Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Nontrawl Lead Level 2 Observers, 30528-30533 [2018-14071]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
30528
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
injury. The means of protection must
take into consideration a range of stature
from a two-year-old child to a 95th
percentile male. The inflatable lap belt
must provide a consistent approach to
energy absorption throughout that range
of occupants. In addition, the following
situations must be considered.
The seat occupant is:
• Holding an infant
• a child in a child-restraint device
• a child not using a child-restraint
device
• a pregnant woman
2. The inflatable lap belt must provide
adequate protection for each occupant
regardless of the number of occupants of
the seat assembly, considering that
unoccupied seats may have an active
airbag system in the lap belt.
3. The design must prevent the
inflatable lap belt from being either
incorrectly buckled or incorrectly
installed such that the inflatable lap belt
would not properly deploy.
Alternatively, it must be shown that
such deployment is not hazardous to the
occupant, and will provide the required
head-injury protection.
4. The inflatable lap-belt system must
be shown not to be susceptible to
inadvertent deployment as a result of
wear and tear, or inertial loads resulting
from in-flight or ground maneuvers
(including gusts and hard landings),
likely to be experienced in service.
5. Deployment of the inflatable lap
belt must not introduce injury
mechanisms to the seated occupant, nor
result in injuries that could impede
rapid egress. This assessment should
include an occupant who is in the brace
position when it deploys, and an
occupant whose inflatable lap belt is
loosely fastened.
6. An inadvertent deployment that
could cause injury to a standing or
sitting person must be shown to be
improbable.
7. It must be shown that inadvertent
deployment of the airbag system in the
lap belt, during the most critical part of
the flight, either will not cause a hazard
to the airplane or its occupants, or meets
the requirement of § 25.1309(b).
8. The inflatable lap belt must be
shown to not impede rapid egress of
occupants 10 seconds after its
deployment.
9. The inflatable lap-belt system must
be protected from lightning and HIRF.
The threats specified in existing
regulations regarding lightning,
§ 25.1316, and HIRF, § 25.1317, are
incorporated by reference for the
purpose of measuring lightning and
HIRF protection. For the purposes of
complying with HIRF requirements, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
inflatable lap-belt system is considered
a ‘‘critical system’’ if its deployment
could have a hazardous effect on the
airplane; otherwise it is considered an
‘‘essential’’ system.
10. The inflatable lap belt must
function properly after loss of normal
airplane electrical power, and after a
transverse separation of the fuselage at
the most critical location. A separation
at the location of the lap belt does not
have to be considered.
11. The inflatable lap belt must be
shown to not release hazardous
quantities of gas or particulate matter
into the cabin.
12. The inflatable lap-belt installation
must be protected from the effects of fire
such that no hazard to occupants will
result.
13. A means must be available for a
crewmember to verify the integrity of
the inflatable-lap-belt-activation system
prior to each flight, or it must be
demonstrated to reliably operate
between inspection intervals.
14. The inflatable material may not
have an average burn rate of greater than
2.5 inches per minute when tested using
the horizontal-flammability test as
defined in 14 CFR part 25, appendix F,
section I(b)(5).
15. The airbag system in the lap belt,
once deployed, must not adversely
affect the emergency-lighting system
(i.e., block floor-proximity lights to the
extent that the lights no longer meet
their intended function).
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on June
25, 2018.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy
and Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–13999 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 902
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 170621579–8522–02]
RIN 0648–BG96
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Nontrawl Lead Level
2 Observers
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NMFS issues regulations to
modify specific provisions of the North
Pacific Observer Program. The first two
elements of this final rule implement
requirements for an observer to obtain a
nontrawl lead level 2 (LL2) deployment
endorsement and implement a precruise meeting requirement for vessels
required to carry an observer with a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement.
These two elements are intended to
increase the number of observers that
qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement and maintain observer
safety and data quality. The third
element of this final rule removes
duplicative and unnecessary reporting
requirements and makes minor changes
to reduce observer requirements for
specific vessels when participating in
the Western Alaska Community
Development Quota (CDQ) Program.
This action is intended to promote the
goals and objectives of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska, and the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area, and other applicable
law.
DATES: Effective July 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and the
Categorical Exclusion prepared for this
action are available from
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region website at
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. All public
comment letters submitted during the
comment period may be obtained from
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
NOAA-NMFS-2017-0071.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this final rule
may be submitted by mail to NMFS
Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802–1668, Attn: Ellen Sebastian,
Records Officer; in person at NMFS
Alaska Region, 709 West 9th Street,
Room 420A, Juneau, AK; and to OIRA
by email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alicia M Miller, (907) 586–7228 or
alicia.m.miller@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone
under the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA
FMP) and under the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (BSAI FMP). The
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) prepared the FMPs
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations
governing U.S. fisheries and
implementing the FMPs appear at 50
CFR parts 600 and 679.
NMFS published the proposed rule
for this action on December 27, 2017 (82
FR 61243), with comments invited
through January 26, 2018.
NMFS received five comment letters
during the applicable comment period.
Four of these comment letters were on
topics that were outside the scope of
this action. One comment letter
addressed the proposed rule and
contained five substantive comments
which are summarized and responded
to under the heading ‘‘Response to
Comments’’ below.
A detailed review of the provisions of
the regulations to modify specific
provisions of the North Pacific Observer
Program (Observer Program) and the
rationale for these regulations are
provided in the preamble to the
proposed rule (82 FR 61243, December
27, 2017) and are briefly summarized in
this final rule.
Background
Regulations at subpart E of 50 CFR
part 679 require that most vessels
fishing for groundfish or halibut must
carry an observer for some or all fishing
activities to ensure the collection of data
necessary to manage the groundfish and
halibut fisheries.
The Observer Program is an integral
component in the management of North
Pacific fisheries. The Observer Program
has two observer coverage categories:
Partial and full. Regulations at 50 CFR
679.51 require vessels and processors in
the full coverage category to carry an
observer at all times when fish are
caught or processed. This final rule
affects catcher/processors in the full
coverage category (i.e., vessels that catch
and process their own catch at-sea), and
all motherships (i.e., those vessels that
receive unsorted catch from other
vessels and process that catch at-sea).
Owners of vessels or processors in the
full coverage category must contract
directly with a permitted observer
provider and pay for required observer
coverage. Two groups of vessels are
required to carry an observer with a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement.
The first group of vessels includes
vessels named on a License Limitation
Program license with a Pacific cod
catcher/processor hook-and-line
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
endorsement for the Bering Sea,
Aleutian Islands, or both the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands (BSAI). These
vessels are subject to monitoring
requirements at 50 CFR 679.100 and are
referred to as ‘‘freezer longline vessels’’
throughout this final rule. Pursuant to
50 CFR 679.100, a freezer longline
vessel must carry an observer with a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement
when the vessel (1) operates in either
the BSAI or Gulf of Alaska groundfish
fisheries and directed fishing for Pacific
cod is open in the BSAI, or (2) when the
vessel participates in the CDQ
groundfish fisheries. These monitoring
requirements for freezer longline vessels
were implemented in 2012 and require
freezer longline vessel owners and
operators to select between one of two
monitoring options: Either carry two
observers so that all catch can be
sampled, or carry one observer and use
a motion-compensated flow scale to
weigh Pacific cod before it is processed.
Both monitoring options require the
vessel to carry one observer endorsed as
a nontrawl LL2 observer (77 FR 59053;
September 26, 2012).
The second group of vessels that is
required to carry an observer with a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement
includes catcher/processors that use pot
gear when participating in the CDQ
groundfish fisheries (groundfish CDQ
fishing) (77 FR 6492; February 8, 2012).
These pot catcher/processors are
required to carry an observer with a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement
when groundfish CDQ fishing and may
participate in other fisheries that do not
require a nontrawl LL2 observer.
Regulations at 50 CFR 679.32 describe
the specific monitoring requirements for
vessels when participating in the
sablefish CDQ, pollock CDQ, and other
groundfish CDQ fisheries.
Since 2014, observer providers
contracted by vessels in the full
coverage category have reported that
they have been unable to create and
retain an adequate pool of qualified
nontrawl LL2 observers resulting in a
diminishing pool of qualified observers
employed by those observer providers.
The requirements in this final rule are
intended to increase the number of
observers that qualify for a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement and
thereby minimize additional costs to
affected entities for an observer to
obtain a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement. This final rule also
implements provisions that are intended
to maintain observer safety and data
quality.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30529
This Final Rule
This final rule includes three
elements. The first element implements
new sampling experience requirements
for an observer to obtain a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement. These
sampling requirements allow sampling
experience on a trawl catcher/processor
or mothership vessel to count toward a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement.
These requirements also authorize the
Observer Program to require additional
training for observers as necessary to
adequately prepare them to safely
perform data collection duties relevant
to the nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement.
The second element of this final rule
requires the operator or manager of a
vessel that carries nontrawl LL2
observers to participate in a pre-cruise
meeting with the observer assigned to
the vessel if notified to do so by NMFS.
This final rule requires freezer longline
vessels and pot catcher/processors when
groundfish CDQ fishing to notify the
Observer Program prior to embarking on
a trip with a nontrawl LL2 observer who
has not deployed on that vessel in the
past 12 months. Subsequently, the
Observer Program may contact the
vessel and require the vessel operator or
manager and the observer assigned to
the vessel to participate in a pre-cruise
meeting prior to embarking on a trip.
The third element of this final rule
removes duplicative and unnecessary
reporting requirements and makes
minor changes to reduce observer
requirements for specific vessels
participating in the CDQ Program.
Response to Comments
NMFS received five comment letters
during the comment period. Four of
these comment letters were outside the
scope of this action. These letters raised
issues not relevant to this rulemaking
and are not addressed in this final rule.
One comment letter directly addressed
the proposed rule and contained five
substantive comments that are
summarized and responded to below.
This comment letter was from the
Freezer Longline Coalition (FLC) that
represents members of the Freezer
Longline Conservation Cooperative
(FLCC), which includes freezer longline
vessels impacted by this action.
Comment 1: We support
implementing new requirements for an
observer to obtain a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement, and for the
operator or manager of a vessel required
to carry an observer with a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement to
participate in a pre-cruise meeting with
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
30530
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
the observer if notified by NMFS to do
so.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment.
Comment 2: We agree that increasing
the number of observers that may
qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement will reduce costs to vessel
owners required to carry a nontrawl LL2
endorsed observer.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment.
Comment 3: NMFS’ proposed rule did
not include sufficient explanation about
how the implementation of the nontrawl
LL2 observer training class will result in
enough observers receiving a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement to
minimize additional costs to the
industry.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The
preamble to the proposed rule includes
a description of the minimum and
potential maximum demand for
nontrawl LL2 observer training classes
(82 FR 61243, December 27, 2017). As
described in the preamble to the
proposed rule and the RIR, observer
providers and representatives of freezer
longline vessels reported shortages in
2014 of nontrawl LL2 observers on
freezer longline vessels, and that this
shortage resulted in delayed fishing
operations in some cases. This final rule
provides a path for observers with
sampling experience on trawl vessels to
qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement. NMFS expects this to
increase the availability of qualified
nontrawl LL2 observers, which would
reduce the potential for delayed fishing
operations and would reduce costs
associated with delays, such as costs for
crew time, food, and missed fishing
opportunities. Section 4.3.2 and Table
16 of the RIR and the preamble to the
proposed rule include additional
information about the costs to industry
created by a shortage of nontrawl LL2
observers.
In addition, the proposed rule cites
the best scientific information available,
and Section 3.3.5 of the RIR provided a
description of the estimated costs to the
freezer longline fleet due to the shortage
of nontrawl LL2 endorsed observers.
Specifically, Section 3.3.5 of the RIR
summarizes the costs of voluntarily
carrying a second observer to allow the
observer to gain experience required for
a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement. That cost is estimated to
be $11,130 per observer for a 30-day
trip. NMFS estimated this cost per trip
by using information provided in Table
16 of the RIR. NMFS multiplied the
estimated length of a freezer longline
trip (30 days) by the estimated cost per
day to deploy an observer ($371). NMFS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
then multiplied that total by the number
of trips for which a freezer longline
vessel voluntarily carried a second
observer to obtain the total annual
estimated cost.
NMFS expects that the cost for an
observer with the requisite experience
aboard a vessel using trawl gear to
obtain a LL2 deployment endorsement
through a two to three day training
course will be significantly lower than
the cost associated with a 30-day
deployment. Based on the best available
scientific information, NMFS
anticipates that providing at least one
nontrawl LL2 observer training class
annually will meet the demand for
additional nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsements, and freezer longline
vessels will not need to voluntarily
carry a second observer and incur
associated additional costs.
In addition, the Observer Program
routinely determines the training
necessary for an observer to receive
certification, annual endorsements and
deployment endorsements, and
responds to requests from observer
providers to schedule training classes at
NMFS facilities. The Observer Program
may adjust the number of nontrawl LL2
training classes offered each year if
required to meet demand.
Comment 4: NMFS should not apply
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) principles of affiliation for the
purpose of determining if members of
the FLCC are considered small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA). In addition, SBA’s principles are
not the best guide for considering
affiliation for RFA analyses performed
by NMFS.
Response: NMFS disagrees. Under
Executive Order 13272, signed on
August 13, 2002, the SBA’s Office of
Advocacy is directed to provide Federal
agencies with training and information
on how to comply with the RFA. The
SBA provides information about how to
comply with the RFA through its
regulations at 13 CFR part 121 and
guidance posted on its website at
www.sba.gov. Therefore, it is
appropriate for NMFS to apply
regulations and guidelines developed by
the SBA in classifying entities for RFA
analyses.
Based on the contractual
relationships, recognized since the
formation of the FLCC in August 2010,
NMFS determined that all members of
the FLCC are affiliated as described
under 13 CFR 121.103(f) for the purpose
of analyses prepared under the RFA.
This application of the SBA principles
of affiliation is consistent with how
NMFS has applied this size standard to
vessels and processors in fishing
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cooperatives in the North Pacific since
at least 2001 (66 FR 65028; December
17, 2001). NMFS has applied this same
determination to vessels and processors
in fishing cooperatives under the
American Fisheries Act, the Crab
Rationalization Program, the
Amendment 80 Program, the Gulf of
Alaska Rockfish Program, and for the
FLCC.
The FLCC is a registered active nonprofit corporation in the State of
Washington and, through the FLC,
maintains an active website identifying
all member vessels (https://www.freezer
longlinecoalition.com/members.html).
In addition, the FLC affirms that the
FLCC operates as a voluntary fishery
cooperative in its letter of comment on
the proposed rule by stating that ‘‘All
members of the FLC [Freezer Longline
Coalition] are also members of the
Freezer Longline Conservation
Cooperative (FLCC), a voluntary fishing
cooperative established in 2010.’’
Thus, NMFS maintains that the
members of the FLCC are recognized as
members of a voluntary fishing
cooperative with a single identity of
interest in the harvest of the annual
allocation of Pacific cod to the BSAI
freezer longline vessels such that
interests should be aggregated for the
purpose of analysis prepared under the
RFA. The contractual relationship
among vessels in the cooperative allows
members to work together to more
efficiently harvest fishery allocations.
The ability to plan ahead, cooperate in
harvest decisions, and share some
expenses constitutes a degree of
economic dependence not available to
independent fishing vessels. In
addition, the conclusion that the
members of the FLCC are affiliated for
purposes of the RFA is consistent with
previous actions implemented since the
formation of the FLCC in 2010 and
impacting the same fleet prosecuting the
same resources (77 FR 59053,
September 26, 2012; 77 FR 58775,
September 24, 2012; 79 FR 603, January
6, 2014; 79 FR 68610, November 18,
2014).
Comment 5: NMFS incorrectly
classifies freezer longline vessels as
predominantly engaged in fish
harvesting rather than fish processing
for the purpose of analysis required
under the RFA. The commenter asserts
that catcher/processors should be
classified as predominantly involved in
fish processing and the associated
threshold of employing 750 or fewer
persons on a full-time, part-time,
temporary, or other basis, at all affiliated
operations worldwide should be applied
to determine if an entity is considered
small under the RFA.
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Response: NMFS disagrees. As
described in the response to Comment
4, all freezer longline vessels impacted
by this action are members of the FLCC.
In a letter received by NMFS on May 19,
2011 from the FLCC, the FLCC describes
itself as a voluntary fishing cooperative
with the purpose of ‘‘promoting,
fostering, and encouraging the
intelligent and orderly harvest of Pacific
cod and other groundfish species in the
Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands longline
fisheries off Alaska . . .’’ The FLCC’s
description of its members refers to
coordinating the harvest of finfish and
does not refer to processing as a primary
activity. Further, the members of the
FLCC have exclusive harvesting rights
to the annual allocation in the BSAI to
the defined class of longline catcher/
processor subsector participants rather
than exclusive processing rights.
Additionally, none of the FLCC
members purchase unprocessed catch
for the sole purpose of increasing
processing activity; therefore, the
processing activity of an individual
freezer longline vessel is limited by its
harvesting activity. Without the primary
harvesting activity, the secondary
processing activity does not occur. For
these reasons, NMFS affirms its
determination that, for purposes of RFA
analyses, the freezer longline vessels
affected by this action are primarily
engaged in commercial fishing.
Therefore, it is appropriate for NMFS to
classify freezer longline vessels in the
commercial fishing industry category
(NAICS 11411), and to apply the small
business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts to the group of
affiliated vessels.
Changes From Proposed to Final Rule
NMFS made three changes to this
final rule. These changes provide minor
clarifications that do not substantively
modify the regulations as proposed.
The first change adds the word
‘‘either’’ and the regulatory text in
paragraph (a)(5)(v)(C)(4) of the proposed
rule to paragraph § 679.53(a)(5)(v)(C)(3)
to clarify that either one of the two
minimum sampling experience
requirements may satisfy one of the
three conditions set forth in paragraph
(a)(5)(v)(C) necessary to deploy as a
nontrawl lead level 2 observer.
The second change adds the words
‘‘at least’’ to § 679.53(a)(5)(v)(C)(3) to
clarify that at least 100 or more sampled
hauls on catcher/processors using trawl
gear satisfies the minimum sampling
experience requirement specified in this
paragraph.
The third change correctly identifies
the locations in 50 CFR part 679 where
the term ‘‘Observer Program Office’’ will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
be replaced with the term ‘‘Observer
Program’’ by including § 679.52(a)(2),
(b)(1)(iii)(A), (b)(2)(iv), (b)(3)(ii)(B), and
(b)(8) introductory text. These
paragraphs were inadvertently
incorrectly listed in the table as
paragraphs of § 679.51 in the proposed
rule.
OMB Revisions to PRA References in 15
CFR 902.1(b)
Section 3507(c)(B)(i) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) requires that
agencies inventory and display a current
control number assigned by the Director
of the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), for each agency information
collection. Section 902.1(b) identifies
the location of NOAA regulations for
which OMB control numbers have been
issued. Because this final rule revises
and adds data elements within a
collection-of-information for
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, this final rule includes
revisions to 15 CFR 902.1(b) to correctly
reference the control number and
associated regulation sections included
in this final rule.
Classification
The Administrator, Alaska Region,
NMFS, has determined that this final
rule is necessary for the conservation
and management of the groundfish
fishery and is consistent with the GOA
and BSAI FMPs, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
NMFS published a proposed rule on
December 27, 2017 (82 FR 61243). An
IRFA was prepared and included in the
‘‘Classification’’ section of the preamble
to the proposed rule. The comment
period closed on January 26, 2018.
NMFS received five letters of comment
on the proposed rule. One comment
letter contained two comments on the
IRFA, which are summarized in the
‘‘Response to Comments’’ section
(Comments 4 and 5). The comments on
the IRFA were considered by NMFS in
the decision to certify this final rule.
The Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
SBA did not file any comments on the
proposed rule.
The factual basis for certification of
this final rule is described below. This
action includes three elements that
modify specific provisions of the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30531
Observer Program. The first element
modifies sampling experience
requirements for an observer to obtain a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement.
The second element requires the
operator or manager of a vessel required
to carry an observer with a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement to
participate in a pre-cruise meeting when
notified to do so by NMFS. The third
element removes duplicative and
unnecessary reporting requirements and
makes minor changes to reduce or
remove observer-related requirements
for specific vessels when participating
in the CDQ Program.
This action directly regulates
observers and owners and operators of
the following vessels: (1) Freezer
longline vessels that participate in the
BSAI hook-and-line Pacific cod fishery;
and (2) pot catcher/processors, trawl
catcher/processors, nontrawl catcher/
processors, and motherships when
groundfish CDQ fishing. For reasons
explained in more detail in the IRFA
and in responses to Comment 4 and
Comment 5 in the preamble to this final
rule, NMFS has determined that there
are no small entities directly regulated
by this final rule.
In addition, this action is expected to
reduce the cost for vessels to comply
with observer coverage requirements
and is not expected to impose
significant costs of complying with new
reporting requirements. This action will
benefit all affected vessels by increasing
the number of observers that may
qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement and will remove observerrelated requirements for specific vessels
when participating in the CDQ Program.
For all of these reasons, this action is
not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As a result, a
final regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required, and none has been prepared.
The economic analysis contained in the
RIR (see ADDRESSES) and in the IRFA
included in the ‘‘Classification’’ section
of the proposed rule prepared for this
action further describes the regulatory
and operational characteristics of the
affected vessels, including the history of
this action, and the details of the
alternatives considered for this action,
including the preferred alternative.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This final rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and
which have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
under OMB control number 0648–0318
(North Pacific Observer Program). The
public reporting burden for these
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
30532
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
collection-of-information requirements
includes the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
This final rule will require that the
Observer Program be notified by phone
at least 24 hours prior to departure
when a vessel will carry an observer
who has not deployed on that vessel in
the past 12 months. Public reporting
burden per response to notify the
Observer Program by phone is estimated
to be five minutes.
Send comments on these burden
estimates or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS Alaska
Region (see ADDRESSES), and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or by
fax to (202) 395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
order for ‘‘679.100(a)’’ and ‘‘679.100(b)’’
to read as follows:
§ 902.1 OMB control numbers assigned
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
CFR part or section
where the information
collection requirement
is located
*
50 CFR:
*
Current OMB control
number (all numbers
begin with 0648–)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
679.84(c)(7) ............... ¥0318.
*
*
*
*
*
679.93(c)(7) ............... ¥0318.
*
*
*
*
*
*
679.100(a) ................. ¥0330 and ¥0515.
679.100(b) ................. ¥0318, ¥0330, and
¥0515.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
§ 679.50
15 CFR Part 902
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
1. The authority citation for part 902
continues to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
2. In § 902.1, in the table in paragraph
(b), under the entry ‘‘50 CFR’’, add
entries in alphanumeric order for
‘‘679.84(c)(7)’’ and ‘‘679.93(c)(7)’’;
remove the entry for ‘‘679.100 (a) and
(b)’’; and add entries in alphanumeric
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
Definitions.
*
PART 902—NOAA INFORMATION
COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT:
OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
■
4. In § 679.2:
a. Remove the definition for
‘‘Observer Program Office’’; and
■ b. Add the definitions for ‘‘Cruise’’
and ‘‘Observer Program’’ in alphabetical
order to read as follows:
■
■
§ 679.2
Title 15—Commerce and Foreign Trade
Subpart E—North Pacific Observer
Program
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
3. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR part
902 and 50 CFR part 679 as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(4) Notify the Observer Program by
phone at 1 (907) 581–2060 (Dutch
Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481–1770
(Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours prior to
departure when the vessel will be
carrying an observer who has not
previously been deployed on that vessel
within the last 12 months. Subsequent
to the vessel’s departure notification,
but prior to departure, NMFS may
contact the vessel to arrange for a precruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting
must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers
assigned to the vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Revise the heading of subpart E to
read as follows:
■
■
Dated: June 26, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
*
Title 50—Wildlife and Fisheries
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
§ 679.32 Groundfish and halibut CDQ
catch monitoring.
*
*
*
*
Cruise means an observer deployment
with a unique cruise number. A cruise
begins when an observer receives an
endorsement to deploy and ends when
the observer completes all debriefing
responsibilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Observer Program means the
administrative office of the North
Pacific Observer Program located at the
Alaska Fisheries Science Center (See
§ 679.51(c)(3) for contact information).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 679.32:
■ a. Remove and reserve paragraphs
(c)(3)(i)(B)(2), (c)(3)(i)(C)(2), and
(c)(3)(i)(E)(2); and
■ b. Add paragraph (c)(3)(i)(E)(4) to read
as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7. In § 679.50, revise paragraph (a)(2)
to read as follows:
Applicability.
(a) * * *
(2) Exceptions. A catcher vessel is not
subject to the requirements of this
subpart when delivering unsorted
codends to a mothership.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 679.51, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(vi)(A)(5) to read as follows:
§ 679.51 Observer and Electronic
Monitoring System requirements for
vessels and plants.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) Motherships. A mothership that
receives unsorted codends from catcher
vessels groundfish CDQ fishing must
have at least two observers aboard the
mothership, at least one of whom must
be endorsed as a lead level 2 observer.
More than two observers must be aboard
if the observer workload restriction
would otherwise preclude sampling as
required.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 679.53:
■ a. Remove and reserve paragraph
(a)(5)(v)(B); and
■ b. Revise paragraph (a)(5)(v)(C) to read
as follows:
§ 679.53 Observer certification and
responsibilities.
(a) * * *
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
30533
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(5) * * *
(v) * * *
(C) A lead level 2 observer on a vessel
using nontrawl gear must have
completed the following:
(1) Two observer cruises (contracts) of
at least 10 days each;
(2) Successfully completed training or
briefing as prescribed by the Observer
Program; and
(3) Either sampled at least 30 sets on
a vessel using nontrawl gear or sampled
at least 100 hauls on a catcher/processor
using trawl gear or on a mothership.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 679.51, 679.52, and 679.53
[Amended]
10. In the table below, for each section
indicated in the ‘‘Location’’ column,
remove the phrase indicated in the
‘‘Remove’’ column from wherever it
appears in the section and add the word
indicated in the ‘‘Add’’ column:
■
Location
Remove
Add
§ 679.51(a)(2)(vi)(B)(1),
(a)(2)(vi)(B)(3),
(a)(2)(vi)(B)(4),
(a)(2)(vi)(C),
(a)(2)(vi)(D)(1),
(a)(2)(vi)(D)(2),
and
(a)(2)(vi)(E)(1).
§ 679.51(c)(3) ............................................................................
§ 679.52(a)(2), (b)(1)(iii)(A), (b)(2)(iv), (b)(3)(ii)(B), and (b)(8)
introductory text.
§ 679.52(b)(11) introductory text ...............................................
§ 679.52(b)(11)(i) introductory text, (b)(11)(ii), (b)(11)(iii), and
(b)(11)(vi) introductory text.
§ 679.52(b)(11)(vii) introductory text .........................................
§ 679.52(b)(11)(viii)
introductory
text,
(b)(11)(viii)(A),
(b)(11)(ix), (b)(11)(x) introductory text, and (b)(12).
§ 679.53(a)(1) ............................................................................
§ 679.53(a)(5)(v) introductory text, and (a)(5)(v)(A) .................
§ 679.53(b)(2)(i) ........................................................................
certified ...................................
endorsed .................................
1
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program ..................
Observer Program ..................
1
1
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program ..................
Observer Program ..................
2
1
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program ..................
Observer Program ..................
3
1
Observer Program Office ........
‘‘lead’’ ......................................
Observer Program Office ........
Observer Program ..................
lead .........................................
Observer Program ..................
1
1
1
11. In § 679.84, revise paragraph (c)(7)
to read as follows:
■
§ 679.84 Rockfish Program
Recordkeeping, permits, monitoring, and
catch accounting.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(7) Pre-cruise meeting. The Observer
Program is notified by phone at 1 (907)
481–1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours
prior to departure when the vessel will
be carrying an observer who has not
previously been deployed on that vessel
within the last 12 months. Subsequent
to the vessel’s departure notification,
but prior to departure, NMFS may
contact the vessel to arrange for a precruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting
must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers
assigned to the vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. In § 679.93, revise paragraph (c)(7)
to read as follows:
§ 679.93 Amendment 80 Program
recordkeeping, permits, monitoring, and
catch accounting.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(7) Pre-cruise meeting. The Observer
Program is notified by phone at 1 (907)
581–2060 (Dutch Harbor, AK) or 1 (907)
481–1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours
prior to departure when the vessel will
be carrying an observer who has not
previously been deployed on that vessel
within the last 12 months. Subsequent
to the vessel’s departure notification,
but prior to departure, NMFS may
contact the vessel to arrange for a pre-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
cruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting
must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers
assigned to the vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. In § 679.100, add paragraphs
(b)(1)(v) and (b)(2)(i)(E) to read as
follows:
§ 679.100
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) The Observer Program is notified
by phone at 1 (907) 581–2060 (Dutch
Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481–1770
(Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours prior to
departure when the vessel will be
carrying an observer who has not
previously been deployed on that vessel
within the last 12 months. Subsequent
to the vessel’s departure notification,
but prior to departure, NMFS may
contact the vessel to arrange for a precruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting
must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers
assigned to the vessel.
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) The Observer Program is notified
by phone at 1 (907) 581–2060 (Dutch
Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481–1770
(Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours prior to
departure when the vessel will be
carrying an observer who has not
previously been deployed on that vessel
within the last 12 months. Subsequent
to the vessel’s departure notification,
but prior to departure, NMFS may
contact the vessel to arrange for a precruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Frequency
must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers
assigned to the vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–14071 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 1
RIN 3038–AD53
Adaptation of Regulations to
Incorporate Swaps; Correction
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
On November 2, 2012, the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission revised its rules. That
document inadvertently failed to
remove several obsolete provisions in
the regulation. This document corrects
the final regulations.
DATES: Effective on June 29, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacob Chachkin, Special Counsel, 202–
418–5496, email: jchachkin@cftc.gov,
Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of November 2, 2012
(77 FR 66287), the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission published final
rules adopting new regulations to
implement particular provisions of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30528-30533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14071]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 902
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 170621579-8522-02]
RIN 0648-BG96
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Nontrawl
Lead Level 2 Observers
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to modify specific provisions of the
North Pacific Observer Program. The first two elements of this final
rule implement requirements for an observer to obtain a nontrawl lead
level 2 (LL2) deployment endorsement and implement a pre-cruise meeting
requirement for vessels required to carry an observer with a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement. These two elements are intended to increase
the number of observers that qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement and maintain observer safety and data quality. The third
element of this final rule removes duplicative and unnecessary
reporting requirements and makes minor changes to reduce observer
requirements for specific vessels when participating in the Western
Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program. This action is
intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Fishery Management Plan
for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska, and the Fishery Management Plan
for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area,
and other applicable law.
DATES: Effective July 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and
the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this action are available from
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region website at
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. All public comment letters submitted during
the comment period may be obtained from www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-0071.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
final rule may be submitted by mail to NMFS Alaska Region, P.O. Box
21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668, Attn: Ellen Sebastian, Records Officer;
in person at NMFS Alaska Region, 709 West 9th Street, Room 420A,
Juneau, AK; and to OIRA by email to [email protected] or by
fax to 202-395-5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia M Miller, (907) 586-7228 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic
zone under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA FMP) and under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish
of the
[[Page 30529]]
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI FMP). The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared the FMPs under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and implementing the FMPs appear
at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
NMFS published the proposed rule for this action on December 27,
2017 (82 FR 61243), with comments invited through January 26, 2018.
NMFS received five comment letters during the applicable comment
period. Four of these comment letters were on topics that were outside
the scope of this action. One comment letter addressed the proposed
rule and contained five substantive comments which are summarized and
responded to under the heading ``Response to Comments'' below.
A detailed review of the provisions of the regulations to modify
specific provisions of the North Pacific Observer Program (Observer
Program) and the rationale for these regulations are provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule (82 FR 61243, December 27, 2017) and are
briefly summarized in this final rule.
Background
Regulations at subpart E of 50 CFR part 679 require that most
vessels fishing for groundfish or halibut must carry an observer for
some or all fishing activities to ensure the collection of data
necessary to manage the groundfish and halibut fisheries.
The Observer Program is an integral component in the management of
North Pacific fisheries. The Observer Program has two observer coverage
categories: Partial and full. Regulations at 50 CFR 679.51 require
vessels and processors in the full coverage category to carry an
observer at all times when fish are caught or processed. This final
rule affects catcher/processors in the full coverage category (i.e.,
vessels that catch and process their own catch at-sea), and all
motherships (i.e., those vessels that receive unsorted catch from other
vessels and process that catch at-sea). Owners of vessels or processors
in the full coverage category must contract directly with a permitted
observer provider and pay for required observer coverage. Two groups of
vessels are required to carry an observer with a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement.
The first group of vessels includes vessels named on a License
Limitation Program license with a Pacific cod catcher/processor hook-
and-line endorsement for the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, or both the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI). These vessels are subject to
monitoring requirements at 50 CFR 679.100 and are referred to as
``freezer longline vessels'' throughout this final rule. Pursuant to 50
CFR 679.100, a freezer longline vessel must carry an observer with a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement when the vessel (1) operates in
either the BSAI or Gulf of Alaska groundfish fisheries and directed
fishing for Pacific cod is open in the BSAI, or (2) when the vessel
participates in the CDQ groundfish fisheries. These monitoring
requirements for freezer longline vessels were implemented in 2012 and
require freezer longline vessel owners and operators to select between
one of two monitoring options: Either carry two observers so that all
catch can be sampled, or carry one observer and use a motion-
compensated flow scale to weigh Pacific cod before it is processed.
Both monitoring options require the vessel to carry one observer
endorsed as a nontrawl LL2 observer (77 FR 59053; September 26, 2012).
The second group of vessels that is required to carry an observer
with a nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement includes catcher/processors
that use pot gear when participating in the CDQ groundfish fisheries
(groundfish CDQ fishing) (77 FR 6492; February 8, 2012). These pot
catcher/processors are required to carry an observer with a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement when groundfish CDQ fishing and may
participate in other fisheries that do not require a nontrawl LL2
observer. Regulations at 50 CFR 679.32 describe the specific monitoring
requirements for vessels when participating in the sablefish CDQ,
pollock CDQ, and other groundfish CDQ fisheries.
Since 2014, observer providers contracted by vessels in the full
coverage category have reported that they have been unable to create
and retain an adequate pool of qualified nontrawl LL2 observers
resulting in a diminishing pool of qualified observers employed by
those observer providers. The requirements in this final rule are
intended to increase the number of observers that qualify for a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement and thereby minimize additional
costs to affected entities for an observer to obtain a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement. This final rule also implements provisions that
are intended to maintain observer safety and data quality.
This Final Rule
This final rule includes three elements. The first element
implements new sampling experience requirements for an observer to
obtain a nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement. These sampling
requirements allow sampling experience on a trawl catcher/processor or
mothership vessel to count toward a nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsement. These requirements also authorize the Observer Program to
require additional training for observers as necessary to adequately
prepare them to safely perform data collection duties relevant to the
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement.
The second element of this final rule requires the operator or
manager of a vessel that carries nontrawl LL2 observers to participate
in a pre-cruise meeting with the observer assigned to the vessel if
notified to do so by NMFS. This final rule requires freezer longline
vessels and pot catcher/processors when groundfish CDQ fishing to
notify the Observer Program prior to embarking on a trip with a
nontrawl LL2 observer who has not deployed on that vessel in the past
12 months. Subsequently, the Observer Program may contact the vessel
and require the vessel operator or manager and the observer assigned to
the vessel to participate in a pre-cruise meeting prior to embarking on
a trip.
The third element of this final rule removes duplicative and
unnecessary reporting requirements and makes minor changes to reduce
observer requirements for specific vessels participating in the CDQ
Program.
Response to Comments
NMFS received five comment letters during the comment period. Four
of these comment letters were outside the scope of this action. These
letters raised issues not relevant to this rulemaking and are not
addressed in this final rule. One comment letter directly addressed the
proposed rule and contained five substantive comments that are
summarized and responded to below. This comment letter was from the
Freezer Longline Coalition (FLC) that represents members of the Freezer
Longline Conservation Cooperative (FLCC), which includes freezer
longline vessels impacted by this action.
Comment 1: We support implementing new requirements for an observer
to obtain a nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement, and for the operator
or manager of a vessel required to carry an observer with a nontrawl
LL2 deployment endorsement to participate in a pre-cruise meeting with
[[Page 30530]]
the observer if notified by NMFS to do so.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment.
Comment 2: We agree that increasing the number of observers that
may qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement will reduce costs
to vessel owners required to carry a nontrawl LL2 endorsed observer.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment.
Comment 3: NMFS' proposed rule did not include sufficient
explanation about how the implementation of the nontrawl LL2 observer
training class will result in enough observers receiving a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement to minimize additional costs to the industry.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The preamble to the proposed rule
includes a description of the minimum and potential maximum demand for
nontrawl LL2 observer training classes (82 FR 61243, December 27,
2017). As described in the preamble to the proposed rule and the RIR,
observer providers and representatives of freezer longline vessels
reported shortages in 2014 of nontrawl LL2 observers on freezer
longline vessels, and that this shortage resulted in delayed fishing
operations in some cases. This final rule provides a path for observers
with sampling experience on trawl vessels to qualify for a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement. NMFS expects this to increase the availability
of qualified nontrawl LL2 observers, which would reduce the potential
for delayed fishing operations and would reduce costs associated with
delays, such as costs for crew time, food, and missed fishing
opportunities. Section 4.3.2 and Table 16 of the RIR and the preamble
to the proposed rule include additional information about the costs to
industry created by a shortage of nontrawl LL2 observers.
In addition, the proposed rule cites the best scientific
information available, and Section 3.3.5 of the RIR provided a
description of the estimated costs to the freezer longline fleet due to
the shortage of nontrawl LL2 endorsed observers. Specifically, Section
3.3.5 of the RIR summarizes the costs of voluntarily carrying a second
observer to allow the observer to gain experience required for a
nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement. That cost is estimated to be
$11,130 per observer for a 30-day trip. NMFS estimated this cost per
trip by using information provided in Table 16 of the RIR. NMFS
multiplied the estimated length of a freezer longline trip (30 days) by
the estimated cost per day to deploy an observer ($371). NMFS then
multiplied that total by the number of trips for which a freezer
longline vessel voluntarily carried a second observer to obtain the
total annual estimated cost.
NMFS expects that the cost for an observer with the requisite
experience aboard a vessel using trawl gear to obtain a LL2 deployment
endorsement through a two to three day training course will be
significantly lower than the cost associated with a 30-day deployment.
Based on the best available scientific information, NMFS anticipates
that providing at least one nontrawl LL2 observer training class
annually will meet the demand for additional nontrawl LL2 deployment
endorsements, and freezer longline vessels will not need to voluntarily
carry a second observer and incur associated additional costs.
In addition, the Observer Program routinely determines the training
necessary for an observer to receive certification, annual endorsements
and deployment endorsements, and responds to requests from observer
providers to schedule training classes at NMFS facilities. The Observer
Program may adjust the number of nontrawl LL2 training classes offered
each year if required to meet demand.
Comment 4: NMFS should not apply the Small Business Administration
(SBA) principles of affiliation for the purpose of determining if
members of the FLCC are considered small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). In addition, SBA's principles are not the best
guide for considering affiliation for RFA analyses performed by NMFS.
Response: NMFS disagrees. Under Executive Order 13272, signed on
August 13, 2002, the SBA's Office of Advocacy is directed to provide
Federal agencies with training and information on how to comply with
the RFA. The SBA provides information about how to comply with the RFA
through its regulations at 13 CFR part 121 and guidance posted on its
website at www.sba.gov. Therefore, it is appropriate for NMFS to apply
regulations and guidelines developed by the SBA in classifying entities
for RFA analyses.
Based on the contractual relationships, recognized since the
formation of the FLCC in August 2010, NMFS determined that all members
of the FLCC are affiliated as described under 13 CFR 121.103(f) for the
purpose of analyses prepared under the RFA. This application of the SBA
principles of affiliation is consistent with how NMFS has applied this
size standard to vessels and processors in fishing cooperatives in the
North Pacific since at least 2001 (66 FR 65028; December 17, 2001).
NMFS has applied this same determination to vessels and processors in
fishing cooperatives under the American Fisheries Act, the Crab
Rationalization Program, the Amendment 80 Program, the Gulf of Alaska
Rockfish Program, and for the FLCC.
The FLCC is a registered active non-profit corporation in the State
of Washington and, through the FLC, maintains an active website
identifying all member vessels (https://www.freezerlonglinecoalition.com/members.html). In addition, the FLC
affirms that the FLCC operates as a voluntary fishery cooperative in
its letter of comment on the proposed rule by stating that ``All
members of the FLC [Freezer Longline Coalition] are also members of the
Freezer Longline Conservation Cooperative (FLCC), a voluntary fishing
cooperative established in 2010.''
Thus, NMFS maintains that the members of the FLCC are recognized as
members of a voluntary fishing cooperative with a single identity of
interest in the harvest of the annual allocation of Pacific cod to the
BSAI freezer longline vessels such that interests should be aggregated
for the purpose of analysis prepared under the RFA. The contractual
relationship among vessels in the cooperative allows members to work
together to more efficiently harvest fishery allocations. The ability
to plan ahead, cooperate in harvest decisions, and share some expenses
constitutes a degree of economic dependence not available to
independent fishing vessels. In addition, the conclusion that the
members of the FLCC are affiliated for purposes of the RFA is
consistent with previous actions implemented since the formation of the
FLCC in 2010 and impacting the same fleet prosecuting the same
resources (77 FR 59053, September 26, 2012; 77 FR 58775, September 24,
2012; 79 FR 603, January 6, 2014; 79 FR 68610, November 18, 2014).
Comment 5: NMFS incorrectly classifies freezer longline vessels as
predominantly engaged in fish harvesting rather than fish processing
for the purpose of analysis required under the RFA. The commenter
asserts that catcher/processors should be classified as predominantly
involved in fish processing and the associated threshold of employing
750 or fewer persons on a full-time, part-time, temporary, or other
basis, at all affiliated operations worldwide should be applied to
determine if an entity is considered small under the RFA.
[[Page 30531]]
Response: NMFS disagrees. As described in the response to Comment
4, all freezer longline vessels impacted by this action are members of
the FLCC. In a letter received by NMFS on May 19, 2011 from the FLCC,
the FLCC describes itself as a voluntary fishing cooperative with the
purpose of ``promoting, fostering, and encouraging the intelligent and
orderly harvest of Pacific cod and other groundfish species in the
Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands longline fisheries off Alaska . . .'' The
FLCC's description of its members refers to coordinating the harvest of
finfish and does not refer to processing as a primary activity.
Further, the members of the FLCC have exclusive harvesting rights to
the annual allocation in the BSAI to the defined class of longline
catcher/processor subsector participants rather than exclusive
processing rights. Additionally, none of the FLCC members purchase
unprocessed catch for the sole purpose of increasing processing
activity; therefore, the processing activity of an individual freezer
longline vessel is limited by its harvesting activity. Without the
primary harvesting activity, the secondary processing activity does not
occur. For these reasons, NMFS affirms its determination that, for
purposes of RFA analyses, the freezer longline vessels affected by this
action are primarily engaged in commercial fishing. Therefore, it is
appropriate for NMFS to classify freezer longline vessels in the
commercial fishing industry category (NAICS 11411), and to apply the
small business size standard of $11 million in annual gross receipts to
the group of affiliated vessels.
Changes From Proposed to Final Rule
NMFS made three changes to this final rule. These changes provide
minor clarifications that do not substantively modify the regulations
as proposed.
The first change adds the word ``either'' and the regulatory text
in paragraph (a)(5)(v)(C)(4) of the proposed rule to paragraph Sec.
679.53(a)(5)(v)(C)(3) to clarify that either one of the two minimum
sampling experience requirements may satisfy one of the three
conditions set forth in paragraph (a)(5)(v)(C) necessary to deploy as a
nontrawl lead level 2 observer.
The second change adds the words ``at least'' to Sec.
679.53(a)(5)(v)(C)(3) to clarify that at least 100 or more sampled
hauls on catcher/processors using trawl gear satisfies the minimum
sampling experience requirement specified in this paragraph.
The third change correctly identifies the locations in 50 CFR part
679 where the term ``Observer Program Office'' will be replaced with
the term ``Observer Program'' by including Sec. 679.52(a)(2),
(b)(1)(iii)(A), (b)(2)(iv), (b)(3)(ii)(B), and (b)(8) introductory
text. These paragraphs were inadvertently incorrectly listed in the
table as paragraphs of Sec. 679.51 in the proposed rule.
OMB Revisions to PRA References in 15 CFR 902.1(b)
Section 3507(c)(B)(i) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires
that agencies inventory and display a current control number assigned
by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), for each
agency information collection. Section 902.1(b) identifies the location
of NOAA regulations for which OMB control numbers have been issued.
Because this final rule revises and adds data elements within a
collection-of-information for recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
this final rule includes revisions to 15 CFR 902.1(b) to correctly
reference the control number and associated regulation sections
included in this final rule.
Classification
The Administrator, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined that this
final rule is necessary for the conservation and management of the
groundfish fishery and is consistent with the GOA and BSAI FMPs, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. NMFS
published a proposed rule on December 27, 2017 (82 FR 61243). An IRFA
was prepared and included in the ``Classification'' section of the
preamble to the proposed rule. The comment period closed on January 26,
2018. NMFS received five letters of comment on the proposed rule. One
comment letter contained two comments on the IRFA, which are summarized
in the ``Response to Comments'' section (Comments 4 and 5). The
comments on the IRFA were considered by NMFS in the decision to certify
this final rule. The Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA did not file
any comments on the proposed rule.
The factual basis for certification of this final rule is described
below. This action includes three elements that modify specific
provisions of the Observer Program. The first element modifies sampling
experience requirements for an observer to obtain a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement. The second element requires the operator or
manager of a vessel required to carry an observer with a nontrawl LL2
deployment endorsement to participate in a pre-cruise meeting when
notified to do so by NMFS. The third element removes duplicative and
unnecessary reporting requirements and makes minor changes to reduce or
remove observer-related requirements for specific vessels when
participating in the CDQ Program.
This action directly regulates observers and owners and operators
of the following vessels: (1) Freezer longline vessels that participate
in the BSAI hook-and-line Pacific cod fishery; and (2) pot catcher/
processors, trawl catcher/processors, nontrawl catcher/processors, and
motherships when groundfish CDQ fishing. For reasons explained in more
detail in the IRFA and in responses to Comment 4 and Comment 5 in the
preamble to this final rule, NMFS has determined that there are no
small entities directly regulated by this final rule.
In addition, this action is expected to reduce the cost for vessels
to comply with observer coverage requirements and is not expected to
impose significant costs of complying with new reporting requirements.
This action will benefit all affected vessels by increasing the number
of observers that may qualify for a nontrawl LL2 deployment endorsement
and will remove observer-related requirements for specific vessels when
participating in the CDQ Program.
For all of these reasons, this action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As a result, a final regulatory flexibility analysis is not required,
and none has been prepared. The economic analysis contained in the RIR
(see ADDRESSES) and in the IRFA included in the ``Classification''
section of the proposed rule prepared for this action further describes
the regulatory and operational characteristics of the affected vessels,
including the history of this action, and the details of the
alternatives considered for this action, including the preferred
alternative.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This final rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and which have been
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control
number 0648-0318 (North Pacific Observer Program). The public reporting
burden for these
[[Page 30532]]
collection-of-information requirements includes the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
This final rule will require that the Observer Program be notified
by phone at least 24 hours prior to departure when a vessel will carry
an observer who has not deployed on that vessel in the past 12 months.
Public reporting burden per response to notify the Observer Program by
phone is estimated to be five minutes.
Send comments on these burden estimates or any other aspect of this
data collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS
Alaska Region (see ADDRESSES), and by email to
[email protected], or by fax to (202) 395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be viewed at https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 902
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: June 26, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR part
902 and 50 CFR part 679 as follows:
Title 15--Commerce and Foreign Trade
PART 902--NOAA INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 902 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. [thinsp]902.1, in the table in paragraph (b), under the
entry ``50 CFR'', add entries in alphanumeric order for
``679.84(c)(7)'' and ``679.93(c)(7)''; remove the entry for ``679.100
(a) and (b)''; and add entries in alphanumeric order for ``679.100(a)''
and ``679.100(b)'' to read as follows:
Sec. [thinsp]902.1 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current OMB control number
CFR part or section where the information (all numbers begin with 0648-
collection requirement is located )
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
50 CFR:
* * * * *
679.84(c)(7).............................. -0318.
* * * * *
679.93(c)(7).............................. -0318.
* * * * *
679.100(a)................................ -0330 and -0515.
679.100(b)................................ -0318, -0330, and -0515.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Title 50--Wildlife and Fisheries
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
3. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
4. In Sec. 679.2:
0
a. Remove the definition for ``Observer Program Office''; and
0
b. Add the definitions for ``Cruise'' and ``Observer Program'' in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 679.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Cruise means an observer deployment with a unique cruise number. A
cruise begins when an observer receives an endorsement to deploy and
ends when the observer completes all debriefing responsibilities.
* * * * *
Observer Program means the administrative office of the North
Pacific Observer Program located at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center
(See Sec. 679.51(c)(3) for contact information).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 679.32:
0
a. Remove and reserve paragraphs (c)(3)(i)(B)(2), (c)(3)(i)(C)(2), and
(c)(3)(i)(E)(2); and
0
b. Add paragraph (c)(3)(i)(E)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.32 Groundfish and halibut CDQ catch monitoring.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(4) Notify the Observer Program by phone at 1 (907) 581-2060 (Dutch
Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481-1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours prior to
departure when the vessel will be carrying an observer who has not
previously been deployed on that vessel within the last 12 months.
Subsequent to the vessel's departure notification, but prior to
departure, NMFS may contact the vessel to arrange for a pre-cruise
meeting. The pre-cruise meeting must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers assigned to the vessel.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise the heading of subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E--North Pacific Observer Program
0
7. In Sec. 679.50, revise paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.50 Applicability.
(a) * * *
(2) Exceptions. A catcher vessel is not subject to the requirements
of this subpart when delivering unsorted codends to a mothership.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 679.51, revise paragraph (a)(2)(vi)(A)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 679.51 Observer and Electronic Monitoring System requirements
for vessels and plants.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) Motherships. A mothership that receives unsorted codends from
catcher vessels groundfish CDQ fishing must have at least two observers
aboard the mothership, at least one of whom must be endorsed as a lead
level 2 observer. More than two observers must be aboard if the
observer workload restriction would otherwise preclude sampling as
required.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 679.53:
0
a. Remove and reserve paragraph (a)(5)(v)(B); and
0
b. Revise paragraph (a)(5)(v)(C) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.53 Observer certification and responsibilities.
(a) * * *
[[Page 30533]]
(5) * * *
(v) * * *
(C) A lead level 2 observer on a vessel using nontrawl gear must
have completed the following:
(1) Two observer cruises (contracts) of at least 10 days each;
(2) Successfully completed training or briefing as prescribed by
the Observer Program; and
(3) Either sampled at least 30 sets on a vessel using nontrawl gear
or sampled at least 100 hauls on a catcher/processor using trawl gear
or on a mothership.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 679.51, 679.52, and 679.53 [Amended]
0
10. In the table below, for each section indicated in the ``Location''
column, remove the phrase indicated in the ``Remove'' column from
wherever it appears in the section and add the word indicated in the
``Add'' column:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Remove Add Frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 679.51(a)(2)(vi)(B)(1), certified................. endorsed.................. 1
(a)(2)(vi)(B)(3), (a)(2)(vi)(B)(4),
(a)(2)(vi)(C), (a)(2)(vi)(D)(1),
(a)(2)(vi)(D)(2), and (a)(2)(vi)(E)(1).
Sec. 679.51(c)(3)..................... Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 1
Sec. 679.52(a)(2), (b)(1)(iii)(A), Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 1
(b)(2)(iv), (b)(3)(ii)(B), and (b)(8)
introductory text.
Sec. 679.52(b)(11) introductory text.. Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 2
Sec. 679.52(b)(11)(i) introductory Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 1
text, (b)(11)(ii), (b)(11)(iii), and
(b)(11)(vi) introductory text.
Sec. 679.52(b)(11)(vii) introductory Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 3
text.
Sec. 679.52(b)(11)(viii) introductory Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 1
text, (b)(11)(viii)(A), (b)(11)(ix),
(b)(11)(x) introductory text, and
(b)(12).
Sec. 679.53(a)(1)..................... Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 1
Sec. 679.53(a)(5)(v) introductory ``lead''.................. lead...................... 1
text, and (a)(5)(v)(A).
Sec. 679.53(b)(2)(i).................. Observer Program Office... Observer Program.......... 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
11. In Sec. 679.84, revise paragraph (c)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.84 Rockfish Program Recordkeeping, permits, monitoring, and
catch accounting.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(7) Pre-cruise meeting. The Observer Program is notified by phone
at 1 (907) 481-1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours prior to departure
when the vessel will be carrying an observer who has not previously
been deployed on that vessel within the last 12 months. Subsequent to
the vessel's departure notification, but prior to departure, NMFS may
contact the vessel to arrange for a pre-cruise meeting. The pre-cruise
meeting must minimally include the vessel operator or manager and any
observers assigned to the vessel.
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec. 679.93, revise paragraph (c)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.93 Amendment 80 Program recordkeeping, permits, monitoring,
and catch accounting.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(7) Pre-cruise meeting. The Observer Program is notified by phone
at 1 (907) 581-2060 (Dutch Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481-1770 (Kodiak, AK)
at least 24 hours prior to departure when the vessel will be carrying
an observer who has not previously been deployed on that vessel within
the last 12 months. Subsequent to the vessel's departure notification,
but prior to departure, NMFS may contact the vessel to arrange for a
pre-cruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting must minimally include the
vessel operator or manager and any observers assigned to the vessel.
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec. 679.100, add paragraphs (b)(1)(v) and (b)(2)(i)(E) to read
as follows:
Sec. 679.100 Applicability.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) The Observer Program is notified by phone at 1 (907) 581-2060
(Dutch Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481-1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours
prior to departure when the vessel will be carrying an observer who has
not previously been deployed on that vessel within the last 12 months.
Subsequent to the vessel's departure notification, but prior to
departure, NMFS may contact the vessel to arrange for a pre-cruise
meeting. The pre-cruise meeting must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers assigned to the vessel.
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) The Observer Program is notified by phone at 1 (907) 581-2060
(Dutch Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481-1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours
prior to departure when the vessel will be carrying an observer who has
not previously been deployed on that vessel within the last 12 months.
Subsequent to the vessel's departure notification, but prior to
departure, NMFS may contact the vessel to arrange for a pre-cruise
meeting. The pre-cruise meeting must minimally include the vessel
operator or manager and any observers assigned to the vessel.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-14071 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P