Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study-II, 30095-30101 [2018-13827]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
30095
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 124
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document No. AMS–ST–18–0043]
Plant Variety Protection Board; Open
Teleconference Meeting
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is
announcing a meeting of the Plant
Variety Protection Board (Board). The
meeting is being held to discuss a
variety of topics including, but not
limited to, work and outreach plans,
subcommittee activities, and program
activities. The meeting is open to the
public. This notice sets forth the
schedule and location for the meeting.
DATES: Tuesday, August 14, 2018, 1 p.m.
to 2 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Room 3543, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC, 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffery Haynes, Acting Commissioner,
Plant Variety Protection Office, USDA,
AMS, Science and Technology
Programs, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20250. Telephone:
(202) 720–1066; Fax: (202) 260–8976, or
Email: Jeffery.Haynes@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the provisions of section 10(a) of the
FACA (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), this
notice informs the public that the Plant
Variety Protection Office (PVPO) is
sponsoring a meeting of the Board on
August 14, 2018. The Plant Variety
Protection Act (PVPA) (7 U.S.C. 2321 et
seq.) provides legal protection in the
form of intellectual property rights to
developers of new varieties of plants,
which are reproduced sexually by seed
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
or are tuber-propagated. A certificate of
Plant Variety Protection is awarded to
an owner of a crop variety after an
examination shows that it is new,
distinct from other varieties, genetically
uniform and stable through successive
generations. The term of protection is 20
years for most crops and 25 years for
trees, shrubs, and vines. The PVPA also
provides for a statutory Board (7 U.S.C.
2327). The Board is composed of 14
individuals who are experts in various
areas of development and represent the
seed industry sector, academia and
government. The duties of the Board are
to: (1) Advise the Secretary concerning
the adoption of rules and regulations to
facilitate the proper administration of
the FACA; (2) provide advisory counsel
to the Secretary on appeals concerning
decisions on applications by the PVP
Office and on requests for emergency
public-interest compulsory licenses; and
(3) advise the Secretary on any other
matters under the Regulations and Rules
of Practice and on all questions under
Section 44 of the FACA, ‘‘Public Interest
in Wide Usage’’ (7 U.S.C. 2404).
Meeting Agenda: The purpose of the
meeting will be to discuss the PVPO
2018 program activities, the electronic
application system, and cooperation
with other countries. The Board plans to
discuss program activities that
encourage the development of new
plant varieties and address appeals to
the Secretary. The meeting will be open
to the public. Those wishing to
participate are encouraged to preregister by August 3, 2018, by contacting
Jeffery Haynes, acting commissioner, at
Telephone: (202) 720–1066; Fax: (202)
260–8976, or Email: Jeffery.Haynes@
ams.usda.gov.
Meeting Accommodation: The
meeting at USDA will provide
reasonable accommodation to
individuals with disabilities where
appropriate. If you need reasonable
accommodation to participate in this
public meeting, please notify Jeffery
Haynes at: Telephone: (202) 720–1066;
Fax: (202) 260–8976, or Email:
Jeffery.Haynes@ams.usda.gov.
Determinations for reasonable
accommodation will be made on a caseby-case basis. Minutes of the meeting
will be available for public review 30
days following the meeting on the
internet at https://www.ams.usda.gov/
PVPO.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 21, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–13751 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—School Nutrition
and Meal Cost Study-II
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Information
Collection; request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
invites the general public and other
public agencies to comment on this
proposed information collection. This
collection is a new collection for the
School Nutrition and Meal Cost StudyII (SNMCS–II). The purpose of SNMCS–
II is to provide a comprehensive picture
of school food service operations and
the nutritional quality, cost, and
acceptability of meals served in the
National School Lunch Program (NSLP)
and School Breakfast Program (SBP).
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received on or before August
27, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to:
John Endahl, Office of Policy Support,
Food and Nutrition Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park
Center Drive, Room 1004, Alexandria,
VA 22302. Comments may also be
submitted via fax to the attention of
John Endahl at 703–305–2576 or via
email to john.endahl@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia
22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
30096
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to John Endahl at
703–305–2127.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were
used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: School Nutrition and Meal Cost
Study-II.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: SNMCS–II will provide a
comprehensive picture of the NSLP and
SBP, and will provide critical
information about the nutritional
quality, cost, and acceptability of school
meals seven years after major reforms
began being phased in during the 2012–
2013 school year (SY). SNMCS–II will
collect a broad range of data from
nationally representative samples of
public school food authorities (SFAs),
public, non-charter schools, students,
and parents/guardians during SY 2019–
2020. These data will provide Federal,
State, and local policymakers with
current information about how federally
sponsored school meal programs are
operating by updating the information
that was collected in SY 2014–2015 for
the first School Nutrition and Meal Cost
Study (SNMCS–I). In addition, findings
from SNMCS–II will be compared to
those from SNMCS–I to explore trends
in key domains including the nutrient
content of school meals, meal costs and
revenues, and student participation,
plate waste, and dietary intakes.
SNMCS–II will also estimate the costs of
producing reimbursable school meals in
up to five States and Territories outside
of the 48 contiguous States and the
District of Columbia (DC), and examine
the relationship of costs to revenues in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
those five outlying areas. Section 28(a)
of the Richard B. Russell National
School Lunch Act authorizes this
assessment of the cost of producing
meals, and the nutrient profile of meals
under the NSLP and SBP.
The sample frame of SFAs is divided
into four groups, including the outlying
areas. Samples in Groups 1, 2, and 3 are
limited to the contiguous 48 States and
DC. The outlying areas sample includes
SFAs and schools in Alaska, Guam,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Data collected from the Group 1
sample will provide the precision
required for national estimates of SFAlevel characteristics and food service
operations. Data collected from the
Group 2 sample will be used to address
study objectives related to the school
nutrition environment and food service
operations; the food and nutrient
content of school meals; student
participation in the NSLP and SBP;
student/parent satisfaction with the
school meal programs; and students’
characteristics and dietary intakes. Data
collected from the Group 3 sample will
be used to address study objectives
related to the school nutrition
environment and food service
operations; the food and nutrient
content of school meals; the costs to
produce reimbursable school lunches
and breakfasts, including indirect and
local administrative costs, and the ratios
of revenues to costs; and plate waste in
the school meals programs. Data
collected from the outlying areas sample
will be used to estimate the costs of
producing reimbursable school meals
and the ratios of revenues to costs.
There is pre-testing burden that is
associated with this collection. This
burden was reviewed and approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
on March 19, 2018 under OMB# 0584–
0606 FNS Generic Clearance for PreTesting, Pilot, and Field Test Studies
(School Nutrition and Meal Cost StudyII, Outlying Areas Cost Study Feasibility
Assessment). This burden is not
included in the burden estimates for
this collection.
Affected Public: State, Local, and
Tribal Governments respondent groups
include: (1) State Child Nutrition
Agency directors; (2) State Education
Agency finance officers; (3) school
district superintendents; (4) SFA
directors; (5) local educational agency
business managers; (6) menu planners;
(7) school nutrition managers (SNMs);
(8) principals; and (9) school study
liaisons appointed by principals. Private
Sector For-Profit Business respondents
include food service management
company managers. Individual
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respondents include: (1) Students (first
grade through high school) and (2) their
parents/guardians.
Estimated Number of Respondents: A
total of 12,979 members of the public
will be initially contacted to participate
in the study. This includes 4,954 from
State, Local, and Tribal Governments,
25 from Private Sector For-Profit
Businesses, and 8,000 Individuals.
Initial contact will vary by type of
respondent and may include study
notification, recruiting, or data
collection. FNS anticipates that
approximately 12,904 of this sample
will respond to initial contact and 75
will not respond. Some respondents
who respond to the initial contact may
subsequently become non-respondents
to one or more components of the data
collection. The number of unique
respondents expected to provide data
for the study is 7,886.
The Group 1 completed sample
includes 125 SFAs but no schools.
Group 1 SFA directors will participate
in the SFA Director Survey.
The Group 2 completed sample
comprises 125 SFAs, 250 schools, and
2,000 students and their parents/
guardians. SFA and school staff will
participate in the SFA Director and
School Planning Interviews; SFA
Director, SNM, and Principal Surveys;
the Basic Menu Survey, A la Carte
Foods Checklist, and Meal Pattern
Crediting Report; and Cafeteria
Observation Guide and Competitive
Foods Checklists. Students and parents/
guardians will complete the Student
Interview, including height and weight
measurement; 24-dietary recall; and
Parent Interview.
The Group 3 completed sample
includes 250 SFAs and 750 schools.
SFA and school staff will participate in
the SFA Director and School Planning
Interviews; SFA Cost Interview and
Food Cost Worksheet; SFA Follow-Up
Web Survey and Cost Interview; SNM
Cost Interview; Principal Cost Interview;
SFA Director, SNM, and Principal
Surveys; the Expanded Menu Survey, A
la Carte Foods Checklist, and Meal
Pattern Crediting Report; and Cafeteria
Observation Guide and Competitive
Foods Checklists. Forty State Education
Agency finance officers will complete
the State Agency Indirect Cost Survey.
Plate waste will be observed for 3,900
reimbursable lunches and 2,000
reimbursable breakfasts at a subsample
of 130 schools among this Group 3
sample.
In the outlying areas, following
recruitment, SFA and school staff in 33
SFAs and 216 schools will complete the
SFA Director and School Planning
Interviews; SFA Cost Interview and
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Food Cost Worksheet; SFA Follow-Up
Web Survey and Cost Interview; SNM
Cost Interview; Principal Cost Interview;
and the Expanded Menu Survey. Up to
5 State Education Agency finance
officers will complete the State Agency
Indirect Cost Survey and the State Child
Nutrition Agency directors in Hawaii
and the U.S. Virgin Islands will
complete the SFA Cost Interview and
SFA Follow-Up Cost Interview to
capture the State agencies’ involvement
in SFAs’ food service operations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: All respondents will be
asked to respond to each specific data
collection activity only once. The
overall average number of responses per
respondent across the entire collection
is 3.52.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
45,653.
Estimated Time per Response: 33
minutes (0.55 hours). The estimated
response varies from 1 minute to 10.25
hours, depending on the data collection
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30097
activity and the respondent group, as
shown in the table below.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 25,184 hours. This
includes 24,950 hours for respondents
and 234 hours for non-respondents. See
the table below for each type of
respondent.
Dated: June 20, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator Food and Nutrition Service.
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Study Notification and
SFA Data Request
Email (a)(b)(c).
Data collection activity
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Study Notification (a) .....
Recruitment (c) ..............
Telephone Survey (SFA
Director Planning Interview, study confirmation).
Web Survey Advance
Letter (a)(c).
Web Survey Invitation ....
State ..................
Jkt 244001
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Self-Administered Web
Survey (SFA Director
Survey) (b)(c).
Self-Administered Web
Survey (SFA Director
Survey) (b)(c).
Self-Administered Web
Survey (SFA Director
Survey) (b)(c).
Web Survey Reminder ...
Sfmt 4703
Local and Tribal
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
School Roster Request
Email.
On-Site Data Collection
Logistics Email.
In-person Interview (SFA
Cost Interview, Food
Cost Worksheet, provide records).
Telephone Interview
(SFA Cost Interview,
Food Cost Worksheet,
provide records) (b).
In-person or Telephone
Interview (SFA Cost
Interview, provide
records) (a)(b)(c).
Follow-Up Web Survey
Invitation.
Self-Administered Web
Survey (SFA FollowUp Web Survey) (c).
Telephone Interview
(SFA Follow-Up Cost
Interview, provide financial records).
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
State ..................
State ..................
Telephone Interview
(SFA Cost Interview,
provide financial
records).
Telephone Interview
(SFA Follow-Up Cost
Interview, provide financial records).
Self-Administered Form
(study letter, State
Agency Indirect Cost
Survey) (a)(b)(c).
Recruitment (a)(c) ..........
State ..................
Affected public
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SFA Directors (Group 3,
outlying areas).
SFA Directors (Group 3,
outlying areas).
SFA Directors (Group 3,
outlying areas).
LEA Business Managers
(Group 3, outlying
areas).
SFA Directors (outlying
areas).
SFA Directors (Groups 2,
3).
SFA Directors (Group 3)
SFA Directors (Groups 1,
2, 3).
SFA Directors (Group 2)
SFA Directors (Group 3)
SFA Directors (Group 2)
SFA Directors (Groups 1,
2, 3).
SFA Directors (Group 1)
SFA Directors (Group 1)
State Education Agency
Finance Officers
(Group 3, outlying
areas).
Superintendents (Groups
2, 3, outlying areas).
SFA Directors (Groups 2,
3, outlying areas).
SFA Directors (Groups 2,
3, outlying areas).
SFA Directors (Groups 2,
3, outlying areas).
State Child Nutrition
Agency Directors (outlying areas).
State Child Nutrition
Agency Directors
(Groups 1, 2, 3, outlying areas).
State Child Nutrition
Agency Directors (outlying areas).
Respondents
269
269
283
283
33
250
390
98
278
250
125
125
555
139
438
438
473
438
45
2
2
54
Estimated
number of
respondents
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Frequency
of
response
269
269
283
283
33
250
390
98
278
250
125
125
555
139
438
438
473
438
45
2
2
54
Total
annual
responses
Response
2.00
0.50
0.05
3.08
3.25
3.25
0.05
1.00
0.15
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.02
0.05
0.58
0.28
0.10
0.33
0.17
2.00
3.08
0.40
Average
burden
hours per
response
538.00
134.50
14.15
871.64
107.25
812.50
19.50
98.00
41.70
207.50
103.75
103.75
11.10
6.95
254.04
122.64
47.30
144.54
7.65
4.00
6.16
21.60
Total
annual
burden
estimate
(hours)
14
14
0
16
2
14
0
32
0
27
14
14
0
0
0
35
0
35
9
0
0
0
Estimated
number of
respondents
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
Frequency
of
response
14
14
0
16
2
14
0
32
0
27
14
14
0
0
0
35
0
35
9
0
0
0
Total
annual
responses
Non-Response
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
Average
burden
hours per
response
0.93
0.93
0.00
1.12
0.28
1.96
0.00
2.24
0.00
1.80
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.45
0.00
2.45
0.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
annual
burden
estimate
(hours)
538.93
135.43
14.15
872.76
107.53
814.46
19.50
100.24
41.70
209.30
104.68
104.68
11.10
6.95
254.04
125.09
47.30
146.99
8.28
4.00
6.16
21.60
Grand total
annual
burden
estimate
(hours)
30098
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices
Telephone Interview
(SFA Follow-Up Cost
Interview, provide financial records) (c).
Self-Administered Web
Survey (Meal Pattern
Crediting Report)
(a)(b)(c).
Study Notification (a) .....
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Web Survey Invitation ....
Self-Administered Web
Survey (Principal Survey) (b)(c).
Web Survey Reminder ...
In-person Interview (Principal Cost Interview).
Telephone Interview
(Principal Cost Interview) (b)(c).
Self-Administered Web
Survey (School Planning Interview)
(a)(b)(c).
On-Site Data Collection
Logistics Email.
School Roster Request
Email.
Local and Tribal
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
27JNN1
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Local and Tribal
Self-Administered Web
Survey (School Planning Interview) (c).
On-Site Data Collection
Logistics Email.
Self-Administered Web
Survey (Basic Menu
Survey, A la Carte
Foods Checklist, SNM
Survey) (b)(c).
Self-Administered Web
Survey (Expanded
Menu Survey, A la
Carte Foods Checklist,
SNM Survey) (b)(c).
Self-Administered Web
Survey (Expanded
Menu Survey) (b)(c).
In-person or Telephone
Interview (SNM Cost
Interview).
Interviewer-Completed
Observation (SelfServe/Made-to-Order
Bar Form).
Interviewer-Completed
Observation (Cafeteria
Observation Guide).
Interviewer-Completed
Observation (Point-ofSale Form).
In-person Data Request
(Reimbursable Meal
Sale Data Request).
Interviewer-Completed
Observation (Plate
Waste Observation
Booklet).
Study Notification and
On-Site Data Collection Logistics Email (a).
Study Notification (a) .....
Local and Tribal
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
School Liaisons (Group
2).
School Liaisons (Group
2).
School Liaisons (Group
2).
Principals (outlying
areas).
Principals (Groups 2, 3)
Principals (Group 3) .......
Principals (outlying
areas).
Principals (Groups 2, 3)
Principals (Groups 2, 3)
Principals (Groups 2, 3)
School Nutrition Managers (Group 3).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 2).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 2).
School Nutrition Managers (Groups 2, 3).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 3, outlying areas).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 3).
School Nutrition Managers (outlying areas).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 3).
School Nutrition Managers (Groups 2, 3,
outlying areas).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 3, outlying areas).
School Nutrition Managers (Groups 2, 3).
School Nutrition Managers (Group 2).
Menu Planners (Groups
2, 3).
LEA Business Managers
(Group 3, outlying
areas).
70
250
264
216
500
750
1,000
900
227
1,040
130
250
250
1,000
173
966
216
750
250
1,040
966
1,541
375
269
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
70
250
264
216
500
750
1,000
900
227
1,040
130
250
250
1,000
173
966
216
750
250
1,040
966
1,541
375
269
1.00
0.05
0.25
0.75
0.15
0.75
0.02
0.50
0.13
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.08
0.08
0.17
1.00
8.34
10.25
8.25
0.05
0.25
0.13
1.50
2.00
70.00
12.50
66.00
162.00
75.00
562.50
20.00
450.00
29.51
187.20
21.67
41.67
20.83
83.00
28.83
966.00
1,801.44
7,687.50
2,062.50
52.00
241.50
200.33
562.50
538.00
0
0
0
11
0
39
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
50
11
39
13
0
50
0
15
14
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
11
0
39
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
50
11
39
13
0
50
0
15
14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.73
0.00
2.60
0.00
6.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
3.33
0.75
5.33
1.78
0.00
3.50
0.00
1.05
0.93
70.00
12.50
66.00
162.73
75.00
565.10
20.00
456.67
29.51
187.20
21.67
41.67
20.83
83.00
29.43
969.33
1,802.19
7,692.83
2,064.28
52.00
245.00
200.33
563.55
538.93
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices
30099
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
........................................
Recruitment (c) ..............
Study Notification (a) .....
........................................
Data collection activity
Study Notification (a) .....
Subtotal Private Sector ForProfit
Businesses.
Private Sector
For-Profit.
Private Sector
For-Profit.
Subtotal
State,
Local, and
Tribal
Governments.
Affected public
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Individual ...........
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Grand Total .......
Subtotal Individuals.
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
........................................
........................................
Self-Administered Web
Survey or Telephone
Interview (Parent Interview) (b)(c).
Self-Administered Form
(dietary recall reminder, Food Diary,
Day 1/Day 2).
Telephone Interview (24Hour Dietary Recall,
Day 1).
Telephone Interview (24Hour Dietary Recall,
Day 2) (c).
Study Assent Form (a) ...
Study Reminder, Day 1
In-person Interview (Student Interview, 24Hour Dietary Recall,
Day 1) (b)(c).
Study Reminder, Day 2
Telephone Interview (24Hour Dietary Recall,
Day 2) (c).
Survey Invitation ............
Individual ...........
Individual ...........
Study Consent Form (c)
Individual ...........
12,904 ............................
........................................
Students (Group 2) ........
Students (Group 2) ........
Students (Group 2) ........
Students (Group 2) ........
Students (Group 2) ........
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
Parents/Guardians
(Group 2).
........................................
Food Service Management Company Manager (Groups 2, 3, outlying areas).
Food Service Management Company Manager (Groups 2, 3, outlying areas).
........................................
Respondents
..................
8,000
857
600
4,000
2,857
2,000
246
820
1,066
2,000
2,222
3,712
4,000
25
24
25
4,879
Estimated
number of
respondents
43,059
..................
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
..................
1
1
..................
Frequency
of
response
0.58
24,380
857
600
4,000
2,857
2,000
246
820
1,066
2,000
2,222
3,712
4,000
49
24
25
18,630
Total
annual
responses
Response
24,950.19
................
0.02
0.75
0.05
0.02
1.12
0.75
0.25
0.19
0.42
0.02
0.10
0.13
................
0.25
0.07
................
Average
burden
hours per
response
75
5,321.74
17.14
450.00
200.00
57.14
2,240.00
184.50
205.00
198.99
833.33
44.44
371.20
520.00
7.75
6.00
1.75
19,620.70
Total
annual
burden
estimate
(hours)
..................
0
0
257
0
0
857
105
91
196
222
0
288
0
0
1
0
75
Estimated
number of
respondents
..................
..................
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
..................
1
0
..................
Frequency
of
response
2,594
2,016
0
257
0
0
857
105
91
196
222
0
288
0
1
1
0
577
Total
annual
responses
Non-Response
0.09
................
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.07
0.07
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.00
................
0.07
0.00
................
Average
burden
hours per
response
234.11
190.10
0.00
17.13
0.00
0.00
119.98
7.00
6.37
3.92
15.54
0.00
20.16
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
43.94
Total
annual
burden
estimate
(hours)
25,184.30
5,511.84
17.14
467.13
200.00
57.14
2,359.98
191.50
211.37
202.91
848.87
44.44
391.36
520.00
7.82
6.07
1.75
19,664.64
Grand total
annual
burden
estimate
(hours)
30100
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2018–13827 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revision of the Land Management
Plans for the Malheur, Umatilla, and
Wallowa-Whitman National Forests in
Oregon, Washington, and Idaho States
USDA Forest Service.
Notice of the opportunity to
object to the Revised Land Management
Plans for the Malheur, Umatilla, and
Wallowa-Whitman National Forests.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The USDA Forest Service has
prepared Revised Land Management
Plans (Forest Plans) for the Malheur,
Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman
National Forests (also termed the Blue
Mountains Forests). The Forest Service
has also prepared a single Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
and a combined Draft Record of
Decision. This notice is to inform the
public that a 60-day objections period is
being initiated for individuals or entities
who have submitted substantive formal
comments related to the revision of the
Malheur, Umatilla, and WallowaWhitman Forest Plans during the
opportunities for public comment
provided during the planning process
for that decision. Objections must be
based on previously submitted
substantive formal comments attributed
to the objector unless the objection
concerns an issue that arose after the
opportunities for formal comment.
DATES: The Revised Malheur, Umatilla,
and Wallowa-Whitman Forest Plans,
FEIS, Draft Record of Decision, and
other supporting documentation are
available on the following web page:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/
BlueMountainsPlanRevision.
A legal notice of the initiation of the
60-day objection period is being
published in The Oregonian, which is
the newspaper of record for Regional
Forester decisions in the Pacific
Northwest Region of the Forest Service.
The 60-day objection period will begin
the day following the date of the
publication of the legal notice in The
Oregonian. A copy of the legal notice
will be posted on web page listed above.
ADDRESSES: Electronic objections must
be submitted to the Objection Reviewing
Officer via email to objections-chief@
fs.fed.us, with a subject line stating:
‘‘Objection regarding the Revised Blue
Mountains Forest Plans.’’ Electronic
submissions must be submitted in a
format (Word, PDF, or Rich Text) that is
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
readable and searchable with optical
character recognition software.
Faxed objections must be sent and
addressed to ‘‘Chris French, Objection
Reviewing Officer’’ at (202) 649–1172
and must include a subject line stating:
‘‘Objection regarding the Revised Blue
Mountains Forest Plans.’’ The fax
coversheet should specify the number of
pages being submitted.
Hardcopy objections may be
submitted by regular mail, private
carrier, or hand delivery to the
following address: USDA Forest Service,
Attn: Chris French, Objection Reviewing
Officer, 1400 Independence Ave. SW,
EMC–PEEARS, Mailstop 1104,
Washington, DC 20250. Office hours are
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Hardcopy submissions must include a
subject line on page one stating:
‘‘Objection regarding the Revised Blue
Mountains Forest Plans.’’
Individuals who need to use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) to transmit objections may call
the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8:00
a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard
Time, Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Team Leader, Peter Fargo, 1550 Dewey
Ave., Suite A, Baker City, OR 97814,
(541) 523–1231.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
decision to approve the Revised
Malheur, Umatilla, and WallowaWhitman Forest Plans will be subject to
the objection process identified in 36
CFR part 219 subpart B (219.50 to
219.62). Individuals and entities who
have submitted substantive formal
comments related to the revision of the
Malheur, Umatilla, and WallowaWhitman Forest Plans during the
opportunities for public comment, as
provided in 36 CFR part 219 subpart A,
during the planning process for that
decision may file an objection.
Objections must be based on previously
submitted substantive formal comments
attributed to the objector unless the
objection concerns an issue that arose
after the opportunities for formal
comment. The burden is on the objector
to demonstrate compliance with
requirements for objection. All
objections must be filed, in writing,
with the reviewing officer for the
Revised Malheur, Umatilla, and
Wallowa-Whitman Forest Plans.
Objections received in response to this
solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who object, will be
considered part of the public record on
these proposed actions and will be
available for public inspection. At a
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30101
minimum, an objection must include
the following (36 CFR 219.54(c)):
(1) The objector’s name and address
along with a telephone number or email
address if available. In cases where no
identifiable name is attached to an
objection, the Forest Service will
attempt to verify the identity of the
objector to confirm objection eligibility;
(2) Signature or other verification of
authorship upon request (a scanned
signature for electronic mail may be
filed with the objection);
(3) Identification of the lead objector,
when multiple names are listed on an
objection. The Forest Service will
communicate to all parties to an
objection through the lead objector.
Verification of the identity of the lead
objector must also be provided if
requested;
(4) The name of the Plan Revision(s)
being objected to, and the name and title
of the responsible official;
(5) A statement of the issues and/or
parts of the Plan Revision(s) to which
the objection applies;
(6) A concise statement explaining the
objection and suggesting how the
proposed plan decision may be
improved. If the objector believes that
the plan revision is inconsistent with
law, regulation, or policy, an
explanation should be included;
(7) A statement that demonstrates the
link between the objector’s prior
substantive formal comments and the
content of the objection, unless the
objection concerns an issue that arose
after the opportunities for formal
comment; and
(8) All documents referenced in the
objection (a bibliography is not
sufficient), except that the following
need not be provided:
a. All or any part of a Federal law or
regulation,
b. Forest Service Directive System
documents and land management Plans
or other published Forest Service
documents,
c. Documents referenced by the Forest
Service in the planning documentation
related to the proposal subject to
objection, and
d. Formal comments previously
provided to the Forest Service by the
objector during the plan revision
comment period.
Prior to the issuance of the reviewing
officer’s written response, either the
reviewing officer or the objector may
request to meet to discuss issues raised
in the objection. Interested persons who
wish to participate in meetings to
discuss issues raised by objectors must
have previously submitted substantive
formal comments related to the
objection issues. Interested persons
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30095-30101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13827]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study-II
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Information Collection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) invites the general public and other
public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection.
This collection is a new collection for the School Nutrition and Meal
Cost Study-II (SNMCS-II). The purpose of SNMCS-II is to provide a
comprehensive picture of school food service operations and the
nutritional quality, cost, and acceptability of meals served in the
National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program
(SBP).
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received on or before
August 27, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: John Endahl, Office of Policy
Support, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1004, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention of John Endahl at 703-305-
2576 or via email to [email protected]. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101 Park Center
Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request
[[Page 30096]]
for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will be a
matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to John Endahl
at 703-305-2127.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Title: School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study-II.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: SNMCS-II will provide a comprehensive picture of the NSLP
and SBP, and will provide critical information about the nutritional
quality, cost, and acceptability of school meals seven years after
major reforms began being phased in during the 2012-2013 school year
(SY). SNMCS-II will collect a broad range of data from nationally
representative samples of public school food authorities (SFAs),
public, non-charter schools, students, and parents/guardians during SY
2019-2020. These data will provide Federal, State, and local
policymakers with current information about how federally sponsored
school meal programs are operating by updating the information that was
collected in SY 2014-2015 for the first School Nutrition and Meal Cost
Study (SNMCS-I). In addition, findings from SNMCS-II will be compared
to those from SNMCS-I to explore trends in key domains including the
nutrient content of school meals, meal costs and revenues, and student
participation, plate waste, and dietary intakes. SNMCS-II will also
estimate the costs of producing reimbursable school meals in up to five
States and Territories outside of the 48 contiguous States and the
District of Columbia (DC), and examine the relationship of costs to
revenues in those five outlying areas. Section 28(a) of the Richard B.
Russell National School Lunch Act authorizes this assessment of the
cost of producing meals, and the nutrient profile of meals under the
NSLP and SBP.
The sample frame of SFAs is divided into four groups, including the
outlying areas. Samples in Groups 1, 2, and 3 are limited to the
contiguous 48 States and DC. The outlying areas sample includes SFAs
and schools in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Data collected from the Group 1 sample will provide the precision
required for national estimates of SFA-level characteristics and food
service operations. Data collected from the Group 2 sample will be used
to address study objectives related to the school nutrition environment
and food service operations; the food and nutrient content of school
meals; student participation in the NSLP and SBP; student/parent
satisfaction with the school meal programs; and students'
characteristics and dietary intakes. Data collected from the Group 3
sample will be used to address study objectives related to the school
nutrition environment and food service operations; the food and
nutrient content of school meals; the costs to produce reimbursable
school lunches and breakfasts, including indirect and local
administrative costs, and the ratios of revenues to costs; and plate
waste in the school meals programs. Data collected from the outlying
areas sample will be used to estimate the costs of producing
reimbursable school meals and the ratios of revenues to costs.
There is pre-testing burden that is associated with this
collection. This burden was reviewed and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget on March 19, 2018 under OMB# 0584-0606 FNS
Generic Clearance for Pre-Testing, Pilot, and Field Test Studies
(School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study-II, Outlying Areas Cost Study
Feasibility Assessment). This burden is not included in the burden
estimates for this collection.
Affected Public: State, Local, and Tribal Governments respondent
groups include: (1) State Child Nutrition Agency directors; (2) State
Education Agency finance officers; (3) school district superintendents;
(4) SFA directors; (5) local educational agency business managers; (6)
menu planners; (7) school nutrition managers (SNMs); (8) principals;
and (9) school study liaisons appointed by principals. Private Sector
For-Profit Business respondents include food service management company
managers. Individual respondents include: (1) Students (first grade
through high school) and (2) their parents/guardians.
Estimated Number of Respondents: A total of 12,979 members of the
public will be initially contacted to participate in the study. This
includes 4,954 from State, Local, and Tribal Governments, 25 from
Private Sector For-Profit Businesses, and 8,000 Individuals. Initial
contact will vary by type of respondent and may include study
notification, recruiting, or data collection. FNS anticipates that
approximately 12,904 of this sample will respond to initial contact and
75 will not respond. Some respondents who respond to the initial
contact may subsequently become non-respondents to one or more
components of the data collection. The number of unique respondents
expected to provide data for the study is 7,886.
The Group 1 completed sample includes 125 SFAs but no schools.
Group 1 SFA directors will participate in the SFA Director Survey.
The Group 2 completed sample comprises 125 SFAs, 250 schools, and
2,000 students and their parents/guardians. SFA and school staff will
participate in the SFA Director and School Planning Interviews; SFA
Director, SNM, and Principal Surveys; the Basic Menu Survey, A la Carte
Foods Checklist, and Meal Pattern Crediting Report; and Cafeteria
Observation Guide and Competitive Foods Checklists. Students and
parents/guardians will complete the Student Interview, including height
and weight measurement; 24-dietary recall; and Parent Interview.
The Group 3 completed sample includes 250 SFAs and 750 schools. SFA
and school staff will participate in the SFA Director and School
Planning Interviews; SFA Cost Interview and Food Cost Worksheet; SFA
Follow-Up Web Survey and Cost Interview; SNM Cost Interview; Principal
Cost Interview; SFA Director, SNM, and Principal Surveys; the Expanded
Menu Survey, A la Carte Foods Checklist, and Meal Pattern Crediting
Report; and Cafeteria Observation Guide and Competitive Foods
Checklists. Forty State Education Agency finance officers will complete
the State Agency Indirect Cost Survey. Plate waste will be observed for
3,900 reimbursable lunches and 2,000 reimbursable breakfasts at a
subsample of 130 schools among this Group 3 sample.
In the outlying areas, following recruitment, SFA and school staff
in 33 SFAs and 216 schools will complete the SFA Director and School
Planning Interviews; SFA Cost Interview and
[[Page 30097]]
Food Cost Worksheet; SFA Follow-Up Web Survey and Cost Interview; SNM
Cost Interview; Principal Cost Interview; and the Expanded Menu Survey.
Up to 5 State Education Agency finance officers will complete the State
Agency Indirect Cost Survey and the State Child Nutrition Agency
directors in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands will complete the SFA
Cost Interview and SFA Follow-Up Cost Interview to capture the State
agencies' involvement in SFAs' food service operations.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: All respondents will
be asked to respond to each specific data collection activity only
once. The overall average number of responses per respondent across the
entire collection is 3.52.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 45,653.
Estimated Time per Response: 33 minutes (0.55 hours). The estimated
response varies from 1 minute to 10.25 hours, depending on the data
collection activity and the respondent group, as shown in the table
below.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 25,184 hours. This
includes 24,950 hours for respondents and 234 hours for non-
respondents. See the table below for each type of respondent.
Dated: June 20, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator Food and Nutrition Service.
[[Page 30098]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response Non-Response
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grand total
Total Total annual
Affected public Data collection Respondents Estimated Frequency Total Average annual Estimated Frequency Total Average annual burden
activity number of of annual burden burden number of of annual burden burden estimate
respondents response responses hours per estimate respondents response responses hours per estimate (hours)
response (hours) response (hours)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State................. Study Notification State Child 54 1 54 0.40 21.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 21.60
and SFA Data Nutrition Agency
Request Email Directors (Groups
(a)(b)(c). 1, 2, 3, outlying
areas).
State................. Telephone Interview State Child 2 1 2 3.08 6.16 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.16
(SFA Cost Nutrition Agency
Interview, provide Directors
financial records). (outlying areas).
State................. Telephone Interview State Child 2 1 2 2.00 4.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 4.00
(SFA Follow-Up Nutrition Agency
Cost Interview, Directors
provide financial (outlying areas).
records).
State................. Self-Administered State Education 45 1 45 0.17 7.65 9 1 9 0.07 0.63 8.28
Form (study Agency Finance
letter, State Officers (Group
Agency Indirect 3, outlying
Cost Survey) areas).
(a)(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Recruitment (a)(c). Superintendents 438 1 438 0.33 144.54 35 1 35 0.07 2.45 146.99
(Groups 2, 3,
outlying areas).
Local and Tribal...... Study Notification SFA Directors 473 1 473 0.10 47.30 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 47.30
(a). (Groups 2, 3,
outlying areas).
Local and Tribal...... Recruitment (c).... SFA Directors 438 1 438 0.28 122.64 35 1 35 0.07 2.45 125.09
(Groups 2, 3,
outlying areas).
Local and Tribal...... Telephone Survey SFA Directors 438 1 438 0.58 254.04 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 254.04
(SFA Director (Groups 2, 3,
Planning outlying areas).
Interview, study
confirmation).
Local and Tribal...... Web Survey Advance SFA Directors 139 1 139 0.05 6.95 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.95
Letter (a)(c). (Group 1).
Local and Tribal...... Web Survey SFA Directors 555 1 555 0.02 11.10 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 11.10
Invitation. (Groups 1, 2, 3).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered SFA Directors 125 1 125 0.83 103.75 14 1 14 0.07 0.93 104.68
Web Survey (SFA (Group 1).
Director Survey)
(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered SFA Directors 125 1 125 0.83 103.75 14 1 14 0.07 0.93 104.68
Web Survey (SFA (Group 2).
Director Survey)
(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered SFA Directors 250 1 250 0.83 207.50 27 1 27 0.07 1.80 209.30
Web Survey (SFA (Group 3).
Director Survey)
(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Web Survey Reminder SFA Directors 278 1 278 0.15 41.70 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 41.70
(Groups 1, 2, 3).
Local and Tribal...... School Roster SFA Directors 98 1 98 1.00 98.00 32 1 32 0.07 2.24 100.24
Request Email. (Group 2).
Local and Tribal...... On-Site Data SFA Directors 390 1 390 0.05 19.50 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 19.50
Collection (Groups 2, 3).
Logistics Email.
Local and Tribal...... In-person Interview SFA Directors 250 1 250 3.25 812.50 14 1 14 0.14 1.96 814.46
(SFA Cost (Group 3).
Interview, Food
Cost Worksheet,
provide records).
Local and Tribal...... Telephone Interview SFA Directors 33 1 33 3.25 107.25 2 1 2 0.14 0.28 107.53
(SFA Cost (outlying areas).
Interview, Food
Cost Worksheet,
provide records)
(b).
Local and Tribal...... In-person or LEA Business 283 1 283 3.08 871.64 16 1 16 0.07 1.12 872.76
Telephone Managers (Group
Interview (SFA 3, outlying
Cost Interview, areas).
provide records)
(a)(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Follow-Up Web SFA Directors 283 1 283 0.05 14.15 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 14.15
Survey Invitation. (Group 3,
outlying areas).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered SFA Directors 269 1 269 0.50 134.50 14 1 14 0.07 0.93 135.43
Web Survey (SFA (Group 3,
Follow-Up Web outlying areas).
Survey) (c).
Local and Tribal...... Telephone Interview SFA Directors 269 1 269 2.00 538.00 14 1 14 0.07 0.93 538.93
(SFA Follow-Up (Group 3,
Cost Interview, outlying areas).
provide financial
records).
[[Page 30099]]
Local and Tribal...... Telephone Interview LEA Business 269 1 269 2.00 538.00 14 1 14 0.07 0.93 538.93
(SFA Follow-Up Managers (Group
Cost Interview, 3, outlying
provide financial areas).
records) (c).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered Menu Planners 375 1 375 1.50 562.50 15 1 15 0.07 1.05 563.55
Web Survey (Meal (Groups 2, 3).
Pattern Crediting
Report) (a)(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Study Notification School Nutrition 1,541 1 1,541 0.13 200.33 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 200.33
(a). Managers (Groups
2, 3, outlying
areas).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered School Nutrition 966 1 966 0.25 241.50 50 1 50 0.07 3.50 245.00
Web Survey (School Managers (Group
Planning 3, outlying
Interview) (c). areas).
Local and Tribal...... On-Site Data School Nutrition 1,040 1 1,040 0.05 52.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 52.00
Collection Managers (Groups
Logistics Email. 2, 3).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered School Nutrition 250 1 250 8.25 2,062.50 13 1 13 0.14 1.78 2,064.28
Web Survey (Basic Managers (Group
Menu Survey, A la 2).
Carte Foods
Checklist, SNM
Survey) (b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered School Nutrition 750 1 750 10.25 7,687.50 39 1 39 0.14 5.33 7,692.83
Web Survey Managers (Group
(Expanded Menu 3).
Survey, A la Carte
Foods Checklist,
SNM Survey) (b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered School Nutrition 216 1 216 8.34 1,801.44 11 1 11 0.07 0.75 1,802.19
Web Survey Managers
(Expanded Menu (outlying areas).
Survey) (b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... In-person or School Nutrition 966 1 966 1.00 966.00 50 1 50 0.07 3.33 969.33
Telephone Managers (Group
Interview (SNM 3, outlying
Cost Interview). areas).
Local and Tribal...... Interviewer- School Nutrition 173 1 173 0.17 28.83 9 1 9 0.07 0.60 29.43
Completed Managers (Group
Observation (Self- 3).
Serve/Made-to-
Order Bar Form).
Local and Tribal...... Interviewer- School Nutrition 1,000 1 1,000 0.08 83.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 83.00
Completed Managers (Groups
Observation 2, 3).
(Cafeteria
Observation Guide).
Local and Tribal...... Interviewer- School Nutrition 250 1 250 0.08 20.83 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 20.83
Completed Managers (Group
Observation (Point- 2).
of-Sale Form).
Local and Tribal...... In-person Data School Nutrition 250 1 250 0.17 41.67 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 41.67
Request Managers (Group
(Reimbursable Meal 2).
Sale Data Request).
Local and Tribal...... Interviewer- School Nutrition 130 1 130 0.17 21.67 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 21.67
Completed Managers (Group
Observation (Plate 3).
Waste Observation
Booklet).
Local and Tribal...... Study Notification Principals (Groups 1,040 1 1,040 0.18 187.20 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 187.20
and On-Site Data 2, 3).
Collection
Logistics Email
(a).
Local and Tribal...... Study Notification Principals 227 1 227 0.13 29.51 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 29.51
(a). (outlying areas).
Local and Tribal...... Web Survey Principals (Groups 1,000 1 1,000 0.02 20.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 20.00
Invitation. 2, 3).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered Principals (Groups 900 1 900 0.50 450.00 100 1 100 0.07 6.67 456.67
Web Survey 2, 3).
(Principal Survey)
(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Web Survey Reminder Principals (Groups 500 1 500 0.15 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 75.00
2, 3).
Local and Tribal...... In-person Interview Principals (Group 750 1 750 0.75 562.50 39 1 39 0.07 2.60 565.10
(Principal Cost 3).
Interview).
Local and Tribal...... Telephone Interview Principals 216 1 216 0.75 162.00 11 1 11 0.07 0.73 162.73
(Principal Cost (outlying areas).
Interview) (b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... Self-Administered School Liaisons 264 1 264 0.25 66.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 66.00
Web Survey (School (Group 2).
Planning
Interview)
(a)(b)(c).
Local and Tribal...... On-Site Data School Liaisons 250 1 250 0.05 12.50 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 12.50
Collection (Group 2).
Logistics Email.
Local and Tribal...... School Roster School Liaisons 70 1 70 1.00 70.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 70.00
Request Email. (Group 2).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 30100]]
Subtotal State, ................... .................. 4,879 .......... 18,630 ......... 19,620.70 75 .......... 577 ......... 43.94 19,664.64
Local, and Tribal
Governments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Sector For- Study Notification Food Service 25 1 25 0.07 1.75 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.75
Profit. (a). Management
Company Manager
(Groups 2, 3,
outlying areas).
Private Sector For- Recruitment (c).... Food Service 24 1 24 0.25 6.00 1 1 1 0.07 0.07 6.07
Profit. Management
Company Manager
(Groups 2, 3,
outlying areas).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal Private ................... .................. 25 .......... 49 ......... 7.75 0 .......... 1 ......... 0.07 7.82
Sector For-Profit
Businesses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual............ Study Notification Parents/Guardians 4,000 1 4,000 0.13 520.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 520.00
(a). (Group 2).
Individual............ Study Consent Form Parents/Guardians 3,712 1 3,712 0.10 371.20 288 1 288 0.07 20.16 391.36
(c). (Group 2).
Individual............ Survey Invitation.. Parents/Guardians 2,222 1 2,222 0.02 44.44 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 44.44
(Group 2).
Individual............ Self-Administered Parents/Guardians 2,000 1 2,000 0.42 833.33 222 1 222 0.07 15.54 848.87
Web Survey or (Group 2).
Telephone
Interview (Parent
Interview) (b)(c).
Individual............ Self-Administered Parents/Guardians 1,066 1 1,066 0.19 198.99 196 1 196 0.02 3.92 202.91
Form (dietary (Group 2).
recall reminder,
Food Diary, Day 1/
Day 2).
Individual............ Telephone Interview Parents/Guardians 820 1 820 0.25 205.00 91 1 91 0.07 6.37 211.37
(24-Hour Dietary (Group 2).
Recall, Day 1).
Individual............ Telephone Interview Parents/Guardians 246 1 246 0.75 184.50 105 1 105 0.07 7.00 191.50
(24-Hour Dietary (Group 2).
Recall, Day 2) (c).
Individual............ Study Assent Form Students (Group 2) 4,000 1 4,000 0.05 200.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 200.00
(a).
Individual............ Study Reminder, Day Students (Group 2) 2,857 1 2,857 0.02 57.14 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 57.14
1.
Individual............ In-person Interview Students (Group 2) 2,000 1 2,000 1.12 2,240.00 857 1 857 0.14 119.98 2,359.98
(Student
Interview, 24-Hour
Dietary Recall,
Day 1) (b)(c).
Individual............ Study Reminder, Day Students (Group 2) 857 1 857 0.02 17.14 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 17.14
2.
Individual............ Telephone Interview Students (Group 2) 600 1 600 0.75 450.00 257 1 257 0.07 17.13 467.13
(24-Hour Dietary
Recall, Day 2) (c).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal ................... .................. 8,000 .......... 24,380 ......... 5,321.74 0 .......... 2,016 ......... 190.10 5,511.84
Individuals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grand Total........... ................... 12,904............ ........... 43,059 0.58 24,950.19 75 ........... .......... 2,594 0.09 234.11 25,184.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 30101]]
[FR Doc. 2018-13827 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
