Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request: Assessment of Mandatory Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Employment & Training (E&T) Programs, 31716-31722 [2018-14538]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31716
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Joseph Binns at
703–605–1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Background Investigation
Request for Contractor Employees Form.
Form Number: FNS–775.
OMB Number: 0584–NEW.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: Update of a currently
approved collection.
Abstract: Form FNS–775 is designed
to collect user information required to
conduct background investigations for
contractor employees required in order
to grant security clearances for
contractor employees.
Affected Public: Contractors, FNS.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
750.
The respondents are contractor
employees at all FNS locations across
the nation, inclusive of the FNS
Headquarters in Alexandria, VA and at
the seven (7) FNS regional offices across
the USA. The estimated annual number
of respondents who will be required to
complete the FNS–775 for requisite
background investigation requests for
contract employees is 750.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
750.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.167
of an hour. Each respondent takes
approximately 0.167 of an hour, or 10
minutes, to complete the required
information on the online form.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 125 hours. See the table
below for estimated total annual burden
for each type of respondent.
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN ON RESPONDENTS
Number of
respondents
Affected public
Form number
Contractors ...................
Annualized Totals .........
FNS–775 .....................
.....................................
Dated: June 19, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–14539 Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request:
Assessment of Mandatory
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program Employment & Training (E&T)
Programs
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection for
the Assessment of Mandatory
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) Employment &Training
(E&T) Programs. This collection is a new
information collection.
This study will help identify how
specific E&T processes and services
affect a participant’s likelihood of
participating or being sanctioned, with
particular attention to potential leakage
points, such as initial referral, intake,
and orientation. This study also will
describe what data exists on how well
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Number of
responses
annually per
respondent
750
750
Total
annual
responses
1
1
mandatory programs help SNAP
participants gain skills, certificates and
credentials and gain stable, well-paying
employment.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before September 7,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to:
Jordan Younes, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1024,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Jordan Younes at 703–305–2576 or
via email to jordan.younes@
fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Jordan Younes at
703–305–2935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
750
750
Estimate of
burden
hours per
response
0.16667 (10 minutes) ..
10 minutes ..................
Total
annual
burden
hours
125
125
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were
used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Assessment of Mandatory
Employment and Training (E&T)
Programs.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: 0584–XXXX.
Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: Section 17 [7 U.S.C. 2026]
(a)(1) of the Food and Nutrition Act of
2008, as amended, provides general
legislative authority for the planned
data collection. It authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to enter into
contracts with private institutions to
undertake research that will help to
improve the administration and
effectiveness of the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in
delivering nutrition-related benefits.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) has
funded the Assessment of Mandatory
E&T Programs to examine program
features and administrative practices of
mandatory State SNAP E&T programs
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
and assess how those features and
practices may affect E&T participation,
sanctions, and outcomes for mandatory
E&T participants. While the intent of the
mandatory E&T program is to assist
SNAP participants in ‘‘gaining skills,
trainings, or experience that will
increase their ability to obtain regular
employment,’’ little is known about
whether or how specific E&T processes
and services affect a participant’s
likelihood of participating or being
sanctioned. In particular, little is known
on whether complex intake or referral
processes, rather than a lack of interest
in participating in E&T, may negatively
impact participation in mandatory
programs. This study also seeks to
understand what data exists on how
well mandatory programs help SNAP
participants gain skills, certificates, and
credentials as well as stable, goodpaying jobs. The findings from this
study will identify lessons learned and
best practices for operating mandatory
E&T programs.
To address these issues, FNS is
conducting a study to accomplish three
objectives:
1. Understand the process for
screening and notifying participants and
enrolling them in mandatory E&T
programs.
2. Determine the main reasons why
mandatory E&T participants are
sanctioned, with particular attention to
program drop-off points that result in
sanctions.
3. Assess how well mandatory
programs help SNAP E&T participants
gain skills, certificates, and credentials;
gain stable, well-paying employment;
and move toward economic selfsufficiency.
The study will gather data through
site visits to six States operating
mandatory E&T programs and from
administrative caseload data. Data will
be collected in each of the six study
States through: (1) Interviews with the
State SNAP director and E&T manager;
(2) in-person interviews, processmapping group discussions, and
observations at two local SNAP offices;
and (3) in-person interviews and
observations at three local E&T
providers. These data will provide
information on overall State policies,
client flow through the process, and
staff perspectives on the effects of
different practices on participation and
sanctions. SNAP administrative
caseload data will also be requested
from the six study States, and if
available, from E&T providers to obtain
quantitative data to complement the
interviews. Administrative data will be
used to examine the characteristics of
mandatory E&T participants in each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
State and to assess the E&T services,
sanctions, case closures, and other
outcomes associated with their E&T
participation.
Affected Public: (1) State, Local and
Tribal Governments; (2) Business or
Other For-Profit; and (3) Not-For-Profit.
Respondent groups identified include:
1. State, Local, and Tribal
Government: State SNAP directors, State
E&T managers, State database
administrators, and State E&T provider
staff and database administrators in six
study States 1; and Local SNAP office
staff in six study States;
2. Business or Other For-Profit:
Business E&T provider staff and
database administrators in six study
States;
3. Not-For-Profit: Not-For-Profit E&T
provider staff and database
administrators in six study States
Note that the E&T providers are
assumed to be a mix of State, Business
or Other For-Profit, and Not-For-Profit
organizations (i.e., 1 State, 1 For-Profit,
and 1 Not-For-Profit E&T provider per
State).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The total estimated number of
respondents is 147 (includes 101 State
and Local Government staff, 23 Business
or Other For-Profit staff, and 23 Not-ForProfit staff). Out of the 147 contacted,
138 are estimated to be responsive and
9 are estimated to be nonresponsive.
The breakout is as follows:
1. 101 State and Local Government
staff: (out of 12 State SNAP staff
contacted, 12 are estimated to be
responsive; out of 6 State database
administrators contacted, 6 are
estimated to be responsive; out of 23
State E&T provider staff contacted, 20
are estimated to be responsive; out of 60
Local office staff contacted, 60 are
estimated to be responsive.)
2. 23 Business or Other For-Profit
staff: (out of 23 Business E&T provider
staff contacted, 20 are estimated to be
responsive.)
1 The study assumes information will be collected
from 6 States. Information will be collected from 1
State SNAP agency per State for a total of 6 State
offices; 2 local SNAP offices per State for a total of
12 local offices; and 3 E&T providers per State for
a total of 18 E&T provider organizations. The 3 E&T
providers are assumed to be a mix of State, Business
or Other For-Profit, and Not-For-Profit organizations
(i.e., 1 State, 1 For-Profit, and 1 Not-For-Profit E&T
provider per State). Interviews will be conducted
with all 3 of the E&T providers in each State (i.e.,
interviews will be conducted with staff at a total of
18 E&T providers), but only 1 of the 3 E&T
providers will provide administrative data in each
State (i.e., data files will be obtained from a total
of 6 E&T providers comprised of 2 State, 2 Business,
and 2 Not-For-Profit E&T providers). The 3 E&T
providers in each State will indicate which 1 will
provide administrative data in the initial contact
with the E&T provider.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31717
3. 23 Not-For-Profit staff: (out of 23
Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff
contacted, 20 are estimated to be
responsive.)
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.5714 (based on 231 total
annual responses (222 responsive and 9
nonresponsive) made by the 147
respondents (138 responsive and 9
nonresponsive). See table below for the
estimated number of responses per
respondent for each type of respondent.
The breakout is as follows:
1. State SNAP Staff: The estimated
number of responses per State SNAP
staff is 1.5:
• 6 State SNAP directors will respond
to advance materials and scheduling;
the same 6 State SNAP directors plus 6
additional State E&T managers will take
part in an interview.
2. State Database Administrators: The
estimated number of responses per State
Database Administrator is two:
• 6 State SNAP database
administrators will respond to advance
materials and scheduling; the same 6
State SNAP database administrators will
submit an administrative data file.
3. State E&T Provider Staff: The
estimated number of responses per State
E&T provider staff is 1.4:
• 6 State E&T provider staff will
respond to advance materials and
scheduling, the same 6 E&T provider
staff plus 12 additional E&T provider
staff will take part in an interview (3
other State E&T provider staff will not
respond).
• 2 State E&T provider database
administrators will respond to advance
materials and scheduling; the same 2
State SNAP database administrators will
submit an administrative data file.
4. Local SNAP Office Staff: The
estimated number of responses per
Local SNAP office staff is 1.8:
• 12 Local SNAP office staff will
respond to advance materials and
scheduling, the same 12 Local SNAP
office staff plus 24 additional Local
SNAP office staff will take part in an
interview; 36 of the Local SNAP office
staff plus 24 additional Local SNAP
office staff will take part in a group
mapping exercise.
5. Business E&T Provider Staff: The
estimated number of responses per
Business E&T provider staff is 1.4:
• 6 Business E&T provider staff will
respond to advance materials and
scheduling, the same 6 Business E&T
provider staff plus 12 additional
Business E&T provider staff will take
part in an interview (3 other Business
E&T provider staff will not respond).
• 2 Business E&T provider database
administrators will respond to advance
materials and scheduling; the same 2
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
31718
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Business SNAP database administrators
will submit an administrative data file.
6. Not-For-Profit E&T Provider Staff:
The estimated number of responses per
Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff is 1.4:
• 6 Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff
will respond to advance materials and
scheduling, the same 6 Not-For-Profit
E&T provider staff plus 12 additional
Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff will
take part in an interview (3 other NotFor-Profit E&T provider staff will not
respond).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
• 2 Not-For-Profit E&T provider
database administrators will respond to
advance materials and scheduling; the
same 2 Not-For-Profit SNAP database
administrators will submit an
administrative data file.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
230.9958 (222 annual responses for
responsive participants and 9 annual
responses for nonresponsive
participants).
Estimated Time per Response:
1.33047619 hours (1.38239 hours for
responsive participants and 0.45 hours
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for nonresponsive participants). The
estimated time of response varies from
0.05 hours to 8.7 hours depending on
respondent group and activity, as shown
in the table below.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 307.34 hours (306.89
hours for responsive participants, and
0.45 hours for nonresponsive
participants). See the table below for
estimated total annual burden for each
type of respondent.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Instruments
and Activities
Sample
Size
Non-Responsive
Total
Annual
Frequency
Total
Hours
Annual Number of Frequency
Total
Annual Burden
Number of
Hours per burden Estimate
Annual
per
burden
Nonof
of
Annual
respondents
response responses response (hours) respondents response responses response (hours)
State, Local, and Tribal government
Jkt 244001
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Responsive
Respondent
Type of
Category
respondents
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
0.0
0.0
Sfmt 4725
0.0
0.0
State
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
0.0
09JYN1
materials and
preparation
Submit
9.0
31719
EN09JY18.000</GPH>
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
31720
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Instruments
and Activities
Sample
Size
Number of
Frequency
of
Total
Annual
Hours
per
Annual
burden
(hours)
Number of
Non-
Total
Annual
Frequency
Total
Annual Burden
Hours per burden Estimate
of
Annual
response (hours)
responses
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Local
Fmt 4703
exercise with 5
local staff in 2
sites over 6
States
90.0
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
9.0
18.0
~
09JYN1
Business or
Other ForProfit
I=R. T
18.0
1.0
18.0
1.0
18.0
0.0
0.0
0.0:
0.0
0.0
18.0
0.0
4.0
nrnvirl~r
l-lrrnJir1Cor
9.0
31.5
EN09JY18.001</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Non-Responsive
Responsive
Respondent
Type of
Category
respondents
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Instruments
and Activities
Sample
Size
Non-Responsive
Frm 00007
Total
Annual
Frequency
Total
Hours
Annual Number of Frequency
Total
Annual Burden
Number of
Hours per burden Estimate
Annual
per
burden
Nonof
of
Annual
respondents
response (hours)
response responses response (hours) respondents response responses
Not-For-Profit
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Responsive
Respondent
Type of
Category
respondents
31721
EN09JY18.002</GPH>
31722
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2018 / Notices
Dated: June 28, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–14538 Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am]
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Notice of Public Meeting of the
Minnesota Advisory Committee
U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights.
ACTION: Announcement of meeting.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 3410–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights (Commission) and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) that a meeting of the Minnesota
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the
Commission will be held from 3:00–4:00
p.m. CDT Monday August 6, 2018 to
discuss civil rights concerns in the
State.
SUMMARY:
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest;
California; I–5 Corridor Fuels
Reduction Project
AGENCY:
Forest Service, USDA.
Withdrawal of Notice of Intent
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement.
ACTION:
The meeting will be held on
Monday August 6, 2018, from 3:00–4:00
p.m. CDT.
Public Call Information: Dial: 888–
500–6973; Conference ID: 9083856.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Allen at callen@usccr.gov or
(312) 353–8311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting is available to the public
through the above toll-free call-in
number. Any interested member of the
public may call this number and listen
to the meeting. Callers can expect to
incur charges for calls they initiate over
wireless lines, and the Commission will
not refund any incurred charges. Callers
will incur no charge for calls they
initiate over land-line connections to
the toll-free telephone number. Persons
with hearing impairments may also
follow the proceedings by first calling
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8339 and providing the Service with the
conference call number and conference
ID number.
Members of the public are entitled to
make comments during the open period
at the end of the meeting. Members of
the public may also submit written
comments; the comments must be
received in the Regional Programs Unit
within 30 days following the meeting.
Written comments may be mailed to the
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights,
Regional Programs Unit, 230 S.
Dearborn, Suite 2120, Chicago, IL
60604. They may be faxed to the
Commission at (312) 353–8324, or
emailed Carolyn Allen at callen@
usccr.gov. Persons who desire
additional information may contact the
Regional Programs Unit at (312) 353–
8311.
Records and documents discussed
during the meeting will be available for
public viewing prior to and after the
meeting at https://facadatabase.gov/
DATES:
The Shasta-Trinity National
Forest is withdrawing its Notice of
Intent issued on April 22, 2011, for
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the I–5 Corridor
Fuels Reduction Project. No significant
issues were identified during this
scoping period or any other opportunity
to comment. Upon further evaluation, it
also appears that there are no potential
significant impacts to the human
environment associated with the
project. As a result, the Forest is
withdrawing its intent to prepare an EIS
and is now preparing an Environmental
Assessment (EA). All comments
previously received regarding this
project will be retained and considered
in the development of the EA. If it is
determined that the project may have
significant impacts, the EIS process will
be reinitiated and a notice of intent will
be published.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Questions concerning this notice and
requests to be added to the project
mailing list should be directed to
Andrew Spain, Shasta Lake Ranger
District, Shasta-Trinity National Forest,
14225 Holiday Road, Redding, CA
96003. Telephone: (530) 242–5548.
Email: aspain@fs.fed.us. Individuals
who have previously submitted
comments on this project will remain on
the project mailing list and do not need
to contact the Forest.
Dated: June 8, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System .
[FR Doc. 2018–14578 Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jul 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
committee/meetings.aspx?cid=256.
Please click on the ‘‘Meeting Details’’
and ‘‘Documents’’ links to download.
Records generated from this meeting
may also be inspected and reproduced
at the Regional Programs Unit, as they
become available, both before and after
the meeting. Persons interested in the
work of this Committee are directed to
the Commission’s website, https://
www.usccr.gov, or may contact the
Regional Programs Unit at the above
email or street address.
Agenda
I. Welcome
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Discussion: Civil Rights Concerns in
Minnesota
IV. Public Comment
V. Next Steps
VI. Adjournment
Dated: July 2, 2018.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2018–14589 Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Notice of Public Meetings of the
Hawai’i Advisory Committee
Commission on Civil Rights.
Announcement of meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights (Commission), and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) that a meeting of the Hawai’i
Advisory Committee to the Commission
will convene by conference call at 11:00
a.m. (HDT) on: Monday, July 9, 2018.
The purpose of the meeting is for the
Committee to approve a list of speakers,
and to approve a date for the briefing.
DATES: Monday, July 9, 2018 at 11:00
a.m. HDT.
PUBLIC CALL-IN INFORMATION: Conference
call-in number: 888–724–9513 and
conference ID# 1067565.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Barreras, at dbarreras@usccr.gov
or by phone at 312–353–8311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested
members of the public may listen to the
discussion by calling the following tollfree conference call-in number: 1–888–
724–9513 and conference ID# 1067565.
Please be advised that before placing
them into the conference call, the
conference call operator will ask callers
to provide their names, their
organizational affiliations (if any), and
email addresses (so that callers may be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31716-31722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14538]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request:
Assessment of Mandatory Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Employment & Training (E&T) Programs
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection for the Assessment of Mandatory
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment &Training
(E&T) Programs. This collection is a new information collection.
This study will help identify how specific E&T processes and
services affect a participant's likelihood of participating or being
sanctioned, with particular attention to potential leakage points, such
as initial referral, intake, and orientation. This study also will
describe what data exists on how well mandatory programs help SNAP
participants gain skills, certificates and credentials and gain stable,
well-paying employment.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 7,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Jordan Younes, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1024, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted via fax to
the attention of Jordan Younes at 703-305-2576 or via email to
[email protected]. Comments will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and
follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Jordan
Younes at 703-305-2935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Assessment of Mandatory Employment and Training (E&T)
Programs.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: 0584-XXXX.
Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: Section 17 [7 U.S.C. 2026] (a)(1) of the Food and
Nutrition Act of 2008, as amended, provides general legislative
authority for the planned data collection. It authorizes the Secretary
of Agriculture to enter into contracts with private institutions to
undertake research that will help to improve the administration and
effectiveness of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
in delivering nutrition-related benefits.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS) has funded the Assessment of Mandatory E&T Programs to examine
program features and administrative practices of mandatory State SNAP
E&T programs
[[Page 31717]]
and assess how those features and practices may affect E&T
participation, sanctions, and outcomes for mandatory E&T participants.
While the intent of the mandatory E&T program is to assist SNAP
participants in ``gaining skills, trainings, or experience that will
increase their ability to obtain regular employment,'' little is known
about whether or how specific E&T processes and services affect a
participant's likelihood of participating or being sanctioned. In
particular, little is known on whether complex intake or referral
processes, rather than a lack of interest in participating in E&T, may
negatively impact participation in mandatory programs. This study also
seeks to understand what data exists on how well mandatory programs
help SNAP participants gain skills, certificates, and credentials as
well as stable, good-paying jobs. The findings from this study will
identify lessons learned and best practices for operating mandatory E&T
programs.
To address these issues, FNS is conducting a study to accomplish
three objectives:
1. Understand the process for screening and notifying participants
and enrolling them in mandatory E&T programs.
2. Determine the main reasons why mandatory E&T participants are
sanctioned, with particular attention to program drop-off points that
result in sanctions.
3. Assess how well mandatory programs help SNAP E&T participants
gain skills, certificates, and credentials; gain stable, well-paying
employment; and move toward economic self-sufficiency.
The study will gather data through site visits to six States
operating mandatory E&T programs and from administrative caseload data.
Data will be collected in each of the six study States through: (1)
Interviews with the State SNAP director and E&T manager; (2) in-person
interviews, process-mapping group discussions, and observations at two
local SNAP offices; and (3) in-person interviews and observations at
three local E&T providers. These data will provide information on
overall State policies, client flow through the process, and staff
perspectives on the effects of different practices on participation and
sanctions. SNAP administrative caseload data will also be requested
from the six study States, and if available, from E&T providers to
obtain quantitative data to complement the interviews. Administrative
data will be used to examine the characteristics of mandatory E&T
participants in each State and to assess the E&T services, sanctions,
case closures, and other outcomes associated with their E&T
participation.
Affected Public: (1) State, Local and Tribal Governments; (2)
Business or Other For-Profit; and (3) Not-For-Profit.
Respondent groups identified include:
1. State, Local, and Tribal Government: State SNAP directors, State
E&T managers, State database administrators, and State E&T provider
staff and database administrators in six study States \1\; and Local
SNAP office staff in six study States;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The study assumes information will be collected from 6
States. Information will be collected from 1 State SNAP agency per
State for a total of 6 State offices; 2 local SNAP offices per State
for a total of 12 local offices; and 3 E&T providers per State for a
total of 18 E&T provider organizations. The 3 E&T providers are
assumed to be a mix of State, Business or Other For-Profit, and Not-
For-Profit organizations (i.e., 1 State, 1 For-Profit, and 1 Not-
For-Profit E&T provider per State). Interviews will be conducted
with all 3 of the E&T providers in each State (i.e., interviews will
be conducted with staff at a total of 18 E&T providers), but only 1
of the 3 E&T providers will provide administrative data in each
State (i.e., data files will be obtained from a total of 6 E&T
providers comprised of 2 State, 2 Business, and 2 Not-For-Profit E&T
providers). The 3 E&T providers in each State will indicate which 1
will provide administrative data in the initial contact with the E&T
provider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Business or Other For-Profit: Business E&T provider staff and
database administrators in six study States;
3. Not-For-Profit: Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff and database
administrators in six study States
Note that the E&T providers are assumed to be a mix of State,
Business or Other For-Profit, and Not-For-Profit organizations (i.e., 1
State, 1 For-Profit, and 1 Not-For-Profit E&T provider per State).
Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated number of
respondents is 147 (includes 101 State and Local Government staff, 23
Business or Other For-Profit staff, and 23 Not-For-Profit staff). Out
of the 147 contacted, 138 are estimated to be responsive and 9 are
estimated to be nonresponsive. The breakout is as follows:
1. 101 State and Local Government staff: (out of 12 State SNAP
staff contacted, 12 are estimated to be responsive; out of 6 State
database administrators contacted, 6 are estimated to be responsive;
out of 23 State E&T provider staff contacted, 20 are estimated to be
responsive; out of 60 Local office staff contacted, 60 are estimated to
be responsive.)
2. 23 Business or Other For-Profit staff: (out of 23 Business E&T
provider staff contacted, 20 are estimated to be responsive.)
3. 23 Not-For-Profit staff: (out of 23 Not-For-Profit E&T provider
staff contacted, 20 are estimated to be responsive.)
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.5714 (based on 231
total annual responses (222 responsive and 9 nonresponsive) made by the
147 respondents (138 responsive and 9 nonresponsive). See table below
for the estimated number of responses per respondent for each type of
respondent.
The breakout is as follows:
1. State SNAP Staff: The estimated number of responses per State
SNAP staff is 1.5:
6 State SNAP directors will respond to advance materials
and scheduling; the same 6 State SNAP directors plus 6 additional State
E&T managers will take part in an interview.
2. State Database Administrators: The estimated number of responses
per State Database Administrator is two:
6 State SNAP database administrators will respond to
advance materials and scheduling; the same 6 State SNAP database
administrators will submit an administrative data file.
3. State E&T Provider Staff: The estimated number of responses per
State E&T provider staff is 1.4:
6 State E&T provider staff will respond to advance
materials and scheduling, the same 6 E&T provider staff plus 12
additional E&T provider staff will take part in an interview (3 other
State E&T provider staff will not respond).
2 State E&T provider database administrators will respond
to advance materials and scheduling; the same 2 State SNAP database
administrators will submit an administrative data file.
4. Local SNAP Office Staff: The estimated number of responses per
Local SNAP office staff is 1.8:
12 Local SNAP office staff will respond to advance
materials and scheduling, the same 12 Local SNAP office staff plus 24
additional Local SNAP office staff will take part in an interview; 36
of the Local SNAP office staff plus 24 additional Local SNAP office
staff will take part in a group mapping exercise.
5. Business E&T Provider Staff: The estimated number of responses
per Business E&T provider staff is 1.4:
6 Business E&T provider staff will respond to advance
materials and scheduling, the same 6 Business E&T provider staff plus
12 additional Business E&T provider staff will take part in an
interview (3 other Business E&T provider staff will not respond).
2 Business E&T provider database administrators will
respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same 2
[[Page 31718]]
Business SNAP database administrators will submit an administrative
data file.
6. Not-For-Profit E&T Provider Staff: The estimated number of
responses per Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff is 1.4:
6 Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff will respond to
advance materials and scheduling, the same 6 Not-For-Profit E&T
provider staff plus 12 additional Not-For-Profit E&T provider staff
will take part in an interview (3 other Not-For-Profit E&T provider
staff will not respond).
2 Not-For-Profit E&T provider database administrators will
respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same 2 Not-For-Profit
SNAP database administrators will submit an administrative data file.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 230.9958 (222 annual responses
for responsive participants and 9 annual responses for nonresponsive
participants).
Estimated Time per Response: 1.33047619 hours (1.38239 hours for
responsive participants and 0.45 hours for nonresponsive participants).
The estimated time of response varies from 0.05 hours to 8.7 hours
depending on respondent group and activity, as shown in the table
below.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 307.34 hours (306.89
hours for responsive participants, and 0.45 hours for nonresponsive
participants). See the table below for estimated total annual burden
for each type of respondent.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
[[Page 31719]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JY18.000
[[Page 31720]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JY18.001
[[Page 31721]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JY18.002
[[Page 31722]]
Dated: June 28, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-14538 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C
