Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Allegheny County Health Department, Withdrawal of Section 112(l) Delegation Authority for the Chemical Accident Prevention Regulations, 29085-29087 [2018-13452]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29085
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.1
(series) OM, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves amending the regulations for
Hampton Roads and adjacent water
anchorages by establishing an
anchorage, Anchorage R, 3 NM west of
Cape Charles, VA and relocating the
existing Quarantine Anchorage,
Anchorage Q, to a more secluded
position that is 6 NM southwest of
Fishermans Point, VA. Normally, such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraphs L59(a)
and L59(b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–
01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
VI. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
We plan to hold three public meetings
to receive oral comments on this NPRM,
one in Norfolk, VA and two in Cape
Charles, VA. The first public meeting
will be held on Monday, June 25, 2018,
from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at Slover Public
Library Meeting Room, 235 E. Plume
Street, Norfolk, VA 23510. Two public
meetings will be held on July 10, 2018
at Cape Charles Civic Center, 500
Tazwell Avenue, Cape Charles, VA; the
first meeting will be held from 1 p.m.
to 3 p.m. and the second meeting will
be held from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. For
information on facilities or services for
individuals with disabilities or to
request special assistance at the public
meeting, contact the person named in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section, above.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C., 471, 1221 through
1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department
Homeland Security Delegation No 0170.1.
2. In § 110.168, add introductory text
in paragraph (a), revise paragraph (a)(6),
and add paragraph (a)(7) to read as
follows:
■
§ 110.168 Hampton Roads, Virginia and
adjacent waters.
(a) Anchorage Grounds. All
coordinates in this section for anchorage
grounds are based on North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Anchorage Q. Quarantine
Anchorage. The waters bound by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
37°05′40″
37°05′40″
37°03′46″
37°03′46″
PO 00000
Longitude
N
N
N
N
Frm 00038
076°08′12″
076°07′19″
076°05′58″
076°06′51″
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
W
W
W
W
(7) Anchorage R. The waters all
within the Chesapeake Bay, bound by a
line connecting the following points:
Latitude
37°19′10″
37°12′00″
37°09′08″
37°11′23″
37°19′10″
*
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
*
076°05′00″
076°05′00″
076°08′19″
076°08′49″
076°05′46″
*
*
W
W
W
W
W
*
Dated: June 8, 2018.
Meredith Austin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018–13439 Filed 6–19–18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0304; FRL–9979–
70—Region 3]
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
Allegheny County Health Department,
Withdrawal of Section 112(l)
Delegation Authority for the Chemical
Accident Prevention Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is notifying the public
that Allegheny County Health
Department (ACHD) has completed the
regulatory process for voluntary
withdrawal from EPA’s delegation of
authority to enforce the chemical
accident prevention regulations, and
EPA is proposing to modify
amendments indicating that ACHD does
not have delegated authority to
implement and enforce the regulatory
requirements. EPA is also notifying the
public that each facility subject to the
previously approved ACHD delegated
chemical accident prevention program
is required to maintain continuous
compliance with applicable
requirements. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2018–0304 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
duke.gerallyn@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
29086
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Cate Opila, (215) 814–2041, or by
email at opila.marycate@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E,
authorizes EPA to approve of State, and
local, rules and programs to be
implemented and enforced in place of
certain CAA requirements, including
the chemical accident prevention
provisions set forth at 40 CFR part 68
(Chemical Accident Prevention
Regulations). EPA promulgated the
Chemical Accident Prevention
Regulations (or risk management
program (RMP) regulations) (RMP
regulations) pursuant to CAA Section
112(r)(7). By letter dated June 15, 2001,
ACHD requested delegation of authority
to implement and enforce the RMP
regulations for all sources, among other
requests for delegation of other
programs. On January 30, 2002, EPA
issued a direct final rule, which became
effective on April 1, 2002, approving
ACHD’s request for delegation of
authority to implement and enforce
EPA’s RMP regulations, which had been
adopted by reference from 40 CFR part
68, for all sources within Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania, subject to such
regulations. See 67 FR 4363 (January 30,
2002).
The procedures for a State, or local
authority, to voluntarily withdraw from
a CAA approved rule, program or
portion of a rule or program are set forth
at 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7). In summary, these
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
regulations and relevant EPA guidance
provide that a State, or local authority,
may unilaterally and voluntarily
withdraw from an approved delegated
program by notifying EPA and all
affected sources of its intent to
withdraw and the specific requirements
subject to such withdrawal. Any such
withdrawal is not effective sooner than
180 days after such notification to EPA.
The State, or local authority, must also
provide notice and opportunity for
comment to the public. To the extent
that any source that is affected by the
withdrawal is also subject to a CAA
operating permit issued pursuant to 40
CFR part 70, the State, or local
authority, must reopen and revise such
permit to the extent necessary.
II. EPA Analysis
By letter dated July 28, 2017, ACHD
notified EPA Region III of its intent to
voluntarily withdraw from EPA’s
delegation of authority to enforce the
RMP regulations. By letter dated
November 9, 2017, ACHD notified EPA
Region III that ACHD announced a
public comment period to take comment
on ACHD’s voluntary withdrawal from
EPA’s delegation of authority to enforce
the RMP regulations. The public
comment period extended from
November 10, 2017 to December 10,
2017. During this public comment
period, ACHD did not receive any
comments in response to the public
comment notification. ACHD provided
all applicable facilities with written
notice that ACHD is voluntarily
withdrawing from EPA’s delegation of
authority to enforce the RMP regulations
set forth at 40 CFR part 68.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7), ACHD
has determined which facilities, located
in Allegheny County, are subject to the
RMP regulations and have effective
CAA Title V operating permits in
accordance with 40 CFR part 70. Sixteen
facilities within Allegheny County have
submitted risk management plans to
EPA and ACHD has issued Title V
operating permits to 28 currently
operating facilities. ACHD Title V
operating permits incorporate the RMP
regulations, set forth at 40 CFR part 68,
by reference. Therefore, each facility,
located in Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania, that is subject to the RMP
regulations and has an effective Title V
operating permit has been issued a Title
V permit which includes the proper
citation to any applicable RMP
regulation.
Upon a State’s or local authority’s
voluntary withdrawal of a delegated
program, in accordance with 40 CFR
63.96(b)(7), EPA is required to publish
a time for sources subject to the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
previously approved State, or local, rule
or program to come into compliance
with applicable Federal requirements.
Because, as part of its previously
approved delegated program, ACHD
incorporated the RMP regulations by
reference, there is no distinction
between ACHD’s previously approved
delegated program for implementing the
requirements set forth at 40 CFR part 68
and the applicable Federal requirements
set forth at 40 CFR part 68. Furthermore,
EPA’s delegation of authority to
implement the requirements set forth at
40 CFR part 68 to ACHD stated in
relevant part: ‘‘Although ACHD has
primary authority and responsibility to
implement and enforce the . . .
chemical accident prevention
provisions, nothing shall preclude,
limit, or interfere with the authority of
EPA to exercise its enforcement,
investigatory, and information gathering
authorities concerning this part of the
Act.’’ See 67 FR 4366 (January 30, 2002).
Therefore, all facilities located in
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania,
subject to any requirement set forth at
40 CFR part 68 shall maintain
continuous compliance with such
requirement.
III. Proposed Action
EPA’s review of this material
indicates that ACHD has completed the
regulatorily mandated process, set forth
at 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7), for voluntary
withdrawal from EPA’s delegation of
authority to enforce the Chemical
Accident Prevention regulations set
forth at 40 CFR part 68. EPA is
proposing to modify 40 CFR
63.99(a)(39)(v) to indicate ACHD’s
withdrawal from EPA’s delegation of
authority to enforce the chemical
accident prevention provisions set forth
at 40 CFR part 68. EPA is soliciting
public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These
comments will be considered before
taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action notifies the public that
ACHD has completed the process for
voluntary withdrawal from EPA’s
delegation of authority to enforce the
chemical accident prevention
provisions set forth at 40 CFR part 68,
and the action proposes to update 40
CFR 63.99(a)(39)(v) to indicate the
withdrawal. The proposed action does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state and
federal law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• is not an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this action is
not significant under Executive Order
12866.
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule to
modify 40 CFR 63.99(a)(39)(v) to
indicate ACHD’s voluntary withdrawal
from EPA’s delegation of authority to
enforce the chemical accident
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
29087
prevention provisions set forth at 40
CFR part 68, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the action does to apply
in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Paper and
paper products industry, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 12, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018–13452 Filed 6–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29085-29087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13452]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0304; FRL-9979-70--Region 3]
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Allegheny County Health Department,
Withdrawal of Section 112(l) Delegation Authority for the Chemical
Accident Prevention Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the public
that Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) has completed the
regulatory process for voluntary withdrawal from EPA's delegation of
authority to enforce the chemical accident prevention regulations, and
EPA is proposing to modify amendments indicating that ACHD does not
have delegated authority to implement and enforce the regulatory
requirements. EPA is also notifying the public that each facility
subject to the previously approved ACHD delegated chemical accident
prevention program is required to maintain continuous compliance with
applicable requirements. This action is being taken under the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2018-0304 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from
[[Page 29086]]
Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Cate Opila, (215) 814-2041, or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR part 63,
subpart E, authorizes EPA to approve of State, and local, rules and
programs to be implemented and enforced in place of certain CAA
requirements, including the chemical accident prevention provisions set
forth at 40 CFR part 68 (Chemical Accident Prevention Regulations). EPA
promulgated the Chemical Accident Prevention Regulations (or risk
management program (RMP) regulations) (RMP regulations) pursuant to CAA
Section 112(r)(7). By letter dated June 15, 2001, ACHD requested
delegation of authority to implement and enforce the RMP regulations
for all sources, among other requests for delegation of other programs.
On January 30, 2002, EPA issued a direct final rule, which became
effective on April 1, 2002, approving ACHD's request for delegation of
authority to implement and enforce EPA's RMP regulations, which had
been adopted by reference from 40 CFR part 68, for all sources within
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, subject to such regulations. See 67 FR
4363 (January 30, 2002).
The procedures for a State, or local authority, to voluntarily
withdraw from a CAA approved rule, program or portion of a rule or
program are set forth at 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7). In summary, these
regulations and relevant EPA guidance provide that a State, or local
authority, may unilaterally and voluntarily withdraw from an approved
delegated program by notifying EPA and all affected sources of its
intent to withdraw and the specific requirements subject to such
withdrawal. Any such withdrawal is not effective sooner than 180 days
after such notification to EPA. The State, or local authority, must
also provide notice and opportunity for comment to the public. To the
extent that any source that is affected by the withdrawal is also
subject to a CAA operating permit issued pursuant to 40 CFR part 70,
the State, or local authority, must reopen and revise such permit to
the extent necessary.
II. EPA Analysis
By letter dated July 28, 2017, ACHD notified EPA Region III of its
intent to voluntarily withdraw from EPA's delegation of authority to
enforce the RMP regulations. By letter dated November 9, 2017, ACHD
notified EPA Region III that ACHD announced a public comment period to
take comment on ACHD's voluntary withdrawal from EPA's delegation of
authority to enforce the RMP regulations. The public comment period
extended from November 10, 2017 to December 10, 2017. During this
public comment period, ACHD did not receive any comments in response to
the public comment notification. ACHD provided all applicable
facilities with written notice that ACHD is voluntarily withdrawing
from EPA's delegation of authority to enforce the RMP regulations set
forth at 40 CFR part 68.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7), ACHD has determined which
facilities, located in Allegheny County, are subject to the RMP
regulations and have effective CAA Title V operating permits in
accordance with 40 CFR part 70. Sixteen facilities within Allegheny
County have submitted risk management plans to EPA and ACHD has issued
Title V operating permits to 28 currently operating facilities. ACHD
Title V operating permits incorporate the RMP regulations, set forth at
40 CFR part 68, by reference. Therefore, each facility, located in
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, that is subject to the RMP regulations
and has an effective Title V operating permit has been issued a Title V
permit which includes the proper citation to any applicable RMP
regulation.
Upon a State's or local authority's voluntary withdrawal of a
delegated program, in accordance with 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7), EPA is
required to publish a time for sources subject to the previously
approved State, or local, rule or program to come into compliance with
applicable Federal requirements. Because, as part of its previously
approved delegated program, ACHD incorporated the RMP regulations by
reference, there is no distinction between ACHD's previously approved
delegated program for implementing the requirements set forth at 40 CFR
part 68 and the applicable Federal requirements set forth at 40 CFR
part 68. Furthermore, EPA's delegation of authority to implement the
requirements set forth at 40 CFR part 68 to ACHD stated in relevant
part: ``Although ACHD has primary authority and responsibility to
implement and enforce the . . . chemical accident prevention
provisions, nothing shall preclude, limit, or interfere with the
authority of EPA to exercise its enforcement, investigatory, and
information gathering authorities concerning this part of the Act.''
See 67 FR 4366 (January 30, 2002). Therefore, all facilities located in
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, subject to any requirement set forth at
40 CFR part 68 shall maintain continuous compliance with such
requirement.
III. Proposed Action
EPA's review of this material indicates that ACHD has completed the
regulatorily mandated process, set forth at 40 CFR 63.96(b)(7), for
voluntary withdrawal from EPA's delegation of authority to enforce the
Chemical Accident Prevention regulations set forth at 40 CFR part 68.
EPA is proposing to modify 40 CFR 63.99(a)(39)(v) to indicate ACHD's
withdrawal from EPA's delegation of authority to enforce the chemical
accident prevention provisions set forth at 40 CFR part 68. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action notifies the public that ACHD has completed the process
for voluntary withdrawal from EPA's delegation of authority to enforce
the chemical accident prevention provisions set forth at 40 CFR part
68, and the action proposes to update 40 CFR 63.99(a)(39)(v) to
indicate the withdrawal. The proposed action does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state and federal law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office
[[Page 29087]]
of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule to modify 40 CFR 63.99(a)(39)(v) to
indicate ACHD's voluntary withdrawal from EPA's delegation of authority
to enforce the chemical accident prevention provisions set forth at 40
CFR part 68, does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
action does to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Paper and paper products
industry, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 12, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018-13452 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
