Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 32211-32213 [2018-14946]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32211
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0104; FRL–9980–
43—Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Yolo-Solano
Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD or ‘‘District’’) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
SUMMARY:
16:03 Jul 11, 2018
State
submittal
date
*
12/14/2015
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 10, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action,
addressing Delaware’s interstate
transport for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS,
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
*
Statewide ..........
[FR Doc. 2018–14838 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Applicable
geographic
area
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
*
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Jkt 244001
Fmt 4700
Dated: June 19, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart I—Delaware
2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding a second entry
for Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS after the first entry. The revised
text reads as follows:
■
§ 52.470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
Additional explanation
*
7/12/2018, [Insert
Federal Register
citation].
*
*
Docket 2017–0152. This action addresses the infrastructure element of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
*
Frm 00021
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter.
EPA
approval
date
*
(SIP). This revision concerns emissions
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from architectural coatings. We are
approving a local rule that regulates
these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on August
13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0104. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
PO 00000
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Sfmt 4700
*
*
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, Lazarus.Arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On May 3, 2018 (83 FR 19495), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rule into the California SIP.
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
32212
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Local agency
Rule No.
YSAQMD ................................
2.14
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one comment
in support of regulating VOC emissions,
and another that was not germane to
this rule.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the California
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rule described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Jul 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Rule title
Revised
Architectural Coatings ............................................................
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10/12/2016
Submitted
01/24/2017
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 10,
2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 22, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(293)(i)(B)(2) and
(c)(497)(i)(D)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
*
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
(c) * * *
(293) * * *
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on January 2,
2004 in paragraph (c)(293)(i)(B)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in (c)(497)(i)(D)(2), Rule
2.14, adopted on November 14, 2001.
*
*
*
*
*
(497) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) Rule 2.14, ‘‘Architectural
Coatings,’’ revised on October 12, 2016.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–14946 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0741; FRL–9980–84–
OAR]
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical
Recovery Combustion Sources at
Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notification of final action
denying petition for reconsideration.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is providing
notice that it has responded to a petition
for reconsideration of the final National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chemical
Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft,
Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills published in
the Federal Register on October 11,
2017. The Acting Administrator denied
the petition in a separate letter to the
petitioners. The letter, which provides a
full explanation of the agency’s
rationale for the denial, is in the
rulemaking docket.
DATES: July 12, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Kelley Spence, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (E143–03), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
3158; fax number: (919) 541–0516;
email address: spence.kelley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
This Federal Register document, the
petition for reconsideration, and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Jul 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
letter denying the petition for
reconsideration are available in the
docket the EPA established under
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–
0741. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Room
3334, EPA WJC West Building, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744 and
the telephone number for the Air Docket
is (202) 566–1742.
II. Judicial Review
Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) indicates which Federal Courts of
Appeals have venue for petitions for
review of final EPA actions. This section
provides, in part, that the petitions for
review must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit if: (1) The agency
action consists of ‘‘nationally applicable
regulations promulgated, or final action
taken, by the Administrator,’’ or (2) such
actions are locally or regionally
applicable, if ‘‘such action is based on
a determination of nationwide scope or
effect and if in taking such action the
Administrator finds and publishes that
such action is based on such a
determination.’’
The EPA has determined that its
action denying the petition for
reconsideration is nationally applicable
for purposes of CAA section 307(b)(1)
because the action directly affects the
NESHAP for Chemical Recovery
Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda,
Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical
Pulp Mills, which are nationally
applicable CAA section 112 standards.
Any petitions for review of the letter
denying the petition for reconsideration
must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit by September 10, 2018.
III. Description of Action
On October 11, 2017, pursuant to
sections 112(d)(6) and (f)(2) of the CAA,
the EPA published the final residual
risk and technology review (RTR) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32213
‘‘National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical
Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft,
Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills.’’ 82 FR
47328. Following publication of the
final RTR amendments, the
Administrator received a petition for
reconsideration of two aspects of the
final RTR pursuant to CAA section
307(d)(7)(B). The petitioners,
Earthjustice on behalf of Crossett
Concerned Citizens for Environmental
Justice, Louisiana Environmental Action
Network, PT AirWatchers, and Sierra
Club, claimed: (1) It was impracticable
to object to the EPA’s rationale for not
setting additional standards for
uncontrolled emissions when the EPA
was conducting the review required by
CAA section 112(d)(6), and their
objections on this issue are of central
relevance to the outcome of the rule;
and (2) it was impracticable to object
during the comment period to the EPA’s
use of census block centroids to account
for the residual risk to the most exposed
individual, and their objections on this
issue are of central relevance to the
outcome of the rule.
CAA section 307(d)(7)(B) requires the
EPA to convene a proceeding for
reconsideration of a rule if a party
raising an objection to the rule ‘‘can
demonstrate to the Administrator that it
was impracticable to raise such
objection within [the public comment
period] or if the grounds for such
objection arose after the period for
public comment (but within the time
specified for judicial review) and if such
objection is of central relevance to the
outcome of the rule.’’ The requirement
to convene a proceeding to reconsider a
rule is, thus, based on the petitioner
demonstrating to the EPA both: (1) That
it was impracticable to raise the
objection during the comment period, or
that the grounds for such objection arose
after the comment period, but within
the time specified for judicial review
(i.e., within 60 days after publication of
the final rulemaking in the Federal
Register, see CAA section 307(b)(1));
and (2) that the objection is of central
relevance to the outcome of the rule.
The EPA carefully reviewed the
petition for reconsideration and
evaluated the issues raised to determine
if they meet the CAA section
307(d)(7)(B) criteria for reconsideration.
In a separate letter to the petitioners, the
EPA Acting Administrator, Andrew R.
Wheeler, denied the petition for
reconsideration. The letter is available
in the docket for this action.
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 134 (Thursday, July 12, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32211-32213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0104; FRL-9980-43--Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management
District (YSAQMD or ``District'') portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from architectural coatings. We are approving
a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on August 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0104. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On May 3, 2018 (83 FR 19495), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
[[Page 32212]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD............................. 2.14 Architectural Coatings..... 10/12/2016 01/24/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one comment in support of regulating
VOC emissions, and another that was not germane to this rule.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into
the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 10, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 22, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(293)(i)(B)(2) and
(c)(497)(i)(D)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(293) * * *
[[Page 32213]]
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on January 2, 2004 in paragraph
(c)(293)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(497)(i)(D)(2), Rule 2.14, adopted on November 14, 2001.
* * * * *
(497) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) Rule 2.14, ``Architectural Coatings,'' revised on October 12,
2016.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-14946 Filed 7-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
