Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order To Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board, 31477-31479 [2018-14507]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
of referendum would be issued, and
growers would be provided the
opportunity to vote for or against the
proposed amendments. Information
about the referendum, including dates
and voter eligibility requirements,
would be published in a future issue of
the Federal Register. A final rule would
then be issued to effectuate any
amendments favored by growers
participating in the referendum.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
General Findings
The findings hereinafter set forth are
supplementary to the findings and
determinations which were previously
made in connection with the issuance of
Marketing Order 981; and all said
previous findings and determinations
are hereby ratified and affirmed, except
insofar as such findings and
determinations may be in conflict with
the findings and determinations set
forth herein.
1. Marketing Order 981 as hereby
proposed to be amended and all of the
terms and conditions thereof, would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act;
2. Marketing Order 981 as hereby
proposed to be amended regulates the
handling of almonds grown in
California and is applicable only to
persons in the respective classes of
commercial and industrial activity
specified in the Marketing Order;
3. Marketing Order 981 as hereby
proposed to be amended is limited in
application to the smallest regional
production area which is practicable,
consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several marketing orders
applicable to subdivisions of the
production area would not effectively
carry out the declared policy of the Act;
4. Marketing Order 981 as hereby
proposed to be amended prescribes,
insofar as practicable, such different
terms applicable to different parts of the
production area as are necessary to give
due recognition to the differences in the
production and marketing of almonds
produced or packed in the production
area; and
5. All handling of almonds produced
or packed in the production area as
defined in Marketing Order 981 is in the
current of interstate or foreign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Jul 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to these proposals. Any comments
received on the amendments proposed
in this proposed rule will be analyzed,
and if AMS determines to proceed based
on all the information presented, a
grower referendum would be conducted
to determine grower support for the
proposed amendments. If appropriate, a
final rule would then be issued to
effectuate the amendments favored by
growers participating in the referendum.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Amend § 981.32 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) and adding paragraph
(a)(3) to read as follows:
■
§ 981.32
Nominations.
(a) Method. (1) Each year the terms of
office of three of the members elected
pursuant to § 981.31(a) and (b) shall
expire, except every third year when the
term of office for two of those members
shall expire. Nominees for each
respective member and alternate
member shall be chosen by ballot
delivered to the Board. Nominees
chosen by the Board in this manner
shall be submitted by the Board to the
Secretary on or before June 1 of each
year together with such information as
the Secretary may require. If a
nomination for any Board member or
alternate is not received by the Secretary
on or before June 1, the Secretary may
select such member or alternate from
persons belonging to the group to be
represented without nomination. The
Board shall mail to all handlers and
growers, other than the cooperative(s) of
record, the required ballots with all
necessary voting information including
the names of incumbents willing to
accept renomination, and, to such
growers, the name of any person
proposed for nomination in a petition
signed by at least 15 such growers and
filed with the Board on or before April
1. Distribution of ballots shall be
announced by press release, furnishing
pertinent information on balloting,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31477
issued by the Board through newspapers
and other publications having general
circulation in the almond producing
areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) The Board may recommend,
subject to the approval of the Secretary,
a change to the nomination method,
should the Board determine that a
revision is necessary.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 981.33 by revising the first
sentence of paragraphs (a) and (b),
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(c), and adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 981.33
Selection and term of office.
(a) Members and their respective
alternates for positions open on the
Board shall be selected by the Secretary
from persons nominated pursuant to
§ 981.32, or, at the discretion of the
Secretary, from other qualified persons,
for a term of office beginning August 1.
* * *
(b) The term of office of members of
the Board shall be for a period of three
years beginning on August 1 of the years
selected except where otherwise
provided. * * *
(c) * * * This limitation on tenure
shall not apply to alternate members.
(d) The Board may recommend,
subject to approval of the Secretary,
revisions to the start date for the term
of office of members of the Board.
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–14512 Filed 7–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1220
[Doc. No. AMS–LPS–18–0015]
Soybean Promotion and Research:
Amend the Order To Adjust
Representation on the United Soybean
Board
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
adjust the number of members on the
United Soybean Board (Board) to reflect
changes in production levels that have
occurred since the Board was last
reapportioned in 2015. As required by
the Soybean Promotion, Research, and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
31478
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Consumer Information Act (Act),
membership on the Board is reviewed
every 3 years and adjustments are made
accordingly. This proposed change
would result in an increase in Board
membership for five States, increasing
the total number of Board members from
73 to 78. These changes would be
reflected in the Soybean Promotion and
Research Order (Order) and would be
effective for the 2019 appointment
process.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments should be submitted on the
internet at www.regulations.gov or
Research and Promotion Division;
Livestock and Poultry Program;
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS);
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Room 2610–S, STOP 0251; 1400
Independence Avenue SW.;
Washington, DC 20250–0251. All
comments should reference the docket
number, the date and page number of
this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection at the above address during
regular business hours or at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Dinkel, (202) 720–0633,
Michael.Dinkel@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for
this action.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule was reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have a retroactive effect. This action
would not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 1971 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6306),
a person subject to the Order may file
a petition with USDA stating that the
Order, any provision of the Order, or
any obligation imposed in connection
with the Order is not in accordance with
the law and request a modification of
the Order or an exemption from the
Order. The petitioner is afforded the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After a hearing, USDA would
rule on the petition. The Act provides
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Jul 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
that district courts of the United States
in any district in which such person is
an inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, have jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition if
a complaint for this purpose is filed
within 20 days after the date of the entry
of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The purpose of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. AMS has
determined that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, as
defined by RFA, because it only adjusts
representation on the Board to reflect
changes in production levels that have
occurred since the Board was last
reapportioned in 2015. As such, these
changes will not have a significant
impact on persons subject to the
program.
There are an estimated 515,008
soybean producers and an estimated
10,000 first purchasers who collect the
assessment, most of whom would be
considered small businesses under the
criteria established by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) [13 CFR
121.201]. SBA defines small agricultural
producers as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements included in
7 CFR part 1220 were previously
approved by OMB and were assigned
control number 0581–0093.
Background and Proposed Changes
The Act (7 U.S.C. 6301–6311)
provides for the establishment of a
coordinated program of promotion and
research designed to strengthen the
soybean industry’s position in the
marketplace, and to maintain and
expand domestic and foreign markets
and uses for soybeans and soybean
products. The program is financed by an
assessment of 0.5 percent of the net
market price of soybeans sold by
producers. Pursuant to the Act, an Order
was made effective July 9, 1991. The
Order established an initial Board with
60 members. For purposes of
establishing the Board, the United States
was divided into 31 States and
geographical units. Representation on
the Board from each unit was
determined by the level of production in
each unit. The initial Board was
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
appointed on July 11, 1991. The Board
is composed of soybean producers.
Section 1220.201(c) of the Order
provides that at the end of each 3-year
period, the Board shall review soybean
production levels in the geographic
units throughout the United States. The
Board may recommend to the Secretary
of Agriculture (Secretary) modifications
in the levels of production necessary to
determine Board membership for each
unit.
Section 1220.201(d) of the Order
provides that at the end of each 3-year
period, the Secretary must review the
volume of production of each unit and
adjust the boundaries of any unit and
the number of Board members from
each such unit as necessary to conform
with the criteria set forth in
§ 1220.201(e): (1) To the extent
practicable, States with annual average
soybean production of less than 3
million bushels shall be grouped into
geographically contiguous units, each of
which has a combined production level
equal to or greater than 3 million
bushels, and each such group shall be
entitled to at least one member on the
Board; (2) units with at least 3 million
bushels, but fewer than 15 million
bushels shall be entitled to one board
member; (3) units with 15 million
bushels or more but fewer than 70
million bushels shall be entitled to two
Board members; (4) units with 70
million bushels or more but fewer than
200 million bushels shall be entitled to
three Board members; and (5) units with
200 million bushels or more shall be
entitled to four Board members.
The Board was last reapportioned in
2015. The total Board membership
increased from 70 to 73 members, with
Missouri, New Jersey, and Wisconsin
each gaining one additional member.
The final rule was published in the
Federal Register (80 FR 63909) on
October 22, 2015. This change was
effective with the 2016 appointments.
This proposed rule would increase
total membership on the Board from 73
to 78, based on production data for
years 2013–2017 (excluding the crops in
years in which production was the
highest and in which production was
the lowest) as reported by USDA’s
National Agricultural Statistics Service.
This change would not affect the
number of geographical units.
This proposed rule would adjust
representation on the Board as follows:
State
Alabama ............
Kentucky ...........
North Dakota ....
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Current
representation
Proposed
representation
1
2
3
2
3
4
31479
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Current
representation
State
Proposed
representation
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1220
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
South Dakota ....
3
4 research, Marketing agreements,
Tennessee ........
2
3 Soybeans and soybean products,
Reporting and recordkeeping
Board adjustments as proposed by
requirements.
this rulemaking would become effective,
For the reasons set forth in the
if adopted, with the 2019 appointment
preamble, it is proposed that Title 7,
process.
part 1220 be amended as follows:
PART 1220—SOYBEAN PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER
INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 1220
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301–6311 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
2. In § 1220.201, the table
immediately following paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 1220.201
Membership of board.
(a) * * *
Unit
Number of
members
South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ................................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ........................................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Alabama ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .............................................................................................................................................................................................
New York .............................................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Eastern Region (Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico) .............................................................................................................................................................
Western Region (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming .......................................................................................................................................................................
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 33
[FR Doc. 2018–14507 Filed 7–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0568; Notice No. 18–
02]
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2120–AK83
Medium Flocking Bird Test at Climb
Condition
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes the
addition of a new test requirement to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Jul 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1
1
the airworthiness regulation addressing
engine bird ingestion. The current
regulation ensures bird ingestion
capability of the turbofan engine fan
blades, but the existing test conditions
do not adequately demonstrate bird
ingestion capability of the engine core.
This proposed rule would require that,
to obtain certification of a turbofan
engine, a manufacturer must show that
the engine core can continue to operate
after ingesting a medium sized bird
while operating at a lower fan speed
associated with climb or landing. This
new requirement would ensure that
engines can ingest the largest medium
flocking bird required by the existing
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31477-31479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14507]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1220
[Doc. No. AMS-LPS-18-0015]
Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order To Adjust
Representation on the United Soybean Board
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would adjust the number of members on the
United Soybean Board (Board) to reflect changes in production levels
that have occurred since the Board was last reapportioned in 2015. As
required by the Soybean Promotion, Research, and
[[Page 31478]]
Consumer Information Act (Act), membership on the Board is reviewed
every 3 years and adjustments are made accordingly. This proposed
change would result in an increase in Board membership for five States,
increasing the total number of Board members from 73 to 78. These
changes would be reflected in the Soybean Promotion and Research Order
(Order) and would be effective for the 2019 appointment process.
DATES: Comments must be received by September 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments should be submitted on the
internet at www.regulations.gov or Research and Promotion Division;
Livestock and Poultry Program; Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS);
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Room 2610-S, STOP 0251; 1400
Independence Avenue SW.; Washington, DC 20250-0251. All comments should
reference the docket number, the date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection
at the above address during regular business hours or at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Dinkel, (202) 720-0633,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the review
process required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule was reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have a retroactive effect. This
action would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 1971 of the Act (7
U.S.C. 6306), a person subject to the Order may file a petition with
USDA stating that the Order, any provision of the Order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with the Order is not in accordance
with the law and request a modification of the Order or an exemption
from the Order. The petitioner is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After a hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that district courts of the United States in
any district in which such person is an inhabitant, or has his or her
principal place of business, have jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling
on the petition if a complaint for this purpose is filed within 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-
612) is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to
such actions so that small businesses will not be disproportionately
burdened. AMS has determined that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, as defined
by RFA, because it only adjusts representation on the Board to reflect
changes in production levels that have occurred since the Board was
last reapportioned in 2015. As such, these changes will not have a
significant impact on persons subject to the program.
There are an estimated 515,008 soybean producers and an estimated
10,000 first purchasers who collect the assessment, most of whom would
be considered small businesses under the criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) [13 CFR 121.201]. SBA defines small
agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the reporting and recordkeeping requirements included in 7
CFR part 1220 were previously approved by OMB and were assigned control
number 0581-0093.
Background and Proposed Changes
The Act (7 U.S.C. 6301-6311) provides for the establishment of a
coordinated program of promotion and research designed to strengthen
the soybean industry's position in the marketplace, and to maintain and
expand domestic and foreign markets and uses for soybeans and soybean
products. The program is financed by an assessment of 0.5 percent of
the net market price of soybeans sold by producers. Pursuant to the
Act, an Order was made effective July 9, 1991. The Order established an
initial Board with 60 members. For purposes of establishing the Board,
the United States was divided into 31 States and geographical units.
Representation on the Board from each unit was determined by the level
of production in each unit. The initial Board was appointed on July 11,
1991. The Board is composed of soybean producers.
Section 1220.201(c) of the Order provides that at the end of each
3-year period, the Board shall review soybean production levels in the
geographic units throughout the United States. The Board may recommend
to the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) modifications in the levels
of production necessary to determine Board membership for each unit.
Section 1220.201(d) of the Order provides that at the end of each
3-year period, the Secretary must review the volume of production of
each unit and adjust the boundaries of any unit and the number of Board
members from each such unit as necessary to conform with the criteria
set forth in Sec. 1220.201(e): (1) To the extent practicable, States
with annual average soybean production of less than 3 million bushels
shall be grouped into geographically contiguous units, each of which
has a combined production level equal to or greater than 3 million
bushels, and each such group shall be entitled to at least one member
on the Board; (2) units with at least 3 million bushels, but fewer than
15 million bushels shall be entitled to one board member; (3) units
with 15 million bushels or more but fewer than 70 million bushels shall
be entitled to two Board members; (4) units with 70 million bushels or
more but fewer than 200 million bushels shall be entitled to three
Board members; and (5) units with 200 million bushels or more shall be
entitled to four Board members.
The Board was last reapportioned in 2015. The total Board
membership increased from 70 to 73 members, with Missouri, New Jersey,
and Wisconsin each gaining one additional member. The final rule was
published in the Federal Register (80 FR 63909) on October 22, 2015.
This change was effective with the 2016 appointments.
This proposed rule would increase total membership on the Board
from 73 to 78, based on production data for years 2013-2017 (excluding
the crops in years in which production was the highest and in which
production was the lowest) as reported by USDA's National Agricultural
Statistics Service. This change would not affect the number of
geographical units.
This proposed rule would adjust representation on the Board as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Proposed
State representation representation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama................................. 1 2
Kentucky................................ 2 3
North Dakota............................ 3 4
[[Page 31479]]
South Dakota............................ 3 4
Tennessee............................... 2 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Board adjustments as proposed by this rulemaking would become
effective, if adopted, with the 2019 appointment process.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1220
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements, Soybeans and soybean products,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that
Title 7, part 1220 be amended as follows:
PART 1220--SOYBEAN PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 1220 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301-6311 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. In Sec. 1220.201, the table immediately following paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1220.201 Membership of board.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Unit members
------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Dakota........................................... 4
Ohio................................................... 4
North Dakota........................................... 4
Nebraska............................................... 4
Missouri............................................... 4
Minnesota.............................................. 4
Iowa................................................... 4
Indiana................................................ 4
Illinois............................................... 4
Wisconsin.............................................. 3
Tennessee.............................................. 3
Mississippi............................................ 3
Michigan............................................... 3
Kentucky............................................... 3
Kansas................................................. 3
Arkansas............................................... 3
Virginia............................................... 2
Pennsylvania........................................... 2
North Carolina......................................... 2
Maryland............................................... 2
Louisiana.............................................. 2
Alabama................................................ 2
Texas.................................................. 1
South Carolina......................................... 1
Oklahoma............................................... 1
New York............................................... 1
New Jersey............................................. 1
Georgia................................................ 1
Delaware............................................... 1
Eastern Region (Connecticut, Florida, Maine, 1
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont,
West Virginia, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).
Western Region (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, 1
Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon,
Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-14507 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P