Removing Outmoded Regulations Regarding the Rural Physician Training Grant Program, Definition of “Underserved Rural Community”, 30079-30080 [2018-13835]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
repeal existing regulations that are
outmoded from the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), HHS is removing 42
CFR part 5a. HHS believes that there is
good cause to bypass notice and
comment and proceed to a final rule,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The
action is non-controversial, as it merely
removes an obsolete provision from the
CFR. This rule poses no new substantive
requirements on the public. Thus, we
view notice and comment as
unnecessary.
PART 302–11—ALLOWANCES FOR
EXPENSES INCURRED IN
CONNECTION WITH RESIDENCE
TRANSACTIONS
9. The authority citation for 41 CFR
part 302–11 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5738 and 20 U.S.C.
905(c).
10. Amend § 302–11.200 by revising
paragraph (f)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 302–11.200 What residence transaction
expenses will my agency pay?
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) Federal Housing Administration
(FHA) or VA fees for the loan
application;
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–13866 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 5a
RIN 0906–AB17
Removing Outmoded Regulations
Regarding the Rural Physician
Training Grant Program, Definition of
‘‘Underserved Rural Community’’
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action removes the
outmoded regulations for the Rural
Physician Training Grant Program,
Definition of ‘‘Underserved Rural
Community.’’ Funding was authorized
at section 749B(i) Public Health Service
Act for fiscal years 2010–2013, but
never appropriated for the Rural
Physician Training Grant Program, and
the program was not implemented.
Therefore, this regulation is no longer
relevant, and HRSA suggested the
regulations defining underserved rural
communities for the Rural Physician
Training Grant Program be removed.
DATES: This action is effective July 27,
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sweta Maheshwari J.D., Legislative
Analyst, Division of Policy and Shortage
Designation, Bureau of Health
Workforce, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Room 11W21A, Rockville, MD 20857,
by phone at (301) 945–3527, or by email
at smaheshwari@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
response to Executive Order 13563,
Section 6(a), which urges agencies to
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
Background
The Rural Physician Training Grant
Program (Program), Definition of
‘‘Underserved Rural Community’’
regulation was issued via an interim
final rule with request for comment on
May 26, 2010 pursuant to Section
749B(f) of the Public Health Service Act
(42 U.S.C. 293m(f)). The regulation has
not been updated since it was issued.
Funding was authorized at section
749B(i) (42 U.S.C. 293m(i)) for fiscal
years 2010–2013, but was never
appropriated for the Program; therefore,
it was not implemented. This rule
defines ‘‘underserved rural
communities,’’ including census track
information, Health Professions
Shortage Areas (HPSAs), and Medically
Underserved Areas (MUAs) for Program
purposes. If the Program were to be
funded, HRSA would be able to define
underserved rural communities for the
purpose of the program through policy
documents.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771,
and 13777
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to categorize all impacts which
generate or alleviate costs associated
with regulatory burden and to
determine the actions net incremental
effect.
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule: (1) Having an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more in any
1 year, or adversely and materially
affecting a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or Tribal governments or
communities (also referred to as
‘‘economically significant’’); (2) creating
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30079
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfering with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raising novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
A regulatory impact analysis (RIA)
must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100
million or more in any 1 year). HHS
submits that this final rule is not
‘‘economically significant’’ as measured
by the $100 million threshold, and
hence not a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act. This rule has
not been designated as a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13771, titled
‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,’’ was issued on
January 30, 2017. HHS identifies this
final rule as a deregulatory action
(removing an obsolete rule from the
Code of Federal Regulations). For the
purposes of Executive Order 13771, this
final rule is not a substantive rule;
rather it is administrative in nature and
provides no cost savings.
Executive Order 13777, titled
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,’’ was issued on February 24,
2017. As required by Section 3 of this
Executive Order, HHS established a
Regulatory Reform Task Force (HHS
Task Force). Pursuant to Section 3(d)(ii),
the HHS Task Force evaluated this
rulemaking and determined that these
regulations are ‘‘outdated, unnecessary,
or ineffective.’’ Following this finding,
the HHS Task Force advised the HRSA
Administrator to initiate this
rulemaking to remove the obsolete
regulations from the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, the
regulatory flexibility analysis provided
for under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not affect any
information collections.
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
30080
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 4, 2018.
George Sigounas,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services
Administration.
Approved: June 21, 2018.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 5a
Health care, Health care professionals,
Public health, Rural health.
PART 5a—[REMOVED]
For reasons set out in the preamble,
and under the authority at 5 U.S.C. 301,
HHS amends 42 CFR chapter I by
removing part 5a.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–13835 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 23
RIN 0906–AB15
Removing Outmoded Regulations
Regarding the National Health Service
Corps Program
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action removes
outmoded regulations for the National
Health Service Corps (NHSC) Program.
The regulations were promulgated to
implement Section 338G of the Public
Health Service (PHS) Act, relating to
private practice loans. The regulations
have not been updated since they were
issued in 1986. The regulations are no
longer relevant or needed as the NHSC
has not made private practice loan
opportunities available since the 1980s,
and does not plan to do so in the
foreseeable future. The removal of these
regulations will not create any
challenges for other programs, as the
law and regulations apply solely to
NHSC clinicians.
DATES: This action is effective July 27,
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sweta Maheshwari J.D., Legislative
Analyst, Division of Policy and Shortage
Designation, Bureau of Health
Workforce, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Room 11W21A, Rockville, MD 20857,
by phone at (301) 945–3527, or by email
at smaheshwari@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
response to Executive Order 13777 and
Executive Order 13563, Sec. 6(a), which
direct agencies to repeal existing
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
regulations that are ‘‘outmoded’’ from
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
HHS is removing 42 CFR part 23,
subpart B (§§ 23.21 through 23.35) and
subpart C (§ 23.41). Furthermore, HHS
has determined that there is good cause
to bypass notice and comment and
proceed to a final rule, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The action is noncontroversial, as it merely removes
certain provisions from the CFR that are
obsolete. Given the length of time
(approximately 30 years) since the
private practice loan provision has been
utilized, it is HHS’s assessment that the
agency is unlikely to receive any
comments opposing the repeal of these
regulations. Thus, a comment period
prior to finalization of this rule is
unnecessary. This rule poses no new
substantive requirements or burdens on
the public.
Background
In 1986, HHS issued implementing
regulations, as directed in Section 338G
of the PHS Act, specifying the interest
rate and loan repayment terms for
private practice special loans to former
Corps members and interest rate and
loan repayment terms for private
practice start-up loans to NHSC
scholarship recipients.
The provision for Special Loans for
Former Corps Members to Enter Private
Practice authorized the Secretary to
make a one-time loan up to $25,000 to
a Corps member. In exchange, the Corps
member reciprocated by committing to
serve as a full-time private practice
provider in a Health Professional
Shortage Area (HPSA) for a minimum of
two years. The intent of these
regulations was to retain Corps members
in HPSAs after the completion of their
service obligation. The regulation is no
longer relevant as the NHSC has not
made such loan opportunities available
since the 1980s and, therefore, no longer
needs to set repayment terms for private
practice start-up loans. HRSA does not
intend to restart this loan program, as
the NHSC program currently has a
retention rate of 88%, making additional
incentives unnecessary.
Section 338G also authorizes Private
Start-Up Loans. At the time the statute
was enacted, only the NHSC
Scholarship Program existed. Scholars
were able to apply for up to $25,000 to
purchase or lease the equipment and
supplies needed for providing health
services in their private practices. The
intention of the program was to offer
further incentives to recruit health
professions students into the program.
The regulation is no longer relevant
since the NHSC has not made such loan
opportunities available since the 1980s
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and, therefore, no longer has need to set
repayment terms for private practice
start-up loans. Furthermore, the NHSC
Scholarship Program is significantly
oversubscribed, and no further
incentives are necessary to recruit
health professions students.
Removing these regulations will not
have an impact on the NHSC program.
There is no specific appropriations
authority to support Section 338G of the
PHS Act; the authorization of
appropriation at 338H supports all the
activities under Subpart III (which
includes the NHSC Loan Repayment
and Scholarship Programs). The repeal
of these regulations will not create any
challenges for other programs, as the
law and regulations apply solely to
NHSC clinicians.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771,
and 13777
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to categorize all impacts which
generate or alleviate costs associated
with regulatory burden and to
determine the actions net incremnatal
effect.
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule: (1) Having an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more in any
1 year, or adversely and materially
affecting a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or Tribal governments or
communities (also referred to as
‘‘economically significant’’); (2) creating
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfering with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raising novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
A regulatory impact analysis (RIA)
must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100
million or more in any 1 year). HHS
submits that this final rule is not
‘‘economically significant’’ as measured
by the $100 million threshold, and
hence not a major rule under the
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30079-30080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13835]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 5a
RIN 0906-AB17
Removing Outmoded Regulations Regarding the Rural Physician
Training Grant Program, Definition of ``Underserved Rural Community''
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action removes the outmoded regulations for the Rural
Physician Training Grant Program, Definition of ``Underserved Rural
Community.'' Funding was authorized at section 749B(i) Public Health
Service Act for fiscal years 2010-2013, but never appropriated for the
Rural Physician Training Grant Program, and the program was not
implemented. Therefore, this regulation is no longer relevant, and HRSA
suggested the regulations defining underserved rural communities for
the Rural Physician Training Grant Program be removed.
DATES: This action is effective July 27, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sweta Maheshwari J.D., Legislative
Analyst, Division of Policy and Shortage Designation, Bureau of Health
Workforce, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 11W21A, Rockville, MD 20857,
by phone at (301) 945-3527, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to Executive Order 13563,
Section 6(a), which urges agencies to repeal existing regulations that
are outmoded from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), HHS is
removing 42 CFR part 5a. HHS believes that there is good cause to
bypass notice and comment and proceed to a final rule, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The action is non-controversial, as it merely removes
an obsolete provision from the CFR. This rule poses no new substantive
requirements on the public. Thus, we view notice and comment as
unnecessary.
Background
The Rural Physician Training Grant Program (Program), Definition of
``Underserved Rural Community'' regulation was issued via an interim
final rule with request for comment on May 26, 2010 pursuant to Section
749B(f) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 293m(f)). The
regulation has not been updated since it was issued.
Funding was authorized at section 749B(i) (42 U.S.C. 293m(i)) for
fiscal years 2010-2013, but was never appropriated for the Program;
therefore, it was not implemented. This rule defines ``underserved
rural communities,'' including census track information, Health
Professions Shortage Areas (HPSAs), and Medically Underserved Areas
(MUAs) for Program purposes. If the Program were to be funded, HRSA
would be able to define underserved rural communities for the purpose
of the program through policy documents.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771, and 13777
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13771 directs agencies to categorize all impacts which generate
or alleviate costs associated with regulatory burden and to determine
the actions net incremental effect.
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant
regulatory action'' as an action that is likely to result in a rule:
(1) Having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more in
any 1 year, or adversely and materially affecting a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local or Tribal governments or communities
(also referred to as ``economically significant''); (2) creating a
serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules
with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1
year). HHS submits that this final rule is not ``economically
significant'' as measured by the $100 million threshold, and hence not
a major rule under the Congressional Review Act. This rule has not been
designated as a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13771, titled ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,'' was issued on January 30, 2017. HHS identifies this
final rule as a deregulatory action (removing an obsolete rule from the
Code of Federal Regulations). For the purposes of Executive Order
13771, this final rule is not a substantive rule; rather it is
administrative in nature and provides no cost savings.
Executive Order 13777, titled ``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,'' was issued on February 24, 2017. As required by Section 3 of
this Executive Order, HHS established a Regulatory Reform Task Force
(HHS Task Force). Pursuant to Section 3(d)(ii), the HHS Task Force
evaluated this rulemaking and determined that these regulations are
``outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective.'' Following this finding, the
HHS Task Force advised the HRSA Administrator to initiate this
rulemaking to remove the obsolete regulations from the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the regulatory
flexibility analysis provided for under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not affect any information collections.
[[Page 30080]]
Dated: June 4, 2018.
George Sigounas,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration.
Approved: June 21, 2018.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 5a
Health care, Health care professionals, Public health, Rural
health.
PART 5a--[REMOVED]
0
For reasons set out in the preamble, and under the authority at 5
U.S.C. 301, HHS amends 42 CFR chapter I by removing part 5a.
[FR Doc. 2018-13835 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P