Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Notification of Data Availability and Extension of Comment Period, 34967-34968 [2018-15715]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules IV. Conclusion We are interested in the public’s opinions regarding the matters discussed in this concept release. We encourage all interested parties to submit comments on these topics. In addition, we solicit comment on any other aspect of Rule 701 and Form S–8 that commenters believe may be improved upon. By the Commission. Dated: July 18, 2018. Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–15731 Filed 7–23–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 68 [EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725; FRL–9981–07– OLEM] RIN 2050–AG95 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Notification of Data Availability and Extension of Comment Period Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; notification of data availability and extension of comment period. AGENCY: EPA is providing notice that it is supplementing the record for the proposed Risk Management Program (RMP) Reconsideration rule published on May 30, 2018. We have placed into the rulemaking docket the November 2017 version of the RMP database containing risk management plans submitted to EPA. EPA used this version to support analysis of changes in the RMP reporting facility universe discussed in the Regulatory Impact Analysis of the proposed Reconsideration rule. To afford the public an opportunity to comment on the updated RMP database and its impacts on the proposed Reconsideration rule, EPA is extending the comment period for the proposed rule. jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: The comment period for the proposed rule published on May 30, 2018 at 83 FR 24850, is extended. Comments and additional material must be received on or before August 23, 2018. DATES: Submit comments and additional materials, identified by ADDRESSES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:58 Jul 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 34967 docket EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725 to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Belke, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564–8023; email address: belke.jim@ epa.gov, or Kathy Franklin, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564–7987; email address: franklin.kathy@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Detailed background information describing the proposed RMP Reconsideration rulemaking may be found in a previously published document: Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Proposed Rule (83 FR 24850, May 30, 2018). in the November 2017 version. This analysis of the change in the number of facilities was presented in the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the Reconsideration Proposal. Stakeholders requested that EPA supply the risk management plan data used in the RIA that supported the comparison analysis. They also requested that EPA extend the comment period for the Reconsideration Proposal for 60 days to allow the public to access and review the data so that they may have enough time to assess the impacts of the updated data on the proposal and provide comments.1 As a result, in this supplemental action, EPA is providing additional information in the docket for the proposed action. On July 11, 2018, EPA placed into the docket the November 2017 version of the database containing risk management plans submitted by RMP facilities. This database does not contain the restricted offsite consequence analysis (OCA) data. This database (Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OEM– 2015–0725–0989) consists of a digital versatile disc (DVD) containing the RMP database as a 1.4 gigabyte size file in .mdb format. The database file is too large to be provided online through regulations.gov. To view or receive a copy of the DVD, contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, 2822T, Room 3334, Washington, DC 20004, telephone: 202–566–1744, fax: 202–566–9744, email: docketcustomerservice@epa.gov. EPA will address all comments received on the supplemental data being provided and any comments submitted in response to this action in our final rulemaking action. EPA is extending the comment period for Reconsideration Proposal through August 23, 2018. I. What action is EPA taking? 1 Earthjustice first informed EPA about the failure to place the November 2017 version in the docket in an email dated July 9, 2018. Between July 10th through close of business on July 11th, EPA received requests for a 60 day-extension of the comment period from, or on behalf of, the: Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Coming Clean, Air Alliance Houston, Coalition For A Safe Environment, Clean Air Council, Sierra Club, the United Steelworkers, the United Autoworkers, and the States of New York, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont. During the week of July 9, 2018 several stakeholders notified EPA that we had failed to provide in the rulemaking docket for the proposed RMP Reconsideration rule (referred to herein as the Reconsideration Proposal) the risk management plan data we used to compare the number of facilities reporting in the February 2015 version of the RMP database to those reporting PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 II. What is the background for this action? On May 30, 2018, EPA proposed a rule (Reconsideration Proposal) that seeks comment on various proposed changes to the final RMP Amendments rule (Amendments rule) issued on E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1 jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS 34968 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules January 13, 2017 (82 FR 4594). The comment period for the Reconsideration Proposal was to end on July 30, 2018. The 2017 Amendments rule amended 40 CFR part 68, the chemical accident prevention provisions under section 112(r) of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)). The RIA for the Amendments rule utilized a February 2015 version of the RMP database to compile the universe of RMP facilities. The database reflected that approximately 12,500 facilities had filed current risk management plans with EPA and could have been potentially affected by the Amendments final rule. EPA had provided in the rulemaking docket, the non-OCA version of the risk management plan data submitted by facilities as of February 2015. (Docket ID: EPA–HQ– OEM–2015–0725–0311). For the RIA for the Reconsideration Proposal (Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725–0907), EPA compared the February 2015 version of the risk management plan database to the most recent version of the database from November 2017 for the purposes of understanding and comparing how the universe of RMP facilities had changed in the intervening period between developing the Amendments rule RIA and the Reconsideration Proposal RIA. EPA also developed a comparison of the number of RMP facilities by industry sector, by employee size, by RMP program level, by process complexity and by responding/nonresponding status. These counts of RMP facilities are presented in various data tables in Chapter 3 of the Reconsideration Proposal RIA and were extracted from the two versions of the RMP database. The comparison revealed that the number of RMP facilities and processes had experienced minor changes in the more than two years between rulemakings. In total, the number of RMP facilities decreased by 1.8% over the time-period and included small changes in the number of facilities in most industry codes and process levels. As discussed in Chapter 3 of the Reconsideration Proposal RIA, EPA determined that the differences between the databases were minor, with the exception of the number of accidents. As a result, EPA utilized the costs estimated for the 2017 Amendments rule RIA as the baseline set of costs to be impacted by the Reconsideration Proposal. For the Amendments rule, EPA had also provided in the docket as a separate dataset data on accidents occurring at RMP facilities from 2004–2013, as reported in the risk management plan database as of February 2015. This accident data was provided in an Excel VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:58 Jul 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 spreadsheet file (Docket ID: EPA–HQ– OEM–2015–0725–0002). This ten-year set of accident data was used as the basis of some of the cost estimates discussed in the Amendments rule RIA. EPA provided similar accident data in an Excel spreadsheet in the docket for RMP accidents occurring in 2014–2016 (Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725– 0909), as a supporting document for the Reconsideration Proposal. EPA developed the latter spreadsheet from the November 2017 version of the database. While the various parties requesting an extension of the comment period asked that EPA extend the period 60 days, we are extending the comment period through August 23, 2018. EPA notes that the November 2017 database was used for limited purposes in the preparation of the Reconsideration Proposal. Primarily, it was used to corroborate that the information from the prior RIA regarding the universe of stationary sources subject to the RMP rule did not change significantly by the time we prepared the RIA for the Reconsideration Proposal. Tables in the Reconsideration Proposal RIA presented the information extracted from the database, so the public could always comment on the information. The major impact was the inability to verify the information from its source. The updated database also was used to confirm that the 2004–2013 trend of declining accident rates over time continued. EPA included in the Reconsideration Proposal docket an Excel spreadsheet on accident data for RMP accidents occurring from 2014– 2016 that we derived from the November 2017 database. Because the November 2017 database was used mostly for corroboration, we do not believe there were fundamental data about sources subject to the RMP Rule that could not have been observed in the 2015 database that was already in the docket. We also note that we have docketed the November 2017 RMP database (non-OCA version) as of July 11, 2018 and on July 10, 2018, provided it to the first party to draw our attention to it not being in the docket. In the interest of expeditiously completing the reconsideration process and putting into effect provisions of the Amendments that we intend to retain or modify, we believe closing comments on August 23, 2018 strikes an appropriate balance. Dated: July 18, 2018. Reggie Cheatham, Director, Office of Emergency Management. [FR Doc. 2018–15715 Filed 7–23–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0006; FRL–9980–31] Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment. AGENCY: This document announces the Agency’s receipt of several initial filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various commodities. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 23, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown in the body of this document, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/ dockets. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) (7511P), main telephone number: (703) 305–7090; email address: BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov., Michael Goodis, Registration Division (RD) (7505P), main telephone number: (703) 305–7090; email address RDFRNotices@ epa.gov. The mailing address for each contact person is: Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34967-34968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15715]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 68

[EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725; FRL-9981-07-OLEM]
RIN 2050-AG95


Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management 
Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Notification of Data Availability and 
Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; notification of data availability and extension 
of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is providing notice that it is supplementing the record 
for the proposed Risk Management Program (RMP) Reconsideration rule 
published on May 30, 2018. We have placed into the rulemaking docket 
the November 2017 version of the RMP database containing risk 
management plans submitted to EPA. EPA used this version to support 
analysis of changes in the RMP reporting facility universe discussed in 
the Regulatory Impact Analysis of the proposed Reconsideration rule. To 
afford the public an opportunity to comment on the updated RMP database 
and its impacts on the proposed Reconsideration rule, EPA is extending 
the comment period for the proposed rule.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published on May 30, 
2018 at 83 FR 24850, is extended. Comments and additional material must 
be received on or before August 23, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments and additional materials, identified by 
docket EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725 to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, 
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance 
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Belke, United States 
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and Emergency 
Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, DC 
20460; telephone number: (202) 564-8023; email address: 
[email protected], or Kathy Franklin, United States Environmental 
Protection Agency, Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, DC 20460; telephone 
number: (202) 564-7987; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Detailed background information describing 
the proposed RMP Reconsideration rulemaking may be found in a 
previously published document: Accidental Release Prevention 
Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; 
Proposed Rule (83 FR 24850, May 30, 2018).

I. What action is EPA taking?

    During the week of July 9, 2018 several stakeholders notified EPA 
that we had failed to provide in the rulemaking docket for the proposed 
RMP Reconsideration rule (referred to herein as the Reconsideration 
Proposal) the risk management plan data we used to compare the number 
of facilities reporting in the February 2015 version of the RMP 
database to those reporting in the November 2017 version. This analysis 
of the change in the number of facilities was presented in the 
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the Reconsideration Proposal. 
Stakeholders requested that EPA supply the risk management plan data 
used in the RIA that supported the comparison analysis. They also 
requested that EPA extend the comment period for the Reconsideration 
Proposal for 60 days to allow the public to access and review the data 
so that they may have enough time to assess the impacts of the updated 
data on the proposal and provide comments.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Earthjustice first informed EPA about the failure to place 
the November 2017 version in the docket in an email dated July 9, 
2018. Between July 10th through close of business on July 11th, EPA 
received requests for a 60 day-extension of the comment period from, 
or on behalf of, the: Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, 
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, the Union of Concerned 
Scientists, Coming Clean, Air Alliance Houston, Coalition For A Safe 
Environment, Clean Air Council, Sierra Club, the United 
Steelworkers, the United Autoworkers, and the States of New York, 
Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result, in this supplemental action, EPA is providing 
additional information in the docket for the proposed action. On July 
11, 2018, EPA placed into the docket the November 2017 version of the 
database containing risk management plans submitted by RMP facilities. 
This database does not contain the restricted offsite consequence 
analysis (OCA) data. This database (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725-
0989) consists of a digital versatile disc (DVD) containing the RMP 
database as a 1.4 gigabyte size file in .mdb format. The database file 
is too large to be provided online through regulations.gov. To view or 
receive a copy of the DVD, contact the EPA Docket Center, Public 
Reading Room, as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection 
Agency, Docket Center, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, 2822T, Room 3334, 
Washington, DC 20004, telephone: 202-566-1744, fax: 202-566-9744, 
email: [email protected]. EPA will address all comments 
received on the supplemental data being provided and any comments 
submitted in response to this action in our final rulemaking action. 
EPA is extending the comment period for Reconsideration Proposal 
through August 23, 2018.

II. What is the background for this action?

    On May 30, 2018, EPA proposed a rule (Reconsideration Proposal) 
that seeks comment on various proposed changes to the final RMP 
Amendments rule (Amendments rule) issued on

[[Page 34968]]

January 13, 2017 (82 FR 4594). The comment period for the 
Reconsideration Proposal was to end on July 30, 2018. The 2017 
Amendments rule amended 40 CFR part 68, the chemical accident 
prevention provisions under section 112(r) of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 
7412(r)).
    The RIA for the Amendments rule utilized a February 2015 version of 
the RMP database to compile the universe of RMP facilities. The 
database reflected that approximately 12,500 facilities had filed 
current risk management plans with EPA and could have been potentially 
affected by the Amendments final rule. EPA had provided in the 
rulemaking docket, the non-OCA version of the risk management plan data 
submitted by facilities as of February 2015. (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OEM-
2015-0725-0311). For the RIA for the Reconsideration Proposal (Docket 
ID: EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725-0907), EPA compared the February 2015 version 
of the risk management plan database to the most recent version of the 
database from November 2017 for the purposes of understanding and 
comparing how the universe of RMP facilities had changed in the 
intervening period between developing the Amendments rule RIA and the 
Reconsideration Proposal RIA. EPA also developed a comparison of the 
number of RMP facilities by industry sector, by employee size, by RMP 
program level, by process complexity and by responding/nonresponding 
status. These counts of RMP facilities are presented in various data 
tables in Chapter 3 of the Reconsideration Proposal RIA and were 
extracted from the two versions of the RMP database. The comparison 
revealed that the number of RMP facilities and processes had 
experienced minor changes in the more than two years between 
rulemakings. In total, the number of RMP facilities decreased by 1.8% 
over the time-period and included small changes in the number of 
facilities in most industry codes and process levels. As discussed in 
Chapter 3 of the Reconsideration Proposal RIA, EPA determined that the 
differences between the databases were minor, with the exception of the 
number of accidents. As a result, EPA utilized the costs estimated for 
the 2017 Amendments rule RIA as the baseline set of costs to be 
impacted by the Reconsideration Proposal.
    For the Amendments rule, EPA had also provided in the docket as a 
separate dataset data on accidents occurring at RMP facilities from 
2004-2013, as reported in the risk management plan database as of 
February 2015. This accident data was provided in an Excel spreadsheet 
file (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725-0002). This ten-year set of 
accident data was used as the basis of some of the cost estimates 
discussed in the Amendments rule RIA. EPA provided similar accident 
data in an Excel spreadsheet in the docket for RMP accidents occurring 
in 2014-2016 (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725-0909), as a supporting 
document for the Reconsideration Proposal. EPA developed the latter 
spreadsheet from the November 2017 version of the database.
    While the various parties requesting an extension of the comment 
period asked that EPA extend the period 60 days, we are extending the 
comment period through August 23, 2018. EPA notes that the November 
2017 database was used for limited purposes in the preparation of the 
Reconsideration Proposal. Primarily, it was used to corroborate that 
the information from the prior RIA regarding the universe of stationary 
sources subject to the RMP rule did not change significantly by the 
time we prepared the RIA for the Reconsideration Proposal. Tables in 
the Reconsideration Proposal RIA presented the information extracted 
from the database, so the public could always comment on the 
information. The major impact was the inability to verify the 
information from its source. The updated database also was used to 
confirm that the 2004-2013 trend of declining accident rates over time 
continued. EPA included in the Reconsideration Proposal docket an Excel 
spreadsheet on accident data for RMP accidents occurring from 2014-2016 
that we derived from the November 2017 database.
    Because the November 2017 database was used mostly for 
corroboration, we do not believe there were fundamental data about 
sources subject to the RMP Rule that could not have been observed in 
the 2015 database that was already in the docket. We also note that we 
have docketed the November 2017 RMP database (non-OCA version) as of 
July 11, 2018 and on July 10, 2018, provided it to the first party to 
draw our attention to it not being in the docket. In the interest of 
expeditiously completing the reconsideration process and putting into 
effect provisions of the Amendments that we intend to retain or modify, 
we believe closing comments on August 23, 2018 strikes an appropriate 
balance.

    Dated: July 18, 2018.
Reggie Cheatham,
Director, Office of Emergency Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-15715 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P