Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Regions; Regulatory Amendment 4, 29044-29047 [2018-13400]
Download as PDF
29044
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
2. In § 622.37, revise paragraphs (a)(5)
and (b)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 622.37
Size limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5) Mutton snapper—18 inches (45.7
cm), TL.
(b) * * *
(1) Gag—24 inches (61.0 cm), TL.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 622.38, revise paragraph (b)(4)
to read as follows:
§ 622.38
Bag and possession limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Snappers, combined, excluding
red, lane, and vermilion snapper—10. In
addition, within the 10-fish aggregate
snapper bag limit, no more than 5 fish
may be mutton snapper.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 622.41, revise the last sentence
of paragraph (o) to read as follows:
§ 622.41 Annual catch limits (ACLs),
annual catch targets (ACTs), and
accountability measures (AMs).
*
*
*
*
*
(o) * * * The stock ACL for mutton
snapper, in round weight, is 134,424 lb
(60,974 kg) for 2018, 139,392 lb (63,227
kg) for 2019, and 143,694 lb (65,179 kg)
for 2020 and subsequent fishing years.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–13401 Filed 6–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 170630611–8525–02]
RIN 0648–BH01
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Spiny
Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
and South Atlantic Regions;
Regulatory Amendment 4
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
NMFS implements
management measures described in
Regulatory Amendment 4 to the Fishery
Management Plan for Spiny Lobster in
the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and South
Atlantic (FMP), as prepared and
submitted by the Gulf and South
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
(Councils). This final rule increases the
annual catch limit (ACL) for spiny
lobster based on updated landings
information and revised scientific
recommendations. This final rule also
prohibits the use of traps for
recreational harvest of spiny lobster in
the South Atlantic exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) off Georgia, South Carolina,
and North Carolina. The purposes of
this final rule are to ensure catch levels
for spiny lobster are based on the best
scientific information available, to
prevent overfishing, and to minimize
potential negative effects of traps on
habitat and protected species
interactions in the South Atlantic EEZ.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of
Regulatory Amendment 4, which
includes an environmental assessment
and a regulatory flexibility analysis, and
a regulatory impact review, may be
obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office website at https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_
fisheries/gulf_sa/spiny_lobster/A4_
lobster_acl/a4_lobster_acl_index.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nikhil Mehta, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, or
email: nikhil.mehta@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The spiny
lobster fishery of the Gulf and the South
Atlantic is managed under the FMP. The
FMP was prepared by the Councils and
implemented through regulations at 50
CFR part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) (16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.).
On February 2, 2018, NMFS
published a proposed rule for
Regulatory Amendment 4 in the Federal
Register and requested public comment
(83 FR 4890). Regulatory Amendment 4
and the proposed rule outline the
rationale for the actions contained in
this final rule. A summary of the
management measures described in
Regulatory Amendment 4 and
implemented by this final rule is
provided below.
Management Measures Contained in
This Final Rule
This final rule modifies the stock ACL
and annual catch target (ACT) for spiny
lobster and prohibits the use of traps for
the recreational harvest of spiny lobster
in the South Atlantic EEZ.
Stock ACL and ACT
This final rule revises the stock ACL
and ACT based on the new acceptable
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
biological catch (ABC) recommendation
provided by the Councils’ Scientific and
Statistical Committees (SSCs). This final
rule sets the ACL equal to the
recommended ABC of 9.60 million lb
(4.35 million kg), which is based on the
mean landings from the years 1991/
1992–2015/2016 plus 1.5 standard
deviations. This final rule sets the ACT
at 8.64 million lb (3.92 million kg),
which is 90 percent of the ACL. As
established in Amendment 10 to the
FMP (Amendment 10), the optimum
yield (OY) equals the ACT. NMFS does
not expect the increase in the ACT and
ACL to result in negative biological
effects on the stock because current
fishing effort is limited by several
variables. These variables include the
number of trap tags issued by the state
of Florida, commercial and recreational
bag and possession limits in the Gulf
and South Atlantic EEZ, and the
duration of the fishing season, which
varies depending on the area where
spiny lobsters are harvested.
Recreational Harvest of Spiny Lobster
Using Traps in the South Atlantic EEZ
This final rule prohibits the use of
traps for recreational harvest of spiny
lobster in all of the South Atlantic EEZ.
The Councils are concerned that using
these traps for recreational harvest may
become more popular and result in
potential negative impacts on essential
fish habitat and an increase in the use
of vertical lines that may interact with
protected species, for example, by
creating entanglement issues,
continuing to fish after a trap is lost, or
creating bycatch.
Measures in Regulatory Amendment 4
Not Codified Through This Final Rule
As established in Amendment 10, the
maximum sustainable yield (MSY)
proxy and maximum fishing mortality
threshold (MFMT) are equal to the OFL,
which was set at 7.9 million lb (3.58
million kg). Consistent with
Amendment 10, Regulatory Amendment
4 would modify the MSY proxy and
MFMT values, so that they are equal to
the revised OFL of 10.46 million lb (4.74
million kg).
Measures in This Final Rule Not
Included in Regulatory Amendment 4
In addition to implementing the
measures associated with Regulatory
Amendment 4, this final rule corrects
regulatory language that was mistakenly
included in the final rule implementing
Amendment 10. This final rule changes
50 CFR 622.407(c) to remove the phrase
‘‘whichever is greater’’ and the first
occurrence of a duplicative sentence.
This final rule also makes a minor
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
wording revision to more directly state
that the total number of undersized
spiny lobster allowed on-board a vessel
is 50 plus 1 per trap.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Comments and Responses
A total of 14 comments were received
on the proposed rule to implement
Regulatory Amendment 4. Comments
that were beyond the scope of the
proposed rule and comments that
agreed with the proposed actions are not
responded to in this final rule. Other
comments that relate to the actions
contained in Regulatory Amendment 4
and the proposed rule are grouped as
appropriate and summarized below,
followed by NMFS’ respective
responses.
Comment 1: The ACL for spiny
lobster should not be increased. The
ACL should remain at its current level
for another 5 years to allow the spiny
lobster populations to increase.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The new
ACL is consistent with a new ABC
recommendation by the Councils’ SSCs.
The prior ABC recommendation was
based on a time period when landings
were historically low. The new ABC and
the corresponding increase in the ACL
are based on a longer time period (1991/
1992 through 2015/2016) to better
capture the dynamics of the fishery that
are influenced by factors beyond spiny
lobster biology and harvest, such as
environmental, economic, and social
conditions. As described in Regulatory
Amendment 4, increasing the ACL is
not expected to negatively affect the
spiny lobster population because fishing
effort is not expected to increase.
Current fishing effort is limited by such
measures as the number of commercial
trap tags issued by the state of Florida,
commercial and recreational bag and
possession limits in the South Atlantic
and Gulf EEZ, and the duration of the
fishing seasons, which varies based on
location. Further, maintaining the
current ACL for 5 years would not
necessarily allow for the spiny lobster
populations to increase in U.S. waters.
Spiny lobster is widely distributed
throughout the western Atlantic Ocean
from as far north as North Carolina to
as far south as Brazil, including
Bermuda, The Bahamas, Caribbean, and
Central America. Genetic studies show
that most larval recruits in U.S. waters
are from elsewhere in the Caribbean,
with only 10–40 percent locally
spawned larvae retained in U.S. waters.
Comment 2: The timeframe used to
specify catch limits for spiny lobster
should be continuously updated to
incorporate periods of low and high
landings, natural disasters such as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
hurricanes, and to allow for accurate
estimates of the stock OFL and ABC.
Response: NMFS agrees that is
appropriate to reevaluate the ABC,
which is used to set the catch limit,
when relevant new information
becomes available. That is what
occurred through the process leading to
up to the Council proposing Regulatory
Amendment 4. As explained above, the
current OFL and ABC for spiny lobster
were established using the mean of the
most recent 10 years of landings at that
time (i.e., fishing years 2000/2001
through 2009/2010). The Councils’ SSCs
reevaluated this approach in 2016 in
response to a recommendation from a
review panel, which was convened as
required by the accountability measures
when landings exceeded the ACT. The
SSCs agreed with the review panel’s
recommendation to use a longer time
series of landings (i.e., fishing years
1991/1992 through 2015/2016) to respecify the OFL and ABC for spiny
lobster. This resulted in the increase in
the ACL and ACT implemented through
this final rule. Regulatory Amendment 4
also states that a review panel should be
convened if there are 2 consecutive
years of low landings (below 5.3 million
lb). Thus, there are mechanisms in place
to respond to changes in harvest and
update the ACL as appropriate.
Comment 3: The increase in spiny
lobster ACL and prohibition of
recreational harvest using traps will
allow more commercial harvest of spiny
lobster. This will have an economic
impact on small business entities and
therefore, as a result of increased
commercial harvest, NMFS should
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
act analysis (IRFA) to better address the
economic impacts of these actions.
Response: NMFS disagrees that it is
necessary to prepare an IRFA. As stated
in the Classification section of the
proposed rule and again in this final
rule, the increase in the ACL and ACT
for spiny lobster will have no impact on
small commercial fishing businesses
because the AMs do not require a
closure or otherwise limit commercial
landings of spiny lobster taken from
Federal waters if landings reach or
exceed the ACL or ACT. Further, the
majority of commercial harvest of spiny
lobster occurs off Florida, and effort is
limited by the number of trap tags
issued by the state of Florida,
commercial limits, and the length of the
fishing season. Therefore, any reduction
in the use of traps for recreational
harvest is not expected to increase
commercial harvest.
Comment 4: NMFS should not
prohibit the use of traps for recreational
harvest in the EEZ off North Carolina.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29045
To avoid interaction of traps with
whales, it would be better to close the
recreational fishing season for spiny
lobster in the EEZ off North Carolina
during the whale migration period.
Response: NMFS does not agree that
a season restriction on the use of traps
for recreational harvest is appropriate.
Potential interactions between traps and
protected species was one issue the
Councils considered in deciding to
prohibit the use of traps for recreational
harvest in the EEZ off all of the South
Atlantic states. However, the Councils
were also concerned about bycatch and
damage to habitat. Therefore, the
Councils did not consider seasonal
restrictions for recreational harvest of
spiny lobster in Regulatory
Amendment 4.
Comment 5: NMFS should allow the
use of traps for recreational harvest in
the EEZ off Florida to make current
spiny lobster regulations consistent in
the EEZ off all the states in the South
Atlantic region. The proposed rule did
not include any evidence that the
recreational sector is harming the
resource or its habitat as a result of trap
use.
Response: NMFS disagrees that
consistency in the regulations related to
recreational harvest by traps should be
achieved by allowing the use of traps in
the EEZ off Florida. Consistency was not
the basis for the Councils’ decision to
prohibit the use of this gear. Although
current recreational harvest using traps
in the EEZ outside Florida is likely
minimal, the Councils were concerned
that there could be an increase in the
use of recreational traps and associated
negative impacts. As discussed in
Regulatory Amendment 4, trap gear can
negatively affect the bottom substrate,
entangle protected species, and
continue ghost fishing when the trap is
lost. Because the majority of spiny
lobster harvest occurs in the EEZ off
Florida, opening this area to recreational
traps would be expected to increase
these negatives impacts. In addition,
because spiny lobsters are larger in the
EEZ off Georgia, South Carolina, and
North Carolina than in Florida, traps in
those areas would require larger mouths
(entrances) that would likely increase
bycatch. Recreational harvest is still
permitted with dive and snorkel gears,
which are the predominant gears used
by the recreational sector, and these
gears do not have the same impact on
habitat and other species as traps do.
Comment 6: Commercial harvest of
spiny lobster has fluctuated, while
recreational harvest, a small part of
overall harvest, has remained
consistent. In order to protect the
resource, there should be restrictions on
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
29046
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
both the commercial and recreational
sectors.
Response: Restrictions are already in
place for spiny lobster in place for both
the commercial and recreational sectors,
and this final rule will not remove these
restrictions. Commercial and
recreational bag and possession limits,
and fishing seasons for spiny lobster are
in place to control harvest. Any person
who commercially fishes for and sells
spiny lobster caught in either the Gulf
or South Atlantic EEZ, except off
Florida, must have a Federal spiny
lobster vessel permit. Any person who
commercially fishes for spiny lobster
caught in the EEZ off Florida, or sells
spiny lobster in Florida must have the
permits and licenses required by Florida
(https://www.myfwc.com/fishing/
saltwater/commercial/spiny-lobster/).
There are also requirements related to
gear and vessel identification, and trap
construction.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
This final rule revises a reference to
a boundary point coordinate for the
Tortugas shrimp sanctuary in 50 CFR
622.55(c)(2)(iii), which incorrectly refers
to paragraph (d)(1) rather than
paragraph (c)(1).
Classification
The Regional Administrator,
Southeast Region, NMFS has
determined that this final rule is
consistent with Regulatory Amendment
4, the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
the statutory basis for this rule. No
duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting
Federal rules have been identified. In
addition, no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are introduced by this
final rule.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this final
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual
basis for this determination was
published in the proposed rule and is
not repeated here.
One public comment (Comment 3)
stated that the increase in commercial
harvest would have an economic impact
on small entities and therefore an IRFA
analysis must be prepared. As stated in
the Classification section of the
proposed rule, although the rule would
increase the ACL and ACT, there would
be no impact on small commercial
fishing businesses because there are no
AMs that can either close the Federal
season early or otherwise limit
commercial landings of spiny lobster
taken from Federal waters if landings
reach or exceed the ACL or ACT.
No changes were made to the final
rule in response to public comments,
and NMFS has not received any new
information that would affect its
previous determination. As a result, a
final regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none was prepared.
The Assistant Administrator for
NOAA Fisheries finds that with respect
to the change to 50 CFR 622.55(c)(2)(iii)
there is good cause to waive the
requirements to provide prior notice
and opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), as such procedures are
unnecessary. Such procedures are
unnecessary because the rule
implementing the provision has been
subject to notice and comment and the
revision corrects only a typographical
error.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 640
Fisheries, Fishing, Gulf, South
Atlantic, Spiny lobster, Trap.
Dated: June 18, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 600 and 622 are
amended as follows:
PART 600—MAGNUSON-STEVENS
ACT PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
Subpart R—Spiny Lobster Fishery of
the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic
2. In § 600.725, in the table in
paragraph (v), under heading ‘‘III. South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council,’’
under entry 7, revise entry B pertaining
to the ‘‘Recreational fishery’’ in the
‘‘Authorized gear types’’ column to read
as follows:
■
§ 600.725
*
Fishery
*
*
General prohibitions.
*
*
(v) * * *
*
*
Authorized gear types
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
III. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
*
*
7. South Atlantic Spiny Lobster Fishery (FMP):.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
B. Recreational fishery ....................................................................................................................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
B. Dip net, bully net, snare, hand harvest.
*
*
4. In § 622.55, revise paragraph
(c)(2)(iii) to read as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND
SOUTH ATLANTIC
■
3. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
*
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 622.55
Closed areas.
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Effective from May 26 through
July 31, each year, that part of the
Tortugas shrimp sanctuary seaward of
rhumb lines connecting the following
points is open to trawling: From point
F, as specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, to point Q at 24°46.7′ N lat.,
81°52.2′ W long. (on the line denoting
the seaward limit of Florida’s waters);
thence along the seaward limit of
Florida’s waters, as shown on the
current edition of NOAA chart 11439, to
point U and north to point T, both
points as specified in paragraph (c)(2)(i)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 622.404, add paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 622.404
Prohibited gear and methods.
*
*
*
*
(d) Except for black sea bass pots and
golden crab traps as allowed in
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 622.188 and § 622.248, respectively,
the possession of all other traps is
prohibited onboard a vessel in the South
Atlantic EEZ when spiny lobster subject
to the recreational bag and possession
limits specified in § 622.408 is also
onboard the vessel. The recreational
harvest of spiny lobster using a trap is
prohibited in the South Atlantic EEZ.
6. In § 622.407, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 622.407 Minimum size limits and other
harvest limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Undersized attractants. A live
spiny lobster under the minimum size
limit specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section that is harvested in the EEZ by
a trap may be retained aboard the
harvesting vessel for future use as an
attractant in a trap provided it is held
in a live well aboard the vessel. The live
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
29047
well must provide a minimum of 3⁄4
gallons (1.7 liters) of seawater per spiny
lobster. An undersized spiny lobster so
retained must be released to the water
alive and unharmed immediately upon
leaving the trap lines and prior to 1 hour
after official sunset each day. No more
than 50 undersized spiny lobsters plus
1 per trap aboard the vessel may be
retained aboard for use as attractants.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Revise § 622.411 to read as follows:
§ 622.411 Annual catch limits (ACLs),
annual catch targets (ACTs), and
accountability measures (AMs).
For recreational and commercial
spiny lobster landings combined, the
ACL is 9.60 million lb (4.35 million kg),
whole weight. The ACT is 8.64 million
lb, (3.92 million kg) whole weight.
[FR Doc. 2018–13400 Filed 6–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29044-29047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13400]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 170630611-8525-02]
RIN 0648-BH01
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Regions;
Regulatory Amendment 4
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS implements management measures described in Regulatory
Amendment 4 to the Fishery Management Plan for Spiny Lobster in the
Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and South Atlantic (FMP), as prepared and
submitted by the Gulf and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
(Councils). This final rule increases the annual catch limit (ACL) for
spiny lobster based on updated landings information and revised
scientific recommendations. This final rule also prohibits the use of
traps for recreational harvest of spiny lobster in the South Atlantic
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off Georgia, South Carolina, and North
Carolina. The purposes of this final rule are to ensure catch levels
for spiny lobster are based on the best scientific information
available, to prevent overfishing, and to minimize potential negative
effects of traps on habitat and protected species interactions in the
South Atlantic EEZ.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of Regulatory Amendment 4, which includes
an environmental assessment and a regulatory flexibility analysis, and
a regulatory impact review, may be obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office website at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_fisheries/gulf_sa/spiny_lobster/A4_lobster_acl/a4_lobster_acl_index.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nikhil Mehta, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727-824-5305, or email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The spiny lobster fishery of the Gulf and
the South Atlantic is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by
the Councils and implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622
under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).
On February 2, 2018, NMFS published a proposed rule for Regulatory
Amendment 4 in the Federal Register and requested public comment (83 FR
4890). Regulatory Amendment 4 and the proposed rule outline the
rationale for the actions contained in this final rule. A summary of
the management measures described in Regulatory Amendment 4 and
implemented by this final rule is provided below.
Management Measures Contained in This Final Rule
This final rule modifies the stock ACL and annual catch target
(ACT) for spiny lobster and prohibits the use of traps for the
recreational harvest of spiny lobster in the South Atlantic EEZ.
Stock ACL and ACT
This final rule revises the stock ACL and ACT based on the new
acceptable biological catch (ABC) recommendation provided by the
Councils' Scientific and Statistical Committees (SSCs). This final rule
sets the ACL equal to the recommended ABC of 9.60 million lb (4.35
million kg), which is based on the mean landings from the years 1991/
1992-2015/2016 plus 1.5 standard deviations. This final rule sets the
ACT at 8.64 million lb (3.92 million kg), which is 90 percent of the
ACL. As established in Amendment 10 to the FMP (Amendment 10), the
optimum yield (OY) equals the ACT. NMFS does not expect the increase in
the ACT and ACL to result in negative biological effects on the stock
because current fishing effort is limited by several variables. These
variables include the number of trap tags issued by the state of
Florida, commercial and recreational bag and possession limits in the
Gulf and South Atlantic EEZ, and the duration of the fishing season,
which varies depending on the area where spiny lobsters are harvested.
Recreational Harvest of Spiny Lobster Using Traps in the South Atlantic
EEZ
This final rule prohibits the use of traps for recreational harvest
of spiny lobster in all of the South Atlantic EEZ.
The Councils are concerned that using these traps for recreational
harvest may become more popular and result in potential negative
impacts on essential fish habitat and an increase in the use of
vertical lines that may interact with protected species, for example,
by creating entanglement issues, continuing to fish after a trap is
lost, or creating bycatch.
Measures in Regulatory Amendment 4 Not Codified Through This Final Rule
As established in Amendment 10, the maximum sustainable yield (MSY)
proxy and maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) are equal to the
OFL, which was set at 7.9 million lb (3.58 million kg). Consistent with
Amendment 10, Regulatory Amendment 4 would modify the MSY proxy and
MFMT values, so that they are equal to the revised OFL of 10.46 million
lb (4.74 million kg).
Measures in This Final Rule Not Included in Regulatory Amendment 4
In addition to implementing the measures associated with Regulatory
Amendment 4, this final rule corrects regulatory language that was
mistakenly included in the final rule implementing Amendment 10. This
final rule changes 50 CFR 622.407(c) to remove the phrase ``whichever
is greater'' and the first occurrence of a duplicative sentence. This
final rule also makes a minor
[[Page 29045]]
wording revision to more directly state that the total number of
undersized spiny lobster allowed on-board a vessel is 50 plus 1 per
trap.
Comments and Responses
A total of 14 comments were received on the proposed rule to
implement Regulatory Amendment 4. Comments that were beyond the scope
of the proposed rule and comments that agreed with the proposed actions
are not responded to in this final rule. Other comments that relate to
the actions contained in Regulatory Amendment 4 and the proposed rule
are grouped as appropriate and summarized below, followed by NMFS'
respective responses.
Comment 1: The ACL for spiny lobster should not be increased. The
ACL should remain at its current level for another 5 years to allow the
spiny lobster populations to increase.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The new ACL is consistent with a new ABC
recommendation by the Councils' SSCs. The prior ABC recommendation was
based on a time period when landings were historically low. The new ABC
and the corresponding increase in the ACL are based on a longer time
period (1991/1992 through 2015/2016) to better capture the dynamics of
the fishery that are influenced by factors beyond spiny lobster biology
and harvest, such as environmental, economic, and social conditions. As
described in Regulatory Amendment 4, increasing the ACL is not expected
to negatively affect the spiny lobster population because fishing
effort is not expected to increase. Current fishing effort is limited
by such measures as the number of commercial trap tags issued by the
state of Florida, commercial and recreational bag and possession limits
in the South Atlantic and Gulf EEZ, and the duration of the fishing
seasons, which varies based on location. Further, maintaining the
current ACL for 5 years would not necessarily allow for the spiny
lobster populations to increase in U.S. waters. Spiny lobster is widely
distributed throughout the western Atlantic Ocean from as far north as
North Carolina to as far south as Brazil, including Bermuda, The
Bahamas, Caribbean, and Central America. Genetic studies show that most
larval recruits in U.S. waters are from elsewhere in the Caribbean,
with only 10-40 percent locally spawned larvae retained in U.S. waters.
Comment 2: The timeframe used to specify catch limits for spiny
lobster should be continuously updated to incorporate periods of low
and high landings, natural disasters such as hurricanes, and to allow
for accurate estimates of the stock OFL and ABC.
Response: NMFS agrees that is appropriate to reevaluate the ABC,
which is used to set the catch limit, when relevant new information
becomes available. That is what occurred through the process leading to
up to the Council proposing Regulatory Amendment 4. As explained above,
the current OFL and ABC for spiny lobster were established using the
mean of the most recent 10 years of landings at that time (i.e.,
fishing years 2000/2001 through 2009/2010). The Councils' SSCs
reevaluated this approach in 2016 in response to a recommendation from
a review panel, which was convened as required by the accountability
measures when landings exceeded the ACT. The SSCs agreed with the
review panel's recommendation to use a longer time series of landings
(i.e., fishing years 1991/1992 through 2015/2016) to re-specify the OFL
and ABC for spiny lobster. This resulted in the increase in the ACL and
ACT implemented through this final rule. Regulatory Amendment 4 also
states that a review panel should be convened if there are 2
consecutive years of low landings (below 5.3 million lb). Thus, there
are mechanisms in place to respond to changes in harvest and update the
ACL as appropriate.
Comment 3: The increase in spiny lobster ACL and prohibition of
recreational harvest using traps will allow more commercial harvest of
spiny lobster. This will have an economic impact on small business
entities and therefore, as a result of increased commercial harvest,
NMFS should prepare an initial regulatory flexibility act analysis
(IRFA) to better address the economic impacts of these actions.
Response: NMFS disagrees that it is necessary to prepare an IRFA.
As stated in the Classification section of the proposed rule and again
in this final rule, the increase in the ACL and ACT for spiny lobster
will have no impact on small commercial fishing businesses because the
AMs do not require a closure or otherwise limit commercial landings of
spiny lobster taken from Federal waters if landings reach or exceed the
ACL or ACT. Further, the majority of commercial harvest of spiny
lobster occurs off Florida, and effort is limited by the number of trap
tags issued by the state of Florida, commercial limits, and the length
of the fishing season. Therefore, any reduction in the use of traps for
recreational harvest is not expected to increase commercial harvest.
Comment 4: NMFS should not prohibit the use of traps for
recreational harvest in the EEZ off North Carolina. To avoid
interaction of traps with whales, it would be better to close the
recreational fishing season for spiny lobster in the EEZ off North
Carolina during the whale migration period.
Response: NMFS does not agree that a season restriction on the use
of traps for recreational harvest is appropriate. Potential
interactions between traps and protected species was one issue the
Councils considered in deciding to prohibit the use of traps for
recreational harvest in the EEZ off all of the South Atlantic states.
However, the Councils were also concerned about bycatch and damage to
habitat. Therefore, the Councils did not consider seasonal restrictions
for recreational harvest of spiny lobster in Regulatory Amendment 4.
Comment 5: NMFS should allow the use of traps for recreational
harvest in the EEZ off Florida to make current spiny lobster
regulations consistent in the EEZ off all the states in the South
Atlantic region. The proposed rule did not include any evidence that
the recreational sector is harming the resource or its habitat as a
result of trap use.
Response: NMFS disagrees that consistency in the regulations
related to recreational harvest by traps should be achieved by allowing
the use of traps in the EEZ off Florida. Consistency was not the basis
for the Councils' decision to prohibit the use of this gear. Although
current recreational harvest using traps in the EEZ outside Florida is
likely minimal, the Councils were concerned that there could be an
increase in the use of recreational traps and associated negative
impacts. As discussed in Regulatory Amendment 4, trap gear can
negatively affect the bottom substrate, entangle protected species, and
continue ghost fishing when the trap is lost. Because the majority of
spiny lobster harvest occurs in the EEZ off Florida, opening this area
to recreational traps would be expected to increase these negatives
impacts. In addition, because spiny lobsters are larger in the EEZ off
Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina than in Florida, traps in
those areas would require larger mouths (entrances) that would likely
increase bycatch. Recreational harvest is still permitted with dive and
snorkel gears, which are the predominant gears used by the recreational
sector, and these gears do not have the same impact on habitat and
other species as traps do.
Comment 6: Commercial harvest of spiny lobster has fluctuated,
while recreational harvest, a small part of overall harvest, has
remained consistent. In order to protect the resource, there should be
restrictions on
[[Page 29046]]
both the commercial and recreational sectors.
Response: Restrictions are already in place for spiny lobster in
place for both the commercial and recreational sectors, and this final
rule will not remove these restrictions. Commercial and recreational
bag and possession limits, and fishing seasons for spiny lobster are in
place to control harvest. Any person who commercially fishes for and
sells spiny lobster caught in either the Gulf or South Atlantic EEZ,
except off Florida, must have a Federal spiny lobster vessel permit.
Any person who commercially fishes for spiny lobster caught in the EEZ
off Florida, or sells spiny lobster in Florida must have the permits
and licenses required by Florida (https://www.myfwc.com/fishing/saltwater/commercial/spiny-lobster/). There are also requirements
related to gear and vessel identification, and trap construction.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
This final rule revises a reference to a boundary point coordinate
for the Tortugas shrimp sanctuary in 50 CFR 622.55(c)(2)(iii), which
incorrectly refers to paragraph (d)(1) rather than paragraph (c)(1).
Classification
The Regional Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS has determined
that this final rule is consistent with Regulatory Amendment 4, the
FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for this
rule. No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules have
been identified. In addition, no new reporting, record-keeping, or
other compliance requirements are introduced by this final rule.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this final rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The factual basis for this determination was published
in the proposed rule and is not repeated here.
One public comment (Comment 3) stated that the increase in
commercial harvest would have an economic impact on small entities and
therefore an IRFA analysis must be prepared. As stated in the
Classification section of the proposed rule, although the rule would
increase the ACL and ACT, there would be no impact on small commercial
fishing businesses because there are no AMs that can either close the
Federal season early or otherwise limit commercial landings of spiny
lobster taken from Federal waters if landings reach or exceed the ACL
or ACT.
No changes were made to the final rule in response to public
comments, and NMFS has not received any new information that would
affect its previous determination. As a result, a final regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and none was prepared.
The Assistant Administrator for NOAA Fisheries finds that with
respect to the change to 50 CFR 622.55(c)(2)(iii) there is good cause
to waive the requirements to provide prior notice and opportunity for
public comment pursuant to the authority set forth in 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), as such procedures are unnecessary. Such procedures are
unnecessary because the rule implementing the provision has been
subject to notice and comment and the revision corrects only a
typographical error.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 640
Fisheries, Fishing, Gulf, South Atlantic, Spiny lobster, Trap.
Dated: June 18, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 600 and 622
are amended as follows:
PART 600--MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Subpart R--Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and South
Atlantic
0
2. In Sec. 600.725, in the table in paragraph (v), under heading
``III. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council,'' under entry 7,
revise entry B pertaining to the ``Recreational fishery'' in the
``Authorized gear types'' column to read as follows:
Sec. 600.725 General prohibitions.
* * * * *
(v) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fishery Authorized gear types
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
7. South Atlantic Spiny Lobster Fishery
(FMP):.
* * * * * * *
B. Recreational fishery...................... B. Dip net, bully net,
snare, hand harvest.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
0
3. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 622.55, revise paragraph (c)(2)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.55 Closed areas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
[[Page 29047]]
(iii) Effective from May 26 through July 31, each year, that part
of the Tortugas shrimp sanctuary seaward of rhumb lines connecting the
following points is open to trawling: From point F, as specified in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, to point Q at 24[deg]46.7' N lat.,
81[deg]52.2' W long. (on the line denoting the seaward limit of
Florida's waters); thence along the seaward limit of Florida's waters,
as shown on the current edition of NOAA chart 11439, to point U and
north to point T, both points as specified in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of
this section.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 622.404, add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.404 Prohibited gear and methods.
* * * * *
(d) Except for black sea bass pots and golden crab traps as allowed
in Sec. 622.188 and Sec. 622.248, respectively, the possession of all
other traps is prohibited onboard a vessel in the South Atlantic EEZ
when spiny lobster subject to the recreational bag and possession
limits specified in Sec. 622.408 is also onboard the vessel. The
recreational harvest of spiny lobster using a trap is prohibited in the
South Atlantic EEZ.
0
6. In Sec. 622.407, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.407 Minimum size limits and other harvest limitations.
* * * * *
(c) Undersized attractants. A live spiny lobster under the minimum
size limit specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section that is
harvested in the EEZ by a trap may be retained aboard the harvesting
vessel for future use as an attractant in a trap provided it is held in
a live well aboard the vessel. The live well must provide a minimum of
\3/4\ gallons (1.7 liters) of seawater per spiny lobster. An undersized
spiny lobster so retained must be released to the water alive and
unharmed immediately upon leaving the trap lines and prior to 1 hour
after official sunset each day. No more than 50 undersized spiny
lobsters plus 1 per trap aboard the vessel may be retained aboard for
use as attractants.
* * * * *
0
7. Revise Sec. 622.411 to read as follows:
Sec. 622.411 Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs),
and accountability measures (AMs).
For recreational and commercial spiny lobster landings combined,
the ACL is 9.60 million lb (4.35 million kg), whole weight. The ACT is
8.64 million lb, (3.92 million kg) whole weight.
[FR Doc. 2018-13400 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P