Tax Return Preparer Due Diligence Penalty Under Section 6695(g), 33875-33879 [2018-15351]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
acceptable safety margins, and out of the
context of RNP–AR operations could lead to
an unusually high pilot workload.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Definitions
For the purposes of this AD, the definitions
in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(3) of this AD
apply.
(1) Group 1 airplanes are those that have
Flight Management Guidance Envelope
Computer (FMGEC) standard P5H3 (Airbus
Modification 204758 Part Number (P/N)
FMGEC C13226HA07 with P/N FMS
operational SW PS4087700–906) embodied
in production, or embodied in service as
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
22–3209; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
22–3225; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
22–3244; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
22–3247; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
22–3262, except those that have RNP–AR.
(2) Group 2 airplanes have the same
configuration as those in Group 1, but in
addition have RNP–AR (Airbus Modification
203441, or Airbus Modification 203442, or
Airbus Modification 200624) embodied in
production or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
34–3262; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
34–3308; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–
34–3345, embodied in service.
(3) Group 3 airplanes are those in any
configuration other than that identified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
(h) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision
For Group 2 airplanes: Within 30 days after
the effective date of this AD, revise the
Limitations section of the Airbus A330/A340
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to include the
information in Temporary Revision TR774,
RNP–AR Operations Forbidden with FMGEC
Standard P5H3, Issue 1, approved October
13, 2017 (‘‘TR774’’), and inform all flight
crews, and, thereafter, operate the airplane
accordingly, as specified in the TR. TR774
prohibits the RNP–AR operation on Airbus
A330 airplanes equipped with FMGEC
standard P5H3. Revising the AFM to include
TR774 may be done by inserting a copy of
TR774 in the AFM. When this TR has been
included in general revisions of the AFM, the
general revisions may be inserted in the
AFM, provided the relevant information in
the general revision is identical to that in
TR774, and the TR may be removed.
(i) FMS Software Modification
(1) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes:
Within 60 days after the effective date of this
AD, modify the airplane by installing FMS
software P4A (P/N FMS operational SW
PS4087700–905) on FMGEC standard P5H3
(P/N FMGEC C13226HA07 with P/N FMS
operational SW PS4087700–906) in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–22–3264, dated March
14, 2018.
(2) For Group 2 airplanes: After
modification of an airplane as required by
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, the AFM revision
required by paragraph (h) of this AD may be
removed from the AFM of that airplane.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jul 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
(j) Optional Modification
For Group 3 airplanes: From the effective
date of this AD, it is allowed to modify any
airplane into a Group 1 or Group 2
configuration, provided that, concurrently,
that airplane is modified in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–22–3264, dated March
14, 2018.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD
and optional actions specified in paragraph
(j) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using
Airbus Alert Operators Transmission—AOT
A22L002–17, dated October 20, 2017.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2017–0233, dated November 23, 2017, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0584.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33875
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3229.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 2 Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine,
31700 Blagnac, France; telephone +33 5 61
93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on June
22, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–14408 Filed 7–17–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–103474–18]
RIN 1545–BO63
Tax Return Preparer Due Diligence
Penalty Under Section 6695(g)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking,
partial withdrawal of notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations that amend
portions of previously proposed
regulations related to the tax return
preparer penalty under section 6695(g)
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
These amendments to the previously
proposed regulations are necessary to
implement a recent law change that
expands the scope of the tax return
preparer due diligence penalty under
section 6695(g) so that it applies with
respect to eligibility to file a return or
claim for refund as head of household.
The proposed regulations affect tax
return preparers.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by August 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103474–18), Room
5207, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand delivered Monday through
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
33876
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103474–
18), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20224, or sent
electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–103474–
18).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Marshall French, 202–317–6845;
concerning submissions of comments
and requests for a public hearing,
Regina Johnson, 202–317–6901 (not tollfree numbers).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information in
current § 1.6695–2 was previously
reviewed and approved under control
number 1545–1570. Control number
1545–1570 was discontinued in 2014, as
the burden for the collection of
information contained in § 1.6695–2 is
reflected in the burden for Form 8867,
‘‘Paid Preparer’s Due Diligence
Checklist,’’ under control number 1545–
1629.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
section 6695(g) of the Code regarding
the tax return preparer due diligence
requirements.
Prior to 2016, section 6695(g) imposed
a penalty on tax return preparers who
fail to comply with due diligence
requirements set forth in regulations
prescribed by the Secretary with respect
to determining eligibility for, or the
amount of, the earned income credit
(EIC). For tax years beginning after
December 31, 2015, the scope of section
6695(g) was expanded to apply the
penalty to tax return preparers who fail
to comply with due diligence
requirements with respect to
determining eligibility for, or the
amount of, the child tax credit (CTC)/
additional child tax credit (ACTC) and
the American opportunity tax credit
(AOTC). See section 207 of the
Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes
Act of 2015, Div. Q of Public Law 114–
113 (129 Stat. 2242, 3082 (2015)) (PATH
Act). On December 5, 2016, final and
temporary regulations (TD 9799, 81 FR
87444) with cross-referencing proposed
regulations (REG–102952–16, 81 FR
87502) (2016 proposed regulations)
were published in the Federal Register
to reflect these changes.
Effective for tax years beginning after
December 31, 2017, section 6695(g) was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jul 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
amended to further expand the scope of
the penalty to tax return preparers who
fail to comply with due diligence
requirements with respect to
determining eligibility to file as head of
household (as defined in section 2(b)).
See section 11001(b) of ‘‘An Act to
provide for reconciliation pursuant to
titles II and V of the concurrent
resolution on the budget for fiscal year
2018,’’ Public Law 115–97 (131 Stat.
2054, 2058 (2017)) (Act). This document
contains proposed regulations to reflect
this change.
Explanation of Provisions
The proposed regulations contained
in this document withdraw paragraphs
(a), (b)(3), and (e) of § 1.6695–2 of the
2016 proposed regulations and propose
in their place new paragraphs (a), (b)(3),
and (e) of § 1.6695–2 (amended
paragraphs). The amended paragraphs
update the 2016 proposed regulations to
reflect the recent change in the law that
expands the tax return preparer due
diligence requirements under section
6695(g) to apply to determining
eligibility to file as head of household.
Accordingly, the proposed regulations
contained in this document amend
paragraphs (a) and (b)(3) of § 1.6695–2
of the 2016 proposed regulations by
adding a reference to determining
eligibility to file as head of household
where reference is made to determining
eligibility for, or the amount of, the EIC,
the CTC/ACTC and/or the AOTC. In
addition, Example 5 in paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of § 1.6695–2 of the 2016
proposed regulations is revised to
demonstrate how head of household
due diligence requirements are
intertwined with the rules for
determining a taxpayer’s eligibility for
the CTC.
A new example is also added to
§ 1.6695–2(a)(2) to illustrate how the
penalty applies if there is a failure to
satisfy the due diligence requirements
with respect to determining eligibility to
file as head of household in addition to
a failure to satisfy the due diligence
requirements with respect to one of the
applicable credits. As explained in the
preamble of the 2016 temporary
regulations, the preparation of one
return or claim for refund may result in
the imposition of more than one penalty
under section 6695(g). That is because
under section 6695(g), each failure to
comply with the due diligence
requirements set forth in regulations
prescribed by the Secretary results in a
separate penalty. To illustrate this point,
a new example, Example 3, is added to
proposed § 1.6695–2(a)(2) contained in
this document.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The applicability date in § 1.6695–2(e)
is also updated to reflect the effective
date of the addition of determining
eligibility to file as head of household
to the due diligence requirements.
Accordingly, proposed § 1.6695–2(e)
contained in this document provides
that § 1.6695–2 applies to tax returns
and claims for refund for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2015, that
are prepared on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision
adopting the proposed rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
However, the rules relating to the
determination of a taxpayer’s eligibility
to file as head of household under
section 2(b) apply to tax returns and
claims for refund for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017, that
are prepared on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision
adopting the proposed rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
As part of satisfying the due diligence
requirements, the regulations under
§ 1.6695–2 require tax return preparers
to complete the Form 8867, ‘‘Paid
Preparer’s Due Diligence Checklist,’’
and, in most cases, attach it to the
relevant return or claim for refund as
part of satisfying the section 6695(g) due
diligence requirements. The Form 8867
underwent significant revisions for the
2016 tax year and is currently a single
checklist to be used for all applicable
credits (namely, the EIC, the CTC/
ACTC, and the AOTC) on the return or
claim for refund subject to the section
6695(g) due diligence requirements. It is
anticipated that the IRS will revise the
Form 8867 to include the head of
household filing status in time for the
2019 filing season.
Proposed Applicability Dates
Proposed § 1.6695–2(e) provides that
the rules in this notice of proposed
rulemaking with respect to determining
eligibility to file as head of household
under section 2(b) will apply to tax
returns and claims for refund for taxable
years beginning after December 31,
2017, that are prepared on or after the
date the final regulations are published
in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
This regulation is not subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Department of the
Treasury and the Office of Management
and Budget regarding review of tax
regulations. Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. chapter
6), it is hereby certified that these
proposed rules, if adopted, would not
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
When an agency issues a notice of
proposed rulemaking, the RFA requires
the agency to ‘‘prepare and make
available for public comment an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis’’ that will
‘‘describe the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.’’ (5 U.S.C. 603(a)).
Section 605 of the RFA provides an
exception to this requirement if the
agency certifies that the proposed
rulemaking will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The proposed rules affect paid tax
return preparers who determine a
taxpayer is eligible to file as head of
household, in addition to those tax
return preparers who determine
eligibility for, or the amount of, the EIC,
the CTC/ACTC, and/or the AOTC. The
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code that relates to tax
return preparation services (NAICS code
541213) is the appropriate code for tax
return preparers subject to this notice of
proposed rulemaking. Entities identified
as tax return preparation services are
considered small under the Small
Business Administration size standards
(13 CFR 121.201) if their annual revenue
is less than $20.5 million. The IRS
estimates that approximately 75 to 85
percent of the 505,000 persons who
work at firms or are self-employed tax
return preparers are operating as or
employed by small entities. The IRS has
therefore determined that these
proposed rules will have an impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The IRS has further determined,
however, that the economic impact on
entities affected by the proposed rules
will not be significant. The current final
and temporary regulations under section
6695(g) already require tax return
preparers to complete the Form 8867
when a return or claim for refund
includes a claim of the EIC, the CTC/
ACTC, and/or the AOTC. Tax return
preparers also must currently maintain
records of the checklists and
computations, as well as a record of
how and when the information used to
compute the credits was obtained by the
tax return preparer. The information
needed to document a taxpayer’s
eligibility to file as head of household
is information the preparer must gather
to file the return. Even if certain
preparers are required to maintain the
checklists and complete Form 8867 for
the first time, the IRS estimates that the
total time required should be minimal
for these tax return preparers. Further,
the IRS does not expect that the
requirements in these proposed
regulations would necessitate the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jul 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
purchase of additional software or
equipment in order to meet the
additional information retention
requirements.
Based on these facts, the IRS hereby
certifies that the collection of
information contained in this notice of
proposed rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this notice of
proposed rulemaking has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on the
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written and electronic comments that
are timely submitted to the IRS as
prescribed in this preamble under the
ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of the proposed
rules. All comments will be available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person that
timely submits written comments. If a
public hearing is scheduled, notice of
the date, time, and place for the public
hearing will be published in the Federal
Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Rachel Gregory of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Partial Withdrawal of a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of
26 U.S.C. 7805, § 1.6695–2(a), (b)(3), and
(e) of the notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–102952–16) published in the
Federal Register on December 5, 2016
(81 FR 87502) are withdrawn.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33877
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.6695–2 is amended
by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (b)(3), and (e) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1.6695–2 Tax return preparer due
diligence requirements for certain returns
and claims.
(a) Penalty for failure to meet due
diligence requirements—(1) In general.
A person who is a tax return preparer
(as defined in section 7701(a)(36)) of a
tax return or claim for refund under the
Internal Revenue Code who determines
the taxpayer’s eligibility to file as head
of household under section 2(b), or who
determines the taxpayer’s eligibility for,
or the amount of, the child tax credit
(CTC)/additional child tax credit
(ACTC) under section 24, the American
opportunity tax credit (AOTC) under
section 25A(i), or the earned income
credit (EIC) under section 32, and who
fails to satisfy the due diligence
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section will be subject to a penalty as
prescribed in section 6695(g) (indexed
for inflation under section 6695(h)) for
each failure. A separate penalty applies
to a tax return preparer with respect to
the head of household filing status
determination and to each applicable
credit claimed on a return or claim for
refund for which the due diligence
requirements of this section are not
satisfied and for which the exception to
penalty provided by paragraph (d) of
this section does not apply.
(2) Examples. The provisions of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section are
illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Preparer A prepares a federal
income tax return for a taxpayer claiming the
CTC and the AOTC. Preparer A did not meet
the due diligence requirements under this
section with respect to the CTC or the AOTC
claimed on the taxpayer’s return. Unless the
exception to penalty provided by paragraph
(d) of this section applies, Preparer A is
subject to two penalties under section
6695(g): One for failure to meet the due
diligence requirements for the CTC and a
second penalty for failure to meet the due
diligence requirements for the AOTC.
Example 2. Preparer B prepares a federal
income tax return for a taxpayer claiming the
CTC and the AOTC. Preparer B did not meet
the due diligence requirements under this
section with respect to the CTC claimed on
the taxpayer’s return, but Preparer B did
meet the due diligence requirements under
this section with respect to the AOTC
claimed on the taxpayer’s return. Unless the
exception to penalty provided by paragraph
(d) of this section applies, Preparer B is
subject to one penalty under section 6695(g)
for the failure to meet the due diligence
requirements for the CTC. Preparer B is not
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
33878
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
subject to a penalty under section 6695(g) for
failure to meet the due diligence
requirements for the AOTC.
Example 3. Preparer C prepares a federal
income tax return for a taxpayer using the
head of household filing status and claiming
the CTC and the AOTC. Preparer C did not
meet the due diligence requirements under
this section with respect to the head of
household filing status and the CTC claimed
on the taxpayer’s return. Preparer C did meet
the due diligence requirements under this
section with respect to the AOTC claimed on
the taxpayer’s return. Unless the exception to
penalty provided by paragraph (d) of this
section applies, Preparer C is subject to two
penalties under section 6695(g) for the failure
to meet the due diligence requirements: One
for the head of household filing status and
one for the CTC. Preparer C is not subject to
a penalty under section 6695(g) for failure to
meet the due diligence requirements for the
AOTC.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
(b) * * *
(3) Knowledge—(i) In general. The tax
return preparer must not know, or have
reason to know, that any information
used by the tax return preparer in
determining the taxpayer’s eligibility to
file as head of household or in
determining the taxpayer’s eligibility
for, or the amount of, any credit
described in paragraph (a) of this
section and claimed on the return or
claim for refund is incorrect. The tax
return preparer may not ignore the
implications of information furnished
to, or known by, the tax return preparer,
and must make reasonable inquiries if a
reasonable and well-informed tax return
preparer knowledgeable in the law
would conclude that the information
furnished to the tax return preparer
appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or
incomplete. The tax return preparer
must also contemporaneously document
in the preparer’s paper or electronic
files any inquiries made and the
responses to those inquiries.
(ii) Examples. The provisions of
paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section are
illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. In 2018, Q, a 22 year-old
taxpayer, engages Preparer C to prepare Q’s
2017 federal income tax return. Q completes
Preparer C’s standard intake questionnaire
and states that she has never been married
and has two sons, ages 10 and 11. Based on
the intake sheet and other information that
Q provides, including information that shows
that the boys lived with Q throughout 2017,
Preparer C believes that Q may be eligible to
claim each boy as a qualifying child for
purposes of the EIC and the CTC. However,
Q provides no information to Preparer C, and
Preparer C does not have any information
from other sources, to verify the relationship
between Q and the boys. To meet the
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, Preparer C must make
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jul 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
reasonable inquiries to determine whether
each boy is a qualifying child of Q for
purposes of the EIC and the CTC, including
reasonable inquiries to verify Q’s relationship
to the boys, and Preparer C must
contemporaneously document these inquiries
and the responses.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1 of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii). In
addition, as part of preparing Q’s 2017
federal income tax return, Preparer C made
sufficient reasonable inquiries to verify that
the boys were Q’s legally adopted children.
In 2019, Q engages Preparer C to prepare her
2018 federal income tax return. When
preparing Q’s 2018 federal income tax return,
Preparer C is not required to make additional
inquiries to determine the boys relationship
to Q for purposes of the knowledge
requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section.
Example 3. In 2018, R, an 18 year-old
taxpayer, engages Preparer D to prepare R’s
2017 federal income tax return. R completes
Preparer D’s standard intake questionnaire
and states that she has never been married,
has one child, an infant, and that she and
her infant lived with R’s parents during part
of the 2017 tax year. R also provides Preparer
D with a Form W–2 showing that she earned
$10,000 during 2017. R provides no other
documents or information showing that R
earned any other income during the tax year.
Based on the intake sheet and other
information that R provides, Preparer D
believes that R may be eligible to claim the
infant as a qualifying child for the EIC and
the CTC. To meet the knowledge requirement
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer
D must make reasonable inquiries to
determine whether R is eligible to claim these
credits, including reasonable inquiries to
verify that R is not a qualifying child of her
parents (which would make R ineligible to
claim the EIC) or a dependent of her parents
(which would make R ineligible to claim the
CTC), and Preparer D must
contemporaneously document these inquiries
and the responses.
Example 4. The facts are the same as the
facts in Example 3 of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
In addition, Preparer D previously prepared
the 2017 joint federal income tax return for
R’s parents. Based on information provided
by R’s parents, Preparer D has determined
that R is not eligible to be claimed as a
dependent or as a qualifying child for
purposes of the EIC or CTC on R’s parents’
return. Therefore, for purposes of the
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, Preparer D is not required to
make additional inquiries to determine that
R is not her parents’ qualifying child or
dependent.
Example 5. In 2019, S engages Preparer E
to prepare his 2018 federal income tax
return. During Preparer E’s standard intake
interview, S states that he has never been
married and that his niece and nephew lived
with him for part of the 2018 taxable year.
Preparer E believes S may be eligible to file
as head of household and claim each of these
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
children as a qualifying child for purposes of
the EIC and the CTC. To meet the knowledge
requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, Preparer E must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether S is eligible to
file as head of household and whether each
child is a qualifying child for purposes of the
EIC and the CTC, including reasonable
inquiries about the children’s residency, S’s
relationship to the children, the children’s
income, the sources of support for the
children, and S’s contribution to the payment
of costs related to operating the household,
and preparer E must contemporaneously
document these inquiries and the responses.
Example 6. W engages Preparer F to
prepare her federal income tax return. During
Preparer F’s standard intake interview, W
states that she is 50 years old, has never been
married, and has no children. W further
states to Preparer F that during the tax year
she was self-employed, earned $10,000 from
her business, and had no business expenses
or other income. Preparer F believes W may
be eligible for the EIC. To meet the knowledge
requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, Preparer F must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether W is eligible
for the EIC, including reasonable inquiries to
determine whether W’s business income and
expenses are correct, and Preparer F must
contemporaneously document these inquiries
and the responses.
Example 7. Y, who is 32 years old, engages
Preparer G to prepare his federal income tax
return. Y completes Preparer G’s standard
intake questionnaire and states that he has
never been married. As part of Preparer G’s
client intake process, Y provides Preparer G
with a copy of the Form 1098–T Y received
showing that University M billed $4,000 of
qualified tuition and related expenses for Y’s
enrollment or attendance at the university
and that Y was at least a half-time
undergraduate student. Preparer G believes
that Y may be eligible for the AOTC. To meet
the knowledge requirements in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, Preparer G must make
reasonable inquiries to determine whether Y
is eligible for the AOTC, as Form 1098–T
does not contain all the information needed
to determine eligibility for the AOTC or to
calculate the amount of the credit if Y is
eligible, and contemporaneously document
these inquiries and the responses.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Applicability date. The rules of
this section apply to tax returns and
claims for refund for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2015, that
are prepared on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register. However, the
rules relating to the determination of a
taxpayer’s eligibility to file as head of
household under section 2(b) apply to
tax returns and claims for refund for
taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017, that are prepared on or after
the date of publication of the Treasury
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules
decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
proposed rulemaking, the Commission
proposes the following revisions to the
periodic reporting requirements found
in 39 CFR part 3050.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018–15351 Filed 7–13–18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2018–2; Order No. 4706]
Periodic Reporting Requirements
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is proposing
revisions to the periodic reporting
requirements codified in our
regulations. This document informs the
public of the proposed rules, invites
public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 17,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Comments
IV. Analysis of Proposed Changes
V. Solicitation of Comments
VI. Conclusion
I. Introduction
On December 27, 2017, the Postal
Service filed a request for the
Commission to consider revisions to the
periodic reporting requirements
codified in 39 CFR part 3050.1 On
January 5, 2018, the Commission
established this docket and invited
comments regarding the Postal Service’s
proposed revisions.2 Based on
comments received in response to the
Commission’s advance notice of
1 United States Postal Service Petition for
Rulemaking on Periodic Reporting, December 27,
2017 (Petition).
2 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
Revise Periodic Reporting Requirements, January 5,
2018 (Order No. 4347).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jul 17, 2018
Jkt 244001
II. Background
The Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act (PAEA) granted the
Commission enhanced information
gathering and reporting responsibilities.
See 39 U.S.C. 3652(e)(1). The PAEA
provides that the Commission shall
prescribe the content and form of the
public reports the Postal Service files
with the Commission under section
3652. In Docket No. RM2008–4, the
Commission approved its current
periodic reporting requirements.3
On December 27, 2017, the Postal
Service filed a request for the
Commission to consider revisions to the
periodic reporting requirements. First,
the Postal Service requests that the
Commission adjust the deadlines for the
quarterly Revenue, Pieces, and Weight
(RPW) report; the Quarterly Statistics
Report (QSR); the quarterly Billing
Determinants report; and the monthly
National Consolidated Trial Balance and
Revenue and Expense Summary (Trial
Balance) report to align the deadlines
with other financial reporting deadlines.
Petition at 1. The Postal Service states
that aligning these deadlines with other
financial reporting deadlines will avoid
potential restatements of the earlier filed
reports once the data for the later filed
reports are finalized. Id. at 3.
Specifically, the Postal Service seeks
to move the quarterly and year-end
deadlines for the RPW and QSR reports
so that they are the same as the Form
10–Q and Form 10–K due dates. Id. at
2–3. In addition, the Postal Service
requests that the Commission extend
deadlines for quarterly Billing
Determinants reports to 60 days after the
end of Quarters 1, 2, and 3, and 90 days
after the end of Quarter 4.4 The Postal
Service also requests that the
Commission revise the periodic
reporting rules so that the Trial Balance
reports and the Monthly Summary
Financial reports have the same
deadline. Id. at 5–6.
Second, the Postal Service requests
that the Commission modify the format
of the Monthly Summary Financial
Report to make the report more
3 Docket No. RM2008–4, Notice of Final Rule
Prescribing Form and Content of Periodic Reports,
April 16, 2009 (Order No. 203).
4 Id. at 4. The Postal Service also requests that the
Quarter 4 Billing Determinants report be
incorporated into the annual Billing Determinants
report rather than submitted as a standalone filing.
Id. The Postal Service states that eliminating the
standalone filing would help the Postal Service
more effectively allocate scarce time and resources.
Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33879
consistent with the Postal Service’s
quarterly and annual financial reports.
Id. at 1. The Postal Service states that
the term ‘‘Operating Revenue’’ as used
in Tables 1 and 2 of the Monthly
Summary Financial Report does not
correspond with its usage in its Form
10–K reports. Id. at 7. The Postal Service
requests revisions to Tables 1 and 2 of
the Monthly Summary Financial Report
so that the items and amounts reported
for total operating revenue reconcile on
both tables and the breakdown for
revenue more closely aligns with the
format in its other financial reports.5
Third, the Postal Service requests that
the Commission consider eliminating or
modifying any reporting requirements
that have become unnecessary or
irrelevant since implementation of the
current periodic reporting rules in 2009.
Id. at 1. The Postal Service requests that
the Commission consider eliminating or
modifying these requirements to avoid
imposing ‘‘unnecessary or unwarranted
administrative effort and expense’’ on
the Postal Service. Id. at 9 (citing 39
U.S.C. 3652(e)(1)).
III. Comments
On March 7, 2018, the Public
Representative and United Parcel
Service, Inc. (UPS) filed comments.6 On
April 6, 2018, the Postal Service and the
Parcel Shippers Association (PSA) filed
reply comments.7
Public Representative. The Public
Representative divides her discussion
into two sections. First, she discusses
the guiding principles the Commission
should consider when revising its
periodic reporting requirements. PR
Comments at 2–4. Specifically, she
observes that the PAEA outlines three
guiding principles for the Commission
to consider when determining the
content and form of the Postal Service’s
public reports submitted under 39
U.S.C. 3652. Id. at 2. The three guiding
principles are whether the requirement
‘‘(A) provid[es] the public with timely,
adequate information to assess the
lawfulness of rates charged; (B) avoid[s]
unnecessary or unwarranted
administrative effort and expense on the
5 Id. The Postal Service also requests updating
Table 2 to reflect the name change of Standard Mail
to USPS Marketing Mail. Id. at 8.
6 Public Representative Comments on Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Revise Periodic
Reporting Requirements, March 7, 2018 (PR
Comments); Comments of United Parcel Service,
Inc. on Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
Revise Periodic Reporting Requirements, March 7,
2018 (UPS Comments).
7 Reply Comments of the United States Postal
Service, April 6, 2018 (Postal Service Reply
Comments); Reply Comments of the Parcel Shippers
Association (PSA), April 6, 2018 (PSA Reply
Comments).
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33875-33879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15351]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-103474-18]
RIN 1545-BO63
Tax Return Preparer Due Diligence Penalty Under Section 6695(g)
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking, partial withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that amend
portions of previously proposed regulations related to the tax return
preparer penalty under section 6695(g) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). These amendments to the previously proposed regulations are
necessary to implement a recent law change that expands the scope of
the tax return preparer due diligence penalty under section 6695(g) so
that it applies with respect to eligibility to file a return or claim
for refund as head of household. The proposed regulations affect tax
return preparers.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by August 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-103474-18), Room
5207, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
[[Page 33876]]
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
103474-18), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224, or sent electronically, via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-103474-18).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Marshall French, 202-317-6845; concerning submissions of comments and
requests for a public hearing, Regina Johnson, 202-317-6901 (not toll-
free numbers).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information in current Sec. 1.6695-2 was
previously reviewed and approved under control number 1545-1570.
Control number 1545-1570 was discontinued in 2014, as the burden for
the collection of information contained in Sec. 1.6695-2 is reflected
in the burden for Form 8867, ``Paid Preparer's Due Diligence
Checklist,'' under control number 1545-1629.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 6695(g) of the Code regarding
the tax return preparer due diligence requirements.
Prior to 2016, section 6695(g) imposed a penalty on tax return
preparers who fail to comply with due diligence requirements set forth
in regulations prescribed by the Secretary with respect to determining
eligibility for, or the amount of, the earned income credit (EIC). For
tax years beginning after December 31, 2015, the scope of section
6695(g) was expanded to apply the penalty to tax return preparers who
fail to comply with due diligence requirements with respect to
determining eligibility for, or the amount of, the child tax credit
(CTC)/additional child tax credit (ACTC) and the American opportunity
tax credit (AOTC). See section 207 of the Protecting Americans from Tax
Hikes Act of 2015, Div. Q of Public Law 114-113 (129 Stat. 2242, 3082
(2015)) (PATH Act). On December 5, 2016, final and temporary
regulations (TD 9799, 81 FR 87444) with cross-referencing proposed
regulations (REG-102952-16, 81 FR 87502) (2016 proposed regulations)
were published in the Federal Register to reflect these changes.
Effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, section
6695(g) was amended to further expand the scope of the penalty to tax
return preparers who fail to comply with due diligence requirements
with respect to determining eligibility to file as head of household
(as defined in section 2(b)). See section 11001(b) of ``An Act to
provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018,'' Public Law
115-97 (131 Stat. 2054, 2058 (2017)) (Act). This document contains
proposed regulations to reflect this change.
Explanation of Provisions
The proposed regulations contained in this document withdraw
paragraphs (a), (b)(3), and (e) of Sec. 1.6695-2 of the 2016 proposed
regulations and propose in their place new paragraphs (a), (b)(3), and
(e) of Sec. 1.6695-2 (amended paragraphs). The amended paragraphs
update the 2016 proposed regulations to reflect the recent change in
the law that expands the tax return preparer due diligence requirements
under section 6695(g) to apply to determining eligibility to file as
head of household. Accordingly, the proposed regulations contained in
this document amend paragraphs (a) and (b)(3) of Sec. 1.6695-2 of the
2016 proposed regulations by adding a reference to determining
eligibility to file as head of household where reference is made to
determining eligibility for, or the amount of, the EIC, the CTC/ACTC
and/or the AOTC. In addition, Example 5 in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of
Sec. 1.6695-2 of the 2016 proposed regulations is revised to
demonstrate how head of household due diligence requirements are
intertwined with the rules for determining a taxpayer's eligibility for
the CTC.
A new example is also added to Sec. 1.6695-2(a)(2) to illustrate
how the penalty applies if there is a failure to satisfy the due
diligence requirements with respect to determining eligibility to file
as head of household in addition to a failure to satisfy the due
diligence requirements with respect to one of the applicable credits.
As explained in the preamble of the 2016 temporary regulations, the
preparation of one return or claim for refund may result in the
imposition of more than one penalty under section 6695(g). That is
because under section 6695(g), each failure to comply with the due
diligence requirements set forth in regulations prescribed by the
Secretary results in a separate penalty. To illustrate this point, a
new example, Example 3, is added to proposed Sec. 1.6695-2(a)(2)
contained in this document.
The applicability date in Sec. 1.6695-2(e) is also updated to
reflect the effective date of the addition of determining eligibility
to file as head of household to the due diligence requirements.
Accordingly, proposed Sec. 1.6695-2(e) contained in this document
provides that Sec. 1.6695-2 applies to tax returns and claims for
refund for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, that are
prepared on or after the date of publication of the Treasury decision
adopting the proposed rules as final regulations in the Federal
Register. However, the rules relating to the determination of a
taxpayer's eligibility to file as head of household under section 2(b)
apply to tax returns and claims for refund for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017, that are prepared on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision adopting the proposed rules as
final regulations in the Federal Register.
As part of satisfying the due diligence requirements, the
regulations under Sec. 1.6695-2 require tax return preparers to
complete the Form 8867, ``Paid Preparer's Due Diligence Checklist,''
and, in most cases, attach it to the relevant return or claim for
refund as part of satisfying the section 6695(g) due diligence
requirements. The Form 8867 underwent significant revisions for the
2016 tax year and is currently a single checklist to be used for all
applicable credits (namely, the EIC, the CTC/ACTC, and the AOTC) on the
return or claim for refund subject to the section 6695(g) due diligence
requirements. It is anticipated that the IRS will revise the Form 8867
to include the head of household filing status in time for the 2019
filing season.
Proposed Applicability Dates
Proposed Sec. 1.6695-2(e) provides that the rules in this notice
of proposed rulemaking with respect to determining eligibility to file
as head of household under section 2(b) will apply to tax returns and
claims for refund for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017,
that are prepared on or after the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
This regulation is not subject to review under section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April
11, 2018) between the Department of the Treasury and the Office of
Management and Budget regarding review of tax regulations. Under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby
certified that these proposed rules, if adopted, would not
[[Page 33877]]
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. When an agency issues a notice of proposed rulemaking, the
RFA requires the agency to ``prepare and make available for public
comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis'' that will
``describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.'' (5
U.S.C. 603(a)). Section 605 of the RFA provides an exception to this
requirement if the agency certifies that the proposed rulemaking will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The proposed rules affect paid tax return preparers who determine a
taxpayer is eligible to file as head of household, in addition to those
tax return preparers who determine eligibility for, or the amount of,
the EIC, the CTC/ACTC, and/or the AOTC. The North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code that relates to tax return
preparation services (NAICS code 541213) is the appropriate code for
tax return preparers subject to this notice of proposed rulemaking.
Entities identified as tax return preparation services are considered
small under the Small Business Administration size standards (13 CFR
121.201) if their annual revenue is less than $20.5 million. The IRS
estimates that approximately 75 to 85 percent of the 505,000 persons
who work at firms or are self-employed tax return preparers are
operating as or employed by small entities. The IRS has therefore
determined that these proposed rules will have an impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The IRS has further determined, however, that the economic impact
on entities affected by the proposed rules will not be significant. The
current final and temporary regulations under section 6695(g) already
require tax return preparers to complete the Form 8867 when a return or
claim for refund includes a claim of the EIC, the CTC/ACTC, and/or the
AOTC. Tax return preparers also must currently maintain records of the
checklists and computations, as well as a record of how and when the
information used to compute the credits was obtained by the tax return
preparer. The information needed to document a taxpayer's eligibility
to file as head of household is information the preparer must gather to
file the return. Even if certain preparers are required to maintain the
checklists and complete Form 8867 for the first time, the IRS estimates
that the total time required should be minimal for these tax return
preparers. Further, the IRS does not expect that the requirements in
these proposed regulations would necessitate the purchase of additional
software or equipment in order to meet the additional information
retention requirements.
Based on these facts, the IRS hereby certifies that the collection
of information contained in this notice of proposed rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on the
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written and electronic comments that
are timely submitted to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under
the ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of the proposed rules. All comments will be
available at www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing
will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Rachel Gregory of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Partial Withdrawal of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, Sec. 1.6695-
2(a), (b)(3), and (e) of the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-102952-
16) published in the Federal Register on December 5, 2016 (81 FR 87502)
are withdrawn.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.6695-2 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (b)(3), and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.6695-2 Tax return preparer due diligence requirements for
certain returns and claims.
(a) Penalty for failure to meet due diligence requirements--(1) In
general. A person who is a tax return preparer (as defined in section
7701(a)(36)) of a tax return or claim for refund under the Internal
Revenue Code who determines the taxpayer's eligibility to file as head
of household under section 2(b), or who determines the taxpayer's
eligibility for, or the amount of, the child tax credit (CTC)/
additional child tax credit (ACTC) under section 24, the American
opportunity tax credit (AOTC) under section 25A(i), or the earned
income credit (EIC) under section 32, and who fails to satisfy the due
diligence requirements of paragraph (b) of this section will be subject
to a penalty as prescribed in section 6695(g) (indexed for inflation
under section 6695(h)) for each failure. A separate penalty applies to
a tax return preparer with respect to the head of household filing
status determination and to each applicable credit claimed on a return
or claim for refund for which the due diligence requirements of this
section are not satisfied and for which the exception to penalty
provided by paragraph (d) of this section does not apply.
(2) Examples. The provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section
are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Preparer A prepares a federal income tax return for a
taxpayer claiming the CTC and the AOTC. Preparer A did not meet the
due diligence requirements under this section with respect to the
CTC or the AOTC claimed on the taxpayer's return. Unless the
exception to penalty provided by paragraph (d) of this section
applies, Preparer A is subject to two penalties under section
6695(g): One for failure to meet the due diligence requirements for
the CTC and a second penalty for failure to meet the due diligence
requirements for the AOTC.
Example 2. Preparer B prepares a federal income tax return for a
taxpayer claiming the CTC and the AOTC. Preparer B did not meet the
due diligence requirements under this section with respect to the
CTC claimed on the taxpayer's return, but Preparer B did meet the
due diligence requirements under this section with respect to the
AOTC claimed on the taxpayer's return. Unless the exception to
penalty provided by paragraph (d) of this section applies, Preparer
B is subject to one penalty under section 6695(g) for the failure to
meet the due diligence requirements for the CTC. Preparer B is not
[[Page 33878]]
subject to a penalty under section 6695(g) for failure to meet the
due diligence requirements for the AOTC.
Example 3. Preparer C prepares a federal income tax return for a
taxpayer using the head of household filing status and claiming the
CTC and the AOTC. Preparer C did not meet the due diligence
requirements under this section with respect to the head of
household filing status and the CTC claimed on the taxpayer's
return. Preparer C did meet the due diligence requirements under
this section with respect to the AOTC claimed on the taxpayer's
return. Unless the exception to penalty provided by paragraph (d) of
this section applies, Preparer C is subject to two penalties under
section 6695(g) for the failure to meet the due diligence
requirements: One for the head of household filing status and one
for the CTC. Preparer C is not subject to a penalty under section
6695(g) for failure to meet the due diligence requirements for the
AOTC.
(b) * * *
(3) Knowledge--(i) In general. The tax return preparer must not
know, or have reason to know, that any information used by the tax
return preparer in determining the taxpayer's eligibility to file as
head of household or in determining the taxpayer's eligibility for, or
the amount of, any credit described in paragraph (a) of this section
and claimed on the return or claim for refund is incorrect. The tax
return preparer may not ignore the implications of information
furnished to, or known by, the tax return preparer, and must make
reasonable inquiries if a reasonable and well-informed tax return
preparer knowledgeable in the law would conclude that the information
furnished to the tax return preparer appears to be incorrect,
inconsistent, or incomplete. The tax return preparer must also
contemporaneously document in the preparer's paper or electronic files
any inquiries made and the responses to those inquiries.
(ii) Examples. The provisions of paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this
section are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. In 2018, Q, a 22 year-old taxpayer, engages Preparer
C to prepare Q's 2017 federal income tax return. Q completes
Preparer C's standard intake questionnaire and states that she has
never been married and has two sons, ages 10 and 11. Based on the
intake sheet and other information that Q provides, including
information that shows that the boys lived with Q throughout 2017,
Preparer C believes that Q may be eligible to claim each boy as a
qualifying child for purposes of the EIC and the CTC. However, Q
provides no information to Preparer C, and Preparer C does not have
any information from other sources, to verify the relationship
between Q and the boys. To meet the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer C must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether each boy is a qualifying child of Q
for purposes of the EIC and the CTC, including reasonable inquiries
to verify Q's relationship to the boys, and Preparer C must
contemporaneously document these inquiries and the responses.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in Example 1 of this
paragraph (b)(3)(ii). In addition, as part of preparing Q's 2017
federal income tax return, Preparer C made sufficient reasonable
inquiries to verify that the boys were Q's legally adopted children.
In 2019, Q engages Preparer C to prepare her 2018 federal income tax
return. When preparing Q's 2018 federal income tax return, Preparer
C is not required to make additional inquiries to determine the boys
relationship to Q for purposes of the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
Example 3. In 2018, R, an 18 year-old taxpayer, engages Preparer
D to prepare R's 2017 federal income tax return. R completes
Preparer D's standard intake questionnaire and states that she has
never been married, has one child, an infant, and that she and her
infant lived with R's parents during part of the 2017 tax year. R
also provides Preparer D with a Form W-2 showing that she earned
$10,000 during 2017. R provides no other documents or information
showing that R earned any other income during the tax year. Based on
the intake sheet and other information that R provides, Preparer D
believes that R may be eligible to claim the infant as a qualifying
child for the EIC and the CTC. To meet the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer D must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether R is eligible to claim these credits,
including reasonable inquiries to verify that R is not a qualifying
child of her parents (which would make R ineligible to claim the
EIC) or a dependent of her parents (which would make R ineligible to
claim the CTC), and Preparer D must contemporaneously document these
inquiries and the responses.
Example 4. The facts are the same as the facts in Example 3 of
this paragraph (b)(3)(ii). In addition, Preparer D previously
prepared the 2017 joint federal income tax return for R's parents.
Based on information provided by R's parents, Preparer D has
determined that R is not eligible to be claimed as a dependent or as
a qualifying child for purposes of the EIC or CTC on R's parents'
return. Therefore, for purposes of the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer D is not required to make
additional inquiries to determine that R is not her parents'
qualifying child or dependent.
Example 5. In 2019, S engages Preparer E to prepare his 2018
federal income tax return. During Preparer E's standard intake
interview, S states that he has never been married and that his
niece and nephew lived with him for part of the 2018 taxable year.
Preparer E believes S may be eligible to file as head of household
and claim each of these children as a qualifying child for purposes
of the EIC and the CTC. To meet the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer E must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether S is eligible to file as head of
household and whether each child is a qualifying child for purposes
of the EIC and the CTC, including reasonable inquiries about the
children's residency, S's relationship to the children, the
children's income, the sources of support for the children, and S's
contribution to the payment of costs related to operating the
household, and preparer E must contemporaneously document these
inquiries and the responses.
Example 6. W engages Preparer F to prepare her federal income
tax return. During Preparer F's standard intake interview, W states
that she is 50 years old, has never been married, and has no
children. W further states to Preparer F that during the tax year
she was self-employed, earned $10,000 from her business, and had no
business expenses or other income. Preparer F believes W may be
eligible for the EIC. To meet the knowledge requirement in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, Preparer F must make reasonable inquiries to
determine whether W is eligible for the EIC, including reasonable
inquiries to determine whether W's business income and expenses are
correct, and Preparer F must contemporaneously document these
inquiries and the responses.
Example 7. Y, who is 32 years old, engages Preparer G to prepare
his federal income tax return. Y completes Preparer G's standard
intake questionnaire and states that he has never been married. As
part of Preparer G's client intake process, Y provides Preparer G
with a copy of the Form 1098-T Y received showing that University M
billed $4,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses for Y's
enrollment or attendance at the university and that Y was at least a
half-time undergraduate student. Preparer G believes that Y may be
eligible for the AOTC. To meet the knowledge requirements in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer G must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether Y is eligible for the AOTC, as Form
1098-T does not contain all the information needed to determine
eligibility for the AOTC or to calculate the amount of the credit if
Y is eligible, and contemporaneously document these inquiries and
the responses.
* * * * *
(e) Applicability date. The rules of this section apply to tax
returns and claims for refund for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2015, that are prepared on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register. However, the rules relating to the
determination of a taxpayer's eligibility to file as head of household
under section 2(b) apply to tax returns and claims for refund for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, that are prepared on
or after the date of publication of the Treasury
[[Page 33879]]
decision adopting these rules as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018-15351 Filed 7-13-18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P