Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Malarone Tablets, 31764-31766 [2018-14632]
Download as PDF
31764
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
Coast Guard will refer to NVIC 01–2011
for process information and guidance in
evaluating SPLNG’s WSA. NVIC 01–
2011 is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES and also on
the Coast Guard’s website at https://
www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/
DCO%20Documents/5p/5ps/NVIC/
2011/NVIC%2001-2011%20Final.pdf.
IV. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. If your
material cannot be submitted using
https://www.regulations.gov, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions. In your
submission, please include the docket
number for this notice of inquiry and
provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this notice
of inquiry as being available in the
docket, and all public comments, will
be in our online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following that website’s instructions.
This document is issued under
authority of 5 U.S.C. 552 (a).
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Jacqueline Twomey,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2018–14596 Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Malarone
Tablets
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of Malarone tablets. Based upon
the facts presented, CBP has concluded
that the country of origin of the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Malarone tablets is Canada for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: This final determination was
issued on July 2, 2018. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest may seek judicial
review of this final determination
within August 8, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
M. Cunningham, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, (202) 325–
0034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on July 2, 2018,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued one final determination
concerning the country of origin of
Malarone tablets, which may be offered
to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination (HQ
H290684) was issued under procedures
set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP concluded that the
processing in Canada will result in a
substantial transformation. Therefore,
the country of origin for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement of the
Malarone tablets is Canada.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
HQ H290684
July 2, 2018
OT:RR:CTF:VS H290684 RMC
CATEGORY: Origin
Nicolas Guzman
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
1500 K Street NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005–1209
Re: U.S. Government Procurement;
Country of Origin of Malarone
Tablets; Substantial Transformation
Dear Mr. Guzman:
This is in response to your letter,
dated September 13, 2017, requesting a
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
final determination on behalf of
GlaxoSmithKline LLP (‘‘GSK’’) pursuant
to subpart B of Part 177 of the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177). A
teleconference was held with counsel
for GSK on June 8, 2018.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of Malarone tablets. As
a U.S. importer, GSK is a party-atinterest within the meaning of 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
FACTS:
GSK is a global healthcare company
that researches, develops, and
manufactures pharmaceutical
medicines, vaccines, and consumer
healthcare products. At issue in this
case are tablets sold under the brand
name Malarone, which are indicated for
the prevention and treatment of acute,
uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum
malaria. GSK states that Malarone
tablets have been shown to be effective
in regions where other malaria drugs
such as chloroquine, halofantrine,
mefloquine, and amodiaquine may have
unacceptable failure rates, presumably
due to drug resistance.
According to the FDA prescribing
information, Malarone is a fixed-dose
combination of atovaquone and
proguanil hydrochloride. See
Prescribing Information, https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/
briefing/2005-4089b1_05_05_
atovaquone.pdf (last visited Dec. 11,
2017). The chemical name of
atovaquone 11 is trans-2-[4-(4
chlorophenyl)cyclohexyl]-3-hydroxy1,4-naphthalenedione and the molecular
formula for atovaquone is C22H19ClO3.
The chemical name of proguanil
hydrochloride is 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-5isopropyl-biguanide hydrochloride and
the chemical formula for proguanil
hydrochloride is C11H16ClN5•HCl.
Each Malarone Tablet contains 250
milligrams of atovaquone and 100
milligrams of proguanil hydrochloride.
The FDA prescribing information also
describes the microbiology or
‘‘mechanism of action’’ of atovaquone
and proguanil hydrochloride. It states
that atovaquone and proguanil
hydrochloride ‘‘interfere with 2
different pathways involved in the
biosynthesis of pyrimidines required for
nucleic acid replication. Atovaquone is
a selective inhibitor of parasite
mitochondrial electron transport.
Proguanil hydrochloride primarily
exerts its effect by means of the
metabolite cycloguanil, a dihydrofolate
reductase inhibitor. Inhibition of
dihydrofolate reductase in the malaria
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
parasite disrupts deoxythymidylate
synthesis.’’
GSK notes that atovaquone by itself is
not indicated for the prevention or
treatment of malaria. By itself,
atovaquone is used for other purposes,
such as the treatment of acute
pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and
cerebral toxoplasmosis. In contrast,
proguanil hydrochloride can be used to
treat malaria. However, GSK cites to
several academic studies that conclude
that the combination of atovaquone and
proguanil hydrochloride provides a
more effective treatment compared to
taking proguanil hydrochloride alone.
GSK therefore states that atovaquone
and proguanil are ‘‘synergistic in their
mechanisms of action,’’ resulting in the
increased effectiveness of Malarone
tablets compared to taking atovaquone
or proguanil hydrochloride alone.
The manufacturing process for GSK’s
Malarone tablets begins in India, where
the Malarone tablets’ two active
pharmaceutical ingredients (‘‘APIs’’),
atovaquone and proguanil
hydrochloride, are manufactured. After
the two APIs are manufactured in India,
they are imported into Canada for
further processing at GSK’s Mississauga,
Ontario facility (‘‘GSK Canada’’). At
GSK Canada, the two APIs are combined
in a process that begins by producing a
dry mix of the APIs, low-substituted
hydroxpropyl cellulose NF,
microcrystalline cellulose NF, and
sodium starch glycolate NF. The dry
mix is then combined with the
following inactive ingredients, which
are each sourced from the United States
or a TAA-eligible country, to produce
granules:
• Povidone K30 USP
• Polaxamer 188 NF
• Sofium Starch Glycolate NF
• Hydroxy Propyl Cellulose NF
• Purified Water USP
• Microcrystalline Cellulose NF
• Alcohol USP
Next, the granules are dried, milled
into a dry powder, blended with
magnesium stearate NF, and
compressed into tablets. Finally, a film
coat mix is added and the tablets are
polished.
Once the manufacturing process is
complete, the finished Malarone tablets
are exported to a GSK facility in
Zebulon, North Carolina. There, the
tablets are packaged and labeled for sale
to Prasco Laboratories, which markets
and distributes the tablets under their
own labeling as an authorized generic
product under an agreement with GSK.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
Malarone tablets for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
CBP issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government, pursuant to
subpart B of Part 177, 19 C.F.R. § 177.21
et seq., which implements Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.).
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(a).
A substantial transformation occurs
when an article emerges from a process
with a new name, character, and use
different from that possessed by the
article prior to processing. A substantial
transformation will not result from a
minor manufacturing or combining
process that leaves the identity of the
article intact. See United States v.
Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 267
(1940); and National Juice Products
Ass’n v. United States, 628 F. Supp. 978
(Ct. Int’l Trade 1986).
In determining whether a substantial
transformation occurs in the
manufacture of chemical products such
as pharmaceuticals, CBP has
consistently examined the complexity of
the processing and whether the final
article retains the essential identity and
character of the raw material. To that
end, CBP has generally held that the
processing of pharmaceutical products
from bulk form into measured doses
does not result in a substantial
transformation of the product. See, e.g.,
Headquarters Ruling (‘‘HQ’’) 561975,
dated April 3, 2002; HQ 561544, dated
May 1, 2000; HQ 735146, dated
November 15, 1993; HQ H267177, dated
November 5, 2016; HQ H233356, dated
December 26, 2012; and, HQ 561975,
dated April 3, 2002. However, where the
processing from bulk form into
measured doses involves the
combination of two or more APIs, and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31765
the resulting combination offers
additional medicinal benefits compared
to taking each API alone, CBP has held
that a substantial transformation
occurred. See, e.g., HQ 563207, dated
June 1, 2005.
For example, in HQ 563207, CBP held
that the combination of two APIs to
form Actoplus Met, an alternative
treatment for type 2 diabetes,
constituted a substantial transformation.
The first API, Pioglitazone HCI sourced
from Japan or other countries,
functioned as an insulin sensitizer that
targets insulin resistance in the body.
The second API, biguanide sourced
from Japan, Spain, and other countries,
functioned to decrease the amount of
glucose produced by the liver and make
muscle tissue more sensitive to insulin
so glucose can be absorbed. In Japan, the
two APIs were mixed together to form
a fixed-combination drug called
Actoplus Met. In holding that a
substantial transformation occurred
when the APIs were combined in Japan
to produce Actoplus Met, CBP
emphasized that ‘‘[w]hile we note that
pioglitazone and metformin may be
prescribed separately, the final product,
Actoplus Met, increases the individual
effectiveness of piofliazone and
metformin in treating type 2 diabetes
patients.’’
Similarly, in HQ H253443, dated
March 13, 2015, CBP held that the
combination of two APIs in China to
produce Prepopik, ‘‘a dual-acting
osmotic and stimulant laxative bowel
preparation for a colonoscopy in
adults,’’ constituted a substantial
transformation. Although the importer
claimed that Country A-origin sodium
picosulfate was the only API in
Prepopik, CBP found that the Country
B-origin magnesium oxide ingredient
also qualified as an API. CBP further
found that taking Prepopik had ‘‘a more
stimulative laxative effect’’ than taking
each of the APIs individually and
therefore held that a substantial
transformation occurred when the APIs
were combined in China.
Here, as in HQ 563207 and HQ
H253443, two separate APIs are mixed
to create a fixed combination drug that
offers additional medicinal benefits
compared to taking each API alone. The
first API, atovaquone, is not indicated
for the prevention or treatment of
malaria. The second API, proguanil
hydrochloride, is used to treat malaria,
but is less effective than Malarone. This
is because of the ‘‘synergies in [the
APIs’] method of action,’’ which result
in a product that ‘‘interfere[s] with 2
different pathways’’ to prevent and treat
malaria. Under these circumstances, the
combination of atovaquone, proguanil
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
31766
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
hydrochloride, and inactive ingredients
to form Malarone tablets in Canada
results in a substantial transformation.
The country of origin of the Malarone
tablets is therefore Canada.
HOLDING:
The country of origin of the Malarone
tablets for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement is Canada.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any
party-at-interest other than the party
which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to
19 C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine
the matter anew and issue a new final
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may,
within 30 days of publication of the
Federal Register Notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations & Rulings
Office of Trade.
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–ES–2015–N040;
FXES11130400000C2–156–FF04E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for
´
Coquı Llanero
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for public comment.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of the draft recovery plan for
´
the endangered coquı llanero, a frog
endemic to Puerto Rico. The draft
recovery plan includes specific recovery
objectives and criteria that must be met
in order for us to remove this species
from listing under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. We
request review and comment on this
draft recovery plan from local, State,
and Federal agencies, and the public.
DATES: In order to be considered,
comments on the draft recovery plan
must be received on or before
September 7, 2018.
ADDRESSES:
Document availability: You may
obtain a copy of this draft recovery plan
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
We, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
announce the availability of the draft
´
recovery plan for the endangered coquı
llanero (Eleutherodactylus juanariveroi).
The draft recovery plan includes
specific recovery objectives and criteria
that must be met in order for us to
remove this species from listing under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
We request review and comment on this
draft recovery plan from local, State,
and Federal agencies and the public.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2018–14632 Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
by contacting Jan Zegarra, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Caribbean Ecological
Services Field Office, P.O. Box 491,
´
Boqueron, PR 00622; tel. (787) 851–
7297; or by visiting the Service’s
Caribbean Field Office website at
https://www.fws.gov/caribbean/ES/
Index.html.
Comment submission: You may
submit comments by one of the
following methods:
1. Submit written comments and
materials by mail or hand-delivery to
Jan Zegarra, at the above address.
2. Fax them to (787) 851–7440.
3. Send comments by email to jan_
´
zegarra@fws.gov. Please include ‘‘Coquı
llanero Draft Recovery Plan Comments’’
in the subject line.
For additional information about
submitting comments, see Request for
Public Comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan
Zegarra at (787) 851–7297, or see
ADDRESSES for further methods of
contact.
Background
´
The coquı llanero is a small frog
species endemic to Puerto Rico. In 2007,
it was described as a new species of the
genus Eleutherodactylus, family
Leptodactylidae. Males measure
approximately 0.58 in (14.7 mm), and
females 0.62 in (15.8 mm). It has the
smallest clutch size of all
Eleutherodactylus species on Puerto
Rico, and a high-frequency call. The
only population estimate available for
´
the coquı llanero indicates a mean
population size of 473.3 ± 186
´
individuals per ha (or 192 per ac; Rıos´
Lopez pers. comm. 2011).
´
The coquı llanero is currently known
to be restricted to one freshwater
herbaceous wetland in the municipality
of Toa Baja, Puerto Rico. The
herbaceous vegetation in the wetland
consists of Blechnum serrulatum
(toothed midsorus fern), Thelypteris
interrupta (willdenow’s maiden fern),
Sagittaria lancifolia (bulltongue
arrowhead), Cyperus sp. (flatsedges),
Eleocharis sp. (spike rushes), and vines
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
´
´
and grasses (Rıos-Lopez and Thomas
2007). The species is currently
threatened by the combined influences
of urban development, activities
associated with the operation and future
closure of the Toa Baja municipal
landfill, activities associated with
clearing water channels for flood
control, and invasive wetland plant
species. Additional threats include
restricted distribution and highly
specialized ecological requirements,
which may exacerbate other potential
threats like landfill leachate pollution,
the use of herbicides, brush fires,
competition, and environmental effects
resulting from climate change.
Under the ESA, the Service added the
´
coquı llanero as an endangered species
to the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife in title 50 of the
Code of Federal Regulations on October
4, 2012 (77 FR 60778). The 2012 final
rule also designated critical habitat,
covering an area of 615 ac (249 ha), for
the species.
´
The recovery strategy for the coquı
llanero includes protection and
management of occupied habitat and
suitable unoccupied habitat for
potential future introductions, and
addresses immediate threats that led to
its listing. Because of stressors like
reduced geographic distribution, limited
dispersal capabilities, and the species’
specialized breeding requirements, the
species is likely to have reduced
adaptive capacity. Therefore, in order to
meet the recovery goal of delisting, we
´
must increase the number of coquı
llanero populations. This strategy seeks
´
to safeguard the only existing coquı
llanero population in case the species
does not withstand or recover from a
stochastic or catastrophic event.
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not
promote the conservation of a particular
species. Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for conservation of
the species, establish criteria for
downlisting or delisting, and estimate
time and cost for implementing recovery
measures. Section 4(f) of the ESA also
requires us to provide public notice and
an opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development. We will consider all
information presented during a public
comment period prior to approval of
each new or revised recovery plan. We
and other Federal agencies will take
these comments into account in the
course of implementing approved
recovery plans.
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31764-31766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14632]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Malarone
Tablets
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of Malarone tablets. Based upon the facts presented,
CBP has concluded that the country of origin of the Malarone tablets is
Canada for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: This final determination was issued on July 2, 2018. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest may seek
judicial review of this final determination within August 8, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross M. Cunningham, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade,
(202) 325-0034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on July 2, 2018,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued one final
determination concerning the country of origin of Malarone tablets,
which may be offered to the U.S. Government under an undesignated
government procurement contract. This final determination (HQ H290684)
was issued under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP concluded
that the processing in Canada will result in a substantial
transformation. Therefore, the country of origin for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement of the Malarone tablets is Canada.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
HQ H290684
July 2, 2018
OT:RR:CTF:VS H290684 RMC
CATEGORY: Origin
Nicolas Guzman
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
1500 K Street NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005-1209
Re: U.S. Government Procurement; Country of Origin of Malarone Tablets;
Substantial Transformation
Dear Mr. Guzman:
This is in response to your letter, dated September 13, 2017,
requesting a final determination on behalf of GlaxoSmithKline LLP
(``GSK'') pursuant to subpart B of Part 177 of the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177). A
teleconference was held with counsel for GSK on June 8, 2018.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of Malarone
tablets. As a U.S. importer, GSK is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this
final determination.
FACTS:
GSK is a global healthcare company that researches, develops, and
manufactures pharmaceutical medicines, vaccines, and consumer
healthcare products. At issue in this case are tablets sold under the
brand name Malarone, which are indicated for the prevention and
treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. GSK
states that Malarone tablets have been shown to be effective in regions
where other malaria drugs such as chloroquine, halofantrine,
mefloquine, and amodiaquine may have unacceptable failure rates,
presumably due to drug resistance.
According to the FDA prescribing information, Malarone is a fixed-
dose combination of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride. See
Prescribing Information, https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/briefing/2005-4089b1_05_05_atovaquone.pdf (last visited Dec. 11, 2017).
The chemical name of atovaquone 11 is trans-2-[4-(4
chlorophenyl)cyclohexyl]-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthalenedione and the
molecular formula for atovaquone is C22H19ClO3. The chemical name of
proguanil hydrochloride is 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-isopropyl-biguanide
hydrochloride and the chemical formula for proguanil hydrochloride is
C11H16ClN5HCl. Each Malarone Tablet contains 250 milligrams of
atovaquone and 100 milligrams of proguanil hydrochloride.
The FDA prescribing information also describes the microbiology or
``mechanism of action'' of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride. It
states that atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride ``interfere with 2
different pathways involved in the biosynthesis of pyrimidines required
for nucleic acid replication. Atovaquone is a selective inhibitor of
parasite mitochondrial electron transport. Proguanil hydrochloride
primarily exerts its effect by means of the metabolite cycloguanil, a
dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor. Inhibition of dihydrofolate
reductase in the malaria
[[Page 31765]]
parasite disrupts deoxythymidylate synthesis.''
GSK notes that atovaquone by itself is not indicated for the
prevention or treatment of malaria. By itself, atovaquone is used for
other purposes, such as the treatment of acute pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia and cerebral toxoplasmosis. In contrast, proguanil
hydrochloride can be used to treat malaria. However, GSK cites to
several academic studies that conclude that the combination of
atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride provides a more effective
treatment compared to taking proguanil hydrochloride alone. GSK
therefore states that atovaquone and proguanil are ``synergistic in
their mechanisms of action,'' resulting in the increased effectiveness
of Malarone tablets compared to taking atovaquone or proguanil
hydrochloride alone.
The manufacturing process for GSK's Malarone tablets begins in
India, where the Malarone tablets' two active pharmaceutical
ingredients (``APIs''), atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride, are
manufactured. After the two APIs are manufactured in India, they are
imported into Canada for further processing at GSK's Mississauga,
Ontario facility (``GSK Canada''). At GSK Canada, the two APIs are
combined in a process that begins by producing a dry mix of the APIs,
low-substituted hydroxpropyl cellulose NF, microcrystalline cellulose
NF, and sodium starch glycolate NF. The dry mix is then combined with
the following inactive ingredients, which are each sourced from the
United States or a TAA-eligible country, to produce granules:
Povidone K30 USP
Polaxamer 188 NF
Sofium Starch Glycolate NF
Hydroxy Propyl Cellulose NF
Purified Water USP
Microcrystalline Cellulose NF
Alcohol USP
Next, the granules are dried, milled into a dry powder, blended
with magnesium stearate NF, and compressed into tablets. Finally, a
film coat mix is added and the tablets are polished.
Once the manufacturing process is complete, the finished Malarone
tablets are exported to a GSK facility in Zebulon, North Carolina.
There, the tablets are packaged and labeled for sale to Prasco
Laboratories, which markets and distributes the tablets under their own
labeling as an authorized generic product under an agreement with GSK.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the Malarone tablets for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant
to subpart B of Part 177, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.).
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a).
A substantial transformation occurs when an article emerges from a
process with a new name, character, and use different from that
possessed by the article prior to processing. A substantial
transformation will not result from a minor manufacturing or combining
process that leaves the identity of the article intact. See United
States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (1940); and National
Juice Products Ass'n v. United States, 628 F. Supp. 978 (Ct. Int'l
Trade 1986).
In determining whether a substantial transformation occurs in the
manufacture of chemical products such as pharmaceuticals, CBP has
consistently examined the complexity of the processing and whether the
final article retains the essential identity and character of the raw
material. To that end, CBP has generally held that the processing of
pharmaceutical products from bulk form into measured doses does not
result in a substantial transformation of the product. See, e.g.,
Headquarters Ruling (``HQ'') 561975, dated April 3, 2002; HQ 561544,
dated May 1, 2000; HQ 735146, dated November 15, 1993; HQ H267177,
dated November 5, 2016; HQ H233356, dated December 26, 2012; and, HQ
561975, dated April 3, 2002. However, where the processing from bulk
form into measured doses involves the combination of two or more APIs,
and the resulting combination offers additional medicinal benefits
compared to taking each API alone, CBP has held that a substantial
transformation occurred. See, e.g., HQ 563207, dated June 1, 2005.
For example, in HQ 563207, CBP held that the combination of two
APIs to form Actoplus Met, an alternative treatment for type 2
diabetes, constituted a substantial transformation. The first API,
Pioglitazone HCI sourced from Japan or other countries, functioned as
an insulin sensitizer that targets insulin resistance in the body. The
second API, biguanide sourced from Japan, Spain, and other countries,
functioned to decrease the amount of glucose produced by the liver and
make muscle tissue more sensitive to insulin so glucose can be
absorbed. In Japan, the two APIs were mixed together to form a fixed-
combination drug called Actoplus Met. In holding that a substantial
transformation occurred when the APIs were combined in Japan to produce
Actoplus Met, CBP emphasized that ``[w]hile we note that pioglitazone
and metformin may be prescribed separately, the final product, Actoplus
Met, increases the individual effectiveness of piofliazone and
metformin in treating type 2 diabetes patients.''
Similarly, in HQ H253443, dated March 13, 2015, CBP held that the
combination of two APIs in China to produce Prepopik, ``a dual-acting
osmotic and stimulant laxative bowel preparation for a colonoscopy in
adults,'' constituted a substantial transformation. Although the
importer claimed that Country A-origin sodium picosulfate was the only
API in Prepopik, CBP found that the Country B-origin magnesium oxide
ingredient also qualified as an API. CBP further found that taking
Prepopik had ``a more stimulative laxative effect'' than taking each of
the APIs individually and therefore held that a substantial
transformation occurred when the APIs were combined in China.
Here, as in HQ 563207 and HQ H253443, two separate APIs are mixed
to create a fixed combination drug that offers additional medicinal
benefits compared to taking each API alone. The first API, atovaquone,
is not indicated for the prevention or treatment of malaria. The second
API, proguanil hydrochloride, is used to treat malaria, but is less
effective than Malarone. This is because of the ``synergies in [the
APIs'] method of action,'' which result in a product that
``interfere[s] with 2 different pathways'' to prevent and treat
malaria. Under these circumstances, the combination of atovaquone,
proguanil
[[Page 31766]]
hydrochloride, and inactive ingredients to form Malarone tablets in
Canada results in a substantial transformation. The country of origin
of the Malarone tablets is therefore Canada.
HOLDING:
The country of origin of the Malarone tablets for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement is Canada.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days of publication
of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations & Rulings Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2018-14632 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P