Information Collection: Domestic Licensing of Source Material, 37537-37538 [2018-16428]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2018–0047]
Information Collection: Domestic
Licensing of Source Material
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Renewal of existing information
collection; request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) invites public
comment on the renewal of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for an existing collection of
information. The information collection
is entitled, ‘‘Domestic Licensing of
Source Material.’’
DATES: Submit comments by October 1,
2018. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0047. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer
Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127;
email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: David Cullison,
Office of the Chief Information Officer,
Mail Stop: T–5 F53, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cullison, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
2084; email: INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@
NRC.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–
0047 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Jul 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0047.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
supporting statement and burden
spreadsheet are available in ADAMS
under Accession Nos. ML18136A682
and ML18136A688.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of
the collection of information and related
instructions may be obtained without
charge by contacting the NRC’s
Clearance Officer, David Cullison,
Office of the Chief Information Officer,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–2084; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information in
comment submissions that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. All comment
submissions are posted at https://
www.regulations.gov and entered into
ADAMS. Comment submissions are not
routinely edited to remove identifying
or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the OMB, then you
should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact
information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment
submission. Your request should state
that comment submissions are not
routinely edited to remove such
information before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the NRC is requesting
public comment on its intention to
request the OMB’s approval for the
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37537
information collection summarized
below.
1. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR part 40, ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Source Material.’’
2. OMB approval number: 3150–0020.
3. Type of submission: Revision.
4. The form number, if applicable:
Not applicable.
5. How often the collection is required
or requested: Reports required under 10
CFR part 40 collected and evaluated on
a continuing basis as events occur.
There is a one-time submittal of
information to receive a license.
Renewal applications need to be
submitted every 15 to 40 years.
Information in previous applications
may be referenced without being
resubmitted. In addition, recordkeeping
must be performed on an on-going basis.
6. Who will be required or asked to
respond: Applicants for and holders of
NRC licenses authorizing the receipt,
possession, use, or transfer of
radioactive source material.
7. The estimated number of annual
responses: 1,390 (750 reporting
responses + 6 third party disclosure
responses + 634 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 634.
9. The estimated number of hours
needed annually to comply with the
information collection requirement or
request: 16,928 (11,366 reporting +
5,544 recordkeeping + 18 third party
disclosure).
10. Abstract: The U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC)
regulations in 10 CFR part 40 establish
procedures and criteria for the issuance
of licenses to receive title to, receive,
possess, use, transfer, or deliver source
and byproduct material. The
application, reporting, recordkeeping,
and third party notification
requirements are necessary to permit the
NRC to make a determination as to
whether the possession, use, and
transfer of source and byproduct
material is in conformance with the
Commission’s regulations for protection
of public health and safety.
III. Specific Requests for Comments
The NRC is seeking comments that
address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the
information collection accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection on respondents
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
37538
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Notices
be minimized, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology?
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day
of July 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–16428 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83713; File No. SR–MSRB–
2018–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend MSRB Rule A–13 to
Temporarily Reduce the Rate of
Assessment for the MSRB’s
Underwriting, Transaction and
Technology Fees on Brokers, Dealers
and Municipal Securities Dealers
July 26, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on July 23, 2018 the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
(the ‘‘MSRB’’ or ‘‘Board’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the MSRB. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The MSRB filed with the Commission
a proposed rule change to amend MSRB
Rule A–13 to temporarily reduce the
rate of assessment for the MSRB’s
underwriting, transaction and
technology fees on brokers, dealers and
municipal securities dealers (‘‘dealers’’)
with respect to assessible activity that
occurs during the months of October,
November and December 2018 (the
‘‘proposed rule change’’). The MSRB has
designated the proposed rule change for
immediate effectiveness.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the MSRB’s website at
www.msrb.org/Rules-and1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Jul 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
Interpretations/SEC-Filings/2018Filings.aspx, at the MSRB’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
MSRB included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The MSRB has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to temporarily reduce the rate
of assessment for the MSRB’s
underwriting, transaction and
technology fees for dealers under Rule
A–13, with respect to assessible activity
that occurs during the months of
October, November and December 2018.
The proposed rule change is designed to
reduce, in a carefully considered and
strategic manner, excess MSRB reserves
in a way that achieves a fair and
equitable balance of fees across
regulated entities.
The MSRB discharges its statutory
mandate under the Exchange Act
through the establishment of rules for
dealers and municipal advisors
(together with dealers, ‘‘regulated
entities’’); the collection and
dissemination of market information;
and market leadership, outreach and
education. As a self-regulatory
organization, the MSRB must maintain
sufficient reserves to discharge its
responsibilities and operate without
interruption, even in an economic
downturn. Reserves are necessary to
mitigate fluctuations in the MSRB’s
revenue stream, which is primarily
market-driven, and provide a backstop
for funding services essential to the
efficiency of the market. However, as
current reserves exceed the target
thresholds that have been established by
its Board of Directors, the MSRB is now
seeking to temporarily reduce its three
largest sources of revenue, which
collectively, make up approximately
80% of the MSRB’s FY 2018 budgeted
revenue. The proposed rule change is
projected to reduce the MSRB’s excess
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reserves by approximately $2.6 million
and will help align reserve levels with
target levels.
Pursuant to Rule A–13, each dealer
must pay to the Board underwriting,
transaction and technology fees based
upon the rates specified in that rule.
The proposed rule change would add a
new section (h) setting forth revised
temporary assessment rates for these
three types of assessments, generally
reducing by one-third the fees for
activity that occurs during the months
of October, November and December
2018. New Rule A–13(h)(i) would
provide that the underwriting
assessment for certain primary offerings
for this time period would be .00185%
of the par value ($0.0185 per $1,000), a
reduction from .00275% of the par value
($.0275 per $1,000). New Rule A–
13(h)(ii) would provide that the
transaction assessment would be
.00067% of the par value ($0.0067 per
$1,000), a reduction from .001% ($.01
per $1,000). And, new Rule A–13(h)(iii)
would provide that the technology
assessment would be $0.67 per
transaction (a reduction from $1.00 per
transaction). Rates of assessment would
revert to current levels effective January
1, 2019.
Importantly, the temporary reduced
rates are for activity that occurs during
this three-month period. Dealers are
typically billed for these fees after the
relevant month end. Specifically, the
underwriting fee is billed immediately
after the respective month end, while
the transaction and technology fees are
billed thirty days in arrears.
Financial Reserves and the Board’s
Holistic Review of MSRB Fees
In 2010, after several years of heavy
investment in the technological
infrastructure needed to launch the
MSRB’s Electronic Municipal Market
Access (EMMA®) website, the MSRB’s
financial reserve levels had dropped
below the target of 12 months of
operating expenses excluding
depreciation expense, plus three-times
annual capital needs. As a result,
replenishing the MSRB’s reserves
became a priority. The following year,
the MSRB increased the transaction fee
under Rule A–13 and began assessing a
new technology fee for dealers under
the same rule.3 By 2014, revenue from
the technology fee had generated
sufficient resources to stabilize the
technology reserve and allowed the
MSRB to rebate $3.6 million in
technology fees to eligible dealers. The
Board’s technology fee rebate decision
3 See Release No. 34–63621 (Dec. 29, 2010), 76 FR
604 (Jan. 5, 2011) (File No. SR–MSRB–2010–10).
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37537-37538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16428]
[[Page 37537]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2018-0047]
Information Collection: Domestic Licensing of Source Material
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Renewal of existing information collection; request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public
comment on the renewal of Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for an existing collection of information. The information
collection is entitled, ``Domestic Licensing of Source Material.''
DATES: Submit comments by October 1, 2018. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0047. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287-
9127; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: David Cullison, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Mail Stop: T-5 F53, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cullison, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2084; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0047 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0047.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The
supporting statement and burden spreadsheet are available in ADAMS
under Accession Nos. ML18136A682 and ML18136A688.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
NRC's Clearance Officer: A copy of the collection of
information and related instructions may be obtained without charge by
contacting the NRC's Clearance Officer, David Cullison, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2084; email:
[email protected].
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission. All comment submissions are
posted at https://www.regulations.gov and entered into ADAMS. Comment
submissions are not routinely edited to remove identifying or contact
information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the OMB, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that comment submissions are not routinely edited to remove such
information before making the comment submissions available to the
public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the NRC is requesting public comment on its intention to
request the OMB's approval for the information collection summarized
below.
1. The title of the information collection: 10 CFR part 40,
``Domestic Licensing of Source Material.''
2. OMB approval number: 3150-0020.
3. Type of submission: Revision.
4. The form number, if applicable: Not applicable.
5. How often the collection is required or requested: Reports
required under 10 CFR part 40 collected and evaluated on a continuing
basis as events occur. There is a one-time submittal of information to
receive a license. Renewal applications need to be submitted every 15
to 40 years. Information in previous applications may be referenced
without being resubmitted. In addition, recordkeeping must be performed
on an on-going basis.
6. Who will be required or asked to respond: Applicants for and
holders of NRC licenses authorizing the receipt, possession, use, or
transfer of radioactive source material.
7. The estimated number of annual responses: 1,390 (750 reporting
responses + 6 third party disclosure responses + 634 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual respondents: 634.
9. The estimated number of hours needed annually to comply with the
information collection requirement or request: 16,928 (11,366 reporting
+ 5,544 recordkeeping + 18 third party disclosure).
10. Abstract: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
regulations in 10 CFR part 40 establish procedures and criteria for the
issuance of licenses to receive title to, receive, possess, use,
transfer, or deliver source and byproduct material. The application,
reporting, recordkeeping, and third party notification requirements are
necessary to permit the NRC to make a determination as to whether the
possession, use, and transfer of source and byproduct material is in
conformance with the Commission's regulations for protection of public
health and safety.
III. Specific Requests for Comments
The NRC is seeking comments that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC
to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical
utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the information collection
accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the information collection on respondents
[[Page 37538]]
be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology?
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of July 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-16428 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P