Preparation of Uninspected Products Outside of the Hours of Inspectional Supervision, 36797-36799 [2018-16339]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Done in Washington, DC.
Paul Kiecker,
Acting Administrator.
Docket: For access to background
documents or comments received, call
(202) 720–5627 to schedule a time to
visit the FSIS Docket Room at 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Room 6065,
Washington, DC 20250–3700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roberta Wagner, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Policy and
Program Development; Telephone: (202)
205–0495.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2018–16345 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 318 and 381
[Docket No. FSIS 2016–0032]
Background
RIN 0583–AD66
FSIS regulations at 9 CFR 318.12 and
381.152 govern the manufacture of pet
food and other uninspected, inedible
products in official meat and poultry
establishments. These regulations set
forth prescriptive requirements
intended to prevent the creation of
insanitary conditions in official
establishments, the commingling of
inedible and edible meat and poultry
products, and the movement of inedible
meat and poultry products into
commerce as human food. They also
require that pet food and other inedible
products be manufactured in official
establishments only when an FSIS
inspector is on premises.
These prescriptive requirements for
the production of pet food and other
inedible products (e.g., inedible
rendered fats, lungs, lung lobes, and
experimental products) are
incompatible with the Hazard Analysis
and Critical Control Point (HACCP)
regulations at 9 CFR part 417 and the
related sanitation regulations at 9 CFR
part 416. Under the HACCP regulations,
establishments are responsible for
developing and implementing HACCP
plans incorporating the controls
determined by the establishment to be
necessary and appropriate to produce
safe, unadulterated products.
Specifically under HACCP, official
establishments must determine the food
safety hazards reasonably likely to occur
in the production process; institute
controls necessary to prevent those
hazards from occurring or keeping them
within acceptable limits; monitor the
performance of controls and verify the
HACCP system is working as intended;
and maintain required HACCP records.
HACCP is a flexible system that
appropriately places the responsibility
for food safety on establishments and
enables them to tailor their control
systems to the needs of specific
processes and operating conditions.
Similarly, the Sanitation Performance
Standards (SPS) and requirements for
Sanitation Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) at 9 CFR part 416 set
forth sanitation objectives to be
Preparation of Uninspected Products
Outside of the Hours of Inspectional
Supervision
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
FSIS is proposing to amend
the Federal meat and poultry products
inspection regulations to eliminate
prescriptive requirements governing the
manufacture of uninspected products,
such as pet food, in edible product areas
of official establishments and to allow
official establishments to manufacture
such products outside the hours of
inspection.
DATES: To receive full consideration,
comments should be received by August
30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested
persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be
submitted by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: This
website provides the ability to type
short comments directly into the
comment field on this web page or
attach a file for lengthier comments. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
• Mail, including CD–ROMs, etc.:
Send to Docket Clerk, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Mailstop 3758, Room 6065,
Washington, DC 20250–3700.
• Hand- or courier-delivered
submittals: Deliver to 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Room 6065,
Washington, DC 20250–3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by
mail or electronic mail must include the
Agency name and docket number FSIS–
2018–0005. Comments received in
response to this docket will be made
available for public inspection and
posted without change, including any
personal information, to https://
www.regulations.gov.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jul 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36797
achieved, while allowing establishments
to develop and employ innovative and
effective sanitation procedures
customized to the nature of their
operations. Under the Sanitation SOP
regulations, FSIS requires that all
inspected establishments develop and
implement written Sanitation SOPs to
prevent direct contamination or
adulteration of product before and
during operations. An establishment’s
Sanitation SOP typically covers the
scheduled, daily pre-operational and
operational cleaning and sanitation of
equipment and surfaces that may
contact product directly. Under the SPS
regulations, establishments must
address all of the other aspects of
establishment sanitation that can affect
food safety, e.g., pest control, adequate
ventilation, lighting, and plumbing
systems.
Under the HACCP and sanitation
requirements, an establishment that
produces both edible and inedible meat
and poultry products must develop and
implement the controls and procedures
necessary to prevent the adulteration of
edible products by insanitary conditions
and product commingling, as well as the
movement of inedible products into
commerce as human food. FSIS
inspectors verify the implementation
and effectiveness of these controls
through inspection, records review and,
as necessary, product sampling. Thus,
FSIS inspectors do not need to be
present in an official establishment
when it manufactures inedible products
in order to verify that edible products
are not adulterated as a result.
Proposed Changes
FSIS is proposing to eliminate the
prescriptive regulatory requirements at
9 CFR 318.12 and 381.152 governing the
manufacture of uninspected, inedible
products, such as pet food, and
restricting the hours during which such
products may be prepared in an official
establishment. Specifically, these
regulations set forth specific
requirements regarding the sanitary
handling of inedible products and their
separation from edible products, as well
as the placement, movement and
cleaning of equipment in areas where
inedible product is manufactured. They
also require that the manufacture of
uninspected, inedible products be
conducted only during those hours in
which the establishment operates under
inspectional supervision. These
regulations were issued before FSIS
published its HACCP and Sanitation
SOP regulations, when prescriptive
regulatory requirements were deemed
necessary to prevent the adulteration of
meat and poultry products by the
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
36798
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
preparation of inedible products in the
same establishment.
FSIS is proposing to replace the
prescriptive requirements in 9 CFR
318.12 and 381.152 with general
standards governing the manufacture of
uninspected, inedible products in
official establishments. The proposed
standards require that the manufacture
of uninspected products in official
establishments must not result in the
adulteration of meat and poultry
products, create insanitary conditions
whereby meat and poultry products may
be adulterated, or prevent or otherwise
interfere with inspection or other
program tasks performed by FSIS
personnel. Establishments that
manufacture pet food and other inedible
products should be meeting these
proposed standards already, through the
implementation of their HACCP plans,
Sanitation SOPs or other prerequisite
programs.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866 and the
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been
designated as a ‘‘non-significant’’
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
Accordingly, the proposed rule has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O.
12866.
Economic Impact Analysis
As stated above, the HACCP and the
sanitation regulations provide a
framework or food safety system for
establishments to produce safe,
unadulterated product. Compliance
with these requirements makes the
prescriptive requirements in 9 CFR
318.12 and 381.151 unnecessary.
Because these prescriptive requirements
are no longer necessary to ensure the
production of safe, unadulterated food,
removing them will have no negative
public health impact. In addition, this
rule will not impose costs on the
industry or the Agency.
Further, removing the unnecessary,
prescriptive requirements should allow
establishments additional flexibility to
be innovative and to operate in the most
efficient manner. Similarly, the rule
should also allow FSIS to use its
resources more appropriately by
relieving inspectors of unnecessary
tasks.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
FSIS has examined the economic
implications of the proposed rule as
required by the RFA (5 U.S.C 601–612).
If a rule has a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, the RFA requires that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jul 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
regulatory options that would lessen the
economic effect of the rule on small
entities be analyzed. FSIS has
determined that, should it become final,
the proposed rule would not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule, if finalized as
proposed, is expected to be a
deregulatory action under E.O. 13771.
Assessment of the costs and cost savings
may be found in the preceding
economic analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no paperwork or
recordkeeping requirements associated
with this proposed rule under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to
achieving the purposes of the EGovernment Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et
seq.) by, among other things, promoting
the use of the internet and other
information technologies and providing
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under this rule: (1) All
State and local laws and regulations that
are inconsistent with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will
be given to this rule; and (3) no
administrative proceedings will be
required before parties may file suit in
court challenging this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.’’ E.O. 13175 requires
Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with tribes on a governmentto-government basis on policies that
have tribal implications, including
regulations, legislative comments or
proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
FSIS has assessed the impact of this
rule on Indian tribes and determined
that this rule does not, to our
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
knowledge, have tribal implications that
require tribal consultation under E.O.
13175. If a Tribe requests consultation,
the Food Safety and Inspection Service
will work with the Office of Tribal
Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes,
additions and modifications identified
herein are not expressly mandated by
Congress.
USDA Non-Discrimination Statement
No agency, officer, or employee of the
USDA shall, on the grounds of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity, sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family/
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, or political
beliefs, exclude from participation in,
deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person in the United
States under any program or activity
conducted by the USDA.
How To File a Complaint of
Discrimination
To file a complaint of discrimination,
complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, which
may be accessed online at https://
www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/
docs/2012/Complain_combined_6_8_
12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you
or your authorized representative.
Send your completed complaint form
or letter to USDA by mail, fax, or email:
Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410; Fax: (202) 690–7442;
Email: program.intake@usda.gov.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.),
should contact USDA’s TARGET Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, FSIS will
announce this Federal Register
publication on-line through the FSIS
web page located at: https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register.
FSIS also will make copies of this
publication available through the FSIS
Constituent Update, which is used to
provide information regarding FSIS
policies, procedures, regulations,
Federal Register notices, FSIS public
meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest
to our constituents and stakeholders.
The Update is available on the FSIS web
page. Through the web page, FSIS is
able to provide information to a much
broader, more diverse audience. In
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
addition, FSIS offers an email
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at:
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe.
Options range from recalls to export
information, regulations, directives, and
notices. Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
from edible products so as to avoid their
distribution as human food. Pet food or
similar uninspected, inedible products
must be labeled or otherwise identified
in accordance with § 325.11(d) of this
subchapter.
PART 381—POULTRY PRODUCTS
INSPECTIONS REGULATIONS
3. The authority citation for part 381
continues to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138f; 7 U.S.C. 450; 21
U.S.C. 451–470; 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.
9 CFR Part 318
■
Food additives, Food packaging,
Laboratories, Meat inspection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Signs
and symbols.
§ 381.152 Manufacture of uninspected,
inedible products at official establishments.
9 CFR Part 381
Administrative practice and
procedure, Animal diseases, Crime,
Exports, Food grades and standards,
Food labeling, Food packaging,
Government employees, Grant
programs-agriculture, Intergovernmental
relations, Laboratories, Meat inspection,
Nutrition, Polychlorinated biphenyls,
Poultry and poultry products, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Seizures and forfeitures, Signs and
symbols, Technical Assistance,
Transportation.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, FSIS is proposing to amend 9
CFR parts 318 and 381 as follows:
PART 318—ENTRY INTO OFFICIAL
ESTABLISHMENTS; REINSPECTION
AND PREPARATION OF PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 318
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138f, 450, 1901–1906;
21 U.S.C. 601–695; 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.
2. Section 318.12 is revised to read as
follows:
4. Section 381.152 is revised to read
as follows:
(a) Official establishments may
manufacture pet food or similar
uninspected, inedible products in areas
where edible products also are
produced, provided that the
manufacture of uninspected, inedible
products does not:
(1) Adulterate edible products;
(2) Create insanitary conditions in the
official establishment whereby edible
products may be adulterated; or
(3) Prevent or interfere with
inspection or other program tasks
performed by FSIS personnel in the
official establishment.
(b) The immediate container of
uninspected, inedible products
manufactured in an official
establishment shall be conspicuously
labeled so as to distinguish them from
human food.
Done in Washington, DC.
Paul Kiecker,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–16339 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
■
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 318.12 Manufacture of uninspected,
inedible products at official establishments.
(a) Official establishments may
manufacture pet food or similar
uninspected, inedible products in areas
where edible products also are
produced, provided that the
manufacture of uninspected, inedible
products does not:
(1) Adulterate edible products;
(2) Create insanitary conditions in the
official establishment whereby edible
products may be adulterated; or
(3) Prevent or interfere with
inspection or other program tasks
performed by FSIS personnel in the
official establishment.
(b) Pet food and similar uninspected,
inedible products must be distinguished
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jul 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 41
RIN 3038–AE61
Position Limits and Position
Accountability for Security Futures
Products
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) is proposing to amend
its position limits rules for security
futures products (‘‘SFPs’’) by: Increasing
the default level of equity SFP position
limits, and modifying the criteria for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36799
setting a higher level of position limits
and position accountability levels. In
addition, the proposed amended
position limit regulation would provide
discretion to a designated contract
market (‘‘DCM’’) to apply limits to either
a person’s net position or a person’s
position on the same side of the market.
The Commission also proposes criteria
for setting position limits on an SFP on
other than an equity security, generally
based on an estimate of deliverable
supply.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3038–AE61 and
‘‘Position Limits and Position
Accountability for Security Futures
Products,’’ by any of the following
methods:
• CFTC website: https://
comments.cftc.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
through the Comments Online process
on the website.
• Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC
20581.
• Hand delivery/courier: Same as
Mail above.
Please submit your comments using
only one method.
All comments must be submitted in
English, or if not, accompanied by an
English translation. Comments will be
posted as received to https://
www.cftc.gov. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. If you wish the
Commission to consider information
that is exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act, a petition
for confidential treatment of the exempt
information may be submitted according
to the procedures set forth in section
145.9 of the Commission’s regulations.1
The Commission reserves the right,
but shall have no obligation, to review,
pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or
remove any or all of your submission
from https://www.cftc.gov that it may
deem to be inappropriate for
publication, such as obscene language.
All submissions that have been redacted
or removed that contain comments on
the merits of the rulemaking will be
retained in the public comment file and
will be considered as required under the
Administrative Procedure Act and other
1 All Commission regulations referred to herein
are found in chapter I of title 17 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. Commission regulations are
accessible on the Commission’s website, https://
www.cftc.gov.
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36797-36799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16339]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 318 and 381
[Docket No. FSIS 2016-0032]
RIN 0583-AD66
Preparation of Uninspected Products Outside of the Hours of
Inspectional Supervision
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FSIS is proposing to amend the Federal meat and poultry
products inspection regulations to eliminate prescriptive requirements
governing the manufacture of uninspected products, such as pet food, in
edible product areas of official establishments and to allow official
establishments to manufacture such products outside the hours of
inspection.
DATES: To receive full consideration, comments should be received by
August 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be submitted by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: This website provides the
ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this
web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Mail, including CD-ROMs, etc.: Send to Docket Clerk, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Mailstop 3758, Room 6065, Washington, DC 20250-
3700.
Hand- or courier-delivered submittals: Deliver to 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Room 6065, Washington, DC 20250-3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by mail or electronic mail must
include the Agency name and docket number FSIS-2018-0005. Comments
received in response to this docket will be made available for public
inspection and posted without change, including any personal
information, to https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to background documents or comments received,
call (202) 720-5627 to schedule a time to visit the FSIS Docket Room at
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 6065, Washington, DC 20250-3700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Wagner, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Policy and Program Development; Telephone:
(202) 205-0495.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FSIS regulations at 9 CFR 318.12 and 381.152 govern the manufacture
of pet food and other uninspected, inedible products in official meat
and poultry establishments. These regulations set forth prescriptive
requirements intended to prevent the creation of insanitary conditions
in official establishments, the commingling of inedible and edible meat
and poultry products, and the movement of inedible meat and poultry
products into commerce as human food. They also require that pet food
and other inedible products be manufactured in official establishments
only when an FSIS inspector is on premises.
These prescriptive requirements for the production of pet food and
other inedible products (e.g., inedible rendered fats, lungs, lung
lobes, and experimental products) are incompatible with the Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulations at 9 CFR part
417 and the related sanitation regulations at 9 CFR part 416. Under the
HACCP regulations, establishments are responsible for developing and
implementing HACCP plans incorporating the controls determined by the
establishment to be necessary and appropriate to produce safe,
unadulterated products. Specifically under HACCP, official
establishments must determine the food safety hazards reasonably likely
to occur in the production process; institute controls necessary to
prevent those hazards from occurring or keeping them within acceptable
limits; monitor the performance of controls and verify the HACCP system
is working as intended; and maintain required HACCP records. HACCP is a
flexible system that appropriately places the responsibility for food
safety on establishments and enables them to tailor their control
systems to the needs of specific processes and operating conditions.
Similarly, the Sanitation Performance Standards (SPS) and
requirements for Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) at 9
CFR part 416 set forth sanitation objectives to be achieved, while
allowing establishments to develop and employ innovative and effective
sanitation procedures customized to the nature of their operations.
Under the Sanitation SOP regulations, FSIS requires that all inspected
establishments develop and implement written Sanitation SOPs to prevent
direct contamination or adulteration of product before and during
operations. An establishment's Sanitation SOP typically covers the
scheduled, daily pre-operational and operational cleaning and
sanitation of equipment and surfaces that may contact product directly.
Under the SPS regulations, establishments must address all of the other
aspects of establishment sanitation that can affect food safety, e.g.,
pest control, adequate ventilation, lighting, and plumbing systems.
Under the HACCP and sanitation requirements, an establishment that
produces both edible and inedible meat and poultry products must
develop and implement the controls and procedures necessary to prevent
the adulteration of edible products by insanitary conditions and
product commingling, as well as the movement of inedible products into
commerce as human food. FSIS inspectors verify the implementation and
effectiveness of these controls through inspection, records review and,
as necessary, product sampling. Thus, FSIS inspectors do not need to be
present in an official establishment when it manufactures inedible
products in order to verify that edible products are not adulterated as
a result.
Proposed Changes
FSIS is proposing to eliminate the prescriptive regulatory
requirements at 9 CFR 318.12 and 381.152 governing the manufacture of
uninspected, inedible products, such as pet food, and restricting the
hours during which such products may be prepared in an official
establishment. Specifically, these regulations set forth specific
requirements regarding the sanitary handling of inedible products and
their separation from edible products, as well as the placement,
movement and cleaning of equipment in areas where inedible product is
manufactured. They also require that the manufacture of uninspected,
inedible products be conducted only during those hours in which the
establishment operates under inspectional supervision. These
regulations were issued before FSIS published its HACCP and Sanitation
SOP regulations, when prescriptive regulatory requirements were deemed
necessary to prevent the adulteration of meat and poultry products by
the
[[Page 36798]]
preparation of inedible products in the same establishment.
FSIS is proposing to replace the prescriptive requirements in 9 CFR
318.12 and 381.152 with general standards governing the manufacture of
uninspected, inedible products in official establishments. The proposed
standards require that the manufacture of uninspected products in
official establishments must not result in the adulteration of meat and
poultry products, create insanitary conditions whereby meat and poultry
products may be adulterated, or prevent or otherwise interfere with
inspection or other program tasks performed by FSIS personnel.
Establishments that manufacture pet food and other inedible products
should be meeting these proposed standards already, through the
implementation of their HACCP plans, Sanitation SOPs or other
prerequisite programs.
Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been designated as a ``non-significant''
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
Accordingly, the proposed rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O. 12866.
Economic Impact Analysis
As stated above, the HACCP and the sanitation regulations provide a
framework or food safety system for establishments to produce safe,
unadulterated product. Compliance with these requirements makes the
prescriptive requirements in 9 CFR 318.12 and 381.151 unnecessary.
Because these prescriptive requirements are no longer necessary to
ensure the production of safe, unadulterated food, removing them will
have no negative public health impact. In addition, this rule will not
impose costs on the industry or the Agency.
Further, removing the unnecessary, prescriptive requirements should
allow establishments additional flexibility to be innovative and to
operate in the most efficient manner. Similarly, the rule should also
allow FSIS to use its resources more appropriately by relieving
inspectors of unnecessary tasks.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
FSIS has examined the economic implications of the proposed rule as
required by the RFA (5 U.S.C 601-612). If a rule has a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the RFA
requires that regulatory options that would lessen the economic effect
of the rule on small entities be analyzed. FSIS has determined that,
should it become final, the proposed rule would not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule, if finalized as proposed, is expected to be a
deregulatory action under E.O. 13771. Assessment of the costs and cost
savings may be found in the preceding economic analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no paperwork or recordkeeping requirements associated
with this proposed rule under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520).
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E-
Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) by, among other things,
promoting the use of the internet and other information technologies
and providing increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under this rule: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule will be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and (3) no
administrative proceedings will be required before parties may file
suit in court challenging this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments.'' E.O. 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult
and coordinate with tribes on a government-to-government basis on
policies that have tribal implications, including regulations,
legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
FSIS has assessed the impact of this rule on Indian tribes and
determined that this rule does not, to our knowledge, have tribal
implications that require tribal consultation under E.O. 13175. If a
Tribe requests consultation, the Food Safety and Inspection Service
will work with the Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes, additions and modifications
identified herein are not expressly mandated by Congress.
USDA Non-Discrimination Statement
No agency, officer, or employee of the USDA shall, on the grounds
of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual
orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status,
income derived from a public assistance program, or political beliefs,
exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person in the United States under any program or
activity conducted by the USDA.
How To File a Complaint of Discrimination
To file a complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, which may be accessed online at https://www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2012/Complain_combined_6_8_12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you or your
authorized representative.
Send your completed complaint form or letter to USDA by mail, fax,
or email: Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of
Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410;
Fax: (202) 690-7442; Email: [email protected].
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), should contact
USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy
development is important. Consequently, FSIS will announce this Federal
Register publication on-line through the FSIS web page located at:
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register.
FSIS also will make copies of this publication available through
the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register
notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information that
could affect or would be of interest to our constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is available on the FSIS web page. Through the
web page, FSIS is able to provide information to a much broader, more
diverse audience. In
[[Page 36799]]
addition, FSIS offers an email subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe. Options range from recalls to export information,
regulations, directives, and notices. Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the option to password protect their
accounts.
List of Subjects
9 CFR Part 318
Food additives, Food packaging, Laboratories, Meat inspection,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Signs and symbols.
9 CFR Part 381
Administrative practice and procedure, Animal diseases, Crime,
Exports, Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Food packaging,
Government employees, Grant programs-agriculture, Intergovernmental
relations, Laboratories, Meat inspection, Nutrition, Polychlorinated
biphenyls, Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seizures and forfeitures, Signs and symbols, Technical
Assistance, Transportation.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, FSIS is proposing to
amend 9 CFR parts 318 and 381 as follows:
PART 318--ENTRY INTO OFFICIAL ESTABLISHMENTS; REINSPECTION AND
PREPARATION OF PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 318 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138f, 450, 1901-1906; 21 U.S.C. 601-695; 7
CFR 2.18, 2.53.
0
2. Section 318.12 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 318.12 Manufacture of uninspected, inedible products at official
establishments.
(a) Official establishments may manufacture pet food or similar
uninspected, inedible products in areas where edible products also are
produced, provided that the manufacture of uninspected, inedible
products does not:
(1) Adulterate edible products;
(2) Create insanitary conditions in the official establishment
whereby edible products may be adulterated; or
(3) Prevent or interfere with inspection or other program tasks
performed by FSIS personnel in the official establishment.
(b) Pet food and similar uninspected, inedible products must be
distinguished from edible products so as to avoid their distribution as
human food. Pet food or similar uninspected, inedible products must be
labeled or otherwise identified in accordance with Sec. 325.11(d) of
this subchapter.
PART 381--POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTIONS REGULATIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 381 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138f; 7 U.S.C. 450; 21 U.S.C. 451-470; 7
CFR 2.18, 2.53.
0
4. Section 381.152 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 381.152 Manufacture of uninspected, inedible products at
official establishments.
(a) Official establishments may manufacture pet food or similar
uninspected, inedible products in areas where edible products also are
produced, provided that the manufacture of uninspected, inedible
products does not:
(1) Adulterate edible products;
(2) Create insanitary conditions in the official establishment
whereby edible products may be adulterated; or
(3) Prevent or interfere with inspection or other program tasks
performed by FSIS personnel in the official establishment.
(b) The immediate container of uninspected, inedible products
manufactured in an official establishment shall be conspicuously
labeled so as to distinguish them from human food.
Done in Washington, DC.
Paul Kiecker,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-16339 Filed 7-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P