Dispositioning of Technical Specifications That Are Insufficient To Ensure Plant Safety, 31429-31430 [2018-14379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2018 / Notices
destruction of the identified records is
administrative in nature and does not
involve information or activities that
could potentially impact the common
defense and security of the United
States.
The purpose for the recordkeeping
regulations is to assist the NRC in
carrying out its mission to protect the
public health and safety by ensuring
that the licensing and design basis of the
facility is understood, documented,
preserved and retrievable in such a way
that will aid the NRC in determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and
examining facts following an incident.
Since the Oyster Creek SSCs that were
safety-related or important to safety
have been or will be removed from the
licensing basis and removed from the
plant, the staff agrees that the records
identified in the exemption request will
no longer be required to achieve the
underlying purpose of the records
retention rule.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the exemptions are authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and are
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants the
Exelon, a partial exemption from the
recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
for Oyster Creek only to the extent
necessary to allow the licensee to
advance the schedule to remove records
associated with SSCs that have been or
will be removed from NRC licensing
basis documents through appropriate
change mechanism (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59
or via NRC-approved license
amendment request, as applicable.
This exemption is effective upon
submittal of the licensee’s certification
of permanent fuel removal, under
§ 50.82(a)(1).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this
26th day of June, 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter, Director,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2018–14391 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Jul 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2018–0137]
Dispositioning of Technical
Specifications That Are Insufficient To
Ensure Plant Safety
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft regulatory guide; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment draft regulatory guide (DG),
DG–1351, ‘‘Dispositioning of Technical
Specifications that are Insufficient to
Ensure Plant Safety.’’ This DG proposes
new guidance that describes methods
and procedures that are acceptable to
the (NRC) staff for dispositioning of
technical specifications (TS) that are
insufficient to ensure power plant
safety.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments by September
4, 2018. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0137. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer
Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127;
email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office
of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blake Purnell, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation; telephone: 301–415–1380,
email: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov or
Stephen Burton, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research; telephone: 301–
415–7000, email: Stephen.Burton@
nrc.gov. Both are staff of the U.S.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31429
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–
0137 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0137.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. DG–
1351, ‘‘Dispositioning of Technical
Specifications that are Insufficient to
Ensure Plant Safety,’’ is available in
ADAMS under Accession
ML18086A690.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2018–
0137 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
31430
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2018 / Notices
II. Additional Information
The NRC is issuing for public
comment a DG in the NRC’s ‘‘Regulatory
Guide’’ series. This series was
developed to describe and make
available to the public information
regarding methods that are acceptable to
the NRC staff for implementing specific
parts of the NRC’s regulations,
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific issues or postulated
events, and data that the staff needs in
its review of applications for permits
and licenses.
The DG, entitled ‘‘Dispositioning of
Technical Specifications that are
Insufficient to Ensure Plant Safety,’’ is a
proposed new guide temporarily
identified by its task number, DG–1351.
DG–1351 proposes new guidance that
describes methods and procedures that
are acceptable to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff for
dispositioning of technical
specifications (TS) that are insufficient
to ensure power plant safety.
This DG proposes guidance to
licensees for compliance with the TS
requirements in section 50.36 of title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), the reporting requirements in 10
CFR 50.72 and 50.73, and the quality
assurance requirements in Criterion XVI
of 10 CFR part 50, appendix B. This DG
proposes to endorse NEI 15–03,
Revision 2, with exceptions and
clarifications.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
If finalized, this DG would endorse,
with certain clarifications, NEI 15–03,
Revision 2, which describes methods
and procedures for dispositioning of TS
that are insufficient to ensure power
plant safety. Issuance of this DG, if
finalized, would not constitute
backfitting as defined in 10 CFR 50.109
(the Backfit Rule) and would not
otherwise be inconsistent with the issue
finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. As
discussed in the ‘‘Implementation’’
section of this DG, the NRC has no
current intention to impose this
guidance on holders of current
operating licenses or combined licenses.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of June 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ruth Reyes-Maldonado,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guidance and
Generic Issues Branch, Division of
Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory
Research.
[FR Doc. 2018–14379 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Jul 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Submission for Review: CyberCorps®:
Scholarship for Service (SFS)
Registration website
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM), Human Resources
Solutions Division, offers the general
public and other Federal agencies the
opportunity to comment on an existing
information collection request (ICR)
3206–0246, SFS Registration. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, as amended by the ClingerCohen Act, OPM is soliciting comments
for this collection. The information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register on December 11,
2017, page 58227 allowing for a 60-day
public comment period. No comments
were received for this information
collection. The purpose of this notice is
to allow an additional 30 days for public
comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until August 6, 2018.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management Budget,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Office of Personnel Management or sent
via email to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
copy of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by contacting the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management Budget, 725 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503,
Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of
Personnel Management or sent via email
to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or
faxed to (202) 395–6974. Please contact
Sara Kunkle at 202–553–1334 if you
have any questions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget is
particularly interested in comments
that:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
The SFS Program was established by
the National Science Foundation, in
collaboration with the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management and the
Department of Homeland Security, in
accordance with the Cybersecurity
Enhancement Act of 2014 (Pub. L. No:
113–274). This initiative reflects the
critical need for Information Technology
(IT) professionals, industrial control
system security professionals, and
security managers in Federal, State,
local and tribal governments. Students
identified by their institutions for SFS
Scholarships must meet selection
criteria based on prior academic
performance, likelihood of success in
obtaining the degree, and suitability for
government employment. Upon
graduation, scholarship recipients are
required to work a period equal to the
length of their scholarship in Federal,
State, Local or Tribal Government or in
other approved organization as
cybersecurity professionals. Approval of
the web page is necessary to facilitate
the timely registration, selection and
placement of program-enrolled students
in Government agencies.
Analysis
Agency: CyberCorps®: Scholarship for
Service Program Staff Acquisition,
Office of Personnel Management.
Title: Scholarship for Service (SFS)
Program internet Site.
OMB Number: 3206–0246.
Affected Public: Individual or
Households.
Number of Respondents: 900.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1
hour.
Total Burden Hours: 900 hours.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Jeff T.H. Pon,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2018–14447 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–43–P
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31429-31430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2018-0137]
Dispositioning of Technical Specifications That Are Insufficient
To Ensure Plant Safety
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft regulatory guide; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for
public comment draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-1351, ``Dispositioning
of Technical Specifications that are Insufficient to Ensure Plant
Safety.'' This DG proposes new guidance that describes methods and
procedures that are acceptable to the (NRC) staff for dispositioning of
technical specifications (TS) that are insufficient to ensure power
plant safety.
DATES: Submit comments by September 4, 2018. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date. Although a time limit is given, comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in guides currently being developed
or improvements in all published guides are encouraged at any time.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0137. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287-
9127; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this document.
Mail comments to: May Ma, Office of Administration, Mail
Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blake Purnell, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation; telephone: 301-415-1380, email:
[email protected] or Stephen Burton, Office of Nuclear Regulatory
Research; telephone: 301-415-7000, email: [email protected]. Both
are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0137 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0137.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. DG-
1351, ``Dispositioning of Technical Specifications that are
Insufficient to Ensure Plant Safety,'' is available in ADAMS under
Accession ML18086A690.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2018-0137 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
[[Page 31430]]
II. Additional Information
The NRC is issuing for public comment a DG in the NRC's
``Regulatory Guide'' series. This series was developed to describe and
make available to the public information regarding methods that are
acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the
NRC's regulations, techniques that the staff uses in evaluating
specific issues or postulated events, and data that the staff needs in
its review of applications for permits and licenses.
The DG, entitled ``Dispositioning of Technical Specifications that
are Insufficient to Ensure Plant Safety,'' is a proposed new guide
temporarily identified by its task number, DG-1351. DG-1351 proposes
new guidance that describes methods and procedures that are acceptable
to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff for
dispositioning of technical specifications (TS) that are insufficient
to ensure power plant safety.
This DG proposes guidance to licensees for compliance with the TS
requirements in section 50.36 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), the reporting requirements in 10 CFR 50.72 and
50.73, and the quality assurance requirements in Criterion XVI of 10
CFR part 50, appendix B. This DG proposes to endorse NEI 15-03,
Revision 2, with exceptions and clarifications.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
If finalized, this DG would endorse, with certain clarifications,
NEI 15-03, Revision 2, which describes methods and procedures for
dispositioning of TS that are insufficient to ensure power plant
safety. Issuance of this DG, if finalized, would not constitute
backfitting as defined in 10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) and would
not otherwise be inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10
CFR part 52. As discussed in the ``Implementation'' section of this DG,
the NRC has no current intention to impose this guidance on holders of
current operating licenses or combined licenses.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of June 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ruth Reyes-Maldonado,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Guidance and Generic Issues Branch, Division
of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2018-14379 Filed 7-3-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P