Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Action on Single Source Orders and Revision to Definitions, 31513-31514 [2018-14371]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 28, 2018.
Anne Idsal,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2018–14493 Filed 7–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0442; FRL–9980–
11—Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire;
Action on Single Source Orders and
Revision to Definitions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Jul 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of New
Hampshire. The revisions incorporate a
single source order into the New
Hampshire SIP, remove a previously
approved order from the SIP, and
approve various definitions used within
New Hampshire’s air pollution control
regulations. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 6, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2017–0442 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
mcconnell.robert@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31513
Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs
Branch (Mail Code OEP05–02), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite
100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109–
3912; (617) 918–1046;
mcconnell.robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Description and Review of Submittals
a. Order for the Diacom Corporation
b. Withdrawal of Order for the Kalwall
Corporation
c. Revisions to Env-A 101, Definitions
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On July 24, 2017, the New Hampshire
Air Resources Division (ARD) submitted
a revision to its SIP consisting of an
order establishing reasonably available
control technology (RACT) requirements
for the Diacom Corporation. On June 22,
2017, the New Hampshire ARD
submitted a SIP revision that requested
removal from the SIP of a previously
approved RACT order for the Kalwall
Corporation. On November 14, 2003, the
New Hampshire ARD submitted a
number of SIP revision requests to EPA,
including a request to revise its set of
definitions used within its air pollution
control regulations. We are proposing to
approve these three SIP revision
requests for the reasons stated below.
II. Description and Review of
Submittals
a. Order for the Diacom Corporation
On July 24, 2017, the New Hampshire
ARD submitted to EPA as a SIP revision
request order RO–0002 establishing
RACT requirements to limit emissions
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
for the Diacom Corporation located in
Amherst, New Hampshire. The Diacom
Corporation requested a source-specific
RACT order for VOCs for an adhesives
process that requires use of a high
solvent-based product necessary to
obtain an extremely thin, monomolecular layer of adhesive onto fabrics
used in the production of diaphragms
for the aerospace, automotive, medical,
and food processing industries.
Diacom’s request included a technical
justification and an evaluation of
capture and control device technologies
that were evaluated. No cost effective
capture and control technologies were
uncovered from the evaluation. New
Hampshire reviewed and concurred
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
31514
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
with the facilities request, and on June
28, 2017, issued Order No. RO–0002 to
the Diacom Corporation. Order No. RO–
0002 includes a 15 tons per year cap for
VOC emissions, a VOC content limit for
adhesives used by the facility,
requirements for how the adhesives
shall be applied, work practice
standards, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements. We are
proposing approval of the order into the
New Hampshire SIP because it is
consistent with CAA requirements for
VOC RACT and with New Hampshire’s
Chapter Env-A 1200, VOC RACT
regulation.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
b. Withdrawal of Order for the Kalwall
Corporation
New Hampshire ARD previously
submitted, and EPA previously
approved, a VOC RACT order for the
Kalwall Corporation. See 63 FR 11600,
March 10, 1998. More recently, EPA
approved a minor update to this order,
referred to by NH ARD as order ARD–
99–001, on November 5, 2012. See 77
FR 66388. Subsequently, NH ARD
adopted VOC control requirements
within Env-A 1200 that regulate the
activity described within the previously
approved VOC RACT order. On June 22,
2017, the NH ARD submitted a SIP
revision requesting that the previously
approved order for the Kalwall
Corporation be removed from the New
Hampshire SIP. New Hampshire’s
submittal indicated this request was
made primarily because requirements
within Env-A 1212, Miscellaneous
Metal and Plastic Parts and Products,
which EPA approved into the New
Hampshire SIP on November 8, 2012 (77
FR 66922), cover all of the coating and
adhesives emission limits contained
within Kalwall’s VOC RACT order.
Therefore, New Hampshire ARD
requested that the VOC RACT order
issued to Kalwall Corporation be
removed from the SIP. We are proposing
approval of the State’s request.
c. Revisions to Env-A 101, Definitions
On November 14, 2003, the New
Hampshire ARD submitted a number of
SIP revision requests to EPA that
included revisions to Env-A 101,
Definitions. Although New Hampshire
ARD subsequently withdrew the
majority of the SIP revision requests
made on November 14, 2003, the
request to amend Env-A 101,
Definitions, was not withdrawn, and we
are proposing to approve that request
within this action. The revision consists
of the addition of definitions for the
terms coal, consignment, crude oil,
major fuel company, manufactured gas,
and used oil, and minor revisions to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Jul 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
existing definitions for acute fuel
shortage, blended fuel, conforming fuel,
fuel supplier, and major fuel company.
These revisions help to clarify the
meaning of these terms as used within
New Hampshire’s air pollution control
regulations and therefore we are
proposing approval of them into the
SIP-approved version of New
Hampshire’s Env-A 101, Definitions.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the New
Hampshire SIP revision requests
described above. The SIP revisions meet
section 110(l) of the CAA because the
revisions will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this notice or on
other relevant matters. These comments
will be considered before taking final
action. Interested parties may
participate in the Federal rulemaking
procedure by submitting written
comments to this proposed rule by
following the instructions listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this Federal
Register.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
order RO–0002, dated June 28, 2017,
issued to the Diacom Corporation, and
the eleven definitions identified within
section III of this proposal. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• This action is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant
under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 28, 2018.
Alexandra Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2018–14371 Filed 7–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31513-31514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14371]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0442; FRL-9980-11--Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Action on Single Source Orders
and Revision to Definitions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of New Hampshire. The revisions incorporate a single source order
into the New Hampshire SIP, remove a previously approved order from the
SIP, and approve various definitions used within New Hampshire's air
pollution control regulations. This action is being taken under the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 6, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2017-0442 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly available
docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post
Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square,
Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109-3912; (617) 918-1046;
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Description and Review of Submittals
a. Order for the Diacom Corporation
b. Withdrawal of Order for the Kalwall Corporation
c. Revisions to Env-A 101, Definitions
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On July 24, 2017, the New Hampshire Air Resources Division (ARD)
submitted a revision to its SIP consisting of an order establishing
reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for the
Diacom Corporation. On June 22, 2017, the New Hampshire ARD submitted a
SIP revision that requested removal from the SIP of a previously
approved RACT order for the Kalwall Corporation. On November 14, 2003,
the New Hampshire ARD submitted a number of SIP revision requests to
EPA, including a request to revise its set of definitions used within
its air pollution control regulations. We are proposing to approve
these three SIP revision requests for the reasons stated below.
II. Description and Review of Submittals
a. Order for the Diacom Corporation
On July 24, 2017, the New Hampshire ARD submitted to EPA as a SIP
revision request order RO-0002 establishing RACT requirements to limit
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the Diacom
Corporation located in Amherst, New Hampshire. The Diacom Corporation
requested a source-specific RACT order for VOCs for an adhesives
process that requires use of a high solvent-based product necessary to
obtain an extremely thin, mono-molecular layer of adhesive onto fabrics
used in the production of diaphragms for the aerospace, automotive,
medical, and food processing industries. Diacom's request included a
technical justification and an evaluation of capture and control device
technologies that were evaluated. No cost effective capture and control
technologies were uncovered from the evaluation. New Hampshire reviewed
and concurred
[[Page 31514]]
with the facilities request, and on June 28, 2017, issued Order No. RO-
0002 to the Diacom Corporation. Order No. RO-0002 includes a 15 tons
per year cap for VOC emissions, a VOC content limit for adhesives used
by the facility, requirements for how the adhesives shall be applied,
work practice standards, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
We are proposing approval of the order into the New Hampshire SIP
because it is consistent with CAA requirements for VOC RACT and with
New Hampshire's Chapter Env-A 1200, VOC RACT regulation.
b. Withdrawal of Order for the Kalwall Corporation
New Hampshire ARD previously submitted, and EPA previously
approved, a VOC RACT order for the Kalwall Corporation. See 63 FR
11600, March 10, 1998. More recently, EPA approved a minor update to
this order, referred to by NH ARD as order ARD-99-001, on November 5,
2012. See 77 FR 66388. Subsequently, NH ARD adopted VOC control
requirements within Env-A 1200 that regulate the activity described
within the previously approved VOC RACT order. On June 22, 2017, the NH
ARD submitted a SIP revision requesting that the previously approved
order for the Kalwall Corporation be removed from the New Hampshire
SIP. New Hampshire's submittal indicated this request was made
primarily because requirements within Env-A 1212, Miscellaneous Metal
and Plastic Parts and Products, which EPA approved into the New
Hampshire SIP on November 8, 2012 (77 FR 66922), cover all of the
coating and adhesives emission limits contained within Kalwall's VOC
RACT order. Therefore, New Hampshire ARD requested that the VOC RACT
order issued to Kalwall Corporation be removed from the SIP. We are
proposing approval of the State's request.
c. Revisions to Env-A 101, Definitions
On November 14, 2003, the New Hampshire ARD submitted a number of
SIP revision requests to EPA that included revisions to Env-A 101,
Definitions. Although New Hampshire ARD subsequently withdrew the
majority of the SIP revision requests made on November 14, 2003, the
request to amend Env-A 101, Definitions, was not withdrawn, and we are
proposing to approve that request within this action. The revision
consists of the addition of definitions for the terms coal,
consignment, crude oil, major fuel company, manufactured gas, and used
oil, and minor revisions to the existing definitions for acute fuel
shortage, blended fuel, conforming fuel, fuel supplier, and major fuel
company. These revisions help to clarify the meaning of these terms as
used within New Hampshire's air pollution control regulations and
therefore we are proposing approval of them into the SIP-approved
version of New Hampshire's Env-A 101, Definitions.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the New Hampshire SIP revision requests
described above. The SIP revisions meet section 110(l) of the CAA
because the revisions will not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or
any other applicable requirement of the CAA. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in this notice or on other relevant
matters. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure
by submitting written comments to this proposed rule by following the
instructions listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference order RO-0002, dated June 28, 2017, issued to the Diacom
Corporation, and the eleven definitions identified within section III
of this proposal. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available through www.regulations.gov.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 28, 2018.
Alexandra Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2018-14371 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P