a line
item divided by the total quantity of imported units reported on a line
item is to be multiplied by the quantity of units designated as the
basis for the drawback claim to determine the
[[Page 37891]]
average per unit value. The refund per unit of the designated imported
merchandise is to be 99% of the duties, taxes, and fees applicable to
the average per unit value and this amount is calculated to two decimal
places (and subject to the ``lesser of'' rule).
Example 1. Substitution Unused Merchandise TFTEA-Drawback Claim
A substitution unused merchandise drawback claim is filed for 500
exported articles with a value of $110 per unit. The 500 units of
designated imported merchandise were reported on an entry summary line
item that covered 1000 units with an entered value of $100,000 and a
duty rate of 2.5%. Therefore, regarding the amount of duties to be
refunded pursuant to the ``lesser of'' methodology, the calculation of
drawback will be based on the per unit value of $100 for the designated
imported merchandise rather than the value of $110 for the exported
merchandise.
The designated imported merchandise has a per unit value of $100.
This applicable duty rate (2.5%) is applied to the average per unit
value ($100) to determine the amount of duties apportioned to each unit
at $2.50.
The amount available for a drawback refund is 99% of the duties
paid per unit ($2.50), which is $2.48. This amount of refundable duties
per unit ($2.48) is multiplied by the quantity of designated imported
merchandise (500 units) to calculate the total amount available for the
drawback refund, which is $1,240. Similar calculations must be
completed for applicable taxes and fees as well.
Example 2. Substitution Manufacturing TFTEA-Drawback Claim
A substitution manufacturing drawback claim is filed for 200
exported finished articles with a value of $400 per unit.\3\ The
designated imported merchandise was reported on an entry summary line
item that covered 800 units with an entered value of $160,000
(averaging $200 per unit) and a duty rate of 3.1%. To manufacture the
finished articles, the manufacturer actually used 600 units of
substituted domestically sourced merchandise that is classifiable under
the same 10-digit tariff provision. The domestically sourced
merchandise has a substituted value of $180 per unit. Therefore,
regarding the amount of duties to be refunded pursuant to the ``lesser
of'' methodology, the calculation of drawback will be based on the per
unit value of $180 for the substituted merchandise rather than the
value of $200 for the designated imported merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ It is noteworthy that the value of the exported (or
destroyed) finished article is not germane to the application of the
``lesser of'' rule for substitution manufacturing drawback claims.
The comparison in value is between the value of the designated
imported merchandise and the substituted merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The substituted merchandise has a per unit value of $180. This
applicable duty rate (3.1%) is applied to the average per unit value
($180) to determine the amount of duties apportioned to each unit at
$5.58.
The amount available for a drawback refund is 99% of the duties
paid per unit ($5.58), which is $5.52. This amount of refundable duties
per unit ($5.52) is multiplied by the quantity of designated imported
merchandise (600 units) to calculate the total amount available for the
drawback refund, which is $3,312. Similar calculations must be
completed for applicable taxes and fees as well.
Per unit averaging facilitates verification of the amounts of
drawback refunds claimed. CBP does not receive invoice data that is
usefully searchable electronically. By moving to the per unit averaging
calculation methodology for substitution claims that is based on entry
summary line data, CBP will gain the ability to automate validations of
refund calculations made by the claimant. This should lead to faster
and more efficient processing of claims, which will benefit both
drawback claimants and CBP. These efficiencies are gained through the
use of entry summary line item data, which is required for all TFTEA-
Drawback claims, and will enable the per unit averaging calculation to
take place as an automated verification rather than a manual process.
(d) The imported merchandise reported on a single entry summary
line item may not be the basis of a direct identification and a
substitution claim under TFTEA-Drawback.
A consequence of using per unit averaging for substitution claims
under TFTEA-Drawback is that a single entry summary line item cannot be
used for both direct identification and substitution drawback claims.
Consequently, CBP proposes to limit each line on an entry summary to
designation as the basis for either direct identification or
substitution claims, but never both. Therefore, all associated imported
merchandise on that line may only be designated as the basis for either
direct identification or substitution claims under TFTEA-Drawback. If
both types of claims were allowed on a single line on an entry summary,
CBP would be unable to issue full refunds for all drawback claims that
could lawfully be made against a specific entry summary line item in
some situations. For example, in some situations where substitution
claims using the per unit average of the line item were to be claimed
prior to a direct identification claim, the total amount of drawback
remaining on the line may not be sufficient to pay the proper amount of
drawback tied to the high value goods.
CBP has also chosen this proposed policy in expectation of the
efficiencies to be gained by both claimants and CBP regarding
calculating and verifying refunds. Accordingly, importers and drawback
claimants need to be aware of the limitation on line item designations
prior to importing merchandise or receiving transferred merchandise,
because the first-filed claim on a line will dictate the type of claim
available for any remaining merchandise of the same line.
6. Recordkeeping and Proof of Export
(a) Congress, through TFTEA, changed the starting date for the
three-year time period for maintaining supporting records for drawback
claims from the date of payment to the date of liquidation.
For all TFTEA-Drawback claims, section 906(o) replaced the previous
requirement to maintain supporting records for three years from the
date of payment of the claim with the new requirement to maintain
records for three years from the date of liquidation of the claim. See
19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3). This extension of the recordkeeping time period
provides CBP with more time to request documents needed to verify or
audit claims. This new timeframe requires claimants with accelerated
payment privileges to maintain supporting records longer than before
TFTEA (because claims are paid prior to liquidation for claimants that
obtain the privilege of accelerated payment).
(b) Claimants for manufacturing drawback must provide a
certification that they are in possession of the relevant bill of
materials or formula for the manufactured goods, in lieu of actual
submission thereof, for each claim filed.
Currently, claimants for manufacturing drawback are required to
provide a bill of materials or formula to CBP upon request, for any
claim filed. CBP has and will continue to request these records for
review in the context of verifications, audits, and other
administrative actions. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure
that the claims are consistent with the applicable bill(s) of materials
or formula(s) that accompanied the
[[Page 37892]]
claimant's application to operate under the applicable general or
specific manufacturing drawback ruling. TFTEA expressly added a
requirement for substitution manufacturing drawback claims that the
person making the claim must submit the bill of materials or formula
identifying the drawback-eligible merchandise and manufactured
article(s) by the 8-digit HTSUS subheading numbers and the quantities
of merchandise with each claim. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)(3)(A). For
administrative efficiency and consistency with how drawback claims are
reviewed and verified, rather than requiring the actual submission of
these records with each claim, CBP will require a certification in ACE
as to possession of these records. This certification requirement
applies to both direct identification and substitution manufacturing
claims.
(c) Congress, through TFTEA, permits the future use of an
electronic export system as automated proof of export for drawback
claims, but no system will be reliable for this purpose on February 24,
2018; and, proof of export must be documented in records that are
summarized for the drawback claim.
Claimants whose exported goods are the basis for a claim of
drawback must provide proof that establishes fully the date and fact of
exportation and the identity of the exporter. These requirements are
provided for in proposed Sec. 190.72. Under TFTEA-Drawback, proof of
exportation is required in the form of export summary data that is
provided as part of a complete drawback claim filed with CBP. However,
the underlying supporting records must fully prove the exportation
through records kept in the normal course of business. TFTEA also
provides for proof of export to be established via an electronic export
system of the United States, as determined by the Commissioner of CBP.
See 19 U.S.C. 1313(i). Currently, the Automated Export System (AES) is
not able to fully establish the required elements. Accordingly, until
such time as the Commissioner of CBP announces the availability of a
capable electronic system through a general notice in the Customs
Bulletin, records kept in the normal course of business shall be used
to establish fully the date and fact of exportation and the identity of
the exporter, and such records must be maintained by claimants whose
exported goods are the basis for a claim of drawback.
7. Transfers of Merchandise and Liability
(a) Specific formats for certificates of delivery and specific
formats for certificates of manufacture and delivery are no longer
required when drawback products or other drawback-eligible goods are
transferred between parties, although records of manufacture and
transfer must be provided and maintained to support the drawback claim.
Section 906 removed the longstanding requirements for the
submission of Certificates of Delivery (CDs) and Certificates of
Manufacture and Delivery (CMDs) by stating that no additional
certificates of transfer or manufacture shall be required 19 U.S.C.
1313(b), and by stating that no additional certificates of transfer are
required in 19 U.S.C. 1313(c), (j), and (p). Section 906(l), Drawback
Certificates, removed the recordkeeping requirements relating to these
certificates for drawback claims by striking 19 U.S.C. 1313(t). Instead
of CDs and CMDs, parties involved in transfers of drawback products or
other drawback-eligible goods must maintain records, which may include
records kept in the normal course of business, to evidence the
transfers.
(b) The first drawback claim to be filed that designates any
portion of imported merchandise from a given entry summary line item
will determine the type of drawback eligibility for all other imported
merchandise covered by that entry summary line item.
As previously explained in part 5(d), above, there is a limitation
that imported merchandise on a single entry summary line item cannot be
designated as the basis for both direct identification and substitution
drawback claims under TFTEA, due to the different methods of
calculating refund amounts. Because the transferor can transfer the
merchandise covered by a specific line item to different transferees,
the transferees might unwittingly attempt to file different types of
claims, which is not permitted. In an effort to best inform transferees
of the possible limitation, if a transferor has already filed a certain
type of drawback claim designating a portion of merchandise from an
entry summary line item, or otherwise has knowledge of an already-filed
claim that does likewise, then the transferor must designate whether
the merchandise is eligible for substitution or direct identification
claims and notify the transferee of that designation at the time of
transfer. This should help transferees to avoid attempting to make
drawback claims for the transferred merchandise under the mutually
exclusive bases of direct identification and substitution. If, at the
time of transfer, the transferor is not aware of a particular type of
drawback claim already filed relating to the entry summary line item,
then the designation shall so indicate to the transferee. Notification
of the designation from the transferor to the transferee must be
documented in records, which may include records kept in the normal
course of business. Notwithstanding the designation made, however, the
type of the first drawback claim to be filed relating to that entry
summary line item will dictate the type of any subsequent claims
relating to that same entry summary line item.
Because this notification requirement is not effective until
February 24, 2018, parties who anticipate making substitution-based
claims under TFTEA-Drawback designating imported merchandise that was
entered and transferred prior to this date, should consult with the
transferor about whether the transferred merchandise potentially is
eligible for substitution-based claims under TFTEA-Drawback. Such
eligibility only exists if the transferred merchandise was not
previously used as the basis for any non-TFTEA drawback claim, because
all types of non-TFTEA drawback claims must be calculated based on
invoice values, which conflicts with the use of per unit averaging when
determining refunds for imported merchandise on a single entry summary
line item.
It is important to note, again, that this notification of
designation requirement is proposed in an effort to better inform
claimants of possible limitations on the type of drawback claim that
can be filed in situations involving transferred merchandise. The
designation, however, is not a guarantee of the type of claim that can
be filed. Drawback claimants must remain aware that the first drawback
claim to be filed on a given entry summary line item will control the
type of claim that subsequently can be filed in the case of transferred
merchandise.
(c) Importers are now jointly and severally liable with drawback
claimants for refunds associated with their imported merchandise, when
designated on a drawback claim.
Section 906(f) established joint and several liability for the
drawback claimant and the importer of the imported merchandise that is
designated as the basis of the claim. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(k).
Accordingly, importers should be aware of this liability when
transferring imported merchandise to other parties for purposes of
drawback. Therefore, it is proposed to amend Sec. 113.62 to reflect
this liability in the import entry bond conditions.
[[Page 37893]]
B. Filing a TFTEA-Drawback Claim
TFTEA-Drawback claims must be filed electronically. A complete
TFTEA-Drawback claim will consist of the successful transmission of the
data required for the TFTEA-Drawback entry and the upload of all
required documents supporting the claim. When submitting the claim, the
filer must provide, among other things, the drawback entry number,
filing port code, claimant ID number, drawback provision, total
drawback claim amount requested, the import entry summary(s) and line
item number(s) for the designated imported merchandise, other required
line item data including the HTSUS subheading number at the 10-digit
level, information on exportation or destruction, and, if applicable,
the NAFTA coding sheet. Proposed section 190.51 provides detailed
information about specific data elements, certifications, and
supporting documents that may be required depending on the particular
type of drawback claim.
After transmission, the filer will receive an automated message
indicating either that the electronic transmission has been accepted or
rejected. In the case of a rejection, the automated message will inform
the filer regarding the reason(s) for the rejection. Uploads of
required forms, and any other supporting documentation should be
submitted through ACE, Document Image System, after the successful
electronic transmission. Further, related to filing claims
electronically, as noted below in the section explaining the proposed
regulations, a definition for ``drawback office'' has been added to
Sec. 190.2 clarifying that CBP has the authority to share or transfer
work between drawback offices at its discretion.
For the interim period between February 24, 2018 and the date on
which the new TFTEA-Drawback regulations will become effective, CBP
developed interim procedures for accepting electronically filed TFTEA-
Drawback claims. Specifically, to enable ACE to recognize and accept
such claims, notwithstanding the absence of the necessary regulatory
requirements for a complete TFTEA-Drawback claim, ACE was programed
with provisional placeholder requirements, modeled on the draft
regulatory package then under development. Corresponding provisional
Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements (CATAIR) Guidelines
were provided to enable claimants to program their systems to interface
with these provisional placeholder requirements in ACE. And on February
9, 2018, CBP posted on its website a document entitled Drawback:
Interim Guidance for Filing TFTEA Drawback Claims (Interim Guidance),
to further inform and provide guidance to the trading community
regarding the temporary procedures for electronically filing TFTEA-
Drawback claims during the interim period until the implementing
regulations are finalized and operational. This Interim Guidance was
subsequently twice updated, to provide additional clarity.
The Interim Guidance explained that the provisional requirements
for electronically-filed TFTEA-Drawback claims that are reflected in
the provisional CATAIR and described in the Interim Guidance document
are placeholders only, and will not be used to process the claims
beyond their initial acceptance in ACE. The actual final requirements
for such claims will be established once the rulemaking process is
complete and the new regulations are implemented and effective. To the
extent that the final requirements established through rulemaking
ultimately differ from the provisional placeholders used to accept
TFTEA-Drawback claims in ACE prior to the effective date of the final
rule, the Interim Guidance explained that claimants will be permitted
to perfect their claims in accordance with the new requirements before
the claims are processed for payment.
The interim procedures outlined and explained in the Interim
Guidance will remain in place until this rulemaking is complete and the
final rule to implement the regulatory changes pending for TFTEA-
Drawback claims is implemented and effective.
The programming specifics for electronic transmission are explained
in more detail in the TFTEA-Drawback CATAIR Guidelines, which can be
accessed at: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/ace/catair. Specific questions
related to filing TFTEA-Drawback claims may be directed to a client
representative or the ACE Account Service Desk at 1-866-530-4172 or
[email protected]. Filers should be aware that a delay of more
than 24 hours in uploading all required accompanying documentation
after the transmission of the claim data will mean that the filing date
will be tied to the uploading of documents rather than the date of
transmitting the claim data. In some instances, this later official
date of filing could affect the timeliness of a claim.
C. Required TFTEA-Drawback Certifications for Existing Manufacturing
Rulings and Privileges
While the processes regarding general and specific manufacturing
rulings detailed in appendices A and B of the proposed part 190 will be
largely unchanged from those described in the appendices of part 191,
TFTEA does have some impact on existing rulings. The existing rulings
were issued based on the requirements of 19 CFR part 191, which do not
comport with the TFTEA-Drawback requirements (e.g., the new
substitution standard and timeframes). Accordingly, in order to
continue operating under an existing manufacturing ruling, a
manufacturer or producer must file a supplemental application for a
limited modification to that ruling. To ensure compliance with the
TFTEA-Drawback requirements, the limited application must include
revised parallel columns and a bill of materials or formula, which must
be annotated with the applicable HTSUS subheading numbers. In addition,
a certification must be provided to confirm that all TFTEA-Drawback
claims made under the subject manufacturing ruling will be in
conformity with all of the applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. Any supplemental application to modify a ruling issued
under 19 CFR part 191 (so that it remains viable for TFTEA-Drawback
claims) must be submitted to CBP no later than February 23, 2019, which
is the close of the transition period for drawback claimants. Any
ruling issued under 19 CFR part 191 that is not modified by this
deadline will not apply to TFTEA-Drawback claims; and, manufacturers
and producers would need to apply for a new ruling under 19 CFR part
190.
Similar to manufacturing rulings, drawback privileges granted under
19 CFR part 191 will not comport with TFTEA-Drawback. The privileges
are the waiver of prior notice of intent to export or destroy and
accelerated payment. With each claim that is filed under 19 CFR part
190, a certification of conformity with TFTEA-Drawback is required for
claimants to continue to operate under one or both privileges if
granted pursuant to 19 CFR part 191. Unlike for manufacturing rulings,
these certifications will be made electronically with each TFTEA-
Drawback claim. These certifications are limited to the drawback
provisions under which they were originally granted in accordance with
19 CFR part 191, except that privileges granted under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1) and 19 CFR 191 may be applied to TFTEA-Drawback
[[Page 37894]]
claims made under 1313(j)(1) or 1313(j)(2).
The certification processes described above are designed to ease
the administrative burden on CBP while minimizing the disruption to
those operating under existing manufacturing rulings and/or privileges.
However, claimants are responsible for performing the requisite due
diligence prior to filing any TFTEA-Drawback claims; and, the
consequences of false or inaccurate claims include, but are not limited
to, the denial of drawback refunds and the associated privileges, noted
above.
D. Federal Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of 1986, as amended, codified as
title 26 of the United States Code (26 U.S.C.), is the main body of
domestic statutory tax law of the United States and includes laws
covering Federal excise taxes. Federal excise taxes are imposed on the
manufacture and distribution of certain consumer goods, including upon
the importation of distilled spirits, wines, beer, tobacco products,
and certain imported taxable fuel and petroleum products. While there
are also excise taxes on other products, it is these taxes, because of
the structure of the tax and the manner in which they are collected,
that are eligible for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313.
1. Distilled Spirits, Wines, and Beer: Imposition of Federal Excise Tax
and Exemptions
Chapter 51 of the IRC sets forth excise tax collection and related
provisions applicable to distilled spirits, wines, and beer. In
general, this chapter provides that a Federal excise tax is imposed on
all wines, distilled spirits, and beer produced in or imported into the
United States. 26 U.S.C. 5001, 5041, 5051.
Statutory exceptions to the required payment of Federal excise tax
exist. For example, when wine, distilled spirits, or beer are exported
after payment or determination of tax, the IRC provides for
``drawback'' in an amount equal to the tax paid. 26 U.S.C. 5055, 5062.
Under these provisions, the excise taxes are refunded upon exportation.
Similarly, drawback is also available when wine, distilled spirits, or
beer are exported from bonded premises regulated by the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), where no tax has been paid,
although tax liability attached at the time of production or import.
While tax must ordinarily be paid upon removal of wine, distilled
spirits, or beer from TTB-bonded premises, the removal may occur
``without payment of tax'' for the purpose of export. 26 U.S.C.
5214(a), 5362(c), 5053(a). Although removed from a TTB-bonded facility,
the product is still subject to bond and still carries a tax liability
until the product is exported. 26 U.S.C. 5053, 5175, 5362. Similarly,
Title 19 also provides for ``drawback equal in amount to the tax found
to have been paid or determined on . . . bottled spirits and wines
manufactured or produced in the United States'' upon exportation. 19
U.S.C. 1313(d). Under these drawback provisions, a refund is made upon
exportation if tax has already been paid, or if an unpaid tax liability
exists, it is extinguished upon exportation. The net economic effect is
identical.
2. Tobacco: Imposition of Federal Excise Tax and Exemptions
Under Chapter 52 of the IRC, a Federal excise tax is imposed on all
tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes manufactured in or
imported into the United States. 26 U.S.C. 5701. The tax on
domestically-produced tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes
is imposed at the time of manufacture but generally is not paid or
determined until the products are removed from TTB-bonded premises. 26
U.S.C. 5702, 5703. Upon exportation of tobacco products and cigarette
papers and tubes upon which the tax has been paid, the IRC permits
drawback of the tax paid. 26 U.S.C. 5706. In addition, tobacco products
and cigarette papers and tubes may be removed from TTB-bonded premises,
without the payment of Federal excise tax, for export. 26 U.S.C. 5704.
Under these provisions, the excise tax liability is extinguished upon
exportation. The net economic effect is identical.
3. Other Excise Taxes
Chapter 32 of the IRC imposes various excise taxes, including taxes
on gasoline, diesel fuel, and kerosene (taxable fuel). For example, 26
U.S.C. 4081 imposes tax on the removal of taxable fuel from any
refinery or terminal and on entry into the United States for
consumption, use, or warehousing. The IRC permits the refund of this
tax when taxable fuel is exported. 26 U.S.C. 6416, 6427. When the
taxable fuel is imported into an IRS-registered facility, it is taxed
upon removal from the facility and is not eligible for drawback under
19 U.S.C. 1313. Some taxable fuel, however, is not imported into an
IRS-registered facility, in which case the tax is due upon importation
and may be eligible for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313.
4. Federal Excise Taxes Have Been Improperly Refunded
Under customs law, a form of drawback known as ``substitution
drawback'' also occurs when products are imported into the United
States and sufficiently similar products are exported or destroyed. 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2). Treasury Department audits and analyses have
revealed that for a number of years, CBP has received and approved
claims for substitution drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) for
imported bottled and bulk wine, even in circumstances in which no
excise tax was paid on the substituted exported merchandise. CBP has
not identified a record of the first time it granted a section
1313(j)(2) drawback claim for wine based on exported merchandise on
which tax had not been paid--a claim for ``double drawback,'' drawback
of the excise tax on both the imported product and the exported
product.
An example of a claim for ``double drawback'' of wine proceeds as
follows:
A domestic winery imports 100 liters of wine, pays Federal
excise tax on the wine, and sells the imported wine in the United
States. The domestic winery then exports 100 liters of its
domestically-produced wine from TTB-bonded premises without payment
of Federal excise tax. The domestic winery files a Sec. 1313(j)(2)
drawback claim with CBP on the basis that the 100 liters of
domestically-produced wine are commercially interchangeable with the
to the 100 liters of imported wine. The domestic winery receives a
refund of 99 percent of the Federal excise taxes that it paid on the
100 liters of imported wine.
In this example, imported products are introduced into the U.S.
market, in net effect, free of 99 percent of Federal excise tax. As a
result, in this example, the U.S. Treasury ultimately receives only one
percent of the Federal excise tax on the imported products that are
consumed in the United States. By contrast, domestically-produced wine
consumed in the United States is fully taxed. This practice results in
revenue loss from having untaxed goods circulating in commerce. It also
has the effect of giving imported wine a clear tax advantage in the
domestic market over domestically produced wine. Because the revenue
loss (or tax break) comes in the form of a reduction of tax on imported
product, it puts domestically produced products at a disadvantage as
compared to imports in the U.S. market.
This result is inconsistent with the broader statutory excise tax
regime, which (on net) generally imposes excise taxes on all subject
goods consumed in the United States, whether produced domestically or
imported for domestic
[[Page 37895]]
consumption. In the above example, by contrast, the importer/exporter
winery has (on net) paid no Federal excise tax on the exported wine and
virtually no Federal excise tax on the imported wine. In net effect,
the winery has introduced imported wine 99% free of excise tax to
compete with domestically produced wine that is fully taxed.
CBP currently permits this practice only with respect to wine. But
as explained, the IRC imposes excise tax and provides exemptions from
such tax for other goods, including distilled spirits, beer, tobacco
products, and certain taxable fuel. Some producers have already
requested that CBP extend its current treatment of wine to distilled
spirits, and it is possible that firms dealing in these other goods may
seek similar treatment.
5. Statutory Prohibition on Double Drawback
The allowance of substitution drawback claims in circumstances
where internal revenue taxes have not been paid on the substituted
product results in imported product being introduced into commerce with
no net payment of excise tax--a ``double drawback'' that is at odds
with the broader statutory schemes of both customs drawback and excise
taxation.
As noted above, the IRC generally imposes excise taxes upon all
covered domestic products and products imported for domestic
consumption. The Customs Modernization and Informed Compliance Act (Mod
Act), Public Law 103-182, 632, 107 Stat. 2057 (1993) (enacted as Title
VI of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act),
added a clause to 19 U.S.C. 1313(v) providing in relevant part that
``[m]erchandise that is exported or destroyed to satisfy any claim for
drawback shall not be the basis of any other claim for drawback.'' This
provision is best read to preclude, among other things, exported or
destroyed merchandise from being used as the basis for both a
substitution drawback claim and a drawback of internal revenue taxes
upon exportation or destruction. In other words, exported merchandise
on which excise taxes have been paid can form the basis of a
substitution drawback claim, but exported products on which no excise
tax has been paid cannot be used to erase existing tax liability on
imported products.
While Congress did not specifically define the term ``drawback'' in
Sec. 1313(v), its meaning is clear in context and within the broader
statutory scheme governing drawback and excise taxes. In context,
drawback encompasses the refund or remission of an excise tax that was
paid, determined, or otherwise imposed by Federal law. The term is
often used to refer to the refund of taxes that have been paid
previously. See, e.g., 19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (c)(1), (j)(1), (j)(2)
(providing for taxes to be ``refunded as drawback''). But it is not
limited to refunds, as other provisions use the term more broadly to
refer to an unpaid tax liability that is extinguished. See, e.g., Sec.
1313(d) (``there shall be allowed . . . a drawback equal in amount to
the tax found to have been paid or determined'') (emphasis added);
sections 1313(n)(2), (n)(4), (o)(3) (using the phrase ``refunded,
waived, or reduced'' to refer to the extinguishing of tax liability
under subsections (a), (b), (f), (h), (p), and (q), each of which uses
the phrase ``drawback''). Nor is section 1313(v)'s use of the term
``drawback'' limited to drawback of taxes imposed upon importation.
Section 1313(v) refers to ``any'' claim for drawback. That broad and
inclusive language contrasts with the language Congress used when it
referred to only specific types of drawback. See, e.g., sections
1313(j), (k)(1), and (1)(2)(A), (B), and (C) (referring to drawback
``under this section''); section 1313(n)(2) (referring to ``NAFTA
drawback''); section 1313(n)(4) (referring to ``Chile FTA drawback'').
The fact that Congress expressly limited ``drawback'' in certain
subsections of section 1313 but did not do so when it referred to
``any'' drawback in subsection (v) indicates that ``drawback'' is not
so limited for purposes of this subsection.
Accordingly, when wine, distilled spirits, beer, tobacco products,
or other products subject to excise tax are exported from TTB-bonded
premises ``without payment of tax,'' pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 5214, 5362,
5053, or 5704, the extinguishment of tax liability upon export is best
understood as a form of drawback within the broad prohibition of 19
U.S.C. 1313(v).
This interpretation is further supported by the broader statutory
scheme, which operates (in net effect) to subject all wine, distilled
spirits, and beer consumed in the United States, whether produced
domestically or imported, to an excise tax. The evident purpose of
section 1313(v) is to advance that objective by preventing excessive
revenue loss through multiple claims for drawback based on a single
export. And to the same end, the statutes that govern withdrawal of
wine, distilled spirits, beer, or tobacco products from TTB-bonded
premises authorize regulations that may be necessary to protect
revenue. See 26 U.S.C. 5175, 5214(a)(4), 5362(c), 5053(a), and 5704(b).
A contrary interpretation would undermine the statutory scheme of
excise taxes that applies to imports and cause undue revenue loss. As
just one example, a contrary reading of the statutory scheme would
appear to permit an importer of distilled spirits to manufacture
inexpensive liquor and destroy it, without having paid the excise tax
imposed on domestically-produced liquor under 26 U.S.C. 5001. The
importer in this scenario could then use the destruction of that
domestically-produced liquor to seek a drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2) of the excise tax on liquor they import. Because the excise
tax per gallon may far exceed the marginal cost of production of some
types of liquor,\4\ these manufacturers would receive a significant
economic benefit, despite having never paid excise taxes on the
domestically-produced liquor. They would also have avoided excise tax
payment not once but twice--on both the domestically produced liquor
and the imported liquor--without, on net, increasing domestic
production for consumption or export. The statutory framework that
imposes excise tax on the domestic consumption of alcohol would have
been almost wholly subverted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In 2006, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated that
that the cost of production of neutral grain spirits at about $0.53
per proof gallon. See ``Economic Feasibility of Ethanol Production
from Sugar in the United States,'' available at https://www.usda.gov/oce/reports/energy/EthanolSugarFeasibilityReport3.pdf.
The excise tax on distilled spirits is $13.50 per proof gallon (see
26 U.S.C. 5001(a)(1)), or more than 25 times the cost of production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A contrary interpretation would also seem to permit the following
hypothetical transaction:
A distilled spirits importer imports 200 gallons of liquor into
a TTB-bonded facility. It pays excise tax on 100 gallons and sells
those in the United States. It then exports the remaining 100
gallons without payment of Federal excise tax. The importer files a
Sec. 1313(j)(2) drawback claim with CBP on the basis that the 100
gallons of imported liquor sold in the United States is commercially
interchangeable with the 100 gallons of imported liquor exported
without payment of excise tax. The importer receives a refund of 99
percent of the Federal excise taxes that it paid on the 100 imported
gallons sold in the United States.
In this hypothetical, too, imported products would be introduced
into the U.S. market, in net effect, free of 99 percent of Federal
excise tax. As a result, the U.S. Treasury would receive only one
percent of the Federal excise tax on the imported products that are
consumed in the United States. Such essentially tax-free treatment of
domestically-consumed imported
[[Page 37896]]
alcohol does not comport with the statutory drawback scheme in the IRC
or Title 19.
Because drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313 does not require CBP to
verify whether substitute exported merchandise is tax paid, CBP does
not have records that would identify instances of double drawback at
issue here. Treasury Department audits and analyses have revealed that
CBP began refunding excise taxes on wine under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) in
approximately 2004 when the San Francisco office permitted drawback for
such a claim. Some of these drawback claims may have included a double
refund. It is possible that this change took place due to a
misunderstanding of a 2004 amendment to the drawback statute designed
to provide for drawback of the Harbor Maintenance Tax. See
Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2003, Public Law
108-429, 118 Stat. 2433, 2579 at section 1557(a)(1) (2004). CBP has
never issued a ruling or regulation authorizing the current treatment
with respect to wine. Nevertheless, because CBP has approved
substitution unused drawback claims based on wine exports for which no
excise tax has been paid, its treatment of this issue must be changed
through a notice and comment process. See 19 U.S.C. 1625(c).
Because of the concern that the statutory scheme was being
subverted and because of concerns with revenue losses both realized and
potential, on October 15, 2009, CBP proposed amending title 19 of the
Code of Federal Regulations to preclude the filing of substitution
drawback claims for internal revenue excise tax paid on imported
merchandise in situations where no excise tax was paid upon the
substituted merchandise or where the substituted merchandise had been
the subject of a different claim for refund or drawback of excise tax
under any provision of the IRC. See Drawback of Internal Revenue Excise
Tax, 74 FR 52928. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
within the Department of the Treasury published a related proposed
rulemaking in the same October 15, 2009, edition of the Federal
Register (Drawback of Internal Revenue Taxes, 74 FR 52937). Both
notices solicited public comments on the proposed amendments.
Subsequently, the notices of proposed rulemaking were withdrawn as
announced in the Federal Register (75 FR 9359) on March 2, 2010.
A number of importers of distilled spirits have since sought the
same treatment for their products that wine currently receives.
Consistent with the analysis in this document, CBP has denied these
requests, but has not corrected the treatment of wine through a notice
and comment process, as required by 19 U.S.C. 1625(c).
6. Impact of Failing To Curtail Double Drawback
For the reasons explained above, CBP believes that the phrase ``any
other claim for drawback'' in section 1313(v), read in context of the
broader statutory scheme, encompasses the refund or remission of an
excise tax that was paid, determined, or otherwise imposed by Federal
law. To the extent section 1313(v) can be considered ambiguous,
however, CBP has determined that there are compelling economic and
fiscal reasons to resolve any ambiguity to preclude substitution
drawback claims for excise tax paid on imported merchandise where no
excise tax was paid on the substituted merchandise.
As explained below, firms dealing in distilled spirits, beer,
tobacco products, and certain taxable fuels have a strong economic
incentive to seek the same double drawback treatment currently afforded
to wine. If CBP fails to adopt a uniform interpretation and application
of section 1313(v), firms dealing in other products subject to Federal
excise tax could also pursue substitution drawback claims similar to
those that have been made for wine under section 1313(j)(2). The
statutory provisions governing excise tax on other goods--beer,
distilled spirits, tobacco products, and certain fuels--are
substantially similar (and in many material respects, identical) to
those governing excise tax on wine. Maintaining the current treatment
of drawback claims for wine risks a growth in future revenue loss
attributable to double drawback.
While proponents of the double drawback practice argue that it
promotes exports, the observed economic effects of the practice do not
support the view that it is an effective or efficient export promotion
measure. Double drawback also places domestic products made for
domestic consumption, which are subject to excise tax across the board,
at a relative disadvantage to products imported for domestic
consumption, for which 99 percent of the excise tax may be refunded
based on a double drawback claim. The interpretation of section 1313(v)
reflected in this proposed rule would avoid such market-distorting
disparities.
A more detailed analysis follows in two parts. First, the available
trade data suggest that double drawback promotes imports. In contrast,
the trade data provide little evidence that total wine exports
increased in response to double drawback. Second, a revenue analysis
elucidates the incentives that double drawback creates for firms that
deal in goods other than wine and provides initial projections of U.S.
Government revenue loss that could result if these firms were provided
the same double drawback treatment currently available only for
substituted wine.
7. Analysis of Trade Statistics
Imported wine that benefits from double drawback enters the U.S.
market with a substantial tax advantage over domestically produced
wine. While this tax advantage exists for all imported wine benefiting
from double drawback, it is largest for imported bulk wine. Because the
customs value of imported bulk wine is lower than the value for bottled
wine, excise tax levied by volume comprises a greater percentage of its
average price, meaning that producers have a stronger economic
incentive to claim double drawback on bulk wine.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For most imported wine, the tax is $0.282 per liter. 26
U.S.C. 5041(b). On a percentage of unit value basis, the tax is
larger for bulk wine than for bottled wine, because the average
value of bulk wine is less. The average value of imports of bulk
wine hovered around $1.10 per liter in the years 2001 to 2016--much
less than the average value per liter of imported bottled wines,
which was about five times as great during the same period. See
Table E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. import statistics are consistent with these incentives. Import
volumes of wine have grown rapidly during the period double drawback
has been available. In 2004, total U.S. imports of wine, either bottled
or bulk, were 576 million liters by volume.\6\ See Table B. By 2016,
that figure had grown to 880 million liters, an increase of over 50
percent. Id. Much of this increase in imports has been driven by bulk
wine, which has made rapid gains in U.S. market share. In 2004,
imported bulk wine accounted for 0.9 percent of domestic wine
consumption. By 2016, imported bulk wine accounted for 6.2 percent of
domestic wine consumption. See Table A. By volume, imports of bulk wine
grew by 875 percent over that period. See Table B. Of course, other
factors affecting wine trade unrelated to drawback may also have
affected this growth.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ CBP believes the practice of double drawback began in or
around 2004. For that reason, this analysis addresses trade
statistics beginning in 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In contrast to the rapid growth of imports, the U.S. trade
statistics provide little evidence that total wine exports by volume
increased from 2004 to 2016. The total volume of wine exports only grew
by 5.5 percent over that period.
[[Page 37897]]
See Table B. Disaggregating exports into those eligible for drawback
and those ineligible for drawback casts further doubt on the effect of
drawback on total exports. Exports from the United States to NAFTA
countries, Canada and Mexico, are not eligible for substitution
drawback. Therefore, they are not subsidized through the double
drawback mechanism. Yet the volume of U.S. wine exports to these
countries experienced a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.3
percent, while export volumes to countries for which substitution
drawback was available experienced a 0.01 percent CAGR over the same
period. See Table D.
Although the value of U.S. bottled wine exports has risen from 2004
to 2016 (from $600 million to $1.05 billion), the average unit value of
the exports also increased during that period (from $2.30 to $6.10).
See Table B and Table E. At the same time, volumes of bottled wine
exports fell by a third. See Table B. U.S. wine export values grew
substantially faster (5.2 percent CAGR) than did export volumes (0.4
percent CAGR) from 2004 to 2016. See Table B and Table C. This suggests
that the increase in bottled wine exports by value was driven by price
increases in the average unit value of the exports, not by an increase
in export volumes. Because the excise tax on wine is levied by volume
and not by value, this suggests that the increase in the value of
exports is not directly connected to the availability of double
drawback and is due to other factors.
While U.S. trade statistics do not indicate a significant increase
in total wine exports, they do indicate a change in the composition of
exports while double drawback has been available. From 2004 to 2016,
the share of exported wine in bulk containers rose from 20.8 percent to
50.6 percent by volume, consistent with the shift in composition of
imports discussed above. See Table B. This growth in the share of bulk
exports is only evident for exports to non-NAFTA countries, which rose
from 16.2 percent to 55.2 percent. See Table D. Exports to NAFTA
countries, which are not eligible for double drawback, show no shift
toward bulk exports over that period. See id. In addition, while U.S.
exports of bulk wine have grown during the period from 2004 to 2016,
growth in the volume of bulk wine imports has been much greater.
Overall, during the same period, there has been an increase in the U.S.
trade deficit for wine--including for bulk wine. See Table C.
In short, while it is not possible to say that double drawback is
the primary driver of the wine trade trends, available trade data are
consistent with the view that double drawback may have promoted wine
imports but that it has not been an effective export promotion measure.
8. Revenue Loss Analysis
Maintaining the current double drawback treatment of wine and
extending that treatment to other products subject to excise tax--
distilled spirits, beer, tobacco products, and certain taxable fuels--
would cause significant revenue loss to the U.S. Government.
(a) Data
Because drawback claims have not previously captured the tax-paid
status on substituted exports, the exact amount of revenue lost to
double drawback involving imported wine is not certain. Nevertheless,
analysis of CBP import data and individual drawback claims at the firm
level permit a reasonable estimate of the historical revenue loss from
double drawback treatment of wine imports.\7\ Because CBP has not kept
drawback summary statistics based on tariff category and type of tax,
this estimate with respect to wine is based on an analysis of
individual drawback claims made by firms involved in wine trade and
comparing the ratios of drawback claimed for duties with those claimed
for taxes to differentiate between shipments of bulk and bottled wine.
These firm-level data are statutorily-protected from public disclosure.
See 26 U.S.C. 6103 (confidentiality of tax return information); 18
U.S.C. 1905 (Trade Secrets Act). With respect to other products,
Treasury's estimates are based on current excise tax revenue for each
product.\8\ The estimated rate at which firms are projected to take
advantage of double drawback (``takeup rate'') is informed by the
economic incentives and data described below--chiefly, excise tax as a
share of product value, and the potential growth in exports resulting
from the expansion of double drawback treatment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See U.S. International Trade Commission Interactive DataWeb,
available at https://dataweb.usitc.gov/ (trade data by product
classification, volume, value, and country of origin, retrieved from
the U.S. Census Bureau).
\8\ See IRS Statistics of Income Tax Stats--Excise Tax
Statistics, available at https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-excise-tax-statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Theory, Assumptions, and Estimate
Excise taxes on most products addressed in this rule are applied
based on volume, not as a percentage of value. For example, the
standard excise tax on wine is $1.07 per wine gallon.\9\ The greater
the ratio of excise tax to product value, the greater the incentive to
avoid payment of the tax through means such as double drawback. The
historical experience with respect to wine bears this out: Excise tax
as a share of customs value has been about 5 percent for bottled wine
and 25 percent for bulk wine in recent years. See Table E. Based on
differences in the tariff rates for bottled and bulk wine that are
reflected in the amounts of individual drawback transactions, Treasury
estimates the takeup rate for double drawback of wine to be 13 percent
for bottled imports and 24 percent for bulk imports. The difference in
these rates indicates that tax as a share of value is an important
determinant of takeup rate. For some products, such as beer, tax as a
share of customs value is similar to that of wine. For other products
subject to excise tax, tax as a share of value is much higher than it
is for wine--sometimes exceeding 100 percent. Indeed, for some
distilled spirits, excise tax can be many multiples the cost of
production.\10\ Excise tax as a share of tobacco products' value is
also much higher than it is as a share of the value of wine.\11\ This
dynamic creates a strong incentive for firms that deal in these other
products to seek double drawback of excise taxes paid on imports by
inexpensively manufacturing domestic products for either export or
destruction. Because of the strength of this incentive, firms dealing
in these products likely would take advantage of double drawback at
higher rates than the wine industry has historically if it were
available to them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 26 U.S.C. 5041(b).
\10\ For example, the average customs value of exported grain
alcohol is $2.78 per proof gallon (USITC DataWeb, supra note 7)
while the tax is $13.50 per proof gallon (26 U.S.C. 5001(a)(1)). The
customs value includes profits and other expenses in addition to the
cost of production. In 2006, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
estimated the cost of production of neutral grain spirits at about
$0.53 per proof gallon. See ``Economic Feasibility of Ethanol
Production from Sugar in the United States,'' supra note 1.
\11\ See Table E; infra note 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A second factor of particular concern is the market-distorting
incentive for re-routing shipments that an expansion of double drawback
would create. Double drawback creates an incentive for firms that both
import and export to route a shipment destined for another country
through the United States to claim excise tax relief on imports into
the United States. Under this approach, first, a firm imports 200 units
of, for example, distilled spirits. It removes 100 units from customs
custody for domestic sale and pays excise tax for their import. It then
imports the second 100 units into TTB bond, without
[[Page 37898]]
having paid excise tax on their import and then exports the product
from bond, and also uses that exportation to seek drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) of the import tax paid on the first 100 units. The
first 100 units of distilled spirits would then have been consumed
domestically at 1 percent of the normal tax rate, without increasing
domestic production or net exports. Depending on the cost of shipping,
firms would have an incentive to route shipments destined for other
countries through the United States--without increasing domestic
production or exports--to claim double drawback on their U.S. imports.
In the analysis, we assume trade re-routing of all distilled spirits
from Canada and Mexico bound for non-NAFTA countries is feasible. We
also assume that trade re-routing of gin, vodka, and grain alcohol
worldwide is feasible, though the analysis does not rely on substantial
rerouting of these products.
The following estimates also assume a 7 percent reduction in
revenue loss by comparison to the historical data concerning wine due
to the Craft Beverage Modernization Act (CBMA), Public Law 115-97,
Sec. 13801-13808 (2017). The CBMA provides lower overall effective tax
rates for smaller producers than for larger producers. This assessment
of the effects of the CBMA is based on the assumption that most double
drawback claims would be taken by large multinational firms paying the
full rate on marginal imports above the limit identified in the CBMA.
The transaction costs involved in drawback support the view that
drawback most benefits larger firms that are involved in both exporting
and importing.
The following estimates further assume that double drawback of
wine, distilled spirits, and beer would grow with real GDP. That is,
Treasury assumes that consumption of excise-taxed beverages, and
drawback on those taxes, would grow with the overall economy. Treasury
uses the Administration's forecast of taxable fuel and tobacco excise
tax revenue to estimate change over time. Both of these forecasts
decrease slightly over time, consistent with recent trends in excise
revenue.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Excise Tax Statistics, supra note 8. From 2010 to 2016,
excise tax revenue for imported beer, wine, and distilled spirits
grew much more quickly than revenue for tobacco products or taxable
fuels. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In total, the incentives for firms that deal in distilled spirits,
beer, tobacco products, and certain fuels--in addition to the continued
double drawback treatment of wine--could cause a revenue loss of $674
million to $3.3 billion on an average annual basis over the next ten
years, if double drawback treatment were extended to commodities other
than wine and not eliminated.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ These estimates are in nominal U.S. dollars, whereas the
figures in the Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 analysis are in
undiscounted and discounted 2016 U.S. dollars. Because of this
difference, only a rough estimate of the total transfers from the
rule and this alternate analysis can be determined. This estimate
can be determined by adding the revenue losses of extending double
drawback to the rule's undiscounted net transfers from the U.S.
Government to trade members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Wine
In fiscal year 2015, CBP paid $54.9 million in excise tax refunds
and had initial tax collections from wine imports of $335 million,
according to CBP data.\14\ As noted above, the tax as a share of
customs value is 5 percent for bottled wine and 25 percent for bulk
wine. The estimated takeup rate--that is, the rate of double drawback
claims--is 13 percent for bottled imports and 25 percent for bulk
imports, demonstrating that tax as a share of value is an important
determinant of the takeup rate. Assuming that double drawback continues
to grow with real GDP, the current treatment of wine is estimated to
cause between $51 million and $69 million in revenue loss to the U.S.
Government annually over the next ten years.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See id. Refunds or drawback paid in any given year may be
paid for imports made in previous years. The $54.9 million figure is
a summation of individual drawback claims from CBP data that are
statutorily-protected from public disclosure. TTB publishes the $335
million figure. See TTB Statistical Release, ``Tax Collections
Cumulative Summary, FY 2015,'' available at https://www.ttb.gov/statistics/final15.pdf.
\15\ These estimates are slightly different from the wine double
drawback estimates shown in Table 49 of the Executive Orders 13563
and 12866 analysis. This is because these estimates are in nominal
U.S. dollars, whereas the figures in Table 49 are in undiscounted
2016 U.S. dollars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Distilled Spirits
With respect to distilled spirits, fiscal year 2016 excise tax
revenue from imports was $1.5 billion, according to TTB collections
data. A large portion of imports are, however, imported into TTB bond
and then are treated as domestic collections. U.S. Census Bureau data
suggest actual import excise tax revenue is closer to $2.6 billion.\16\
The tax as a share of customs value for distilled spirits--currently
$13.50 per proof gallon \17\--is 5 to 8 times higher than it is for
wine, creating a significantly greater incentive to export to take
advantage of double drawback. Further, as noted above, the tax is much
higher than the cost of production for inexpensive distilled
spirits.\18\ For this reason, Treasury expects strong behavioral
responses to generate substitution drawback claims if distilled spirits
become eligible for double drawback, including purposeful destruction
of inexpensive distilled spirits and routing of goods destined for
other countries through the United States when feasible. We estimate
that up to 45 percent of imported spirits would be commercially viable
predicates for double drawback claims.\19\ Varying the projected takeup
rate between 25 percent and 75 percent for these claims, annual U.S.
Government revenue loss from allowing double drawback on distilled
spirits is estimated to range from $312 million to $937 million
annually over ten years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Accessed through the USITC DataWeb, supra note 7.
\17\ 26 U.S.C. 5001(a)(1). The CBMA reduces the excise tax on a
portion of imported goods. The estimates reported in this analysis
assume the CBMA is extended indefinitely, reducing the revenue loss
by roughly 7 percent.
\18\ See supra note 10.
\19\ For the years 2014-2016, vodka, gin, and grain alcohol
imports represented 34% of total spirits imports. Because the cost
of production for these spirits is so low relative to the tax, we
expect a strong behavioral response, including increased exports,
trade re-routing, and destruction, such that all imports could
qualify for duty drawback. In contrast, brandy, liqueurs, and
cordials are relatively high value spirits, making destruction and
increased exports less feasible. For these products, we assume that
opportunities to claim double drawback are limited by current
exports, which amount to 2 percent of current spirits imports.
Finally, we assume that all spirits exports from Canada and Mexico
to non-NAFTA countries could be re-routed through the United States
to take advantage of double drawback. Using United Nations
International Trade Statistics data for 2014-2016, we estimate that,
at current trade levels, this re-routing would generate double
drawback claims for up to 8 percent of US spirits imports. Adding
these shares of imports together, without rounding, sums to 45
percent of US imports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Beer
With respect to beer, fiscal year 2016 excise tax revenue from
imports was $542 million, according to TTB collections data. The tax of
$18 per barrel is 12.3 percent of the value of imports and 15.5 percent
of the value of exports,\20\ suggesting firms have a stronger incentive
to claim double drawback on beer than bottled wine. However,
qualifying, non-NAFTA exports of beer amount to only 4 percent of
imports, suggesting limited scope for
[[Page 37899]]
takeup of double drawback. Varying the projected takeup rate between 10
percent and 30 percent on existing imports and exports, and varying the
increase in qualifying exports between 10 percent and 30 percent,
annual U.S. Government revenue loss from extending double drawback to
beer is estimated to range from $9 million to $28 million annually over
ten years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In 2016, the average customs value of imported beer was
$145.98 per barrel while the average free alongside ship (FAS) value
of exports was $116.06 per barrel. See USITC DataWeb, supra note 7.
The U.S. Census Bureau defines ``customs value'' and ``FAS export
value'' in their Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics, Sec. 8,
available at https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/guide/sec2.html#customs_value. Treasury uses customs value and FAS value,
because data on cost of production are not available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(f) Tobacco Products
With respect to tobacco products, fiscal year 2016 excise tax
revenue on imports was $829 million according to TTB collections data.
The tax incentives to claim double drawback are especially strong for
tobacco products. For instance, in 2016, the Federal excise tax on a
carton of cigarettes was 199 percent of the average customs value of a
carton of imported cigarettes and 408 percent of the average export
value of a carton of cigarettes exported from the United States based
on U.S. Census Bureau trade data.\21\ The tax rate by value is about 40
times larger for cigarettes than that for bottled wine, suggesting the
incentive to claim drawback on cigarettes is considerably larger than
the incentive to claim drawback on wine. Extending the double drawback
treatment to tobacco products would create significant incentives to
shift production of tobacco products overseas. It would also create a
great incentive for importers to contract with domestic producers to
match imports and exports for drawback; the incentive would be to
import products for domestic sale and export domestically produced
cigarettes. Because domestically produced tobacco products account for
95 percent of domestic tobacco consumption, Treasury assumes that
tobacco firms would gradually respond by contracting with importers and
setting up foreign production facilities. Accounting for this slow
ramp-up in drawback claims, Treasury estimates that between 3 percent
and 18 percent of excise revenue on tobacco products would be lost due
to an extension of double drawback to tobacco products over the next 10
years, or between $332 million and $2.2 billion annually.\22\ In the
long run, Treasury estimates that U.S. Government revenue losses would
be substantially higher, with increasing shifts of domestic production
overseas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ In 2016, the average customs value of 1,000 imported
cigarettes was $25.335 while the average FAS value of 1,000 exported
cigarettes was $12.345. See USITC DataWeb, supra note 6. The Federal
excise tax on 1,000 cigarettes is $50.33. 26 U.S.C. 5701(b)(1).
\22\ The range of possible outcomes is large, primarily due to
uncertainty in the timing of firm responses rather than the
magnitude of response. Specifically, Treasury does not know how
quickly tobacco companies might set up new or use existing overseas
production operations to serve the U.S. market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) Taxable Fuels
Finally, with respect to taxable fuels, current annual excise tax
revenue on imports is roughly $2 billion according to U.S. Census
Bureau data on imports of gasoline and diesel fuel.\23\ Due to the lack
of detailed data on fuel imports, differentiating between those
importations eligible for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313 and those that
are not, it is quite difficult to estimate the takeup rate on
substitution drawback for taxable fuels. Even a small takeup rate,
however, could have a significant economic impact. Assuming, for
example, that 1 percent to 5 percent of imported fuel receives double
drawback of excise taxes, the U.S. Government revenue loss would range
between $20 million and $98 million annually over ten years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Retrieved from USITC DataWeb, supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Conclusion
This proposed rule would protect the integrity of excise tax
revenue collections by ensuring that 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) substitution
drawback is not employed to evade the statutory prohibition on using a
single exportation as the basis for two drawback claims. It would
preclude the filing of substitution drawback claims for excise tax paid
on imported merchandise in situations where no excise tax was paid upon
the substituted merchandise or limit the amount of drawback allowable
to the amount of taxes paid (and not returned by refund, credit, or
drawback) on the substituted merchandise, and thus eliminate double
drawback. CBP invites comments from interested members of the public on
this proposal.
Table A--Import Shares by Volume of Total U.S. Table Wine Consumption \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported wine container size
\2\
--------------------------------
Year Over four Imported sum
Two liters or liters (bulk)
less (bottles) \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004............................................................ 26.0 0.9 26.9
2005............................................................ 26.8 1.8 28.6
2006............................................................ 26.5 3.6 30.1
2007............................................................ 27.2 3.8 30.9
2008............................................................ 25.4 4.6 30.0
2009............................................................ 24.5 8.7 33.2
2010............................................................ 25.7 6.5 32.2
2011............................................................ 24.6 7.7 32.3
2012............................................................ 22.8 12.7 35.5
2013............................................................ 23.5 8.9 32.4
2014............................................................ 21.9 7.3 29.2
2015............................................................ 22.9 6.6 29.5
2016............................................................ 21.9 6.2 28.1
2004-2016:
CAGR \4\ (Pct).............................................. -1.4 17.1 0.4
Total growth (Pct).......................................... -15.7 567.2 4.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
U.S. International Trade Commission, ``Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,'' accessed February 2, 2018.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, ``Tax Collections,'' accessed March 2, 2018.
1. Total U.S. wine consumption is estimated using gross excise tax collections and tax rates for wine.
2. The ITC website explains that: ``General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from
foreign countries, whether such merchandise enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded
warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade Zones.''
3. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from
the table.
[[Page 37900]]
4. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit imports codes 2204215005,
2204215015, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046, 2204215050,
2204215055, 2204215060, and 2204296000.
Table B--Volume of U.S. Total Wine Exports and General Imports by Container Size (All Countries)
[Millions of liters of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total exports \1\ General imports \2\
-------------------------- --------------------------
Container Size Pct share Container Size Pct share
Year -------------------------- Exported in large -------------------------- Imported in large
Two liters Over two sum containers Two liters Over four sum containers
or less liters or less liters
(bottles) (bulk) (bottles) (bulk) \3\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004............................................ 259 68 327 20.8 556 20 576 3.5
2005............................................ 177 100 278 36.2 602 40 642 6.2
2006............................................ 189 138 327 42.3 615 84 699 12.0
2007............................................ 207 169 376 45.0 661 92 753 12.2
2008............................................ 209 201 410 49.0 623 112 735 15.2
2009............................................ 177 171 349 49.2 612 218 830 26.3
2010............................................ 171 196 368 53.4 658 168 826 20.3
2011............................................ 185 190 375 50.8 673 211 884 23.9
2012............................................ 196 167 364 46.1 659 365 1024 35.6
2013............................................ 207 172 379 45.4 671 255 926 27.5
2014............................................ 195 176 371 47.5 655 219 874 25.1
2015............................................ 205 180 385 46.7 685 197 882 22.3
2016............................................ 171 175 345 50.6 685 195 880 22.2
2004-2016:
CAGR \4\ (Pct).............................. -3.4 8.2 0.4 7.7 1.8 20.9 3.6 16.7
Total growth (Pct).......................... -34.1 156.6 5.5 143.2 23.2 875.0 52.8 538.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: U.S. International Trade Commission, ``Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,'' accessed February 2, 2018.
1. The ITC describes total exports as ``Domestic exports plus foreign exports'' on their website.
2. The ITC website explains that ``General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such merchandise
enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade Zones.''
3. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
4. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020. HTS imports codes used
include 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046, 2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and
2204296000.
Table C--Value of U.S. Total Wine Exports and General Imports by Container Size (All Countries)
[Millions of U.S. dollars of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total exports, free General imports, general
alongside ship (FAS) \1\ customs value \2\
-------------------------- --------------------------
Container Size Exported Pct share Container Size Imported Pct share
Year -------------------------- sum in large -------------------------- sum in large
Two liters Over two containers Two liters Over four containers
or less liters or less liters
(bottles) (bulk) (bottles) (bulk) \3\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004............................................ 600 82 682 12.0 2,658 19 2,677 0.7
2005............................................ 452 91 543 16.8 2,891 35 2,926 1.2
2006............................................ 616 121 737 16.4 3,153 67 3,220 2.1
2007............................................ 635 151 786 19.2 3,494 77 3,571 2.2
2008............................................ 645 182 827 22.0 3,511 114 3,625 3.1
2009............................................ 549 202 751 26.9 3,029 157 3,186 4.9
2010............................................ 702 212 914 23.2 3,143 149 3,292 4.5
2011............................................ 869 213 1,082 19.7 3,420 225 3,645 6.2
2012............................................ 905 199 1,104 18.0 3,458 400 3,858 10.4
2013............................................ 1,037 235 1,272 18.5 3,652 281 3,933 7.1
2014............................................ 921 240 1,161 20.7 3,708 242 3,950 6.1
2015............................................ 1,035 227 1,262 18.0 3,709 202 3,911 5.2
2016............................................ 1,050 205 1,255 16.3 3,779 217 3,996 5.4
2004-2016:
CAGR \4\ (Pct).............................. 4.8 7.9 5.2 2.6 3.0 22.5 3.4 18.5
Total growth (Pct).......................... 75.0 150.0 84.0 35.9 42.2 1,042.1 49.3 665.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: U.S. International Trade Commission, ``Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,'' accessed February 15, 2018.
The ITC describes total exports as ``Domestic exports plus foreign exports'' on their website. The U.S. Census Bureau provides definitions of FAS export
value and customs value in their Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics, Sec. 8, available at https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/guide/sec2.html#customs_value.
1. The ITC website explains that ``General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such merchandise
enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade Zones.''
[[Page 37901]]
2. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
3. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020. HTS imports codes used
include 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046, 2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and
2204296000.
Table D--Volume of U.S. Total Wine Exports \1\ by Destination
[Millions of liters of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exports to Pct share in Exports to non- Pct share in
Year NAFTA large NAFTA large
countries containers \2\ countries containers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004............................................ 37 56.7 290 16.2
2005............................................ 35 50.7 243 34.1
2006............................................ 40 38.0 287 42.9
2007............................................ 50 37.2 325 46.2
2008............................................ 55 39.8 354 50.5
2009............................................ 48 29.4 301 52.3
2010............................................ 42 33.3 325 56.0
2011............................................ 46 33.4 329 53.2
2012............................................ 53 30.9 311 48.6
2013............................................ 50 18.0 330 49.6
2014............................................ 57 22.6 314 52.0
2015............................................ 61 27.0 324 50.4
2016............................................ 55 25.6 291 55.2
2004-2016:
CAGR \3\ (Pct).............................. 3.3 -6.4 0.0 10.8
Total growth (Pct).......................... 47.6 -54.8 0.2 240.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Treasury calculations based on import data from U.S. International Trade Commission, ``Interactive
Tariff and Trade DataWeb,'' accessed March 2, 2018.
1. The ITC website describes total exports as ``Domestic exports plus foreign exports.''
2. Large containers is defined here as containers over 2 liters in size.
3. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000
and 2204290020.
Table E--Average Value of U.S. Total Wine Exports and General Imports and Effective Tax Rates by Container Size (All Countries)
[U.S. dollars per liter of wine with not over 14 percent alcohol by volume]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average value per liter of total exports \1\ Average value per liter of general imports \2\
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two liters or less Over two liters (bulk) Two liters or less Over four liters (bulk)
Year (bottles) -------------------------- (bottles) \3\
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
Value per Tax/value Value per Tax/value Value per Tax/value Value per Tax/value
liter \4\ (pct) liter (pct) liter (pct) liter (pct)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004............................................ 2.3 12.2 1.2 23.5 4.8 5.9 1.0 29.8
2005............................................ 2.5 11.1 0.9 31.2 4.8 5.9 0.9 32.3
2006............................................ 3.3 8.7 0.9 32.2 5.1 5.5 0.8 35.4
2007............................................ 3.1 9.2 0.9 31.6 5.3 5.3 0.8 33.8
2008............................................ 3.1 9.1 0.9 31.2 5.6 5.0 1.0 27.8
2009............................................ 3.1 9.1 1.2 24.0 4.9 5.7 0.7 39.2
2010............................................ 4.1 6.9 1.1 26.2 4.8 5.9 0.9 31.9
2011............................................ 4.7 6.0 1.1 25.3 5.1 5.6 1.1 26.5
2012............................................ 4.6 6.1 1.2 23.8 5.2 5.4 1.1 25.8
2013............................................ 5.0 5.6 1.4 20.7 5.4 5.2 1.1 25.7
2014............................................ 4.7 6.0 1.4 20.7 5.7 5.0 1.1 25.6
2015............................................ 5.0 5.6 1.3 22.4 5.4 5.2 1.0 27.6
2016............................................ 6.1 4.6 1.2 24.1 5.5 5.1 1.1 25.4
2004-2016:
CAGR \5\ (Pct).............................. 8.5 -7.8 -0.2 0.2 1.2 -1.2 1.3 -1.3
Total growth (Pct).......................... 165.7 -62.4 -2.6 2.6 15.4 -13.3 17.1 -14.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: U.S. International Trade Commission, ``Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb,'' accessed February 2-15, 2018.
1. The ITC describes total exports as ``Domestic exports plus foreign exports'' on their website.
2. The ITC website explains that ``General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such merchandise
enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses under Customs custody or from Foreign Trade Zones.''
3. The amount of imported wine in containers between 2 and 4 liters in size is negligible and is omitted from the table.
4. The tax as a share of value is approximated by dividing the most common tax rate (28.266 cents per liter) by the average customs value per liter.
5. CAGR is compound annual growth rate.
Note: Wine trade data in the table include Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 10-digit exports codes 2204214000 and 2204290020. HTS imports codes used
include 2204215005, 2204215015, 2204215025, 2204215030, 2204215035, 2204215040, 2204215045, 2204215046, 2204215050, 2204215055, 2204215060, and
2204296000.
[[Page 37902]]
III. Explanation of Proposed Regulations
The following proposed regulatory amendments are generally based on
19 U.S.C. 1313, including the new requirements, timeframes, and related
operational decisions necessitated by TFTEA. When proposed regulatory
language is based, at least in part, on authority other than 19 U.S.C.
1313, these instances are noted below.
A. Proposed New Part 190
CBP based the regulatory structure of the proposed new part 190 on
the current part 191 in order to ease the transition for drawback
practitioners by attempting to ensure, wherever possible, that the
numerical regulations in each part correspond with each other. In some
regulations, while the name of a section has changed, the content of
the proposed section generally aligns with the content of the
corresponding section in part 191. For example, Sec. 191.10,
Certificate of delivery, deals with transfers of merchandise and
requirements related to certificates of delivery as evidence of the
transfers. However, proposed Sec. 190.10, Transfer of merchandise,
also deals with transfers of merchandise but it is not called
``certificate of delivery'' because TFTEA eliminated certificates of
delivery (as well as certificates of manufacture and delivery). In
other instances, it was necessary to reserve a section (e.g., Sec.
190.76, Landing certificate) if the corresponding section in part 191
was no longer required or to add a new section (e.g., Sec. 190.63,
Liability for drawback claims) if there was no corresponding section in
part 191. However, for the most part, the regulations in proposed part
190 directly correspond with those in part 191. Accordingly, when
describing the proposed regulations, comparisons to the corresponding
section in part 191 are included to facilitate the transition to TFTEA-
Drawback. Generally, these comparisons will note the major differences
between the proposed regulation and the corresponding regulation in
part 191 (such as in regulations dealing with substitution which is now
generally based on the HTSUS), or, in many cases, will indicate that
there are no differences (other than the references being to sections
in part 191) or that the differences are minor. These minor differences
will usually include grammatical or stylistic edits (for example,
changing ``shall'' to ``will'' or ``must'') or nomenclature changes
(for example, changing ``Customs'' to ``CBP'' such as in ``CBP
custody'' or ``CBP supervision'').
New part 190 is drafted with a scope section and a section
regarding claims filed under NAFTA followed by 19 subparts: General
Provisions; Manufacturing Drawback; Unused Merchandise Drawback;
Rejected Merchandise; Completion of Drawback Claims; Verification of
Claims; Exportation and Destruction; Liquidation and Protest of
Drawback Entries; Waiver of Prior Notice of Intent to Export;
Accelerated Payment of Drawback; Internal Revenue Tax on Flavoring
Extracts and Medicinal or Toilet Preparations (Including Perfumery)
Manufactured From Domestic Tax-Paid Alcohol; Supplies for Certain
Vessels and Aircraft; Meats Cured With Imported Salt; Materials for
Construction and Equipment of Vessels and Aircraft Built for Foreign
Ownership and Account; Foreign-Built Jet Aircraft Engines Processed in
the United States; Merchandise Exported From Continuous CBP Custody;
Distilled Spirits, Wines, or Beer Which Are Unmerchantable or Do Not
Conform to Sample or Specifications; Substitution of Finished Petroleum
Derivatives; Merchandise Transferred to a Foreign Trade Zone From CBP
Custody; Drawback Compliance Program.
Section 190.0 briefly describes the scope of the new proposed part
190 dealing with drawback as amended by TFTEA.
Section 190.0a states that claims involving NAFTA are provided for
in part 181. This section contains only grammatical changes from the
corresponding section in part 190.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Section 190.1 briefly describes the authority of the Commissioner
of CBP to prescribe, and of the Secretary of the Treasury to approve,
rules and regulations regarding drawback. It is proposed to amend the
corresponding section in part 191 as well as to identify Treasury
Department Order Number 100-16 and DHS Delegation Order 7010.3 as
sources of authority. See 19 CFR part 0.
Section 190.2 lists definitions used throughout the proposed part
190. This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 in
that the definitions for certificate of delivery, certificate of
manufacture and delivery, and commercially interchangeable merchandise
have been removed and the definitions for the following terms were
added: Bill of materials; document; drawback office; formula;
intermediate party; per unit averaging; schedule B; sought chemical
element; and wine.
Section 190.3 provides information regarding the duties, taxes, and
fees subject or not subject to drawback. This proposed regulation
differs from the corresponding regulation in part 191 in that it
generally provides for refunds of duties, taxes, and fees based on the
changes to 19 U.S.C. 1313(l) stemming from TFTEA. This proposed
regulation differs from the current corresponding regulation in part
191 by allowing drawback on the merchandise processing fee (MPF)
generally, whereas 19 CFR 191.3(a)(4) limits drawback on MPF to
situations only involving claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) and 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv). Consistent with the Miscellaneous Trade and
Technical Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-429), which amended 19
U.S.C. 1313 to allow, inter alia, harbor maintenance taxes (HMT)
refunds, this proposed regulation also allows drawback on HMT for
claims under the provisions which provide for drawback of tax.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations may also refer
to the harbor maintenance tax as the harbor maintenance fee (HMF).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, but subject to the limitations under 19 U.S.C. 1313
prior to being amended by TFTEA, this document proposes to update 19
CFR 191.3 by creating a new paragraph (a)(5) to allow drawback on HMT,
but limited to situations involving only claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)
and 19 U.S.C. 1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv). In addition, 19 CFR
191.3(b)(1) is revised to otherwise prohibit HMT refunds except under
the provisions specified in proposed new paragraph (a)(5). Relatedly,
section 191.3 is retitled as ``duties, taxes, and fees subject or not
subject to drawback'' for clarifying purposes.
Section 190.4 provides information regarding drawback and
merchandise in which the U.S. Government has an interest. This section
replicates the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.5 states that drawback is available on goods shipped to
Guantanamo Bay and that drawback under 1313(j)(1) is permitted on
merchandise shipped to certain insular possessions and trust
territories. This section differs from the corresponding section in the
current part 191 because the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-429), amended 19 U.S.C. 1313 by
adding paragraph (y) to allow drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) on
entries shipped from the customs territory of the United States to the
U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands,
Kingman Reef, Guam, Canton Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston Island,
and Palmyra Island.
[[Page 37903]]
Accordingly, while this 2004 change was not previously made in part
191, this document proposes to clarify this modification in proposed
Sec. 190.5 and in existing Sec. 191.5. Further, consistent with
proposed Sec. 190.5, it is proposed to amend Sec. 191.5 to clarify
that drawback is not allowable on merchandise shipped to Puerto Rico
from elsewhere in the customs territory of the United States because
Puerto Rico is part of the customs territory of the United States (see
19 CFR 101.1).
Section 190.6 specifies who has the authority to sign or
electronically certify drawback documents. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 in that it provides for
electronic signatures, removes references to Certificates of Delivery
and Certificates of Manufacture and Delivery, and includes additional
references to bill of materials and formulas.
Section 190.7 provides information on general manufacturing
drawback rulings, states that the process to modify these rulings is
the same as provided for in Sec. 190.8, and also clarifies the
longstanding CBP procedures for the modification of these rulings. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 in that it
makes TFTEA-conforming changes, such as adding the requirement to
provide the 8-digit HTSUS number, and it contains grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.8 provides information on specific manufacturing
drawback rulings and establishes a process to modify these rulings to
comply with TFTEA-Drawback requirements by providing the ability to
annotate the ruling with the 8-digit HTSUS numbers for rulings issued
prior to February 24, 2018, if accompanied by the relevant
certification. This section differs from the corresponding section in
part 191 in that it makes TFTEA-conforming changes, such as adding the
requirement to provide the 8-digit HTSUS number, and it contains
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.9 provides information regarding agency relationships
detailing how the owner of the identified merchandise, the designated
imported merchandise, and/or the substituted merchandise used to
produce an exported article may employ another person to do part, or
all, of the manufacture or production under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b).
This section is similar to the corresponding section in part 191;
however, it updates the language by removing references to Certificates
of Delivery and includes the requirement to provide the 10-digit HTSUS
number.
Section 190.10 provides information regarding documenting and
maintaining records regarding transfers of merchandise. This section
contains significant differences specific to TFTEA-Drawback, from the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.11 provides information on the valuation of the
designated imported merchandise for drawback claims, as well as for the
application of the ``lesser of'' rules for substitution claims (i.e.,
for exported or destroyed merchandise and articles, as well as
substituted merchandise used in manufacturing). The corresponding
regulation in part 191 deals with tradeoff, which was provided for in
19 U.S.C. 1313(k) prior to the TFTEA amendments. TFTEA deleted the
provision that authorized tradeoff in 19 U.S.C. 1313(k) and replaced it
with an unrelated new provision establishing joint and several
liability for drawback claims.
Section 190.12 provides information regarding situations when a
claimant files under an incorrect provision and this section states
that the claim may be deemed filed pursuant to any other provision if
it is determined that drawback is allowable under that provision but
not under the provision as originally filed. With the exception of
cross-references, this section is generally unchanged from the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.13 states that drawback is available under 19 U.S.C.
1313(q) on imported packaging material when used to package or
repackage merchandise or articles exported or destroyed pursuant to
certain other provisions. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical changes.
Section 190.14 provides for identification of merchandise or
articles through accounting methods in situations not involving
substitution, which remain the same as in part 191 and are based on a
standard of fungibility. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 regarding the five-year time period and generally
due to minor clarifying edits as well as grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.15 provides general information regarding recordkeeping
requirements. With the exception of the recordkeeping time period, this
section is unchanged from the corresponding section in part 191.
Subpart B Contains Requirements Specific to Manufacturing Drawback
Claims
Section 190.21 provides the general rule regarding direct
identification manufacturing drawback claims. This section differs from
the corresponding regulation in part 191 in that it incorporates
changes such as the amount of drawback provided for and the limitation
of drawback of duties regarding flour or by-products of imported wheat.
Section 190.22 provides the general rule regarding substitution
manufacturing drawback claims. This section differs from the
corresponding regulation in part 191 in that it incorporates changes to
19 U.S.C. 1313(b) brought about in Section 906 of TFTEA such as the 8-
digit HTSUS substitution standard and provides for the ``lesser of''
rule as it applies to TFTEA-Drawback and also contains grammatical and
nomenclature changes. This section also includes language regarding the
preclusion of claiming Federal excise taxes discussed in detail in the
section titled Federal Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims.
Section 190.23 details the methods and requirements for claiming
drawback specific to manufacturing claims. This section differs
significantly from the corresponding section in part 191 in that it is
titled differently, it provides for a different methodology for
claiming drawback (relative value) and it is slightly reordered.
Section 190.24 directs parties involved in drawback-related
transactions to Sec. 190.10, the general section dealing with
transfers of merchandise. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 by referencing the appropriate section in the
proposed part dealing with transfers of merchandise.
Section 190.25 directs parties involved in the destruction of
merchandise for drawback-related transactions to Sec. 190.71, which
contains the procedures for destroying merchandise under CBP
supervision. This section is nearly identical to the corresponding
section in part 191.
Section 190.26 provides information regarding recordkeeping
requirements generally and specifically requires documents enabling CBP
to trace the articles manufactured or produced from importation,
through any transfers, to exportation or destruction. This section is
substantially similar to the corresponding section in part 191 but it
differs due to certain grammatical and nomenclature changes and it
contains TFTEA-based modifications such as requiring the 8-digit HTSUS
number rather than referencing same kind and quality.
Section 190.27 provides general information on the time limitations
regarding manufacturing drawback. This
[[Page 37904]]
section is substantially similar to the corresponding section in part
191 but it differs in that it contains certain grammatical and
nomenclature changes and TFTEA-based modifications such as changing the
time period to 5 years after importation, from the 3-year time period
after date of receipt by the manufacturer or producer at the factory in
Sec. 191.27.
Section 190.28 details the parties entitled to file a claim in
situations involving manufacturing drawback. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 due only to a few grammatical
changes.
Section 190.29 requires a claimant filing a manufacturing drawback
claim to make certifications regarding the availability of the
applicable bill of materials or formula including the HTSUS subheading
number(s) and the quantities of merchandise. This regulation is new and
does not have a corresponding regulation in part 191; however, the type
of documentation covered by this certification has generally been
required by CBP as part of a manufacturing drawback claim.
Subpart C Provides Specific Requirements Dealing With Unused
Merchandise Drawback
Section 190.31 provides the general rule regarding direct
identification unused merchandise drawback claims. This section differs
from the corresponding regulation in part 191 in that it incorporates
TFTEA-based changes to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) such as the 5-year period
for filing a claim and it contains grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.32 provides the general rule regarding substitution
unused merchandise drawback claims. This section differs from the
corresponding regulation in part 191 in that it incorporates TFTEA-
based changes to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) such as the 5-year period for
filing a claim and HTSUS-based substitution determinations, provides
for the ``lesser of'' rule regarding allowable refunds, and contains
grammatical and nomenclature changes. This section also explains the
special substitution rule for wine, which is not provided for in the
corresponding section of part 191, and includes language regarding the
preclusion of claiming Federal excise taxes discussed in detail in the
section titled Federal Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims. As
discussed further below in the section titled Amendments Regarding
Federal Excise Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims, this preclusion is
also proposed as an amendment to Sec. 191.32.
Section 190.33 details the parties entitled to claim in situations
regarding unused merchandise drawback. This section differs from the
corresponding regulation in part 191 in that it incorporates TFTEA-
based changes such as referencing records kept in the normal course of
business; it does not reference terms such as commercially
interchangeable and certificate of delivery, which were eliminated for
TFTEA-Drawback; and it contains grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.34 directs parties involved in drawback-related
transactions to Sec. 190.10, the general section dealing with
transfers of merchandise. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 in that it merely directs to the general section
dealing with transfers of merchandise rather than detailing specifics.
Section 190.35 contains specific instructions regarding the
required notice of intent to export, destroy, or return merchandise,
and the process regarding CBP's determination to examine merchandise.
The process described in this section replicates the process as laid
out in the corresponding section in part 191, with only grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.36 contains information regarding obtaining a one-time
waiver of the requirement to provide notice of intent to export. The
process described in this section replicates the process as laid out in
the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.37 directs parties involved in the destruction of
merchandise for drawback claims to Sec. 190.71, which contains the
procedures for destroying merchandise under CBP supervision. The
process described in this section replicates the process as laid out in
the corresponding section in part 191 and contains only one
nomenclature change.
Section 190.38 provides information regarding recordkeeping
requirements generally and specifically requires documents enabling CBP
to trace the merchandise from importation, through any transfers, to
exportation or destruction. This section is substantially similar to
the process as laid out in the corresponding section in part 191 and
contains grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Subpart D Provides Specific Requirements Regarding Rejected Merchandise
Drawback Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)
Section 190.41 provides for drawback claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)
regarding rejected merchandise involving goods that do not conform to
sample or specifications, were shipped without consent of the
consignee, or determined to be defective at the time of importation.
This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 in that
it contains nomenclature changes and includes additional language
regarding goods sold at retail and returned, removes certain language
regarding satisfactory evidence and includes language regarding the
amount of drawback allowable.
Section 190.42 sets forth the general procedures for filing,
documenting, and certifying claims under rejected merchandise drawback.
This regulation differs from the corresponding regulation in part 191
in that it includes the expanded time frame of 5 years from the date of
importation for filing claims and directs claimants to Sec. 190.71 for
procedures regarding the destruction of merchandise under CBP
supervision. This regulation also differs from the current
corresponding regulation in part 191 (at Sec. 191.42(a)), which
requires that the merchandise be in CBP custody prior to exportation or
destruction. This was rendered obsolete by the Miscellaneous Trade and
Technical Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-429), which removed the
requirement that the merchandise be in CBP custody prior to exportation
or destruction. Accordingly, it is proposed to update Sec. 191.42(a)
as well.
Section 190.43 informs claimants of the possibility of filing a
direct identification unused merchandise claim under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1) in lieu of a rejected merchandise claim, to the extent that
the merchandise qualifies. This section replicates the corresponding
section in part 191; however, the section title, unused merchandise
drawback claim, differs from the corresponding section title in part
191, which is unused merchandise claim.
Section 190.44 is reserved. The corresponding regulation in part
191 directs claimants to Sec. 191.71 for the procedures for destroying
merchandise under CBP supervision. This section is unnecessary as a
stand-alone regulation because the citation to Sec. 190.71, dealing
with destruction under CBP supervision, is included in Sec. 190.42, as
discussed above.
Section 190.45 is a new regulation regarding the special rule for
substitution for returned retail merchandise, a subset of rejected
merchandise provided for in 19 U.S.C. 1313(c). This section includes
requirements that have been in effect since 2004, when the
Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
[[Page 37905]]
2004 (Pub. L. 108-429), amended 19 U.S.C. 1313(c) regarding drawback on
returned items sold at the retail level. Specifically, this regulation
provides for a special rule going beyond mere HTSUS interchangeability
for substitution involving returned retail merchandise by requiring the
specific product identifier to be the same for both the returned retail
merchandise and the substituted exported or destroyed merchandise
(e.g., SKU or part number). Therefore, it is proposed to add a new
Sec. 191.45 as well.
Subpart E Deals With the Completion of Drawback Claims
Section 190.51 provides information regarding what constitutes a
complete drawback claim and delineates those supporting documents that
must be uploaded to complete a claim. This proposed section explains
the requirement that the successful electronic transmission of drawback
claims in the CBP-authorized EDI system includes upload of supporting
documentation. This section, at 190.51(a)(4), includes the prohibition
against designating imported merchandise from a line item on an entry
summary as part of a TFTEA-Drawback substitution claim under part 190
if any other merchandise covered on that entry summary has been
designated as the basis of a claim under part 191 (and the
corresponding regulation in part 191 is similarly amended at
191.51(a)(3)). This section also provides information regarding the
official date of filing, calculation of refunds relative to drawback-
eligible duties, taxes, and fees, as well as information regarding the
reporting of the HTSUS classifications and Department of Commerce
Schedule B commodity numbers applicable to imported, substituted,
exported, and destroyed merchandise and articles. This section also
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to corrections
of clerical errors in (b)(2)(i) regarding the mathematical calculations
included in the example.
Section 190.52 concerns rejecting, perfecting, or amending drawback
claims, including the applicable timeframes and limitations. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 in that it
includes the TFTEA-based 5-year deadline and includes certain
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.53 details CBP's authority to require claimants to
restructure claims if necessary to foster administrative efficiency.
This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due
only to nomenclature changes.
Subpart F Deals With the Verification of Drawback Claims
Section 190.61 provides information regarding the verification of
drawback claims, including how verification is done and its impact on
liquidation. This section differs from the corresponding section in
part 191 slightly due to simplification of the language related to the
electronic environment for TFTEA-Drawback claims and grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.62 provides information regarding criminal and civil
penalties related to drawback claims. This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.63 is a new regulation detailing the joint and several
liability of the importer of the merchandise designated as the basis of
a drawback claim and the party claiming drawback.
Subpart G Deals With the Exportation and Destruction of Articles
Involved in Drawback Claims
Section 190.71 provides procedures and requirements regarding
obtaining drawback on articles destroyed under CBP supervision. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.72 provides requirements regarding proof of export in
drawback claims. This section differs from the corresponding section in
part 191 in that it lists the required summary data for establishing
exportation and references certain supporting documents to prove
export.
Section 190.73 states that records kept through an electronic
export system of the United States Government may be considered as
actual proof of exportation only if CBP has officially approved the use
of that electronic export system as proof of compliance. The
corresponding regulation in part 191 provided information regarding
export summary procedures.
Section 190.74 provides information regarding exportation by mail
and how to claim drawback. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.75 provides information regarding exportation by the
U.S. Government and how to claim drawback. This section differs
slightly from the corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
changes and it does not contain the reference to section 191.73, which
in part 191 provided detailed information on export summary procedures
(the relevant data elements from the export summary are now
incorporated into the drawback entry summary, as provided for in 19 CFR
190.51(a)).
Section 190.76 is reserved as corresponding section 191.76 provides
information regarding landing certificates, which are now obsolete.
Subpart H Deals With the Liquidation and Protest of Drawback Entries
Section 190.81 provides information regarding the liquidation of
drawback claims. The Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act
of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-429), amended 19 U.S.C. 1504 to expressly impose
limitations on the liquidation of drawback entries. Pursuant to this
2004 amendment, unless a claim for drawback is extended or suspended,
an entry or claim for drawback not liquidated within 1 year from the
date of entry or claim will be deemed liquidated at the drawback amount
asserted at the time of entry or claim. Accordingly, this document in
Sec. 190.81 and in Sec. 191.81 proposes to clarify this 2004
modification regarding drawback claims and deemed liquidations.
Section 190.82 specifies who is entitled to claim drawback. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due only to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.83 specifies who is entitled to receive drawback
payments. This section replicates the corresponding section in part
191.
Section 190.84 provides information regarding protest procedures
involving drawback claims. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due only to a grammatical change.
Subpart I Deals With Applications for Privileges Involving Drawback
Section 190.91 provides procedures regarding applying for and
obtaining the privilege of waiver of prior notice of intent to export.
This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 in that
it references the need to meet the standard for substitution rather
than using the term commercially interchangeable, it discusses
grandfathering in existing privilege holders relative to TFTEA-based
changes, and it contains grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.92 provides procedures regarding applying for and
obtaining the privilege of accelerated payment in which payment of
drawback claims may be obtained prior to liquidation. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
[[Page 37906]]
Section 190.93 provides for the combined privileges of waiver of
prior notice and accelerated payment and states that applications may
be for one privilege, both privileges separately, or both privileges in
a combined application. This section replicates the corresponding
section in part 191.
Subpart J Deals With Internal Revenue Taxes on Flavoring Extracts and
Medicinal or Toilet Preparations.
In addition to the proposed regulations described immediately below
in subpart J (Sec. Sec. 190.101--190.106), the Department of the
Treasury and CBP are also considering transferring the administration
of drawback refunds provided for in subpart J from CBP to the Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB). This part of the law solely
involves drawback for the export of domestic products, and such a
transfer would place with the agency with responsibility for taxation
of domestic products. It would also enable exporters of flavoring
extracts and medicinal or toilet preparations to claim the full amount
of drawback available at a single agency. CBP and TTB would greatly
appreciate comments on this proposal.
Section 190.101 states that 19 U.S.C. 1313(d) provides for drawback
for the refund of internal revenue tax upon the exportation of
flavoring extracts and medicinal or toilet preparations (including
perfumery) manufactured or produced in the United States in part from
the domestic tax-paid alcohol. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical changes.
Section 190.102 provides that provisions relating to direct
identification drawback (contained in subpart B of this part) will
apply to claims for drawback filed upon the exportation of flavoring
extracts and medicinal or toilet preparations (including perfumery)
manufactured or produced in the United States in part from the domestic
tax-paid alcohol. This section differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature changes and in
paragraph (e), which states that the time period for completing claims
is three years from the date of export.
Section 190.103 details additional requirements in situations where
a declaration of the manufacturer showing whether a claim has been or
will be filed by the manufacturer with the regional Director, National
Review Center, TTB, is necessary. TTB was previously referred to as the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. This regulation has been
updated throughout for accuracy, including updating the statutory
citations to 26 U.S.C. 5111-5114, dealing with the Internal Revenue
Code. This section also differs from the current corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature changes. For the same
reasons detailed here, it is proposed to update Sec. 191.103 as well.
Section 190.104 provides information regarding required
certificates involving drawback and TTB. This regulation has been
updated for accuracy because, among other things, the relevant TTB Form
(5100.4), was updated in November of 2015. This section also differs
from the current corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes. It is proposed to update that section, Sec.
191.104, as well.
Section 190.105 provides that the drawback office must ascertain
the final amount of drawback due by reference to the specific
manufacturing ruling under which drawback was claimed. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191, which requires that
the final amount be made in reference to the certificate of manufacture
and delivery, which is no longer required in TFTEA-Drawback.
Section 190.106 provides for the limitation of drawback available
in situations in which the declaration required by Sec. 190.103 of
this subpart shows that a claim has been or will be filed and it states
that drawback may not be granted absent receipt from TTB of a copy of
TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol). This section also
differs from the current corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes regarding TTB. It is proposed to
update that section, Sec. 191.106, as well.
Subpart K Deals With Supplies for Certain Vessels and Aircraft
Section 190.111 states that 19 U.S.C. 1309 provides for drawback on
articles laden as supplies on certain vessels or aircraft of the United
States or as supplies including equipment upon, or used in the
maintenance or repair of, certain foreign vessels or aircraft. This
section replicates the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.112 provides procedures regarding obtaining drawback in
situations involving supplies for certain vessels and aircraft and
states that the provisions of this subpart will override other
conflicting provisions of this part. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to TFTEA-based changes, such as
the 5-year time period for filing claims, and due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Subpart L Deals With Meats Cured With Imported Salt
Section 190.121 states that 19 U.S.C. 1313(f) provides for drawback
allowance on meats cured with imported salt. This section replicates
the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.122 provides procedures regarding obtaining drawback in
situations involving meats cured with imported salt. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 in that the
organizational structure was changed because paragraph (b), regarding
modifying a paper form, was removed, and grammatical changes have been
made.
Section 190.123 provides that drawback will be refunded in
aggregate amounts of not less than $100 and will not be subject to the
retention of 1 percent of duties paid for claims involving meats cured
with imported salt. This section differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical changes.
Subpart M Deals With Materials for Construction and Equipment for
Vessels and Aircraft for Foreign Ownership and Account
Section 190.131 states that 19 U.S.C. 1313(g) provides for drawback
on materials for construction and equipment for vessels and aircraft
for foreign ownership and account. This section replicates the
corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.132 states that other provisions of this part relating
to direct identification manufacturing drawback will apply to claims
for drawback filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(g) and this subpart insofar as
applicable to and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.133 provides an explanation of terms specific to this
subpart dealing with drawback on materials for construction and
equipment for vessels and aircraft for foreign ownership and account.
This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Subpart N Deals With Foreign-Built Jet Aircraft Engines Processed in
the United States
Section 190.141 states that 19 U.S.C. 1313(h) provides for drawback
on the exportation of jet aircraft engines manufactured or produced
abroad that have been overhauled, repaired, rebuilt,
[[Page 37907]]
or reconditioned in the United States with the use of imported
merchandise, including parts. This section replicates the corresponding
section in part 191.
Section 190.142 states that other provisions of this part relating
to direct identification manufacturing drawback will apply to claims
for drawback filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(h) and this subpart insofar as
applicable to and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
a grammatical change.
Section 190.143 provides specifics relating to the filing of entry
and the contents of the entry regarding claims filed under this
subpart. This section differs from the corresponding section in part
191 by removing the reference to CBP Form 7551 (as this data will be
submitted through ACE) and due to grammatical changes.
Section 190.144 states that drawback under this subpart will be
refunded in aggregate amounts of not less than $100 and will not be
subject to the deduction of 1 percent of duties paid. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
changes.
Subpart O Deals With Merchandise Exported From Continuous CBP Custody
Section 190.151 states that 19 U.S.C. 1557(a) provides for drawback
on merchandise upon which duties have been paid and which has remained
continuously in bonded warehouse or otherwise in CBP custody for a
specified period of time, when exported to certain locations. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.152 provides specified exceptions for when drawback
will be allowed on merchandise released from CBP custody. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.153 provides information regarding when merchandise is
considered in continuous CBP custody in certain scenarios. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.154 provides information regarding filing a direct
export entry or entry for merchandise transported to another port for
exportation. This section differs from the corresponding section in
part 191 by not requiring the filing of CBP Form 7551 (as the data will
be transmitted through ACE) and due to grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.155 states that the regulations in 19 CFR part 18 will
be followed to the extent possible when merchandise is withdrawn from a
warehouse for exportation. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to grammatical changes.
Section 190.156 provides information regarding the filing of a bill
of lading and applicable timeframes. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.157 is reserved as the corresponding section in part
191 directed readers to section 191.76 regarding landing certificates,
which are now obsolete.
Section 190.158 provides for procedures of liquidation for a
complete drawback claim in accordance with Sec. 190.81. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical
changes.
Section 190.159 states that drawback due under this subpart will
not be subject to the deduction of 1 percent of duties paid. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical changes.
Subpart P Deals With Distilled Spirits, Wines, or Beer Which are
Unmerchantable or do not Conform to Sample or Specifications
Section 190.161 provides for the refund, remission, abatement or
credit regarding imported distilled spirits, wines, or beer found after
entry to be unmerchantable or not to conform to sample or
specifications and which are returned to CBP custody. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to nomenclature
changes.
Section 190.162 states that export procedures as provided for at
Sec. 190.42 apply, except that the claimant must be the importer. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical changes.
Section 190.163 provides for the required documentation in claims
setting forth in detail the facts which cause the merchandise to be
unmerchantable and any additional evidence that the drawback office
requires to establish that the merchandise is unmerchantable. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.164 states that there is no time limit for the return
to CBP custody for merchandise covered under this subpart. This section
differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due only to
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.165 states that exportations by mail are not permitted
for merchandise covered in this subpart. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical changes.
Section 190.166 provides information regarding the destruction of
merchandise under this subpart. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.167 states that no deduction of 1 percent of the
internal revenue taxes paid or determined will be made in allowing
entries under 26 U.S.C. 5062(c), as amended. This section differs from
the corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical changes.
Section 190.168 is reserved because the 90-day time limit for
exportation or destruction from the date of notification of acceptance
of the drawback entry it is contrary to the statutory requirement that
a claim be filed after exportation or destruction. Accordingly, this
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191.
Subpart Q Deals With the Substitution of Finished Petroleum Derivatives
Section 190.171 states that 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) provides for drawback
on the basis of qualified articles including petroleum derivatives
imported or manufactured or produced in the United States (and
qualified under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)). TFTEA permits MPF refunds
for all claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p), therefore there is no
limitation on MPF refunds as there was in paragraph (c) in part 191.
Additionally, there is a new paragraph (c) that explains the
calculation of drawback for claims on petroleum derivatives. This
paragraph requires per unit averaging for refunds, but clarifies that
the refunds are not subject to the ``lesser of'' rule. Finally, this
paragraph includes the preclusion of claiming Federal excise taxes
discussed in detail in the section titled Federal Excise Tax and
Substitution Drawback Claims.
Section 190.172 provides relevant definitions for purposes of this
subpart. This section replicates the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.173 provides specific requirements for drawback when
the basis is 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) with no manufacture. This section
replicates the corresponding section in part 191.
Section 190.174 provides specific requirements for drawback when
the basis is 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) with a manufacture under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b). This section replicates the corresponding section in
part 191.
Section 190.175 provides specific requirements regarding the
identity of drawback claimants and maintenance of
[[Page 37908]]
records under this subpart. This section differs from the corresponding
section in part 191 due to TFTEA-based changes removing requirements
related to certificates of delivery and certificates of manufacture and
delivery.
Section 190.176 states that the general procedures for filing
claims are applicable to claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) unless
otherwise specified in this section. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to the timeframe for
recordkeeping being changed to 3 years from the date of liquidation
(rather than from the date of payment) and due to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Subpart R Deals With Merchandise Transferred to a Foreign Trade Zone
From Customs Territory
Section 190.181 states that drawback is provided under 19 U.S.C.
81c for merchandise transferred to a foreign trade zone for the sole
purpose of exportation, storage, or destruction, with certain
exceptions. This section replicates the corresponding section in part
191.
Section 190.182 states that merchandise in a foreign trade zone for
purposes specified in Sec. 190.181 will be given status as zone-
restricted merchandise on proper application as provided for in 19 CFR
146.44. This section differs from the corresponding section in part 191
due only to grammatical changes.
Section 190.183 provides filing procedures for certain articles
manufactured or produced in the United States, including transfers to a
foreign trade zone. This section differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature changes, and due to
changes related to the electronic filing provisions of section 906 of
TFTEA.
Section 190.184 states that the procedure described in subpart O of
this part will be followed, as applicable, for drawback on merchandise
transferred to a foreign trade zone from continuous CBP custody and
provides information on the drawback entry, required certifications,
modifications, and endorsement. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature
changes, and due to changes related to the electronic filing
environment of TFTEA-Drawback.
Section 190.185 states that the procedure described in subparts C
and D of this part will be followed, as applicable, for drawback on
merchandise under this subpart and provides information on the drawback
entry, required certifications, modifications, and endorsement. This
section differs from the corresponding section in part 191 due to
grammatical and nomenclature changes, and to the electronic filing
environment provisions of section 906 of TFTEA.
Section 190.186 provides information regarding which person may be
considered the transferor and states that drawback may be claimed by,
and paid to, the transferor. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical changes.
Subpart S Deals With the Drawback Compliance Program
Section 190.191 provides general information regarding the CBP
drawback compliance program. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to nomenclature changes.
Section 190.192 provides information regarding obtaining
certification for the compliance program. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.193 provides the application procedure for the
compliance program. This section differs from the corresponding section
in part 191 due only to grammatical and nomenclature changes.
Section 190.194 describes the actions taken on the application to
participate in the compliance program. This section differs from the
corresponding section in part 191 due only to grammatical and
nomenclature changes.
Section 190.195 relates to combined applications for certification
in the drawback compliance program and privileges regarding the waiver
of prior notice and/or accelerated payment of drawback. This section
replicates the corresponding section in Part 191.
Appendices A and B Deal With Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Appendix A to Part 190 sets forth the general manufacturing
drawback rulings, accompanied by instructions for how to submit a
letter of notification to operate thereunder. This appendix differs
from Appendix A to part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature changes
as well as changes to conform to TFTEA-Drawback requirements.
Appendix B to Part 190 provides the sample formats for applications
for specific manufacturing drawback rulings. This appendix differs from
Appendix B to part 191 due to grammatical and nomenclature changes as
well as changes to conform to TFTEA-Drawback requirements.
B. Other Conforming Amendments
NAFTA drawback, which is separately provided for in subpart E of
part 181 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR part 181), provides for special
provisions in situations where goods were imported into the United
States and then subsequently exported to either Canada or Mexico. While
TFTEA left NAFTA drawback unchanged, minor conforming edits to part 181
are necessary to correct certain errors or to allow for interaction
with both the proposed part 190 and existing part 191 during the
transition period. For example, 19 CFR 181.50(a) includes an inaccurate
reference to subpart G of part 191, stating that it is for liquidation
procedures. However, it is subpart H of part 191 that deals with
liquidation (and protest) procedures while subpart G of part 191 deals
with exportation and destruction. Accordingly, it is proposed to amend
Sec. 181.50(a) to update the reference so it accurately cites to
subpart H of part 191 and to include an accompanying reference to
subpart H of part 190. Further, Sec. 181.50(c) includes a specific
reference to Sec. 191.92 addressing accelerated payment. Accordingly,
it is proposed to amend this regulation to also include a reference to
the corresponding section of the proposed new part 190, i.e., Sec.
190.92. CBP is amending sections 181.45, 181.46, 181.47, 181.49, and
181.50 to conform with proposed part 190 and existing part 191.
As stated above, the existing regulations in part 191 are mostly
unchanged with this rulemaking. However, it is proposed to amend the
scope section of part 191, Sec. 191.0, to make reference to the
drawback provisions in proposed part 190 and to note that claims cannot
be filed under part 191 on or after February 24, 2019. Additionally, as
noted above in the section detailing the differences between the
sections in part 190 and the corresponding sections in part 191, some
sections in part 191 are outdated for reasons other than TFTEA, such as
those affected by the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act
of 2004. Therefore, as noted above in the section detailing the
proposed changes to part 190, where changes were required due to non-
TFTEA reasons, it is proposed to amend Sec. Sec. 191.0, 191.1, 191.3,
191.5, 191.42, 191.51, 191.81, 191.103, 191.104, and 191.106 and new
Sec. 191.45 to address returned retail merchandise.
Finally, it is important to note that it is CBP's intention to
remove part 191 at a future date, but not until after the completion of
the transition period. The
[[Page 37909]]
part 191 regulations will continue to be applicable for claims filed
under that part before February 24, 2019, but will become increasingly
less relevant over time; CBP will assess at what point in time removal
will be most appropriate to lessen burdens or confusion. This removal
will be announced in the Federal Register.
C. Amendments Regarding Federal Excise Tax and Substitution Claims
For the reasons outlined above in the section titled Federal Excise
Tax and Substitution Drawback Claims, this document proposes to amend:
Sec. 191.22 by adding a new last sentence to paragraph (a); Sec.
191.32 by adding a new paragraph (b)(4); and, Sec. 191.171 by adding a
new paragraph (d). These amendments preclude drawback of internal
revenue tax imposed under the IRC in connection with a substitution
drawback claim if no excise tax was paid on the substituted exported
merchandise or if that merchandise was subject to a claim for refund or
drawback of tax under any provision of the IRC. In addition, this
document proposes to amend Sec. 113.62, which sets forth basic
importation and entry bond conditions, to add a new condition under
which the principal agrees not to file, or transfer the right to file,
a substitution drawback claim that would be inconsistent with the terms
of new Sec. 191.32(b)(4). The consequences of default specified in
newly re-designated paragraph (n) of Sec. 113.62 would apply in the
case of a breach of this bond condition.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ The amendment referenced here to Sec. 113.62 of this
chapter is in addition to the previously discussed proposed
amendment to Sec. 113.62, proposing to add a new paragraph (a)(4)
regarding the joint and several liability provisions of the
importer's bond.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These changes are intended to preclude the filing of substitution
drawback claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), and 19
U.S.C. 1313(p) in circumstances in which internal revenue taxes have
not been paid on the substituted domestic product, or where that
merchandise is subject to a different claim for refund or drawback of
IRC taxes. The proposed amendments still allow for the return of 99
percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the imported merchandise
upon export, or when IRC taxes have been paid on substituted domestic
product and the substituted merchandise is not the subject of a
separate claim for refund or drawback of such taxes.
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
and Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This rule is an ``economically significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this proposed rule
has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB''). CBP
and Treasury have prepared an economic analysis of the potential
impacts of this rule for public awareness. The analysis can be found in
the public docket for this rulemaking at www.regulations.gov.
B. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs)
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs, and provides that ``for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a budgeting process.'' \26\ These
requirements only apply to rules designated as ``significant regulatory
actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. OMB's
implementation guidance explains that ``Federal spending regulatory
actions that cause only income transfers between taxpayers and program
beneficiaries . . . . are considered `transfer rules' and are not
covered by E.O. [Executive Order] 13771 . . . However . . . such
regulatory actions may impose requirements apart from transfers . . .
In those cases, the actions would need to be offset to the extent they
impose more than de minimis costs.'' \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See 82 FR 9339 (February 3, 2017).
\27\ See OMB's memorandum titled, ``Guidance Implementing
Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule is a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and is hence subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 13771. Most of the regulatory amendments proposed in
this rule are the result of the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-125), which amended 19 U.S.C. 1313,
the statute guiding CBP drawback regulations, and required CBP to
promulgate regulations implementing these changes by February 24, 2018.
This rule includes both a regulatory action and a deregulatory action
that implement TFTEA's requirements. Because these actions are related
to drawback, CBP chose to include both actions in this rule instead of
promulgating two separate rules. On net, this rule imposes a regulatory
burden (and is thus a regulatory action) because its regulatory impacts
exceed its deregulatory impacts. This rule's regulatory impacts (i.e.,
costs) would measure $8.3 million on an annualized basis, while its
deregulatory impacts (i.e., cost savings) would measure $1.3 million on
an annualized basis (in 2016 U.S. dollars, using a 7 percent discount
rate). Together, these impacts would introduce an annualized net
regulatory cost of $7.0 million.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of this proposed rule on small
entities per the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et. seq.)(RFA), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). A small entity may be a
small business (defined as any independently owned and operated
business not dominant in its field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small not-for-profit organization; or a
small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000
people).
Under the RFA and SBREFA, if an agency can certify (typically
through a screening analysis) that a rule will not have a ``significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,'' a detailed
assessment of the rule's impact on small entities is not required.
Otherwise, an agency must complete an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) exploring the impact of the proposed rulemaking on
small entities.
Screening Analysis
The proposed Modernized Drawback rule would fundamentally change
the drawback process and consequently affect all trade members eligible
for drawback (i.e., drawback claimants).\28\
[[Page 37910]]
These trade members can include importers, exporters, manufacturers,
producers, and intermediate parties representing a diverse array of
industries. CBP does not assess the rule's impact on customs brokers
who file claims for trade members eligible for drawback in this RFA
analysis because they would presumably charge their clients a fee for
any costs introduced with the rule (and thus not be affected
themselves).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ For more detailed information on the impacts of this rule,
see CBP and Treasury's economic analysis in the public docket for
this rulemaking at www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the Small Business Administration's (SBA) guidelines on
small entities under the RFA do not explicitly define small entity
standards for the importers, exporters, manufacturers, producers, and
intermediate parties potentially affected by the rule, CBP used data on
the industries in which these parties operate to determine the number
of small entities potentially affected by this rule. CBP began by
compiling a list of all 9,017 unique drawback claimants who filed
claims between 2007 and 2016 and matching the claimant identification
number (``claimant ID'') to the operator/owner name and address listed
in internal CBP databases. Next, CBP assigned a random number to each
of the claimants in that list and sorted the data in ascending order by
the random number assigned. Using public and proprietary databases, CBP
then pulled information like the entity type (subsidiary or parent
company), primary line of business, employee size, and revenue on the
claimants in ascending order until the agency had market data for 100
unique entities.29 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Only 13 of the entities researched (12 percent) did not
have market data available.
\30\ Out of a total population of 9,017 unique drawback
claimants who filed claims between 2007 and 2016, CBP used a sample
of 100 claimants with market data to inform this screening analysis.
This sample size resulted in a statistically significant sample
using a 95 percent confidence level with a 10 percent margin of
error.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1 shows the industries, according to their North American
Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code, in the sample of
entities affected by this rule and the SBA's small entity size
standards for these industries. For the most part, the SBA's size
standards are the average annual receipts or the average employment of
a firm.\31\ As shown, CBP finds that 69 percent (69) of the drawback
claimants sampled are considered ``small'' according to the SBA's size
standards, including one non-profit organization. CBP did not identify
any small governmental jurisdictions affected by the proposed rule in
this sample. According to these findings, CBP assumes that the proposed
rule would affect a substantial number of small entities. CBP
recognizes that this screening analysis may have excluded some less
established, potentially small entities due to market data
availability. To the extent that those excluded are small, the portion
of small entities affected by the rule would be higher than estimated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ The SBA's calculation methods for average annual receipts
and average employment of a firm can be found in 13 CFR 121.104 and
13 CFR 121.106, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of the small drawback claimants sampled and included in Table 1,
the average number of employees at these entities ranged from 1 to
1,000 and their annual revenue measured from less than $0.5 million to
$391.0 million (see Table 2 and Table 3). Table 2 compares the low
range average number of employees at the small entities sampled and the
overall average for the corresponding NAICS industry. Table 3 shows the
average annual revenue of the small entities sampled by NAICS industry
using the low range of annual revenue data available as well as the
average annual revenue for all U.S. entities in each industry.
Table 1--Summary Statistics of Small Entities Affected by Rule From the Random Sample
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percent of Number of Percent of
NAICS code NAICS description entities in entities in SBA size standard small entities small entities
sample sample in sample in sample
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
311211....................... Flour Milling................. 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
311421....................... Fruit and Vegetable Canning... 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
312140....................... Distilleries.................. 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
313210....................... Broadwoven Fabric Mills....... 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 0 0
315220....................... Men's and Boys' Cut and Sew 2 2 750 Employees............ 2 2
Apparel Manufacturing.
315240....................... Women's, Girls', and Infants' 1 1 750 Employees............ 1 1
Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing.
321911....................... Wood Window and Door 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
Manufacturing.
325180....................... Other Basic Inorganic Chemical 2 2 1,000 Employees.......... 2 2
Manufacturing.
325194....................... Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, 1 1 1,250 Employees.......... 1 1
and Gum and Wood Chemical
Manufacturing.
325199....................... All Other Basic Organic 1 1 1,250 Employees.......... 0 0
Chemical Manufacturing.
325998....................... All Other Miscellaneous 1 1 500 Employees............ 1 1
Chemical Product and
Preparation Manufacturing.
326199....................... All Other Plastics Product 1 1 750 Employees............ 1 1
Manufacturing.
331410....................... Nonferrous Metal (except 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
Aluminum) Smelting and
Refining.
331491....................... Nonferrous Metal (except 1 1 750 Employees............ 1 1
Copper and Aluminum) Rolling,
Drawing, and Extruding.
332999....................... All Other Miscellaneous 1 1 750 Employees............ 1 1
Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing.
[[Page 37911]]
334118....................... Computer Terminal and Other 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 0 0
Computer Peripheral Equipment
Manufacturing.
334310....................... Audio and Video Equipment 1 1 750 Employees............ 1 1
Manufacturing.
334513....................... Instruments and Related 1 1 750 Employees............ 0 0
Products Manufacturing for
Measuring, Displaying, and
Controlling Industrial
Process Variables.
335221....................... Household Cooking Appliance 1 1 1,500 Employees.......... 1 1
Manufacturing.
336612....................... Boat Building................. 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
336991....................... Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 0 0
Manufacturing.
337920....................... Blind and Shade Manufacturing. 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 0 0
339112....................... Surgical and Medical 2 2 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
Instrument Manufacturing.
339920....................... Sporting and Athletic Goods 1 1 750 Employees............ 0 0
Manufacturing.
339992....................... Musical Instrument 1 1 1,000 Employees.......... 1 1
Manufacturing.
339999....................... All Other Miscellaneous 1 1 500 Employees............ 1 1
Manufacturing.
423210....................... Furniture Merchant Wholesalers 1 1 100 Employees............ 1 1
423220....................... Home Furnishing Merchant 2 2 100 Employees............ 1 1
Wholesalers.
423510....................... Metal Service Centers and 2 2 200 Employees............ 2 2
Other Metal Merchant
Wholesalers.
423620....................... Household Appliances, Electric 1 1 200 Employees............ 1 1
Housewares, and Consumer
Electronics Merchant
Wholesalers.
423690....................... Other Electronic Parts and 1 1 250 Employees............ 0 0
Equipment Merchant
Wholesalers.
423910....................... Sporting and Recreational 3 3 100 Employees............ 3 3
Goods and Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers.
423920....................... Toy and Hobby Goods and 1 1 150 Employees............ 1 1
Supplies Merchant Wholesalers.
423940....................... Jewelry, Watch, Precious 3 3 100 Employees............ 3 3
Stone, and Precious Metal
Merchant Wholesalers.
423990....................... Other Miscellaneous Durable 1 1 100 Employees............ 1 1
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
424310....................... Piece Goods, Notions, and 2 2 100 Employees............ 2 2
Other Dry Goods Merchant
Wholesalers.
424330....................... Women's, Children's, and 1 1 100 Employees............ 0 0
Infants' Clothing and
Accessories Merchant
Wholesalers.
424340....................... Footwear Merchant Wholesalers. 3 3 200 Employees............ 2 2
424490....................... Other Grocery and Related 1 1 250 Employees............ 1 1
Products Merchant Wholesalers.
424610....................... Plastics Materials and Basic 2 2 150 Employees............ 2 2
Forms and Shapes Merchant
Wholesalers.
424720....................... Petroleum and Petroleum 1 1 200 Employees............ 1 1
Products Merchant Wholesalers
(except Bulk Stations and
Terminals).
424910....................... Farm Supplies Merchant 3 3 200 Employees............ 3 3
Wholesalers.
424990....................... Other Miscellaneous Nondurable 1 1 100 Employees............ 1 1
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
441120....................... Used Car Dealers.............. 1 1 $25.0 Million............ 1 1
448120....................... Women's Clothing Stores....... 2 2 $27.5 Million............ 2 2
448130....................... Children's and Infants' 1 1 $32.5 Million............ 0 0
Clothing Stores.
448190....................... Other Clothing Stores......... 2 2 $20.5 Million............ 2 2
451110....................... Sporting Goods Stores......... 1 1 $15.0 Million............ 1 1
451130....................... Sewing, Needlework, and Piece 1 1 $27.5 Million............ 1 1
Goods Stores.
452112....................... Discount Department Stores.... 1 1 $29.5 Million............ 1 1
[[Page 37912]]
453998....................... All Other Miscellaneous Store 1 1 $7.5 Million............. 1 1
Retailers (except Tobacco
Stores).
454113....................... Mail-Order Houses............. 1 1 $38.5 Million............ 0 0
483112....................... Deep Sea Passenger 1 1 1,500 Employees.......... 0 0
Transportation.
493110....................... General Warehousing and 1 1 $27.5 Million............ 1 1
Storage.
525990....................... Other Financial Vehicles...... 1 1 $32.5 Million............ 1 1
541380....................... Testing Laboratories.......... 1 1 $15.0 Million............ 0 0
541690....................... Other Scientific and Technical 1 1 $15.0 Million............ 0 0
Consulting Services.
541990....................... All Other Professional, 1 1 $15.0 Million............ 1 1
Scientific, and Technical
Services.
561499....................... All Other Business Support 2 2 $15.0 Million............ 2 2
Services.
561621....................... Security Systems Services 1 1 $20.5 Million............ 0 0
(except Locksmiths).
561990....................... All Other Support Services.... 5 5 $11.0 Million............ 5 5
624110....................... Child and Youth Services *.... 1 1 $11.0 Million............ 1 1
711510....................... Independent Artists, Writers, 1 1 $7.5 Million............. 1 1
and Performers.
811310....................... Commercial and Industrial 1 1 $7.5 Million............. 1 1
Machinery and Equipment
(except Automotive and
Electronic) Repair and
Maintenance.
811490....................... Other Personal and Household 1 1 $7.5 Million............. 1 1
Goods Repair and Maintenance.
Foreign Entity................ 13 13 N/A...................... N/A N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... .............................. 100 100 ......................... 69 69
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This sample corresponds to a non-profit organization.
Source of drawback claimants sample: Internal CBP database; gathered through email correspondence with CBP's Office of Trade on March 2, 2017.
Source of descriptive entity information: Hoover's. Online company reports. Available at https://www.hoovers.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24,
2017; Manta. Online company reports. Available at https://www.manta.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017.
Source of SBA size standard information: U.S. Small Business Administration, ``Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry
Classification System Codes.'' February 26, 2016. Available at https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf. Accessed April
17, 2017.
Table 2--Employment Statistics of Small Entities Affected by Rule From the Random Sample and Industry Averages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average number
of employees Average number
Number of at small of employees
NAICS code NAICS description small entities entities in at all U.S.
in sample sample-low entities in
range value industry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
311211........................ Flour Milling................... 1 20 66
311421........................ Fruit and Vegetable Canning..... 1 540 74
312140........................ Distilleries.................... 1 15 30
315220........................ Men's and Boys' Cut and Sew 2 40 31
Apparel Manufacturing.
315240........................ Women's, Girls', and Infants' 1 6 15
Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing.
321911........................ Wood Window and Door 1 250 46
Manufacturing.
325180........................ Other Basic Inorganic Chemical 2 502 100
Manufacturing.
325194........................ Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and 1 1,000 92
Gum and Wood Chemical
Manufacturing.
325998........................ All Other Miscellaneous Chemical 1 3 34
Product and Preparation
Manufacturing.
326199........................ All Other Plastics Product 1 2 60
Manufacturing.
331410........................ Nonferrous Metal (except 1 700 66
Aluminum) Smelting and Refining.
331491........................ Nonferrous Metal (except Copper 1 65 69
and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing,
and Extruding.
332999........................ All Other Miscellaneous 1 65 20
Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing.
334310........................ Audio and Video Equipment 1 350 19
Manufacturing.
335221........................ Household Cooking Appliance 1 67 110
Manufacturing.
336612........................ Boat Building................... 1 35 34
339112........................ Surgical and Medical Instrument 1 52 94
Manufacturing.
339992........................ Musical Instrument Manufacturing 1 625 20
339999........................ All Other Miscellaneous 1 20 10
Manufacturing.
423210........................ Furniture Merchant Wholesalers.. 1 5 12
423220........................ Home Furnishing Merchant 1 17 14
Wholesalers.
423510........................ Metal Service Centers and Other 2 3 20
Metal Merchant Wholesalers.
[[Page 37913]]
423620........................ Household Appliances, Electric 1 80 21
Housewares, and Consumer
Electronics Merchant
Wholesalers.
423910........................ Sporting and Recreational Goods 3 18 11
and Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers.
423920........................ Toy and Hobby Goods and Supplies 1 12 15
Merchant Wholesalers.
423940........................ Jewelry, Watch, Precious Stone, 3 7 7
and Precious Metal Merchant
Wholesalers.
423990........................ Other Miscellaneous Durable 1 20 10
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
424310........................ Piece Goods, Notions, and Other 2 2 9
Dry Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
424340........................ Footwear Merchant Wholesalers... 2 17 17
424490........................ Other Grocery and Related 1 11 28
Products Merchant Wholesalers.
424610........................ Plastics Materials and Basic 2 14 13
Forms and Shapes Merchant
Wholesalers.
424720........................ Petroleum and Petroleum Products 1 7 15
Merchant Wholesalers (except
Bulk Stations and Terminals).
424910........................ Farm Supplies Merchant 3 26 21
Wholesalers.
424990........................ Other Miscellaneous Nondurable 1 1 7
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
441120........................ Used Car Dealers................ 1 1 6
448120........................ Women's Clothing Stores......... 2 12 31
448190........................ Other Clothing Stores........... 2 23 14
451110........................ Sporting Goods Stores........... 1 1 14
451130........................ Sewing, Needlework, and Piece 1 7 11
Goods Stores.
452112........................ Discount Department Stores...... 1 20 15,091
453998........................ All Other Miscellaneous Store 1 5 6
Retailers (except Tobacco
Stores).
493110........................ General Warehousing and Storage. 1 20 118
525990........................ Other Financial Vehicles........ 1 2 6
541990........................ All Other Professional, 1 2 6
Scientific, and Technical
Services.
561499........................ All Other Business Support 2 29 17
Services.
561990........................ All Other Support Services...... 5 3 13
624110........................ Child and Youth Services *...... 1 20 21
711510........................ Independent Artists, Writers, 1 2 2
and Performers.
811310........................ Commercial and Industrial 1 28 10
Machinery and Equipment (except
Automotive and Electronic)
Repair and Maintenance.
811490........................ Other Personal and Household 1 18 3
Goods Repair and Maintenance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This sample corresponds to a non-profit organization.
Source of drawback claimants sample: Internal CBP database; gathered through email correspondence with CBP's
Office of Trade on March 2, 2017.
Source of small entity employment information: Hoover's. Online company reports. Available at https://www.hoovers.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017; Manta. Online company reports. Available at
https://www.manta.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017.
Source of industry employment information: U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment
Industry, ``Number of Firms, Number of Establishments, Employment, Annual Payroll, and Estimated Receipts by
Enterprise Employment Size for the United States, All Industries: 2012.'' June 22, 2015. Available at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/econ/susb/2012-susb-annual.html. Accessed May 30, 2018.
Table 3--Revenue Statistics of Small Entities Affected by Rule from the Random Sample and Industry Averages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average annual
revenue of Average annual
Number of small entities revenue of all
NAICS code NAICS description small entities in sample-low U.S. entities
in sample range value in industry
(in millions) (in millions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
311211........................ Flour Milling................... 1 $5.0 $93.7
311421........................ Fruit and Vegetable Canning..... 1 178.1 41.7
312140........................ Distilleries.................... 1 Unknown 39.6
315220........................ Men's and Boys' Cut and Sew 2 6.4 3.8
Apparel Manufacturing.
315240........................ Women's, Girls', and Infants' 1 1.1 2.8
Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing.
321911........................ Wood Window and Door 1 48.0 9.2
Manufacturing.
325180........................ Other Basic Inorganic Chemical 2 90.7 94.2
Manufacturing.
325194........................ Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and 1 391.0 161.8
Gum and Wood Chemical
Manufacturing.
325998........................ All Other Miscellaneous Chemical 1 5.0 22.2
Product and Preparation
Manufacturing.
326199........................ All Other Plastics Product 1 0.3 14.7
Manufacturing.
331410........................ Nonferrous Metal (except 1 228.9 93.2
Aluminum) Smelting and Refining.
331491........................ Nonferrous Metal (except Copper 1 17.2 30.9
and Aluminum) Rolling, Drawing,
and Extruding.
[[Page 37914]]
332999........................ All Other Miscellaneous 1 13.5 4.2
Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing.
334310........................ Audio and Video Equipment 1 29.0 6.1
Manufacturing.
335221........................ Household Cooking Appliance 1 9.4 47.2
Manufacturing.
336612........................ Boat Building................... 1 5.1 8.4
339112........................ Surgical and Medical Instrument 1 17.0 35.3
Manufacturing.
339992........................ Musical Instrument Manufacturing 1 115.1 3.2
339999........................ All Other Miscellaneous 1 4.3 2.4
Manufacturing.
423210........................ Furniture Merchant Wholesalers.. 1 1.6 7.4
423220........................ Home Furnishing Merchant 1 4.2 8.1
Wholesalers.
423510........................ Metal Service Centers and Other 2 0.8 27.8
Metal Merchant Wholesalers.
423620........................ Household Appliances, Electric 1 23.0 40.2
Housewares, and Consumer
Electronics Merchant
Wholesalers.
423910........................ Sporting and Recreational Goods 3 3.2 7.3
and Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers.
423920........................ Toy and Hobby Goods and Supplies 1 2.9 11.0
Merchant Wholesalers.
423940........................ Jewelry, Watch, Precious Stone, 3 1.2 8.3
and Precious Metal Merchant
Wholesalers.
423990........................ Other Miscellaneous Durable 1 50.0 5.1
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
424310........................ Piece Goods, Notions, and Other 2 1.4 5.0
Dry Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
424340........................ Footwear Merchant Wholesalers... 2 8.0 20.3
424490........................ Other Grocery and Related 1 14.6 28.4
Products Merchant Wholesalers.
424610........................ Plastics Materials and Basic 2 7.5 17.2
Forms and Shapes Merchant
Wholesalers.
424720........................ Petroleum and Petroleum Products 1 11.4 289.0
Merchant Wholesalers (except
Bulk Stations and Terminals).
424910........................ Farm Supplies Merchant 3 49.2 29.2
Wholesalers.
424990........................ Other Miscellaneous Nondurable 1 0.1 4.1
Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
441120........................ Used Car Dealers................ 1 0.1 3.0
448120........................ Women's Clothing Stores......... 2 1.9 3.5
448190........................ Other Clothing Stores........... 2 7.3 1.8
451110........................ Sporting Goods Stores........... 1 0.6 2.5
451130........................ Sewing, Needlework, and Piece 1 0.6 1.1
Goods Stores.
452112........................ Discount Department Stores...... 1 2.5 2,899.3
453998........................ All Other Miscellaneous Store 1 0.5 1.2
Retailers (except Tobacco
Stores).
493110........................ General Warehousing and Storage. 1 0.5 6.0
525990........................ Other Financial Vehicles........ 1 0.2 2.8
541990........................ All Other Professional, 1 0.2 1.0
Scientific, and Technical
Services.
561499........................ All Other Business Support 2 2.0 2.8
Services.
561990........................ All Other Support Services...... 5 0.2 1.9
624110........................ Child and Youth Services *...... 1 5.3 1.5
711510........................ Independent Artists, Writers, 1 0.3 0.7
and Performers.
811310........................ Commercial and Industrial 1 7.4 1.7
Machinery and Equipment (except
Automotive and Electronic)
Repair and Maintenance.
811490........................ Other Personal and Household 1 2.0 0.3
Goods Repair and Maintenance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This sample corresponds to a non-profit organization.
Source of drawback claimants sample: Internal CBP database; gathered through email correspondence with CBP's
Office of Trade on March 2, 2017.
Source of small entity revenue information: Hoover's. Online company reports. Available at https://www.hoovers.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017; Manta. Online company reports. Available at
https://www.manta.com/. Accessed April 20, 2017 and April 24, 2017.
Source of industry revenue information: U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment
Industry, ``Number of Firms, Number of Establishments, Employment, Annual Payroll, and Estimated Receipts by
Enterprise Employment Size for the United States, All Industries: 2012.'' June 22, 2015. Available at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/econ/susb/2012-susb-annual.html. Accessed May 30, 2018.
Based on the share of drawback claimants sampled, CBP assumes that
69 percent of drawback claimants affected by this rule over the 2018 to
2027 period of analysis, or 6,844 claimants, would be small entities.
These drawback claimants would incur costs related to ACE system
modifications, electronic claim submission requirements, additional
full desk reviews, and expanded recordkeeping requirements; however,
these costs would differ depending on their filing preferences and
claim review.
Each unique drawback claimant would need to either modify its
existing drawback system, acquire add-on drawback software, or hire a
customs broker to comply with this rule's new drawback regulations
outlined in 19 CFR part 190. CBP estimates that approximately 200 small
entity drawback claimants (69 percent of the estimated 290 total
claimants) would modify their ACE filing systems in 2018 to comply with
all of the new drawback regulations outlined in 19 CFR part 190.\32\
These claimants could incur an
[[Page 37915]]
estimated one-time cost of $90,000 that would translate to $9,000 per
year of the analysis.\33\ However, because of the high cost of ACE
system modifications, these small claimants are more likely to choose a
lower-cost option like purchasing add-on drawback software or hiring a
customs broker to meet this rule's requirements while lessening its
impact on their revenue. CBP projects that an additional 3,795 small
drawback claimants (69 percent of the estimated 5,500 total claimants)
would acquire add-on drawback software consistent with all of this
rule's requirements for a one-time cost of $1,500, or $150 over the 10-
year period of analysis. CBP presumes that rather than acquire and
learn the software necessary to file a drawback claim electronically
and meet the other submission requirements of this rule, an estimated
2,849 small paper-based drawback claimants (69 percent of the estimated
4,129 total claimants) would hire a customs broker to file their claim
as a result of the rule. These claimants would likely file an average
of three drawback claims per year, at an annual cost of $921 according
to the $307 customs broker filing fee.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ CBP based the estimate of drawback claimants required to
modify their ACE drawback systems consistent with this rule's
changes on the projected number of unique drawback claimants with
this rule in 2018 (9,919) minus the 4,129 trade members estimated to
file by paper under the current 19 CFR part 191 regulations in 2018
(and thus exempt from an ACE drawback system modification cost),
multiplied by the 5 percent share of claimants anticipated to modify
their ACE drawback systems consistent with this rule's changes:
(9,919 unique drawback claimants in 2018--4,129 paper-based filers
in 2018) x 5 percent anticipated to modify their ACE drawback
systems = 290 (rounded) trade members.
\33\ Such regulatory changes would include providing line-item
drawback claim data at the 10-digit HTSUS subheading level;
consistent units of measurement for claimed imports, exports, and
destructions; exported, destroyed, or substituted merchandise values
for substitution claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) and 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2); accounting methodologies used for direct identification
drawback claims (if applicable); unique identifiers linking imports
to exports or destructions on each drawback claim; per-unit averages
for substitution claims; and ``lesser of'' rule calculations for
substitution claims.
\34\ From 2018 to 2027, CBP projects under its primary
estimation method that 4,129 unique trade members would file 101,642
drawback claims electronically instead of by paper as a result of
this rule, averaging about 3 claims per unique trade member each
year over the 10-year period: 101,642 drawback claims filed
electronically instead of by paper over 10-year period/4,129 unique
trade members = 25 (rounded) claims per unique trade member over the
10-year period; 25 claims over 10-year period/10 years = 3 (rounded)
claims per unique trade member each year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All drawback claimants must also retain drawback records for an
extended period of time with this rule. CBP finds that all 6,844 small
drawback claimants would sustain $59.99 in expenses between 2021 and
2027, or approximately $4 each year over the 10-year period of
analysis, to electronically store drawback claim documentation.\35\ In
addition to these requirements, some drawback claimants may be subject
to this rule's additional full desk reviews. CBP estimates that this
rule would affect an estimated 355 small drawback claimants (69 percent
of the estimated 515 total claimants) over the 10-year period of
analysis, introducing an average cost of $18 per year to these
claimants. CBP assumes that these 355 claimants would each complete one
full desk review over the 10-year period, at a cost of $181 per review
(or $18 over 10 years). Besides these monetized costs, this rule would
introduce non-monetized, non-quantified costs to trade members,
including the possibility of decreased use of the United States as a
home base for a distribution facility when coupled with other
considerations, less third-party drawback, and less time to file
drawback claims as compared to the current process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ $59.99 electronic recordkeeping cost per year x 7-year
period of recordkeeping = $419 (rounded) total electronic
recordkeeping cost over 7-year period; $419 storage cost over 7-year
period of recordkeeping/10-year period of analysis = $42 (rounded)
electronic recordkeeping cost per year of the 10-year period of
analysis; $42 (rounded) storage cost per year x 10 percent of unique
claimants incurring electronic recordkeeping cost per year = $4
(rounded) electronic recordkeeping cost per unique trade member each
year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4 outlines the rule's different costs to small entities,
while Table 5 shows this rule's potential range of costs to small
entities. As shown, small entities could incur undiscounted annual
costs from this rule as low as $154 if a small claimant only incurs an
added recordkeeping cost and add-on drawback software cost and up to
$9,022 if a small claimant experiences the rule's high ACE drawback
system modification cost, full desk review cost (once over the 10-year
analysis), and added recordkeeping cost. About 97 percent of small
drawback claimants would likely sustain a cost of $943 (Cost C + Cost D
+ Cost E in Table 5) or less per year from this rule, while the
remaining 3 percent could incur higher annual cost measuring up to
$9,022.
Table 4--Cost of Rule to Small Entities
[Undiscounted 2016 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Share of small Annual cost
Cost category small entities entities per claimant
affected affected (undiscounted)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................ ACE Drawback System Modification..... 200 3 9,000
B........................ Add-On Drawback Software............. 3,795 55 150
C........................ Customs Broker Claim Filing.......... 2,849 42 921
D........................ Added Recordkeeping.................. 6,844 100 4
E........................ Full Desk Review..................... 355 5 18
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
Table 5--Range of Annual Costs of Rule to Small Entities
[Undiscounted 2016 U.S. dollars]
Cost per claimant by category
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACE drawback
system Add-on Customs broker Added Full desk
Cost range modification drawback claim filing recordkeeping review [E] Total
[A] software [B] [C] [D]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low..................................................... .............. $150 .............. $4 .............. $154
Medium.................................................. .............. .............. 921 4 18 943
[[Page 37916]]
High.................................................... 9,000 .............. .............. 4 18 9,022
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
CBP compares the rule's low ($154), medium ($943), and high
($9,022) range of monetized costs per year to the annual revenue of the
small drawback claimants sampled. At the low range, this rule's $154
monetized cost would represent less than 1 percent of annual revenue
for 100 percent (68) of the small entities sampled with revenue data
available,\36\ as shown in Table 6. At the medium range, this rule's
$943 monetized cost would represent less than 1 percent of annual
revenue for 97 percent (66) of the small entities sampled with revenue
data available. This rule's $943 monetized cost would represent between
1 percent and 3 percent of annual revenue for the remaining 3 percent
(2) of the small entities, as Table 7 illustrates. Finally, at the high
range, this rule's $9,022 monetized cost would represent less than 1
percent of the annual revenue for 66 percent (45) of the small entities
sampled with revenue data available (see Table 8). The share of this
rule's $9,022 monetized cost on annual revenue would measure between: 1
percent and 3 percent for about 16 percent (11) of the remaining small
entities, 3 percent and 5 percent for 4 percent (3) of the small
entities sampled, 5 percent and 10 percent for 10 percent (7) percent
of small entities sampled, and 10 percent or more for 3 percent (2) of
the small entities sampled (see Table 8). Note that because of the high
cost of ACE system modifications included in the high range cost
estimate, only a nominal number of small claimants would likely incur
this rule's high annual cost of $9,022. Instead, most claimants would
probably choose lower-cost options like purchasing add-on drawback
software or hiring a customs broker to meet this rule's requirements
that would have minimal impacts on their annual revenue, as assumed
under the low- and medium-cost scenarios shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ One of the small entities sampled did not have revenue data
available, so CBP excluded this entity from the revenue impact
calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under all three ranges, the share of this rule's costs on the
annual revenue of small entities is less than 1 percent for the vast
majority of entities sampled. Small entities would experience an impact
of 3 percent or more only under the high cost range of $9,022. Assuming
that the share of this rule's total annualized cost to small entities
is equal to the estimated share of drawback claimants affected by this
rule over the 2018 to 2027 period of analysis (69 percent), the total
annualized cost of this rule to all small entities would equal $5.0
million under the primary estimation method.
Table 6--Cost Impacts as a Share of Revenue for Small Entities Affected
by Rule From the Random Sample--Assuming Annual Cost of $154 per Unique
Drawback Claimant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percent of
Cost as a share of revenue range small entities small entities
affected affected
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0% <= Impact < 1%....................... 68 100%
1% <= Impact < 3%....................... 0 0
3% <= Impact < 5%....................... 0 0
5% <= Impact < 10%...................... 0 0
10% or More............................. 0 0
-------------------------------
Total............................... 68 100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
Table 7--Cost Impacts as a Share of Revenue for Small Entities Affected
by Rule From the Random Sample- Assuming Annualized Cost of $943 per
Unique Drawback Claimant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percent of
Cost as a share of revenue range small entities small entities
affected affected
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0% <= Impact < 1%....................... 66 97%
1% <= Impact < 3%....................... 2 3
3% <= Impact < 5%....................... 0 0
5% <= Impact < 10%...................... 0 0
10% or More............................. 0 0
-------------------------------
[[Page 37917]]
Total............................... 68 100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
Table 8--Cost Impacts as a Share of Revenue for Small Entities Affected
by Rule from the Random Sample- Assuming Annualized Cost of $9,022 per
Unique Drawback Claimant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percent of
Cost as a share of revenue range small entities small entities
affected affected
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0% <= Impact < 1%....................... 45 66
1% <= Impact < 3%....................... 11 16
3% <= Impact < 5%....................... 3 4
5% <= Impact < 10%...................... 7 10
10% or More............................. 2 3
-------------------------------
Total............................... 68 100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Estimates may not sum to total due to rounding.
This rule would also result in benefits as well as net monetary
transfers to drawback claimants. This rule would provide time and
resource savings from forgone paper-based drawback claims, form
submissions, and ruling and predetermination requests that offset some
of the rule's costs to small entities. CBP estimates that 2,849 small
paper-based drawback claimants (69 percent of the estimated 4,129 total
claimants) would enjoy $8 in cost savings for each paper claim avoided.
These claimants would likely file an average of three drawback claims
per year, at an annual cost saving of $24.\37\ CBP finds that all 6,844
small drawback claimants would save $17 in printing and mailing costs
related to forgone CBP Form 7552 submissions beginning in 2019. Before
2019, the estimated 2,849 small paper-based claimants would not gain
this benefit because they would still submit paper CBP Form 7552s.
Based on the total number of CBP Form 7552s avoided over the period of
analysis and the total number of unique drawback claimants, CBP
estimates that each claimant would forgo about four CBP Form 7552
submissions each year of the analysis, saving a total of $68 per
year.\38\ Lastly, only a small number of claimants would sustain
benefits from forgone ruling and predetermination requests. CBP
estimates that 645 requests would be avoided during the period of
analysis due to the rule and assumes that each forgone request
corresponds to a unique drawback claimant. By applying the previously
discussed assumption that 69 percent of drawback claimants affected by
this rule over the 2018 to 2027 period of analysis are small entities,
CBP finds that 445 small drawback claimants would each save $189 in
costs related to ruling and predeterminations requests. This would
translate to about $19 per year over the 10-year period of analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ From 2018 to 2027, CBP projects under its primary
estimation method that 4,129 unique trade members would file 101,642
drawback claims electronically instead of by paper as a result of
this rule, averaging about 3 claims per unique trade member each
year over the 10-year period: 101,642 drawback claims filed
electronically instead of by paper over 10-year period/4,129 unique
trade members = 25 (rounded) claims per unique trade member over the
10-year period; 25 claims over 10-year period/10 years = 3 (rounded)
claims per unique trade member each year.
\38\ From 2018 to 2027, CBP projects under its primary
estimation method that 9,919 unique trade members would forgo
392,000 CBP Form 7552 submissions as a result of this rule,
averaging about 4 forms per unique trade member each year over the
10-year period: 392,000 CBP Form 7552 submissions forgone over 10-
year period/9,919 unique trade members = 40 (rounded) forms per
unique trade member over the 10-year period; 40 claims over 10-year
period/10 years = 4 (rounded) forms per unique trade member each
year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule's share of net monetary transfers to small entities is
unknown. This rule would introduce $35.3 million to $42.4 million in
annualized net transfers from the U.S. Government to drawback claimants
(using a 7 percent discount rate). These transfers would average
between $3,600 and $4,300 per claimant based on the projected 9,919
unique drawback claimants affected by this rule. Some small entities
may receive more or less than this average, and potentially even
negative net transfers if they make net payments to the U.S.
Government.
According to the results from this screening analysis, CBP believes
that a substantial number of trade members who could be considered
``small'' may be affected by this proposed rule.\39\ CBP cannot
determine whether the economic impact on these entities may be
considered significant under the RFA. For these reasons, CBP cannot
currently certify that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. CBP has prepared the
following IRFA assessing the rule's potential effect on small entities.
CBP welcomes public comments on the data and findings included in this
RFA analysis. Comments that will provide the most assistance to CBP
will reference a specific portion of the RFA analysis, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include data, information, or
authority that supports a recommended change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ SBA publishes small business size standards for a variety
of, though not all, economic activities and industries. SBA does not
explicitly define size standards for the importers, exporters,
manufacturers, producers, and intermediate parties potentially
affected by this rule. See 13 CFR 121.101-13 CFR 121.201 for
information on SBA's size standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This IRFA includes the following:
1. A description of the reasons why the action by the agency is
being considered;
2. A succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for,
the proposed rule;
[[Page 37918]]
3. A description--and, where feasible, an estimate of the number--
of small entities to which the proposed rule would apply;
4. A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an
estimate of the classes of small entities that would be subject to the
requirement and the types of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record;
5. An identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant
federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed rule; and
6. A description of any significant alternatives to the proposed
rule which accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and
which minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on
small entities.
1. A description of the reasons why the action by the agency is
being considered.
Section 906 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of
2015 (P.L. 114-125) (TFTEA), signed into law on February 24, 2016,
seeks to simplify and modernize the current drawback procedures through
amendments to 19 U.S.C. 1313, the statute guiding CBP drawback
regulations. Section 906(q) of TFTEA requires CBP to promulgate
regulations implementing these changes and allows for a one-year
transition period (February 24, 2018-February 23, 2019) in which trade
members can follow either the old drawback statute and corresponding
regulations as written prior to TFTEA or the amended statute.
To fulfill TFTEA's requirements, CBP, through this rulemaking,
proposes to add an entirely new part of drawback regulations in
proposed 19 CFR part 190 that would replace the current drawback
regulations contained in 19 CFR part 191. Proposed 19 CFR part 190
would directly reflect the following major amendments made by TFTEA, as
well as another amendment required to protect U.S. Government revenue:
(1) Require the electronic filing of drawback claims; (2) liberalize
the standard for substituting merchandise for drawback; (3) generally
require per-unit averaging calculation for substitution drawback; (4)
generally require substitution drawback claims to be calculated on a
``lesser of'' basis; (5) expand the scope of drawback refunds; (6)
establish joint and several liability for drawback claims; (7) modify
the rulings process; (8) standardize the timeframe for eligibility to
claim drawback; (9) modify recordkeeping requirements; and (10)
eliminate ``double drawback'' of excise taxes. The proposed rule would
also make minor amendments to the drawback regulations in accordance
with TFTEA.
2. A succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for,
the proposed rule.
TFTEA requires CBP to prescribe drawback regulations in accordance
with the new statute and allows for a one-year transition period in
which trade members can follow either the old drawback statute and
corresponding regulations as written prior to TFTEA or the amended
statute until February 23, 2019. CBP proposes to implement new drawback
regulations consistent with TFTEA in 2018. These new regulations aim to
modernize the current drawback process.
3. A description--and, where feasible, an estimate of the number--
of small entities to which the proposed rule would apply.
As discussed in the screening analysis above, the proposed
Modernized Drawback rule would fundamentally change the drawback
process and consequently affect all trade members eligible for drawback
(i.e., drawback claimants). These trade members can include importers,
exporters, manufacturers, producers, and intermediate parties
representing a diverse array of industries. CBP estimates that 69
percent of drawback claimants affected by this rule over the 2018 to
2027 period of analysis, or 6,844 claimants, would be small entities.
4. A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an
estimate of the classes of small entities that would be subject to the
requirement and the types of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record.
This rule proposes several new reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements for all drawback claimants, including those
considered small. Among these changes, CBP proposes to require drawback
claimants filing under the new drawback regulations outlined in 19 CFR
part 190 to:
Submit new data elements with their claims, including Form
7551: Drawback Entry summary data at the line, rather than header,
level; claimed merchandise data at the 10-digit HTSUS subheading level;
line designations; and consistent units of measurement for claimed
import, export, or destruction data beginning in 2018.
File their complete drawback claims electronically using
ACE and DIS, thus not allowing for manual, paper-based claims.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ Some drawback documentation constituting a complete
drawback claim, such as privilege and ruling applications, would
remain paper-based.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit additional data, including exported, destroyed, or
substituted merchandise values for substitution claims filed under 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2); accounting methodologies used
for direct identification drawback claims (if applicable); unique
identifiers linking imports to exports or destructions; per-unit
averages for substitution claims; and ``lesser of'' rule calculations
for substitution claims.
Along with these reporting requirements, CBP would change the
recordkeeping standards for all drawback claimants filing under the new
regulations in 19 CFR part 190. Consistent with TFTEA, this rule would
change the drawback recordkeeping timeframe for all drawback claimants
from three years from CBP's date of payment of the drawback claim to
three years from the liquidation of the claim. CBP estimates that
drawback claimants would generally have to retain records for one extra
year with this rule's new recordkeeping requirement than under the
current three-year recordkeeping period, though some trade members may
need to retain records for up to four more years under this rule.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ Based on input from CBP and trade community representative.
Sources: Email correspondence with CBP's Office of Field Operations
on April 5, 2017 and email correspondence with trade community
representative on February 22, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule would also require parties that split entry summary line
items when transferring merchandise (transferors) to provide
notification to the recipients (transferees) as to whether that
merchandise is eligible for substitution or direct identification
drawback. Notification of this designation from the transferor to the
transferee must be documented in records, which may include records
kept in the normal course of business.
Furthermore, this rule would require all drawback claimants filing
manufacturing drawback claims under the new regulations in 19 CFR part
190 (which would account for about 20 percent of all claims filed with
this rule) to maintain applicable BOMs and/or formula records \42\
identifying the imported and/or substituted merchandise and the
exported or destroyed article(s) in their normal course of business.
When filing a manufacturing drawback claim, trade members must also
certify that they have these BOMs and/or formula
[[Page 37919]]
records by checking a box on their electronic drawback claim, and
provide the documentation to CBP upon request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See 19 CFR 190.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. An identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant
federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed rule.
CBP does not believe that any federal rule duplicates, overlaps, or
conflicts with the proposed rule.
6. A description of any significant alternatives to the proposed
rule which accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and
which minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on
small entities.
CBP considered two other alternatives in addition to the proposed
rule.
a. Alternative 1
The first regulatory alternative CBP considered would implement all
of the proposed rule's changes in 2018 rather than in 2019, offering no
transition period. With this alternative, paper-based filers must begin
filing their drawback claims electronically in 2018, but they would
receive the benefits of drawback modernization in 2018 and beyond. With
this alternative, paper-based filers, including those considered small,
would begin to incur electronic filing costs in 2018 rather than 2019
like under the rule. This alternative would also lead to relatively
more full desk reviews for claimants, including those considering
small, than under the rule. Drawback claimants, including those
considered small, would sustain an annualized cost of $8.0 million from
this alternative under the primary estimation method, which is slightly
higher than the proposed rule's $7.6 million annualized cost to trade
members (using a 7 percent discount rate). On a per-claimant basis,
Alternative 1 would cost $810 annually over the period of analysis
compared to the rule's nearly $770 cost per unique claimant.\43\
Alternative 1 would also result in an annualized net transfer measuring
between $42.8 million and $49.9 million from the U.S. Government to
drawback claimants, which would average from $4,300 to $5,000 per
unique claimant based on the 9,919 unique drawback claimants projected
under this alternative (using a 7 percent discount rate). Like the
proposed rule, Alternative 1 would introduce benefits to drawback
claimants. These benefits to claimants, including those considered
small, would be greater than the rule's cost savings due to the
relatively higher number of CBP Form 7552s (and corresponding time,
printing, and mailing costs) avoided. CBP did not choose Alternative 1
because TFTEA statutorily allows a one-year transition period (February
24, 2018-February 23, 2019) in which drawback claimants can follow
either the old drawback statute and corresponding regulations in 19 CFR
part 191 as written prior to TFTEA or the amended statute.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ $8,000,000/9,919 unique drawback claimants = $810
(rounded); $7,600,000/9,919 unique drawback claimants = $770
(rounded).
\44\ See Section 906 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-125).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Alternative 2
The second regulatory alternative CBP considered would implement
all of the proposed rule's changes, except it would not change the
current regulatory standard for substituting merchandise for drawback
(i.e., no implementation of Major Amendment 2). Under this alternative,
CBP estimates that the number of substitution drawback claim
submissions and the number of drawback claimants would be lower than
under the proposed rule over the period of analysis because this
alternative would offer relatively fewer new opportunities to claim
drawback. In fact, drawback claims would measure about 548,000 from
2018 to 2027 under Alternative 2's primary estimation method and the
number of unique drawback claimants would equal approximately 9,017.
Because of its narrower scope, Alternative 2 would introduce slightly
lower costs to drawback claimants, including those considered small,
than the proposed rule's cost. In particular, claimants would incur
relatively fewer full desk reviews and associated costs with this
alternative. Drawback claimants, including those considered small,
would incur an annualized cost of $7.6 million from this alternative
under the primary estimation method, compared to the proposed rule's
annualized cost of $7.6 million (using a 7 percent discount rate). On a
per-claimant basis, Alternative 2 would cost nearly $840 annually over
the period of analysis, while the proposed rule would introduce an
average cost of almost $770 cost per unique claimant.\45\ Alternative 2
would also result in annualized net transfers between $56.3 million and
$63.4 million from drawback claimants to the U.S. Government, which
would average $6,200 to $7,000 per unique claimant based on the 9,017
unique drawback claimants projected under this alternative (using a 7
percent discount rate). Like the proposed rule, Alternative 2 would
introduce benefits to drawback claimants. These benefits would be
slightly lower than the rule's benefits because drawback claimants
would continue to submit ruling and predeterminations requests for
substitution drawback claims with this alternative. CBP did not choose
this Alternative 2 because TFTEA statutorily requires CBP to liberalize
the standard for substituting merchandise for drawback by generally
basing it on goods classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS (or
Schedule B) subheading.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ $7,600,000/9,017 unique drawback claimants = $840
(rounded); $7,600,000/9,919 unique drawback claimants = $770
(rounded).
\46\ See Section 906 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-125).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
In conclusion, because the proposed Modernized Drawback rule would
presumably affect all drawback claimants, it would likely impact a
substantial number of small entities in each industry submitting such
claims. CBP cannot certify whether the rule's (negative) impact on
these small entities would be significant. CBP welcomes public comments
on the data and findings included in this RFA analysis. Comments that
will provide the most assistance to CBP will reference a specific
portion of the RFA analysis, explain the reason for any recommended
change, and include data, information, or authority that supports a
recommended change. If CBP does not receive comments contradicting the
RFA analysis findings, CBP may certify that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
at the final rule stage.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507), an agency may not conduct, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of
information displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. The
collections of information for this notice of proposed rulemaking are
included in an existing collection for CBP Forms 7551, 7552, and 7553
(OMB control number 1651-0075).
This rule proposes, among other things, to eliminate the submission
requirement for CBP Form 7552 for drawback claimants who file
electronically under the new, proposed drawback regulations in 19 CFR
part 190. Drawback claimants filing by paper under the current drawback
regulations in 19 CFR part 191 would still be required to submit the
paper CBP Form 7552 until this rule's requirements become mandatory in
2019. Based on this change, CBP estimates a decrease in
[[Page 37920]]
CBP Form 7552 responses and burden hours. Additionally, CBP Form 7551
has a decrease in burden hours based on changes in the agency estimate.
CBP will submit to OMB for review the following adjustments to the
previously approved Information Collection under OMB control number
1651-0075 to account for the changes proposed in this rule.
Furthermore, CBP expects to submit a request to eliminate CBP Form 7552
to OMB in 2019 prior to this rule's mandatory requirement date.
CBP Form 7551, Drawback Entry (reduction in burden hours due to change
in agency estimate)
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,516
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 22.2
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 55,772
Estimated Time per Response: 35 minutes
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 32,532
CBP Form 7552, Delivery Certificate for Drawback (reduction in burden
hours due to regulation)
Estimated Number of Respondents: 400
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 20
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 8,000
Estimated Time per Response: 33 minutes
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,400
CBP Form 7553, Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback (no change)
Estimated Number of Respondents: 150
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 20
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 3,000
Estimated Time per Response: 33 minutes
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,650
V. Proposed Effective/Applicability Dates
To allow stakeholders immediate benefit from these proposed
regulations (see 5 U.S.C. 553(d) and 808), they are proposed to be
effective upon publication of a rule adopting them as final, except
that the regulations proposed in Sec. Sec. 190.22(a)(1)(C),
190.32(b)(3), 191.22(a), 191.32(b)(4), and 191.171(d) regarding the
drawback of excise taxes are proposed to become applicable for drawback
claims filed on or after 60 days from the date of publication of the
final rule.
CBP and Treasury invite interested members of the public to comment
on these proposed effective and applicability dates.
VI. Signing Authority
This proposed regulation is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR
0.1(a)(1) pertaining to the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury
(or that of his or her delegate) to approve regulations pertaining to
certain customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 113
Bonds, Copyrights, Counterfeit goods, Customs duties and
inspection, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Restricted merchandise, Seizures and forfeitures.
19 CFR Part 181
Administrative practice and procedure, Canada, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Mexico, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Trade agreements.
19 CFR Part 190
Alcohol and alcoholic beverages, Claims, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Foreign trade zones, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station,
Cuba, Packaging and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Trade agreements.
19 CFR Part 191
Alcohol and alcoholic beverages, Claims, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Foreign trade zones, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station,
Cuba, Packaging and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Trade agreements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons given above, it is proposed to amend 19 CFR chapter
I as set forth below:
PART 113--CUSTOMS BONDS
0
1. The general authority citations for part 113 continue and the
specific authority for Sec. 113.62 is added in numerical order to read
as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624.
* * * * *
Section 113.62 is also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1313(k).
* * * * *
0
2. In Sec. 113.62, redesignate paragraphs (m) and (n) as paragraphs
(o) and (p) and add paragraphs (a)(4) and (m) to read as follows:
Sec. 113.62 Basic importation and entry bond conditions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) If a person who is not the principal makes a drawback claim
with respect to merchandise imported by the principal (see part 190 of
this chapter), the principal and surety (jointly and severally) agree
to pay, as demanded by CBP, any erroneous drawback payment in an amount
not to exceed the lesser of:
(i) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the person claimed
with respect to the imported merchandise; or
(ii) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the importer
authorized the other person to claim with respect to the imported
merchandise.
(iii) The amount of the erroneous drawback payment.
* * * * *
(m) Agreement to comply with CBP regulations applicable to
substitution drawback claims. In the case of imported merchandise that
is subject to internal revenue tax imposed under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), the principal agrees not to file, or to
transfer to a successor the right to file, a substitution drawback
claim involving such tax if the substituted merchandise has been, or
will be, the subject of a removal from bonded premises without payment
of tax, or the subject of a claim for refund or drawback of tax, under
any provision of the IRC.
* * * * *
PART 181--NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
0
3. The general authority citations for part 181 continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 3314;
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 181.45, 181.46, 181.47, 181.49, and 181.50 [Amended]
0
4. In the table below, for each section indicated in the left column,
remove the words indicated in the middle column, and add, in their
place, the words indicated in the right column.
[[Page 37921]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Remove Add
------------------------------------------------------------------------
181.45(b)(2)(i)(B).......... Sec. 191.14 of Sec. Sec. 190.14
this chapter, as or 191.14 of this
provided therein. chapter, as
appropriate.
181.45(c)................... Such a good must be Such a good must be
returned to Customs exported or
custody for destroyed within
exportation under the statutory 5-
Customs supervision year time period
within three years and in compliance
after the release with the
from Customs requirements set
custody. forth in subpart D
of part 190 of this
chapter or within
the 3-year time
period and in
compliance with the
requirements set
forth in subpart D
of part 191 of this
chapter, as
applicable.
181.46(b)................... (see Sec. (see Sec. Sec.
191.141(b)(3) (ii) 190.35 or 191.35 of
and (iii) of this this chapter, as
chapter). appropriate).
181.47(a)................... part 191 of this part 190 or 191 of
chapter;. this chapter, as
appropriate
181.49...................... (see Sec. 191.15 (see Sec. 190.15
(see also Sec. (see also Sec.
Sec. 191.26(f), Sec. 190.26(f),
191.38, 191.175(c)) 190.38, 190.175(c))
of this chapter). or Sec. 191.15
(see also Sec.
Sec. 191.26(f),
191.38, 191.175(c))
of this chapter, as
appropriate)
181.50(a)................... subpart G of part subpart H of part
190 of this chapter. 190 or subpart H of
part 191 of this
chapter, as
appropriate
181.50(c)................... Sec. 191.92 of Sec. Sec. 190.92
this chapter. or 191.92 of this
chapter, as
appropriate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5. Add part 190 to read as follows:
PART 190--MODERNIZED DRAWBACK
Sec.
190.0 Scope.
190.0a Claims filed under NAFTA.
Subpart A--General Provisions
190.1 Authority of the Commissioner of CBP.
190.2 Definitions.
190.3 Duties, taxes, and fees subject or not subject to drawback.
190.4 Merchandise in which a U.S. Government interest exists.
190.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular possessions, trust territories.
190.6 Authority to sign drawback documents.
190.7 General manufacturing drawback ruling.
190.8 Specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
190.9 Agency.
190.10 Transfer of merchandise.
190.11 Valuation of merchandise.
190.12 Claim filed under incorrect provision.
190.13 Packaging materials.
190.14 Identification of merchandise or articles by accounting
method.
190.15 Recordkeeping.
Subpart B--Manufacturing Drawback
190.21 Direct identification drawback.
190.22 Substitution drawback.
190.23 Methods and requirements for claiming drawback.
190.24 Transfer of merchandise.
190.25 Destruction under CBP supervision.
190.26 Recordkeeping for manufacturing drawback.
190.27 Time limitations.
190.28 Person entitled to claim manufacturing drawback.
Subpart C--Unused Merchandise Drawback
190.31 Direct identification drawback.
190.32 Substitution unused merchandise drawback.
190.33 Person entitled to claim unused merchandise drawback.
190.34 Transfer of merchandise.
190.35 Notice of intent to export; examination of merchandise.
190.36 Failure to file Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback.
190.37 Destruction under CBP supervision.
190.38 Recordkeeping for unused merchandise drawback.
Subpart D--Rejected Merchandise
190.41 Rejected merchandise drawback.
190.42 Procedures and supporting documentation.
190.43 Unused merchandise claim.
190.44 [Reserved]
190.45 Returned retail merchandise.
Subpart E--Completion of Drawback Claims
190.51 Completion of drawback claims.
190.52 Rejecting, perfecting or amending claims.
190.53 Restructuring of claims.
Subpart F--Verification of Claims
190.61 Verification of drawback claims.
190.62 Penalties.
190.63 Liability for drawback claims.
Subpart G--Exportation and Destruction
190.71 Drawback on articles destroyed under CBP supervision.
190.72 Exportation procedures.
190.73 Electronic proof of exportation.
190.74 Exportation by mail.
190.75 Exportation by the Government.
190.76 [Reserved]
Subpart H--Liquidation and Protest of Drawback Entries
190.81 Liquidation.
190.82 Person entitled to claim drawback.
190.83 Person entitled to receive payment.
190.84 Protests.
Subpart I--Waiver of Prior Notice of Intent To Export; Accelerated
Payment of Drawback
190.91 Waiver of prior notice of intent to export.
190.92 Accelerated payment.
190.93 Combined applications.
Subpart J--Internal Revenue Tax on Flavoring Extracts and Medicinal or
Toilet Preparations Including Perfumery) Manufactured From Domestic
Tax-Paid Alcohol
190.101 Drawback allowance.
190.102 Procedure.
190.103 Additional requirements.
190.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau certificates.
190.105 Liquidation.
190.106 Amount of drawback.
Subpart K--Supplies for Certain Vessels and Aircraft
190.111 Drawback allowance.
190.112 Procedure.
Subpart L--Meats Cured With Imported Salt
190.121 Drawback allowance.
190.122 Procedure.
190.123 Refund of duties.
Subpart M--Materials for Construction and Equipment of Vessels and
Aircraft Built for Foreign Ownership and Account
190.131 Drawback allowance.
190.132 Procedure.
190.133 Explanation of terms.
Subpart N--Foreign-Built Jet Aircraft Engines Processed in the United
States
190.141 Drawback allowance.
190.142 Procedure.
190.143 Drawback entry.
190.144 Refund of duties.
Subpart O--Merchandise Exported From Continuous CBP Custody
190.151 Drawback allowance.
190.152 Merchandise released from CBP custody.
190.153 Continuous CBP custody.
190.154 Filing the entry.
190.155 Merchandise withdrawn from warehouse for exportation.
190.156 Bill of lading.
190.157 [Reserved]
190.158 Procedures.
190.159 Amount of drawback.
[[Page 37922]]
Subpart P--Distilled Spirits, Wines, or Beer Which Are Unmerchantable
or Do Not Conform to Sample or Specifications
190.161 Refund of taxes.
190.162 Procedure.
190.163 Documentation.
190.164 Return to CBP custody.
190.165 No exportation by mail.
190.166 Destruction of merchandise.
190.167 Liquidation.
190.168 [Reserved]
Subpart Q--Substitution of Finished Petroleum Derivatives
190.171 General; drawback allowance.
190.172 Definitions.
190.173 Imported duty-paid derivatives (no manufacture).
190.174 Derivatives manufactured under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b).
190.175 Drawback claimant; maintenance of records.
190.176 Procedures for claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p).
Subpart R--Merchandise Transferred to a Foreign Trade Zone From Customs
Territory
190.181 Drawback allowance.
190.182 Zone-restricted merchandise.
190.183 Articles manufactured or produced in the United States.
190.184 Merchandise transferred from continuous CBP custody.
190.185 Unused merchandise drawback and merchandise not conforming
to sample or specification, shipped without consent of the
consignee, found to be defective as of the time of importation, or
returned after retail sale.
190.186 Person entitled to claim drawback.
Subpart S--Drawback Compliance Program
190.191 Purpose.
190.192 Certification for compliance program.
190.193 Application procedure for compliance program.
190.194 Action on application to participate in compliance program.
190.195 Combined application for certification in drawback
compliance program and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of
accelerated payment of drawback.
Appendix A to Part 190--General Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Appendix B to Part 190--Sample Formats For Applications For Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624;
Sec. Sec. 190.2, 190.10, 190.15, 190.23, 190.38, 190.51 issued
under 19 U.S.C. 1508; Sec. 190.84 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1514;
Sec. Sec. 190.111, 190.112 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1309;
Sec. Sec. 190.151(a)(1), 190.153, 190.157, 190.159 also issued
under 19 U.S.C. 1557; Sec. Sec. 190.182-190.186 also issued under
19 U.S.C. 81c; Sec. Sec. 190.191-190.195 also issued under 19
U.S.C. 1593a.
Sec. 190.0 Scope.
This part sets forth general provisions applicable to all drawback
claims and specialized provisions applicable to specific types of
drawback claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313, as amended. For drawback
claims and specialized provisions applicable to specific types of
drawback claims filed pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313, as it was in effect
on or before February 24, 2016, please see part 191 of this title.
Additional drawback provisions relating to the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) are contained in subpart E of part 181 of this
chapter.
Sec. 190.0a Claims filed under NAFTA.
Claims for drawback filed under the provisions of part 181 of this
chapter must be filed separately from claims filed under the provisions
of this part.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 190.1 Authority of the Commissioner of CBP.
Pursuant to DHS Delegation number 7010.3, the Commissioner of CBP
has the authority to prescribe, and pursuant to Treasury Order No. 100-
16 (set forth in the appendix to part 0 of this chapter), the Secretary
of the Treasury has the sole authority to approve, rules and
regulations regarding drawback.
Sec. 190.2 Definitions.
For the purposes of this part:
Abstract. Abstract means the summary of the actual production
records of the manufacturer.
Act. Act, unless indicated otherwise, means the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended.
Bill of materials. Bill of materials refers to a record that
identifies each component incorporated into a manufactured or produced
article. This may include a record kept in the normal course of
business.
Designated merchandise. Designated merchandise means either
eligible imported duty-paid merchandise or drawback products selected
by the drawback claimant as the basis for a drawback claim under 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) or (j)(2), as applicable, or qualified articles selected
by the claimant as the basis for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p).
Destruction. Destruction means the destruction of articles or
merchandise to the extent that they have no commercial value. For
purposes of 19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (b), (c), and (j), destruction also
includes a process by which materials are recovered from imported
merchandise or from an article manufactured from imported merchandise,
as provided for in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x).
Direct identification drawback. Direct identification drawback
includes drawback authorized pursuant to section 313(j)(1) of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)), on imported merchandise exported, or
destroyed under CBP supervision, without having been used in the United
States (see also sections 313(c), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (q)). Direct
identification is involved in manufacturing drawback pursuant to
section 313(a) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a)), on imported
merchandise used to manufacture or produce an article which is either
exported or destroyed. Merchandise or articles may be identified for
purposes of direct identification drawback by use of the accounting
methods provided for in Sec. 190.14.
Document. In this part, document has its normal meaning and
includes information input to and contained within an electronic data
field, and electronic versions of hard-copy documents.
Drawback. Drawback, as authorized under 19 U.S.C. 1313, means the
refund or remission, in whole or in part, of the duties, taxes, and/or
fees paid on merchandise which were imposed under Federal law. It
includes drawback paid upon the entry or importation of the imported
merchandise and the refund or remission of internal revenue taxes paid
on domestic alcohol as prescribed in 19 U.S.C. 1313(d) (see also Sec.
190.3).
Drawback claim. Drawback claim means the drawback entry and related
documents required by regulation which together constitute the request
for drawback payment. All drawback claims must be filed electronically
through a CBP-authorized EDI system.
Drawback entry. Drawback entry means the document containing a
description of, and other required information concerning, the exported
or destroyed article upon which a drawback claim is based and the
designated imported merchandise for which drawback of the duties,
taxes, and fees paid upon importation is claimed. Drawback entries must
be filed electronically.
Drawback office. Drawback office means any of the locations where
drawback claims and related applications or requests may be submitted.
CBP may, in its discretion, transfer or share work between the
different drawback offices even though that the submission may have
been to a particular office.
Drawback product. A drawback product means a finished or partially
finished product manufactured in the United States under the procedures
in this part for manufacturing drawback. A drawback product may be
exported, or
[[Page 37923]]
destroyed under CBP supervision with a claim for drawback, or it may be
used in the further manufacture of other drawback products by
manufacturers or producers operating under the procedures in this part
for manufacturing drawback, in which case drawback may be claimed upon
exportation or destruction of the ultimate product. Products
manufactured or produced from substituted merchandise (imported or
domestic) also become ``drawback products'' when applicable
substitution requirements of the Act are met. For purposes of section
313(b) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(b)), drawback products
may be designated as the basis for drawback or deemed to be substituted
merchandise (see 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)). For a drawback product to be
designated as the basis for a drawback claim, any transfer of the
product must be properly documented (see Sec. 190.24).
Exportation. Exportation means the severance of goods from the mass
of goods belonging to this country, with the intention of uniting them
with the mass of goods belonging to some foreign country. An
exportation may be deemed to have occurred when goods subject to
drawback are admitted into a foreign trade zone in zone-restricted
status, or are laden upon qualifying aircraft or vessels as aircraft or
vessel supplies in accordance with section 309(b) of the Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1309(b)) (see Sec. Sec. 10.59 through 10.65 of this
chapter).
Exporter. Exporter means that person who, as the principal party in
interest in the export transaction, has the power and responsibility
for determining and controlling the sending of the items out of the
United States. In the case of ``deemed exportations'' (see definition
of exportation in this section), exporter means that person who, as the
principal party in interest in the transaction deemed to be an
exportation, has the power and responsibility for determining and
controlling the transaction. In the case of aircraft or vessel supplies
under 19 U.S.C. 1309(b), exporter means the party who has the power and
responsibility for lading supplies on the qualifying aircraft or
vessel.
Filing. Filing means the electronic delivery to CBP of any document
or documentation, as provided for in this part.
Formula. Formula refers to records that identify the quantity of
each element, material, chemical, mixture, or other substance
incorporated into a manufactured article. This includes records kept in
the normal course of business.
Fungible merchandise or articles. Fungible merchandise or articles
means merchandise or articles which for commercial purposes are
identical and interchangeable in all situations.
General manufacturing drawback ruling. A general manufacturing
drawback ruling means a description of a manufacturing or production
operation for drawback and the regulatory requirements and
interpretations applicable to that operation (see Sec. 190.7).
Intermediate party. Intermediate party means any party in the chain
of commerce leading to the exporter from the importer and who has
acquired, purchased, or possessed the imported merchandise (or any
intermediate or finished article, in the case of manufacturing
drawback) as allowed under the applicable regulations for the type of
drawback claimed, which authorize the transfer of the imported or other
drawback eligible merchandise by that intermediate party to another
party.
Manufacture or production. Manufacture or production means a
process, including, but not limited to, an assembly, by which
merchandise is either made into a new and different article having a
distinctive name, character or use; or is made fit for a particular use
even though it is not made into a new and different article.
Multiple products. Multiple products mean two or more products
produced concurrently by a manufacture or production operation or
operations.
Per unit averaging. Per unit averaging means the equal
apportionment of the amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible for
drawback for all units covered by a single line item on an entry
summary to each unit of merchandise (and is required for certain
substitution drawback claims) (see Sec. 190.51(b)). The value of the
imported merchandise for which a claim is approved may not exceed the
total value of the exported merchandise which forms the basis for the
claim (``lesser of'' rule) (see Sec. 190.22(a)(1)(ii) and 190.32(b)).
Possession. Possession, for purposes of substitution unused
merchandise drawback (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), means physical or
operational control of the merchandise, including ownership while in
bailment, in leased facilities, in transit to, or in any other manner
under the operational control of, the party claiming drawback.
Records. Records include, but are not limited to, written or
electronic business records, statements, declarations, documents and
electronically generated or machine readable data which pertain to a
drawback claim or to the information contained in the records required
by Chapter 4 of Title 19, United States Code, in connection with the
filing of a drawback claim and which may include records normally kept
in the ordinary course of business (see 19 U.S.C. 1508).
Relative value. Relative value means, except for purposes of Sec.
190.51(b), the value of a product divided by the total value of all
products which are necessarily manufactured or produced concurrently in
the same operation. Relative value is based on the market value, or
other value approved by CBP, of each such product determined as of the
time it is first separated in the manufacturing or production process.
Market value is generally measured by the selling price, not including
any packaging, transportation, or other identifiable costs, which
accrue after the product itself is processed. Drawback must be
apportioned to each such product based on its relative value at the
time of separation.
Schedule. A schedule means a document filed by a drawback claimant,
under section 313(a) or (b), as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)),
showing the quantity of imported or substituted merchandise used in or
appearing in each article exported or destroyed that justifies a claim
for drawback.
Schedule B. Schedule B means the Department of Commerce Schedule B,
Statistical Classification of Domestic and Foreign Commodities Exported
from the United States.
Sought chemical element. A sought chemical element, under section
313(b), means an element listed in the Periodic Table of Elements that
is imported into the United States or a chemical compound (a distinct
substance formed by a chemical union of two or more elements in
definite proportion by weight) consisting of those elements, either
separately in elemental form or contained in source material.
Specific manufacturing drawback ruling. A specific manufacturing
drawback ruling means a letter of approval (or its electronic
equivalent) issued by CBP Headquarters in response to an application
filed by a manufacturer or producer for a ruling on a specific
manufacturing or production operation for drawback, as described in the
format in Appendix B of this part. Synopses of approved specific
manufacturing drawback rulings are published in the Customs Bulletin
with each synopsis being published under an identifying CBP Decision.
Specific manufacturing drawback rulings are subject to the provisions
in part 177 of this chapter.
Substituted merchandise or articles. Substituted merchandise or
articles
[[Page 37924]]
means merchandise or articles that may be substituted as follows:
(1) For manufacturing drawback pursuant to section 1313(b),
substituted merchandise must be classifiable under the same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number as the imported designated merchandise;
(2) For direct identification drawback pursuant to section
1313(c)(2), substituted merchandise must be classifiable under the same
8-digit HTSUS subheading number and have the same specific product
identifier (such as part number, SKU, or product code) as the imported
designated merchandise;
(3) For direct identification drawback pursuant to section
1313(j)(2), substituted merchandise must be classifiable under the same
8-digit HTSUS subheading number as the imported designated merchandise
except for wine which may also qualify pursuant to Sec. 190.32(d), but
when the 8-digit HTSUS subheading number under which the imported
merchandise is classified begins with the term ``other,'' then the
other merchandise may be substituted for imported merchandise for
drawback purposes if the other merchandise and such imported
merchandise are classifiable under the same 10-digit HTSUS statistical
reporting number and the article description for that 10-digit HTSUS
statistical reporting number does not begin with the term ``other'';
and
(4) For substitution drawback of finished petroleum derivatives
pursuant to section 1313(p), a substituted article must be of the same
kind and quality as the qualified article for which it is substituted,
that is, the articles must be commercially interchangeable or described
in the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number (see Sec. 190.172(b)).
Verification. Verification means the examination of any and all
records, maintained by the claimant, or any party involved in the
drawback process, which are required by the appropriate CBP officer to
render a meaningful recommendation concerning the drawback claimant's
conformity to the law and regulations and the determination of
supportability, correctness, and validity of the specific claim or
groups of claims being verified.
Wine. Wine, for purposes of substitution unused merchandise
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) and pursuant to the alternative
standard for substitution (see 19 CFR 190.32(d)), refers to table wine.
Consistent with Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
regulations, table wine is a ``Class 1 grape wine'' that satisfies the
requirements of 27 CFR 4.21(a)(1) and having an alcoholic content not
in excess of 14 percent by volume pursuant to 27 CFR 4.21(a)(2)).
Sec. 190.3 Duties, taxes, and fees subject or not subject to
drawback.
(a) Drawback is allowable pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313 of on duties,
taxes, and fees paid on imported merchandise which were imposed under
Federal law upon entry or importation, including:
(1) Ordinary customs duties, including:
(i) Duties paid on an entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption for which liquidation has become final;
(ii) Estimated duties paid on an entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, for which liquidation has not become final,
subject to the conditions and requirements of Sec. 190.81(b); and
(iii) Tenders of duties after liquidation of the entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption for which the duties are
paid, subject to the conditions and requirements of Sec. 190.81(c),
including:
(A) Voluntary tenders (for purposes of this section, a ``voluntary
tender'' is a payment of duties on imported merchandise in excess of
duties included in the liquidation of the entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, provided that the liquidation has become
final and that the other conditions of this section and Sec. 190.81
are met);
(B) Tenders of duties in connection with notices of prior
disclosure under 19 U.S.C. 1592(c)(4); and
(C) Duties restored under 19 U.S.C. 1592(d).
(2) Marking duties assessed under section 304(c), Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(c));
(3) Internal revenue taxes which attach upon importation (see Sec.
101.1 of this chapter);
(4) Merchandise processing fees (see Sec. 24.23 of this chapter);
and
(5) Harbor maintenance taxes (see Sec. 24.24 of this chapter).
(b) Drawback is not allowable on antidumping and countervailing
duties which were imposed on any merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption (see 19 U.S.C. 1677h).
(c) Drawback is not allowed when the identified merchandise, the
designated imported merchandise, or the substituted merchandise (when
applicable), consists of an agricultural product which is duty-paid at
the over-quota rate of duty established under a tariff-rate quota,
except that:
(1) Agricultural products as described in this paragraph are
eligible for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1); and
(2) Tobacco otherwise meeting the description of agricultural
products in this paragraph is eligible for drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1) or 19 U.S.C. 1313(a).
Sec. 190.4 Merchandise in which a U.S. Government interest exists.
(a) Restricted meaning of Government. A U.S. Government
instrumentality operating with nonappropriated funds is considered a
Government entity within the meaning of this section.
(b) Allowance of drawback. If the merchandise is sold to the U.S.
Government, drawback will be available only to the:
(1) Department, branch, agency, or instrumentality of the U.S.
Government which purchased it; or
(2) Supplier, or any of the parties specified in Sec. 190.82,
provided the claim is supported by documentation signed by a proper
officer of the department, branch, agency, or instrumentality concerned
certifying that the right to drawback was reserved by the supplier or
other parties with the knowledge and consent of the department, branch,
agency, or instrumentality.
(c) Bond. No bond will be required when a U.S. Government entity
claims drawback.
Sec. 190.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular possessions, trust territories.
Guantanamo Bay Naval Station is considered foreign territory for
drawback purposes and, accordingly, drawback may be permitted on
articles shipped there from the customs territory of the United States.
Drawback is not allowed, except on claims made under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1), on articles shipped from the customs territory of the
United States to the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island,
Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Guam, Canton Island, Enderbury Island,
Johnston Island, or Palmyra Island. See 19 U.S.C. 1313(y). Puerto Rico,
which is part of the customs territory of the United States, is not
considered foreign territory for drawback purposes and, accordingly,
drawback may not be permitted on articles shipped there from elsewhere
in the customs territory of the United States. For refunds of duties,
taxes, or fees paid on merchandise imported into Puerto Rico and
exported outside of the customs territory of the United States, claims
must be filed separately from other claims filed under the provisions
of this part.
[[Page 37925]]
Sec. 190.6 Authority to sign or electronically certify drawback
documents.
(a) Documents listed in paragraph (b) of this section must be
signed or electronically certified only by one of the following:
(1) The president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer, or any
other employee legally authorized to bind the corporation;
(2) A full partner of a partnership;
(3) The owner of a sole proprietorship;
(4) Any employee of the business entity with a power of attorney;
(5) An individual acting on his or her own behalf; or
(6) A licensed customs broker with a power of attorney to sign the
applicable drawback document.
(b) The following documents require execution in accordance with
paragraph (a) of this section:
(1) Drawback entries;
(2) Notices of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for
Purposes of Drawback;
(3) Certifications of exporters on bills of lading or evidence of
exportation (see Sec. Sec. 190.28 and 190.82); and
(4) Abstracts, schedules and extracts from monthly abstracts, and
bills of materials and formulas, if not included as part of a drawback
claim.
(c) The following documents (see also part 177 of this chapter) may
be executed by one of the persons described in paragraph (a) of this
section or by any other individual legally authorized to bind the
person (or entity) for whom the document is executed:
(1) A letter of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling under Sec. 190.7;
(2) An application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling
under Sec. 190.8;
(3) An application for waiver of prior notice under Sec. 190.91;
(4) An application for approval of accelerated payment of drawback
under Sec. 190.92; and
(5) An application for certification in the Drawback Compliance
Program under Sec. 190.193.
Sec. 190.7 General manufacturing drawback ruling.
(a) Purpose; eligibility. General manufacturing drawback rulings
are designed to simplify drawback for certain common manufacturing
operations but do not preclude or limit the use of applications for
specific manufacturing drawback rulings (see Sec. 190.8). A
manufacturer or producer engaged in an operation that falls within a
published general manufacturing drawback ruling may submit a letter of
notification of intent to operate under that general ruling. Where a
separately-incorporated subsidiary of a parent corporation is engaged
in manufacture or production for drawback, the subsidiary is the proper
party to submit the letter of notification, and cannot operate under a
letter of notification submitted by the parent corporation.
(b) Procedures--(1) Publication. General manufacturing drawback
rulings are contained in Appendix A to this part. As deemed necessary
by CBP, new general manufacturing drawback rulings will be issued as
CBP Decisions and added to the appendix thereafter.
(2) Submission. Letters of notification of intent to operate under
a general manufacturing drawback ruling must be submitted to any
drawback office where drawback entries will be filed, concurrent with
or prior to filing a claim, provided that the general manufacturing
drawback ruling will be followed without variation. If there is any
variation from the general manufacturing drawback ruling, the
manufacturer or producer must apply for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling under Sec. 190.8.
(3) Information required. Each manufacturer or producer submitting
a letter of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling under this section must provide the
following specific detailed information:
(i) Name and address of manufacturer or producer (if the
manufacturer or producer is a separately-incorporated subsidiary of a
corporation, the subsidiary corporation must submit a letter of
notification in its own name);
(ii) In the case of a business entity, the names of the persons
listed in Sec. 190.6(a)(1) through (6) who will sign drawback
documents;
(iii) Locations of the factories which will operate under the
letter of notification;
(iv) Identity (by T.D. or CBP Decision number and title) of the
general manufacturing drawback ruling under which the manufacturer or
producer will operate;
(v) Description of the merchandise and articles, unless
specifically described in the general manufacturing drawback ruling,
and the applicable 8-digit HTSUS subheading number(s);
(vi) Description of the manufacturing or production process, unless
specifically described in the general manufacturing drawback ruling;
(vii) Basis of claim used for calculating drawback; and
(viii) IRS (Internal Revenue Service) number (with suffix) of the
manufacturer or producer.
(c) Review and action by CBP. The drawback office to which the
letter of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling was submitted will review the letter of
notification of intent.
(1) Acknowledgment. The drawback office will promptly issue a
letter acknowledging receipt of the letter of intent and authorizing
the person to operate under the identified general manufacturing
drawback ruling, subject to the requirements and conditions of that
general manufacturing drawback ruling and the law and regulations, to
the person who submitted the letter of notification if:
(i) The letter of notification is complete (i.e., contains the
information required in paragraph (b)(3) of this section);
(ii) The general manufacturing drawback ruling identified by the
manufacturer or producer is applicable to the manufacturing or
production process;
(iii) The general manufacturing drawback ruling identified by the
manufacturer or producer will be followed without variation; and
(iv) The described manufacturing or production process is a
manufacture or production as defined in Sec. 190.2 of this subpart.
(2) Computer-generated number. With the letter of acknowledgment
the drawback office will include the unique computer-generated number
assigned to the acknowledgment of the letter of notification of intent
to operate. This number must be stated when the person files
manufacturing drawback claims with CBP under the general manufacturing
drawback ruling.
(3) Non-conforming letters of notification of intent. If the letter
of notification of intent to operate does not meet the requirements of
paragraph (c)(1) of this section in any respect, the drawback office
will promptly and in writing specifically advise the person of this
fact and why this is so. A letter of notification of intent to operate
which is not acknowledged may be resubmitted to the drawback office to
which it was initially submitted with modifications and/or explanations
addressing the reasons CBP may have given for non-acknowledgment, or
the matter may be referred (by letter from the manufacturer or
producer) to CBP Headquarters (Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade).
(d) Procedure to modify a general manufacturing drawback ruling.
[[Page 37926]]
Modifications are allowed under the same procedure terms as provided
for in Sec. 190.8(g) for specific manufacturing drawback rulings.
(e) Duration. Acknowledged letters of notification under this
section will remain in effect under the same terms as provided for in
Sec. 190.8(h) for specific manufacturing drawback rulings.
Sec. 190.8 Specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
(a) Applicant. Unless operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.7), each manufacturer or producer of
articles intended to be claimed for drawback must apply for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling. Where a separately-incorporated
subsidiary of a parent corporation is engaged in manufacture or
production for drawback, the subsidiary is the proper party to apply
for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling, and cannot operate under
any specific manufacturing drawback ruling approved in favor of the
parent corporation.
(b) Sample application. Sample formats for applications for
specific manufacturing drawback rulings are contained in Appendix B to
this part.
(c) Content of application. The application of each manufacturer or
producer must include the following information as applicable:
(1) Name and address of the applicant;
(2) Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number (with suffix) of the
applicant;
(3) Description of the type of business in which engaged;
(4) Description of the manufacturing or production process, which
shows how the designated and substituted merchandise is used to make
the article that is to be exported or destroyed;
(5) In the case of a business entity, the names of persons listed
in Sec. 190.6(a)(1) through (6) who will sign drawback documents;
(6) Description of the imported merchandise including
specifications and applicable 8-digit HTSUS subheading(s);
(7) Description of the exported article and applicable 8-digit
HTSUS subheadings;
(8) How manufacturing drawback is calculated;
(9) Summary of the records kept to support claims for drawback; and
(10) Identity and address of the recordkeeper if other than the
claimant.
(d) Submission of Application. An application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling must be submitted to CBP Headquarters
(Attention: Entry Process and Duty Refunds Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade). Applications may be physically delivered (in
triplicate) or submitted via email. Claimants must indicate if drawback
claims are to be filed under the ruling at more than one drawback
office.
(e) Review and action by CBP. CBP Headquarters will review each
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
(1) Approval. If the application is consistent with the drawback
law and regulations, CBP Headquarters will issue a letter of approval
to the applicant and will forward 1 copy of the application for the
specific manufacturing drawback ruling to the appropriate drawback
office(s) with a copy of the letter of approval. Each specific
manufacturing drawback ruling will be assigned a unique manufacturing
number which will be included in the letter of approval to the
applicant from CBP Headquarters, which must be used when filing
manufacturing drawback claims.
(2) Disapproval. If the application is not consistent with the
drawback law and regulations, CBP Headquarters will promptly and in
writing inform the applicant that the application cannot be approved
and will specifically advise the applicant why this is so. A
disapproved application may be resubmitted with modifications and/or
explanations addressing the reasons given for disapproval, a
disapproval may be appealed to CBP Headquarters (Attention: Entry
Process and Duty Refunds Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of
Trade).
(f) Schedules and supplemental schedules. When an application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling states that drawback is to be
based upon a schedule, as defined in 190.2, filed by the manufacturer
or producer, the schedule will be reviewed by CBP Headquarters. The
application may include a request for authorization for the filing of
supplemental schedules with the drawback office where claims are filed.
(g) Procedure to modify a specific manufacturing drawback ruling--
(1) Supplemental application. Except as provided for limited
modifications in paragraph (g)(2) of this section, a manufacturer or
producer desiring to modify an existing specific manufacturing drawback
ruling may submit a supplemental application for such modification to
CBP Headquarters (Attention: Entry Process and Duty Refunds Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade). Such a supplemental
application may, at the discretion of the manufacturer or producer, be
in the form of the original application, or it may identify the
specific manufacturing drawback ruling to be modified (by T.D. or CBP
Decision number, if applicable, and unique computer-generated number)
and include only those paragraphs of the application that are to be
modified, with a statement that all other paragraphs are unchanged and
are incorporated by reference in the supplemental application.
(2) Limited modifications. (i) A supplemental application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling must be submitted to the
drawback office where the original claims was filed if the
modifications are limited to:
(A) The location of a factory, or the addition of one or more
factories where the methods followed and records maintained are the
same as those at another factory operating under the existing specific
manufacturing drawback ruling of the manufacturer or producer;
(B) The succession of a sole proprietorship, partnership or
corporation to the operations of a manufacturer or producer;
(C) A change in name of the manufacturer or producer;
(D) A change in the persons who will sign drawback documents in the
case of a business entity;
(E) A change in the basis of claim used for calculating drawback;
(F) A change in the decision to use or not to use an agent under
Sec. 190.9 of this chapter, or a change in the identity of an agent
under that section;
(G) A change in the drawback office where claims will be filed
under the ruling (see paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of this section);
(H) An authorization to continue operating under a ruling approved
under 19 CFR part 191 (see paragraph (g)(2)(iv) of this section); or
(I) Any combination of the foregoing changes.
(ii) A limited modification, as provided for in this paragraph
(g)(2), must contain only the modifications to be made, in addition to
identifying the specific manufacturing drawback ruling and being signed
by an authorized person. To effect a limited modification, the
manufacturer or producer must file with the drawback office(s) where
claims were originally filed a letter stating the modifications to be
made. The drawback office will promptly acknowledge acceptance of the
limited modifications.
(iii) To transfer a claim to another drawback office, the
manufacturer or producer must file with the second drawback office
where claims will be
[[Page 37927]]
filed, a written application to file claims at that office, with a copy
of the application and approval letter under which claims are currently
filed. The manufacturer or producer must provide a copy of the written
application to file claims at the new drawback office to the drawback
office where claims are currently filed.
(iv) To file a claim under this part based on a ruling approved
under 19 CFR part 191, the manufacturer or producer must file a
supplemental application for a limited modification no later than
February 23, 2019, which provides the following:
(A) Revised parallel columns with the required annotations for the
applicable 8-digit HTSUS subheading number(s);
(B) Revised bill of materials or formula with the required
annotations for the applicable 8-digit HTSUS subheading number(s); and
(C) A certification of continued compliance, which states: ``The
undersigned acknowledges the current statutory requirements under 19
U.S.C. 1313 and the regulatory requirements in 19 CFR part 190, and
hereby certifies its continuing eligibility for operating under the
manufacturing drawback ruling in compliance therewith.''
(h) Duration. Subject to 19 U.S.C. 1625 and part 177 of this
chapter, a specific manufacturing drawback ruling under this section
will remain in effect indefinitely unless:
(1) No drawback claim is filed under the ruling for a period of 5
years and notice of termination is published in the Customs Bulletin;
or
(2) The manufacturer or producer to whom approval of the ruling was
issued files a request to terminate the ruling, in writing, with CBP
Headquarters (Attention: Entry Process and Duty Refunds Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade).
Sec. 190.9 Agency.
(a) General. An owner of the identified merchandise, the designated
imported merchandise and/or the substituted merchandise that is used to
produce the exported articles may employ another person to do part, or
all, of the manufacture or production under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)
and as defined in Sec. 190.2 of this subpart. For purposes of this
section, such owner is the principal and such other person is the
agent. Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), the principal will be treated as the
manufacturer or producer of merchandise used in manufacture or
production by the agent. The principal must be able to establish by its
manufacturing records, the manufacturing records of its agent(s), or
the manufacturing records of both (or all) parties, compliance with all
requirements of this part (see, in particular, Sec. 190.26).
(b) Requirements--(1) Contract. The manufacturer must establish
that it is the principal in a contract between it and its agent who
actually does the work on either the designated or substituted
merchandise, or both, for the principal. The contract must include:
(i) Terms of compensation to show that the relationship is an
agency rather than a sale;
(ii) How transfers of merchandise and articles will be recorded by
the principal and its agent;
(iii) The work to be performed on the merchandise by the agent for
the principal;
(iv) The degree of control that is to be exercised by the principal
over the agent's performance of work;
(v) The party who is to bear the risk of loss on the merchandise
while it is in the agent's custody; and
(vi) The period that the contract is in effect.
(2) Ownership of the merchandise by the principal. The records of
the principal and/or the agent must establish that the principal had
legal and equitable title to the merchandise before receipt by the
agent. The right of the agent to assert a lien on the merchandise for
work performed does not derogate the principal's ownership interest
under this section.
(3) Sales prohibited. The relationship between the principal and
agent must not be that of a seller and buyer. If the parties' records
show that, with respect to the merchandise that is the subject of the
principal-agent contract, the merchandise is sold to the agent by the
principal, or the articles manufactured by the agent are sold to the
principal by the agent, those records are inadequate to establish
existence of a principal-agency relationship under this section.
(c) Specific manufacturing drawback rulings; general manufacturing
drawback rulings--(1) Owner. An owner who intends to operate under the
principal-agent procedures of this section must state that intent in
any letter of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling filed under Sec. 190.7 or in any
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling filed under
Sec. 190.8.
(2) Agent. Each agent operating under this section must have filed
a letter of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.7), for an agent, covering
the articles manufactured or produced, or have obtained a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8), as appropriate.
(d) Certificate--(1) Contents of certificate. The principal for
whom processing is conducted under this section must file, with any
drawback claim, a certificate, subject to the recordkeeping
requirements of Sec. Sec. 190.15 and 190.26, certifying that upon
request by CBP it can establish the following:
(i) Quantity of merchandise transferred from the principal to the
agent;
(ii) Date of transfer of the merchandise from the principal to the
agent;
(iii) Date of manufacturing or production operations performed by
the agent;
(iv) Total quantity, description, and 10-digit HTSUS classification
of merchandise appearing in or used in manufacturing or production
operations performed by the agent;
(v) Total quantity, description, and 10-digit HTSUS classification
of articles produced in manufacturing or production operations
performed by the agent;
(vi) Quantity and 10-digit HTSUS classification of articles
transferred from the agent to the principal; and
(vii) Date of transfer of the articles from the agent to the
principal.
(2) Blanket certificate. The certificate required under paragraph
(d)(1) of this section may be a blanket certificate for a stated
period.
Sec. 190.10 Transfer of merchandise.
(a) Ability to transfer merchandise. (1) A party may transfer
drawback eligible merchandise or articles to another party, provided
that the transferring party:
(i) Imports and pays duties, taxes, and/or fees on such imported
merchandise;
(ii) Receives such imported merchandise;
(iii) In the case of 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), receives such imported
merchandise, substituted merchandise, or any combination of such
imported and substituted merchandise; or
(iv) Receives an article manufactured or produced under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) and/or (b).
(2) The transferring party must maintain records that:
(i) Document the transfer of that merchandise or article;
(ii) Identify such merchandise or article as being that to which a
potential right to drawback exists; and
(iii) Assign such right to the transferee (see Sec. 190.82).
(b) Required records. The records that support the transfer must
include the following information:
(1) The party to whom the merchandise or articles are delivered;
[[Page 37928]]
(2) Date of physical delivery;
(3) Import entry number and entry line item number;
(4) Quantity delivered and, for substitution claims, total quantity
attributable to the relevant import entry line item number;
(5) Total duties, taxes, and fees paid on, or attributable to, the
delivered merchandise, and, for substitution claims, total duties,
taxes, and fees paid on, or attributable to, the relevant import entry
line item number;
(6) Date of importation;
(7) Port where import entry filed;
(8) Person from whom received;
(9) Description of the merchandise delivered;
(10) The 10-digit HTSUS classification for the designated imported
merchandise (such HTSUS number must be from the entry summary line item
and other entry documentation for the merchandise); and
(11) If the merchandise transferred is substituted for the
designated imported merchandise under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), the 10-
digit HTSUS classification of the substituted merchandise (as if it had
been imported).
(c) Transferor notification for line item designation. (1) Pursuant
to Sec. 190.51(a)(3) and for transfers that do not cover the entire
quantity of the merchandise reported on a specific line item from an
entry summary, the transferring party (transferor) must provide notice
to the transferee(s) of the following:
(i) Whether the transferor has claimed or will claim drawback
relating to any merchandise reported on the entry summary line item
(specifying either direct identification or substitution as the basis
for the claim);
(ii) Whether the transferor has previously transferred any
merchandise reported on the entry summary line item and whether the
transferor has knowledge regarding a drawback claim being filed
relating that transferred merchandise (specifying either direct
identification or substitution); and
(iii) Whether the transferor has not previously transferred any
merchandise reported on the entry summary line item.
(2) Notification of this designation from the transferor to the
transferee(s) must be documented in records.
(3) Notwithstanding the designation made, the basis for the first-
filed claim relating to merchandise reported on that entry summary line
item (either direct identification or substitution) will be the
exclusive basis for any subsequent claims for any other merchandise
reported on that same entry summary line item.
(d) Retention period. The records listed in paragraph (b) of this
section must be retained by the issuing party for 3 years from the date
of liquidation of the related claim or longer period if required by law
(see 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3)).
(e) Submission to CBP. If the records required under paragraph (b)
of this section or additional records requested by CBP are not provided
by the claimant, the part of the drawback claim dependent on those
records will be denied.
(f) Warehouse transfer and withdrawals. The person in whose name
merchandise is withdrawn from a bonded warehouse will be considered the
importer for drawback purposes. No records are required to document
prior transfers of merchandise while in a bonded warehouse.
Sec. 190.11 Valuation of merchandise.
The values declared to CBP as part of a complete drawback claim
pursuant to Sec. 190.51 must be established as provided below. If the
drawback eligible merchandise or articles are destroyed, then the value
of the imported merchandise and any substituted merchandise must be
reduced by the value of materials recovered during destruction in
accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1313(x).
(a) Designated imported merchandise. The value of the imported
merchandise is determined as follows:
(1) Direct identification claims. The value of the imported
merchandise is the customs value of the imported merchandise upon entry
into the United States (see subpart E of part 152 of this chapter); or,
if the merchandise is identified pursuant to an approved accounting
method, then the value of the imported merchandise is the customs value
that is properly attributable to the imported merchandise as identified
by the appropriate recordkeeping (see Sec. 190.14, varies by
accounting method).
(2) Substitution claims. The value of the designated imported
merchandise is the per unit average value, which is the entered value
for the applicable entry summary line item apportioned equally over
each unit covered by the line item.
(b) Exported merchandise or articles. The value of the exported
merchandise or articles eligible for drawback is the selling price as
declared for the Electronic Export Information (EEI), including any
adjustments and exclusions required by 15 CFR 30.6(a)). If there is no
selling price for the EEI, then the value is the other value as
declared for the EEI including any adjustments and exclusions required
by 15 CFR 30.6(a) (e.g., the market price, if the goods are shipped on
consignment). (For special types of transactions where certain unusual
conditions are involved, the value for the EEI is determined pursuant
to 15 CFR part 30 subpart C.) If no EEI is required (see, 15 CFR part
30 subpart D for a complete list of exemptions), then the claimant must
provide the value that would have been set forth on the EEI when the
exportation took place, but for the exemption from the requirement for
an EEI.
(c) Destroyed merchandise or articles. The value of the destroyed
merchandise or articles eligible for drawback is the value at the time
of destruction, determined as if the merchandise had been exported in
its condition at the time of its destruction and an EEI had been
required.
(d) Substituted merchandise for manufacturing drawback claims. The
value of the substituted merchandise for manufacturing drawback claims
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) is the cost of acquisition or production
for the manufacturer or producer who used the substituted merchandise
in manufacturing or production.
Sec. 190.12 Claim filed under incorrect provision.
A drawback claim filed pursuant to any provision of section 313 of
the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313) may be deemed filed pursuant to
any other provision thereof should the drawback office determine that
drawback is not allowable under the provision as originally filed, but
that it is allowable under such other provision. To be allowable under
such other provision, the claim must meet each of the requirements of
such provision. The claimant may raise alternative provisions prior to
liquidation and by protest (see part 174 of this chapter).
Sec. 190.13 Packaging materials.
(a) Imported packaging material. Drawback of duties is provided in
section 313(q)(1) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(q)(1)), on
imported packaging material used to package or repackage merchandise or
articles exported or destroyed pursuant to section 313(a), (b), (c), or
(j) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (b), (c), or (j)). The
amount of drawback payable on the packaging material is determined
pursuant to the particular drawback provision to which the packaged
goods themselves are subject. The packaging material must be separately
identified on the claim, and all other information
[[Page 37929]]
and documents required for the particular drawback provision under
which the claim is made must be provided for the packaging material.
(b) Packaging material manufactured in United States from imported
materials. Drawback of duties is provided in section 313(q)(2) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(q)(2)), on packaging material that is
manufactured or produced in the United States from imported materials
and used to package or repackage articles that are exported or
destroyed under section 313(a) or (b) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b)). The amount of drawback payable on the packaging
material is determined pursuant to the particular manufacturing
drawback provision to which the packaged articles themselves are
subject, either 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), as applicable. The packaging
material and the imported merchandise used in the manufacture or
production of the packaging material must be separately identified on
the claim, and all other information and documents required for the
particular drawback provision under which the claim is made must be
provided for the packaging material as well as the imported merchandise
used in its manufacture or production, for purposes of determining the
applicable drawback payable.
Sec. 190.14 Identification of merchandise or articles by accounting
method.
(a) General. This section provides for the identification of
merchandise or articles for drawback purposes by the use of accounting
methods. This section applies to identification of merchandise or
articles in inventory or storage, as well as identification of
merchandise used in manufacture or production, as defined in Sec.
190.2. This section is not applicable to situations in which the
drawback law authorizes substitution (substitution is allowed in
specified situations under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), 1313(j)(2), 1313(k), and
1313(p); this section does apply to situations in these subsections in
which substitution is not allowed, as well as to the subsections of the
drawback law under which no substitution is allowed). When substitution
is authorized, merchandise or articles may be substituted without
reference to this section, under the criteria and conditions
specifically authorized in the statutory and regulatory provisions
providing for the substitution.
(b) Conditions and criteria for identification by accounting
method. Manufacturers, producers, claimants, or other appropriate
persons may identify for drawback purposes lots of merchandise or
articles under this section, subject to each of the following
conditions and criteria:
(1) The lots of merchandise or articles to be so identified must be
fungible as defined in Sec. 190.2;
(2) The person using the identification method must be able to
establish that inventory records (for example, material control
records), prepared and used in the ordinary course of business, account
for the lots of merchandise or articles to be identified as being
received into and withdrawn from the same inventory. Even if
merchandise or articles are received or withdrawn at different
geographical locations, if such inventory records treat receipts or
withdrawals as being from the same inventory, those inventory records
may be used to identify the merchandise or articles under this section,
subject to the conditions of this section. If any such inventory
records (that is, inventory records prepared and used in the ordinary
course of business) treat receipts and withdrawals as being from
different inventories, those inventory records must be used and
receipts into or withdrawals from the different inventories may not be
accounted for together. If units of merchandise or articles can be
specifically identified (for example, by serial number), the
merchandise or articles must be specifically identified and may not be
identified by accounting method, unless it is established that
inventory records, prepared and used in the ordinary course of
business, treat the merchandise or articles to be identified as being
received into and withdrawn from the same inventory (subject to the
above conditions);
(3) Unless otherwise provided in this section or specifically
approved by CBP (by a binding ruling under part 177 of this chapter),
all receipts (or inputs) into and all withdrawals from the inventory
must be recorded in the accounting record;
(4) The records which support any identification method under this
section are subject to verification by CBP (see Sec. 190.61). If CBP
requests such verification, the person using the identification method
must be able to demonstrate how, under Generally Accepted Accounting
Procedures (GAAP), the records which support the identification method
used account for all merchandise or articles in, and all receipts into
and withdrawals from, the inventory, and the drawback per unit for each
receipt and withdrawal; and
(5) Any accounting method which is used by a person for drawback
purposes under this section must be used exclusively, without using
other methods for a period of at least one year, unless approval is
given by CBP for a shorter period.
(c) Approved accounting methods. The following accounting methods
are approved for use in the identification of merchandise or articles
for drawback purposes under this section. If a claim is eligible for
the use of any accounting method, the claimant must indicate on the
drawback entry whether an accounting method was used, and if so, which
accounting method was used, to identify the merchandise as part of the
complete claim (see Sec. 190.51).
(1) First-in, first-out (FIFO)--(i) General. The FIFO method is the
method by which fungible merchandise or articles are identified by
recordkeeping on the basis of the first merchandise or articles
received into the inventory. Under this method, withdrawals are from
the oldest (first-in) merchandise or articles in the inventory at the
time of withdrawal.
(ii) Example. If the beginning inventory is zero, 100 units with $1
drawback attributable per unit are received in inventory on the 2nd of
the month, 50 units with no drawback attributable per unit are received
into inventory on the 5th of the month, 75 units are withdrawn for
domestic (non-export) shipment on the 10th of the month, 75 units with
$2 drawback attributable per unit are received in inventory on the 15th
of the month, 100 units are withdrawn for export on the 20th of the
month, and no other receipts or withdrawals occurred in the month, the
drawback attributable to the 100 units withdrawn for export on the 20th
is a total of $75 (25 units from the receipt on the 2nd with $1
drawback attributable per unit, 50 units from the receipt on the 5th
with no drawback attributable per unit, and 25 units from the receipt
on the 15th with $2 drawback attributable per unit). The basis of the
foregoing and the effects on the inventory of the receipts and
withdrawals, and balance in the inventory thereafter are as follows: On
the 2nd of the month the receipt of 100 units ($1 drawback/unit)
results in a balance of that amount; the receipt of 50 units ($0
drawback/unit) on the 5th results in a balance of 150 units (100 with
$1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0 drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
10th of 75 units ($1 drawback/unit) results in a balance of 75 units
(25 with $1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0 drawback/unit); the receipt of
75 units ($2 drawback/unit) on the 15th results in a balance of 150
units (25 with $1 drawback/unit, 50 with $0 drawback/unit, and 75 with
$2 drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the 20th of 100 units (25
[[Page 37930]]
with $1 drawback/unit, 50 with $0 drawback/unit, and 25 with $2
drawback unit) results in a balance of 50 units (all 50 with $2
drawback/unit).
(2) Last-in, first out (LIFO)--(i) General. The LIFO method is the
method by which fungible merchandise or articles are identified by
recordkeeping on the basis of the last merchandise or articles received
into the inventory. Under this method, withdrawals are from the newest
(last-in) merchandise or articles in the inventory at the time of
withdrawal.
(ii) Example. In the example in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this
section, the drawback attributable to the 100 units withdrawn for
export on the 20th is a total of $175 (75 units from the receipt on the
15th with $2 drawback attributable per unit and 25 units from the
receipt on the 2nd with $1 drawback attributable per unit). The basis
of the foregoing and the effects on the inventory of the receipts and
withdrawals, and balance in the inventory thereafter are as follows: On
the 2nd of the month the receipt of 100 units ($1 drawback/unit)
results in a balance of that amount; the receipt of 50 units ($0
drawback/unit) on the 5th results in a balance of 150 units (100 with
$1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0 drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
10th of 75 units (50 with $0 drawback/unit and 25 with $1 drawback/
unit) results in a balance of 75 units (all with $1 drawback/unit); the
receipt of 75 units ($2 drawback/unit) on the 15th results in a balance
of 150 units (75 with $1 drawback/unit and 75 with $2 drawback/unit);
the withdrawal on the 20th of 100 units (75 with $2 drawback/unit and
25 with $1 drawback/unit) results in a balance of 50 units (all 50 with
$1 drawback/unit).
(3) Low-to-high--(i) General. The low-to-high method is the method
by which fungible merchandise or articles are identified by
recordkeeping on the basis of the lowest drawback amount per unit of
the merchandise or articles in inventory. Merchandise or articles with
no drawback attributable to them (for example, domestic merchandise or
duty-free merchandise) must be accounted for and are treated as having
the lowest drawback attributable to them. Under this method,
withdrawals are from the merchandise or articles with the least amount
of drawback attributable to them, then those with the next higher
amount, and so forth. If the same amount of drawback is attributable to
more than one lot of merchandise or articles, withdrawals are from the
oldest (first-in) merchandise or articles among those lots with the
same amount of drawback attributable. Drawback requirements are
applicable to withdrawn merchandise or articles as identified (for
example, if the merchandise or articles identified were attributable to
an import more than 5 years before the claimed export, no drawback
could be granted).
(ii) Ordinary Low-to-High--(A) Method. Under the ordinary low-to-
high method, all receipts into and all withdrawals from the inventory
are recorded in the accounting record and accounted for so that each
withdrawal, whether for export or domestic shipment, is identified by
recordkeeping on the basis of the lowest drawback amount per unit of
the merchandise or articles available in the inventory.
(B) Example. (1) In this example, the beginning inventory is zero,
and receipts into and withdrawals from the inventory are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Receipt ($ per
Date unit) Withdrawals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. 2........................ 100 (zero).........
Jan. 5........................ 50 ($1.00).........
Jan. 15....................... ................... 50 (export).
Jan. 20....................... 50 ($1.01).........
Jan. 25....................... 50 ($1.02).........
Jan. 28....................... ................... 50 (domestic).
Jan. 31....................... 50 ($1.03).........
Feb. 5........................ ................... 100 (export).
Feb. 10....................... 50 ($.95)..........
Feb. 15....................... ................... 50 (export).
Feb. 20....................... 50 (zero)..........
Feb. 23....................... ................... 50 (domestic).
Feb. 25....................... 50 ($1.05).........
Feb. 28....................... ................... 100 (export).
Mar. 5........................ 50 ($1.06).........
Mar. 10....................... 50 ($.85)..........
Mar. 15....................... ................... 50 (export).
Mar. 21....................... ................... 50 (domestic).
Mar. 20....................... 50 ($1.08).........
Mar. 25....................... 50 ($.90)..........
Mar. 31....................... ................... 100 (export).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) The drawback attributable to the January 15 withdrawal for
export is zero (the available receipt with the lowest drawback amount
per unit is the January 2 receipt), the drawback attributable to the
January 28 withdrawal for domestic shipment (no drawback) is zero (the
remainder of the January 2 receipt), the drawback attributable to the
February 5 withdrawal for export is $100.50 (the January 5 and January
20 receipts), the drawback attributable to the February 15 withdrawal
for export is $47.50 (the February 10 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the February 23 withdrawal for domestic shipment (no
drawback) is zero (the February 20 receipt), the drawback attributable
to the February 28 withdrawal for export is $102.50 (the January 25 and
January 31 receipts), the drawback attributable to the March 15
withdrawal for export is $42.50 (the March 10 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the March 21 withdrawal for domestic shipment (no
drawback) is $52.50 (the February 25 receipt), and the drawback
attributable to the March 31 withdrawal for export is $98.00 (the March
25 and March 5 receipts). Remaining in inventory is the March 20
receipt of 50 units ($1.08 drawback/unit). Total drawback attributable
to withdrawals for export in this example would be $391.00.
(iii) Low-to-high method with established average inventory turn-
over period--(A) Method. Under the low-to-high method with established
average inventory turn-over period, all receipts into and all
withdrawals for export are recorded in the accounting record and
accounted for so that each withdrawal is identified by recordkeeping on
the basis of the lowest drawback amount per available unit of the
merchandise or articles received into the inventory in the established
average inventory turn-over period preceding the withdrawal.
(B) Accounting for withdrawals (for domestic shipments and for
export). Under the low to-high method with established average
inventory turn-over period, domestic withdrawals (withdrawals for
domestic shipment) are not accounted for and do not affect the
available units of merchandise or articles. All withdrawals for export
must be accounted for whether or not drawback is available or claimed
on the withdrawals. Once a withdrawal for export is made and accounted
for under this method, the merchandise or articles withdrawn are no
longer available for identification.
(C) Establishment of inventory turn-over period. For purposes of
the low to-high method with established average inventory turn-over
period, the average inventory turn-over period is based on the rate of
withdrawal from inventory and represents the time in which all of the
merchandise or articles in the inventory at a given time must have been
withdrawn based on that rate. To establish an average of this time, at
least 1 year, or 3 turn-over periods (if inventory turns over fewer
than 3 times per year), must be averaged. The inventory turn-over
period must be that for the merchandise or articles to be identified,
except that if the person using the method has more than one kind of
merchandise or articles with different inventory turn-over periods, the
longest average turn-over period established under this section may be
used (instead of using a different inventory turn-over period for each
kind of merchandise or article).
(D) Example. In the example in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this
section
[[Page 37931]]
(but, as required for this method, without accounting for domestic
withdrawals, and with an established average inventory turn-over period
of 30 days), the drawback attributable to the January 15 withdrawal for
export is zero (the available receipt in the preceding 30 days with the
lowest amount of drawback is the January 2 receipt, of which 50 units
will remain after the withdrawal), the drawback attributable to the
February 5 withdrawal for export is $101.50 (the January 20 and January
25 receipts), the drawback attributable to the February 15 withdrawal
for export is $47.50 (the February 10 receipt), the drawback
attributable to the February 28 withdrawal for export is $51.50 (the
February 20 and January 31 receipts), the drawback attributable to the
March 15 withdrawal for export is $42.50 (the March 10 receipt), and
the drawback attributable to the March 31 withdrawal for export is
$98.00 (the March 25 and March 5 receipts). No drawback may be claimed
on the basis of the January 5 receipt or the February 25 receipt
because in the case of each, there were insufficient withdrawals for
export within the established average inventory turn-over period; the
50 units remaining from the January 2 receipt after the January 15
withdrawal are not identified for a withdrawal for export because there
is no other withdrawal for export (other than the January 15
withdrawal) within the established average inventory turn-over period;
the March 20 receipt (50 units at $1.08) is not yet attributed to
withdrawals for export. Total drawback attributable to withdrawals for
export in this example would be $341.00.
(iv) Low-to-high blanket method--(A) Method. Under the low-to-high
blanket method, all receipts into and all withdrawals for export are
recorded in the accounting record and accounted for. Each withdrawal is
identified on the basis of the lowest drawback amount per available
unit of the merchandise or articles received into inventory in the
applicable statutory period for export preceding the withdrawal (e.g.,
180 days under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) and 5 years for other types of
drawback claims pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(r)). Drawback requirements
are applicable to withdrawn merchandise or articles as identified (for
example, no drawback could be granted generally if the merchandise or
articles identified were attributable to an import made more than 5
years before the claimed export; and, for claims pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1313(p), no drawback could be granted if the merchandise or articles
identified were attributable to an import that was entered more than
180 days after the date of the claimed export or if the claimed export
was more than 180 days after the close of the manufacturing period
attributable to an import).
(B) Accounting for withdrawals (for domestic shipments and for
export). Under the low-to-high blanket method, domestic withdrawals
(withdrawals for domestic shipment) are not accounted for and do not
affect the available units of merchandise or articles. All withdrawals
for export must be accounted for whether or not drawback is available
or claimed on the withdrawals. Once a withdrawal for export is made and
accounted for under this method, the merchandise or articles withdrawn
are no longer available for identification.
(C) Example. In the example in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this
section (but, as required for this method, without accounting for
domestic withdrawals), the drawback attributable to the January 15
withdrawal for export is zero (the available receipt in the inventory
with the lowest amount of drawback is the January 2 receipt, of which
50 units will remain after the withdrawal), the drawback attributable
to the February 5 withdrawal for export is $50.00 (the remainder of the
January 2 receipt and the January 5 receipt), the drawback attributable
to the February 15 withdrawal for export is $47.50 (the February 10
receipt), the drawback attributable to the February 28 withdrawal for
export is $50.50 (the February 20 and January 20 receipts), the
drawback attributable to the March 15 withdrawal for export is $42.50
(the March 10 receipt), and the drawback attributable to the March 31
withdrawal for export is $96.00 (the March 25 and January 25 receipts).
Receipts not attributed to withdrawals for export are the January 31
(50 units at $1.03), February 25 (50 units at $1.05), March 5 (50 units
at $1.06), and March 20 (50 units at $1.08) receipts. Total drawback
attributable to withdrawals for export in this example would be
$286.50.
(4) Average--(i) General. The average method is the method by which
fungible merchandise or articles are identified on the basis of the
calculation by recordkeeping of the amount of drawback that may be
attributed to each unit of merchandise or articles in the inventory. In
this method, the ratio of:
(A) The total units of a particular receipt of the fungible
merchandise in the inventory at the time of a withdrawal to;
(B) The total units of all receipts of the fungible merchandise
(including each receipt into inventory) at the time of the withdrawal;
(C) Is applied to the withdrawal, so that the withdrawal consists
of a proportionate quantity of units from each particular receipt and
each receipt is correspondingly decreased. Withdrawals and
corresponding decreases to receipts are rounded to the nearest whole
number.
(ii) Example. In the example in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this
section, the drawback attributable to the 100 units withdrawn for
export on the 20th is a total of $133 (50 units from the receipt on the
15th with $2 drawback attributable per unit, 33 units from the receipt
on the 2nd with $1 drawback attributable per unit, and 17 units from
the receipt on the 5th with $0 drawback attributable per unit). The
basis of the foregoing and the effects on the inventory of the receipts
and withdrawals, and balance in the inventory thereafter are as
follows: On the 2nd of the month the receipt of 100 units ($1 drawback/
unit) results in a balance of that amount; the receipt of 50 units ($0
drawback/unit) on the 5th results in a balance of 150 units (100 with
$1 drawback/unit and 50 with $0 drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
10th of 75 units (50 with $1 drawback/unit (applying the ratio of 100
units from the receipt on the 2nd to the total of 150 units at the time
of withdrawal) and 25 with $0 drawback/unit (applying the ratio of 50
units from the receipt on the 5th to the total of 150 units at the time
of withdrawal)) results in a balance of 75 units (with 50 with $1
drawback/unit and 25 with $0 drawback/unit, on the basis of the same
ratios); the receipt of 75 units ($2 drawback/unit) on the 15th results
in a balance of 150 units (50 with $1 drawback/unit, 25 with $0
drawback/unit, and 75 with $2 drawback/unit); the withdrawal on the
20th of 100 units (50 with $2 drawback/unit (applying the ratio of the
75 units from the receipt on the 15th to the total of 150 units at the
time of withdrawal), 33 with $1 drawback/unit (applying the ratio of
the 50 units remaining from the receipt on the 2nd to the total of 150
units at the time of withdrawal, and 17 with $0 drawback/unit (applying
the ratio of the 25 units remaining from the receipt on the 5th to the
total of 150 units at the time of withdrawal)) results in a balance of
50 units (25 with $2 drawback/unit, 17 with $1 drawback/unit, and 8
with $0 drawback/unit, on the basis of the same ratios).
(5) Inventory turn-over for limited purposes. A properly
established average inventory turn-over period, as provided for in
paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(C) of this section, may be used to determine:
(i) The fact and date(s) of use in manufacture or production of the
[[Page 37932]]
imported designated merchandise and other (substituted) merchandise
(see 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)); or
(ii) The fact and date(s) of manufacture or production of the
exported or destroyed articles (see 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and (b)).
(d) Approval of other accounting methods. (1) Persons proposing to
use an accounting method for identification of merchandise or articles
for drawback purposes which has not been previously approved for such
use (see paragraph (c) of this section), or which includes
modifications from the methods listed in paragraph (c) of this section,
may seek approval by CBP of the proposed accounting method under the
provisions for obtaining an administrative ruling (see part 177 of this
chapter). The conditions applied and the criteria used by CBP in
approving such an alternative accounting method, or a modification of
one of the approved accounting methods, will be the criteria in
paragraph (b) of this section, as well as those in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section.
(2) In order for a proposed accounting method to be approved by CBP
for purposes of this section, it must meet the following criteria:
(i) For purposes of calculations of drawback, the proposed
accounting method must be either revenue neutral or favorable to the
Government; and
(ii) The proposed accounting method should be:
(A) Generally consistent with commercial accounting procedures, as
applicable for purposes of drawback;
(B) Consistent with inventory or material control records used in
the ordinary course of business by the person proposing the method; and
(C) Easily administered by CBP.
Sec. 190.15 Recordkeeping.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all records which pertain to the
filing of a drawback claim or to the information contained in the
records required by 19 U.S.C. 1313 in connection with the filing of a
drawback claim must be retained for 3 years after liquidation of such
claims or longer period if required by law (under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the
same records may be subject to a different period for different
purposes).
Subpart B--Manufacturing Drawback
Sec. 190.21 Direct identification manufacturing drawback.
Section 313(a) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a)), provides
for drawback upon the exportation, or destruction under CBP
supervision, of articles manufactured or produced in the United States
with the use of imported merchandise, provided that those articles have
not been used in the United States prior to such exportation or
destruction. The amount of drawback allowable shall not exceed 99
percent of the amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to
the imported merchandise. However, duties may not be refunded upon the
exportation or destruction of flour or by-products produced from
imported wheat. Where two or more products result, drawback must be
distributed among the products in accordance with their relative
values, as defined in Sec. 190.2, at the time of separation.
Merchandise may be identified for drawback purposes under 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) in the manner provided for and prescribed in Sec. 190.14.
Sec. 190.22 Substitution manufacturing drawback.
(a)(1) General--(i) Substitution standard. If imported, duty-paid
merchandise or merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number as the imported merchandise is used in the
manufacture or production of articles within a period not to exceed 5
years from the date of importation of such imported merchandise, then
upon the exportation, or destruction under CBP supervision, of any such
articles, without their having been used in the United States prior to
such exportation or destruction, drawback is provided for in section
313(b) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(b)). Drawback is
allowable even though none of the imported, duty-paid merchandise may
actually have been used in the manufacture or production of the
exported or destroyed articles.
(ii) Allowable refund--(A) Exportation. In the case of an article
that is exported, the amount of drawback allowable will not exceed 99
percent of the lesser of:
(1) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise; or
(2) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the
substituted merchandise if the substituted merchandise were imported.
(B) Destruction. In the case of an article that is destroyed, the
amount of drawback allowable will not exceed 99 percent of the lesser
of:
(1) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise (reduced by the value of materials recovered
during destruction as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x)); or
(2) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the
substituted merchandise if the substituted merchandise were imported
(reduced by the value of materials recovered during destruction as
provided in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x)).
(C) Federal excise tax. For purposes of drawback of internal
revenue tax imposed under Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export
or destruction of substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount
of taxes paid (and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substituted merchandise.
(2) Special rule for sought chemical elements--(i) Substitution
standard. A sought chemical element, as defined in Sec. 190.2, may be
considered imported merchandise, or merchandise classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number as such imported merchandise, used
in the manufacture or production of an article as described in
paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, and it may be substituted for
source material containing that sought chemical element, without regard
to whether the sought chemical element and the source material are
classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number, and
apportioned quantitatively, as appropriate (see Sec. 190.26(b)(4)).
(ii) Allowable refund. The amount of drawback allowable will be
determined in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section. The
value of the substituted source material must be determined based on
the quantity of the sought chemical element present in the source
material, as calculated per Sec. 190.26(b)(4).
(b) Use by same manufacturer or producer at different factory.
Duty-paid merchandise or drawback products used at one factory of a
manufacturer or producer within 5 years after the date on which the
material was imported may be designated as the basis for drawback on
articles manufactured or produced in accordance with these regulations
at other factories of the same manufacturer or producer.
(c) Designation. A manufacturer or producer may designate any
eligible imported merchandise or drawback product which it has used in
manufacture or production.
(d) Designation by successor--(1) General rule. Upon compliance
with the requirements in this section and under 19 U.S.C. 1313(s), a
drawback successor as defined in paragraph (d)(2) of this section may
designate merchandise or drawback product used by a predecessor before
the date of succession as the basis for drawback on articles
manufactured or produced by the successor after the date of succession.
[[Page 37933]]
(2) Drawback successor. A ``drawback successor'' is a manufacturer
or producer to whom another entity (predecessor) has transferred, by
written agreement, merger, or corporate resolution:
(i) All or substantially all of the rights, privileges, immunities,
powers, duties, and liabilities of the predecessor; or
(ii) The assets and other business interests of a division, plant,
or other business unit of such predecessor, provided that the value of
the transferred assets and interests (realty, personalty, and
intangibles, exclusive of the drawback rights) exceeds the value of
such drawback rights, whether vested or contingent.
(3) Certifications and required evidence--(i) Records of
predecessor. The predecessor or successor must certify that the
successor is in possession of the predecessor's records which are
necessary to establish the right to drawback under the law and
regulations with respect to the merchandise or drawback product.
(ii) Merchandise not otherwise designated. The predecessor or
successor must certify in an attachment to the claim, that the
predecessor has not designated and will not designate, nor enable any
other person to designate, such merchandise or product as the basis for
drawback.
(iii) Value of transferred property. In instances in which assets
and other business interests of a division, plant, or other business
unit of a predecessor are transferred, the predecessor or successor
must specify, and maintain supporting records to establish, the value
of the drawback rights and the value of all other transferred property.
(iv) Review by CBP. The written agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution, provided for in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, and the
records and evidence provided for in paragraph (d)(3)(i) through (iii)
of this section, must be retained by the appropriate party(s) for 3
years from the date of liquidation of the related claim and are subject
to review by CBP upon request.
(e) Multiple products--(1) General. Where two or more products are
produced concurrently in a substitution manufacturing operation,
drawback will be distributed to each product in accordance with its
relative value (see Sec. 190.2) at the time of separation.
(2) Claims covering a manufacturing period. Where the claim covers
a manufacturing period rather than a manufacturing lot, the entire
period covered by the claim is the time of separation of the products
and the value per unit of product is the market value for the period
(as provided for in the definition of relative value in Sec. 190.2).
Manufacturing periods in excess of one month may not be used without
specific approval of CBP.
(3) Recordkeeping. Records must be maintained showing the relative
value of each product at the time of separation.
Sec. 190.23 Methods and requirements for claiming drawback.
Claims must be based on one or more of the methods specified in
paragraph (a) of this section and comply with all other requirements
specified in this section.
(a) Method of claiming drawback.--(1) Used in. Drawback may be paid
based on the amount of the imported or substituted merchandise used in
the manufacture of the exported article, where there is no waste or the
waste is valueless or unrecoverable. This method must be used when
multiple products also necessarily and concurrently result from the
manufacturing process, and there is no valuable waste (see paragraph
(a)(2) of this section).
(2) Used in less valuable waste. Drawback is allowable under this
method based on the quantity of merchandise or drawback products used
to manufacture the exported or destroyed article, reduced by an amount
equal to the quantity of this merchandise that the value of the waste
would replace. This method must be used when multiple products also
necessarily and concurrently result from the manufacturing process, and
there is valuable waste.
(3) Relative value. Drawback is also allowable under this method
when two or more products result from manufacturing or production. The
relative value method must be used when multiple products also
necessarily and concurrently result from the manufacturing process, and
drawback must be distributed among the products in accordance with
their relative values (as defined in Sec. 190.2) at the time of
separation.
(4) Appearing in. Drawback is allowable under this method based
only on the amount of imported or substituted merchandise that appears
in (is contained in) the exported articles. The appearing in method may
not be used if there are multiple products also necessarily and
concurrently resulting from the manufacturing process.
(b) Abstract or schedule. A drawback claimant may use either the
abstract or schedule method to show the quantity of material used or
appearing in the exported or destroyed article. An abstract is the
summary of records which shows the total quantity used in or appearing
in all articles produced during the period covered by the abstract. A
schedule shows the quantity of material actually used in producing, or
appearing in, each unit of product. Manufacturers or producers
submitting letters of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.7) and applicants for
approval of specific manufacturing drawback rulings (see Sec. 190.8)
must state whether the abstract or schedule method is used; if no such
statement is made, drawback claims must be based upon the abstract
method.
(c) Claim for waste.--(1) Valuable waste. When the waste has a
value and the drawback claim is not limited to the quantity of imported
or substituted merchandise or drawback products appearing in the
exported or destroyed articles claimed for drawback, the manufacturer
or producer must keep records to show the market value of the
merchandise or drawback products used to manufacture or produce the
exported or destroyed articles, as well as the market value of the
resulting waste, under the used in less valuable waste method (as
provided for in the definition of relative value in Sec. 190.2).
(2) If claim for waste is waived. If claim for waste is waived,
only the ``appearing in'' basis may be used (see paragraph (a)(4) of
this section). Waste records need not be kept unless required to
establish the quantity of imported duty-paid merchandise or drawback
products appearing in the exported or destroyed articles claimed for
drawback.
Sec. 190.24 Transfer of merchandise.
Evidence of any transfers of merchandise (see Sec. 190.10) must be
evidenced by records, as defined in Sec. 190.2.
Sec. 190.25 Destruction under CBP supervision.
A claimant may destroy merchandise and obtain drawback by complying
with the procedures set forth in Sec. 190.71 relating to destruction.
Sec. 190.26 Recordkeeping.
(a) Direct identification. (1) Records required. Each manufacturer
or producer under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) must keep records to allow the
verifying CBP official to trace all articles manufactured or produced
for exportation or destruction with drawback, from importation, through
manufacture or production, to exportation or destruction. To this end,
these records must specifically establish:
(i) The date or inclusive dates of manufacture or production;
[[Page 37934]]
(ii) The quantity, identity, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading number(s)
of the imported duty-paid merchandise or drawback products used in or
appearing in (see Sec. 190.23) the articles manufactured or produced;
(iii) The quantity, if any, of the non-drawback merchandise used,
when these records are necessary to determine the quantity of imported
duty-paid merchandise or drawback product used in the manufacture or
production of the exported or destroyed articles or appearing in them;
(iv) The quantity and description of the articles manufactured or
produced;
(v) The quantity of waste incurred, if applicable; and
(vi) That the articles on which drawback is claimed were exported
or destroyed within 5 years after the importation of the duty-paid
merchandise, without having been used in the United States prior to
such exportation or destruction. (If the articles were commingled after
manufacture or production, their identity may be maintained in the
manner prescribed in Sec. 190.14.)
(2) Accounting. The merchandise and articles to be exported or
destroyed will be accounted for in a manner which will enable the
manufacturer, producer, or claimant:
(i) To determine, and the CBP official to verify, the applicable
import entry and any transfers of the merchandise associated with the
claim; and
(ii) To identify with respect to that import entry, and any
transfers of the merchandise, the imported merchandise or drawback
products used in manufacture or production.
(b) Substitution. The records of the manufacturer or producer of
articles manufactured or produced in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
must establish the facts in paragraph (a)(1)(i), (iv) through (vi) of
this section, and:
(1) The quantity, identity, and specifications of the merchandise
designated (imported duty-paid, or drawback product);
(2) The quantity, identity, and specifications of the substituted
merchandise before its use to manufacture or produce (or appearing in)
the exported or destroyed articles;
(3) That, within 5 years after the date of importation of the
imported duty-paid merchandise, the manufacturer or producer used the
designated merchandise in manufacturing or production and that during
the same 5-year period it manufactured or produced the exported or
destroyed articles; and
(4) If the designated merchandise is a sought chemical element, as
defined in Sec. 190.2, that was contained in imported material and a
substitution drawback claim is made based on that chemical element:
(i) The duty paid on the imported material must be apportioned
among its constituent components. The claim on the chemical element
that is the designated merchandise must be limited to the duty
apportioned to that element on a unit-for-unit attribution using the
unit of measure set forth in the HTSUS that is applicable to the
imported material. If the material is a compound with other
constituents, including impurities, and the purity of the compound in
the imported material is shown by satisfactory analysis, that purity,
converted to a decimal equivalent of the percentage, is multiplied
against the entered amount of the material to establish the amount of
pure compound. The amount of the element in the pure compound is to be
determined by use of the atomic weights of the constituent elements and
converting to the decimal equivalent of their respective percentages
and multiplying that decimal equivalent against the above-determined
amount of pure compound.
(ii) The amount claimed as drawback based on the sought chemical
element must be deducted from the duty paid on the imported material
that may be claimed on any other drawback claim.
Example to paragraph (b)(4): Synthetic rutile that is shown by
appropriate analysis in the entry papers to be 91.7% pure titanium
dioxide is imported and dutiable at a 5% ad valorem duty rate. The
amount of imported synthetic rutile is 30,000 pounds with an entered
value of $12,000. The total duty paid is $600. Titanium in the
synthetic rutile is designated as the basis for a drawback claim under
19 U.S.C. 1313(b). The amount of titanium dioxide in the synthetic
rutile is determined by converting the purity percentage (91.7%) to its
decimal equivalent (.917) and multiplying the entered amount of
synthetic rutile (30,000 pounds) by that decimal equivalent (.917 x
30,000 = 27,510 pounds of titanium dioxide contained in the 30,000
pounds of imported synthetic rutile). The titanium, based on atomic
weight, represents 59.93% of the constituents in titanium dioxide.
Multiplying that percentage, converted to its decimal equivalent, by
the amount of titanium dioxide determines the titanium content of the
imported synthetic rutile (.5993 x 27,510 pounds of titanium dioxide =
16,486.7 pounds of titanium contained in the imported synthetic
rutile). Therefore, up to 16,486.7 pounds of titanium is available to
be designated as the basis for drawback. As the per unit duty paid on
the synthetic rutile is calculated by dividing the duty paid ($600) by
the amount of imported synthetic rutile (30,000 pounds), the per unit
duty is two cents of duty per pound of the imported synthetic rutile
($600 / 30,000 = $0.02). The duty on the titanium is calculated by
multiplying the amount of titanium contained in the imported synthetic
rutile by two cents of duty per pound (16,486.7 x $0.02 = $329.73 duty
apportioned to the titanium). The product is then multiplied by 99% to
determine the maximum amount of drawback available ($329.73 x .99 =
$326.44). If an exported titanium alloy ingot weighs 17,000 pounds, in
which 16,000 pounds of titanium was used to make the ingot, drawback is
determined by multiplying the duty per pound ($0.02) by the weight of
the titanium contained in the ingot (16,000 pounds) to calculate the
duty available for drawback ($0.02 x 16,000 = $320.00). Because only
99% of the duty can be claimed, drawback is determined by multiplying
this available duty amount by 99% (.99 x $320.00 = $316.80). As the
oxygen content of the titanium dioxide is 45% of the synthetic rutile,
if oxygen is the designated merchandise on another drawback claim, 45%
of the duty claimed on the synthetic rutile would be available for
drawback based on the substitution of oxygen.
(c) Valuable waste records. When waste has a value and the
manufacturer, producer, or claimant, has not limited the claims based
on the quantity of imported or substituted merchandise appearing in the
articles exported or destroyed, the manufacturer or producer must keep
records to show the market value of the merchandise used to manufacture
or produce the exported or destroyed article, as well as the quantity
and market value of the waste incurred (as provided for in the
definition of relative value in Sec. 190.2). In such records, the
quantity of merchandise identified or designated for drawback, under 19
U.S.C. 1313(a) or 1313(b), respectively, must be based on the quantity
of merchandise actually used to manufacture or produce the exported or
destroyed articles. The waste replacement reduction will be determined
by reducing from the quantity of merchandise actually used by the
amount of merchandise which the value of the waste would replace.
(d) Purchase of manufactured or produced articles for exportation.
Where the claimant purchases articles from the manufacturer or producer
and exports them, the claimant must
[[Page 37935]]
maintain records to document the manufacture or production and transfer
of those articles (see Sec. 190.51(a)(1)).
(e) Multiple claimants--(1) General. Multiple claimants may file
for drawback with respect to the same export (for example, if an
automobile is exported, where different parts of the automobile have
been produced by different manufacturers under drawback conditions and
the exporter waives the right to claim drawback and assigns such right
to the manufacturers under Sec. 190.82).
(2) Procedures--(i) Submission of letter. Each drawback claimant
must file a separate letter, as part of the claim, describing the
component article on the export bill of lading to which each claim will
relate. Each letter must show the name of the claimant and bear a
statement that the claim will be limited to its respective component
article. The exporter must endorse the letters, as required, to show
the respective interests of the claimants.
(ii) Blanket waivers and assignments of drawback rights. Exporters
may waive and assign their drawback rights for all, or any portion, of
their exportations with respect to a particular commodity for a given
period to a drawback claimant.
(f) Retention of records. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all
records required to be kept by the manufacturer, producer, or claimant
with respect to drawback claims, and records kept by others to
complement the records of the manufacturer, producer, or claimant with
respect to drawback claims must be retained for 3 years after the date
of liquidation of the related claims (under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the same
records may be subject to a different retention period for different
purposes).
Sec. 190.27 Time limitations for manufacturing drawback.
(a) Direct identification. Drawback will be allowed on imported
merchandise used to manufacture or produce articles that are exported
or destroyed under CBP supervision within 5 years after importation of
the merchandise identified to support the claim.
(b) Substitution. Drawback will be allowed on the imported
merchandise if the following conditions are met:
(1) The designated merchandise is used in manufacture or production
within 5 years after importation;
(2) Within the 5-year period described in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the exported or destroyed articles, or drawback products, were
manufactured or produced; and
(3) The completed articles must be exported or destroyed under CBP
supervision within 5 years of the date of importation of the designated
merchandise, or within 5 years of the earliest date of importation
associated with a drawback product.
(c) Drawback claims filed before specific or general manufacturing
drawback ruling approved or acknowledged. Drawback claims may be filed
before the letter of notification of intent to operate under a general
manufacturing drawback ruling covering the claims is acknowledged
(Sec. 190.7), or before the specific manufacturing drawback ruling
covering the claims is approved (Sec. 190.8), but no drawback will be
paid until such acknowledgement or approval, as appropriate.
Sec. 190.28 Person entitled to claim manufacturing drawback.
The exporter (or destroyer) will be entitled to claim drawback,
unless the exporter (or destroyer), by means of a certification,
assigns the right to claim drawback to the manufacturer, producer,
importer, or intermediate party. Such certification must also affirm
that the exporter (or destroyer) has not and will not itself claim
drawback or assign the right to claim drawback on the particular
exportation or destruction to any other party. The certification
provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a
stated period. Drawback is paid to the claimant, who may be the
manufacturer, producer, intermediate party, importer, or exporter (or
destroyer).
Sec. 190.29 Certification of bill of materials or formula.
At the time of filing a claim under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), the
claimant must certify the following:
(a) The claimant is in possession of the applicable bill of
materials or formula for the exported or destroyed article(s), which
will be promptly provided upon request;
(b) The bill of materials or formula identifies the imported and/or
substituted merchandise and the exported or destroyed article(s) by
their 8-digit HTSUS subheading numbers; and
(c) The bill of materials or formula identifies the manufactured
quantities of the imported and/or substituted merchandise and the
exported or destroyed article(s).
Subpart C--Unused Merchandise Drawback
Sec. 190.31 Direct identification unused merchandise drawback.
(a) General. Section 313(j)(1) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1)), provides for drawback upon the exportation or destruction
under CBP supervision of imported merchandise upon which was paid any
duty, tax, or fee imposed under Federal law upon entry or importation,
if the merchandise has not been used within the United States before
such exportation or destruction. The total amount of drawback allowable
will not exceed 99 percent of the amount of duties, taxes, and fees
paid with respect to the imported merchandise.
(b) Time of exportation or destruction. Drawback will be allowable
on imported merchandise if, before the close of the 5-year period
beginning on the date of importation and before the drawback claim is
filed, the merchandise is exported from the United States or destroyed
under CBP supervision.
(c) Operations performed on imported merchandise. The performing of
any operation or combination of operations, not amounting to
manufacture or production under the provisions of the manufacturing
drawback law as provided for in 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(3)(A), on imported
merchandise is not a use of that merchandise for purposes of this
section.
Sec. 190.32 Substitution unused merchandise drawback.
(a) General. Section 313(j)(2) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2)), provides for drawback of duties, taxes, and fees paid on
imported merchandise based on the export or destruction under CBP
supervision of substituted merchandise (as defined in Sec. 190.2,
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)), before the close of the 5-year
period beginning on the date of importation of the imported merchandise
and before the drawback claim is filed, and before such exportation or
destruction the substituted merchandise is not used in the United
States (see paragraph (e) of this section) and is in the possession of
the party claiming drawback.
(b) Allowable refund. (1) Exportation. In the case of an article
that is exported, subject to paragraph (3) below, the total amount of
drawback allowable will not exceed 99 percent of the lesser of:
(i) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise; or
(ii) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the
exported
[[Page 37936]]
article if the exported article were imported.
(2) Destruction. In the case of an article that is destroyed,
subject to paragraph (3) below, the total amount of drawback allowable
will not exceed 99 percent of the lesser of:
(i) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the
imported merchandise (reduced by the value of materials recovered
during destruction as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1313(x)); or
(ii) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the
destroyed article if the destroyed article had been imported (reduced
by the value of materials recovered during destruction as provided in
19 U.S.C. 1313(x)).
(3) Federal excise tax. For purposes of drawback of internal
revenue tax imposed under Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export
or destruction of substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount
of taxes paid (and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substituted merchandise.
(c) Determination of HTSUS classification for substituted
merchandise. Requests for binding rulings on the classification of
imported, substituted, or exported merchandise may be submitted to CBP
pursuant to the procedures set forth in part 177.
(d) Claims for wine. (1) Alternative substitution standard. In
addition to 8-digit HTSUS substitution standard in Sec. 190.2,
drawback of duties, taxes, and fees, paid on imported wine as defined
in Sec. 190.2 may be allowable under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) with respect
to wine if the imported wine and the exported wine are of the same
color and the price variation between the imported wine and the
exported wine does not exceed 50 percent.
(2) Allowable refund. For any drawback claim for wine (as defined
in Sec. 190.2) based on subsection (j)(2), the total amount of
drawback allowable will be equal to 99 percent of the duties, taxes,
and fees paid with respect to the imported merchandise, without regard
to the limitations in paragraph (b).
(3) Required certification. When the basis for substitution for
wine drawback claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) is the alternative
substitution standard rule set forth in (d)(1), claims under this
subpart may be paid and liquidated if:
(i) The claimant specifies on the drawback entry that the basis for
substitution is the alternative substitution standard for wine; and
(ii) The claimant provides a certification, as part of the complete
claim (see 190.51(a)), stating that:
(A) The imported wine and the exported wine are a Class 1 grape
wine (as defined in 27 CFR 4.21(a)(1)) of the same color (i.e., red,
white, or ros[eacute]);
(B) The imported wine and the exported wine are table wines (as
defined in 27 CFR 4.21(a)(2)) and the alcoholic content does not exceed
14 percent by volume; and
(C) The price variation between the imported wine and the exported
wine does not exceed 50 percent.
(e) Operations performed on substituted merchandise. The performing
of any operation or combination of operations, not amounting to
manufacture or production as provided for in 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(3)(B),
on the substituted merchandise is not a use of that merchandise for
purposes of this section.
(f) Designation by successor; 19 U.S.C. 1313(s). (1) General rule.
Upon compliance with the requirements of this section and under 19
U.S.C. 1313(s), a drawback successor as defined in paragraph (f)(2) of
this section may designate either of the following as the basis for
drawback on merchandise possessed by the successor after the date of
succession:
(i) Imported merchandise which the predecessor, before the date of
succession, imported; or
(ii) Imported and/or substituted merchandise that was transferred
to the predecessor from the person who imported and paid duty on the
imported merchandise.
(2) Drawback successor. A ``drawback successor'' is an entity to
which another entity (predecessor) has transferred, by written
agreement, merger, or corporate resolution:
(i) All or substantially all of the rights, privileges, immunities,
powers, duties, and liabilities of the predecessor; or
(ii) The assets and other business interests of a division, plant,
or other business unit of such predecessor, provided that the value of
the transferred assets and interests (realty, personalty, and
intangibles, exclusive of the drawback rights) exceeds the value of
such drawback rights, whether vested or contingent.
(3) Certifications and required evidence--(i) Records of
predecessor. The predecessor or successor must certify in an attachment
to the drawback claim that the successor is in possession of the
predecessor's records which are necessary to establish the right to
drawback under the law and regulations with respect to the imported
and/or substituted merchandise.
(ii) Merchandise not otherwise designated. The predecessor or
successor must certify in an attachment to the drawback claim, that the
predecessor has not and will not designate, nor enable any other person
to designate, the imported and/or substituted merchandise as the basis
for drawback.
(iii) Value of transferred property. In instances in which assets
and other business interests of a division, plant, or other business
unit of a predecessor are transferred, the predecessor or successor
must specify, and maintain supporting records to establish, the value
of the drawback rights and the value of all other transferred property.
(iv) Review by CBP. The written agreement, merger, or corporate
resolution, provided for in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, and the
records and evidence provided for in paragraph (f)(3)(i) through (iii)
of this section, must be retained by the appropriate party(s) for 3
years from the date of liquidation of the related claim and are subject
to review by CBP upon request.
Sec. 190.33 Person entitled to claim unused merchandise drawback.
(a) Direct identification. (1) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), as
amended, the exporter or destroyer will be entitled to claim drawback.
(2) The exporter or destroyer may waive the right to claim drawback
and assign such right to the importer or any intermediate party. A
drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) other than the exporter or
destroyer must secure and retain a certification signed by the exporter
or destroyer waiving the right to claim drawback, and did not and will
not authorize any other party to claim the exportation or destruction
for drawback (see Sec. 190.82 of this part). The certification
provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a
stated period. The claimant must file such certification at the time
of, or prior to, the filing of the claim(s) covered by the
certification.
(b) Substitution. (1) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), as amended, the
following parties may claim drawback:
(i) In situations where the exporter or destroyer of the
substituted merchandise is also the importer of the imported
merchandise, that party will be entitled to claim drawback.
(ii) In situations where the person who imported and paid the duty
on the imported merchandise transfers the imported merchandise,
substituted merchandise, or any combination of imported and substituted
merchandise to the person who exports or destroys that merchandise, the
exporter or destroyer will be entitled to claim drawback. (Any such
transferred
[[Page 37937]]
merchandise, regardless of its origin, will be treated as imported
merchandise for purposes of drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), and
any retained merchandise will be treated as domestic merchandise.)
(iii) In situations where the transferred merchandise described in
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section is the subject of further
transfer(s), such transfer(s) must be documented by records, including
records kept in the normal course of business, and the exporter or
destroyer will be entitled to claim drawback (multiple substitutions
are not permitted).
(2) The exporter or destroyer may waive the right to claim drawback
and assign such right to the importer or to any intermediate party,
provided that the claimant had possession of the substituted
merchandise prior to its exportation or destruction. A drawback
claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) other than the exporter or
destroyer must secure and retain a certification signed by the exporter
or destroyer that such party waived the right to claim drawback, and
did not and will not authorize any other party to claim the exportation
or destruction for drawback (see Sec. 190.82). The certification
provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a
stated period. The claimant must file such certification at the time
of, or prior to, the filing of the claim(s) covered by the
certification.
Sec. 190.34 Transfer of merchandise.
Any transfer of merchandise (see Sec. 190.10) must be recorded in
records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, as defined in Sec. 190.2.
Sec. 190.35 Notice of intent to export; examination of merchandise.
(a) Notice. A notice of intent to export merchandise which may be
the subject of an unused merchandise drawback claim (19 U.S.C. 1313(j))
must be provided to CBP to give CBP the opportunity to examine the
merchandise. The claimant, or the exporter, must file at the port of
intended examination a Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553 at least 2
working days prior to the date of intended exportation unless CBP
approves another filing period or the claimant has been granted a
waiver of prior notice (see Sec. 190.91).
(b) Required information. The notice must certify that the
merchandise has not been used in the United States before exportation.
In addition, the notice must provide the bill of lading number, if
known, the name and telephone number, mailing address, and, if
available, fax number and email address of a contact person, and the
location of the merchandise.
(c) Decision to examine or to waive examination. Within 2 working
days after receipt of the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback (see paragraph (a) of this
section), CBP will notify the party designated on the Notice in writing
of CBP's decision to either examine the merchandise to be exported, or
to waive examination. If CBP timely notifies the designated party, in
writing, of its decision to examine the merchandise (see paragraph (d)
of this section), but the merchandise is exported without having been
presented to CBP for examination, any drawback claim, or part thereof,
based on the Notice will be denied. If CBP notifies the designated
party, in writing, of its decision to waive examination of the
merchandise, or, if timely notification of a decision by CBP to examine
or to waive examination has not been received, the merchandise may be
exported without delay.
(d) Time and place of examination. If CBP gives timely notice of
its decision to examine the export merchandise, the merchandise to be
examined must be promptly presented to CBP. CBP must examine the
merchandise within 5 working days after presentation of the
merchandise. The merchandise may be exported without examination if CBP
fails to timely examine the merchandise after presentation to CBP. If
the examination is completed at a port other than the port of actual
exportation, the merchandise must be transported in-bond to the port of
exportation.
(e) Extent of examination. The appropriate CBP office may permit
release of merchandise without examination, or may examine, to the
extent determined to be necessary, the items exported or destroyed.
Sec. 190.36 Failure to file Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback.
(a) General; application. Merchandise which has been exported
without complying with the requirements of Sec. 190.35(a) or Sec.
190.91 may be eligible for unused merchandise drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j) subject to the following conditions:
(1) Application. The claimant must file a written application with
the drawback office where the drawback claims will be filed. Such
application must include the following:
(i) Required information.
(A) Name, address, and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number (with
suffix) of applicant;
(B) Name, address, and IRS number(s) (with suffix(es)) of
exporter(s), if applicant is not the exporter;
(C) Export period covered by this application;
(D) Commodity/product lines of imported and exported merchandise
covered in this application (and the applicable HTSUS numbers);
(E) The origin of the above merchandise;
(F) Estimated number of export transactions covered in this
application;
(G) Estimated number of drawback claims and estimated time of
filing those claims to be covered in this application;
(H) The port(s) of exportation;
(I) Estimated dollar value of potential drawback claims to be
covered in this application;
(J) The relationship between the parties involved in the import and
export transactions; and
(K) Provision(s) of drawback covered under the application;
(ii) Written declarations regarding:
(A) The reason(s) that CBP was not notified of the intent to
export; and
(B) Whether the applicant, to the best of its knowledge, will have
future exportations on which unused merchandise drawback might be
claimed; and
(iii) A certification that the following documentary evidence will
be made available for CBP to review upon request:
(A) For the purpose of establishing that the imported merchandise
was not used in the United States (for purposes of drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)) or that the exported merchandise was not used in the
United States and satisfied the requirements for substitution with the
imported merchandise (for purposes of drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2)), and, as applicable:
(1) Records;
(2) Any laboratory records prepared in the ordinary course of
business; and/or
(3) Inventory records prepared in the ordinary course of business
tracing all relevant movements and storage of the imported merchandise,
substituted merchandise, and/or exported merchandise; and
(B) Evidence establishing compliance with all other applicable
drawback requirements.
(2) One-Time Use. The procedure provided for in this section may be
used by a claimant only once, unless good cause is shown (for example,
successorship).
(3) Claims filed pending disposition of application. Drawback
claims may be
[[Page 37938]]
filed under this section pending disposition of the application.
However, those drawback claims will not be processed or paid until the
application is approved by CBP.
(b) CBP action. In order for CBP to evaluate the application under
this section, CBP may request, and the applicant must provide, any of
the information listed in paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of
this section. In making its decision to approve or deny the application
under this section, CBP will consider factors such as, but not limited
to, the following:
(1) Information provided by the claimant in the written
application;
(2) Any of the information listed in paragraphs (a)(1)(iii)(A)(1)
through (3) of this section and requested by CBP under paragraph (b);
and
(3) The applicant's prior record with CBP.
(c) Time for CBP action. CBP will notify the applicant in writing
within 90 days after receipt of the application of its decision to
approve or deny the application, or of CBP's inability to approve, deny
or act on the application and the reason therefor.
(d) Appeal of denial of application. If CBP denies the application,
the applicant may file a written appeal with the drawback office which
issued the denial, provided that the applicant files this appeal within
30 days of the date of denial. If CBP denies this initial appeal, the
applicant may file a further written appeal with CBP Headquarters,
Office of Trade, Trade Policy and Programs, provided that the applicant
files this further appeal within 30 days of the denial date of the
initial appeal. CBP may extend the 30-day period for appeal to the
drawback office or to CBP Headquarters, for good cause, if the
applicant applies in writing for such extension within the appropriate
30-day period above.
(e) Future intent to export unused merchandise. If an applicant
states it will have future exportations on which unused merchandise
drawback may be claimed (see paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B) of this section),
the applicant will be informed of the procedures for waiver of prior
notice (see Sec. 190.91). If the applicant seeks waiver of prior
notice under Sec. 190.91, any documentation submitted to CBP to comply
with this section will be included in the request under Sec. 190.91.
An applicant that states that it will have future exportations on which
unused merchandise drawback may be claimed (see paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B)
of this section) and which does not obtain waiver of prior notice must
notify CBP of its intent to export prior to each such exportation, in
accordance with Sec. 190.35.
Sec. 190.37 Destruction under CBP supervision.
A claimant may destroy merchandise and obtain unused merchandise
drawback by complying with the procedures set forth in Sec. 190.71
relating to destruction.
Sec. 190.38 Recordkeeping.
(a) Maintained by claimant; by others. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1508(c)(3), all records which are necessary to be maintained by the
claimant under this part with respect to drawback claims, and records
kept by others to complement the records of the claimant, which are
essential to establish compliance with the legal requirements of 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) or (j)(2), as applicable, and this part with respect
to drawback claims, must be retained for 3 years after liquidation of
such claims (under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the same records may be subject to a
different retention period for different purposes).
(b) Accounting for the merchandise. Merchandise subject to drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) and (j)(2) must be accounted for in a manner
which will enable the claimant:
(1) To determine, and CBP to verify, the applicable import entry or
transfer(s) of drawback-eligible merchandise;
(2) To determine, and CBP to verify, the applicable exportation or
destruction; and
(3) To identify, with respect to the import entry or any
transfer(s) of drawback-eligible merchandise, the imported merchandise
designated as the basis for the drawback claim.
Subpart D--Rejected Merchandise
Sec. 190.41 Rejected merchandise drawback.
Section 313(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(c)), provides
for drawback upon the exportation or destruction under CBP supervision
of imported merchandise which has been entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, duty-paid, and which: Does not conform to
sample or specifications; has been shipped without the consent of the
consignee; or has been determined to be defective as of the time of
importation; or ultimately sold at retail by the importer or the person
who received the merchandise from the importer, and for any reason
returned to and accepted by the importer or the person who received the
merchandise from the importer. The total amount of drawback allowable
will be 99 percent of the amount of duties paid with respect to the
imported, duty-paid merchandise. See subpart P for drawback of internal
revenue taxes for unmerchantable or nonconforming distilled spirits,
wines, or beer.
Sec. 190.42 Procedures and supporting documentation.
(a) Time limit for exportation or destruction. Drawback will be
denied on merchandise that is exported or destroyed after the statutory
5-year time period.
(b) Required documentation. The claimant must submit documentation
to CBP as part of the complete drawback claim (see Sec. 190.51) to
establish that the merchandise did not conform to sample or
specification, was shipped without the consent of the consignee, or was
defective as of the time of importation (see Sec. 190.45 for
additional requirements for claims made on rejected retail merchandise
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)). If the claimant was not the
importer, the claimant must also:
(1) Submit a statement signed by the importer and every other
person, other than the ultimate purchaser, that owned the goods, that
no other claim for drawback was made on the goods by any other person;
and
(2) Certify that records are available to support the statement
required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(c) Notice. A notice of intent to export or destroy merchandise
which may be the subject of a rejected merchandise drawback claim (19
U.S.C. 1313(c)) must be provided to CBP to give CBP the opportunity to
examine the merchandise. The claimant, or the exporter (for destruction
under CBP supervision, see Sec. 190.71), must file at the port of
intended redelivery to CBP custody a Notice of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form
7553 at least 5 working days prior to the date of intended return to
CBP custody. Waiver of prior notice for exportations under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j) (see Sec. 190.91) is inapplicable to exportations under 19
U.S.C. 1313(c).
(d) Required information. The notice must provide the bill of
lading number, if known, the name and telephone number, mailing
address, and, if available, fax number and email address of a contact
person, and the location of the merchandise.
(e) Decision to waive examination. Within 2 working days after
receipt of the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback (see paragraph (c) of this
section), CBP will notify, in writing, the party designated on the
Notice of CBP's decision to either examine the merchandise to be
exported or
[[Page 37939]]
destroyed, or to waive examination. If CBP timely notifies the
designated party, in writing, of its decision to examine the
merchandise (see paragraph (f) of this section), but the merchandise is
exported or destroyed without having been presented to CBP for such
examination, any drawback claim, or part thereof, based on the Notice
of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback, must be denied. If CBP notifies the designated party, in
writing, of its decision to waive examination of the merchandise, or,
if timely notification of a decision by CBP to examine or to waive
examination is absent, the merchandise may be exported or destroyed
without delay and will be deemed to have been returned to CBP custody.
(f) Time and place of examination. If CBP gives timely notice of
its decision to examine the merchandise to be exported or destroyed,
the merchandise to be examined must be promptly presented to CBP. CBP
must examine the merchandise within 5 working days after presentation
of the merchandise. The merchandise may be exported or destroyed
without examination if CBP fails to timely examine the merchandise
after presentation to CBP, and in such case the merchandise will be
deemed to have been returned to CBP custody. If the examination is
completed at a port other than the port of actual exportation or
destruction, the merchandise must be transported in-bond to the port of
exportation or destruction.
(g) Extent of examination. The appropriate CBP office may permit
release of merchandise without examination, or may examine, to the
extent determined to be necessary, the items exported or destroyed.
(h) Drawback claim. When filing the drawback claim, the drawback
claimant must correctly calculate the amount of drawback due (see Sec.
190.51(b)). The procedures for restructuring a claim (see Sec. 190.53)
apply to rejected merchandise drawback if the claimant has an ongoing
export program which qualifies for this type of drawback.
(i) Exportation. Claimants must provide documentary evidence of
exportation (see subpart G of this part). The claimant may establish
exportation by mail as set out in Sec. 190.74o.
Sec. 190.43 Unused merchandise drawback claim.
Rejected merchandise may be the subject of an unused merchandise
drawback claim under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), in accordance with subpart C
of this part, to the extent that the merchandise qualifies therefor.
Sec. 190.44 [Reserved]
Sec. 190.45 Returned retail merchandise.
(a) Special rule for substitution. Section 313(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)), provides
for drawback upon the exportation or destruction under CBP supervision
of imported merchandise which has been entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, duty-paid and ultimately sold at retail by
the importer, or the person who received the merchandise from the
importer, and for any reason returned to and accepted by the importer,
or the person who received the merchandise from the importer.
(b) Eligibility requirements. (1) Drawback is allowable pursuant to
compliance with all requirements set forth in this subpart; and
(2) The claimant must also show by evidence satisfactory to CBP
that drawback may be claimed by--
(i) Designating an entry of merchandise that was imported within 1
year before the date of exportation or destruction of the merchandise
described in paragraph (a) under CBP supervision.
(ii) Certifying that the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number and
specific product identifier (such as part number, SKU, or product code)
apply to both the merchandise designated for drawback (in the import
documentation) and the returned merchandise.
(c) Allowable refund. The total amount of drawback allowable will
not exceed 99 percent of the amount of duties paid with respect to the
imported merchandise.
(d) Denial of claims. No drawback will be refunded if CBP is not
satisfied that the claimant has provided, upon request, the
documentation necessary to support the certification required in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii).
Subpart E--Completion of Drawback Claims
Sec. 190.51 Completion of drawback claims.
(a) General--(1) Complete claim. Unless otherwise specified, a
complete drawback claim under this part will consist of the successful
electronic transmission to CBP of the drawback entry (as described in
subparagraph (2)), applicable Notice(s) of Intent to Export, Destroy,
or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553,
applicable import entry data, and evidence of exportation or
destruction as provided for under subpart G of this part.
(2) Drawback entry. The drawback entry is to be filed through a
CBP-authorized electronic system and must include the following:
(i) Claimant identification number, name, and address;
(ii) Broker identification number, name, and address (if
applicable);
(iii) Surety code, bond type, and amount of bond;
(iv) Port code for the drawback office that will review the claim;
(v) Drawback entry number and provision(s) under which drawback is
claimed;
(vi) Statement of eligibility for applicable privileges (as
provided for in subpart I of this part);
(vii) Amount of refund claimed for each of relevant duties, taxes,
and fees (calculated to two decimal places);
(viii) For each designated import entry line item, the entry number
and the line item number designating the merchandise, a description of
the merchandise, a unique import tracing identification number(s)
(ITIN) (used to associate the imported merchandise and any substituted
merchandise with any intermediate products (if applicable) and the
drawback-eligible exported or destroyed merchandise or finished
article(s)), as well as the following information for the merchandise
designated as the basis for the drawback claim: The 10-digit HTSUS
classification and associated duty rate(s), amount of duties paid,
applicable entered value (see 19 CFR 190.11(a)), quantity and unit of
measure (using the unit(s) of measure required under the HTSUS, if
applicable), as well as the types, rates, and amounts of any other
duties, taxes, or fees for which a refund is requested;
(ix) For manufacturing claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), the
basis of the claim (as provided for in Sec. 190.23), the ruling
number, the factory location, the date(s) of use of the imported and/or
substituted merchandise in manufacturing/processing, the 10-digit HTSUS
classification for the imported merchandise and/or which would have
been applicable to the substituted merchandise had it been imported,
the quantity and unit of measure (using the unit(s) of measure required
under the HTSUS, if applicable) of the imported and/or substituted
merchandise in manufacturing/processing, unique manufacture tracing
identification number(s) (MTIN) (used to associate the manufactured
merchandise, including any intermediate products, with the drawback-
eligible exported or destroyed finished article(s)), and a
certification from the claimant that provides as follows: ``The
article(s) described above were manufactured or produced and disposed
of as stated herein in
[[Page 37940]]
accordance with the drawback ruling on file with CBP and in compliance
with applicable laws and regulations.'';
(x) Indicate whether the designated imported merchandise, other
substituted merchandise, or finished article (for manufacturing claims)
was transferred to the drawback claimant prior to the exportation or
destruction of the eligible merchandise, and for unused merchandise
drawback claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j), provide a certification from
the client that provides as follows: ``The undersigned hereby certifies
that the merchandise herein described is unused in the United States
and further certifies that this merchandise was not subjected to any
process of manufacture or other operation except the allowable
operations as provided for by regulation.'';
(xi) Indicate whether the eligible merchandise was exported or
destroyed and provide the applicable 10-digit HTSUS or Department of
Commerce Schedule B classification, quantity, and unit of measure (the
unit of measure specified must be the same as that which was required
under the HTSUS for the designated imported merchandise) and, for
claims under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c), specify the basis as one of the
following:
(A) Merchandise does not conform to sample or specifications;
(B) Merchandise was defective at time of importation;
(C) Merchandise was shipped without consent of the consignee; or
(D) Merchandise sold at retail and returned to the importer or the
person who received the merchandise from the importer;
(xii) For eligible merchandise that was exported, the unique export
identifier (the number used to associate the export transaction with
the appropriate documentary evidence of exportation), bill of lading
number, export destination, name of exporter, the applicable
comparative value pursuant to 19 CFR 190.11(b) (see Sec.
190.22(a)(1)(ii), Sec. 190.22(a)(2)(ii), or Sec. 190.32(b)) for
substitution claims, and a certification from the claimant that
provides as follows: ``I declare, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that all of the statements in this document are correct and
that the exported article is not to be relanded in the United States or
any of its possessions without paying duty.'';
(xiii) For eligible merchandise that was destroyed, the name of the
destroyer and, if substituted, the applicable comparative value
pursuant to 19 CFR 190.11(c) (see Sec. 190.22(a)(1)(ii), Sec.
190.22(a)(2)(ii), or Sec. 190.32(b)), and a certification from the
claimant, if applicable, that provides as follows: ``The undersigned
hereby certifies that, for the destroyed merchandise herein described,
the value of recovered materials (including the value of any tax
benefit or royalty payment) that accrues to the drawback claimant has
been deducted from the value of the imported (or substituted)
merchandise designated by the claimant, in accordance with 19 U.S.C.
1313(x).'';
(xiv) For substitution unused merchandise drawback claims under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), a certification from the claimant that provides as
follows: ``The undersigned hereby certifies that the substituted
merchandise is unused in the United States and that the substituted
merchandise was in our possession prior to exportation or
destruction.'';
(xv) For NAFTA drawback claims provided for in subpart E of part
181, the foreign entry number and date of entry, the HTSUS
classification for the foreign entry, the amount of duties paid for the
foreign entry and the applicable exchange rate, and, if applicable, a
certification from the claimant that provides as follows: ``Same
condition to NAFTA countries--The undersigned certifies that the
merchandise herein described is in the same condition as when it was
imported under the above import entry(s) and further certifies that
this merchandise was not subjected to any process of manufacture or
other operation except the allowable operations as provided for by
regulation.''; and
(xvi) All certifications required in this part and as otherwise
deemed necessary by CBP to establish compliance with the applicable
laws and regulations, as well as the following declaration: ``The
undersigned acknowledges statutory requirements that all records
supporting the information on this document are to be retained by the
issuing party for a period of 3 years from the date of liquidation of
the drawback claim. All required documentation that must be uploaded in
accordance with 19 CFR 190.51 will be provided to CBP within 24 hours
of the filing of the drawback claim. The undersigned acknowledges that
a false certification of the foregoing renders the drawback claim
incomplete and subject to denial. The undersigned is fully aware of the
sanctions provided in 18 U.S.C. 1001, and 18 U.S.C. 550, and 19 U.S.C.
1593a.''
(3) Election of line item designation for imported merchandise.
Merchandise on a specific line on an entry summary may be designated
for either direct identification or substitution claims but a single
line on an entry summary may not be split for purposes of claiming
drawback under both direct identification and substitution claims. The
first complete drawback claim accepted by CBP which designates
merchandise on a line on an entry summary establishes this designation
for any remaining merchandise on that same line. For claims involving
transferred merchandise, please see Sec. 190.10(c) regarding required
notifications concerning whether the merchandise should be eligible for
direct identification or substitution claims.
(4) Limitation on line item eligibility for imported merchandise.
Claimants are prohibited from filing substitution drawback claims under
part 190 for imported merchandise associated with a line item on an
entry summary if any other merchandise covered on that entry summary
has been designated as the basis of a claim under part 191.
(b) Drawback due--(1) Claimant required to calculate drawback.
Drawback claimants are required to correctly calculate the amount of
drawback due. The amount of drawback requested on the drawback entry is
generally to be 99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees eligible for
drawback. (For example, if $1,000 in import duties are eligible for
drawback less 1 percent ($10), the amount claimed on the drawback entry
should be for $990.) Claims exceeding 99 percent (or 100% when 100% of
the duty is available for drawback) will not be paid until the
calculations have been corrected by the claimant. Claims for less than
99 percent (or 100% when 100% of the duty is available for drawback)
will be paid as filed, unless the claimant amends the claim in
accordance with Sec. 190.52(c). The amount of duties, taxes, and fees
eligible for drawback is determined by whether a claim is based upon
direct identification or substitution, as provided for below:
(i) Direct identification. The amounts eligible for drawback for a
unit of merchandise consists of those duties, taxes, and fees that were
paid for that unit of the designated imported merchandise. This may be
the amount of duties, taxes, and fees actually tendered on that unit or
those attributable to that unit, if identified pursuant to an approved
accounting method (see 19 CFR 190.14).
(ii) Substitution. The amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible
for drawback pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) or 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) is
determined by per unit averaging, as defined in 19 CFR 190.2. The
amount that may be refunded is also subject to the limitations set
forth
[[Page 37941]]
in 19 CFR 190.22(a)(1)(ii) (manufacturing claims) and 19 CFR 190.32(b)
(unused merchandise claims), as applicable.
(2) Merchandise processing fee apportionment calculation. Where a
drawback claimant requests a refund of a merchandise processing fee
paid pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9)(A), the claimant is required to
correctly apportion the fee to that imported merchandise for which
drawback is claimed when calculating the amount of drawback requested
on the drawback entry. This is determined as follows:
(i) Relative value ratio for each line item. The value of each line
item of entered merchandise subject to a merchandise processing fee is
calculated (to four decimal places) by dividing the value of the line
item subject to the fee by the total value of entered merchandise
subject to the fee. The result is the relative value ratio.
(ii) Merchandise processing fee apportioned to each line item. To
apportion the merchandise processing fee to each line item, the
relative value ratio for each line item is multiplied by the
merchandise processing fee paid.
(iii) Amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for drawback
per line item. The amount of merchandise processing fee apportioned to
each line item is multiplied by 99 percent to calculate that portion of
the fee attributable to each line item that is eligible for drawback.
(iv) Amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for drawback per
unit of merchandise. To calculate the amount of a merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per unit of merchandise, the line
item amount that is eligible for drawback is divided by the number of
units covered by that line item (to two decimal places).
(v) Limitation on amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for
drawback for substitution claims. The amount of a merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per unit of merchandise for
drawback claims based upon substitution is subject to the limitations
set forth in Sec. Sec. 190.22(a)(1)(ii) (manufacturing claims) and
190.32(b) (unused merchandise claims), as applicable.
(vi)(A) Example 1:
(1) Line item 1--5,000 articles valued at $10 each total $50,000
(2) Line item 2--6,000 articles valued at $15 each total $90,000
(3) Line item 3--10,000 articles valued at $20 each total $200,000
(4) Total units = 21,000
(5) Total value = $340,000
(6) Merchandise processing fee = $485 (for purposes of this example,
the fee cap of $485 is assumed; see 19 CFR 24.23 for the current amount
consistent with 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9)(B)(i))
(i) Line item relative value ratios. The relative value ratio for
line item 1 is calculated by dividing the value of that line item by
the total value ($50,000 / 340,000 = .1471). The relative value ratio
for line item 2 is .2647. The relative value ratio for line item 3 is
.5882.
(ii) Merchandise processing fee apportioned to each line item. The
amount of fee attributable to each line item is calculated by
multiplying $485 by the applicable relative value ratio. The amount of
the $485 fee attributable to line item 1 is $71.3435 (.1471 x $485 =
$71.3435). The amount of the fee attributable to line item 2 is
$128.3795 (.2647 x $485 = $128.3795). The amount of the fee
attributable to line item 3 is $285.2770 (.5882 x $485 = $285.2770).
(iii) Amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for drawback
per line item. The amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for
drawback for line item 1 is $70.6301 (.99 x $71.3435). The amount of
fee eligible for drawback for line item 2 is $127.0957 (.99 x
$128.3795). The amount of fee eligible for drawback for line item 3 is
$282.4242 (.99 x $285.2770).
(iv) Amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for drawback per
unit of merchandise. The amount of merchandise processing fee eligible
for drawback per unit of merchandise is calculated by dividing the
amount of fee eligible for drawback for the line item by the number of
units in the line item. For line item 1, the amount of merchandise
processing fee eligible for drawback per unit is $.0141 ($70.6301 /
5,000 = $.0141). If 1,000 widgets form the basis of a claim for
drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j), the total amount of drawback
attributable to the merchandise processing fee is $14.10 (1,000 x .0141
= $14.10). For line item 2, the amount of fee eligible for drawback per
unit is $.0212 ($127.0957 / 6,000 = $.0212). For line item 3, the
amount of fee eligible for drawback per unit is $.0282 ($282.4242 /
10,000 = $.0282).
(B) Example 2. This example illustrates the treatment of dutiable
merchandise that is exempt from the merchandise processing fee and
duty-free merchandise that is subject to the merchandise processing
fee.
(1)(i) Line item 1--700 meters of printed cloth valued at $10 per
meter (total value $7,000) that is exempt from the merchandise
processing fee under 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(8)(B)(iii)
(ii) Line item 2--15,000 articles valued at $100 each (total value
$1,500,000)
(iii) Line item 3--10,000 duty-free articles valued at $50 each
(total value $500,000)
(iv) The relative value ratios are calculated using line items 2
and 3 only, as there is no merchandise processing fee imposed by reason
of importation on line item 1.
(2)(i) Line item 2--1,500,000 / 2,000,000 = .75 (line items 2 and 3
form the total value of the merchandise subject to the merchandise
processing fee).
(ii) Line item 3--500,000 / 2,000,000 = .25.
(iii) If the total merchandise processing fee paid was $485, the
amount of the fee attributable to line item 2 is $363.75 (.75 x $485 =
$363.75). The amount of the fee attributable to line item 3 is $121.25
(.25 x $485 = $121.25).
(iv) The amount of merchandise processing fee eligible for drawback
for line item 2 is $360.1125 (.99 x $363.75). The amount of fee
eligible for line item 3 is $120.0375 (.99 x $121.25).
(v) The amount of drawback on the merchandise processing fee
attributable to each unit of line item 2 is $.0240 ($360.1125 / 15,000
= $.0240). The amount of drawback on the merchandise processing fee
attributable to each unit of line item 3 is $.0120 ($120.0375 / 10,000
= $.0120).
(vi) If 1,000 units of line item 2 were exported, the drawback
attributable to the merchandise processing fee is $24.00 ($.0240 x
1,000 = $24.00).
(3) Calculations for all other duties, taxes, and fees.
(i) General. Where a drawback claimant requests a refund of any
other duties, taxes, and fees allowable in accordance with Sec. 190.3,
the claimant is required to accurately calculate (including
apportionment using per unit averaging or inventory management methods,
as appropriate) the duties, taxes, and fees attributable to the
designated imported merchandise for which drawback is being claimed
when calculating the amount of drawback requested on the drawback entry
(generally 99% of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the imported
merchandise).
(ii) Examples. As illustrated in the examples in this paragraph, in
the case of customs duties, the type of calculation required to
determine the amount of duties available for refund (generally 99% of
the duties paid on the imported merchandise) will vary depending on
whether the duty involved is ad valorem, specific, or compound.
[[Page 37942]]
(1) Example 1: Ad valorem duty rate. Apportionment of the duties
paid (and available for refund) will be based on the application of the
duty rates to the per unit values of the imported merchandise. The per
unit values are based on the invoice values unless the method of refund
calculation is per unit averaging, which would require equal
apportionment of the duties paid over the quantity of imported
merchandise covered by the line item upon which the imported
merchandise was reported on the import entry summary. As a result, the
amount of duties available for refund will vary depending on the method
used to calculate refunds.
(2) Example 2: Specific duty rate. No apportionment of the duties
paid is required to determine the amount available for refund. A fixed
duty rate is applicable to each unit of the imported merchandise based
on quantity. This fixed rate will not vary based on the per unit values
of the imported merchandise and, as a result, there is no impact on the
amount of duties available for refunds (regardless of whether the
refunds are calculated based on invoice values or per unit averaging).
(3) Example 3: Compound duty rate. A compound duty rate is a
combination of an ad valorem duty rate and a specific duty rate, with
both rates applied to the same imported merchandise. As a result, a
combination of the calculations discussed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section will apply when calculating the amount of duties paid that
are available for refund.
(b) Limitation. The amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible for
drawback per unit of merchandise for drawback claims based upon
substituted merchandise is subject to the limitations set forth in 19
CFR 190.22(a)(1)(ii) (manufacturing claims) and 19 CFR 190.32(b)
(unused merchandise claims), as applicable.
(c) HTSUS classification or Schedule B commodity number(s)--(1)
General. Drawback claimants are required to provide, on all drawback
claims they submit, the 10-digit HTSUS classification or the Schedule B
commodity number(s), for the following:
(i) Designated imported merchandise. For imported merchandise
designated on drawback claims, the HTSUS classification applicable at
the time of entry (e.g., as required to be reported on the applicable
entry summary(s) and other entry documentation).
(ii) Substituted merchandise on manufacturing claims. For
merchandise substituted on manufacturing drawback claims, the HTSUS
classification numbers provided must be the same as either--
(A) if the substituted merchandise was imported, the HTSUS
classification applicable at the time of entry (e.g., as required to be
reported on the applicable entry summary(s) and other entry
documentation); or,
(B) if the substituted merchandise was not imported, the HTSUS
classification that would have been reported to CBP for the applicable
entry summary(s) and other entry documentation, for the domestically
produced substituted merchandise, at the time of entry of the
designated imported merchandise.
(iii) Exported merchandise or articles. For exported merchandise or
articles, the HTSUS classification or Schedule B commodity number(s)
must be from the Electronic Export Information (EEI), when required. If
no EEI is required (see, 15 CFR part 30 subpart D for a complete list
of exemptions), then the claimant must provide the Schedule B commodity
number(s) or HTSUS number(s) that the exporter would have set forth on
the EEI when the exportation took place, but for the exemption from the
requirement for an EEI.
(iv) Destroyed merchandise or articles. For destroyed merchandise
or articles, the HTSUS classification or Schedule B commodity number(s)
must be reported, subject to the following:
(A) if the HTSUS classification is reported, then it must be the
HTSUS classification that would have been applicable to the destroyed
merchandise or articles if they had been entered for consumption at the
time of destruction; or
(B) if the Schedule B commodity number is reported, then it must be
the Schedule B commodity number that would have been reported for the
destroyed merchandise or articles if the EEI had been required for an
exportation at the time of destruction.
(2) Changes to classification. If the 10-digit HTSUS classification
or the Schedule B commodity number(s) reported to CBP for the drawback
claim are determined to be incorrect or otherwise in controversy after
the filing of the drawback entry, then the claimant must notify the
drawback office where the drawback claim was filed of the correct HTSUS
classification or Schedule B commodity number or the nature of the
controversy before the liquidation of the drawback entry.
(d) Method of filing. All drawback claims must be submitted through
a CBP-authorized system.
(e) Time of filing--(1) General. A complete drawback claim is
timely filed if it is successfully transmitted not later than 5 years
after the date on which the merchandise designated as the basis for the
drawback claim was imported and in compliance with all other applicable
deadlines under this part.
(i) Official date of filing. The official date of filing is the
date upon which CBP receives a complete claim, as provided in paragraph
(a) of this section, via transmission through a CBP-authorized system,
including the uploading of all required supporting documentation.
(ii) Abandonment. Claims not completed within the 5-year period
after the date on which the merchandise designated as the basis for the
drawback claim was imported will be considered abandoned. Except as
provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, no extension will be
granted unless it is established that CBP was responsible for the
untimely filing; and
(iii) Special timeframes. For substitution claims, the exportation
or destruction of merchandise shall not have preceded the date of
importation of the designated imported merchandise, and/or the
exportation or destruction of merchandise shall not otherwise be
outside of the timeframes specified in 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(2)(C) and 19
U.S.C. 1313(p)(2), if applicable.
(2) Major disaster. The 5-year period for filing a complete
drawback claim provided for in paragraph (e)(1) of this section may be
extended for a period not to exceed 18 months if:
(i) The claimant establishes to the satisfaction of CBP that the
claimant was unable to file the drawback claim because of an event
declared by the President to be a major disaster, within the meaning
given to that term in 42 U.S.C. 5122(2), on or after January 1, 1994;
and
(ii) The claimant files a request for such extension with CBP no
later than 1 year from the last day of the 5-year period referred to in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
(3) Record retention. If an extension is granted with respect to a
request filed under paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section, the periods
of time for retaining records under 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3) will be
extended for an additional 18 months.
Sec. 190.52 Rejecting, perfecting or amending claims.
(a) Rejecting the claim. Upon review of a drawback claim, if the
claim is determined to be incomplete (see Sec. 190.51(a)(1)) or
untimely (see Sec. 190.51(e)), the claim will be rejected and CBP will
notify the filer. The filer will then have the opportunity to complete
the claim subject to the requirement for filing a complete claim within
5 years of the date of importation
[[Page 37943]]
of the merchandise designated as the basis for the drawback claim.
(b) Perfecting the claim; additional evidence required. If CBP
determines that the claim is complete according to the requirements of
Sec. 190.51(a)(1), but that additional evidence or information is
required, CBP will notify the filer. The claimant must furnish, or have
the appropriate party furnish, the evidence or information requested
within 30 days of the date of notification by CBP. CBP may extend this
30-day period if the claimant files a written request for such
extension within the 30-day period and provides good cause. The
evidence or information required under this paragraph may be filed more
than 5 years after the date of importation of the merchandise
designated as the basis for the drawback claim. Such additional
evidence or information may include, but is not limited to:
(1) Records or other documentary evidence of exportation, as
provided for in Sec. 190.72, which shows that the articles were
shipped by the person filing the drawback entry, or a letter of
endorsement from exporter which must be attached to such bill of
lading, showing that the party filing the entry is authorized to claim
drawback and receive payment (the claimant must have on file and make
available to CBP upon request, the endorsement from the exporter
assigning the right to claim drawback);
(2) A copy of the import entry and invoice annotated for the
merchandise identified or designated;
(3) A copy of the export invoice annotated to indicate the items on
which drawback is being claimed; and
(4) Records documenting the transfer of the merchandise including
records kept in the normal course of business upon which the claim is
based (see Sec. 190.10).
(c) Amending the claim; supplemental filing. Amendments to claims
for which the drawback entries have not been liquidated must be made
within 5 years of the date of importation of the merchandise designated
as the basis for the drawback claim. Liquidated drawback entries may
not be amended; however, they may be protested as provided for in Sec.
190.84 and part 174 of this chapter.
Sec. 190.53 Restructuring of claims.
(a) General. CBP may require claimants to restructure their
drawback claims in such a manner as to foster administrative
efficiency. In making this determination, CBP will consider the
following factors:
(1) The number of transactions of the claimant (imports and
exports);
(2) The value of the claims;
(3) The frequency of claims;
(4) The product or products being claimed; and
(5) For 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) claims, the provisions, as
applicable, of the general manufacturing drawback ruling or the
specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
(b) Exemption from restructuring; criteria. In order to be exempt
from a restructuring, a claimant must demonstrate an inability or
impracticability in restructuring its claims as required by CBP and
must provide a mutually acceptable alternative. Criteria used in such
determination will include a demonstration by the claimant of one or
more of the following:
(1) Complexities caused by multiple commodities or the applicable
general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing
drawback ruling;
(2) Variable and conflicting manufacturing and inventory periods
(for example, financial, accounting and manufacturing records
maintained are significantly different);
(3) Complexities caused by multiple manufacturing locations;
(4) Complexities caused by difficulty in adjusting accounting and
inventory records (for example, records maintained--financial or
accounting--are significantly different); and/or
(5) Complexities caused by significantly different methods of
operation.
Subpart F--Verification of Claims
Sec. 190.61 Verification of drawback claims.
(a) Authority. All claims are subject to verification by CBP.
(b) Method. CBP personnel will verify compliance with the law and
this part, the accuracy of the related general manufacturing drawback
ruling or specific manufacturing drawback ruling (as applicable), and
the selected drawback claims. Verification may include an examination
of all records relating to the transaction(s).
(c) Liquidation. When a claim has been selected for verification,
liquidation will be postponed only on the drawback entry for the claim
selected for verification. Postponement will continue in effect until
the verification has been completed and a report is issued, subject to
the limitation in 19 CFR 159.12(f). In the event that a substantial
error is revealed during the verification, CBP may postpone liquidation
of all related product line claims, or, in CBP's discretion, all claims
made by that claimant.
(d) Errors in specific or general manufacturing drawback rulings--
(1) Specific manufacturing drawback ruling; action by CBP. If
verification of a drawback claim filed under a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8) reveals errors or deficiencies in the
drawback ruling or application therefor, the verifying CBP official
will promptly inform CBP Headquarters (Attention: Entry Process and
Duty Refunds Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade).
(2) General manufacturing drawback ruling. If verification of a
drawback claim filed under a general manufacturing drawback ruling (see
Sec. 190.7) reveals errors or deficiencies in a general manufacturing
drawback ruling, the letter of notification of intent to operate under
the general manufacturing drawback ruling, or the acknowledgment of the
letter of notification of intent, the verifying CBP official will
promptly inform CBP Headquarters (Attention: Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade).
(3) Action by CBP Headquarters. CBP Headquarters will review the
stated errors or deficiencies and take appropriate action (see 19
U.S.C. 1625; 19 CFR part 177).
Sec. 190.62 Penalties.
(a) Criminal penalty. Any person who knowingly and willfully files
any false or fraudulent entry or claim for the payment of drawback upon
the exportation or destruction of merchandise or knowingly or willfully
makes or files any false document for the purpose of securing the
payment to himself or others of any drawback on the exportation or
destruction of merchandise greater than that legally due, will be
subject to the criminal provisions of 18 U.S.C. 550, 1001, or any other
appropriate criminal sanctions.
(b) Civil penalty. Any person who seeks, induces or affects the
payment of drawback, by fraud or negligence, or attempts to do so, is
subject to civil penalties, as provided under 19 U.S.C. 1593a. A
fraudulent violation is subject to a maximum administrative penalty of
3 times the total actual or potential loss of revenue. Repetitive
negligent violations are subject to a maximum penalty equal to the
actual or potential loss of revenue.
Sec. 190.63 Liability for drawback claims.
(a) Liability of claimants. Any person making a claim for drawback
will be liable for the full amount of the drawback claimed.
(b) Liability of importers. An importer will be liable for any
drawback claim made by another person with respect to
[[Page 37944]]
merchandise imported by the importer in an amount equal to the lesser
of:
(1) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the person claimed
with respect to the imported merchandise; or
(2) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the importer
authorized the other person to claim with respect to the imported
merchandise.
(c) Joint and several liability. Persons described in paragraphs
(a) and (b) will be jointly and severally liable for the amount
described in paragraph (b).
Subpart G--Exportation and Destruction
Sec. 190.71 Drawback on articles destroyed under CBP supervision.
(a) Procedure. At least 7 working days before the intended date of
destruction of merchandise or articles upon which drawback is intended
to be claimed, a Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553 must be filed by
the claimant with the CBP port where the destruction is to take place,
giving notification of the date and specific location where the
destruction is to occur. Within 4 working days after receipt of the CBP
Form 7553, CBP will advise the filer in writing of its determination to
witness or not to witness the destruction. If the filer of the notice
is not so notified within 4 working days, the merchandise may be
destroyed without delay and will be deemed to have been destroyed under
CBP supervision. Unless CBP determines to witness the destruction, the
destruction of the articles following timely notification on CBP Form
7553 will be deemed to have occurred under CBP supervision. If CBP
attends the destruction, CBP will certify on CBP Form 7553.
(b) Evidence of destruction. When CBP does not attend the
destruction, the claimant must submit evidence that destruction took
place in accordance with the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or
Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553. The
evidence must be issued by a disinterested third party (for example, a
landfill operator). The type of evidence depends on the method and
place of destruction, but must establish that the merchandise was, in
fact, destroyed within the meaning of ``destruction'' in Sec. 190.2.
(c) Completion of drawback entry. After destruction, the claimant
must provide CBP Form 7553, certified by the CBP official witnessing
the destruction in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, to
CBP as part of the completed drawback claim based on the destruction
(see Sec. 190.51(a)). If CBP has not attended the destruction, the
claimant must provide the evidence that destruction took place in
accordance with the approved CBP Form 7553, as provided for in
paragraph (b) of this section, as part of the completed drawback claim
based on the destruction (see Sec. 190.51(a)).
Sec. 190.72 Proof of Exportation.
(a) Required export data. Proof of exportation of articles for
drawback purposes must establish fully the date and fact of exportation
and the identity of the exporter by providing the following summary
data as part of a complete claim (see Sec. 190.51) (in addition to
providing prior notice of intent to export if applicable (see
Sec. Sec. 190.35, 190.36, 190.42, and 190.91)):
(1) Date of export;
(2) Name of exporter;
(3) Description of the goods;
(4) Quantity and unit of measure;
(5) Schedule B number or HTSUS number; and
(6) Country of ultimate destination.
(b) Supporting documentary evidence. Exportation may be established
by providing the following:
(1) Records or other documentary evidence of exportation (originals
or copies) issued by the exporting carrier, such as a bill of lading,
air waybill, freight waybill, Canadian Customs manifest, and/or cargo
manifest;
(2) Records from a CBP-approved electronic export system of the
United States Government (Sec. 190.73);
(3) Official postal records (originals or copies) which evidence
exportation by mail (Sec. 190.74);
(4) Notice of lading for supplies on certain vessels or aircraft
(Sec. 190.112); or
(5) Notice of transfer for articles manufactured or produced in the
United States which are transferred to a foreign trade zone (Sec.
190.183).
Sec. 190.73 Electronic proof of exportation.
Records kept through an electronic export system of the United
States Government may be considered as actual proof of exportation only
if CBP has officially approved the use of that electronic export system
as proof of compliance for drawback claims. Official approval will be
published as a general notice in the Customs Bulletin.
Sec. 190.74 Exportation by mail.
If the merchandise on which drawback is to be claimed is exported
by mail or parcel post, the official postal records (original or
copies) which describe the mail shipment will be sufficient to prove
exportation. The postal record must be identified on the drawback
entry, and must be retained by the claimant and submitted as part of
the drawback claim (see Sec. 190.51(a)).
Sec. 190.75 Exportation by the Government.
(a) Claim by U.S. Government. When a department, branch, agency, or
instrumentality of the U.S. Government exports products with the
intention of claiming drawback, it may establish the exportation in the
manner provided in Sec. 190.72 of this subpart (see Sec. 190.4).
(b) Claim by supplier. When a supplier of merchandise to the
Government or any of the parties specified in Sec. 190.82 claims
drawback, exportation must be established under Sec. 190.72 of this
subpart.
Sec. 190.76 [Reserved]
Subpart H--Liquidation and Protest of Drawback Entries
Sec. 190.81 Liquidation.
(a) Time of liquidation. Drawback entries may be liquidated after:
(1) Liquidation of the designated import entry or entries becomes
final pursuant to paragraph (e); or
(2) Deposit of estimated duties on the imported merchandise and
before liquidation of the designated import entry or entries.
(b) Claims based on estimated duties. (1) Drawback may be paid upon
liquidation of a claim based on estimated duties if one or more of the
designated import entries have not been liquidated, or the liquidation
has not become final (because of a protest being filed) (see also Sec.
173.4(c) of this chapter), only if the drawback claimant and any other
party responsible for the payment of liquidated import duties each
files a written request for payment of each drawback claim, waiving any
right to payment or refund under other provisions of law, to the extent
that the estimated duties on the unliquidated import entry are included
in the drawback claim for which drawback on estimated duties is
requested under this paragraph. The drawback claimant must, to the best
of its knowledge, identify each import entry that has been protested
and that is included in the drawback claim. A drawback entry, once
finally liquidated on the basis of estimated duties pursuant to
paragraph (e)(2), will not be adjusted by reason of a subsequent final
liquidation of the import entry.
(2) However, if final liquidation of the import entry discloses
that the total amount of import duty is different from the total
estimated duties deposited, except in those cases when drawback is 100%
of the duty, the party responsible
[[Page 37945]]
for the payment of liquidated duties, as applicable, will:
(i) Be liable for 1 percent of all increased duties found to be due
on that portion of merchandise recorded on the drawback entry; or
(ii) Be entitled to a refund of 1 percent of all excess duties
found to have been paid as estimated duties on that portion of the
merchandise recorded on the drawback entry.
(c) Claims based on voluntary tenders or other payments of duties--
(1) General. Subject to the requirements in paragraph (2) of this
section, drawback may be paid upon liquidation of a claim based on
voluntary tenders of the unpaid amount of lawful ordinary customs
duties or any other payment of lawful ordinary customs duties for an
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption (see Sec.
190.3(a)(1)(iii)), provided that:
(i) The tender or payment is specifically identified as duty on a
specifically identified entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption;
(ii) Liquidation of the specifically identified entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption became final prior to such
tender or payment; and
(iii) Liquidation of the drawback entry in which that specifically
identified import entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption
is designated has not become final.
(2) Written request and waiver. Drawback may be paid on claims
based on voluntary tenders or other payments of duties under this
subsection only if the drawback claimant and any other party
responsible for the payment of the voluntary tenders or other payments
of duties each files a written request for payment of each drawback
claim based on such voluntary tenders or other payments of duties,
waiving any claim to payment or refund under other provisions of law,
to the extent that the voluntary tenders or other payment of duties
under this paragraph are included in the drawback claim for which
drawback on the voluntary tenders or other payment of duties is
requested under this paragraph.
(d) Claims based on liquidated duties. Drawback will be based on
the final liquidated duties paid that have been made final by operation
of law (except in the case of the written request for payment of
drawback on the basis of estimated duties, voluntary tender of duties,
and other payments of duty, and waiver, provided for in paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section).
(e) Liquidation procedure. (1) General. When the drawback claim has
been completed by the filing of the entry and other required documents,
and exportation (or destruction) of the merchandise or articles has
been established, CBP will determine drawback due on the basis of the
complete drawback claim, the applicable general manufacturing drawback
ruling or specific manufacturing drawback ruling, and any other
relevant evidence or information. Notice of liquidation will be given
electronically as provided in Sec. Sec. 159.9 and 159.10(c)(3).
(2) Liquidation by operation of law. (i) Liquidated import entries.
A drawback claim that satisfies the requirements of paragraph (d) that
is not liquidated within one year from the date of the drawback claim
(see Sec. 190.51(e)(1)(i)) will be deemed liquidated for the purpose
of the drawback claim at the drawback amount asserted by the claimant
or claim, unless the time for liquidation is extended in accordance
with Sec. 159.12 or if liquidation is suspended as required by statute
or court order.
(ii) Unliquidated import entries. A drawback claim that satisfies
the requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section will be
deemed liquidated upon the deposit of estimated duties on the
unliquidated imported merchandise (see Sec. 190.81(b)).
(f) Relative value; multiple products--(1) Distribution. Where two
or more products result from the manufacture or production of
merchandise, drawback will be distributed to the several products in
accordance with their relative values at the time of separation.
(2) Values. The values to be used in computing the distribution of
drawback where two or more products result from the manufacture or
production of merchandise under drawback conditions must be the market
value (as provided for in the definition of relative value in Sec.
190.2), unless other values are approved by CBP.
(g) Payment. CBP will authorize the amount of the refund due as
drawback to the claimant.
Sec. 190.82 Person entitled to claim drawback.
Unless otherwise provided in this part (see Sec. Sec. 190.42(b),
190.162, 190.175(a), 190.186), the exporter (or destroyer) will be
entitled to claim drawback, unless the exporter (or destroyer), by
means of a certification, waives the right to claim drawback and
assigns such right to the manufacturer, producer, importer, or
intermediate party (in the case of drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)
and (2), see Sec. 190.33(a) and (b)). Such certification must also
affirm that the exporter (or destroyer) has not and will not assign the
right to claim drawback on the particular exportation or destruction to
any other party. The certification provided for in this section may be
a blanket certification for a stated period.
Sec. 190.83 Person entitled to receive payment.
Drawback is paid to the claimant (see Sec. 190.82).
Sec. 190.84 Protests.
Procedures to protest the denial, in whole or in part, of a
drawback entry must be in accordance with part 174 of this chapter (19
CFR part 174).
Subpart I--Waiver of Prior Notice of Intent to Export; Accelerated
Payment of Drawback
Sec. 190.91 Waiver of prior notice of intent to export.
(a) General--(1) Scope. The requirement in Sec. 190.35 for prior
notice of intent to export merchandise which may be the subject of an
unused merchandise drawback claim under Sec. 313(j) of the Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)), may be waived under the provisions of this
section.
(2) Effective date for claimants with existing approval. For
claimants approved for waiver of prior notice before February 24, 2019,
and under 19 CFR 191, such approval of waiver of prior notice will
remain in effect, but only if the claimant provides the following
certification as part of each complete claim filed on or after that
date, pursuant to 19 CFR 190.51(a)(2)(xvi): ``The undersigned
acknowledges the current statutory requirements under 19 U.S.C. 1313
and the regulatory requirements in 19 CFR part 190, and hereby
certifies continuing eligibility for the waiver of prior notice
(granted prior to February 24, 2019) in compliance therewith.'' This
certification may only be made for waiver of prior notice for the
specific type of drawback claim for which the application was
previously approved under 19 CFR 191, except that applications approved
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) will also be applicable to claims for the
same type of merchandise if made under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2).
(3) Limited successorship for waiver of prior notice. When a
claimant (predecessor) is approved for waiver of prior notice under
this section and all of the rights, privileges, immunities, powers,
duties and liabilities of the claimant are transferred by written
agreement, merger, or corporate resolution to a successor, such
approval of waiver of prior notice will remain in
[[Page 37946]]
effect for a period of 1 year after such transfer. The approval of
waiver of prior notice will terminate at the end of such 1-year period
unless the successor applies for waiver of prior notice under this
section. If such successor applies for waiver of prior notice under
this section within such 1-year period, the successor may continue to
operate under the predecessor's waiver of prior notice until CBP
approves or denies the successor's application for waiver of prior
notice under this section, subject to the provisions in this section
(see, in particular, paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section).
(b) Application--(1) Who may apply. A claimant for unused
merchandise drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) may apply for a waiver of
prior notice of intent to export merchandise under this section.
(2) Contents of application. An applicant for a waiver of prior
notice under this section must file a written application (which may be
physically delivered or delivered via email) with the drawback office
where the claims will be filed. Such application must include the
following:
(i) Required information:
(A) Name, address, and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number (with
suffix) of applicant;
(B) Name, address, and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number (with
suffix) of current exporter(s) (if more than 3 exporters, such
information is required only for the 3 most frequently used exporters),
if applicant is not the exporter;
(C) Export period covered by this application;
(D) Commodity/product lines of imported and exported merchandise
covered by this application;
(E) Origin of merchandise covered by this application;
(F) Estimated number of export transactions during the next
calendar year covered by this application;
(G) Port(s) of exportation to be used during the next calendar year
covered by this application;
(H) Estimated dollar value of potential drawback during the next
calendar year covered by this application;
(I) The relationship between the parties involved in the import and
export transactions; and
(J) Provision(s) of drawback covered by the application.
(ii) A written declaration whether or not the applicant has
previously been denied a waiver request, or had an approval of a waiver
revoked, by any other drawback office, and whether the applicant has
previously requested a 1-time waiver of prior notice under Sec.
190.36, and whether such request was approved or denied; and
(iii) A certification that the following documentary evidence will
be made available for CBP review upon request:
(A) For the purpose of establishing that the imported merchandise
was not used in the United States (for purposes of drawback under 19
U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)) or that the exported merchandise was not used in the
United States and satisfies the requirements for substitution with the
imported merchandise (for purposes of drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(2)), and, as applicable:
(1) Records;
(2) Laboratory records prepared in the ordinary course of business;
and/or
(3) Inventory records prepared in the ordinary course of business
tracing all relevant movements and storage of the imported merchandise,
substituted merchandise, and/or exported merchandise; and
(B) Any other evidence establishing compliance with other
applicable drawback requirements, upon CBP's request under paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) of this section.
(3) Samples of records to accompany application. To expedite the
processing of applications under this section, the application should
contain at least one sample of each of the records to be used to
establish compliance with the applicable requirements (that is, sample
of import document (for example, CBP Form 7501, or its electronic
equivalent), sample of export document (for example, bill of lading),
and samples of business, laboratory, and inventory records certified,
under paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of this section, to be
available to CBP upon request).
(c) Action on application--(1) CBP review. The drawback office will
review and verify the information submitted on and with the
application. CBP will notify the applicant in writing within 90 days of
receipt of the application of its decision to approve or deny the
application, or of CBP's inability to approve, deny, or act on the
application and the reason therefor. In order for CBP to evaluate the
application, CBP may request any of the information listed in paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(A)(1) through (3) of this section. Based on the information
submitted on and with the application and any information so requested,
and based on the applicant's record of transactions with CBP, the
drawback office will approve or deny the application. The criteria to
be considered in reviewing the applicant's record with CBP include, but
are not limited to:
(i) The presence or absence of unresolved CBP charges (duties,
taxes, or other debts owed CBP);
(ii) The accuracy of the claimant's past drawback claims;
(iii) Whether waiver of prior notice was previously revoked or
suspended; and
(iv) The presence or absence of any failure to present merchandise
to CBP for examination after CBP had timely notified the party filing a
Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes
of Drawback on CBP Form 7553 of CBP's intent to examine the merchandise
(see Sec. 190.35).
(2) Approval. The approval of an application for waiver of prior
notice of intent to export, under this section, will operate
prospectively, applying only to those export shipments occurring after
the date of the waiver. It will be subject to a stay, as provided in
paragraph (d) of this section.
(3) Denial. If an application for waiver of prior notice of intent
to export, under this section, is denied, the applicant will be given
written notice, specifying the grounds therefor, together with what
corrective action may be taken, and informing the applicant that the
denial may be appealed in the manner prescribed in paragraph (g) of
this section. The applicant may not reapply for a waiver until the
reason for the denial is resolved.
(d) Stay. An approval of waiver of prior notice may be stayed, for
a specified reasonable period, should CBP desire for any reason to
examine the merchandise being exported with drawback prior to its
exportation for purposes of verification. CBP will provide written
notice, by registered or certified mail, of such a stay to the person
for whom waiver of prior notice was approved. CBP will specify the
reason(s) for the stay in such written notice. The stay will take
effect 2 working days after the date the person signs the return post
office receipt for the registered or certified mail. The stay will
remain in effect for the period specified in the written notice, or
until such earlier date as CBP notifies the person for whom waiver of
prior notice was approved in writing that the reason for the stay has
been satisfied. After the stay is lifted, operation under the waiver of
prior notice procedure may resume for exports on or after the date the
stay is lifted.
(e) Proposed revocation. CBP may propose to revoke the approval of
an application for waiver of prior notice of intent to export, under
this section, for good cause (such as, noncompliance with the drawback
law and/or regulations). CBP will give written
[[Page 37947]]
notice of the proposed revocation of a waiver of prior notice of intent
to export. The notice will specify the reasons for CBP's proposed
action and provide information regarding the procedures for challenging
CBP's proposed revocation action as prescribed in paragraph (g) of this
section. The written notice of proposed revocation may be included with
a notice of stay of approval of waiver of prior notice as provided
under paragraph (d) of this section. The revocation of the approval of
waiver of prior notice will take effect 30 days after the date of the
proposed revocation if not timely challenged under paragraph (g) of
this section. If timely challenged, the revocation will take effect
after completion of the challenge procedures in paragraph (g) of this
section unless the challenge is successful.
(f) Action by drawback office controlling. Action by the drawback
office to approve, deny, stay, or revoke waiver of prior notice of
intent to export, unless reversed by CBP Headquarters, will govern the
applicant's eligibility for this procedure in all CBP drawback offices.
If the application for waiver of prior notice of intent to export is
approved, the claimant must refer to such approval in the first
drawback claim filed after such approval in the drawback office
approving waiver of prior notice and must submit a copy of the approval
letter with the first drawback claim filed in any drawback office other
than the approving office, when the export upon which the claim is
based was without prior notice, under this section.
(g) Appeal of denial or challenge to proposed revocation. An appeal
of a denial of an application under this section, or challenge to the
proposed revocation of an approved application under this section, may
be made by letter to the drawback office issuing the denial or proposed
revocation and must be filed within 30 days of the date of denial or
proposed revocation. A denial of an appeal or challenge made to the
drawback office may itself be appealed to CBP Headquarters, Office of
Trade, Trade Policy and Programs, and must be filed within 30 days of
the denial date of the initial appeal or challenge. The 30-day period
for appeal or challenge to the drawback office or to CBP Headquarters
may be extended for good cause, upon written request by the applicant
or holder for such extension filed with the appropriate office within
the 30-day period.
Sec. 190.92 Accelerated payment.
(a) General--(1) Scope. Accelerated payment of drawback is
available under this section on drawback claims under this part, unless
specifically excepted from such accelerated payment. Accelerated
payment of drawback consists of the payment of estimated drawback
before liquidation of the drawback entry. Accelerated payment of
drawback is only available when CBP's review of the request for
accelerated payment of drawback does not find omissions from, or
inconsistencies with the requirements of the drawback law and part 190
(see, especially, subpart E of this part). Accelerated payment of a
drawback claim does not constitute liquidation of the drawback entry.
(2) Effective date for claimants with existing approval. For
claimants approved for accelerated payment of drawback before February
24, 2019, and under 19 CFR part 191, such approval of accelerated
payment will remain in effect, but only if the claimant provides the
following certification as part of each complete claim filed after that
date, pursuant to 19 CFR 190.51(a)(2)(xvi): ``The undersigned
acknowledges the current statutory requirements under 19 U.S.C. 1313
and the regulatory requirements in 19 CFR part 190, and hereby
certifies continuing eligibility for accelerated payment (granted prior
to February 24, 2019) in compliance therewith.'' This certification may
only be made for accelerated payment for the specific type of drawback
claim for which the application was previously approved under 19 CFR
191, except that applications approved under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) will
also be applicable to claims for the same type of merchandise if made
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2).
(3) Limited successorship for approval of accelerated payment. When
a claimant (predecessor) is approved for accelerated payment of
drawback under this section and all of the rights, privileges,
immunities, powers, duties and liabilities of the claimant are
transferred by written agreement, merger, or corporate resolution to a
successor, such approval of accelerated payment will remain in effect
for a period of 1 year after such transfer. The approval of accelerated
payment of drawback will terminate at the end of such 1-year period
unless the successor applies for accelerated payment of drawback under
this section. If such successor applies for accelerated payment of
drawback under this section within such 1-year period, the successor
may continue to operate under the predecessor's approval of accelerated
payment until CBP approves or denies the successor's application for
accelerated payment under this section, subject to the provisions in
this section (see, in particular, paragraph (f) of this section).
(b) Application for approval; contents. A person who wishes to
apply for accelerated payment of drawback must file a written
application (which may be physically delivered or delivered via email)
with the drawback office where claims will be filed.
(1) Required information. The application must contain:
(i) Company name and address;
(ii) Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number (with suffix);
(iii) Identity (by name and title) of the person in claimant's
organization who will be responsible for the drawback program;
(iv) Description of the bond coverage the applicant intends to use
to cover accelerated payments of drawback (see paragraph (d) of this
section), including:
(A) Identity of the surety to be used;
(B) Dollar amount of bond coverage for the first year under the
accelerated payment procedure; and
(C) Procedures to ensure that bond coverage remains adequate (that
is, procedures to alert the applicant when and if its accelerated
payment potential liability exceeds its bond coverage);
(v) Description of merchandise and/or articles covered by the
application;
(vi) Provision(s) of drawback covered by the application; and
(vii) Estimated dollar value of potential drawback during the next
12-month period covered by the application.
(2) Previous applications. In the application, the applicant must
state whether or not the applicant has previously been denied an
application for accelerated payment of drawback, or had an approval of
such an application revoked by any drawback office.
(3) Certification of compliance. In or with the application, the
applicant must also submit a certification, signed by the applicant,
that all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for drawback
will be met.
(4) Description of claimant's drawback program. With the
application, the applicant must submit a description (with sample
documents) of how the applicant will ensure compliance with its
certification that the statutory and regulatory drawback requirements
will be met. This description may be in the form of a booklet. The
detail contained in this description should vary depending on the size
and complexity of the applicant's accelerated drawback program (for
example, if the dollar amount is great and there are several kinds of
drawback involved, with differing inventory, manufacturing, and
[[Page 37948]]
shipping methods, greater detail in the description will be required).
The description must include at least:
(i) The name of the official in the claimant's organization who is
responsible for oversight of the claimant's drawback program;
(ii) The procedures and controls demonstrating compliance with the
statutory and regulatory drawback requirements;
(iii) The parameters of claimant's drawback recordkeeping program,
including the retention period and method (for example, paper,
electronic, etc.);
(iv) A list of the records that will be maintained, including at
least sample import documents, sample export documents, sample
inventory and transportation documents (if applicable), sample
laboratory or other documents establishing the qualification of
merchandise or articles for substitution under the drawback law (if
applicable), and sample manufacturing documents (if applicable);
(v) The procedures that will be used to notify CBP of changes to
the claimant's drawback program, variances from the procedures
described in this application, and violations of the statutory and
regulatory drawback requirements; and
(vi) The procedures for an annual review by the claimant to ensure
that its drawback program complies with the statutory and regulatory
drawback requirements and that CBP is notified of any modifications
from the procedures described in this application.
(c) Sample application. The drawback office, upon request, will
provide applicants for accelerated payment with a sample letter format
to assist them in preparing their submissions.
(d) Bond required. If approved for accelerated payment, the
claimant must furnish a properly executed bond in an amount sufficient
to cover the estimated amount of drawback to be claimed during the term
of the bond. If outstanding accelerated drawback claims exceed the
amount of the bond, the drawback office will require additional bond
coverage as necessary before additional accelerated payments are made.
(e) Action on application--(1) CBP review. The drawback office will
review and verify the information submitted in and with the
application. In order for CBP to evaluate the application, CBP may
request additional information (including additional sample documents)
and/or explanations of any of the information provided for in paragraph
(b)(4) of this section. Based on the information submitted on and with
the application and any information so requested, and based on the
applicant's record of transactions with CBP, the drawback office will
approve or deny the application. The criteria to be considered in
reviewing the applicant's record with CBP include, but are not limited
to (as applicable):
(i) The presence or absence of unresolved CBP charges (duties,
taxes, fees, or other debts owed CBP);
(ii) The accuracy of the claimant's past drawback claims; and
(iii) Whether accelerated payment of drawback or waiver of prior
notice of intent to export was previously revoked or suspended.
(2) Notification to applicant. CBP will notify the applicant in
writing within 90 days of receipt of the application of its decision to
approve or deny the application, or of CBP's inability to approve,
deny, or act on the application and the reason therefor.
(3) Approval. The approval of an application for accelerated
payment, under this section, will be effective as of the date of CBP's
written notification of approval under paragraph (e)(2) of this
section. Accelerated payment of drawback will be available under this
section to unliquidated drawback claims filed before and after such
date. For claims filed before such date, accelerated payment of
drawback will be paid only if the claimant furnishes a properly
executed single transaction bond covering the claim, in an amount
sufficient to cover the amount of accelerated drawback to be paid on
the claim.
(4) Denial. If an application for accelerated payment of drawback
under this section is denied, the applicant will be given written
notice, specifying the grounds therefor, together with what corrective
action may be taken, and informing the applicant that the denial may be
appealed in the manner prescribed in paragraph (i) of this section. The
applicant may not reapply for accelerated payment of drawback until the
reason for the denial is resolved.
(f) Revocation. CBP may propose to revoke the approval of an
application for accelerated payment of drawback under this section, for
good cause (such as, noncompliance with the drawback law and/or
regulations). In case of such proposed revocation, CBP will give
written notice, by registered or certified mail, of the proposed
revocation of the approval of accelerated payment. The notice will
specify the reasons for CBP's proposed action and the procedures for
challenging CBP's proposed revocation action as prescribed in paragraph
(h) of this section. The revocation will take effect 30 days after the
date of the proposed revocation if not timely challenged under
paragraph (h) of this section. If timely challenged, the revocation
will take effect after completion of the challenge procedures in
paragraph (h) of this section unless the challenge is successful.
(g) Action by drawback office controlling. Action by the drawback
office to approve, deny, or revoke accelerated payment of drawback will
govern the applicant's eligibility for this procedure in all CBP
drawback offices. If the application for accelerated payment of
drawback is approved, the claimant must refer to such approval in the
first drawback claim filed after such approval in the drawback office
approving accelerated payment of drawback and must submit a copy of the
approval letter with the first drawback claim filed in a drawback
office other than the approving office.
(h) Appeal of denial or challenge to proposed revocation. An appeal
of a denial of an application under this section, or challenge to the
proposed revocation of an approved application under this section, may
be made in writing to the drawback office issuing the denial or
proposed revocation and must be filed within 30 days of the date of
denial or proposed revocation. A denial of an appeal or challenge made
to the drawback office may itself be appealed to CBP Headquarters,
Office of Trade, Trade Policy and Programs, and must be filed within 30
days. The 30-day period for appeal or challenge to the drawback office
or to CBP Headquarters may be extended for good cause, upon written
request by the applicant or holder for such extension filed with the
appropriate office within the 30-day period.
(i) Payment. The drawback office approving a drawback claim in
which accelerated payment of drawback was requested will certify the
drawback claim for payment. After liquidation, the drawback office will
certify the claim for payment of any amount due or demand a refund of
any excess amount paid. Any excess amount of duty the subject of
accelerated payment that is not repaid to CBP within 30 days after the
date of liquidation of the related drawback entry will be considered
delinquent (see Sec. Sec. 24.3a and 113.65(b) of this chapter).
Sec. 190.93 Combined applications.
An applicant for the procedures provided for in Sec. Sec. 190.91
and 190.92 of this subpart may apply for only one procedure, both
procedures separately, or both procedures in one application package
(see also Sec. 190.195 regarding
[[Page 37949]]
combined applications for certification in the drawback compliance
program and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of accelerated
payment of drawback). In the latter instance, the intent to apply for
both procedures must be clearly stated. In all instances, all of the
requirements for the procedure(s) applied for must be met (for example,
in a combined application for both procedures, all of the information
required for each procedure, all required sample documents for each
procedure, and all required certifications must be included in and with
the application).
Subpart J--Internal Revenue Tax on Flavoring Extracts and Medicinal
or Toilet Preparations (Including Perfumery) Manufactured From
Domestic Tax-Paid Alcohol
Sec. 190.101 Drawback allowance.
(a) Drawback. Section 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(d)), provides for drawback of internal revenue tax upon the
exportation of flavoring extracts and medicinal or toilet preparations
(including perfumery) manufactured or produced in the United States in
part from domestic tax-paid alcohol.
(b) Shipment to Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American
Samoa. Drawback of internal revenue tax on articles manufactured or
produced under this subpart and shipped to Puerto Rico, the Virgin
Islands, Guam, or American Samoa will be allowed in accordance with
section 7653(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 7653(c)).
However, there is no authority of law for the allowance of drawback of
internal revenue tax on flavoring extracts or medicinal or toilet
preparations (including perfumery) manufactured or produced in the
United States and shipped to Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef,
Canton Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston Island, or Palmyra Island.
Sec. 190.102 Procedure.
(a) General. Other provisions of this part relating to direct
identification drawback (see subpart B of this part) will apply to
claims for drawback filed under this subpart insofar as applicable to
and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
(b) Manufacturing record. The manufacturer of flavoring extracts or
medicinal or toilet preparations on which drawback is claimed will
record the products manufactured, the quantity of waste, if any, and a
full description of the alcohol. These records must be available at all
times for inspection by CBP officers.
(c) Additional information required on the manufacturer's
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling. The
manufacturer's application for a specific manufacturing drawback
ruling, under Sec. 190.8, must state the quantity of domestic tax-paid
alcohol contained in each product on which drawback is claimed.
(d) Variance in alcohol content--(1) Variance of more than 5
percent. If the percentage of alcohol contained in an exported
medicinal preparation, flavoring extract or toilet preparation varies
by more than 5 percent from the percentage of alcohol in the total
volume of the product as stated in a previously approved application
for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling, the manufacturer must
apply for a new specific manufacturing drawback ruling pursuant to
Sec. 190.8. If the variation differs from a previously filed schedule,
the manufacturer must file a new schedule incorporating the change.
(2) Variance of 5 percent or less. Variances of 5 percent or less
of the volume of the product must be reported to the drawback office
where the drawback entries are liquidated. In such cases, the drawback
office may allow drawback without specific authorization from CBP
Headquarters.
(e) Time period for completing claims. Drawback claims under this
subpart must be completed within 3 years after the date of exportation
of the articles upon which drawback is claimed.
(f) Filing of drawback entries on duty-paid imported merchandise
and tax-paid alcohol. When the drawback claim covers duty-paid imported
merchandise in addition to tax-paid alcohol, the claimant must file one
set of entries for drawback of customs duty and another set for
drawback of internal revenue tax.
(g) Description of the alcohol. The description of the alcohol that
is the subject of the drawback entry may be obtained from the
description on the package containing the tax-paid alcohol.
Sec. 190.103 Additional requirements.
(a) Manufacturer claims domestic drawback. In the case of medicinal
preparations and flavoring extracts, the claimant must file with the
drawback entry, a declaration of the manufacturer stating whether a
claim has been or will be filed by the manufacturer with the Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) for domestic drawback on alcohol
under Sec. Sec. 5111, 5112, 5113, and 5114, Internal Revenue Code, as
amended (26 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5113, and 5114).
(b) Manufacturer does not claim domestic drawback--(1) Submission
of statement. If no claim has been or will be filed with TTB for
domestic drawback on medicinal preparations or flavoring extracts, the
manufacturer must submit a statement, in duplicate, setting forth that
fact to the Director, National Revenue Center, TTB.
(2) Contents of the statement. The statement must show the:
(i) Quantity and description of the exported products;
(ii) Identity of the alcohol used by serial number of package or
tank car;
(iii) Name and registry number of the distilled spirits plant from
which the alcohol was withdrawn;
(iv) Date of withdrawal;
(v) Serial number of the applicable record of tax determination
(see 27 CFR 17.163(a) and 27 CFR 19.626(c)(7); and
(vi) Drawback office where the claim will be filed.
(3) Verification of receipt of the statement. The Director,
National Revenue Center, TTB, will verify receipt of this statement,
and transmit a verification of receipt of the statement with a copy of
that document to the drawback office designated.
Sec. 190.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
certificates.
(a) Request. The drawback claimant or manufacturer must request the
Director, National Revenue Center, TTB, to provide the CBP office where
the drawback claim will be processed with a tax-paid certificate on TTB
Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol).
(b) Contents. The request must state the:
(1) Quantity of alcohol in proof gallons;
(2) Serial number of each package;
(3) Amount of tax paid on the alcohol;
(4) Name, registry number, and location of the distilled spirits
plant;
(5) Date of withdrawal;
(6) Name of the manufacturer using the alcohol in producing the
exported articles;
(7) Address of the manufacturer and its manufacturing plant; and
(8) Customs drawback office where the drawback claim will be
processed.
(c) Extract of TTB certificate. If a certification of any portion
of the alcohol described in the TTB Form 5100.4 is required for
liquidation of drawback entries processed in another drawback office,
the drawback office, on written application of the person who requested
its issuance, will transmit a copy of the extract from the certificate
for use at that drawback office. The drawback office will note that the
copy of the extract was prepared and transmitted.
[[Page 37950]]
Sec. 190.105 Liquidation.
The drawback office will ascertain the final amount of drawback due
by reference to the specific manufacturing drawback ruling under which
the drawback claimed is allowable.
Sec. 190.106 Amount of drawback.
(a) Claim filed with TTB. If the declaration required by Sec.
190.103(a) of this subpart shows that a claim has been or will be filed
with TTB for domestic drawback, drawback under Sec. 313(d) of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)), will be limited to the difference
between the amount of tax paid and the amount of domestic drawback
claimed.
(b) Claim not filed with TTB. If the declaration and statement
required by Sec. 190.103(a) and (b) show that no claim has been or
will be filed by the manufacturer with TTB for domestic drawback, the
drawback will be the full amount of the tax on the alcohol used.
Drawback under this provision may not be granted absent receipt from
TTB of a copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol)
indicating that taxes have been paid on the exported product for which
drawback is claimed.
(c) No deduction of 1 percent. No deduction of 1 percent may be
made in drawback claims under Sec. 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1313(d)).
(d) Payment. The drawback due will be paid in accordance with Sec.
190.81(f).
Subpart K--Supplies for Certain Vessels and Aircraft
Sec. 190.111 Drawback allowance.
Section 309 of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309), provides for
drawback on articles laden as supplies on certain vessels or aircraft
of the United States or as supplies including equipment upon, or used
in the maintenance or repair of, certain foreign vessels or aircraft.
Sec. 190.112 Procedure.
(a) General. The provisions of this subpart will override
conflicting provisions of this part, such as the export procedures in
Sec. 190.72.
(b) Notice of lading. The drawback claimant must file with the
drawback office a notice of lading.
(c) Time of filing notice of lading. In the case of drawback in
connection with 19 U.S.C. 1309(b), the notice of lading must be filed
within 5 years after the date of importation of the imported
merchandise.
(d) Contents of notice. The notice of lading must show:
(1) The name of the vessel or identity of the aircraft on which
articles were or are to be laden;
(2) The number and kind of packages and their marks and numbers;
(3) A description of the articles and their weight (net), gauge,
measure, or number; and
(4) The name of the exporter.
(e) Declaration of Master or other officer--(1) Requirement. The
master or an authorized representative of the vessel or aircraft having
knowledge of the facts must provide the following declaration on the
notice of lading ``I declare that the information given above is true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; that I have
knowledge of the facts set forth herein; that the articles described in
this notice of lading were received in the quantities stated, from the
person, and on the date, indicated above; that said articles were laden
on the vessel (or aircraft) named above for use on said vessel (or
aircraft) as supplies (or equipment), except as noted below; and that
at the time of lading of the articles, the said vessel (or aircraft)
was engaged in the business or trade checked below: (It is not
necessary for a foreign vessel to show its class of trade.).''
(2) Filing. The drawback claimant must file with the drawback
office both the drawback entry and the notice of lading or separate
document containing the declaration of the master or other officer or
representative.
(f) Information concerning class or trade. Information about the
class of business or trade of a vessel or aircraft is required to be
furnished in support of the drawback entry if the vessel or aircraft is
American.
(g) Articles laden or installed on aircraft as equipment or used in
the maintenance or repair of aircraft. The drawback office where the
drawback claim is filed will require a declaration or other evidence
showing to its satisfaction that articles have been laden or installed
on aircraft as equipment or used in the maintenance or repair of
aircraft.
(h) Fuel laden on vessels or aircraft as supplies--(1) Composite
notice of lading. In the case of fuel laden on vessels or aircraft as
supplies, the drawback claimant may file with the drawback office a
composite notice of lading for each calendar month. The composite
notice of lading must describe all of the drawback claimant's
deliveries of fuel supplies during the one calendar month at a single
port or airport to all vessels or airplanes of one vessel owner or
operator or airline. This includes fuel laden for flights or voyages
between the contiguous United States and Hawaii, Alaska, or any U.S.
possessions (see Sec. 10.59 of this chapter).
(2) Contents of composite notice. Composite notice must show for
each voyage or flight:
(i) The identity of the vessel or aircraft;
(ii) A description of the fuel supplies laden;
(iii) The quantity laden; and
(iv) The date of lading.
(3) Declaration of owner or operator. An authorized vessel or
airline representative having knowledge of the facts must complete the
``Declaration of Master or other officer''(see paragraph (e) of this
section).
(i) Desire to land articles covered by notice of lading. The master
of the vessel or commander of the aircraft desiring to land in the
United States articles covered by a notice of lading must apply for a
permit to land those articles under CBP supervision. All articles
landed, except those transferred under the original notice of lading to
another vessel or aircraft entitled to drawback, will be considered
imported merchandise for the purpose of Sec. 309(c) of the Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1309(c)).
Subpart L--Meats Cured With Imported Salt
Sec. 190.121 Drawback allowance.
Section 313(f) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(f)), provides
for the allowance of drawback upon the exportation of meats cured with
imported salt.
Sec. 190.122 Procedure.
Other provisions of this part relating to direct identification
manufacturing drawback will apply to claims for drawback under this
subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent with the
provisions of this subpart.
Sec. 190.123 Refund of duties.
Drawback allowed under this subpart will be refunded in aggregate
amounts of not less than $100 and will not be subject to the retention
of 1 percent of duties paid.
Subpart M--Materials for Construction and Equipment of Vessels and
Aircraft Built for Foreign Account and Ownership
Sec. 190.131 Drawback allowance.
Section 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), provides
for drawback on imported materials used in the construction and
equipment of vessels and aircraft built for foreign account and
ownership, or for the government of any foreign country,
notwithstanding that these vessels or aircraft may not be exported
within the strict meaning of the term.
[[Page 37951]]
Sec. 190.132 Procedure.
Other provisions of this part relating to direct identification
manufacturing drawback will apply to claims for drawback filed under
this subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent with the
provisions of this subpart.
Sec. 190.133 Explanation of terms.
(a) Materials. Section 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(g)), applies only to materials used in the original construction
and equipment of vessels and aircraft, or to materials used in a
``major conversion,'' as defined in this section, of a vessel or
aircraft. Section 313(g) does not apply to materials used for
alteration or repair, or to materials not required for safe operation
of the vessel or aircraft.
(b) Foreign account and ownership. Foreign account and ownership,
as used in Sec. 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)),
means only vessels or aircraft built or equipped for the account of an
owner or owners residing in a foreign country and having a bona fide
intention that the vessel or aircraft, when completed, will be owned
and operated under the flag of a foreign country.
(c) Major conversion. For purposes of this subpart, a ``major
conversion'' means a conversion that substantially changes the
dimensions or carrying capacity of the vessel or aircraft, changes the
type of the vessel or aircraft, substantially prolongs the life of the
vessel or aircraft, or otherwise so changes the vessel or aircraft that
it is essentially a new vessel or aircraft, as determined by CBP (see
46 U.S.C. 2101(14a)).
Subpart N--Foreign-Built Jet Aircraft Engines Processed in the
United States
Sec. 190.141 Drawback allowance.
Section 313(h) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(h)), provides
for drawback on the exportation of jet aircraft engines manufactured or
produced abroad that have been overhauled, repaired, rebuilt, or
reconditioned in the United States with the use of imported
merchandise, including parts.
Sec. 190.142 Procedure.
Other provisions of this part will apply to claims for drawback
filed under this subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent
with the provisions of this subpart.
Sec. 190.143 Drawback entry.
(a) Filing of entry. Drawback entries covering these foreign-built
jet aircraft engines must show that the entry covers jet aircraft
engines processed under Sec. 313(h) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(h)).
(b) Contents of entry. The drawback entry must indicate the country
in which each engine was manufactured and describe the processing
performed thereon in the United States.
Sec. 190.144 Refund of duties.
Drawback allowed under this subpart will be refunded in aggregate
amounts of not less than $100, and will not be subject to the deduction
of 1 percent of duties paid.
Subpart O--Merchandise Exported From Continuous CBP Custody
Sec. 190.151 Drawback allowance.
(a) Eligibility of entered or withdrawn merchandise--(1) Under 19
U.S.C. 1557(a). Section 557(a) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1557(a)), provides for drawback on the exportation to a foreign
country, or the shipment to the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake
Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Johnston Island, or Guam, of
merchandise upon which duties have been paid which has remained
continuously in bonded warehouse or otherwise in CBP custody for a
period not to exceed 5 years from the date of importation.
(2) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313. Imported merchandise that has not been
regularly entered or withdrawn for consumption, will not satisfy any
requirement for use, importation, exportation or destruction, and will
not be available for drawback, under Sec. 313 of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1313) (see 19 U.S.C. 1313(u)).
(b) Guantanamo Bay. Guantanamo Bay Naval Station will be considered
foreign territory for drawback purposes under this subpart and
merchandise shipped there is eligible for drawback. Imported
merchandise which has remained continuously in bonded warehouse or
otherwise in CBP custody since importation is not entitled to drawback
of duty when shipped to Puerto Rico, Canton Island, Enderbury Island,
or Palmyra Island.
Sec. 190.152 Merchandise released from CBP custody.
No remission, refund, abatement, or drawback of duty will be
allowed under this subpart because of the exportation or destruction of
any merchandise after its release from Government custody, except in
the following cases:
(a) When articles are exported or destroyed on which drawback is
expressly provided for by law;
(b) When prohibited articles have been regularly entered in good
faith and are subsequently exported or destroyed pursuant to statute
and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury; or
(c) When articles entered under bond are destroyed within the
bonded period, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1557(c), or destroyed within
the bonded period by death, accidental fire, or other casualty, and
satisfactory evidence of destruction is furnished to CBP (see Sec.
190.71), in which case any accrued duties will be remitted or refunded
and any condition in the bond that the articles must be exported will
be deemed satisfied (see 19 U.S.C. 1558).
Sec. 190.153 Continuous CBP custody.
(a) Merchandise released under an importer's bond and returned.
Merchandise released to an importer under a bond prescribed by Sec.
142.4 of this chapter and later returned to the public stores upon
requisition of the appropriate CBP office will not be deemed to be in
the continuous custody of CBP officers.
(b) Merchandise released under Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Merchandise
released as provided for in Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII, HTSUS (19
U.S.C. 1202), will not be deemed to be in the continuous custody of CBP
officers.
(c) Merchandise released from warehouse. For the purpose of this
subpart, in the case of merchandise entered for warehouse, CBP custody
will be deemed to cease when estimated duty has been deposited and the
appropriate CBP office has authorized the withdrawal of the
merchandise.
(d) Merchandise not warehoused, examined elsewhere than in public
stores--(1) General rule. Except as stated in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section, merchandise examined elsewhere than at the public stores, in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 151.7 of this chapter, will be
considered released from CBP custody upon completion of final
examination for appraisement.
(2) Merchandise upon the wharf. Merchandise which remains on the
wharf by permission of the appropriate CBP office will be considered to
be in CBP custody, but this custody will be deemed to cease when the
CBP officer in charge accepts the permit and has no other duties to
perform relating to the merchandise, such as measuring, weighing, or
gauging.
Sec. 190.154 Filing the entry.
(a) Direct export. At least 6 working hours before lading the
merchandise on which drawback is claimed under this subpart, the
importer or the agent
[[Page 37952]]
designated by him or her in writing must file a direct export drawback
entry.
(b) Merchandise transported to another port for exportation. The
importer of merchandise to be transported to another port for
exportation must file an entry naming the transporting conveyance,
route, and port of exit. The drawback office will certify one copy and
forward it to the CBP office at the port of exit. A bonded carrier must
transport the merchandise in accordance with the applicable
regulations. Manifests must be prepared and filed in the manner
prescribed in Sec. 144.37 of this chapter.
Sec. 190.155 Merchandise withdrawn from warehouse for exportation.
The regulations in part 18 of this chapter concerning the
supervision of lading and certification of exportation of merchandise
withdrawn from warehouse for exportation without payment of duty will
be followed to the extent applicable.
Sec. 190.156 Bill of lading.
(a) Filing. In order to complete the claim for drawback under this
subpart, a bill of lading covering the merchandise described in the
drawback entry must be filed within 2 years after the merchandise is
exported.
(b) Contents. The bill of lading must either show that the
merchandise was shipped by the person making the claim or bear an
endorsement of the person in whose name the merchandise was shipped
showing that the person making the claim is authorized to do so.
(c) Limitation of the bill of lading. The terms of the bill of
lading may limit and define its use by stating that it is for customs
purposes only and not negotiable.
(d) Inability to produce bill of lading. When a required bill of
lading cannot be produced, the person making the drawback entry may
request the drawback office, within the time required for the filing of
the bill of lading, to accept a statement setting forth the cause of
failure to produce the bill of lading and such evidence of exportation
and of that person's right to make the drawback entry as may be
available. The request will be granted if the drawback office is
satisfied by the evidence submitted that the failure to produce the
bill of lading is justified, that the merchandise has been exported,
and that the person making the drawback entry has the right to do so.
If the drawback office is not so satisfied, such office will transmit
the request and its accompanying evidence to the Office of Trade, CBP
Headquarters, for final determination.
(e) Extracts of bills of lading. Drawback offices may issue
extracts of bills of lading filed with drawback claims.
Sec. 190.157 [Reserved]
Sec. 190.158 Procedures.
When the drawback claim has been completed and the bill of lading
filed, together with the landing certificate, if required, the reports
of inspection and lading made, and the clearance of the exporting
conveyance established by the record of clearance in the case of direct
exportation or by certificate in the case of transportation and
exportation, the drawback office will verify the importation by
referring to the import records to ascertain the amount of duty paid on
the merchandise exported. To the extent appropriate and not
inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart, drawback entries will
be liquidated in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 190.81.
Sec. 190.159 Amount of drawback.
Drawback due under this subpart will not be subject to the
deduction of 1 percent.
Subpart P--Distilled Spirits, Wines, or Beer Which Are
Unmerchantable or Do Not Conform to Sample or Specifications
Sec. 190.161 Refund of taxes.
Section 5062(c), Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C.
5062(c)), provides for the refund, remission, abatement or credit to
the importer of internal revenue taxes paid or determined incident to
importation, upon the exportation, or destruction under CBP
supervision, of imported distilled spirits, wines, or beer found after
entry to be unmerchantable or not to conform to sample or
specifications and which are returned to CBP custody.
Sec. 190.162 Procedure.
The export procedure will be the same as that provided in Sec.
190.42 for rejected merchandise, except that the claimant must be the
importer and must comply with all other provisions in this subpart.
Sec. 190.163 Documentation.
(a) Entry. A drawback entry must be filed to claim drawback under
this subpart.
(b) Documentation. The drawback entry for unmerchantable
merchandise must be accompanied by a certificate of the importer
setting forth in detail the facts which cause the merchandise to be
unmerchantable and any additional evidence that the drawback office
requires to establish that the merchandise is unmerchantable.
Sec. 190.164 Return to CBP custody.
There is no time limit for the return to CBP custody of distilled
spirits, wine, or beer subject to refund of taxes under the provisions
of this subpart. The claimant must return the merchandise to CBP
custody prior to exportation or destruction and claims are subject to
the filing deadline set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1313(r)(1).
Sec. 190.165 No exportation by mail.
Merchandise covered by this subpart must not be exported by mail.
Sec. 190.166 Destruction of merchandise.
(a) Action by the importer. A drawback claimant who proposes to
destroy rather than export the distilled spirits, wine, or beer must
state that fact on the drawback entry.
(b) Action by CBP. Distilled spirits, wine, or beer returned to CBP
custody at the place approved by the drawback office where the drawback
entry was filed must be destroyed under the supervision of the CBP
officer who will certify the destruction on CBP Form 7553.
Sec. 190.167 Liquidation.
No deduction of 1 percent of the internal revenue taxes paid or
determined will be made in allowing entries under Sec. 5062(c),
Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5062(c)).
Sec. 190.168 [Reserved]
Subpart Q--Substitution of Finished Petroleum Derivatives
Sec. 190.171 General; drawback allowance.
(a) General. Section 313(p) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1313(p)), provides for drawback for duties, taxes, and fees paid on
qualified articles (see definition below) which consist of either
petroleum derivatives that are imported, duty-paid, and qualified for
drawback under the unused merchandise drawback law (19 U.S.C.
1313(j)(1)), or petroleum derivatives that are manufactured or produced
in the United States, and qualified for drawback under the
manufacturing drawback law (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)).
(b) Allowance of drawback. Drawback may be granted under 19 U.S.C.
1313(p):
(1) In cases where there is no manufacture, upon exportation of the
imported article, an article of the same kind and quality, or any
combination thereof; or
(2) In cases where there is a manufacture or production, upon
[[Page 37953]]
exportation of the manufactured or produced article, an article of the
same kind and quality, or any combination thereof.
(c) Calculation of drawback. For drawback of finished petroleum
derivatives pursuant to Sec. 1313(p), the claimant is required to
calculate the total amount of drawback due, for purposes of 190.51(b),
which will not exceed 99 percent of the allowable duties, taxes, and
fees, subject to the following:
(1) Per unit averaging calculation. The amount of duties, taxes,
and fees eligible for drawback is determined by per unit averaging, as
defined in 19 CFR 190.2, for any drawback claim based on 19 U.S.C.
1313(p) pursuant to the standards set forth in 19 CFR 190.172(b) and
without respect to the limitations set forth in subparagraphs (B) and
(C) of 19 U.S.C. 1313(l).
(2) Limitations. The amount of duties, taxes, and fees eligible for
drawback is not subject to the limitations set out in 19 U.S.C.
1313(p)(4) for unused merchandise claims (no manufacture) and
manufacturing claims (see 190.173(e) and 190.174(f)).
(3) Federal excise tax. For purposes of drawback of internal
revenue tax imposed under Chapters 32 and 38 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export of
substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount of taxes paid
(and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise.
Sec. 190.172 Definitions.
The following are definitions for purposes of this subpart only:
(a) Qualified article. Qualified article means an article described
in headings 2707, 2708, 2710 through 2715, 2901, 2902, 2909.19.14, or
3901 through 3914 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). In the case of an article described in headings 3901
through 3914, the definition covers the article in its primary forms as
provided in Note 6 to chapter 39 of the HTSUS.
(b) Same kind and quality article. Same kind and quality article
means an article which is referred to under the same 8-digit
classification of the HTSUS as the article to which it is compared.
(c) Exported article. Exported article means an article which has
been exported and is a qualified article, an article of the same kind
and quality as the qualified article, or any combination thereof.
Sec. 190.173 Imported duty-paid derivatives (no manufacture).
When the basis for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) is imported
duty-paid petroleum derivatives (that is, not articles manufactured
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)), the requirements for drawback are as
follows:
(a) Imported duty-paid merchandise. The imported duty-paid
merchandise designated for drawback must be a ``qualified article'' as
defined in Sec. 190.172(a) of this subpart;
(b) Exported article. The exported article on which drawback is
claimed must be an ``exported article'' as defined in Sec. 190.172(c)
of this subpart;
(c) Exporter. The exporter of the exported article must have
either:
(1) Imported the qualified article in at least the quantity of the
exported article; or
(2) Purchased or exchanged (directly or indirectly) from an
importer an imported qualified article in at least the quantity of the
exported article;
(d) Time of export. The exported article must be exported within
180 days after the date of entry of the designated imported duty-paid
merchandise; and
(e) Amount of drawback. The amount of drawback payable may not
exceed the amount of drawback which would be attributable to the
imported qualified article under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) which serves as
the basis for drawback.
Sec. 190.174 Derivatives manufactured under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b).
When the exported article which is the basis for a drawback claim
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) is petroleum derivatives which were
manufactured or produced in the United States and qualify for drawback
under the manufacturing drawback law (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)), the
requirements for drawback are as follows:
(a) Merchandise. The merchandise which is the basis for drawback
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) must:
(1) Have been manufactured or produced as described in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) or (b) from crude petroleum or a petroleum derivative; and
(2) Be a ``qualified article'' as defined in Sec. 190.172(a) of
this subpart;
(b) Exported article. The exported article on which drawback is
claimed must be an ``exported article'' as defined in Sec. 190.172(c)
of this subpart;
(c) Exporter. The exporter of the exported article must have
either:
(1) Manufactured or produced the qualified article in at least the
quantity of the exported article; or
(2) Purchased or exchanged (directly or indirectly) from a
manufacturer or producer described in 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b) the
qualified article in at least the quantity of the exported article;
(d) Manufacture in specific facility. The qualified article must
have been manufactured or produced in a specific petroleum refinery or
production facility which must be identified;
(e) Time of export. The exported article must be exported either:
(1) During the period provided for in the manufacturer's or
producer's specific manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8) in
which the qualified article is manufactured or produced; or
(2) Within 180 days after the close of the period in which the
qualified article is manufactured or produced; and
(f) Amount of drawback. The amount of drawback payable may not
exceed the amount of drawback which would be attributable to the
article manufactured or produced under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b) which
serves as the basis for drawback.
Sec. 190.175 Drawback claimant; maintenance of records.
(a) Drawback claimant. A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p)
must be the exporter of the exported article, or the refiner, producer,
or importer of either the qualified article or the exported article.
Any of these persons may designate another person to file the drawback
claim.
(b) Transfer of merchandise--(1) General. A drawback claimant under
19 U.S.C. 1313(p) must maintain records (which may be records kept in
the normal cause of business) to support the receipt of transferred
merchandise and the party transferring the merchandise must maintain
records to demonstrate the transfer.
(2) Article substituted for the qualified article. (i) Subject to
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section, the manufacturer, producer, or
importer of a qualified article may transfer to the exporter an article
of the same kind and quality as the qualified article in a quantity not
greater than the quantity of the qualified article.
(ii) Subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section, any
intermediate party in the chain of commerce leading to the exporter
from the manufacturer, producer, or importer of a qualified article may
also transfer to the exporter or to another intermediate party an
article of the same kind and quality as the article purchased or
exchanged from the prior transferor (whether the manufacturer,
producer, importer, or another intermediate transferor) in a quantity
not greater than the quantity of the article purchased or exchanged.
(iii) Under either paragraph (b)(2)(i) or (b)(2)(ii) of this
section, the article transferred, regardless of its origin (imported,
manufactured, substituted, or any combination thereof), will be the
[[Page 37954]]
qualified article eligible for drawback for purposes of section
1313(p).
(c) Maintenance of records. The manufacturer, producer, importer,
transferor, exporter and drawback claimant of the qualified article and
the exported article must all maintain their appropriate records
required by this part.
Sec. 190.176 Procedures for claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p).
(a) Applicability. The general procedures for filing drawback
claims will be applicable to claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p)
unless otherwise specifically provided for in this section.
(b) Administrative efficiency, frequency of claims, and
restructuring of claims. The procedures regarding administrative
efficiency, frequency of claims, and restructuring of claims (as
applicable, see Sec. 190.53) will apply to claims filed under this
subpart.
(c) Imported duty-paid derivatives (no manufacture). When the basis
for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) is imported duty-paid petroleum
(not articles manufactured under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)), claims
under this subpart may be paid and liquidated if:
(1) The claim is filed on the drawback entry; and
(2) The claimant provides a certification stating the basis (such
as company records, or customer's written certification), for the
information contained therein and certifying that:
(i) The exported merchandise was exported within 180 days of entry
of the designated, imported merchandise;
(ii) The qualified article and the exported article are
commercially interchangeable or both articles are subject to the same
8-digit HTSUS subheading number;
(iii) To the best of the claimant's knowledge, the designated
imported merchandise, the qualified article and the exported article
have not and will not serve as the basis of any other drawback claim;
(iv) Evidence in support of the certification will be retained by
the person providing the certification for 3 years after liquidation of
the claim; and
(v) Such evidence will be available for verification by CBP.
(d) Derivatives manufactured under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b). When
the basis for a claim for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) is articles
manufactured under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), claims under this section
may be paid and liquidated if:
(1) The claim is filed on the drawback entry;
(2) All documents required to be filed with a manufacturing claim
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b) are filed with the claim;
(3) The claim identifies the specific refinery or production
facility at which the derivatives were manufactured or produced;
(4) The claim states the period of manufacture for the derivatives;
and
(5) The claimant provides a certification stating the basis (such
as company records or a customer's written certification), for the
information contained therein and certifying that:
(i) The exported merchandise was exported during the manufacturing
period for the qualified article or within 180 days after the close of
that period;
(ii) The qualified article and the exported article are
commercially interchangeable or both articles are classifiable under
the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number;
(iii) To the best of the claimant's knowledge, the designated
imported merchandise, the qualified article and the exported article
have not and will not serve as the basis of any other drawback claim;
(iv) Evidence in support of the certification will be retained by
the person providing the certification for 3 years after liquidation of
the claim; and
(v) Such evidence will be available for verification by CBP.
Subpart R--Merchandise Transferred to a Foreign Trade Zone from
Customs Territory
Sec. 190.181 Drawback allowance.
The fourth proviso of Sec. 3 of the Foreign Trade Zones Act of
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c), provides that merchandise
transferred to a foreign trade zone for the sole purpose of
exportation, storage or destruction (except destruction of distilled
spirits, wines, and fermented malt liquors), will be considered to be
exported for the purpose of drawback, provided there is compliance with
the regulations of this subpart.
Sec. 190.182 Zone-restricted merchandise.
Merchandise in a foreign trade zone for the purposes specified in
Sec. 190.181 will be given status as zone-restricted merchandise on
proper application (see Sec. 146.44 of this chapter).
Sec. 190.183 Articles manufactured or produced in the United States.
(a) Procedure for filing documents. Except as otherwise provided,
the drawback procedures prescribed in this part must be followed when
claiming drawback under this subpart on articles manufactured or
produced in the United States with the use of imported or substituted
merchandise, and on flavoring extracts or medicinal or toilet
preparations (including perfumery) manufactured or produced with the
use of domestic tax-paid alcohol.
(b) Notice of transfer--(1) Evidence of export. The notice of zone
transfer on CBP Form 214 (Application for Foreign-Trade Zone Admission
and/or Status Designation) or its electronic equivalent will be in
place of the documents under subpart G of this part to establish the
exportation.
(2) Filing procedures. The notice of transfer (CBP Form 214) will
be filed not later than 3 years after the transfer of the articles to
the zone. A notice filed after the transfer will state the foreign
trade zone lot number.
(3) Contents of notice. Each notice of transfer must show the:
(i) Number and location of the foreign trade zone;
(ii) Number and kind of packages and their marks and numbers;
(iii) Description of the articles, including weight (gross and
net), gauge, measure, or number; and
(iv) Name of the transferor.
(c) Action of foreign trade zone operator. After articles have been
received in the zone, the zone operator must certify on a copy of the
notice of transfer (CBP Form 214) the receipt of the articles (see
Sec. 190.184(d)(2)) and forward the notice to the transferor or the
person designated by the transferor. The transferor must verify that
the notice has been certified before filing it with the drawback claim.
(d) Drawback entries. Drawback entries must indicate that the
merchandise was transferred to a foreign trade zone. The ``Declaration
of Exportation'' must be modified as follows:
Declaration of Transfer to a Foreign Trade Zone
I, ________ (member of firm, officer representing corporation,
agent, or attorney), of ____, declare that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, the particulars of transfer stated in this entry, the
notices of transfer, and receipts are correct, and that the merchandise
was transferred to a foreign trade zone for the sole purpose of
exportation, destruction, or storage, not to be removed from the
foreign trade zone for domestic consumption.
Dated:-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Transferor or agent
Sec. 190.184 Merchandise transferred from continuous CBP custody.
(a) Procedure for filing claims. The procedure described in subpart
O of this
[[Page 37955]]
part will be followed as applicable, for drawback on merchandise
transferred to a foreign trade zone from continuous CBP custody.
(b) Drawback entry. Before the transfer of merchandise from
continuous CBP custody to a foreign trade zone, the importer or a
person designated in writing by the importer for that purpose must file
with the drawback office a direct export drawback entry. CBP will
notify the zone operator at the zone.
(c) Certification by zone operator. After the merchandise has been
received in the zone, the zone operator must certify the receipt of the
merchandise (see paragraph (d)(2) of this section) and notify the
transferor or the person designated by the transferor. After executing
the declaration provided for in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the
transferor must resubmit the drawback entry to the drawback office in
place of the bill of lading required by Sec. 190.156.
(d) Modification of drawback entry--(1) Indication of transfer. The
drawback entry must include a certification to indicate that the
merchandise is to be transferred to a foreign trade zone.
(2) Endorsement. The transferor or person designated by the
transferor and the foreign trade zone operator must certify transfer to
the foreign trade zone, with respect to the drawback entry, as follows:
Certification by Foreign Trade Zone Operator
The merchandise described in the entry was received from ______ on
____; 20__; in Foreign Trade Zone No. __, (City and State)
Exceptions-------------------------------------------------------------
(Name and title)
By---------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of operator)
(3) Transferor's declaration. The transferor must declare, with
respect to the drawback entry, as follows:
Transferor's Declaration
I, ________ of the firm of ____, declare that the merchandise
described in this entry was duly entered at the customhouse on arrival
at this port; that the duties thereon have been paid as specified in
this entry; and that it was transferred to Foreign Trade Zone No. __,
located at ____, (City and State) for the sole purpose of exportation,
destruction, or storage, not to be removed from the foreign trade zone
for domestic consumption. I further declare that to the best of my
knowledge and belief, this merchandise is in the same quantity,
quality, value, and package, unavoidable wastage and damage excepted,
as it was at the time of importation; that no allowance nor reduction
of duties has been made for damage or other cause except as specified
in this entry; and that no part of the duties paid has been refunded by
drawback or otherwise.
Dated:-----------------------------------------------------------------
Transferor
Sec. 190.185 Unused merchandise drawback and merchandise not
conforming to sample or specification, shipped without consent of the
consignee, found to be defective as of the time of importation, or
returned after retail sale.
(a) Procedure for filing claims. The procedures described in
subpart C of this part relating to unused merchandise drawback, and in
subpart D of this part relating to rejected merchandise, must be
followed with respect to drawback under this subpart for unused
merchandise drawback and merchandise that does not conform to sample or
specification, is shipped without consent of the consignee, or is found
to be defective as of the time of importation.
(b) Drawback entry. Before transfer of the merchandise to a foreign
trade zone, the importer or a person designated in writing by the
importer for that purpose must file the drawback entry. CBP will notify
the zone operator at the zone.
(c) Certification by zone operator. After the merchandise has been
received in the zone, the zone operator at the zone must certify, with
respect to the drawback entry, the receipt of the merchandise and
notify the transferor or the person designated by the transferor. After
executing the declaration provided for in paragraph (d)(3) of this
section, the transferor must resubmit the drawback entry in place of
the bill of lading required by Sec. 190.156.
(d) Modification of drawback entry--(1) Indication of transfer. The
drawback entry must indicate that the merchandise is to be transferred
to a foreign trade zone.
(2) Endorsement. The transferor or person designated by the
transferor and the foreign trade zone operator must certify transfer to
the foreign trade zone, with respect to the drawback entry, as follows:
Certification by Foreign Trade Zone Operator
The merchandise described in this entry was received from ______on
____, 20 __, in Foreign Trade Zone No. __, ____(City and State).
Exceptions:------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of operator)
By---------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name and title)
(3) Transferor's declaration. The transferor must certify, with
respect to the drawback entry, as follows:
Transferor's Declaration
I, ________ of the firm of _____, declare that the merchandise
described in the within entry was duly entered at the customhouse on
arrival at this port; that the duties thereon have been paid as
specified in this entry; and that it was transferred to Foreign Trade
Zone No. __, located at ____ (City and State) for the sole purpose of
exportation, destruction, or storage, not to be removed from the
foreign trade zone for domestic consumption. I further declare that to
the best of my knowledge and belief, said merchandise is the same in
quantity, quality, value, and package as specified in this entry; that
no allowance nor reduction in duties has been made; and that no part of
the duties paid has been refunded by drawback or otherwise.
Dated:-----------------------------------------------------------------
Transferor
Sec. 190.186 Person entitled to claim drawback.
The person named in the foreign trade zone operator's certification
on the notice of transfer or the drawback entry, as applicable, will be
considered to be the transferor. Drawback may be claimed by, and paid
to, the transferor.
Subpart S--Drawback Compliance Program
Sec. 190.191 Purpose.
This subpart sets forth the requirements for the drawback
compliance program in which claimants and other parties in interest,
including customs brokers, may participate after being certified by
CBP. Participation in the program is voluntary. Under the program, CBP
is required to inform potential drawback claimants and related parties
clearly about their rights and obligations under the drawback law and
regulations. Reduced penalties and/or warning letters may be issued
once a party has been certified for the program, and is in general
compliance with the appropriate procedures and requirements thereof.
Sec. 190.192 Certification for compliance program.
(a) General. A party may be certified as a participant in the
drawback compliance program after meeting the core requirements
established under the program, or after negotiating an alternative
drawback compliance
[[Page 37956]]
program suited to the needs of both the party and CBP. Certification
requirements will take into account the size and nature of the party's
drawback program, the type of drawback claims filed, and the volume of
claims filed. Whether the party is a drawback claimant, a broker, or
one that provides data and documentation on which a drawback claim is
based, will also be considered.
(b) Core requirements of program. In order to be certified as a
participant in the drawback compliance program or negotiated
alternative drawback compliance program, the party must demonstrate
that it:
(1) Understands the legal requirements for filing claims, including
the nature of the records that are required to be maintained and
produced and the time periods involved;
(2) Has in place procedures that explain the CBP requirements to
those employees involved in the preparation of claims, and the
maintenance and production of required records;
(3) Has in place procedures regarding the preparation of claims and
maintenance of required records, and the production of such records to
CBP;
(4) Has designated a dependable individual or individuals who will
be responsible for compliance under the program, and maintenance and
production of required records;
(5) Has in place a record maintenance program approved by CBP
regarding original records, or if approved by CBP, alternative records
or recordkeeping formats for other than the original records; and
(6) Has procedures for notifying CBP of variances in, or violations
of, the drawback compliance program or other alternative negotiated
drawback compliance program, and for taking corrective action when
notified by CBP of violations and problems regarding such program.
(c) Broker certification. A customs broker may be certified as a
participant in the drawback compliance program only on behalf of a
given claimant (see Sec. 190.194(b)). To do so, a customs broker who
assists a claimant in filing for drawback must be able to demonstrate,
for and on behalf of such claimant, conformity with the core
requirements of the drawback compliance program as set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section. The broker must ensure that the claimant
has the necessary documentation and records to support the drawback
compliance program established on its behalf, and that claims to be
filed under the program are reviewed by the broker for accuracy and
completeness.
Sec. 190.193 Application procedure for compliance program.
(a) Who may apply. Claimants and other parties in interest may
apply for participation in the drawback compliance program. This
includes any person, corporation or business entity that provides
supporting information or documentation to one who files drawback
claims, as well as customs brokers who assist claimants in filing for
drawback. Program participants may further consist of importers,
manufacturers or producers, agent-manufacturers, complementary
recordkeepers, subcontractors, intermediate parties, and exporters.
(b) Place of filing. An application in letter format containing the
information as prescribed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section may
be submitted to any drawback office.
(c) Letter of application; contents. A party requesting
certification to become a participant in the drawback compliance
program must file with the drawback office a written application,
signed by an authorized individual (see Sec. 190.6(c) of this part).
The detail required in the application must take into account the size
and nature of the applicant's drawback program, the type of drawback
claims filed, and the dollar value and volume of claims filed. However,
the application must contain at least the following information:
(1) Name of applicant, address, IRS number (with suffix), and the
type of business in which engaged, as well as the name(s) of the
individual(s) designated by the applicant to be responsible for
compliance under the program;
(2) A description of the nature of the applicant's drawback
program, including the type of drawback in which involved (such as,
manufacturing, or unused or rejected merchandise), and the applicant's
particular role(s) in the drawback claims process (such as claimant
and/or importer, manufacturer or producer, agent-manufacturer,
complementary recordkeeper, subcontractor, intermediate party
(possessor or purchaser), or exporter (destroyer)); and
(3) Size of applicant's drawback program. For example, if the
applicant is a claimant, the number of claims filed over the previous
12-month period should be included, along with the number estimated to
be filed over the next 12-month period, and the estimated amount of
drawback to be claimed annually. Other parties should describe the
extent to which they are involved in drawback activity, based upon
their particular role(s) in the drawback process; for example,
manufacturers should explain how much manufacturing they are engaged in
for drawback, such as the quantity of drawback product produced on an
annual basis, as established by the certificates of manufacture and
delivery they have executed.
(d) Application package. Along with the letter of application as
prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section, the application package
must include a description of how the applicant will ensure compliance
with statutory and regulatory drawback requirements. This description
may be in the form of a booklet or set forth otherwise. The description
must include at least the following:
(1) The name and title of the official in the applicant's
organization who is responsible for oversight of the applicant's
drawback program, and the name and title, with mailing address and, if
available, fax number and email address, of the person(s) in the
applicant's organization responsible for the actual maintenance of the
applicant's drawback program;
(2) If the applicant is a manufacturer and the drawback involved is
manufacturing drawback, a copy of the letter of notification of intent
to operate under a general manufacturing drawback ruling or the
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling (see
Sec. Sec. 190.7 and 190.8), as appropriate;
(3) A description of the applicant's drawback record-keeping
program, including the retention period and method (for example, paper,
and electronic.);
(4) A list of the records that will be maintained, including at
least sample import documents, sample export documents, sample
inventory and transportation documents (if applicable), sample
laboratory or other documents establishing the qualification of
merchandise or articles for substitution under the drawback law (if
applicable), and sample manufacturing documents (if applicable);
(5) A description of the applicant's specific procedures for:
(i) How drawback claims are prepared (if the applicant is a
claimant); and
(ii) How the applicant will fulfill any requirements under the
drawback law and regulations applicable to its role in the drawback
program;
(6) A description of the applicant's procedures for notifying CBP
of variances in, or violations of, its drawback compliance program or
negotiated alternative drawback compliance program, and procedures for
taking corrective action when notified by CBP of violations or other
problems in such program; and
[[Page 37957]]
(7) A description of the applicant's procedures for annual review
to ensure that its drawback compliance program meets the statutory and
regulatory drawback requirements and that CBP is notified of any
modifications from the procedures described in this application.
Sec. 190.194 Action on application to participate in compliance
program.
(a) Review by drawback office--(1) General. It is the
responsibility of the drawback office to coordinate its decision making
on the package with CBP Headquarters and other CBP offices as
appropriate. CBP processing of the package will consist of the review
of the information contained therein as well as any additional
information requested (see paragraph (a)(2) of this section).
(2) Criteria for CBP review. The drawback office will review and
verify the information submitted in and with the application. In order
for CBP to evaluate the application, CBP may request additional
information (including additional sample documents) and/or explanations
of any of the information provided for in Sec. 190.193(c) and (d) of
this subpart. Based on the information submitted on and with the
application and any information so requested, and based on the
applicant's record of transactions with CBP, the drawback office will
approve or deny the application. The criteria to be considered in
reviewing the applicant's record with CBP will include (as applicable):
(i) The presence or absence of unresolved customs charges (duties,
taxes, fees, or other debts owed CBP);
(ii) The accuracy of the claimant's past drawback claims; and
(iii) Whether accelerated payment of drawback or waiver of prior
notice of intent to export was previously revoked or suspended.
(b) Approval. Certification as a participant in the drawback
compliance program will be given to applicants whose applications are
approved under the criteria in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The
drawback office will give written notification to an applicant of its
certification as a participant in the drawback compliance program. A
customs broker obtaining certification for a drawback claimant will be
sent written notification on behalf of such claimant, with a copy of
the notification also being sent to the claimant.
(c) Benefits of participation in program. When a party that has
been certified as a participant in the drawback compliance program and
is generally in compliance with the appropriate procedures and
requirements of the program commits a violation of 19 U.S.C. 1593a(a)
(see Sec. 190.62(b)), CBP will, in the absence of fraud or repeated
violations, and in lieu of a monetary penalty as otherwise provided
under Sec. 1593a, issue a written notice of the violation to the
party. Repeated violations by a participant, including a customs
broker, may result in the issuance of penalties and the removal of
certification under the program until corrective action, satisfactory
to CBP, is taken.
(d) Denial. If certification as a participant in the drawback
compliance program is denied, the applicant will be given written
notice by the drawback office, specifying the grounds for such denial,
together with any action that may be taken to correct the perceived
deficiencies, and informing the applicant that such denial may be
appealed to the drawback office that issued the notice of denial and
then appealed to CBP Headquarters.
(e) Certification removal--(1) Grounds for removal. The
certification for participation in the drawback compliance program by a
party may be removed when any of the following conditions are
discovered:
(i) The certification privilege was obtained through fraud or
mistake of fact;
(ii) The program participant is no longer in compliance with the
customs laws and CBP regulations, including the requirements set forth
in Sec. 190.192;
(iii) The program participant has repeatedly filed false drawback
claims or false or misleading documentation or other information
relating to such claims; or
(iv) The program participant is convicted of any felony or has
committed acts which would constitute a misdemeanor or felony involving
theft, smuggling, or any theft-connected crime.
(2) Removal procedure. If CBP determines that the certification of
a program participant should be removed, the drawback office will send
the program participant a written notice of the removal. Such notice
will inform the program participant of the grounds for the removal and
will advise the program participant of its right to file an appeal of
the removal in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section.
(3) Effect of removal. The removal of certification will be
effective immediately in cases of willfulness on the part of the
program participant or when required by public health, interest, or
safety. In all other cases, the removal of certification will be
effective when the program participant has received notice under
paragraph (e)(2) of this section and either no appeal has been filed
within the time limit prescribed in paragraph (f)(2) of this section or
all appeal procedures have been concluded by a decision that upholds
the removal action. Removal of certification may subject the affected
person to penalties.
(f) Appeal of certification denial or removal--(1) Appeal of
certification denial. A party may challenge a denial of an application
for certification as a participant in the drawback compliance program
by filing a written appeal, within 30 days of issuance of the notice of
denial, with the drawback office. A denial of an appeal may itself be
appealed to CBP Headquarters, Trade Policy and Programs, Office of
Trade, within 30 days after issuance of the drawback office's appeal
decision. This office will review the appeal and will respond with a
written decision within 30 days after receipt of the appeal unless
circumstances require a delay in issuance of the decision. If the
decision cannot be issued within the 30-day period, the officewill
advise the appellant of the reasons for the delay and of any further
actions which will be carried out to complete the appeal review and of
the anticipated date for issuance of the appeal decision.
(2) Appeal of certification removal. A party who has received a CBP
notice of removal of certification for participation in the drawback
compliance program may challenge the removal by filing a written
appeal, within 30 days after issuance of the notice of removal, with
the drawback office. A denial of an appeal may itself be appealed to
CBP Headquarters, Trade Policy and Programs, Office of Trade, within 30
days after issuance of the drawback office's appeal decision. This
office will consider the allegations upon which the removal was based
and the responses made to those allegations by the appellant and will
render a written decision on the appeal within 30 days after receipt of
the appeal.
Sec. 190.195 Combined application for certification in drawback
compliance program and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of
accelerated payment of drawback.
An applicant for certification in the drawback compliance program
may also, in the same application, apply for waiver of prior notice of
intent to export and accelerated payment of drawback, under subpart I
of this part. Alternatively, an applicant may separately apply for
certification in the drawback compliance program and either or both
waiver of prior notice and accelerated payment of drawback. In the
[[Page 37958]]
former instance, the intent to apply for certification and waiver of
prior notice and/or approval of accelerated payment of drawback must be
clearly stated. In all instances, all of the requirements for
certification and the procedure applied for must be met (for example,
in a combined application for certification in the drawback compliance
program and both procedures, all of the information required for
certification and each procedure, all required sample documents for
certification and each procedure, and all required certifications must
be included with the application).
Appendix A to Part 190--General Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Table of Contents
I. General Instructions
II. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
(T.D. 81-234; T.D. 83-123)
III. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
or 1313(b) for Agents (T.D. 81-181)
IV. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
for Burlap or Other Textile Material (T.D. 83-53)
V. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Component Parts (T.D. 81-300)
VI. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
for Flaxseed (T.D. 83-80)
VII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
for Fur Skins or Fur Skin Articles (T.D. 83-77)
VIII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
for Orange Juice (T.D. 85-110)
IX. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
for Petroleum or Petroleum Derivatives (T.D. 84-49)
X. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Piece Goods (T.D. 83-73)
XI. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
for Raw Sugar (T.D. 83-59)
XII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
for Steel (T.D. 81-74)
XIII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
for Sugar (T.D. 81-92)
XIV. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
for Woven Piece Goods (T.D. 83-84)
I. General Instructions
A. There follow various general manufacturing drawback rulings
which have been designed to simplify drawback procedures. Any person
that can comply with the conditions of any one of these rulings may
notify a CBP drawback office in writing of its intention to operate
under the ruling (see Sec. 190.7). Such a letter of notification
must include the following information:
1. Name and address of manufacturer or producer;
2. IRS (Internal Revenue Service) number (with suffix) of
manufacturer or producer;
3. Location[s] of factory[ies] which will operate under the
general ruling;
4. If a business entity, names of persons who will sign drawback
documents (see Sec. 190.6);
5. Identity (by T.D. number and title, as stated in this
Appendix) of general manufacturing drawback ruling under which the
manufacturer or producer intends to operate;
6. Description of the merchandise and articles, unless
specifically described in the general manufacturing drawback ruling,
and 8-digit HTSUS subheading number, and the quantity of the
merchandise;
7. Only for General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) for Petroleum or Petroleum Derivatives, the name of
each article to be exported or, if the identity of the product is
not clearly evident by its name, what the product is, and the
abstract period to be used for each refinery (monthly or other
specified period (not to exceed 1 year)), subject to the conditions
in the General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
for Petroleum or Petroleum Derivatives, I. Procedures and Records
Maintained, 4(a) or (b);
8. Basis of claim used for calculating drawback; and
9. Description of the manufacturing or production process,
unless specifically described in the general manufacturing drawback
ruling.
For the General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling under Sec.
1313(a), the General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) for Component Parts, and the General Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or 1313(b) for Agents, if the
drawback office has doubts as to whether there is a manufacture or
production, as defined in Sec. 190.2, the manufacturer or producer
will be asked to provide details of the operation purported to be a
manufacture or production.
10. For the General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling where
substituted merchandise will be used, the bill of materials and/or
formulas annotated with the 8-digit HTSUS classifications.
B. These general manufacturing drawback rulings supersede
general ``contracts'' previously published under the following
Treasury Decisions (T.D.s): 81-74, 81-92, 81-181, 81-234, 81-300,
83-53, 83-59, 83-73, 83-77, 83-80, 83-84, 83-123, 84-49, and 85-110.
Anyone currently operating under any of the above-listed Treasury
Decisions will automatically be covered by the superseding general
ruling, including all privileges of the previous ``contract''.
II. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) (T.D.
81-234; T.D. 83-123)
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products 1 Used
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported merchandise or drawback products are used in the
manufacture of the exported articles upon which drawback claims will
be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will be claimed will be
manufactured in the United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback products will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
1. Relative Values
Drawback law mandates the assignment of relative values when two
or more products necessarily are produced concurrently in the same
operation. If multiple products are produced records, which may
include records kept in the normal course of business, will be
maintained of the market value of each product at the time it is
first separated in the manufacturing process.
2. Appearing-in Method
The appearing-in basis may not be used if multiple products are
produced.
F. Loss or Gain
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained showing the extent of any loss or gain
in net weight or measurement of the imported merchandise, caused by
atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions, or other factors.
G. [Reserved]
H. Stock in Process
Stock in process does not result; or if it does result, details
will be given in claims as filed, and it will not be included in the
computation of the merchandise used to manufacture the finished
articles on which drawback is claimed.
I. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of merchandise appearing in the exported articles,
records will be maintained to establish the value, the quantity, and
the disposition of any waste that results from manufacturing the
exported articles. If no waste results, records will be maintained
to establish that fact.
J. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
[[Page 37959]]
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of the imported merchandise, and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \2\ used in producing
the exported articles. (To obtain drawback the claimant must
establish that the completed articles were exported within 5 years
after importation of the imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements must be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of
compliance).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of the sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
K. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures And Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
L. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the full quantity of merchandise
used in producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation. A
drawback claim may be based on the quantity of eligible merchandise
that appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there
is waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible material used to
produce the exported articles less the amount of that merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace.
M. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer must:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
III. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or
1313(b) for Agents (T.D. 81-181)
Manufacturers or producers operating under this general
manufacturing drawback ruling must comply with T.D.s 55027(2) and
55207(1), and 19 U.S.C. 1313(b), if applicable, as well as 19 CFR
part 190 (see particularly, Sec. 190.9).
A. Name and Address of Principal
B. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback products or other
substituted merchandise will be used to manufacture or produce
articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
C. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. Quantity, kind, quality, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading number
of merchandise transferred from the principal to the agent;
2. Date of transfer of the merchandise from the principal to the
agent;
3. Date of manufacturing or production operations performed by
the agent;
4. Total quantity and description of merchandise (including 8-
digit HTSUS subheading number) appearing in or used in manufacturing
or production operations performed by the agent;
5. Total quantity and description of articles (including 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number) produced in manufacturing or production
operations performed by the agent;
6. Quantity, kind, quality, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading number
of articles transferred from the agent to the principal; and
7. Date of transfer of the articles from the agent to the
principal.
D. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
manufacturing or producing articles for account of the principal
under the principal's general manufacturing drawback ruling or
specific manufacturing drawback ruling, as appropriate;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates the claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to help ensure proper compliance with
title 19, United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP
Regulations and this general ruling.
IV. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for
Burlap or Other Textile Material (T.D. 83-53)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) upon the
exportation of bags or meat wrappers manufactured with the use of
imported burlap or other textile material, subject to the following
special requirements:
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products 1 Used
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported merchandise or drawback products (burlap or other
textile material) are used in the manufacture of the exported
articles upon which drawback claims will be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will be claimed will be
manufactured in the United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another, or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback products will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Loss or Gain
Not applicable.
G. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of merchandise appearing in the exported articles,
records will be maintained to establish the value, the quantity, and
the disposition of any waste that results from manufacturing the
exported articles. If no waste results, records will be maintained
to establish that fact.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of the imported merchandise; and
[[Page 37960]]
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \2\ used in producing
the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of the sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of compliance.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures and Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish compliance with those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid. Each lot of imported material
received by a manufacturer or producer must be given a lot number
and kept separate from other lots until used. The records of the
manufacturer or producer must show, as to each manufacturing lot or
period of manufacture, the 8-digit HTSUS classification, the
quantity of material used from each imported lot and the number of
each kind and size of bags or meat wrappers obtained.
All bags or meat wrappers manufactured or produced for the
account of the same exporter during a specified period may be
designated as one manufacturing lot. All exported bags or meat
wrappers must be identified by the exporter.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of merchandise used in
producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible merchandise that
appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible material used to
produce the exported articles, less the amount of that merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace.
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer must:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to help ensure proper compliance with 19,
United States Code, Sec. 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
V. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Component Parts (T.D. 81-300)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification (Parallel Columns)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise
Imported merchandise or drawback classifiable under the same 8-
products \1\ to be designated as the digit HTSUS subheading number
basis for drawback on the exported as that designated which will
products be used in the production of
the exported products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component parts identified by Component parts classifiable
individual part numbers and 8-digit under the same 8-digit HTSUS
HTSUS subheading number. subheading number and
identified with the same
individual part numbers as
those in the column
immediately to the left
hereof.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The designated components will have been manufactured in
accordance with the same specifications and from the same materials,
and identified by the same 8-digit HTSUS classification, and part
number as the substituted components. Further, the designated and
substituted components are used interchangeably in the manufacture
of the exported articles upon which drawback will be claimed.
Specifications or drawings will be maintained and made available for
CBP officers. Fluctuations in market value resulting from factors
other than quality will not affect the drawback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
The exported articles will have been manufactured in the United
States using components described in the parallel columns above.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The components described in the parallel columns will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of components appearing in the exported articles,
records will be maintained to establish the value (or the lack of
value), the quantity, and the disposition of any waste that results
from manufacturing the exported articles. If no waste results,
records will be maintained to establish that fact.
G. [Reserved]
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the designated merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification as the designated merchandise \2\ used to
produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles produced.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years after the date of importation of the
designated merchandise, the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-year period, the
manufacturer or producer produced \3\ the exported articles. To
obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after the importation of the
imported merchandise. Records establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37961]]
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures And Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of eligible components
used in producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible components that
appear in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible components used
to produce the exported articles less the amount of those components
which the value of the waste would replace.
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
VI. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for
Flaxseed (T.D. 83-80)
Drawback may be allowed under the provision of 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)
upon the exportation of linseed oil, linseed oil cake, and linseed
oil meal, manufactured or produced with the use of imported
flaxseed, subject to the following special requirements:
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products 1 Used
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported merchandise or drawback products (flaxseed) are used in
the manufacture of the exported articles upon which drawback claims
will be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will be claimed will be
manufactured in the United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback products will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Drawback law mandates the assignment of relative values when two
or more products necessarily are produced concurrently in the same
operation. If multiple products are produced records will be
maintained of the market value of each product at the time it is
first separated in the manufacturing process (when a claim covers a
manufacturing period, the entire period covered by the claim is the
time of separation of the products and the value per unit of product
is the market value for the period (see Sec. Sec. 190.2,
190.22(e)). The ``appearing in'' basis may not be used if multiple
products are produced.
F. Loss or Gain
Records will be maintained showing the extent of any loss or
gain in net weight or measurement of the imported merchandise,
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors.
G. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of merchandise appearing in the exported articles,
records will be maintained to establish the value, the quantity, and
the disposition of any waste that results from manufacturing the
exported articles. If no waste results, records will be maintained
to establish that fact.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of the imported merchandise; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \2\ used in producing
the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of the sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of compliance.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures and Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer will show
the inclusive dates of manufacture; the quantity, identity, value,
and 8-digit HTSUS classification of the imported flaxseed or
screenings, scalpings, chaff, or scourings used; the quantity by
actual weight and value, if any, of the material removed from the
foregoing by screening prior to crushing; the quantity and kind of
domestic merchandise added, if any; the quantity by actual weight or
gauge and value of the oil, cake, and meal obtained; and the
quantity and value, if any, of the waste incurred. The quantity of
imported flaxseed, screenings, scalpings, chaff, or scourings used
or of material removed will not be estimated nor computed on the
basis of the quantity of finished products obtained, but will be
determined by actually weighing the said flaxseed, screenings,
scalpings, chaff, scourings, or other material; or, at the option of
the crusher, the quantities of imported materials used may be
determined from CBP weights, as shown by the import entry covering
such imported materials, and the Government weight certificate of
analysis issued at the time of entry. The entire period covered by
an abstract will be deemed the time of separation of the oil and
cake covered thereby.
If the records of the manufacturer or producer do not show the
quantity of oil cake used in the manufacture or production of the
exported oil meal and the quantity of oil meal obtained, the net
weight of the oil meal exported will be regarded as the weight of
the oil cake used in the manufacture thereof.
If various tanks are used for the storage of imported flaxseed,
the mill records must establish the tank or tanks in which each lot
or cargo is stored. If raw or processed oil manufactured or produced
during different periods of manufacture is intermixed in storage, a
record must be maintained showing the quantity, identity, kind, and
8-digit HTSUS classification of oil so intermixed. Identity of
merchandise or articles in either instance must be in accordance
with Sec. 190.14.
[[Page 37962]]
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of merchandise used in
producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible merchandise that
appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible material used to
produce the exported articles, less the amount of that merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace.
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with 19,
United States Code, Sec. 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
VII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for
Fur Skins or Fur Skin Articles (T.D. 83-77)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) upon the
exportation of dressed, redressed, dyed, redyed, bleached, blended,
or striped fur skins or fur skin articles manufactured or produced
by any one or a combination of the foregoing processes with the use
of fur skins or fur skin articles, such as plates, mats, sacs,
strips, and crosses, imported in a raw, dressed, or dyed condition,
subject to the following special requirements:
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products \1\ Used
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported merchandise or drawback products (fur skins or fur skin
articles) are used in the manufacture of the exported articles upon
which drawback claims will be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will be claimed will be
manufactured in the United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback products will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
Drawback will not be allowed under this general manufacturing
drawback ruling when the process performed results only in the
restoration of the merchandise to its condition at the time of
importation.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Loss or Gain
Records will be maintained showing the extent of any loss or
gain in net weight or measurement of the imported merchandise,
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors.
G. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of merchandise appearing in the exported articles,
records will be maintained to establish the value, the quantity, and
the disposition of any waste that results from manufacturing the
exported articles. If no waste results, records will be maintained
to establish that fact.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of the imported merchandise; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \2\ used in producing
the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of the sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records establishing compliance with these
requirements will be available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of compliance.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures and Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
The records of the manufacturer or producer must show, as to
each lot of fur skins and/or fur skin articles used in the
manufacture or production of articles for exportation with benefit
of drawback, the lot number and date or inclusive dates of
manufacture or production, the quantity, identity, description, and
8-digit HTSUS classification of the imported merchandise used, the
condition in which imported, the process or processes applied
thereto, the quantity, description, and 8-digit HTSUS classification
of the finished articles obtained, and the quantity of imported
pieces rejected, if any, or spoiled in manufacture or production.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of merchandise used in
producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible merchandise that
appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible material used to
produce the exported articles, less the amount of that merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace. (If rejects and/or
spoilage are incurred, the quantity of imported merchandise used
will be determined by deducting from the quantity of fur skins or
fur skin articles put into manufacture or production the quantity of
such rejects and/or spoilage.)
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with 19,
United States Code,
[[Page 37963]]
Sec. 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and this general ruling.
VIII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Orange Juice (T.D. 85-110)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification (Parallel Columns)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise
Imported merchandise or drawback classifiable under the same 8-
products \1\ to be designated as the digit HTSUS subheading number
basis for drawback on the exported as that designated which will
products be used in the production of
the exported products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concentrated orange juice for Concentrated orange juice for
manufacturing (of not less than manufacturing as described in
55[deg] Brix) as defined in the the left-hand parallel column.
standard of identity of the Food and
Drug Administration (21 CFR 146.53)
which meets the Grade A standard of
the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (7 CFR
52.1557, Table IV).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The imported merchandise designated on drawback claims must be
classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification as the
merchandise used in producing the exported articles on which
drawback is claimed. Fluctuations in the market value resulting from
factors other than quality will not affect the drawback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
1. Orange juice from concentrate (reconstituted juice).
2. Frozen concentrated orange juice.
3. Bulk concentrated orange juice.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
1. Orange juice from concentrate (reconstituted juice).
Concentrated orange juice for manufacturing is reduced to a desired
11.8[deg] Brix by a blending process to produce orange juice from
concentrate. The following optional blending processes may be used:
i. The concentrate is blended with fresh orange juice (single
strength juice); or
ii. The concentrate is blended with essential oils, flavoring
components, and water; or
iii. The concentrate is blended with water and is heat treated
to reduce the enzymatic activity and the number of viable
microorganisms.
2. Frozen concentrated orange juice. Concentrated orange juice
for manufacturing is reduced to a desired degree Brix of not less
than 41.8[deg] Brix by the following optional blending processes:
i. The concentrate is blended with fresh orange juice (single
strength juice); or
ii. The concentrate is blended with essential oils and flavoring
components and water.
3. Bulk concentrated orange juice. Concentrated orange juice for
manufacturing is blended with essential oils and flavoring
components which would enable another processor such as a dairy to
prepare finished frozen concentrated orange juice or orange juice
from concentrate by merely adding water to the (intermediate) bulk
concentrated orange juice.
E. Multiple Products, Waste, Loss or Gain
Not applicable.
F. [Reserved]
G. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The 8-digit HTSUS classification, identity, and
specifications of the designated merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification as the designated merchandise \2\ used to
produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles produced.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years after the date of importation of the
designated merchandise, the manufacturer or producer used the
designated merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-year
period, the manufacturer or producer produced \3\ the exported
articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback it must be established that the completed
articles were exported within 5 years after the importation of the
imported merchandise. Records establishing compliance with these
requirements must be available for audit by CBP during business
hours. No drawback is payable without proof of compliance.
H. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures And Records Maintained'',
and will show what components were blended with the concentrated
orange juice for manufacturing. If those records do not establish
satisfaction of those legal requirements drawback cannot be paid.
I. Basis of Claim for Drawback
The basis of claim for drawback will be the quantity of
concentrated orange juice for manufacturing used in the production
of the exported articles. It is understood that when fresh orange
juice is used as ``cutback'', it will not be included in the ``pound
solids'' when computing the drawback due.
J. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
IX. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Petroleum or Petroleum Derivatives (T.D. 84-49)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification (Parallel Columns)
[[Page 37964]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported merchandise or drawback Duty-paid, duty-free or
products \1\ to be designated as the domestic merchandise
basis for drawback on the exported classifiable under the same 8-
products. digit HTSUS subheading number
as that designated which will
be used in the production of
the exported products.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Exported Articles Produced From Fractionation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Motor Gasoline
2. Aviation Gasoline
3. Special Naphthas
4. Jet Fuel
5. Kerosene & Range Oils
6. Distillate Oils
7. Residual Oils
8. Lubricating Oils
9. Paraffin Wax
10. Petroleum Coke
11. Asphalt
12. Road Oil
13. Still Gas
14. Liquified Petroleum Gas
15. Petrochemical Synthetic Rubber
16. Petrochemical Plastics & Resins
17. All Other Petrochemical Products
C. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
See the General Instructions, I.A.7., for this general drawback
ruling. Each article to be exported must be named. When the identity
of the product is not clearly evident by its name, there must be a
statement as to what the product is, e.g., a herbicide.
D. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
E. Process of Manufacture or Production
Heated crude oil is charged to an atmospheric distillation tower
where it is subjected to fractionation. The charge to the
distillation tower consists of a single crude oil, or of commingled
crudes which are fed to the tower simultaneously or after blending
in a tank. During fractionation, components of different boiling
ranges are separated.
F. Multiple Products
1. Relative Values
Fractionation results in 17 products. In order to insure proper
distribution of drawback to each of these products, the manufacturer
or producer agrees to record the relative values at the time of
separation. The entire period covered by an abstract is to be
treated as the time of separation. The value per unit of each
product will be the average market value for the abstract period.
2. Producibility
The manufacturer or producer can vary the proportionate quantity
of each product. The manufacturer or producer understands that
drawback is payable on exported products only to the extent that
these products could have been produced from the designated
merchandise. The records of the manufacturer or producer must show
that all of the products exported for which drawback will be claimed
under this general manufacturing drawback ruling could have been
produced concurrently on a practical operating basis from the
designated merchandise.
The manufacturer or producer agrees to establish the amount to
be designated by reference to the Industry Standards of Potential
Production published in T.D. 66-16.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A manufacturer who proposes to use standards other than
those in T.D. 66-16 must state the proposed standards and provide
sufficient information to CBP in order for those proposed standards
to be verified in accordance with T.D. 84-49.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no valuable wastes as a result of the processing.
G. Loss or Gain
Because the manufacturer or producer keeps records on a volume
basis rather than a weight basis, it is anticipated that the
material balance will show a volume gain. For the same reason, it is
possible that occasionally the material balance will show a volume
loss. Fluctuations in type of crude used, together with the type of
finished product desired make an estimate of an average volume gain
meaningless. However, records will be kept to show the amount of
loss or gain with respect to the production of export products.
H. Exchange
The use of any domestic merchandise acquired in exchange for
imported merchandise that meets the same kind and quality
specifications contained in the parallel columns of this general
ruling shall be treated as use of the imported merchandise.
I. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the merchandise designated;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification as the designated merchandise used to
produce the exported articles.
3. That, within 5 years after importation, the manufacturer or
producer used the designated merchandise to produce articles. During
the same 5-year period, the manufacturer or producer produced the
exported articles.
4(a). The manufacturer or producer agrees to use a 28-31 day
period (monthly) abstract period for each refinery covered by this
general manufacturing drawback ruling, or
(b). The manufacturer or producer agrees to use an abstract
period (not to exceed 1 year) for each refinery covered by this
general manufacturing drawback ruling. The manufacturer or producer
certifies that if it were to file abstracts covering each
manufacturing period of not less than 28 days and not more than 31
days (monthly) within the longer period, in no such monthly abstract
would the quantity of designated merchandise exceed the material
introduced into the manufacturing process during that monthly
period. (Select (a) or (b), and state which is selected in the
application, and, if (b) is selected, specify the length of the
particular abstract period chosen (not to exceed 1 year (see General
Instruction I.A.7.)).)
5. On each abstract of production the manufacturer or producer
agrees to show the value per barrel to five decimal places.
6. The manufacturer or producer agrees to file claims in the
format set forth in exhibits A through F which are attached to this
general manufacturing drawback ruling. The manufacturer or producer
realizes that to obtain drawback the claimant must establish that
the completed articles were exported within 5 years after
importation of the imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. It is understood that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance. Records will be kept in
accordance with T.D. 84-49, as amended by T.D. 95-61.
J. Residual Rights
It is understood that the refiner can reserve as the basis for
future payment the right to drawback only on the number of barrels
of raw material computed by subtracting from Line E the larger of
Lines A or B, of a given Exhibit E. It is further understood that
this right to future payment can be claimed only against products
concurrently producible with the products listed in Column 21, in
the quantities shown in Column 22 of such Exhibit E. Such residual
right can be transferred to another refinery of the same refiner
only when Line B of Exhibit E is larger than Line A. Unless the
number of residual barrels is specifically computed and rights
thereto are expressly reserved on Exhibit E, such residual rights
will be deemed waived. The procedure the manufacturer or producer
must follow in preparing drawback entries claiming this residual
right is illustrated in the attached sample Exhibit E-1. It is
understood that claims involving residual rights must be filed only
at the port where the Exhibit E reserving such right was filed.
K. Inventory Procedures
The manufacturer or producer realizes that inventory control is
of major importance. In
[[Page 37965]]
accordance with the normal accounting procedures of the manufacturer
or producer, each refinery prepares a monthly stock and yield
report, which accounts for inventories, production and disposals
from time of receipt to time of disposition. This provides an audit
trail of all products.
The above-noted records will provide the required audit trail
from the initial source documents to the drawback claims of the
manufacturer or producer and will support adherence with the
requirements discussed under the heading PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
MAINTAINED.
L. Basis of Claim for Drawback
The amount of raw material on which drawback may be based will
be computed by multiplying the quantity of each product exported by
the drawback factor for that product. The amount of raw material
which may be designated as the basis for drawback on the exported
products produced at a given refinery and covered by a drawback
entry must not exceed the quantity of such raw material used at the
refinery during the abstract period or periods from which the
exported products were produced. The quantity of raw material to be
designated as the basis for drawback on exported products must be at
least as great as the quantity of raw material which would be
required to produce the exported products in the quantities
exported.
M. Agreements
The manufacturer or producer specifically agrees that it will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its refinery and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this application;
4. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to the
drawback office which liquidates its claims any changes in the
information required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to
be included therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the
corporate name or corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02AU18.000
[[Page 37966]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02AU18.001
Exhibit C--Inventory Control Sheet: ABC Oil Co., Inc.; Beaumont, Texas Refinery, Period From January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2019
[All quantities exclude non-petroleum additives]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation gasoline Residual oils Lubricating oils Petrochemicals, all
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ other
-------------------------
Bbls. Drawback Bbls. Drawback Bbls. Drawback Drawback
factor factor factor Bbls. factor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(10) Opening Inventory.......................... 11,218 1.00126 21,221 .45962 9,242 4.52178 891 1.00244
(11) Production................................. 108,269 1.01300 308,002 .43642 292,492 4.64041 7,996 1.07895
(11-A) Receipts................................. ........ .............. ........ .............. ........ .............. ........ ..............
(12) Exports.................................... 11,218 1.00126 21,221 .45962 8,774 4.52178 195 1.00244
176 1.01300 104,397 .43642
(13) Drawback Deliveries........................ ........ .............. ........ .............. ........ .............. 696 1.00244
319 1.07895
(14) Domestic Shipments......................... 97,863 1.01300 180,957 .43642 468 4.52178 6,867 1.07895
278,286 4.64041
(15) Closing Inventory.......................... 10,230 1.01300 22,648 .43642 14,206 4.64041 810 1.07895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Line (10)--Opening inventory from previous period's closing inventory.
Line (11)--From production period under consideration.
Line (11-A)--Product received from other sources.
Line (12)--From earliest on hand (inventory or production). Totals from drawback entry or entries recapitulated (see column 18).
Line (13)--Deliveries for export or for designation against further manufacture--earliest on hand after exports are deducted.
Line (14)--From earliest on hand after lines (12) and (13) are deducted.
Line (15)--Balance on hand.
[[Page 37967]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02AU18.002
[[Page 37968]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02AU18.003
[[Page 37969]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02AU18.004
[[Page 37970]]
Exhibit E (Combination)--Producibility Test for Products Exported (Including Drawback Deliveries) ABC Oil Co., Inc.; Beaumont, Texas Refinery, Period
From January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2019
[Type and Class of Raw Material Designated--Crude, Class III]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity of
raw material
of type and
class
Product Quantity in Industry designated Drawback factor Crude allowed
barrels standard (%) needed to for drawback
produce
product per
barrel
(21) (22) (23) (24) (19) (20)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation Gasoline \1\.......................................... \1\ 11,218 40 28,045 1.00126 11,232
\1\ 176 40 440 1.01300 178
Residual Oils \1\.............................................. \1\ 21,221 83 25,567 .45962 9,754
\1\ 104,397 83 125,780 .43642 45,561
Lubricating Oils \1\........................................... \1\ 8,774 50 17,548 4.52178 39,674
Petrochemicals, Other \1\...................................... \1\ 195 29 672 1.00244 195
Petrochemicals, Other \2\...................................... \2\ 696 29 2,400 1.00244 698
Petrochemicals, Other \2\...................................... \2\ 319 29 1,100 1.07895 344
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................................... 146,996 .............. .............. ....................... 107,636
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Exports.
\2\ Drawback deliveries.
A--Crude allowed (column 20: 107,636 bbls. (106,594 for export, plus 1,042 for drawback deliveries)).
B--Total quantity exported (including drawback deliveries) (column 22): 146,996.
C--Largest quantity of raw material needed to produce an individual exported product (see column 24): 151,347.
D--The excess of raw material over the largest of lines A, B, or C, required to produce concurrently on a practical operating basis, using the most
efficient processing equipment existing within the domestic industry, the exported articles (including drawback deliveries) in the quantities exported
(or delivered): None.
E--Minimum quantity of raw material required to be designated (which is A, B, or C, whichever is largest, plus D, if applicable): 151,347 bbs.
I hereby certify that all the above drawback deliveries and products exported by the Beaumont refinery of ABC Oil Co., Inc. during the period from
January 1, 1995 to January 31, 1995, could have been produced concurrently on a practical operating basis from 151,347 barrels of imported Class III
crude against which drawback is claimed.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP02AU18.005
Exhibit F--Designations for Drawback Claim, ABC Oil Co., Inc.; Beaumont, Texas Refinery
[Period From January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2019]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity of
Entry No. Date of Kind of materials materials in Date received Date consumed Rate of duty
importation barrels
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26192......................... 04/13/17 Class III Crude............ 75,125 04/13/17 May 2017................... $.1050
23990......................... 08/04/18 ......do................... 37,240 08/04/18 Oct. 2018.................. .1050
22517......................... 10/05/18 ......do................... 38,982 10/05/18 Nov. 2018.................. .1050
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37971]]
X. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Piece Goods (T.D. 83-73)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification (Parallel Columns)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise
classifiable under the same
Imported merchandise or drawback products 8-digit HTSUS subheading
\1\ to be designated as the basis for number as that designated
drawback on the exported products which will be used in the
production of the exported
products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Piece goods. Piece goods.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The piece goods used in manufacture will be classifiable under
the same 8-digit HTSUS classification as the piece goods designated
as the basis of claim for drawback, and are used interchangeably
without change in manufacturing processes or resultant products
(including, if applicable, multiple products), or wastes. Some
tolerances between imported-designated piece goods and the used-
exported piece goods will be permitted to accommodate variations
which are normally found in piece goods. These tolerances are no
greater than the tolerances generally allowed in the industry for
piece goods classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification
as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b). They may be designated as
the basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. A 4% weight tolerance so that the piece goods used in
manufacture will be not more than 4% lighter or heavier than the
imported piece goods which will be designated;
2. A tolerance of 4% in the aggregate thread count per square
inch so that the piece goods used in manufacture will have an
aggregate thread count within 4%, more or less of the aggregate
thread count of the imported piece goods which will be designated.
In each case, the average yarn number of the domestic piece goods
will be the same or greater than the average yarn number of the
imported piece goods designated, and in each case, the substitution
and tolerance will be employed only within the same family of
fabrics, i.e., print cloth for print cloth, gingham for gingham,
greige for greige, dyed for dyed, bleached for bleached, etc. The
piece goods used in manufacture of the exported articles will be
designated as containing the identical percentage of identical
fibers as the piece goods designated as the basis for allowance of
drawback; for example, piece goods containing 65% cotton and 35%
dacron will be designated against the use of piece goods shown to
contain 65% cotton and 35% dacron. The actual fiber composition may
vary slightly from that described on the invoice or other acceptance
of the fabric as having the composition described on documents in
accordance with trade practices. Differences in value resulting from
factors other than quality, as for example, price fluctuations, will
not preclude an allowance of drawback.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
Finished piece goods.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s. 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
Piece goods are subject to any one of the following finishing
productions:
1. Bleaching,
2. Mercerizing,
3. Dyeing,
4. Printing,
5. A combination of the above, or
6. Any additional finishing processes.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
Rag waste may be incurred. No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for
drawback is based on the quantity of merchandise appearing in the
exported articles, the records of the manufacturer or producer must
show the quantity of rag waste, if any, and its value. In instances
where rag waste occurs and it is impractical to account for the
actual quantity of rag waste incurred, it may be assumed that such
rag waste constituted 2% of the piece goods put into the finishing
processes. If necessary to establish the quantity of merchandise
(eligible piece goods) appearing in the exported articles, such
waste records must also be kept.
G. Shrinkage, Gain, and Spoilage
Unless the claim for drawback is based on the quantity of
merchandise appearing in the exported articles, the records of the
manufacturer or producer must show the yardage lost by shrinkage or
gained by stretching during manufacture or production, and the
quantity of remnants resulting and of spoilage incurred, if any. If
necessary to establish the quantity of merchandise (eligible piece
goods) appearing in the exported articles, such records for
shrinkage, gain and spoilage will also be kept.
H. [Reserved]
I. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the designated merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification as the designated merchandise \2\ used to
produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles produced.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years after the date of importation of the
designated merchandise, the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-year period, the
manufacturer or producer produced \3\ the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of
compliance.
J. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures And Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
K. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of eligible piece goods
used in producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible piece goods that
appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste from
each lot of piece goods, drawback may be claimed on the quantity of
eligible piece goods used to produce the exported articles less the
amount of piece goods which the value of the waste would replace.
[[Page 37972]]
L. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XI. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Raw Sugar (T.D. 83-59)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) upon the
exportation of hard or soft refined sugars and sirups manufactured
from raw sugar, subject to the following special requirements:
A. The drawback allowance must not exceed an amount calculated
pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury,
of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on a quantity of raw sugar
designated by the refiner which contains a quantity of sucrose not
in excess of the quantity required to manufacture the exported sugar
or sirup, ascertained as provided in this general rule.
B. The refined sugars and sirups must have been manufactured
with the use of duty-paid, duty-free, or domestic sugar, or
combinations thereof, within 5 years after the date of importation,
and must have been exported within 5 years from the date of
importation of the designated sugar.
C. All granulated sugar testing by the polariscope 99.5
[degrees] and over will be deemed hard refined sugar. All refined
sugar testing by the polariscope less than 99.5 [degrees] will be
deemed soft refined sugar. All ``blackstrap,'' ``unfiltered sirup,''
and ``final molasses'' will be deemed sirup.
D. The imported duty-paid sugar selected by the refiner as the
basis for the drawback claim (designated sugar) must be classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification as that used in the
manufacture of the exported refined sugar or sirup and must have
been used within 5 years after the date of importation. Duty-paid
sugar which has been used at a plant of a refiner within 5 years
after the date on which it was imported by such refiner may be
designated as the basis for the allowance of drawback on refined
sugars or sirups manufactured at another plant of the same refiner.
E. For the purpose of distributing the drawback, relative values
must be established between hard refined (granulated) sugar, soft
refined (various grades) sugar, and sirups at the time of
separation. The entire period covered by an abstract will be deemed
the time of separation of the sugars and sirups covered by such
abstract.
F. The sucrose allowance per pound on hard refined (granulated)
sugar established by an abstract, as provided for in this general
ruling, will be applied to hard refined sugar commercially known as
loaf, cut loaf, cube, pressed, crushed, or powdered sugar
manufactured from the granulated sugar covered by the abstract.
G. The sucrose allowance per gallon on sirup established by an
abstract, as provided for in this general ruling, will be applied to
sirup further advanced in value by filtration or otherwise, unless
such sirup is the subject of a special manufacturing drawback
ruling.
H. As to each lot of imported or domestic sugar used in the
manufacture of refined sugar or sirup on which drawback is to be
claimed, the raw stock records must show the refiner's raw lot
number, the number and character of the packages, the settlement
weight in pounds, the settlement polarization, and the 8-digit HTSUS
classification. Such records covering imported sugar must show, in
addition to the foregoing, the import entry number, date of
importation, name of importing carrier, country of origin, the
Government weight, and the Government polarization.
I. The melt records must show the date of melting, the number of
pounds of each lot of raw sugar melted, and the full analysis at
melting.
J. There must be kept a daily record of final products boiled
showing the date of the melt, the date of boiling, the magma filling
serial number, the number of the vacuum pan or crystallizer filling,
the date worked off, and the sirup filling serial number.
K. The sirup manufacture records must show the date of boiling,
the period of the melt, the sirup filling serial number, the number
of barrels in the filling, the magma filling serial number, the
quantity of sirup, its disposition in tanks or barrels and the
refinery serial manufacture number.
L. The refined sugar stock records must show the refinery serial
manufacture number, the period of the melt, the date of manufacture,
the grade of sugar produced, its polarization, the number and kind
of packages, and the net weight. When soft sugars are manufactured,
the commercial grade number and quantity of each must be shown.
M. Each lot of hard or soft refined sugar and each lot of sirup
manufactured, regardless of the character of the containers or
vessels in which it is packed or stored, must be marked immediately
with the date of manufacture and the refinery manufacture number
applied to it in the refinery records provided for and shown in the
abstract, as provided for in this general ruling, from such records.
If all the sugar or sirup contained in any lot manufactured is not
intended for exportation, only such of the packages as are intended
for exportation need be marked as prescribed above, provided there
is filed with the drawback office immediately after such marking a
statement showing the date of manufacture, the refinery manufacture
number, the number of packages marked, and the quantity of sugar or
sirup contained therein. No drawback will be allowed in such case on
any sugar or sirup in excess of the quantity shown on the statement
as having been marked. If any packages of sugar or sirup so marked
are repacked into other containers, the new containers must be
marked with the marks which appeared on the original containers and
a revised statement covering such repacking and remarking must be
filed with the drawback office. If sirups from more than one lot are
stored in the same tank, the refinery records must show the refinery
manufacture number and the quantity of sirup from each lot contained
in such tank.
N. An abstract from the foregoing records covering manufacturing
periods of not less than 1 month nor more than 3 months, unless a
different period will have been authorized, must be filed when
drawback is to be claimed on any part of the refined sugar or sirup
manufactured during such period. Such abstract must be filed by each
refiner with the drawback office where drawback claims are filed on
the basis of this general ruling. Such abstract must consist of: (1)
A raw stock record (accounting for Refiner's raw lot No., Import
entry No., Packages No. and kind, Pounds, Polarization, By whom
imported or withdrawn, Date of importation, Date of receipt by
refiner, Date of melt, Importing carrier, Country of origin); (2) A
melt record [number of pounds in each lot melted] (accounting for
Lot No. Pounds, and Polarization degrees and pounds sucrose); (3)
Sirup stock records (accounting for Date of boiling, Refinery serial
manufacture No., Quantity of sirup in gallons, and Pounds sucrose
contained therein); (4) Refined sugar stock record (accounting for
Refinery serial production No., Date of manufacture, Hard or soft
refined, Polarization and No., Net weight in pounds); (5)
Recapitulation (consisting of (in pounds): (a) Sucrose in process at
beginning of period, (b) sucrose melted during period, (c) sucrose
in process at end of period, (d) sucrose used in manufacture, and
(e) sucrose contained in manufacture, in which item (a) plus item
(b), minus item (c), should equal item (d)); and (6) A statement as
follows:
I, _____, the ___ refiner at the ___ refinery of ___, located at
___, do solemnly and truly declare that each of the statements
contained in the foregoing abstract is true to the best of my
knowledge and belief and can be verified by the refinery records,
which have been kept in accordance with Treasury Decision 83-59 and
Appendix A of 19 CFR part 190 and which are at all times open to the
inspection of CBP.
Date-------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature--------------------------------------------------------------
O. The refiner must file with each abstract a statement, showing
the average market values of the products specified in the abstract
and including a statement as follows:
I, _____, (Official capacity) of the ___ (Refinery), do solemnly
and truly declare that the values shown above are true
[[Page 37973]]
to the best of my knowledge and belief, and can be verified by our
records.
Date-------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature--------------------------------------------------------------
P. At the end of each calendar month the refiner must furnish to
the drawback office a statement showing the actual sales of sirup
and the average market values of refined sugars for the calendar
month.
Q. The sucrose allowance to be applied to the various products
based on the abstract and statement provided for in this general
ruling will be in accordance with the example set forth in Treasury
Decision 83-59.
R. [Reserved.]
S. Drawback entries under this general ruling must state the
polarization in degrees and the sucrose in pounds for the designated
imported sugar. Drawback claims under this general ruling must
include a statement as follows:
I, _____, the ___ of ___, located at ___ declare that the sugar
(or sirup) described in this entry, was manufactured by said company
at its refinery at ___ and is part of the sugar (or sirup) covered
by abstract No. __, filed at the port of __; that, subject to 19
U.S.C. 1508 and 1313(t), the refinery and other records of the
company verifying the statements contained in said abstract are now
and at all times hereafter will be open to inspection by CBP. I
further declare that the above-designated imported sugar (upon which
the duties have been paid) was received by said company on _ and was
used in the manufacture of sugar and sirup during the period covered
by abstract No. __, CBP No. __, on file with the port director at
___.
I further declare that the sugar or sirup specified therein was
exported as stated in the entry.
Date-------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature--------------------------------------------------------------
T. General Statement. The refiner manufactures or produces for
its own account. The refiner may manufacture or produce articles for
the account of another or another manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce for the refiner's account under contract
within the principal and agency relationship outlined in T.D.s
55027(2) and 55207(1) (see Sec. 190.9).
U. Waste. No drawback is payable on any waste which results from
the manufacturing operation. Unless drawback claims are based on the
``appearing in'' method, records will be maintained to establish the
value (or the lack of value), the quantity, and the disposition of
any waste that results from manufacturing the exported articles. If
no waste results, records to establish that fact will be maintained.
V. Loss or Gain. The refiner will maintain records showing the
extent of any loss or gain in net weight or measurement of the sugar
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors.
W. [Reserved]
X. Procedures and Records Maintained.
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the designated merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification as the designated merchandise \1\ used to
produce the exported articles; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles produced.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years of the date of importation of the
designated merchandise, the refiner used the designated merchandise
to produce articles. During the same 5-year period, the refiner
produced \2\ the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of
compliance.
Y. General requirements. The refiner will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Steel (T.D. 81-74)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification (Parallel Columns)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
\2\ Standards set by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE),
the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), or the American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise
classifiable under the same
Imported merchandise or drawback products 8-digit HTSUS subheading
\1\ to be designated as the basis for number as that designated
drawback on the exported products which will be used in the
production of the exported
products.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steel of one general class, e.g., an Steel of the same general
ingot, falling within on SAE, AISI, or class, specification, and
ASTM \2\ specification and, if the grade as the steel in the
specification contains one or more column immediately to the
grades, falling within one grade of the left hereof.
specification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The duty-paid, duty-free, or domestic steel used instead of
the imported, duty-paid steel (or drawback products) will be
interchangeable for manufacturing purposes with the duty-paid steel.
To be interchangeable a steel must be able to be used in place of
the substituted steel without any additional processing step in the
manufacture of the article on which drawback is to be claimed.
2. Because the duty-paid steel (or drawback products) that is to
be designated as the basis for drawback is dutiable according to its
value, the amount of duty can vary with its size (gauge, width, or
length) or composition (e.g., chrome content). If such variances
occur, designation will be by ``price extra'', and in no case will
drawback be claimed in a greater amount than that which would have
accrued to that steel used in manufacture of or appearing in the
exported articles. Price extra is not available for coated or plated
steel, covered in paragraph 4, infra, insofar as the coating or
plating is concerned.
3. Any fluctuation in market value caused by a factor other than
quality does not affect drawback.
4. If the steel is coated or plated with a base metal, in
addition to meeting the requirements for uncoated or unplated steel
set forth in the parallel columns, the base-metal coating or plating
on the duty-paid, duty-free, or domestic steel used in place of the
duty-paid steel (or drawback products) will have the same
composition and thickness as the coating or plating on the duty-paid
steel. If the coated or plated duty-paid steel is within an SAE,
AISI, ASTM specification, then any duty-paid, duty-free, or domestic
coated or plated steel must be covered by the same specification and
grade (if two or more grades are in the specification).
[[Page 37974]]
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
The exported articles will have been manufactured in the United
States using steels described in the parallel columns above.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account.
The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce articles
for the account of another or another manufacturer or producer may
manufacture or produce for the account of the manufacturer or
producer under contract within the principal and agency relationship
outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The steel described in the parallel columns will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of steel appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value (or the lack of value),
the quantity, and the disposition of any waste that results from
manufacturing the exported articles. If no waste results, records to
establish that fact will be maintained.
G. Loss or Gain
The manufacturer or producer will maintain records showing the
extent of any loss or gain in net weight or measurement of the steel
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors.
H. [Reserved]
I. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the designated merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise of the designated merchandise \3\
used to produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles produced.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years of the date of importation of the
designated merchandise, the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-year period, the
manufacturer or producer produced \4\ the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of
compliance.
J. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures And Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
K. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of steel used in
producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible steel that
appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste from
each lot of steel, drawback may be claimed on the quantity of
eligible steel used to produce the exported articles less the amount
of that steel which the value of the waste would replace.
L. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification to operate under this general
ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback office which
liquidates its claims any changes in the information required by the
General Instructions of this Appendix to be included therein (I.
General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate name or
corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XIII. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) for
Sugar (T.D. 81-92)
A. Same 8-Digit HTSUS Classification (Parallel Columns)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise
classifiable under the same
Imported merchandise or drawback products 8-digit HTSUS subheading
\1\ to be designated as the basis for number as that designated
drawback on the exported products which will be used in the
production of the exported
products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Granulated or liquid sugar for 1. Granulated or liquid
manufacturing, containing sugar solids of sugar for manufacturing,
not less than 99.5 sugar degrees. containing sugar solids of
less than 99.5 sugar
degrees.
2. Granulated or liquid sugar for 2. Granulated or liquid
manufacturing, containing sugar solids of sugar for manufacturing,
not less than 99.5 sugar degrees. containing sugar solids of
less than 99.5 sugar
degrees.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The sugars listed above test within three-tenths of a degree on
the polariscope. Sugars in each column are completely
interchangeable with the sugars directly opposite and designation
will be made on this basis only. The designated sugar on which
claims for drawback will be based will be classifiable under the
same 8-digit HTSUS classification. Differences in value resulting
from factors other than quality, such as market fluctuation, will
not affect the allowance of drawback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
Edible substances (including confectionery) and/or beverages
and/or ingredients therefor.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The sugars are subjected to one or more of the following
operations to form the desired product(s):
1. Mixing with other substances,
2. Cooking with other substances,
3. Boiling with other substances,
[[Page 37975]]
4. Baking with other substances,
5. Additional similar processes.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
No drawback is payable on any waste which results from the
manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for drawback is based on
the quantity of sugar appearing in the exported articles, records
will be maintained to establish the value (or the lack of value),
the quantity, and the disposition of any waste that results from
manufacturing the exported articles. If no waste results, records to
establish that fact will be maintained.
G. Loss or Gain
The manufacturer or producer will maintain records showing the
extent of any loss or gain in net weight or measurement of the sugar
caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical reactions, or other
factors.
H. [Reserved]
I. Procedures And Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the designated merchandise;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification as the designated merchandise \2\ used to
produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles produced.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years of the date of importation of the
designated merchandise, the manufacturer or producer used the
merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-year period, the
manufacturer or producer produced \3\ the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Records establishing
compliance with these requirements will be available for audit by
CBP during business hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of
compliance.
J. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer, will show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures And Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
K. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of sugar used in
producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible sugar that
appears in the exported articles regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible material used to
produce the exported articles less the amount of that sugar which
the value of the waste would replace.
L. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation;
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this general ruling.
XIV. General Manufacturing Drawback Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) for
Woven Piece Goods (T.D. 83-84)
Drawback may be allowed under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) upon the
exportation of bleached, mercerized, printed, dyed, or redyed piece
goods manufactured or produced by any one or a combination of the
foregoing processes with the use of imported woven piece goods,
subject to the following special requirements:
A. Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products 1 Used
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imported merchandise or drawback products (woven piece goods)
are used in the manufacture of the exported articles upon which
drawback claims will be based.
B. Exported Articles on Which Drawback Will Be Claimed
Exported articles on which drawback will be claimed will be
manufactured in the United States using imported merchandise or
drawback products.
C. General Statement
The manufacturer or producer manufactures or produces for its
own account. The manufacturer or producer may manufacture or produce
articles for the account of another or another manufacturer or
producer may manufacture or produce for the account of the
manufacturer or producer under contract within the principal and
agency relationship outlined in T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) (see
Sec. 190.9).
D. Process of Manufacture or Production
The imported merchandise or drawback products will be used to
manufacture or produce articles in accordance with Sec. 190.2.
The piece goods used in manufacture or production under this
general manufacturing drawback ruling may also be subjected to one
or more finishing processes. Drawback will not be allowed under this
general manufacturing drawback ruling when the process performed
results only in the restoration of the merchandise to its condition
at the time of importation.
E. Multiple Products
Not applicable.
F. Waste
Rag waste may be incurred. No drawback is payable on any waste
which results from the manufacturing operation. Unless the claim for
drawback is based on the quantity of merchandise appearing in the
exported articles, the records of the manufacturer or producer must
show the quantity of rag waste, if any, its value, and its
disposition. If no waste results, records will be maintained to
establish that fact. In instances where rag waste occurs and it is
impractical to account for the actual quantity of rag waste
incurred, it may be assumed that such rag waste constituted 2% of
the woven piece goods put into process. If necessary to establish
the quantity of merchandise (eligible piece goods) appearing in the
exported articles, such waste records will also be kept.
G. Shrinkage, Gain, and Spoilage
Unless the claim for drawback is based on the quantity of
merchandise appearing in the exported articles, the records of the
manufacturer or producer must show the yardage lost by shrinkage or
gained by stretching during manufacture, and the quantity of
remnants resulting and of spoilage incurred, if any. If necessary to
establish the quantity of merchandise (eligible piece goods)
appearing in the exported articles, such records for shrinkage,
gain, and spoilage will also be kept.
H. Procedures and Records Maintained
Records, which may include records kept in the normal course of
business, will be maintained to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of the imported merchandise; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \2\ used in producing
the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of the sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To obtain drawback the claimant must establish that the
completed articles were exported within 5 years after importation of
the imported merchandise. Records establishing compliance with these
[[Page 37976]]
requirements will be available for audit by CBP during business
hours. Drawback is not payable without proof of compliance.
I. Inventory Procedures
The inventory records of the manufacturer or producer must show
how the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19 U.S.C.
1313(a) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations will be met, as
discussed under the heading ``Procedures and Records Maintained''.
If those records do not establish satisfaction of those legal
requirements, drawback cannot be paid.
The records of the manufacturer or producer must show, as to
each lot of piece goods manufactured or produced for exportation
with benefit of drawback, the lot number and the date or inclusive
dates of manufacture or production, the quantity, identity, value,
and 8-digit HTSUS classification of the imported (or drawback
product) piece goods used, the condition in which imported or
received (whether in the gray, bleached, dyed, or mercerized), the
working allowance specified in the contract under which they are
received, the process or processes applied thereto, and the quantity
and description of the piece goods obtained. The records must also
show the yardage lost by shrinkage or gained by stretching during
manufacture or production, and the quantity of remnants resulting
and of spoilage incurred.
J. Basis of Claim for Drawback
Drawback will be claimed on the quantity of merchandise used in
producing the exported articles only if there is no waste or
valueless or unrecovered waste in the manufacturing operation.
Drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible merchandise that
appears in the exported articles, regardless of whether there is
waste, and no records of waste need be maintained. If there is
valuable waste recovered from the manufacturing operation and
records are kept which show the quantity and value of the waste,
drawback may be claimed on the quantity of eligible material used to
produce the exported articles, less the amount of that merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace. (If remnants and/or
spoilage occur during manufacture or production, the quantity of
imported merchandise used will be determined by deducting from the
quantity of piece goods received and put into manufacture or
production the quantity of such remnants and/or spoilage. The
remaining quantity will be reduced by the quantity thereof which the
value of the rag waste, if any, would replace.)
K. General Requirements
The manufacturer or producer will:
1. Comply fully with the terms of this general ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this general ruling;
4. Keep its letter of notification of intent to operate under
this general ruling current by reporting promptly to the drawback
office which liquidates its claims any changes in the information
required by the General Instructions of this Appendix to be included
therein (I. General Instructions, 1 through 10) or the corporate
name or corporate organization by succession or reincorporation.
5. Keep a copy of this general ruling on file for ready
reference by employees and require all officials and employees
concerned to familiarize themselves with the provisions of this
general ruling; and
6. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with 19,
United States Code, Sec. 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations and
this general ruling.
Appendix B to Part 190--Sample Formats for Applications for Specific
Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
Table of Contents
I. General
II. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) (Combination)
III. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
IV. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback
Ruling Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(d)
V. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(g)
I. General
Applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings using
these sample formats must be submitted to and reviewed and approved
by CBP Headquarters. See 19 CFR 190.8. A specific manufacturing
drawback ruling consists of the letter of approval that CBP issues
to the applicant. In these application formats, remarks in
parentheses and footnotes are for explanatory purposes only and
should not be copied. Other material should be quoted directly in
the applications.
II. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) (Combination)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry Process and Duty
Refunds, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90 K Street NE--
10th Floor (Mail Stop 1177), Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant's Name), a (State, e.g.,
Delaware) corporation (or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling that our
manufacturing operations qualify for drawback under title 19, United
States Code, Sec. Sec. 1313 (a) & (b), and part 190 of the CBP
Regulations. We request that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of
this application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER (WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations provides that each
manufacturer or producer of articles intended for exportation with
the benefit of drawback must apply for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling, unless operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under Sec. 190.7 of the CBP Regulations. CBP will
not approve an application which shows an unincorporated division or
company as the applicant (see Sec. 190.8(a)).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY
(Give the address of the factory(s) where the process of
manufacture or production will take place. If the factory is a
different legal entity from the applicant, so state and indicate if
operating under an Agent's general manufacturing drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the corporation who
will sign drawback documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP Regulations
permits only the president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or
any employee legally authorized to bind the corporation to sign for
a corporation. In addition, a person within a business entity with a
customs power of attorney for the company may sign. A customs power
of attorney may also be given to a licensed customs broker. This
heading should be changed to Names of Partners or Proprietor in the
case of a partnership or sole proprietorship, respectively (see
footnote at end of this sample format for persons who may sign
applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings).)
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located
at: New York, NY; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA.)
(An original application and two copies must be filed. If the
applicant intends to file drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application must be furnished for
each additional office indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The following questions must be answered:)
1. Who will be the importer of the designated merchandise?
(If the applicant will not always be the importer of the
designated merchandise, does the applicant understand its
obligations to maintain records to support the transfer under Sec.
190.10, and its liability under Sec. 190.63?)
2. Will an agent be used to process the designated or the
substituted merchandise into articles?
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant must state it will
comply with T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1) and Sec. 190.9, as
applicable, and that its agent will submit a letter of notification
of intent to operate under the general manufacturing drawback ruling
for agents (see Sec. 190.7 and Appendix A) or an application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
3. Will the applicant be the exporter?
[[Page 37977]]
(If the applicant will not be the exporter in every case but
will be the claimant, the manufacturer must state that it will
reserve the right to claim drawback with the knowledge and written
consent of the exporter (19 CFR 190.82).)
PROCEDURES UNDER SECTION 1313(b) (PARALLEL COLUMNS--``SAME 8-DIGIT
CLASSIFICATION'')
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise of the
Imported merchandise or drawback products same 8-digit HTSUS
\1\ to be designated as the basis for subheading number as that
drawback on the exported products designated which will be
used in the production of
the exported products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Following the items listed in the parallel columns, a statement
will be made, by the applicant, that affirms the same 8-digit HTSUS
classification of the merchandise. This statement should be included
in the application exactly as it is stated below:)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The imported merchandise which we will designate in our claims
will be classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification as
the merchandise used in producing the exported articles on which we
claim drawback.
Fluctuations in the market value resulting from factors other
than quality will not affect the drawback.
(In order to successfully claim drawback it is necessary to
prove that the duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise which is
to be substituted for the imported merchandise is ``classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS classification''. In order to enable
CBP to rule on ``the same 8-digit HTSUS classification'', the
application must include a detailed description of the designated
imported merchandise and of the substituted duty-paid, duty-free or
domestic merchandise to be used to produce the exported articles, as
well as provide the Bill of Materials and/or formulas annotated with
the HTSUS classifications.)
(It is essential that all the characteristics which determine
the quality of the merchandise are provided in the application in
order to substantiate that the merchandise meets the ``the same 8-
digit HTSUS classification'' statutory requirement. These
characteristics should clearly distinguish merchandise of different
qualities. For example, USDA standards; FDA standards; industry
standards, e.g., ASTM; concentration; specific gravity; purity;
luster; melting point, boiling point; odor; color; grade; type;
hardness; brittleness; etc. Note that these are only a few examples
of characteristics and that each kind of merchandise has its own set
of specifications that characterizes its quality. If specifications
are given with a minimum value, be sure to include a maximum value.
The converse is also true. Often characteristics are given to CBP on
attached specification sheets. These specifications should not
include Material Safety Data sheets or other descriptions of the
merchandise that do not contribute to the ``same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number'' determination. When the merchandise is a
chemical, state the chemical's generic name as well as its trade
name plus any generally recognized identifying number, e.g., CAS
number; Color Index Number, etc.) (In order to expedite the specific
manufacturing drawback ruling process, it will be helpful if you
provide copies of technical standards/specifications (particularly
industry standards such as ASTM standards) referred to in your
application.)
(The descriptions of the ``the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number'' merchandise should be formatted in the parallel columns.
The left-hand column will consist of the name and specifications of
the designated imported merchandise under the heading set forth
above. The right-hand column will consist of the name,
specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading number for the duty-
paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise under the heading set forth
above. Amendments to rulings will be required if any changes to the
HTSUS classifications occur.)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported. When the identity of the
product is not clearly evident by its name state what the product
is, e.g., a herbicide. There must be a match between each article
described under the PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR PRODUCTION section
below and each article listed here.)
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR PRODUCTION
(Drawback under Sec. 1313(b) is not allowable except where a
manufacture or production exists. Manufacture or production is
defined, for drawback purposes, in Sec. 190.2. In order to obtain
drawback under Sec. 1313(b), it is essential for the applicant to
show use in manufacture or production by giving a thorough
description of the manufacturing process. This description should
include the name and exact condition of the merchandise listed in
the Parallel Columns, a complete explanation of the processes to
which it is subjected in this country, the effect of such processes,
the name and exact description of the finished article, and the use
for which the finished article is intended. When applicable, give
equations of the chemical reactions. The attachment of a flow chart
in addition to the description showing the manufacturing process is
an excellent means of illustrating whether or not a manufacture or
production has occurred. Flow charts can clearly illustrate if and
at what point during the manufacturing process by-products and
wastes are generated.)
(This section should contain a description of the process by
which each item of merchandise listed in the parallel columns above
is used to make or produce every article that is to be exported.)
MULTIPLE PRODUCTS
1. Relative Values
(Some processes result in the separation of the merchandise used
in the same operation into two or more products. List all of the
products. State that you will record the market value of each
product at the time it is first separated in the manufacturing
process. If this section is not applicable to you, then state so.)
(Drawback law mandates the assignment of relative values when
two or more products necessarily are produced concurrently in the
same operation. For instance, the refining of flaxseed necessarily
produces linseed oil and linseed husks (animal feed), and drawback
must be distributed to each product in accordance with its relative
value. However, the voluntary election of a steel fabricator, for
instance, to use part of a lot of imported steel to produce
automobile doors and part of the lot to produce automobile fenders
does not call for relative value distribution.)
(The relative value of a product is its value divided by the
total value of all products, whether or not exported. For example,
100 gallons of drawback merchandise are used to produce 100 gallons
of products, including 60 gallons of product A, 20 gallons of
product B, and 20 gallons of product C. At the time of separation,
the unit values of products A, B, and C are $5, $10, and $50
respectively. The relative value of product A is $300 divided by
$1500 or \1/5\. The relative value of B is \2/15\ and of product C
is \2/3\, calculated in the same manner. This means that \1/5\ of
the drawback product payments will be distributed to product A, \2/
15\ to product B, and \2/3\ to product C.)
(Drawback is allowable on exports of any of multiple products,
but is not allowable on exports of valuable waste. In making this
distinction between a product and valuable waste, the applicant
should address the following significant elements: (1) The nature of
the material of which the residue is composed; (2) the value of the
residue as compared to the value of the principal manufactured
product and the raw material; (3) the use to which it is put; (4)
its status under the tariff laws, if imported; (5) whether it is a
commodity recognized in commerce; (6) whether it must be subjected
to some process to make it saleable.)
[[Page 37978]]
2. Producibility
(Some processes result in the separation of fixed proportions of
each product, while other processes afford the opportunity to
increase or decrease the proportion of each product. An example of
the latter is petroleum refining, where the refiner has the option
to increase or decrease the production of one or more products
relative to the others. State under this heading whether you can or
cannot vary the proportionate quantity of each product.) (The
MULTIPLE PRODUCTS section consists of two sub-sections: Relative
Values and Producibility. If multiple products do not result from
your operation state ``not applicable'' for the entire section. If
multiple products do result from your operation Relative Values will
always apply. However, Producibility may or may not apply. If
Producibility does not apply to your multiple product operation
state ``Not Applicable'' for this sub-section.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials which, for drawback
purposes, are treated as wastes. Describe any residue materials
which you believe should be so treated. If no waste results, include
a positive statement to that effect under this heading.)
(If waste occurs, state: (1) Whether or not it is recovered, (2)
whether or not it is valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This
information is required whether claims are made on a ``used in'' or
``appearing in'' basis and regardless of the amount of waste
incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting of materials which
are lost in the process. Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These irrecoverable and valueless
wastes do not reduce the drawback claim provided the claim is based
on the quantity of imported material used in manufacturing. If the
claim is based upon the quantity of imported merchandise appearing
in the exported article, irrecoverable and valueless waste will
cause a reduction in the amount of drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered wastes which have a value
either for sale or for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this standard applies to the entire
industry and is not a selection on your part. An option by you not
to choose to sell or use the waste in some different operation does
not make it valueless if another manufacturer can use the waste.
State what you do with the waste. If you have to pay someone to get
rid of it, or if you have buyers for the waste, you must state so in
your application regardless of what ``Basis'' you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you choose to claim on the
basis of the quantity of imported or substituted merchandise used in
producing the exported articles (less valuable waste), state that
you will keep records to establish the quantity and value of the
waste recovered. See ``Basis of Claim for Drawback'' section below.)
STOCK IN PROCESS
(Some processes result in another type of residual material,
namely, stock in process, which affects the allowance of drawback.
Stock in process may exist when residual material resulting from a
manufacturing or processing operation is reintroduced into a
subsequent manufacturing or processing operation; e.g., trim pieces
from a cast article. The effect of stock in process on a drawback
claim is that the amount of drawback for the period in which the
stock in process was withdrawn from the manufacturing or processing
operation (or the manufactured article, if manufacturing or
processing periods are not used) is reduced by the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used to produce the stock in
process if the ``used in'' or ``used in less valuable waste''
methods are used (if the ``appearing in'' method is used, there will
be no effect on the amount of drawback), and the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used to produce the stock in
process is added to the merchandise or drawback products used in the
subsequent manufacturing or production period (or the subsequently
produced article)).
(If stock in process occurs and claims are to be based on stock
in process, the application must include a statement to that effect.
The application must also include a statement that merchandise is
considered to be used in manufacture at the time it was originally
processed so that the stock in process will not be included twice in
the computation of the merchandise used to manufacture the finished
articles on which drawback is claimed.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in an intangible loss or
gain of the net weight or measurement of the merchandise used. This
loss or gain is caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors. State the approximate usual percentage
or quantity of such loss or gain. Note that percentage values will
be considered to be measured ``by weight'' unless otherwise
specified. Loss or gain does not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to your manufacturing
process, state ``Not Applicable.'')
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number of the merchandise we designate;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS subheading number as the designated merchandise \2\ we
used to produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles we produce.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years after the date of importation, we used
the designated merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-
year period, we produced \3\ the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We realize that to obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Our records establishing
our compliance with these requirements will be available for audit
by CBP during business hours. We understand that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state how those records
will meet the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations as discussed
under the heading PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED. To insure
compliance the following areas, as applicable, should be included in
your discussion:)
RECEIPT AND STORAGE OF DESIGNATED MERCHANDISE
RECORDS OF USE OF DESIGNATED MERCHANDISE
BILLS OF MATERIALS
MANUFACTURING RECORDS
WASTE RECORDS
RECORDS OF USE OF DUTY-PAID, DUTY-FREE OR DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE OF THE
REQUIRED SAME 8-DIGIT HTSUS SUBHEADING NUMBER WITHIN 5 YEARS AFTER THE
DATE OF IMPORTATION
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
SHIPPING RECORDS
(Proof of time frames may be specific or inclusive, e.g., within
120 days, but specific proof is preferable. Separate storage and
identification of each article or lot of merchandise usually will
permit specific proof of exact dates. Proof of inclusive dates of
use, production or export may be acceptable, but in such cases it is
best to describe very specifically the data you intend to use to
establish each legal requirement, thereby avoiding misunderstandings
at the time of audit.) (If you do not describe the inventory records
that you will use, a statement that the legal requirements will be
met by your inventory procedures is acceptable. However, it should
be noted that without a detailed description of the inventory
procedures set forth in the application a judgment as to the
adequacy of such a statement cannot be made until a drawback claim
is verified. Approval of this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling merely constitutes approval of the
ruling application as submitted; it does not constitute approval of
the applicant's record keeping procedures if, for example, those
procedures are merely described as meeting the legal requirements,
without specifically stating how the requirements will be met.
Drawback is not payable without proof of compliance.)
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be used to claim
drawback: (1) Used in; (2) appearing in; and (3) used in less
valuable waste.)
(The ``used in'' basis may be employed only if there is either
no waste or valueless or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not
[[Page 37979]]
reduce the amount of drawback when claims are based on the ``used
in'' basis. Drawback is payable in the amount of 99 percent of the
duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of imported material
designated as the basis for the allowance of drawback on the
exported articles. The designated quantity may not exceed the
quantity of material actually used in the manufacture of the
exported articles.)
(For example, if 100 pounds of material, valued at $1.00 per
pound, were used in manufacture resulting in 10 pounds of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10 pounds of irrecoverable or
valueless waste would not reduce the drawback. In this case drawback
would be payable on 99% of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the
100 pounds of designated material used to produce the exported
articles.)
(The ``appearing in'' basis may be used regardless of whether
there is waste. If the ``appearing in'' basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and its value. However, the
manufacturer must establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported product and provide this
information. Waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are
made on the ``appearing in'' basis. Drawback is payable on 99
percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of
material designated, which may not exceed the quantity of eligible
material that appears in the exported articles. ``Appearing in'' may
not be used if multiple products are involved.)
(Based on the previous example, drawback would be payable on the
90 pounds of merchandise which actually went into the exported
product (appearing in) rather than the 100 pounds used in as set
forth previously.)
(The ``used in less valuable waste'' basis may be employed when
the manufacturer recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of the
quantity and value of waste from each lot of merchandise. The value
of the waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are based on
the ``used in less valuable waste'' basis. When valuable waste is
incurred, the drawback allowance on the exported article is based on
the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of merchandise used
in the manufacture, reduced by the quantity of such merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace. Thus in this case,
drawback is claimed on the quantity of eligible material actually
used to produce the exported product, less the amount of such
material which the value of the waste would replace. Note section
190.26(c) of the CBP Regulations.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10 pounds of waste had a
value of $.50 per pound, then the 10 pounds of waste, having a total
value of $5.00, would be equivalent in value to 5 pounds of the
designated material. Thus the value of the waste would replace 5
pounds of the merchandise used, and drawback is payable on 99
percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 95 pounds of
imported material designated as the basis for the allowance of
drawback on the exported article rather than on the 100 pounds
``used in'' or the 90 pounds ``appearing in'' as set forth in the
above examples.)
(Two methods exist for the manufacturer to show the quantity of
material used or appearing in the exported article: (1) Schedule or
(2) Abstract.)
(A ``schedule'' shows the quantity of material used in producing
each unit of product. The schedule method is usually employed when a
standard line of merchandise is being produced according to fixed
formulas. Some schedules will show the quantity of merchandise used
to manufacture or produce each article and others will show the
quantity appearing in each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and measurements. A schedule
determines the amount that will be needed to produce a unit of
product before the material is actually used in production.)
(An ``abstract'' is the summary of the records which shows the
total quantity used in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at a period of time, for
instance 3 months, in which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material was actually used after
a production period has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the ``schedule'' choice must
base its claims on the ``abstract'' method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In by Schedule follows:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of (specify material)
used in manufacturing (exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below. (Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations requires
submission of the schedule with the application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to file
supplemental schedules with the drawback office whenever there is a
change in the quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office covering changes in the quantities of material used
to produce the exported articles, or different styles or capacities
of containers of such exported merchandise. (Neither the ``appearing
in'' basis nor the ``schedule'' method for claiming drawback may be
used where the relative value procedure is required.)
PROCEDURES UNDER SECTION 1313(a)
IMPORTED MERCHANDISE OR DRAWBACK PRODUCTS USED UNDER 1313(a)
(List the imported merchandise or drawback products.)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported. When the identity of the
product is not clearly evident by its name state what the product
is, e.g., a herbicide. There must be a match between each article
described under the PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE AND PRODUCTION section
below and each article listed here.)
(If the merchandise used under Sec. 1313(a) is not also used
under Sec. 1313(b), the sections entitled PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR
PRODUCTION, BY-PRODUCTS, LOSS OR GAIN, and STOCK IN PROCESS should
be included here to cover merchandise used under Sec. 1313(a).
However, if the merchandise used under Sec. 1313(a) is also used
under Sec. 1313(b) these sections need not be repeated unless they
differ in some way from the Sec. 1313(b) descriptions.)
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of the imported merchandise, and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \4\ we used in producing
the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of the sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles we produce.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We realize that to obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported within 5 years after
importation of the imported merchandise. We understand that drawback
is not payable without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(This section must be completed separately from that set forth
under the Sec. 1313(b) portion of your application. The legal
requirements under Sec. 1313(a) differ from those under Sec.
1313(b).)
(Describe your inventory procedures and state how you will
identify the imported merchandise from date of importation until it
is incorporated in the articles to be exported. Also describe how
you will identify the finished articles from the time of manufacture
until shipment.)
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(See section with this title for procedures under Sec. 1313(b).
Either repeat the same basis of claim or use a different basis of
claim, as described above, specifically for drawback claimed under
Sec. 1313(a).)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the terms of this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this application;
4. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to the
drawback office which liquidates its claims any changes in the
number or locations of its offices or factories, the corporate name,
the persons who will sign drawback documents, the basis of claim
used for calculating drawback, the decision to use or not to use an
agent under Sec. 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, or the corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
[[Page 37980]]
5. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to CBP
Headquarters all other changes affecting information contained in
this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the letter of approval by
CBP Headquarters on file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned to familiarize
themselves with the provisions of this application and that letter
of approval; and
7. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL
I declare that I have read this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling; that I know the averments and
agreements contained herein are true and correct; and that my
signature on this __ day of ____ 20_, makes this application binding
on
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership, or Sole Proprietorship)
By \5\-----------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally
authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application
is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a
partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president,
secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a
customs power of attorney filed with the CBP port for the drawback
office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an
application, as may a licensed customs broker with a customs power
of attorney. You should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Signature and Title)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Print Name)
III. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90 K Street NE--10th Floor
(Mail Stop 1177), Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant's Name), a (State, e.g.,
Delaware) corporation (or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling that our
manufacturing operations qualify for drawback under title 19, United
States Code, section 1313(b), and part 190 of the CBP Regulations.
We request that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of this
application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER (WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations provides that each
manufacturer or producer of articles intended for exportation with
the benefit of drawback will apply for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling, unless operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under Sec. 190.7 of the CBP Regulations. CBP will
not approve an application which shows an unincorporated division or
company as the applicant (see Sec. 190.8(a)).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY
(Give the address of the factory(s) where the process of
manufacture or production will take place. If the factory is a
different legal entity from the applicant, so state and indicate if
operating under an Agent's general manufacturing drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the corporation who
will sign drawback documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP Regulations
permits only the president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or
any employee legally authorized to bind the corporation to sign for
a corporation. In addition, a person within a business entity with a
customs power of attorney for the company may sign. A customs power
of attorney may also be given to a licensed customs broker. This
heading should be changed to NAMES OF PARTNERS or PROPRIETOR in the
case of a partnership or sole proprietorship, respectively (see
footnote at end of this sample format for persons who may sign
applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings).)
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located
at: New York, NY; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA.)
(An original application and two copies must be filed. If the
applicant intends to file drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application must be furnished for
each additional office indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The following questions must be answered:)
1. Who will be the importer of the designated merchandise?
(If the applicant will not always be the importer of the
designated merchandise, does the applicant understand its
obligations to maintain records to support the transfer under Sec.
190.10, and its liability under Sec. 190.63?)
2. Will an agent be used to process the designated or the
substituted merchandise into articles?
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant must state it will
comply with T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1), and Sec. 190.9, as
applicable, and that its agent will submit a letter of notification
of intent to operate under the general manufacturing drawback ruling
for agents (see Sec. 190.7 and Appendix A), or an application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
3. Will the applicant be the exporter?
(If the applicant will not be the exporter in every case but
will be the claimant, the manufacturer must state that it will
reserve the right to claim drawback with the knowledge and written
consent of the exporter (19 CFR 190.82).)
PARALLEL COLUMNS--``SAME 8-DIGIT HTSUS CLASSIFICATION'')
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty-Paid, Duty-Free or
Domestic Merchandise of the
Imported Merchandise or Drawback Products Same 8-Digit HTSUS
\1\ to be Designated as the Basis for Subheading Number as that
Drawback on the Exported Products Designated Which Will be
Used in the Production of
the Exported Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Following the items listed in the parallel columns, a statement
will be made, by the applicant, that affirms the ``same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number'' of the merchandise. This statement should
be included in the application exactly as it is stated below:)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawback products are those produced in the United States in
accordance with the drawback law and regulations. Such products have
``dual status'' under section 1313(b). They may be designated as the
basis for drawback and also may be deemed to be domestic
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The imported merchandise which we will designate on our claims
will be classifiable under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number
as to the merchandise used in producing the exported articles on
which we claim drawback, such that the merchandise used would, if
imported, be subject to the same rate of duty as the imported
designated merchandise.
Fluctuations in the market value resulting from factors other
than quality will not affect the drawback.
(In order to successfully claim drawback it is necessary to
prove that the duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise which is
to be substituted for the imported merchandise is ``classifiable
under the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number''. In order to enable
CBP to rule on ``same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number'', the
application must include a detailed description of the designated
imported merchandise and of the
[[Page 37981]]
substituted duty-paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise to be used
to produce the exported articles, as well as provide the Bill of
Materials and/or formulas annotated with the HTSUS classification.)
(It is essential that all the characteristics which determine
the quality of the merchandise are provided in the application in
order to substantiate that the merchandise meets the ``same 8-digit
HTSUS subheading number'' statutory requirement. These
characteristics should clearly distinguish merchandise of different
qualities. For example, USDA standards; FDA standards; industry
standards, e.g., ASTM; concentration; specific gravity; purity;
luster; melting point, boiling point; odor; color; grade; type;
hardness; brittleness; etc. Note that these are only a few examples
of characteristics and that each kind of merchandise has its own set
of specifications that characterizes its quality. If specifications
are given with a minimum value, be sure to include a maximum value.
The converse is also true. Often characteristics are given to CBP on
attached specification sheets. These specifications should not
include Material Safety Data sheets or other descriptions of the
merchandise that do not contribute to the ``same 8-digit HTSUS
subheading number'' determination. When the merchandise is a
chemical, state the chemical's generic name as well as its trade
name plus any generally recognized identifying number, e.g., CAS
number; Color Index Number, etc.)
(In order to expedite the specific manufacturing drawback ruling
review process, it will be helpful if you provide copies of
technical standards/specifications (particularly industry standards
such as ASTM standards) referred to in your application.)
(The descriptions of the ``same 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number'' merchandise should be formatted in the parallel columns.
The left-hand column will consist of the name and specifications of
the designated imported merchandise under the heading set forth
above. The right-hand column will consist of the name,
specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading number for the duty-
paid, duty-free or domestic merchandise under the heading set forth
above. Amendments to rulings will be required if any changes to the
HTSUS classifications occur.)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported. When the identity of the
product is not clearly evident by its name state what the product
is, e.g., a herbicide. There must be a match between each article
described under the PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE AND PRODUCTION section
below and each article listed here.)
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR PRODUCTION
(Drawback under Sec. 1313(b) is not allowable except where a
manufacture or production exists. Manufacture or production is
defined, for drawback purposes, in Sec. 190.2. In order to obtain
drawback under Sec. 1313(b), it is essential for the applicant to
show use in manufacture or production by giving a thorough
description of the manufacturing process. This description should
include the name and exact condition of the merchandise listed in
the Parallel Columns, a complete explanation of the processes to
which it is subjected in this country, the effect of such processes,
the name and exact description of the finished article, and the use
for which the finished article is intended. When applicable, give
equations of the chemical reactions. The attachment of a flow chart
in addition to the description showing the manufacturing process is
an excellent means of illustrating whether or not a manufacture or
production has occurred. Flow charts can clearly illustrate if and
at what point during the manufacturing process by-products and
wastes are generated.)
(This section should contain a description of the process by
which each item of merchandise listed in the parallel columns above
is used to make or produce every article that is to be exported.)
MULTIPLE PRODUCTS
1. Relative Values
(Some processes result in the separation of the merchandise used
in the same operation into two or more products. List all of the
products. State that you will record the market value of each
product or by-product at the time it is first separated in the
manufacturing process. If this section is not applicable to you,
then state so.)
(Drawback law mandates the assignment of relative values when
two or more products necessarily are produced concurrently in the
same operation. For instance, the refining of flaxseed necessarily
produces linseed oil and linseed husks (animal feed), and drawback
must be distributed to each product in accordance with its relative
value. However, the voluntary election of a steel fabricator, for
instance, to use part of a lot of imported steel to produce
automobile doors and part of the lot to produce automobile fenders
does not call for relative value distribution.)
(The relative value of a product is its value divided by the
total value of all products, whether or not exported. For example,
100 gallons of drawback merchandise are used to produce 100 gallons
of products, including 60 gallons of product A, 20 gallons of
product B, and 20 gallons of product C. At the time of separation,
the unit values of products A, B, and C are $ 5, $ 10, and $ 50
respectively. The relative value of product A is $ 300 divided by $
1500 or \1/5\. The relative value of B is \2/15\ and of product C is
\2/3\, calculated in the same manner. This means that \1/5\ of the
drawback product payments will be distributed to product A, \2/15\
to product B, and \2/3\ to product C.)
(Drawback is allowable on exports of any of multiple products,
but is not allowable on exports of valuable waste. In making this
distinction between a product and valuable waste, the applicant
should address the following significant elements: (1) the nature of
the material of which the residue is composed; (2) the value of the
residue as compared to the value of the principal manufactured
product and the raw material; (3) the use to which it is put; (4)
its status under the tariff laws, if imported; (5) whether it is a
commodity recognized in commerce; (6) whether it must be subjected
to some process to make it saleable.)
2. Producibility
(Some processes result in the separation of fixed proportions of
each product, while other processes afford the opportunity to
increase or decrease the proportion of each product. An example of
the latter is petroleum refining, where the refiner has the option
to increase or decrease the production of one or more products
relative to the others. State under this heading whether you can or
cannot vary the proportionate quantity of each product.)
(The MULTIPLE PRODUCTS section consists of two sub-sections:
Relative Values and Producibility. If multiple products do not
result from your operation state ``Not Applicable'' for the entire
section. If multiple products do result from your operation Relative
Values will always apply. However, Producibility may or may not
apply. If Producibility does not apply to your multiple product
operation state ``Not Applicable'' for this sub-section.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials which, for drawback
purposes, are treated as waste. Describe any residue materials which
you believe should be so treated. If no waste results, include a
positive statement to that effect under this heading.)
(If waste occurs, state: (1) whether or not it is recovered, (2)
whether or not it is valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This
information is required whether claims are made on a ``used in'' or
``appearing in'' basis and regardless of the amount of waste
incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting of materials which
are lost in the process. Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These irrecoverable and valueless
wastes do not reduce the drawback claim provided the claim is based
on the quantity of imported material used in manufacturing. If the
claim is based upon the quantity of imported merchandise appearing
in the exported article, irrecoverable and valueless waste will
cause a reduction in the amount of drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered wastes which have a value
either for sale or for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this standard applies to the entire
industry and is not a selection on your part. An option by you not
to choose to sell or use the waste in some different operation does
not make it valueless if another manufacturer can use the waste.
State what you do with the waste. If you have to pay someone to get
rid of it, or if you have buyers for the waste, you must state so in
your application regardless of what ``Basis'' you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you choose to claim on the
basis of the quantity of imported or substituted merchandise used in
producing the exported articles less valuable waste, state that you
will keep records to establish the quantity and value of the waste
recovered. See ``Basis of Claim for Drawback'' section below.)
[[Page 37982]]
STOCK IN PROCESS
(Some processes result in another type of residual material,
namely, stock in process, which affects the allowance of drawback.
Stock in process may exist when residual material resulting from a
manufacturing or processing operation is reintroduced into a
subsequent manufacturing or processing operation; e.g., trim pieces
from a cast article. The effect of stock in process on a drawback
claim is that the amount of drawback for the period in which the
stock in process was withdrawn from the manufacturing or processing
operation (or the manufactured article, if manufacturing or
processing periods are not used) is reduced by the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used to produce the stock in
process if the ``used in'' or ``used in less valuable waste''
methods are used (if the ``appearing in'' method is used, there will
be no effect on the amount of drawback), and the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used to produce the stock in
process is added to the merchandise or drawback products used in the
subsequent manufacturing or production period (or the subsequently
produced article)).
(If stock in process occurs and claims are to be based on stock
in process, the application must include a statement to that effect.
The application must also include a statement that merchandise is
considered to be used in manufacture at the time it was originally
processed so that the stock in process will not be included twice in
the computation of the merchandise used to manufacture the finished
articles on which drawback is claimed.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in an intangible loss or
gain of the net weight or measurement of the merchandise used. This
loss or gain is caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors. State the approximate usual percentage
or quantity of such loss or gain. Note that percentage values will
be considered to be measured ``by weight'' unless otherwise
specified. Loss or gain does not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to your manufacturing
process, state ``Not Applicable.'')
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. The identity, specifications, and 8-digit HTSUS subheading
number of the merchandise we designate;
2. The quantity of merchandise classifiable under the same 8-
digit HTSUS subheading number as the designated merchandise \2\ we
used to produce the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles we produce.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. That, within 5 years after the date of importation, we used
the designated merchandise to produce articles. During the same 5-
year period, we produced \3\ the exported articles;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The date of production is the date an article is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We realize that to obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Our records establishing
our compliance with these requirements will be available for audit
by CBP during business hours. We understand that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state how those records
will meet the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(b) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations as discussed
under the heading PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED. To help ensure
compliance the following areas, as applicable, should be included in
your discussion:)
RECEIPT AND STORAGE OF DESIGNATED MERCHANDISE
RECORDS OF USE OF DESIGNATED MERCHANDISE
BILLS OF MATERIALS
MANUFACTURING RECORDS
WASTE RECORDS
RECORDS OF USE OF DUTY-PAID, DUTY-FREE OR DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE OF THE
REQUIRED SAME 8-DIGIT HTSUS SUBHEADING WITHIN 5 YEARS AFTER IMPORTATION
OF THE DESIGNATED MERCHANDISE
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
SHIPPING RECORDS
(Proof of time frames may be specific or inclusive, e.g., within
120 days, but specific proof is preferable. Separate storage and
identification of each article or lot of merchandise usually will
permit specific proof of exact dates. Proof of inclusive dates of
use, production or export may be acceptable, but in such cases it is
better to describe very specifically the data you intend to use to
establish each legal requirement, thereby avoiding misunderstandings
at the time of audit.)
(If you do not describe the inventory records that you will use,
a statement that the legal requirements will be met by your
inventory procedures is acceptable. However, it should be noted that
without a detailed description of the inventory procedures set forth
in the application, a judgment as to the adequacy of such a
statement cannot be made until a drawback claim is verified.
Approval of this application for a specific manufacturing drawback
ruling merely constitutes approval of the ruling application as
submitted; it does not constitute approval of the applicant's record
keeping procedures if, for example, those procedures are merely
described as meeting the legal requirements, without specifically
stating how the requirements will be met. Drawback is not payable
without proof of compliance.)
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be used to claim
drawback: (1) used in; (2) appearing in; and (3) used in less
valuable waste.)
(The ``used in'' basis may be employed only if there is either
no waste or valueless or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not reduce the amount of
drawback when claims are based on the ``used in'' basis. Drawback is
payable in the amount of 99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees
paid on the quantity of imported material designated as the basis
for the allowance of drawback on the exported articles. The
designated quantity may not exceed the quantity of material actually
used in the manufacture of the exported articles.)
(For example, if 100 pounds of material, valued at $1.00 per
pound, were used in manufacture resulting in 10 pounds of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10 pounds of irrecoverable or
valueless waste would not reduce the drawback. In this case drawback
would be payable on 99% of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the
100 pounds of designated material used to produce the exported
articles.)
(The ``appearing in'' basis may be used regardless of whether
there is waste. If the ``appearing in'' basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and its value. However, the
manufacturer must establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported product and provide this
information. Waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are
made on the ``appearing in'' basis. Drawback is payable on 99
percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of
material designated, which may not exceed the quantity of eligible
material that appears in the exported articles. ``Appearing in'' may
not be used if multiple products are involved.)
(Based on the previous example, drawback would be payable on the
90 pounds of merchandise which actually went into the exported
product (appearing in) rather than the 100 pounds used in as set
forth previously.)
(The ``used in less valuable waste'' basis may be employed when
the manufacturer recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of the
quantity and value of waste from each lot of merchandise. The value
of the waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are based on
the ``used in less valuable waste'' basis. When valuable waste is
incurred, the drawback allowance on the exported article is based on
the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of merchandise used
in the manufacture, reduced by the quantity of such merchandise
which the value of the waste would replace. Thus in this case,
drawback is claimed on the quantity of eligible material actually
used to produce the exported product, less the amount of such
material which the value of the waste would replace. Note section
190.26(c) of the CBP Regulations.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10 pounds of waste had a
value of $.50 per pound, then the 10 pounds of waste, having a total
value of $ 5.00, would be equivalent
[[Page 37983]]
in value to 5 pounds of the designated material. Thus the value of
the waste would replace 5 pounds of the merchandise used, and
drawback is payable on 99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees
paid on the 95 pounds of imported material designated as the basis
for the allowance of drawback on the exported article rather than on
the 100 pounds ``used in'' or the 90 pounds ``appearing in'' as set
forth in the above examples.)
(Two methods exist for the manufacturer to show the quantity of
material used or appearing in the exported article: (1) Schedule or
(2) Abstract.)
(A ``schedule'' shows the quantity of material used in producing
each unit of product. The schedule method is usually employed when a
standard line of merchandise is being produced according to fixed
formulas. Some schedules will show the quantity of merchandise used
to manufacture or produce each article and others will show the
quantity appearing in each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and measurements. A schedule
determines the amount that will be needed to produce a unit of
product before the material is actually used in production.)
(An ``abstract'' is the summary of the records which shows the
total quantity used in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at a period of time, for
instance 3 months, in which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material was actually used after
a production period has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the ``schedule'' choice must
base its claims on the ``abstract'' method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In by Schedule would read:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of (specify material)
used in manufacturing (exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below.
(Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations requires submission of
the schedule with the application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office whenever there is a change in the
quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office covering changes in the quantities of material used
to produce the exported articles, or different styles or capacities
of containers of such exported merchandise.
(Neither the ``appearing in'' basis nor the ``schedule'' method
for claiming drawback may be used where the relative value procedure
is required.)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the terms of this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this application;
4. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to the
drawback office which liquidates its claims any changes in the
number or locations of its offices or factories, the corporate name,
the persons who will sign drawback documents, the basis of claim
used for calculating drawback, the decision to use or not to use an
agent under Sec. 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, or the corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to CBP
Headquarters, all other changes affecting information contained in
this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the letter of approval by
CBP Headquarters on file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned to familiarize
themselves with the provisions of this application and that letter
of approval; and
7. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
Declaration of Official
I declare that I have read this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling; that I know the averments and
agreements contained herein are true and correct; and that my
signature on this __ day of __ 20_, makes this application binding
on
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership, or Sole Proprietorship)
By \4\-----------------------------------------------------------------
(Signature and Title)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally
authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application
is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a
partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president,
secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a
customs power of attorney filed with the CBP port for the drawback
office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an
application, as may a licensed customs broker with a customs power
of attorney. You should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Print Name)
IV. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(d)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90 K Street NE--10th Floor
(Mail Stop 1177), Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant's Name), a (State, e.g.,
Delaware) corporation (or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling that our
manufacturing operations qualify for drawback under title 19, United
States Code, section 1313(d), and part 190 of the CBP Regulations.
We request that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of this
application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER (WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations provides that each
manufacturer or producer of articles intended for exportation with
the benefit of drawback must apply for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling, unless operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under Sec. 190.7 of the CBP Regulations. CBP will
not approve an application which shows an unincorporated division or
company as the applicant (see Sec. 190.8(a)).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY
(Give the address of the factory(s) where the process of
manufacture or production will take place. If the factory is a
different legal entity from the applicant, so state and indicate if
operating under an Agent's general manufacturing drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the corporation who
will sign drawback documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP Regulations
permits only the president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or
any employee legally authorized to bind the corporation to sign for
a corporation. In addition, a person within a business entity with a
customs power of attorney for the company may sign. A customs power
of attorney may also be given to a licensed customs broker. This
heading should be changed to NAMES OF PARTNERS or PROPRIETOR in the
case of a partnership or sole proprietorship, respectively (see
footnote at end of this sample format for persons who may sign
applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings).
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located
at: New York, NY; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA.)
(An original application and two copies must be filed. If the
applicant intends to file drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application must be furnished for
each additional office indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The exact material placed under this heading in individual
cases will vary, but it should include such information as the type
of business in which the manufacturer is engaged, whether the
manufacturer is manufacturing for its own account or is performing
the operation on a toll basis (including commission or conversion
basis) for the account of others, whether the manufacturer is a
direct exporter of its
[[Page 37984]]
products or sells or delivers them to others for export, and whether
drawback will be claimed by the manufacturer or by others.)
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant must state it will
comply with T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1), and Sec. 190.9, as
applicable, and that its agent will submit a letter of notification
of intent to operate under the general manufacturing drawback ruling
for agents (see Sec. 190.7 and Appendix A), or an application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
(Regarding drawback operations conducted under Sec. 1313(d),
the data may describe the flavoring extracts, medicinal, or toilet
preparations (including perfumery) manufactured with the use of
domestic tax-paid alcohol; and where such alcohol is obtained or
purchased.)
TAX-PAID MATERIAL USED UNDER SECTION 1313(d)
(Describe or list the tax-paid material)
EXPORTED ARTICLES ON WHICH DRAWBACK WILL BE CLAIMED
(Name each article to be exported)
PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OR PRODUCTION
(Drawback under Sec. 1313(d) is not allowable except where a
manufacture or production exists. ``Manufacture or production'' is
defined, for drawback purposes, in Sec. 190.2. In order to obtain
drawback under Sec. 1313(d), it is essential for the applicant to
show use in manufacture or production by giving a thorough
description of the manufacturing process. Describe how the tax-paid
material is processed into the export article.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials which, for drawback
purposes, are treated as wastes. Describe any residue materials
which you believe should be so treated. If no waste results, include
a positive statement to that effect under this heading.) (If waste
occurs, state: (1) whether or not it is recovered, (2) whether or
not it is valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This information
is required whether claims are made on a ``used in'' or ``appearing
in'' basis and regardless of the amount of waste incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting of materials which
are lost in the process. Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These irrecoverable and valueless
wastes do not reduce the drawback claim provided the claim is based
on the quantity of domestic tax-paid alcohol used in manufacturing.
If the claim is based upon the quantity of domestic tax-paid alcohol
appearing in the exported article, irrecoverable and valueless waste
will cause a reduction in the amount of drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered wastes which have a value
either for sale or for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this standard applies to the entire
industry and is not a selection on your part. An option by you not
to choose to sell or use the waste in some different operation, does
not make it valueless if another manufacturer can use the waste.
State what you do with the waste. If you have to pay someone to get
rid of it, or if you have buyers for the waste, you must state so in
your application regardless of what ``Basis'' you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you choose to claim on the
basis of the quantity of domestic tax-paid alcohol used in producing
the exported articles (less valuable waste), state that you will
keep records to establish the quantity and value of the waste
recovered. See ``Basis of Claim for Drawback'' section below.)
STOCK IN PROCESS
(Some processes result in another type of residual material,
namely, stock in process, which affects the allowance of drawback.
Stock in process may exist when residual material resulting from a
manufacturing or processing operation is reintroduced into a
subsequent manufacturing or processing operation; e.g., trim pieces
from a cast article. The effect of stock in process on a drawback
claim is that the amount of drawback for the period in which the
stock in process was withdrawn from the manufacturing or processing
operation (or the manufactured article, if manufacturing or
processing periods are not used) is reduced by the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used to produce the stock in
process if the ``used in'' or ``used in less valuable waste''
methods are used (if the ``appearing in'' method is used, there will
be no effect on the amount of drawback), and the quantity of
merchandise or drawback products used to produce the stock in
process is added to the merchandise or drawback products used in the
subsequent manufacturing or production period (or the subsequently
produced article)).
(If stock in process occurs and claims are to be based on stock
in process, the application must include a statement to that effect.
The application must also include a statement that the domestic tax-
paid alcohol is considered to be used in manufacture at the time it
was originally processed so that the stock in process will not be
included twice in the computation of the domestic tax-paid alcohol
used to manufacture the finished articles on which drawback is
claimed.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in an intangible loss or
gain of the net weight or measurement of the merchandise used. This
loss or gain is caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors. State the approximate usual percentage
or quantity of such loss or gain. Note that percentage values will
be considered to be measured ``by weight'' unless otherwise
specified. Loss or gain does not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to your manufacturing
process, state ``Not Applicable.'')
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. That the exported articles on which drawback is claimed were
produced with the use of a particular lot (or lots) of domestic tax-
paid alcohol, and
2. The quantity of domestic tax-paid alcohol\1\ we used in
producing the exported articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles we produce.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We realize that to obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
tax has been paid on the domestic alcohol. Our records establishing
our compliance with these requirements will be available for audit
by CBP during business hours. We understand that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state how those records
will meet the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313(d) and part 190 of the CBP Regulations as discussed
under the heading PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED. To help ensure
compliance the following areas should be included in your
discussion:)
RECEIPT AND RAW STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
MANUFACTURING RECORDS
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be used to claim
drawback: (1) used in; (2) appearing in; and (3) used in less
valuable waste.)
(The ``used in'' basis may be employed only if there is either
no waste or valueless or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not reduce the amount of
drawback when claims are based on the ``used in'' basis. Drawback is
payable in the amount of 100% of the tax paid on the quantity of
domestic alcohol used in the manufacture of flavoring extracts and
medicinal or toilet preparation (including perfumery).)
(For example, if 100 gallons of alcohol, valued at $ 1.00 per
gallon, were used in manufacture resulting in 10 gallons of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10 gallons of irrecoverable or
valueless waste would not reduce the drawback. In this case drawback
would be payable on 100% of the tax paid on the 100 gallons of
domestic alcohol used to produce the exported articles.)
The ``appearing in'' basis may be used regardless of whether
there is waste. If the ``appearing in'' basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and its value. However, the
manufacturer must establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported product and provide this
information. Waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are
made on the ``appearing in'' basis. Drawback is payable on 100% of
the tax paid on the quantity of domestic alcohol which appears in
the exported articles.
(Based on the previous example, drawback would be payable on the
90 gallons of
[[Page 37985]]
domestic alcohol which actually went into the exported product
(appearing in) rather than the 100 gallons used in as set forth
previously.)
(The ``used in less valuable waste'' basis may be employed when
the manufacturer recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of the
quantity and value of waste from each lot of domestic tax-paid
alcohol. The value of the waste reduces the amount of drawback when
claims are based on the ``used in less valuable waste'' basis. When
valuable waste is incurred, the drawback allowance on the exported
article is based on the quantity of tax-paid alcohol used to
manufacture the exported articles, reduced by the quantity of such
alcohol which the value of the waste would replace.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10 gallons of waste had
a value of $.50 per gallon, then the 10 gallons of waste, having a
total value of $ 5.00, would be equivalent in value to 5 gallons of
the tax-paid alcohol. Thus the value of the waste would replace 5
gallons of the alcohol used, and drawback is payable on 100% of the
tax paid on 95 gallons of alcohol rather than on the 100 gallons
``used in'' or the 90 gallons ``appearing in'' as set forth in the
above examples.) (Two methods exist for the manufacturer to show the
quantity of material used or appearing in the exported article: (1)
Schedule or (2) Abstract.)
(A ``schedule'' shows the quantity of material used in producing
each unit of product. The schedule method is usually employed when a
standard line of merchandise is being produced according to fixed
formulas. Some schedules will show the quantity of merchandise used
to manufacture or produce each article and others will show the
quantity appearing in each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and measurements. A schedule
determines the amount that will be needed to produce a unit of
product before the material is actually used in production.)
(An ``abstract'' is the summary of the records which shows the
total quantity used in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at a period of time, for
instance 3 months, in which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material was actually used after
a production period has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the ``schedule'' choice must
base its claims on the ``abstract'' method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In by schedule follows:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of (specify material)
used in manufacturing (exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below.
(Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations requires submission of
the schedule with the application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office whenever there is a change in the
quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office covering changes in the quantities of material used
to produce the exported articles, or different styles or capacities
of containers of such exported merchandise.
(Neither the ``appearing in'' basis nor the ``schedule'' method
for claiming drawback may be used where the relative value procedure
is required.)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the terms of this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this application;
4. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to the
drawback office which liquidates its claims any changes in the
number or locations of its offices or factories, the corporate name,
the persons who will sign drawback documents, the basis of claim
used for calculating drawback, the decision to use or not to use an
agent under Sec. 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, the drawback office where claims will be filed under the
ruling, or the corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to CBP
Headquarters, all other changes affecting information contained in
this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the letter of approval by
CBP Headquarters on file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned to familiarize
themselves with the provisions of this application and that letter
of approval; and
7. Issue instructions to insure proper compliance with title 19,
United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP Regulations
and this application and letter of approval.
DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL
I declare that I have read this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling; that I know the averments and
agreements contained herein are true and correct; and that my
signature on this _ day of ____ 20 _, makes this application binding
on
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership, or Sole Proprietorship)
By \2\-----------------------------------------------------------------
(Signature and Title)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Print Name)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally
authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application
is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a
partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president,
secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a
customs power of attorney filed with the CBP port for the drawback
office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an
application, as may a licensed customs broker with a customs power
of attorney. You should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Format for Application for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Ruling
Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(g).
COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Optional)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Entry Process and Duty
Refunds Branch, Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, 90 K Street NE--10th Floor
(Mail Stop 1177), Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Dear Sir or Madam: We, (Applicant's Name), a (State, e.g.,
Delaware) corporation (or other described entity) submit this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling that our
manufacturing operations qualify for drawback under title 19, United
States Code, section 1313(g), and part 190 of the CBP Regulations.
We request that CBP authorize drawback on the basis of this
application.
NAME AND ADDRESS AND IRS NUMBER (WITH SUFFIX) OF APPLICANT
(Section 190.8(a) of the CBP Regulations provides that each
manufacturer or producer of articles intended for exportation with
the benefit of drawback must apply for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling, unless operating under a general manufacturing
drawback ruling under Sec. 190.7 of the CBP Regulations. CBP will
not approve an application which shows an unincorporated division or
company as the applicant (see Sec. 190.8(a).)
LOCATION OF FACTORY OR SHIPYARD
(Give the address of the factory(s) or shipyard(s) at which the
construction and equipment will take place. If the factory or
shipyard is a different legal entity from the applicant, so state
and indicate if operating under an Agent's general manufacturing
drawback ruling.)
PERSONS WHO WILL SIGN DRAWBACK DOCUMENTS
(List persons legally authorized to bind the corporation who
will sign drawback documents. Section 190.6 of the CBP Regulations
permits only the president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or
any employee legally authorized to bind the corporation to sign for
a corporation. In addition, a person within a business entity with a
customs power of attorney for the company may sign. A customs power
of attorney may also be given to a licensed customs broker. This
heading should be changed to NAMES OF PARTNERS or PROPRIETOR in the
case of a partnership or sole proprietorship, respectively (see
footnote at end of this sample format for persons who may sign
applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings).)
CBP OFFICE WHERE DRAWBACK CLAIMS WILL BE FILED
(The four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located
at: New York, NY;
[[Page 37986]]
Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA.)
(An original application and two copies must be filed. If the
applicant intends to file drawback claims at more than one drawback
office, one additional copy of the application must be furnished for
each additional office indicated.)
GENERAL STATEMENT
(The following questions must be answered:
1. Who will be the importer of the merchandise? (If the
applicant will not always be the importer, does the applicant
understand its obligations to maintain records to support the
transfer under 19 CFR 190.10, and its liability under 19 CFR
190.63?)
2. Who is the manufacturer?
(Is the applicant constructing and equipping for his own account
or merely performing the operation on a toll basis for others?)
(If an agent is to be used, the applicant must state it will
comply with T.D.s 55027(2) and 55207(1), and Sec. 190.9, as
applicable, and that its agent will submit a letter of notification
of intent to operate under the general manufacturing drawback ruling
for agents (see Sec. 190.7 and Appendix A), or an application for a
specific manufacturing drawback ruling (see Sec. 190.8 and this
Appendix B).)
3. Will the applicant be the drawback claimant?
(State how the vessel will qualify for drawback under 19 U.S.C.
1313(g). Who is the foreign person or government for whom the vessel
is being made or equipped?)
(There must be included under this heading the following
statement:
We are particularly aware of the terms of Sec. 190.76(a)(1) of
and subpart M of part 190 of the CBP Regulations, and will comply
with these sections where appropriate.)
IMPORTED MERCHANDISE OR DRAWBACK PRODUCTS USED
(Describe the imported merchandise or drawback products.)
ARTICLES CONSTRUCTED AND EQUIPPED FOR EXPORT
(Name the vessel or vessels to be made with imported merchandise
or drawback products.)
PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT
(What is required here is a clear, concise description of the
process of construction and equipment involved. The description
should also trace the flow of materials through the manufacturing
process for the purpose of establishing physical identification of
the imported merchandise or drawback products and of the articles
resulting from the processing.)
WASTE
(Many processes result in residue materials which, for drawback
purposes, are treated as wastes. Describe any residue materials
which you believe should be so treated. If no waste results, include
a positive statement to that effect under this heading.)
(If waste occurs, state: (1) whether or not it is recovered, (2)
whether or not it is valueless, and (3) what you do with it. This
information is required whether claims are made on a ``used in'' or
``appearing in'' basis and regardless of the amount of waste
incurred.)
(Irrecoverable wastes are those consisting of materials which
are lost in the process. Valueless wastes are those which may be
recovered but have no value. These irrecoverable and valueless
wastes do not reduce the drawback claim provided the claim is based
on the quantity of imported material used in manufacturing. If the
claim is based upon the quantity of imported merchandise appearing
in the exported article, irrecoverable and valueless waste will
cause a reduction in the amount of drawback.)
(Valuable wastes are those recovered wastes which have a value
either for sale or for use in a different manufacturing process.
However, it should be noted that this standard applies to the entire
industry and is not a selection on your part. An option by you not
to choose to sell or use the waste in some different operation does
not make it valueless if another manufacturer can use the waste.
State what you do with the waste. If you have to pay someone to get
rid of it, or if you have buyers for the waste, you must state so in
your application regardless of what ``Basis'' you are using.)
(If you recover valuable waste and if you choose to claim on the
basis of the quantity of imported or substituted merchandise used in
producing the exported articles (less valuable waste), state that
you will keep records to establish the quantity and value of the
waste recovered. See ``Basis of Claim for Drawback'' section below.)
LOSS OR GAIN (Separate and distinct from WASTE)
(Some manufacturing processes result in an intangible loss or
gain of the net weight or measurement of the merchandise used. This
loss or gain is caused by atmospheric conditions, chemical
reactions, or other factors. State the approximate usual percentage
or quantity of such loss or gain. Note that percentage values will
be considered to be measured ``by weight'' unless otherwise
specified. Loss or gain does not occur during all manufacturing
processes. If loss or gain does not apply to your manufacturing
process, state ``Not Applicable.'')
PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED
We will maintain records to establish:
1. That the exported article on which drawback is claimed was
constructed and equipped with the use of a particular lot (or lots)
of imported material; and
2. The quantity of imported merchandise \1\ we used in producing
the exported article.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If claims are to be made on an ``appearing in'' basis, the
remainder of this sentence should read ``appearing in the exported
articles we produce.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We realize that to obtain drawback the claimant must establish
that the completed articles were exported within 5 years after the
importation of the imported merchandise. Our records establishing
our compliance with these requirements will be available for audit
by CBP during business hours. We understand that drawback is not
payable without proof of compliance.
INVENTORY PROCEDURES
(Describe your inventory records and state how those records
will meet the drawback recordkeeping requirements set forth in 19
U.S.C. 1313 and part 190 of the CBP Regulations as discussed under
the heading PROCEDURES AND RECORDS MAINTAINED. To help ensure
compliance the following should be included in your discussion:)
RECEIPT AND RAW STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT RECORDS
FINISHED STOCK STORAGE RECORDS
SHIPPING RECORDS
BASIS OF CLAIM FOR DRAWBACK
(There are three different bases that may be used to claim
drawback: (1) Used in; (2) appearing in; and (3) used in less
valuable waste.)
(The ``used in'' basis may be employed only if there is either
no waste or valueless or unrecovered waste in the operation.
Irrecoverable or valueless waste does not reduce the amount of
drawback when claims are based on the ``used in'' basis. Drawback is
payable in the amount of 99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees
paid on the quantity of imported material used to construct and
equip the exported article.)
(For example, if 100 pounds of material, valued at $ 1.00 per
pound, were used in manufacture resulting in 10 pounds of
irrecoverable or valueless waste, the 10 pounds of irrecoverable or
valueless waste would not reduce the drawback. In this case drawback
would be payable on 99% of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the
100 pounds of imported material used in constructing and equipping
the exported articles.)
(The ``appearing in'' basis may be used regardless of whether
there is waste. If the ``appearing in'' basis is used, the claimant
does not need to keep records of waste and its value. However, the
manufacturer must establish the identity and quantity of the
merchandise appearing in the exported product and provide this
information. Waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are
made on the ``appearing in'' basis. Drawback is payable on 99
percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of
imported material which appears in the exported articles.
``Appearing in'' may not be used if multiple products are involved.)
(Based on the previous example, drawback would be payable on the
90 pounds of imported material which actually went into the exported
product (appearing in) rather than the 100 pounds used in as set
forth previously.)
(The ``used in less valuable waste'' basis may be employed when
the manufacturer recovers valuable waste, and keeps records of the
quantity and value of waste from each lot of merchandise. The value
of the waste reduces the amount of drawback when claims are based on
the ``used in less
[[Page 37987]]
valuable waste'' basis. When valuable waste is incurred, the
drawback allowance on the exported article is based on the duties,
taxes, and fees paid on the quantity of imported material used to
construct and equip the exported product, reduced by the quantity of
such material which the value of the waste would replace. Thus in
this case, drawback is claimed on the quantity of eligible material
actually used to produce the exported product, less the amount of
such material which the value of the waste would replace. Note
section 190.26(c) of the CBP Regulations.)
(Based on the previous examples, if the 10 pounds of waste had a
value of $.50 per pound, then the 10 pounds of waste, having a total
value of $5.00, would be equivalent in value to 5 pounds of the
imported material. Thus the value of the waste would replace 5
pounds of the merchandise used, and drawback is payable on 99
percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the 95 pounds of
imported material rather than on the 100 pounds ``used in'' or the
90 pounds ``appearing in'' as set forth in the above examples.)
(Two methods exist for the manufacturer to show the quantity of
material used or appearing in the exported article: (1) Schedule or
(2) Abstract.)
(A ``schedule'' shows the quantity of material used in producing
each unit of product. The schedule method is usually employed when a
standard line of merchandise is being produced according to fixed
formulas. Some schedules will show the quantity of merchandise used
to manufacture or produce each article and others will show the
quantity appearing in each finished article. Schedules may be
prepared to show the quantity of merchandise either on the basis of
percentages or by actual weights and measurements. A schedule
determines the amount that will be needed to produce a unit of
product before the material is actually used in production.)
(An ``abstract'' is the summary of the records which shows the
total quantity used in producing all products during the period
covered by the abstract. The abstract looks at a period of time, for
instance 3 months, in which the quantity of material has been used.
An abstract looks back at how much material was actually used after
a production period has been completed.)
(An applicant who fails to indicate the ``schedule'' choice must
base its claims on the ``abstract'' method. State which Basis and
Method you will use. An example of Used In by Schedule would read:)
We will claim drawback on the quantity of (specify material)
used in manufacturing (exported article) according to the schedule
set forth below.
(Section 190.8(f) of the CBP Regulations requires submission of
the schedule with the application for a specific manufacturing
drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to file supplemental
schedules with the drawback office whenever there is a change in the
quantity or material used should state:)
We request permission to file supplemental schedules with the
drawback office covering changes in the quantities of material used
to produce the exported articles, or different styles or capacities
of containers of such exported merchandise.
(Neither the ``appearing in'' basis nor the ``schedule'' method
for claiming drawback may be used where the relative value procedure
is required.)
AGREEMENTS
The Applicant specifically agrees that it will:
1. Operate in full conformance with the terms of this
application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling when
claiming drawback;
2. Open its factory and records for examination at all
reasonable hours by authorized Government officers;
3. Keep its drawback related records and supporting data for at
least 3 years from the date of liquidation of any drawback claim
predicated in whole or in part upon this application;
4. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to the
drawback office which liquidates its claims any changes in the
number or locations of its offices or factories, the corporate name,
the persons who will sign drawback documents, the basis of claim
used for calculating drawback, the decision to use or not to use an
agent under Sec. 190.9 or the identity of an agent under that
section, the drawback office where claims will be filed under the
ruling, or the corporate organization by succession or
reincorporation;
5. Keep this application current by reporting promptly to CBP
Headquarters, all other changes affecting information contained in
this application;
6. Keep a copy of this application and the letter of approval by
CBP Headquarters on file for ready reference by employees and
require all officials and employees concerned to familiarize
themselves with the provisions of this application and that letter
of approval; and
7. Issue instructions to help ensure proper compliance with
title 19, United States Code, section 1313, part 190 of the CBP
Regulations and this application and letter of approval.
DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL
I declare that I have read this application for a specific
manufacturing drawback ruling; that I know the averments and
agreements contained herein are true and correct; and that my
signature on this __ day of ____ 20 _, makes this application
binding on
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Applicant Corporation, Partnership, or Sole Proprietorship)
By \2\-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Section 190.6(a) requires that applications for specific
manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally
authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application
is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a
partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president,
secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the
corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a
customs power of attorney filed with the CBP port for the drawback
office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an
application, as may a licensed customs broker with a customs power
of attorney. You should state in which CBP port your customs
power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
(Signature and Title)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 191--DRAWBACK
0
6. The general authority citations for part 191 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624;
* * * * *
0
7. Revise Sec. 191.0 to read as follows:
Sec. 191.0 Scope.
This part sets forth general provisions applicable to drawback
claims and specialized provisions applicable to specific types of
drawback claims filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313, prior to the February 24,
2016, amendments to the U.S. drawback law. Drawback claims may not be
filed under this part after February 23, 2019. For drawback claims
filed under 19 U.S.C. 1313, as amended, see part 190. Additional
drawback provisions relating to the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) are contained in subpart E of part 181 of this chapter.
0
8. Revise Sec. 191.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 191.1 Authority of the Commissioner of CBP.
Pursuant to DHS Delegation number 7010.3, the Commissioner of CBP
has the authority to prescribe, and pursuant to Treasury Department
Order No. 100-16 (set forth in the appendix to part 0 of this chapter),
the Secretary of the Treasury has the sole authority to approve, rules
and regulations regarding drawback.
0
9. In Sec. 191.3:
0
a. Revise the section heading;
0
b. Amend paragraph (a)(3) by removing the word ``and'' at the end of
the paragraph;
0
c. Amend paragraph (a)(4) by removing the ``(iv).'' and adding in its
place the words ``(iv); and'';
0
d. Add paragraph (a)(5).
0
e. Revise paragraph (b).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 191.3 Duties, taxes, and fees subject or not subject to
drawback.
(a) * * *
(5) Harbor maintenance taxes (see Sec. 24.24 of this chapter) for
unused merchandise drawback pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j), and drawback
for substitution of finished petroleum derivatives pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv).
(b) Duties and fees not subject to drawback include:
[[Page 37988]]
(1) Harbor maintenance taxes (see Sec. 24.24 of this chapter)
except where unused merchandise drawback pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)
or drawback for substitution of finished petroleum derivatives pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv) is claimed;
(2) Merchandise processing fees (see Sec. 24.23 of this chapter),
except where unused merchandise drawback pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)
or drawback for substitution of finished petroleum derivatives pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1313(p)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv) is claimed; and
(3) Antidumping and countervailing duties on merchandise entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 23,
1988.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 191.5 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular possessions, trust territories.
Guantanamo Bay Naval Station is considered foreign territory for
drawback purposes and, accordingly, drawback may be permitted on
articles shipped there. Drawback is not allowed, except on claims made
under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), on articles shipped to the U.S. Virgin
Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef,
Guam, Canton Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston Island, or Palmyra
Island. Puerto Rico is not considered foreign territory for drawback
purposes and, accordingly, drawback may not be permitted on articles
shipped there from elsewhere in the customs territory of the United
States.
0
11. In Sec. 191.22, paragraph (a) is amended by adding a new sentence
to the end of the paragraph to read as follows:
Sec. 191.22 Substitution drawback.
(a) * * * For purposes of drawback of internal revenue tax imposed
under Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export or destruction of
substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount of taxes paid
(and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise.
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec. 191.32:
0
a. Remove the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (b)(2);
0
b. Remove ``.'' and adding, in its place, ``; and''; at the end of
paragraph (b)(3) and;
0
c. Add paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 191.32 Substitution drawback.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) For purposes of drawback of internal revenue tax imposed under
Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export or destruction of
substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount of taxes paid
(and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise.
* * * * *
0
13. Section 191.42 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.42 Procedures and supporting documentation.
(a) Time limit for exportation or destruction. Drawback will be
denied on merchandise that is exported or destroyed after the statutory
3-year time period.
(b) Required documentation. The claimant must submit documentation
to CBP as part of the complete drawback claim (see Sec. 191.51) to
establish that the merchandise did not conform to sample or
specification, was shipped without the consent of the consignee, or was
defective as of the time of importation (see Sec. 191.45 for
additional requirements for claims made with respect to rejected retail
merchandise under 19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)). If the claimant was not
the importer, the claimant must also:
(1) Submit a statement signed by the importer and every other
person, other than the ultimate purchaser, that owned the goods that no
other claim for drawback was made on the goods by any other person; and
(2) Certify that records are available to support the statement
required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(c) Notice. A notice of intent to export or destroy merchandise
which may be the subject of a rejected merchandise drawback claim (19
U.S.C. 1313(c)) must be provided to CBP to give CBP the opportunity to
examine the merchandise. The claimant, or the exporter (for destruction
under CBP supervision, see Sec. 191.71), must file at the port of
intended redelivery to CBP custody a Notice of Intent to Export,
Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form
7553 at least 5 working days prior to the date of intended return to
CBP custody. Waiver of prior notice for exportations under 19 U.S.C.
1313(j) (see Sec. 191.91) is inapplicable to exportations under 19
U.S.C. 1313(c).
(d) Required information. The notice must provide the bill of
lading number, if known, the name and telephone number, mailing
address, and, if available, fax number and email address of a contact
person, and the location of the merchandise.
(e) Decision to waive examination. Within 2 working days after
receipt of the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return
Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback (see paragraph (c) of this
section), CBP will notify, in writing, the party designated on the
Notice of CBP's decision to either examine the merchandise to be
exported or destroyed, or to waive examination. If CBP timely notifies
the designated party, in writing, of its decision to examine the
merchandise (see paragraph (f) of this section), but the merchandise is
exported or destroyed without having been presented to CBP for such
examination, any drawback claim, or part thereof, based on the Notice
of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of
Drawback, must be denied. If CBP notifies the designated party, in
writing, of its decision to waive examination of the merchandise, or,
if timely notification of a decision by CBP to examine or to waive
examination is absent, the merchandise may be exported or destroyed
without delay and will be deemed to have been returned to CBP custody.
(f) Time and place of examination. If CBP gives timely notice of
its decision to examine the merchandise to be exported or destroyed,
the merchandise to be examined must be promptly presented to CBP. CBP
must examine the merchandise within 5 working days after presentation
of the merchandise. The merchandise may be exported or destroyed
without examination if CBP fails to timely examine the merchandise
after presentation to CBP, and in such case the merchandise will be
deemed to have been returned to CBP custody. If the examination is
completed at a port other than the port of actual exportation or
destruction, the merchandise must be transported in-bond to the port of
exportation or destruction.
(g) Extent of examination. The appropriate CBP office may permit
release of merchandise without examination, or may examine, to the
extent determined to be necessary, the items exported or destroyed.
(h) Drawback claim. When filing the drawback claim, the drawback
claimant must correctly calculate the amount of drawback due (see Sec.
191.51(b)). The procedures for restructuring a claim (see Sec. 191.53)
apply to rejected merchandise drawback if the claimant has an ongoing
export program which qualifies for this type of drawback.
[[Page 37989]]
(i) Exportation. Claimants must provide documentary evidence of
exportation (see subpart G of this part). The claimant may establish
exportation by mail as set out in Sec. 191.74 of this part.
0
14. Section 191.45 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 191.45 Returned retail merchandise.
(a) Special rule for substitution. Section 313(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)), provides
for drawback upon the exportation or destruction under CBP supervision
of imported merchandise which has been entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, duty-paid and ultimately sold at retail by
the importer, or the person who received the merchandise from the
importer, and for any reason returned to and accepted by the importer,
or the person who received the merchandise from the importer.
(b) Eligibility requirements. (1) Drawback is allowable, subject to
compliance with all requirements set forth in this subpart; and
(2) The claimant must also show by evidence satisfactory to CBP
that drawback may be claimed by--
(i) Designating an entry of merchandise that was imported within 1
year before the date of exportation or destruction of the merchandise
described in paragraph (a) of this section under CBP supervision.
(ii) Certifying that the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number and
specific product identifier (such as part number, SKU, or product code)
apply to both the merchandise designated for drawback (in the import
documentation) and the returned merchandise.
(c) Allowable refund. The amount of drawback allowable will be
equal to 99 percent of the amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with
respect to the imported merchandise.
(d) Denial of claims. No drawback will be refunded if CBP is not
satisfied that the claimant has provided, upon request, the
documentation necessary to support the certification required in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
0
15. Amend Sec. 191.51 by adding a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 191.51 Completion of drawback claims.
(a) * * *
(3) Limitation on eligibility for imported merchandise. Claimants
are prohibited from filing any drawback claims under part 191 for
imported merchandise associated with an entry summary if any other
merchandise covered on that entry summary has been designated as the
basis of a drawback substitution claim under part 190.
* * * * *
0
16. Section 191.81 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.81 Liquidation.
(a) Time of liquidation. Drawback entries may be liquidated after:
(1) Liquidation of the designated import entry or entries becomes
final pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section; or
(2) Deposit of estimated duties on the imported merchandise and
before liquidation of the designated import entry or entries.
(b) Claims based on estimated duties. (1) Drawback may be paid upon
liquidation of a claim based on estimated duties if one or more of the
designated import entries have not been liquidated, or the liquidation
has not become final (because of a protest being filed) (see also Sec.
173.4(c) of this chapter), only if the drawback claimant and any other
party responsible for the payment of liquidated import duties each
files a written request for payment of each drawback claim, waiving any
right to payment or refund under other provisions of law, to the extent
that the estimated duties on the unliquidated import entry are included
in the drawback claim for which drawback on estimated duties is
requested under this paragraph. The drawback claimant must, to the best
of its knowledge, identify each import entry that has been protested
and that is included in the drawback claim. A drawback entry, once
finally liquidated on the basis of estimated duties pursuant to
paragraph (e)(2), will not be adjusted by reason of a subsequent final
liquidation of the import entry.
(2) However, if final liquidation of the import entry discloses
that the total amount of import duty is different from the total
estimated duties deposited, except in those cases when drawback is 100%
of the duty, the party responsible for the payment of liquidated
duties, as applicable, will:
(i) Be liable for 1 percent of all increased duties found to be due
on that portion of merchandise recorded on the drawback entry; or
(ii) Be entitled to a refund of 1 percent of all excess duties
found to have been paid as estimated duties on that portion of the
merchandise recorded on the drawback entry.
(c) Claims based on voluntary tenders or other payments of duties--
(1) General. Subject to the requirements in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, drawback may be paid upon liquidation of a claim based on
voluntary tenders of the unpaid amount of lawful ordinary customs
duties or any other payment of lawful ordinary customs duties for an
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption (see Sec.
191.3(a)(1)(iii)), provided that:
(i) The tender or payment is specifically identified as duty on a
specifically identified entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption;
(ii) Liquidation of the specifically identified entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption became final prior to such
tender or payment; and
(iii) Liquidation of the drawback entry in which that specifically
identified import entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption
is designated has not become final.
(2) Written request and waiver. Drawback may be paid on claims
based on voluntary tenders or other payments of duties under this
subsection only if the drawback claimant and any other party
responsible for the payment of the voluntary tenders or other payments
of duties each files a written request for payment of each drawback
claim based on such voluntary tenders or other payments of duties,
waiving any claim to payment or refund under other provisions of law,
to the extent that the voluntary tenders or other payment of duties
under this paragraph are included in the drawback claim for which
drawback on the voluntary tenders or other payment of duties is
requested under this paragraph.
(d) Claims based on liquidated duties. Drawback will be based on
the final liquidated duties paid that have been made final by operation
of law (except in the case of the written request for payment of
drawback on the basis of estimated duties, voluntary tender of duties,
and other payments of duty, and waiver, provided for in paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section).
(e) Liquidation procedure. (1) General. When the drawback claim has
been completed by the filing of the entry and other required documents,
and exportation (or destruction) of the merchandise or articles has
been established, CBP will determine drawback due on the basis of the
complete drawback claim, the applicable general manufacturing drawback
ruling or specific manufacturing drawback ruling, and any other
relevant evidence or information. Notice of liquidation will be given
electronically as provided in Sec. Sec. 159.9 and 159.10(c)(3).
(2) Liquidation by operation of law. (i) Liquidated import entries.
A drawback claim that satisfies the requirements of
[[Page 37990]]
paragraph (d) that is not liquidated within one year from the date of
the drawback claim (see Sec. 190.51(e)(1)(i)) will be deemed
liquidated for the purposes of the drawback claim at the drawback
amount asserted by the claimant or claim, unless the time for
liquidation is extended in accordance with Sec. 159.12 or if
liquidation is suspended as required by statute or court order.
(ii) Unliquidated import entries. A drawback claim that satisfies
the requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section will be
deemed liquidated upon the deposit of estimated duties on the
unliquidated imported merchandise (see Sec. 191.81(b)).
(iii) Applicability. The provisions of paragraphs (e)(2)(i) of this
section will apply to drawback entries made on or after December 3,
2004. An entry or claim for drawback filed before December 3, 2004, the
liquidation of which was not final as of December 3, 2004, will be
deemed liquidated on the date that is 1 year after December 3, 2004, at
the drawback amount asserted by the claimant at the time of the entry
or claim.
(f) Relative value; multiple products--(1) Distribution. Where two
or more products result from the manufacture or production of
merchandise, drawback will be distributed to the several products in
accordance with their relative values at the time of separation.
(2) Values. The values to be used in computing the distribution of
drawback where two or more products result from the manufacture or
production of merchandise under drawback conditions must be the market
value (as provided for in the definition of relative value in Sec.
191.2(u)), unless other values are approved by CBP.
(g) Payment. CBP will authorize payment of the amount of the refund
due as drawback to the claimant.
0
17. Section 191.103 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.103 Additional requirements.
(a) Manufacturer claims domestic drawback. In the case of medicinal
preparations and flavoring extracts, the claimant must file with the
drawback entry, a declaration of the manufacturer showing whether a
claim has been or will be filed by the manufacturer with the Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) for domestic drawback on alcohol
under Sec. Sec. 5111, 5112, 5113, and 5114, Internal Revenue Code, as
amended (26 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5113, and 5114).
(b) Manufacturer does not claim domestic drawback--(1) Submission
of statement. If no claim has been or will be filed with TTB for
domestic drawback on medicinal preparations or flavoring extracts, the
manufacturer must submit a statement setting forth that fact to the
Director, National Revenue Center, TTB.
(2) Contents of the statement. The statement must show the:
(i) Quantity and description of the exported products;
(ii) Identity of the alcohol used by serial number of package or
tank car;
(iii) Name and registry number of the distilled spirits plant from
which the alcohol was withdrawn;
(iv) Date of withdrawal;
(v) Serial number of the applicable record of tax determination
(see 27 CFR 17.163(a) and 27 CFR 19.626(c)(7); and
(vi) CBP office where the claim will be filed.
(3) Verification of the statement. The Director, National Revenue
Center, TTB, will verify receipt of this statement, forward the
original of the document to the drawback office designated, and retain
the copy.
0
18. Section 191.104 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
certificates.
(a) Request. The drawback claimant or manufacturer must request the
Director, National Revenue Center, TTB, provide the CBP office where
the drawback claim will be processed with a tax-paid certificate on TTB
Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol).
(b) Contents. The request must state the:
(1) Quantity of alcohol in proof gallons;
(2) Serial number of each package;
(3) Amount of tax paid on the alcohol;
(4) Name, registry number, and location of the distilled spirits
plant;
(5) Date of withdrawal;
(6) Name of the manufacturer using the alcohol in producing the
exported articles;
(7) Address of the manufacturer and its manufacturing plant; and
(8) CBP drawback office where the drawback claim will be processed.
(c) Extract of TTB certificate. If a certification of any portion
of the alcohol described in the TTB Form 5100.4 is required for
liquidation of drawback entries processed in another drawback office,
the drawback office, on written application of the person who requested
its issuance, will transmit a copy of the extract from the certificate
for use at that drawback office. The drawback office will note that the
copy of the extract was prepared and transmitted.
0
19. Section 191.103 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 191.106 Amount of drawback.
(a) Claim filed with TTB. If the declaration required by Sec.
191.103 of this subpart shows that a claim has been or will be filed
with TTB for domestic drawback, drawback under Sec. 313(d) of the Act,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)), will be limited to the difference
between the amount of tax paid and the amount of domestic drawback
claimed.
(b) Claim not filed with TTB. If the declaration and verified
statement required by Sec. 191.103 show that no claim has been or will
be filed by the manufacturer with TTB for domestic drawback, the
drawback will be the full amount of the tax on the alcohol used.
Drawback under this provision may not be granted absent receipt from
TTB of a copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol)
indicating that taxes have been paid on the exported product for which
drawback is claimed.
(c) No deduction of 1 percent. No deduction of 1 percent will be
made in drawback claims under Sec. 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1313(d)).
(d) Payment. The drawback due will be paid in accordance with Sec.
191.81(f).
0
20. In Sec. 191.171, add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 191.171 General; drawback allowance.
* * * * *
(d) Federal excise tax. For purposes of drawback of internal
revenue tax imposed under Chapters 32 and 38 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export of
substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount of taxes paid
(and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the substituted
merchandise.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Approved:
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2018-16279 Filed 7-27-18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P